sv1
As filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 14, 2006
Registration
No. 333-
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
2911 |
|
37-1516132 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
2780 Waterfront Pkwy E. Drive
Suite 200
Indianapolis, Indiana 46214
(317) 328-5660
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including
Area Code, of Registrants Principal Executive Offices)
R. Patrick Murray, II
2780 Waterfront Pkwy E. Drive
Suite 200
Indianapolis, Indiana 46214
(317) 328-5660
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
David Oelman
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2300
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 758-2222
|
|
Joshua Davidson
Timothy S. Taylor
Baker Botts L.L.P.
910 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 229-1234 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this Registration
Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to
Rule 434, please check the following
box. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum |
|
|
Proposed Maximum |
|
|
|
Title of Class of |
|
|
Amount to Be |
|
|
Offering Price Per |
|
|
Aggregate Offering |
|
|
Amount of |
Securities to Be Registered |
|
|
Registered(1) |
|
|
Unit(2) |
|
|
Price(1)(2) |
|
|
Registration Fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units representing limited
partner interests
|
|
|
4,600,000
common units
|
|
|
$34.41
|
|
|
$158,286,000
|
|
|
$16,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes 600,000 common units which may be sold upon exercise of
the underwriters option to purchase additional units. |
|
(2) |
Calculated in accordance with Rule 457(c) on the basis of
the average of the high and low sales price of the common units
on June 8, 2006. |
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this registration statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration
statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities
and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said
Section 8(a), may determine.
The information
in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may
not sell these securities until the registration statement filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This
prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is
not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state
where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
Subject to completion. Dated
June 14, 2006
PROSPECTUS
4,000,000 Common Units
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.
Representing Limited Partner Interests
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. is offering 4,000,000
common units representing limited partner interests.
The common units are traded on the NASDAQ National Market under
the symbol CLMT. On June 8, 2006, the last
reported sale price of the common units on the NASDAQ National
Market was $35.52 per common unit.
See Risk Factors on page 15 to read about
factors you should consider before buying the common units.
These risks include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations to pay our
minimum quarterly distribution following the establishment of
cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses, including
payments to our general partner. |
|
|
|
Refining margins are volatile, and a reduction in our refining
margins will adversely affect the amount of cash we will have
available for distribution. |
|
|
|
Our hedging activities may reduce our earnings, profitability
and cash flows. |
|
|
|
Our asset reconfiguration and enhancement initiatives, including
the major expansion project currently underway at our Shreveport
refinery may not result in revenue or cash flow increases, may
be subject to cost overruns and are subject to regulatory,
environmental, political, legal and economic risks, which could
adversely affect our business, operating results, cash flows and
financial condition. |
|
|
|
We depend on certain key crude oil gatherers for a significant
portion of our supply of crude oil. |
|
|
|
Our general partner and its affiliates have conflicts of
interest and limited fiduciary duties, which may permit them to
favor their own interests to your detriment. |
|
|
|
Unitholders have limited voting rights and are not entitled to
elect our general partner or its directors. |
|
|
|
Even if unitholders are dissatisfied, they cannot initially
remove our general partner without its consent. |
|
|
|
You may be required to pay taxes on income from us even if you
do not receive any cash distributions from us. |
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Unit |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Initial price to public
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses to
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
To the extent that the underwriters sell more than 4,000,000
common units, the underwriters have the option to purchase up to
an additional 600,000 common units at the initial price to the
public less the underwriting discount.
The underwriters expect to deliver the common units against
payment in New York, New York
on ,
2006.
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Prospectus
dated ,
2006.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not,
authorized anyone to provide you with different information. If
anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information,
you should not rely on it. We are not, and the underwriters are
not, making an offer to sell these securities in any
jurisdiction where an offer or sale is not permitted. You should
assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is
accurate as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus.
Our business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects may have changed since that date.
iii
References in this prospectus to Calumet, the
Partnership, we, our,
us or like terms when used in the present tense,
prospectively or for historical periods since January 31,
2006, refer to Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. and its
subsidiaries. References to Calumet Predecessor, or
to we, our, us or like terms
for historical periods prior to January 31, 2006, refer to
Calumet Lubricants Co., Limited Partnership and its
subsidiaries, which were contributed to us at the closing of our
initial public offering on January 31, 2006. The results of
operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 for Calumet
include the results of operations of Calumet Predecessor for the
period of January 1, 2006 through January 31, 2006.
References in this prospectus to our general partner
refer to Calumet GP, LLC.
iv
SUMMARY
This summary provides a brief overview of information
contained elsewhere in this prospectus. Because it is
abbreviated, this summary does not contain all of the
information that you should consider before investing in the
common units. You should read the entire prospectus carefully,
including the historical and pro forma financial statements and
the notes to those financial statements. The information
presented in this prospectus assumes that the underwriters
option to purchase additional common units is not exercised. You
should read Risk Factors beginning on page 15
for more information about important risks that you should
consider carefully before buying our common units. We include a
glossary of some of the terms used in this prospectus as
Appendix A.
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.
We are a leading independent producer of high-quality, specialty
hydrocarbon products in North America. Our business is organized
into two segments: specialty products and fuel products. In our
specialty products segment, we process crude oil into a wide
variety of customized lubricating oils, solvents and waxes. Our
specialty products are sold to domestic and international
customers who purchase them primarily as raw material components
for basic industrial, consumer and automotive goods. In our fuel
products segment, we process crude oil into a variety of fuel
and fuel-related products including unleaded gasoline, diesel
fuel and jet fuel. In connection with our production of
specialty products and fuel products, we also produce asphalt
and a limited number of other by-products. For the year ended
December 31, 2005 and the three months ended March 31,
2006, approximately 52.2% and 72.7%, respectively, of our gross
profit was generated from our specialty products segment and
approximately 47.8% and 27.3%, respectively, of our gross profit
was generated from our fuel products segment.
Our operating assets consist of our:
|
|
|
|
|
Princeton Refinery. Our Princeton refinery, with an
aggregate crude oil throughput capacity of approximately
10,000 barrels per day (bpd) and located in
northwest Louisiana, produces specialty lubricating oils,
including process oils, base oils, transformer oils and
refrigeration oils that are used in a variety of industrial and
automotive applications. |
|
|
|
Cotton Valley Refinery. Our Cotton Valley refinery, with
an aggregate crude oil throughput capacity of approximately
13,500 bpd and located in northwest Louisiana, produces
specialty solvents that are used principally in the manufacture
of paints, cleaners and automotive products. |
|
|
|
Shreveport Refinery. Our Shreveport refinery, with an
aggregate current crude oil throughput capacity of approximately
42,000 bpd and located in northwest Louisiana, produces
specialty lubricating oils and waxes, as well as fuel products
such as gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel. In the second
quarter of 2006, we began processing 5,000 bpd of sour
crude oil utilizing existing permitted capacity at our
Shreveport refinery. We have commenced a major expansion
project, scheduled for completion in the third quarter of 2007,
to increase our Shreveport refinerys aggregate crude oil
throughput capacity to approximately 57,000 bpd. |
|
|
|
Distribution and Logistics Assets. We own and operate a
terminal in Burnham, Illinois with a storage capacity of
approximately 150,000 barrels that facilitates the
distribution of our products in the upper Midwest and East Coast
regions of the United States and in Canada. In addition, we
lease approximately 1,200 rail cars to receive crude oil or
distribute our products throughout the United States and Canada.
We also have approximately 4.5 million barrels of aggregate
finished product storage capacity at our refineries. |
1
Business Strategies
Our management team is dedicated to increasing the amount of
cash available for distribution on each limited partner unit by
executing the following strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
Concentrate on stable cash flows. |
|
|
|
Develop and expand our customer relationships. |
|
|
|
Enhance profitability of our existing assets. |
|
|
|
Pursue strategic and complementary acquisitions. |
Competitive Strengths
We believe that we are well positioned to execute our business
strategies successfully based on the following competitive
strengths:
|
|
|
|
|
We offer our customers a diverse range of specialty
products. |
|
|
|
We have strong relationships with a broad customer base. |
|
|
|
Our refineries have advanced technology. |
|
|
|
We have an experienced management team. |
Shreveport Refinery Expansion
We have commenced a major expansion project at our Shreveport
refinery to increase its throughput capacity and its production
of specialty products. The expansion project involves several of
the refinerys operating units and is estimated to result
in a crude oil throughput capacity increase of approximately
15,000 bpd, bringing total crude oil throughput capacity of
the refinery to approximately 57,000 bpd. The expansion is
expected to be completed and fully operational in the third
quarter of 2007. Upon completion of the project and on a
combined basis, our production of specialty lubricating oils and
waxes at the Shreveport refinery is anticipated to increase by
approximately 75% over first quarter 2006 levels and our
production of fuel products at the Shreveport refinery is
anticipated to increase by approximately 30% over first quarter
2006 levels.
As part of the Shreveport refinery expansion project, we plan to
increase the Shreveport refinerys capacity to process an
additional 8,000 bpd of sour crude oil, bringing total
capacity to process sour crude oil to 13,000 bpd. Of the
anticipated 57,000 bpd throughput rate upon completion of
the expansion project, we expect the refinery to process
approximately 42,000 bpd of sweet crude oil and
13,000 bpd of sour crude oil, with the remainder coming
from interplant feedstocks. Our ability to process significant
amounts of sour crude oil enhances our competitive position in
the industry relative to refiners that process primarily sweet
crude oil because sour crude oil typically can be purchased at a
discount to sweet crude oil.
Subject to normal contingencies, we anticipate incurring
approximately $60 million in capital expenditures related
to the expansion project during 2006 and approximately
$50 million related to the expansion project in 2007. We
expect that our expansion project will be accretive on a per
unit basis upon its completion.
2
Risk Factors
An investment in our common units involves risks associated with
our business, regulatory and legal matters, our limited
partnership structure and the tax characteristics of our common
units. Please carefully read Risk Factors
immediately following this Summary beginning on
page 15.
Partnership Structure
We are a Delaware limited partnership formed in September 2005
to acquire, own and operate the assets that were historically
owned by Calumet Lubricants Co., Limited Partnership.
Upon the completion of this offering:
|
|
|
|
|
The Heritage Group, a privately-owned general partnership that
invests in a variety of industrial companies, the Fred M.
Fehsenfeld, Jr. and F. William Grube families or
trusts set up on their behalf, and certain of their affiliates
will own 5,761,015 common units and 13,066,000 subordinated
units, representing a 61.2% limited partner interest in us; |
|
|
|
Our general partner, Calumet GP, LLC, will continue to own a 2%
general partner interest in us and all of our incentive
distribution rights, which entitles our general partner to
increasing percentages of the cash we distribute in excess of
$0.495 per unit per quarter; and |
|
|
|
Our public unitholders will own 11,304,985 common units,
representing a 36.8% limited partner interest in us. |
The principal difference between our common units and
subordinated units is that, in any quarter during the
subordination period, holders of the subordinated units are
entitled to receive the minimum quarterly distribution of
$0.45 per unit only after the common units have received
the minimum quarterly distribution plus arrearages from prior
quarters. Subordinated units will not accrue arrearages. The
subordination period will end if we meet the financial tests in
our partnership agreement, but it generally cannot end before
December 31, 2010. Please read The
Offering for a description of the subordination period.
Holding Company Structure
As is common with publicly traded limited partnerships and in
order to maximize operational flexibility, we conduct our
operations through subsidiaries. In order to be treated as a
partnership for federal income tax purposes, we must generate
90% or more of our gross income from certain qualifying sources,
such as the refining of crude oil and other feedstocks and the
marketing of finished petroleum products. However, the income
derived from the marketing of these products to certain
end-users, such as governmental entities and airlines, is not
considered qualifying income for federal income tax purposes. As
a result, we market products to these non-qualifying end-users
through Calumet Sales Company Incorporated, a corporate
subsidiary of our operating company, Calumet Operating, LLC.
Income from activities conducted by our corporate subsidiary are
taxed at the applicable corporate income tax rate. Dividends
received by us from our corporate subsidiary constitute
qualifying income. For a more complete description of this
qualifying income requirement, please read Material Tax
Consequences Partnership Status.
The following diagram depicts our organization and ownership
after giving effect to the offering.
3
Organizational Structure
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership of Calumet Specialty
Products Partners, L.P.
|
Public Common Units
|
|
|
36.8% |
|
Common Units owned by Affiliates of
our General Partner
|
|
|
18.7% |
|
Subordinated Units owned by
Affiliates of our General Partner
|
|
|
42.5% |
|
General Partner Interest
|
|
|
2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100% |
|
4
Management and Ownership of Calumet Specialty Products
Partners, L.P.
Calumet GP, LLC, our general partner, has sole responsibility
for conducting our business and for managing our operations. The
Heritage Group and the Fred M. Fehsenfeld, Jr. and
F. William Grube families and their family trusts own our
general partner. For information about the executive officers
and directors of our general partner, please read
Management Directors and Executive
Officers. Our general partner does not receive any
management fee or other compensation in connection with its
management of our business but is entitled to be reimbursed for
all direct and indirect expenses incurred on our behalf. Our
general partner is also entitled to distributions on its general
partner interest and, if specified requirements are met, on its
incentive distribution rights. Please read Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions and
Management.
Neither our general partner nor the board of directors of our
general partner is elected by our unitholders. Unlike
shareholders in a publicly traded corporation, our unitholders
are not entitled to elect the directors of our general partner.
Principal Executive Offices and Internet Address
Our principal executive offices are located at
2780 Waterfront Pkwy. E. Drive, Suite 200,
Indianapolis, Indiana 46214 and our telephone number is
(317) 328-5660.
Our website is located at http://www.calumetspecialty.com. We
make our periodic reports and other information filed with or
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC,
available, free of charge, through our website, as soon as
reasonably practicable. Information on our website or any other
website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus
and does not constitute a part of this prospectus.
Summary of Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties
Calumet GP, LLC, our general partner, has a legal duty to manage
us in a manner beneficial to our unitholders. This legal duty
originates in statutes and judicial decisions and is commonly
referred to as a fiduciary duty. The officers and
directors of our general partner also have fiduciary duties to
manage our general partner in a manner beneficial to its owners.
As a result of this relationship, conflicts of interest may
arise in the future between us and our unitholders, on the one
hand, and our general partner and its affiliates on the other
hand. For a more detailed description of the conflicts of
interest and fiduciary duties of our general partner, please
read Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties.
Our partnership agreement limits the liability and reduces the
fiduciary duties of our general partner to our unitholders. Our
partnership agreement also restricts the remedies available to
unitholders for actions that might otherwise constitute a breach
of our general partners fiduciary duties owed to
unitholders. By purchasing a common unit, you are treated as
having consented to various actions contemplated in our
partnership agreement and conflicts of interest that might
otherwise be considered a breach of fiduciary or other duties
under applicable state law. Please read Conflicts of
Interest and Fiduciary Duties Fiduciary Duties
for a description of the fiduciary duties imposed on our general
partner by Delaware law, the material modifications of these
duties contained in our partnership agreement and certain legal
rights and remedies available to unitholders.
5
The Offering
|
|
|
Common units offered |
|
4,000,000 common units. |
|
|
|
4,600,000 common units, if the underwriters exercise their
option to purchase additional units in full. |
|
Units outstanding after this offering |
|
17,066,000 common units, representing a 55.5% limited partner
interest in us, and 13,066,000 subordinated units, representing
a 42.5% limited partner interest in us. |
|
|
|
17,666,000 common units, representing a 56.3% limited partner
interest, and 13,066,000 subordinated units, representing a
41.7% limited partner interest in us, if the underwriters
exercise their option to purchase additional units in full. |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to use the estimated net proceeds of approximately
$135.0 million from this offering, after deducting
underwriting discounts, commissions and fees, and estimated
offering expenses of approximately $1.0 million, to: |
|
|
|
repay all of our borrowings outstanding under our
revolving credit facility, which were $14.8 million as of
March 31, 2006; |
|
|
|
fund the construction and other start-up costs of
the expansion project currently underway at our Shreveport
refinery; and |
|
|
|
for general partnership purposes, to the extent
available. |
|
|
|
If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional
units, we will use the additional net proceeds for general
partnership purposes, to the extent available. |
|
Cash distributions |
|
We paid a prorated quarterly cash distribution of $0.30 per
unit for the first quarter of 2006, or $1.80 per unit on an
annualized and un-prorated basis, on May 15, 2006 to
unitholders of record as of May 2, 2006. This distribution
was for the period from January 31, 2006, the date of the
closing of our initial public offering, through the end of the
first quarter. |
|
|
|
Within 45 days after the end of each quarter, we distribute
our available cash to unitholders of record on the applicable
record date. |
|
|
|
In general, we will pay any cash distributions we make each
quarter in the following manner: |
|
|
|
first, 98% to the holders of common units, pro rata,
and 2% to our general partner, until each common unit has
received a minimum quarterly distribution of $0.45 plus any
arrearages from prior quarters; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the holders of subordinated units,
pro rata, and 2% to our general partner, until each subordinated
unit |
6
|
|
|
|
|
has received a minimum quarterly distribution of $0.45; and |
|
|
|
third, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
our general partner, until each unit has received a distribution
of $0.495. |
|
|
|
If cash distributions to our unitholders exceed $0.495 per
common unit in any quarter, our general partner will receive
increasing percentages, up to 50%, of the cash we distribute in
excess of that amount. We refer to the amount of these
distributions in excess of the 2% general partner interest as
incentive distributions. Please read How We
Make Cash Distributions Incentive Distribution
Rights. |
|
|
|
We must distribute all of our cash on hand at the end of each
quarter, less reserves established by our general partner. We
refer to this cash as available cash, and we define
its meaning in our partnership agreement, in How We Make
Cash Distributions Distributions of Available
Cash Definition of Available Cash and in the
glossary of terms attached as Appendix A. The amount of
available cash may be greater than or less than the minimum
quarterly distribution to be distributed on all units. |
|
Subordination period |
|
During the subordination period, the common units will have the
right to receive distributions of available cash from operating
surplus in an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution
of $0.45 per quarter, plus any arrearages from prior
quarters, before any distributions may be made on the
subordinated units. The subordination period will extend until
the first day of any quarter beginning after December 31,
2010 that each of the following tests are met: |
|
|
|
(1) distributions of available cash from operating surplus
on each of the outstanding common units, subordinated units and
general partner units equaled or exceeded the minimum quarterly
distributions on all such units for each of the three
consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods immediately
preceding that date; |
|
|
|
(2) the adjusted operating surplus generated during each of
the three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods
immediately preceding that date equaled or exceeded the sum of
the minimum quarterly distributions on all of the outstanding
common units, subordinated units and general partner units
during those periods on a fully diluted basis; and |
|
|
|
(3) there are no arrearages in payment of minimum quarterly
distributions on the common units. |
|
|
|
When the subordination period ends, all subordinated units will
convert into common units on a one-for-one basis, and the common
units will no longer be entitled to arrearages. |
7
|
|
|
Issuance of additional units |
|
In general, during the subordination period, we may issue up to
6,533,000 additional common units without obtaining unitholder
approval. We can also issue an unlimited number of common units
in connection with acquisitions and capital improvements that
increase cash flow from operations per unit on an estimated pro
forma basis. We can also issue additional common units if the
proceeds are used to repay certain of our indebtedness. |
|
|
|
Until the time that our Shreveport refinery expansion project is
put into commercial service, the common units to be issued in
connection with this offering will be deemed to constitute a
portion of the up to 6,533,000 common units we are permitted to
issue during the subordination period without obtaining
unitholder approval and will reduce the number of additional
common units we may issue in the future without obtaining
unitholder approval accordingly. However, we anticipate that our
Shreveport refinery expansion project will increase cash flow
from operations per unit upon its completion. If this occurs,
the common units we issue in this offering that are used to pay
for such expansion project will be added back to the number of
additional common units we may issue in the future without
unitholder approval. |
|
|
|
Please read Units Eligible for Future Sale and
The Partnership Agreement Issuance of
Additional Securities. |
|
Limited voting rights |
|
Our general partner manages and operates us. Unlike the holders
of common stock in a corporation, you will have only limited
voting rights on matters affecting our business. You will have
no right to elect our general partner or its directors on an
annual or other continuing basis. Our general partner may not be
removed except by a vote of the holders of at least
662/3
% of the outstanding units, including any units owned by
our general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a
single class. Upon consummation of this offering, the owners of
our general partner and certain of their affiliates will own an
aggregate of 62.5% of our common and subordinated units. This
will give our general partner the practical ability to prevent
its involuntary removal. Please read The Partnership
Agreement Voting Rights. |
|
Limited call right |
|
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more
than 80% of the outstanding common units, our general partner
has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase all of the
remaining common units at a price not less than the then-current
market price of the common units. |
|
Estimated ratio of taxable income to distributions |
|
We estimate that if you own the common units you purchase in
this offering through the record date for distributions for the
period ending December 31, 2008, you will be allocated, on
a cumulative basis, an amount of federal taxable income for that
period that will be 20% or less of the cash distributed to you
with respect to that period. For example, if you receive |
8
|
|
|
|
|
an annual distribution of $1.80 per unit, we estimate that
your average allocable federal taxable income per year will be
no more than $0.36 per unit. Please read Material Tax
Consequences Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Ratio of Taxable Income to
Distributions. |
|
Material tax consequences |
|
For a discussion of other material federal income tax
consequences that may be relevant to prospective unitholders who
are individual citizens or residents of the United States,
please read Material Tax Consequences. |
|
Trading |
|
Our common units are traded on the NASDAQ National Market under
the symbol CLMT. |
9
Summary Historical and Pro Forma Financial and Operating
Data
The following table shows summary historical financial and
operating data of Calumet Lubricants Co., Limited Partnership
(Calumet Predecessor) and pro forma financial data
of Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.
(Calumet) for the periods and as of the dates
indicated. The summary historical financial data as of
December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and March 31, 2005
and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005
and the three months ended March 31, 2005 are derived from
the consolidated financial statements of Calumet Predecessor.
The summary financial data as of and for the three months ended
March 31, 2006, are derived from the consolidated financial
statements of Calumet. The results of operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 for Calumet include the results
of operations of Calumet Predecessor for the period of
January 1, 2006 through January 31, 2006. The summary
pro forma financial data as of March 31, 2006, and for the
year ended December 31, 2005 and the three months ended
March 31, 2006 are derived from the unaudited pro forma
financial statements of Calumet. The pro forma adjustments have
been prepared as if the transactions listed below had taken
place on March 31, 2006, in the case of the pro forma
balance sheet, or as of January 1, 2005, in the case of the
pro forma statement of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and for the year ended December 31,
2005. The pro forma financial data give pro forma effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
this offering of common units, our general partners
proportionate capital contribution and our application of the
proceeds, net of estimated underwriting commissions and other
offering expenses, therefrom; |
|
|
|
our initial public offering of common units, our application of
the net proceeds therefrom and the formation transactions
related to our partnership; and |
|
|
|
the refinancing by Calumet Predecessor of its long-term debt
obligations pursuant to new credit facilities it entered into in
December 2005. |
None of the assets or liabilities of Calumet Predecessors
Rouseville wax processing facility, Reno wax packaging facility
and Bareco wax marketing joint venture, which are included in
the historical financial statements, were contributed to us in
connection with the closing of our initial public offering on
January 31, 2006.
The following table includes the non-GAAP financial measures
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. For a reconciliation of EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA to net income and cash flow from operating
activities, our most directly comparable financial performance
and liquidity measures calculated in accordance with GAAP,
please read Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
We derived the information in the following table from, and that
information should be read together with and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to, the historical and pro forma combined
financial statements and the accompanying notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The table should be read together
with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
Calumet | |
|
Calumet Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit data) | |
Summary of Operations
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
430,381 |
|
|
$ |
539,616 |
|
|
$ |
1,289,072 |
|
|
$ |
229,549 |
|
|
$ |
397,694 |
|
|
$ |
1,289,072 |
|
|
$ |
397,694 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
385,890 |
|
|
|
501,284 |
|
|
|
1,148,715 |
|
|
|
203,432 |
|
|
|
346,744 |
|
|
|
1,148,715 |
|
|
|
346,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
44,491 |
|
|
|
38,332 |
|
|
|
140,357 |
|
|
|
26,117 |
|
|
|
50,950 |
|
|
|
140,357 |
|
|
|
50,950 |
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
9,432 |
|
|
|
13,133 |
|
|
|
22,126 |
|
|
|
3,392 |
|
|
|
4,929 |
|
|
|
22,126 |
|
|
|
4,929 |
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
28,139 |
|
|
|
33,923 |
|
|
|
46,849 |
|
|
|
10,723 |
|
|
|
13,907 |
|
|
|
46,849 |
|
|
|
13,907 |
|
|
Taxes other than income
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
Restructuring, decommissioning and
asset impairments(1)
|
|
|
6,694 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(3,098 |
) |
|
|
(12,189 |
) |
|
|
65,685 |
|
|
|
10,745 |
|
|
|
31,085 |
|
|
|
65,685 |
|
|
|
31,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9,493 |
) |
|
|
(9,869 |
) |
|
|
(22,961 |
) |
|
|
(4,864 |
) |
|
|
(3,976 |
) |
|
|
(8,542 |
) |
|
|
(2,011 |
) |
|
Debt extinguishment costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,967 |
) |
|
|
(6,882 |
) |
|
|
(2,967 |
) |
|
Realized gain (loss) on derivative
instruments
|
|
|
(961 |
) |
|
|
39,160 |
|
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
(6,651 |
) |
|
|
(3,080 |
) |
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
(3,080 |
) |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
derivative instruments
|
|
|
7,228 |
|
|
|
(7,788 |
) |
|
|
(27,586 |
) |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
(17,715 |
) |
|
|
(27,586 |
) |
|
|
(17,715 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(2,327 |
) |
|
|
21,159 |
|
|
|
(54,357 |
) |
|
|
(10,873 |
) |
|
|
(27,539 |
) |
|
|
(39,938 |
) |
|
|
(25,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before income
taxes
|
|
|
(5,425 |
) |
|
|
8,970 |
|
|
|
11,328 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
3,546 |
|
|
|
25,747 |
|
|
|
5,511 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(5,425 |
) |
|
$ |
8,970 |
|
|
$ |
11,328 |
|
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
$ |
3,532 |
|
|
$ |
25,657 |
|
|
$ |
5,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted pro forma net
income per limited partner unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
2.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,950 |
|
|
|
17,066 |
|
|
|
17,066 |
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,066 |
|
|
|
13,066 |
|
|
|
13,066 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period
end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
89,938 |
|
|
$ |
126,585 |
|
|
$ |
127,846 |
|
|
$ |
131,194 |
|
|
$ |
127,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
127,674 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
216,941 |
|
|
|
318,206 |
|
|
|
399,717 |
|
|
|
327,961 |
|
|
|
349,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472,650 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
32,263 |
|
|
|
58,027 |
|
|
|
44,759 |
|
|
|
28,053 |
|
|
|
52,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,216 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
146,853 |
|
|
|
214,069 |
|
|
|
267,985 |
|
|
|
251,376 |
|
|
|
64,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,875 |
|
Partners capital
|
|
|
25,544 |
|
|
|
34,514 |
|
|
|
39,054 |
|
|
|
34,385 |
|
|
|
169,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307,122 |
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
7,048 |
|
|
$ |
(612 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,001 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,005 |
) |
|
$ |
60,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(11,940 |
) |
|
|
(42,930 |
) |
|
|
(12,903 |
) |
|
|
(6,933 |
) |
|
|
(2,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
|
61,561 |
|
|
|
40,990 |
|
|
|
37,306 |
|
|
|
(69,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
10,837 |
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
51,557 |
|
|
$ |
7,532 |
|
|
$ |
13,162 |
|
|
$ |
51,557 |
|
|
$ |
13,162 |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
6,110 |
|
|
|
34,711 |
|
|
|
85,821 |
|
|
|
8,718 |
|
|
|
26,110 |
|
|
|
85,821 |
|
|
|
26,110 |
|
Operating Data (bpd):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales volume(2)
|
|
|
23,616 |
|
|
|
24,658 |
|
|
|
46,953 |
|
|
|
38,418 |
|
|
|
52,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total feedstock runs(3)
|
|
|
25,007 |
|
|
|
26,205 |
|
|
|
50,213 |
|
|
|
42,059 |
|
|
|
52,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total refinery production(4)
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
|
|
26,297 |
|
|
|
48,331 |
|
|
|
40,343 |
|
|
|
50,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Incurred in connection with the decommissioning of the
Rouseville, Pennsylvania facility, the termination of the Bareco
joint venture and the closing of the Reno, Pennsylvania
facility, none of which were contributed to us in connection
with our initial public offering. |
|
(2) |
Total sales volume includes sales from the production of our
refineries and sales of inventories. |
|
(3) |
Feedstock runs represents the barrels per day of crude oil and
other feedstocks processed at our refineries. |
|
(4) |
Total refinery production represents the barrels per day of
specialty products and fuel products yielded from processing
crude oil and other refinery feedstocks at our refineries. The
difference between total refinery production and total feedstock
is primarily a result of the time lag between the input of
feedstock and production of end products and volume loss. |
11
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We include in this prospectus the non-GAAP financial measures
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, and provide reconciliations of
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net income and cash flow from
operating activities, our most directly comparable financial
performance and liquidity measures calculated and presented in
accordance with GAAP.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are used as supplemental financial
measures by our management and by external users of our
financial statements such as investors, commercial banks,
research analysts and others, to assess:
|
|
|
|
|
the financial performance of our assets without regard to
financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis; |
|
|
|
the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient to pay
interest costs and support our indebtedness; |
|
|
|
our operating performance and return on capital as compared to
those of other companies in our industry, without regard to
financing or capital structure; and |
|
|
|
the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects
and the overall rates of return on alternative investment
opportunities. |
We define EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, taxes and
depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA to be
Consolidated EBITDA as defined in our credit facilities.
Consistent with that definition, Adjusted EBITDA means, for any
period: (1) net income plus (2)(a) interest expense;
(b) taxes; (c) depreciation and amortization;
(d) unrealized losses from mark to market accounting for
hedging activities; (e) unrealized items decreasing net
income (including the non-cash impact of restructuring,
decommissioning and asset impairments in the periods presented);
and (f) other non-recurring expenses reducing net income
which do not represent a cash item for such period; minus
(3)(a) tax credits; (b) unrealized items increasing
net income (including the non-cash impact of restructuring,
decommissioning and asset impairment in the periods presented);
(c) unrealized gains from mark to market accounting for
hedging activities; and (d) other non-recurring expenses
and unrealized items that reduced net income for a prior period,
but represent a cash item in the current period. We are required
to report Adjusted EBITDA to our lenders under our credit
facilities and it is used to determine our compliance with the
consolidated leverage test thereunder. We are required to
maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of consolidated debt to
Adjusted EBITDA, after giving effect to any proposed
distributions, of no greater than 3.75 to 1 in order to make
distributions to our unitholders.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered alternatives
to net income, operating income, cash flow from operating
activities or any other measure of financial performance
presented in accordance with GAAP. Our EBITDA and Adjusted
EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of
another company because all companies may not calculate EBITDA
and Adjusted EBITDA in the same manner. The following tables
present a reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted
12
EBITDA to net income and cash flow from operating activities,
our most directly comparable GAAP financial performance and
liquidity measures, for each of the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Calumet Predecessor 5,2 | |
|
Calumet | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Three M | |
|
onths | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
End | |
|
ed | |
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March | |
|
31, | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Reconciliation of Adjusted
EBITDA and EBITDA to net income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(5,425 |
) |
|
$ |
8,970 |
|
|
$ |
11,328 |
|
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
$ |
3,532 |
|
|
$ |
25,657 |
|
|
$ |
5,497 |
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and debt
extinguishment costs
|
|
|
9,493 |
|
|
|
9,869 |
|
|
|
29,843 |
|
|
|
4,864 |
|
|
|
6,943 |
|
|
|
15,424 |
|
|
|
4,978 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,769 |
|
|
|
6,927 |
|
|
|
10,386 |
|
|
|
2,796 |
|
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
10,386 |
|
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
10,837 |
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
51,557 |
|
|
$ |
7,532 |
|
|
$ |
13,162 |
|
|
$ |
51,557 |
|
|
$ |
13,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) from
mark to market accounting for hedging activities
|
|
$ |
(7,228 |
) |
|
$ |
7,788 |
|
|
$ |
27,586 |
|
|
$ |
(603 |
) |
|
$ |
17,715 |
|
|
$ |
27,586 |
|
|
$ |
17,715 |
|
|
Non-cash impact of restructuring,
decommissioning and asset impairments
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
(1,276 |
) |
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid non-recurring expenses and
accrued non-recurring expenses, net of cash outlays
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
4,912 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
(4,767 |
) |
|
|
4,912 |
|
|
|
(4,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$ |
6,110 |
|
|
$ |
34,711 |
|
|
$ |
85,821 |
|
|
$ |
8,718 |
|
|
$ |
26,110 |
|
|
$ |
85,821 |
|
|
$ |
26,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Reconciliation of Adjusted
EBITDA and EBITDA to net cash provided (used) by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by
operating activities
|
|
$ |
7,048 |
|
|
$ |
(612 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,001 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,005 |
) |
|
$ |
60,115 |
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and debt
extinguishment costs
|
|
|
9,493 |
|
|
|
9,869 |
|
|
|
29,843 |
|
|
|
4,864 |
|
|
|
6,943 |
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
(874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,693 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
Equity in (loss) income of
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received from
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
(3,470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt extinguishment costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,967 |
) |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
19,399 |
|
|
|
56,878 |
|
|
|
22,506 |
|
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(15,547 |
) |
|
|
20,304 |
|
|
|
25,441 |
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
(7,313 |
) |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
11,596 |
|
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
|
5,117 |
|
|
|
(16,471 |
) |
|
Derivative activity
|
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
(5,046 |
) |
|
|
(31,101 |
) |
|
|
(6,305 |
) |
|
|
(18,694 |
) |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
(25,764 |
) |
|
|
13,268 |
|
|
|
29,974 |
|
|
|
(7,457 |
) |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(1,379 |
) |
|
|
(1,203 |
) |
|
|
(5,874 |
) |
|
|
(2,551 |
) |
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
Other, including changes in
noncurrent assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(1,316 |
) |
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
|
|
(1,027 |
) |
|
|
(4,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
10,837 |
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
51,557 |
|
|
$ |
7,532 |
|
|
$ |
13,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) from
mark to market accounting for hedging activities
|
|
$ |
(7,228 |
) |
|
$ |
7,788 |
|
|
$ |
27,586 |
|
|
$ |
(603 |
) |
|
$ |
17,715 |
|
|
Non-cash impact of restructuring,
decommissioning and asset impairments
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
(1,276 |
) |
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid non-recurring expenses and
accrued non-recurring expenses, net of cash outlays
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
4,912 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
(4,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$ |
6,110 |
|
|
$ |
34,711 |
|
|
$ |
85,821 |
|
|
$ |
8,718 |
|
|
$ |
26,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
RISK FACTORS
Limited partner interests are inherently different from
capital stock of a corporation, although many of the business
risks to which we are subject are similar to those that would be
faced by a corporation engaged in a similar business. You should
consider carefully the following risk factors together with all
of the other information included in this prospectus in
evaluating an investment in our common units.
The following risks could materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition or results of operations. In that
case, we might not be able to pay the minimum quarterly
distribution on our common units, the trading price of our
common units could decline and you could lose all or part of
your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations to enable
us to pay the minimum quarterly distribution following the
establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses,
including payments to our general partner. |
We may not have sufficient available cash from operations each
quarter to enable us to pay the minimum quarterly distribution.
Under the terms of our partnership agreement, we must pay
expenses, including payments to our general partner, and set
aside any cash reserve amounts before making a distribution to
our unitholders. The amount of cash we can distribute on our
units principally depends upon the amount of cash we generate
from our operations, which is primarily dependent upon our
producing and selling quantities of fuel and specialty products,
or refined products, at margins that are high enough to cover
our fixed and variable expenses. Crude oil costs, fuel and
specialty products prices and, accordingly, the cash we generate
from operations, will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based
on, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
overall demand for specialty hydrocarbon products, fuels and
other refined products; |
|
|
|
the level of foreign and domestic production of crude oil and
refined products; |
|
|
|
our ability to produce fuel and specialty products that meet our
customers unique and precise specifications; |
|
|
|
the marketing of alternative and competing products; |
|
|
|
the extent of government regulation; |
|
|
|
results of our hedging activities; and |
|
|
|
overall economic and local market conditions. |
In addition, the actual amount of cash we will have available
for distribution will depend on other factors, some of which are
beyond our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of capital expenditures we make, including those for
acquisitions, if any; |
|
|
|
our debt service requirements; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in our working capital needs; |
|
|
|
our ability to borrow funds and access capital markets; |
|
|
|
restrictions on distributions and on our ability to make working
capital borrowings for distributions contained in our credit
facilities; |
|
|
|
the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner
for the proper conduct of our business. |
15
|
|
|
The amount of cash we have available for distribution to
unitholders depends primarily on our cash flow and not solely on
profitability. |
You should be aware that the amount of cash we have available
for distribution depends primarily upon our cash flow, including
cash flow from financial reserves and working capital
borrowings, and not solely on profitability, which will be
affected by non-cash items. As a result, we may make cash
distributions during periods when we record losses and may not
make cash distributions during periods when we record net income.
|
|
|
Refining margins are volatile, and a reduction in our
refining margins will adversely affect the amount of cash we
will have available for distribution to our unitholders. |
Our financial results are primarily affected by the
relationship, or margin, between our specialty products and fuel
prices and the prices for crude oil and other feedstocks. The
cost to acquire our feedstocks and the price at which we can
ultimately sell our refined products depend upon numerous
factors beyond our control. Historically, refining margins have
been volatile, and they are likely to continue to be volatile in
the future. A widely used benchmark in the fuel products
industry to measure market values and margins is the 3/2/1
crack spread, which represents the approximate gross
margin resulting from processing one barrel of crude oil,
assuming that three barrels of a benchmark crude oil are
converted, or cracked, into two barrels of gasoline and one
barrel of heating oil. The 3/2/1 crack spread averaged
$3.04 per barrel between 1990 and 1999, $4.61 per
barrel between 2000 and 2004, $6.52 per barrel in the first
quarter of 2005, $9.10 per barrel in the second quarter of
2005, $17.07 per barrel in the third quarter of 2005,
$9.81 per barrel in the fourth quarter of 2005, and $8.68
in the first quarter of 2006. Our actual refinery margins vary
from the Gulf Coast 3/2/1 crack spread due to the actual crude
oil used and products produced, transportation costs, regional
differences, and the timing of the purchase of the feedstock and
sale of the refined products, but we use the Gulf Coast 3/2/1
crack spread as an indicator of the volatility and general
levels of refining margins. Because refining margins are
volatile, you should not assume that our current margins will be
sustained. If our refining margins fall, it will adversely
affect the amount of cash we will have available for
distribution to our unitholders. Please read Industry
Overview Fuel Products.
The price at which we sell specialty products, fuel and other
refined products is strongly influenced by the commodity price
of crude oil. If crude oil prices increase, our operating
margins will fall unless we are able to pass along these price
increases to our customers. Increases in selling prices
typically lag the rising cost of crude oil for specialty
products. It is possible we may not be able to pass on all or
any portion of the increased crude oil costs to our customers.
In addition, we will not be able to completely eliminate our
commodity risk through our hedging activities.
|
|
|
Because of the volatility of crude oil and refined
products prices, our method of valuing our inventory may result
in decreases in net income. |
The nature of our business requires us to maintain substantial
quantities of crude oil and refined product inventories. Because
crude oil and refined products are essentially commodities, we
have no control over the changing market value of these
inventories. Because our inventory is valued at the lower of
cost or market value, if the market value of our inventory were
to decline to an amount less than our cost, we would record a
write-down of inventory and a non-cash charge to cost of sales.
In a period of decreasing crude oil or refined product prices,
our inventory valuation methodology may result in decreases in
net income.
|
|
|
The price volatility of fuel and utility services may
result in decreases in our earnings, profitability and cash
flows. |
The volatility in costs of fuel, principally natural gas, and
other utility services, principally electricity, used by our
refinery and other operations affect our net income and cash
flows. Fuel and
16
utility prices are affected by factors outside of our control,
such as supply and demand for fuel and utility services in both
local and regional markets. Natural gas prices have historically
been volatile. For example, daily prices as reported on the New
York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) ranged between
$4.57 and $8.75 per million British thermal units, or
MMBtu, in 2004, between $5.79 and $15.39 per MMBtu in 2005
and between $6.54 and $10.62 per MMBtu in the first quarter
of 2006. Typically, electricity prices fluctuate with natural
gas prices. Future increases in fuel and utility prices may have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Fuel and
utility costs constituted approximately 45.6% and 45.8% of our
total operating expenses included in cost of sales for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and the three months ended
March 31, 2006, respectively.
|
|
|
Our hedging activities may reduce our earnings,
profitability and cash flows. |
We are exposed to fluctuations in the price of crude oil, fuel
products, natural gas and interest rates. We utilize derivative
financial instruments with the intent of reducing volatility in
our cash flows due to fluctuations in these prices or interest
rates. We are not able to enter into derivative instruments to
reduce the volatility of the sales prices of the specialty
hydrocarbon products we sell as there is no established
derivative market for such products.
Historically, we have not designated all of our derivative
instruments as hedges in accordance with the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities. According to SFAS 133, changes in
fair value of derivatives which have not been designated as
hedges are to be recorded in earnings as reflected in unrealized
gain (loss) on derivative instruments. For derivatives
designated as cash flow hedges, the change in fair value of
these derivatives is reflected in other comprehensive income.
For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005, these
unrealized gains (losses) were $7,228,000, $(7,788,000) and
$(27,586,000), respectively. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2006, these unrealized gains (losses)
were $603,000 and $(17,715,000), respectively. On April 1,
2006, we designated certain derivative contracts that hedge the
purchase of crude oil and sale of fuel products as cash flow
hedges to the extent they qualify for hedge accounting.
The extent of our commodity price exposure is related largely to
the effectiveness and scope of our hedging activities. For
example, the derivative instruments we utilize are based on
posted market prices, which may differ from the actual crude oil
prices, natural gas prices or crack spreads that we realize in
our operations. Furthermore, we have a policy to enter into
derivative transactions related to only a portion of the volume
of our expected production or fuel requirements and, as a
result, we will continue to have direct commodity price exposure
to the unhedged portion. Our actual future production or fuel
requirements may be significantly higher or lower than we
estimate for such period. If the actual amount is higher than we
estimate, we will have greater commodity price exposure than we
intended. If the actual amount is lower than the amount that is
subject to our derivative financial instruments, we might be
forced to satisfy all or a portion of our derivative
transactions without the benefit of the cash flow from our sale
or purchase of the underlying physical commodity, resulting in a
substantial diminution of our liquidity. As a result, our
hedging activities may not be as effective as we intend in
reducing the volatility of our cash flows and our cash
distributions to unitholders may be reduced. Please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
|
|
|
Our asset reconfiguration and enhancement initiatives,
including the major expansion project currently underway at our
Shreveport refinery, may not result in revenue or cash flow
increases, may be subject to significant cost overruns and are
subject to regulatory, environmental, political, legal and
economic risks, which could adversely affect our business,
operating results, cash flows and financial condition. |
We plan to grow our business through the reconfiguration and
enhancement of our refinery assets. As a specific current
example, we have commenced a major expansion project at our
17
Shreveport refinery to increase throughput capacity and crude
oil processing flexibility that we expect to complete in the
third quarter of 2007. The construction of additions or
modifications to our existing refineries involves numerous
regulatory, environmental, political, legal and economic
uncertainties beyond our control and could require the
expenditure of significant amounts of capital, which we may
finance with additional indebtedness or by issuing additional
equity securities. As we undertake these projects, they may not
be completed at the budgeted cost, on schedule or at all. For
example, we currently anticipate that our expansion project at
our Shreveport refinery will cost approximately
$110 million to complete, but we do not expect to complete
this project until the third quarter of 2007, and we may suffer
significant delays to the expected completion date or
significant cost overruns as a result of a variety of factors,
such as shortages of workers or materials, transportation
constraints, adverse weather, unforeseen difficulties or labor
issues. In addition, construction to expand our existing
refineries may occur over an extended period of time, and we may
not receive any material increases in revenues and cash flows
until the projects are completed, or at all.
If our general financial condition deteriorates, we may be
limited in our ability to obtain credit with counterparties and
issue letters of credit, which may affect our ability to enter
into hedging arrangements or to purchase crude oil.
We rely on our ability to obtain unsecured credit lines or issue
letters of credit to enter into hedging arrangements in an
effort to reduce our exposure to adverse fluctuations in the
prices of crude oil, natural gas, and fuel products. We also
rely on our ability to obtain unsecured credit lines or issue
letters of credit to support the purchase of crude oil
feedstocks for our refineries. If, due to our financial
condition or other reasons, we are limited in our ability or
unable to obtain unsecured credit lines or issue letters of
credit, we may be required to post substantial amounts of cash
collateral to our hedging counterparties or crude oil suppliers
in order to continue these activities, which would adversely
affect our liquidity and our ability to distribute cash to our
unitholders.
We depend on certain key crude oil gatherers for a
significant portion of our supply of crude oil, and the loss of
any of these key suppliers or a material decrease in the supply
of crude oil generally available to our refineries could
materially reduce our ability to make distributions to
unitholders.
We purchase crude oil from major oil companies as well as from
various gatherers and marketers in Texas and north Louisiana.
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, Plains All
American Pipeline, L.P. and Koch Supply and Trading, LP supplied
us with approximately 49.7% and 27.1%, respectively, of our
total crude oil supplies. Each of our refineries is dependent on
one or both of these suppliers and the loss of these suppliers
would adversely affect our financial results to the extent we
were unable to find another supplier of this substantial amount
and type of crude oil. We do not maintain long-term contracts
with most of our suppliers. Please read
Business Crude Oil and Feedstock Supply.
To the extent that our suppliers reduce the volumes of crude oil
that they supply us as a result of declining production or
competition or otherwise, our revenues, net income and cash
available for distribution would decline unless we were able to
acquire comparable supplies of crude oil on comparable terms
from other suppliers, which may not be possible in areas where
the supplier that reduces its volumes is the primary supplier in
the area. A material decrease in crude oil production from the
fields that supply our refineries, as a result of depressed
commodity prices, lack of drilling activity, natural production
declines or otherwise, could result in a decline in the volume
of crude oil we refine. Fluctuations in crude oil prices can
greatly affect production rates and investments by third parties
in the development of new oil reserves. Drilling activity
generally decreases as crude oil prices decrease. We have no
control over the level of drilling activity in the fields that
supply our refineries, the amount of reserves underlying the
wells in these fields, the rate at which production from a well
will decline or the production decisions of producers, which are
affected by, among other things, prevailing and projected energy
prices, demand for hydrocarbons, geological considerations,
governmental regulation and the availability and cost of capital.
18
|
|
|
We are dependent on certain third-party pipelines for
transportation of crude oil and refined products, and if these
pipelines become unavailable to us, our revenues and cash
available for distribution could decline. |
Each of our refineries is interconnected to pipelines that
supply most of its crude oil and ship most of its refined fuel
products to customers, such as pipelines operated by
subsidiaries of TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and ExxonMobil
Corporation. Since we do not own or operate any of these
pipelines, their continuing operation is not within our control.
If any of these third-party pipelines become unavailable to
transport crude oil feedstock or our refined products because of
accidents, government regulation, terrorism or other events, our
revenues, net income and cash available for distribution could
decline.
|
|
|
Distributions to unitholders could be adversely affected
by a decrease in the demand for our specialty products. |
Changes in our customers products or processes may enable
our customers to reduce consumption of the specialty products
that we produce or make our specialty products unnecessary.
Should a customer decide to use a different product due to
price, performance or other considerations, we may not be able
to supply a product that meets the customers new
requirements. In addition, the demand for our customers
end products could decrease, which would reduce their demand for
our specialty products. Our specialty product customers are
primarily in the industrial goods, consumer goods and automotive
goods industries and we are therefore susceptible to changing
demand patterns and products in those industries. Consequently,
it is important that we develop and manufacture new products to
replace the sales of products that mature and decline in use. If
we are unable to manage successfully the maturation of our
existing specialty products and the introduction of new
specialty products, our revenues, net income and cash available
for distribution to unitholders could be reduced.
|
|
|
Distributions to unitholders could be adversely affected
by a decrease in demand for fuel products in the markets we
serve. |
Any sustained decrease in demand for fuel products in the
markets we serve could result in a reduction in our cash flow,
reducing our ability to make distributions to unitholders.
Factors that could lead to a decrease in market demand include:
|
|
|
|
|
a recession or other adverse economic condition that results in
lower spending by consumers on gasoline, diesel, and travel; |
|
|
|
higher fuel taxes or other governmental or regulatory actions
that increase, directly or indirectly, the cost of gasoline and
other fuel products; |
|
|
|
an increase in fuel economy or the increased use of alternative
fuel sources; |
|
|
|
an increase in the market price of gasoline and other fuel
products, which may reduce demand for gasoline and other fuel
products; |
|
|
|
competitor actions; and |
|
|
|
availability of raw materials. |
|
|
|
We could be subject to damages based on claims brought
against us by our customers or lose customers as a result of the
failure of our products to meet certain quality
specifications. |
Our specialty products provide precise performance attributes
for our customers products. If a product fails to perform
in a manner consistent with the detailed quality specifications
required by the customer, the customer could seek replacement of
the product or damages for costs incurred as a result of the
product failing to perform as expected. A successful claim or
series of claims against us
19
could result in a loss of one or more customers and reduce our
ability to make distributions to unitholders.
|
|
|
We are subject to compliance with stringent environmental
laws and regulations that may expose us to substantial costs and
liabilities. |
Our crude oil and specialty hydrocarbon refining and terminal
operations are subject to stringent and complex federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations governing the
discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise
relating to environmental protection. These laws and regulations
impose numerous obligations that are applicable to our
operations, including the acquisition of permits to conduct
regulated activities, the incurrence of significant capital
expenditures to limit or prevent releases of materials from our
refineries, terminal, and related facilities, and the incurrence
of substantial costs and liabilities for pollution resulting
both from our operations and from those of prior owners.
Numerous governmental authorities, such as the EPA and state
agencies, such as the Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality (LDEQ), have the power to enforce compliance
with these laws and regulations and the permits issued under
them, often requiring difficult and costly actions. Failure to
comply with environmental laws, regulations, permits and orders
may result in the assessment of administrative, civil, and
criminal penalties, the imposition of remedial obligations, and
the issuance of injunctions limiting or preventing some or all
of our operations.
We recently have entered into discussions on a voluntary basis
with the LDEQ regarding our participation in that agencys
Small Refinery and Single Site Refinery Initiative.
We are only in the beginning stages of discussion with the LDEQ
and, consequently, while no significant compliance and
enforcement expenditures have been requested as a result of our
discussions, we anticipate that we will ultimately be required
to make emissions reductions or other efforts requiring capital
investments and increased operating expenditures that may be
material. Please read Business Environmental
Matters Air.
|
|
|
Our business subjects us to the inherent risk of incurring
significant environmental liabilities in the operation of our
refineries and related facilities. |
There is inherent risk of incurring significant environmental
costs and liabilities in the operation of our refineries,
terminal, and related facilities due to our handling of
petroleum hydrocarbons and wastes, air emissions and water
discharges related to our operations, and historical operations
and waste disposal practices by prior owners. We currently own
or operate properties that for many years have been used for
industrial activities, including refining or terminal storage
operations. Petroleum hydrocarbons or wastes have been released
on or under the properties owned or operated by us. Joint and
several strict liability may be incurred in connection with such
releases of petroleum hydrocarbons and wastes on, under or from
our properties and facilities. Private parties, including the
owners of properties adjacent to our operations and facilities
where our petroleum hydrocarbons or wastes are taken for
reclamation or disposal, may also have the right to pursue legal
actions to enforce compliance as well as to seek damages for
non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations or for
personal injury or property damage. We may not be able to
recover some or any of these costs from insurance or other
sources of indemnity.
Increasingly stringent environmental laws and regulations,
unanticipated remediation obligations or emissions control
expenditures and claims for penalties or damages could result in
substantial costs and liabilities, and our ability to make
distributions to our unitholders could suffer as a result.
Neither the owners of our general partner nor their affiliates
have indemnified us for any environmental liabilities, including
those arising from non-compliance or pollution, that may be
discovered at, or arise from operations on, our assets they
contributed to us. As such, we can expect no economic assistance
from any of them in the event that we are required to make
expenditures to investigate or remediate any petroleum
hydrocarbons, wastes, or other materials. Please read
Business Environmental Matters.
20
|
|
|
We are exposed to trade credit risk in the ordinary course
of our business activities. |
We are exposed to risks of loss in the event of nonperformance
by our customers, suppliers and by counterparties of our forward
contracts, options and swap agreements. Some of our customers,
suppliers and counterparties may be highly leveraged and subject
to their own operating and regulatory risks. Even if our credit
review and analysis mechanisms work properly, we may experience
financial losses in our dealings with other parties. Any
increase in the nonpayment or nonperformance by any of these
parties could reduce our ability to make distributions to our
unitholders.
|
|
|
If we do not make acquisitions on economically acceptable
terms, our future growth will be limited. |
Our ability to grow depends on our ability to make acquisitions
that result in an increase in the cash generated from operations
per unit. If we are unable to make these accretive acquisitions
either because we are: (1) unable to identify attractive
acquisition candidates or negotiate acceptable purchase
contracts with them, (2) unable to obtain financing for
these acquisitions on economically acceptable terms, or
(3) outbid by competitors, then our future growth and
ability to increase distributions will be limited. Furthermore,
any acquisition involves potential risks, including, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
performance from the acquired assets and businesses that is
below the forecasts we used in evaluating the acquisition; |
|
|
|
a significant increase in our indebtedness and working capital
requirements; |
|
|
|
an inability to timely and effectively integrate the operations
of recently acquired businesses or assets, particularly those in
new geographic areas or in new lines of business; |
|
|
|
the incurrence of substantial unforeseen environmental and other
liabilities arising out of the acquired businesses or assets; |
|
|
|
the diversion of managements attention from other business
concerns; and |
|
|
|
customer or key employee losses at the acquired businesses. |
If we consummate any future acquisitions, our capitalization and
results of operations may change significantly, and you will not
have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial and
other relevant information that we will consider in determining
the application of our funds and other resources.
|
|
|
Our refineries face operating hazards, and the potential
limits on insurance coverage could expose us to potentially
significant liability costs. |
Our refining activities are conducted at three refineries in
northwest Louisiana. These refineries are our principal
operating assets. Our operations are subject to significant
interruption, and our cash from operations could decline, if any
of our refineries experiences a major accident or fire, is
damaged by severe weather or other natural disaster, or
otherwise is forced to curtail its operations or shut down.
These hazards could result in substantial losses due to personal
injury and/or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of
property and equipment and pollution or other environmental
damage and may result in curtailment or suspension of our
related operations.
We are not fully insured against all risks incident to our
business. Furthermore, we may be unable to maintain or obtain
insurance of the type and amount we desire at reasonable rates.
As a result of market conditions, premiums and deductibles for
certain of our insurance policies have increased and could
escalate further. In some instances, certain insurance could
become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of
coverage. Our business interruption insurance will not apply
unless a business interruption exceeds 90 days. We are not
insured for environmental
21
accidents. If we were to incur a significant liability for which
we were not fully insured, it could diminish our ability to make
distributions to unitholders.
Downtime for maintenance at our refineries will reduce our
revenues and cash available for distribution.
Our refineries consist of many processing units, a number of
which have been in operation for a long time. One or more of the
units may require additional unscheduled down time for
unanticipated maintenance or repairs that are more frequent than
our scheduled turnaround for each unit every one to five years.
Scheduled and unscheduled maintenance reduce our revenues during
the period of time that our units are not operating.
We are subject to strict regulations at many of our
facilities regarding employee safety, and failure to comply with
these regulations could reduce our ability to make distributions
to our unitholders.
The workplaces associated with the refineries we operate are
subject to the requirements of the federal Occupational Safety
and Health Act (OSHA) and comparable state statutes
that regulate the protection of the health and safety of
workers. In addition, the OSHA hazard communication standard
requires that we maintain information about hazardous materials
used or produced in our operations and that we provide this
information to employees, state and local government
authorities, and local residents. Failure to comply with OSHA
requirements, including general industry standards, record
keeping requirements and monitoring of occupational exposure to
regulated substances, could reduce our ability to make
distributions to our unitholders if we are subjected to fines or
significant compliance costs.
We face substantial competition from other refining
companies.
The refining industry is highly competitive. Our competitors
include large, integrated, major or independent oil companies
that, because of their more diverse operations, larger
refineries and stronger capitalization, may be better positioned
than we are to withstand volatile industry conditions, including
shortages or excesses of crude oil or refined products or
intense price competition at the wholesale level. If we are
unable to compete effectively, we may lose existing customers or
fail to acquire new customers. For example, if a competitor
attempts to increase market share by reducing prices, our
operating results and cash available for distribution to our
unitholders could be reduced.
Our debt levels may limit our flexibility in obtaining
additional financing and in pursuing other business
opportunities.
After giving effect to this offering, we estimate that our total
debt as of the close of this offering will be approximately
$49.8 million, consisting of borrowings under our term loan
facility. Additionally, we have a $50.0 million letter of
credit facility to support crack spread hedging. Following this
offering, we estimate we will continue to have the ability to
incur additional debt, including the capacity to borrow up to
approximately $131.2 million under our senior secured
revolving credit facility, subject to borrowing base limitations
in the credit agreement. Our level of indebtedness could have
important consequences to us, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other
purposes may be impaired or such financing may not be available
on favorable terms; |
|
|
|
covenants contained in our existing and future credit and debt
arrangements will require us to meet financial tests that may
affect our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes
in our business, including possible acquisition opportunities; |
22
|
|
|
|
|
we will need a substantial portion of our cash flow to make
principal and interest payments on our indebtedness, reducing
the funds that would otherwise be available for operations,
future business opportunities and distributions to
unitholders; and |
|
|
|
our debt level will make us more vulnerable than our competitors
with less debt to competitive pressures or a downturn in our
business or the economy generally. |
Our ability to service our indebtedness will depend upon, among
other things, our future financial and operating performance,
which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and
financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which
are beyond our control. If our operating results are not
sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, we
will be forced to take actions such as reducing distributions,
reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions,
investments and/or capital expenditures, selling assets,
restructuring or refinancing our indebtedness, or seeking
additional equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may not
be able to effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms,
or at all.
Our credit agreements contain operating and financial
restrictions that may restrict our business and financing
activities.
The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in our
credit agreements and any future financing agreements could
restrict our ability to finance future operations or capital
needs or to engage, expand or pursue our business activities.
For example, our credit agreements restrict our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur indebtedness; |
|
|
|
grant liens; |
|
|
|
make certain acquisitions and investments; |
|
|
|
make capital expenditures above specified amounts; |
|
|
|
redeem or prepay other debt or make other restricted payments; |
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
enter into a merger, consolidation or sale of assets; and |
|
|
|
cease our crack spread hedging program. |
Our ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions
contained in our credit agreements may be affected by events
beyond our control. If market or other economic conditions
deteriorate, our ability to comply with these covenants may be
impaired. If we violate any of the restrictions, covenants,
ratios or tests in our credit agreements, a significant portion
of our indebtedness may become immediately due and payable, our
ability to make distributions may be inhibited and our
lenders commitment to make further loans to us may
terminate. We might not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient
funds to make these accelerated payments. In addition, our
obligations under our credit agreements are secured by
substantially all of our assets, and if we are unable to repay
our indebtedness under our credit agreements, the lenders could
seek to foreclose on our assets.
An increase in interest rates will cause our debt service
obligations to increase.
Borrowings under our revolving credit facility bear interest at
a floating rate (8.00% as of June 9, 2006). Borrowings
under our term loan facility bear interest at a floating rate
(8.78% as of June 9, 2006). The rates are subject to
adjustment based on fluctuations in the London Interbank Offered
Rate (LIBOR) and prime rate. An increase in the
interest rates associated with our floating-rate debt would
increase our debt service costs and affect our results of
operations and cash flow available for distribution to our
unitholders. In addition, an increase in our interest rates could
23
adversely affect our future ability to obtain financing or
materially increase the cost of any additional financing.
|
|
|
Our business and operations could be adversely affected by
terrorist attacks. |
Since the September 11th terrorist attacks, the
U.S. government has issued public warnings that indicate
that energy assets might be specific targets of terrorist
organizations. The continued threat of terrorism and the impact
of military and other actions will likely lead to increased
volatility in prices for natural gas and oil and could affect
the markets for our products. These developments have subjected
our operations to increased risk and, depending on their
ultimate magnitude, could have a material adverse affect on our
business. We do not carry any terrorism risk insurance.
|
|
|
Due to our lack of asset and geographic diversification,
adverse developments in our operating areas would reduce our
ability to make distributions to our unitholders. |
We rely exclusively on sales generated from products processed
from the refineries we own. Furthermore, almost all of our
assets and operations are located in northwest Louisiana. Due to
our lack of diversification in asset type and location, an
adverse development in these businesses or areas, including
adverse developments due to catastrophic events or weather,
decreased supply of crude oil feedstocks and/or decreased demand
for refined petroleum products, would have a significantly
greater impact on our financial condition and results of
operations than if we maintained more diverse assets and in
diverse locations.
|
|
|
We depend on key personnel for the success of our business
and the loss of those persons could adversely affect our
business and our ability to make distributions to our
unitholders. |
The loss of the services of any member of senior management or
key employee could have an adverse effect on our business and
reduce our ability to make distributions to our unitholders. We
may not be able to locate or employ on acceptable terms
qualified replacements for senior management or other key
employees if their services were no longer available. Except
with respect to Mr. Grube, neither we, our general partner
nor any affiliate thereof has entered into an employment
agreement with any member of our senior management team or other
key personnel. Furthermore, we do not maintain any key man
insurance.
|
|
|
We depend on unionized labor for the operation of our
refineries. Any work stoppages or labor disturbances at these
facilities could disrupt our business. |
Substantially all of our operating personnel at our Princeton,
Cotton Valley and Shreveport refineries are employed under
collective bargaining agreements that expire in 2008, 2007 and
2007, respectively. Please read Business
Employees. Any work stoppages or other labor disturbances
at these facilities could have an adverse effect on our business
and reduce our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.
In addition, employees who are not currently represented by
labor unions may seek union representation in the future, and
any renegotiation of current collective bargaining agreements
may result in terms that are less favorable to us.
|
|
|
The operating results for our fuel products segment and
the selling price of asphalt we produce and sell can be seasonal
and are generally lower in the first and fourth quarters of the
year. |
The operating results for the fuel products segment and the
selling prices of asphalt products we produce can be seasonal.
Asphalt demand is generally lower in the first and fourth
quarters of the year as compared to the second and third
quarters due to the seasonality of road construction. Demand for
gasoline is generally higher during the summer months than
during the winter months due to seasonal increases in highway
traffic. In addition, our natural gas costs can be higher during
24
the winter months. Our operating results for the first and
fourth calendar quarters may be lower than those for the second
and third calendar quarters of each year as a result of this
seasonality.
Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us
|
|
|
Following this offering, the Fred M. Fehsenfeld, Jr.
and F. William Grube families or trusts set up on their
behalf, The Heritage Group and certain of their affiliates will
own a 61.2% limited partner interest in us and will continue to
own and control our general partner, which has sole
responsibility for conducting our business and managing our
operations. Our general partner and its affiliates have
conflicts of interest and limited fiduciary duties, which may
permit them to favor their own interests to your
detriment. |
Following the offering, The Heritage Group, the Fred M.
Fehsenfeld, Jr. and F. William Grube families (or trusts
set up on their behalf), and certain of their affiliates will
own a 61.2% limited partner interest in us. In addition, The
Heritage Group and the Fred M. Fehsenfeld, Jr. and F.
William Grube families (or trusts set up on their behalf) will
continue to own our general partner. Conflicts of interest may
arise between our general partner and its affiliates, on the one
hand, and us and our unitholders, on the other hand. As a result
of these conflicts, the general partner may favor its own
interests and the interests of its affiliates over the interests
of our unitholders. These conflicts include, among others, the
following situations:
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner is allowed to take into account the
interests of parties other than us, such as its affiliates, in
resolving conflicts of interest, which has the effect of
limiting its fiduciary duty to our unitholders; |
|
|
|
our general partner has limited its liability and reduced its
fiduciary duties under our partnership agreement and has also
restricted the remedies available to our unitholders for actions
that, without the limitations, might constitute breaches of
fiduciary duty. As a result of purchasing common units,
unitholders consent to some actions and conflicts of interest
that might otherwise constitute a breach of fiduciary or other
duties under applicable state law; |
|
|
|
our general partner determines the amount and timing of asset
purchases and sales, borrowings, issuance of additional
partnership securities, and reserves, each of which can affect
the amount of cash that is distributed to unitholders; |
|
|
|
our general partner determines which costs incurred by it and
its affiliates are reimbursable by us; |
|
|
|
our general partner determines the amount and timing of any
capital expenditures and whether a capital expenditure is a
maintenance capital expenditure, which reduces operating
surplus, or a capital expenditure for acquisitions or capital
improvements, which does not. This determination can affect the
amount of cash that is distributed to our unitholders and the
ability of the subordinated units to convert to common units; |
|
|
|
our general partner has the flexibility to cause us to enter
into a broad variety of derivative transactions covering
different time periods, the net cash receipts from which will
increase operating surplus and adjusted operating surplus, with
the result that our general partner may be able to shift the
recognition of operating surplus and adjusted operating surplus
between periods to increase the distributions it and its
affiliates receive on their subordinated units and incentive
distribution rights or to accelerate the expiration of the
subordination period; and |
|
|
|
in some instances, our general partner may cause us to borrow
funds in order to permit the payment of cash distributions, even
if the purpose or effect of the borrowing is to make a
distribution on the subordinated units, to make incentive
distributions or to accelerate the expiration of the
subordination period. |
Please read Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary
Duties.
25
|
|
|
The Heritage Group and certain of its affiliates may
engage in limited competition with us. |
Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, The Heritage Group and its
controlled affiliates have agreed not to engage in, whether by
acquisition or otherwise, the business of refining or marketing
specialty lubricating oils, solvents and wax products as well as
gasoline, diesel and jet fuel products in the continental United
States (restricted business) for so long as it
controls us. This restriction does not apply to certain assets
and businesses which are more fully described under
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Omnibus Agreement.
Although Mr. Grube is prohibited from competing with us
pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement we have
entered into with him, the owners of our general partner, other
than The Heritage Group, are not prohibited from competing with
us.
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement limits our general
partners fiduciary duties to our unitholders and restricts
the remedies available to unitholders for actions taken by our
general partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of
fiduciary duty. |
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that reduce the
standards to which our general partner would otherwise be held
by state fiduciary duty law. For example, our partnership
agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
permits our general partner to make a number of decisions in its
individual capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as our
general partner. This entitles our general partner to consider
only the interests and factors that it desires, and it has no
duty or obligation to give any consideration to any interest of,
or factors affecting, us, our affiliates or any limited partner.
Examples include the exercise of its limited call right, its
voting rights with respect to the units it owns, its
registration rights and its determination whether or not to
consent to any merger or consolidation of our partnership or
amendment to our partnership agreement; |
|
|
|
provides that our general partner will not have any liability to
us or our unitholders for decisions made in its capacity as a
general partner so long as it acted in good faith, meaning it
believed the decision was in the best interests of our
partnership; |
|
|
|
generally provides that affiliated transactions and resolutions
of conflicts of interest not approved by the conflicts committee
of the board of directors of our general partner and not
involving a vote of unitholders must be on terms no less
favorable to us than those generally being provided to or
available from unrelated third parties or be fair and
reasonable to us. In determining whether a transaction or
resolution is fair and reasonable, our general
partner may consider the totality of the relationships between
the parties involved, including other transactions that may be
particularly advantageous or beneficial to us; and |
|
|
|
provides that our general partner and its officers and directors
will not be liable for monetary damages to us or our limited
partners for any acts or omissions unless there has been a final
and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of competent
jurisdiction determining that the general partner or those other
persons acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful
misconduct or, in the case of a criminal matter, acted with
knowledge that such persons conduct was criminal. |
In order to become a limited partner of our partnership, a
common unitholder is required to agree to be bound by the
provisions in the partnership agreement, including the
provisions discussed above. Please read Conflicts of
Interest and Fiduciary Duties Fiduciary Duties.
|
|
|
Unitholders have limited voting rights and are not
entitled to elect our general partner or its directors. |
Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, unitholders
have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our
business and, therefore, limited ability to influence
managements decisions
26
regarding our business. Unitholders did not elect our general
partner or its board of directors, and will have no right to
elect our general partner or its board of directors on an annual
or other continuing basis. The board of directors of our general
partner is chosen by the members of our general partner.
Furthermore, if the unitholders were dissatisfied with the
performance of our general partner, they will have little
ability to remove our general partner. As a result of these
limitations, the price at which the common units will trade
could be diminished because of the absence or reduction of a
takeover premium in the trading price.
|
|
|
Even if unitholders are dissatisfied, they cannot remove
our general partner without its consent. |
The unitholders are unable initially to remove the general
partner without its consent because the general partner and its
affiliates own sufficient units to be able to prevent its
removal. The vote of the holders of at least
662/3
% of all outstanding units voting together as a single
class is required to remove the general partner. Following the
closing of this offering, the owners of our general partner and
certain of their affiliates will own 62.5% of our common and
subordinated units. Also, if our general partner is removed
without cause during the subordination period and units held by
our general partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor of
that removal, all remaining subordinated units will
automatically convert into common units and any existing
arrearages on the common units will be extinguished. A removal
of the general partner under these circumstances would adversely
affect the common units by prematurely eliminating their
distribution and liquidation preference over the subordinated
units, which would otherwise have continued until we had met
certain distribution and performance tests.
Cause is narrowly defined in our partnership agreement to mean
that a court of competent jurisdiction has entered a final,
non-appealable judgment finding our general partner liable for
actual fraud or willful misconduct in its capacity as our
general partner. Cause does not include most cases of charges of
poor management of the business, so the removal of our general
partner during the subordination period because of the
unitholders dissatisfaction with our general
partners performance in managing our partnership will most
likely result in the termination of the subordination period.
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of
those unitholders owning 20% or more of our common units. |
Unitholders voting rights are further restricted by the
partnership agreement provision providing that any units held by
a person that owns 20% or more of any class of units then
outstanding, other than our general partner, its affiliates,
their transferees, and persons who acquired such units with the
prior approval of the board of directors of our general partner,
cannot vote on any matter. Our partnership agreement also
contains provisions limiting the ability of unitholders to call
meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as well
as other provisions limiting the unitholders ability to
influence the manner or direction of management.
|
|
|
Control of our general partner may be transferred to a
third party without unitholder consent. |
Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to
a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially
all of its assets without the consent of the unitholders.
Furthermore, our partnership agreement does not restrict the
ability of the members of our general partner from transferring
their respective membership interests in our general partner to
a third party. The new members of our general partner would then
be in a position to replace the board of directors and officers
of our general partner with their own choices and thereby
control the decisions taken by the board of directors.
27
|
|
|
We do not have our own officers and employees and rely
solely on the officers and employees of our general partner and
its affiliates to manage our business and affairs. |
We do not have our own officers and employees and rely solely on
the officers and employees of our general partner and its
affiliates to manage our business and affairs. We can provide no
assurance that our general partner will continue to provide us
the officers and employees that are necessary for the conduct of
our business nor that such provision will be on terms that are
acceptable to us. If our general partner fails to provide us
with adequate personnel, our operations could be adversely
impacted and our cash available for distribution to unitholders
could be reduced.
|
|
|
We may issue additional common units without your
approval, which would dilute your existing ownership
interests. |
During the subordination period, our general partner, without
the approval of our unitholders, may also cause us to issue up
to 6,533,000 additional common units. Our general partner may
also cause us to issue an unlimited number of additional common
units or other equity securities of equal rank with the common
units, without unitholder approval, in a number of circumstances
set forth under The Partnership Agreement
Issuance of Additional Securities.
The issuance of additional common units or other equity
securities of equal or senior rank to the common units will have
the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
our unitholders proportionate ownership interest in us may
decrease; |
|
|
|
the amount of cash available for distribution on each unit may
decrease; |
|
|
|
because a lower percentage of total outstanding units will be
subordinated units, the risk that a shortfall in the payment of
the minimum quarterly distribution will be borne by our common
unitholders will increase; |
|
|
|
the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding unit
may be diminished; |
|
|
|
the market price of the common units may decline; and |
|
|
|
the ratio of taxable income to distributions may increase. |
After the end of the subordination period, we may issue an
unlimited number of limited partner interests of any type
without the approval of our unitholders. Our partnership
agreement does not give our unitholders the right to approve our
issuance of equity securities ranking junior to the common units
at any time. In addition, our partnership agreement does not
prohibit the issuance by our subsidiaries of equity securities,
which may effectively rank senior to the common units.
|
|
|
Our general partners determination of the level of
cash reserves may reduce the amount of available cash for
distribution to you. |
Our partnership agreement requires our general partner to deduct
from operating surplus cash reserves that it establishes are
necessary to fund our future operating expenditures. In
addition, our partnership agreement also permits our general
partner to reduce available cash by establishing cash reserves
for the proper conduct of our business, to comply with
applicable law or agreements to which we are a party, or to
provide funds for future distributions to partners. These
reserves will affect the amount of cash available for
distribution to you.
|
|
|
Cost reimbursements due to our general partner and its
affiliates will reduce cash available for distribution to
you. |
Prior to making any distribution on the common units, we will
reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for all
expenses they incur on our behalf. Any such reimbursement will
be determined by our general partner and will reduce the cash
available for distribution to unitholders.
28
These expenses will include all costs incurred by our general
partner and its affiliates in managing and operating us. Please
read Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions and Conflicts of Interests and
Fiduciary Duties Conflicts of Interest.
|
|
|
Our general partner has a limited call right that may
require you to sell your units at an undesirable time or
price. |
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more
than 80% of the issued and outstanding common units, our general
partner will have the right, but not the obligation, which right
it may assign to any of its affiliates or to us, to acquire all,
but not less than all, of the common units held by unaffiliated
persons at a price not less than their then-current market
price. As a result, you may be required to sell your common
units to our general partner, its affiliates or us at an
undesirable time or price and may not receive any return on your
investment. You may also incur a tax liability upon a sale of
your common units. At the completion of this offering, our
general partner and its affiliates will own approximately 33.8%
of the common units. At the end of the subordination period,
assuming no additional issuances of common units, our general
partner and its affiliates will own approximately 62.5% of the
common units. For additional information about this right,
please read The Partnership Agreement Limited
Call Right.
|
|
|
Your liability may not be limited if a court finds that
unitholder action constitutes control of our business. |
A general partner of a partnership generally has unlimited
liability for the obligations of the partnership, except for
those contractual obligations of the partnership that are
expressly made without recourse to the general partner. Our
partnership is organized under Delaware law and we conduct
business in a number of other states. The limitations on the
liability of holders of limited partner interests for the
obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly
established in some of the other states in which we do business.
You could be liable for any and all of our obligations as if you
were a general partner if:
|
|
|
|
|
a court or government agency determined that we were conducting
business in a state but had not complied with that particular
states partnership statute; or |
|
|
|
your right to act with other unitholders to remove or replace
the general partner, to approve some amendments to our
partnership agreement or to take other actions under our
partnership agreement constitute control of our
business. |
For a discussion of the implications of the limitations of
liability on a unitholder, please read The Partnership
Agreement Limited Liability.
|
|
|
Unitholders may have liability to repay distributions that
were wrongfully distributed to them. |
Under certain circumstances, unitholders may have to repay
amounts wrongfully returned or distributed to them. Under
Section 17-607 of
the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, which we
call the Delaware Act, we may not make a distribution to you if
the distribution would cause our liabilities to exceed the fair
value of our assets. Delaware law provides that for a period of
three years from the date of the impermissible distribution,
limited partners who received the distribution and who knew at
the time of the distribution that it violated Delaware law will
be liable to the limited partnership for the distribution
amount. Purchasers of units who become limited partners are
liable for the obligations of the transferring limited partner
to make contributions to the partnership that are known to the
purchaser of the units at the time it became a limited partner
and for unknown obligations if the liabilities could be
determined from the partnership agreement. Liabilities to
partners on account of their partnership interest and
liabilities that are non-recourse to the partnership are not
counted for purposes of determining whether a distribution is
permitted.
29
Our common units have a limited trading history and a
limited trading volume compared to other units representing
limited partner interests.
Our common units are traded publicly on the NASDAQ National
Market under the symbol CLMT. However, our common
units have a limited trading history and daily trading volumes
for our common units are, and may continue to be, relatively
small compared to many other units representing limited partner
interests quoted on the NASDAQ. This offering may not increase
the trading volume for our common units, and the price of our
common units may, therefore, be volatile.
The market price of our common units may also be influenced by
many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our quarterly distributions; |
|
|
|
our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other companies in
our industry; |
|
|
|
changes in commodity prices or refining margins; |
|
|
|
loss of a large customer; |
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts
or acquisitions; |
|
|
|
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance,
interpretations or principles; |
|
|
|
general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
the failure of securities analysts to cover our common units
after this offering or changes in financial estimates by
analysts; |
|
|
|
future sales of our common units; and |
|
|
|
the other factors described in these Risk Factors. |
Tax Risks to Common Unitholders
In addition to reading the following risk factors, you should
read Material Tax Consequences for a more complete
discussion of the expected material federal income tax
consequences of owning and disposing of common units.
Our tax treatment depends on our status as a partnership
for federal income tax purposes, as well as our not being
subject to a material amount of entity-level taxation by
individual states. If the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, were
to treat us as a corporation or we become subject to a material
amount of entity-level taxation for state tax purposes, it would
substantially reduce the amount of cash available for
distribution to you.
The anticipated after-tax economic benefit of an investment in
our common units depends largely on our being treated as a
partnership for federal income tax purposes. We have not
requested, and do not plan to request, a ruling from the IRS on
this or any other tax matter affecting us.
If we were treated as a corporation for federal income tax
purposes, we would pay federal income tax on our taxable income
at the corporate tax rate, which is currently a maximum of 35%
and would likely pay state income tax at varying rates.
Distributions to you would generally be taxed again as corporate
distributions, and no income, gains, losses or deductions would
flow through to you. Because a tax would be imposed upon us as a
corporation, our cash available for distribution to you would be
substantially reduced. Therefore, treatment of us as a
corporation would result in a material reduction in the
anticipated cash flow and after-tax return to the unitholders,
likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of our
common units.
30
Current law may change so as to cause us to be treated as a
corporation for federal income tax purposes or otherwise subject
us to entity-level taxation. In addition, because of widespread
state budget deficits and other reasons, several states are
evaluating ways to subject partnerships to entity-level taxation
through the imposition of state income, franchise and other
forms of taxation. For example, we will be subject to a new
entity level tax on the portion of our income that is generated
in Texas beginning in our tax year ending in 2007. Specifically,
the Texas margin tax will be imposed at a maximum effective rate
of .7% of our gross income apportioned to Texas. Imposition of
such a tax on us by Texas, or any other state, will reduce the
cash available for distribution to you.
Our partnership agreement provides that if a law is enacted or
existing law is modified or interpreted in a manner that
subjects us to taxation as a corporation or otherwise subjects
us to entity-level taxation for federal, state or local income
tax purposes, the minimum quarterly distribution amount and the
target distribution levels will be adjusted to reflect the
impact of that law on us.
|
|
|
If the IRS contests the federal income tax positions we
take, the market for our common units may be adversely impacted,
and the cost of any IRS contest will reduce our cash available
for distribution to you. |
We have not requested a ruling from the IRS with respect to our
treatment as a partnership for federal income tax purposes or
any other matter affecting us. The IRS may adopt positions that
differ from the conclusions of our counsel expressed in this
prospectus or from the positions we take. It may be necessary to
resort to administrative or court proceedings to sustain some or
all of our counsels conclusions or the positions we take.
A court may not agree with some or all of our counsels
conclusions or positions we take. Any contest with the IRS may
materially and adversely impact the market for our common units
and the price at which they trade. In addition, our costs of any
contest with the IRS will be borne indirectly by our unitholders
and our general partner because the costs will reduce our cash
available for distribution.
|
|
|
You may be required to pay taxes on your share of our
income even if you do not receive any cash distributions from
us. |
Because our unitholders will be treated as partners to whom we
will allocate taxable income which could be different in amount
than the cash we distribute, you will be required to pay any
federal income taxes and, in some cases, state and local income
taxes on your share of our taxable income even if you receive no
cash distributions from us. You may not receive cash
distributions from us equal to your share of our taxable income
or even equal to the actual tax liability that results from that
income.
|
|
|
Tax gain or loss on disposition of our common units could
be more or less than expected. |
If you sell your common units, you will recognize a gain or loss
equal to the difference between the amount realized and your tax
basis in those common units. Prior distributions to you in
excess of the total net taxable income you were allocated for a
common unit, which decreased your tax basis in that common unit,
will, in effect, become taxable income to you if the common unit
is sold at a price greater than your tax basis in that common
unit, even if the price you receive is less than your original
cost. A substantial portion of the amount realized, whether or
not representing gain, may be ordinary income. In addition, if
you sell your units, you may incur a tax liability in excess of
the amount of cash you receive from the sale.
|
|
|
Tax-exempt entities and foreign persons face unique tax
issues from owning our common units that may result in adverse
tax consequences to them. |
Investment in common units by tax-exempt entities, such as
individual retirement accounts (IRAs), other
retirement plans, and
non-U.S. persons
raises issues unique to them. For example,
31
virtually all of our income allocated to organizations that are
exempt from federal income tax, including individual retirement
accounts and other retirement plans, will be unrelated business
taxable income and will be taxable to them. Distributions to
non-U.S. persons
will be reduced by withholding taxes at the highest applicable
effective tax rate, and
non-U.S. persons
will be required to file United States federal tax returns and
pay tax on their share of our taxable income. If you are a
tax-exempt entity or a foreign person, you should consult your
tax advisor before investing in our common units.
|
|
|
We will treat each purchaser of our common units as having
the same tax benefits without regard to the actual common units
purchased. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could
adversely affect the value of the common units. |
Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of common
units and because of other reasons, we have adopted depreciation
and amortization positions that may not conform to all aspects
of existing Treasury Regulations. A successful IRS challenge to
those positions could adversely affect the amount of tax
benefits available to you. It also could affect the timing of
these tax benefits or the amount of gain from your sale of
common units and could have a negative impact on the value of
our common units or result in audit adjustments to your tax
returns. For a further discussion of the effect of the
depreciation and amortization positions we have adopted, please
read Material Tax Consequences Uniformity of
Units.
|
|
|
We have a subsidiary that is treated as a corporation for
federal income tax purposes and subject to corporate-level
income taxes. |
We conduct all or a portion of our operations in which we market
finished petroleum products to certain end-users through a
subsidiary that is organized as a corporation. We may elect to
conduct additional operations through this corporate subsidiary
in the future. This corporate subsidiary is subject to
corporate-level tax, which reduces the cash available for
distribution to us and, in turn, to you. If the IRS were to
successfully assert that this corporation has more tax liability
than we anticipate or legislation was enacted that increased the
corporate tax rate, our cash available for distribution to you
would be further reduced.
|
|
|
The sale or exchange of 50% or more of our capital and
profits interests during any twelve-month period will result in
the termination of our partnership for federal income tax
purposes. |
We will be considered to have terminated for federal income tax
purposes if there is a sale or exchange of 50% or more of the
total interests in our capital and profits within a twelve-month
period. Our termination would, among other things, result in the
closing of our taxable year for all unitholders and could result
in a deferral of depreciation deductions allowable in computing
our taxable income. If this occurs, you will be allocated an
increased amount of federal taxable income for the year in which
we are considered to be terminated as a percentage of the cash
distributed to you with respect to that period. Please read
Material Tax Consequences Tax Consequences of
Unit Ownership Ratio of Taxable Income to
Distributions.
|
|
|
You will likely be subject to state and local taxes and
return filing requirements in states where you do not live as a
result of investing in our common units. |
In addition to federal income taxes, you will likely be subject
to other taxes, including foreign, state and local taxes,
unincorporated business taxes and estate, inheritance or
intangible taxes that are imposed by the various jurisdictions
in which we conduct business or own property, even if you do not
live in any of those jurisdictions. You will likely be required
to file foreign, state and local income tax returns and pay
state and local income taxes in some or all of these various
jurisdictions. Further, you may be subject to penalties for
failure to comply with those requirements. We own assets and
conduct business in Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida,
Georgia, Indiana, Illinois,
32
Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, New
Jersey, New York, Ohio, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas,
Utah and Virginia. Each of these states, other than Texas and
Florida, currently imposes a personal income tax as well as an
income tax on corporations and other entities. As we make
acquisitions or expand our business, we may own assets or
conduct business in additional states that impose a personal
income tax. It is your responsibility to file all United States
federal, foreign, state and local tax returns. Our counsel has
not rendered an opinion on the state or local tax consequences
of an investment in our common units.
33
USE OF PROCEEDS
We expect to receive net proceeds of approximately
$135.0 million from the sale of 4,000,000 common units
offered by this prospectus, based on an assumed offering price
of $35.52 per common unit, which was the closing price of
our common units on June 8, 2006, after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses of approximately $1.0 million. Our estimates
assume no exercise of the underwriters option to purchase
additional units.
We intend to use all of the proceeds from this offering to:
|
|
|
|
|
repay all of our debt outstanding under our revolving credit
facility, which was $14.8 million as of March 31, 2006; |
|
|
|
fund the construction and other
start-up costs of the
expansion project currently underway at our Shreveport refinery;
and |
|
|
|
for general partnership purposes, to the extent available. |
Please read Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operation
Liquidity and Capital Resources Capital
Expenditures for additional discussion of the expansion
project at our Shreveport refinery.
If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional
common units, we will use the net proceeds for general
partnership purposes, to the extent available. An increase or
decrease in the offering price of $1.00 per common unit
would cause the net proceeds from the offering, after deducting
underwriting discounts, commissions and fees and offering
expenses payable by us, to increase or decrease by
$3.8 million (or $4.4 million assuming full exercise
of the underwriters option to purchase additional common
units). If the offering price were to exceed $35.52 per
common unit or if we were to increase the number of common units
in this offering, the additional proceeds would be used for
general partnership purposes, to the extent available.
We entered into a $225.0 million revolving credit facility
in December 2005 and simultaneously drew down a revolving loan
thereunder, the proceeds of which (along with simultaneous
borrowings under our term loan facility) were used to repay all
of our then outstanding indebtedness. Borrowings under our
revolving credit facility bear interest at a variable rate based
upon LIBOR or the Bank of America, N.A.s prime rate, at
our option. As of June 8, 2006, we had $6.2 million of
outstanding indebtedness under our revolving credit facility,
which matures in 2010, at an interest rate of 8.0%.
34
CAPITALIZATION
The following table shows:
|
|
|
|
|
our historical cash and capitalization as of March 31,
2006; and |
|
|
|
on a pro forma basis to reflect the sale of common units in this
offering, our general partners proportionate capital
contribution and the application of the net proceeds we expect
to receive in the offering as described under Use of
Proceeds. |
We derived this table from, and it should be read in conjunction
with and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the
historical and pro forma consolidated financial statements and
the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
You should also read this table in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
March 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
123,276 |
|
Long term debt, including current
portion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit loan
|
|
|
14,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan
|
|
|
49,875 |
|
|
|
49,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
64,626 |
|
|
|
49,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common unitholders
|
|
|
147,442 |
|
|
|
282,484 |
|
|
Subordinated unitholders
|
|
|
20,273 |
|
|
|
20,273 |
|
|
General partner interest
|
|
|
966 |
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital
|
|
|
169,180 |
|
|
|
307,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
|
233,806 |
|
|
|
356,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON UNITS AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Our common units are quoted and traded on the NASDAQ National
Market under the symbol CLMT. Our common units began
trading on January 26, 2006 at an initial public offering
price of $21.50 per common unit. The following table shows
the low and high sales prices per common unit, as reported by
the NASDAQ National Market, for the periods indicated.
Distributions are shown in the quarter for which they were paid.
For the first quarter of 2006, an identical cash distribution
was paid on all outstanding common and subordinated units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Distribution | |
|
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Per Unit | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter(1)
|
|
$ |
21.70 |
|
|
$ |
27.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
(2) |
|
Second quarter(3)
|
|
|
27.11 |
|
|
|
36.68 |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
|
(1) |
January 26, 2006, the day our common units began trading on
the NASDAQ National Market, through March 31, 2006. |
|
(2) |
Reflects the pro rata portion of the $0.45 quarterly
distribution per unit paid, representing the period from the
January 31, 2006 closing of our initial public offering
through March 31, 2006. |
|
(3) |
Through June 8, 2006. |
|
(4) |
The cash distribution for this period has not been declared or
paid. |
The last reported sale price of the common units on the NASDAQ
National Market on June 8, 2006 was $35.52. As of
June 8, 2006, there were approximately 14 holders of
record of our common units.
36
HOW WE MAKE CASH DISTRIBUTIONS
Distributions of Available Cash
General. Within 45 days after the end of each
quarter, we will distribute our available cash to unitholders of
record on the applicable record date.
Definition of Available Cash. Available cash
generally means, for any quarter, all cash on hand at the end of
the quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
less the amount of cash reserves established by our general
partner to: |
|
|
|
|
|
provide for the proper conduct of our business; |
|
|
|
comply with applicable law, any of our debt instruments or other
agreements; or |
|
|
|
provide funds for distributions to our unitholders and to our
general partner for any one or more of the next four quarters. |
|
|
|
|
|
plus all cash on hand on the date of determination of available
cash for the quarter resulting from working capital borrowings
made after the end of the quarter for which the determination is
being made. Working capital borrowings are generally borrowings
that will be made under our revolving credit facility and in all
cases are used solely for working capital purposes or to pay
distributions to partners. |
Intent to Distribute the Minimum Quarterly
Distribution. We will distribute to the holders of
common units and subordinated units on a quarterly basis at
least the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.45 per unit,
or $1.80 per year, to the extent we have sufficient cash
from our operations after establishment of cash reserves and
payment of fees and expenses, including payments to our general
partner. However, there is no guarantee that we will pay the
minimum quarterly distribution on the units in any quarter. Even
if our cash distribution policy is not modified or revoked, the
amount of distributions paid under our policy and the decision
to make any distribution is determined by our general partner,
taking into consideration the terms of our partnership
agreement. We are prohibited from making any distributions to
unitholders if it would cause an event of default, or an event
of default is existing, under our credit agreements. Please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Debt and Credit Facilities
for a discussion of the restrictions to be included in our
credit agreement that may restrict our ability to make
distributions.
General Partner Interest and Incentive Distribution
Rights. As of the date of this offering, our general
partner is entitled to 2% of all quarterly distributions since
inception that we make prior to our liquidation. This general
partner interest is represented by 614,939 general partner
units. Our general partner has the right, but not the
obligation, to contribute a proportionate amount of capital to
us to maintain its current general partner interest. The general
partners initial 2% interest in these distributions may be
reduced if we issue additional units in the future and our
general partner does not contribute a proportionate amount of
capital to us to maintain its 2% general partner interest. Our
general partner also currently holds incentive distribution
rights that entitle it to receive increasing percentages, up to
a maximum of 50%, of the cash we distribute from operating
surplus (as defined below) in excess of $0.45 per unit. The
maximum distribution of 50% includes distributions paid to our
general partner on its 2% general partner interest, and assumes
that our general partner maintains its general partner interest
at 2%. The maximum distribution of 50% does not include any
distributions that our general partner may receive on units that
it owns. Please read Incentive Distribution
Rights for additional information.
37
Operating Surplus and Capital Surplus
General. All cash distributed to unitholders is
characterized as either operating surplus or
capital surplus. Our partnership agreement requires
that we distribute available cash from operating surplus
differently than available cash from capital surplus.
Operating Surplus. Operating surplus generally
consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
our cash balance on the closing date of this offering; plus |
|
|
|
$10.0 million (as described below); plus |
|
|
|
all of our cash receipts after the closing of this offering,
excluding cash from (1) borrowings that are not working
capital borrowings, (2) sales of equity and debt securities
and (3) sales or other dispositions of assets outside the
ordinary course of business; plus |
|
|
|
working capital borrowings made after the end of a quarter but
before the date of determination of operating surplus for the
quarter; less |
|
|
|
all of our operating expenditures after the closing of this
offering (including the repayment of working capital borrowings,
but not the repayment of other borrowings) and maintenance
capital expenditures; less |
|
|
|
the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner
for future operating expenditures. |
Please read Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Maintenance capital expenditures represent capital expenditures
made to replace partially or fully depreciated assets, to
maintain the existing operating capacity of our assets and to
extend their useful lives, or other capital expenditures that
are incurred in maintaining existing system volumes and related
cash flows. Expansion capital expenditures represent capital
expenditures made to expand the existing operating capacity of
our assets or to expand the operating capacity or revenues of
existing or new assets, whether through construction or
acquisition. Costs for repairs and minor renewals to maintain
facilities in operating condition and that do not extend the
useful life of existing assets are treated as operations and
maintenance expenses as we incur them. Our partnership agreement
provides that our general partner determines how to allocate a
capital expenditure for the acquisition or expansion of our
assets between maintenance capital expenditures and expansion
capital expenditures.
Capital Surplus. Capital surplus consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
borrowings other than working capital borrowings; |
|
|
|
sales of our equity and debt securities; and |
|
|
|
sales or other dispositions of assets for cash, other than
inventory, accounts receivable and other current assets sold in
the ordinary course of business or as part of normal retirement
or replacement of assets. |
Characterization of Cash Distributions. We treat
all available cash distributed as coming from operating surplus
until the sum of all available cash distributed since we began
operations equals the operating surplus as of the most recent
date of determination of available cash. We treat any amount
distributed in excess of operating surplus, regardless of its
source, as capital surplus. As reflected above, operating
surplus includes $10.0 million. This amount does not
reflect actual cash on hand that is available for distribution
to our unitholders. Rather, it is a provision that will enable
us, if we choose, to distribute as operating surplus up to this
amount of cash we receive in the future from non-operating
sources, such as asset sales, issuances of securities and
borrowings, that would
38
otherwise be distributed as capital surplus. We do not
anticipate that we will make any distributions from capital
surplus.
Subordination Period
General. Our partnership agreement provides that,
during the subordination period (which we define below and in
Appendix A), the common units have the right to receive
distributions of available cash from operating surplus in an
amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution of
$0.45 per quarter, plus any arrearages in the payment of
the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units from
prior quarters, before any distributions of available cash from
operating surplus may be made on the subordinated units. These
units are deemed subordinated because for a period
of time, referred to as the subordination period, the
subordinated units will not be entitled to receive any
distributions until the common units have received the minimum
quarterly distribution plus any arrearages from prior quarters.
Furthermore, no arrearages will be paid on the subordinated
units. The practical effect of the existence of the subordinated
units is to increase the likelihood that during the
subordination period there will be available cash to be
distributed on the common units. All of the outstanding
subordinated units are owned by affiliates of our general
partner. Please read Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management.
Subordination Period. The subordination period
will extend until the first day of any quarter beginning after
December 31, 2010 that each of the following tests are met:
|
|
|
|
|
distributions of available cash from operating surplus on each
of the outstanding common units, subordinated units and general
partner units equaled or exceeded the minimum quarterly
distributions on such common units, subordinated units and
general partner units for each of the three consecutive,
non-overlapping four-quarter periods immediately preceding that
date; |
|
|
|
the adjusted operating surplus (as defined below)
generated during each of the three consecutive, non-overlapping
four-quarter periods immediately preceding that date equaled or
exceeded the sum of the minimum quarterly distributions on all
of the outstanding common units, subordinated units and general
partner units during those periods on a fully diluted
basis; and |
|
|
|
there are no arrearages in payment of minimum quarterly
distributions on the common units. |
Expiration of the Subordination Period. When the
subordination period expires, each outstanding subordinated unit
will convert into one common unit and will then participate pro
rata with the other common units in distributions of available
cash. In addition, if the unitholders remove our general partner
other than for cause and units held by the general partner and
its affiliates are not voted in favor of such removal:
|
|
|
|
|
the subordination period will end and each subordinated unit
will immediately convert into one common unit; |
|
|
|
any existing arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units will be extinguished; and |
|
|
|
the general partner will have the right to convert its general
partner interest and its incentive distribution rights into
common units or to receive cash in exchange for those interests. |
Adjusted Operating Surplus. Adjusted operating
surplus is intended to reflect the cash generated from
operations during a particular period and therefore excludes net
increases in working capital borrowings and net drawdowns of
reserves of cash generated in prior periods. Adjusted operating
surplus consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
operating surplus generated with respect to that period; less |
|
|
|
any net increase in working capital borrowings with respect to
that period; less |
39
|
|
|
|
|
any net decrease in cash reserves for operating expenditures
with respect to that period not relating to an operating
expenditure made with respect to that period; plus |
|
|
|
any net decrease in working capital borrowings with respect to
that period; plus |
|
|
|
any net increase in cash reserves for operating expenditures
with respect to that period required by any debt instrument for
the repayment of principal, interest or premium. |
Distributions of Available Cash from Operating Surplus During
the Subordination Period
We will make distributions of available cash from operating
surplus for any quarter during the subordination period in the
following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding common
unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for
that quarter; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding common
unit an amount equal to any arrearages in payment of the minimum
quarterly distribution on the common units for any prior
quarters during the subordination period; |
|
|
|
third, 98% to the subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
the general partner, until we distribute for each subordinated
unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for
that quarter; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, in the manner described in
Incentive Distribution Rights below. |
The preceding discussion is based on the assumptions that our
general partner maintains its 2% general partner interest and
that we do not issue additional classes of equity securities.
Distributions of Available Cash from Operating Surplus After
the Subordination Period
We will make distributions of available cash from operating
surplus for any quarter after the subordination period in the
following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the general
partner, until we distribute for each outstanding unit an amount
equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for that
quarter; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, in the manner described in
Incentive Distribution Rights below. |
The preceding discussion is based on the assumptions that our
general partner maintains its 2% general partner interest and
that we do not issue additional classes of equity securities.
Incentive Distribution Rights
Incentive distribution rights represent the right to receive an
increasing percentage of quarterly distributions of available
cash from operating surplus after the minimum quarterly
distribution and the target distribution levels have been
achieved. Our general partner currently holds the incentive
distribution rights, but may transfer these rights separately
from its general partner interest, subject to restrictions in
the partnership agreement.
If for any quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
we have distributed available cash from operating surplus to the
common and subordinated unitholders in an amount equal to the
minimum quarterly distribution; and |
|
|
|
we have distributed available cash from operating surplus on
outstanding common units in an amount necessary to eliminate any
cumulative arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution; |
40
then, we will distribute any additional available cash from
operating surplus for that quarter among the unitholders and the
general partner in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the general
partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.495 per unit for that quarter (the first target
distribution); |
|
|
|
second, 85% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to the general
partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.563 per unit for that quarter (the second target
distribution); |
|
|
|
third, 75% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to the general
partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.675 per unit for that quarter (the third target
distribution); and |
|
|
|
thereafter, 50% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 50% to the
general partner. |
In each case, the amount of the target distribution set forth
above is exclusive of any distributions to common unitholders to
eliminate any cumulative arrearages in payment of the minimum
quarterly distribution. The preceding discussion is based on the
assumptions that our general partner maintains its 2% general
partner interest and that we do not issue additional classes of
equity securities.
Percentage Allocations of Available Cash from Operating
Surplus
The following table illustrates the percentage allocations of
the additional available cash from operating surplus between the
unitholders and our general partner up to the various target
distribution levels. The amounts set forth under Marginal
Percentage Interest in Distributions are the percentage
interests of our general partner and the unitholders in any
available cash from operating surplus we distribute up to and
including the corresponding amount in the column Total
Quarterly Distribution, until available cash from
operating surplus we distribute reaches the next target
distribution level, if any. The percentage interests shown for
the unitholders and the general partner for the minimum
quarterly distribution are also applicable to quarterly
distribution amounts that are less than the minimum quarterly
distribution. The percentage interests set forth below for our
general partner include its 2% general partner interest and
assume our general partner has contributed any additional
capital to maintain its 2% general partner interest and has not
transferred its incentive distribution rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marginal Percentage | |
|
|
|
|
Interest in | |
|
|
Total Quarterly |
|
Distributions | |
|
|
Distribution |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General | |
|
|
Target Amount |
|
Unitholders | |
|
Partner | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Minimum Quarterly Distribution
|
|
$0.45
|
|
|
98% |
|
|
|
2% |
|
First Target Distribution
|
|
up to $0.495
|
|
|
98% |
|
|
|
2% |
|
Second Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.495 up to $0.563
|
|
|
85% |
|
|
|
15% |
|
Third Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.563 up to $0.675
|
|
|
75% |
|
|
|
25% |
|
Thereafter
|
|
above $0.675
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
|
50% |
|
Distributions from Capital Surplus
How Distributions from Capital Surplus Will Be
Made. We will make distributions of available cash from
capital surplus, if any, in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the general
partner, until we distribute for each common unit that was
issued in this offering, an amount of available cash from
capital surplus equal to the initial public offering price; |
41
|
|
|
|
|
second, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until we distribute for each common unit, an
amount of available cash from capital surplus equal to any
unpaid arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, we will make all distributions of available cash
from capital surplus as if they were from operating surplus. |
Effect of a Distribution from Capital Surplus. Our
partnership agreement treats a distribution of capital surplus
as the repayment of the initial unit price from the initial
public offering, which is a return of capital. The initial
public offering price less any distributions of capital surplus
per unit is referred to as the unrecovered initial unit
price. Each time a distribution of capital surplus is
made, the minimum quarterly distribution and the target
distribution levels will be reduced in the same proportion as
the corresponding reduction in the unrecovered initial unit
price. Because distributions of capital surplus will reduce the
minimum quarterly distribution, after any of these distributions
are made, it may be easier for the general partner to receive
incentive distributions and for the subordinated units to
convert into common units. However, any distribution of capital
surplus before the unrecovered initial unit price is reduced to
zero cannot be applied to the payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution or any arrearages.
Once we distribute capital surplus on a unit issued in this
offering in an amount equal to the initial unit price, our
partnership agreement specifies that the minimum quarterly
distribution and the target distribution levels will be reduced
to zero. Our partnership agreement specifies that we then make
all future distributions from operating surplus, with 50% being
paid to the holders of units and 50% to the general partner. The
percentage interests shown for our general partner include its
2% general partner interest and assume the general partner has
not transferred the incentive distribution rights.
Adjustment to the Minimum Quarterly Distribution and Target
Distribution Levels
In addition to adjusting the minimum quarterly distribution and
target distribution levels to reflect a distribution of capital
surplus, if we combine our units into fewer units or subdivide
our units into a greater number of units, our partnership
agreement specifies that the following items will be
proportionately adjusted:
|
|
|
|
|
the minimum quarterly distribution; |
|
|
|
target distribution levels; |
|
|
|
the unrecovered initial unit price; |
|
|
|
the number of common units issuable during the subordination
period without a unitholder vote; and |
|
|
|
the number of common units into which a subordinated unit is
convertible. |
For example, if a two-for-one split of the common units should
occur, the minimum quarterly distribution, the target
distribution levels and the unrecovered initial unit price would
each be reduced to 50% of its initial level, the number of
common units issuable during the subordination period without
unitholder vote would double and each subordinated unit would be
convertible into two common units. Our partnership agreement
provides that we not make any adjustment by reason of the
issuance of additional units for cash or property.
In addition, if legislation is enacted or if existing law is
modified or interpreted by a governmental taxing authority, so
that we become taxable as a corporation or otherwise subject to
taxation as an entity for federal, state or local income tax
purposes, our partnership agreement specifies that the minimum
quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels for
each quarter will be reduced by multiplying each distribution
level by a fraction, the numerator of which is available
42
cash for that quarter and the denominator of which is the sum of
available cash for that quarter plus the general partners
estimate of our aggregate liability for the quarter for such
income taxes payable by reason of such legislation or
interpretation. To the extent that the actual tax liability
differs from the estimated tax liability for any quarter, the
difference will be accounted for in subsequent quarters.
Distributions of Cash Upon Liquidation
General. If we dissolve in accordance with the
partnership agreement, we will sell or otherwise dispose of our
assets in a process called liquidation. We will first apply the
proceeds of liquidation to the payment of our creditors. We will
distribute any remaining proceeds to the unitholders and the
general partner, in accordance with their capital account
balances, as adjusted to reflect any gain or loss upon the sale
or other disposition of our assets in liquidation.
The allocations of gain and loss upon liquidation are intended,
to the extent possible, to entitle the holders of outstanding
common units to a preference over the holders of outstanding
subordinated units upon our liquidation, to the extent required
to permit common unitholders to receive their unrecovered
initial unit price plus the minimum quarterly distribution for
the quarter during which liquidation occurs plus any unpaid
arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on
the common units. However, there may not be sufficient gain upon
our liquidation to enable the holders of common units to fully
recover all of these amounts, even though there may be cash
available for distribution to the holders of subordinated units.
Any further net gain recognized upon liquidation will be
allocated in a manner that takes into account the incentive
distribution rights of the general partner.
Manner of Adjustments for Gain. The manner of the
adjustment for gain is set forth in the partnership agreement.
If our liquidation occurs before the end of the subordination
period, we will allocate any gain to the partners in the
following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, to the general partner and the holders of units who have
negative balances in their capital accounts to the extent of and
in proportion to those negative balances; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until the capital account for each common unit
is equal to the sum of: (1) the unrecovered initial unit
price; (2) the amount of the minimum quarterly distribution
for the quarter during which our liquidation occurs; and
(3) any unpaid arrearages in payment of the minimum
quarterly distribution; |
|
|
|
third, 98% to the subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
the general partner until the capital account for each
subordinated unit is equal to the sum of: (1) the
unrecovered initial unit price; and (2) the amount of the
minimum quarterly distribution for the quarter during which our
liquidation occurs; |
|
|
|
fourth, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the general
partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an amount per
unit equal to: (1) the sum of the excess of the first
target distribution per unit over the minimum quarterly
distribution per unit for each quarter of our existence; less
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the minimum
quarterly distribution per unit that we distributed 98% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the general partner, for each
quarter of our existence; |
|
|
|
fifth, 85% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to the general
partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an amount per
unit equal to: (1) the sum of the excess of the second
target distribution per unit over the first target distribution
per unit for each quarter of our existence; less (2) the
cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of available
cash from operating surplus in excess of the first target
distribution per unit that we distributed 85% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to the general partner for each
quarter of our existence; |
43
|
|
|
|
|
sixth, 75% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to the general
partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an amount per
unit equal to: (1) the sum of the excess of the third
target distribution per unit over the second target distribution
per unit for each quarter of our existence; less (2) the
cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of available
cash from operating surplus in excess of the second target
distribution per unit that we distributed 75% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to the general partner for each
quarter of our existence; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, 50% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 50% to the
general partner. |
The percentage interests set forth above for our general partner
include its 2% general partner interest and assume the general
partner has not transferred the incentive distribution rights.
If the liquidation occurs after the end of the subordination
period, the distinction between common units and subordinated
units will disappear, so that clause (3) of the second
bullet point above and all of the third bullet point above will
no longer be applicable.
Manner of Adjustments for Losses. If our
liquidation occurs before the end of the subordination period,
we will generally allocate any loss to the general partner and
the unitholders in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to holders of subordinated units in proportion to the
positive balances in their capital accounts and 2% to the
general partner, until the capital accounts of the subordinated
unitholders have been reduced to zero; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the holders of common units in proportion to the
positive balances in their capital accounts and 2% to the
general partner, until the capital accounts of the common
unitholders have been reduced to zero; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, 100% to the general partner. |
If the liquidation occurs after the end of the subordination
period, the distinction between common units and subordinated
units will disappear, so that all of the first bullet point
above will no longer be applicable.
Adjustments to Capital Accounts. Our partnership
agreement requires that we make adjustments to capital accounts
upon the issuance of additional units. In this regard, our
partnership agreement specifies that we allocate any unrealized
and, for tax purposes, unrecognized gain or loss resulting from
the adjustments to the unitholders and the general partner in
the same manner as we allocate gain or loss upon liquidation. In
the event that we make positive adjustments to the capital
accounts upon the issuance of additional units, our partnership
agreement requires that we allocate any later negative
adjustments to the capital accounts resulting from the issuance
of additional units or upon our liquidation in a manner which
results, to the extent possible, in the general partners
capital account balances equaling the amount which they would
have been if no earlier positive adjustments to the capital
accounts had been made.
44
SELECTED HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL AND OPERATING
DATA
The following table shows selected historical financial and
operating data of Calumet Lubricants, Co., Limited Partnership
(Calumet Predecessor) and pro forma financial data
of Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.
(Calumet) for the periods and as of the dates
indicated. The selected historical financial data as of
December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and
March 31, 2005 and for the years ended December 31,
2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, are derived from the consolidated financial
statements of Calumet Predecessor. This summary financial data
as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2006 are
derived from the consolidated financial statements of Calumet.
The results of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 for Calumet include the results of
operations of Calumet Predecessor for the period of
January 1, 2006 through January 31, 2006. The selected
pro forma financial data as of March 31, 2006 and for the
year ended December 31, 2005 and the three months ended
March 31, 2006 are derived from the unaudited pro forma
financial statements of Calumet. The pro forma adjustments have
been prepared as if the transactions listed below had taken
place on March 31, 2006, in the case of the pro forma
balance sheet, or as of January 1, 2005, in the case of the
pro forma statement of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and for the year ended December 31,
2005. The pro forma financial data give pro forma effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
this offering of common units, our general partners
proportionate capital contribution and our application of the
net proceeds, net of estimated underwriting commissions and
other offering and transaction expenses therefrom; |
|
|
|
our initial public offering of common units, our application of
the net proceeds therefrom and the formation transactions
related to our partnership; and |
|
|
|
the refinancing by Calumet Predecessor of its long-term debt
obligations pursuant to new credit facilities it entered into in
December 2005. |
None of the assets or liabilities of Calumet Predecessors
Rouseville wax processing facility, Reno wax packaging facility
and Bareco wax marketing joint venture, which are included in
the historical financial statements, were contributed to us in
connection with the closing of our initial public offering on
January 31, 2006.
The following table includes the non-GAAP financial measures
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. For a reconciliation of EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA to net income and cash flow from operating
activities, our most directly comparable financial performance
and liquidity measures calculated in accordance with GAAP,
please read Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
We derived the information in the following table from, and that
information should be read together with and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to, the historical and pro forma combined
financial statements and the accompanying notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The table should be read together
with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
Calumet | |
|
Calumet Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three | |
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
Months | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit data) | |
Summary of Operations
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
306,760 |
|
|
$ |
316,350 |
|
|
$ |
430,381 |
|
|
$ |
539,616 |
|
|
$ |
1,289,072 |
|
|
$ |
229,549 |
|
|
$ |
397,694 |
|
|
$ |
1,289,072 |
|
|
$ |
397,694 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
272,523 |
|
|
|
268,911 |
|
|
|
385,890 |
|
|
|
501,284 |
|
|
|
1,148,715 |
|
|
|
203,432 |
|
|
|
346,744 |
|
|
|
1,148,715 |
|
|
|
346,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
34,237 |
|
|
|
47,439 |
|
|
|
44,491 |
|
|
|
38,332 |
|
|
|
140,357 |
|
|
|
26,117 |
|
|
|
50,950 |
|
|
|
140,357 |
|
|
|
50,950 |
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
7,844 |
|
|
|
9,066 |
|
|
|
9,432 |
|
|
|
13,133 |
|
|
|
22,126 |
|
|
|
3,392 |
|
|
|
4,929 |
|
|
|
22,126 |
|
|
|
4,929 |
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
24,096 |
|
|
|
25,449 |
|
|
|
28,139 |
|
|
|
33,923 |
|
|
|
46,849 |
|
|
|
10,723 |
|
|
|
13,907 |
|
|
|
46,849 |
|
|
|
13,907 |
|
|
Taxes other than income
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Restructuring, decommissioning and
asset impairments(1)
|
|
|
9,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,694 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(9,156 |
) |
|
|
9,128 |
|
|
|
(3,098 |
) |
|
|
(12,189 |
) |
|
|
65,685 |
|
|
|
10,745 |
|
|
|
31,085 |
|
|
|
65,685 |
|
|
|
31,085 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
2,442 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(6,235 |
) |
|
|
(7,435 |
) |
|
|
(9,493 |
) |
|
|
(9,869 |
) |
|
|
(22,961 |
) |
|
|
(4,864 |
) |
|
|
(3,976 |
) |
|
|
(8,542 |
) |
|
|
(2,011 |
) |
|
Debt extinguishment costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,967 |
) |
|
|
(6,882 |
) |
|
|
(2,967 |
) |
|
Realized gain (loss) on derivative
instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
(961 |
) |
|
|
39,160 |
|
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
(6,651 |
) |
|
|
(3,080 |
) |
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
(3,080 |
) |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,228 |
|
|
|
(7,788 |
) |
|
|
(27,586 |
) |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
(17,715 |
) |
|
|
(27,586 |
) |
|
|
(17,715 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(4,128 |
) |
|
|
(3,847 |
) |
|
|
(2,327 |
) |
|
|
21,159 |
|
|
|
(54,357 |
) |
|
|
(10,873 |
) |
|
|
(27,539 |
) |
|
|
(39,938 |
) |
|
|
(25,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before income
taxes
|
|
|
(13,284 |
) |
|
|
5,281 |
|
|
|
(5,425 |
) |
|
|
8,970 |
|
|
|
11,328 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
3,546 |
|
|
|
25,747 |
|
|
|
5,511 |
|
Pro forma income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(13,284 |
) |
|
$ |
5,281 |
|
|
$ |
(5,425 |
) |
|
$ |
8,970 |
|
|
$ |
11,328 |
|
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
$ |
3,532 |
|
|
$ |
25,657 |
|
|
$ |
5,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted pro forma net
income per limited partner unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
2.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
Weighted average units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,950 |
|
|
|
17,066 |
|
|
|
17,066 |
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,066 |
|
|
|
13,066 |
|
|
|
13,066 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period
end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
76,316 |
|
|
$ |
85,995 |
|
|
$ |
89,938 |
|
|
$ |
126,585 |
|
|
$ |
127,846 |
|
|
$ |
131,194 |
|
|
$ |
127,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
127,674 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
192,118 |
|
|
|
217,915 |
|
|
|
216,941 |
|
|
|
318,206 |
|
|
|
399,717 |
|
|
|
327,961 |
|
|
|
349,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472,650 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
24,485 |
|
|
|
34,072 |
|
|
|
32,263 |
|
|
|
58,027 |
|
|
|
44,759 |
|
|
|
28,053 |
|
|
|
52,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,216 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
127,759 |
|
|
|
141,968 |
|
|
|
146,853 |
|
|
|
214,069 |
|
|
|
267,985 |
|
|
|
251,376 |
|
|
|
64,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,875 |
|
Partners capital
|
|
|
17,362 |
|
|
|
30,968 |
|
|
|
25,544 |
|
|
|
34,514 |
|
|
|
39,054 |
|
|
|
34,385 |
|
|
|
169,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307,122 |
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
(13,774 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,326 |
) |
|
$ |
7,048 |
|
|
$ |
(612 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,001 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,005 |
) |
|
$ |
60,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(31,059 |
) |
|
|
(9,924 |
) |
|
|
(11,940 |
) |
|
|
(42,930 |
) |
|
|
(12,903 |
) |
|
|
(6,933 |
) |
|
|
(2,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
44,872 |
|
|
|
14,209 |
|
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
|
61,561 |
|
|
|
40,990 |
|
|
|
37,306 |
|
|
|
(69,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
Calumet | |
|
Calumet Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three | |
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
Months | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit data) | |
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,592 |
|
|
$ |
10,837 |
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
51,557 |
|
|
$ |
7,532 |
|
|
$ |
13,162 |
|
|
$ |
51,557 |
|
|
$ |
13,162 |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,277 |
|
|
|
6,110 |
|
|
|
34,711 |
|
|
|
85,821 |
|
|
|
8,718 |
|
|
|
26,110 |
|
|
|
85,821 |
|
|
|
26,110 |
|
Operating Data (bpd):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales volume(2)
|
|
|
19,021 |
|
|
|
19,110 |
|
|
|
23,616 |
|
|
|
24,658 |
|
|
|
46,953 |
|
|
|
38,418 |
|
|
|
52,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total feedstock runs(3)
|
|
|
18,941 |
|
|
|
21,665 |
|
|
|
25,007 |
|
|
|
26,205 |
|
|
|
50,213 |
|
|
|
42,059 |
|
|
|
52,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total refinery production(4)
|
|
|
18,991 |
|
|
|
21,587 |
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
|
|
26,297 |
|
|
|
48,331 |
|
|
|
40,343 |
|
|
|
50,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Incurred in connection with the decommissioning of the
Rouseville, Pennsylvania facility, the termination of the Bareco
joint venture and the closing of the Reno, Pennsylvania
facility, none of which will be contributed to Calumet Specialty
Products Partners, L.P. |
|
(2) |
Total sales volume includes sales from the production of our
refineries and sales of inventories. |
|
(3) |
Feedstock runs represents the barrels per day of crude oil and
other feedstocks processed at our refineries. |
|
(4) |
Total refinery production represents the barrels per day of
specialty products and fuel products yielded from processing
crude oil and other refinery feedstocks at our refineries. The
difference between total refining production and total feedstock
production is primarily a result of the time lag between the
input of feedstock and production of end products and volume
loss. |
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We include in this prospectus the non-GAAP financial measures
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, and provide reconciliations of
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net income and cash flow from
operating activities, our most directly comparable financial
performance and liquidity measures calculated and presented in
accordance with GAAP.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are used as supplemental financial
measures by our management and by external users of our
financial statements such as investors, commercial banks,
research analysts and others, to assess:
|
|
|
|
|
the financial performance of our assets without regard to
financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis; |
|
|
|
the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient to pay
interest costs and support our indebtedness; |
|
|
|
our operating performance and return on capital as compared to
those of other companies in our industry, without regard to
financing or capital structure; and |
|
|
|
the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects
and the overall rates of return on alternative investment
opportunities. |
We define EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, taxes and
depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA to be
Consolidated EBITDA as defined in our new credit facilities.
Consistent with that definition. Adjusted EBITDA means, for any
period: (1) net income plus (2)(a) interest expense;
(b) taxes; (c) depreciation and amortization;
(d) unrealized losses from mark to market accounting for
hedging activities; (e) unrealized items decreasing net
income (including the non-cash impact of restructuring,
decommissioning and asset impairments in the periods presented);
and (f) other non-recurring expenses reducing net income
which do not represent a cash item for such period; minus (3)(a)
tax credits; (b) unrealized items increasing net income
(including the non-cash impact of restructuring, decommissioning
and asset impairments in the periods presented);
(c) unrealized gains from mark to market accounting for
hedging activities; and (d) other non-recurring expenses
and unrealized items that reduced net income for a prior period,
but represent a cash item in the current period. We are required
to report Adjusted EBITDA to our lenders under our new credit
facilities and it is used to determine our compliance with the
consolidated leverage test thereunder. We are required to
maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of consolidated debt to
47
Adjusted EBITDA, after giving effect to any proposed
distributions, of no greater than 3.75 to 1 in order to make
distributions to our unitholders.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered alternatives
to net income, operating income, cash flows from operating
activities or any other measure of financial performance
presented in accordance with GAAP. Our EBITDA and Adjusted
EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of
another company because all companies may not calculate EBITDA
and Adjusted EBITDA in the same manner. The following table
presents a reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net
income and cash flow from operating activities, our most
directly comparable GAAP financial performance and liquidity
measures, for each of the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
Calumet | |
|
Calumet Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three | |
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
Months | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Reconciliation of EBITDA to net
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
5,281 |
|
|
$ |
(5,425 |
) |
|
$ |
8,970 |
|
|
$ |
11,328 |
|
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
$ |
3,532 |
|
|
$ |
25,657 |
|
|
$ |
5,497 |
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and debt
extinguishment costs
|
|
|
7,435 |
|
|
|
9,493 |
|
|
|
9,869 |
|
|
|
29,843 |
|
|
|
4,864 |
|
|
|
6,943 |
|
|
|
15,424 |
|
|
|
4,978 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,876 |
|
|
|
6,769 |
|
|
|
6,927 |
|
|
|
10,386 |
|
|
|
2,796 |
|
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
10,386 |
|
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
18,592 |
|
|
$ |
10,837 |
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
51,557 |
|
|
$ |
7,532 |
|
|
$ |
13,162 |
|
|
$ |
51,557 |
|
|
$ |
13,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) from
mark to market accounting for hedging activities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,228 |
) |
|
$ |
7,788 |
|
|
$ |
27,586 |
|
|
$ |
(603 |
) |
|
$ |
17,715 |
|
|
$ |
27,586 |
|
|
$ |
17,715 |
|
|
Non-cash impact of restructuring,
decommissioning and asset impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
(1,276 |
) |
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid non-recurring expenses and
accrued non-recurring expenses, net of cash outlays
|
|
|
(2,315 |
) |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
4,912 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
(4,767 |
) |
|
|
4,912 |
|
|
|
(4,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$ |
16,277 |
|
|
$ |
6,110 |
|
|
$ |
34,711 |
|
|
$ |
85,821 |
|
|
$ |
8,718 |
|
|
$ |
26,110 |
|
|
$ |
85,821 |
|
|
$ |
26,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Reconciliation of EBITDA to net
cash provided (used) by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by
operating activities
|
|
$ |
(4,326 |
) |
|
$ |
7,048 |
|
|
$ |
(612 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,011 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,055 |
) |
|
$ |
60,115 |
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and debt
extinguishment costs
|
|
|
7,435 |
|
|
|
9,493 |
|
|
|
9,869 |
|
|
|
29,843 |
|
|
|
4,864 |
|
|
|
6,943 |
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,693 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
Equity in (loss) income of
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2,442 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received from
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(2,925 |
) |
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
(3,470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt extinguishment costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,967 |
) |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
19,399 |
|
|
|
56,878 |
|
|
|
22,506 |
|
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
16,984 |
|
|
|
(15,547 |
) |
|
|
20,304 |
|
|
|
25,441 |
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
(7,313 |
) |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(1,295 |
) |
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
11,596 |
|
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
|
5,117 |
|
|
|
(16,471 |
) |
|
Derivative activity
|
|
|
3,682 |
|
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
(5,046 |
) |
|
|
(31,101 |
) |
|
|
(6,305 |
) |
|
|
(18,694 |
) |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(9,587 |
) |
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
(25,764 |
) |
|
|
13,268 |
|
|
|
29,974 |
|
|
|
(7,457 |
) |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,622 |
|
|
|
(1,379 |
) |
|
|
(1,203 |
) |
|
|
(5,874 |
) |
|
|
(2,551 |
) |
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
Other, including changes in
noncurrent assets and liabilities
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
(1,316 |
) |
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
|
|
(1,027 |
) |
|
|
(4,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
18,592 |
|
|
$ |
10,837 |
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
51,557 |
|
|
$ |
7,532 |
|
|
$ |
13,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) from
mark to market accounting for hedging activities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,228 |
) |
|
$ |
7,788 |
|
|
$ |
27,586 |
|
|
$ |
(603 |
) |
|
$ |
17,715 |
|
|
Non-cash impact of restructuring,
decommissioning and asset impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
(1,276 |
) |
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid non-recurring expenses and
accrued non-recurring expenses, net of cash outlays
|
|
|
(2,315 |
) |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
4,912 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
(4,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$ |
16,277 |
|
|
$ |
6,110 |
|
|
$ |
34,711 |
|
|
$ |
85,821 |
|
|
$ |
8,718 |
|
|
$ |
26,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The historical consolidated financial statements included in
this prospectus reflect all of the assets, liabilities, and
results of operations of Calumet Specialty Products Partners,
L.P. (Calumet) when used in the present tense,
prospectively or for historical periods since January 31,
2006 and Calumet Lubricants Co., Limited Partnership
(Calumet Predecessor) for historical periods prior
to January 31, 2006 where applicable. These historical
consolidated financial statements include the results of
operations of the Rouseville and Reno facilities, which have
been closed, and the Bareco joint venture, which was terminated
as described below. The following discussion analyzes the
financial condition and results of operations of Calumet
Predecessor for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004,
2005, and for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The
financial condition and results of operation for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 are of Calumet and include the
results of operations of Calumet Predecessor for the period from
January 1, 2006 to January 31, 2006. You should read
the following discussion of the financial condition and results
of operations for Calumet Predecessor in conjunction with the
historical consolidated financial statements and notes of
Calumet Predecessor and historical consolidated financial
statements and notes and the pro forma financial statements for
Calumet included elsewhere in this prospectus. The statements in
this discussion regarding industry outlook, our expectations
regarding our future performance, liquidity and capital
resources and other non-historical statements in this discussion
are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements
are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but
not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in the
Risk Factors and Forward-Looking
Statements sections of this prospectus. Our actual results
may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any
forward-looking statements.
Overview
We are a leading independent producer of high-quality, specialty
hydrocarbon products in North America. Our business is organized
into two segments: specialty products and fuel products. In our
specialty products segment, we process crude oil into a wide
variety of customized lubricating oils, solvents and waxes. Our
specialty products are sold to domestic and international
customers who purchase them primarily as raw material components
for basic industrial, consumer and automotive goods. In our fuel
products segment, we process crude oil into a variety of fuel
and fuel-related products including unleaded gasoline, diesel
fuel and jet fuel. Our specialty products segment results
include fuel, asphalt, and other by-products produced in
connection with our production of specialty products. Our fuel
products segment results includes asphalt and other by-products
produced in connection with the production of fuel products at
the Shreveport refinery. For the year ended December 31,
2005 and the three months ended March 31, 2006,
approximately 52.2% and 72.7%, respectively, of our gross profit
was generated from our specialty products segment and
approximately 47.8% and 27.3%, respectively, of our gross profit
was generated from our fuel products segment.
On January 31, 2006, we completed our initial public
offering of our common units and received aggregate net proceeds
(including pursuant to the underwriters full exercise of
their option to purchase additional units) of approximately
$144.4 million. The net proceeds were used to:
(1) repay indebtedness and accrued interest under our first
lien term loan facility in the amount of approximately
$125.7 million, (2) repay indebtedness under our
secured revolving credit facility in the amount of approximately
$13.1 million and (3) pay transaction fees and
expenses in the amount of approximately $5.6 million.
Subsequent to the acquisition of the Shreveport refinery,
Calumet Predecessor undertook to streamline its wax processing
and marketing operations by decommissioning its Rouseville
facility, closing its Reno facility and terminating its Bareco
joint venture. None of the assets or liabilities of Calumet
Predecessors Rouseville facility, Reno facility or Bareco
joint venture were contributed to Calumet in connection with the
initial public offering on January 31, 2006. Calumet
Predecessor
50
began decommissioning the Rouseville facility in 2003 and
completed the decommissioning in 2005. This resulted in
restructuring costs of $6.7 million in 2003 and
$0.3 million in 2004 and $2.3 million in 2005. In
2005, Calumet Predecessor closed the Reno facility for a
restructuring cost of $1.7 million. In 2003, Calumet
Predecessor terminated its Bareco joint venture. The results of
operations of Bareco are reflected in equity in (loss) income of
unconsolidated affiliates in the consolidated statements of
operations. The combined net book value of the Reno and
Rouseville operations as of December 31, 2005 was
$0.4 million.
Our fuel products segment began operations in 2004, as we
substantially completed the approximately $39.7 million
reconfiguration of the Shreveport refinery to add motor fuels
production, including gasoline, diesel and jet fuel, to its
existing specialty products slate as well as to increase overall
feedstock throughput. The project was fully completed in
February 2005. The reconfiguration was undertaken to capitalize
on strong fuels refining margins, or crack spreads, relative to
historical levels, to utilize idled assets, and to enhance the
profitability of the Shreveport refinerys specialty
products segment by increasing overall refinery throughput.
Since completion of the reconfiguration of the Shreveport
refinery, crack spreads have increased, which has further
improved the profitability of the fuel products segment. During
2006, we commenced a major expansion project at our Shreveport
refinery to increase throughput capacity and feedstock
flexibility. Please read Liquidity and Capital
Resources Capital Expenditures.
Our sales and net income are principally affected by the price
of crude oil, demand for specialty and fuel products, prevailing
crack spreads for fuel products, the price of natural gas used
as fuel in our operations and our results from derivative
instrument activities.
Our primary raw material is crude oil and our primary outputs
are specialty petroleum and fuel products. The prices of crude
oil, specialty and fuel products are subject to fluctuations in
response to changes in supply, demand, market uncertainties and
a variety of additional factors beyond our control. We monitor
these risks and enter into financial derivatives designed to
mitigate the impact of commodity price fluctuations on our
business. The primary purpose of our commodity risk management
activities is to economically hedge our cash flow exposure to
commodity price risk so that we can meet our cash distribution,
debt service and capital expenditure requirements despite
fluctuations in crude oil and fuel product prices. We enter into
derivative contracts for future periods in quantities which do
not exceed our projected purchases of crude oil and fuels
production. Please read Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Commodity
Price Risk.
Our management uses several financial and operational
measurements to analyze our performance. These measurements
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales volumes; |
|
|
|
Production yields; and |
|
|
|
Specialty products and fuel products gross profit. |
Sales volumes. We view the volumes of specialty
and fuel products sold as an important measure of our ability to
effectively utilize our refining assets. Our ability to meet the
demands of our customers is driven by the volumes of crude oil
and feedstocks that we run at our refineries. Higher volumes
improve profitability both through the spreading of fixed costs
over greater volumes and the additional gross margin achieved on
the incremental volumes.
Production yields. We seek the optimal product mix
for each barrel of crude oil we refine in order to maximize our
gross profits and minimize lower margin by-products which we
refer to as production yield.
Specialty products and fuel products gross profit.
Specialty products and fuel products gross profit are an
important measure of our ability to maximize the profitability
of our specialty products and fuel products segments. We define
specialty products and fuel products gross profit as sales less
the cost of crude oil and other feedstocks and other
production-related expenses, the
51
most significant portion of which include labor, fuel,
utilities, contract services, maintenance and processing
materials. We use specialty products and fuel products gross
profit as an indicator of our ability to manage our business
during periods of crude oil and natural gas price fluctuations,
as the prices of our specialty products and fuel products
generally do not change immediately with changes in the price of
crude oil and natural gas. The increase in selling prices
typically lags behind the rising costs of crude oil feedstocks
for specialty products. Other than plant fuel,
production-related expenses generally remain stable across broad
ranges of throughput volumes, but can fluctuate depending on the
maintenance and turnaround activities performed during a
specific period. Maintenance expense includes accruals for
turnarounds and other maintenance expenses.
In addition to the foregoing measures, we also monitor our
general and administrative expenditures, substantially all of
which are incurred through our general partner, Calumet GP, LLC.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth information about our combined
refinery operations. Refining production volume differs from
sales volume due to changes in inventory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet | |
|
|
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
Calumet | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003- | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total sales volume (bpd)(1)
|
|
|
23,616 |
|
|
|
24,658 |
|
|
|
46,953 |
|
|
|
38,418 |
|
|
|
52,090 |
|
Total feedstock runs (bpd)(2)
|
|
|
25,007 |
|
|
|
26,205 |
|
|
|
50,213 |
|
|
|
42,059 |
|
|
|
52,370 |
|
Refinery production (bpd)(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lubricating oils
|
|
|
8,290 |
|
|
|
9,437 |
|
|
|
11,556 |
|
|
|
10,095 |
|
|
|
11,695 |
|
|
|
Solvents
|
|
|
4,623 |
|
|
|
4,973 |
|
|
|
4,422 |
|
|
|
3,422 |
|
|
|
4,346 |
|
|
|
Waxes
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
Asphalt and other by-products
|
|
|
5,159 |
|
|
|
5,992 |
|
|
|
6,313 |
|
|
|
5,490 |
|
|
|
5,561 |
|
|
|
Fuels
|
|
|
6,433 |
|
|
|
3,931 |
|
|
|
2,354 |
|
|
|
2,395 |
|
|
|
2,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
|
|
25,343 |
|
|
|
25,665 |
|
|
|
22,288 |
|
|
|
25,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasoline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8,278 |
|
|
|
6,401 |
|
|
|
10,002 |
|
|
|
Diesel fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
8,891 |
|
|
|
7,792 |
|
|
|
7,724 |
|
|
|
Jet fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
5,080 |
|
|
|
3,772 |
|
|
|
7,308 |
|
|
|
Asphalt and other by-products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
22,666 |
|
|
|
18,055 |
|
|
|
25,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total refinery production
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
|
|
26,297 |
|
|
|
48,331 |
|
|
|
40,343 |
|
|
|
50,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Total sales volume includes sales from the production of our
refineries and sales of inventories. |
|
(2) |
Feedstock runs represents the barrels per day of crude oil and
other feedstocks processed at our refineries. |
|
(3) |
Total refinery production represents the barrels per day of
specialty products and fuel products yielded from processing
crude oil and other refinery feedstocks at our refineries. The
difference between total refinery production and total feedstock
runs is primarily a result of the time lag between the input of
feedstock and production of end products and volume loss. |
52
The following table sets forth information about the sales of
our principal products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet | |
|
|
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
Calumet | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Specialty products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lubricating oils
|
|
$ |
205.9 |
|
|
$ |
251.9 |
|
|
$ |
394.4 |
|
|
$ |
79.0 |
|
|
$ |
132.9 |
|
|
Solvents
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
114.7 |
|
|
|
145.0 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
52.4 |
|
|
Waxes
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
39.5 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
Fuels
|
|
|
83.5 |
|
|
|
72.7 |
|
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
Asphalt and other by-products
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
51.2 |
|
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
430.4 |
|
|
|
530.0 |
|
|
|
703.3 |
|
|
|
141.8 |
|
|
|
229.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasoline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223.6 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
|
71.9 |
|
|
Diesel fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
230.9 |
|
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
56.0 |
|
|
Jet fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121.3 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
Asphalt and other by-products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
585.8 |
|
|
|
87.7 |
|
|
|
168.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated sales
|
|
$ |
430.4 |
|
|
$ |
539.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,289.1 |
|
|
$ |
229.5 |
|
|
$ |
397.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
The following table reflects our consolidated results of
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
Calumet | |
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Sales
|
|
$ |
430.4 |
|
|
$ |
539.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,289.1 |
|
|
$ |
229.5 |
|
|
$ |
397.7 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
385.9 |
|
|
|
501.3 |
|
|
|
1,148.7 |
|
|
|
203.4 |
|
|
|
346.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
44.5 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
140.4 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
51.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
46.9 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
Taxes other than income taxes
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
Restructuring, decommissioning and
asset impairments
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (loss) income of
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
Debt extinguishment costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
Realized gain (loss) on derivative
instruments
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
derivative instruments
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(27.6 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
(54.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
(27.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(5.4 |
) |
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 Compared to Three
Months Ended March 31, 2005 |
Sales. Sales increased $168.1 million, or
73.3%, to $397.7 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2006 from $229.5 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2005. Sales for each of our principal
product categories in these periods were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
Calumet | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
Sales by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lubricating oils
|
|
$ |
79.0 |
|
|
$ |
132.9 |
|
|
|
68.2 |
% |
|
|
Solvents
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
52.4 |
|
|
|
90.2 |
|
|
|
Waxes
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
81.5 |
|
|
|
Fuels(1)
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
Asphalt and by-products(2)
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty products
|
|
$ |
141.8 |
|
|
$ |
229.7 |
|
|
|
61.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty products volume (in
barrels)
|
|
|
2,033,000 |
|
|
|
2,414,000 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
Fuel products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasoline
|
|
$ |
27.9 |
|
|
$ |
71.9 |
|
|
|
157.7 |
% |
|
|
Diesel
|
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
56.0 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
Jet fuel
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
154.5 |
|
|
|
Asphalt and by-products(3)
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(67.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fuel products
|
|
$ |
87.7 |
|
|
$ |
168.0 |
|
|
|
91.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fuel products sales volumes
(in barrels)
|
|
|
1,425,000 |
|
|
|
2,274,000 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
% |
|
Total sales
|
|
$ |
229.5 |
|
|
$ |
397.7 |
|
|
|
73.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales volumes (in barrels)
|
|
|
3,458,000 |
|
|
|
4,688,000 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents fuels produced in connection with the production of
specialty products at the Princeton and Cotton Valley refineries. |
|
(2) |
Represents asphalt and other by-products produced in connection
with the production of specialty products at the Princeton,
Cotton Valley and Shreveport refineries. |
|
(3) |
Represents asphalt and other by-products produced in connection
with the production of fuels at the Shreveport refinery. |
This $168.1 million increase in sales resulted from the
increased production of our fuels operations at the Shreveport
refinery in the first quarter of 2005, which accounted for
$80.3 million of the increase, and from a
$87.9 million increase in sales by our specialty products
segment.
Specialty products segment sales for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 increased $87.9 million, or 61.9% over
sales for the three months ended March 31, 2005, primarily
due to a 36.3% increase in the average selling price per barrel.
In addition, specialty products segment sales were positively
affected by an 18.8% increase in volumes sold, from
approximately 2.0 million barrels in the first quarter of
2005 to 2.4 million barrels in the first quarter of 2006
mainly due to increased sales volume of 0.3 and 0.2 million
barrels for lubricating oils and solvents, respectively,
partially
55
offset by decreased sales of fuels and asphalt and by-products
that are produced by the specialty products segment. Average
selling prices per barrel for lubricating oils, solvents, fuels
and asphalt and by-product prices increased at rates comparable
to or in excess of the overall 25.1% increase in the cost of
crude oil per barrel during the period, whereas waxes increased
by only 22.0% due to market conditions.
Fuel products segment sales for 2006 increased
$80.3 million, or 91.5% for the three months ended
March 31, 2006, primarily due to increased volume of 59.6%
attributable to the increased production of our fuels operations
at the Shreveport refinery in the first quarter of 2005. This
increase was due to increased combined sales volume for gasoline
and jet fuel of 0.8 million barrels, or $48.3 million,
with diesel fuel sales volume remaining relatively constant. In
addition, fuel product segment sales increased due to a 20.1%
increase in average sales prices per barrel for fuel products
consistent with the 25.6% increase in the cost of crude oil per
barrel.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased
$24.8 million, or 95.1%, to $51.0 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 from $26.1 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Gross profit for
our specialty and fuel products segments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
Calumet | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
Gross profit by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products
|
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
|
|
109.6 |
% |
|
|
Percentage of sales
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel products
|
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
13.9 |
|
|
|
65.5 |
% |
|
|
Percentage of sales
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
|
$ |
51.0 |
|
|
|
95.1 |
% |
|
|
Percentage of sales
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
This $24.8 million increase in total gross profit includes
an increase in gross profit of $19.4 million in our
specialty product segment and $5.5 million in our fuel
product segment.
The increase of $19.4 million in our specialty products
segment gross profit was primarily due to improved selling
prices and profitability of lubricating oils at our Shreveport
refinery which is attributable to the increase of
0.4 million barrels in sales volumes and a 36.3% increase
in sales prices for the specialty products segment which
exceeded the 25.1% increase in the cost of crude oil.
The increase of $5.5 million in our fuel products segment
gross profit was primarily affected by a 59.6% increase in sales
volume, which was largely driven by increased combined sales
volume for gasoline and jet fuel of 0.8 million barrels as
a result of the increased production of the fuels operations at
the Shreveport refinery in the first quarter of 2005.
Selling, general and administrative. Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased $1.5 million,
or 45.3%, to $4.9 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2006 from $3.4 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2005. This increase primarily reflects
increased general and administrative costs incurred as a result
of being a publicly traded partnership and increased employee
compensation costs.
Transportation. Transportation expenses increased
$3.2 million, or 29.7%, to $13.9 million in the three
months ended March 31, 2006 from $10.7 million in the
three months ended March 31, 2005. The quarter over quarter
increase in transportation expense is primarily due to the
overall increase in volumes which was partially offset by more
localized marketing of fuel products.
56
Restructuring, decommissioning and asset
impairments. Restructuring, decommissioning and asset
impairment expenses were $0.4 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2005, and we incurred no such expenses in
2006. The charges recorded in 2005 related to asset impairment
of the Reno wax packaging assets. No assets impairments occurred
the first quarter of 2006.
Interest expense. Interest expense decreased
$0.9 million, or 18.3%, to $4.0 million in the three
months ended March 31, 2006 from $4.9 million in the
three months ended March 31, 2005. This decrease was
primarily due to our debt refinancing in December 2005 and the
repayment of debt with the proceeds of our initial public
offering, which occurred on January 31, 2006.
Debt extinguishment costs. Debt extinguishment
costs increased to $3.0 for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 compared to no debt extinguishment costs for
the three months ended March 31, 2005, as a result of the
repayment of borrowings under our term loan using a portion of
the net proceeds from our initial public offering, which
occurred on January 31, 2006.
Realized loss on derivative instruments. Realized
loss on derivative instruments decreased $3.6 million, or
53.7%, to a $3.1 million loss in the three months ended
March 31, 2006 from a $6.7 million loss in the three
months ended March 31, 2005. This decrease primarily was
the result of a new mix of crude and fuel product margin collar
and swap contracts which have experienced less decline in value
than the contracts that settled in the first quarter of 2005.
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments.
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments increased
$18.3 million to a $17.7 million loss in the three
months ended March 31, 2006 from a $0.6 million
unrealized gain for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
This unrealized loss is a non-cash item that results from
valuing at fair value our derivative instruments used to hedge
our fuel products margins in future periods. The increase
compared to the same period in the prior year is primarily due
to the decline in fair value of these instruments as the market
prices for fuel products have increased. Our objective in
hedging our fuel products margins is to ensure stability of cash
flows in future periods. We believe that this hedging program is
helping us achieve this objective.
57
Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2004
Sales. Sales increased $749.5 million, or
138.9%, to $1,289.1 million in the year ended
December 31, 2005 from $539.6 million in the year
ended December 31, 2004. Sales for each of our principal
product categories in these periods were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
Sales by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lubricating oils
|
|
$ |
251.9 |
|
|
$ |
394.4 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
% |
|
|
Solvents
|
|
|
114.7 |
|
|
|
145.0 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
Waxes
|
|
|
39.5 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
Fuels(1)
|
|
|
72.7 |
|
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
|
(39.5 |
) |
|
|
Asphalt and by-products(2)
|
|
|
51.2 |
|
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty products
|
|
$ |
530.0 |
|
|
$ |
703.3 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty products volume (in
barrels)
|
|
|
8,807,000 |
|
|
|
8,900,000 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
Fuel products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasoline
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
223.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diesel
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
230.9 |
|
|
|
6,885.7 |
% |
|
|
Jet fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asphalt and by-products(3)
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fuel products
|
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
$ |
585.8 |
|
|
|
5,998.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fuel products sales volumes
(in barrels)
|
|
|
193,000 |
|
|
|
8,238,000 |
|
|
|
4,168.4 |
% |
|
Total sales
|
|
$ |
539.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,289.1 |
|
|
|
138.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales volumes (in barrels)
|
|
|
9,000,000 |
|
|
|
17,138,000 |
|
|
|
90.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents fuels produced in connection with the production of
specialty products at the Princeton and Cotton Valley refineries. |
|
(2) |
Represents asphalt and other by-products produced in connection
with the production of specialty products at the Princeton,
Cotton Valley and Shreveport refineries. |
|
(3) |
Represents asphalt and other by-products produced in connection
with the production of fuels at the Shreveport refinery. |
This $749.5 million increase in sales resulted primarily
from the startup of our fuels operations at Shreveport in the
fourth quarter of 2004, which accounted for $576.2 million
of the increase, and also from a $173.3 million increase in
sales by our specialty products segment.
Specialty products segment sales for 2005 increased
$173.3 million, or 32.7%, due to a 31.3% increase in the
average selling price per barrel and a 1.1% increase in volumes
sold, from approximately 8.8 million barrels in 2004 to
8.9 million barrels in 2005. Average selling prices per
barrel for lubricating oils, solvents and fuels increased at
rates comparable to or in excess of the overall 30.9% increase
in the cost of crude oil per barrel during the period. Asphalt
and by-product prices per barrel increased by only 7.4% due to
market conditions. The slight increase in volumes sold was
largely due to higher production volumes offset by downtime in
February 2005 at Cotton Valley for a plant expansion project,
which resulted in reduced volumes of fuels and solvents for that
period. Fuel sales decreased disproportionately more than
solvents because we had higher levels of inventory of solvents
at Cotton Valley available for sale.
58
Fuel products segment sales for 2005 increased
$576.2 million which is attributable to the reconfiguration
of the Shreveport refinery, which was fully completed by
February 2005, and the
start-up of our fuel
products segment in the fourth quarter of 2004.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased
$102.0 million, or 266.2%, to $140.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005 from $38.3 million for
year ended December 31, 2004. Gross profit for our
specialty and fuel products segments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet | |
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
Gross profit by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products
|
|
$ |
40.6 |
|
|
$ |
73.3 |
|
|
|
80.5 |
% |
|
|
Percentage of sales
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel products
|
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
|
$ |
67.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of sales
|
|
|
(24.1 |
)% |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$ |
38.3 |
|
|
$ |
140.4 |
|
|
|
266.2 |
% |
|
|
Percentage of sales
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
This $102.0 million increase in total gross profit includes
an increase in gross profit of $69.4 million in our fuel
products segment, which began operations late in 2004, and an
increase of $32.7 million in our specialty product segment
gross profit which was driven by a 31.3% increase in selling
prices and improved profitability on specialty products
manufactured at our Shreveport refinery due to the increase in
the refinerys overall throughput largely resulting from
its reconfiguration. The increase in specialty products gross
profit was offset by a 30.9% increase in the average price of
crude oil per barrel. During 2005, we were able to successfully
increase prices on our lubricating oils, solvents and fuels at
rates comparable to or in excess of the rising cost of crude oil.
Selling, general and administrative. Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased $9.0 million,
or 68.5%, to $22.1 million in the year ended
December 31, 2005 from $13.1 million in the year ended
December 31, 2004. This increase primarily reflects
increased employee compensation costs due to incentive bonuses.
Transportation. Transportation expenses increased
$12.9 million, or 38.1%, to $46.8 million in the year
ended December 31, 2005 from $33.9 million in the year
ended December 31, 2004. The year over year increase in
transportation expense was due to the overall increase in
volumes which was partially offset by more localized marketing
of fuel products.
Restructuring, decommissioning and asset
impairments. Restructuring, decommissioning and asset
impairment expenses increased $2.0 million to
$2.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2005 from
$0.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2004.
During 2005, we recorded a $2.0 million charge related to
the closing of the Reno wax packaging facility. During 2004, we
recorded a $0.3 million charge related to the completion of
the Rouseville asset decommissioning.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased
$13.1 million, or 132.7%, to $23.0 million in the year
ended December 31, 2005 from $9.9 million in the year
ended December 31, 2004. This increase was primarily due to
our debt refinancing and increased borrowings under our prior
credit agreements for the reconfiguration of the Shreveport
facility entered into during the fourth quarter of 2004.
Borrowings under the prior term loan agreement incurred interest
at a fixed rate of 14.0%.
59
On December 9, 2005, we repaid our existing facilities with
the proceeds of borrowings under our current credit agreements.
This resulted in debt extinguishment costs of $6.9 million
being recorded in the fourth quarter.
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments. Gains
(loss) on derivative instruments decreased $56.1 million,
to a $24.8 million loss in the year ended December 31,
2005 from a $31.4 million gain in the year ended
December 31, 2004. This decrease primarily was the result
of marking to fair value a new mix of fuel product margin collar
and swap contracts which experienced significant declines in
value due to increased crack spreads as of December 31,
2005.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2003 |
Sales. Sales increased $109.2 million, or
25.4%, to $539.6 million in the year ended
December 31, 2004 from $430.4 million in the year
ended December 31, 2003. Sales for each of our principal
product categories in these periods were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
Sales by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lubricating oils
|
|
$ |
205.9 |
|
|
$ |
251.9 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
Solvents
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
114.7 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
Waxes
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
39.5 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
Fuels(1)
|
|
|
83.5 |
|
|
|
72.7 |
|
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
Asphalt and by-products(2)
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
51.2 |
|
|
|
142.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty products
|
|
$ |
430.4 |
|
|
$ |
530.0 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
Total specialty products volumes
(in barrels)
|
|
|
8,620,000 |
|
|
|
8,807,000 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
Fuel products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasoline
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diesel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jet fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asphalt and by-products(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fuel products
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fuel products volumes (in
barrels)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
$ |
430.4 |
|
|
$ |
539.6 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales volumes (in barrels)
|
|
|
8,620,000 |
|
|
|
9,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents fuels produced in connection with the production of
specialty products at the Princeton and Cotton Valley refineries. |
|
(2) |
Represents asphalt and other by-products produced in connection
with the production of specialty products at the Princeton and
Cotton Valley refineries. |
|
(3) |
Represents asphalt and other by-products produced in connection
with the production of fuels at the Shreveport refinery. |
This $109.2 million increase in sales resulted primarily
from a 23.1% increase in specialty products sales, and also from
the addition of $9.6 million in sales from the
start-up of our fuel
products operations at the Shreveport refinery. The increase in
specialty product sales resulted primarily from an increase of
20.5% in the average price per barrel of product sold, and also
from a
60
2.2% increase in volumes sold, from approximately
8.6 million barrels in 2003 to 8.8 million barrels in
2004. Sales price increases were driven by an average 32.5%
increase in the cost of crude oil per barrel over the same
period. Increases in prices for waxes lagged our average
increase in price per barrel of product sold compared to the
increase in prices for lubricating oils, solvents and fuels. In
2004 as compared to 2003, sales volumes of fuels decreased and
sales volumes of asphalt and by-products increased due to a
different mix of feedstock.
Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased
$6.2 million, or 13.8%, to $38.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 from $44.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2003. Gross profit for our
specialty and fuel products segments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet | |
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Gross profit by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products
|
|
$ |
44.5 |
|
|
$ |
40.6 |
|
|
|
(8.6 |
)% |
|
|
Percentage of sales
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$ |
44.5 |
|
|
$ |
38.3 |
|
|
|
(13.8 |
)% |
|
|
Percentage of sales
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
This $6.2 million decrease in total gross profit includes a
decrease of $3.9 million in specialty products gross profit
and a loss of $2.3 million in our fuel products segment
which began operations in late 2004. The decrease in specialty
products gross profit resulted from a 32.3% increase in the
average price of crude oil per barrel which was partially offset
by a 20.5% increase in selling prices and 2.2% increase in sales
volumes. The increase in selling prices lagged behind the rising
costs of crude oil feedstocks for specialty products. However,
we sought to manage the financial impact of this lag through the
use of derivative instruments, which provided gains in the 2003
and 2004 periods as described in gain (loss) on derivative
instruments below.
Selling, general and administrative. Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased $3.7 million,
or 39.2%, to $13.1 million in the year ended
December 31, 2004 from $9.4 million in the year ended
December 31, 2003. This increase primarily reflects
$2.2 million of increased compensation costs due to our
incentive bonuses.
Transportation. Transportation expenses increased
$5.8 million, or 20.6%, to $33.9 million in the year
ended December 31, 2004 from $28.1 million in the year
ended December 31, 2003. This increase primarily reflects
fuel surcharges and rail rate increases.
Restructuring, decommissioning and asset
impairments. Restructuring, decommissioning and asset
impairment expenses decreased $6.4 million to
$0.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2004 from
$6.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2003. In
2004, we recorded a $0.3 million charge related to the
completion of the Rouseville asset decommissioning. In 2003, we
recorded a $6.7 million charge related to the
decommissioning of the Rouseville facility and related asset
impairment.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased
$0.4 million, or 4.0%, to $9.9 million in the year
ended December 31, 2004 from $9.5 million in the year
ended December 31, 2003. This increase was primarily due to
increased borrowings under the credit agreement with a limited
partner and borrowings under the term loan agreement related to
the reconfiguration of the Shreveport refinery entered into
during the fourth quarter of 2004.
61
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments. Gains on
derivative instruments increased $25.1 million, or 400.6%,
to $31.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2004
from $6.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2003.
This increase was the result of marking to fair value gains due
to the rising price of crude oil in relation to the contractual
strike prices on our derivative instruments and our new mix of
fuel product margin collar and swap contracts during 2004.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal historical sources of cash have included the
issuance of private debt, bank borrowings, and cash flow from
operations. Principal historical uses of cash have included
capital expenditures, growth in working capital and debt
service. We expect that our principal uses of cash in the future
will be to finance working capital, capital expenditures,
distributions and debt service.
We believe that we have sufficient liquid assets, cash flow from
operations and borrowing capacity to meet our financial
commitments, debt service obligations, contingencies and
anticipated capital expenditures. However, we are subject to
business and operational risks that could materially adversely
affect our cash flows. A material decrease in our cash flows
would likely produce a corollary materially adverse effect on
our borrowing capacity.
The following table summarizes our primary sources and uses of
cash in the periods presented (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet | |
|
|
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
Calumet | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(34.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(48.0 |
) |
|
$ |
60.1 |
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
|
|
(42.9 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
61.6 |
|
|
$ |
41.0 |
|
|
$ |
37.3 |
|
|
$ |
(69.3 |
) |
Operating Activities. Operating activities
provided $60.1 million in cash during the three months
ended March 31, 2006 compared to $48.0 million used in
operating activities during the three months ended
March 31, 2005. The cash provided by operating activities
during the three months ended March 31, 2006 primarily
consisted of a $26.2 million decrease in current assets, a
$7.5 million increase in accounts payable, and a
$17.7 million unrealized loss on derivatives instruments.
These were offset by increases in other current liabilities of
$4.9. The cash used in operating activities during the three
months ended March 31, 2005 was primarily due to the build
up of working capital as a result of the rampup of the fuels
operations at the Shreveport refinery.
Operating activities used $34.0 million in cash during the
year ended December 31, 2005 compared to $0.6 million
during the year ended December 31, 2004. This increase is
primarily due to increases in accounts receivable of
$56.9 million and inventory of $25.4 million, which
relate to the rising price of crude oil and the increase in
throughput in our fuel products segment as the Shreveport
reconfiguration was completed in February 2005. The increase was
also driven by the decrease in accounts payable which relates to
the timing of payment for capital expenditures and the increase
in purchases from suppliers who required shorter payment terms.
The increase was partially offset by the mark to market impact
of derivative instruments.
62
Operating activities used $0.6 million of cash for the year
ended December 31, 2004 compared to generating
$7.0 million of cash for the year ended December 31,
2003. This decrease is primarily due to increased levels of
accounts receivable and inventory which more than offset
increases in net income and accounts payable. This net increase
in accounts payable was driven primarily by capital expenditures
related to the Shreveport reconfiguration incurred but not paid
at the end of 2004 and the rising cost of crude oil.
Investing Activities. Cash used in investing
activities decreased to $2.9 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2006 as compared to
$6.9 million during the three months ended March 31,
2005. This decrease is primarily due to the $5.1 million of
additions to property, plant and equipment related to the
reconfiguration at our Shreveport refinery incurred during 2005,
with no comparable expenditures in 2006.
Cash used in investing activities decreased to
$12.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2005
as compared to $42.9 million during the year ended
December 31, 2004. This decrease is primarily due to the
$36.0 million of additions to property, plant and equipment
related to the reconfiguration at our Shreveport refinery
incurred during 2004, with no comparable expenditures in 2005,
offset by an upgrade to the capacity and enhancement of product
mix at our Cotton Valley refinery in 2005.
Cash used in investing activities increased to
$42.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to $11.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. This increase is primarily due to
$36.0 million of additions to property, plant and equipment
related to the reconfiguration at our Shreveport refinery
incurred during 2004.
Financing Activities. Financing activities used
cash of $69.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 compared to providing $37.3 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2005. This decrease is
primarily due to the use of cash from operations to pay down
debt and borrowings in the three months ended March 31,
2005 to finance the growth in working capital related to the
increased production of fuel products operations at Shreveport.
Financing activities provided cash of $41.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005 compared to $61.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2004. This decrease is
primarily due to distributions to our partners of
$7.3 million and increased borrowings in 2005 to finance
the growth in working capital related to the startup of fuel
products operations at Shreveport.
Cash provided by financing activities increased to
$61.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to $4.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. This increase is primarily due to the
third party borrowings of $49.8 million and additional
borrowings from a limited partner obtained to finance the
reconfiguration at our Shreveport refinery.
|
|
|
Cash Distributions to Unitholders |
We paid a quarterly distribution of $0.30 per unit
($8.0 million) to common and subordinated unitholders and
our general partner on May 15, 2006. The $0.30 per
unit distribution reflected the pro rata portion of the $0.45
quarterly distribution per unit for the period from
January 31, 2006, the date of the closing of our initial
public offering, through March 31, 2006. We intend to
continue making minimum quarterly distributions of
$0.45 per unit to all common and subordinated unitholders
throughout 2006 to the extent we have sufficient cash from
operations after establishment of cash reserves.
Our capital requirements consist of capital improvement
expenditures, replacement capital expenditures and environmental
expenditures. Capital improvement expenditures include
expenditures to acquire assets to grow our business and to
expand existing facilities, such as projects that increase
operating capacity. Replacement capital expenditures replace
worn out or obsolete
63
equipment or parts. Environmental expenditures include property
additions to meet or exceed environmental and operating
regulations. We expense all maintenance costs with major
maintenance and repairs (facility turnarounds) accrued in
advance over the period between turnarounds.
The following table sets forth our capital improvement
expenditures, replacement capital expenditures and environmental
expenditures in each of the periods shown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet | |
|
|
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
Calumet | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Capital improvement expenditures
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
39.0 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
Replacement capital expenditures
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Environmental expenditures
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
|
$ |
43.0 |
|
|
$ |
13.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We anticipate that future capital improvement requirements will
be provided through long-term borrowings, other debt financings,
equity offerings and/or cash on hand.
|
|
|
Shreveport Refinery Expansion Project |
We have commenced a major expansion project at our Shreveport
refinery to increase its throughput capacity and its production
of specialty products. The expansion project involves several of
the refinerys operating units and is estimated to result
in a crude oil throughput capacity increase of approximately
15,000 bpd, bringing total crude oil throughput capacity of
the refinery to approximately 57,000 bpd. The expansion is
expected to be completed and fully operational in the third
quarter of 2007. Upon completion of the project and on a
combined basis, our production of specialty lubricating oils and
waxes at the Shreveport refinery is anticipated to increase by
approximately 75.0% over first quarter 2006 levels and our
production of fuel products at the Shreveport refinery is
anticipated to increase by approximately 30.0% over first
quarter 2006 levels.
As part of the Shreveport refinery expansion project, we plan to
increase the Shreveport refinerys capacity to process an
additional 8,000 bpd of sour crude oil, bringing total
capacity to process sour crude oil to 13,000 bpd. Of the
anticipated 57,000 bpd throughput rate upon completion of
the expansion project, we expect the refinery to process
approximately 42,000 bpd of sweet crude oil and
13,000 bpd of sour crude oil, with the remainder coming
from interplant feedstocks. Our ability to process significant
amounts of sour crude oil enhances our competitive position in
the industry relative to refiners that process primarily sweet
crude oil because sour crude oil typically can be purchased at a
discount to sweet crude oil.
Subject to normal contingencies, we anticipate incurring
approximately $60 million in capital expenditures related
to the expansion project during 2006 and approximately
$50 million related to the expansion project in 2007. We
expect that our expansion project will be accretive on a per
unit basis upon its completion. Please read The
Partnership Agreement Issuance of Additional
Securities for a discussion of our ability to issue
additional equity securities before the completion of the
Shreveport refinery expansion project.
64
|
|
|
Debt and Credit Facilities |
On December 9, 2005, we repaid all of our existing
indebtedness under our prior credit facilities and entered into
new credit agreements with syndicates of financial institutions
for credit facilities that consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
a $225.0 million senior secured revolving credit
facility; and |
|
|
|
a $225.0 million senior secured first lien credit facility
consisting of a $175.0 million term loan facility and a
$50.0 million letter of credit facility to support crack
spread hedging. |
At March 31, 2006 we had borrowings of $49.9 million
under our term loan and $14.8 million under our revolving
credit facility. Our letters of credit outstanding as of
March 31, 2006 were $40.0 million under the revolving
credit facility and $50.0 million under the
$50.0 million letter of credit facility.
At December 31, 2005 we had borrowings of
$175.0 million under our term loan facility and
$93.0 million under our revolving credit facility. Our
letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2005 were
$37.7 million under the revolving credit facility and
$11.0 million under the $50 million letter of credit
facility to support crack spread hedging.
The secured revolving credit facility currently bears interest
at Bank of America, N.A.s prime rate or LIBOR plus
150 basis points (which basis point margin may fluctuate),
has a first priority lien on our cash, accounts receivable and
inventory and a second priority lien on our fixed assets and
matures in December 2010. On March 31, 2006, we had
availability on our revolving credit facility of
$130.5 million, based upon its $185.2 million
borrowing base, $40.0 million in outstanding letters of
credit, and borrowings of $14.8 million. As of June 8,
2006, we had availability on our revolving credit facility of
$131.2 million, based upon its $206.3 borrowing base,
$68.9 million in outstanding letters of credit, and
borrowings of $6.2 million.
The term loan facility was fully drawn at the time of the
refinancing. The term loan facility bears interest at a rate of
LIBOR plus 350 basis points and the letter of credit
facility to support crack spread hedging bears interest at a
rate of 3.5%. Each facility has a first priority lien on our
fixed assets and a second priority lien on our cash, accounts
receivable and inventory and matures in December 2012. Under the
terms of our term loan facility, we applied a portion of the net
proceeds we received from our initial public offering, including
and the underwriters option to purchase additional units,
to repay the term loan facility, and are required to make
mandatory repayments of approximately $0.1 million at the
end of each fiscal quarter, beginning with the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2006 and ending with the fiscal quarter
ending December 31, 2011. At the end of each fiscal quarter
in 2012 we are required to make mandatory repayments of
approximately $11.8 million per quarter, with the remainder
of the principal due at maturity. On April 24, 2006, the
Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a
counterparty to fix the LIBOR component of the interest rate on
a portion of outstanding borrowings under its term loan
facility. The notional amount of the interest rate swap
agreement is 85% of the outstanding term loan balance over its
remaining term, with LIBOR fixed at 5.44%. Borrowings under the
term loan facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 3.50%.
In June 2006, we expect to amend our term loan and revolving
credit facilities to increase the amount of permitted capital
expenditures we may make in order to accommodate our Shreveport
refinery expansion project and to increase the level of
permitted annual capital expenditures beginning in 2007.
Our letter of credit facility to support crack spread hedging is
secured by a first priority lien on our fixed assets. As long as
this first priority lien is in effect, we will have no
obligation to post additional cash, letters of credit or other
collateral to supplement this $50.0 million letter of
credit to secure our crack spread hedges at any time, even if
our counterpartys exposure to our credit increases over
the term of the hedge as a result of higher commodity prices.
65
The credit facilities permit us to make distributions to our
unitholders as long as we are not in default or would not be in
default following the distribution. Under the credit facilities,
we are obligated to comply with certain financial covenants
requiring us to maintain a Consolidated Leverage Ratio of no
more than 3.75 to 1 (as of the end of each fiscal quarter
and after giving effect to a proposed distribution) and
available liquidity of at least $30.0 million (after giving
effect to a proposed distribution). The Consolidated Leverage
Ratio is defined under our credit agreements to mean the ratio
of our consolidated debt (as defined in the credit agreements)
as of the last day of any fiscal quarter to our Adjusted EBITDA
(as defined below) for the four fiscal quarter period ending on
such date. Available liquidity is a measure used under our
credit agreements to mean the sum of the cash and borrowing
capacity under our revolving credit facility that we have as of
a given date. Adjusted EBITDA means Consolidated EBITDA as
defined in our credit facilities to mean, for any period:
(1) net income plus (2)(a) interest expense;
(b) taxes; (c) depreciation and amortization;
(d) unrealized losses from mark to market accounting for
hedging activities; (e) unrealized items decreasing net
income (including the non-cash impact of restructuring,
decommissioning and asset impairments in the periods presented);
and (f) other non-recurring expenses reducing net income
which do not represent a cash item for such period; minus
(3)(a) tax credits; (b) unrealized items increasing
net income (including the non-cash impact of restructuring,
decommissioning and asset impairments in the periods presented);
(c) unrealized gains from mark to market accounting for
hedging activities; and (d) other non-recurring expenses
and unrealized items that reduced net income for a prior period,
but represent a cash item in the current period.
In addition, at any time that our borrowing capacity under our
revolving credit facility falls below $25.0 million, we
must maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of at least 1
to 1 (as of the end of each fiscal quarter). The Fixed
Charge Coverage Ratio is defined under our credit agreements to
mean the ratio of (a) Adjusted EBITDA minus Consolidated
Capital Expenditures minus Consolidated Cash Taxes, to
(b) Fixed Charges (as each such term is defined in our
credit agreements). We anticipate that we will continue to be in
compliance with the financial covenants contained in our credit
facilities and will, therefore, be able to make distributions to
our unitholders.
In addition, our credit agreements contain various covenants
that limit, among other things, our ability to: incur
indebtedness; grant liens; make certain acquisitions and
investments; make capital expenditures above specified amounts;
redeem or prepay other debt or make other restricted payments
such as dividends to unitholders; enter into transactions with
affiliates; enter into a merger, consolidation or sale of
assets; and cease our refining margin hedging program (our
lenders have required us to obtain and maintain derivative
contracts for refining margins in our fuels segment for a
rolling two-year period for at least 40%, and no more than 80%,
of our anticipated fuels production).
If an event of default exists under our credit agreements, the
lenders will be able to accelerate the maturity of the credit
facilities and exercise other rights and remedies. An event of
default is defined as nonpayment of principal interest, fees or
other amounts; failure of any representation or warranty to be
true and correct when made or confirmed; failure to perform or
observe covenants in the credit agreement or other loan
documents, subject to certain grace periods; payment defaults in
respect of other indebtedness; cross-defaults in other
indebtedness if the effect of such default is to cause the
acceleration of such indebtedness under any material agreement
if such default could have a material adverse effect on us;
bankruptcy or insolvency events; monetary judgment defaults; the
accrual of liability with respect to any pension or
multiemployer plan in excess of $5.0 million asserted
invalidity of the loan documentation; a change of control in us;
the loss of collateral; the inability to conduct any material
part of our business; and certain criminal matters.
66
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments |
A summary of our total contractual cash obligations as of
March 31, 2006, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period (thousands) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Than | |
|
1-3 | |
|
3-5 | |
|
More Than | |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$ |
64,626 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,751 |
|
|
$ |
47,375 |
|
Operating lease obligations(1)
|
|
|
35,666 |
|
|
|
8,719 |
|
|
|
11,496 |
|
|
|
7,088 |
|
|
|
8,363 |
|
Letters of credit(2)
|
|
|
40,045 |
|
|
|
40,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crack spread hedging letter of
credit(3)
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Purchase commitments(4)
|
|
|
793,132 |
|
|
|
399,190 |
|
|
|
359,028 |
|
|
|
34,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employment agreement(5)
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total obligations
|
|
$ |
985,078 |
|
|
$ |
448,787 |
|
|
$ |
372,190 |
|
|
$ |
58,363 |
|
|
$ |
105,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
We have various operating leases for the use of land, storage
tanks, pressure stations, railcars, equipment, precious metals
and office facilities that extend through August 2015. |
|
(2) |
Standby letters of credit supporting crude oil purchases and
hedging activities. |
|
(3) |
Standby letters of credit supporting hedging activities. |
|
(4) |
Purchase commitments consist of obligations to purchase fixed
volumes of crude oil from various suppliers based on current
market prices at the time of delivery. |
|
(5) |
Annual compensation under the employment agreement of F. William
Grube, President and Chief Executive Officer. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of results of operations and
financial condition are based upon our consolidated financial
statements for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2006 and the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that
affect the amounts reported in those financial statements. On an
ongoing basis, we evaluate estimates and base our estimates on
historical experience and assumptions believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances. Those estimates form the basis for our
judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements. Actual results could differ from our estimates under
different assumptions or conditions. Our significant accounting
policies, which may be affected by our estimates and
assumptions, are more fully described in Note 2 to our
consolidated financial statements that appear elsewhere in this
prospectus. We believe that the following are the more critical
judgment areas in the application of our accounting policies
that currently affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
We recognize revenue on orders received from our customers when
there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement with the customer
that is supportive of revenue recognition, the customer has made
a fixed commitment to purchase the product for a fixed or
determinable sales price, collection is reasonably assured under
our normal billing and credit terms, and ownership and all risks
of loss have been transferred to the buyer, which is upon
shipment to the customer.
67
Periodic major maintenance and repairs (turnaround costs)
applicable to refining facilities are accounted for using the
accrue-in-advance
method. Accruals are based upon managements estimate of
the nature and extent of maintenance and repair necessary for
each facility. Actual expenditures could vary significantly from
managements estimates as the scope of a turnaround may
significantly change once the actual maintenance has commenced.
The cost of inventories is determined using the
last-in, first-out
(LIFO) method. Costs include material, labor and
manufacturing overhead costs. We review our inventory balances
quarterly for excess inventory levels or obsolete products and
write down, if necessary, the inventory to net realizable value.
The replacement cost of our inventory, based on current market
values, would have been $47.8 million and
$53.2 million higher at December 31, 2005 and
March 31, 2006, respectively.
Derivatives
We utilize derivative instruments to minimize our price risk and
volatility of cash flows associated with the purchase of crude
oil and natural gas, the sale of fuel products and interest
expense. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, which was amended in June
2000 by SFAS No. 138 and in May 2003 by
SFAS No. 149 (collectively referred to as
SFAS 133), we recognize all derivative
transactions as either assets or liabilities at fair value on
the balance sheet. To the extent designated as an effective cash
flow hedge of an exposure to future changes in the value of a
purchase or sale transaction, the change in fair value of the
derivative is deferred in other comprehensive income. For cash
flow hedges of the purchase of natural gas and crude oil, the
realized gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recorded
to cost of goods sold in the statement of operations upon
completed purchase of crude oil or natural gas. The realized
gain or loss upon the settlement of a cash flow hedge of the
sale of diesel fuel or gasoline is recorded to sales in the
statement of operations when the sale occurs. For derivative
instruments not designated as cash flow hedges and the portion
of any cash flow hedge that is determined to be ineffective, the
change in fair value of the asset or liability for the period is
recorded to unrealized gain or loss on derivative instruments in
the statement of operations. Upon the settlement of a derivative
not designated as a cash flow hedge, the gain or loss for the
gain or loss at settlement is recorded to realized gain or loss
on derivative instruments in the statement of operations.
At March 31, 2006, certain derivatives hedging natural gas
and crude oil purchases for our specialty products segment were
designated as cash flow hedges. During 2003, 2004 and through
November 30, 2005, none of our outstanding derivative
transactions were designated as hedges. At March 31, 2006,
$0.5 million was recorded in other comprehensive income
related to these natural gas and crude derivative contracts with
$0.1 million to be recognized in the statement of
operations during the remainder of 2006 and $0.4 million in
2007.
At March 31, 2006, we had not designated our derivative
contracts hedging refining margins as cash flow hedges. The
company utilizes third party valuations, published market data
and option valuation models to determine the fair value of these
derivatives. The change in fair value of these derivatives is
recorded in unrealized gain or loss on derivative instruments in
the statement of operations. On April 1, 2006, we
designated certain derivative contracts that hedge the purchase
of crude oil and sale of fuel products as cash flow hedges to
the extent they qualify for hedge accounting.
In April 2006, we entered into a derivative contract to minimize
a portion of our exposure to rising interest rates. We have
designated this contract as a cash flow hedge.
68
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
(SFAS) No. 151, Inventory Costs an
amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin
(ARB) No. 43, Chapter 4. The Statement clarifies
that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight,
handling costs and wasted materials should be recognized as
current-period expenses regardless of how abnormal the
circumstances. In addition, this Statement requires that the
allocation of fixed overheads to the costs of conversion be
based upon normal production capacity levels. The Statement is
effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not anticipate that
this Statement will have a material effect on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued Statement
No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a
revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock
Based Compensation. Statement 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and
amends FASB Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows.
Generally, the approach in Statement 123(R) is similar to
the approach described in Statement 123. However,
Statement 123(R) requires all share-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be
recognized in the income statement based on their fair values.
Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.
Statement 123(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning
after July 1, 2005. We expect to adopt
Statement 123(R) using the modified prospective
method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with
the effective date based on the requirements of
Statement 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after
the effective date and based on the requirements of
Statement 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to
the effective date of Statement 123(R) that remain unvested
on the effective date. There was no impact of adoption of
Statement 123(R) as we had not granted share-based payments
as of the date of adoption.
In 2005, the FASB Interpretation No. 47 (FIN 47),
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations
was issued. We were required to adopt this interpretation as
of December 31, 2005. We have conditional asset retirement
obligations related to our Cotton Valley, Shreveport and
Princeton refineries related to asbestos. We believe that there
is an indeterminate settlement date for these obligations so
that a fair value cannot be reasonably estimated. Therefore, we
did not record any liability for asset retirement obligations
related to these refineries upon adoption of FIN 47.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from fluctuations in interest
rates. As of December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006, we
had approximately $268.0 and $64.6 million of variable rate
debt, respectively. Holding other variables constant (such as
debt levels) a one hundred basis point change in interest rates
on our variable rate debt as of March 31, 2006 would be
expected to have an impact on net income and cash flows for 2006
of approximately $0.6 million.
Both our profitability and our cash flows are affected by
volatility in prevailing crude oil and natural gas prices and
crack spreads (the difference between crude oil prices and
refined product sale prices). The primary purpose of our
commodity risk management activities is to hedge our exposure to
price risks associated with the cost of crude oil and natural
gas and sales prices of our fuel and specialty products.
69
|
|
|
Crude Oil Price Volatility |
We are exposed to significant fluctuations in the price of crude
oil, our principal raw material. Given the historical volatility
of crude oil prices, this exposure can significantly impact
product costs and gross profit. Holding all other variables
constant, and excluding the impact of our current hedges, we
expect a $1.00 change in the per barrel price of crude oil would
change our specialty product segment cost of sales by
$9.7 million and our fuel product segment cost of sales by
$9.1 million on an annual basis based on our results for
the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Because we typically do not set prices for our specialty
products in advance of our crude oil purchases, we can take into
account the cost of crude oil in setting prices. We further
manage our exposure to fluctuations in crude oil prices in our
specialty products segment through the use of derivative
instruments. Our policy is generally to enter into crude oil
contracts for three to six months forward and for 50% to 70% of
our anticipated crude oil purchases related to our specialty
products production.
|
|
|
Natural Gas Price Volatility |
Since natural gas purchases comprise a significant component of
our cost of sales, changes in the price of natural gas also
significantly affect our profitability and our cash flows.
Holding all other cost and revenue variables constant, and
excluding the impact of our current hedges, we expect a
$0.50 change per MMBtu (one million British Thermal Units)
in the price of natural gas would change our cost of sales by
$2.4 million on an annual basis based on our results for
the three months ended March 31, 2006.
|
|
|
Natural Gas Hedging Policy |
In order to manage our exposure to natural gas prices, we enter
into derivative contracts. Our policy is generally to enter into
natural gas swap contracts during the summer months for
approximately 50% of our anticipated natural gas requirements
for the upcoming fall and winter months.
Our profitability and cash flows are also significantly impacted
by the crack spreads we experience. Crack spreads represent the
difference between the prices we are able to realize for our
fuel products and the cost of the crude oil we must purchase to
produce those products. Holding other variables constant, and
excluding the impact of our current hedges, we expect a
$0.50 change in the Gulf Coast 2/1/1 crack spread per
barrel would change our annual fuel products segment gross
profit by $4.5 million based on our results for the three
months ended March 31, 2006.
|
|
|
Crack Spread Hedging Policy |
In order to manage our exposure to crack spreads, we enter into
fuels product margin swap and collar contracts. We began to
implement this policy in October 2004. Our policy is to enter
into derivative contracts to hedge our refining margins for a
period no greater than five years and for no more than 75% of
anticipated fuels production. We believe this policy lessens the
volatility of our cash flows. In addition, in connection with
our credit facilities, our lenders require us to obtain and
maintain derivative contracts to hedge our refining margins for
a rolling two-year period for at least 40%, and no more than
80%, of our anticipated fuels production.
The historical impact of fair value fluctuations in our
derivative instruments has been reflected in the
realized/unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments line
items in our consolidated statements of operations. As a result,
gain (loss) on derivative transactions recognized in our
70
historical financial statements may not be consistent with
future periods. Effective April 1, 2006, we restructured
and designated certain of our derivative contracts for our fuel
products segment as cash flow hedges of future crude oil
purchases or fuel product sales, to the extent they qualify for
hedge accounting.
The unrealized gain or loss on derivatives at a given point in
time is not necessarily indicative of the results realized when
such contracts mature. Please read Note 3
Derivatives in our unaudited consolidated financial
statements and Note 7 Derivatives in our
consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the
accounting treatment for the various types of derivative
transactions, and a further discussion of our derivatives policy.
71
|
|
|
Existing Derivative Instruments |
The following tables provide information about our derivative
instruments as of March 31, 2006:
2006 Derivative Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Put/Call Spread |
|
|
|
Lower Put | |
|
Upper Put | |
|
Call Floor | |
|
Call Ceiling | |
Contracts Expiration Dates |
|
Barrels | |
|
($/Bbl) | |
|
($/Bbl) | |
|
($/Bbl) | |
|
($/Bbl) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
April 2006
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
$ |
45.85 |
|
|
$ |
55.58 |
|
|
$ |
65.58 |
|
|
$ |
75.58 |
|
May 2006
|
|
|
248,000 |
|
|
|
52.60 |
|
|
|
62.60 |
|
|
|
72.60 |
|
|
|
82.60 |
|
June 2006
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
51.06 |
|
|
|
61.06 |
|
|
|
71.06 |
|
|
|
81.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
728,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
49.87 |
|
|
$ |
59.78 |
|
|
$ |
69.78 |
|
|
$ |
79.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crack Spread Swap Contracts Expiration Dates |
|
Barrels | |
|
($/Bbl) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Second Quarter 2006
|
|
|
1,039,000 |
|
|
|
8.94 |
|
|
Third Quarter 2006
|
|
|
1,043,000 |
|
|
|
8.61 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2006
|
|
|
1,043,000 |
|
|
|
8.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Totals
|
|
|
3,125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Put | |
|
Call | |
|
|
|
|
Option | |
|
Option | |
|
|
|
|
Strike | |
|
Strike | |
|
|
|
|
Price | |
|
Price | |
Crack Spread Collar Contracts Expiration Dates |
|
Barrels | |
|
($/Bbl) | |
|
($/Bbl) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Second Quarter 2006
|
|
|
680,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.82 |
|
|
$ |
|