prem14a
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
þ   Preliminary Proxy Statement
o   Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o   Definitive Proxy Statement
o   Definitive Additional Materials
o   Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
Alteon Inc.
 
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
 
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
o   No fee required.
þ   Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
  1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
     
 
 
  2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
37,399,065
     
 
 
  3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 
      $0.1950 — Average of high and low prices reported on June 2, 2006
     
 
 
  4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
$7,292,817.68
     
 
 
  5)   Total fee paid:
$1,458.56
     
 
o   Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing:
  1)   Amount previously paid:
 
     
 
 
  2)
 
  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No:
     
 
 
  3)
 
  Filing party:
     
 
 
  4)
 
  Date Filed:
     
 


Table of Contents

Alteon Inc.
6 Campus Drive
Parsippany, NJ 07054
(201) 934-5000
MERGER PROPOSED — YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
      The board of directors of Alteon Inc. has agreed to a merger of Alteon and HaptoGuard, Inc. We believe the combined company will be able to create substantially more stockholder value than could be achieved by the companies individually.
      It is presently expected that HaptoGuard stockholders and warrant holders will receive an aggregate of 37,399,065 shares of Alteon common stock. The aggregate number of shares of Alteon common stock to be issued and transferred for the outstanding HaptoGuard common stock and outstanding warrants will not be adjusted based upon changes in the value of these shares. It is presently expected that each holder of a HaptoGuard common share would receive 3,521 shares of Alteon common stock. The exchange ratios are subject to adjustment depending upon the number of outstanding shares and warrants to purchase HaptoGuard common stock at the effective time of the merger. For a more detailed discussion of the exchange ratios, see “The Merger — The Merger Agreement — Merger Consideration” on page I-     . Alteon common stock is currently listed on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “ALT.”
      Based upon the outstanding shares of Alteon common stock on                     , 2006 and HaptoGuard’s outstanding shares of common stock and warrants on                     , 2006, HaptoGuard stockholders will own approximately 31.37% of Alteon’s then outstanding common stock after we complete the merger. Based upon the fully-diluted capitalization of Alteon and HaptoGuard on                     , 2006, immediately following the completion of the merger, HaptoGuard security holders would own approximately 28.93% of the combined company assuming (i) shares of Alteon common stock outstanding following the cash exercise of all outstanding Alteon warrants and stock options and (ii) shares of Alteon common stock outstanding following the cash exercise of all HaptoGuard stock options assumed by Alteon at the closing of the merger. Genentech, Inc., an Alteon stockholder and party to the merger agreement, would own approximately 11.99% of the combined company after the merger.
      We are asking stockholders of Alteon to approve the merger and merger agreement and the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock and the transfer and conversion of shares of Alteon common stock contemplated thereby. In addition, in order to effect the conversion of shares contemplated by the merger agreement, we are asking Alteon stockholders will be asked to approve an amendment to the Certificate of Designation of the Series G Preferred Stock and an amendment to the Certificate of Designation of the Series H Preferred Stock. As this will be our annual meeting of stockholders, Alteon stockholders will also be asked to vote on Alteon director nominees and to ratify the selection of J.H. Cohn LLP as Alteon’s independent registered public accounting firm.
      We cannot complete the merger unless HaptoGuard stockholders adopt the merger and the merger agreement, and Alteon stockholders approve (i) the merger and the merger agreement and (ii) the amendment to the Certificate of Designation of the Series G Preferred Stock and the amendment to the Certificate of Designation of the Series H Preferred Stock in order to effect the conversion of shares contemplated by the merger agreement.
      This Proxy Statement provides you with detailed information concerning Alteon, HaptoGuard and the merger. Please give all of the information contained in the Proxy Statement your careful attention. In particular, you should carefully consider the discussion in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page I-     of this Proxy Statement.


Table of Contents

      The date, time and place of the Alteon annual meeting is:
                    , 2006
10:00 a.m., Eastern Time
The Hanover Marriott
1401 Route 10 East
Whippany, New Jersey 07981
/s/ KENNETH I. MOCH  
 
 
Kenneth I. Moch  
Chairman of the Board  
President and Chief Executive Officer  
Alteon Inc.  
      NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES REGULATORS HAVE APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THE ALTEON COMMON STOCK TO BE ISSUED IN THE MERGER OR DETERMINED WHETHER THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS ACCURATE OR ADEQUATE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
      Proxy Statement is dated                     , 2006 and is first being mailed to stockholders on or around                     , 2006.
      Alteon will provide you with copies of important information about Alteon from documents filed with the SEC that are not included in or delivered with this Proxy Statement, free of charge, upon request to:
Alteon Inc.
6 Campus Drive
Parsippany, NY 07054
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone: (201) 934-5000
      In order to receive timely delivery of the documents before the Alteon annual meeting, you should make your request no later than                     , 2006.
      Please also see “Where You Can Find More Information” on page VIII-     .


Table of Contents

HaptoGuard, Inc.
Park 80 West, Plaza II
Suite 200
Saddle Brook, NJ 07663
(201) 947-1270
MERGER PROPOSED — YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
      HaptoGuard, Inc. and Alteon Inc. have entered into an agreement and plan of merger pursuant to which Alteon intends to acquire HaptoGuard by way of a merger.
      It is presently expected that HaptoGuard stockholders and warrant holders will receive an aggregate of 37,399,065 shares of Alteon common stock. The aggregate number of shares of Alteon common stock to be issued and transferred for the outstanding HaptoGuard common stock and outstanding warrants will not be adjusted based upon changes in the value of these shares. It is presently expected that each holder of a HaptoGuard common share would receive 3,521 shares of Alteon common stock. The exchange ratios are subject to adjustment depending upon the number of outstanding shares and warrants to purchase HaptoGuard common stock at the effective time of the merger. For a more detailed discussion of the exchange ratios, see “The Merger — The Merger Agreement — Merger Consideration” on page I-     . Alteon common stock is currently listed on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “ALT.”
      Based upon the outstanding shares of Alteon common stock on                     , 2006 and HaptoGuard’s outstanding shares of common stock and warrants on                     , 2006, immediately following the completion of the merger, HaptoGuard stockholders will own approximately 31.37% of Alteon’s then outstanding common stock. Based upon the fully-diluted capitalization of Alteon and HaptoGuard on                     , 2006, immediately following the merger HaptoGuard security holders would own 28.93% of the combined company assuming (i) shares of Alteon common stock outstanding following the cash exercise of all outstanding Alteon warrants and stock options and (ii) shares of Alteon common stock outstanding following the cash exercise of all HaptoGuard stock options assumed by Alteon at the closing of the merger. Genentech, Inc., an Alteon stockholder and party to the merger agreement, would own 11.99% of the combined company after the merger.
      We are asking stockholders of HaptoGuard to adopt the merger and the merger agreement at a special meeting of HaptoGuard stockholders. We cannot complete the merger unless HaptoGuard stockholders adopt the merger and the merger agreement, and Alteon stockholders approve (i) the merger and the merger agreement and (ii) the amendment to the Certificate of Designation of the Series G Preferred Stock and the amendment to the Certificate of Designation of the Series H Preferred Stock in order to effect the conversion of Alteon shares contemplated by the merger agreement.
      The date, time, and place of the HaptoGuard special meeting is:
[                    ], 2006
[                         ]
      This Proxy Statement provides you with detailed information concerning Alteon, HaptoGuard and the merger. Please give all of the information contained in the Proxy Statement your careful attention. In particular, you should carefully consider the discussion in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page I-     of this Proxy Statement.
  By: 
 
 
  Name: 
  Title:
      NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES REGULATORS HAVE APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THE ALTEON COMMON STOCK TO BE ISSUED IN THE MERGER OR DETERMINED WHETHER THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS ACCURATE OR ADEQUATE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.


Table of Contents

      Proxy Statement is dated                     , 2006 and is first being mailed to stockholders on or around                     , 2006.
      THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
      Alteon will provide you with copies of important information about Alteon from documents filed with the SEC that are not included in or delivered with this Proxy Statement, free of charge, upon request to:
Alteon Inc.
6 Campus Drive
Parsippany, NY 07054
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone: (201) 934-5000
      In order to receive timely delivery of the documents before the Alteon annual meeting, you should make your request no later than                     , 2006.
      Please also see “Where You Can Find More Information” on page VIII-     .


Table of Contents

Alteon Inc.
6 Campus Drive
Parsippany, NJ 07054
(201) 934-5000
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
ALTEON INC.
To Be Held on                         , 2006
To the Stockholders of Alteon Inc.:
      The annual meeting of stockholders of Alteon Inc. will be held on                     , 2006, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, at The Hanover Marriott, 1401 Route 10 East, Whippany, New Jersey 07981 for the following purposes:
        1. To approve the merger, the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 19, 2006, by and among Alteon Inc., HaptoGuard, Inc., Alteon Merger Sub, Inc., and Genentech, Inc., and the issuance of shares, transfer and conversion of shares contemplated thereby, as described in the attached Proxy Statement;
 
        2. To consider and vote upon an adjournment of the annual meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of Proposal No. 1;
 
        3. To consider and vote upon a proposal to amend Alteon’s Certificate of Designation of Series G Preferred Stock, as described in the attached Proxy Statement, in order to, among other related technical changes, change the written notice requirements to Alteon for conversion of the preferred stock in order to allow for the conversion pursuant to the merger agreement;
 
        4. To consider and vote upon a proposal to amend Alteon’s Certificate of Designation of Series H Preferred Stock, as described in the attached Proxy Statement, in order to, among other related technical changes, change the written notice requirements to Alteon for conversion of the preferred stock in order to allow for the conversion pursuant to the merger agreement;
 
        5. To elect two directors to hold office until the completion of the merger or, in the event the merger is not completed, until the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified;
 
        6. To ratify the appointment of J.H. Cohn LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Alteon for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006; and
 
        7. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
      Only stockholders of record at the close of business on                     , 2006 are entitled to vote at the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Only stockholders or their proxy holders and Alteon guests may attend the meeting. A complete list of those stockholders entitled to vote will be kept at the principal executive offices of Alteon, 6 Campus Drive, Parsippany, NJ 07054 for a period of ten days prior to the meeting.
      Your vote is important. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the Alteon annual meeting is required for approval of Proposal No. 1 regarding the merger agreement and issuance of shares of Alteon common stock in the merger. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the annual meeting is required for approval of Proposal No. 2 regarding an adjournment of the annual meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of Proposal No. 1. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of Alteon common stock outstanding on the record date for the Alteon annual meeting, as well as the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the voting power of the shares of Alteon Series G Preferred Stock outstanding on the record date and the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the voting power of the shares of Alteon Series H Preferred Stock outstanding on the record date, respectively, is required for approval of Proposal No. 3 and


Table of Contents

Proposal No. 4, respectively, regarding the amendment of Alteon’s certificates of designation. The affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the Alteon annual meeting is required for approval of Proposal No. 5 regarding the election of directors. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the Alteon annual meeting is required for approval of Proposal No. 6 regarding the ratification of auditors. You are urged to attend the annual meeting in person, but if you are unable to do so, the board of directors would appreciate the prompt return of the enclosed proxy card, dated and signed, or, if your proxy card or voting instruction form so indicates, your prompt vote electronically via the Internet or telephone. We strongly encourage you to vote electronically if you have that option.
 
 
  Name: 
  Title: Secretary
                          , 2006


Table of Contents

HaptoGuard, Inc.
Park 80 West, Plaza II
Suite 200
Saddle Brook, NJ 07663
(201) 947-1270
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
HAPTOGUARD, INC.
To Be Held on                         , 2006
To the Stockholders of HaptoGuard Inc.:
      A special meeting of stockholders of HaptoGuard Inc. will be held on                     , 2006, at Park 80 West, Plaza II, Suite 200, Saddle Brook, NJ 07663, (201) 947-1270, for the following purposes:
        1. To consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 19, 2006, by and among Alteon Inc., HaptoGuard, Alteon Merger Sub, Inc., and Genentech, Inc. as described in the attached Proxy Statement;
 
        2. To consider and vote upon an adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of Proposal No. 1; and
 
        3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
      Only stockholders of record at the close of business on                     , 2006 may vote at the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. A list of stockholders entitled to vote will be kept at HaptoGuard, Inc. Park 80 West, Plaza II, Suite 200, Saddle Brook, NJ 07663, (201) 947-1270, for ten days before the special meeting.
Please do not send any certificates for your stock at this time.
      Your vote is important. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of HaptoGuard common stock outstanding on the record date for the HaptoGuard special meeting is required for approval of Proposal No. 1 regarding adoption of the merger agreement. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the HaptoGuard special meeting is required to approve Proposal No. 2 regarding an adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of Proposal No. 1. You are urged to attend the special meeting in person, but if you are unable to do so, the board of directors would appreciate the prompt return of the enclosed proxy card, dated and signed, or, if your proxy card or voting instruction form so indicates, your prompt vote by telephone. If you sign, date and mail your proxy card without indicating how you wish to vote, your proxy will be counted as a vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement and an adjournment of the HaptoGuard special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of Proposal No. 1. If you fail to return your proxy card or vote by telephone, the effect will be a vote against the adoption of the merger agreement and your shares will not be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the HaptoGuard special meeting. If you do attend the HaptoGuard special meeting and wish to vote in person, you may withdraw your proxy and vote in person.
 
 
  Name: 
  Title: Secretary
                          , 2006


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
  I-1
    I-1
    I-11
    I-16
    I-20
    I-31
    I-32
    I-43
    I-50
    I-52
  II-1
  III-1
    III-1
  IV-1
    IV-1
  V-1
    V-1
    V-3
  VI-1
    VI-1
    VI-1
    VI-1
    VI-5
    VI-7
    VI-8
    VI-8
    VI-10
    VI-14
    VI-16
    VI-17
    VI-18
    VI-19
  VII-1
    VII-1
  VIII-1
    VIII-1
    VIII-1
    VIII-1
      VIII-1
  F-1
   


Table of Contents

CHAPTER ONE — THE MERGER
SUMMARY
      This summary highlights selected information from this Proxy Statement and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. To understand the merger fully and for a more complete description of the legal terms of the merger, you should read this Proxy Statement and the documents we have referred you to carefully. See “Chapter Eight — Additional Information for Stockholders — Where You Can Find More Information.”
The Companies
Alteon Inc.
6 Campus Drive
Parsippany, NY 07054
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone: (201) 934-5000
      Alteon is a product-based biopharmaceutical company engaged in the development of small molecule drugs to treat and prevent cardiovascular diseases and other diseases associated with aging and diabetes. Alteon has identified promising product candidates that it believes represent novel potential approaches to some of the largest pharmaceutical markets. It has advanced one of these products into Phase 2 clinical trials.
HaptoGuard Corporation
Park 80 West, Plaza II
Suite 200
Saddle Brook, NJ 07663
Telephone: (201) 947-1270
      HaptoGuard, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company developing and commercializing therapeutics for inflammatory diseases, particularly those that are present as a consequence of elevated oxidized lipids in the blood. HaptoGuard’s portfolio includes orally bioavailable, organoselenium mimics of glutathione peroxidase that metabolize lipid peroxides. Its lead compound, ALT-2074, is in Phase 2 clinical trials. HaptoGuard also controls rights to a diagnostic assay that identifies the large subset of diabetic patients at highest risk for cardiovascular complications, because of a defect in oxidized lipid metabolism that results in increased cardiovascular inflammation.
Reasons for the Merger
      Alteon and HaptoGuard are proposing the merger because, among other things, the companies believe that combining the products and technologies of the two companies will result in an increased ability of the companies to raise capital to continue product development and to offer a broader range of products. The companies have complementary product platforms in the areas of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and other inflammatory diseases.
Factors Considered by and Recommendation of, the Alteon Board of Directors (see page I-     )
      The Alteon board of directors approved the merger based on a number of factors, including, among other factors, the following:
  •  The ability of Alteon’s stockholders to continue to participate in the growth of the business conducted by Alteon and HaptoGuard after the completion of the merger;
 
  •  Anticipated improvements in the ability to raise capital;
 
  •  The strategic fit between Alteon and HaptoGuard in the cardiovascular and diabetes arenas;
 
  •  The synergy of the board of directors and the management of the combined company;


Table of Contents

  •  Anticipated synergies to be achieved by combining the management of the development and commercialization of HaptoGuard and Alteon products;
 
  •  The likelihood that the combined company will have better opportunities for future growth and increase the likelihood of successful commercialization of HaptoGuard and Alteon products; and
 
  •  The potential to improve Alteon’s strategic position in the potential markets it may serve.
Factors Considered by, and Recommendation of, the HaptoGuard Board of Directors (see page I-     )
      The HaptoGuard board of directors approved the merger based on a number of factors, including, among other factors, the following:
  •  Anticipated improvements in the ability to raise capital;
 
  •  The belief that the merger represented the best value reasonably available to HaptoGuard’s stockholders for their shares of HaptoGuard;
 
  •  The likelihood that the combined company will have better opportunities for future growth by increasing the number of potential candidates;
 
  •  The ability of HaptoGuard’s stockholders to continue to participate in the growth of the business conducted by Alteon and HaptoGuard after the completion of the merger;
 
  •  The strategic fit between Alteon and HaptoGuard in the cardiovascular and diabetes arenas;
 
  •  The importance of scale in the increasingly competitive market environments in which both Alteon and HaptoGuard operate; and
 
  •  The belief that the combined company will be able to better develop and commercialize its products.
Recommendations to Stockholders
Recommendation of Alteon’s Board of Directors (see page I-     ):
      The Alteon board of directors believes that the terms of the merger are fair to you and in your best interest and recommends that you vote FOR the merger and the merger agreement and the issuance of the shares and the transfer and conversion of shares contemplated thereby, FOR adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of the merger and the merger agreement and the issuance of the shares and the transfer and conversion of shares contemplated thereby, FOR an amendment to the Certificate of Designation of the Series G Preferred Stock, FOR an amendment to the Certificate of Designation of the Series H Preferred Stock, FOR the election of two directors to hold office until the completion of the merger or, in the event the merger is not completed, until the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified and FOR ratification of J.H. Cohn LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Alteon.
Recommendation of HaptoGuard’s Board of Directors (see page I-     ):
      The HaptoGuard board of directors believes that the merger is fair to you and in your best interest and recommends that you vote FOR the adoption of the merger and the merger agreement and FOR adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of adoption of the merger agreement.
Restructuring of Genentech’s Preferred Stock Position in Alteon
      As of March 31, 2006, Genentech owned 1,418.41 shares of Alteon’s Series G Preferred Stock and 4,260.52 shares of Alteon’s Series H Preferred Stock. On the basis of the trading price of Alteon common stock on March 31, 2006, such shares are convertible into 222,702,745.10 shares of common stock of Alteon, which would be approximately 79.3% of the outstanding shares of Alteon common stock as of March 31, 2006.

I-2


Table of Contents

      As part of the merger, Genentech will:
  •  convert a portion of its existing preferred Alteon stock to 13,492,349 shares of Alteon common stock, which number when combined with prior shares owned would represent approximately 11.99% of the combined company after completion of the merger;
 
  •  transfer to HaptoGuard shareholders a portion of Genentech’s preferred stock, which when converted to common stock equals approximately $3.5 million in Alteon common stock;
 
  •  transfer to Alteon the remaining Alteon preferred stock it holds, which will be cancelled;
 
  •  as consideration for the conversion, transfer and cancellation of Alteon preferred stock by Genentech, receive from the combined company certain milestone payments and royalties on net sales of alagebrium, Alteon’s lead compound, as well as a right of first negotiation on ALT-2074, HaptoGuard’s lead compound. This restructuring reduces Genentech’s ownership of Alteon and removes the substantial liquidation preference of Genentech’s stock which we anticipate will remove an impediment to future financings of the combined company.
Risks Relating to the Merger (see page I-     )
      In evaluating the adoption of the merger agreement or the issuance of shares of Alteon in the merger, you should carefully read this Proxy Statement and especially consider the factors discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors,” starting on page I-     , for a description of risks relating to the merger, the combined company’s businesses, and the Alteon common stock.
The Merger Agreement(see page I-     )
      The merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this Proxy Statement. You should read the merger agreement as it is the legal document that governs the merger.
Merger Consideration (see page I-     )
      At the effective time of the merger:
  •  Genentech will convert a portion of the Alteon preferred stock that it holds into shares of Alteon common stock, such that the number of such shares of Alteon common stock to be issued will, when added to the shares of Alteon common stock already owned by Genentech, equal 19.99% of Alteon’s outstanding common stock, as calculated after the conversion of such Alteon preferred stock but prior to (i) the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock in connection with the merger; (ii) the issuance of Alteon common stock and warrants in connection with the $2.6 million financing which occurred immediately after signing of the merger agreement; and (iii) the conversion of Alteon preferred stock to be transferred to HaptoGuard in connection with the merger as described below;
 
  •  Genentech will transfer to HaptoGuard a portion of Alteon preferred stock held by it, in such an amount that will convert to a number of shares of Alteon common stock, in accordance with the terms of Alteon’s certificate of incorporation and the terms of the merger agreement equal in value to $3,500,000 (the value of the price per share of the Alteon common stock being equal to $0.2353, based on the 20-trading day volume-weighted average price of the per share selling prices on the American Stock Exchange for the period immediately preceding the signing of the merger agreement);
 
  •  Genentech will transfer to Alteon all of the remaining shares of Alteon preferred stock held by Genentech which are not either converted or transferred, and such shares of Alteon preferred stock shall be canceled and retired without payment of any consideration therefor other than pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement and cease to be outstanding;
 
  •  every share of HaptoGuard common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger (other than the dissenting shares) shall be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of Alteon common stock equal to the quotient of (i) the sum of (x) a number of

I-3


Table of Contents

  shares of Alteon common stock to be issued by Alteon to HaptoGuard stockholders at the effective time with a value of $5.3 million, which we refer to as the Alteon Shares, plus (y) the number of shares of Alteon common stock to be issued pursuant to the transfer of shares by Genentech to HaptoGuard as noted above, the market value of (x) and (y) to be equal to $8,800,000, divided by (ii) the sum of (x) the number of outstanding shares of HaptoGuard common stock at the effective time, and (y) the number of Share Equivalents (as defined below). This quotient is referred to as the exchange ratio; and
 
  •  each share of HaptoGuard common stock held in the treasury of HaptoGuard and each share of HaptoGuard common stock owned by Alteon or by any direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of HaptoGuard or Alteon immediately prior to the effective time shall, by virtue of the merger and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, cease to be outstanding, be canceled and retired without payment of any consideration therefor other than pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement and cease to exist.
      In consideration of the conversion, transfer and cancellation of shares by Genentech, Genentech will receive from the combined company certain milestone payments and royalties on net sales of alagebrium, Alteon’s lead compound, as well as a right of first negotiation on ALT-2074, HaptoGuard’s lead compound.
      Alteon will assume each outstanding vested or unvested option to purchase HaptoGuard common stock, which:
  •  will be exercisable following the merger for the number of shares of Alteon common stock that is equal to the product of the number of shares of HaptoGuard common stock that were purchasable under such option immediately prior to the effective time of the merger multiplied by the exchange ratio (rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of Alteon common stock) and
 
  •  the per share exercise price for the shares of Alteon common stock issuable upon exercise of such assumed option will be equal to the quotient determined by dividing the exercise price per share of HaptoGuard common stock at which such option was exercisable immediately prior to the effective time of the merger by the exchange ratio (and rounding the resulting exercise price up to the nearest whole cent).
      All outstanding warrants to purchase HaptoGuard common stock will be exchanged for the right to receive a number of shares of Alteon common stock (“Share Equivalents”) at the effective time of the merger which will have a market value equal to the difference between:
  •  the market value of the product of the number of shares of HaptoGuard common stock that were purchasable under such warrants immediately prior to the Effective Time multiplied by the Exchange Ratio (rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of Alteon Common Stock) and
 
  •  the total exercise price of such warrant.
Listing of Alteon Common Stock (see page I-     )
      The shares of Alteon common stock to be issued in the merger will be listed on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “ALT.”
Ownership of Alteon After the Merger (see page I-     )
      It is presently expected that HaptoGuard stockholders and warrant holders will receive an aggregate of 37,399,065 shares of Alteon common stock. The aggregate number of shares of Alteon common stock to be issued and transferred for the outstanding HaptoGuard common stock and outstanding warrants will not be adjusted based upon changes in the value of these shares. It is presently expected that each holder of a HaptoGuard common share would receive 3,521 shares of Alteon common stock. The exchange ratio is subject to adjustment depending upon the number of outstanding shares and warrants to purchase HaptoGuard common stock at the effective time of the merger.

I-4


Table of Contents

      Based upon the outstanding shares of Alteon common stock on                     , 2006 and HaptoGuard’s outstanding shares of common stock and warrants on                     , 2006, HaptoGuard stockholders will own approximately 31.37% of Alteon’s outstanding common stock after we complete the merger. Based upon the fully-diluted capitalization of Alteon and HaptoGuard on                     , 2006, immediately following the completion of the merger, HaptoGuard security holders would own approximately 28.93% of the combined company assuming (i) shares of Alteon common stock outstanding following the cash exercise of all outstanding Alteon warrants and stock options and (ii) shares of Alteon common stock outstanding following the cash exercise of all HaptoGuard stock options assumed by Alteon at the closing of the merger. Genentech, Inc., an Alteon stockholder and party to the merger agreement, would own approximately 11.99% of the combined company after the merger.
Vote Necessary to Approve Alteon and HaptoGuard Proposals (see page II-     )
      For Alteon stockholders: Directors are elected by a plurality vote, which means that the two nominees receiving the most votes will be elected to fill the seats on the Board. The amendment of Alteon’s Certificates of Designation of the Series G Preferred Stock and the Series H Preferred Stock must be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock and the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Series G Preferred Stock and Series H Preferred Stock, respectively. All of the other actions to be considered at the meeting, including an adjournment, may be taken upon the favorable vote of a majority of the votes present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting.
      For HaptoGuard stockholders: Adoption of the merger agreement requires the vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of HaptoGuard common stock voting as a single class. Approval of the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient voted in favor of adoption of the merger agreement requires the vote of a majority of the votes cast.
Voting Agreements (see page I-     )
      All executive officers and directors of HaptoGuard, together with their affiliates, own as a group approximately 53% of the shares of HaptoGuard common stock entitled to vote to adopt the merger agreement. A vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of HaptoGuard common stock is required to adopt the merger agreement.
      The Chief Executive Officer of HaptoGuard, Dr. Noah Berkowitz, and a family trust for the benefit of certain members of his family, together representing approximately 41% of HaptoGuard outstanding common stock, have entered into voting agreements with Alteon, under which these persons have agreed to vote their shares of HaptoGuard common stock:
  •  in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement,
 
  •  against any action or agreement that would reasonably be expected to compete with, prevent, impede, interfere with, attempt to discourage the Merger or inhibit the timely consummation of the Merger,
 
  •  against any action or agreement that, to such stockholder’s knowledge, would result in a breach in any material respect of any covenant, representation or warranty or any other obligation of the Company under the Merger Agreement, and
 
  •  except for the merger and the merger agreement, against any merger, consolidation, business combination, reorganization, recapitalization, liquidation or sale or transfer of any material assets of HaptoGuard.
Appraisal Rights (see page I-     )
      The holders of Alteon common stock do not have any right to an appraisal of the value of their shares in connection with the merger under Delaware law. The holders of HaptoGuard common stock do have a right to

I-5


Table of Contents

an appraisal of the value of their shares in connection with the merger if they do not vote for the merger and if they follow certain procedures outlined on page I-     .
New Directors Following the Merger (see page I-     )
      Upon completion of the merger, the Alteon board of directors will consist of eight members, including four of the current Alteon directors which shall initially consist of Kenneth I. Moch, Thomas Moore, Marilyn Breslow, and George M. Naimark, plus three nominees of HaptoGuard which shall initially consist of Noah Berkowitz, Wayne Yetter and Mary Tanner and one independent member to be designated by the board, who may be appointed to the board after the completion of the merger. In the event that the merger is not completed, Alteon will reevaluate the composition of its board of directors.
Interest of Certain Persons in the Merger (see page I-     )
      When you consider the recommendations of the Alteon board of directors that the Alteon stockholders vote in favor of the merger and the merger agreement and the issuance of shares and the transfer and conversion of shares contemplated thereby and the HaptoGuard board of directors that the HaptoGuard stockholders adopt the merger agreement you should be aware that certain Alteon directors and members of the management and certain HaptoGuard directors and members of management may have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of Alteon or HaptoGuard stockholders.
Treatment of HaptoGuard Stock Options and Warrants (see page I-     )
      Alteon will assume each outstanding vested or unvested option to purchase HaptoGuard common stock, which will be exercisable following the merger for a number of shares of Alteon common stock that is equal to the product of the number of shares of HaptoGuard common stock that were purchasable under such option immediately prior to the effective time of the merger multiplied by the exchange ratio (rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of common stock) and the per share exercise price for the shares of Alteon common stock issuable upon exercise of such assumed option will be equal to the quotient determined by dividing the exercise price per share of HaptoGuard common stock at which such option was exercisable immediately prior to the effective time of the merger by the exchange ratio (and rounding the resulting exercise price up to the nearest whole cent). All outstanding warrants to purchase HaptoGuard common stock will be exchanged for the right to receive a number of shares of Alteon common stock at the effective time of the merger which will have a market value equal to the difference between (i) the market value of the product of the number of shares of HaptoGuard common stock that were purchasable under such warrants immediately prior to the effective time of the merger multiplied by the exchange ratio (rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of Alteon common stock) and (ii) the total exercise price of such warrant.
Accounting Treatment (see page I-     )
      The merger will be accounted for as a purchase by Alteon under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets and liabilities of HaptoGuard will be recorded, as of the completion of the merger, at their respective fair values and added to those of Alteon. The reported financial condition and results of operations of Alteon issued after completion of the merger will reflect HaptoGuard’s balances and results after completion of the merger, but will not be restated retroactively to reflect the historical financial position or results of operations of HaptoGuard. Following the completion of the merger, the net loss and balance sheet of the combined company will reflect purchase accounting adjustments, including a one-time in-process research and development charge.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger (see page I-     )
      The companies expect the merger to be treated as a tax-free reorganization pursuant to Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. If the merger is treated as a tax-free reorganization, generally the stockholders of HaptoGuard, for federal income tax purposes, will recognize no gain or loss upon their receipt of Alteon common stock, except with respect to cash received by HaptoGuard

I-6


Table of Contents

stockholders instead of fractional shares of Alteon common stock, or upon exercise of their dissenters’ rights. A HaptoGuard stockholder who receives cash in lieu of fractional shares will generally recognize capital gain or loss based on the difference between the amount of the cash received and the HaptoGuard stockholder’s aggregate adjusted tax basis in the HaptoGuard stock surrendered. Tax matters are very complicated, and the tax consequences of the merger to each HaptoGuard stockholder will depend on the facts of that stockholder’s particular situation. You are urged to consult your own tax advisors regarding the specific tax consequences of the merger, including tax return reporting requirements, the applicability of federal, state, local and foreign tax laws and the effect of any proposed changes in the tax laws.
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger (see page I-     )
      The completion of the merger depends upon the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions, including the following:
  •  approval and adoption of the merger agreement and issuance of shares pursuant to the merger agreement by the Alteon and HaptoGuard stockholders; and
 
  •  absence of all legal prohibition on completion of the merger.
      In addition, HaptoGuard’s obligation to complete the merger is subject to, among other things, the following conditions:
  •  accuracy as of closing of the representations and warranties made by Alteon to the extent specified in the merger agreement;
 
  •  assumption by Alteon of all outstanding vested and unvested options to purchase HaptoGuard common stock;
 
  •  adoption of an employment agreement for Dr. Berkowitz in form and substance reasonably identical to the proposed employment agreement Dr. Berkowitz would have received from HaptoGuard in the event of an acquisition transaction involving HaptoGuard (where HaptoGuard remains the controlling entity); and
 
  •  performance by Alteon of the obligations required to be performed by it at or prior to closing to the extent specified in the merger agreement.
      In addition, Alteon’s obligation to complete the merger is subject to, among other things, the following conditions:
  •  accuracy as of closing of the representations and warranties made by HaptoGuard to the extent specified in the merger agreement;
 
  •  performance by HaptoGuard of the obligations required to be performed by it at or prior to closing to the extent specified in the merger agreement; and
 
  •  HaptoGuard shall have received all consents and approvals to the merger, if any, under certain material agreements, and such agreements shall be in full force and effect.
      In addition, Genentech’s obligation to consummate the transaction contemplated by the merger agreement is subject to, among other things, the following conditions:
  •  Alteon shall have filed an amendment to its Certificate of Designations of its Series G Preferred Stock and Series H Preferred Stock as described herein;
 
  •  the shares of Alteon common stock issuable to Genentech upon conversion of the shares of Series G Preferred Stock and Series H Preferred Stock held by Genentech shall have been approved for listing on the American Stock Exchange;
 
  •  accuracy as of closing of the representations and warranties made by Alteon and HaptoGuard to the extent specified in the merger agreement; and

I-7


Table of Contents

  •  performance by Alteon and HaptoGuard of the obligations required to be performed by it at or prior to closing to the extent specified in the merger agreement except as would not have a material adverse effect on such party.
Regulatory Approvals (see page I-     )
      Neither Alteon nor HaptoGuard is aware of any government regulatory approval required to be obtained with respect to the consummation of the merger, except for the filing of a Certificate of Designations with respect to the Series G Preferred Stock and the Series H Preferred Stock and a certificate of merger with the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, and compliance with all applicable state securities laws regarding the offering and issuance of the merger shares.
Interim Payments to HaptoGuard (see page I-     )
      In order to allow HaptoGuard to continue its clinical development programs and in consideration for HaptoGuard’s agreement to provide Dr. Berkowitz and Dr. Malcolm MacNab, HaptoGuard’s Chief Medical Officer, to provide advice and counsel to Alteon during the period from the signing of the merger agreement to the effective time of the merger with respect to the clinical development of alagebrium, Alteon agreed to pay HaptoGuard an amount equal to $140,000 per month, subject to adjustment by agreement upon any material changes in personnel or clinical development programs, to be applied by HaptoGuard to payment of salaries and existing clinical development programs or additional programs as may be agreed upon by such parties going forward.
      In consideration of HaptoGuard’s agreement to provide advice and counsel to Alteon with respect to the corporate and scientific development of certain Alteon technology for the period from January 1, 2006 through the effective time of the merger, as described in a consulting agreement between Alteon and HaptoGuard, Alteon agreed to pay HaptoGuard an amount equal to $125,000 to be applied by HaptoGuard to payment of salaries and existing clinical development programs, or additional programs as agreed upon by such parties going forward.
Termination of the Merger Agreement (see page I-     )
      The merger agreement may be terminated by mutual written consent of Alteon and HaptoGuard.
      The merger agreement may be terminated by either Alteon or HaptoGuard if:
      (1) subject to certain exceptions set forth in the merger agreement, the merger has not been completed by August 30, 2006, provided that the party terminating may not be the party whose conduct was responsible for the failure of the merger to occur before such date;
      (2) Alteon or HaptoGuard stockholders fail to approve the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock or adopt the merger agreement, respectively, at a duly held meeting, provided that the party terminating may not be the party whose conduct was responsible for the failure to receive such vote;
      (3) certain breaches of covenants of the other party, respectively; or
      (4) if any representation or warranty of the other party or Genentech proves to be untrue prior to the effective time of the merger, if such failure to be true would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect, as defined in the merger agreement, if the terminating party is not in material breach of any of its obligation under the merger agreement and such representation or warranty is not made true within ten (10) business days of the date such representation or warranty became untrue.
      The merger agreement may be terminated by either Alteon, HaptoGuard or Genentech if there is a permanent legal prohibition, restraint or injunction to closing the merger.
      In addition, the merger agreement may be terminated by Genentech if:
      (1) it is not in material breach of any of its obligations under the merger agreement, if any representation or warranty of Alteon or HaptoGuard set forth in the merger agreement proved to have been untrue prior to

I-8


Table of Contents

the effective time of the merger, if such failure to be true would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect as defined in the merger agreement and such representation or warranty is not made true within ten (10) business days of the date such representation or warranty became untrue; or
      (2) upon a breach of any covenant or agreement on the part of HaptoGuard or Alteon set forth in the merger agreement, in either case, such that any of Genentech’s conditions to consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement would not be satisfied, provided that, if such breach is curable prior to the expiration of ten (10) days from its occurrence by Alteon or HaptoGuard, as the case may be, through the exercise of its commercially reasonable efforts and for so long as Alteon or HaptoGuard, as the case may be, continues to exercise such commercially reasonable efforts, Genentech may not terminate unless such 10-day period expires without such breach having been cured.
Termination Fees (see page I-     )
      HaptoGuard shall pay Alteon (x) a fee of $440,000 and (y) the amount of any interim payments made by Alteon to HaptoGuard pursuant to the merger agreement for payment of salaries and existing clinical development programs (other than those made pursuant to the consulting agreement), upon the termination of the merger agreement by Alteon:
  •  in the event of the failure to receive HaptoGuard stockholder approval of the merger agreement;
 
  •  upon breach of any of HaptoGuard’s covenants or agreements but only with respect to a termination for a breach of any material covenant or agreement, (provided that at the time of such termination Alteon is not in material breach of any of the covenants or agreements set forth in the merger agreement that are applicable to Alteon); or
 
  •  if any representation or warranty of HaptoGuard proves to be untrue prior to the effective time of the merger, if such failure to be true would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect, as defined in the merger agreement, if Alteon is not in material breach of any of its obligation under the merger agreement and such representation or warranty is not made true within ten (10) business days of the date such representation or warranty became untrue.
      Alteon shall pay HaptoGuard a fee of $440,000 upon the termination of the merger agreement by HaptoGuard:
  •  in the event of the failure to receive Alteon stockholder approval of the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock or adoption of the merger agreement;
 
  •  upon breach of any of Alteon’s covenants or agreements but only with respect to a termination for a breach of any material covenant or agreement, (provided that at the time of such termination HaptoGuard is not in material breach of any of the covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement that are applicable to HaptoGuard); or
 
  •  if any representation or warranty of Alteon proves to be untrue prior to the effective time of the merger, if such failure to be true would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect, as defined in the merger agreement, if HaptoGuard is not in material breach of any of its obligation under the merger agreement and such representation or warranty is not made true within ten (10) business days of the date such representation or warranty became untrue.
Approval of Amendment to the Certificates of Designations
      In order to effect the conversion of shares contemplated by the merger agreement, the Alteon stockholders will be asked to approve the amendments to the Certificates of Designations of the Series G Preferred Stock and the Series H Preferred Stock. The amendments, among other related technical changes, change the written notice requirements to Alteon for conversion of the preferred stock and the limitations on the amount of preferred stock that may be converted in order to allow for the conversion pursuant to the merger agreement.

I-9


Table of Contents

Other Alteon Annual Meeting Matters
      As this will be the annual meeting of Alteon stockholders, Alteon stockholders will also be asked to elect two directors, ratify the selection of J.H. Cohn LLP as Alteon’s independent registered public accounting firm, and conduct other business if properly presented.

I-10


Table of Contents

SELECTED HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA
How the Financial Statements Were Prepared
      Alteon is providing the following information to aid you in your analysis of the financial aspects of the merger. Alteon derived this information from the audited financial statements of Alteon as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, the unaudited financial statements of Alteon as of March 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the three months then ended, the audited financial statements of HaptoGuard as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the year ended December 31, 2005, and the period of July 19, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004 and the unaudited financial statements of HaptoGuard as of March 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the three months then ended. This information is only a summary and you should read it together with Alteon’s and HaptoGuard’s historical financial statements and related notes attached to this Proxy Statement. See Alteon Financial Statement and Annex G attached to this Proxy Statement.
Accounting Treatment
      The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations and pro forma condensed combined balance sheet were prepared by combining the historical amounts of each company in addition to pro forma adjustments due to the merger. The companies may have performed differently had they always been combined. You should not rely on the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information as being indicative of the historical results that Alteon would have had or the future results that Alteon will experience after the merger. See “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements” on page I -     .
Merger-Related Expenses
      Alteon estimates that merger-related fees and expenses, consisting primarily of SEC filing fees, fees and expenses of investment bankers, attorneys and accountants, and financial printing and other related charges, will be approximately $800,000 (for Alteon and HaptoGuard in the aggregate) for the merger. See note (iv) on page I-97 and note (4) on page I-     .
Periods Covered
      The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of March 31, 2006 gives effect to Alteon’s merger with HaptoGuard as if the transaction had occurred on that date. The pro forma condensed combined balance sheet is based on the historical balance sheets of Alteon and HaptoGuard as of March 31, 2006, in addition to the pro forma adjustments due to the merger. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and for the year ended December 31, 2005 give effect to Alteon’s merger with HaptoGuard as if it had occurred on January 1, 2005.
Selected Historical Financial Data of Alteon
      The following selected historical financial data has been derived from Alteon’s financial statements. This information is only a summary and should be read together with Alteon’s historical financial statements and related notes attached to this Proxy Statement.

I-11


Table of Contents

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA FOR ALTEON AND HAPTOGUARD
Selected Historical Financial Data of Alteon Inc.
      The following selected historical financial data as of and for each of the fiscal years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2005 and as of and for each of the three month periods ending March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006 has been derived from Atleon’s audited financial statements and the unaudited financial statements of Alteon as of March 31, 2006 and 2005. This information is only a summary and should be read together with Alteons’s historical financial statements and related notes attached to this Proxy Statement.
                                                         
    Three Months    
    Ended March 31,   Years Ended December 31,
         
    2006   2005   2005   2004   2003   2002   2001
                             
            (In thousands, except per share data)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Income
  $ 60     $ 99     $ 458     $ 334     $ 179     $ 410     $ 452  
Loss before income tax benefit
    (1,621 )     (4,741 )     (12,941 )     (14,345 )     (14,797 )     (17,528 )     (12,770 )
Preferred stock dividends
    1,175       1,072       4,486       4,135       3,791       3,485       3,204  
Net loss applicable to common stockholders
  $ (2,797 )   $ (5,714 )   $ (17,100 )   $ (18,094 )   $ (18,243 )   $ (20,366 )   $ (14,997 )
Basic/diluted net loss per share applicable to common stockholders
  $ (0.05 )   $ (0.10 )   $ (0.30 )   $ (0.41 )   $ (0.50 )   $ (0.64 )   $ (0.61 )
Weighted average common shares used in computing basic/diluted net loss per share
    57,997       56,547       57,639       44,349       36,190       31,793       24,556  
                                                         
    Three Months Ended    
    March 31,   As of December 31,
         
    2006   2005   2005   2004   2003   2002   2001
                             
            (In thousands, except per share data)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
  $ 4,469     $ 6,583     $ 6,583     $ 11,176     $ 16,679     $ 17,439     $ 10,726  
Working capital
    3,756       13,712       5,657       8,740       15,033       13,786       9,758  
Total assets
    5,157       7,134       7,134       11,642       17,255       18,099       13,233  
Accumulated deficit
    (225,610 )     (222,813 )     (222,813 )     (205,713 )     (187,619 )     (169,376 )     (149,009 )
Total stockholders’ equity
    4,370       5,992       5,992       9,047       15,384       14,303       10,871  

I-12


Table of Contents

Selected Historical Financial Data of HaptoGuard Inc.
      The following selected historical financial data as of and for the Period from July 19, 2004 (Inception) to December 31, 2005 and as of and for each of the three month periods ending March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006, has been derived from HaptoGuard’s audited financial statements and the unaudited financial statements of HaptoGuard as of March 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the three months then ended. This information is only a summary and should be read together with HaptoGuard’s historical financial statements and related notes attached as an annex to this Proxy Statement. See Annex G.
                         
            For the Period
    For the   For the   from July 19, 2004
    Three Months Ended   Year Ended   (Inception) to
    March 31,   December 31,   December 31,
    2006   2005   2004
             
    (In thousands, except per share data)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Income
  $ 2     $ 10     $ 3  
Net loss
  $ (651 )   $ (1,655 )   $ (771 )
                         
    As of
     
    March 31,   December 31,   December 31,
    2006   2005   2004
             
    (In thousands, except per share data)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA
Cash and cash equivalents
    3       101       582  
Working capital
    (238 )     (267 )     39  
Total assets
    33       115       587  
Accumulated deficit
    (3,076 )     (2,425 )     (771 )
Total stockholders’ equity
    (210 )     (259 )     40  
Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data of Alteon and HaptoGuard
      The following selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data has been derived from and should be read with the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements and related notes on pages I-     through I-     . This information is based on the historical combined balance sheets and related historical combined statements of operations of Alteon and HaptoGuard giving effect to the proposed merger. The proposed merger will be accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and is presented below as if the merger had been completed on January 1, 2005 (the first day of Alteon’s fiscal year) for income statement purposes, and on March 31, 2006 for balance sheet purposes. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data is based on the estimates and assumptions set forth in the notes to such statements, which are preliminary and have been made solely for the purposes of developing such pro forma information. This information is for illustrative purposes only. The companies may have performed differently had they always been combined. You should not rely on the selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data as being indicative of the historical results that would have been achieved had the companies always been combined or the future results that the combined company will experience after the merger.

I-13


Table of Contents

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA FOR ALTEON
Selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined Financial Data of Alteon Inc.
                 
    Three Months Ended   Year Ended
    March 31, 2006   December 31, 2005
         
    (In thousands,   (In thousands,
    except per share   except per share
    data)   data)
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Income
  $ 62     $ 468  
Loss before income tax benefit
  $ (2,273 )   $ (14,596 )
Net loss applicable to common stockholders
  $ (2,273 )   $ (14,270 )
Basic/diluted net loss per share applicable to common stockholders
  $ (0.02 )   $ (0.12 )
Weighted average common shares used in computing basic/diluted net loss per share
    119,848,525       119,491,069  
         
    As of March 31, 2006
     
    (In thousands)
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET DATA
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 6,972  
Working capital
  $ 5,642  
Total assets
  $ 7,266  
Accumulated deficit
  $ (235,738 )
Total stockholders’ equity
  $ 5,862  

I-14


Table of Contents

COMPARATIVE PER SHARE BOOK VALUE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
Comparative Per Share Data
      Alteon Inc. is providing the following comparative per share information to aid you in your analysis of the financial aspects of the merger. You should read this information in conjunction with the historical financial statements and pro forma combined financial statements of Alteon Inc. and HaptoGuard, Inc. and the related notes that are included and incorporated elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. The pro forma combined per share data presented below reflects the purchase method of accounting in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations.” The pro forma per share data is not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred, your financial interest in such results, or the future results that will occur after the merger. Both Alteon Inc’s. and HaptoGuard, Inc’s latest fiscal year ended on December 31, 2005.
      The historical book value per share is computed by dividing total stockholders’ equity by the number of common shares outstanding at the end of the period. The pro forma net loss per share is computed by dividing the pro forma net loss by the pro forma weighted average number of shares outstanding. The pro forma combined book value per share is computed by dividing total pro forma stockholders’ equity by the pro forma number of common shares outstanding at the end of the period.
                 
    Year Ended
     
    March 31,   December 31,
    2006   2005
         
Alteon Inc. — Historical per share:
               
Basic and diluted net loss per common share
  $ (0.05 )   $ (0.30 )
Book value per share
  $ 0.08     $ 0.10  
HaptoGuard, Inc. — Historical per share:
               
Basic and diluted net loss per common share
  $ (62.17 )   $ (171.13 )
Book value per share
  $ (20.03 )   $ (26.82 )
Pro forma — Combined Alteon Inc. per share:
               
Basic and diluted net loss per common share
  $ (0.02 )   $ (0.12 )
Book value per share
  $ 0.05          
      Alteon and HaptoGuard have never paid cash dividends. If the merger is not consummated, the boards of directors of Alteon and HaptoGuard presently intend to continue a policy of retaining all earnings to finance the expansion of the companies’ respective businesses. Following the merger, it is expected that the board of directors of Alteon will continue the policy of not paying cash dividends in order to retain earnings for reinvestment in the business of the combined companies.

I-15


Table of Contents

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
Q:     Why are we proposing the merger?
A: We are proposing the merger because, among other things, we believe that combining the products and technologies of the two companies will enhance the combined companies’ ability to raise capital to continue its product development, and offer a broader range of products, which could result in an increase in stockholder value. For a full discussion of our reasons for the merger, we urge you to read the sections entitled “The Merger Transaction — Factors Considered by, and Recommendation of, the Alteon Board of Directors” beginning on page I-     .
Q:     What will happen in the merger?
A: In the merger, HaptoGuard will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alteon. Based upon the outstanding shares of Alteon common stock on                     , 2006 and HaptoGuard’s outstanding shares of common stock and warrants on                     , 2006, immediately following the completion of the merger, HaptoGuard stockholders will own approximately 31.37% of Alteon’s then outstanding common stock. Based upon the fully-diluted capitalization of Alteon and HaptoGuard on                     , 2006, immediately following the completion of the merger, HaptoGuard security holders would own approximately 28.93% of the combined company assuming (i) shares of Alteon common stock outstanding following the cash exercise of all outstanding Alteon warrants and stock options and (ii) shares of Alteon common stock outstanding following the cash exercise of all HaptoGuard stock options assumed by Alteon at the closing of the merger. Genentech, Inc., an Alteon stockholder and party to the merger agreement, would own approximately 11.99% of the combined company after the merger.
Q:     What will the HaptoGuard stockholders and warrant holders receive in the merger?
A: We currently estimate that HaptoGuard stockholders and warrant holders will receive an aggregate of 37,399,065 shares of Alteon common stock. The aggregate number of shares of Alteon common stock to be issued for the outstanding HaptoGuard common stock and outstanding warrants will not be adjusted based upon changes in the value of these shares. It is presently expected that each holder of a HaptoGuard common share would receive 3,521 shares of Alteon common stock. The exchange ratios are subject to adjustment depending upon the number of outstanding shares and warrants to purchase HaptoGuard common stock at the effective time of the merger. For a more detailed discussion of the exchange ratios, see “The Merger — The Merger Agreement — Merger Consideration” on page I-     . As a result, the exact number of shares of Alteon common stock that HaptoGuard security holders will receive in the merger will not be known until immediately prior to the completion of the merger. Moreover, the value of these shares and warrants will go up or down as the market price of Alteon common stock goes up or down. Neither party will be permitted to terminate its obligations to complete the merger or fail to solicit the vote of its stockholders based solely on changes in stock valuation of either party.
Q:     When and where are the stockholder meetings?
A: The Alteon annual meeting will take place on                     , 2006 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time at The Hanover Marriott, 1401 Route 10 East, Whippany, New Jersey 07981.
      The HaptoGuard special meeting will take place on                     , 2006 at [          ].
Q:     Do the board of directors of Alteon and HaptoGuard recommend voting in favor of the merger?
A: Yes, after careful consideration, Alteon’s board of directors, by unanimous vote of those directors voting on such matters, has determined the merger to be fair to Alteon stockholders and in their best interests and declared the merger advisable. Alteon’s board of directors approved the merger agreement and recommends that Alteon stockholders approve the merger and merger agreement and the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock and the transfer and conversion of shares of Alteon common stock

I-16


Table of Contents

contemplated thereby. In considering the recommendation of the Alteon board of directors with respect to the merger agreement, Alteon stockholders should be aware that certain directors of Alteon have certain interests in the merger that are different from, or are in addition to, the interests of Alteon stockholders generally. We encourage you to read the section titled “Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger” at page I-                        for a discussion of these interests.
  After careful consideration, HaptoGuard’s board of directors has determined, by unanimous vote of those directors voting on such matters, the merger to be fair to HaptoGuard stockholders and in their best interests and declared the merger advisable. HaptoGuard’s board of directors approved the merger agreement and recommends the adoption of the merger agreement by HaptoGuard stockholders. In considering the recommendation of the HaptoGuard board of directors with respect to the merger agreement, HaptoGuard stockholders should be aware that certain directors and officers of HaptoGuard have certain interests in the merger that are different from, or are in addition to, the interests of HaptoGuard stockholders generally. We encourage you to read the section titled “Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger” at page I-     for a discussion of these interests.
Q:     Who Can Vote?
A: Only stockholders who own Alteon common stock at the close of business on [                    ] are entitled to vote at the Alteon annual meeting. On this record date, there were [                    ] shares of Alteon common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of stock of common stock is entitled to one vote on any matter presented at the meeting. Alteon common stock is its only class of voting stock.
  Only stockholders who own HaptoGuard common stock at the close of business on [                    ] are entitled to vote at the HaptoGuard annual meeting. On this record date, there were [                    ] shares of HaptoGuard common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of stock of common stock is entitled to one vote on any matter presented at the meeting. HaptoGuard common stock is its only class of voting stock.
Q:     How do I vote?
A: You may vote by mail by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and returning it in the enclosed, postage-paid and addressed envelope. If you mark your voting instructions on the proxy card, your shares will be voted:
  •  as you instruct, and
 
  •  according to the best judgment of the proxy holders if a proposal comes up for a vote at the annual meeting that is not on the proxy card.
  If you return a signed card, but do not provide voting instructions, your shares will be voted:
  •  if you are an Alteon stockholder, FOR the merger and merger agreement and the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock and the transfer and conversion of shares of Alteon common stock contemplated thereby, FOR the amendment to Alteon’s Certificate of Designation of Series G Preferred Stock, FOR the amendment to Alteon’s Certificate of Designation of Series H Preferred Stock, FOR the election of two directors to hold office until the completion of the merger or, in the event the merger is not completed, until the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified, FOR the ratification of J.H. Cohn LLP as Alteon’s independent registered public accounting firm and FOR any proposal by the Alteon board of directors to adjourn the meeting;
 
  •  if you are a HaptoGuard stockholder, FOR the adoption of the merger and the merger agreement and FOR adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of adoption of the merger agreement; and
 
  •  according to the best judgment of the proxy holders if a proposal comes up for a vote at the annual or special meeting that is not on the proxy card or for the adjournment or postponement of the special meeting.

I-17


Table of Contents

  If you are a stockholder of record of Alteon, you may also vote by telephone at the toll-free number 1-800-PROXIES or on the Internet at www.voteproxy.com. If you are a beneficial owner of Alteon, you may be able to vote electronically as well, if your proxy card or voting instruction form so indicates. See the instructions on your proxy card or voting instruction form. You are strongly encouraged to vote electronically if you are given that option.
Q:     What do I do if I want to change my vote?
A: Just send in a later-dated, signed proxy or proxy card to your company’s Secretary before your meeting. Or, you can attend your meeting in person and vote. You may also revoke your proxy by sending a notice of revocation to your company’s Secretary at the address under “The Companies” on page I-     . If you voted by the Internet or telephone, you can submit a later vote using those same methods.
Q: If my shares are held in “street name” by my broker, bank or other nominee, will my broker, bank or other nominee vote my shares for me?
A: If you do not provide your broker, bank or nominee with instructions on how to vote your “street name” shares, your broker, bank or nominee will not be permitted to vote them on the matters that are to be considered by the Alteon stockholders and the HaptoGuard stockholders at their respective meetings relating to the merger. You should therefore be sure to provide your broker with instructions on how to vote your shares.
  If you wish to vote your shares in person, you must bring to the meeting a letter from the broker, bank or nominee confirming your beneficial ownership in the shares to be voted.
Q:     What happens if I do not return a proxy card or otherwise provide proxy instructions?
A: If you are a Alteon stockholder the failure to return your proxy card or otherwise provide proxy instructions could be a factor in establishing a quorum for the annual meeting of Alteon stockholders for purposes of approving the merger and merger agreement and the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock and the transfer and conversion of shares of Alteon common stock contemplated thereby, which is required to transact business at the meeting.
  If you are a HaptoGuard stockholder, the failure to return your proxy card or otherwise provide proxy instructions will have the same effect as voting against the adoption of the merger agreement and could be a factor in establishing a quorum for the special meeting of HaptoGuard stockholders, which is required to transact business at the meeting.
Q:     What are the costs of soliciting these proxies?
A: Alteon will pay all of the costs of soliciting its proxies. Alteon directors and employees may solicit proxies in person or by telephone, fax or e-mail. Alteon will pay these employees and directors no additional compensation for these services. Alteon will ask banks, brokers and other institutions, nominees and fiduciaries to forward these proxy materials to their principals and to obtain authority to execute proxies. Alteon will then reimburse them for their expenses.
  HaptoGuard will pay all of the costs of soliciting its proxies. HaptoGuard directors and employees may solicit proxies in person or by telephone, fax or e-mail. HaptoGuard will not pay these employees additional compensation for these services.
Q:     What Constitutes a Quorum at the Meeting?
A: The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Alteon’s common stock is necessary to constitute a quorum at the meeting. Votes of stockholders of record who are present at the meeting in person or by proxy, abstentions, and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists.

I-18


Table of Contents

  The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of HaptoGuard’s common stock is necessary to constitute a quorum at the meeting. Votes of stockholders of record who are present at the meeting in person or by proxy, abstentions, and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists.
Q:     When do you expect the merger to be completed?
A: We are working towards completing the merger as quickly as possible. We hope to complete the merger by                     , 2006. However, the exact timing of completion of the merger cannot be determined yet because completion of the merger is subject to a number of conditions.
Q: How many authorized but unissued shares of Alteon common stock will exist after the closing of the merger?
A: Following the closing of the merger, we anticipate that there will be approximately 180,000,000 shares of authorized but unissued Alteon common stock. In addition, Alteon will be required to have reserved for future issuance following the merger approximately 22,000,000 shares, including approximately 18,600,000 shares pursuant to the exercise and/or issuance of Alteon common stock as a result of outstanding Alteon stock options and warrants and approximately 3,400,000 shares for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding HaptoGuard options and warrants to be assumed in connection with the merger.
Q:     What are the federal income tax consequences of the merger?
A: The companies expect the merger to be treated as a tax-free reorganization pursuant to Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. If the merger is treated as a tax-free reorganization, generally the stockholders of HaptoGuard, for federal income tax purposes, will recognize no gain or loss upon their receipt of Alteon common stock to purchase Alteon common stock in the merger, except with respect to cash received by HaptoGuard stockholders instead of fractional shares of Alteon common stock or upon exercise of their dissenters’ rights. A HaptoGuard stockholder who receives cash in lieu of fractional shares will generally recognize capital gain or loss based on the difference between the amount of the cash received and the HaptoGuard stockholder’s aggregate adjusted tax basis in the HaptoGuard stock surrendered.
  Tax matters are very complicated, and the tax consequences of the merger to each HaptoGuard stockholder will depend on the facts of that stockholder’s particular situation. See “— The Merger Transaction — Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on page I-     .
Q:     Who do I call if I have questions about the meetings or the merger?
A: Alteon stockholders may call Alteon Investor Relations at 201-934-5000. HaptoGuard stockholders may call 201-947-1270.

I-19


Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS
      You should consider the following risk factors in determining how to vote at your stockholders’ meeting.
      This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or the future financial performance of Alteon and HaptoGuard. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimated”, “predicts”, “potential”, or “continue” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. These statements only reflect management’s expectations and estimates. Actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating these statements, you should specifically consider various factors, including the risks outlined below. The risks described below are the risks that Alteon and HaptoGuard believe to be the most significant to the merger, the business of the combined company, and Alteon common stock at this time. These factors may cause Alteon’s actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements. Alteon and HaptoGuard are not undertaking any obligations to update any forward-looking statements contained in this Proxy Statement to reflect any future events or developments.
      The following factors should be considered carefully by HaptoGuard stockholders in evaluating whether to adopt the merger agreement and by Alteon stockholders in evaluating whether to approve the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock in the merger. These factors should be considered in conjunction with any other information included or incorporated by reference herein, including in conjunction with forward-looking statements made herein. See “Chapter Eight — Additional Information for Stockholders — Where You Can Find More Information” on page VIII-     .
Risks Relating to the Merger
Alteon’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on future financing.
      J.H. Cohn LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has included an explanatory paragraph in its report on our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, which expresses substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The inclusion of a going concern explanatory paragraph in J.H. Cohn LLP’s report on our financial statements could have a detrimental effect on our stock price and our ability to raise additional capital, either alone or as a combined company.
      Our financial statements have been prepared on the basis of a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have not made any adjustments to the financial statements as a result of the outcome of the uncertainty described above. Accordingly, the value of the combined company in liquidation may be different from the values set forth in our financial statements.
      If the merger is not completed, the liquidation preference associated with the shares of Alteon preferred stock owned by Genentech and the substantial common stock ownership represented by these preferred shares, on an as-converted basis, will make it unlikely that the combined company will be able to obtain additional funding. The continued success of the combined company will depend on its ability to continue to raise capital in order to fund the development and commercialization of its products.
      Failure to raise additional capital may result in substantial adverse circumstances, including delisting of our common stock shares from the American Stock Exchange, which could substantially decrease the liquidity and value of such shares, or ultimately result in the liquidation of the combined company.
Alteon and HaptoGuard have each historically incurred operating losses and these losses will continue after the merger.
      Alteon and HaptoGuard have each historically incurred substantial operating losses due to their research and development activities and expect these losses to continue after the merger for the foreseeable future. As of December 31, 2005, Alteon and HaptoGuard had an accumulated deficit of approximately $222,813,445 and $2,425,258, respectively. Alteon’s fiscal year 2005, 2004 and 2003 net losses were $12,614,459, $13,958,646, and $14,452,418, respectively. HaptoGuards’ fiscal year 2005 and 2004 net losses were

I-20


Table of Contents

$1,654,695 and $770,563, respectively. Alteon’s fiscal year 2005, 2004 and 2003 net losses applicable to common stockholders were $17,100,795, $18,093,791 and $18,243,265, respectively. The combined company currently expects to continue its research and development activities at the same or at a more rapid pace than prior periods. After the merger, the combined company will expend significant amounts on research and development programs for alagebrium and ALT-2074. These activities will take time and expense, both to identify appropriate partners, to reach agreement on basic terms, and to negotiate and sign definitive agreements. We will actively seek new financing from time to time to provide financial support for our research and development activities. Any partnering agreements would required significant time and effort to identify potential partners, to reach agreement on basic terms and to negotiate and sign definitive agreements.
The combined company will need additional capital in the future, but its access to such capital is uncertain.
      At this time we are not able to assess the probability of success in our fundraising efforts or the terms, if any, under which we may secure financial support from strategic partners or other investors. It is expected that we will continue to incur operating losses for the foreseeable future. Alteon’s current resources are insufficient to fund its own commercialization efforts as well as the combined company’s commercialization efforts. As of March 31, 2006, Alteon had cash on hand of $4,469,170. As described elsewhere in this prospectus, in April, 2006 we closed on approximately $2.6 million in financing. Prior to the financing, Alteon was expending approximately $450,000 in cash per month. Following the merger, including HaptoGuard’s cash spending rate of approximately $110,000 in cash per month, the combined company expects to spend approximately $560,000 in cash per month. Our capital needs beyond the second quarter of 2006 will depend on many factors, including our research and development activities and the success thereof, the scope of our clinical trial program, the timing of regulatory approval for our products under development and the successful commercialization of our products. Our needs may also depend on the magnitude and scope of these activities, the progress and the level of success in our clinical trials, the costs of preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights, competing technological and market developments, changes in or terminations of existing collaboration and licensing arrangements, the establishment of new collaboration and licensing arrangements and the cost of manufacturing scale-up and development of marketing activities, if undertaken by the combined company. Other than the recently completed financing described in this prospectus, we do not have committed external sources of funding and may not be able to secure additional funding on any terms or on terms that are favourable to us. If we raise additional funds by issuing additional stock, further dilution to our existing stockholders will result, and new investors may negotiate for rights superior to existing stockholders. If adequate funds are not available, the combined company may be required to:
  •  delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more of its development programs;
 
  •  obtain funds through arrangements with collaboration partners or others that may require it to relinquish rights to some or all of its technologies, product candidates or products that it would otherwise seek to develop or commercialize itself;
 
  •  license rights to technologies, product candidates or products on terms that are less favorable to it than might otherwise be available; or
 
  •  seek a buyer for all or a portion of its business, or wind down its operations and liquidate its assets on terms not favorable to it.
The success of the combined company will also depend on the products and systems under development by HaptoGuard, including ALT-2074, and we cannot assure you that the efforts to commercialize ALT-2074 will succeed.
      ALT-2074, HaptoGuard’s lead compound, is in development for the treatment of heart complications in patients with diabetes. It has demonstrated efficacy in mouse models.

I-21


Table of Contents

      ALT-2074 is still in early clinical trials and any success to date should not be seen as indicative of the probability of any future success. The failure to complete clinical development and commercialize ALT-2074 for any reason or due to a combination of reasons will have a material adverse impact on the combined company.
      We are dependent on the successful outcome of clinical trials and will not be able to successfully develop and commercialize products if clinical trials are not successful.
      HaptoGuard received approval from Israel’s Ministry of Health to conduct Phase II trials in diabetic patients recovering from a recent myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the biological effects on cardiac tissue in patients treated with ALT-2074. HaptoGuard has received Institutional Review Board (“IRB”) approval for 3 sites in Israel. HaptoGuard recently withdrew its submission to request approval to conduct Phase 2 clinical trials in the Czech Republic, in order to have the time to generate a response to the Czech Republic’s request for additional data on drug stability. The failure of either Alteon or HaptoGuard to obtain approvals to conduct clinical trials would adversely affect the combined company’s business.
      None of Alteon’s or HaptoGuard’s product candidates are currently approved for sale by the FDA or by any other regulatory agency in the world, and may never receive approval for sale or become commercially viable. Before obtaining regulatory approval for sale, each of the combined company’s product candidates will be subjected to extensive preclinical and clinical testing to demonstrate safety and efficacy for a particular indication for humans in addition to meeting other regulatory standards. The combined company’s success will depend on the successful outcome of clinical trials for one or more product candidates.
      There are a number of difficulties and risks associated with clinical trials. The possibility exists that:
  •  we may discover that a product candidate may cause, alone or in combination with another therapy, harmful side effects;
 
  •  we may discover that a product candidate, alone or in combination with another therapy, does not exhibit the expected therapeutic results in humans;
 
  •  results from early trials may not be statistically significant or predictive of results that may be obtained from large-scale, advanced clinical trials;
 
  •  we, the FDA, other similar foreign regulatory agencies or an institutional review board may suspend clinical trials for any reason whatsoever;
 
  •  patient recruitment may be slower than expected;
 
  •  patients may drop out of our clinical trials; and
 
  •  we may be unable to produce sufficient supplies of products in a timely fashion for clinical trials.
      Given the uncertainty surrounding the regulatory and clinical trial process, we may not be able to develop safety, efficacy or manufacturing data necessary for approval for any product candidate. In addition, even if we receive approval, such approval may be limited in scope and hurt the commercial viability of such product. If the combined company is unable to successfully obtain approval of and commercialize a product, this would materially harm the business, impair our ability to generate revenues and adversely impact our stock price.
      The combined company is subject to significant government regulation and failure to achieve regulatory approval of our drug candidates would harm our business.
      The FDA regulates the development, testing, manufacture, distribution, labeling and promotion of pharmaceutical products in the United States pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and related regulations. We must receive pre-market approval by the FDA prior to any commercial sale of any drug candidates. Before receiving such approval, we must provide preclinical data and proof in human clinical trials of the safety and efficacy of our drug candidates, which trials can take several years. In addition, we must show that we can produce any drug candidates consistently at quality levels sufficient for administration in humans. Pre-market approval is a lengthy and expensive process. We may not be able to obtain FDA approval

I-22


Table of Contents

for any commercial sale of any drug candidate. By statute and regulation, the FDA has 180 days to review an application for approval to market a drug candidate; however, the FDA frequently exceeds the 180-day time period, at times taking up to 18 months. In addition, based on its review, the FDA or other regulatory bodies may determine that additional clinical trials or preclinical data are required. Except for any potential licensing or marketing arrangements with other pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies, we will not generate any revenues in connection with any of our other drug candidates unless and until we obtain FDA approval to sell such products in commercial quantities for human application.
      Even if the combined company’s products receive approval for commercial sale, their manufacture, storage, marketing and distribution are and will be subject to extensive and continuing regulation in the United States by the federal government, especially the FDA, and state and local governments. The failure to comply with these regulatory requirements could result in enforcement action, including, without limitation, withdrawal of approval, which would have a material adverse effect on the combined company’s business. Later discovery of problems with the combined company’s products may result in additional restrictions on the product, including withdrawal of the product from the market. Regulatory authorities may also require post-marketing testing, which can involve significant uncontemplated expense. Additionally, governments may impose new regulations, which could further delay or preclude regulatory approval of the combined company’s products or result in significantly increased compliance costs.
      In similar fashion to the FDA, foreign regulatory authorities require demonstration of product quality, safety and efficacy prior to granting authorization for product registration which allows for distribution of the product for commercial sale. International organizations, such as the World Health Organization, and foreign government agencies including those for the Americas, Middle East, Europe, and Asia and the Pacific, have laws, regulations and guidelines for reporting and evaluating the data on safety, quality and efficacy of new drug products. Although most of these laws, regulations and guidelines are very similar, each of the individual nations reviews all of the information available on the new drug product and makes an independent determination for product registration. A finding of product quality, safety or efficacy in one jurisdiction does not guarantee approval in any other jurisdiction, even if the other jurisdiction has similar laws, regulations and guidelines.
Failure to integrate the companies’ operations successfully could result in delays and increased expenses in the companies’ clinical trial programs.
      Alteon and HaptoGuard have entered into the merger agreement with the expectation that the merger will result in beneficial synergies, including:
  •  improved ability to raise new capital through access to new classes of investors focused on public companies engaged in small molecule drug development;
 
  •  shared expertise in developing innovative small molecule drug technologies and the potential for technology collaboration;
 
  •  a broader pipeline of products;
 
  •  greater ability to attract commercial partners;
 
  •  larger combined commercial opportunities; and
 
  •  a broader portfolio of patents and trademarks.
      Achieving these anticipated synergies and the potential benefits underlying the two companies’ reasons for the merger will depend on a number of factors, some of which include:
  •  retention of scientific staff;
 
  •  significant litigation, if any, adverse to Alteon and HaptoGuard, including, particularly, product liability litigation and patent and trademark litigation; and

I-23


Table of Contents

  •  the ability of the combined company to continue development of Alteon and HaptoGuard product candidates;
 
  •  success of our research and development efforts;
 
  •  increased capital expenditures;
 
  •  general market conditions relating to small cap biotech investments; and
 
  •  competition from other drug development companies.
      Achieving the benefits of the merger will depend in part on the successful integration of Alteon and HaptoGuard in a timely and efficient manner. The integration will require significant time and efforts from each company, including the coordination of research, development, regulatory, manufacturing, commercial, administrative and general functions. Integration may be difficult and unpredictable because of possible cultural conflicts and different opinions on scientific and regulatory matters. Delays in successfully integrating and managing employee benefits could lead to dissatisfaction and employee turnover. The combination of Alteon’s and HaptoGuard’s organizations may result in greater competition for resources and elimination of research and development programs that might otherwise be successfully completed. If we cannot successfully integrate our operations and personnel, we may not recognize the expected benefits of the merger.
      Even if the two companies are able to integrate their operations, there can be no assurance that these anticipated synergies will be achieved. The failure to achieve such synergies could have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition of the combined company.
Integrating Alteon and HaptoGuard may divert management’s attention away from our core research and development activities.
      Successful integration of our operations, products and personnel may place a significant burden on our management and our internal resources. The diversion of management’s attention and any difficulties encountered in the transition and integration process could result in delays in the companies’ clinical trial programs and could otherwise significantly harm our business, financial condition and operating results.
      We expect to incur significant costs integrating our operations, product candidates and personnel, which cannot be estimated accurately at this time. These costs include:
  •  severance;
 
  •  conversion of information systems;
 
  •  combining research, development, regulatory, manufacturing and commercial teams and processes;
 
  •  reorganization of facilities; and
 
  •  relocation or disposition of excess equipment.
      We expect that Alteon and HaptoGuard will incur aggregate direct transaction costs of approximately $800,000 associated with the merger. If the total costs of the merger exceed our estimates or benefits of the merger do not exceed the total costs of the merger, the financial results of our combined company could be adversely affected.
Completion of, or the failure to complete, the merger could adversely affect Alteon’s stock price and Alteon’s and HaptoGuard’s future business and operations.
      The merger is subject to the satisfaction of various closing conditions, including the approval by both Alteon and HaptoGuard stockholders, and there can be no assurance that the merger will be successfully completed. In the event that the merger is not consummated, Alteon and HaptoGuard will be subject to many risks, including the costs related to the merger, such as legal, accounting and advisory fees, which must be paid even if the merger is not completed, or the payment of a termination fee under certain circumstances. If the merger is not consummated for any reason, the market price of Alteon common stock could decline.

I-24


Table of Contents

      The shares of the combined company are publicly traded and we cannot predict how the market will react to the merger of Alteon and HaptoGuard. Even the successful completion of the merger may negatively affect the stock price of the combined company, if the market were to come to the view that Alteon would be in a better position absent completion of the merger.
The combined company will remain dependent on third parties for research and development and manufacturing activities necessary to commercialize certain of our patents.
      We utilize the services of several scientific and technical consultants to oversee various aspects of our protocol design, clinical trial oversight and other research and development functions. Alteon and HaptoGuard both contract out most of our research and development operations, utilize third-party contract manufacturers for drug inventory and shipping services and third-party contract research organizations in connection with preclinical and/or clinical studies in accordance with our designed protocols, as well as conducting research at medical and academic centers.
      Because we rely on third parties for much our research and development work and manufacturing, we have less direct control over our research and development and manufacturing. We face risks that these third parties may not be appropriately responsive to our time frames and development needs and could devote resources to other customers. In addition, certain of these third parties may have to comply with FDA regulations or other regulatory requirements in the conduct of this research and development work, which they may fail to do.
If the combined company does not successfully distinguish and commercialize its technology, it may be unable to compete successfully or to generate significant revenues.
      The biotechnology industry, including the field of small molecule drugs to treat and prevent cardiovascular disease and diabetes, is highly competitive and subject to significant and rapid technological change. Accordingly, the combined company’s success will depend, in part, on its ability to respond quickly to such change through the development and introduction of new products and systems.
The combined company will have substantial competition, including competitors with substantially greater resources.
      Many of the combined company’s competitors or potential competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources than Alteon has and may also have greater experience in conducting pre-clinical studies, clinical trials and other regulatory approval procedures as well as in marketing their products. Major competitors in the market for our potential products include large, publicly-traded pharmaceutical companies, public development stage companies and private development stage companies. If the combined company or its corporate partners commence commercial product sales, the combined company or its corporate partners will be competing against companies with greater marketing and manufacturing capabilities.
      The combined company’s ability to compete successfully against currently existing and future alternatives to its product candidates and systems, and competitors who compete directly with it in the small molecule drug industry will depend, in part, on its ability to:
  •  attract and retain skilled scientific and research personnel;
 
  •  develop technologically superior products;
 
  •  develop competitively priced products;
 
  •  obtain patent or other required regulatory approvals for the combined company’s products;
 
  •  be early entrants to the market; and
 
  •  manufacture, market and sell its products, independently or through collaborations.

I-25


Table of Contents

The success of the combined company is dependent on the extent of third-party reimbursement for its products.
      Third-party reimbursement policies may also adversely affect the combined company’s ability to commercialize and sell its products. The combined company’s ability to successfully commercialize its products depends in part on the extent to which appropriate levels of reimbursement for its products and related treatments are obtained from government authorities, private health insurers, third party payers, and other organizations, such as managed care organizations, or MCOs. Any failure by doctors, hospitals and other users of the combined company’s products or systems to obtain appropriate levels of reimbursement could adversely affect the combined company’s ability to sell these products and systems.
      Federal legislation, enacted in December 2003, has altered the way in which physician-administered drug programs covered by Medicare are reimbursed, generally leading to lower reimbursement levels. The new legislation has also added an outpatient prescription drug benefit to Medicare, effective January 2006. In the interim, the U.S. Congress has established a discount drug card program for Medicare beneficiaries. Both benefits will be provided through private entities, which will attempt to negotiate price concessions from pharmaceutical manufacturers. These negotiations may increase pressures to lower prices. On the other hand, the drug benefit may increase the volume of pharmaceutical drug purchases, offsetting at least in part these potential price discounts. While the new law specifically prohibits the U.S. government from interfering in price negotiations between manufacturers and Medicare drug plan sponsors, some members of Congress are pursuing legislation that would permit de facto price controls on prescription drugs. In addition, the law triggers, for congressional consideration, cost containment measures for Medicare in the event Medicare cost increases exceed a certain level. These cost containment measures could include limitations on prescription drug prices. This legislation could adversely impact the combined company’s ability to commercialize any of its products successfully.
      Significant uncertainty exists about the reimbursement status of newly approved medical products and services. Reimbursement in the United States or foreign countries may not be available for any of the combined company’s products, reimbursement granted may not be maintained, and limits on reimbursement available from third-party payers may reduce the demand for, or negatively affect the price of, the combined company’s products. Alteon anticipates that the combined company will need to work with a variety of organizations to lobby government agencies for improved reimbursement policies for its products. However, Alteon cannot guarantee that such lobbying efforts will take place or that they will ultimately be successful.
      Internationally, where national healthcare systems are prevalent, little if any funding may be available for new products, and cost containment and cost reduction efforts can be more pronounced than in the United States.
If the combined company is unable to protect its intellectual property, it may not be able to operate its business profitably.
      The combined company’s success will depend on its ability to develop proprietary products and technologies, to obtain and maintain patents, to protect trade secrets, and to prevent others from infringing on its proprietary rights. The combined company has exclusive patents, licenses to patents or patent applications covering critical components of its technologies, including certain jointly owned patents. We also seek to protect our proprietary technology and processes, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our employees and certain contractors. Patents, pending patent applications and licensed technologies may not afford adequate protection against competitors, and any pending patent applications now or hereafter filed by or licensed to us may not result in patents being issued. In addition, certain of the combined company’s technology relies on patented inventions developed using university resources. Universities may have certain rights, as defined by law or applicable agreements, in such patents, and may choose to exercise such rights. To the extent that employees, consultants or contractors of the combined company use intellectual property owned by others, disputes may arise as to the rights related to or resulting from the know-how and inventions. In addition, the laws of certain non-U.S. countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same

I-26


Table of Contents

extent as do the laws of the United States. Medical technology patents involve complex legal and factual questions and, therefore, the combined company cannot predict with certainty their enforceability.
      The combined company is a party to various license agreements that give it exclusive and partial exclusive rights to use specified technologies applicable to research, development and commercialization of its products, including alagebrium and ALT-2074. The agreements pursuant to which such technology is used permit the licensors to terminate agreements in the event that certain conditions are not met. If these conditions are not met and the agreements are terminated, the combined company’s product development, research and commercialization efforts may be altered or delayed.
      Patents or patent applications, if issued, may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or may not provide protection or competitive advantages against competitors with similar technology. Furthermore, competitors of the combined company may obtain patent protection or other intellectual property rights for technology similar to the combined company’s that could limit its ability to use its technology or commercialize products that it may develop.
      Litigation may be necessary to assert claims of infringement, to enforce patents issued to the combined company, to protect trade secrets or know-how or to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. Litigation or interference proceedings could result in substantial additional costs and diversion of management focus. If the combined company is ultimately unable to protect its technology, trade secrets or know-how, it may be unable to operate profitably. Although we have not been involved with any threats of litigation or negotiations regarding patent issues or other intellectual property, or other related court challenges or legal actions, it is possible that the combined company could be involved with such matters in the future.
If the combined company is unable to operate its business without infringing upon intellectual property rights of others, it may not be able to operate its business profitably.
      The combined company’s success depends on its ability to operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others. We are aware that patents have been applied for and/or issued to third parties claiming technologies for Advanced Glycation End-Products or glutathione peroxidase mimetics that may be similar to those needed by us. To the extent that planned or potential products are covered by patents or other intellectual property rights held by third parties, the combined company would need a license under such patents or other intellectual property rights to continue development and marketing of its products. Any required licenses may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. If the combined company does not obtain such licenses or it may not be able to proceed with the development, manufacture or sale of its products.
      Litigation may be necessary to defend against claims of infringement or to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. Litigation or interference proceedings could result in substantial additional costs and diversion of management focus. If the combined company is ultimately unsuccessful in defending against claims of infringement, it may be unable to operate profitably.
HaptoGuard’s ALT-2074 and other HaptoGuard compounds are licensed to HaptoGuard by third parties and if the combined company is unable to continue licensing this technology our future prospects may be materially adversely affected.
      HaptoGuard licenses technology, including technology related to ALT-2074, from third parties. We anticipate that we will continue to license technology from third parties in the future. To maintain HaptoGuard’s license to ALT-2074 from Oxis International, we are obligated to meet certain development and clinical trial milestones and to make certain payments. There can be no assurance that we will be able to meet any milestone or make any payment required under the license with Oxis International. While Oxis has not claimed a default under the license agreement, it has indicated that its view as to whether HaptoGuard satisfied the milestone to begin Phase II clinical trials by May 28, 2006 differs from HaptoGuard’s view. If we fail to meet any milestone or make any payment, Oxis may terminate this license, and there can be no assurance that we may be able to negotiate any continuation or extension of the license agreement.

I-27


Table of Contents

      The technology HaptoGuard licenses from third parties would be difficult or impossible to replace and the loss of this technology would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and any future prospects.
If the combined company loses or is unable to hire and retain qualified personnel, it may not be able to develop its products and technology.
      The combined company is highly dependent on the members of its scientific and management staff. In particular, the combined company will depend on Dr. Noah Berkowitz as the combined company’s Chief Executive Officer and Malcolm MacNab as the combined company’s Vice-President of Clinical Development. We may not be able to attract and retain scientific and management personnel on acceptable terms, if at all, given the competition for such personnel among other companies and research and academic institutions. Mary Phelan has resigned from her position as our Director of Finance and Financial Reporting effective May 31, 2006. If the combined company loses an executive officer or certain key members of its clinical or research and development staff or is unable to hire and retain qualified management personnel, then its ability to develop and commercialize its products and technology and to raise capital and effect strategic opportunities may be hindered. We have not purchased and do not anticipate purchasing any key-man life insurance.
The combined company may face exposure to product liability claims.
      The combined company may face exposure to product liability and other claims due to allegations that its products cause harm. These risks are inherent in the clinical trials for pharmaceutical products and in the testing, and future manufacturing and marketing of, the combined company’s products. Although we currently maintain product liability insurance, such insurance may not be adequate and the combined company may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage in the future at a reasonable cost, if at all. If the combined company is unable to obtain product liability insurance in the future at an acceptable cost or to otherwise protect against potential product liability claims, it could be inhibited in the commercialization of its products which could have a material adverse effect on its business. We currently have a policy covering $10 million of product liability for our clinical trials. We do not have sales of any products. The coverage will be maintained and limits reviewed from time to time as the combined company progresses to later stages of its clinical trials and as the length of the trials and the number of patients enrolled in the trials changes. The combined company intends to obtain a combined coverage policy that includes tail coverage in order to cover any claims that are made for any events that have occurred prior to the merger. Currently, our annual premium for product liability insurance is approximately $219,000.
Risks Related to Owning Alteon’s Common Stock
Our stock price is volatile and you may not be able to resell your shares at a profit.
      We first publicly issued common stock on November 8, 1991 at $15.00 per share in our initial public offering and it has been subject to fluctuations. For example, during 2005, the closing sale price of our common stock has ranged from a high of $1.43 per share to a low of $0.17 per share. The market price of our common stock could continue to fluctuate substantially due to a variety of factors, including:
  •  quarterly fluctuations in results of operations;
 
  •  the announcement of new products or services by the combined company or competitors;
 
  •  sales of common stock by existing stockholders or the perception that these sales may occur;
 
  •  adverse judgments or settlements obligating the combined company to pay damages;
 
  •  negative publicity;
 
  •  loss of key personnel;
 
  •  developments concerning proprietary rights, including patents and litigation matters; and
 
  •  clinical trial or regulatory developments in both the United States and foreign countries.

I-28


Table of Contents

      In addition, overall stock market volatility has often significantly affected the market prices of securities for reasons unrelated to a company’s operating performance. In the past, securities class action litigation has been commenced against companies that have experienced periods of volatility in the price of their stock. Securities litigation initiated against the combined company could cause it to incur substantial costs and could lead to the diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on revenue and earnings.
We have a large number of authorized but unissued shares of common stock, which our Board of Directors may issue without further stockholder approval, thereby causing dilution of your holdings of our common stock.
      After the closing of the merger and the financing, there are expected to be approximately 180,000,000 shares of authorized but unissued shares of our common stock. Our management will continue to have broad discretion to issue shares of our common stock in a range of transactions, including capital-raising transactions, mergers, acquisitions, for anti-takeover purposes, and in other transactions, without obtaining stockholder approval, unless stockholder approval is required for a particular transaction under the rules of the American Stock Exchange, Delaware law, or other applicable laws. We currently have no specific plans to issue shares of our common stock for any purpose other than in connection with the merger. However, if our management determines to issue shares of our common stock from the large pool of such authorized but unissued shares for any purpose in the future without obtaining stockholder approval, your ownership position would be diluted without your further ability to vote on that transaction.
The sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock could cause the market price of our common stock to decline and may impair the combined company’s ability to raise capital through additional offerings.
      We currently have outstanding warrants to purchase an aggregate of 12,591,455 shares of our common stock, including warrants to purchase 10,960,400 shares of our common stock issued together with 10,960,400 shares of common stock all of which such warrants and common stock we issued in connection with a private equity financing completed in April 2006. Under the terms of the financing we have agreed to register all of such shares for resale. The resale of these shares of common stock and the shares underlying the warrants may be effected at any time once the resale registration statement is effective. The shares issued in the private equity financing, together with the shares underlying the warrants issued in such financing, represent approximately 37.8% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding immediately prior to the financing, and not including shares to be issued in the merger with HaptoGuard or shares to be issued upon conversion of preferred stock upon transfer to HaptoGuard.
      Sales of these shares in the public market, or the perception that future sales of these shares could occur, could have the effect of lowering the market price of our common stock below current levels and make it more difficult for us and our shareholders to sell our equity securities in the future.
      Our executive officers, directors and holders of more than 5% of our common stock and collectively beneficially own approximately 13.7% of the outstanding common stock as of March 31, 2006. In addition, 6,403,464 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of vested stock options could become available for immediate resale if such options were exercised.
      Sale or the availability for sale, of shares of common stock by stockholders could cause the market price of our common stock to decline and could impair our ability to raise capital through an offering of additional equity securities.
Anti-takeover provisions may frustrate attempts to replace our current management and discourage investors from buying our common stock.
      We have entered into a Stockholders’ Rights Agreement pursuant to which each holder of a share of common stock is granted a Right to purchase our Series F Preferred Stock under certain circumstances if a person or group acquires, or commences a tender offer for, 20 percent of our outstanding common stock. We

I-29


Table of Contents

also have severance obligations to certain employees in the event of termination of their employment after or in connection with a change in control of the Company. In addition, the Board of Directors has the authority, without further action by the stockholders, to fix the rights and preferences of, and issue shares of, Preferred Stock. The staggered board terms, Fair Price Provision, Stockholders’ Rights Agreement, severance arrangements, Preferred Stock provisions and other provisions of our charter and Delaware corporate law may discourage certain types of transactions involving an actual or potential change in control.

I-30


Table of Contents

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
      This Proxy Statement and the documents incorporated by reference herein contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements relate to future events or our respective future financial performance. Forward-looking statements are identified by terminology denoting future events such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” or “should” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks pertaining to Alteon and the combined entity outlined under the caption “Risk Factors.”
      Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Alteon’s expectations are as of the date of this Proxy Statement, and Alteon does not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date it files this Proxy Statement to conform these statements to actual results, unless required by law.

I-31


Table of Contents

THE MERGER TRANSACTION
General
      At the effective time, Alteon Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alteon, will merge with and into HaptoGuard. HaptoGuard will be the surviving corporation. The parties currently estimate that HaptoGuard stockholders and warrant holders will receive an aggregate of 37,399,065 shares of Alteon common stock. The aggregate number of shares of Alteon common stock to be issued for the outstanding HaptoGuard common stock and outstanding warrants will not be adjusted based upon changes in the value of these shares. It is presently expected that each holder of a HaptoGuard common share would receive approximately 3,521 shares of Alteon common stock. The exchange ratios are subject to adjustment depending upon the number of outstanding shares and warrants to purchase HaptoGuard common stock at the effective time of the merger.
      Based upon the outstanding shares of Alteon common stock on                     , 2006 and HaptoGuard’s outstanding shares of common stock and warrants on                     , 2006, HaptoGuard stockholders will own approximately 31.37% of Alteon’s then outstanding common stock. Based upon the fully-diluted capitalization of Alteon and HaptoGuard on                     , 2006, immediately following the completion of the merger, HaptoGuard security holders would own approximately 28.93% of the combined company assuming (i) shares of Alteon common stock outstanding following the cash exercise of all outstanding Alteon warrants and stock options and (ii) shares of Alteon common stock outstanding following the cash exercise of all HaptoGuard stock options assumed by Alteon at the closing of the merger. Genentech, Inc., an Alteon stockholder and party to the merger agreement, would own approximately 11.99% of the combined company after the merger.
Background of the Merger
      Alteon had originally been introduced to HaptoGuard in May 2004 by investment bankers at Rodman & Renshaw LLC. Although Alteon had had an initial interest in the HaptoGuard technology and a potential strategic transaction at that time, due to the status of clinical activities at Alteon, these conversations did not progress.
      In May 2005, Dr. Berkowitz, President of HaptoGuard, contacted Mr. Moch, President and Chief Executive Officer of Alteon, suggesting that the companies consider merging HaptoGuard into Alteon. No action was taken at that time.
      In June 2005, the Alteon Board of Directors began to discuss the implications of the results from the interim analysis of a clinical trial relating to, and other potential avenues for use of, the Alteon’s lead compound alagebrium, along with Alteon’s other strategic options.
      On June 28, 2005, the Board had a discussion of Alteon’s strategic alternatives, including all available strategic options with respect to Alteon’s technology in general and alagebrium in particular. Members of the Board also discussed and agreed upon the substantial impact that the Genentech ownership position of convertible preferred stock of Alteon would have on those strategic options.
      The Board also established a Strategic Planning Committee, which was authorized and directed to meet from time to time with management of Alteon and to formulate a set of recommendations for consideration by the full Board with respect to the available strategic options for alagebrium and Alteon as a whole.
      On July 12, 2005, the Strategic Planning Committee held its first meeting at which it discussed and approved the engagement of Aurora Capital to represent Alteon in discussions with a specific list of compatible companies with respect to strategic transactions. Aurora Capital joined the meeting and discussed with the Committee the specific companies they had identified as potential targets. The Committee also discussed the status of conversations with a number of potential strategic advisors and investment bankers and it was decided to pursue discussion with such entities. Discussions with two of the identified companies were held after such meeting but no basis for a transaction was identified with either.

I-32


Table of Contents

      On July 19, 2005, the Committee discussed the status of Alteon’s conversations with financial advisors and investment bankers and the scope of the review of potential strategic partners. The Board also discussed the ongoing dialogue with Genentech regarding restructuring its convertible preferred stock ownership position and the anticipated timeline for Genentech to respond to Alteon’s initial proposal. Members of the merchant banking group at Burrill & Company then met with the Board and reviewed its proposal to act as a strategic advisor to Alteon in partnering and merger transactions. The Board voted that Alteon should engage Burrill & Company.
      On August 1, 2005, an initial meeting was held with Burrill & Company and Alteon management in order to discuss the initial strategy and timelines for discussions with third parties with respect to strategic transactions.
      During August 2005, approximately 185 companies were contacted by Burrill & Company that broadly matched the criteria Alteon was looking for. Of these companies, 6 expressed interest, one of which had previously been contacted by Aurora. A telephonic or face-to-face meeting was set up with each of these companies about a possible combination with Alteon. Each of the companies contacted during this process was invited to make a presentation for the Alteon Board of Directors. As part of this process, Mr. Moch spoke with Dr. Noah Berkowitz, President and CEO of HaptoGuard, which was one of the 6 companies asked to make a presentation. Discussions with such candidates continued through early October.
      On September 9, 2005, as a result of discussions with HaptoGuard, Alteon and HaptoGuard entered into a Confidential Disclosure and Non-Use Agreement.
      On September 15, 2005, HaptoGuard submitted a presentation to Alteon along with other company materials for Alteon’s review.
      On September 27, 2005, Mr. Moch discussed with the Committee the recent letter received from Genentech and certain parameters relating to evaluation of Genentech’s proposal relating to the convertible preferred stock held by Genentech.
      On October 4, 2005, the Strategic Planning Committee spent considerable time specifically discussing potential strategic transactions and reviewing the interested parties in such transactions.
      On October 5, 2005, the Strategic Planning Committee provided an update to the Board of Directors on the status of discussion with third parties. Burrill & Company presented a review of the actions which had been undertaken by Burrill in conjunction with company management to identify potential transaction partners for Alteon. At this point, it was the consensus of the Alteon Board that HaptoGuard presented the most promising candidate for a strategic transaction.
      On October 14, 2005, the Senior Management team from Alteon and HaptoGuard held a conference call during which HaptoGuard management provided a detailed scientific presentation of the HaptoGuard technology.
      On October 14, 2005, Mr. Guggenheimer, acting Chief Financial Officer of Alteon, resigned from Alteon to join the investment banking firm of Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein. At that time, Alteon agreed to engage Mr. Guggenheimer through DKW as an advisory consultant to the merger process. This agreement was formally signed on October 19, 2005.
      On October 17, 2005, HaptoGuard submitted to Alteon an offer letter for a merger transaction.
      On October 18, 2005, Alteon initiated an internal scientific and clinical and corporate due diligence review of HaptoGuard and its technology and requested due diligence materials from HaptoGuard. Due diligence meetings and review of documents proceeded through December 2005.
      On November 10, 2005, HaptoGuard submitted to Burrill on behalf of Alteon, a revised merger proposal.
      On November 15, 2005, the Strategic Planning Committee held a meeting to discuss the revised proposal from HaptoGuard relating to a combination with Alteon. Of the companies Alteon was in discussion with, it was the consensus of the committee members that HaptoGuard continued to present the most promising

I-33


Table of Contents

strategic opportunity. It was resolved that Alteon should proceed to complete due diligence, evaluate deal structure and pricing and negotiate a strategic transaction with HaptoGuard.
      At a November 22, 2005 Strategic Planning Committee meeting, Burrill reviewed the status of the deal evaluation and valuation process with respect to HaptoGuard and the companies who were still in the discussion process with Alteon. Burrill apprised the Committee of the ongoing due diligence process, particularly issues that existed and that were being evaluated, as well as the funding needs of the proposed relationships. Burrill also apprised the Committee on the status of conversations with Genentech relating to the restructuring of its preferred stock ownership position.
      On November 30, 2005, Alteon submitted to HaptoGuard a memorandum of intent for a proposed transaction.
      During December 2005, members of the HaptoGuard and Alteon management teams held additional conference calls to discuss valuation and deal parameters. Also during such period discussions were held between Alteon and Genentech regarding the restructuring of its convertible preferred stock.
      On December 14, 2005, Alteon submitted to the American Stock Exchange a document describing the proposed transaction with HaptoGuard requesting their informal approval with respect to the listing of shares.
      During January and February, 2006, Alteon continued to discuss with HaptoGuard and Genentech issues relating to the transaction and with the American Stock Exchange the proposal for a deal structure in order to secure its informal approval of the listing of shares.
      On January 18, 2006, Mintz Levin, Alteon’s legal counsel, delivered to HaptoGuard merger agreement and related document drafts.
      On January 22, 2006, a memorandum of intent was sent to Genentech by Alteon regarding a proposed restructuring of its preferred stock ownership.
      On February 1, 2006, Mr. Moch provided the Board with an update on the company’s ongoing discussions with HaptoGuard, Genentech and the American Stock Exchange, as well as the prospects relating to fund raising with their investment banker, Rodman & Renshaw.
      On February 12, 2006, Mintz Levin delivered a revised merger agreement draft, reflecting changes to the structure of the transaction to HaptoGuard. Alteon, HaptoGuard and their respective legal counsel negotiated the agreement over the next week.
      On February 24, 2006, Mintz Levin delivered a memorandum of intent to Genentech.
      On February 28, 2006, Mintz Levin delivered a revised merger agreement to HaptoGuard and Genentech. The agreements were negotiated between such parties during March.
      On March 1, 2006, Mr. Moch provided an update to Alteon’s Board of Directors on the status of the company’s discussions with HaptoGuard, Genentech and the American Stock Exchange. The Board discussed the potential for entering into a consulting arrangement with HaptoGuard prior to the execution of the transaction agreements. The Board approved the consulting agreement.
      Mr. Moch also discussed with the Board the need to initiate fund raising with Rodman & Renshaw, to be completed concurrent with the entering into the merger agreement with HaptoGuard and Genentech. It was the sense of the Board that the company should continue with such discussions at that time.
      On March 3, 2006, AMEX provided informal approval for the listing of shares to be issued in the transaction with HaptoGuard.
      On March 6, 2006, Mr. Moch, Mr. Guggenheimer, Dr. Berkowitz and Ms. Tanner met with representatives of Rodman & Renshaw to discuss potential financing strategies for the proposed transaction. Such discussions continued through March.

I-34


Table of Contents

      On April 4, 2006, Alteon engaged Rodman & Renshaw to serve as the exclusive placement agent for the company in connection with a proposed offer and private placement of common stock and warrants of the company.
      On April 13, 2006, the Alteon Board held a meeting during which they approved the private placement through Rodman & Renshaw and the proposed merger agreement with HaptoGuard, including the restructuring of the Genentech preferred stock relationship and authorized company management to complete said transactions subject to legal review and approval.
      On April 19, 2006, the merger agreement between Alteon, HaptoGuard and Genentech was signed by all parties and the financing through Rodman & Renshaw was commenced.
      On April 21, 2006, the financing through Rodman & Renshaw was closed.
Factors Considered by, and Recommendation of, the Alteon Board of Directors
      Alteon’s board of directors has determined that the terms of the merger and the merger agreement are fair to, and in the best interests of, Alteon and its stockholders. Accordingly, Alteon’s board of directors has approved the merger agreement and the consummation of the merger and recommends that you vote FOR approval of the merger and the merger agreement and the issuance of shares and the transfer and conversion of shares contemplated thereby. In reaching its decision, Alteon’s board of directors consulted with and received information and analyses from the management of Alteon and its financial and legal advisors, and considered the material factors described below.
Reasons for the Merger Identified by the Alteon Board of Directors
      Alteon’s board of directors has identified potential benefits of the merger that they believe will contribute to the success of the combined company, including the following:
  •  Anticipated improvements in revenue, cash flow and profitability. Alteon believes that the merger will increase the combined company’s future revenues, accelerate profit growth, and improve cash flow.
 
  •  The strategic fit between Alteon and HaptoGuard in the cardiovascular and diabetes arenas. Alteon’s lead compound alagebrium is being developed for chronic cardiovascular diseases and HaptoGuard’s lead compound, ALT-2074, for acute cardiovascular indications. The development program of both companies is currently focused on cardiovascular disease of diabetic patients. Each of Alteon and HaptoGuard’s lead programs are based on different but complimentary inflammatory mechanisms of action.
 
  •  The synergy of the board of directors and the management of the combined company. The board of directors and management of the combined company will increase the experience and expertise available to the company.
 
  •  Anticipated synergies to be achieved by combining the development and commercialization of HaptoGuard and Alteon products. Alteon believes that the respective product development strategies of HaptoGuard and Alteon complement each other, potentially resulting in synergy between the two product development and commercialization efforts of the companies. Alteon believes that the combined products of Alteon and HaptoGuard will result in synergies in the development of such products in the cardiovascular and diabetes arenas.
 
  •  Anticipated increase in ability to raise capital for development and commercialization of products. Alteon believes that the restructuring of the Genentech preferred stock ownership and combined products of Alteon and HaptoGuard will increase the ability of the combined company to raise capital for the development and commercialization of its products.
 
  •  The potential to improve Alteon’s strategic position in the markets it serves. Alteon believes that the merger will improve the strategic position of the combined company.

I-35


Table of Contents

Other Factors Considered by the Alteon Board of Directors
      In the course of deliberations, the Alteon board reviewed with Alteon management and its legal and financial advisors a number of additional factors relevant to the merger, including the following:
  •  historical information concerning HaptoGuard’s and Alteon’s respective businesses, financial performance and condition, operations, management and competitive position, including results of operations during the most recent fiscal year for each company;
 
  •  Alteon management’s view of the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of HaptoGuard and Alteon before and after giving effect to the merger, based on management due diligence;
 
  •  current financial market conditions and historical market prices, volatility and trading information with respect to Alteon common stock;
 
  •  Alteon management’s view as to the potential for other third parties to enter into strategic relationships with or to acquire HaptoGuard;
 
  •  certain terms of the merger agreement, including the provisions that prohibit HaptoGuard from soliciting other acquisition offers, the provisions that require HaptoGuard to pay Alteon a termination fee if the merger agreement is terminated by HaptoGuard for specified reasons, and the provisions that require Alteon to pay HaptoGuard a termination fee if the merger agreement is terminated by Alteon for specified reasons;
 
  •  other terms of the merger agreement, including the parties’ respective representations, warranties and covenants, and the conditions to the parties’ respective obligations;
 
  •  an assessment of alternatives to the merger, including development opportunities and other possible acquisition candidates, and the determination that the merger was a strategic fit and presented a unique opportunity to enhance and expand Alteon’s operations, product and service offerings and position Alteon for future growth; and
 
  •  the impact of the merger on Alteon’s stockholders and employees.
Potentially Negative Factors Considered by the Alteon Board of Directors
      Alteon’s board of directors also identified and considered a variety of potentially negative factors in its deliberations concerning the merger, including, but not limited to:
  •  the risk that the potential benefits sought in the merger might not be fully realized;
 
  •  the costs and timing of achieving the expected benefits may exceed management’s estimates;
 
  •  the possibility that the merger might not be completed, and the potential adverse effect of the public announcement of the merger on Alteon’s reputation and ability to obtain financing in the future;
 
  •  the significant number of shares to be issued to HaptoGuard stockholders; and
 
  •  other risks described under “Risk Factors” beginning on page I-     of this Proxy Statement.
      Alteon’s board of directors believes that these risks were outweighed by the potential benefits of the merger. The foregoing discussion is not exhaustive of all factors considered by Alteon’s board of directors, but it does describe all material factors considered by the Alteon board of directors.
      Individual members of Alteon’s board of directors may have considered different factors, and Alteon’s board of directors evaluated these factors as a whole and did not quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to factors considered. There can be no assurance that the potential synergies or opportunities considered by the board of directors of Alteon will be achieved through consummation of the offer. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page I-     .

I-36


Table of Contents

Recommendation of Alteon’s Board of Directors
      After careful consideration, Alteon’s board of directors has determined the merger to be fair to Alteon’s stockholders and in the best interests of Alteon’s stockholders and declared the merger advisable. Alteon’s board of directors has approved the merger agreement and recommends approval by Alteon’s stockholders of the issuance of the shares pursuant to the merger agreement. In considering the recommendation of the Alteon board of directors with respect to the merger agreement, you should be aware that certain directors and officers of Alteon have certain interests in the merger that are in addition to the interests of Alteon stockholders generally.
Factors Considered by, and Recommendation of, the HaptoGuard Board of Directors
Reasons for the Merger Identified by the HaptoGuard Board of Directors
      In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement, HaptoGuard’s board of directors consulted with HaptoGuard’s management and legal and financial advisors regarding strategic, legal, operational and financial aspects of the transaction. In the course of reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement and the merger, the HaptoGuard board of directors considered a variety of factors in favor of the merger, including but not limited to, the following:
  •  Anticipated improvements in the ability to raise capital. Because HaptoGuard does not contemplate generating significant revenues in the near future, HaptoGuard’s board of directors believe HaptoGuard’s ability to raise capital in crucial to its viability. HaptoGuard’s board of directors believes that a company with more potential drug candidates and a larger infrastructure will be more likely to attract capital.
 
  •  The belief of the HaptoGuard board of directors that the merger represented the best value reasonably available to HaptoGuard’s stockholders for their shares of HaptoGuard. HaptoGuard’s board of directors concluded that the merger represents the best value reasonably available to HaptoGuard’s stockholders. The HaptoGuard board of directors also determined that no other potential strategic partner had expressed an interest in a merger, acquisition or other business combination that would likely be on terms as favorable to HaptoGuard’s stockholders as those of the merger.
 
  •  The likelihood that the combined company will have better opportunities for future growth through diversification and growth of the number of potential drug candidates. HaptoGuard’s board of directors and management analyzed the technology, business, financial performance and condition, prospects and products of each of Alteon and HaptoGuard as separate entities and on a combined basis, and the HaptoGuard board of directors considers it likely that the merger of Alteon and HaptoGuard will provide the combined company with greater opportunities for growth than are available to HaptoGuard as a stand-alone company. HaptoGuard’s board of directors considers the anticipated revenue growth of the combined company to be greater than that achievable by HaptoGuard alone.
 
  •  The ability of HaptoGuard’s stockholders to continue to participate in the growth of the business conducted by Alteon and HaptoGuard after the completion of the merger. HaptoGuard’s board of directors believes that HaptoGuard’s stockholders will have the opportunity to participate in the combined company, with the potential to enhance stockholder value through share ownership in a larger, more competitive company, through their receipt of Alteon common stock in the merger, and to benefit from the potential appreciation in value of Alteon common stock.
 
  •  The strategic fit between Alteon and HaptoGuard. HaptoGuard’s board of directors determined that the combination of Alteon and HaptoGuard represented a good strategic fit. The combined company potentially could take advantage of the complementary nature of its product platforms in cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and other inflammatory diseases. In addition, HaptoGuard’s board of directors believes that the opportunities for the combined company to market its products will exceed those currently available to HaptoGuard.

I-37


Table of Contents

  •  The importance of scale in the increasingly competitive market environments in which both Alteon and HaptoGuard operate. HaptoGuard’s board of directors believes that the merger will enhance the ability of the combined company to compete effectively in competitive market environments, because the combined company will have greater financial resources and a wider array of product offerings.
 
  •  The belief that the combined company will be able to better develop and commercialize its products. Because of the complementary nature of the markets in which Alteon and HaptoGuard historically have focused their efforts, HaptoGuard’s board of directors believes that the opportunity for the combined company to better develop and commercialize products is substantial.
Other Factors Considered by the HaptoGuard Board of Directors
      In the course of its consideration of the merger, the HaptoGuard board of directors reviewed with HaptoGuard management and its legal and financial advisors a number of additional factors relative to the merger, including the following:
  •  the strategic and financial alternatives available to HaptoGuard, including the business, financial and execution risks of remaining independent, continuing as a stand-alone entity, seeking to acquire another company, seeking to engage in one or more joint ventures, seeking to engage in a combination with a company other than Alteon, or seeking to complete a private placement of HaptoGuard common stock;
 
  •  the results of HaptoGuard’s due diligence investigation of Alteon;
 
  •  historical and current information concerning HaptoGuard’s and Alteon’s respective businesses, financial performance and condition, operations, management, competitive positions, and prospects, both before and after giving effect to the merger;
 
  •  that, by combining operations, the combined company will likely have enhanced liquidity and access to capital markets;
 
  •  the terms and conditions of the merger agreement;
 
  •  the likely impact of the offer and the transaction on HaptoGuard’s employees; and
 
  •  the qualification of the merger as a tax-free transaction for United States federal income tax purposes.
Potentially Negative Factors Considered by the HaptoGuard Board of Directors
      HaptoGuard’s board of directors also identified and considered potentially negative factors relating to the merger in its deliberations, including but not limited to:
  •  the fact that under the terms of the merger agreement, HaptoGuard was required to terminate all discussions and negotiations with other parties who might be interested in negotiating a transaction with HaptoGuard, and that HaptoGuard is restricted in its ability to solicit other acquisition proposals;
 
  •  the challenges and costs of combining the operations of the two companies and the substantial expenses to be incurred in connection with the merger, including the risks that delays or difficulties in completing the integration could adversely affect the combined company’s operating results and preclude or delay the achievement of some or all of the benefits anticipated from the merger;
 
  •  the potential disruption to partner relationships important to either company as a result of the merger;
 
  •  the potential disruptions as a result of the integration process;
 
  •  the possibility that the reactions of existing and potential competitors could adversely affect the competitive environment in which either company currently operates, or the combined company could operate;

I-38


Table of Contents

  •  the termination fee payable by HaptoGuard to Alteon if the merger agreement is terminated by HaptoGuard for specified reasons, as well as the potential deterrence of other potential acquirors resulting from the existence of that termination fee;
 
  •  the risk of diverting management’s attention from other strategic priorities to implement merger integration efforts, as well as the fact that HaptoGuard officers and employees have and will expend considerable efforts attempting to complete the merger and have and will experience significant distractions from their work during the pendency of the merger;
 
  •  the significant transaction costs that HaptoGuard will have incurred in connection with the merger even if the merger is not consummated;
 
  •  the interests that certain executive officers and directors of HaptoGuard may have with respect to the merger in addition to their interests as stockholders of HaptoGuard generally, as described in “Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger” on page I-     ;
 
  •  the risk that the merger might not be consummated in a timely manner or at all; and
 
  •  various other applicable risks associated with the merger and the combined company, including those described under “Risk Factors” beginning on page I-     of this Proxy Statement.
      HaptoGuard’s board of directors believes that these risks were outweighed by the potential benefits of the merger. The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by the board of directors of HaptoGuard is not intended to be exhaustive. In view of the wide variety of material factors considered in connection with the evaluation of the offer, and the complexity of these matters, the board of directors of HaptoGuard did not find it practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise attempt to assign any relative weight to the various factors considered. In addition, the board of directors of HaptoGuard did not undertake to make any specific determination as to whether any particular factor, or any aspect of any particular factor, was favorable or unfavorable to the ultimate determination of the board of directors of HaptoGuard, but rather the board of directors of HaptoGuard conducted an overall analysis of the factors described above, including discussions with and questioning of HaptoGuard’s senior management and legal advisors. In considering the factors described above, individual members of the board of directors of HaptoGuard may have given different weight to different factors.
      There can be no assurance that the potential synergies or opportunities considered by the board of directors of HaptoGuard will be achieved though consummation of the merger. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page I-     .
Recommendation of HaptoGuard’s Board of Directors
      After careful consideration, HaptoGuard’s board of directors has determined, by unanimous vote of those directors voting on such matters, the merger to be fair to the stockholders of HaptoGuard and in the best interests of such stockholders and declared the merger advisable. HaptoGuard’s board of directors approved the merger agreement and recommends adoption of the merger agreement by the stockholders of HaptoGuard. In considering the recommendation of the HaptoGuard board of directors with respect to the merger agreement, you should be aware that certain directors and officers of HaptoGuard have certain interests in the merger that are different from, or are in addition to, the interests of HaptoGuard stockholders generally. See “— Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger.”
Accounting Treatment
      The merger will be accounted for as a purchase by Alteon under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets and liabilities of HaptoGuard will be recorded, as of the completion of the merger, at their respective fair values and added to those of Alteon. The reported financial condition and results of operations of Alteon issued after completion of the merger will reflect HaptoGuard’s balances and results after completion of the merger, but will not be restated retroactively to reflect the historical financial position or results of operations of HaptoGuard. Following the completion of

I-39


Table of Contents

the merger, the net loss and balance sheet of the combined company will reflect purchase accounting adjustments, including a one-time in-process research and development charge.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
      The following is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger that are generally applicable to holders of HaptoGuard common stock. This discussion is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which are referred to as the Code, the regulations promulgated under the Code, Internal Revenue Service rulings, and judicial and administrative rulings in effect as of the date hereof, all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. Any such change could affect the accuracy of the statements and conclusions discussed below and the tax consequences of the merger. This discussion does not address all aspects of federal income taxation that may be relevant to a HaptoGuard stockholder in light of the stockholder’s particular circumstances, or to those HaptoGuard stockholders who are subject to special rules, such as:
  •  financial institutions and mutual funds;
 
  •  banks;
 
  •  insurance companies;
 
  •  investment companies;
 
  •  retirement plans;
 
  •  tax-exempt organizations;
 
  •  dealers in securities;
 
  •  traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method;
 
  •  persons that hold their HaptoGuard common stock as part of a straddle, a hedge against a currency risk or a constructive sale or conversion transaction;
 
  •  persons that are or who hold their HaptoGuard common stock through partnerships or other pass-through entities;
 
  •  persons who are not citizens or residents of the United States or who are foreign corporations, foreign partnerships or foreign estates or trusts for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
 
  •  persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;
 
  •  persons who hold HaptoGuard stock as qualified small business stock within the meaning of Section 1202 of the Code;
 
  •  persons who are subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code; or
 
  •  persons who acquired their HaptoGuard common stock in connection with stock option or stock purchase plans or in some other compensatory transaction.
      This discussion assumes that HaptoGuard’s stockholders hold their shares of HaptoGuard common stock as capital assets. In addition, the following discussion does not address the tax consequences of the merger under foreign, state or local tax laws. Furthermore, the discussion does not address the tax consequences of transactions effected before, after, or at the same time as the merger, whether or not they are in connection with the merger, including, without limitation, transactions in which persons acquired HaptoGuard common stock or disposed of Alteon shares. HaptoGuard stockholders are urged to consult their tax advisors as to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger and related reporting obligations, as well as the effects of state, local and non-U.S. tax laws and U.S. tax laws other than income tax laws.
      It is the opinion of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., counsel to Alteon, that, subject to the qualifications set forth herein, the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger are as set forth below, such tax opinions are based on certain assumptions and subject to certain limitations and

I-40


Table of Contents

qualifications, including the assumptions that the merger will be consummated as described in this Proxy Statement and the merger agreement and that the factual representations contained in letters delivered to counsel by Alteon in connection with the tax opinions are true, correct and complete as of the date of the letters and will remain true, correct and complete through the effective time of the merger. An opinion of counsel only represents counsel’s best judgment, and has no binding effect or official status of any kind, and no assurance can be given that contrary positions may not be taken by the IRS or a court considering the issues. Neither Alteon nor HaptoGuard has requested or will request a ruling from the IRS with regard to any of the federal income tax consequences of the merger.
Tax Treatment of HaptoGuard Stockholders in Merger
      The following U.S. federal income tax consequences will result to HaptoGuard stockholders who exchange their HaptoGuard stock for Alteon stock:
  •  Qualification as a Reorganization. The merger will be treated as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the United States federal income tax laws.
 
  •  No Gain or Loss. Subject to the discussion below regarding cash received in lieu of fractional shares of Alteon common stock, as well as cash received upon exercise of appraisal rights, HaptoGuard stockholders receiving Alteon common stock in the merger in exchange for HaptoGuard common stock will not recognize any gain or loss as a result of the receipt of Alteon common stock in the merger.
 
  •  Tax Basis and Holding Period. A HaptoGuard stockholder’s aggregate tax basis in the Alteon common stock, including any fractional shares deemed received, as discussed below, will be equal to the aggregate tax basis of the HaptoGuard common stock surrendered in the exchange. A HaptoGuard stockholder’s holding period for the Alteon common stock received will include the holding period for the HaptoGuard common stock surrendered in the exchange.
Cash Payments Received in Lieu of Fractional Shares and/or Fractional Warrants.
  •  Gain or Loss. Cash payments received by HaptoGuard stockholders in lieu of fractional shares of Alteon common stock will be treated as if such fractional shares had been issued in the merger and then redeemed by Alteon. A HaptoGuard stockholder receiving such cash will generally recognize capital gain or loss with respect to such payment equal to the difference, if any, between such HaptoGuard stockholder’s tax basis in the fractional share, and the amount of cash received. The capital gain or loss will be long-term if the holding period for such HaptoGuard common stock is more than one year as of the date of the exchange.
Tax Treatment of the Entities.
  •  No Gain or Loss. No gain or loss will be recognized by HaptoGuard, Alteon or Alteon Merger Sub, Inc. as a result of this merger.
      Other relevant tax considerations in connection with the merger include the following:
      Payments in connection with the merger may be subject to “backup withholding” at a 28% rate. Backup withholding generally applies if a holder: (a) fails to furnish his, her or its taxpayer identification number, or TIN, (b) furnishes an incorrect TIN, (c) fails to properly include a reportable interest or dividend payment on his, her or its United States federal income tax return or (d) under certain circumstances, fails to provide a certified statement, signed under penalties of perjury, that the TIN provided is its correct number and that the stockholder is not subject to backup withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional tax but merely an advance payment, which may be refunded to the extent it results in an overpayment of tax. Certain persons generally are entitled to exemption from backup withholding, including corporations, financial institutions and certain foreign stockholders if such foreign stockholders submit a statement, signed under penalties of perjury, attesting to their exempt status. Certain penalties apply for failure to furnish correct information and for failure to include reportable payments in income. Each HaptoGuard stockholder should consult such

I-41


Table of Contents

stockholder’s own tax advisor as to his, her or its qualification for exemption from backup withholding and the procedure for obtaining such exemption.
      HaptoGuard stockholders receiving Alteon common stock in the merger should file a statement with their U.S. federal income tax returns for the year in which the merger occurs, setting forth the tax basis in the HaptoGuard common stock exchanged in the merger and the fair market values of the Alteon common stock received in the merger.
      The preceding discussion is intended only as a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger and does not purport to be a complete analysis or discussion of all potential tax effects relevant thereto. Thus, HaptoGuard stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to the specific tax consequences to them of the merger, including tax return reporting requirements, the applicability and effect of foreign, federal, state, local and other applicable tax laws and the effect of any proposed changes in the tax laws.
Regulatory Approvals
      Neither Alteon nor HaptoGuard is aware of any government regulatory approvals required to be obtained with respect to the consummation of the merger, except for the filing of a certificate of merger with the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, and compliance with all applicable state securities laws regarding the offering and issuance of the merger shares.

I-42


Table of Contents

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Introduction to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
      The following Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements combine the historical balance sheets and statements of operations of Alteon and HaptoGuard giving effect to the merger using the purchase method of accounting.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data
      The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and the year ended December 31, 2005 and the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2006 are based on the historical financial statements of Alteon and HaptoGuard, after giving effect to the acquisition of HaptoGuard.
      The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of Operations are presented as if the combination had taken place on January 1, 2005. It is expected that following the acquisition Alteon will incur additional costs in connection with integrating the operations of the two companies. These initiatives are expected to involve the termination of employees and the elimination of redundant facilities. Plans with respect to these restructuring activities are in the process of being developed. As such, integration-related costs and the related anticipated cost savings are not included in the accompanying Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements.
      The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet is presented to give effect to the acquisition as if it occurred on March 31, 2006, combines the balance sheet for Alteon as of March 31, 2006 with the balance sheet of HaptoGuard as of March 31, 2006 and reflects the allocation of the purchase price to the HaptoGuard assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
      The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements are based on the estimates and assumptions set forth in the accompanying notes to such statements. The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements are prepared for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been achieved had the transaction been consummated as of the date indicated or that may be achieved in the future.
      The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements of Alteon and the historical financial statements of HaptoGuard attached to this Proxy Statement. See Alteon Financial Statements and Annex G attached to this Proxy Statement.

I-43


Table of Contents

DRAFT
UNAUDITED PROFORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
March 31, 2006
                                   
            Proforma   Proforma
    Alteon Inc   HaptoGuard   Adjustments   Combined
                 
    Unaudited
    (In 000’s)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 4,469     $ 3       2,600 (6)   $ 6,972  
                      (100 )(6)        
Other current assets
    73       1             74  
                         
 
Total current assets
    4,542       4       2,500       7,046  
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
    41       5               46  
RESTRICTED CASH
    150                     150  
OTHER ASSETS
    424       24       (424 )(4)     20  
                         
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 5,157     $ 33     $ 2,076     $ 7,266  
                         
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
                               
Accounts payable
  $ 190     $ 188             $ 378  
Accrued expenses
    596       54       376 (4)     1,026  
                         
 
Total liabilities
    786       242       376       1,404  
                         
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
                               
Preferred stock
    1             (1 )(7)     (7 )
Common stock
    580             374 (3)     1,199  
                      110 (6)        
                      135 (7)        
Additional paid in capital
    229,400       2,897       (2,897 )(2)     240,401  
                      8,426 (3)        
                      2,492 (6)        
                      (100 )(6)        
                      (135 )(7)        
                      318 (5)        
Accumulated deficit
    (225,610 )     (3,106 )     3,106 (2)     (235,738 )
                  (10,128 )(3)      
                         
 
Total stockholders’ equity
    4,371       (209 )     1,700       5,862  
                         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
  $ 5,157     $ 33     $ 2,076     $ 7,266  
                         

I-44


Table of Contents

DRAFT
UNAUDITED PROFORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
                                   
            Proforma   Proforma
    Alteon Inc   HaptoGuard   Adjustments   Combined
                 
    Unaudited
    (In 000’s except per share amounts)
INCOME:
                               
INVESTMENT INCOME
  $ 358     $ 10             $ 368  
OTHER INCOME
    100                     100  
                         
 
TOTAL INCOME
  $ 458     $ 10             $ 468  
EXPENSES:
                               
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    9,074       916               9,990  
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
    4,325       749               5,074  
                         
 
TOTAL EXPENSES
    13,399       1,665               15,064  
                         
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT
    (12,941 )     (1,655 )           $ (14,596 )
INCOME TAX BENEFIT
    326                     326  
                         
NET LOSS
    (12,615 )     (1,655 )             (14,270 )
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
    4,486             (4,486 )(7)      
                         
NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
  $ (17,101 )   $ (1,655 )   $ 4,486     $ (14,270 )
                         
NET LOSS PER SHARE APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
  $ (0.30 )   $             $ (0.12 )
                         
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
    57,639,255                     119,491,069  
                         
Calculation of pro forma adjustment for weighted average shares:
                               
ALTEON INC WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
    57,639,255                          
add:
                               
COMMON SHARES ISSUED TO HAPTOGUARD SHAREHOLDERS
    37,399,065                          
COMMON SHARES ISSUED TO PIPE SHAREHOLDERS
    10,340,000                          
COMMON SHARES ISSUED TO RODMAN AND RENSHAW (PIPE)
    620,400                          
COMMON SHARES ISSUED TO GENENTECH UPON CONVERSION
    13,492,349                          
                         
 
TOTAL
    119,491,069                          
                         

I-45


Table of Contents

DRAFT
UNAUDITED PROFORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE 3 MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2006
                                   
            Proforma   Proforma
    Alteon Inc   HaptoGuard   Adjustments   Combined
                 
    Unaudited
    (In 000’s except per share amounts)
INCOME:
                               
INVESTMENT INCOME
  $ 60     $ 2             $ 62  
OTHER INCOME
                         
                         
 
TOTAL INCOME
  $ 60     $ 2             $ 62  
EXPENSES:
                               
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    450       481               931  
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
    1,232       172               1,404  
                         
 
TOTAL EXPENSES
    1,682       653               2,335  
                         
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT
    (1,622 )     (651 )             (2,273 )
INCOME TAX BENEFIT
                         
                         
NET LOSS
    (1,622 )     (651 )             (2,273 )
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
    1,175             (1,175 )(7)      
                         
NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
  $ (2,797 )   $ (651 )     (1,175 )   $ (2,273 )
                         
NET LOSS PER SHARE APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
  $ (0.05 )   $             $ (0.02 )
                         
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
    57,996,711                     119,848,525  
                         
Calculation of pro forma adjustment for weighted average shares:
                               
ALTEON INC WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
    57,996,711                          
add:
                               
COMMON SHARES ISSUED TO HAPTOGUARD SHAREHOLDERS
    37,399,065                          
COMMON SHARES ISSUED TO PIPE SHAREHOLDERS
    10,340,000                          
COMMON SHARES ISSUED TO RODMAN AND RENSHAW (PIPE)
    620,400                          
COMMON SHARES ISSUED TO GENENTECH UPON CONVERSION
    13,492,349                          
                         
 
TOTAL
    119,848,525                          
                         

I-46


Table of Contents

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
      (1) Description of Transaction and Basis of Presentation
      On April 19, 2006, Alteon entered into a definitive merger agreement with HaptoGuard, Inc., Genentech, Inc. and Alteon Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alteon. The merger agreement provides that upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into HaptoGuard, with HaptoGuard becoming the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alteon.
      At the effective time of the merger, (a) pursuant to the terms of Alteon’s certificate of incorporation and the merger agreement, Genentech will convert a portion of Alteon’s preferred stock that it holds into shares of Alteon’s common stock, such that the number of such shares of common stock to be issued will, when added to the shares of common stock already owned by Genentech, equal 19.99% of Alteon’s outstanding common stock as calculated after the conversion of the preferred stock; (b) Genentech will transfer to HaptoGuard a portion of Alteon preferred stock held by it, in such an amount that will convert to a number of shares of Alteon common stock, in accordance with the terms of Alteon’s certificate of incorporation and the terms of the merger agreement equal in value to $3,500,000 (the price per share of Alteon common stock based on the volume-weighted average price of the per share selling prices on the American Stock Exchange for the twenty (20) trading days immediately preceding the signing of the merger agreement); (c) Genentech will transfer to Alteon all of the remaining shares of Alteon preferred stock held by Genentech which are not either converted or transferred, and such shares of preferred stock shall cease to be outstanding, be canceled and retired without payment of any consideration therefor other than pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement and cease to exist; (d) every share of HaptoGuard common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger (other than the dissenting shares) shall be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of Alteon common stock equal to the quotient of (i) the sum of (x) a number of shares of Alteon common stock to be issued by Alteon to HaptoGuard stockholders at the effective time with a value of $5.3 million, plus (y) the number of shares of Alteon common stock to be issued pursuant to section (b) above at the effective time, the market value of (x) and (y) to be equal to $8,800,000, divided by (ii) the sum of (x) the number of outstanding shares of HaptoGuard common stock at the effective time, and (y) the number of Share Equivalents (as defined below) (the “Exchange Ratio”); and (e) each share of HaptoGuard common stock held in the treasury of HaptoGuard and each share of HaptoGuard common stock owned by Alteon or by any direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of HaptoGuard or Alteon immediately prior to the effective time shall, by virtue of the merger and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, cease to be outstanding, be canceled and retired without payment of any consideration therefor other than pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement and cease to exist. Alteon will assume each outstanding vested or unvested option to purchase HaptoGuard common stock, which will be exercisable following the merger for the number of shares of HaptoGuard common stock that were purchasable under such option immediately prior to the effective time of the merger multiplied by the Exchange Ratio (rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of common stock) and the per share exercise price for the shares of HaptoGuard common stock issuable upon exercise of such assumed option will be equal to the quotient determined by dividing the exercise price per share of HaptoGuard common stock at which such option was exercisable immediately prior to the effective time of the merger by the Exchange Ratio (and rounding the resulting exercise price up to the nearest whole cent). All outstanding warrants to purchase HaptoGuard common stock will be exchanged for the right to receive a number of shares of Alteon common stock (“Share Equivalents”) at the effective time of the merger which will have a market value equal to the difference between (i) the market value of the product of the number of shares of HaptoGuard common stock that were purchasable under such warrants immediately prior to the Effective Time multiplied by the Exchange Ratio (rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of Alteon common stock) and (ii) the total exercise price of such warrant.
      HaptoGuard has made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the merger agreement, including, among others, covenants (i) to conduct its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice during the interim period between the execution of the merger agreement and consummation of the

I-47


Table of Contents

merger, (ii) not to engage in certain kinds of transactions during such period, and (iii) not to solicit proposals relating to alternative business combination transactions. Alteon and Merger Sub have also made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the merger agreement, including covenants (i) to conduct its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice during the interim period between the execution of the merger agreement and consummation of the merger and (ii) not to engage in certain kinds of transactions during such period.
      Consummation of the merger is subject to certain conditions, including (i) receipt of any necessary governmental approvals, (ii) approval of the merger agreement and the merger by the stockholders of Alteon and HaptoGuard, (iii) absence of any law or order prohibiting the consummation of the merger, and (iv) subject to certain exceptions, the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by HaptoGuard and by Alteon.
      The merger agreement contains certain termination rights for both HaptoGuard and Alteon. Upon termination of the merger agreement under specified circumstances, the terminating party would be required to pay the other party a termination fee of $440,000 plus any payments already made pursuant to the merger agreement.
      The merger will be accounted for as a purchase by Alteon under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Under the purchase method of accounting, the net liabilities of HaptoGuard will be recorded as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair values, and combined with those of Alteon. The reported financial condition and results of operations of Alteon will reflect these values, but will not be restated retroactively to reflect the historical financial position or results of operations of HaptoGuard.
      As required by FASB Interpretation No. 4, “Applicability of FASB Statement No. 2 to Business Combinations Accounted for by the Purchase Method”, the Company will record a charge upon the closing of the transaction of approximately $10,092,000 for the estimate of the portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired IPRD (in-process research and development).
      A valuation using the guidance in SFAS NO. 141, “Business Combinations” and the AICPA Practice Aid “Assets Acquired in a Business Combination to Be Used in Research and Development Activities: A Focus on Software, Electronic Devices and Pharmaceutical Industries” was performed to determine the fair value of research and development projects of HaptoGuard which were in-process but not yet completed.
      (2) To eliminate the stockholders’ deficiency accounts of HaptoGuard.
      (3) To reflect the issuance of 37,399,065 shares of common stock to HaptoGuard shareholders, including 22,524,437 shares from Alteon and 14,874,628 shares from the conversion of Genentech’s preferred stock ownership in Alteon. The number of shares was calculated by dividing the preliminary purchase price of $8,800,000 by the 20-day volume weighted average market price of the stock or $0.2353.
      The components of the preliminary purchase price, which we anticipate will be charged to IPRD, are summarized as follows (000’s):
         
Common stock issued
  $ 8,800  
Fair value of HaptoGuard vested options @ 3/31/06
    318  
Estimated transaction costs
    800  
       
      9,918  
Net liabilities assumed
    210  
       
Total purchase price
  $ 10,128  
       
      (4) To reflect estimated transaction costs.
      (5) To reflect the fair value of vested HaptoGuard stock options exchanged for Alteon options.

I-48


Table of Contents

      (6) To reflect the issuance of 10,960,400 shares of common stock in connection with a PIPE to new investors at signing of definitive merger agreement. Includes 620,400 common shares issued to placement agent in lieu of cash fee. 10,340,000 sold for a price of $0.25 providing gross proceeds of $2,585,000 less approximately $100,000 in other cash expenses for net proceeds to Alteon of $2,485,000.
      (7) To reflect the partial conversion and cancellation of all outstanding preferred stock to Genentech in exchange for 13,492,349 shares of common stock and certain rights and royalties as noted in the definitive merger agreement.

I-49


Table of Contents

INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER
Interests of Alteon’s Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger
      In considering the recommendation of the Alteon board of directors that the Alteon stockholders vote FOR the merger and the merger agreement and the issuance of shares and the transfer and conversion of shares contemplated thereby, Alteon stockholders should be aware that certain members of the management and board of directors of Alteon have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of the Alteon stockholders generally. The board of directors of Alteon was aware of these potential conflicts of interest during its deliberations on the merits of the merger and in making its decision to approve the merger, the merger agreement and the related transactions.
Severance Arrangements
      Alteon entered into a three-year amended and restated employment agreement with Kenneth I. Moch as of December 15, 2004 as clarified and supplemented by Alteon’s Board meetings dated November 4, 2005 and December 7, 2005, pursuant to which the Board agreed that Mr. Moch should also be paid an amount equal to six months of his current annual salary upon the closing of a strategic transaction or liquidation in a way to maximize tax benefit to Mr. Moch and Alteon. Under the terms of the amended and restated employment agreement, Mr. Moch serves as Alteon’s Chief Executive Officer and is entitled to an annual salary for the 2006 fiscal year of $382,454 and a bonus of up to $150,000. Alteon entered into a three-year amended and restated employment agreement with Judith S. Hedstrom as of February 11, 2005 as clarified and supplemented by Alteon’s Board meetings dated November 4, 2005 and December 7, 2005, pursuant to which the Board confirmed that Ms. Hedstrom would receive one-year’s salary if terminated without cause prior to a change in control transaction. Further, it was agreed that she be offered a consulting contract for three months following termination, that she would be available to Alteon for up to 15 days during this period, and that her compensation under this agreement would be an extension of her right to exercise her stock options for a 2 year period commencing on April 30, 2006. It was also agreed that she would remain entitled to receive her CIC Plan benefit upon a Change in Control, offset by the amount of any payment received under her consulting contract and upon the termination of her employment without cause (i.e., total 1x salary benefit under the CIC Plan).
      In February 1996, Alteon adopted the Alteon Inc. Change in Control Severance Benefits Plan to protect and retain qualified employees and to encourage their full attention, free from distractions caused by personal uncertainties and risks in the event of a pending or threatened change in control of Alteon. The Change in Control Severance Plan provides for severance benefits to certain employees upon certain terminations of employment after or in connection with a change in control of Alteon as defined in the Change in Control Severance Plan. Following a qualifying termination that occurs as a result of a change in control, our executive officers will be entitled to continuation of (i) their base salary for a period of 24 months, and (ii) all benefit programs and plans providing for health and insurance benefits for a period of up to 18 months. In addition, upon a change in control of us, all outstanding unexercisable stock options held by certain employees that are participants in the Change in Control Severance Plan will become exercisable. The Change in Control Severance Plan was terminated in November 2005. However, such provisions remain in effect for Mr. Moch and Ms. Hedstrom pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements.
      The Alteon Severance Plan, which became effective June 1, 2005, provides for severance payments and benefits to certain employees upon termination of their employment as a result of a triggering event as defined in the Alteon Severance Plan. Upon a triggering event, these employees will be entitled to continuation of (i) their base salary for a period of up to six months, and (ii) all benefit programs and plans providing for health care coverage for a period of up to three months. Our obligation to provide severance payments and benefits to each employee ends if the employee secures employment during such time periods. In the event the merger is approved and all eligible employees are effected by a triggering event, the cost of such benefits would be approximately $1,429,764 in the aggregate.

I-50


Table of Contents

Interests of HaptoGuard’s Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger
      In considering the recommendation of the HaptoGuard board of directors that the HaptoGuard stockholders vote FOR the adoption of the merger agreement, HaptoGuard stockholders should be aware that certain members of the management and board of directors of HaptoGuard have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of the HaptoGuard stockholders generally. The board of directors of HaptoGuard was aware of these potential conflicts of interest during its deliberations on the merits of the merger and in making its decision to approve the merger, the merger agreement and the related transactions.
Alteon Management and Board Membership
      Three members of the HaptoGuard board of directors will be members of the Alteon board of directors, contingent upon completion of the merger. Upon the effectiveness of the merger, each new director will be entitled to receive cash compensation and option grants. All members of the board of directors of Alteon are eligible to receive cash compensation and option grants as further set forth under “Chapter Three — Other Information Regarding Alteon — Management — Compensation of Directors.” In addition, upon the effectiveness of the merger, Noah Berkowitz and Dr. Malcolm MacNab will hold executive positions and be paid employees of the combined company.
Indemnification; Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance
      For a period of six years after the closing of the merger, Alteon has agreed to indemnify the individuals who, on or before the closing of the merger, were officers or directors of HaptoGuard, with respect to all acts or omissions before the closing of the merger by these individuals in these capacities. HaptoGuard has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to negotiate and secure a “tail” on its existing directors, officers and company liability insurance policies with a nationally recognized insurance carrier providing for coverage at least as good as the coverage in its existing policy, for a period of six years from the effective time of the merger, provided however that such coverage shall not cost more than $400,000 in the aggregate to be paid by Alteon. Alteon has agreed that prior to the effective time of the merger, Alteon will negotiate and acquire a “tail” effective at the effective time of the merger, on its existing directors, officers and company liability insurance policy for a period of six years from the effective time of the merger, provided however that such coverage shall not cost more than $800,000 in the aggregate to be paid by Alteon. Alteon has further agreed to honor all of HaptoGuard’s indemnification agreements in existence prior to the closing of the merger.

I-51


Table of Contents

THE MERGER AGREEMENT
      The following summary of the merger agreement is qualified by reference to the complete text of the merger agreement, which is incorporated by reference and attached hereto as Annex A. The merger agreement has been included to provide you with information regarding its terms. You are encouraged to read the entire merger agreement. The merger agreement is not intended to provide any other factual information about us. Such information can be found elsewhere in this Proxy Statement and in the other public filings Alteon makes with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which are available without charge at www.sec.gov.
Structure of the Merger
      Under the merger agreement, Alteon Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Alteon, will merge into HaptoGuard, with HaptoGuard becoming the surviving corporation.
Timing of Closing; Effective Time of the Merger
      The closing will occur as promptly as practicable and in any event within two business days after the day on which the last of the conditions set forth in the merger agreement has been satisfied or waived (in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement), unless the parties to the merger agreement agree to a different date or the merger agreement has been terminated prior to such date. Alteon expects that, immediately upon the closing of the merger, the parties will cause to be filed a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of Delaware, at which time the merger will be effective.
Restructuring of Genentech’s Preferred Stock Position in Alteon
      Genentech currently owns 1,418.41 shares of Alteon’s Series G Preferred Stock and 4,260.52 shares of Alteon’s Series H Preferred Stock. On the basis of the trading price of Alteon common stock on March 31, 2006, such shares are convertible into 222,702,745 shares of common stock of Alteon, which would be approximately 79.3% of the outstanding shares of Alteon common stock as of March 31, 2006. Although Genentech is limited as to the number of shares of common stock of Alteon which it may own, it would be allowed to sell any shares converted and then convert additional shares of preferred stock. As part of the merger, Genentech will convert a portion of its existing preferred Alteon stock to 13,492,349 shares of Alteon common stock, which number after combined with prior shares owned would represent approximately 11.99% of the combined company after completion of the merger. A portion of the preferred stock held by Genentech, which when converted to common stock equals approximately $3.5 million in Alteon common stock, will be transferred to HaptoGuard shareholders as part of the merger. The remaining Alteon preferred stock held by Genentech will be cancelled and there will be no shares of preferred stock of any class outstanding. As consideration for the conversion, transfer and cancellation of Alteon preferred stock by Genentech, it will receive from the combined company certain milestone payments and royalties on net sales of alagebrium, Alteon’s lead compound, as well as a right of first negotiation on ALT-2074, HaptoGuard’s lead compound. This restructuring reduces Genentech’s ownership of Alteon and removes the substantial liquidation preference of Genentech’s stock which will remove an impediment to future financings of the combined company.
Merger Consideration
      At the effective time of the Merger, (a) pursuant to the terms of Alteon’s certificate of incorporation and the Merger Agreement, Genentech will convert a portion of the Alteon preferred stock that it holds into shares of Alteon common stock, such that the number of such shares of Alteon common stock to be issued will, when added to the shares of Alteon common stock already owned by Genentech, equal 19.99% of Alteon’s outstanding common stock, as calculated after the conversion of such Alteon preferred stock but prior to (i) the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock in connection with the merger; (ii) the issuance of Alteon common stock and warrants in connection with the $2.6 financing which occurred immediately after the signing of the merger agreement; and (iii) the conversion of Alteon preferred stock to be transferred to

I-52


Table of Contents

HaptoGuard in connection with the merger as described in clause (b); (b) Genentech will transfer to HaptoGuard a portion of Alteon preferred stock held by it, in such an amount that will convert to a number of shares of Alteon common stock, in accordance with the terms of Alteon’s certificate of incorporation and the terms of the Merger Agreement equal in value to $3,500,000 (the value of the price per share of the Alteon common stock referenced herein equal to $0.2353, based on the volume-weighted average price of the per share selling prices on the American Stock Exchange for the twenty (20) trading days immediately preceding the signing of the Merger Agreement); (c) Genentech will transfer to Alteon all of the remaining shares of Alteon preferred stock held by Genentech which are not either converted or transferred, and such shares of Alteon preferred stock shall cease to be outstanding, be canceled and retired without payment of any consideration therefor other than pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and cease to exist; (d) every share of HaptoGuard common stock (the “Shares”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger (other than the dissenting shares) shall be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of Alteon common stock equal to the quotient of (i) the sum of (x) a number of shares of Alteon common stock to be issued by Alteon to HaptoGuard stockholders at the effective time with a value of $5.3 million (the “Alteon Shares”), plus (y) the number of shares of Alteon common stock to be issued pursuant to section (b) above at the effective time, the market value of (x) and (y) to be equal to $8,800,000, divided by (ii) the sum of (x) the number of outstanding Shares at the effective time, and (y) the number of Share Equivalents (as defined below) (the “Exchange Ratio”); and (e) each Share held in the treasury of HaptoGuard and each Share owned by Alteon or by any direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of HaptoGuard or Alteon immediately prior to the effective time shall, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, cease to be outstanding, be canceled and retired without payment of any consideration therefor other than pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and cease to exist. Alteon will not issue any fractional shares. HaptoGuard stockholders will receive a check in the amount of (1) the fractional share multiplied by the price per share as determined by the volume-weighted average of the per share selling prices on the American Stock Exchange for the twenty (20) trading days immediately prior to the signing of the merger agreement.
      In consideration of the conversion, transfer and cancellation of shares by Genentech to HaptoGuard, Genentech will receive from the combined company certain milestone payments and royalties on net sales of alagebrium, Alteon’s lead compound, as well as a right of first negotiation on ALT-2074, HaptoGuard’s lead compound.
      For example:
      If you currently own 1,000 shares of HaptoGuard common stock, then at the effective time of the merger, based upon an assumed stock exchange ratio of approximately 3,521, you would receive 3,521,000 shares of Alteon common stock, and a check for any resulting fractional share of Alteon common stock. The value of the stock that you will receive will fluctuate as the price of Alteon common stock changes prior to the merger.
Treatment of HaptoGuard Stock Options and Warrants
      Alteon will assume each outstanding vested or unvested option to purchase HaptoGuard common stock, which will be exercisable following the Merger for a number of shares of Alteon common stock that is equal to the product of the number of shares of HaptoGuard common stock that were purchasable under such option immediately prior to the effective time of the merger multiplied by the exchange ratio (rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of Alteon common stock) and the per share exercise price for the shares of Alteon common stock issuable upon exercise of such assumed option will be equal to the quotient determined by dividing the exercise price per share of HaptoGuard common stock at which such option was exercisable immediately prior to the effective time of the merger by the exchange ratio (and rounding the resulting exercise price up to the nearest whole cent).
      All outstanding warrants to purchase HaptoGuard common stock will be exchanged for the right to receive a number of shares of Alteon common stock (“Share Equivalents”) at the effective time of the Merger which will have a market value equal to the difference between (i) the market value of the product of the number of shares of HaptoGuard common stock that were purchasable under such warrants immediately

I-53


Table of Contents

prior to the Effective Time multiplied by the Exchange Ratio (rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of Alteon common stock) and (ii) the total exercise price of such warrant.
Exchange of Shares
      Promptly after the effective time of the merger, Alteon will provide to each holder of HaptoGuard stock instructions explaining how to surrender HaptoGuard stock certificates to Alteon. Holders of HaptoGuard stock that surrender their certificates to Alteon, together with a properly completed letter of transmittal, will receive the appropriate merger consideration. Holders of unexchanged shares of HaptoGuard stock will not be entitled to receive any dividends or other distributions payable by Alteon after the closing until their certificates are surrendered.
      Alteon will not issue any fractional shares. HaptoGuard stockholders will receive a check in the amount of (1) the fractional share multiplied by the price per share as determined by the volume-weighted average of the per share selling prices on the American Stock Exchange for the twenty (20) trading days immediately prior to the signing of the merger agreement.
Alteon Board of Directors and Related Matters
      Alteon has agreed to take the necessary corporate actions so that, as of the closing of the merger, three nominees of HaptoGuard will become directors of Alteon. Upon completion of the merger, the board of directors will consist of eight members, including four of the current Alteon directors which shall initially consist of Kenneth I. Moch, Thomas Moore, Marilyn Breslow, and George M. Naimark, plus three nominees of HaptoGuard which shall initially consist of Noah Berkowitz, Wayne Yetter and Mary Tanner and one independent member to be designated by the board who may be appointed to the board after the completion of the merger.
Certain Covenants
      Each of Alteon and HaptoGuard has undertaken certain covenants in the merger agreement. The following summarizes the most significant of these covenants.
      No Solicitation by HaptoGuard. HaptoGuard has agreed that it and its officers, directors, employees, representatives or agents will not take action to solicit or encourage an offer for an “acquisition proposal.” An “acquisition proposal” is any other proposal or offer regarding any acquisition, merger, take-over bid, sale of substantial assets, sale of shares of capital stock (including without limitation by tender offer) or similar transactions. Restricted actions include engaging in discussions or negotiations with any potential bidder, or disclosing non-public information relating to HaptoGuard. HaptoGuard must inform Alteon of the identity of any potential bidder and the terms of any offer.
      HaptoGuard Board of Directors’ Covenant to Recommend. The HaptoGuard board of directors has agreed to recommend the adoption of the merger agreement and the merger to HaptoGuard’s stockholders.
      Alteon Board of Directors’ Covenant to Recommend. The Alteon board of directors has agreed to recommend the approval of the merger agreement and the issuance of Alteon common stock in connection with the merger to Alteon’s stockholders.
      Interim Operations of Alteon and HaptoGuard. Each of Alteon and HaptoGuard has undertaken a separate covenant that places restrictions on it until either the effective time of the merger or until the merger agreement is terminated. In general, HaptoGuard is required to conduct its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice and to use its commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact its business organization and relationships with third parties. Alteon has agreed to conduct its business in the ordinary course and consistent with past practice.

I-54


Table of Contents

      The companies have also agreed to some specific restrictions which are subject to exceptions described in the merger agreement. The following table summarizes the most significant of these restrictions, subject to certain exceptions, undertaken by each company:
                 
Restriction   HaptoGuard   Alteon
         
Amending its organizational documents
    *       *  
Acquire by merger, consolidation, or otherwise an interest in any corporation, limited liability company or other business
    *       *  
Issuing or disposing of equity securities, options or other securities convertible into or exercisable for equity securities
    *       *  
Splitting, combining or reclassifying its capital stock
    *       *  
Declaring, setting aside or paying dividends
    *       *  
Selling, transferring, or encumbering assets
    *       *  
Amending the terms of any outstanding stock options
    *       *  
Making significant capital expenditures, subject to certain ordinary course exceptions
    *       *  
Increasing employee compensation or benefits, except for normal ordinary course increases consistent with past practice, or establishing, adopting, entering into or amending any employee benefit plan
    *       *  
Changing its accounting policies
    *       *  
      Reasonable Efforts Covenant. Alteon and HaptoGuard have agreed to cooperate with each other and use all commercially reasonable efforts to take all actions and do all things necessary or advisable under the merger agreement and applicable laws to complete the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
      Indemnification and Insurance of HaptoGuard Directors and Officers. For a period of six years after the closing of the merger, Alteon has agreed to indemnify the individuals who, on or before the closing of the merger, were officers or directors of HaptoGuard, with respect to all acts or omissions before the closing of the merger by these individuals in these capacities. HaptoGuard has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to negotiate and secure a “tail” on its existing directors, officers and company liability insurance policies with a nationally recognized insurance carrier providing for coverage at least as good as the coverage in its existing policy, for a period of six years from the effective time of the merger, provided however that such coverage shall not cost more than $400,000 in the aggregate to be paid by Alteon. Alteon has agreed that prior to the effective time of the merger, Alteon will negotiate and acquire a “tail” effective at the effective time of the merger, on its existing directors, officers and company liability insurance policy for a period of six years from the effective time of the merger, provided however that such coverage shall not cost more than $800,000 in the aggregate to be paid by Alteon. Alteon has further agreed to honor all of HaptoGuard’s indemnification agreements in existence prior to the closing of the merger.
Representations and Warranties
      The merger agreement contains representations and warranties made by Alteon and HaptoGuard to each other with respect to each party’s:
  •  organization and qualifications to do business in foreign jurisdictions;
 
  •  subsidiaries;
 
  •  corporate authorization to enter into the merger;
 
  •  board consent to the transaction and stockholder votes required to adoption of the merger agreement or the issuance of Alteon shares pursuant to the merger agreement;
 
  •  SEC filings and certain compliance matters;

I-55


Table of Contents

  •  governmental approvals required in connection with the merger;
 
  •  absence of any breach of organizational documents, law or certain material agreements as a result of the merger;
 
  •  capitalization;
 
  •  absence of certain material changes since a specified balance sheet date;
 
  •  intellectual property;
 
  •  tax matters;
 
  •  finders’ or advisors’ fees;
 
  •  absence of undisclosed material liabilities;
 
  •  compliance with laws;
 
  •  material permits;
 
  •  restrictions on business activities;
 
  •  employee benefits matters;
 
  •  insurance policies;
 
  •  environmental matters; and
 
  •  business practices.
      In addition, HaptoGuard has made representations and warranties with respect to its:
  •  information provided by it for inclusion in this Proxy Statement;
 
  •  financial statements;
 
  •  litigation;
 
  •  labor and employment matters;
 
  •  properties and assets; and
 
  •  material contracts.
      The representations and warranties in the merger agreement shall survive the closing of the merger for a period of twelve (12) months, except with respect to the representations made by HaptoGuard with respect to its taxes and environmental matters, which shall survive until the expiration of the applicable statutes of limitation with respect to such claims.
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger
      Mutual Closing Conditions. The obligations of Alteon and HaptoGuard to complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction or, to the extent legally permissible, waiver of the following conditions:
  •  approval of the merger and the merger agreement and the issuance of Alteon stock and transfer and conversion of shares contemplated thereby by the Alteon stockholders;
 
  •  approval and adoption of the merger agreement by the HaptoGuard stockholders;
 
  •  absence of legal prohibition on completion of the merger; and
 
  •  all necessary governmental approvals shall have been obtained;

I-56


Table of Contents

      Additional Closing Conditions for HaptoGuard’s Benefit. HaptoGuard’s obligations to complete the merger are subject to the following additional conditions:
  •  accuracy as of closing of the representations and warranties made by Alteon to the extent specified in the merger agreement;
 
  •  performance by Alteon of the obligations required to be performed by it at or prior to closing to the extent specified in the merger agreement;
 
  •  all material consents and approvals required to be obtained, and all filings required to be made, by Alteon for the execution and delivery of the merger agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby shall have been obtained and made;
 
  •  no governmental actions or proceedings shall have been instituted, pending or threatened seeking to prohibit or limit HaptoGuard from exercising all material rights and privileges pertaining to its ownership of the surviving corporation in the merger or the ownership or operation by HaptoGuard of all or a material portion of the business or assets of HaptoGuard, or seeking to compel HaptoGuard to dispose of or hold separate all or any material portion of the business or assets of HaptoGuard, as a result of the merger or the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;
 
  •  assumption by Alteon of all outstanding vested and unvested options to purchase HaptoGuard Common Stock; and
 
  •  adoption of an employment agreement for Dr. Berkowitz in form and substance reasonably identical to the proposed employment agreement Dr. Berkowitz would have received from HaptoGuard in the event of an acquisition transaction involving HaptoGuard (where HaptoGuard remains the controlling entity).
      Additional Closing Conditions for Alteon’s Benefit. Alteon’s obligations to complete the merger are subject to the following additional conditions:
  •  accuracy as of closing of the representations and warranties made by HaptoGuard to the extent specified in the merger agreement;
 
  •  performance by HaptoGuard of the obligations required to be performed by it at or prior to closing to the extent specified in the merger agreement;
 
  •  all consents and approvals, if any, relating to certain material agreements have been obtained and such agreements are in full force and effect;
 
  •  no governmental actions or proceedings shall have been instituted, pending or threatened seeking to prohibit or limit Alteon from exercising all material rights and privileges pertaining to its ownership of the surviving corporation in the merger or the ownership or operation by Alteon of all or a material portion of the business or assets of Alteon, or seeking to compel Alteon to dispose of or hold separate all or any material portion of the business or assets of Alteon, as a result of the merger or the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement; and
 
  •  certain voting agreements and lock-up agreements, as specified, shall have been entered into and be in full force and effect.
      Additional Closing Conditions for Genentech’s Benefit. Genentech’s obligations to consummate the transaction contemplated by the merger agreement are subject to the following additional conditions:
  •  Alteon shall have filed an amendment to its Certificate of Designations of its Series G Preferred Stock and Series H Preferred Stock as described herein;
 
  •  the shares of Alteon common stock issuable to Genentech upon conversion of the shares of Series G Preferred Stock and Series H Preferred Stock held by Genentech shall have been approved for listing on the American Stock Exchange;

I-57


Table of Contents

  •  accuracy as of closing of the representations and warranties made by Alteon and HaptoGuard to the extent specified in the merger agreement; and
 
  •  performance by Alteon and HaptoGuard of the obligations required to be performed by it at or prior to closing to the extent specified in the merger agreement except as would not have a material adverse effect on such party.
Interim Payments to HaptoGuard
      In order to allow HaptoGuard to continue its clinical development programs and in consideration for HaptoGuard’s agreement to provide Noah Berkowitz and Malcolm MacNab to provide advice and counsel to Alteon during the period from the signing of the merger agreement to the effective time of the merger with respect to the clinical development of alagebrium, Alteon agreed to pay HaptoGuard an amount equal to $140,000 per month, subject to adjustment by agreement upon any material changes in personnel or clinical development programs, to be applied by HaptoGuard to payment of salaries and existing clinical development programs or additional programs as may be agreed upon by such parties going forward.
      In consideration of HaptoGuard’s agreement to provide advice and counsel to Alteon with respect to the corporate and scientific development of certain Alteon technology for the period from January 1, 2006 through the effective time of the merger, as described in a consulting agreement between Alteon and HaptoGuard, Alteon agreed to pay HaptoGuard an amount equal to $125,000 to be applied by HaptoGuard to payment of salaries and existing clinical development programs, or additional programs as agreed upon by such parties going forward.
Termination of the Merger Agreement
      Right to Terminate. The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the effective time of the merger in any of the following ways:
  •  By the mutual written consent of Alteon and HaptoGuard.
 
  •  By Alteon or HaptoGuard if:
        (1) subject to certain exceptions set forth in the merger agreement, the merger has not been completed by August 30, 2006;
 
        (2) Alteon or HaptoGuard stockholders fail to approve the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock or adopt the merger agreement, respectively, at a duly held meeting, provided that the party terminating may not be the party whose conduct was responsible for the failure to receive such vote;
 
        (3) certain breaches of covenants of the other party, respectively; or
 
        (4) if any representation or warranty of the other party or Genentech proves to be untrue prior to the effective time of the merger, if such failure to be true would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect, as defined in the merger agreement, if the terminating party is not in material breach of any of its obligation under the merger agreement and such representation or warranty is not made true within ten (10) business days of the date such representation or warranty became untrue.
  •  By either Alteon, HaptoGuard or Genentech if there is a permanent legal prohibition to closing the merger.
 
  •  By Genentech if:
        (1) it is not in material breach of any of its obligations under the merger agreement, if any representation or warranty of Alteon or HaptoGuard set forth in the merger agreement proved to have been untrue prior to the effective time of the merger, if such failure to be true would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect as defined in the merger agreement and such representation or warranty is not made true within ten (10) business days of the date such representation or warranty became untrue; or

I-58


Table of Contents

        (2) upon a breach of any covenant or agreement on the part of HaptoGuard or Alteon set forth in the merger agreement, in either case, such that any of Genentech’s conditions to consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement would not be satisfied, provided that, if such breach is curable prior to the expiration of ten (10) days from its occurrence by Alteon or HaptoGuard, as the case may be, through the exercise of its commercially reasonable efforts and for so long as Alteon or HaptoGuard, as the case may be, continues to exercise such commercially reasonable efforts, Genentech may not terminate unless such 10-day period expires without such breach having been cured.
      If the merger agreement is validly terminated, the agreement will become void without any liability on the part of any party unless such party is, prior to such termination, in breach thereof. However, the provisions of the merger agreement relating to termination fees will continue in effect notwithstanding termination of the merger agreement.
Termination Fees
Termination Fees Payable by HaptoGuard.
      HaptoGuard shall pay Alteon (x) a fee of $440,000 and (y) the amount of any interim payments made by Alteon to HaptoGuard pursuant to the merger agreement for payment of salaries and existing clinical development programs, or additional programs as agreed upon by such parties going forward (other than those made pursuant to the consulting agreement), upon the termination of the merger agreement by Alteon (i) in the event of the failure to receive HaptoGuard stockholder approval of the merger agreement; (ii) upon breach of any of HaptoGuard’s covenants or agreements but only with respect to a termination for a breach of any material covenant or agreement, (provided that at the time of such termination Alteon is not in material breach of any of the covenants or agreements set forth in the merger agreement that are applicable to Alteon), or (iii) if any representation or warranty of HaptoGuard proves to be untrue prior to the effective time of the merger, if such failure to be true would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect, as defined in the merger agreement, if Alteon is not in material breach of any of its obligation under the merger agreement and such representation or warranty is not made true within ten (10) business days of the date such representation or warranty became untrue.
Termination Fees Payable by Alteon.
      Alteon shall pay HaptoGuard a fee of $440,000 upon the termination of the merger agreement by HaptoGuard (i) in the event of the failure to receive Alteon stockholder approval of the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock or adoption of the merger agreement, (ii) upon breach of any of Alteon’s covenants or agreements but only with respect to a termination for a breach of any material covenant or agreement, (provided that at the time of such termination HaptoGuard is not in material breach of any of the covenants or agreements set forth in the merger agreement that are applicable to HaptoGuard), or (iii) if any representation or warranty of Alteon or Genentech proves to be untrue prior to the effective time of the merger, if such failure to be true would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect, as defined in the merger agreement, if HaptoGuard is not in material breach of any of its obligation under the merger agreement and such representation or warranty is not made true within ten (10) business days of the date such representation or warranty became untrue.
Voting Agreements
      All executive officers and directors of HaptoGuard, together with their affiliates, own as a group approximately      % of the shares of HaptoGuard common stock entitled to vote to adopt the merger agreement. A vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of HaptoGuard common stock is required to adopt the merger agreement.
      The Chief Executive Officer of HaptoGuard, Dr. Noah Berkowitz, and a family trust for the benefit of certain members of his family, together representing approximately 41% of HaptoGuard outstanding common

I-59


Table of Contents

stock, have entered into voting agreements with Alteon, under which these persons have agreed to vote their shares of HaptoGuard common stock:
  •  in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement,
 
  •  against any action or agreement that would reasonably be expected to compete with, prevent, impede, interfere with, attempt to discourage the merger or inhibit the timely consummation of the merger,
 
  •  against any action or agreement that, to Stockholder’s knowledge, would result in a breach in any material respect of any covenant, representation or warranty or any other obligation of HaptoGuard under the merger agreement, and
 
  •  except for the merger and the merger agreement, against any merger, consolidation, business combination, reorganization, recapitalization, liquidation or sale or transfer of any material assets of HaptoGuard or its subsidiaries.
Other Expenses
      Except as described above or herein, all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the merger agreement and related transactions will be paid by the party incurring such costs or expenses, whether or not the merger is consummated.
      Alteon shall be responsible for all fees and expenses incurred in relation to the preparation, printing, and distribution of this Proxy Statement, including any amendments or supplements thereto, provided that HaptoGuard shall pay the incremental costs for distributing the Proxy Statement to the shareholders of HaptoGuard and its costs in providing information for inclusion in the proxy statement.
      Within thirty (30) days of receiving an invoice from Genentech with supporting documentation attached, Alteon shall pay 100% of Genentech’s legal fees up to an amount of $50,000. In the event that such fees exceed $50,000, Alteon will pay 50% of such excess, up to an additional $25,000 to be paid by Alteon. In no case will Alteon pay more than $75,000 for such legal fees.
Amendments and Waivers
      Any provision of the merger agreement may be amended or waived prior to closing if the amendment or waiver is in writing and signed, in the case of an amendment, by HaptoGuard and Alteon or, in the case of a waiver, by the party against whom the waiver is to be effective. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no amendment may be made with respect to Genentech’s representations and warranties, the indemnification provisions, and certain other sections of the merger agreement without Genentech’s written consent. After the adoption of the merger agreement by the stockholders of HaptoGuard and the approval of the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock in the merger by the stockholders of Alteon, no amendment or waiver that by law requires further approval by stockholders may be made without the further approval of such stockholders.
Appraisal Rights
      By virtue of Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL, if holders of HaptoGuard stock exercise appraisal rights in connection with the merger, any shares of HaptoGuard stock as to which such appraisal rights are exercised will not be converted into the right to receive shares of Alteon common stock but instead will be converted into the right to receive such consideration as may be determined to be due with respect to such dissenting shares pursuant to the DGCL.
      THE FOLLOWING SUMMARY OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 262 IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A COMPLETE STATEMENT OF SUCH PROVISIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE FULL TEXT OF SECTION 262, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS ANNEX D AND IS INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE.
      If the merger is approved by the required vote of HaptoGuard’s stockholders, each holder of HaptoGuard stock who (1) files written notice with HaptoGuard of his, her or its intention to exercise his, her or its rights

I-60


Table of Contents

to appraisal of his, her or its shares prior to the HaptoGuard special meeting and (2) does not vote in favor of adoption of the merger agreement and who follows the procedures set forth in Section 262 will be entitled to have his, her or its HaptoGuard stock purchased by the surviving corporation for cash at the fair market value of the shares of HaptoGuard stock. The fair market value of shares of HaptoGuard stock will be determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, exclusive of any element of value arising from the merger. The shares of HaptoGuard stock with respect to which holders have perfected their appraisal demand in accordance with Section 262 and have not effectively withdrawn or lost such appraisal rights are referred to in this Proxy Statement as the “dissenting shares.”
      Within ten days after the effective date, HaptoGuard must mail a notice to all stockholders who have complied with 1 and 2 above notifying such stockholders of the effective date. Within 120 days after the effective date such holders of stock may file a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery for the appraisal of their shares, provided such holders may within 60 days of the effective date withdraw their demand for appraisal. Within 120 days of the effective time, the holders of dissenting shares may also, upon written request, receive from the surviving corporation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares with respect to which demands for appraisals have been received.
      If any holder of HaptoGuard stock who demands the appraisal and purchase of his, her or its shares under Section 262 fails to perfect, or effectively withdraws or loses his, her or its right to such purchase, the shares of such holder will be converted into a right to receive a number of shares of Alteon common stock in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement. Dissenting shares lose their status as dissenting shares if
  •  the merger is abandoned;
 
  •  the shares are transferred prior to their submission for the required endorsement;
 
  •  the dissenting stockholder fails to make a timely written demand for appraisal;
 
  •  the dissenting shares are voted in favor of adoption of the merger agreement;
 
  •  neither Alteon nor the stockholder files a complaint or intervenes in a pending action within 120 days after mailing of the approval notice; or
 
  •  the stockholder delivers to Alteon a written withdrawal of such stockholder’s demand for appraisal of his, her or its shares.
      FAILURE TO FOLLOW THE STEPS REQUIRED BY SECTION 262 FOR PERFECTING APPRAISAL RIGHTS MAY RESULT IN THE LOSS OF SUCH RIGHTS (IN WHICH EVENT A STOCKHOLDER WILL BE ENTITLED TO RECEIVE THE CONSIDERATION RECEIVABLE WITH RESPECT TO SUCH DISSENTING SHARES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MERGER AGREEMENT). IN VIEW OF THE COMPLEXITY OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 262, HAPTOGUARD STOCKHOLDERS WHO ARE CONSIDERING OBJECTION TO THE MERGER SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN LEGAL ADVISORS.

I-61


Table of Contents

CHAPTER TWO — INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING
      Alteon’s board of directors is using this Proxy Statement to solicit proxies from the holders of Alteon common stock for use at the Alteon annual meeting. We are first mailing this Proxy Statement and accompanying form of proxy to Alteon stockholders on or about                     , 2006.
Matters Relating to the Meetings
         
    Alteon Annual Meeting   HaptoGuard Special Meeting
         
Date, Time and Place:
            , 2006
10:00 a.m., Eastern Time
The Hanover Marriott
1401 Route 10 East
Whippany, New Jersey 07981
            , 2006
[                    ]
Purpose of Meeting is to Vote on the Following Items:   1. the merger and merger agreement and the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock and the transfer and conversion of shares of Alteon common stock contemplated thereby, described under “Chapter One — The Merger — The Merger Transaction — General” on page I-  ;   1. adoption of the merger agreement as described under “Chapter One — The Merger — The Merger Transaction — General”; and
    2. the adjournment of the annual meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of Proposal No. 1;   2. adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of Proposal No. 1; and
    3. the amendment to Alteon’s Certificate of Designation of Series G Preferred Stock, as described in the attached Proxy Statement; as described under “Chapter Six — Alteon Annual Meeting Proposals — Item 2 — Amendment of Certificates of Designation” beginning on page VI-  ;   3. such other matters as may properly come before the HaptoGuard meeting, including the approval of any adjournment of the meeting.
    4. the amendment to Alteon’s Certificate of Designation of Series H Preferred Stock, as described in the attached Proxy Statement; as described under “Chapter Six — Alteon Annual Meeting Proposals — Item 2 — Amendment” beginning on page VI-  ;    

II-1


Table of Contents

         
    Alteon Annual Meeting   HaptoGuard Special Meeting
         
    5. the election of two directors to serve until the completion of the merger or, in the event the merger is not complete, the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2009 and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified;    
    6. the ratification of the appointment by the Audit Committee of the board of directors of J.H. Cohn LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Alteon for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006; and    
    7. such other matters as may properly come before the Alteon meeting, including the approval of any adjournment of the meeting.    
Record Date:
  The record date for shares entitled to vote is [          ], 2006.   The record date for shares entitled to vote is [          ], 2006.
Outstanding Shares Held on Record Date:   As of [          ], 2006, there were [          ] shares of Alteon common stock outstanding. As of [          ], 2006, there were [          ] shares of Alteon Series G Preferred Stock and [          ] shares of Alteon Series H Preferred Stock outstanding.   As of [          ], 2006, there were [          ] shares of HaptoGuard common stock outstanding.
Shares Entitled to Vote:   Shares entitled to vote are Alteon common stock held at the close of business on the record date, [          ], 2006.   Shares entitled to vote are HaptoGuard common stock held at the close of business on the record date, [          ], 2006.
    Each share of Alteon common stock that you own entitles you to one vote.   Each share of HaptoGuard common stock that you own entitles you to one vote.
    Shares held by Alteon in its treasury, if any, are not voted.   Shares held by HaptoGuard in its treasury, if any, are not voted.

II-2


Table of Contents

         
    Alteon Annual Meeting   HaptoGuard Special Meeting
         
Quorum Requirement:
  A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. This means the holders of at least a majority of our common stock must be represented at the meeting, either by proxy or in person. Votes that are withheld, abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum.   A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. This means the holders of at least a majority of our common stock must be represented at the meeting, either by proxy or in person. Votes that are withheld, abstentions and broker non- votes will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum.
Outstanding Shares Entitled to Vote and Owned by Alteon and HaptoGuard Directors, Executive Officers and their Affiliates as of           , 2006:   [          ] shares of Alteon common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Alteon annual meeting. These shares represent in total approximately [  ]% of the voting power of Alteon’s common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Alteon meeting.   [          ] shares of HaptoGuard common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the HaptoGuard special meeting. These shares represent in total approximately [  ]% of the voting power of HaptoGuard’s common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the HaptoGuard meeting.
Vote Necessary to Approve Alteon and HaptoGuard Proposals
         
    Item   Vote Necessary
         
I.
  Merger Proposal   Alteon:
Approval of the merger and merger agreement and the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock and the transfer and conversion of shares of Alteon common stock contemplated thereby described in “Chapter One — The Merger” requires an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. Abstentions will be counted towards the vote total for each proposal, and will have the same effect as “Against” votes. Broker non-votes have no effect and will not be counted towards the vote total for any proposal.
        HaptoGuard:
Adoption of the merger agreement described in “Chapter One — The Merger” requires an affirmative vote of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of HaptoGuard common stock.
II.
  Adjournment of the meeting, if necessary   Alteon:
Approval of the adjournment of Alteon’s annual meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient vote to approve the issuance of the shares of Alteon common stock pursuant to the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, regardless of whether a quorum is present. Abstentions will be counted towards the vote total for each proposal, and will have the same effect as “Against” votes. Broker non-votes have no effect and will not be counted towards the vote total for any proposal.
        HaptoGuard:
Approval of the adjournment of HaptoGuard’s special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of adoption of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, if a quorum is present.

II-3


Table of Contents

         
    Item   Vote Necessary
         
III.
  Amendment of Alteon’s Certificates of Designation   Alteon:
The amendment of Alteon’s certificates of designation as described in “Chapter Six — Alteon Annual Meeting Proposals — Item 2 — Amendment” requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the issued and outstanding common stock and two-thirds of the issued and outstanding Series G Preferred Stock and Series H Preferred Stock, respectively. Abstentions will be counted towards the vote total for each proposal, and will have the same effect as “Against” votes. Broker non-votes have no effect and will not be counted towards the vote total for any proposal.
        HaptoGuard:
Not Applicable
IV.
  Election of two directors to serve until the completion of the merger or, in the event the merger is not completed, until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2009 and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.   Alteon:
The election of two directors to Alteon’s board as described in “Chapter Six — Alteon Annual Meeting Proposals — Item 3 — Election of Directors” requires the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast. Abstentions will be counted towards the vote total for each proposal, and will have the same effect as “Against” votes. Broker non- votes have no effect and will not be counted towards the vote total for any proposal.
        HaptoGuard:
Not Applicable
V.
  Ratification of the appointment by the Audit Committee of J.H. Cohn LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Alteon   Alteon:
The ratification of the appointment by the Audit Committee of J.H. Cohn LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Alteon as described in “Chapter Six — Alteon Annual Meeting Proposals — Item 4 — Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. Abstentions will be counted towards the vote total for each proposal, and will have the same effect as “Against” votes. Broker non-votes have no effect and will not be counted towards the vote total for any proposal.
        HaptoGuard:
Not Applicable
Voting
      Voting. You may vote in person at your meeting or by proxy. We recommend you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend your meeting. You can always change your vote at the meeting.
      Voting instructions are included on your proxy or proxy card. If you properly give your proxy and submit it in time to vote (or vote electronically via the Internet or telephone), one of the individuals named as your proxy will vote your shares as you have directed. You may vote for or against the proposals or abstain from voting. If you mark your proxy “abstain” with respect to any proposal, you will be in effect voting against the proposal. In addition, if you fail to send in your proxy, this, too, will have the same negative effect. If your shares are held in “street name” by a broker, bank or other nominee, the broker cannot vote your shares on any proposal without your instructions. This is a “broker non-vote.” A “broker non-vote” with respect to a proposal may have the effect of a vote against that proposal.

II-4


Table of Contents

How to Vote by Proxy
     
Alteon   HaptoGuard
     
Complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope. You may also vote electronically by Internet or telephone if your proxy card so indicates. You are encouraged to vote electronically if you have that option.   Complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope.
      If you submit your proxy but do not make specific choices, your proxy will follow the board of directors’ recommendations and vote your shares:
     
Alteon   HaptoGuard
     
• “FOR” the merger and merger agreement and the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock and the transfer and conversion of shares of Alteon common stock contemplated thereby;   • “FOR” adoption of the merger agreement;
• “FOR” the adjournment of Alteon’s annual meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient vote to approve the merger and merger agreement and the issuance of shares of Alteon common stock and the transfer and conversion of shares of Alteon common stock contemplated thereby;   • “FOR” the adjournment of HaptoGuard’s special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of adoption of the merger agreement; and
• “FOR” the amendment of Alteon’s certificates of designation of Series G Preferred Stock and Series H Preferred Stock;
  • In its discretion as to any other business that may properly come before the HaptoGuard meeting.
• “FOR” the ratification of J.H. Cohn LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm;
   
• “FOR” any proposal by the Alteon board of directors to adjourn the meeting; and
   
• In its discretion as to any other business that may properly come before the Alteon meeting.
   
      Revoking Your Proxy. You may revoke your proxy before it is voted by:
  •  submitting a new proxy with a later date,
 
  •  submitting a vote electronically via the Internet or by telephone with a later date, if that was how the original vote was submitted,
 
  •  notifying your company’s Secretary in writing before the meeting that you have revoked your proxy, or
 
  •  voting in person at the meeting.
      Voting in person. If you plan to attend a meeting and wish to vote in person, we will give you a ballot at the meeting. However, if your shares are held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, and you are a Alteon stockholder, you must bring an account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you are the beneficial owner of the shares on [                    ], 2006, the Alteon record date for shares entitled to vote at the annual meeting. If your shares are held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, and you are a HaptoGuard stockholder, you must bring an account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you are the beneficial owner of the shares on [                    ], 2006, the HaptoGuard record date for shares entitled to vote at the special meeting.
      People with disabilities. We can provide reasonable assistance to help you participate in the meeting if you tell us about your disability and your plan to attend. Please call or write to the Secretary of your company at least two weeks before your meeting at the number or address under “The Companies” on page I-     .

II-5


Table of Contents

      Proxy solicitation. Alteon will pay its own costs, if any, of soliciting proxies. Alteon reserves the right to retain outside agencies for the purpose of soliciting proxies.
      HaptoGuard will pay its own costs, if any, of soliciting proxies.
      In addition to this mailing, Alteon and HaptoGuard employees may solicit proxies personally, electronically or by telephone.
      The extent to which these proxy soliciting efforts will be necessary depends entirely upon how promptly proxies are submitted. You should send in your proxy without delay. We also reimburse brokers and other nominees for their expenses in sending these materials to you and getting your voting instructions.
      Do not send in any stock certificates with your proxy. Alteon will provide instructions for the surrender of stock certificates for HaptoGuard common stock to HaptoGuard stockholders immediately following the completion of the merger.
Other Business; Adjournments
      We are not currently aware of any other business to be acted upon at either meeting. Under the laws of Delaware, where Alteon and HaptoGuard are each incorporated, no business other than procedural matters may be raised at either the Alteon meeting or the HaptoGuard meeting unless proper notice to the stockholders has been given. If, however, other matters are properly brought before either meeting, or any adjourned meeting, your proxies will have discretion to vote or act on those matters according to their best judgment, including to adjourn the meeting.
      Adjournments may be made for the purpose of, among other things, soliciting additional proxies. Any adjournment may be made from time to time by approval of the holders of shares representing a majority of the votes present in person or by proxy at the meeting, whether or not a quorum exists, without further notice other than by an announcement made at the meeting. Neither Alteon nor HaptoGuard currently intends to seek an adjournment of their meetings.
Appraisal Rights
      Holders of Alteon common stock are not entitled to appraisal rights under Delaware law in connection with any matters to be voted on at the special meeting.
      Holders of HaptoGuard common stock are entitled to appraisal rights under Delaware law in connection with the merger. In order to validly exercise their dissenters’ appraisal rights under Delaware law, HaptoGuard stockholders shall (1) file a written notice with HaptoGuard prior to the HaptoGuard special meeting of the stockholder’s intent to demand payment for fair value for such holder’s shares and (2) not vote such shares in favor of adoption of the merger agreement, as more fully described in “The Merger Agreement — Appraisal Rights.” See “Chapter Five — Comparison of Stockholder Rights — Appraisal Rights.”

II-6


Table of Contents

CHAPTER THREE — OTHER INFORMATION REGARDING ALTEON
BUSINESS OF ALTEON
Overview
      We are a product-based biopharmaceutical company engaged in the development of small molecule drugs to treat and prevent cardiovascular disease and diabetes. We identified several promising product candidates that we believe represent novel approaches to some of the largest pharmaceutical markets. We have advanced one of these products into Phase 2 clinical trials.
      Our lead drug candidate, alagebrium chloride or alagebrium (formerly ALT-711), is a product of our drug discovery and development program. Alagebrium has demonstrated potential efficacy in two clinical trials in heart failure, as well as in animal models of heart failure and nephropathy, among others. It has been tested in approximately 1,000 patients in a number of Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials. Our goal is to develop alagebrium in diastolic heart failure (DHF). This disease represents a rapidly growing market of unmet need, particularly common among diabetic patients, and alagebrium has demonstrated relevant clinical activity in two Phase 2 clinical trials.
      We are in the process of preparing to submit an investigational new drug application (IND) to the Division of Cardio-Renal Drug Products (the Cardio-Renal division) specifically for alagebrium in heart failure, in order to expand our clinical program in this therapeutic area. However, any continued development of alagebrium by us is contingent upon our entering into strategic collaboration agreements for this product candidate which, among other things, would be required to include funding for product development.
      In June 2005, our SPECTRA (Systolic Pressure Efficacy and Safety Trial of Alagebrium) Phase 2b trial in systolic hypertension was discontinued after an interim analysis found that the data did not indicate a treatment effect of alagebrium and we have ceased development of alagebrium for this indication.
      Also, in June 2005, we announced that we had submitted preclinical toxicity data on alagebrium to two divisions of the United States Food and Drug Administration’s, or FDA’s, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), specifically the Division of Cardio-Renal Drug Products and the Division of Reproductive and Urologic Drug Products (the Reproductive/ Urologic division). The preclinical toxicity data were submitted in support of our view that liver alterations previously observed in rats, and reported in December 2004, were related to the male rat metabolism and not to genotoxic pathways. Subsequent preliminary data on liver alterations in rats had caused us to voluntarily suspend enrolling new patients into all of our alagebrium clinical trials in February 2005.
      Following review of the rat liver data, the Cardio-Renal division allowed us to proceed with the development of alagebrium in cardiovascular indications. The Reproductive/ Urologic division placed on clinical hold further enrollment in the EMERALD (Efficacy and Safety of AlagebriuM in ERectile Dysfunction in MALe Diabetics) study, our Phase 2a study of alagebrium in diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction, and requested further preclinical toxicity data, which we submitted in August 2005. After review of these data, the Reproductive/ Urologic division decided to maintain the clinical hold pending further preclinical testing. In January 2006, we announced that we had withdrawn the IND for the EMERALD study. We decided instead to commit our resources to the development of alagebrium in cardiovascular diseases. There can be no assurance that we will ever pursue the development of alagebrium for the ED indication.
      In November 2005, we announced that data presented at the American Heart Association (AHA), Scientific Sessions from the Phase 2a PEDESTAL (Patients with Impaired Ejection Fraction and Diastolic Dysfunction: Efficacy and Safety Trial of ALagebrium) study in diastolic dysfunction demonstrated the ability of alagebrium to improve measures of diastolic function, including a significant reduction in left ventricular mass.
      Also in November 2005, in conjunction with a presentation at the AHA, we announced positive findings from a Phase 2a study to evaluate the potential effects of alagebrium on endothelial dysfunction. Initiated in

III-1


Table of Contents

February 2004, the study was conducted at Johns Hopkins University (JHU) School of Medicine under grants from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and the Society of Geriatric Cardiology.
      As a result of having withdrawn the IND for the EMERALD study, there is no clinical hold remaining on alagebrium from any division of the FDA. The FDA has never placed a clinical hold on our protocols in cardiovascular diseases, which are under the oversight of CDER’s Division of Cardio-Renal Drug Products.
      We are primarily focused on fundraising activities and exploring strategic relationships to support our development programs. During 2005, as part of these efforts, we engaged an investment banking firm to help us identify potential strategic options for the company. On April 19, we entered into a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger with Alteon Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Alteon, HaptoGuard, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Genentech, Inc., a Delaware corporation. On April 21, 2006, we closed a private placement of Units, consisting of common stock and warrants, for gross proceeds of approximately $2.6 million. At the present time, we have significantly curtailed all product development activities of alagebrium due to the absence of sufficient financial resources to continue its development.
      We were incorporated in Delaware in October 1986. Our headquarters are located at 6 Campus Drive, Parsippany, New Jersey 07054. We maintain a web site at www.alteon.com and our telephone number is (201) 934-5000. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports, are available to you free of charge through the “Investor Relations” section of our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials have been electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.
PATHWAYS
The A.G.E. Pathway
      Advanced Glycation End-Products (A.G.E.) are glucose/protein complexes and are formed by a reaction between circulating blood glucose molecules and proteins. A.G.E.’s have been associated with protein crosslinking. These pathological complexes affect the structural chemistry of tissues and organs, resulting in increased stiffness and fibrosis, and compromised function. The A.G.E. pathway may provide the scientific explanation for how and why many of the medical complications of the aging process occur with higher frequency and earlier in life in diabetic patients. Diabetic individuals form excessive amounts of A.G.E.s earlier in life than do non-diabetic individuals, due primarily to higher levels of blood glucose. For this reason, diabetes may be viewed as an accelerated form of aging.
      A.G.E.s and A.G.E. crosslinks are considered to be likely causative factors in the development of many age-related and diabetic disorders. For example, proteins in the body such as collagen and elastin, which play an important role in maintaining the elasticity of the cardiovascular system, are prime targets for A.G.E. crosslinking. This stiffening process can impair the normal function of contractile organs, such as blood vessels, which depend on flexibility for normal function. A loss of flexibility of the vasculature is associated with a number of cardiovascular disorders, including diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and heart failure itself, as well as other diabetic complications.
      In addition to their role in promoting the fibrosis and stiffening of tissues and organs throughout the body, A.G.E.s have been shown to contribute to disease by adversely altering multiple inflammatory and metabolic pathways. A.G.E.s can lead to pathologic alterations commonly associated with diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy and processes that accelerate atherosclerosis.
      In recent years, our research and drug development activities targeting the A.G.E. pathway have focused on the development of A.G.E. Crosslink Breakers and A.G.E. Formation Inhibitors. We believe that we were the first company to focus on the development of compounds to treat diseases caused by A.G.E. formation and crosslinking. Since our inception, we have created an extensive library of novel compounds targeting the A.G.E. pathway and have actively pursued patent protection for these discoveries.
      The primary focus of our research and development activities is alagebrium, which is our lead product candidate, and we believe it to be the only A.G.E. Crosslink Breaker to have entered advanced human clinical

III-2


Table of Contents

testing. Alagebrium is the first rapidly-acting oral agent designed to “break” A.G.E. crosslinks, the benefit of which may be to restore structure and function to tissues and organs, thereby potentially reversing the damage caused by aging and diabetes.
OUR BUSINESS STRATEGY
      Our strategy has been to develop drug candidates from our proprietary portfolio of new chemical entities with a goal to develop compounds to address large medical needs that are unmet by existing therapies. We may seek, as appropriate, to selectively in-license clinical stage compounds and as appropriate to out-license or co-develop some drug candidates with corporate partners. Assuming we continue the clinical development of alagebrium, we may elect to retain development and marketing rights for one or several indications, while at the same time continuing to evaluate potential corporate partnerships for the further development and ultimate marketing of the compound. In addition to these pipeline products, we have identified compounds in multiple chemical classes of A.G.E. Crosslink Breakers and A.G.E. Formation inhibitors that may warrant further evaluation and potential development.
      In August 2005, in order to enable us to move forward with the continued development of alagebrium, we announced that we had engaged the services of Burrill & Company (Burrill) to assist in developing and identifying options designed to diversify our portfolio of product candidates and to enhance the ability to raise financing in the future. Such options include the acquisition of technologies and product programs, licensing opportunities, the sale to or merger into another company, and debt and equity financing.
MARKETS OF OPPORTUNITY
      Our research and development efforts have led us to an initial focus on cardiovascular and other vascular diseases, including heart failure, retinopathy and nephropathy, as well as other complications of diabetes. Therapeutic targeting of the A.G.E. pathway may reverse the progressive fibrosis and stiffening of tissues and organs thus potentially broadening our markets of opportunity to include additional medical disorders related to aging and diabetes. Importantly, there are currently no marketed drugs of which we are aware that are known to work directly on A.G.E.s and the structural stiffening of tissues and organs that lead to diseases such as heart failure and renal failure.
Diastolic Dysfunction in Heart Failure/ Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
      Diastolic dysfunction is the impaired ability of the heart to relax and fill properly after a contraction, in part due to the stiffening of the heart tissue. It is characterized by higher than normal pressures during the relaxing phase of the heart cycle (diastole). If the heart tissue (interstitium) has stiffened, the filling of the heart will be impaired. When the ventricles (the heart’s lower pumping chambers) do not relax and fill normally, increased pressure and fluid in the blood vessels of the lungs may be a result (pulmonary congestion), resulting in shortness of breath. Diastolic dysfunction can also cause increased pressure and fluid in the blood vessels returning to the heart (systemic congestion). Diastolic dysfunction is common to both systolic and diastolic heart failure in a group that collectively numbers about five million in the United States alone. DHF, which is estimated to account for 30% to 50% of all heart failure cases, is an especially poorly treated medical condition. Data presented from the Phase 2a PEDESTAL study in diastolic dysfunction demonstrated the ability of alagebrium to improve measures of diastolic function.
      Left ventricular hypertrophy, refers to the thickening of the left ventricle that can occur progressively with hypertension and DHF. It can lead to decreased cardiac output, the inability to meet the circulatory needs of the body and to heart failure itself. It is a condition associated with many cardiovascular diseases and DHF. Patients who were treated with alagebrium have experienced a rapid remodeling of the heart, resulting in a statistically significant reduction of left ventricular mass, as well as a marked improvement in the initial phase of left ventricular diastolic filling. Additionally, in several preclinical studies, alagebrium has been shown to reduce the thickening of the left ventricle and induce a reverse remodeling of the heart.
      The endothelium, a single-cell lining of the arteries that acts as an interface between the blood and arterial wall, is impaired in many cardiovascular conditions. Endothelial damage, and the resulting inability of

III-3


Table of Contents

smaller vessels to react to changes in blood pressure and flow, can be a predictor of present and future cardiovascular disease. Recent evidence suggests that when arteries become increasingly stiff, endothelial function is worsened even when the endothelial cells themselves are normal. The loss of vascular tone, due to the interaction between arterial stiffening and endothelial function, may be important in explaining why stiff arteries are a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Alagebrium has been shown to significantly improve endothelial function.
Complications of Diabetes
      A significant portion of diabetic individuals develop cardiovascular diseases and other complications due to the high levels of blood glucose and A.G.E.s within the body. According to the American Diabetes Association, heart disease is the leading cause of diabetes-related deaths. Heart disease death rates are two to four times higher in adults with diabetes than adults without diabetes. The risk of stroke is also two to four times higher in those with diabetes.
      The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, a multi-center clinical trial conducted by the National Institutes of Health, demonstrated that elevated blood glucose levels significantly increase the rate of progression of blood vessel, kidney, eye and nerve complications from diabetes. More than 50% of people with diabetes in the United States develop diabetic complications that range from mild to severe.
Kidney Disease
      Kidney disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. It is a chronic and progressive disease that affects approximately one-third of patients with Type 1 diabetes and approximately 10-15% of patients with Type 2 diabetes. One of the early signs of kidney damage is microalbuminuria (characterized by leakage of small amounts of protein into the urine), which progresses to overt nephropathy (characterized by leakage of large amounts of protein into the urine) and ultimately to end-stage renal disease. Diabetes is the leading cause of kidney failure in the United States.
OUR TECHNOLOGY: THE A.G.E. PATHWAY IN AGING AND DIABETES
      The harmful consequences of A.G.E. formation in man were proposed in the 1980’s by our scientific founders as an outgrowth of a research effort focused on diabetes. The foundation for our technology is the experimental evidence that intervention along the A.G.E. pathway provides significant benefit in slowing or reversing the development of serious diseases in the diabetic and aging populations. We are the pioneers in A.G.E. technology, and we have built an extensive patent estate covering our discoveries and compounds.
      A.G.E.s are permanent structures that form when simple sugars, such as glucose, bind to the surface of proteins. As the body ages, A.G.E. complexes form on proteins continuously and naturally, though slowly throughout life, at a rate dependent upon glucose levels and on the body’s natural ability to clear these pathological structures. A.G.E. complexes subsequently crosslink to other proteins. The A.G.E. crosslink has been found to be unique in biology and is prevalent in animal models of aging and diabetes. Scientific literature suggests that the formation and subsequent crosslinking of A.G.E.s is an inevitable part of the aging process and diabetes that leads to the progressive loss of flexibility and function in various tissues and organs.
      The formation and crosslinking of A.G.E.s is a well-known process in food chemistry called the Maillard Reaction. The browning and toughening of food during the cooking process occurs, in part, as a result of the formation of A.G.E. complexes between sugars and the amino acids of proteins.
      The A.G.E. pathway may provide the scientific explanation for how and why many of the medical complications of the aging process occur with higher frequency and earlier in life in diabetic patients. Diabetic individuals form excessive amounts of A.G.E.s earlier in life than do non-diabetic individuals, due primarily to higher levels of blood sugar. For this reason, diabetes may be viewed as an accelerated form of aging.
      A.G.E.s and A.G.E. crosslinks are considered likely causative factors in the development of many age-related and diabetic disorders. For example, proteins in the body, such as collagen and elastin, which play an important role in maintaining the elasticity of the cardiovascular system, are prime targets for A.G.E.

III-4


Table of Contents

crosslinking. This stiffening process can impair the normal function of contractile organs, such as blood vessels, which depend on flexibility for normal function. A loss of flexibility of the vasculature is associated with a number of cardiovascular disorders diastolic dysfunction, LVH and heart failure itself, as well as ED and other diabetic complications.
      In addition to their role in promoting fibrosis and stiffening of tissues and organs throughout the body, A.G.E.s have been shown to contribute to disease by adversely altering multiple inflammatory and metabolic pathways. A.G.E.s can lead to pathologic alterations commonly associated with diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy and alterations in molecules that accelerate atherosclerosis.
      We incurred research and development expenditures of $9,074,000, $10,147,000 and $9,930,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
A.G.E. Crosslink Breakers
      A.G.E. Crosslink Breakers have the potential to treat a number of medical disorders where loss of flexibility or elasticity leads to a loss in function. Our lead clinical candidate, alagebrium, has demonstrated the ability to reverse tissue damage and restore function to the cardiovascular system in Phase 2 clinical studies in cardiovascular distensibility and DHF. Additionally, we are evaluating the development of several compounds in the breaker class for other indications where A.G.E. crosslinking leads to abnormal function.
      We have identified several potential chemical classes of A.G.E. Crosslink Breakers, and have an extensive library of compounds.
Alagebrium
      Alagebrium is a small, easily synthesized compound with a rapid mode of action. It is well absorbed from an oral tablet formulation. The compound has completed several Phase 2 studies and is being evaluated in various preclinical models to assess its safety and potential in a number of other disease states.
CURRENT CLINICAL STUDIES
CLINICAL AND PRECLINICAL DEVELOPMENT OF LEAD COMPOUND ALAGEBRIUM
      Our current priorities are to continue the Phase 2 clinical development of alagebrium in heart failure. If we are able to obtain sufficient funding to do so, through a collaboration or otherwise, we hope to restart our clinical studies of alagebrium in heart failure in late 2006 or early 2007.
ALAGEBRIUM: AN A.G.E. CROSSLINK BREAKER
      We plan to pursue development of alagebrium in high potential cardiovascular indications such as heart failure, after recent data presented at the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions in November 2005 demonstrated continued positive results of alagebrium in patients with cardiovascular disease. The AHA presentations included data from the Phase 2a PEDESTAL study in diastolic dysfunction in heart failure with impaired ejection fraction, as well as positive results from a Phase 2a study in endothelial function.
      In addition to these and other Phase 2 clinical studies, we have also conducted a series of Phase 1 safety and dose escalation studies of alagebrium. These studies have thus far shown alagebrium to be safe and well tolerated in humans.
      We are in the process of preparing an IND specifically in heart failure in order to expand alagebrium’s clinical program in this therapeutic area. Based on the previous positive data in heart failure and endothelial dysfunction (see the discussions of the PEDESTAL, Johns Hopkins and DIAMOND (Distensibility Improvement And ReMOdeliNg in Diastolic Heart Failure) studies set forth below), we are proposing an advanced multi-institutional Phase 2 study involving 200 patients with diastolic heart failure and diabetes, and hope to initiate this trial in late 2006 or early 2007. However, any continued development of alagebrium by us is contingent upon our entering into strategic collaboration agreements for this product candidate which, among other things, would be required to include funding for product development.

III-5


Table of Contents

      As a result of having withdrawn the IND for our EMERALD study, discontinued the SPECTRA trial and completed the PEDESTAL and Johns Hopkins endothelial dysfunction studies, all of which are described below, we have no subjects currently under protocol in any clinical study of alagebrium.
      We continue to evaluate potential preclinical and clinical studies in other therapeutic indications in which alagebrium may address significant unmet needs. In addition to our anticipated clinical studies in heart failure, we have conducted early research studies focusing on atherosclerosis; Alzheimer’s disease; photoaging of the skin; eye diseases, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and glaucoma; and other diabetic complications, including renal diseases.
CLINICAL STUDIES
PEDESTAL
      In November 2005, we announced that data presented at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions from the Phase 2a PEDESTAL (Patients with Impaired Ejection Fraction and Diastolic Dysfunction: Efficacy and Safety Trial of ALagebrium) study in diastolic dysfunction demonstrated the ability of alagebrium to improve measures of diastolic function, including a significant reduction in left ventricular mass.
      PEDESTAL was an open-label exploratory study to determine the effects of alagebrium at two oral dosages (35 mg once a day or 210 mg twice daily) for 6, 12, 16 and 24 weeks on diastolic function and left ventricular mass in 20 patients diagnosed with systolic heart failure and diastolic dysfunction. Safety and quality of life were also evaluated. The study included men and women at least 30 years of age with or without diabetes, who were classified as having grade II to IV heart failure under the New York Heart Association guidelines. The primary endpoints, which include quantification of left ventricular mass and complete Doppler evaluation of changes in diastolic function, were designed to look at the therapeutic remodeling capability of alagebrium. Secondary endpoints include a quality of life assessment as measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire.
      The PEDESTAL data indicated trends consistent with positive data from our previous heart failure study, DIAMOND. While subjects in PEDESTAL could not be compared directly with those from DIAMOND, because those in PEDESTAL had impaired ejection fraction, larger hearts and were sicker overall, treatment with alagebrium appeared to have important and consistent effects in both patient groups.
      The AHA poster presentation, entitled “Improvements in Diastolic Function Among Patients with Advanced Systolic Heart Failure Utilizing Alagebrium, an Oral Advanced Glycation End-product Crosslink Breaker,” describes the key findings from PEDESTAL. Twenty-two subjects were treated at the Baylor College of Medicine in an open-label, two-dose (35 mg and 210 mg bid) regimen and followed by echocardiography. The data revealed significant improvements from a combined analysis of both dose groups in Doppler measures of diastolic function, including the early/late atrial filling phase ratio, deceleration time, isovolumetric relaxation time and resulting reduction of left atrial pressure. In addition, some patients achieved regression of left ventricular mass and left ventricular end-diastolic volume.
Johns Hopkins University Study in Endothelial Dysfunction
      Also in November 2005, in conjunction with a presentation at the AHA, we announced positive findings from a Phase 2a study to evaluate the potential effects of alagebrium on endothelial dysfunction. Initiated in February 2004, the study was conducted at Johns Hopkins University (JHU) School of Medicine under grants from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and the Society of Geriatric Cardiology.
      The JHU endothelial study was designed to enroll male or female subjects 50 years of age or more, with systolic hypertension (defined as having systolic blood pressure of greater than 140 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure of less than 95 mm Hg). Subjects received 210 mg of alagebrium twice daily for eight weeks, preceded by three weeks of twice daily placebo run-in dosing. The primary purpose of the study was to determine whether increasing arterial elasticity by breaking A.G.E. crosslinks improves endothelial function as assessed by evaluating vessel relaxation and biomarkers of endothelial function.

III-6


Table of Contents

      In the study, “Improved Flow-Mediated Arterial Vasodilation by Advanced Glycation Crosslink Breaker, Alagebrium Chloride (ALT-711), in Older Adults with Isolated Systolic Hypertension,” 13 adults with isolated systolic hypertension on stable antihypertensive therapy received a 2-week placebo run-in followed by 8 weeks of oral alagebrium. Data measurements were taken after placebo run-in and after 8 weeks of therapy. Treatment with alagebrium reduced carotid augmentation index (AI), a measure of arterial stiffness, by 37% and carotid augmented pressure, whereas pulse wave velocity (PWV) was unaltered. Thus, overall arterial stiffening, as reflected by AI, was markedly reduced by alagebrium therapy. Heart rate, brachial arterial pressures and brachial artery distensibility measures were unaltered by alagebrium therapy. However, alagebrium significantly improved flow-mediated dilation, a measure of endothelial function, by 102%. Alagebrium therapy improved peripheral artery endothelial function, independent of changing local arterial distensibility, suggesting a new mechanism through which alagebrium may act on A.G.E.s which directly impair dynamic vascular function in addition to its apparent effect on A.G.E.s impacting the structural aspects of arteries.
SPECTRA
      In June 2005, SPECTRA, a Phase 2b trial in systolic hypertension, was discontinued after an interim analysis of data from the first 190 out of an anticipated 400 patients in the trial did not indicate a treatment effect of alagebrium. Accordingly, we have ceased development of alagebrium for this indication.
SAPPHIRE/ SILVER
      The Phase 2b SAPPHIRE/ SILVER (Systolic And Pulse Pressure Hemodynamic Improvement by Restoring Elasticity/ Systolic Hypertension Interaction with Left VEntricular Remodeling) trial evaluated the effectiveness of alagebrium in approximately 770 patients having elevated systolic blood pressure with or without LVH. The trial was dose-ranging, double-blind, placebo-controlled and conducted at over 60 sites in the United States. In May 2004, the detailed findings from an analysis of the SAPPHIRE/ SILVER trial were presented at the American Society of Hypertension (ASH), Nineteenth Annual Scientific Meeting. These data, which were subsequently published in a supplement to the December 15, 2004 issue of the American Journal of Hypertension, demonstrated that treatment with alagebrium, as recorded by automatic blood pressure measurement (ABPM), resulted in a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure in patients that are traditionally difficult to treat.
      The findings supported the hypothesis that alagebrium works best in patients with more serious baseline hypertension via a mechanism of action unlike any currently marketed high blood pressure drug.
      We announced the initial results of the SAPPHIRE/ SILVER trial in July 2003. The pre-specified primary endpoint of this trial, reduction of systolic blood pressure by office cuff pressure measurement at the highest of the four active dose levels, 210 mg per day, did not demonstrate statistical significance as compared to placebo. The data analysis was confounded by a 6 to 10 mm Hg drop in systolic blood pressures in all arms of the SAPPHIRE/ SILVER trial, including placebo, during the first two weeks after patient randomization. However, subjects in the SAPPHIRE “intent-to-treat” population demonstrated efficacy net of placebo, in the 2 to 3 mm Hg range by cuff pressure, at the lower end of the alagebrium dosing range. As reported at that time, a pre-specified secondary analysis of ABPM measurements in subjects who completed the study demonstrated a blood pressure lowering effect at lower doses of about 4 mm Hg net of placebo. Importantly, there was no significant placebo effect noted in the ABPM measurements, and that data were presented at the ASH meeting in May 2004, as noted above.
DIAMOND
      In January 2003, we announced positive results from an analysis of the first 17 subjects in the Phase 2a DIAMOND clinical study, evaluating the potential effects of alagebrium in patients with diastolic dysfunction in diastolic heart failure. The study was conducted at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center and the Medical University of South Carolina in subjects at least 60 years of age with isolated DHF.

III-7


Table of Contents

      In the DIAMOND study, 23 subjects received 210 mg of alagebrium twice daily on an open-label outpatient basis for 16 weeks in addition to their current medications. Primary endpoints included changes in exercise tolerance and aortic stiffness. Effects on left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic filling and quality of life were also assessed. Those who received alagebrium for 16 weeks experienced a rapid remodeling of the heart, resulting in a statistically significant reduction in left ventricular mass as well as a marked improvement in the initial phase of left ventricular diastolic filling. Additionally, the drug was well tolerated and had a positive effect on quality of life. Measurements of exercise tolerance and aortic distensibility proved to be more variable than anticipated for a study of this size and were not reportable.
EMERALD
      In January 2005, we initiated a Phase 2a study to evaluate the potential effects of alagebrium in ED. EMERALD was designed to assess the ability of alagebrium to restore erectile function in approximately 40 male diabetic subjects with moderate to severe ED who achieve limited benefit from current treatment with PDE5 inhibitors, the first class of orally-active compounds approved for the treatment of ED. In a preclinical rat model of diabetes, alagebrium had demonstrated an ability to restore erectile function through what appeared to be a unique mechanism of action that might offer significant potential as an adjunctive treatment for diabetic ED.
      In January 2006, we announced that we had withdrawn the IND for the EMERALD study because the Reproductive/ Urologic Division had required additional preclinical testing of the drug before allowing phase 2a testing to proceed, and we decided instead to commit resources to the development of alagebrium in cardiovascular diseases. There can be no assurance that we will ever pursue the development of alagebrium for the ED indication.
      In June 2005, we announced that we had submitted pre-clinical toxicity data on alagebrium to two divisions of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, specifically the Division of Cardio-Renal Drug Products and the Division of Reproductive and Urologic Drug Products. The pre-clinical toxicity data were submitted in support of our view that liver alterations previously observed in rats, and reported in December 2004, were related to the male rat metabolism and not to genotoxic pathways. Preliminary data on liver alterations in rats had caused us to voluntarily suspend enrolling new patients into all of our alagebrium clinical trials, including EMERALD, in February 2005.
      Following review of the rat liver data, CDER’s Division of Reproductive and Urologic Drug Products placed on clinical hold further enrollment in the EMERALD study, our Phase 2a study of alagebrium in diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction, and requested further pre-clinical toxicity data, which we submitted in August 2005. After review of these data, the Reproductive/ Urologic division decided to maintain the clinical hold pending further pre-clinical data.
Phase 2a Cardiovascular Compliance Study
      In January 2001, we announced successful results from a Phase 2a clinical study of alagebrium evaluating the effects of the compound on cardiovascular elasticity and function. This study, conducted at nine United States clinical sites, was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the safety, efficacy and pharmacology of alagebrium.
      Study results showed that subjects who received alagebrium had a statistically significant (p<0.02) and clinically meaningful reduction in the arterial pulse pressure, defined as the difference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Results also showed a statistically significant increase in large artery compliance (p<0.03), an indicator of greater vascular flexibility and volume capacity, using a traditional measurement of the ratio of stroke volume to pulse pressure. Additionally, the drug was well tolerated.
PRECLINICAL STUDIES
      Alagebrium efficacy data are consistent across species. Studies in animal models in several laboratories around the world have demonstrated rapid reversal of impaired cardiovascular functions with alagebrium. In

III-8


Table of Contents

these preclinical models, alagebrium reverses the stiffening of arteries, as well as the stiffening of the hearts that are consequences of aging and diabetes.
      Preclinical studies of alagebrium conducted by researchers from the National Institute on Aging and Johns Hopkins Geriatric Center demonstrated the ability of the compound to significantly and rapidly reduce arterial stiffness in elderly Rhesus monkeys. In a preclinical study of alagebrium in aged dogs, administration of alagebrium for one month resulted in an approximate 40% decrease in age-related ventricular stiffness, or hardening of the heart, with an overall improvement in cardiac function. Additionally, in several preclinical studies, alagebrium has been shown to normalize the thickening of the left ventricle and to have a beneficial, therapeutic effect on reversing the pathologic remodeling of the heart. Preclinical studies have also demonstrated the beneficial effects of alagebrium on atherosclerosis, kidney disease, ED and certain eye conditions.
MANUFACTURING
      We have no manufacturing facilities for either production of bulk chemicals or the manufacturing of pharmaceutical dosage forms. We have relied in the past on third party contract manufacturers to produce the raw materials and chemicals used as the active drug ingredients in our products used in clinical studies, nd we expect to rely on third parties to perform the tasks necessary to process, package and distribute these products in finished form.
      We will inspect third party contract manufacturers and their consultants to confirm compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practice, or cGMP, required for pharmaceutical products. Upon any resumption of activity in our clinical trial program, we believe we will be able to obtain sufficient quantities of bulk chemicals at reasonable prices to satisfy anticipated needs.
MARKETING AND SALES
      We retain worldwide marketing rights to our A.G.E. Crosslink Breaker compounds. We believe that alagebrium may address the cardiovascular, diabetes, ophthalmologic and primary care physician markets. We plan to market and sell our products, if and when they are successfully developed and approved, directly or through co-promotion or other licensing arrangements with third parties. Such arrangements may be exclusive or nonexclusive and may provide for marketing rights worldwide or in a specific market.
PATENTS, TRADE SECRETS AND LICENSES
      Proprietary protection for our product candidates, processes and know-how is important to our business. We aggressively file and prosecute patents covering our proprietary technology, and, if warranted, will defend our patents and proprietary technology. As appropriate, we seek patent protection for our proprietary technology and products in the United States and Canada and in key commercial European and Asia/ Pacific countries. We also rely upon trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovation and licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our competitive position. In addition to our own patent filings, we have licensed or obtained technology and patent portfolios from others relating to the A.G.E.-formation and crosslinking technology currently under development by us.
      As of the date of this report, our patent estate of owned and/or licensed patent rights consisted of 84 issued United States patents and 15 pending patent applications in the United States, Canada and Mexico, the majority of which are A.G.E.-related. We also own or have exclusive rights to over 40 issued patents in Europe, Japan, Australia and Canada. These patents and additional patent applications cover compounds, compositions and methods of treatment for several chemical classes of crosslink breaker compounds, including alagebrium.
      We previously exclusively licensed from The Picower Institute for Medical Research, or The Picower, certain patentable inventions and discoveries relating to A.G.E. technology. The Picower license agreement was terminated as of April 15, 2002, when we entered into a Termination Agreement, pursuant to which The Picower assigned to us all of its patents, patent applications and other technology related to A.G.E.s. We

III-9


Table of Contents

agreed to prosecute and maintain the patents and patent applications and will pay to the trustee for The Picower royalties on any sales of products falling within the claims of these patents and patent applications until they expire or are allowed to lapse.
      We believe that our licensed and owned patents provide a substantial proprietary base that will allow us and our collaborative partners to commercialize products in this field. We believe our research and development plans will expand and broaden our rights within our technological and patent base. We are also prepared to in-license additional technology that may be useful in building our proprietary position. There can be no assurance, however, that pending or future applications will issue, that the claims of any patents which do issue will provide any significant protection of our technology or that our directed discovery research will yield compounds and products of therapeutic and commercial value.
      Where appropriate, we utilize trade secrets and unpatentable improvements to enhance our technology base and improve our competitive position. We require all employees, scientific consultants and contractors to execute confidentiality agreements as a condition of engagement. There can be no assurance, however, that we can limit unauthorized or wrongful disclosures of unpatented trade secret information.
      We believe that our estate of licensed and owned issued patents, if upheld, and pending applications, if granted and upheld, will be a substantial factor in our success. The patent positions of pharmaceutical firms, including ours, are generally uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. Consequently, even though we are currently prosecuting such patent applications in the United States and foreign patent offices, we do not know whether any of such applications will result in the issuance of any additional patents or, if any additional patents are issued, whether the claims thereof will provide significant proprietary protection or will be circumvented or invalidated.
      Competitors or potential competitors have filed for or have received United States and foreign patents and may obtain additional patents and proprietary rights relating to compounds or processes competitive with those of ours. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that our patent applications will result in patents being issued or that, if issued, the claims of the patents will afford protection against competitors with similar technology; nor can there be any assurance that others will not obtain patents that we would need to license or circumvent. See “— Competition.”
      Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain patent protection for our products, preserve our trade secrets and operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of third parties. There can be no assurance that our current patent estate will enable us to prevent infringement by third parties or that competitors will not develop competitive products outside the protection that may be afforded by the claims of such patents. To the extent we rely on trade secrets and unpatented know-how to maintain our competitive technological position, there can be no assurance that others may not develop independently the same or similar technologies. Failure to maintain our current patent estate or to obtain requisite patent and trade secret protection, which may become material or necessary for product development, could delay or preclude us or our licensees or marketing partners from marketing their products and could thereby have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
      We and our products are subject to comprehensive regulations by the FDA and by comparable authorities in other countries. These national agencies and other federal, state and local entities regulate, among other things, the preclinical and clinical testing, safety, effectiveness, approval, manufacturing, labeling, marketing, export, storage, record keeping, advertising and promotion of our products.
      The process required by the FDA before our products may be approved for marketing in the United States generally involves (1) preclinical new drug laboratory and animal tests, (2) submission to the FDA of an investigational new drug application, or IND, which must become effective before clinical trials may begin, (3) adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the drug for its intended indication, (4) submission to the FDA of a new drug application, or NDA, and (5) FDA review of the NDA in order to determine, among other things, whether the drug is safe and effective for its intended

III-10


Table of Contents

uses. There is no assurance that the FDA review process will result in product approval on a timely basis, if at all.
      Preclinical tests include laboratory evaluation of product chemistry and formulation, as well as animal studies to assess the potential safety and efficacy of the product. Certain preclinical tests are subject to FDA regulations regarding current Good Laboratory Practices. The results of the preclinical tests are submitted to the FDA as part of an IND and are reviewed by the FDA prior to the commencement of clinical trials or during the conduct of the clinical trials, as appropriate.
      Clinical trials are conducted under protocols that detail such matters as the objectives of the study, the parameters to be used to monitor safety and the efficacy criteria to be evaluated. Each protocol must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND. Further, each protocol must be reviewed and approved by an IRB.
      Clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases, which may overlap. During Phase 1, when the drug is initially given to human subjects, the product is tested for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution and excretion. Phase 2 involves studies in a limited patient population to (1) evaluate preliminarily the efficacy of the product for specific targeted indications, (2) determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage, and (3) identify possible adverse effects and safety risks. Phase 3 trials are undertaken in order to further evaluate clinical efficacy and to further test for safety within an expanded patient population. The FDA may suspend clinical trials at any point in this process if it concludes that clinical subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk.
      We will need FDA approval of our products, including a review of the manufacturing processes and facilities used to produce such products, before such products may be marketed in the United States. The process of obtaining approvals from the FDA can be costly, time-consuming and subject to unanticipated delays. We have experienced such delays in the past, including in February 2005, when, based on initial findings from a preclinical toxicity study that provided direction for further analysis, we voluntarily and temporarily suspended enrollment of patients into our ongoing clinical studies of alagebrium, pending receipt of additional preclinical data and discussions with the FDA.
      We cannot assure at this time when enrollment in our clinical studies will resume, if ever. There can no assurance that the FDA will grant approvals of our proposed products, processes or facilities on a timely basis, if at all. Any delay or failure to obtain such approvals would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, even if regulatory approval is granted, such approval may include significant limitations on indicated uses for which a product could be marketed.
      Among the conditions for NDA approval is the requirement that the prospective manufacturer’s operating procedures conform to cGMP requirements, which must be followed at all times. In complying with these requirements, manufacturers, including a drug sponsor’s third-party contract manufacturers, must continue to expend time, money and effort in the area of production and quality control to ensure compliance. Domestic manufacturing establishments are subject to periodic inspections by the FDA in order to assess, among other things, cGMP compliance. To supply a product for use in the United States, foreign manufacturing establishments must comply with cGMP and are subject to periodic inspection by the FDA or by regulatory authorities from other countries, as applicable.
      Both before and after approval is obtained, a product, its manufacturer and the holder of the NDA for the product are subject to comprehensive regulatory oversight. Violations of regulatory requirements at any stage, including the preclinical and clinical testing process, the approval process, or thereafter, including after approval, may result in various adverse consequences, including the FDA’s delay in approving or refusal to approve a product, withdrawal of an approved product from the market and/or the imposition of criminal penalties against the manufacturer and/or NDA holder. In addition, later discovery of previously unknown problems may result in restrictions on the product, manufacturer or NDA holder, including withdrawal of the product from the market. Also, new government requirements may be established that could delay or prevent regulatory approval of our products under development.
      For marketing outside of the United States, we will have to satisfy foreign regulatory requirements governing human clinical trials and marketing approval for drugs and diagnostic products. The requirements

III-11


Table of Contents

governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary widely from country to country. We do not currently have any facilities or personnel outside of the United States.
COMPETITION
      A.G.E.s have been shown to contribute to many of the disorders of aging and diabetes. Cardiovascular diseases and diabetic complications are among the diseases that may be a consequence of A.G.E. accumulation in the body. We are aware of many companies pursuing research and development of compounds for these indications. In addition, we are aware of companies, such as Novartis AG, that currently have or previously have had research and development activities in the A.G.E. field itself and may have identified candidates for clinical development.
      Our competition will be determined, in part, by the potential indications for which our compounds are developed and ultimately approved by regulatory authorities. An important factor in competition may be the timing of market introduction of our or our competitors’ products. Accordingly, the relative speed with which we can develop products, complete the clinical trials and approval processes and supply commercial quantities of the products to the market are important competitive factors. We expect that competition among any products that are approved for sale will be based on, among other things, product efficacy, safety, reliability, availability, price and patent position. Our competitive position also depends upon our ability to obtain sufficient capital resources, attract and retain qualified personnel, and obtain protection for or otherwise develop proprietary products or processes.
      We are competing in an industry in which technologies can become obsolete over time, thereby reducing or eliminating the market for any pharmaceutical product. For example, competitive drugs based on other therapeutic mechanisms are currently marketed and are being developed to treat cardiovascular disease and diabetic complications. The development by others of non-A.G.E.-related treatment modalities could render any products that we develop non-competitive. Therapeutic approaches being pursued by others include treating cardiovascular disease and diabetic complications via gene therapy and cell transplantation, as well as pharmaceutical intervention with agents such as aldose reductase inhibitors.
      There are many drugs currently being used for the treatment of heart failure including ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, adrenergic alpha 1 receptor antagonists, aldosterone inhibitors, beta-blockers and diuretics, among others.
      Most of our competitors and potential competitors have significantly greater financial resources than we have. Our competitive position also depends on our ability to enter into a collaboration agreement with respect to alagebrium, and we cannot assure that we will be able to do so on reasonable terms, or at all.
MEDICAL AND CLINICAL ADVISORS
      Our Medical and Clinical Advisors are individuals with recognized expertise in medical and pharmaceutical sciences and related fields who advise us about present and long-term scientific planning, research and development. These advisors consult and meet with our management informally on a frequent basis. All advisors are employed by employers other than us, who may also be competitors of ours, and may have commitments to, or consulting or advisory agreements with, other entities that may limit their availability to us. The advisors have agreed, however, not to provide any services to any other entities that might conflict with the activities that they provide us. Each member also has executed a confidentiality agreement for our benefit.
      The following persons are our Medical and Clinical Advisors:
  Daniel Burkhoff, M.D., PhD, Adjunct Associate Professor, Medicine/ Cardiology, Columbia University and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Chief Medical Officer, Impulse Dynamics.
 
  Norman K. Hollenberg, M.D., Ph.D., Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Director of Physiologic Research, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston; served as an Editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.
 
  Dalane Kitzman, M.D., Professor, Cardiology, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center.

III-12


Table of Contents

  Peter R. Kowey, M.D., Full Professor, Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology, Jefferson Medical College; President and Chief of the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Main Line Health Heart Center, Lankenau Hospital; Fellow of the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, the American College of Physicians, the College of Physicians of Philadelphia, the American College of Chest Physicians and the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
 
  William Little, M.D., Section Head, Professor, Cardiology, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center.
 
  Craig M. Pratt, M.D., Professor of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine; Director of Research, Methodist DeBakey Heart Center; Director, Coronary Intensive Care Unit, The Methodist Hospital; Member, Continuing Medical Education Advisory Board, Discovery International; Fellow, American College of Cardiology.
 
  Vinay Thohan, M.D., Assistant Professor of Medicine, Methodist DeBakey Heart Center.
 
  Guillermo Torre, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Medicine/ Medical Director, Heart Transplant Service, Methodist DeBakey Heart Center.
 
  Susan Zieman, M.D., PhD, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Medicine/ Cardiovascular, John Hopkins School of Medicine.
      As of March 1, 2006, we employed seven persons; one engaged in research and development, and 6 engaged in administration and management. One of those employed held a Ph.D. We believe that we have been successful in the past in attracting skilled and experienced personnel. Our employees are not covered by collective bargaining agreements. All employees are covered by confidentiality agreements. We believe that our relationship with our employees is good. We have also engaged consultants for certain administrative and scientific functions.
PROPERTIES
      We lease 10,800 square feet of space in a building in Parsippany, New Jersey, which contains our executive and administrative offices. The lease, which commenced on December 1, 2003, has a 37-month term. We currently do not intend to renew this lease, which expires on December 31, 2006. We believe that alternate commercial space is available on reasonable terms.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
      The lawsuit referred to in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 against Advanced Biologics L.L.C. has settled and, pursuant to the terms of the settlement, we and Advanced Biologics have dismissed outstanding claims against each other and an undisclosed payment has been received by Alteon.

III-13


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
      We are a product-based biopharmaceutical company engaged in the development of small molecule drugs to treat and prevent cardiovascular disease and diabetes. We have identified several promising product candidates that we believe represent novel approaches to some of the largest pharmaceutical markets. We have advanced one of these products into Phase 2 clinical trials.
      Our lead drug candidate, alagebrium, is a product of our drug discovery and development program. Alagebrium has demonstrated potential efficacy in two clinical trials in heart failure, as well as in animal models of heart failure, nephropathy, hypertension and erectile dysfunction. It has been tested in approximately 1,000 patients in a number of Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials. However, we have significantly curtailed all product development activities of alagebrium due to an absence of sufficient financial resources to continue its development. As announced on February 1, 2006, while our goal is to pursue development of alagebrium in high potential cardiovascular indications such as diastolic heart failure, any continued development of alagebrium by us is contingent upon our entering into strategic collaboration agreements for this product candidate which, among other things, would be required to include funding for product development. We may not be able to enter into a strategic collaboration agreement with respect to alagebrium on reasonable terms, or at all. No enrollment or other activity is taking place with respect to any of our Phase 2 trials of alagebrium pending the resolution of our financial resource issues.
      We expect to utilize cash and cash equivalents to fund our operating activities, including any continued development of our lead compound, alagebrium. As a result of the discontinuation of the Phase 2b SPECTRA trial in systolic hypertension, we have undertaken curtailment actions and expect to have reduced expenses in the first half of 2006. These actions include evaluating clinical strategies before resuming clinical trials, increased selectivity in preclinical programs and reduced headcount. We have engaged third parties to assist in developing and identifying options designed to diversify our portfolio of product candidates. If we are unable to secure additional financing on reasonable terms, unable to generate sufficient new sources of revenue through collaborative arrangements or if the level of cash and cash equivalents falls below anticipated levels, we will not have the ability to continue as a going concern after mid-2006.
      We are in the process of preparing to submit an IND to the FDA’s Division of Cardio-Renal Drug Products specifically for alagebrium in heart failure, in order to expand our clinical program in this therapeutic area.
      If we are able to continue the clinical development of alagebrium, we will determine if it is appropriate to retain development and marketing rights for one or several indications, while at the same time continuing to evaluate potential corporate partnerships for the further development and ultimate marketing of the compound in other territories throughout the world. We believe that alagebrium may address the cardiovascular, diabetes, and primary care physician markets.
      We cannot predict at this time when enrollment in our clinical studies will resume, if ever. If we do not resume enrollment in one or more of our clinical studies, we will evaluate moving into more focused clinical trials in different indications or returning to our pre-clinical library of compounds to identify new compounds to bring forward for further evaluation. Should we be unable to resume enrollment in our clinical studies, in a timely manner, or at all, our business will be materially adversely affected.
      We continue to evaluate potential preclinical and clinical trials in other therapeutic indications in which A.G.E. Crosslink Breaker compounds may address significant unmet needs. In addition to our clinical studies in heart failure and endothelial dysfunction, we have early research studies focused on atherosclerosis; Alzheimer’s disease; photoaging of the skin; eye diseases, including AMD and glaucoma; and diabetic complications, including renal diseases. However, the pursuit of research or development in any of these areas is contingent upon our ability to secure sufficient funding to proceed with these programs.

III-14


Table of Contents

      Since our inception in October 1986, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to research, drug discovery and development programs. To date, we have not generated any revenues from the sale of products and do not expect to generate any such revenues for a number of years, if at all. We have incurred an accumulated deficit of $222,813,000 as of December 31, 2005, and expect to incur net losses, potentially greater than losses in prior years, for a number of years.
      We have financed our operations through proceeds from public offerings of common stock, private placements of common and preferred equity securities, revenue from former collaborative relationships, reimbursement of certain of our research and development expenses by our collaborative partners, investment income earned on cash balances and short-term investments and the sale of a portion of our New Jersey State net operating loss carryforwards.
      In April 2006, we announced the signing of a definitive merger agreement with HaptoGuard, Inc., whereby the two companies will combine operations. The companies have complementary product platforms in cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and other inflammatory diseases. We have begun working with the HaptoGuard team in anticipation of the merger of the companies, and are preparing a Phase 2 protocol for alagebrium in heart failure in order to expand our clinical program in this therapeutic area. However, any continued development of alagebrium by us is contingent upon the successful completion of the merger and adequate funding for product development.
      Following the merger, the combined company will have two products in Phase 2 clinical development:
  •  Alagebrium chloride (formally ALT-711), Alteon’s lead compound, is an Advanced Glycation End-product Crosslink Breaker being developed for heart failure. Data presented from two Phase 2 clinical studies at the American Heart Association meeting in November 2005 demonstrated the ability of alagebrium to improve overall cardiac function, including measures of diastolic and endothelial function. In these studies, alagebrium also demonstrated the ability to significantly reduce left ventricular mass. The compound has been tested in approximately 1,000 patients, which represents a sizeable human safety database, in a number of Phase 2 clinical trials.
 
  •  ALT-2074 (formerly BXT-51072), HaptoGuard’s licensed lead compound, is a glutathione peroxidase mimetic in development for reduction of mortality in post-myocardial infarction patients with diabetes. The compound has shown the ability to reduce infarct size by approximately 85% in a mouse model of heart attack called ischemia reperfusion injury.
      Additionally, HaptoGuard owns a license to a proprietary genetic biomarker that has shown the potential to identify patients who are most responsive to the HaptoGuard compound.
      In April 2006, we also announced the signing of definitive agreements for an equity financing which resulted in gross proceeds to us of approximately $2.6 million. The PIPE financing includes new and existing institutional investors, in which we sold approximately 10.3 million Units, consisting of common stock and warrants, for net proceeds after expenses and fees of approximately $2.5 million. Each Unit consists of one share of Alteon common stock and one warrant to purchase one share of Alteon common stock. The Units were sold at a price of $0.25 per Unit and the warrants are exercisable, commencing six months from the date of issuance, for a period of five years at an exercise price of $0.30 per share. The shares of common stock and warrants that were offered and sold in the financing were not registered under the Securities Act or state securities laws pursuant to an exemption from registration provided by Regulation D under the Securities Act. We have filed a registration statement with the SEC for the resale of the shares of common stock and the shares of common stock underlying the warrants sold in the PIPE transaction. Rodman & Renshaw, LLC served as placement agent in the transaction and received a 6% placement fee which was paid in Units.
      Our business is subject to significant risks including, but not limited to, (1) our ability to obtain sufficient additional funding in the near term, whether through a strategic collaboration agreement or otherwise, to allow us to resume the development of alagebrium and to continue operations, (2) our ability to restructure our preferred stock agreement with Genentech through completion of the merger with HaptoGuard (3) our ability to resume enrollment in our clinical studies of alagebrium should we have adequate financial and other resources to do so, (4) the risks inherent in our research and development efforts, including clinical trials and

III-15


Table of Contents

the length, expense and uncertainty of the process of seeking regulatory approvals for our product candidates, (5) our reliance on alagebrium, which is our only significant drug candidate, (6) uncertainties associated with obtaining and enforcing our patents and with the patent rights of others, (7) uncertainties regarding government healthcare reforms and product pricing and reimbursement levels, (8) technological change and competition, (9) manufacturing uncertainties, and (10) dependence on collaborative partners and other third parties. Even if our product candidates appear promising at an early stage of development, they may not reach the market for numerous reasons. These reasons include the possibilities that the products will prove ineffective or unsafe during preclinical or clinical studies, will fail to receive necessary regulatory approvals, will be difficult to manufacture on a large scale, will be uneconomical to market or will be precluded from commercialization by proprietary rights of third parties. These risks and others are discussed under the heading “Risk Factors.”
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
Revenues
      Total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, was $60,000 and $99,000, respectively. Revenues were derived from interest earned on cash and cash equivalents. The decrease from 2005 to 2006 was attributed to lower investment balances and partially offset by higher interest rates.
Operating Expenses
      Our total expenses were $1,682,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, compared to $4,741,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, and in each period consisted primarily of research and development expenses. Research and development expenses normally include third-party expenses associated with pre-clinical and clinical studies, manufacturing costs, including the development and preparation of clinical supplies, personnel and personnel-related expenses and facility expenses.
      Research and development expenses were $450,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to $3,641,000 for the same period in 2005, a decrease of $3,191,000, or 87.6%. This decrease was attributed to decreased clinical trial costs and manufacturing expenses as a result of the discontinuation in June 2005 of our Systolic Pressure Efficacy and Safety Trial of Alagebrium (“SPECTRA”). In 2006, of the total amount spent on research and development expenses, we incurred $233,000 in personnel and personnel-related expenses, $101,000 in product liability insurance and $86,000 in third party consulting. In 2005, we incurred $1,275,000 in clinical trial expenses primarily related to SPECTRA, $1,252,000 in personnel and personnel-related expenses, $441,000 in pre-clinical expenses and $284,000 related to manufacturing (packaging and distribution).
      General and administrative expenses were $1,232,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to $1,100,000 for the same period in 2005. Although general and administrative expenses remained relatively flat, 2006 includes increased severance costs and retention bonuses offset by decreased corporate expenses.
Net Loss
      Our net loss applicable to common stockholders was $2,797,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, compared to $5,714,000 in the same period in 2005, a decrease of 51.1%. This decrease was a result primarily of our significantly reduced research and development expenses. Included in the net loss applicable to common stockholders are preferred stock dividends of $1,175,322 and $1,071,578 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 respectively.

III-16


Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
      We had cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2006, of $4,469,000, compared to $6,583,000 at December 31, 2005. The decrease is attributable to $1,912,000 of net cash used in operating activities and $202,000 of cash used in investing activities. At March 31, 2006 we had working capital of $3,756,000.
      We do not have any approved products and currently derive cash from sales of our securities, sales of our New Jersey state net operating loss carryforwards and interest on cash and cash equivalents. We are highly susceptible to conditions in the global financial markets and in the pharmaceutical industry. Positive and negative movement in those markets will continue to pose opportunities and challenges to us. Previous downturns in the market valuations of biotechnology companies and of the equity markets more generally have restricted our ability to raise additional capital on favorable terms.
      The Company has entered into a definitive merger agreement whereby it plans to combine operations with HaptoGuard, Inc., a privately-held biotechnology company. The merger and associated preferred stock restructuring transactions are subject to the approval of Alteon and HaptoGuard shareholders and are expected to close early in the third quarter of 2006. See Note 6 — Subsequent Events.
      In addition, the Company has completed an equity financing that resulted in net proceeds to Alteon of approximately $2.5 million. The new financing, as well as the Company’s current cash and cash equivalents, will be used to help fund future development efforts of the combined companies, including studies for two Phase 2 clinical-stage compounds focused on cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients. See Note 6 — Subsequent Events.
      The Company may continue to pursue fund-raising possibilities through the sale of its equity securities after the merger is completed. If the Company is unable to complete the merger, is unsuccessful in its efforts to raise additional funds through the sale of additional equity securities or if the level of cash and cash equivalents falls below anticipated levels, Alteon will not have the ability to continue as a going concern after late 2006. As part of the merger, there are associated costs that could result in the Company being required to make payment of certain obligations in the amount of approximately $2.0 million, including severance and other contractual and regulatory requirements. In association with developing and identifying strategic options, certain costs have been deferred relating to the merger of $424,000.
      The amount and timing of the Company’s future capital requirements will depend on numerous factors, including the timing of resuming its research and development programs, if at all, the timing of completion of the merger with HaptoGuard, the number and characteristics of product candidates that it pursues, the conduct of pre-clinical tests and clinical studies, the status and timelines of regulatory submissions, the costs associated with protecting patents and other proprietary rights, the ability to complete strategic collaborations and the availability of third-party funding, if any.
      Selling securities to satisfy the Company’s short-term and long-term capital requirements may have the effect of materially diluting the current holders of its outstanding stock. Alteon may also seek additional funding through corporate collaborations and other financing vehicles. There can be no assurance that such funding will be available at all or on terms acceptable to the Company. If adequate funds are not available, the Company may be required to curtail significantly one or more of its research and development programs. If funds are obtained through arrangements with collaborative partners or others, the Company may be required to relinquish rights to certain of its technologies or product candidates. If Alteon is unable to obtain the necessary funding, it may need to cease operations. Even if the Company completes the merger with HaptoGuard, there can be no assurance that the products or technologies acquired in such transaction will result in revenues to the combined company or any meaningful return on investment to its stockholders.

III-17


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended December 2005, 2004, and 2003
Revenues
      Total revenues for 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $458,000, $334,000, and $179,000, respectively. Revenues were derived from interest earned on cash and cash equivalents, other income, and short-term investments. Investment income in 2005 was higher than 2004 due to an increase in short-term interest rates, partially offset by lower investment balances. In 2005, other income included $100,000 received from a licensing agreement with Avon Products, Inc. In 2004, other income included approximately $52,000 derived from the sale of fully depreciated laboratory equipment and supplies and a reimbursement of $100,000 for improvements made to our former facility in Ramsey, NJ. The increase in investment income in 2004 versus 2003 was attributed to increased interest rates.
Operating Expenses
      Total expenses decreased to $13,399,000 in 2005 from $14,679,000 in 2004 and from $14,976,000 in 2003 and consisted primarily of research and development expenses. Research and development expenses were $9,074,000 in 2005, $10,147,000 in 2004, and $9,930,000 in 2003. These expenses consisted primarily of third-party expenses associated with preclinical and clinical studies, manufacturing costs, including the development and preparation of clinical supplies, personnel and personnel-related expenses and an allocation of facility expense.
      Research and development expenses decreased to $9,074,000 in 2005 from $10,147,000 in 2004, a decrease of $1,073,000, or 10.6%. This was primarily related to decreased clinical trial costs and manufacturing expenses as a result of the discontinuation of the SPECTRA trial, partially offset by additional preclinical toxicity testing. The 2005 results include $3,796,000 in personnel and personnel-related costs, $2,199,000 in clinical trial costs primarily related to SPECTRA, $1,288,000 in preclinical expenses primarily associated with the additional toxicity testing, $579,000 of manufacturing expenses related to on-going drug stability studies, drug destruction and storage, $425,000 in consulting expense, $396,000 in trial-related insurance, and $351,000 in facility allocation.
      Research and development expenses increased to $10,147,000 in 2004 from $9,930,000 in 2003, an increase of $218,000, or 2.2%. This was primarily related to increased clinical trial costs and manufacturing expenses and offset by lower facility cost. In 2004, $3,222,000 of the total research and development expenditures related to SPECTRA. The 2004 results also included $3,901,000 in personnel and personnel-related costs, $1,088,000 of manufacturing costs primarily related to tableting, packaging and drug stability studies, $472,000 in facility allocation, $459,000 in consulting expense, $392,000 in preclinical expenses and $387,000 in trial-related insurance.
      General and administrative expenses were $4,325,000 in 2005, a decrease from $4,532,000 in 2004 and a decrease from $5,046,000 in 2003. The decrease in 2005 over 2004 includes a $397,000 reduction in business development and marketing that was incurred in early 2004 related to the start-up of SPECTRA, $284,000 in reduced personnel costs due to reduced headcount, and $123,000 in reduced patent expenses. This decrease was offset by $597,000 in additional corporate expenses related to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance and increased third-party consulting expenses. The decrease in 2004 over 2003 included $266,000 in patent expense as a result of higher expenses in 2003 associated with changing patent counsel, $320,000 in reduced facility expenses associated with the relocation to Parsippany, and $137,000 in reduced marketing expenses related to the use of consultants.
      At December 31, 2005, we had available federal net operating loss carryforwards of $159,565,000, which expire in various amounts from the years 2006 through 2025, and state net operating loss carryforwards of $56,141,000, which expire in the years 2006 through 2012. In addition, at December 31, 2005, we had federal research and development tax credit carryforwards of $6,906,000 and state research and development tax credit carryforwards of $1,646,000.

III-18


Table of Contents

Net Loss
      We had net losses of $12,614,000 in 2005, $13,959,000 in 2004 and $14,452,000 in 2003. Included in our net loss in 2005, 2004 and 2003 was the sale of $4,077,000, $3,456,000 and $2,083,000, respectively, of our state net operating loss carryforwards and $0, $123,000 and $209,000, respectively, of our state research and development tax credit carryforwards. The proceeds from the sale of these carryforwards in 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $327,000, $386,000, and $345,000, respectively.
      Included in the net loss applicable to common stockholders for 2005, 2004 and 2003 were preferred stock dividends of $4,486,000, $4,135,000 and $3,791,000, respectively.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
      We had cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2005, of $6,583,000 compared to $11,176,000 at December 31, 2004, a decrease of $4,593,000. Cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2005, totaled $14,033,000 (net of $327,000 of cash received for the sales of our New Jersey state net operating loss carryforwards) and consisted primarily of research and development expenses, personnel and related costs, and facility expenses. Cash used in investing activities totaled $92,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005 and included $13,000 of capital expenditures and $129,000 of deferred acquisition costs offset by a decrease in restricted cash of $50,000 required by our facility lease. Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2005 was $9,532,000 and arose from a January 2005 public offering of 9,523,813 shares of common stock at $1.05 per share, which provided net proceeds of $9,532,000.
      In 2005, 2004 and 2003, we sold $4,077,000, $3,456,000 and $2,083,000, respectively, of our gross state net operating loss carryforwards and $0, $123,000 and $209,000, respectively, of our state research and development tax credit carryforwards under the State of New Jersey’s Technology Business Tax Certificate Transfer Program. This program allows qualified technology and biotechnology businesses in New Jersey to sell unused amounts of net operating loss carryforwards and defined research and development tax credits for cash. Due to the uncertainty at any time as to our ability to effectuate the sale of our available New Jersey state net operating losses, and since we have no control or influence over the tax certificate transfer program, the benefits are recorded once the agreement with the counterparty is signed and the sale is approved by the State of New Jersey. The proceeds from the sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $327,000, $386,000 and $345,000, respectively, and such amounts were recorded as a tax benefit in the statements of operations. As of December 31, 2005, we had state net loss carryforwards and state research and development tax credit carryforwards available for sale of $57,787,000. We cannot be certain if we will be able to sell any or all of these carryforwards under the tax certificate transfer program.
      We do not have any approved products and currently derive cash from sales of our securities, sales of our New Jersey state net operating loss carryforwards and interest on cash and cash equivalents. We are highly susceptible to conditions in the global financial markets and in the pharmaceutical industry. Positive and negative movement in those markets will continue to pose opportunities and challenges to us. Previous downturns in the market valuations of biotechnology companies and of the equity markets more generally have restricted our ability to raise additional capital on favorable terms.
      We expect to utilize cash and cash equivalents to fund our operating activities, including any continued development of our lead compound, alagebrium. However, as a result of the discontinuation of the Phase 2b SPECTRA trial in systolic hypertension and a decrease in our financial resources, we have significantly curtailed all product development activities of alagebrium and expect to have further reduced expenses in the first half of 2006. As announced on February 1, 2006, while we intend to pursue development of alagebrium in high potential cardiovascular indications such as heart failure, any continued development of alagebrium by us is contingent upon our entering into strategic collaboration agreements for this product candidate which, among other things, would be required to include funding for product development. We may not be able to enter into a strategic collaboration agreement with respect to alagebrium on reasonable terms, or at all. No enrollment or other activity is taking place with respect to any of our Phase 2 trials of alagebrium pending the resolution of our financial resource issues.

III-19


Table of Contents

      In August 2005, in order to enable us to move forward with the continued development of alagebrium, we announced that we had engaged the services of Burrill & Company to assist in developing and identifying strategic options designed to diversify our portfolio of product candidates and to enhance our ability to raise financing in the future. Potential transactions include the acquisition of technologies and product programs, licensing opportunities, the sale to or merger into another company, and debt and equity financing.
      The amount and timing of our future capital requirements will depend on numerous factors, including the consummation of a merger with HaptoGuard, the timing of resuming our research and development programs, if at all, the number and characteristics of product candidates that we pursue, the conduct of preclinical tests and clinical studies, the status and timelines of regulatory submissions, the costs associated with protecting patents and other proprietary rights, the ability to complete strategic collaborations and the availability of third-party funding, if any.
      Selling securities to satisfy our short-term and long-term capital requirements may have the effect of materially diluting the current holders of our outstanding stock. We may also seek additional funding through corporate collaborations and other financing vehicles. If the merger is not consummated, potential financing sources may be dissuaded from investing in us in light of the fact that Genentech, Inc., as the sole holder of the outstanding shares of our Series G and Series H Preferred Stock, currently has a significant liquidation preference and voting position, on an as-converted to common stock basis. If funds are obtained through arrangements with collaborative partners or others, we may be required to relinquish rights to our technologies or product candidates. Even if we complete a merger, there can be no assurance that the products or technologies acquired in such transaction will result in revenues to the combined company or any meaningful return on investment to our stockholders.
COMMITMENTS
      The table below presents our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005:
                                           
    Payments Due by Period
     
        Within       After
    Total   1 Year   1-3 Years   4-5 Years   5 Years
                     
Contractual Obligations:
                                       
 
Employment agreements(1)
  $ 1,717,668     $ 1,717,668     $     $     $  
 
Operating lease commitments
    345,464       336,727       8,737              
                               
 
Total contractual obligations
  $ 2,063,132     $ 2,054,395     $ 8,737     $     $  
                               
 
(1)  We have employment agreements with key executives, which provide severance and/or change in control benefits. If we terminate all of the agreements, we are subject to obligations totaling $1,717,668.
      On January 31, 2006, Judith Hedstrom, our COO, resigned and was paid one year’s salary in the amount of $300,000 and COBRA benefits for up to 18 months. Under the terms of her employment agreement with us, Ms. Hedstrom is entitled to an additional one year’s salary upon a change in control.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
      In December 2001, the SEC issued a statement concerning its views regarding the appropriate amount of disclosure by publicly held companies with respect to their critical accounting policies. In particular, the SEC expressed its view that in order to enhance investor understanding of financial statements, companies should explain the effects of critical accounting policies as they are applied, the judgments made in the application of these policies and the likelihood of materially different reported results if different assumptions or conditions were to prevail. We have since carefully reviewed the disclosures included in our filings with the SEC. We believe the effects of the following accounting policies are significant to our results of operations and financial condition.

III-20


Table of Contents

      In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), which replaces “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (“SFAS 123”) and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values beginning with the first annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005. Under SFAS 123R, the pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123 are no longer an alternative to financial statement recognition.
      The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation, awards issued to non-employee directors, and stock options issued to consultants and contractors in accordance with SFAS 123R, SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure” and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services.”
      The Company has adopted the new standard, SFAS 123R, effective January 1, 2006 and has selected the Black-Scholes method of valuation for share-based compensation. The Company has adopted the modified prospective transition method which requires that compensation cost be recorded, as earned, for all unvested stock options and restricted stock outstanding at the beginning of the first quarter of adoption of SFAS 123R, and is recognized over the remaining service period after the adoption date based on the options’ original estimate of fair value.
      On December 15, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved the acceleration of the vesting date of all previously issued, outstanding and unvested options, effective December 31, 2005. The acceleration and the fact that no options were issued in the three months ended March 31, 2006, resulted in the Company not being required to recognize aggregate compensation expense under SFAS 123R for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
      Prior to adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company applied the intrinsic-value method under APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations, under which no compensation cost (excluding those options granted below fair market value) has been recognized. SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair-value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. As permitted by SFAS 123, the Company elected to continue to apply the intrinsic-value based method of accounting described above, and adopted only the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123, as amended, which were similar in most respects to SFAS 123R.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
      Not applicable.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
      Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment in marketable securities. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investments. In 2006, 2005 and 2004, all of our investments resided in money market accounts. In 2003, our investments consisted primarily of debt instruments of the United States government, government agencies, financial institutions and corporations with strong credit ratings.
      Accordingly, we do not believe that there is any material market risk exposure with respect to derivative or other financial instruments that would require disclosure under this Item.

III-21


Table of Contents

CHAPTER FOUR — OTHER INFORMATION REGARDING HAPTOGUARD
BUSINESS OF HAPTOGUARD
Brief Description of Business
Overview
      HaptoGuard is a product-based biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of small molecule drugs to treat and prevent diseases associated with inflammation, initially targeting the inflammatory components of cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients. Its principal drug candidate, ALT-2074, was in-licensed from Oxis International (“Oxis”), where it was previously referred to as “BXT-50172”. HaptoGuard recently initiated Phase 2 clinical trials of ALT-2074. HaptoGuard also has strategic license agreements in place with BIO-RAP Technologies Ltd. (“BIO-RAP”) and UTI Limited Partnership , the technology transfer and commercialization center of the University of Calgary (“UTI”).
      HaptoGuard is a Delaware corporation formed on November 3, 2003. Its offices are located in New Jersey although it outsources most of its activities to third parties. HaptoGuard currently has two employees, Dr. Noah Berkowitz, its President and Chief Executive Officer, and Dr. Malcolm MacNab, its Chief Medical Officer. HaptoGuard has engaged a number of consultants and service providers to enable it to execute on its strategic plans, including, among others, Ockham Development Corporation, a clinical research organization that is conducting the Phase 2 clinical trial of ALT-2074, Oxis, which in addition to licensing ALT-2074 to HaptoGuard, is providing the drug on a exclusive basis to HaptoGuard and UPM Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a contract manufacturer that is producing ALT-2074 in tablet form for use in the Phase 2 clinical trial of ALT-2074.
      HaptoGuard licensed a family of compounds, including ALT-2074, from Oxis on an exclusive basis. Oxis previously conducted clinical trials for ALT-2074 for an alternative indication, inflammatory bowel disease. HaptoGuard believes the clinical trial data Oxis produced suggests that ALT-2074 could be safe and biologically potent, subject to additional testing, in the area of inflammation related to cardiovascular disease, more specifically in reducing iron mediated oxidative damage.
      HaptoGuard’s development plan includes a specialized clinical diagnostic test (Hp Test) to choose high risk patients that may benefit from treatment with ALT-2074. The use of the Hp Test to more quickly identify high risk patients may allow HaptoGuard to perform efficacy studies with fewer patients than otherwise would have been possible, in the absence of such risk stratification. The Hp Test (also known as a qualitative haptoglobin typing test) uses technology and reagents licensed by HaptoGuard from BIO-RAP Technologies Ltd.
      HaptoGuard also recently licensed a family of organoselenium and organotelluriam compounds from UTI on a worldwide, exclusive basis. These compounds, like the compounds HaptoGuard licensed from Oxis, can convert oxidized lipids and hydrogen peroxide to alcohols and water, respectively. This conversion process reduces oxidative stress in cells and has been thought to reduce inflammation. HaptoGuard believes these compounds may be used to treat diseases such as acute ischemic injury as well as autoimmune diseases such as Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, ulcerative colitis and psoriasis although the research is in the early stages and significant development is still required, including initial toxicity studies, before any conclusions regarding the potential for commercialization of such compounds may be made.
Market Opportunity
      Diabetes is a therapeutic area that HaptoGuard believes has a large market potential. Diabetes is characterized by a large patient population, a small number of branded drugs, many generics, and a widespread level of dissatisfaction with treatment benefits. The number of patients suffering from diabetes is growing rapidly in both the United States and developing nations, particularly Asia. This coincides with an epidemic of obesity, a syndrome that almost certainly contributes to the increased risk of Type 2 diabetes. The

IV-1


Table of Contents

increased incidence of diabetes is also a consequence of a downward reclassification of fasting blood glucose levels.
      Diabetes is the third leading cause of death from disease in the United States far exceeding that of many well known cancers. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that by year end 2000, there were approximately 150 million diabetics worldwide, 7.5 million (5%) with Type 1 and an overwhelming 140 million (95%) with Type 2 diabetes. By the year 2025, WHO estimates that the overall number of people with diabetes will have doubled to 300 million. Data from recent years has supported these predictions, and has shown that diabetes is growing into one of the most costly diseases on a global basis in both human and economic terms.
      Long term complications of diabetes, rather than the disease itself, are the major causes of diabetes associated morbidity and mortality. These complications include blindness (retinopathy), kidney failure (nephropathy), nerve damage (neuropathy) and cardiovascular disease. The second largest diabetes related direct cost to the United States healthcare system is the treatment of cardiovascular diseases by the medical management of hypertension and hyperlipidemia and by procedures such as coronary by pass surgery, coronary angioplasty and amputations. A medical treatment for, and the prevention of, diabetic cardiovascular complications would fill an important unmet need in the repertoire of physicians treating diabetics.
Cardiovascular Disease (“CVD”) and ALT-2074
      The relationship between diabetes mellitus (DM) and the complications of CVD are well known. The Nurses Health Study, which followed 117,000 individuals for 20 years, stated that the overall incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke was two and a half times higher in diabetic patients than in the total population. In fact, statistics show that diabetes confers the same degree of risk for future MI as having established CVD. Additionally, CVD accounts for 75% of all deaths in patients with DM. In patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes, 30% have DM, whereas the prevalence of DM in the general population is only about 7%. Finally, studies show that the one year survival of patients with DM following first MI is significantly lower than for patients without DM (57% vs. 70%, respectively). For 28 day survival, the death rate in patients with DM following first MI is twice that of the non diabetic population (14% vs. 7%, respectively). Thus, the epidemiology of DM and CVD demonstrates a relationship between these diseases and traditionally, tailoring medical treatment has followed the same logic.
      The primary medical treatment of diabetes consists of managing blood glucose levels through diet modification, insulin treatment or oral hypoglycemics. Diabetics often receive drugs used for some CVD risk factors (such as ACE inhibitors for HTN and statins for hyperlipidemia). Oxidative stress (the physiological condition of inadequate oxygen supply) may worsen atherosclerosis and make heart muscle more susceptible to damage. Inflammation may induce the thrombosis that causes acute coronary syndromes and may contribute to the remodeling of the heart muscle seen after ischemic damage, often associated with the development of congestive heart failure. Drugs that target the inflammation caused by oxidative stress in some diabetics may limit the severity of CVD.
      The basis for a clinical development strategy that targets drugs that reduce oxidative stress and inflammation to high risk diabetics is supported by some well corroborated epidemiology and some rapidly evolving basic science. Several studies have observed that a genetic variant of haptoglobin (a ubiquitous serum protein associated with inflammation and found commonly, but not distributed evenly, in the human population as Hp 1 1, Hp 2 1 or Hp 2 2, see later section for biology and genetics) may be associated with the rate of vascular complications in diabetic patients. Those studies include:
  •  The Strong Heart Study — This longitudinal survey of the healthcare of PIMA Indians focuses on CVD and diabetes, and is particularly informative because of the high incidence of diabetes in this patient population. An examination of blood samples from several thousand patients enrolled in this study revealed that haptoglobin type predicts cardiovascular risk among diabetics but not non diabetics and the presence of a Haptoglobin 2 allele seemed to be associated with risk in a dose dependent fashion, such that Hp 2 2 diabetics were at higher risk than Hp 2 1 diabetics who were at still higher risk than Hp l 1 diabetics.

IV-2


Table of Contents

  •  The Munich Stent Study — A group in Munich followed 935 diabetic patients after an angioplasty and stent placement for one year. When patients were segregated based on haptoglobin type, it became apparent that the risk of MI and death was highest in the Hp 2 2 and lowest in Hp l l.
 
  •  The Rambam MI Study — Dr. Andrew Levy, a consultant to HaptoGuard, led a study at the Rambam Medical Center in Haifa, Israel in which over 500 consecutive diabetics who presented to the emergency room with a MI were followed for at least 30 days. This study demonstrated that the risk of 30 day mortality in Hp 2 2 diabetics was 16%, while the risk of mortality in the Hp l 1 group was less than 1%. The risk of clinical heart failure was also much higher for diabetics with Hp 2 2 as compared to those with other Hp types.
 
  •  The HOPE Study — The Heart Outcomes Prevention Study compared the ability of Ramipril (an ACE inhibitor), or vitamin E, to prevent cardiovascular events in patients at high risk for CVD. The study results were first reported in 2000. Ramipril was noted to reduce incidence of MI and death. Vitamin E was ineffective. These findings were reported in diabetics and non diabetics. In a 2003 collaboration, Hp type predicted event rate in diabetics but not non diabetics, confirming the Strong and Framingham observations.
      In short, Hp type correlates, in diabetic patients, with risk of CVD, severity of disease, death and heart failure following infarction and restenosis after angioplasty.
Oxidative Stress, the Glutathione Peroxidase Reaction and CVD
      During oxidative metabolism in the mitochondria, 02 is reduced by the addition of 4 electrons. In the course of this reaction, small quantities of reduced oxygen compounds, including 02, 0H and H202 are produced. These substances, referred to as reactive oxygen species (ROS) can initiate a cascade of reactions whereby other cellular macromolecules undergo oxidation, and can then function as ROS themselves, causing oxidation of additional cellular components. The human organism has several ways of detoxifying these ROS, but when there is an imbalance between formation of ROS and their removal, a condition of oxidative stress is said to exist. Under these conditions, lipids are oxidized to create lipid peroxides and these peroxides are felt to contribute to atherogenesis.
      One of the defense mechanisms against the presence of ROS in general and hydroperoxides, such as lipid peroxide, in particular, is the enzyme glutathione peroxidase (GPx), which inactivates the ROS hydrogen peroxide and other organic ROS by the following reactions:
(CHART)
      There is significant evidence that oxidative stress, due to inadequate activity of detoxifying mechanisms such as the GPx reaction, plays a role in the development of CVD. Animal models including GPx knockouts have demonstrated the significant role played by GPx in ischemic heart disease. Human epidemiology has

IV-3


Table of Contents

implicated the same enzyme activity — one group elucidated a clear inverse relationship between GPx activity and cardiac events. Also, GPx activity is significantly reduced in diabetics.
      Further, oxidized lipids (“lipid peroxides”) are inflammatory signaling which increases sensitivity of blood vessels, and possibly the heart muscle, to hypoxia (lack of oxygen). Persons with high concentrations of lipid peroxides may exhibit an increased risk for larger infarctions of the heart and more severe heart failure.
      The human body has developed protective mechanisms against the accumulation of lipid peroxides. One such mechanism is glutathione peroxidase, a seleno-enzyme that catalyzes the reduction of hydroperoxides to less toxic species using glutathione (GSH) as the reducing agent. In the case of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), water is the reduction product, while organic hydroperoxides (ROOH) are reduced to the corresponding alcohol (ROH) and water. The other product of the reaction, oxidized glutathione (GSSG), is recycled back to the reduced form via the enzyme NADPH-dependent glutathione reductase.
Technology
      ALT-2074 mimics the activity of glutathione peroxidase, by catalyzing the conversion of organic hydroperoxides to their presumably less toxic alcohols. One reputable multinational research consortium has elucidated a clear inverse relationship between GPx activity and cardiac events. HaptoGuard believes that augmenting GPx activity with ALT-2074, particularly in diabetics at high risk for elevated lipid hydroperoxides, will reduce oxidized lipid-induced cardiovascular injury. ALT-2074 has a variety of special anti-inflammatory features that include:
  •  inhibition of ICAM1, VCAM-1, p-selectin;
 
  •  inhibition of neutrophil attachment to endothelium, while maintaining endothelial integrity; and
 
  •  inhibition of neoiintimal formation in pig models of balloon-inflation, endothelial injury.
      All clinical development prior to the Phase 2 clinical trial was performed by Oxis. ALT-2074 was tested in a preclinical mouse model (high risk diabetic mice that have been genetically engineered to model the human condition) of ischemia reperfusion injury (i.e., a controlled heart attack) by administering different doses of ALT-2074. Results demonstrated an approximate 85% reduction in infarct size following a single oral administration of ALT-2074. Doses of 0.5mg/kg to 5mg/kg of ALT-2074 each yielded similar results. After dosage testing, ALT-2074 was administered to over 40 patients and volunteers in one Phase 1 study and a Phase 2a study involving patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis. No drug related serious adverse events were reported and the drug was shown to be rapidly absorbed by the oral route. In the Phase 2a trial, 20 patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis, who had failed first line therapy (5-ASA drugs), received one of two dosage regimens of ALT-2074 for 28 days. The primary end point was the Mayo Colitis Activity Index (“CAI”), a well accepted composite clinical disease activity score. A statistically significant improvement in CAI from Day 1 to Day 28 was demonstrated in both dose groups.
Target Markets
      Diabetics are generally treated with insulin replacement and oral hypoglycemics to reduce their elevated blood concentrations of glucose (hyperglycemia). Despite readily available drugs, glucose is imperfectly controlled even in well-managed diabetic patients. Hence, ongoing hyperglycemia and possibly, the ensuing state of high oxidative stress, lead to vascular complications that persist in diabetics despite improvements in blood glucose concentrations. HaptoGuard believes that direct treatment of CVD in diabetics to prevent or reduce oxidative stress and inflammation will:
  •  be most effective in preventing or delaying serious vascular complications;
 
  •  reduce the number of diabetics who are also diagnosed with vascular disease;
 
  •  improve the recovery rate for diabetics with vascular disease; and
 
  •  significantly reduce healthcare costs.

IV-4


Table of Contents

      ALT-2074 currently has an open IND in the CardioRenal Division of the FDA. HaptoGuard recently initiated a Phase 2 clinical trial for ALT-2074. HaptoGuard plans to conduct the Phase 2 clinical trial for ALT-2074 in Israel and the Czech Republic over 8 separate sites and approximately 60 patients. The trial is a 5 day study in diabetic patients undergoing urgent angioplasty in the brief aftermath of a resolved, acute coronary syndrome. The clinical trial seeks to test whether patients with biologically measurable cardiac damage, as shown by the release of cardiac enzymes during the interventional procedure, as a consequence of transient ischemia from the brief occlusion of a coronary artery, will have less cardiac damage if treated with ALT-2074.
Personnel
      HaptoGuard has two employees, each of who has substantial expertise working with biopharmaceutical companies.
Noah Berkowitz, M.D., Ph.D. (Founder, CEO)
      Dr. Noah Berkowitz earned his B.A., M.D., and Ph.D. from Columbia University and trained at the National Cancer Institute in medical oncology. Prior to founding HaptoGuard, he was vice-president of Clinical Development at IMPATH Inc., a NASDAQ-traded, “cancer information company” where he developed a division, IMPATH Predictive Oncology, focused on biopharmaceutical partnerships supporting the discovery and development of cancer-related targeted diagnostics and therapeutics. Prior to IMPATH, Dr. Berkowitz was the founder of Physician Choice, a biopharmaceutical strategic consulting company.
Malcolm MacNab, M.D., Ph.D. (Vice President, Clinical Development)
      Dr. Malcolm MacNab was Vice President of Cardiovascular & Metabolism, US Clinical Development and Medical Affairs at Novartis Pharmaceuticals until February 4, 2005. In his more than 20 years of pharmaceutical industry experience, he assisted in all phases of drug development. He contributed to the registration of Diovan, a leading angiotensin receptor blocker used for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure and Lotrel, a leading branded combination product for the treatment of hypertension. Dr. MacNab received his MD and PhD in vascular pharmacology from Temple University in Philadelphia. He received post-graduate training in Internal Medicine and Hematology at the Medical College of Pennsylvania.
      HaptoGuard also has an established scientific advisory board consisting of recognized scholars in the fields of chemistry, molecular biology, pharmacology and pre-clinical development. Scientific advisors are reimbursed for participating on HaptoGuard’s scientific advisory board. HaptoGuard’s scientific advisors are:
Burton E. Sobel, M.D.
      Dr. Sobel is E.L. Amidon Professor, Physician-in-Chief and Professor of Biochemistry at the University of Vermont and a trustee of the Fletcher Allen Health Care Center, Burlington. He is Editor of Circulation and Coronary Artery Disease. Previously, he held senior academic and administrative positions at Washington University School of Medicine from 1973 to 1994, and at the University of California, San Diego, from 1968 to 1973. Dr. Sobel completed postgraduate training at the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston and the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, and received an M.D. from Harvard University and an A.B. from Cornell University.
Joseph Loscaizo, M.D., Ph.D.
      Dr. Loscaizo is the Wade Professor and Chairman of the Department of Medicine and Director of the Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute at Boston University School of Medicine. Author of over 450 articles and 20 books, he is internationally recognized for his work on the vascular biology of nitric oxide, platelet function, and atherothrombosis. He is immediate past Chair of the Board of Scientific Counselors of the NHLBI and the Cardiovascular Board of the American Board of Internal Medicine, and current Director of the NHLBI-sponsored Specialized Center of Research in Ischemic Heart Disease at Boston University. He is also Editor-in-Chief of the premier cardiovascular journal, Circulation.

IV-5


Table of Contents

Stanley Hazen, M.D., Ph.D.
      Dr. Stanley Hazen is the Section Head of Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation, and Director of the Center for Cardiovascular Diagnostics and Prevention at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. A recipient of numerous honors and awards, and frequent speaker at national and international meetings, Dr. Hazen is an internationally recognized expert in inflammation biochemistry and cardiovascular disease pathogenesis. Dr. Hazen oversees a world-class research program focusing on mechanisms of oxidant stress and inflammatory diseases.
Recent Developments
      In addition to entering into the merger agreement with Alteon, HaptoGuard has undertaken numerous activities in the calendar year 2006. In February 2006 HaptoGuard entered into a master service agreement with Ockham Development Corporation to engage Ockham to act as its contract research organization in connection with the Phase 2 clinical trial of ALT-2074. In March 2006, UPM Pharmaceutical, the contract manufacturer engaged by HaptoGuard, completed manufacturing sufficient quantities of ALT-2074 for the Phase 2 clinical trial. In April 2006, HaptoGuard received approval from the Israeli Ministry of Health regarding the commencement of the Phase 2 clinical trial in Israel and subsequently received IRB approval for 3 sites in Israel and has contracted with these sites. Ockham Development Corporation, HaptoGuard’s contract research organization, conducted initiation visits and is screening patients at those sites. HaptoGuard withdrew its request of the Czech Republic regulatory agency to conduct a Phase 2 clinical trial at sites in the Czech Republic because additional data regarding the duration of drug stability was requested and at the time of submission was unavailable. HaptoGuard plans to resubmit its application with the Czech Republic Ministry of Health once such data can be generated, which HaptoGuard believes will be later in 2006.
Intellectual Property
Overview
      HaptoGuard currently has certain exclusive license rights under certain issued patents and patent applications worldwide covering technology licensed from BIO-RAP, certain patents covering the compounds licensed from Oxis and one provisional patent application covering the compounds licensed from UTI. HaptoGuard also depends upon the skills, knowledge, and experience of its scientific and technical personnel, as well as that of its advisors, consultants, and other contractors, none of which is patentable. To help protect its proprietary know-how which is not patentable, and for inventions for which patents may be difficult to enforce, HaptoGuard relies on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect its interests. To this end, HaptoGuard requires its employees, consultants, advisors and other contractors to enter into confidentiality agreements that prohibit the disclosure of confidential information and, where applicable, require disclosure and assignment to HaptoGuard of the ideas, developments, discoveries and inventions important to its business.
      As part of the licensing agreement with Oxis covering ALT-2074, HaptoGuard controls the prosecution and maintenance of all licensed patents and patent applications and HaptoGuard has the first right, but not the obligation, to direct, bring and control any action or proceedings with respect to any infringement in the United States, Europe or any other territory of any patent or patent application licensed to HaptoGuard. HaptoGuard has similar rights with respect to the patents HaptoGuard licenses from BIO-RAP and the Rappaport Institute of Medicine which cover the insights and tests that will be used to determine the haptoglobin phenotype of the patient. HaptoGuard also retains the right and obligation under its agreement with UTI to prosecute all patents relating to the compounds it licensed from UTI and to protect such intellectual property against use by non-licensees. In the event HaptoGuard elects not to prosecute such patents, HaptoGuard will cease to have any rights to such intellectual property.
      As part of the licensing agreement with Oxis covering ALT-2074, Oxis is responsible for protecting the underlying intellectual property against use by non-licensees and to use all legal methods to defend the patents. BIO-RAP and the Rappaport Institute of Medicine are similarly responsible for the patents HaptoGuard licenses from them covering the insights and tests that will be used to determine the haptoglobin

IV-6


Table of Contents

phenotype of the patient. Conversely, HaptoGuard retains the right and obligation under its agreement with UTI to prosecute all patents relating to the compounds it licensed from UTI and to protect such intellectual property against use by non-licensees. In the event HaptoGuard elects not to prosecute such patents, HaptoGuard will cease to have any rights to such intellectual property.
Oxis Exclusive License and Supply Agreement
      On September 28, 2004, HaptoGuard entered into an exclusive license and supply agreement with Oxis under which it received an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing license, with the right to grant sublicenses, under certain patents, compounds, process, know-how relating to ALT-2074 and a family of related compounds for therapeutic, diagnostic, preventative, ameliorative and/or prognostic in certain defined cardiovascular indications. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, HaptoGuard has already made aggregate payments to Oxis of approximately $550,000 in cash as of May 31, 2006. These payments include a $100,000 payment to Oxis in exchange for a 6 month extension in complying with a stated milestone. HaptoGuard is obligated to make future payments to Oxis upon achievement of certain FDA-related milestones and to pay Oxis royalties on sales of ALT-2074 upon commercialization, net of various customary discounts, attributable to certain licensed products. HaptoGuard is also obligated to achieve certain development milestones in accordance with the timelines set forth in the license agreement. While Oxis has not claimed a default under the license agreement, it has indicated that its view as to whether HaptoGuard satisfied the milestone to begin Phase II clinical trials by May 28, 2006 differs from HaptoGuard’s view.
      The license agreement with Oxis also requires HaptoGuard to treat Oxis as the sole supplier of ALT-2074, provided Oxis meets its supply requirements under the agreement. The agreement provides that all product purchased from Oxis shall be priced on a cost plus basis. HaptoGuard has typical rights to inspect and analyze representative samples of licensed products from batches supplied by Oxis and to reject any non-conforming goods.
BlO-RAP License and Research Agreement
      On July 12, 2004 HaptoGuard entered into a license and research agreement with BIO-RAP on its own and on behalf of the Rappaport Family Institute for Research in the Medical Sciences. Under the license, HaptoGuard received an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing license, with the right to grant sublicenses, to certain technology, patents and technology relating to products in the field of testing and/or measurement for diagnostic predictive purposes of vascular or cardiac diseases. HaptoGuard is currently negotiating such a sublicense with Oxis. Under the agreement HaptoGuard is obligated to make annual research funding payments to BIO-RAP plus a portion of BIO-RAP’s direct overhead costs. HaptoGuard is also obligated to make future payments upon achievement of certain milestones including FDA-related milestones as well as royalty payments on sales, net of various customary discounts, attributable to therapeutic products derived from the technology being licensed to HaptoGuard by BIO-RAP. HaptoGuard has a first right to acquire a license to any of the technology developed as part of the research conducted pursuant to the agreement. If HaptoGuard exercises this right but the parties acting in good faith fail to reach an agreement in respect of such license then HaptoGuard has a right of first refusal to license the research technology on the same terms offered by BIO-RAP to a third party.
UTI (University of Calgary) License Agreement
      On May 5, 2006, HaptoGuard entered into an exclusive license agreement with UTI under which it received an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing license, with the right to grant sublicenses, in and to certain organoselenium and tellurium compounds described in the patent application, technology relating to such compounds, and a provisional patent application covering such compounds. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, HaptoGuard is obligated to make future annual payments to UTI as well as a portion of the fees it receives on any sublicense of compounds licensed under the agreement between HaptoGuard and UTI. HaptoGuard is also obligated to pay UTI royalties on sales, net of various customary discounts, attributable to certain licensed products.

IV-7


Table of Contents

Competition
      The family of compounds licensed from Oxis (including ALT-2074), can be characterized as organoselenium compounds or mimics of glutathione peroxidase. HaptoGuard is currently unaware of any other companies actively developing organoselenium compounds for treatment of oxidative stress and inflammation. A variety of academic efforts to mimic glutathione peroxidase activity have appeared in the scientific literature over the past few years but none appear to be in clinical development. Although HaptoGuard is not aware of any companies actively developing such compounds, many large pharmaceutical companies have active programs targeting the inflammatory aspects of CVD and numerous companies are developing hypoglycemic medications or variants of insulin that may promise tighter glucose control. As a consequence, these approaches may deliver decreased oxidative stress and fewer cardiovascular complications which may lessen the need for treatment by a GPx mimic like ALT-2074.
      Possibly the most advanced antioxidant drug with similar properties is AGI-1067, which is being developed by Atherogenics. This probucol-like compound has anti-inflammatory properties, some of which may be mediated through its anti-oxidative.
Manufacturing
      Oxis International is the sole supplier of the ALT-2074 product to HaptoGuard. Oxis supplies the product to HaptoGuard at cost plus basis.
      If Oxis is unable to supply ALT-2074 as ordered by HaptoGuard, for a period of sixty (60) or more days after the agreed delivery time for any reason other than a delay caused by HaptoGuard, then HaptoGuard may, at its option, responsibility and expense, elect to manufacture or have a third party manufacture ALT-2074 until such time as Oxis can demonstrate to HaptoGuard’s reasonable satisfaction that Oxis is capable of resuming the manufacture of the products.
      HaptoGuard believes that there are several other manufacturers that could produce ALT-2074 but there could be significant time loss and expense in changing manufacturers.
Government Regulation
      The FDA and comparable regulatory agencies in foreign countries as well as pharmacy regulators in state and local jurisdictions, impose substantial requirements upon the clinical development, manufacture and marketing of pharmaceutical products. These agencies and other federal, state and local entities regulate research and development activities and the testing, manufacture, quality control, safety, effectiveness, labeling, storage, record keeping, approval, advertising, and promotion of our products. These regulations are also subject to change from time to time.
      The current process required by the FDA under the drug provisions of the United States Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act before HaptoGuard’s product candidates may be marketed in the U.S. generally involves the following:
  •  Pre clinical laboratory and animal tests;
 
  •  Submission of an IND, which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin;
 
  •  Adequate and well controlled human clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the product candidate for its intended use;
 
  •  Submission to the FDA of a NDA; and
 
  •  FDA review and approval of a NDA.
      The testing and approval process requires substantial time, effort, and financial resources, and there is no certainty that any approval will be granted on a timely basis, if at all.
      Pre-clinical tests include laboratory evaluation of the product candidate, its chemistry, formulation and stability, as well as animal studies to assess the potential safety and efficacy of the product candidate. Certain

IV-8


Table of Contents

pre clinical tests must be conducted in compliance with good laboratory practice regulations. Violations of these regulations can, in some cases, lead to invalidation of the studies, requiring such studies to be replicated. In some cases, long tern pre clinical studies are conducted while clinical studies are ongoing.
      An applicant then submit the results of the pre clinical tests, together with manufacturing information and analytical data, to the FDA as part of an IND, which must become effective before beginning human clinical trials. The IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA, within the 30 day time period, raises concerns or questions about the conduct of the trials as outlined in the IND and imposes a clinical hold. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before clinical trials can begin. Submission of an IND may not result in FDA authorization to commence clinical trials. All clinical trials must be conducted under the supervision of a qualified investigator in accordance with good clinical practice regulations. These regulations include the requirement that all subjects provide informed consent. Further, an independent Institutional Review Board (“IRB”) at each medical center proposing to conduct the clinical trials must review and approve any clinical study. The IRB also continues to monitor the study and must be kept aware of the study’s progress, particularly as to adverse events and changes in the research. Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted at least annually to the FDA and more frequently if adverse events occur.
      Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases that may overlap:
  •  Phase 1: The drug is initially introduced into healthy human subjects or patients and tested for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution, and excretion.
 
  •  Phase 2: The drug is studied in a limited patient population to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, to determine the efficacy of the product for specific targeted diseases and to determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage.
 
  •  Phase 3: When Phase 2 evaluations demonstrate that a dosage range of the drug is effective and has an acceptable safety profile, Phase 3 trials are undertaken to further evaluate dosage and clinical efficacy and to further test for safety in an expanded patient population, often at geographically dispersed clinical study sites.
      There is no certainty that HaptoGuard will successfully complete Phase 1, Phase 2, or Phase 3 testing of its product candidates within any specific time period, if at all. Furthermore, the FDA or the Institutional Review Board or the IND sponsor may suspend clinical trials at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the subjects or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk.
      Concurrent with clinical trials and pre clinical studies, we also must develop information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the drug and finalize a process for manufacturing the product in accordance with good manufacturing practice (“GMP”) requirements. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product, and we must develop methods for testing the quality, purity, and potency of the final products. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested and chemistry stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the product does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.
      The results of product development, pre clinical studies, and clinical studies are submitted to the FDA as part of a NDA for approval of the marketing and commercial shipment of the product. The FDA reviews each NDA submitted and may request additional information, rather than accepting the NDA for filing. In this event, the application must be resubmitted with the additional information. The resubmitted application is also subject to review before the FDA accepts it for filing. Once the FDA accepts the NDA for filing, the agency begins an in depth review of the NDA. The FDA has substantial discretion in the approval process and may disagree with interpretation of the data submitted in the NDA. The review process may be significantly extended by the FDA requests for additional information or clarification regarding information already provided. Also, as part of this review, the FDA may refer the application to an appropriate advisory committee, typically a panel of clinicians, for review, evaluation and a recommendation. The FDA is not bound by the recommendation of an advisory committee. Manufacturing establishments often also are subject

IV-9


Table of Contents

to inspections prior to NDA approval to assure compliance with GMP and with manufacturing commitments made in the relevant marketing application.
      The FDA assigns a goal of ten months for standard NDA reviews from acceptance of the application to the time the agency issues its “complete response”, in which the FDA may approve the NDA, deny the NDA if the applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied, or require additional clinical data. Even if these data are submitted, the FDA may ultimately decide that the NDA does not satisfy the criteria for approval. If the FDA approves the NDA, the product becomes available for physicians to prescribe. Even if the FDA approves the NDA, the agency may decide later to withdraw product approval if compliance with regulatory standards is not maintained or if safety problems occur after the product reaches the market. The FDA may require post marketing studies, also known as Phase IV studies, as a condition of approval to develop additional information regarding the safety of a product. In addition, the FDA requires surveillance programs to monitor approved products that have been commercialized, and the agency has the power to require changes in labeling or to prevent further marketing of a product based on the results of these post marketing programs.
      Satisfaction of the above FDA requirements or requirements of state, local and foreign regulatory agencies typically takes several years, and the actual time required may vary substantially based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the pharmaceutical product. Government regulation may delay or prevent marketing of potential products for a considerable period of time and impose costly procedures upon our activities. There is significant uncertainty as to whether FDA or any other regulatory agency will grant approval for any of product candidate under development on a timely basis, if at all. Success in pre clinical or early stage clinical trials does not assure success in later stage clinical trials. Data obtained from pre clinical and clinical activities are not always conclusive and may be susceptible to varying interpretations that could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. Even if a product receives regulatory approval, the approval may be significantly limited to specific indications or uses. Further, even after regulatory approval is obtained, later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product may result in restrictions on the product or even complete withdrawal of the product from the market. Delays in obtaining, or failures to obtain, regulatory approvals would have a material adverse effect on our business.
      HaptoGuard received approval from Israel’s Ministry of Health to conduct Phase 2 clinical trials for its lead product candidate, ALT-2074, and has received IRB approval for 3 sites in Israel and has contracted with these sites. Ockham Development Corporation, HaptoGuard’s contract research organization, conducted initial visits and is screening patients at each of these sites. HaptoGuard recently withdrew its submission to request approval to conduct a Phase 2 clinical trial at sites in the Czech Republic, in order to generate additional data regarding the duration of drug stability . While HaptoGuard intends to resubmit its application later in 2006, no assurance can be given that such approval will be granted. The requirements for approvals necessary to conduct clinical trials differ from country to country as do the timelines for such approvals, and additional delays and complications can arise from conducting trials in multiple countries.
Market Price and Dividends on HaptoGuard’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
     (a) Market Information
      There is no established public trading market for any of HaptoGuard’s securities. Because there is no established market for such securities, pricing information cannot be readily provided.
     (b) Holders
      As of May      , 2006, HaptoGuard had 24 holders of record of its common stock. Pursuant to the merger agreement, at the effective time of the merger, each holder of HaptoGuard common stock will receive approximately 3,521 shares of Alteon common stock for each one (1) share of HaptoGuard common stock then held.

IV-10


Table of Contents

     (c) Dividends
      HaptoGuard has never paid a cash dividend on its common stock and has no present intention to declare or pay cash dividends on the common stock at any time prior to the effective date of the merger.
     (d) Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
      The following table sets forth information concerning the number of outstanding options and warrants, the weighted average exercise price of those securities and the number of securities remaining to be granted under existing equity plans, whether approved or not approved by security holders, as of December 31, 2005:
                           
    Number of Securities   Weighted-Average   Number of Securities
    to be Issued Upon   Exercise Price of   Remaining Available
    Exercise of   Outstanding   for Future Issuance
    Outstanding Options,   Options, Warrants   Under Existing Equity
Plan Category   Warrants and Rights   and Rights   Compensation Plans
             
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
    [800 ]   $ [572.08 ]     ]
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
    [509 ]   $ [572.08 ]     [0 ]
                   
 
Total
    [1,309 ]   $ [572.08 ]     ]
      In connection with entering into an exclusive license and supply agreement with Oxis, HaptoGuard granted Oxis a warrant to purchase 509 shares of common stock of HaptoGuard at a price per share of $572.08. The warrant has a term of three years and expires on February 1, 2008. The warrant may only be exercised in whole, not in part. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the merger, the warrant will be canceled and exchanged for the right to receive approximately 551,800 shares of common stock of Alteon on the basis of outstanding stock as of April 18, 2006.

IV-11


Table of Contents

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
      HaptoGuard is a product-based biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of small molecule drugs to treat and prevent diseases associated with inflammation, initially targeting the inflammatory components of cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients. HaptoGuard’s lead product, ALT-2074, has recently begun Phase 2 clinical trials. See “Brief Discussion of Business” in this Chapter 4 for more information.
      Since HaptoGuard’s inception in July 2004, it has devoted substantially all of its resources to research, drug discovery and development programs of ALT-2074 and the technology it licensed from BIO-RAP. To date, HaptoGuard has not generated any revenues from the sale of products and does not expect to generate any such revenues for a number of years, if at all. HaptoGuard has incurred an accumulated deficit of $2,425,258 as of December 31, 2005 and of $3,075,881 as of March 31, 2006, and expects to incur net losses, potentially greater than losses in prior years, for a number of years.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
Revenues
      Total revenues for three months ended March 31, 2006 were $1,774 as compared to $3,006 for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Revenues were derived from interest earned on cash and cash equivalents.
Operating Expenses
      Total expenses were $671,801 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and $682,328 for the three month ended March 31, 2005. Research and development expenses were $491,824 for the three month ended March 31, 2006 and $375,458 for the period ending March 31, 2005. Research and development expenses consisted primarily of third-party expenses associated with preclinical and clinical studies, manufacturing costs, including the development and preparation of clinical supplies, personnel and personnel-related expenses. The $116,366 increase in R&D expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2006 were related to contracting of a Contract Research Organization for the management of a Phase II clinical trial and the authorization of manufacturing of ALT-2074 for that clinical trial.
      General and administrative expenses were $179,977 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and $306,870 for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The decrease in expenses were primarily a consequence of one time legal expenses incurred in an aborted merger transaction contemplated in the first quarter of 2005.
Net Loss
      HaptoGuard had net losses of $670,027 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, $679,322 for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Net losses are primarily due to the research and development expenses and legal expenses relating to the merger consideration.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
      HaptoGuard had cash and cash equivalents of $2,805 at March 31, 2006 and $833,178 at March 31, 2005. Cash used in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2006 totaled $562,931 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005 totaled $373,483 and consisted primarily of research and development expenses, personnel and related costs. Cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2006 totaled $464,646 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005 totaled $837,849 and arose from the sale of common stock.
      HaptoGuard does not have any approved products or services that it has commercialized and currently derives cash from sales of securities and interest on cash and cash equivalents. HaptoGuard expects to generate modest revenues in 2006 through various consulting engagements. HaptoGuard’s ability to generate

IV-12


Table of Contents

additional financing is highly susceptible to conditions in the global financial markets and in the pharmaceutical industry.
Subsequent Events
      On April 4, 2006, HaptoGuard entered into a consulting agreement with Alteon Inc. This agreement called for HaptoGuard to provide advisory services relating to clinical development and receive in consideration $125,000 in two installments, $75,000 at the time of signing of such agreement and $50,000 on May 1, 2006.
      In addition, upon signing the definitive merger agreement with Alteon on April 19, 2006, HaptoGuard contracted to continue the advancement of its Phase 2 clinical program for ALT-2074 and will receive from Alteon $140,000/month until the time of the shareholder vote.
      The amount and timing of HaptoGuard’s future capital requirements will depend on numerous factors, including the timing its research and development activities and the Phase 2 clinical trial, the focus on one or more product candidates, the conduct of preclinical tests and clinical studies, the status and timelines of regulatory submissions, the costs associated with protecting patents and other proprietary rights, the ability to complete strategic collaborations and the availability of third-party funding, if any.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 2005 and Period from July 19, 2004 (Inception) to December 31, 2004
Revenues
      Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 and for the period from July 19, 2004 (Inception) to December 31, 2004 were $9,885 and $2,643 respectively. Revenues were derived from interest earned on cash and cash equivalents.
Operating Expenses
      Total expenses increased to $1,664,580 for the year ended December 31, 2005 from $773,206 for the period from July 19, 2004 (Inception) to December 31, 2004 and consisted primarily of research and development expenses. Research and development expenses were $915,409 for the year ended December 31, 2005 and $603,173 for the period from July 19, 2004 (Inception) to December 31, 2004. Research and development expenses consisted primarily of third-party expenses associated with preclinical and clinical studies, manufacturing costs, including the development and preparation of clinical supplies, personnel and personnel-related expenses.
      Research and development expenses increased to $915,409 for the year ended December 31, 2005 from $603,173 for the period from July 19, 2004 (Inception) to December 31, 2004, a change of $312,236, or 52%. The primary reasons for the change were the filing of an IND with the FDA, an increase in patent expenses for the licensed intellectual property, and the submission of new patent applications.
      General and administrative expenses increased to $749,171 for the calendar year ended December 31, 2005 from $170,033 for the period from July 19, 2004 (Inception) to December 31, 2004, a change of $579,138, or 340%. The primary reason for the change was the incurrence of considerable legal expenses in consideration of a proposed merger transaction.
Net Loss
      HaptoGuard had net losses of $1,654,695 for the year ended December 31, 2005 and $770,563 for the period from July 19, 2004 (Inception) to December 31, 2004. Net loss increased primarily due to the increase in research and development expenses and legal expenses relating to the proposed merger. In addition, the period from July 19, 2004 (Inception) to December 31, 2004 was a shorter period than the year ended December 31, 2005 (approximately five and one-half months versus 12 months) which attributed to the increase in net loss when comparing periods.

IV-13


Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
      HaptoGuard had cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2005, of $101,090, compared to $581,573 at December 31, 2004. Cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2005, totaled $1,312,189 and consisted primarily of research and development expenses, personnel and related costs. Cash used in investing activities totaled $6,143 for the year ended December 31, 2005 and was for the purchase of computers. Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2005 was $837,849 and arose from the sale of securities in a private placement.
      HaptoGuard does not have any approved products or services that it has commercialized and currently derives cash from sales of securities and interest on cash and cash equivalents. HaptoGuard expects to generate modest revenues in 2006 through various consulting engagements. HaptoGuard’s ability to generate additional financing is highly susceptible to conditions in the global financial markets and in the pharmaceutical industry.
      The amount and timing of HaptoGuard’s future capital requirements will depend on numerous factors, including the timing its research and development activities and the Phase 2 clinical trial, the focus on one or more product candidates, the conduct of preclinical tests and clinical studies, the status and timelines of regulatory submissions, the costs associated with protecting patents and other proprietary rights, the ability to complete strategic collaborations and the availability of third-party funding, if any.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
      In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), which replaces “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (“SFAS 123”) and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values effective for the Company January 1, 2006. Under SFAS 123R, the pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123 are no longer an alternative to financial statement recognition.
      The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation, awards issued to non-employee directors, and stock options issued to consultants and contractors in accordance with SFAS 123R and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services.”
      The Company has adopted the new standard, SFAS 123R, effective January 1, 2006 and has selected the Black-Scholes method of valuation for share-based compensation. The Company has adopted the modified prospective transition method which requires that compensation cost be recorded, as earned, for all unvested stock options and restricted stock outstanding at the beginning of the first quarter of adoption of SFAS 123R, and that such costs be recognized over the remaining service period after the adoption date based on the options’ original estimate of fair value.
      There were no options that were issued in the three months ended March 31, 2006, resulted in the Company not being required to recognize aggregate compensation expense under SFAS 123R for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
      Prior to adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company applied the intrinsic-value method under APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations, under which no compensation cost (excluding those options granted below fair market value) had been recognized. SFAS 123 established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair-value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. As permitted by SFAS 123, the Company elected to continue to apply the intrinsic-value based method of accounting described above, and adopted only the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123, as amended

IV-14


Table of Contents

      As with all pharmaceutical products, the probability of commercial success for any one research and development project is highly uncertain. The risks and uncertainties associated with completing development within the projected completion dates and realization of the anticipated return on our investment include the inability to obtain and maintain access to intellectual property, failure in clinical trials, the inability to obtain required regulatory approvals, and the availability of competitive products. If we fail to successfully advance our clinical development of ALT-2074, we may not achieve the currently anticipated return on any investment we have made or will make. We currently are incurring costs for the development of our portfolio of compounds. These costs are recognized as expenses at the time they are incurred.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
      HaptoGuard’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to its investment in cash and cash equivalents. HaptoGuard does not use derivative financial instruments in making or holding its investments. Accordingly, HaptoGuard does not believe that there is any material market risk exposure with respect to derivative or other financial instruments that would require additional disclosure.

IV-15


Table of Contents

CHAPTER FIVE — CERTAIN LEGAL INFORMATION
COMPARISON OF STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS
      Both Alteon and HaptoGuard are incorporated in the state of Delaware. If the merger is consummated, holders of HaptoGuard preferred and common stock will become holders of Alteon common stock, and the rights of former HaptoGuard stockholders will be governed by Delaware law and Alteon’s certificate of incorporation and by-laws. The rights of HaptoGuard stockholders under HaptoGuard’s certificate of incorporation and by-laws differ in limited respects from the rights of Alteon stockholders under Alteon’s certificate of incorporation and by-laws. These differences are summarized in the table below.
         
    Alteon Stockholder Rights   HaptoGuard Stockholder Rights
         
Corporate Governance:
  The rights of Alteon stockholders are currently governed by Delaware law and the certificate of incorporation and by-laws of Alteon.   The rights of HaptoGuard stockholders are currently governed by Delaware law and the certificate of incorporation and by-laws of HaptoGuard.
    Upon consummation of the merger, the rights of Alteon stockholders will continue to be governed by Delaware law and the certificate of incorporation and by-laws of Alteon.   Upon consummation of the merger, the rights of HaptoGuard stockholders will continue to be governed by Delaware law. They will also be governed by the certificate of incorporation and by-laws of Alteon.
Authorized Capital Stock:
  The authorized capital stock of Alteon consists of 300,000,000 shares of Alteon common stock and 1,993,329 shares of Alteon preferred stock.   The authorized capital stock of HaptoGuard consists of            shares of HaptoGuard common stock and            shares of HaptoGuard preferred stock.
Number of Directors:
  Alteon’s by-laws provide that the number of directors shall be determined by the board of directors and shall be no less than four (4) and no more than ten (10).   HaptoGuard’s by-laws provide that the number of directors shall be determined by the board of directors.
Classification of Board of Directors:   Alteon’s certificate of incorporation and by-laws provide that the board of directors shall be divided into three classes, with each class serving a staggered three-year term.   None
Stockholder Action by Written Consent:   According to Alteon’s by-laws, stockholders may take any action by written consent.   According to HaptoGuard’s by- laws, stockholders may take any action by written consent.
Notice of Business at Annual Meetings:   Under Alteon’s by-laws, written notice of stockholder meetings, including annual meetings, must include a statement of the purposes for which the meeting is called. Also, stockholder-proposed business may only be transacted if the proposing stockholder provides timely written notice to an officer of the corporation.   Under HaptoGuard’s by-laws, all notices of meetings with stockholders shall be in writing and shall be given not less than ten (10) nor more than sixty (60) days before the date of the meeting to each stockholder entitled to vote at such meeting.

V-1


Table of Contents

         
    Alteon Stockholder Rights   HaptoGuard Stockholder Rights
         
Liquidation Rights:
  Under Alteon’s certificate of incorporation, holders of Alteon common stock are entitled to share ratably in the remaining assets of the corporation, after payment to the preferred stock holders of all amounts to which such preferred holders are entitled.    
Voting Rights:
  Each holder of Alteon common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of Alteon common stock held of record on the applicable record date on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. There are no cumulative voting rights.    
Dividend Rights:
  Under Alteon’s certificate of incorporation, holders of common stock are not entitled to receive dividends.    
Appraisal Rights:
  Alteon stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights Delaware law in connection with the merger.   HaptoGuard stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights under the under the Delaware law in connection with the merger.

V-2


Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF ALTEON CAPITAL STOCK
      The following summary of the current terms of the capital stock of Alteon and the terms of the capital stock of Alteon to be in effect after completion of the merger is not meant to be complete and is qualified by reference to the Alteon certificate of incorporation and Alteon by-laws. Copies of the Alteon certificate of incorporation and Alteon by-laws are incorporated by reference and will be sent to holders of shares of Alteon common stock and HaptoGuard common stock upon request. See “Chapter Eight — Additional Information for Stockholders — Where You Can Find More Information.”
Authorized Capital Stock
      Under the Alteon certificate of incorporation, Alteon’s authorized capital stock consists of 300,000,000 shares of Alteon common stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 1,993,329 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share.
Alteon Common Stock
      Alteon Common Stock Outstanding. The outstanding shares of Alteon common stock are, and the shares of Alteon common stock issued pursuant to the merger will be, duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.
      Voting Rights. Each holder of Alteon common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of Alteon common stock held of record on the applicable record date on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. There are no cumulative voting rights.
      Dividend Rights; Rights upon Liquidation. The holders of Alteon common stock are not entitled to receive dividends. In the event of liquidation, each share of Alteon common stock is entitled to share pro rata in any distribution of Alteon’s assets after payment or providing for the payment of liabilities and the liquidation preference of any then outstanding Alteon preferred stock.
      Preemptive Rights. Holders of Alteon common stock have no preemptive rights to purchase, subscribe for or otherwise acquire any unissued or treasury shares or other securities.
Alteon Preferred Stock
      Blank Check Preferred Stock. Under the Alteon certificate of incorporation, the Alteon board of directors has the authority, without stockholder approval, to create one or more classes or series within a class of preferred stock, to issue shares of preferred stock in such class or series up to the maximum number of shares of the relevant class or series of preferred stock authorized, and to determine the preferences, rights, privileges, qualifications, limitations, and restrictions of any such class or series, including the dividend rights, dividend rates, voting rights, the rights and terms of redemption, redemption prices, the rights and terms of conversion, liquidation preferences, sinking fund terms, the number of shares constituting any such class or series, and the designation of such class or series. Alteon believes that the power to issue preferred stock will provide flexibility in connection with possible corporate transactions. The issuance of preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of common stock and restrict their rights to receive payment upon liquidation and could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of Alteon. See “— Anti-Takeover Measures.” Alteon has no present plans to issue any shares of preferred stock.
      Terms of Series G Preferred Stock and Series H Preferred Stock. Alteon has outstanding shares of Series G Preferred Stock and Series H Preferred Stock. Both the Series G Preferred Stock and Series H Preferred Stock have dividends which are payable quarterly in shares of preferred stock at a rate of 8.5% of the accumulated balance. The Series G and Series H Preferred Stock each carry a liquidation preference, which means that the value of that preferred stock would be required to be paid to the holders of the Series G and Series H Preferred Stock upon a sale or liquidation before any proceeds from such sale or liquidation are paid to any other holders of equity securities, including the common stock. The Series G and Series H Preferred Stock have no voting rights. Each share of Series G Preferred Stock and Series H Preferred Stock is convertible, upon 70 days’ prior written notice, into the number of shares of common stock determined by

V-3


Table of Contents

dividing $10,000 by the average of the closing prices of our common stock, as reported on the American Stock Exchange, for the 20 business days immediately preceding the date of conversion. On December 31, 2005, the Series G and Series H Preferred Stock would have been convertible into 69,464,500 and 208,605,500 shares of common stock, respectively, representing, in aggregate, approximately 83% of our common stock outstanding on an as-converted basis as of that date.
Stock Purchase Warrants
      Alteon currently has outstanding warrants to purchase 12,591,455 shares of its common stock, expiring at various dates through 2011, ranging from $.25 to $2.93 per share.
Anti-Takeover Measures
      Alteon’s Certificate of Incorporation provides for staggered terms for the members of the Board of Directors and includes a provision (the “Fair Price Provision”) that requires the approval of the holders of 80 percent of its voting stock as a condition to a merger or certain other business transactions with, or proposed by, a holder of 10 percent or more of its voting stock, except in cases where certain directors approve the transaction or certain minimum price criteria and other procedural requirements are met. Alteon has entered into a Stockholders’ Rights Agreement pursuant to which each holder of a share of common stock is granted a Right to purchase our Series F Preferred Stock under certain circumstances if a person or group acquires or commences a tender offer for 20 percent of our outstanding common stock. Alteon has also adopted a Change in Control Severance Benefits Plan which provides for severance benefits to employees upon certain events of termination of employment after or in connection with a change in control as defined in the Plan. In addition, the Board of Directors has the authority, without further action by the stockholders, to fix the rights and preferences of, and issue shares of, Preferred Stock. The staggered board terms, Fair Price Provision, Stockholders’ Rights Agreement, Change in Control Severance Benefits Plan, Preferred Stock provision and other provisions of Alteon’s charter and Delaware corporate law may discourage certain types of transactions involving an actual or potential change in control.
Transfer Agent
      The transfer agent and registrar for Alteon’s common stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Co. Its telephone number is 212-936-5100.
AMEX Listing
      Alteon has agreed to use its best efforts to cause the shares of its common stock issuable in the merger to be approved for listing on AMEX prior to the closing.

V-4


Table of Contents

CHAPTER SIX — ALTEON ANNUAL MEETING PROPOSALS
ITEM 1 — MERGER PROPOSAL
      For summary and detailed information regarding the merger proposal, see “Chapter One — The Merger.”
      THE ALTEON BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE MERGER AND MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES OF ALTEON COMMON STOCK AND THE TRANSFER AND CONVERSION OF SHARES OF ALTEON COMMON STOCK CONTEMPLATED THEREBY.
ITEM 2 — AMENDMENTS OF CERTIFICATES OF DESIGNATION
      At the Alteon meeting, holders of Alteon stock will be asked to approve the amendment of Alteon’s Certificate of Designation of Series G Preferred Stock and the amendment of Alteon’s Certificate of Designation of Series H Preferred Stock. The amendments, among other related technical changes, change the written notice requirements to Alteon for conversion of the preferred stock and the limitations on the amount of the preferred stock that can be converted in order to allow for the conversion of the preferred stock pursuant to the merger agreement. See Annexes D and E.
Votes Required to Approve the Amendments of the Certificates of Designation
      The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding Alteon common stock and the holders of two-thirds of the issued and outstanding Series G Preferred Stock will be required to approve the amendment of Alteon’s Certificate of Designation of Series G Preferred Stock; and the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding Alteon common stock and the holders of two-thirds of the issued and outstanding Series H Preferred Stock will be required to approve the amendment of Alteon’s Certificate of Designation of Series H Preferred Stock.
      THE ALTEON BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF ITEM 2.
ITEM 3 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
      At the meeting, two directors are to be elected to hold office until the completion of the merger or, in the event the merger is not completed, the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2009 and until their successors are elected and qualified. The nominees for election to the Board of Directors are David K. McCurdy and Mark Novitch, M.D. Their biographies appear below.
      Pursuant to Alteon’s certificate of incorporation, the Board of Directors is divided into three classes, each of which serves a term of three years. Class C consists of Mr. McCurdy and Dr. Novitch, whose terms will expire at the upcoming meeting. Class A consists of Ms. Breslow, Mr. Dalby and Mr. Moore, whose terms will expire at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2007. Class B consists of Mr. Moch, Dr. Bransome and Dr. Naimark, whose terms will expire at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2008.
      Proxies solicited by the Board of Directors will be voted for the election of the nominees named above, unless otherwise specified in the proxy. All of the persons whose names and biographies appear below are present directors of Alteon. In the event a nominee should become unavailable or unable to serve as a director, it is intended that votes will be cast for a substitute nominee designated by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that the nominees named will be unable to serve if elected. The nominees have consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serve if elected.

VI-1


Table of Contents

      The current Board of Directors, including the nominees, is comprised of the following persons:
                     
        Served as a    
Name   Age   Director Since   Positions with Alteon
             
Kenneth I. Moch
    51       1998     Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Edwin D. Bransome, Jr., M.D. 
    72       1999     Director
Marilyn G. Breslow
    61       1988     Director
Alan J. Dalby
    69       1994     Director
David K. McCurdy(1)
    55       1997     Director
Thomas A. Moore
    55       2001     Director
George M. Naimark, Ph.D. 
    81       1999     Director
Mark Novitch, M.D.(1)
    73       1994     Director
 
(1)  A nominee for election to the Board of Directors.
      The principal occupations and business experience, for at least the past five years, of each director are as follows:
      Kenneth I. Moch, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, joined the Company in February 1995, as Senior Vice President, Finance and Business Development and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Moch became President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company in December 1998. In June 2001, he was named Chairman of the Board. From 1990 to 1995, Mr. Moch served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Biocyte Corporation, a cellular therapy company that pioneered the use of cord blood stem cells in transplantation therapy. Mr. Moch was a founder and the Managing General Partner of Catalyst Ventures, a seed venture capital partnership, and was a founder of The Liposome Company, Inc. in Princeton, New Jersey, where he served as Vice President from 1982 to 1988. Previously, he was a management consultant with McKinsey & Company, Inc. and a biomedical technology consultant with Channing, Weinberg & Company, Inc. Mr. Moch received an A.B. in Biochemistry from Princeton University, and an M.B.A. with emphasis in Finance and Marketing from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.
      Edwin D. Bransome, Jr., M.D., has been a director of the Company since July 1999. Dr. Bransome has been a consultant to CSRA Renal Services LLC since 2000. He is a Professor of Medicine and Physiology Emeritus at the Medical College of Georgia. He retired as Chief of the Section of Endocrinology and Metabolism in 2000, is the Past-President of the United States Pharmacopoeia Convention and has been a member of the USP Board of Trustees since 1990. He served on the Georgia Department of Medical Assistance (Medicaid) Drug Utilization Board from 1992 to 2000 and was its first Chairman. Currently, Dr. Bransome is in medical practice as a consultant in Endocrinology. He is a member of the editorial board of the journal, Diabetes Care. Dr. Bransome has had faculty positions at the Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, MIT and the Harvard University School of Medicine. He received his A.B. in 1954 from Yale University and received his M.D. from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in 1958. His post-graduate training in Internal Medicine and Clinical Endocrinology fellowship was at the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital in Boston and in Biochemistry at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.
      Marilyn G. Breslow has been a director of the Company since June 1988. She had been a Portfolio Manager/Analyst for W. P. Stewart & Co., Inc., the research subsidiary of W. P. Stewart & Co., Ltd., an investment advisory firm, since 1990, and was previously President of the New York office of WPS, Inc. She was a General Partner of Concord Partners and a Vice President of Dillon, Read & Co., Inc. from 1984 to 1990. Prior to Dillon, Read & Co., she worked at Polaroid Corporation from 1973 to 1984 and was with Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company from 1970 to 1972 and ICF, Inc. from 1972 to 1973. Ms. Breslow holds a B.S. degree from Barnard College and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration.

VI-2


Table of Contents

      Alan J. Dalby has been a director of the Company since December 1994. He is the former Chairman of Reckitt Benckiser plc, a household products company, and former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a founder of Cambridge NeuroScience, Inc. He was Executive Vice President and member of the Board of Directors for SmithKline Beckman Corporation, retiring in 1987. Mr. Dalby is a director of Acambis plc.
      David K. McCurdy has been a director of the Company since June 1997. He is currently the President of Electronic Industries Alliance (“EIA”), the premier trade organization representing more than 2,100 of the world’s leading electronics manufacturers. Before becoming President of EIA in November 1998, Mr. McCurdy was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the McCurdy Group L.L.C., a business consulting and investment firm focused on high-growth companies in the fields of healthcare, high technology and international business, which he formed in 1995. Prior to forming the McCurdy Group, Mr. McCurdy served for 14 years in the United States House of Representatives from the fourth district of Oklahoma. He attained numerous leadership positions, including Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and subcommittee chairs in both the House Armed Services Committee and the Science and Space Committee. He held a commission in the United States Air Force Reserve attaining the rank of major and serving as a Judge Advocate General (JAG). A 1972 graduate of the University of Oklahoma, Mr. McCurdy received his J.D. in 1975 from the University of Oklahoma College of Law. He also studied international economics at the University of Edinburgh, Scotland, as a Rotary International Graduate Fellow.
      Thomas A. Moore has been a director of the Company since October 2001. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Biopure Corporation, a leading developer, manufacturer and marketer of oxygen therapeutics for the treatment of anemia and other applications, from 2002 to 2004. Prior to joining Biopure in 2002, Mr. Moore was President and Chief Executive Officer of Nelson Communications Worldwide, one of the largest providers of healthcare marketing services globally. From 1992 to 1996, Mr. Moore was President of Procter & Gamble’s worldwide prescription and over-the-counter healthcare products business, and Group Vice President of the Procter & Gamble Company. Mr. Moore holds a B.A. in History from Princeton University.
      George M. Naimark, Ph.D., has been a director of the Company since July 1999. He is President of Naimark & Barba, Inc., a management consultancy, since September 1966, and Naimark & Associates, Inc., a private healthcare consulting organization, since February 1994. Dr. Naimark has more than 30 years of experience in the pharmaceutical, diagnostic and medical device industries. His experience includes management positions in research and development, new product development and quality control. In addition, Dr. Naimark has authored books on patent law, communications and business, as well as many articles that appeared in general business, marketing, scientific and medical journals and was the editor of a medical journal. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Delaware in 1951, and received a B.S. and M.S. from Bucknell University in 1947 and 1948, respectively.
      Mark Novitch, M.D., has been a director of the Company since June 1994. He retired as Vice Chairman and Chief Compliance Officer of the Upjohn Company in December 1993. Prior to joining Upjohn in 1985, he was Deputy Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Dr. Novitch is a Director of Guidant Corporation, a supplier of cardiology and minimally invasive surgery products; Neurogen Corporation, a biopharmaceutical firm focused on central nervous system disorders; and Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a developer of pharmaceutical products for cardiovascular and respiratory conditions. He graduated from Yale University and received his M.D. from New York Medical College.
Committees and Meetings of the Board
      The Board of Directors has a Compensation Committee, which reviews incentive compensation for employees of and consultants to Alteon, as well as salaries and incentive compensation of executive officers; a Nominating Committee, which reviews the qualifications of candidates and proposes nominees to serve as directors on our Board of Directors and nominees for membership on Board committees; and an Audit Committee, which oversees the accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial statements. In 2005, the Strategic Planning Committee was formed to oversee all discussions relating to the identification and implementation for the Alteon’s Advanced Glycation End-product assets, as well as for

VI-3


Table of Contents

Alteon itself. In 2005, the Audit, Nominating, Compensation and Strategic Planning Committees were comprised of Edwin D. Bransome, Jr., M.D., Marilyn G. Breslow, Alan J. Dalby, David K. McCurdy, Thomas A. Moore, George M. Naimark, Ph.D., and Mark Novitch, M.D. All of the members of the Compensation Committee, the Nominating Committee, the Strategic Planning Committee and the Audit Committee, are independent, as such term is defined by Section 121.A of the American Stock Exchange listing standards. The Board of Directors does not currently have an “audit committee financial expert,” within the meaning of applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, serving on its Audit Committee. The Board of Directors believes that one or more members of the Audit Committee satisfy the financial sophistication requirement of the American Stock Exchange and are capable of (i) understanding generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and financial statements; (ii) assessing the application of GAAP in connection with our accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves; (iii) analyzing and evaluating our financial statements; (iv) understanding our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting; and (v) understanding audit committee functions, all of which are attributes of an audit committee financial expert. However, the Board of Directors believes that these members may not have obtained these attributes through the experience specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules with respect to audit committee financial experts, and therefore may not qualify to serve in that role.
      The Strategic Planning Committee held 17 meetings, the Audit Committee held fourteen meetings, the Compensation Committee held four meetings and the Nominating Committee held one meeting during the year ended December 31, 2005. There were 18 meetings of the Board of Directors in 2005. Each of the incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors held during the year ended December 31, 2005 and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which he or she served during the year ended December 31, 2005, except for Alan J. Dalby, who attended 12 of the 18 meetings of the Board and committees of the Board held during 2005. The Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, the Nominating Committee and the Strategic Planning Committee. The written charter for the Nominating Committee is available on our website at www.alteon.com.
Director Nomination Process
      The Nominating Committee reviews the qualifications of candidates and proposes nominees to serve as directors on Alteon’s Board of Directors and nominees for membership on Board committees. It is the Nominating Committee’s policy to consider potential candidates for Board membership recommended by its members, management, stockholders and others. The Nominating Committee has not established any specific minimum qualifications that must be met for a recommendation for a position on the Board of Directors. Instead, the Nominating Committee conducts appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates for nomination to the Board of Directors giving due consideration to such criteria, including without limitation, diversity, experience, skill set and the ability to act on behalf of stockholders, as it believes appropriate and in the best interests of Alteon and its stockholders. All potential director candidates are evaluated based upon the same criteria, and the Nominating Committee makes no distinction in its evaluation of candidates based upon whether such candidates are recommended by stockholders or others. Once the evaluation is complete, the Nominating Committee recommends the nominees to the Board of Directors, who makes the final determination. If a stockholder wishes to nominate a candidate to be considered for election as a director at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders using the procedures set forth in Alteon’s amended and restated by-laws, it must follow the procedures described in “Advance Notice of Stockholder Nominees for Director and Other Stockholder Proposals” set forth in Alteon’s amended and restated by-laws. If a stockholder wishes simply to propose a candidate for consideration as a nominee by the Nominating Committee, it should follow the procedures set forth in Appendix B, “Procedures for Shareholders Submitting Nominating Recommendations,” to our Nominating Committee Charter, which is available on our website at www.alteon.com.

VI-4


Table of Contents

Compensation of Directors
      All of the directors are reimbursed for their expenses for each Board meeting attended. Directors who are not also compensated as our employees receive $1,500 per Board meeting attended in person and $1,000 for each Board meeting attended by telephone.
      Pursuant to Alteon’s 2005 Stock Plan, non-employee directors also receive, upon the date of their election or re-election to the Board and on the dates of the next two Annual Meetings of Stockholders (subject to their continued service on the Board of Directors), a stock option to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment if they received stock options upon appointment to the Board between Annual Meetings of Stockholders to fill a vacancy or newly created directorship) at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Each of these options will vest and become exercisable upon completion of one full year of service and shall have a term of ten years regardless of whether the director ceases to be a director of the Company.
Stockholder Communication
      Stockholders and other parties interested in communicating directly with the Chairman or with the Board of Directors as a group may do so by writing to Chairman, Alteon Inc., 6 Campus Drive, Parsippany, New Jersey 07054. All correspondence received by Alteon and addressed to the Chairman is forwarded directly to the Board of Directors.
Director Attendance at Annual Meeting
      All eight incumbent Directors attended Alteon’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2005. Each Director is expected to dedicate sufficient time, energy and attention to ensure the diligent performance of his or her duties, including attending meetings of the stockholders, the Board and Committees of which he or she is a member.
      THE ALTEON BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF ITEM 3.
ITEM 4 —  RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
      The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed, subject to stockholder ratification, J.H. Cohn LLP (“J.H. Cohn”) to serve as Alteon’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. As described below, KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), our former independent registered accounting firm, resigned effective August 10, 2004. The Board recommends that our stockholders ratify this appointment.
      J.H. Cohn served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
      If the stockholders do not ratify the decision to appoint J.H. Cohn, the Audit Committee may reconsider its selection. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares voted at the Annual Meeting is required for ratification.
      Representatives of J.H. Cohn are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions from our stockholders. They will be given the opportunity to make a statement if they wish to do so.

VI-5


Table of Contents

      The following table summarizes the fees paid or payable to J.H. Cohn for services rendered for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005:
           
    Fiscal Year Ended
Type of Fees   December 31, 2005
     
Audit Fees
  $ 288,966  
Audit-Related Fees
    7,150  
Tax Fees
     
All Other Fees
     
       
 
Total Fees
  $ 296,116  
       
      The following table summarizes the fees paid or payable KPMG for services rendered for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005:
           
    Fiscal Year Ended
Type of Fees   December 31, 2005
     
Audit Fees
  $ 7,500  
Audit-Related Fees
    3,500  
Tax Fees
     
All Other Fees
    3,325  
       
 
Total Fees
  $ 14,325  
       
      The following table summarizes the fees paid or payable J.H. Cohn for services rendered for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004:
           
    Fiscal Year Ended
Type of Fees   December 31, 2004
     
Audit Fees
  $ 47,667  
Audit-Related Fees
    1,500  
Tax Fees
     
All Other Fees
     
       
 
Total Fees
  $ 49,167  
       
      The following table summarizes the fees paid or payable KPMG for services rendered for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004:
           
    Fiscal Year Ended
Type of Fees   December 31, 2004
     
Audit Fees
  $ 83,000  
Audit-Related Fees
     
Tax Fees
    12,150  
All Other Fees
    26,828  
       
 
Total Fees
  $ 121,978  
       
      Information set forth below the caption “audit fees” relates to fees we paid the independent registered public accountants for professional services for the audit of our financial statements included in our Form 10-K, review of our financial statements included in our Forms 10-Q and for the issuance of comfort letters and/or consents in connection with registration statements. 2005 Audit Fees to J.H. Cohn LLP also include $196,239 for work related to the audit of our internal controls over financial reporting and related attestation to management’s report on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. “Audit-Related Fees” are fees we paid for assurance and related services by the independent registered public accountants that are reasonably related to

VI-6


Table of Contents

the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, including special procedures required to meet certain regulatory requirements. “All Other Fees” are fees paid to KPMG LLP for the year ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 related to an audit of a third-party vendor. “Tax fees” are fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
      THE ALTEON BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF ITEM 4.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
      The following table identifies Alteon’s current executive officers:
                 
            In Current
Name   Age   Capacities in Which Served   Positions Since
             
Kenneth I. Moch
    51     Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer   June 2001 December 1998
Mary Phelan(1)(2)
    43     Director of Finance and Financial Reporting   May 2005
 
(1)  Mary Phelan has served as Alteon’s Director of Finance and Financial Reporting since May 2005. Prior to that, she served as Alteon’s Controller since October 2003. From July 2000 to September 2003, Ms. Phelan served as Alteon’s Assistant Controller. Prior to joining Alteon, Ms. Phelan was accounting manager at Medicom Communications Corporation from August 1999 to July 2000. Ms. Phelan is a Certified Public Accountant who has held several accounting positions, including Senior Accountant at KPMG, LLP. Ms. Phelan received a BBA in Certified Public Accounting from Pace University.
 
(2)  Mary Phelan has resigned from her position as Director of Finance and Financial Reporting effective May 31, 2006.

VI-7


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
      The following table sets forth certain information concerning the annual and long-term compensation for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, of Alteon’s Chief Executive Officer and Alteon’s three other highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at December 31, 2005, or who served as executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (collectively, the “Named Officers”):
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
                                           
                Long-Term    
                Compensation    
        Awards    
    Annual Compensation   Securities    
        Underlying   All Other
        Salary   Bonus   Options   Compensation
Name and Principal Position   Year   ($)   ($)   (#)   ($)
                     
Kenneth I. Moch
    2005       382,454             150,000       15,930 (1)
 
President and Chief
    2004       367,744       100,000 (2)     600,000       13,619 (3)
 
Executive Officer
    2003       353,600       200,000 (4)     100,000       3,000 (5)
Judith S. Hedstrom(6)
    2005       300,000                   3,500 (5)
 
Chief Operating Officer
    2004       250,000       75,000 (2)     400,000       3,250 (5)
      2003       223,600       78,333 (7)     150,000       3,000 (5)
Elizabeth A. O’Dell(8)
    2005       101,667                   3,500 (5)
 
Vice President, Finance, Secretary and
    2004       183,872       30,000 (2)     63,000       3,250 (5)
 
Treasurer
    2003       176,800       30,000 (9)     150,000       3,000 (5)
Mary T. Phelan(10)
    2005       131,667       32,500       44,000       2,400 (5)
  Director of Finance and Financial Reporting                                        
 
  (1)  Represents expenses for a car allowance of $11,430 and matching 401(k) contributions of $4,500.
 
  (2)  Represents a deferred performance bonus relating to the year ended December 31, 2004, paid in 2005.
 
  (3)  Represents expenses for a car allowance of $9,619 and matching 401(k) contributions of $4,000.
 
  (4)  Includes a $100,000 deferred performance bonus relating to the year ended December 31, 2003, paid in 2004.
 
  (5)  Represents matching 401(k) contributions.
 
  (6)  Ms. Hedstrom resigned effective January 31, 2006.
 
  (7)  Includes a $45,000 deferred performance bonus relating to the year ended December 31, 2003, paid in 2004.
 
  (8)  Ms. O’Dell resigned effective May 18, 2005.
 
  (9)  Includes a $20,000 deferred performance bonus relating to the year ended December 31, 2003, paid in 2004.
(10)  Ms. Phelan became our Director of Finance and Financial Reporting in May 2005. Ms. Phelan has resigned from her position as Director of Finance and Financial Reporting effective May 31, 2006.

VI-8


Table of Contents

      The following tables set forth certain information concerning grants and exercises of stock options during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, to and by the Named Officers:
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS
                                                 
                    Potential Realizable
                    Value at Assumed
    Number of   Percent of           Annual Rates of
    Securities   Total Options           Stock Price
    Underlying   Granted to           Appreciation For
    Options   Employees in   Exercised       Option Term(1)
    Granted   Fiscal Year   or Base        
Name   (#)   (%)   Price ($/SH)   Expiration Date   5% ($)   10% ($)
                         
Kenneth I. Moch
    150,000       64.7       0.75       02/28/10       31,082       68,682  
Mary T. Phelan
    20,000       8.6       0.58       05/02/15       7,295       18,487  
      24,000       10.3       0.35       07/25/15       5,283       13,387  
Judith S. Hedstrom
                N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A  
Mary T. Phelan
                N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A  
 
(1)  The dollar amounts under these columns are the result of calculations assuming that the price of Alteon common stock on the date of the grant of the option increases at the hypothetical 5% and 10% rates set by the Securities and Exchange Commission and therefore are not intended to forecast possible future appreciation, if any, of our stock price over the option term of 10 years.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
                                                 
            Number of Securities    
    Shares       Underlying Unexercised   Value of Unexercised In-
    Acquired       Options at December 31,   The-Money Options
    on   Value   2005 (#)   December 31, 2005(1) ($)
    Exercise   Realized        
Name   (#)   ($)   Exercisable   Unexercisable   Exercisable   Unexercisable
                         
Kenneth I. Moch
                1,150,000                    
Judith S. Hedstrom
                825,000                    
Elizabeth A. O’Dell
                576,167                    
Mary T. Phelan
                81,730                    
 
(1)  No values are shown in these columns because none of the reported exercisable options were in-the-money at December 31, 2005.

VI-9


Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
      The following table sets forth information concerning the number of outstanding options, the weighted average exercise price of those securities and the number of securities remaining to be granted under existing equity plans, whether approved or not approved by security holders, as of December 31, 2005:
                         
        Weighted-    
    Number of Securities   Average Exercise    
    to be Issued Upon   Price of   Number of Securities
    Exercise of   Outstanding   Remaining Available
    Outstanding   Options,   For Future Issuance
    Options, Warrants   Warrants and   Under Existing Equity
Plan Category   and Rights   Right   Compensation Plans
             
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)
    6,486,665     $ 2.12       4,807,978  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
                 
                   
Total
    6,486,665     $ 2.12       4,807,978  
                   
 
(1)  These plans consist of our Amended and Restated 1987 Stock Option Plan, our Amended 1995 Stock Option Plan and our 2005 Stock Option Plan.
Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements
      Alteon entered into a three-year amended and restated employment agreement with Kenneth I. Moch as of December 15, 2004. Under the terms of the amended and restated employment agreement, Mr. Moch serves as Alteon’s Chief Executive Officer and is entitled to an annual salary for the 2006 fiscal year of $382,454. The term of his employment is for a three-year period.
      Alteon entered into a three-year amended and restated employment agreement with Judith S. Hedstrom as of February 11, 2005. Under the terms of the amended and restated employment agreement, Ms. Hedstrom served as our Chief Operating Officer and was entitled to an annual salary of $300,000 per annum. The term of her employment was for a three-year period. Ms. Hedstrom resigned effective January 31, 2006.
      By letter agreement dated December 22, 2003, Alteon entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Elizabeth A. O’Dell for an additional three years. Pursuant to this letter agreement, Ms. O’Dell received stock options to purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of common stock and was entitled to an annual salary of $182,872 (subject to annual review by the Board of Directors) plus an annual bonus awarded at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Based on the provisions of her agreement, in December 2004, the Board of Directors approved an increase in Ms. O’Dell’s base salary to $191,227. Ms. O’Dell resigned effective May 18, 2005.
      In addition to provisions in the above-described agreements requiring each individual to maintain the confidentiality of Alteon’s information and assign inventions to Alteon, such executive officers have agreed that during the terms of their agreements and for one year thereafter, they will not compete with Alteon by engaging in any capacity in any business that is competitive with Alteon’s business. The employment agreements with Mr. Moch and Ms. Hedstrom provide that either party may terminate the agreement upon 30 days’ prior written notice, subject to a salary continuation obligation of Alteon if it terminates the agreements without cause. Mr. Moch and Ms. Hedstrom will receive a 12-month salary continuation under such circumstances. The employment agreements with Mr. Moch and Ms. Hedstrom provide that they are entitled to receive benefits upon a change in control of Alteon, including payment of an amount equal to their base salary payable each month for a period of 12 months following the change in control. Mr. Moch and Ms. Hedstrom may elect to receive this payment, if it is made, in a lump sum, subject to a discount equal to the then applicable federal rate.

VI-10


Table of Contents

      On December 15, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Alteon Inc. approved the acceleration of the vesting date of all previously issued, outstanding and unvested options, effective December 31, 2005. Approximately 1.47 million options were accelerated, of which approximately 1.3 million belong to executive officers and non-employee members of the Board of Directors.
Change in Control Severance Benefits Plan
      In February 1996, Alteon adopted the Alteon Inc. Change in Control Severance Benefits Plan (the “Change in Control Severance Plan”) to protect and retain qualified employees and to encourage their full attention, free from distractions caused by personal uncertainties and risks in the event of a pending or threatened change in control of Alteon. The Change in Control Severance Plan provides for severance benefits to certain employees upon certain terminations of employment after or in connection with a change in control of Alteon as defined in the Change in Control Severance Plan. Following a qualifying termination that occurs as a result of a change in control, Alteon’s executive officers will be entitled to continuation of (i) their base salary for a period of 24 months, and (ii) all benefit programs and plans providing for health and insurance benefits for a period of up to 18 months. In addition, upon a change in control of Alteon, all outstanding unexercisable stock options held by certain employees that are participants in the Change in Control Severance Plan will become exercisable. The Change in Control Severance Plan was terminated in November 2005.
Alteon Severance Plan
      The Alteon Severance Plan, which became effective June 1, 2005, provides for severance payments and benefits to certain employees upon termination of their employment as a result of a triggering event as defined in the Alteon Severance Plan. Upon a triggering event, these employees will be entitled to continuation of (i) their base salary for a period of up to six months, and (ii) all benefit programs and plans providing for health care coverage for a period of up to three months. Our obligation to provide severance payments and benefits to each employee ends if the employee secures employment during such time periods.
401(k) Plan
      Alteon has a tax-qualified employee savings and retirement plan (the “401(k) Plan”) covering all of its employees. Pursuant to the 401(k) Plan, employees may elect to reduce their current compensation by up to the statutorily prescribed annual limit ($15,000 in 2006) and have the amount of such reduction contributed to the 401(k) Plan. The 401(k) Plan does not require that Alteon make additional matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan on behalf of participants in the 401(k) Plan. However, in 1998, we began making discretionary contributions at a rate of 25% of employee contributions up to a maximum of 5% of their base salary. Contributions by employees to the 401(k) Plan and income earned on such contributions are not taxable to employees until the contributions are withdrawn from the 401(k) Plan. The Trustees under the 401(k) Plan, at the direction of each participant, invest the assets of the 401(k) Plan.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
      The persons who served as members of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors during 2005 were Alan J. Dalby, Edwin D. Bransome, Jr., M.D., Marilyn G. Breslow, David K. McCurdy, Thomas A. Moore, George M. Naimark, Ph.D., and Mark Novitch, M.D. None of the members of the Compensation Committee was an officer, former officer or employee of Alteon or had any relationship with Alteon that requires disclosure under Item 404 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-K.
Stockholder Return Performance Presentation
      The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock over the five-year period ending December 31, 2005, with the cumulative total return of (i) the American Stock

VI-11


Table of Contents

Exchange U.S. Index (“Amex US”) and (ii) the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index (“Nasdaq Biotech”). The graph assumes (i) an investment of $100 in our common stock and in each of the indices, and (ii) reinvestment of all dividends. No cash dividends have been declared on our common stock as of December 31, 2005. The stock performance set forth below is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.

VI-12


Table of Contents

RELATIVE PERFORMANCE
                                                               
                                             
      31-Dec-00     31-Dec-01     31-Dec-02     31-Dec-03     29-Dec-04     31-Dec-05  
                                             
 ALTEON
      100.00         520.00         234.29         179.43         149.71         20.57    
                                                   
 AMEX US
      100.00         86.34         70.57         95.52         110.38         119.47    
                                                   
 AMEX HP&S
      100.00         112.77         77.94         136.53         140.45         121.47    
                                                   
 NASDAQ Biotech
      100.00         103.06         56.35         82.12         87.16         89.63    
                                                   
chart
      The preceding performance graph, the Compensation Committee report and the Audit Committee report contained in this Proxy Statement are not to be incorporated by reference into filings Alteon has made or may make under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that incorporate other filings Alteon has made or may make under those statutes.

VI-13


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
General Policies
      The Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and approving Alteon’s general compensation policies and compensation plans, as well as the specific compensation levels for officers and highly compensated employees. The Committee also acts as the Administrator under Alteon’s 2005 Stock Option Plan, and, from time to time, grants options under such Plan.
      Under the supervision of the Committee, Alteon has developed and implemented compensation policies, plans and programs which (i) provide a total compensation package which is intended to be competitive within the industry so as to enable Alteon to attract and retain high-caliber executive personnel, and (ii) seek to align the financial interests of Alteon’s employees with those of its stockholders by relying heavily on long-term incentive compensation that is tied to performance.
      The primary components of executive compensation include base salary and long-term equity incentives in the form of stock options. Alteon relies on long-term incentive compensation (i.e., stock options) to motivate the executive officers and other employees. This allows Alteon to retain cash for research and development projects. In determining the size of stock option grants to individual executives, the Committee considers a number of factors, including the following: the level of an executive’s job responsibilities; the executive’s past performance; the size and frequency of grants by comparable companies; the executive’s salary level; the need to provide incentive for the purpose of retaining qualified personnel in light of Alteon’s current conditions and prospects; the size of any prior grants; and the achievement of designated milestones by the executive. The Committee assigns no specific weight to any of the foregoing factors (other than achievement of designated milestones by the executive in cases where the executive’s employment agreement provides for a grant of a specific size upon achievement of the milestone) when making determinations as to the size of stock option grants.
      Executive officers are also eligible to earn an annual cash incentive award, the amount of which is based upon (i) the position level of the executive officer, and (ii) the attainment of specific individual non-financial performance objectives.
      The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the development of the annual salary plan for executive officers other than himself. The plan is based on industry and peer group comparisons and national surveys and on performance judgments as to the past and expected future contributions of the individuals. To maintain a competitive level of compensation, Alteon targets base salary at the upper percentiles of a comparative group composed of other biotechnology companies of a similar size and stage of business to Alteon. Base salary may exceed this level as a result of individual performance. The Committee reviews the annual plan and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors, with any modifications it deems appropriate. The Committee believes it has established executive compensation levels which are competitive with companies in the industry, taking into account individual experience, performance of both Alteon and the individual, company size, location and stage of development.
Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer
      Mr. Moch’s compensation was determined on the basis of his expertise and experience, which include over 20 years of experience in the biotechnology and venture capital fields. Mr. Moch received a base salary of $382,454 in 2005. Based on a review of the compensation of chief executive officers of comparable biotechnology companies, the Committee believes that Mr. Moch’s compensation arrangements reflect the compensation package necessary to retain his services for Alteon in light of Alteon’s current condition and prospects and is commensurate with his expertise and experience as well as with compensation offered by comparable biotechnology companies.
      It should be noted that when the Committee considers any component of the Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation, the aggregate amounts and mix of all the components, including accumulated (realized and unrealized) option gains are taken into consideration in the Committee’s decisions. In addition, it is the

VI-14


Table of Contents

Committee’s policy to make most compensation decisions in a two-step process. At the first Committee meeting during the year, the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers’ proposed compensation is presented, reviewed and analyzed in the context of all the components of their total compensation. Members then have additional time between meetings to ask for additional information and to raise and discuss further questions. The discussion is continued at a second Committee meeting, after which a vote is taken.
      Effective January 1, 1994, the Internal Revenue Code does not permit corporations to deduct payment of certain compensation in excess of $1,000,000 to the chief executive officer and the four other most highly paid executive officers. All compensation paid to our executive officers for 2005 will be fully deductible, and the Committee anticipates that amounts paid as cash compensation will continue to be fully deductible because the amounts are expected to be less than the $1,000,000 threshold. Under certain circumstances, the executive officers may realize compensation upon the exercise of stock options granted under our stock option plans which would not be deductible by Alteon. Alteon expects to take such action as is necessary to qualify its stock option plans as “performance-based compensation,” which is not subject to the limitation, if and when the Committee determines that the effect of the limitation on deductibility warrants such action.
  Compensation Committee
  Alan J. Dalby
  Edwin D. Bransome, Jr., M.D.
  Marilyn G. Breslow
  David K. McCurdy
  Thomas A. Moore
  George M. Naimark, Ph.D.
  Mark Novitch, M.D.

VI-15


Table of Contents

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
      The Audit Committee’s powers and responsibilities and the qualifications required of each of its members are set forth in the Audit Committee Charter.
Responsibilities
      The primary function of the Audit Committee is to oversee Alteon’s accounting and financial reporting processes, the audits of its financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting. Management is solely responsible for the financial statements and the financial reporting process, including the system of internal controls, and has represented to the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors that the financial statements discussed below were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America appropriate in the circumstances and necessarily include some amounts based on management’s estimates and judgments. Alteon’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing those financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of these financial statements, in all material respects, with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Independence
      As required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, as currently in effect, Alteon’s independent registered public accounting firm, J.H. Cohn LLP (“J.H. Cohn”) has disclosed to the Audit Committee any relationships between it (and its related entities) and Alteon (and its related entities), which, in J.H. Cohn’s professional judgment, may reasonably be thought to affect its ability to be independent. In addition, J.H. Cohn has discussed its independence with the Audit Committee and confirmed in a letter to the Audit Committee that, in its professional judgment, it is independent of Alteon within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Recommendation
      Acting pursuant to its Charter, the Audit Committee has reviewed Alteon’s audited annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 and the related report of J.H. Cohn, and has discussed the audited financial statements and report with management and with the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has also discussed with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as currently in effect. These matters include significant accounting policies, management judgments and accounting estimates, management’s consultation with other accountants, and any difficulties encountered in performing the audit, significant audit adjustment or disagreements with management. Based on the review and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended to Alteon’s Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in Alteon’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  Audit Committee
  Marilyn G. Breslow
  Edwin D. Bransome, Jr., M.D.
  Alan J. Dalby
  David K. McCurdy
  Thomas A. Moore
  George M. Naimark, Ph.D.
  Mark Novitch, M.D.

VI-16


Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
      The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of May 15, 2006, except as otherwise set forth below, by (i) each person who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of the common stock, (ii) each Director, (iii) each individual named in the Summary Compensation Table on page [     ] hereof and (iv) all current Directors and executive officers as a group:
                 
    Amount and Nature    
    of Beneficial   Percent of
Name of Beneficial Owner(1)   Ownership(1)   Class(2)
         
Kenneth I. Moch
    1,152,123 (3)     1.64 %
Edwin D. Bransome, Jr., M.D
    132,500 (4)     *  
Marilyn G. Breslow
    154,867 (5)     *  
Alan J. Dalby
    154,867 (6)     *  
David K. McCurdy
    166,067 (7)     *  
Thomas A. Moore
    119,000 (8)     *  
George M. Naimark, Ph.D
    142,337 (9)     *  
Mark Novitch, M.D
    421,067 (10)     *  
Mary T. Phelan
    82,590 (11)     *  
Judith S. Hedstrom
    825,000 (12)     1.18 %
Elizabeth A. O’Dell
    613,667 (13)     *  
All current directors and officers as a group (9 persons)
    2,525,418 (14)     3.54 %
 
  * Less than one percent.
  (1)  Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to stock options and warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such options and the percentage ownership of any group of which the holder is a member, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as indicated by footnote, and subject to community property laws where applicable, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.
 
  (2)  Applicable percentage of ownership is based on 68,957,111 shares of common stock outstanding.
 
  (3)  Includes 2,023 shares of common stock and 1,150,000 shares of common stock subject to options which were exercisable as of May 15, 2006, and 100 shares held by Mr. Moch’s sons. Does not include options to purchase 1,652,000 shares of common stock held in trust for Mr. Moch’s minor children, for which Mr. Moch’s wife is the trustee and Mr. Moch disclaims beneficial ownership.
 
  (4)  Includes 10,000 shares of common stock held directly by Dr. Bransome, 2,500 shares held by his wife and 120,000 shares of common stock subject to options that were exercisable as of May 15, 2006.
 
  (5)  Includes 154,867 shares of common stock subject to options that were exercisable as of May 15, 2006.
 
  (6)  Includes 12,467 shares of common stock held directly by Mr. Dalby and 142,400 shares of common stock subject to options which were exercisable as of May 15, 2006.
 
  (7)  Includes 166,067 shares of common stock subject to options which were exercisable as of May 15, 2006.
 
  (8)  Includes 24,000 shares of common stock held directly by Mr. Moore and 95,000 shares of common stock subject to options which were exercisable as of May 15, 2006.
 
  (9)  Includes 5,000 shares of common stock held directly by Dr. Naimark, 4,000 shares held jointly by Dr. Naimark and his wife and 133,337 shares of common stock subject to options which were exercisable as of May 15, 2006.

VI-17


Table of Contents

(10)  Includes 5,000 shares of common stock held jointly by Dr. Novitch and his wife and 416,067 shares of common stock subject to options that were exercisable as of May 15, 2006.
 
(11)  Includes 860 shares of common stock held directly by Ms. Phelan and 81,730 shares of common stock subject to options which were exercisable as of May 15, 2006.
 
(12)  Includes 825,000 shares of common stock subject to options that were exercisable as of May 15, 2006.
 
(13)  Includes 37,500 shares of common stock held directly by Ms. O’Dell and 576,167 shares of common stock subject to options which were exercisable as of May 15, 2006.
 
(14)  Includes 2,459,468 shares of common stock subject to options which were exercisable as of May 15, 2006.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services by Independent Accountants
      The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and legally permissible non-audit services provided by the independent accountants. The Audit Committee pre-approved all services performed by the independent accountants during 2004 and 2005.
Change in Accountants
      KPMG resigned as our principal accountants effective August 10, 2004. The resignation was the sole decision of KPMG and was neither approved nor recommended by our Audit Committee. KPMG’s reports on our financial statements, as of and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the period from December 31, 2003 to the date of resignation of KPMG, (i) there were no disagreements with KPMG on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to KPMG’s satisfaction, would have caused KPMG to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its report, and (ii) there were no “reportable events,” as such term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K. On August 26, 2004, our Audit Committee engaged J.H. Cohn as our principal accountant. During the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the period from December 31, 2003 to the date of engagement of J.H. Cohn, neither Alteon nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted with J.H. Cohn with respect to the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on Alteon’s financial statements or any matters or events set forth in Items 304(a)(2)(i), and (ii) of Regulation S-K. KPMG’s letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating its agreement with the statements made herein is filed as an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2004.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
      Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by Securities and Exchange Commission regulation to furnish us with copies of all Forms 3, 4 and 5, and any amendments thereto, they file.
      Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms we have received and written representations from certain reporting persons that they were not required to file Forms 5 for specified fiscal years, we believe that all of our officers, directors, and greater than 10% beneficial owners complied with all filing requirements applicable to them with respect to transactions in our equity securities during fiscal year 2005.