sv1za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
November 16, 2005
Registration No. 333-128880
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Amendment No. 1
to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
2911 |
|
37-1516132 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
2780 Waterfront Pkwy E. Drive
Suite 200
Indianapolis, Indiana 46214
(317) 328-5660
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including
Area Code, of Registrants Principal Executive Offices)
R. Patrick Murray, II
2780 Waterfront Pkwy E. Drive
Suite 200
Indianapolis, Indiana 46214
(317) 328-5660
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
David Oelman
Catherine Gallagher
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2300
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 758-2222
|
|
Joshua Davidson
Timothy S. Taylor
Baker Botts L.L.P.
910 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 229-1234 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this Registration
Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to
Rule 434, please check the following
box. o
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this registration statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration
statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities
and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said
Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in this preliminary
prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell
these securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This
preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities
and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any
state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
Subject to Completion. Dated November 16,
2005.
PROSPECTUS
6,450,000 Common Units
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.
Representing Limited Partner Interests
We are offering 6,450,000 common units, including
$15.0 million of common units that will be offered directly
by us to three individuals related to the chairman of the board
of directors of our general partner. This is the initial public
offering of our common units.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for the
common units. It is currently estimated that the initial public
offering price per common unit will be between
$ and
$ . We have
applied to have our common units quoted on the NASDAQ National
Market under the symbol CLMT.
See Risk Factors on page 14 to read about
factors you should consider before buying the common units.
These risks include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations to pay the
minimum quarterly distribution of $0.45 per quarter, or $1.80
per year, following the establishment of cash reserves and
payment of fees and expenses, including payments to our general
partner. |
|
|
|
|
Refining margins are volatile and at historical highs and a
reduction in our refining margins will adversely affect the
amount of cash we will have available for distribution. |
|
|
|
|
Our hedging activities may reduce our earnings, profitability
and cash flows. |
|
|
|
|
We depend on certain key crude oil gatherers for a significant
portion of our supply of crude oil. |
|
|
|
Our general partner and its affiliates have conflicts of
interest and limited fiduciary duties, which may permit them to
favor their own interests to your detriment. |
|
|
|
Unitholders have limited voting rights and are not entitled to
elect our general partner or its directors. |
|
|
|
|
Even if unitholders are dissatisfied, they cannot initially
remove our general partner without its consent. |
|
|
|
|
|
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of
$17.16 per common unit. |
|
|
|
|
You may be required to pay taxes on income from us even if you
do not receive any cash distributions from us. |
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Unit | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Initial public offering price
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Underwriting discount(1)(2)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Proceeds before expenses to Calumet
Specialty Products
Partners, L.P.
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The underwriters will not receive any underwriting discount or
commission on $15.0 million of common units offered
directly by us to three individuals related to our chairman
(representing 731,818 common units at the assumed initial public
offering price of $22.00 less the underwriting discount per unit
for the common units being sold to the public). |
|
|
|
(2) |
Excludes a structuring fee of
$ to
be paid to Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
|
We have granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up
to 857,727 common units on the same terms and conditions as
set forth above to cover over-allotment of common units, if any.
The underwriters expect to deliver the common units against
payment in New York, New York
on ,
2005.
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Prospectus
dated ,
2005.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
ii
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not,
authorized anyone to provide you with different information. If
anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information,
you should not rely on it. We are not, and the underwriters are
not, making an offer to sell these securities in any
jurisdiction where an offer or sale is not permitted. You should
assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is
accurate as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus.
Our business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects may have changed since that date.
References in this prospectus to Calumet Specialty
Products Partners, we, our,
us or like terms, when used in a historical context,
refer to the assets of Calumet Lubricants Co., Limited
Partnership and its subsidiaries that are being contributed to
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. and its subsidiaries
in connection with this offering. When used in the present tense
or prospectively, those terms refer to Calumet Specialty
Products Partners, L.P. and its subsidiaries. References in this
prospectus to our general partner refer to Calumet
GP, LLC.
iii
SUMMARY
This summary provides a brief overview of information
contained elsewhere in this prospectus. Because it is
abbreviated, this summary does not contain all of the
information that you should consider before investing in the
common units. You should read the entire prospectus carefully,
including the historical and pro forma financial statements and
the notes to those financial statements. The information
presented in this prospectus assumes (1) an initial public
offering price of $22.00 per common unit and (2) that
the underwriters over-allotment option to purchase
additional units is not exercised. You should read Risk
Factors beginning on page 14 for more information
about important risks that you should consider carefully before
buying our common units. We include a glossary of some of the
terms used in this prospectus as Appendix B.
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.
We are a leading independent producer of high-quality, specialty
hydrocarbon products in North America. Our business is organized
into two segments: specialty products and fuel products. In our
specialty products segment, we process crude oil into a wide
variety of customized lubricating oils, solvents and waxes. Our
specialty products are sold to domestic and international
customers who purchase them primarily as raw material components
for basic industrial, consumer and automotive goods. In our fuel
products segment, we process crude oil into a variety of fuel
and fuel-related products including unleaded gasoline, diesel
fuel and jet fuel. In connection with our production of
specialty products and fuel products, we also produce asphalt
and a limited number of other by-products. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2005, approximately 53.7% of our gross
profit was generated from our specialty products segment and
approximately 46.3% of our gross profit was generated from our
fuel products segment.
Our operating assets consist of our:
|
|
|
|
|
Princeton Refinery. Our Princeton refinery, with an
aggregate crude oil throughput capacity of approximately
10,000 barrels per day (bpd) and located in
northwest Louisiana, produces specialty lubricating oils,
including process oils, base oils, transformer oils and
refrigeration oils that are used in a variety of industrial and
automotive applications. |
|
|
|
Cotton Valley Refinery. Our Cotton Valley refinery, with
an aggregate crude oil throughput capacity of approximately
13,500 bpd and located in northwest Louisiana, produces
specialty solvents that are used principally in the manufacture
of paints, cleaners and automotive products. |
|
|
|
Shreveport Refinery. Our Shreveport refinery, with an
aggregate crude oil throughput capacity of approximately
42,000 bpd and located in northwest Louisiana, produces
specialty lubricating oils and waxes, as well as fuel products
such as gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel. |
|
|
|
Distribution and Logistics Assets. We own and operate a
terminal in Burnham, Illinois with a storage capacity of
130,000 barrels that facilitates the distribution of our
products in the upper Midwest and East Coast regions of the
United States and in Canada. In addition, we lease approximately
1,200 rail cars to receive crude oil or distribute our products
throughout the United States and Canada. We also have
approximately 4.5 million barrels of aggregate finished
product storage capacity at our refineries. |
Business Strategies
Our management team is dedicated to increasing the amount of
cash available for distribution on each limited partner unit by
executing the following strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentrate on stable cash flows. |
|
|
|
|
|
Develop and expand our customer relationships. |
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enhance profitability of our existing assets. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursue strategic and complementary acquisitions. |
|
Competitive Strengths
We believe that we are well positioned to execute our business
strategies successfully based on the following competitive
strengths:
|
|
|
|
|
|
We offer our customers a diverse range of specialty
products. |
|
|
|
|
|
We have strong relationships with a broad customer base. |
|
|
|
|
|
Our refineries have advanced technology. |
|
|
|
|
|
We have an experienced management team. |
|
Risk Factors
An investment in our common units involves risks associated with
our business, regulatory and legal matters, our limited
partnership structure and the tax characteristics of our common
units. Please carefully read Risk Factors
immediately following this Summary beginning on
page 14.
Formation Transactions and Partnership Structure
We are a Delaware limited partnership formed in September 2005
to acquire, own and operate the assets that have historically
been owned by Calumet Lubricants Co., Limited Partnership.
In connection with this offering and the related formation
transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will issue to the current owners of Calumet Lubricants Co.,
Limited Partnership (The Heritage Group, a privately-owned
general partnership that invests in a variety of industrial
companies, the Fehsenfeld and Grube families or trusts set up on
their behalf, and certain of their affiliates) 5,758,273 common
units and 13,066,000 subordinated units, representing a 73.0%
limited partner interest in us, in exchange for the contribution
of their ownership interests in Calumet Lubricants Co., Limited
Partnership; |
|
|
|
|
we will issue to our general partner, Calumet GP, LLC, a 2%
general partner interest in us and all of our incentive
distribution rights, which will entitle our general partner to
increasing percentages of the cash we distribute in excess of
$0.495 per unit per quarter; |
|
|
|
we will enter into new senior secured credit facilities; |
|
|
|
|
we will enter into an omnibus agreement with The Heritage Group
and certain of its affiliates pursuant to which The Heritage
Group and certain of its affiliates will generally agree not to
compete with us in the business of refining or marketing certain
fuels and specialty hydrocarbon products; |
|
|
|
|
|
we will sell 5,718,182 common units to the public in this
offering, representing a 22.2% limited partner interest in us;
and |
|
|
|
|
|
we will sell 731,818 common units, representing a 2.8%
limited partner interest in us, to Messrs. Fred M.
Fehsenfeld, Sr., the father of our chairman, Mac
Fehsenfeld, the uncle of our chairman, and Frank B. Fehsenfeld,
the uncle of our chairman (collectively, the Fehsenfeld
Investors). |
|
The principal difference between our common units and
subordinated units is that, in any quarter during the
subordination period, holders of the subordinated units are
entitled to receive the minimum quarterly distribution of
$0.45 per unit only after the common units have received the
2
minimum quarterly distribution plus arrearages from prior
quarters. Subordinated units will not accrue arrearages. The
subordination period will end if we meet the financial tests in
our partnership agreement, but it generally cannot end before
December 31, 2010. Please read The
Offering for a description of the subordination period.
We believe that conducting our operations through a publicly
traded limited partnership will offer us the following
advantages:
|
|
|
|
|
access to public equity and debt capital markets; |
|
|
|
a lower cost of capital for expansions and acquisitions; |
|
|
|
an enhanced ability to use equity securities as consideration in
future acquisitions; and |
|
|
|
an overall lower effective income tax rate to our unitholders
than if we were a corporation. |
Holding Company Structure
As is common with publicly traded limited partnerships and in
order to maximize operational flexibility, we will conduct our
operations through subsidiaries. In order to be treated as a
partnership for federal income tax purposes, we must generate
90% or more of our gross income from certain qualifying sources,
such as the refining of crude oil and other feedstocks and the
marketing of finished petroleum products. However, the income
derived from the marketing of these products to certain
end-users, such as governmental entities and airlines, is not
considered qualifying income for federal income tax purposes. As
a result, we plan on marketing products to these non-qualifying
end-users through Calumet Reseller, Inc., a corporate subsidiary
of our operating company, Calumet Operating, LLC. Sales from
activities conducted by our corporate subsidiary will be taxed
at the applicable corporate income tax rate. Dividends received
by us from our corporate subsidiary constitute qualifying
income. For a more complete description of this qualifying
income requirement, please read Material Tax
Consequences Partnership Status.
The diagram on the following page depicts our organization and
ownership after giving effect to the offering and the related
formation transactions.
3
Organizational Structure After the Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership of Calumet Specialty
Products Partners, L.P.
|
Public Common Units
|
|
|
22.2% |
|
Common Units to be purchased by the
Fehsenfeld Investors
|
|
|
2.8% |
|
Common Units owned by Affiliates of
our General Partner
|
|
|
22.3% |
|
Subordinated Units owned by
Affiliates of our General Partner
|
|
|
50.7% |
|
General Partner Interest
|
|
|
2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100% |
|
4
Management and Ownership of Calumet Specialty Products
Partners, L.P.
Calumet GP, LLC, our general partner, has sole responsibility
for conducting our business and for managing our operations. The
Heritage Group and the Fehsenfeld and Grube families and their
family trusts own our general partner. For information about the
executive officers and directors of our general partner, please
read Management Directors and Executive
Officers. Our general partner will not receive any
management fee or other compensation in connection with its
management of our business but will be entitled to be reimbursed
for all direct and indirect expenses incurred on our behalf. Our
general partner will also be entitled to distributions on its
general partner interest and, if specified requirements are met,
on its incentive distribution rights. Please read Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions and
Management Executive Compensation.
Neither our general partner nor the board of directors of our
general partner will be elected by our unitholders. Unlike
shareholders in a publicly traded corporation, our unitholders
will not be entitled to elect the directors of our general
partner.
Principal Executive Offices and Internet Address
Our principal executive offices are located at
2780 Waterfront Pkwy E. Drive, Suite 200,
Indianapolis, Indiana 46214 and our telephone number is
(317) 328-5660. Our website is located at
http://www.calumetspecialty.com. We expect to make our periodic
reports and other information filed with or furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, available, free of
charge, through our website, as soon as reasonably practicable
after those reports and other information are electronically
filed with or furnished to the SEC. Information on our website
or any other website is not incorporated by reference into this
prospectus and does not constitute a part of this prospectus.
Summary of Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties
Calumet GP, LLC, our general partner, has a legal duty to manage
us in a manner beneficial to our unitholders. This legal duty
originates in statutes and judicial decisions and is commonly
referred to as a fiduciary duty. The officers and
directors of our general partner also have fiduciary duties to
manage our general partner in a manner beneficial to its owners.
As a result of this relationship, conflicts of interest may
arise in the future between us and our unitholders, on the one
hand, and our general partner and its affiliates on the other
hand. For a more detailed description of the conflicts of
interest and fiduciary duties of our general partner, please
read Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties.
Our partnership agreement limits the liability and reduces the
fiduciary duties of our general partner to our unitholders. Our
partnership agreement also restricts the remedies available to
unitholders for actions that might otherwise constitute a breach
of our general partners fiduciary duties owed to
unitholders. By purchasing a common unit, you are treated as
having consented to various actions contemplated in our
partnership agreement and conflicts of interest that might
otherwise be considered a breach of fiduciary or other duties
under applicable state law. Please read Conflicts of
Interest and Fiduciary Duties Fiduciary Duties
for a description of the fiduciary duties imposed on our general
partner by Delaware law, the material modifications of these
duties contained in our partnership agreement and certain legal
rights and remedies available to unitholders.
5
The Offering
|
|
|
|
Common units offered |
|
6,450,000 common units, including 731,818 common units offered
to the Fehsenfeld Investors that will not be underwritten and
will be sold directly by us. |
|
|
|
|
|
7,307,727 common units, if the underwriters exercise their
over-allotment option in full. |
|
|
|
Units outstanding after this offering |
|
12,208,273 common units, representing a 47.3% limited partner
interest in us, and 13,066,000 subordinated units, representing
a 50.7% limited partner interest in us. |
|
|
|
|
13,066,000 common units and 13,066,000 subordinated
units, each representing a 49.0% limited partner interest in us,
if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full. |
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to use the estimated net proceeds of approximately
$127.0 million from this offering, after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
and related formation transaction expenses of approximately
$5.0 million, to: |
|
|
|
|
|
repay $119.7 million in term loans under our
new credit facilities; and |
|
|
|
|
|
pay $7.3 million of prepayment penalties and
fees to our lenders. |
|
|
|
|
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option to
purchase additional common units, we will use the net proceeds
to repay additional borrowings under our term loans. |
|
|
Cash distributions |
|
We will make minimum quarterly distributions of $0.45 per
unit to the extent we have sufficient cash from operations after
establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses,
including payments to our general partner. |
|
|
|
|
|
Within 45 days after the end of each quarter, beginning
with the quarter ending March 31, 2006, we will distribute
our available cash to unitholders of record on the applicable
record date. We will adjust the minimum quarterly distribution
for the period from the closing of the offering through the end
of the quarter in which the offering occurs based on the actual
length of the period. |
|
|
|
|
In general, we will pay any cash distributions we make each
quarter in the following manner: |
|
|
|
first, 98% to the holders of common units and 2% to
our general partner, until each common unit has received a
minimum quarterly distribution of $0.45 plus any arrearages from
prior quarters; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the holders of subordinated units and
2% to our general partner, until each subordinated unit has
received a minimum quarterly distribution of $0.45; and |
|
|
|
third, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
our general partner, until each unit has received a distribution
of $0.495. |
6
|
|
|
|
|
If cash distributions to our unitholders exceed $0.495 per
common unit in any quarter, our general partner will receive
increasing percentages, up to 50%, of the cash we distribute in
excess of that amount. We refer to the amount of these
distributions in excess of the 2% general partner interest as
incentive distributions. Please read How We
Make Cash Distributions Incentive Distribution
Rights. |
|
|
|
We must distribute all of our cash on hand at the end of each
quarter, less reserves established by our general partner. We
refer to this cash as available cash, and we define
its meaning in our partnership agreement, in How We Make
Cash Distributions Distributions of Available
Cash Definition of Available Cash and in the
glossary of terms attached as Appendix B. The amount of
available cash may be greater than or less than the minimum
quarterly distribution to be distributed on all units. |
|
|
|
|
We believe that, based on the estimates contained and the
assumptions listed under the caption Our Cash Distribution
Policy and Restrictions on Distributions, we will have
sufficient cash from operations to enable us to pay the full
minimum quarterly distribution for the four quarters ending
December 31, 2006 on all common units and subordinated
units. Our pro forma cash available for distribution generated
during the year ended December 31, 2004 would have been
sufficient to allow us to pay approximately 81.1% of the minimum
quarterly distribution on the common units and none of the
minimum quarterly distribution on the subordinated units. Our
pro forma cash available for distribution generated during
the twelve months ended September 30, 2005 would have been
sufficient to allow us to pay the full minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units and the subordinated units.
Please read Our Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions
on Distributions. |
|
|
|
Subordination period |
|
During the subordination period, the common units will have the
right to receive distributions of available cash from operating
surplus in an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution
of $0.45 per quarter, plus any arrearages from prior
quarters, before any distributions may be made on the
subordinated units. The subordination period will extend until
the first day of any quarter beginning after December 31,
2010 that each of the following tests are met: |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) distributions of available cash from operating surplus
on each of the outstanding common units, subordinated units and
general partner units equaled or exceeded the minimum quarterly
distributions on all such units for each of the three
consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods immediately
preceding that date; |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) the adjusted operating surplus generated during each of
the three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods
immediately preceding that date equaled or exceeded the |
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
sum of the minimum quarterly distributions on all of the
outstanding common units, subordinated units and general partner
units during those periods on a fully diluted basis; and |
|
|
|
|
|
(3) there are no arrearages in payment of minimum quarterly
distributions on the common units. |
|
|
|
|
When the subordination period ends, all subordinated units will
convert into common units on a one-for-one basis, and the common
units will no longer be entitled to arrearages. |
|
Issuance of additional units |
|
In general, during the subordination period, we may issue up to
6,533,000 additional common units without obtaining unitholder
approval. We can also issue an unlimited number of common units
in connection with acquisitions and capital improvements that
increase cash flow from operations per unit on an estimated pro
forma basis. We can also issue additional common units if the
proceeds are used to repay certain of our indebtedness. Please
read Units Eligible for Future Sale and The
Partnership Agreement Issuance of Additional
Securities. |
|
|
Limited voting rights |
|
Our general partner will manage and operate us. Unlike the
holders of common stock in a corporation, you will have only
limited voting rights on matters affecting our business. You
will have no right to elect our general partner or its directors
on an annual or other continuing basis. Our general partner may
not be removed except by a vote of the holders of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding units, including any units owned by our
general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single
class. Upon consummation of this offering, the owners of our
general partner, certain of their affiliates and the Fehsenfeld
Investors will own an aggregate of 77.4% of our common and
subordinated units. This will give our general partner the
practical ability to prevent its involuntary removal. Please
read The Partnership Agreement Voting
Rights. |
|
|
Limited call right |
|
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more
than 80% of the outstanding common units, our general partner
has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase all of the
remaining common units at a price not less than the then-current
market price of the common units. |
|
Estimated ratio of taxable income to distributions |
|
We estimate that if you own the common units you purchase in
this offering through the record date for distributions for the
period ending December 31, 2008, you will be allocated, on
a cumulative basis, an amount of federal taxable income for that
period that will be % or less of the cash
distributed to you with respect to that period. For example, if
you receive an annual distribution of $1.80 per unit, we
estimate that your average allocable federal taxable income per
year will be no more than $ per unit. Please read
Material Tax Conse- |
8
|
|
|
|
|
quences Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Ratio of Taxable Income to
Distributions. |
|
Material tax consequences |
|
For a discussion of other material federal income tax
consequences that may be relevant to prospective unitholders who
are individual citizens or residents of the United States,
please read Material Tax Consequences. |
|
|
Trading |
|
We have applied to have our common units quoted on the NASDAQ
National Market under the symbol CLMT. |
|
9
Summary Historical and Pro Forma Financial and Operating
Data
The following table shows summary historical financial and
operating data of Calumet Lubricants Co., Limited Partnership
(Calumet Predecessor) and pro forma financial data
of Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. for the periods and
as of the dates indicated. The summary historical financial data
as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 and September 30,
2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2005
are derived from the consolidated financial statements of
Calumet Predecessor. The summary pro forma financial data as of
September 30, 2005 and for the year ended December 31,
2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2005 are
derived from the unaudited pro forma financial statements of
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. The pro forma
adjustments have been prepared as if the transactions listed
below had taken place on September 30, 2005, in the case of
the pro forma balance sheet, or as of January 1, 2004, in
the case of the pro forma statement of operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The pro forma financial data give pro
forma effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
the refinancing by Calumet Predecessor of its long-term debt
obligations pursuant to new credit facilities it expects to
enter into in the fourth quarter of 2005; |
|
|
|
the retention of certain assets and liabilities of Calumet
Predecessor by the owners of Calumet Predecessor; |
|
|
|
|
the contribution of the ownership interests in Calumet
Predecessor to Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. in
exchange for the issuance by Calumet Specialty Products
Partners, L.P. to the owners of Calumet Predecessor of
5,758,273 common units, 13,066,000 subordinated units,
the 2% general partner interest represented by
515,801 general partner units and the incentive
distribution rights; |
|
|
|
|
|
the sale by Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. of
6,450,000 common units in this offering; |
|
|
|
|
the payment of estimated underwriting commissions and other
offering and transaction expenses; and |
|
|
|
the repayment by Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. of a
portion of indebtedness under its new credit facilities. |
None of the assets or liabilities of Calumet Predecessors
Rouseville wax processing facility, Reno wax packaging facility
and Bareco wax marketing joint venture, which are included in
the historical financial statements, will be contributed to us
upon the closing of this offering.
The following table includes the non-GAAP financial measures
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. For a reconciliation of EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA to net income and cash flow from operating
activities, our most directly comparable financial performance
and liquidity measures calculated in accordance with GAAP,
please read Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
We derived the information in the following table from, and that
information should be read together with and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to, the historical and pro forma combined
financial statements and the accompanying notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The table should be read together
with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
|
Calumet Specialty Products | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Partners, L.P. Pro Forma | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(audited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit data) | |
Summary of Operations
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
316,350 |
|
|
$ |
430,381 |
|
|
$ |
539,616 |
|
|
$ |
393,036 |
|
|
$ |
894,981 |
|
|
|
$ |
539,616 |
|
|
$ |
894,981 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
268,911 |
|
|
|
385,890 |
|
|
|
501,284 |
|
|
|
361,820 |
|
|
|
799,574 |
|
|
|
|
501,284 |
|
|
|
799,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
47,439 |
|
|
|
44,491 |
|
|
|
38,332 |
|
|
|
31,216 |
|
|
|
95,407 |
|
|
|
|
38,332 |
|
|
|
95,407 |
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
9,066 |
|
|
|
9,432 |
|
|
|
13,133 |
|
|
|
10,286 |
|
|
|
11,998 |
|
|
|
|
13,133 |
|
|
|
11,998 |
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
25,449 |
|
|
|
28,139 |
|
|
|
33,923 |
|
|
|
24,987 |
|
|
|
35,544 |
|
|
|
|
33,923 |
|
|
|
35,544 |
|
|
Taxes other than income
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
Restructuring, decommissioning and
asset impairments(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,694 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
9,128 |
|
|
|
(3,098 |
) |
|
|
(12,189 |
) |
|
|
(6,697 |
) |
|
|
45,051 |
|
|
|
|
(12,189 |
) |
|
|
45,051 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2,442 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(7,435 |
) |
|
|
(9,493 |
) |
|
|
(9,869 |
) |
|
|
(6,617 |
) |
|
|
(16,771 |
) |
|
|
|
(5,572 |
) |
|
|
(9,173 |
) |
|
Realized gain (loss) on derivative
instruments
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
(961 |
) |
|
|
39,160 |
|
|
|
27,133 |
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
|
|
39,160 |
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,228 |
|
|
|
(7,788 |
) |
|
|
5,299 |
|
|
|
(48,412 |
) |
|
|
|
(7,788 |
) |
|
|
(48,412 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(3,847 |
) |
|
|
(2,327 |
) |
|
|
21,159 |
|
|
|
25,463 |
|
|
|
(65,868 |
) |
|
|
|
25,456 |
|
|
|
(58,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before income
taxes
|
|
|
5,281 |
|
|
|
(5,425 |
) |
|
|
8,970 |
|
|
|
18,766 |
|
|
|
(20,817 |
) |
|
|
|
13,267 |
|
|
|
(13,219 |
) |
Pro forma income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
5,281 |
|
|
$ |
(5,425 |
) |
|
$ |
8,970 |
|
|
$ |
18,766 |
|
|
$ |
(20,817 |
) |
|
|
$ |
13,267 |
|
|
$ |
(13,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted pro forma net
income per limited partner unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.69 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.26 |
) |
Weighted average units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,208,273 |
|
|
|
12,208,273 |
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,066,000 |
|
|
|
13,066,000 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period
end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
80,916 |
|
|
$ |
89,938 |
|
|
$ |
126,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
127,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
126,931 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
217,915 |
|
|
|
216,941 |
|
|
|
318,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443,518 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
34,072 |
|
|
|
32,263 |
|
|
|
58,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,695 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
141,968 |
|
|
|
146,853 |
|
|
|
214,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,735 |
|
Partners capital
|
|
|
30,968 |
|
|
|
25,544 |
|
|
|
34,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,855 |
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
(4,326 |
) |
|
$ |
7,048 |
|
|
$ |
(612 |
) |
|
$ |
5,061 |
|
|
$ |
(97,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(9,924 |
) |
|
|
(11,940 |
) |
|
|
(42,930 |
) |
|
|
(4,672 |
) |
|
|
(9,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
14,209 |
|
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
|
61,561 |
|
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
92,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
18,592 |
|
|
$ |
10,837 |
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
30,480 |
|
|
$ |
3,368 |
|
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
3,368 |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
16,277 |
|
|
|
10,554 |
|
|
|
36,304 |
|
|
|
29,191 |
|
|
|
58,203 |
|
|
|
|
36,304 |
|
|
|
58,203 |
|
Operating Data (bpd):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales volume(2)
|
|
|
19,110 |
|
|
|
23,616 |
|
|
|
24,658 |
|
|
|
24,891 |
|
|
|
45,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total feedstock runs(3)
|
|
|
21,665 |
|
|
|
25,007 |
|
|
|
26,209 |
|
|
|
26,570 |
|
|
|
48,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total refinery production(4)
|
|
|
21,586 |
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
|
|
26,300 |
|
|
|
26,760 |
|
|
|
46,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Incurred in connection with the decommissioning of the
Rouseville, Pennsylvania facility, the termination of the Bareco
joint venture and the closing of the Reno, Pennsylvania
facility, none of which will be contributed to Calumet Specialty
Products Partners, L.P. |
|
(2) |
Total sales volume includes sales from the production of our
refineries and sales of inventories. |
|
(3) |
Feedstock runs represents the barrels per day of crude oil and
other feedstocks processed at our refineries. |
|
(4) |
Total refinery production represents the barrels per day of
specialty products and fuel products yielded from processing
crude oil and other refinery feedstocks at our refineries. |
11
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We include in this prospectus the non-GAAP financial measures
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, and provide reconciliations of
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net income and cash flow from
operating activities, our most directly comparable financial
performance and liquidity measures calculated and presented in
accordance with GAAP.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are used as supplemental financial
measures by our management and by external users of our
financial statements such as investors, commercial banks,
research analysts and others, to assess:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the financial performance of our assets without regard to
financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis; |
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient to pay
interest costs and support our indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
|
our operating performance and return on capital as compared to
those of other companies in our industry, without regard to
financing or capital structure; and |
|
|
|
|
|
the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects
and the overall rates of return on alternative investment
opportunities. |
|
We define EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, taxes and
depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA to be
Consolidated EBITDA as defined in our new credit facilities.
Consistent with that definition, Adjusted EBITDA represents
(1) net income plus (2) (a) interest expense;
(b) taxes; (c) depreciation and amortization;
(d) unrealized losses from derivatives;
(e) restructuring, decommissioning and asset impairments
and extraordinary gains and losses; and (f) prepaid
expenses and accrued expenses net of cash outlays; minus
(3) unrealized gains from derivatives. We are required to
report Adjusted EBITDA to our lenders under our new credit
facilities and it will be used to determine our compliance with
the consolidated leverage test thereunder. We will be required
to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of consolidated debt
to Adjusted EBITDA, after giving effect to any proposed
distributions, of no greater than 3.75 to 1 in order to
make distributions to our unitholders.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered alternatives
to net income, operating income, cash flow from operating
activities or any other measure of financial performance
presented in accordance with GAAP. Our EBITDA and Adjusted
EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of
another company because all companies may not calculate EBITDA
and Adjusted EBITDA in the same manner. The following tables
present a reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net
income and cash flow from operating activities, our most
directly comparable GAAP financial performance and liquidity
measures, for each of the periods indicated:
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Calumet Specialty Products | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners, L.P. Pro Forma | |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Reconciliation of Adjusted
EBITDA and EBITDA to net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
5,281 |
|
|
$ |
(5,425 |
) |
|
$ |
8,970 |
|
|
$ |
18,766 |
|
|
$ |
(20,817 |
) |
|
|
$ |
13,267 |
|
|
$ |
(13,309 |
) |
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,435 |
|
|
|
9,493 |
|
|
|
9,869 |
|
|
|
6,617 |
|
|
|
16,771 |
|
|
|
|
5,572 |
|
|
|
9,173 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,876 |
|
|
|
6,769 |
|
|
|
6,927 |
|
|
|
5,097 |
|
|
|
7,414 |
|
|
|
|
6,927 |
|
|
|
7,414 |
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
18,592 |
|
|
$ |
10,837 |
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
30,480 |
|
|
$ |
3,368 |
|
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
3,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses (gains) from
derivatives
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,228 |
) |
|
$ |
7,788 |
|
|
$ |
(5,299 |
) |
|
$ |
48,412 |
|
|
|
$ |
7,788 |
|
|
$ |
48,412 |
|
|
Restructuring, decommissioning and
asset impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,694 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and accrued
expenses, net of cash outlays
|
|
|
(2,315 |
) |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$ |
16,277 |
|
|
$ |
10,554 |
|
|
$ |
36,304 |
|
|
$ |
29,191 |
|
|
$ |
58,203 |
|
|
|
$ |
36,304 |
|
|
$ |
58,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
|
Reconciliation of Adjusted
EBITDA and EBITDA to net cash provided (used) by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by
operating activities
|
|
$ |
(4,326 |
) |
|
$ |
7,048 |
|
|
$ |
(612 |
) |
|
$ |
5,061 |
|
|
$ |
(97,769 |
) |
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,435 |
|
|
|
9,493 |
|
|
|
9,869 |
|
|
|
6,617 |
|
|
|
16,771 |
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,693 |
) |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
Equity in (loss) income of
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2,442 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received from
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(2,925 |
) |
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
(3,470 |
) |
|
|
(3,470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating working
capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
19,399 |
|
|
|
18,681 |
|
|
|
65,077 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
16,984 |
|
|
|
(15,547 |
) |
|
|
20,304 |
|
|
|
(4,882 |
) |
|
|
50,114 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(1,295 |
) |
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
11,596 |
|
|
|
17,697 |
|
|
|
14,622 |
|
|
Derivative activity
|
|
|
3,682 |
|
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
(5,046 |
) |
|
|
3,686 |
|
|
|
(51,018 |
) |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(9,587 |
) |
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
(25,764 |
) |
|
|
(12,194 |
) |
|
|
12,333 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,622 |
|
|
|
(1,379 |
) |
|
|
(1,203 |
) |
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
|
|
(6,278 |
) |
|
Other, including changes in
noncurrent assets and liabilities
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
(1,316 |
) |
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
18,592 |
|
|
$ |
10,837 |
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
30,480 |
|
|
$ |
3,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses (gains) from
derivatives
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,228 |
) |
|
$ |
7,788 |
|
|
$ |
(5,299 |
) |
|
$ |
48,412 |
|
|
Restructuring, decommissioning and
asset impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,694 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and accrued
expenses, net of cash outlays
|
|
|
(2,315 |
) |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$ |
16,277 |
|
|
$ |
10,554 |
|
|
$ |
36,304 |
|
|
$ |
29,191 |
|
|
$ |
58,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
RISK FACTORS
Limited partner interests are inherently different from
capital stock of a corporation, although many of the business
risks to which we are subject are similar to those that would be
faced by a corporation engaged in a similar business. You should
consider carefully the following risk factors together with all
of the other information included in this prospectus in
evaluating an investment in our common units.
The following risks could materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition or results of operations. In that
case, we might not be able to pay the minimum quarterly
distribution on our common units, the trading price of our
common units could decline and you could lose all or part of
your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
We may not have sufficient cash from operations to enable
us to pay the minimum quarterly distribution following the
establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses,
including payments to our general partner.
We may not have sufficient available cash from operations each
quarter to enable us to pay the minimum quarterly distribution.
Under the terms of our partnership agreement, we must pay
expenses, including payments to our general partner, and set
aside any cash reserve amounts before making a distribution to
our unitholders. The amount of cash we can distribute on our
units principally depends upon the amount of cash we generate
from our operations, which is primarily dependent upon our
producing and selling quantities of fuels and specialty
products, or refined products, at margins that are high enough
to cover our fixed and variable expenses. Crude oil costs, fuels
and specialty products prices and, accordingly, the cash we
generate from operations, will fluctuate from quarter to quarter
based on, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
overall demand for specialty hydrocarbon products, fuels and
other refined products; |
|
|
|
the level of foreign and domestic production of crude oil and
refined products; |
|
|
|
our ability to produce fuels and specialty products that meet
our customers unique and precise specifications; |
|
|
|
the marketing of alternative and competing products; |
|
|
|
|
the extent of government regulation; |
|
|
|
|
|
results of our hedging activities; and |
|
|
|
|
|
overall economic and local market conditions. |
|
In addition, the actual amount of cash we will have available
for distribution will depend on other factors, some of which are
beyond our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the level of capital expenditures we make, including those for
acquisitions, if any; |
|
|
|
|
our debt service requirements; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in our working capital needs; |
|
|
|
our ability to borrow funds and access capital markets; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on distributions and on our ability to make working
capital borrowings for distributions contained in our credit
facilities; |
|
|
|
|
the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner
for the proper conduct of our business. |
For a description of additional restrictions and factors that
may affect our ability to make cash distributions, please read
Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on
Distributions.
14
The amount of cash we have available for distribution to
unitholders depends primarily on our cash flow and not solely on
profitability.
You should be aware that the amount of cash we have available
for distribution depends primarily upon our cash flow, including
cash flow from financial reserves and working capital
borrowings, and not solely on profitability, which will be
affected by non-cash items. As a result, we may make cash
distributions during periods when we record losses and may not
make cash distributions during periods when we record net income.
The assumptions underlying our estimate of cash available
for distribution that we include in Cash Distribution
Policy and Restrictions on Distributions are inherently
uncertain and are subject to significant business, economic,
financial, regulatory and competitive risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
estimated.
Our estimate of cash available for distribution for the twelve
months ending December 31, 2006 set forth in Cash
Distribution Policy and Restrictions on Distributions is
based on assumptions that are inherently uncertain and are
subject to significant business, economic, regulatory and
competitive risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those estimated. Furthermore,
our estimate of cash available for distribution for the twelve
months ending December 31, 2006 exceeds the amount of
available cash we need to pay the minimum quarterly distribution
for four quarters on all of our units by less than 2%. If we do
not achieve the estimated results, we may not be able to pay the
full minimum quarterly distribution or any amount on the common
units or subordinated units, in which event the market price of
the common units may decline materially.
The amount of available cash we need to pay the minimum
quarterly distribution for four quarters on the common units,
the subordinated units and the general partner interest to be
outstanding immediately after this offering is approximately
$46.2 million. Our pro forma cash available for
distribution generated during the year ended December 31,
2004 would have been sufficient to allow us to pay approximately
81.1% of the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units
and none of the minimum quarterly distribution on the
subordinated units. For a calculation of our ability to make
distributions to unitholders based on our pro forma results for
2004 and the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2005,
and for an estimate of our ability to pay the full minimum
quarterly distributions on the common and subordinated units and
the 2% general partner interest for the twelve-month period
ending December 31, 2006, please read Cash
Distribution Policy and Restrictions on Distributions.
Refining margins are volatile and currently at historical
highs, and a reduction in our refining margins will adversely
affect the amount of cash we will have available for
distribution to our unitholders.
Our financial results are primarily affected by the
relationship, or margin, between our specialty products and fuel
prices and the prices for crude oil and other feedstocks. The
cost to acquire our feedstocks and the price at which we can
ultimately sell our refined products depend upon numerous
factors beyond our control. Historically, refining margins have
been volatile, and they are likely to continue to be volatile in
the future. A widely used benchmark in the fuel products
industry to measure market values and margins is the 3/2/1
crack spread, which represents the approximate gross
margin resulting from processing one barrel of crude oil,
assuming that three barrels of a benchmark crude oil are
converted, or cracked, into two barrels of gasoline and one
barrel of heating oil. The 3/2/1 crack spread, as reported by
Bloomberg L.P., averaged $3.04 per barrel between 1990 and
1999, $4.61 per barrel between 2000 and 2004,
$6.52 per barrel in the first quarter of 2005,
$9.10 per barrel in the second quarter of 2005 and $17.07
in the third quarter of 2005. Our actual refinery margins vary
from the Gulf Coast 3/2/1 crack spread due to the actual
crude oil used and products produced, transportation costs,
regional differences, and the timing of the purchase of the
feedstock and sale of the refined products, but we use the Gulf
Coast 3/2/1 crack spread as an
15
indicator of the volatility and general levels of refining
margins. Because refining margins are volatile and are at
historical highs, you should not assume that our current margins
will be sustained. If our refining margins fall, it will
adversely affect the amount of cash we will have available for
distribution to our unitholders. Please read Industry
Overview Fuel Products.
The price at which we sell specialty products, fuel and other
refined products is strongly influenced by the commodity price
of crude oil. If crude oil prices increase, our operating
margins will fall unless we are able to pass along these price
increases to our customers. While we have generally been able to
pass on the costs associated with increased crude oil prices to
our specialty product customers in the past, the increase in
selling prices typically lags the rising cost of crude oil for
specialty products. It is possible we may not be able to pass on
all or any portion of the increased crude oil costs to our
customers. Although we purchase forward crude oil supply
contracts, enter into forward product agreements to hedge excess
inventories and hedge our refined product margins to mitigate
our commodity risk, we will not be able to eliminate this risk.
Because of the volatility of crude oil and refined
products prices, our method of valuing our inventory may result
in decreases in net income.
The nature of our business requires us to maintain substantial
quantities of crude oil and refined product inventories. Because
crude oil and refined products are essentially commodities, we
have no control over the changing market value of these
inventories. Because our inventory is valued at the lower of
cost or market value, if the market value of our inventory were
to decline to an amount less than our cost, we would record a
write-down of inventory and a non-cash charge to cost of sales.
In a period of decreasing crude oil or refined product prices,
our inventory valuation methodology may result in decreases in
net income.
The price volatility of fuel and utility services may
result in decreases in our earnings, profitability and cash
flows.
The volatility in costs of fuel, principally natural gas, and
other utility services, principally electricity, used by our
refinery and other operations affect our net income and cash
flows. Fuel and utility prices are affected by factors outside
of our control, such as supply and demand for fuel and utility
services in both local and regional markets. Natural gas prices
have historically been volatile. For example, daily prices as
reported on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX)
ranged between $4.57 and $8.75 per million British thermal
units, or MMBtu, in 2004. During the first nine months of 2005,
these prices ranged between $5.79 and $14.20 per MMBtu.
Typically, electricity prices fluctuate with natural gas prices.
Future increases in fuel and utility prices may have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations. Fuel and utility
costs constituted approximately 48.1% and 43.2% of our total
operating expenses included in cost of sales for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, respectively.
Our hedging activities may reduce our earnings,
profitability and cash flows.
We utilize derivative financial instruments related to the
future price of crude oil, natural gas and crack spreads with
the intent of reducing volatility in our cash flows due to
fluctuations in commodity prices. We are not able to enter into
derivative financial instruments to reduce the volatility of the
prices of the specialty hydrocarbon products we sell as there is
no established derivative market for such products. While our
hedging program is designed to reduce commodity price risk, we
remain exposed to fluctuations in commodity prices.
Historically, we have not designated any of our derivative
instruments as hedges in accordance with the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. According to SFAS 133, changes in the fair
value of derivatives which have not been designated as hedges
are to be recorded each period in earnings as reflected in
unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments in the
consolidated statements of
16
operations. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004,
these unrealized gains (losses) were $7,228,000 and
$(7,788,000), respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2004 and 2005, these unrealized gains
(losses) were $5,299,000 and $(48,412,000), respectively.
The extent of our commodity price exposure is related largely to
the effectiveness and scope of our hedging activities. For
example, the derivative instruments we utilize are based on
posted market prices, which may differ significantly from the
actual crude oil prices, natural gas prices or crack spreads
that we realize in our operations. Furthermore, we have a policy
to enter into derivative transactions related to only a portion
of the volume of our expected production or fuel requirements
and, as a result, we will continue to have direct commodity
price exposure to the unhedged portion. Please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. Our actual
future production or fuel requirements may be significantly
higher or lower than we estimate at the time we enter into
derivative transactions for such period. If the actual amount is
higher than we estimate, we will have greater commodity price
exposure than we intended. If the actual amount is lower than
the amount that is subject to our derivative financial
instruments, we might be forced to satisfy all or a portion of
our derivative transactions without the benefit of the cash flow
from our sale or purchase of the underlying physical commodity,
resulting in a substantial diminution of our liquidity. As a
result of these factors, our hedging activities may not be as
effective as we intend in reducing the volatility of our cash
flows, and in certain circumstances may actually increase the
volatility of our cash flows. In addition, our hedging
activities are subject to the risks that a counterparty may not
perform its obligation under the applicable derivative
instrument, the terms of the derivative instruments are
imperfect, and our hedging policies and procedures are not
properly followed. It is possible that the steps we take to
monitor our derivative financial instruments may not detect and
prevent violations of our risk management policies and
procedures, particularly if deception or other intentional
misconduct is involved.
If our general financial condition deteriorates, we may be
limited in our ability to issue letters of credit which may
affect our ability to enter into hedging arrangements or to
purchase crude oil.
We rely on our ability to issue letters of credit to enter into
hedging arrangements in an effort to reduce our exposure to
adverse fluctuations in the prices of crude oil, natural gas and
crack spreads. We also rely on our ability to issue letters of
credit to purchase crude oil feedstocks for our refineries. If,
due to our financial condition or other reasons, we are limited
in our ability to issue letters of credit or we are unable to
issue letters of credit at all, we may be required to post
substantial amounts of cash collateral to our hedging
counterparties or crude oil suppliers in order to continue these
activities, which would adversely affect our liquidity and our
ability to distribute cash to our unitholders.
We depend on certain key crude oil gatherers for a
significant portion of our supply of crude oil, and the loss of
any of these key suppliers or a material decrease in the supply
of crude oil generally available to our refineries could
materially reduce our ability to make distributions to
unitholders.
We purchase crude oil from major oil companies as well as from
various gatherers and marketers in Texas and North Louisiana.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, subsidiaries
of Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. and Genesis Crude Oil,
L.P. supplied us with approximately 65% and 12%, respectively,
of our total crude oil supplies. Each of our refineries is
dependent on one or both of these suppliers and the loss of
these suppliers would adversely affect our financial results to
the extent we were unable to find another supplier of this
substantial amount of crude oil. We do not maintain long-term
contracts with most of our suppliers. Please read
Business Crude Oil and Feedstock Supply.
17
To the extent that our suppliers reduce the volumes of crude oil
that they supply us as a result of declining production or
competition or otherwise, our revenues, net income and cash
available for distribution would decline unless we were able to
acquire comparable supplies of crude oil on comparable terms
from other suppliers, which may not be possible in areas where
the supplier that reduces its volumes is the primary supplier in
the area. A material decrease in crude oil production from the
fields that supply our refineries, as a result of depressed
commodity prices, lack of drilling activity, natural production
declines or otherwise, could result in a decline in the volume
of crude oil we refine. Fluctuations in crude oil prices can
greatly affect production rates and investments by third parties
in the development of new oil reserves. Drilling activity
generally decreases as crude oil prices decrease. We have no
control over the level of drilling activity in the fields that
supply our refineries, the amount of reserves underlying the
wells in these fields, the rate at which production from a well
will decline or the production decisions of producers, which are
affected by, among other things, prevailing and projected energy
prices, demand for hydrocarbons, geological considerations,
governmental regulation and the availability and cost of capital.
We are dependent on certain third-party pipelines for
transportation of crude oil and refined products, and if these
pipelines become unavailable to us, our revenues and cash
available for distribution could decline.
Each of our refineries is interconnected to pipelines that
supply most of its crude oil and ship most of its refined fuel
products to customers, such as pipelines operated by
subsidiaries of TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and ExxonMobil
Corporation. Since we do not own or operate any of these
pipelines, their continuing operation is not within our control.
If any of these third-party pipelines become unavailable to
transport crude oil feedstock or our refined products because of
accidents, government regulation, terrorism or other events, our
revenues, net income and cash available for distribution could
decline.
Distributions to unitholders could be adversely affected
by a decrease in the demand for our specialty products.
Changes in our customers products or processes may enable
our customers to reduce consumption of the specialty products
that we produce or make our specialty products unnecessary.
Should a customer decide to use a different product due to
price, performance or other considerations, we may not be able
to supply a product that meets the customers new
requirements. In addition, the demand for our customers
end products could decrease, which would reduce their demand for
our specialty products. Our specialty product customers are
primarily in the industrial goods, consumer goods and automotive
goods industries and we are therefore susceptible to changing
demand patterns and products in those industries. Consequently,
it is important that we develop and manufacture new products to
replace the sales of products that mature and decline in use. If
we are unable to manage successfully the maturation of our
existing specialty products and the introduction of new
specialty products our revenues, net income and cash available
for distribution to unitholders could be reduced.
Distributions to unitholders could be adversely affected
by a decrease in demand for fuel products in the markets we
serve.
Any sustained decrease in demand for fuel products in the
markets we serve could result in a significant reduction in our
cash flow, reducing our ability to make distributions to
unitholders. Factors that could lead to a decrease in market
demand include:
|
|
|
|
|
a recession or other adverse economic condition that results in
lower spending by consumers on gasoline, diesel, and travel; |
|
|
|
higher fuel taxes or other governmental or regulatory actions
that increase, directly or indirectly, the cost of gasoline; |
|
|
|
|
an increase in fuel economy or the increased use of alternative
fuel sources; |
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in the market price of crude oil that lead to higher
refined product prices, which may reduce demand for gasoline; |
|
|
|
|
|
competitor actions; and |
|
|
|
|
|
availability of raw materials. |
|
We could be subject to damages based on claims brought
against us by our customers or lose customers as a result of the
failure of our products to meet certain quality
specifications.
Our specialty products provide precise performance attributes
for our customers products. If a product fails to perform
in a manner consistent with the detailed quality specifications
required by the customer, the customer could seek replacement of
the product or damages for costs incurred as a result of the
product failing to perform as guaranteed. A successful claim or
series of claims against us could result in a loss of one or
more customers and reduce our ability to make distributions to
unitholders.
We are subject to compliance with stringent environmental
laws and regulations that may expose us to substantial costs and
liabilities.
Our crude oil and specialty hydrocarbon refining and terminal
operations are subject to stringent and complex federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations governing the
discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise
relating to environmental protection. These laws and regulations
impose numerous obligations that are applicable to our
operations, including the acquisition of permits to conduct
regulated activities, the incurrence of significant capital
expenditures to limit or prevent releases of materials from our
refineries, terminal, and related facilities, and the incurrence
of substantial costs and liabilities for pollution resulting
both from our operations and from those of prior owners.
Numerous governmental authorities, such as the EPA and state
agencies, such as the Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality (LDEQ), have the power to enforce compliance
with these laws and regulations and the permits issued under
them, often requiring difficult and costly actions. Failure to
comply with environmental laws, regulations, permits and orders
may result in the assessment of administrative, civil, and
criminal penalties, the imposition of remedial obligations, and
the issuance of injunctions limiting or preventing some or all
of our operations.
We recently have entered into discussions on a voluntary basis
with the LDEQ regarding our participation in that agencys
Small Refinery and Single Site Refinery Initiative.
We are only in the beginning stages of discussion with the LDEQ
and, consequently, while no significant compliance and
enforcement expenditures have been requested as a result of our
discussions, we anticipate that we will ultimately be required
to make emissions reductions or other efforts requiring capital
investments and increased operating expenditures that may be
material. Please read Business Environmental
Matters Air.
Our business subjects us to the inherent risk of incurring
significant environmental liabilities in the operation of our
refineries and related facilities.
There is inherent risk of incurring significant environmental
costs and liabilities in the operation of our refineries,
terminal, and related facilities due to our handling of
petroleum hydrocarbons and wastes, air emissions and water
discharges related to our operations, and historical operations
and waste disposal practices by prior owners. We currently own
or operate properties that for many years have been used for
industrial activities, including refining or terminal storage
operations. Although we used operating and disposal practices
that were standard in the industry at the time, petroleum
hydrocarbons or wastes have been released on or under the
properties owned or operated by us. Joint and several strict
liability may be incurred in connection with such releases of
petroleum hydrocarbons and wastes on, under or from our
properties and facilities. Private parties, including
19
the owners of properties adjacent to our operations and
facilities where our petroleum hydrocarbons or wastes are taken
for reclamation or disposal, may also have the right to pursue
legal actions to enforce compliance as well as to seek damages
for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations or
for personal injury or property damage. We may not be able to
recover some or any of these costs from insurance or other
sources of indemnity.
Increasingly stringent environmental laws and regulations,
unanticipated remediation obligations or emissions control
expenditures and claims for penalties or damages could result in
substantial costs and liabilities, and our ability to make
distributions to our unitholders could suffer as a result.
Neither the owners of our general partner nor their affiliates
will indemnify us for any environmental liabilities, including
those arising from non-compliance or pollution, that may be
discovered at, or arise from operations on, the assets they are
contributing to us. As such, we can expect no economic
assistance from any of them in the event that we are required to
make expenditures to investigate or remediate any petroleum
hydrocarbons, wastes, or other materials. Please read
Business Environmental Matters.
We are exposed to trade credit risk in the ordinary course
of our business activities.
We are exposed to risks of loss in the event of nonperformance
by our customers and by counterparties of our forward contracts,
options and swap agreements. Some of our customers and
counterparties may be highly leveraged and subject to their own
operating and regulatory risks. Even if our credit review and
analysis mechanisms work properly, we may experience financial
losses in our dealings with other parties. Any increase in the
nonpayment or nonperformance by our customers and/or
counterparties could reduce our ability to make distributions to
our unitholders.
Our reconfiguration and enhancement of assets may not
result in revenue increases and is subject to regulatory,
environmental, political, legal and economic risks, which could
adversely affect our business, operating results, cash flows and
financial condition.
One of the ways we may grow our business is through the
reconfiguration and enhancement of our refinery assets. The
construction of additions or modifications to our existing
refineries involves numerous regulatory, environmental,
political and legal uncertainties beyond our control and
requires the expenditure of significant amounts of capital. If
we undertake these projects, they may not be completed on
schedule or at the budgeted cost, or at all. Moreover, our
revenues may not increase immediately upon the expenditure of
funds on a particular project. For instance, if we expand an
existing refinery, the construction may occur over an extended
period of time, and we will not receive any material increases
in revenues until the project is completed.
If we do not make acquisitions on economically acceptable
terms, our future growth will be limited.
Our ability to grow depends on our ability to make acquisitions
that result in an increase in the cash generated from operations
per unit. If we are unable to make these accretive acquisitions
either because we are: (1) unable to identify attractive
acquisition candidates or negotiate acceptable purchase
contracts with them, (2) unable to obtain financing for
these acquisitions on economically acceptable terms, or
(3) outbid by competitors, then our future growth and
ability to increase distributions will be limited. Furthermore,
any acquisition involves potential risks, including, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
performance from the acquired assets and businesses that is
below the forecasts we used in evaluating the acquisition; |
|
|
|
a significant increase in our indebtedness and working capital
requirements; |
|
|
|
an inability to timely and effectively integrate the operations
of recently acquired businesses or assets, particularly those in
new geographic areas or in new lines of business; |
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
the incurrence of substantial unforeseen environmental and other
liabilities arising out of the acquired businesses or assets; |
|
|
|
|
the diversion of managements attention from other business
concerns; and |
|
|
|
customer or key employee losses at the acquired businesses. |
If we consummate any future acquisitions, our capitalization and
results of operations may change significantly, and you will not
have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial and
other relevant information that we will consider in determining
the application of our funds and other resources.
Our refineries face operating hazards, and the potential
limits on insurance coverage could expose us to potentially
significant liability costs.
Our refining activities are conducted at three refineries in
northwest Louisiana. These refineries are our principal
operating assets. Our operations are subject to significant
interruption, and our cash from operations could decline, if any
of our refineries experiences a major accident or fire, is
damaged by severe weather or other natural disaster, or
otherwise is forced to curtail its operations or shut down.
These hazards could result in substantial losses due to personal
injury and/or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of
property and equipment and pollution or other environmental
damage and may result in curtailment or suspension of our
related operations.
We are not fully insured against all risks incident to our
business. Furthermore, we may be unable to maintain or obtain
insurance of the type and amount we desire at reasonable rates.
As a result of market conditions, premiums and deductibles for
certain of our insurance policies have increased and could
escalate further. In some instances, certain insurance could
become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of
coverage. If we were to incur a significant liability for which
we were not fully insured, it could diminish our ability to make
distributions to unitholders. Although we will maintain business
interruption insurance at our refineries, our business
interruption insurance will not apply unless a business
interruption exceeds 60 days. We are also not insured for
environmental accidents.
Downtime for maintenance at our refineries will reduce our
revenues and cash available for distribution.
Our refineries consist of many processing units, a number of
which have been in operation for a long time. One or more of the
units may require additional unscheduled down time for
unanticipated maintenance or repairs that are more frequent than
our scheduled turnaround for each unit every one to five years.
Scheduled and unscheduled maintenance reduce our revenues during
the period of time that our units are not operating.
We are subject to strict regulations at many of our
facilities regarding employee safety, and failure to comply with
these regulations could reduce our ability to make distributions
to our unitholders.
The workplaces associated with the refineries we operate are
subject to the requirements of the federal Occupational Safety
and Health Act (OSHA) and comparable state statutes
that regulate the protection of the health and safety of
workers. In addition, the OSHA hazard communication standard
requires that we maintain information about hazardous materials
used or produced in our operations and that we provide this
information to employees, state and local government
authorities, and local residents. Failure to comply with OSHA
requirements, including general industry standards, record
keeping requirements and monitoring of occupational exposure to
regulated substances, could reduce our ability to make
distributions to our unitholders if we are subjected to fines or
significant compliance costs.
21
We face substantial competition from other refining
companies.
The refining industry is highly competitive. Our competitors
include large, integrated, major or independent oil companies
that, because of their more diverse operations, larger
refineries and stronger capitalization, may be better positioned
than we are to withstand volatile industry conditions, including
shortages or excesses of crude oil or refined products or
intense price competition at the wholesale level. If we are
unable to compete effectively, we may lose existing customers or
fail to acquire new customers. For example, if a competitor
attempts to increase market share by reducing prices, our
operating results and cash available for distribution to our
unitholders could be reduced.
Our debt levels may limit our flexibility in obtaining
additional financing and in pursuing other business
opportunities.
After giving effect to this offering and the related
transactions, we estimate that our pro forma total debt as of
September 30, 2005 would have been approximately
$193.7 million. Following this offering, we will continue
to have the ability to incur additional debt, including the
capacity to borrow up to $87.6 million under our new senior
secured revolving credit facility, subject to borrowing base
limitations in the credit agreement. Our significant level of
indebtedness could have important consequences to us, including
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other
purposes may be impaired or such financing may not be available
on favorable terms; |
|
|
|
covenants contained in our existing and future credit and debt
arrangements will require us to meet financial tests that may
affect our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes
in our business, including possible acquisition opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
we will need a substantial portion of our cash flow to make
principal and interest payments on our indebtedness, reducing
the funds that would otherwise be available for operations,
future business opportunities and distributions to unitholders;
and |
|
|
|
|
|
our debt level will make us more vulnerable than our competitors
with less debt to competitive pressures or a downturn in our
business or the economy generally. |
|
Our ability to service our indebtedness will depend upon, among
other things, our future financial and operating performance,
which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and
financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which
are beyond our control. If our operating results are not
sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, we
will be forced to take actions such as reducing distributions,
reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions,
investments and/or capital expenditures, selling assets,
restructuring or refinancing our indebtedness, or seeking
additional equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may not
be able to effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms,
or at all.
Our new credit agreements will contain operating and
financial restrictions that may restrict our business and
financing activities.
The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in our
new credit agreements and any future financing agreements could
restrict our ability to finance future operations or capital
needs or to engage, expand or pursue our business activities.
For example, we anticipate that our new credit agreements will
restrict our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
incur indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
|
grant liens; |
|
|
|
|
|
make certain acquisitions and investments; |
|
|
|
|
|
make capital expenditures above specified amounts; |
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
redeem or prepay other debt; |
|
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
|
|
enter into a merger, consolidation or sale of assets; or |
|
|
|
|
|
cease our crack spread hedging program. |
|
Our ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions
contained in our new credit agreements may be affected by events
beyond our control. If market or other economic conditions
deteriorate, our ability to comply with these covenants may be
impaired. If we violate any of the restrictions, covenants,
ratios or tests in our credit agreement, a significant portion
of our indebtedness may become immediately due and payable, and
our lenders commitment to make further loans to us may
terminate. We might not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient
funds to make these accelerated payments. In addition, our
obligations under our credit agreement will be secured by
substantially all of our assets, and if we are unable to repay
our indebtedness under our credit agreement, the lenders could
seek to foreclose on our assets.
An increase in interest rates will cause our debt service
obligations to increase.
Borrowings under our new credit facilities will bear interest at
floating rates. The rates are subject to adjustment based on
fluctuations in the London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR). An increase in the interest rates
associated with our floating-rate debt would increase our debt
service costs and affect our results of operations and cash flow
available for distribution to our unitholders. In addition, an
increase in our interest expense could adversely affect our
future ability to obtain financing or materially increase the
cost of any additional financing.
Our business and operations could be adversely affected by
terrorist attacks.
Since the September 11th terrorist attacks, the
U.S. government has issued public warnings that indicate
that energy assets might be specific targets of terrorist
organizations. The continued threat of terrorism and the impact
of military and other actions will likely lead to increased
volatility in prices for natural gas and oil and could affect
the markets for our products. These developments have subjected
our operations to increased risk and, depending on their
ultimate magnitude, could have a material adverse affect on our
business. We do not carry any terrorism risk insurance.
Due to our lack of asset and geographic diversification,
adverse developments in our operating areas would reduce our
ability to make distributions to our unitholders.
We rely exclusively on sales generated from products processed
from the refineries we own. Furthermore, almost all of our
assets and operations are located in northwest Louisiana. Due to
our lack of diversification in asset type and location, an
adverse development in these businesses or areas, including
adverse developments due to catastrophic events or weather,
decreased supply of crude oil feedstocks and/or decreased demand
for refined petroleum products, would have a significantly
greater impact on our financial condition and results of
operations than if we maintained more diverse assets and in
diverse locations.
We depend on key personnel for the success of our business
and the loss of those persons could adversely affect our
business and our ability to make distributions to our
unitholders.
The loss of the services of any member of senior management or
key employee could have an adverse effect on our business and
reduce our ability to make distributions to our unitholders. We
may not be able to locate or employ on acceptable terms
qualified replacements for senior management or other key
employees if their services were no longer available. Except
with respect to Mr. Grube, neither we, our general partner
nor any affiliate thereof has entered into an employment
agreement with any member of our senior management team or other
key personnel. Furthermore, we do not maintain any key man
insurance.
23
We depend on unionized labor for the operation of our
refineries. Any work stoppages or labor disturbances at these
facilities could disrupt our business.
Substantially all of our operating personnel at our Princeton,
Cotton Valley and Shreveport refineries are employed under
collective bargaining agreements that expire in 2008, 2007 and
2007, respectively. Please read Business
Employees. Any work stoppages or other labor disturbances
at these facilities could have an adverse effect on our business
and reduce our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.
In addition, employees who are not currently represented by
labor unions may seek union representation in the future, and
any renegotiation of current collective bargaining agreements
may result in terms that are less favorable to us.
The operating results for our fuels segment and the
asphalt we produce and sell are seasonal and generally lower in
the first and fourth quarters of the year.
Demand for gasoline and asphalt products is generally higher
during the summer months than during the winter months due to
seasonal increases in highway traffic and road construction
work. In addition, our natural gas costs tend to be higher
during the winter months. As a result, our operating results for
the first and fourth calendar quarters for those businesses are
generally lower than those for the second and third calendar
quarters of each year.
Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us
The Fehsenfeld and Grube families, The Heritage Group and
certain of their affiliates will own a 75.8% limited partner
interest in us and will own and control our general partner,
which has sole responsibility for conducting our business and
managing our operations. Our general partner and its affiliates
have conflicts of interest and limited fiduciary duties, which
may permit them to favor their own interests to your
detriment.
Following the offering, The Heritage Group, the Fehsenfeld and
Grube families and certain of their affiliates will own a 75.8%
limited partner interest in us. In addition, The Heritage Group
and the Fehsenfeld and Grube families will own our general
partner. Conflicts of interest may arise between our general
partner and its affiliates, on the one hand, and us and our
unitholders, on the other hand. As a result of these conflicts,
the general partner may favor its own interests and the
interests of its affiliates over the interests of our
unitholders. These conflicts include, among others, the
following situations:
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner is allowed to take into account the
interests of parties other than us, such as its affiliates, in
resolving conflicts of interest, which has the effect of
limiting its fiduciary duty to our unitholders; |
|
|
|
our general partner has limited its liability and reduced its
fiduciary duties under our partnership agreement and has also
restricted the remedies available to our unitholders for actions
that, without the limitations, might constitute breaches of
fiduciary duty. As a result of purchasing common units,
unitholders consent to some actions and conflicts of interest
that might otherwise constitute a breach of fiduciary or other
duties under applicable state law; |
|
|
|
our general partner determines the amount and timing of asset
purchases and sales, borrowings, issuance of additional
partnership securities, and reserves, each of which can affect
the amount of cash that is distributed to unitholders; |
|
|
|
|
our general partner determines which costs incurred by it and
its affiliates are reimbursable by us; |
|
|
|
|
our general partner determines the amount and timing of any
capital expenditures and whether a capital expenditure is a
maintenance capital expenditure, which reduces operating
surplus, or a capital expenditure for acquisitions or capital
improvements, which does not. |
24
|
|
|
|
|
This determination can affect the amount of cash that is
distributed to our unitholders and the ability of the
subordinated units to convert to common units; |
|
|
|
|
our general partner has the flexibility to cause us to enter
into a broad variety of derivative transactions covering
different time periods, the net cash receipts from which will
increase operating surplus and adjusted operating surplus, with
the result that our general partner may be able to shift the
recognition of operating surplus and adjusted operating surplus
between periods to increase the distributions it and its
affiliates receive on their subordinated units and incentive
distribution rights or to accelerate the expiration of the
subordination period; and |
|
|
|
|
|
in some instances, our general partner may cause us to borrow
funds in order to permit the payment of cash distributions, even
if the purpose or effect of the borrowing is to make a
distribution on the subordinated units, to make incentive
distributions or to accelerate the expiration of the
subordination period. |
|
Please read Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary
Duties.
The Heritage Group and certain of its affiliates may
engage in limited competition with us.
Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, The Heritage Group and its
controlled affiliates will agree not to engage in, whether by
acquisition or otherwise, the business of refining or marketing
specialty lubricating oils, solvents and wax products as well as
gasoline, diesel and jet fuel products in the continental United
States (restricted business) for so long as it
controls us. This restriction does not apply to certain assets
and businesses which are more fully described under
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Omnibus Agreement.
Although Mr. Grube will be prohibited from competing with
us pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement we intend
to enter into with him, the owners of our general partner, other
than The Heritage Group, will not be prohibited from competing
with us.
Our partnership agreement limits our general
partners fiduciary duties to our unitholders and restricts
the remedies available to unitholders for actions taken by our
general partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of
fiduciary duty.
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that reduce the
standards to which our general partner would otherwise be held
by state fiduciary duty law. For example, our partnership
agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
permits our general partner to make a number of decisions in its
individual capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as our
general partner. This entitles our general partner to consider
only the interests and factors that it desires, and it has no
duty or obligation to give any consideration to any interest of,
or factors affecting, us, our affiliates or any limited partner.
Examples include the exercise of its limited call right, its
voting rights with respect to the units it owns, its
registration rights and its determination whether or not to
consent to any merger or consolidation of our partnership or
amendment to our partnership agreement; |
|
|
|
provides that our general partner will not have any liability to
us or our unitholders for decisions made in its capacity as a
general partner so long as it acted in good faith, meaning it
believed the decision was in the best interests of our
partnership; |
|
|
|
generally provides that affiliated transactions and resolutions
of conflicts of interest not approved by the conflicts committee
of the board of directors of our general partner and not
involving a vote of unitholders must be on terms no less
favorable to us than those generally being provided to or
available from unrelated third parties or be fair and
reasonable to us. In determining whether a transaction or
resolution is fair and reasonable, our general |
25
|
|
|
|
|
partner may consider the totality of the relationships between
the parties involved, including other transactions that may be
particularly advantageous or beneficial to us; and |
|
|
|
provides that our general partner and its officers and directors
will not be liable for monetary damages to us or our limited
partners for any acts or omissions unless there has been a final
and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of competent
jurisdiction determining that the general partner or those other
persons acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful
misconduct or, in the case of a criminal matter, acted with
knowledge that such persons conduct was criminal. |
In order to become a limited partner of our partnership, a
common unitholder is required to agree to be bound by the
provisions in the partnership agreement, including the
provisions discussed above. Please read Conflicts of
Interest and Fiduciary Duties Fiduciary Duties.
Unitholders have limited voting rights and are not
entitled to elect our general partner or its directors.
Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, unitholders
have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our
business and, therefore, limited ability to influence
managements decisions regarding our business. Unitholders
did not elect our general partner or its board of directors, and
will have no right to elect our general partner or its board of
directors on an annual or other continuing basis. The board of
directors of our general partner is chosen by the members of our
general partner. Furthermore, if the unitholders were
dissatisfied with the performance of our general partner, they
will have little ability to remove our general partner. As a
result of these limitations, the price at which the common units
will trade could be diminished because of the absence or
reduction of a takeover premium in the trading price.
Even if unitholders are dissatisfied, they cannot remove
our general partner without its consent.
The unitholders will be unable initially to remove the general
partner without its consent because the general partner and its
affiliates will own sufficient units upon completion of the
offering to be able to prevent its removal. The vote of the
holders of at least
662/3%
of all outstanding units voting together as a single class is
required to remove the general partner. Following the closing of
this offering, the owners of our general partner, certain of
their affiliates and the Fehsenfeld Investors will own 77.4% of
our common and subordinated units. Also, if our general partner
is removed without cause during the subordination period and
units held by our general partner and its affiliates are not
voted in favor of that removal, all remaining subordinated units
will automatically convert into common units and any existing
arrearages on the common units will be extinguished. A removal
of the general partner under these circumstances would adversely
affect the common units by prematurely eliminating their
distribution and liquidation preference over the subordinated
units, which would otherwise have continued until we had met
certain distribution and performance tests.
Cause is narrowly defined in our partnership agreement to mean
that a court of competent jurisdiction has entered a final,
non-appealable judgment finding our general partner liable for
actual fraud or willful misconduct in its capacity as our
general partner. Cause does not include most cases of charges of
poor management of the business, so the removal of our general
partner during the subordination period because of the
unitholders dissatisfaction with our general
partners performance in managing our partnership will most
likely result in the termination of the subordination period.
Our partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of
those unitholders owning 20% or more of our common units.
Unitholders voting rights are further restricted by the
partnership agreement provision providing that any units held by
a person that owns 20% or more of any class of units then
outstanding, other
26
than our general partner, its affiliates, their transferees, and
persons who acquired such units with the prior approval of the
board of directors of our general partner, cannot vote on any
matter. Our partnership agreement also contains provisions
limiting the ability of unitholders to call meetings or to
acquire information about our operations, as well as other
provisions limiting the unitholders ability to influence
the manner or direction of management.
Control of our general partner may be transferred to a
third party without unitholder consent.
Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to
a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially
all of its assets without the consent of the unitholders.
Furthermore, our partnership agreement does not restrict the
ability of the members of our general partner from transferring
their respective membership interests in our general partner to
a third party. The new members of our general partner would then
be in a position to replace the board of directors and officers
of our general partner with their own choices and thereby
control the decisions taken by the board of directors.
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of
$17.16 in net tangible book value per common unit.
The assumed initial public offering price of $22.00 per
unit exceeds our pro forma net tangible book value of
$(0.11) per unit. Based on an assumed initial public
offering price of $22.00 per unit, you will incur immediate
and substantial dilution of $17.16 per common unit. This
dilution results primarily because the assets contributed by our
general partner and its affiliates are recorded at their
historical cost, and not their fair value, in accordance with
GAAP. Please read Dilution.
We do not have our own officers and employees and rely
solely on the officers and employees of our general partner and
its affiliates to manage our business and affairs.
We do not have our own officers and employees and rely solely on
the officers and employees of our general partner and its
affiliates to manage our business and affairs. We can provide no
assurance that our general partner will continue to provide us
the officers and employees that are necessary for the conduct of
our business nor that such provision will be on terms that are
acceptable to us. If our general partner fails to provide us
with adequate personnel, our operations could be adversely
impacted and our cash available for distribution to unitholders
could be reduced.
We may issue additional common units without your
approval, which would dilute your existing ownership
interests.
During the subordination period, our general partner, without
the approval of our unitholders, may cause us to issue up to
6,533,000 additional common units. Our general partner may also
cause us to issue an unlimited number of additional common units
or other equity securities of equal rank with the common units,
without unitholder approval, in a number of circumstances set
forth under The Partnership
Agreement Issuance of Additional
Securities.
The issuance of additional common units or other equity
securities of equal or senior rank to the common units will have
the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
our unitholders proportionate ownership interest in us may
decrease; |
|
|
|
the amount of cash available for distribution on each unit may
decrease; |
|
|
|
because a lower percentage of total outstanding units will be
subordinated units, the risk that a shortfall in the payment of
the minimum quarterly distribution will be borne by our common
unitholders will increase; |
27
|
|
|
|
|
the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding unit
may be diminished; |
|
|
|
the market price of the common units may decline; and |
|
|
|
the ratio of taxable income to distributions may increase. |
After the end of the subordination period, we may issue an
unlimited number of limited partner interests of any type
without the approval of our unitholders. Our partnership
agreement does not give our unitholders the right to approve our
issuance of equity securities ranking junior to the common units
at any time. In addition, our partnership agreement does not
prohibit the issuance by our subsidiaries of equity securities,
which may effectively rank senior to the common units.
Our general partners determination of the level of
cash reserves may reduce the amount of available cash for
distribution to you.
Our partnership agreement requires our general partner to deduct
from operating surplus cash reserves that it establishes are
necessary to fund our future operating expenditures. In
addition, our partnership agreement also permits our general
partner to reduce available cash by establishing cash reserves
for the proper conduct of our business, to comply with
applicable law or agreements to which we are a party, or to
provide funds for future distributions to partners. These
reserves will affect the amount of cash available for
distribution to you.
Cost reimbursements due to our general partner and its
affiliates will reduce cash available for distribution to
you.
Prior to making any distribution on the common units, we will
reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for all
expenses they incur on our behalf. Any such reimbursement will
be determined by our general partner and will reduce the cash
available for distribution to unitholders. These expenses will
include all costs incurred by our general partner and its
affiliates in managing and operating us. Please read
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
and Conflicts of Interests and Fiduciary
Duties Conflicts of Interest.
Our general partner has a limited call right that may
require you to sell your units at an undesirable time or
price.
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more
than 80% of the issued and outstanding common units, our general
partner will have the right, but not the obligation, which right
it may assign to any of its affiliates or to us, to acquire all,
but not less than all, of the common units held by unaffiliated
persons at a price not less than their then-current market
price. As a result, you may be required to sell your common
units to our general partner, its affiliates or us at an
undesirable time or price and may not receive any return on your
investment. You may also incur a tax liability upon a sale of
your common units. At the completion of this offering, our
general partner and its affiliates will own approximately 47.2%
of the common units. At the end of the subordination period,
assuming no additional issuances of common units, our general
partner and its affiliates will own approximately 74.5% of the
common units. For additional information about this right,
please read The Partnership Agreement Limited
Call Right.
Your liability may not be limited if a court finds that
unitholder action constitutes control of our business.
A general partner of a partnership generally has unlimited
liability for the obligations of the partnership, except for
those contractual obligations of the partnership that are
expressly made without recourse to the general partner. Our
partnership is organized under Delaware law and we conduct
business in a number of other states. The limitations on the
liability of holders of limited partner interests for the
obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly
established in
28
some of the other states in which we do business. You could be
liable for any and all of our obligations as if you were a
general partner if:
|
|
|
|
|
a court or government agency determined that we were conducting
business in a state but had not complied with that particular
states partnership statute; or |
|
|
|
your right to act with other unitholders to remove or replace
the general partner, to approve some amendments to our
partnership agreement or to take other actions under our
partnership agreement constitute control of our
business. |
For a discussion of the implications of the limitations of
liability on a unitholder, please read The Partnership
Agreement Limited Liability.
Unitholders may have liability to repay distributions that
were wrongfully distributed to them.
Under certain circumstances, unitholders may have to repay
amounts wrongfully returned or distributed to them. Under
Section 17-607 of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited
Partnership Act, which we call the Delaware Act, we may not make
a distribution to you if the distribution would cause our
liabilities to exceed the fair value of our assets. Delaware law
provides that for a period of three years from the date of the
impermissible distribution, limited partners who received the
distribution and who knew at the time of the distribution that
it violated Delaware law will be liable to the limited
partnership for the distribution amount. Purchasers of units who
become limited partners are liable for the obligations of the
transferring limited partner to make contributions to the
partnership that are known to the purchaser of the units at the
time it became a limited partner and for unknown obligations if
the liabilities could be determined from the partnership
agreement. Liabilities to partners on account of their
partnership interest and liabilities that are non-recourse to
the partnership are not counted for purposes of determining
whether a distribution is permitted.
There is no existing market for our common units, and a
trading market that will provide you with adequate liquidity may
not develop. The price of our common units may fluctuate
significantly, and you could lose all or part of your
investment.
Prior to the offering, there has been no public market for the
common units. After the offering, there will be only 6,450,000
publicly traded common units, assuming no exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option. We do not know the
extent to which investor interest will lead to the development
of a trading market or how liquid that market might be. You may
not be able to resell your common units at or above the initial
public offering price. Additionally, the lack of liquidity may
result in wide bid-ask spreads, contribute to significant
fluctuations in the market price of the common units and limit
the number of investors who are able to buy the common units.
The initial public offering price for the common units will be
determined by negotiations between us and the representatives of
the underwriters and may not be indicative of the market price
of the common units that will prevail in the trading market. The
market price of our common units may decline below the initial
public offering price. The market price of our common units may
also be influenced by many factors, some of which are beyond our
control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the level of our distributions and our earnings or those of
other companies in our industry; |
|
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts,
acquisitions or other business developments; |
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance,
interpretations or principles; |
|
|
|
general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
the failure of securities analysts to cover our common units
after this offering or changes in financial estimates by
analysts; and |
|
|
|
|
|
the other factors described in these Risk Factors. |
|
29
We will incur increased costs as a result of being a
public company.
We have no history operating as a public company. As a public
company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other
expenses that we did not incur as a private company. For
example, as a result of becoming a public company, we are
required to have three independent directors, create additional
board committees and adopt policies regarding internal controls
and disclosure controls and procedures, including the
preparation of reports on internal controls over financial
reporting. In addition, we will incur additional costs
associated with our public company reporting requirements. We
also expect these rules and regulations to make it more
difficult and more expensive for our general partner to obtain
director and officer liability insurance and it may be required
to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur
substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar
coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for our general
partner to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on its
board of directors or as executive officers. We have included
$4.5 million of estimated incremental costs per year
associated with being a public company; however, our actual
incremental costs of being a public company may be higher than
we currently estimate.
Tax Risks to Common Unitholders
In addition to reading the following risk factors, you should
read Material Tax Consequences for a more complete
discussion of the expected material federal income tax
consequences of owning and disposing of common units.
Our tax treatment depends on our status as a partnership
for federal income tax purposes, as well as our not being
subject to entity-level taxation by individual states. If the
Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, treats us as a corporation or
we become subject to entity-level taxation for state tax
purposes, it would substantially reduce the amount of cash
available for distribution to you.
The anticipated after-tax economic benefit of an investment in
the common units depends largely on our being treated as a
partnership for federal income tax purposes. We have not
requested, and do not plan to request, a ruling from the IRS on
this or any other tax matter affecting us.
If we were treated as a corporation for federal income tax
purposes, we would pay federal income tax on our income at the
corporate tax rate, which is currently a maximum of 35% and
would likely pay state income tax at varying rates.
Distributions to you would generally be taxed again as corporate
distributions, and no income, gains, losses or deductions would
flow through to you. Because a tax would be imposed upon us as a
corporation, our cash available for distribution to you would be
substantially reduced. Therefore, our treatment as a corporation
would result in a material reduction in the anticipated cash
flow and after-tax return to the unitholders, likely causing a
substantial reduction in the value of our common units.
Current law may change so as to cause us to be treated as a
corporation for federal income tax purposes or otherwise subject
us to entity-level taxation. In addition, because of widespread
state budget deficits, several states are evaluating ways to
subject partnerships to entity-level taxation through the
imposition of state income, franchise and other forms of
taxation. If any of these states were to impose a tax on us, the
cash available for distribution to you would be reduced. The
partnership agreement provides that if a law is enacted or
existing law is modified or interpreted in a manner that
subjects us to taxation as a corporation or otherwise subjects
us to entity-level taxation for federal, state or local income
tax purposes, the minimum quarterly distribution amount and the
target distribution levels will be adjusted to reflect the
impact of that law on us.
30
A successful IRS contest of the federal income tax
positions we take may adversely affect the market for our common
units, and the cost of any IRS contest will reduce our cash
available for distribution to our unitholders.
We have not requested a ruling from the IRS with respect to our
treatment as a partnership for federal income tax purposes or
any other matter affecting us. The IRS may adopt positions that
differ from the conclusions of our counsel expressed in this
prospectus or from the positions we take. It may be necessary to
resort to administrative or court proceedings to sustain some or
all of our counsels conclusions or the positions we take.
A court may not agree with all of our counsels conclusions
or positions we take. Any contest with the IRS may materially
and adversely impact the market for our common units and the
price at which they trade. In addition, our costs of any contest
with the IRS will be borne indirectly by our unitholders and our
general partner because the costs will reduce our cash available
for distribution.
You may be required to pay taxes on income from us even if
you do not receive any cash distributions from us.
Because our unitholders will be treated as partners to whom we
will allocate taxable income which could be different in amount
than the cash we distribute, you will be required to pay any
federal income taxes and, in some cases, state and local income
taxes on your share of our taxable income even if you receive no
cash distributions from us. You may not receive cash
distributions from us equal to your share of our taxable income
or even equal to the tax liability that results from that income.
Tax gain or loss on disposition of common units could be
more or less than expected.
If you sell your common units, you will recognize a gain or loss
equal to the difference between the amount realized and your tax
basis in those common units. Prior distributions to you in
excess of the total net taxable income you were allocated for a
common unit, which decreased your tax basis in that common unit,
will, in effect, become taxable income to you if the common unit
is sold at a price greater than your tax basis in that common
unit, even if the price is less than your original cost. A
substantial portion of the amount realized, whether or not
representing gain, may be ordinary income. In addition, if you
sell your units, you may incur a tax liability in excess of the
amount of cash you receive from the sale.
Tax-exempt entities and foreign persons face unique tax
issues from owning common units that may result in adverse tax
consequences to them.
Investment in common units by tax-exempt entities, such as
individual retirement accounts (IRAs), other
retirement plans, and non-U.S. persons raises issues unique
to them. For example, virtually all of our income allocated to
organizations that are exempt from federal income tax, including
individual retirement accounts and other retirement plans, will
be unrelated business taxable income and will be taxable to
them. Distributions to non-U.S. persons will be reduced by
withholding taxes at the highest applicable effective tax rate,
and non-U.S. persons will be required to file United States
federal tax returns and pay tax on their share of our taxable
income. If you are a tax-exempt entity you should consult your
tax advisor before investing in our common units.
We will treat each purchaser of our common units as having
the same tax benefits without regard to the actual common units
purchased. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could
adversely affect the value of the common units.
Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of common
units and because of other reasons, we will take depreciation
and amortization positions that may not conform to all aspects
of existing Treasury regulations. A successful IRS challenge to
those positions could adversely affect the amount of tax
benefits available to you. It also could affect the timing of
these tax benefits or the
31
amount of gain from the sale of common units and could have a
negative impact on the value of our common units or result in
audit adjustments to your tax returns. For a further discussion
of the effect of the depreciation and amortization positions we
will adopt, please read Material Tax
Consequences Uniformity of Units.
Unitholders may be subject to state and local taxes and
return filing requirements.
In addition to federal income taxes, you will likely be subject
to other taxes, including foreign, state and local taxes,
unincorporated business taxes and estate, inheritance or
intangible taxes that are imposed by the various jurisdictions
in which we do business or own property, even if you do not live
in any of those jurisdictions. You will likely be required to
file foreign, state and local income tax returns and pay state
and local income taxes in some or all of these jurisdictions.
Further, you may be subject to penalties for failure to comply
with those requirements. We will initially own assets and do
business in Indiana, Illinois, Louisiana, New Jersey,
Pennsylvania, Texas and Utah. Each of these states, other than
Texas, currently imposes a personal income tax as well as an
income tax on corporations and other entities. As we make
acquisitions or expand our business, we may own assets or do
business in additional states that impose a personal income tax.
It is your responsibility to file all United States federal,
foreign, state and local tax returns. Our counsel has not
rendered an opinion on the state or local tax consequences of an
investment in the common units.
We have a subsidiary that will be treated as a corporation
for federal income tax purposes and subject to corporate-level
income taxes.
We will conduct all or a portion of our operations in which we
market finished petroleum products to certain end-users through
a subsidiary that is organized as a corporation. We may elect to
conduct additional operations through this corporate subsidiary
in the future. This corporate subsidiary will be subject to
corporate-level tax, which will reduce the cash available for
distribution to us and, in turn, to you. If the IRS were to
successfully assert that this corporation has more tax liability
than we anticipate or legislation was enacted that increased the
corporate tax rate, our cash available for distribution to you
would be further reduced.
The sale or exchange of 50% or more of our capital and
profits interests during any twelve-month period will result in
the termination of our partnership for federal income tax
purposes.
We will be considered to have terminated for federal income tax
purposes if there is a sale or exchange of 50% or more of the
total interests in our capital and profits within a twelve-month
period. Our termination would, among other things, result in the
closing of our taxable year for all unitholders and could result
in a deferral of depreciation deductions allowable in computing
our taxable income. Please read Material Tax
Consequences Disposition of Common Units
Constructive Termination for a discussion of the
consequences of our termination for federal income tax purposes.
32
USE OF PROCEEDS
We expect to receive net proceeds of approximately
$132.0 million from the sale of 6,450,000 common units
offered by this prospectus, before deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering and related
formation transaction expenses of approximately
$5.0 million. Our estimates assume an initial public
offering price of $22.00 per common unit and no exercise of
the underwriters over-allotment option. The underwriters
will not receive any discount or commission on
$15.0 million of common units to be offered to the
Fehsenfeld Investors, which will be sold directly by us at a
price per unit equal to the initial public offering price less
an amount equal to the underwriting discount per unit for the
common units being sold to the public. The following table
illustrates the estimated sources and uses of funds from this
offering (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources: |
|
|
|
|
|
6,450,000 common units offered
hereby (net of underwriters discount)
|
|
$ |
132.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sources of funds
|
|
$ |
132.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uses: |
|
|
|
|
|
Repay indebtedness under our first
lien term loan facility(1)(2)
|
|
$ |
119.7 |
|
Pay prepayment penalties and fees
to lenders
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Pay transaction fees and expenses
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total uses of funds
|
|
$ |
132.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Our new credit facilities, which will mature in 2010 and 2012,
provide for a secured revolving credit facility of up to
$225.0 million, a $175.0 million first lien term loan
facility and a $50.0 million pre-funded letter of credit
facility. Borrowings under our bank credit facilities will bear
interest at a variable rate based upon LIBOR or prime rate, at
our option. We expect to enter into our new credit facilities in
the fourth quarter of 2005 and simultaneously draw down
revolving and term loans thereunder, the proceeds of which will
be used to repay all of our currently outstanding indebtedness.
Please read Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources Debt and Credit
Facilities. |
|
|
|
(2) |
After applying the net proceeds from this offering, we expect to
have $56.3 million outstanding under our first lien term
loan facility. In addition, we expect to have
$137.4 million drawn under our revolving credit facility.
We believe we will be able to borrow up to approximately
$87.6 million in additional funds under our revolving
credit facility, subject to the borrowing base limitations
contained in that facility. |
|
If the underwriters over-allotment option is exercised, we
will use the additional net proceeds to repay additional
borrowings under our credit facilities.
33
CAPITALIZATION
The following table shows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
our historical cash and capitalization as of September 30,
2005; and |
|
|
|
|
|
our pro forma cash and capitalization as of September 30,
2005 as adjusted to reflect (1) the borrowings under our
new credit facilities and the repayment by us of all of our then
existing indebtedness which we expect will occur in the fourth
quarter of 2005 and (2) the offering of the common units
and related formation transactions and the application of the
net proceeds from the offering as described under Use of
Proceeds. |
|
We derived this table from, and it should be read in conjunction
with and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the
historical and pro forma consolidated financial statements and
the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
You should also read this table in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash
|
|
$ |
2,754 |
|
|
$ |
2,754 |
|
Long term debt, including current
portion(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt due affiliates
|
|
|
181,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revolving credit loans
|
|
|
91,583 |
|
|
|
137,398 |
|
|
Other term loans
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
56,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
313,398 |
|
|
|
193,735 |
|
Partners equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners capital
|
|
|
6,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held by public:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,994 |
|
|
Held by the general partner and its
affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(637 |
) |
|
|
Subordinated units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
General partner units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners equity
|
|
|
6,412 |
|
|
|
124,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
319,810 |
|
|
$ |
318,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Prior to December 31, 2005, we intend to refinance all
existing borrowings with proceeds from a new $175.0 million
first lien term loan facility, a $50.0 million pre-funded
letter of credit facility and borrowings under a new
$225.0 million secured revolving credit facility. We intend
to use the net proceeds of the offering to repay the a portion
of the amounts outstanding under the $175.0 million term
loan. |
34
DILUTION
Dilution is the amount by which the offering price paid by the
purchasers of common units sold in this offering will exceed the
pro forma net tangible book value per unit after the offering.
Assuming an initial public offering price of $22.00 per
common unit, on a pro forma basis as of September 30, 2005,
after giving effect to the offering of common units and the
application of the related net proceeds, our net tangible book
value was $124.9 million, or $4.84 per common unit.
Purchasers of common units in this offering will experience
substantial and immediate dilution in net tangible book value
per common unit for financial accounting purposes, as
illustrated in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering
price per common unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22.00 |
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value
per common unit before the offering(1)
|
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net tangible book value
per common unit attributable to purchasers in the offering
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Pro forma net tangible book
value per common unit after the offering(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immediate dilution in tangible net
book value per common unit to new investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Determined by dividing the number of units (5,758,273 common
units, 13,066,000 subordinated units and the 2% general partner
interest represented by 515,801 general partner units) to be
issued to the general partner and its affiliates for their
contribution of assets and liabilities to us into the net
tangible book value of the contributed assets and liabilities. |
|
|
|
(2) |
Determined by dividing the total number of units to be
outstanding after the offering (12,208,273 common units,
13,066,000 subordinated units and the 2% general partner
interest represented by 515,801 general partner units) into our
pro forma net tangible book value, after giving effect to the
application of the expected net proceeds of the offering. |
|
The following table sets forth the number of units that we will
issue and the total consideration contributed to us by our
general partner, its affiliates and by the purchasers of common
units in this offering upon consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units Acquired | |
|
Total Consideration | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
General partner and affiliates(1)
|
|
|
19,340,074 |
|
|
|
75.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(2,139,000 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
New investors(2)
|
|
|
6,450,000 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
126,994,000 |
|
|
|
101.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
25,790,074 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
124,855,000 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The units acquired by our general partner and its affiliates,
excluding the estimated 731,818 common units to be offered to
the Fehsenfeld Investors, consist of 5,758,273 common units and
13,066,000 subordinated units and the 2% general partner
interest represented by 515,801 general partner units. |
|
|
|
(2) |
Includes an estimated 731,818 common units to be offered to the
Fehsenfeld Investors. |
|
35
OUR CASH DISTRIBUTION POLICY AND RESTRICTIONS ON
DISTRIBUTIONS
You should read the following discussion of our cash
distribution policy in conjunction with the specific assumptions
upon which our cash distribution policy is based. Please read
Assumptions and Considerations below. For
additional information regarding our historical and pro forma
operating results, you should refer to our historical financial
statements for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004, our unaudited historical financial statements for the nine
months ended September 30, 2004 and 2005, and our unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2004 and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
General
Rationale for Our Cash Distribution Policy. Our
cash distribution policy reflects a basic judgment that our
unitholders will be better served by our distributing our
available cash rather than retaining it. Because we are not
subject to a partnership-level federal income tax, we have more
cash to distribute to you than would be the case were we subject
to partnership level federal income tax. Our cash distribution
policy is consistent with the terms of our partnership
agreement, which requires that we distribute available cash to
our unitholders quarterly. Our determination of available cash
takes into account the need to maintain certain cash reserves to
preserve our distribution levels across seasonal and cyclical
fluctuations in our business. We will distribute to the holders
of common units and subordinated units on a quarterly basis at
least the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.45 per unit, or
$1.80 per year, to the extent we have sufficient cash from our
operations after establishment of cash reserves and payment of
fees and expenses, including payments to our general partner.
During the subordination period, the common units have a
priority over the subordinated units for the minimum quarterly
distribution and, during the subordination period, the common
units carry arrearage rights, which are similar to cumulative
rights on preferred stock. If the minimum quarterly distribution
is not paid, we must pay all arrearages in addition to the
current minimum quarterly distribution before distributions are
made on the subordinated units or the incentive distribution
rights. We are a newly formed limited partnership and have not
historically paid any cash distributions. For a more detailed
discussion, please read How We Make Cash
Distributions.
Limitations on Cash Distributions and Our Ability to
Change Our Cash Distribution Policy. There is no
guarantee that unitholders will receive quarterly distributions
from us. Our distribution policy is subject to certain
restrictions and may be changed at any time, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our distribution policy will be subject to restrictions on
distributions under our new credit facilities. Specifically, we
anticipate that our new credit facilities will contain
consolidated leverage and minimum liquidity tests that we must
satisfy in order to make distributions to unitholders. Please
read Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources Debt and Credit
Facilities. Should we be unable to satisfy these
restrictions under our new credit facilities, we would be
prohibited from making cash distributions to you notwithstanding
our stated cash distribution policy. |
|
|
|
|
Our board of directors will have the authority to establish
reserves for the prudent conduct of our business or for future
distributions to unitholders, and the establishment of those
reserves could result in a reduction in cash distributions to
you from levels we currently anticipate pursuant to our stated
distribution policy. |
|
|
|
Even if our cash distribution policy is not modified or revoked,
the amount of distributions we pay under our cash distribution
policy and the decision to make any distribution is determined
by our general partner, taking into consideration the terms of
our partnership agreement. |
36
|
|
|
|
|
Under Section 17-607 of the Delaware Act, we may not make a
distribution to you if the distribution would cause our
liabilities to exceed the fair value of our assets. |
|
|
|
We may lack sufficient cash to pay distributions to our
unitholders due to a number of factors, including increases in
our general and administrative expense, principal and interest
payments on our outstanding debt, tax expenses, working capital
requirements, anticipated cash needs and seasonality. Please
read Risk Factors for a discussion of these factors. |
|
|
|
|
While our partnership agreement requires us to distribute our
available cash, our partnership agreement may be amended.
Although during the subordination period, with certain
exceptions, our partnership agreement may not be amended without
approval of the nonaffiliated common unitholders, our
partnership agreement can be amended with the approval of a
majority of our outstanding common units after the subordination
period has ended. At the closing of this offering, owners of our
general partner, certain of their affiliates and the Fehsenfeld
Investors will own approximately 77.4% of our outstanding common
units and subordinated units. |
|
Our Cash Distribution Policy May Limit Our Ability to
Grow. Because we intend to distribute the majority of
the cash generated from our business to our unitholders, our
growth may not be as fast as businesses that reinvest their
available cash to expand ongoing operations.
Our Ability to Grow is Dependent on Our Ability to Access
External Expansion Capital. We will distribute our
available cash from operations to our unitholders. As a result,
we expect that we will rely primarily upon external financing
sources, including commercial bank borrowings and the issuance
of debt and equity securities, to fund our acquisitions and
major expansion capital expenditures. As a result, to the extent
we are unable to finance growth externally, our cash
distribution policy will significantly impair our ability to
grow. In addition, to the extent we issue additional units in
connection with any acquisitions or expansion capital
expenditures, the payments of distributions on those additional
units may increase the risk that we will be unable to maintain
or increase our per unit distribution level, which in turn may
reduce the available cash that we have to distribute on each
unit. We are able to issue additional units without the approval
of our unitholders in a number of circumstances. Please read
The Partnership Agreement Issuance of
Additional Securities. The incurrence of additional
commercial borrowings or other debt to finance our growth
strategy would result in increased interest expense, which in
turn may reduce the available cash that we have to distribute to
our unitholders.
Our Initial Distribution Rate
Upon completion of this offering, the board of directors of our
general partner will adopt a policy pursuant to which we will
declare an initial quarterly distribution of $0.45 per unit
per complete quarter, or $1.80 per unit per year, to be
paid no later than 45 days after the end of the fiscal
quarter through the quarter ending December 31, 2006. This
equates to an aggregate cash distribution of $11.6 million
per quarter or $46.4 million per year, in each case based
on the number of common units, subordinated units and general
partner units outstanding immediately after completion of this
offering. Our ability to make cash distributions at the initial
distribution rate pursuant to this policy will be subject to the
factors described above under the caption
Limitations on Cash Distributions and Our
Ability to Change Our Cash Distribution Policy.
37
The table below sets forth the assumed number of outstanding
common units, subordinated units and general partner units upon
the closing of this offering and the aggregate distribution
amounts payable on such units during the year following the
closing of this offering at our initial distribution rate of
$0.45 per common unit per quarter ($1.80 per common
unit on an annualized basis).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
| |
|
|
Units | |
|
One Quarter | |
|
Four Quarters | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Publicly held common units
|
|
|
5,718,182 |
|
|
$ |
2,573,182 |
|
|
$ |
10,292,727 |
|
Common units held by affiliates of
our general partner and the Fehsenfeld Investors
|
|
|
6,490,091 |
|
|
|
2,920,541 |
|
|
|
11,682,164 |
|
Subordinated units held by
affiliates of our general partner
|
|
|
13,066,000 |
|
|
|
5,879,700 |
|
|
|
23,518,800 |
|
General partner units held by
our
general partner
|
|
|
515,801 |
|
|
|
232,110 |
|
|
|
928,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
25,790,074 |
|
|
$ |
11,605,533 |
|
|
$ |
46,422,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We do not have a legal obligation to pay distributions at our
initial distribution rate or at any other rate except as
provided in our partnership agreement. Our partnership agreement
requires that we distribute our available cash quarterly. Under
our partnership agreement, available cash is defined to
generally mean, for each fiscal quarter, cash generated from our
business in excess of expenses and the amount of reserves our
general partner determines is necessary or appropriate to
provide for the conduct of our business, comply with applicable
law, any of our debt instruments or other agreements or provide
for future distributions to our unitholders for any one or more
of the upcoming four quarters. Please read How We Make
Distributions Distributions of Available Cash.
If distributions on our common units are not paid with respect
to any fiscal quarter at the anticipated initial distribution
rate, our unitholders will not be entitled to receive such
payments in the future; provided, however, the holders of common
units will be entitled to a preference over holders of
subordinated units with respect to cash distributions at our
initial distribution rate, which preference will allow holders
of common units to receive deficiencies in payments of cash
distributions at our initial distribution rate in subsequent
quarters to the extent we have available cash to pay these
deficiencies related to prior quarters, before any cash
distribution is made to holders of subordinated units. Please
read How We Make Distributions Subordination
Period.
Our distribution policy is consistent with the terms of our
partnership agreement, which requires that we distribute all of
our available cash quarterly. Under our partnership agreement,
available cash is defined to generally mean, for each fiscal
quarter, cash generated from our business in excess of the
amount of reserves our general partner determines is necessary
or appropriate to provide for the conduct of our business, to
comply with applicable law, any of our debt instruments or other
agreements or to provide for future distributions to our
unitholders for any one or more of the upcoming four quarters.
Our partnership agreement provides that any determination made
by our general partner in its capacity as our general partner
must be made in good faith and that any such determination will
not be subject to any other standard imposed by our partnership
agreement, the Delaware limited partnership statute or any other
law, rule or regulation or at equity. Holders of our common
units may pursue judicial action to enforce provisions of our
partnership agreement, including these related to requirements
to make cash distributions as described above; however, our
partnership agreement provides that our general partner is
entitled to make the determinations described above without
regard to any standard other than the requirement to act in good
faith. Our partnership agreement provides that, in order for a
determination by our general partner to be made in good
faith, our general partner must believe that the
determination is in our best interests.
38
Our cash distribution policy, as expressed in our partnership
agreement, may not be modified or repealed without amending our
partnership agreement; however, the actual amount of our cash
distributions for any quarter is subject to fluctuations based
on the amount of cash we generate from our business and the
amount of reserves our general partner establishes in accordance
with our partnership agreement as described above. Our
partnership agreement may be amended with the approval of our
general partner and holders of a majority of our outstanding
common units and subordinated units, each voting separately as a
class.
As of the date of this offering, our general partner will be
entitled to 2% of all distributions that we make prior to our
liquidation. The general partners initial 2% interest in
these distributions may be reduced if we issue additional units
in the future and our general partner does not elect to
contribute a proportionate amount of capital to us to maintain
its initial 2% general partner interest.
We will pay our distributions on or about the 15th of each
February, May, August and November to holders of record on or
about the 1st of each of such month. If the distribution
date does not fall on a business day, we will make the
distribution on the business day immediately preceding the
indicated distribution date. We will adjust the quarterly
distribution for the period from the closing of this offering
through March 31, 2006 based on the actual length of the
period.
In the sections that follow, we present in detail the basis for
our belief that we will have sufficient available cash from
operating surplus to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on
all of our outstanding common and subordinated units for each
quarter through December 31, 2006. In those sections, we
present two tables, consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Cash Available for Distribution,
in which we present the amount of cash we would have had
available for distribution for our fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 and the twelve months ended
September 30, 2005, based on our pro forma financial
statements. |
|
|
|
|
Estimated Cash Available for Distribution, in which
we present how we calculate the estimated minimum EBITDA
necessary for us to have sufficient cash available for
distribution to pay the full minimum quarterly distribution on
all the outstanding units for each quarter through
December 31, 2006. In Assumptions and
Considerations below, we also present our assumptions
underlying our belief that we will generate sufficient EBITDA to
pay the minimum quarterly distribution on all units for each
quarter through December 31, 2006. |
Pro Forma Cash Available for Distribution for Year Ended
December 31, 2004 and Twelve Months Ended
September 30, 2005
If we had completed the transactions contemplated in this
prospectus on January 1, 2004, pro forma available cash
generated during the year ended December 31, 2004 would
have been approximately $17.8 million. This amount would
have been sufficient to pay approximately 81.1% of the minimum
quarterly distribution on the common units and none of the
minimum quarterly distribution on the subordinated units in
2004. We would not have borrowed in order to make up this
shortfall, and to the extent our pro forma available cash
was insufficient to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on
our common or subordinated units, such amount would not have
been paid. If we had completed the transactions contemplated in
this prospectus on October 1, 2004, our pro forma available
cash for the twelve months ended September 30, 2005 would
have been approximately $55.2 million. This amount would
have been sufficient to pay the full minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units and the subordinated units for
the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2005.
Pro forma cash available for distribution includes incremental
general and administrative expenses we will incur as a result of
being a publicly traded limited partnership, such as costs
associated with annual and quarterly reports to unitholders, tax
return and Schedule K-1 preparation and distribution,
investor relations, registrar and transfer agent fees, director
compensation and
39
incremental insurance costs, including director and officer
liability and business interruption insurance. We expect these
incremental general and administrative expenses initially to
total approximately $4.5 million per year. The estimated
incremental general and administrative expenses are not
reflected in our pro forma financial statements.
The pro forma financial statements, upon which pro forma cash
available for distribution is based, do not purport to present
our results of operations had the transactions contemplated in
this prospectus actually been completed as of the dates
indicated. Furthermore, cash available for distribution is a
cash accounting concept, while our pro forma financial
statements have been prepared on an accrual basis. We derived
the amounts of pro forma cash available for distribution shown
above in the manner described in the table below. As a result,
the amount of pro forma cash available for distribution should
only be viewed as a general indication of the amount of cash
available for distribution that we might have generated had we
been formed in earlier periods.
40
The following table illustrates, on a pro forma basis, for the
year ended December 31, 2004 and for the twelve months
ended September 30, 2005, the amount of available cash that
would have been available for distributions to our unitholders,
assuming in each case that the offering had been consummated at
the beginning of such period. Each of the pro forma adjustments
presented below is explained in the footnotes to such
adjustments.
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.
Unaudited Pro Forma Cash Available for Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit amounts) | |
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
13,267 |
|
|
$ |
(22,277 |
) |
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma interest expense(a)
|
|
|
5,572 |
|
|
|
11,597 |
|
|
Pro forma income tax expense(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,927 |
|
|
|
9,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(c)
|
|
|
25,766 |
|
|
|
(1,346 |
) |
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain)/loss on
derivative instruments(d)
|
|
|
7,788 |
|
|
|
61,499 |
|
|
Realized (gain)/loss on derivative
instruments(d)
|
|
|
(39,160 |
) |
|
|
(11,215 |
) |
|
Net cash receipts from derivative
instruments(e)
|
|
|
32,999 |
|
|
|
24,905 |
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts(f)
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
Loss on disposal of property and
equipment(g)
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
Restructuring charge(h)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
Dividends received from
unconsolidated affiliates(i)
|
|
|
3,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of unconsolidated
affiliates(j)
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other(k)
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated incremental general and
administrative expenses(l)
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
Replacement and environmental
capital expenditures(m)
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
4,700 |
|
|
Pro forma interest expense(a)
|
|
|
5,572 |
|
|
|
11,599 |
|
|
Pro forma income tax expense(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma cash available for
distribution
|
|
$ |
17,825 |
|
|
$ |
55,240 |
|
Expected distributions per unit
|
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
Distributions to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units
|
|
$ |
21,975 |
|
|
$ |
21,975 |
|
|
Subordinated units
|
|
|
23,519 |
|
|
|
23,519 |
|
|
General partner units
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
46,422 |
|
|
$ |
46,422 |
|
Surplus/(Shortfall)
|
|
$ |
(28,597 |
) |
|
$ |
8,818 |
|
Consolidated leverage ratio(n)
|
|
|
2.60 |
x |
|
|
3.03 |
x |
Available liquidity(n)
|
|
$ |
143,700 |
|
|
$ |
62,602 |
|
41
|
|
(a) |
Reflects the interest expense and fees related to our borrowings
after giving effect to the refinancing of our long-term debt
obligations pursuant to new credit facilities that we expect to
enter into in the fourth quarter of 2005 and the repayment of a
portion of these borrowings under these facilities from the net
proceeds of this offering. |
|
(b) |
Reflects the income tax expense of Calumet Reseller, Inc., a
corporate subsidiary of our operating company, Calumet
Operating, LLC. |
|
|
(c) |
EBITDA is defined as net income plus interest expense, taxes,
depreciation and amortization. |
|
|
|
(d) |
Reflects the (gain)/loss on derivative instruments recognized in
net income. |
|
|
(e) |
Reflects the net cash proceeds received in settlement of our
derivative instruments. |
|
(f) |
Reflects non-cash expenses recognized in net income related to
doubtful accounts. |
|
(g) |
Reflects non-cash loss recognized in net income related to the
disposal of equipment. |
|
(h) |
Reflects a non-cash impairment charge recognized in net income
to write-down the carrying value of the long-lived assets at
Calumet Predecessors Reno wax packaging facility to
estimated fair value. |
|
(i) |
Reflects cash dividends received by us from our unconsolidated
affiliates and not recognized in net income. |
|
(j) |
Reflects non-cash loss recognized in net income related to our
equity investment in unconsolidated affiliates. |
|
|
(k) |
Reflects other non-cash expenses reflected in net income. |
|
|
|
(l) |
Reflects an adjustment for estimated incremental general and
administrative expenses we will incur as a result of being a
publicly traded limited partnership, such as costs associated
with annual and quarterly reports to unitholders, tax return and
Schedule K-1 preparation and distribution, investor
relations, registrar and transfer agent fees, director
compensation and incremental insurance costs, including director
and officer liability and business interruption insurance. |
|
|
|
(m) |
Reflects actual capital expenditures for the replacement of worn
out or obsolete equipment and for property additions to comply
with environmental and operations regulations. |
|
|
|
(n) |
We expect that in the fourth quarter of 2005 we will pay off all
of our existing indebtedness and enter into new credit
agreements with syndicates of financial institutions for credit
facilities that will consist of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a five-year $225.0 million senior secured revolving credit
facility; and |
|
|
|
|
|
a seven-year $225.0 million senior secured first lien
credit facility consisting of a $175.0 million term loan
facility and a $50.0 million pre-funded letter of credit
facility. |
|
|
|
|
|
We expect that the term loan and letter of credit facility will
be fully drawn at the closing of the refinancing. In calculating
available liquidity, we assumed that the senior secured
revolving credit facility would have a borrowing base capacity
of $200.0 million as of December 31, 2004 and
September 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
The credit facilities will permit us to make distributions to
our unitholders as long as we are not in default or would not be
in default following the distribution. Under the credit
facilities, we will be obligated to comply with financial
covenants, after giving effect to the distribution, requiring us
to maintain a maximum consolidated debt (as defined in the
credit agreement) to Adjusted EBITDA ratio of no more than 3.75
to 1 and to maintain cash, cash equivalents and borrowing
capacity under our revolving credit facility of at least
$30.0 million. |
|
42
|
|
|
We would have been in compliance with these covenants for the
year ended December 31, 2004 and the twelve months ended
September 30, 2005 had our new credit facilities been in
effect at each of those dates. |
Estimated Cash Available for Distribution
As a result of the factors described in this
Estimated Cash Available for
Distribution and Assumptions and
Considerations below, we believe we will be able to pay
the minimum quarterly distribution on all our common units,
subordinated units and general partner units for each quarter in
the twelve months ending December 31, 2006.
In order to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on all our
common units and subordinated units of $0.45 per unit per
complete quarter, we estimate that our EBITDA for the
twelve months ending December 31, 2006 must be at
least $66.8 million. EBITDA should not be considered an
alternative to net income, operating income, cash flows from
operating activities or any other measure of financial
performance calculated in accordance with GAAP, as those items
are used to measure operating performance, liquidity or ability
to service debt obligations.
We have also determined that if our EBITDA for such period is at
or above our estimate, we would be permitted to make the minimum
quarterly distributions on all the common units and subordinated
units under the restricted payments covenants in our new credit
agreement.
We believe we will generate estimated EBITDA of
$68.1 million for the twelve months ending
December 31, 2006. You should read
Assumptions and Considerations below for
a discussion of the material assumptions underlying this belief,
which reflect our judgment of conditions we expect to exist and
the course of action we expect to take. If our estimate is not
achieved, we may not be able to pay the minimum quarterly
distribution on all our units. We can give you no assurance that
our assumptions will be realized or that we will generate the
$66.8 million in EBITDA required to pay the minimum
quarterly distribution on all our common and subordinated units.
There will likely be differences between our estimates and the
actual results we will achieve and those differences could be
material. If we do not generate the estimated minimum EBITDA or
if our replacement and environmental capital expenditures,
interest expense or income tax expense are higher than
estimated, we may not be able to pay the minimum quarterly
distribution on all units.
When considering our ability to generate the estimated EBITDA of
$68.1 million, you should keep in mind the risk factors and
other cautionary statements under the heading Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus. Any of these
factors or the other risks discussed in this prospectus could
cause our results of operations and cash available for
distribution to our unitholders to vary significantly from those
set forth below.
43
The following table shows how we calculate the estimated EBITDA
necessary to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on all our
common units, subordinated units and general partner units
through December 31, 2006. Our estimated EBITDA is based on
our estimates of consolidated sales and expenses from all of our
operating subsidiaries for the twelve months ending
December 31, 2006. The assumptions that we have made that
we believe are relevant to particular line items in the table
below are explained in the corresponding footnotes set forth in
Assumptions and Considerations beginning
on page 46.
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.
Estimated Cash Available for Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ending | |
|
|
December 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products(c)(d)(e)
|
|
$ |
863,370 |
|
|
Fuel products(c)(e)
|
|
|
643,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
|
1,506,462 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products(a)(b)(c)(f)
|
|
|
778,222 |
|
|
Fuel products(a)(b)(c)(f)
|
|
|
594,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
|
1,372,296 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products
|
|
|
85,148 |
|
|
Fuel products
|
|
|
49,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit(g)
|
|
|
134,166 |
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative(h)
|
|
|
17,988 |
|
|
Transportation(i)
|
|
|
49,810 |
|
|
Taxes other than income
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
70,598 |
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
63,568 |
|
|
Realized gain (loss) on derivatives
instruments(k)
|
|
|
(7,021 |
) |
|
Depreciation and amortization(l)
|
|
|
11,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated EBITDA
|
|
$ |
68,082 |
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming No Exercise | |
|
Assuming Full Exercise | |
|
|
of the Underwriters | |
|
of the Underwriters | |
|
|
Over-allotment Option | |
|
Over-allotment Option(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replacement and environmental
capital expenditures(n)
|
|
$ |
7,200 |
|
|
$ |
7,200 |
|
|
Interest expense(j)*
|
|
|
13,395 |
|
|
|
12,258 |
|
|
Income tax expense(m)*
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated cash available for
distribution
|
|
$ |
47,167 |
|
|
$ |
48,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per unit minimum annual distribution
|
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
Distributions to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly held common units
|
|
$ |
10,293 |
|
|
$ |
11,837 |
|
|
Common units held by affiliates of
our general partner and the Fehsenfeld Investors
|
|
|
11,682 |
|
|
|
11,682 |
|
|
Subordinated units held by
affiliates of our general partner
|
|
|
23,519 |
|
|
|
23,519 |
|
|
General partner units held by our
general partner
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum annual cash
distribution(o)(p)(q)(r)
|
|
$ |
46,422 |
|
|
$ |
47,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated leverage ratio**
|
|
|
2.51 |
x |
|
|
2.25 |
x |
Available liquidity**
|
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
|
|
* |
Assuming the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option
to purchase 857,727 common units in this offering, we would
receive additional net proceeds of $17.5 million, which we
would use to pay down additional borrowings under our term
loans. Our resulting decreased indebtedness will reduce our
estimated interest expense by $1.1 million and will have a
corresponding increase in our estimated cash available for
distribution. The annual minimum quarterly distribution on the
additional 857,727 common units and 17,505 general partner
units issued to the general partner to maintain its 2% general
partner interest will be $1.6 million. |
|
|
** |
We expect that in the fourth quarter of 2005 we will pay off all
of our existing indebtedness and enter into new credit
agreements with syndicates of financial institutions for credit
facilities that will consist of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
a five-year $225.0 million senior secured revolving credit
facility; and |
|
|
|
|
|
a seven-year $225.0 million senior secured first lien
credit facility consisting of a $175.0 million term loan
facility and a $50.0 million pre-funded letter of credit
facility. |
|
We expect that the term loan and letter of credit facility will
be fully drawn at the closing of the refinancing. In calculating
available liquidity, we expect that the senior secured revolving
credit facility will have a borrowing base capacity of
$200.0 million as of December 31, 2006. In addition,
additional proceeds resulting from the exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option will be used to pay
down the term loan facility and thus will not affect available
liquidity.
The credit facilities will permit us to make distributions to
our unitholders as long as we are not in default or would not be
in default following the distribution. Under the credit
facilities, we will be obligated to comply with financial
covenants, after giving effect to the distribution, requiring us
to maintain a maximum consolidated debt (as defined in the
credit agreement) to Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the credit
agreement) ratio of no more than 3.75 to 1 and to maintain cash,
cash equivalents and borrowing capacity under our revolving
credit facility of at least $30.0 million.
We believe that we will be in compliance with these covenants
for the twelve months ending December 31, 2006.
45
Assumptions and Considerations
Based on a number of specific assumptions, we believe that,
following completion of this offering, we will have sufficient
cash available for distribution to allow us to make the full
minimum quarterly distribution on all the outstanding units for
each quarter through December 31, 2006. These assumptions
include that:
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Our average realized crude oil cost will be $60.31 per barrel,
which assumes an average NYMEX West Texas Intermediate, or WTI,
crude oil price of $59.50 per barrel plus $0.81 per
barrel to reflect the historical difference between our
delivered crude oil price and the NYMEX price. For the twelve
months ended September 30, 2005, the average daily price of
the prompt NYMEX WTI crude oil contract was $53.62 per
barrel. The average of the monthly NYMEX WTI crude oil swap
prices for 2006 was $59.57 per barrel as of
November 11, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Our average realized natural gas cost will be $10.50 per
MMBtu, which assumes a $10.50 per MMBtu NYMEX Henry Hub
natural gas price. Our realized natural gas price has
historically approximated the NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas price.
For the twelve months ended September 30, 2005, the average
NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas monthly settlement price was
$7.15 per MMBtu. The average of the monthly NYMEX Henry Hub
natural gas swap prices for 2006 was $10.61 per MMBtu as of
November 11, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Our average realized Gulf Coast 2/1/1 crack spread will be
$10.00 per barrel. For the twelve months ended
September 30, 2005, the average U.S. Gulf Coast 2/1/1 crack
spread to NYMEX WTI calculated using the calendar average NYMEX
price of WTI crude oil, unleaded gasoline and low-sulfur diesel
was $10.20 per barrel. The average of the monthly Gulf
Coast 2/1/1 crack spread swap prices for 2006 was
$10.63 per barrel as of November 11, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
Our specialty product prices are based on specialty product
prices we realized in September 2005. |
|
|
|
|
(e) |
We will realize average sales of approximately 30,500 bpd
in our specialty products segment and approximately
24,829 bpd in our fuel products segment as compared to
26,629 bpd and 16,161 bpd, respectively, for the
twelve months ended September 30, 2005. This volumetric
assumption is based on our average daily sales levels for the
three months ended September 30, 2005 (25,429 bpd in
our specialty products segment and 23,956 bpd in our fuel
products segment) as adjusted to include an anticipated increase
in blending feedstocks to optimize production at the Shreveport
refinery. We have also assumed that our product mix will
approximate the product mix we experienced during the three
months ended September 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
(f) |
Our cost of sales in 2006 are expected to be $778.2 million
in the specialty products segment and $594.1 million in the
fuel products segment as compared to $575.5 million and
$363.6 million for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2005, respectively. The cost of sales
increase is primarily a result of increased costs of crude oil
and natural gas as discussed above. Crude oil feedstock
purchases will increase in volume to approximately
55,329 bpd from 44,491 bpd for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2005. Natural gas purchased to fuel our
refineries in 2006 will remain constant in volume at
6.2 million MMBtu. Labor, electricity and repair and
maintenance charges, including turnaround costs, will be
substantially similar to those realized in the twelve months
ended September 30, 2005. We allocate costs to each segment
based on barrels produced in each segment. |
|
|
|
|
(g) |
Our gross profit will be approximately $134.2 million for
the twelve months ending December 31, 2006, based on our
volume and price assumptions listed above, as compared to
$102.5 million for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2005. |
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
Our selling, general and administrative expenses for the twelve
months ending December 31, 2006 will be approximately
$18.0 million. Our selling, general and administrative
expenses for the twelve months ended September 30, 2005
were $14.8 million. We have assumed that selling, general
and administrative expenses will increase by approximately
$4.5 million as a result of incremental expenses associated
with our operation as a publicly traded partnership. In
addition, we assume that employee compensation costs will
decrease by approximately $2.0 million due to a reduction
in incentive bonuses. We assume that our other selling, general
and administrative expenses will remain similar to those for the
twelve months ended September 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
(i) |
Our transportation costs for the twelve months ending
December 31, 2006 will be approximately $49.8 million
as compared to $42.5 million for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2005. We have assumed that transportation
costs will increase as a result of our increased sales volume in
2006. |
|
|
|
|
(j) |
Our interest expense (including commitment, letter of credit and
other fees) for the twelve months ending December 31, 2006
will be approximately $13.4 million. Our pro forma interest
expense for the twelve months ended September 30, 2005 was
$11.7 million. We anticipate that borrowings under our new
credit facilities will bear interest at a variable rate based on
LIBOR. We have assumed that our weighted average interest rate
on all of our borrowings will be approximately 6.5% and we will
incur approximately $2.8 million in commitment and other
financing-related fees. |
|
|
|
|
(k) |
Our net cash payment on derivative instruments will be
$7.0 million for the twelve months ending December 31,
2006 as compared to a net cash receipt of $25.4 million for
the twelve months ended September 30, 2005. |
|
We expect the $7.0 million net cash payment as a result of
having completed the following transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
- |
entering into swap transactions which fix the price of
200,000 MMBtu per month of natural gas at $9.84 per
MMBtu for each of January, February and March 2006, which
means that we will be paid by the counterparty to the extent
that the NYMEX Henry Hub price of natural gas is greater than
$9.84 per MMBtu, but we will be required to pay the
counterparty to the extent that the NYMEX Henry Hub price of
natural gas is less than $9.84 per MMBtu; |
|
|
|
|
- |
entering into swap transactions for 4,150,000 barrels for
the NYMEX Gulf Coast 2/1/1 crack spread to NYMEX WTI at
$8.72 per barrel, which means that we will be required to
pay the counterparty to the extent that Gulf Coast 2/1/1 crack
spreads are greater than $8.72 per barrel, but we will be
paid by the counterparty to the extent that Gulf Coast crack
spreads are less than $8.72 per barrel; and |
|
|
|
- |
entering into collar transactions for 2,700,000 barrels for
the Gulf Coast 2/1/1 crack spread to NYMEX WTI pursuant to which
we will be required to pay the counterparty to the extent the
Gulf Coast crack spread is above $9.41 per barrel, but we
will be paid by the counterparty to the extent the Gulf Coast
crack spread is below $7.24 per barrel. |
|
|
|
- |
entering into put/call spread transactions for a total of
598,000 barrels for the NYMEX WTI during the four months
ending April 30, 2006 at the lower put price of $46.75 per
barrel, the upper put price of $56.20 per barrel, the call
floor price of $66.20 and the call ceiling price of $76.20. This
means that if the price of crude oil falls between the upper put
price of $56.20 per barrel and the call floor price of
$66.20 per barrel we will pay the market rate for crude
oil. If the price of crude oil falls between the call floor
price of $66.20 per barrel and the call ceiling price of
$76.20 per barrel we will pay $66.20 per barrel. If the
price is above the call ceiling price of $76.20 per barrel we
pay the market price of crude oil minus the difference between
the call ceiling price and the call floor |
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
price. If the price of crude oil falls between the lower put
price of $46.75 per barrel and the upper put price of
$56.20 per barrel we will pay $56.20 per barrel and if
the crude oil price falls below the lower put price of $46.75 we
will pay the market price plus the difference between the lower
put price and the upper put price. |
We have entered into a portion of our total expected 2007 crack
spread hedging transactions at more favorable prices than those
prices entered into for 2006, due to improved market conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
(l) |
Our depreciation and amortization expense for the twelve months
ending December 31, 2006 will be $11.5 million, as
compared to $9.2 million for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2005. The increase in depreciation and
amortization expense is principally related to expansion capital
expenditures budgeted for the Shreveport refinery in 2006.
Depreciation and amortization expense is reflected in cost of
sales. |
|
|
|
|
(m) |
The income tax expense of Calumet Reseller, Inc., a corporate
subsidiary of our operating company, Calumet Operating, LLC,
through which we market jet fuel products to certain end-users,
for the twelve months ending December 31, 2006 will be
approximately $0.3 million. |
|
|
|
|
(n) |
Our replacement and environmental capital expenditures for the
twelve months ending December 31, 2006 will be
approximately $7.2 million, as compared to
$3.8 million for the twelve months ended September 30,
2005. The increase in replacement and environmental capital
expenditures is due to environmental projects at all three of
our refineries. Our replacement and environmental capital
expenditures are the only maintenance capital expenditures that
we anticipate we will incur. |
|
|
|
|
(o) |
No material accidents, releases or similar unanticipated
material events will occur at any of our facilities. |
|
|
|
|
(p) |
Market, regulatory and overall economic conditions will not
change substantially. |
|
|
|
|
(q) |
In the event of a shortfall, we will borrow under our new
revolving credit facility in order to make payments of the
minimum quarterly distribution. |
|
|
|
|
(r) |
We will refinance all term debt as it comes due, as we will not
build up cash reserves for debt repayment. We will make
borrowings and repayments under our revolving credit facility
for working capital purposes as appropriate. |
|
Sensitivity Analysis
Our cash available for distribution is significantly impacted by
volatility in prevailing crude oil and natural gas prices and
crack spreads (the difference between crude oil prices and
refined product sales). In the paragraphs below, we discuss the
impact of changes in these three primary variables, while
holding all other variables constant, on our ability to generate
our estimated cash available for distribution.
Crude Oil Price Volatility
We are exposed to significant fluctuations in the price of crude
oil. Holding all other variables constant, and excluding the
impact of our current hedges, we expect a $1.00 change in
the per barrel price of crude oil would change our estimated
cash available for distribution by $20.1 million for the
twelve months ending December 31, 2006.
Specialty Product Pricing and Crude Oil Hedging Policy
In order to manage our exposure to fluctuations in crude oil
prices, we take into account the cost of crude oil in setting
our specialty product prices. We are able to do this because we
typically do not set our specialty product prices in advance of
our crude oil purchases. We further manage
48
our exposure to fluctuations in crude oil prices in our
specialty products segment through the use of derivative
instruments. Our historical policy has generally been to enter
into crude oil contracts for a period no greater than twelve
months forward and for no more than 70% of our anticipated crude
oil purchases related to non-fuels production. Our policy after
this offering will be generally to enter into crude oil
contracts covering a period of three to six months and for an
amount equal to 50% to 70% of our anticipated crude oil
purchases related to our specialty products production.
Natural Gas Price Volatility
Since natural gas purchases comprise a significant component of
our cost of sales, changes in the price of natural gas will also
significantly affect the amount of cash available for
distribution. Holding all other cost and revenue variables
constant, and excluding the impact of our current hedges, we
expect a $0.50 change per MMBtu in the price of natural gas
would change our estimated cash available for distribution by
$3.1 million for the twelve months ending December 31,
2006.
Natural Gas Hedging Policy
In order to manage our exposure to natural gas prices, we enter
into derivative contracts. Our policy is generally to enter into
natural gas swap contracts during the summer months for
approximately 50% of our anticipated natural gas requirements
for the upcoming winter months.
Crack Spread Volatility
The amount of cash we have available to distribute to you is
also significantly impacted by the crack spreads we experience.
Crack spreads represent the difference between the prices we are
able to realize for our fuel products and the cost of the crude
oil we must purchase to produce those products. Holding all
other variables constant, and excluding the impact of our
current hedges, we expect a $0.50 change in the Gulf Coast 2/ 1
/1 crack spread per barrel would change our estimated cash
available for distribution by $4.6 million for the twelve
months ending December 31, 2006.
Crack Spread Hedging Policy
In order to manage our exposure to crack spreads, we enter into
fuels product margin swap and collar contracts. We began to
implement this policy in October 2004. Our historical policy has
been to enter into crack spread hedging contracts for a period
of no greater than two years and for no more than 75% of
anticipated fuels production. Our policy going forward will be
to enter into crack spread derivative hedging contracts for a
period of no greater than five years and for no more than 75% of
anticipated fuels production. In addition, in connection with
our new credit facilities, our lenders will require us to obtain
and maintain crack spread hedges for our fuels segment for a
rolling two-year period for at least 40%, and no more than 80%,
of our anticipated fuels production.
Although the sensitivity analysis set forth above for crude oil
and natural gas prices and crack spreads calculates the impact
of individual commodity price changes within each variable
without changing any other, our experience has been that changes
in crude oil costs, crack spreads and natural gas costs do not
occur in isolation. As crude oil prices have increased over the
past twelve months, we have experienced an increase in our
realized crack spread and also increased the prices we charge
our customers for specialty products at levels in excess of the
increasing crude oil costs we are experiencing, each of which
has mitigated the negative impact to cash available for
distribution from higher crude oil costs. In general, our cash
available for distribution is positively impacted by decreasing
crude oil prices, increasing crack spreads, increasing specialty
product prices and decreasing natural gas prices. Conversely,
our cash available for distribution is generally negatively
impacted by increasing crude oil prices, decreasing crack
spreads, decreasing specialty product prices and increasing
natural gas prices.
49
While we believe that our assumptions supporting our estimated
cash available for distribution for the twelve months ending
December 31, 2006 are reasonable in light of
managements current beliefs concerning future events, the
assumptions are inherently uncertain and are subject to
significant business, economic, regulatory and competitive risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those we anticipate. If our assumptions are not
realized, the actual cash available for distribution that we
could generate could be substantially less than that currently
expected and could, therefore, be insufficient to permit us to
make the full minimum quarterly distribution on all units, in
which event the market price of the common units may decline
materially. When reading this section, it is important that you
keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements
under the heading Risk Factors, many of which
discuss factors that may cause our assumptions not to be
realized. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly
the results of any future revisions we may make to the foregoing
or to update the foregoing to reflect events or circumstances
after the date of this prospectus. Therefore, you are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on this information.
50
HOW WE MAKE CASH DISTRIBUTIONS
Distributions of Available Cash
General. Within 45 days after the end of each
quarter, beginning with the quarter ending March 31, 2006,
we will distribute our available cash to unitholders of record
on the applicable record date. We will adjust the minimum
quarterly distribution for the period from the closing of the
offering through March 31, 2006 based on the actual length
of the period.
Available Cash. Available cash generally means,
for any quarter, all cash on hand at the end of the quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
less the amount of cash reserves established by our general
partner to: |
|
|
|
|
|
provide for the proper conduct of our business; |
|
|
|
comply with applicable law, any of our debt instruments or other
agreements; or |
|
|
|
provide funds for distributions to our unitholders and to our
general partner for any one or more of the next four
quarters. |
|
|
|
|
|
plus all cash on hand on the date of determination of available
cash for the quarter resulting from working capital borrowings
made after the end of the quarter for which the determination is
being made. Working capital borrowings are generally borrowings
that will be made under our revolving credit facility and in all
cases are used solely for working capital purposes or to pay
distributions to partners. |
Intent to Distribute the Minimum Quarterly
Distribution. We will distribute to the holders of
common units and subordinated units on a quarterly basis at
least the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.45 per unit,
or $1.80 per year, to the extent we have sufficient cash
from our operations after establishment of cash reserves and
payment of fees and expenses, including payments to our general
partner. However, there is no guarantee that we will pay the
minimum quarterly distribution on the units in any quarter. Even
if our cash distribution policy is not modified or revoked, the
amount of distributions paid under our policy and the decision
to make any distribution is determined by our general partner,
taking into consideration the terms of our partnership
agreement. We will be prohibited from making any distributions
to unitholders if it would cause an event of default, or an
event of default is existing, under our credit agreement. Please
read Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources Debt and Credit
Facilities New Credit Facilities for a
discussion of the restrictions to be included in our credit
agreement that may restrict our ability to make distributions.
General Partner Interest and Incentive Distribution
Rights. As of the date of this offering, our general
partner will be entitled to 2% of all quarterly distributions
since inception that we make prior to our liquidation. This
general partner interest will be represented by 515,801 general
partner units. Our general partner has the right, but not the
obligation, to contribute a proportionate amount of capital to
us to maintain its current general partner interest. The general
partners initial 2% interest in these distributions may be
reduced if we issue additional units in the future and our
general partner does not contribute a proportionate amount of
capital to us to maintain its 2% general partner interest. Our
general partner also currently holds incentive distribution
rights that entitle it to receive increasing percentages, up to
a maximum of 50%, of the cash we distribute from operating
surplus (as defined below) in excess of $0.45 per unit. The
maximum distribution of 50% includes distributions paid to our
general partner on its 2% general partner interest, and assumes
that our general partner maintains its general partner interest
at 2%. The maximum distribution of 50% does not include any
distributions that our general partner may receive on units that
it owns. Please read Incentive Distribution
Rights for additional information.
51
Operating Surplus and Capital Surplus
General. All cash distributed to unitholders will
be characterized as either operating surplus or
capital surplus. Our partnership agreement requires
that we distribute available cash from operating surplus
differently than available cash from capital surplus.
Operating Surplus. Operating surplus generally
consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
our cash balance on the closing date of this offering; |
|
|
|
$10.0 million (as described below); plus |
|
|
|
all of our cash receipts after the closing of this offering,
excluding cash from (1) borrowings that are not working
capital borrowings, (2) sales of equity and debt securities
and (3) sales or other dispositions of assets outside the
ordinary course of business; plus |
|
|
|
working capital borrowings made after the end of a quarter but
before the date of determination of operating surplus for the
quarter; less |
|
|
|
all of our operating expenditures after the closing of this
offering (including the repayment of working capital borrowings,
but not the repayment of other borrowings) and maintenance
capital expenditures; less |
|
|
|
the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner
for future operating expenditures. |
Please read Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Maintenance capital expenditures represent capital expenditures
made to replace partially or fully depreciated assets, to
maintain the existing operating capacity of our assets and to
extend their useful lives, or other capital expenditures that
are incurred in maintaining existing system volumes and related
cash flows. Expansion capital expenditures represent capital
expenditures made to expand the existing operating capacity of
our assets or to expand the operating capacity or revenues of
existing or new assets, whether through construction or
acquisition. Costs for repairs and minor renewals to maintain
facilities in operating condition and that do not extend the
useful life of existing assets will be treated as operations and
maintenance expenses as we incur them. Our partnership agreement
provides that our general partner determines how to allocate a
capital expenditure for the acquisition or expansion of our
assets between maintenance capital expenditures and expansion
capital expenditures.
Capital Surplus. Capital surplus consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
borrowings other than working capital borrowings; |
|
|
|
sales of our equity and debt securities; and |
|
|
|
sales or other dispositions of assets for cash, other than
inventory, accounts receivable and other current assets sold in
the ordinary course of business or as part of normal retirement
or replacement of assets. |
Characterization of Cash Distributions. We will
treat all available cash distributed as coming from operating
surplus until the sum of all available cash distributed since we
began operations equals the operating surplus as of the most
recent date of determination of available cash. We will treat
any amount distributed in excess of operating surplus,
regardless of its source, as capital surplus. As reflected
above, operating surplus includes $10.0 million. This
amount does not reflect actual cash on hand that is available
for distribution to our unitholders. Rather, it is a provision
that will enable us, if we choose, to distribute as operating
surplus up to this amount of cash we receive in the future from
non-operating sources, such as asset sales, issuances of
52
securities and borrowings, that would otherwise be distributed
as capital surplus. We do not anticipate that we will make any
distributions from capital surplus.
Subordination Period
General. Our partnership agreement provides that,
during the subordination period (which we define below and in
Appendix B), the common units will have the right to
receive distributions of available cash from operating surplus
in an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution of
$0.45 per quarter, plus any arrearages in the payment of
the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units from
prior quarters, before any distributions of available cash from
operating surplus may be made on the subordinated units. These
units are deemed subordinated because for a period
of time, referred to as the subordination period, the
subordinated units will not be entitled to receive any
distributions until the common units have received the minimum
quarterly distribution plus any arrearages from prior quarters.
Furthermore, no arrearages will be paid on the subordinated
units. The practical effect of the existence of the subordinated
units is to increase the likelihood that during the
subordination period there will be available cash to be
distributed on the common units. As of the closing of the
offering, all of the outstanding subordinated units will be
owned by affiliates of our general partner. Please read
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management.
Subordination Period. The subordination period
will extend until the first day of any quarter beginning after
December 31, 2010 that each of the following tests are met:
|
|
|
|
|
distributions of available cash from operating surplus on each
of the outstanding common units, subordinated units and general
partner units equaled or exceeded the minimum quarterly
distributions on such common units, subordinated units and
general partner units for each of the three consecutive,
non-overlapping four-quarter periods immediately preceding that
date; |
|
|
|
the adjusted operating surplus (as defined below)
generated during each of the three consecutive, non-overlapping
four-quarter periods immediately preceding that date equaled or
exceeded the sum of the minimum quarterly distributions on all
of the outstanding common units, subordinated units and general
partner units during those periods on a fully diluted basis; and |
|
|
|
there are no arrearages in payment of minimum quarterly
distributions on the common units. |
Expiration of the Subordination Period. When the
subordination period expires, each outstanding subordinated unit
will convert into one common unit and will then participate pro
rata with the other common units in distributions of available
cash. In addition, if the unitholders remove our general partner
other than for cause and units held by the general partner and
its affiliates are not voted in favor of such removal:
|
|
|
|
|
the subordination period will end and each subordinated unit
will immediately convert into one common unit; |
|
|
|
any existing arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units will be extinguished; and |
|
|
|
the general partner will have the right to convert its general
partner interest and its incentive distribution rights into
common units or to receive cash in exchange for those interests. |
Adjusted Operating Surplus. Adjusted operating
surplus is intended to reflect the cash generated from
operations during a particular period and therefore excludes net
increases in working
53
capital borrowings and net drawdowns of reserves of cash
generated in prior periods. Adjusted operating surplus consists
of:
|
|
|
|
|
operating surplus generated with respect to that period; less |
|
|
|
any net increase in working capital borrowings with respect to
that period; less |
|
|
|
any net decrease in cash reserves for operating expenditures
with respect to that period not relating to an operating
expenditure made with respect to that period; plus |
|
|
|
any net decrease in working capital borrowings with respect to
that period; plus |
|
|
|
any net increase in cash reserves for operating expenditures
with respect to that period required by any debt instrument for
the repayment of principal, interest or premium. |
Distributions of Available Cash from Operating Surplus During
the Subordination Period
We will make distributions of available cash from operating
surplus for any quarter during the subordination period in the
following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
the general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding
common unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly
distribution for that quarter; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2%
to the general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding
common unit an amount equal to any arrearages in payment of the
minimum quarterly distribution on the common units for any prior
quarters during the subordination period; |
|
|
|
third, 98% to the subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and
2% to the general partner, until we distribute for each
subordinated unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly
distribution for that quarter; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, in the manner described in
Incentive Distribution Rights below. |
The preceding discussion is based on the assumptions that our
general partner maintains its 2% general partner interest and
that we do not issue additional classes of equity securities.
Distributions of Available Cash from Operating Surplus After
the Subordination Period
We will make distributions of available cash from operating
surplus for any quarter after the subordination period in the
following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding unit
an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for that
quarter; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, in the manner described in
Incentive Distribution Rights below. |
The preceding discussion is based on the assumptions that our
general partner maintains its 2% general partner interest and
that we do not issue additional classes of equity securities.
Incentive Distribution Rights
Incentive distribution rights represent the right to receive an
increasing percentage of quarterly distributions of available
cash from operating surplus after the minimum quarterly
distribution and the target distribution levels have been
achieved. Our general partner currently holds the incentive
distribution rights, but may transfer these rights separately
from its general partner interest, subject to restrictions in
the partnership agreement.
54
If for any quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
we have distributed available cash from operating surplus to the
common and subordinated unitholders in an amount equal to the
minimum quarterly distribution; and |
|
|
|
we have distributed available cash from operating surplus on
outstanding common units in an amount necessary to eliminate any
cumulative arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution; |
then, we will distribute any additional available cash from
operating surplus for that quarter among the unitholders and the
general partner in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.495 per unit for that quarter (the first target
distribution); |
|
|
|
second, 85% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to the
general partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.563 per unit for that quarter (the second target
distribution); |
|
|
|
third, 75% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to the
general partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.675 per unit for that quarter (the third target
distribution); and |
|
|
|
thereafter, 50% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 50% to
the general partner. |
In each case, the amount of the target distribution set forth
above is exclusive of any distributions to common unitholders to
eliminate any cumulative arrearages in payment of the minimum
quarterly distribution. The preceding discussion is based on the
assumptions that our general partner maintains its 2% general
partner interest and that we do not issue additional classes of
equity securities.
Percentage Allocations of Available Cash from Operating
Surplus
The following table illustrates the percentage allocations of
the additional available cash from operating surplus between the
unitholders and our general partner up to the various target
distribution levels. The amounts set forth under Marginal
Percentage Interest in Distributions are the percentage
interests of our general partner and the unitholders in any
available cash from operating surplus we distribute up to and
including the corresponding amount in the column Total
Quarterly Distribution, until available cash from
operating surplus we distribute reaches the next target
distribution level, if any. The percentage interests shown for
the unitholders and the general partner for the minimum
quarterly distribution are also applicable to quarterly
distribution amounts that are less than the minimum quarterly
distribution. The percentage interests set forth below for our
general partner include its 2% general partner interest and
assume our general partner has contributed any additional
capital to maintain its 2% general partner interest and has not
transferred its incentive distribution rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marginal Percentage | |
|
|
|
|
Interest in | |
|
|
Total Quarterly |
|
Distributions | |
|
|
Distribution |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General | |
|
|
Target Amount |
|
Unitholders | |
|
Partner | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Minimum Quarterly Distribution
|
|
$0.45
|
|
|
98% |
|
|
|
2% |
|
First Target Distribution
|
|
up to $0.495
|
|
|
98% |
|
|
|
2% |
|
Second Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.495 up to $0.563
|
|
|
85% |
|
|
|
15% |
|
Third Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.563 up to $0.675
|
|
|
75% |
|
|
|
25% |
|
Thereafter
|
|
above $0.675
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
|
50% |
|
55
Distributions from Capital Surplus
How Distributions from Capital Surplus Will Be
Made. Our partnership agreement requires that we make
distributions of available cash from capital surplus, if any, in
the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until we distribute for each common unit that
was issued in this offering, an amount of available cash from
capital surplus equal to the initial public offering price; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2%
to the general partner, until we distribute for each common
unit, an amount of available cash from capital surplus equal to
any unpaid arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, we will make all distributions of available
cash from capital surplus as if they were from operating surplus. |
Effect of a Distribution from Capital Surplus. Our
partnership agreement treats a distribution of capital surplus
as the repayment of the initial unit price from this initial
public offering, which is a return of capital. The initial
public offering price less any distributions of capital surplus
per unit is referred to as the unrecovered initial unit
price. Each time a distribution of capital surplus is
made, the minimum quarterly distribution and the target
distribution levels will be reduced in the same proportion as
the corresponding reduction in the unrecovered initial unit
price. Because distributions of capital surplus will reduce the
minimum quarterly distribution, after any of these distributions
are made, it may be easier for the general partner to receive
incentive distributions and for the subordinated units to
convert into common units. However, any distribution of capital
surplus before the unrecovered initial unit price is reduced to
zero cannot be applied to the payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution or any arrearages.
Once we distribute capital surplus on a unit issued in this
offering in an amount equal to the initial unit price, our
partnership agreement specifies that the minimum quarterly
distribution and the target distribution levels will be reduced
to zero. Our partnership agreement specifies that we then make
all future distributions from operating surplus, with 50% being
paid to the holders of units and 50% to the general partner. The
percentage interests shown for our general partner include its
2% general partner interest and assume the general partner has
not transferred the incentive distribution rights.
Adjustment to the Minimum Quarterly Distribution and Target
Distribution Levels
In addition to adjusting the minimum quarterly distribution and
target distribution levels to reflect a distribution of capital
surplus, if we combine our units into fewer units or subdivide
our units into a greater number of units, our partnership
agreement specifies that the following items will be
proportionately adjusted:
|
|
|
|
|
the minimum quarterly distribution; |
|
|
|
target distribution levels; |
|
|
|
the unrecovered initial unit price; |
|
|
|
the number of common units issuable during the subordination
period without a unitholder vote; and |
|
|
|
the number of common units into which a subordinated unit is
convertible. |
For example, if a two-for-one split of the common units should
occur, the minimum quarterly distribution, the target
distribution levels and the unrecovered initial unit price would
each be reduced to 50% of its initial level, the number of
common units issuable during the subordination period without
unitholder vote would double and each subordinated unit would be
convertible into two
56
common units. Our partnership agreement provides that we not
make any adjustment by reason of the issuance of additional
units for cash or property.
In addition, if legislation is enacted or if existing law is
modified or interpreted by a governmental taxing authority, so
that we become taxable as a corporation or otherwise subject to
taxation as an entity for federal, state or local income tax
purposes, our partnership agreement specifies that the minimum
quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels for
each quarter will be reduced by multiplying each distribution
level by a fraction, the numerator of which is available cash
for that quarter and the denominator of which is the sum of
available cash for that quarter plus the general partners
estimate of our aggregate liability for the quarter for such
income taxes payable by reason of such legislation or
interpretation. To the extent that the actual tax liability
differs from the estimated tax liability for any quarter, the
difference will be accounted for in subsequent quarters.
Distributions of Cash Upon Liquidation
General. If we dissolve in accordance with the
partnership agreement, we will sell or otherwise dispose of our
assets in a process called liquidation. We will first apply the
proceeds of liquidation to the payment of our creditors. We will
distribute any remaining proceeds to the unitholders and the
general partner, in accordance with their capital account
balances, as adjusted to reflect any gain or loss upon the sale
or other disposition of our assets in liquidation.
The allocations of gain and loss upon liquidation are intended,
to the extent possible, to entitle the holders of outstanding
common units to a preference over the holders of outstanding
subordinated units upon our liquidation, to the extent required
to permit common unitholders to receive their unrecovered
initial unit price plus the minimum quarterly distribution for
the quarter during which liquidation occurs plus any unpaid
arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on
the common units. However, there may not be sufficient gain upon
our liquidation to enable the holders of common units to fully
recover all of these amounts, even though there may be cash
available for distribution to the holders of subordinated units.
Any further net gain recognized upon liquidation will be
allocated in a manner that takes into account the incentive
distribution rights of the general partner.
Manner of Adjustments for Gain. The manner of the
adjustment for gain is set forth in the partnership agreement.
If our liquidation occurs before the end of the subordination
period, we will allocate any gain to the partners in the
following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, to the general partner and the holders of units
who have negative balances in their capital accounts to the
extent of and in proportion to those negative balances; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2%
to the general partner, until the capital account for each
common unit is equal to the sum of: (1) the unrecovered
initial unit price; (2) the amount of the minimum quarterly
distribution for the quarter during which our liquidation
occurs; and (3) any unpaid arrearages in payment of the
minimum quarterly distribution; |
|
|
|
third, 98% to the subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and
2% to the general partner until the capital account for each
subordinated unit is equal to the sum of: (1) the
unrecovered initial unit price; and (2) the amount of the
minimum quarterly distribution for the quarter during which our
liquidation occurs; |
|
|
|
fourth, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an
amount per unit equal to: (1) the sum of the excess of the
first target distribution per unit over the minimum quarterly
distribution per unit for each quarter of our existence; less
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the minimum
quarterly distribution per unit that we distributed 98% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the general partner, for each
quarter of our existence; |
57
|
|
|
|
|
fifth, 85% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to the
general partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an
amount per unit equal to: (1) the sum of the excess of the
second target distribution per unit over the first target
distribution per unit for each quarter of our existence; less
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the first
target distribution per unit that we distributed 85% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to the general partner for each
quarter of our existence; |
|
|
|
sixth, 75% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to the
general partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an
amount per unit equal to: (1) the sum of the excess of the
third target distribution per unit over the second target
distribution per unit for each quarter of our existence; less
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the second
target distribution per unit that we distributed 75% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to the general partner for each
quarter of our existence; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, 50% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 50% to
the general partner. |
The percentage interests set forth above for our general partner
include its 2% general partner interest and assume the general
partner has not transferred the incentive distribution rights.
If the liquidation occurs after the end of the subordination
period, the distinction between common units and subordinated
units will disappear, so that clause (3) of the second
bullet point above and all of the third bullet point above will
no longer be applicable.
Manner of Adjustments for Losses. If our
liquidation occurs before the end of the subordination period,
we will generally allocate any loss to the general partner and
the unitholders in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to holders of subordinated units in proportion
to the positive balances in their capital accounts and 2% to the
general partner, until the capital accounts of the subordinated
unitholders have been reduced to zero; |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the holders of common units in proportion
to the positive balances in their capital accounts and 2% to the
general partner, until the capital accounts of the common
unitholders have been reduced to zero; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, 100% to the general partner. |
If the liquidation occurs after the end of the subordination
period, the distinction between common units and subordinated
units will disappear, so that all of the first bullet point
above will no longer be applicable.
Adjustments to Capital Accounts. Our partnership
agreement requires that we make adjustments to capital accounts
upon the issuance of additional units. In this regard, our
partnership agreement specifies that we allocate any unrealized
and, for tax purposes, unrecognized gain or loss resulting from
the adjustments to the unitholders and the general partner in
the same manner as we allocate gain or loss upon liquidation. In
the event that we make positive adjustments to the capital
accounts upon the issuance of additional units, our partnership
agreement requires that we allocate any later negative
adjustments to the capital accounts resulting from the issuance
of additional units or upon our liquidation in a manner which
results, to the extent possible, in the general partners
capital account balances equaling the amount which they would
have been if no earlier positive adjustments to the capital
accounts had been made.
58
SELECTED HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL AND OPERATING
DATA
The following table shows selected historical financial and
operating data of Calumet Lubricants, Co., Limited Partnership
(Calumet Predecessor) and pro forma financial data
of Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. for the periods and
as of the dates indicated. The selected historical financial
data as of December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and
September 30, 2005 and for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2005, are derived
from the consolidated financial statements of Calumet
Predecessor. The selected pro forma financial data as of
September 30, 2005 and for the year ended December 31,
2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2005 are
derived from the unaudited pro forma financial statements of
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. The pro forma
adjustments have been prepared as if the transactions listed
below had taken place on September 30, 2005, in the case of
the pro forma balance sheet or as of January 1, 2004, in
the case of the pro forma statement of operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The pro forma financial data give pro
forma effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
the refinancing by Calumet Predecessor of its long-term debt
obligations pursuant to new credit facilities it expects to
enter into in the fourth quarter of 2005; |
|
|
|
the retention of certain assets and liabilities of Calumet
Predecessor by the owners of Calumet Predecessor; |
|
|
|
|
the contribution of the ownership interests in Calumet
Predecessor to Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. in
exchange for the issuance by Calumet Specialty Products
Partners, L.P. to the owners of Calumet Predecessor of 5,758,273
common units, 13,066,000 subordinated units, the 2% general
partner interest represented by 515,801 general partner units
and the incentive distribution rights; |
|
|
|
|
|
the sale by Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. of
6,450,000 common units in this offering; |
|
|
|
|
the payment of estimated underwriting commissions and other
offering and transaction expenses; and |
|
|
|
the repayment by Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. of a
portion of indebtedness under its new credit facilities. |
None of the assets or liabilities of Calumet Predecessors
Rouseville wax processing facility, Reno wax packaging facility
and Bareco wax marketing joint venture, which are included in
the historical financial statements, will be contributed to us
upon the closing of this offering.
The following table includes the non-GAAP financial measures
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. For a reconciliation of EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA to net income and cash flow from operating
activities, our most directly comparable financial performance
and liquidity measures calculated in accordance with GAAP,
please read Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
We derived the information in the following table from, and that
information should be read together with and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to, the historical and pro forma combined
financial statements and the accompanying notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The table should be read together
with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet Specialty Products | |
|
|
|
|
|
Partners, L.P. | |
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine | |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
Year | |
|
Months | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit data) | |
|
|
|
Summary of Operations
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
267,307 |
|
|
$ |
306,760 |
|
|
$ |
316,350 |
|
|
$ |
430,381 |
|
|
$ |
539,616 |
|
|
$ |
393,036 |
|
|
$ |
894,981 |
|
|
|
$ |
539,616 |
|
|
$ |
894,981 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
249,852 |
|
|
|
272,523 |
|
|
|
268,911 |
|
|
|
385,890 |
|
|
|
501,284 |
|
|
|
361,820 |
|
|
|
799,574 |
|
|
|
|
501,284 |
|
|
|
799,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
17,455 |
|
|
|
34,237 |
|
|
|
47,439 |
|
|
|
44,491 |
|
|
|
38,332 |
|
|
|
31,216 |
|
|
|
95,407 |
|
|
|
|
38,332 |
|
|
|
95,407 |
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
8,257 |
|
|
|
7,844 |
|
|
|
9,066 |
|
|
|
9,432 |
|
|
|
13,133 |
|
|
|
10,286 |
|
|
|
11,998 |
|
|
|
|
13,133 |
|
|
|
11,998 |
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
19,620 |
|
|
|
24,096 |
|
|
|
25,449 |
|
|
|
28,139 |
|
|
|
33,923 |
|
|
|
24,987 |
|
|
|
33,544 |
|
|
|
|
33,923 |
|
|
|
33,544 |
|
|
Taxes other than income
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
Restructuring, decommissioning and
asset impairments(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,694 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(12,094 |
) |
|
|
(9,156 |
) |
|
|
9,128 |
|
|
|
(3,098 |
) |
|
|
(12,189 |
) |
|
|
(6,697 |
) |
|
|
45,051 |
|
|
|
|
(12,189 |
) |
|
|
45,051 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
2,442 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,180 |
) |
|
|
(6,235 |
) |
|
|
(7,435 |
) |
|
|
(9,493 |
) |
|
|
(9,869 |
) |
|
|
(6,617 |
) |
|
|
(16,771 |
) |
|
|
|
(5,572 |
) |
|
|
(9,173 |
) |
|
Realized gain (loss) on derivative
instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
(961 |
) |
|
|
39,160 |
|
|
|
27,133 |
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
|
|
39,160 |
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,228 |
|
|
|
(7,788 |
) |
|
|
5,299 |
|
|
|
(48,412 |
) |
|
|
|
(7,788 |
) |
|
|
(48,412 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(1,806 |
) |
|
|
(4,128 |
) |
|
|
(3,847 |
) |
|
|
(2,327 |
) |
|
|
21,159 |
|
|
|
25,463 |
|
|
|
(65,868 |
) |
|
|
|
25,456 |
|
|
|
(58,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before income
taxes
|
|
|
(13,900 |
) |
|
|
(13,284 |
) |
|
|
5,281 |
|
|
|
(5,425 |
) |
|
|
8,970 |
|
|
|
18,766 |
|
|
|
(20,817 |
) |
|
|
|
13,267 |
|
|
|
(13,219 |
) |
Pro forma income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(13,900 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,284 |
) |
|
$ |
5,281 |
|
|
$ |
(5,425 |
) |
|
$ |
8,970 |
|
|
$ |
18,766 |
|
|
$ |
(20,817 |
) |
|
|
$ |
13,267 |
|
|
$ |
(13,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted pro forma net
income per limited partner unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.69 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.26 |
) |
Weighted average units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,208,273 |
|
|
|
12,208,273 |
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,066,050 |
|
|
|
13,066,500 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period
end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
60,679 |
|
|
$ |
76,316 |
|
|
$ |
80,916 |
|
|
$ |
89,938 |
|
|
$ |
126,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
127,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
126,931 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
143,340 |
|
|
|
192,118 |
|
|
|
217,915 |
|
|
|
216,941 |
|
|
|
318,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443,518 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
24,701 |
|
|
|
24,485 |
|
|
|
34,072 |
|
|
|
32,263 |
|
|
|
58,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,695 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
72,571 |
|
|
|
127,759 |
|
|
|
141,968 |
|
|
|
146,853 |
|
|
|
214,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,735 |
|
Partners capital
|
|
|
38,972 |
|
|
|
17,362 |
|
|
|
30,968 |
|
|
|
25,544 |
|
|
|
34,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,855 |
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
(9,792 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,774 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,326 |
) |
|
$ |
7,048 |
|
|
$ |
(612 |
) |
|
$ |
5,061 |
|
|
$ |
(97,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(32,078 |
) |
|
|
(31,059 |
) |
|
|
(9,924 |
) |
|
|
(11,940 |
) |
|
|
(42,930 |
) |
|
|
(4,672 |
) |
|
|
(9,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
41,908 |
|
|
|
44,872 |
|
|
|
14,209 |
|
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
|
61,561 |
|
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
92,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,592 |
|
|
$ |
10,837 |
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
30,480 |
|
|
$ |
3,368 |
|
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
3,368 |
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,277 |
|
|
|
10,544 |
|
|
|
36,304 |
|
|
|
29,191 |
|
|
|
58,203 |
|
|
|
|
36,304 |
|
|
|
58,203 |
|
Operating Data (bpd):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales volume(2)
|
|
|
15,869 |
|
|
|
19,021 |
|
|
|
19,110 |
|
|
|
23,616 |
|
|
|
24,658 |
|
|
|
24,891 |
|
|
|
45,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total feedstock runs(3)
|
|
|
15,729 |
|
|
|
18,941 |
|
|
|
21,665 |
|
|
|
25,007 |
|
|
|
26,209 |
|
|
|
26,570 |
|
|
|
48,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total refinery production(4)
|
|
|
15,747 |
|
|
|
18,991 |
|
|
|
21,586 |
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
|
|
26,300 |
|
|
|
26,760 |
|
|
|
46,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Incurred in connection with the decommissioning of the
Rouseville, Pennsylvania facility, the termination of the Bareco
joint venture and the closing of the Reno, Pennsylvania
facility, none of which will be contributed to Calumet Specialty
Products Partners, L.P. |
|
(2) |
Total sales volume includes sales from the production of our
refineries and sales of inventories. |
|
(3) |
Feedstock runs represents the barrels per day of crude oil and
other feedstocks processed at our refineries. |
|
(4) |
Total refinery production represents the barrels per day of
specialty products and fuel products yielded from processing
crude oil and other refinery feedstocks at our refineries. |
60
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We include in this prospectus the non-GAAP financial measures
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, and provide reconciliations of
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net income and cash flow from
operating activities, our most directly comparable financial
performance and liquidity measures, calculated and presented in
accordance with GAAP.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are used as supplemental financial
measures by our management and by external users of our
financial statements such as investors, commercial banks,
research analysts and others, to assess:
|
|
|
|
the financial performance of our assets without regard to
financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient to pay
interest costs and support our indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
our operating performance and return on capital as compared to
those of other companies in our industry, without regard to
financing or capital structure; and |
|
|
|
|
the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects
and the overall rates of return on alternative investment
opportunities. |
|
We define EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, taxes and
depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA to be
Consolidated EBITDA as defined in our new credit facilities.
Consistent with that definition, Adjusted EBITDA represents
(1) net income plus (2) (a) interest expense;
(b) taxes; (c) depreciation and amortization;
(d) unrealized losses from derivatives;
(e) restructuring, decommissioning and asset impairments
and extraordinary gains and losses; and (f) prepaid
expenses and accrued expenses net of cash outlays; minus
(3) unrealized gains from derivatives. We are required to
report Adjusted EBITDA to our lenders under our new credit
facilities and it will be used to determine our compliance with
the consolidated leverage test thereunder. We will be required
to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of consolidated debt
to Adjusted EBITDA, after giving effect to any proposed
distributions, of no greater than 3.75 to 1 in order to make
distributions to our unitholders.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered alternatives
to net income, operating income, cash flows from operating
activities or any other measure of financial performance
presented in accordance with GAAP. Our EBITDA and Adjusted
EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of
another company because all companies may not calculate EBITDA
and Adjusted EBITDA in the same manner. The following table
presents a reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net
income and cash flow from operating activities, our most
directly comparable GAAP financial performance and liquidity
measures, for each of the periods indicated:
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calumet Specialty Products | |
|
|
Calumet Predecessor | |
|
Partners, L.P. Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Reconciliation of EBITDA to net
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
5,281 |
|
|
$ |
(5,425 |
) |
|
$ |
8,970 |
|
|
$ |
18,766 |
|
|
$ |
(20,817 |
) |
|
$ |
13,267 |
|
|
$ |
(13,309 |
) |
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,435 |
|
|
|
9,493 |
|
|
|
9,869 |
|
|
|
6,617 |
|
|
|
16,771 |
|
|
|
5,572 |
|
|
|
9,173 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,876 |
|
|
|
6,769 |
|
|
|
6,927 |
|
|
|
5,097 |
|
|
|
7,414 |
|
|
|
6,927 |
|
|
|
7,414 |
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
18,592 |
|
|
$ |
10,837 |
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
30,480 |
|
|
$ |
3,368 |
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
3,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses (gains) from
derivatives
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,228 |
) |
|
$ |
7,788 |
|
|
$ |
(5,299 |
) |
|
$ |
48,412 |
|
|
$ |
7,788 |
|
|
$ |
48,412 |
|
|
Restructuring, decomissioning and
asset impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,694 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and accrued
expenses, net of cash outlays
|
|
|
(2,315 |
) |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$ |
16,277 |
|
|
$ |
10,554 |
|
|
$ |
36,304 |
|
|
$ |
29,191 |
|
|
$ |
58,203 |
|
|
$ |
36,304 |
|
|
$ |
58,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) | |
|
|
Reconciliation of EBITDA to net
cash provided (used) by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by
operating activities
|
|
$ |
(4,326 |
) |
|
$ |
7,048 |
|
|
$ |
(612 |
) |
|
$ |
5,061 |
|
|
$ |
(97,769 |
) |
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,435 |
|
|
|
9,493 |
|
|
|
9,869 |
|
|
|
6,617 |
|
|
|
16,771 |
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,693 |
) |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
Equity in (loss) income of
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2,442 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received from
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(2,925 |
) |
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
(3,470 |
) |
|
|
(3,470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating working
capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
19,399 |
|
|
|
18,681 |
|
|
|
65,077 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
16,984 |
|
|
|
(15,547 |
) |
|
|
20,304 |
|
|
|
(4,882 |
) |
|
|
50,114 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(1,295 |
) |
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
11,596 |
|
|
|
17,697 |
|
|
|
14,622 |
|
|
Derivative activity
|
|
|
3,682 |
|
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
(5,046 |
) |
|
|
3,686 |
|
|
|
(51,018 |
) |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(9,587 |
) |
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
(25,764 |
) |
|
|
(12,194 |
) |
|
|
12,333 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,622 |
|
|
|
(1,379 |
) |
|
|
(1,203 |
) |
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
|
|
(6,278 |
) |
|
Other, including changes in
noncurrent assets and liabilities
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
(1,316 |
) |
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
18,592 |
|
|
$ |
10,837 |
|
|
$ |
25,766 |
|
|
$ |
30,480 |
|
|
$ |
3,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses (gains) from
derivatives
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,228 |
) |
|
$ |
7,788 |
|
|
$ |
(5,299 |
) |
|
$ |
48,412 |
|
|
Restructuring, decommissioning and
asset impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,694 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and accrued
expenses, net of cash outlays
|
|
|
(2,315 |
) |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$ |
16,277 |
|
|
$ |
10,554 |
|
|
$ |
36,304 |
|
|
$ |
29,191 |
|
|
$ |
58,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The historical consolidated financial statements included in
this prospectus reflect all of the assets, liabilities and
results of operations of Calumet Lubricants Co., Limited
Partnership. We refer to these assets, liabilities and
operations as the Calumet Predecessor. These historical
consolidated financial statements include the results of
operations of the Rouseville and Reno facilities, which have
been closed, and the Bareco joint venture, which has been
terminated as described below. The following discussion analyzes
the financial condition and results of operations of Calumet
Predecessor. You should read the following discussion of the
financial condition and results of operations for Calumet
Predecessor in conjunction with the historical consolidated
financial statements and notes of Calumet Predecessor and the
pro forma financial statements for Calumet Specialty Products
Partners, L.P. included elsewhere in this prospectus. The
statements in this discussion regarding industry outlook, our
expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and
capital resources and other non-historical statements in this
discussion are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties,
including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties
described in the Risk Factors and Forward
Looking Statements sections of this prospectus. Our actual
results may differ materially from those contained in or implied
by any forward-looking statements.
Overview
We are a leading independent producer of high-quality, specialty
hydrocarbon products in North America. Our business is organized
into two segments: specialty products and fuel products. In our
specialty products segment, we process crude oil into a wide
variety of customized lubricating oils, solvents and waxes. Our
specialty products are sold to domestic and international
customers who purchase them primarily as raw material components
for basic industrial, consumer and automotive goods. In our fuel
products segment, we process crude oil into a variety of fuel
and fuel-related products including unleaded gasoline, diesel
fuel and jet fuel. In connection with our production of
specialty products and fuel products, we also produce asphalt
and a limited number of other by-products. The asphalt and other
by-products produced in connection with the production of
specialty products at the Princeton, Cotton Valley and
Shreveport refineries are included in our specialty products
segment. The asphalt and other by-products produced in
connection with the production of fuel products at the
Shreveport refinery are included in our fuel products segment.
The fuels produced in connection with the production of
specialty products at the Princeton and Cotton Valley refineries
are included in our specialty products segment. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2005, approximately 53.7% of our
gross profit was generated from our specialty products segment
and approximately 46.3% of our gross profit was generated from
our fuel products segment.
Subsequent to the acquisition of the Shreveport refinery,
Calumet Predecessor undertook to streamline its wax processing
and marketing operations by decomissioning its Rouseville
facility, closing its Reno facility and terminating its Bareco
joint venture. None of the assets or liabilities of Calumet
Predecessors Rouseville facility, Reno facility and Bareco
joint venture will be contributed to us upon the closing of this
offering. Calumet Predecessor began decommissioning the
Rouseville facility in 2003 and completed the decommissioning in
2005. This resulted in restructuring costs of $6.7 million
in 2003, $0.3 million in 2004 and $2.2 million in
2005. In 2005, Calumet Predecessor closed the Reno facility for
a restructuring cost of $1.7 million. In 2003, Calumet
Predecessor terminated its Bareco joint venture. The results of
operations of Bareco are reflected in equity income (loss) of
unconsolidated affiliates. The combined total book value of
these operations as of September 30, 2005 was
$0.2 million.
Our fuel products segment began operations in 2004, as we
substantially completed the approximately $39.7 million
reconfiguration of the Shreveport refinery to add motor fuels
production, including gasoline, diesel and jet fuel, to its
existing specialty products slate as well as to increase overall
feedstock throughput. The project was fully completed in
February of 2005. The
63
reconfiguration was undertaken to capitalize on strong fuels
refining margins, or crack spreads, relative to historical
levels, to utilize idled assets, and to enhance the
profitability of the Shreveport refinerys specialty
products segment by increasing overall refinery throughput.
Since completion of the reconfiguration of the Shreveport
refinery, crack spreads have continued to increase through
September, 2005 to historically high levels, which has further
improved the profitability of the fuel products segment.
Our sales and net income are principally affected by the price
of crude oil, demand for specialty and fuel products, prevailing
crack spreads for fuel products, the price of natural gas used
as fuel in our operations and our results from derivative
instrument activities.
Our primary raw material is crude oil and our primary outputs
are specialty petroleum and fuel products. The prices of crude
oil, specialty and fuel products are subject to fluctuations in
response to changes in supply, demand, market uncertainties and
a variety of additional factors beyond our control. We monitor
these risks and enter into financial derivatives designed to
mitigate the impact of commodity price fluctuations on our
business. The primary purpose of our commodity risk management
activities is to economically hedge our cash flow exposure to
commodity price risk so that we can meet our cash distribution,
debt service and capital expenditure requirements despite
fluctuations in crude oil and fuel product prices. We enter into
derivative contracts for future periods in quantities which do
not exceed our projected purchases of crude oil and fuel
production. Please read Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk Commodity
Price Risk.
Our management uses several financial and operational
measurements to analyze our performance. These measurements
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales volumes; |
|
|
|
Production yields; and |
|
|
|
Specialty products and fuel products gross profit. |
Sales volumes. We view the volumes of specialty
and fuels products sold as an important measure of our ability
to effectively utilize our refining assets. Our ability to meet
the demands of our customers is driven by the volumes of crude
oil and feedstocks that we run at our refineries. Higher volumes
improve profitability through the spreading of fixed costs over
greater volumes.
Production yields. We seek the optimal product mix
for each barrel of crude oil we refine in order to maximize our
gross profits and minimize lower margin by-products which we
refer to as production yield.
Specialty products and fuel products gross profit.
Specialty products and fuel products gross profit are an
important measure of our ability to maximize the profitability
of our specialty products and fuel products segments. We define
specialty products and fuel products gross profit as sales less
the cost of crude oil and other feedstocks and other
production-related expenses, the most significant portion of
which include labor, fuel, utilities, contract services,
maintenance and processing materials. We use specialty products
and fuel products gross profit as an indicator of our ability to
manage our business during periods of crude oil and natural gas
price fluctuations, as the prices of our specialty products and
fuel products generally do not change immediately with changes
in the price of crude oil and natural gas. The increase in
selling prices typically lags behind the rising costs of crude
oil feedstocks for specialty products. Other than plant fuel,
production-related expenses generally remain stable across broad
ranges of throughput volumes, but can fluctuate depending on the
maintenance and turnaround activities performed during a
specific period. Maintenance expense includes accruals for
turnarounds and other maintenance expenses.
In addition to the foregoing measures, we will also monitor our
general and administrative expenditures, substantially all of
which will be incurred through our general partner, Calumet GP,
LLC. We estimate that we will incur incremental general and
administrative expenses of approximately $4.5 million per
year as a result of being a publicly traded limited partnership.
These
64
costs include those associated with annual and quarterly reports
to unitholders, independent auditors fees, tax return and
Schedule K-1 preparation and distribution, investor
relations, registrar and transfer agent fees, management and
director compensation and incremental insurance costs, including
director and officer liability and business interruption
insurance.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth information about our combined
refinery operations. Refining production volume differs from
sales volumes due to changes in inventory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
September 30, 2004 | |
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total sales volume (bpd)(1)
|
|
|
19,110 |
|
|
|
23,616 |
|
|
|
24,658 |
|
|
|
24,982 |
|
|
|
45,484 |
|
Feedstock runs (bpd)(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil
|
|
|
19,351 |
|
|
|
22,086 |
|
|
|
23,867 |
|
|
|
23,663 |
|
|
|
44,728 |
|
|
Condensate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,793 |
|
|
Other feedstocks and additives
|
|
|
2,314 |
|
|
|
2,921 |
|
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
21,665 |
|
|
|
25,007 |
|
|
|
26,209 |
|
|
|
26,122 |
|
|
|
48,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinery production (bpd)(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lubricating oils
|
|
|
8,173 |
|
|
|
8,290 |
|
|
|
9,439 |
|
|
|
9,535 |
|
|
|
11,439 |
|
|
|
Waxes
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
Solvents
|
|
|
4,333 |
|
|
|
4,623 |
|
|
|
4,974 |
|
|
|
4,922 |
|
|
|
4,430 |
|
|
|
Asphalt and other by-products
|
|
|
3,910 |
|
|
|
5,159 |
|
|
|
5,992 |
|
|
|
6,182 |
|
|
|
6,489 |
|
|
|
Fuels
|
|
|
4,168 |
|
|
|
6,433 |
|
|
|
3,931 |
|
|
|
5,162 |
|
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
21,586 |
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
|
|
25,346 |
|
|
|
26,760 |
|
|
|
25,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasolines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,577 |
|
|
|
Diesel fuels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,870 |
|
|
|
Jet fuels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,498 |
|
|
|
Asphalt and other by-products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total refinery production
|
|
|
21,586 |
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
|
|
26,300 |
|
|
|
26,760 |
|
|
|
46,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Total sales volume includes sales from the production of our
refineries and sales of inventories. |
|
(2) |
Feedstock runs represents the barrels per day of crude oil and
other feedstocks processed at our refineries. |
|
(3) |
Total refinery production represents the barrels per day of
specialty products and fuel products yielded from processing
crude oil and other refinery feedstocks at our refineries. The
difference between total refinery production and total feedstock
runs is primarily a result of the time lag between the input of
feedstock and production of end products. |
65
The following table sets forth information about the sales of
our principal products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended | |
|
Nine Months | |
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Specialty products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lubricating oils
|
|
$ |
156.5 |
|
|
$ |
205.9 |
|
|
$ |
251.9 |
|
|
$ |
182.9 |
|
|
$ |
270.2 |
|
|
Waxes
|
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
39.5 |
|
|
|
84.4 |
|
|
|
104.0 |
|
|
Solvents
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
114.7 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
Asphalt and other by-products
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
51.2 |
|
|
|
56.8 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
Fuels
|
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
|
83.5 |
|
|
|
72.7 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
56.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
316.4 |
|
|
|
430.4 |
|
|
|
530.0 |
|
|
|
393.0 |
|
|
|
499.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasolines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155.1 |
|
|
Diesel fuels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160.0 |
|
|
Jet fuels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
Asphalt and other by-products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
395.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated sales
|
|
$ |
316.4 |
|
|
$ |
430.4 |
|
|
$ |
539.6 |
|
|
$ |
393.0 |
|
|
$ |
895.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth a summary of our consolidated
operations for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Sales
|
|
$ |
316.4 |
|
|
$ |
430.4 |
|
|
$ |
539.6 |
|
|
$ |
393.0 |
|
|
$ |
895.0 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
269.0 |
|
|
|
385.9 |
|
|
|
501.3 |
|
|
|
361.8 |
|
|
|
799.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
44.5 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
Taxes other than income taxes
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
Restructuring, decommissioning and
asset impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (loss) income of
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
(16.8 |
) |
|
Realized gain (loss) on derivative
instruments
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
(48.4 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
(65.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
(5.4 |
) |
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
18.8 |
|
|
$ |
(20.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 Compared to Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2004
Sales. Sales increased $501.9 million, or
127.7%, to $895.0 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 from $393.0 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2004. Sales for each of our
principal product categories in these periods were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
Sales by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lubricating oils
|
|
$ |
182.9 |
|
|
$ |
270.2 |
|
|
|
47.7 |
% |
|
|
Solvents
|
|
|
84.4 |
|
|
|
104.0 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
Waxes
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
Fuels(1)
|
|
|
56.8 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
(34.9 |
) |
|
|
Asphalt and by-products(2)
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
56.2 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty products
|
|
$ |
393.0 |
|
|
$ |
499.1 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty products volume (in
barrels)
|
|
|
6,820,000 |
|
|
|
6,664,000 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
)% |
|
Fuel products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasoline
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
155.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diesel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jet fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asphalt and by-products(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fuel products
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
395.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fuel products sales volumes
(in barrels)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,753,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
$ |
393.0 |
|
|
$ |
895.0 |
|
|
|
127.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales volumes (in barrels)
|
|
|
6,820,000 |
|
|
|
12,417,000 |
|
|
|
82.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents fuels produced in connection with the production of
specialty products at the Princeton and Cotton Valley refineries. |
|
(2) |
Represents asphalt and other by-products produced in connection
with the production of specialty products at the Princeton,
Cotton Valley and Shreveport refineries. |
|
(3) |
Represents asphalt and other by-products produced in connection
with the production of fuels at the Shreveport refinery. |
This $501.9 million increase in sales resulted primarily
from the startup of our fuels operations at Shreveport in the
second half of 2004, which accounted for $395.9 million of
the increase, and also from a $106.1 million increase in
sales by our specialty products segment.
Specialty products segment sales for the first nine months of
2005 increased $106.1 million, or 27.0%, due to a 29.8%
increase in the average selling price per barrel partially
offset by a 2.3% decrease in volumes sold, from approximately
6.8 million barrels in the 2004 period to 6.7 million
barrels in the 2005 period. Average selling prices per barrel
for lubricating oils, solvents and fuels increased at rates
comparable to or in excess of the overall 29.8% increase in the
cost of crude oil per barrel during the period. Asphalt and
by-product prices per barrel increased by only 4.4% due to
market conditions. Although our wax volumes increased 14.7% in
the first nine months of 2005, our average selling price per
barrel of wax decreased due to a shift in the grade of wax
products sold.
67
The 2.3% overall decline in volumes was largely due to
downtime in February 2005 at Cotton Valley for a plant expansion
project, which resulted in reduced volumes of fuels and solvents
for that period. Fuel sales decreased disproportionately more
than solvents because we had higher levels of inventory of
solvents at Cotton Valley available for sale.
Fuel product segment sales for the first nine months of 2005
increased $395.9 million which is attributable to the
reconfiguration of the Shreveport refinery, which was fully
completed by February 2005, and the start-up of our fuel
products segment in the fourth quarter of 2004.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased
$64.2 million, or 205.6%, to $95.4 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 from
$31.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2004. Gross profit for our specialty and fuel product segments
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
Gross profit by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products
|
|
$ |
31.2 |
|
|
$ |
51.2 |
|
|
|
64.1 |
% |
|
|
Percentage of sales
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel products
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
44.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$ |
31.2 |
|
|
$ |
95.4 |
|
|
|
205.6 |
% |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
This $64.2 million increase in total gross profit includes
gross profit of $44.2 million in our fuel products segment,
which began operations late in 2004, and $20.0 million in
our specialty product segment gross profit which was driven by a
29.8% increase in selling prices and improved profitability on
specialty products manufactured at our Shreveport refinery due
to the increase in the refinerys overall throughput
largely resulting from its reconfiguration. The increase in
specialty products gross profits were partially offset by a
35.5% increase in the average price of crude oil per barrel and
an 2.3% decrease in sales volumes. During the 2005 period, we
were able to successfully increase prices on our lubricating
oils, solvents and fuels at rates comparable to the rising cost
of crude oil. However, we were unable to increase prices on
asphalt and waxes at similar rates.
Selling, general and administrative. Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased $1.7 million,
or 16.6%, to $12.0 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 from $10.3 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2004. This increase primarily
reflects increased employee compensation costs due to our
incentive bonuses.
Transportation. Transportation expenses increased
$8.6 million, or 34.2%, to $33.5 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 from $25.0 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The period over
period increase in transportation expense was due to the overall
increase in volumes which was partially offset by more localized
marketing of fuels products.
Restructuring, decommissioning and asset
impairments. Restructuring, decommissioning and asset
impairment expenses increased $2.0 million to
$2.2 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005 from $0.2 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. During the first nine months of 2005,
we recorded a $1.7 million charge related to an impairment
charge recorded in conjunction with the Reno wax processing
assets. During the first nine months of 2004, we recorded a
$0.1 million charge related to the completion of the
Rouseville asset decommissioning.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased
$10.2 million, or 153.4%, to $16.8 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 from $6.6 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2004. This increase was
primarily due to increased borrowings under the credit agreement
with a
68
limited partner and new borrowings under a term loan agreement
related to the reconfiguration of the Shreveport facility
entered into during the fourth quarter of 2004. Borrowings under
the term loan agreement bear interest at a fixed rate of
interest of 14.0%.
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments. Gains
(loss) on derivative instruments decreased $81.7 million,
to a $49.2 million loss in the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 from a $32.4 million gain in the
nine months ended September 30, 2004. This decrease was the
result of marking to fair value a new mix of fuel product margin
collar and swap contracts which experienced significant declines
in value due to rising crack spreads during the nine months
ended September 30, 2005.
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2003
Sales. Sales increased $109.2 million, or
25.4%, to $539.6 million in the year ended
December 31, 2004 from $430.4 million in the year
ended December 31, 2003. Sales for each of our principal
product categories in these periods were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
Sales by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lubricating oils
|
|
$ |
205.9 |
|
|
$ |
251.9 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
Solvents
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
114.7 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
Waxes
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
39.5 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
Fuels(1)
|
|
|
83.6 |
|
|
|
72.7 |
|
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
Asphalt and by-products(2)
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
51.2 |
|
|
|
142.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty products
|
|
$ |
430.4 |
|
|
$ |
530.0 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
Total specialty products volumes
(in barrels)
|
|
|
8,620,000 |
|
|
|
8,807,000 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
Fuel products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasoline
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diesel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jet fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asphalt and by-products(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fuel products
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fuel products volumes (in
barrels)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
$ |
430.4 |
|
|
$ |
539.6 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales volumes (in barrels)
|
|
|
8,620,000 |
|
|
|
9,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents fuels produced in connection with the production of
specialty products at the Princeton and Cotton Valley refineries. |
|
(2) |
Represents asphalt and other by-products produced in connection
with the production of specialty products at the Princeton and
Cotton Valley refineries. |
|
(3) |
Represents asphalt and other by-products produced in connection
with the production of fuels at the Shreveport refinery. |
This $109.2 million increase in sales resulted primarily
from a 23.1% increase in specialty products sales, and also from
the addition of $9.6 million in sales from the start up of
our fuel products operations at the Shreveport refinery. The
increase in specialty product sales resulted
69
primarily from an increase of 20.5% in the average price per
barrel of product sold, and also from a 2.2% increase in volumes
sold, from approximately 8.6 million barrels in 2003 to
8.8 million barrels in 2004. Sales price increases were
driven by an average 32.5% increase in the cost of crude oil per
barrel over the same period. Increases in prices for waxes
lagged our average increase in price per barrel of product sold
compared to the increase in prices for lubricating oils,
solvents and fuels. In 2004 as compared to 2003, sales volumes
of fuels decreased and sales volumes of asphalt and by-products
increased due to a different mix of feedstock.
Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased
$6.2 million, or 13.8%, to $38.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 from $44.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2003. Gross profit for our
specialty and fuel product segments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
Gross profit by segment:
|
|
|
|