DYN-2013.6.30-10Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________ to ________
Commission file number: 001-33443
DYNEGY INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
State of Incorporation | | I.R.S. Employer Identification No. |
Delaware | | 20-5653152 |
| | |
601 Travis, Suite 1400 | | |
Houston, Texas | | 77002 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(713) 507-6400
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | |
Large accelerated filer o | | Accelerated filer ý |
Non-accelerated filer o | | Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes x No ¨
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of our class of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 100,030,967 shares outstanding as of July 26, 2013.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| | |
| Page |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
| |
Item 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: | |
| |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets: | |
As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 | |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations: | |
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 (Successor) and 2012 (Predecessor) | |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss): | |
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 (Successor) and 2012 (Predecessor) | |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: | |
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 (Successor) and 2012 (Predecessor) | |
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | |
| |
Item 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
Item 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | |
Item 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | |
| |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | |
| |
Item 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | |
Item 1A. | RISK FACTORS | |
Item 6. | EXHIBITS | |
| | |
Signature | | |
DEFINITIONS
As used in this Form 10-Q, the abbreviations contained herein have the meanings set forth below.
|
| | |
AEM | | Ameren Energy Marketing Company |
AER | | Ameren Energy Resources Company, LLC |
AERG | | Ameren Energy Resources Generating Company |
ARO | | Asset Retirement Obligation |
ASU | | Accounting Standards Update |
BTA | | Best Technology Available |
CAIR | | Clean Air Interstate Rule |
CAISO | | The California Independent System Operator |
CARB | | California Air Resources Board |
CCR | | Coal Combustion Residuals |
CEO | | Chief Executive Officer |
CFO | | Chief Financial Officer |
CFTC | | U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission |
CPUC | | California Public Utility Commission |
CSAPR | | Cross-State Air Pollution Rule |
DCIH | | Dynegy Coal Investments Holdings, LLC |
DH | | Dynegy Holdings, LLC (formerly known as Dynegy Holdings Inc.) |
DMG | | Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC |
DMSLP | | Dynegy Midstream Services L.P. |
DPC | | Dynegy Power, LLC |
DYPM | | Dynegy Power Marketing, LLC |
EBITDA | | Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization |
ELG | | Effluent Limitation Guidelines |
EMA | | Energy Management Agency Services Agreement |
EPA | | Environmental Protection Agency |
FASB | | Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FERC | | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
FTR | | Financial Transmission Rights |
GAAP | | Generally Accepted Accounting Principles of the United States of America |
GHG | | Greenhouse Gas |
IBEW | | International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers |
IMA | | In-market Asset Availability |
IPCB | | Illinois Pollution Control Board |
IPH | | Illinois Power Holdings, LLC |
ISO | | Independent System Operator |
ISO-NE | | Independent System Operator New England |
kW | | Kilowatt |
LC | | Letter of Credit |
LIBOR | | London Interbank Offered Rate |
LMP | | Locational Marginal Pricing |
MISO | | Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. |
MMBtu | | One Million British Thermal Units |
MW | | Megawatts |
MWh | | Megawatt Hour |
NM | | Not Meaningful |
NPDES | | National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System |
|
| | |
NSPS | | New Source Performance Standard |
NYISO | | New York Independent System Operator |
PG&E | | Pacific Gas and Electric Company |
PJM | | PJM Interconnection, LLC |
PRIDE | | Producing Results through Innovation by Dynegy Employees |
RFO | | Request for Offer |
RGGI | | Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative |
RMR | | Reliability Must Run |
RPM | | Reliability Pricing Model |
RTO | | Regional Transmission Organization |
SCE | | Southern California Edison |
SEC | | U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
SO2 | | Sulfur Dioxide |
SPDES | | State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System |
VaR | | Value at Risk |
VLGC | | Very Large Gas Carrier |
Item 1—FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DYNEGY INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited) (in millions, except share data)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
ASSETS | | |
| | |
|
Current Assets | | |
| | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 461 |
| | $ | 348 |
|
Restricted cash | | — |
| | 98 |
|
Accounts receivable | | 106 |
| | 108 |
|
Accounts receivable, affiliates | | — |
| | 1 |
|
Inventory | | 76 |
| | 101 |
|
Assets from risk-management activities | | 8 |
| | 13 |
|
Assets from risk-management activities, affiliates | | — |
| | 4 |
|
Broker margin account | | 36 |
| | 40 |
|
Intangible assets | | 175 |
| | 271 |
|
Prepayments and other current assets | | 51 |
| | 59 |
|
Total Current Assets | | 913 |
| | 1,043 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment | | 3,122 |
| | 3,064 |
|
Accumulated depreciation | | (116 | ) | | (42 | ) |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net | | 3,006 |
| | 3,022 |
|
Other Assets | | |
| | |
|
Restricted cash | | — |
| | 237 |
|
Assets from risk-management activities | | 3 |
| | — |
|
Intangible assets | | 31 |
| | 71 |
|
Deferred income taxes | | 95 |
| | 95 |
|
Other long-term assets | | 105 |
| | 67 |
|
Total Assets | | $ | 4,153 |
| | $ | 4,535 |
|
See the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
DYNEGY INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited) (in millions, except share data)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | |
| | |
|
Current Liabilities | | |
| | |
|
Accounts payable | | $ | 87 |
| | $ | 112 |
|
Accounts payable, affiliates | | 1 |
| | 1 |
|
Accrued interest | | 6 |
| | — |
|
Deferred income taxes | | 95 |
| | 95 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities | | 79 |
| | 85 |
|
Liabilities from risk-management activities | | 42 |
| | 25 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt | | 7 |
| | 29 |
|
Total Current Liabilities | | 317 |
| | 347 |
|
Long-term debt | | 1,289 |
| | 1,386 |
|
Other Liabilities | | |
| | |
|
Liabilities from risk-management activities | | 39 |
| | 42 |
|
Other long-term liabilities | | 292 |
| | 257 |
|
Total Liabilities | | $ | 1,937 |
| | $ | 2,032 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13) | |
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
Stockholders’ Equity | | | | |
Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 420,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012; 100,029,507 shares and 99,999,196 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | | 1 |
| | 1 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | | 2,605 |
| | 2,598 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax | | 4 |
| | 11 |
|
Accumulated deficit | | (394 | ) | | (107 | ) |
Total Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 2,216 |
| | $ | 2,503 |
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 4,153 |
| | $ | 4,535 |
|
See the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
DYNEGY INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited) (in millions, except share data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | Predecessor |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 | | | Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
Revenues | | $ | 301 |
| | $ | 619 |
| | | $ | 270 |
| | $ | 538 |
|
Cost of sales | | (253 | ) | | (537 | ) | | | (170 | ) | | (350 | ) |
Gross margin, exclusive of depreciation shown separately below | | 48 |
| | 82 |
| | | 100 |
| | 188 |
|
Operating and maintenance expense, exclusive of depreciation shown separately below | | (85 | ) | | (156 | ) | | | (48 | ) | | (82 | ) |
Depreciation expense | | (49 | ) | | (103 | ) | | | (43 | ) | | (65 | ) |
Gain on sale of assets, net | | 1 |
| | 2 |
| | | — |
| | — |
|
General and administrative expense | | (25 | ) | | (47 | ) | | | (17 | ) | | (37 | ) |
Acquisition and integration costs | | (1 | ) | | (4 | ) | | | — |
| | — |
|
Operating income (loss) | | (111 | ) | | (226 | ) | | | (8 | ) | | 4 |
|
Bankruptcy reorganization items, net | | (2 | ) | | (3 | ) | | | (23 | ) | | 129 |
|
Interest expense | | (16 | ) | | (45 | ) | | | (41 | ) | | (72 | ) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt | | (12 | ) | | (11 | ) | | | — |
| | — |
|
Impairment of Undertaking receivable, affiliate | | — |
| | — |
| | | — |
| | (832 | ) |
Other income and expense, net | | (9 | ) | | (7 | ) | | | 7 |
| | 31 |
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes | | (150 | ) | | (292 | ) | | | (65 | ) | | (740 | ) |
Income tax benefit (Note 15) | | — |
| | — |
| | | 1 |
| | 7 |
|
Loss from continuing operations | | (150 | ) | | (292 | ) | | | (64 | ) | | (733 | ) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (Note 5) | | 5 |
| | 5 |
| | | (5 | ) | | (418 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (145 | ) | | $ | (287 | ) | | | $ | (69 | ) | | $ | (1,151 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Loss Per Share (Note 17): | | | | | | | | | |
Basic loss per share: | | | | | | | | | |
Loss from continuing operations | | $ | (1.50 | ) | | $ | (2.92 | ) | | | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
Income from discontinued operations | | 0.05 |
| | 0.05 |
| | | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
Basic loss per share | | $ | (1.45 | ) | | $ | (2.87 | ) | | | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Diluted loss per share: | | | | | | | | | |
Loss from continuing operations | | $ | (1.50 | ) | | $ | (2.92 | ) | | | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
Income from discontinued operations | | 0.05 |
| | 0.05 |
| | | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
Diluted loss per share | | $ | (1.45 | ) | | $ | (2.87 | ) | | | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Basic shares outstanding | | 100 |
| | 100 |
| | | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
Diluted shares outstanding | | 100 |
| | 100 |
| | | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
See the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
DYNEGY INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(unaudited) (in millions)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | Predecessor |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 | | | Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
Net loss | | $ | (145 | ) | | $ | (287 | ) | | | $ | (69 | ) | | $ | (1,151 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost and actuarial loss | | — |
| | — |
| | | — |
| | (1 | ) |
Reclassification of curtailment gain included in net loss, net of tax | | (7 | ) | | (7 | ) | | | — |
| | — |
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | (7 | ) | | | $ | — |
| | $ | (1 | ) |
Total comprehensive loss | | $ | (152 | ) | | $ | (294 | ) | | | $ | (69 | ) | | $ | (1,152 | ) |
See the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
DYNEGY INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited) (in millions)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | Predecessor |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 | | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | |
| | | |
|
Net loss | | $ | (287 | ) | | | $ | (1,151 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation expense | | 103 |
| | | 65 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt | | 11 |
| | | — |
|
Non-cash interest expense (benefit) | | (3 | ) | | | 4 |
|
Amortization of intangibles | | 127 |
| | | 31 |
|
Bankruptcy reorganization items, net | | — |
| | | 247 |
|
Impairment of Undertaking receivable, affiliate | | — |
| | | 832 |
|
Risk-management activities | | 34 |
| | | (49 | ) |
Risk-management activities, affiliate | | — |
| | | (1 | ) |
Gain on sale of assets, net | | (2 | ) | | | — |
|
Deferred income taxes | | — |
| | | (7 | ) |
Change in value of common stock warrants | | 9 |
| | | — |
|
Other | | 5 |
| | | 4 |
|
Changes in working capital: | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | 3 |
| | | (14 | ) |
Inventory | | 25 |
| | | 1 |
|
Broker margin account | | (10 | ) | | | (12 | ) |
Prepayments and other current assets | | 7 |
| | | (73 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | (21 | ) | | | 34 |
|
Affiliate transactions | | (1 | ) | | | 6 |
|
Changes in non-current assets | | (5 | ) | | | (10 | ) |
Changes in non-current liabilities | | (5 | ) | | | (14 | ) |
Net cash used in operating activities | | $ | (10 | ) | | | $ | (107 | ) |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | |
| | | |
|
Capital expenditures | | (55 | ) | | | (37 | ) |
Proceeds from asset sales, net | | 3 |
| | | — |
|
Decrease in restricted cash | | 335 |
| | | 134 |
|
DMG acquisition | | — |
| | | 256 |
|
Payments received for Undertaking, receivable affiliate | | — |
| | | 16 |
|
Other investing | | — |
| | | 3 |
|
Net cash provided by investing activities | | $ | 283 |
| | | $ | 372 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | |
| | | |
|
Proceeds from long-term borrowings, net of financing costs | | 1,753 |
| | | — |
|
Repayments of borrowings, including debt extinguishment costs | | (1,913 | ) | | | (7 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | | $ | (160 | ) | | | $ | (7 | ) |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | 113 |
| | | 258 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | 348 |
| | | 398 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 461 |
| | | $ | 656 |
|
See the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
DYNEGY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
Note 1—Basis of Presentation and Organization
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to interim financial reporting as prescribed by the SEC. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this report include all material adjustments of a normal recurring nature that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods. These interim financial statements should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed with the SEC on March 14, 2013, which we refer to as our “Form 10-K.” Unless the context indicates otherwise, throughout this report, the terms “Dynegy,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “ours” are used to refer to Dynegy Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries.
Our current business operations are focused primarily on the power generation sector of the energy industry. We report the results of our power generation business as two segments in our consolidated financial statements: (i) the Coal segment (“Coal”) and (ii) the Gas segment (“Gas”). Our consolidated financial results also reflect corporate-level expenses such as general and administrative expense, interest expense and depreciation expense. Please read Note 18—Segment Information for further discussion.
The Gas segment includes Dynegy Power, LLC (“DPC”), which owns, directly and indirectly, substantially all of our wholly-owned natural gas-fired power generation facilities.
The Coal segment includes Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC (“DMG”), which owns, directly and indirectly, substantially all of our coal-fired power generation facilities. On September 1, 2011, DH sold 100 percent of the outstanding membership interests of Dynegy Coal Holdco, LLC (“Coal Holdco”) to Legacy Dynegy (as defined below), (the “DMG Transfer”). On June 5, 2012, DH reacquired Coal Holdco (including its subsidiary, DMG) from Legacy Dynegy (the “DMG Acquisition”). Therefore, the results of our Coal segment are only included in our consolidated results subsequent to June 5, 2012. Please read Note 3—Acquisitions—DMG Acquisition for further discussion.
On September 10, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court (as defined and discussed below in Note 4—Chapter 11 Cases) entered an order confirming the Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”), and on October 1, 2012, (the “Plan Effective Date”), we consummated our reorganization under Chapter 11 pursuant to the Plan and Dynegy exited bankruptcy. As a result of the application of fresh-start accounting as of the Plan Effective Date, the financial statements on or prior to October 1, 2012 are not comparable with the financial statements after October 1, 2012. References to “Successor” refer to the Company after October 1, 2012, after giving effect to the application of fresh-start accounting. References to “Predecessor” refer to the Company on or prior to October 1, 2012. Additionally, on the Plan Effective Date, the DNE Debtor Entities (as defined and discussed below in Note 4—Chapter 11 Cases) did not emerge from bankruptcy; therefore, we deconsolidated our investment in these entities as of October 1, 2012 and began accounting for our investment using the cost method. Accordingly, any activity related to our Roseton and Danskammer operations is presented in discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Merger. On September 30, 2012, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, DH merged with and into Legacy Dynegy, with Dynegy continuing as the surviving legal entity (the “Merger”). Immediately prior to the Merger, Legacy Dynegy had no substantive operations as our power generation facilities were operated through subsidiaries of DH. Further, as a result of the DH Chapter 11 Cases (as defined in Note 4—Chapter 11 Cases) in 2011, under applicable accounting standards, Dynegy was no longer deemed to have a controlling financial interest in DH and its wholly-owned subsidiaries; therefore, DH and its consolidated subsidiaries were no longer consolidated in Dynegy’s consolidated financial statements as of November 7, 2011. As a result of these factors, the Merger was accounted for in a manner similar to a reverse merger, whereby DH is the surviving accounting entity for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, our historical results for periods prior to the Merger are the same as DH's historical results; accordingly, we refer to Dynegy as “Legacy Dynegy” for periods prior to the Merger.
Prior to the Merger, DH was organized as a limited liability company and the capital structure of DH did not change until September 30, 2012. Although Legacy Dynegy’s shares were publicly traded, DH did not have any publicly traded shares prior to the Merger; therefore, no earnings (loss) per share is presented on our unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.
Fresh-Start Accounting. On the Plan Effective Date, we applied “fresh-start accounting.” Fresh-start accounting required us to allocate the reorganization value to our assets and liabilities in a manner similar to that which is required using
DYNEGY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
the acquisition method of accounting for a business combination. The financial statements of the Predecessor include the impact of the Plan provisions and the application of fresh-start accounting. As such, our financial information for the Successor is presented on a basis different from, and is therefore not comparable to, our financial information for the Predecessor for the period ended and as of October 1, 2012 or for prior periods. For further information, please read Note 3—Emergence from Bankruptcy and Fresh-Start Accounting in our Form 10-K.
Note 2—Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make informed estimates and judgments that affect our reported financial position and results of operations based on currently available information. Actual results could differ materially from our estimates. The results of operations for the interim periods presented in this Form 10-Q are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any other interim period due to seasonal fluctuations in demand for our energy products and services, changes in commodity prices, timing of maintenance and other expenditures and other factors.
Accounting Principles Adopted During the Current Period
Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-02—Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This new guidance requires entities to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, entities are required to present significant amounts reclassified out of other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income if the amount is reclassified in its entirety. ASU 2013-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012. Please read Note 8—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for further discussion.
Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11—Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The FASB added clarification to this guidance in ASU 2013-01—Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This new guidance requires entities to disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offsetting in the statement of financial position, as well as instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. ASU 2011-11 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012. Please read Note 6—Risk Management Activities, Derivatives and Financial Instruments for further discussion.
Accounting Principles Not Yet Adopted
Presentation of Unrecognized Tax Benefits. In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11—Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. The provisions of the rule require an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented as a reduction to a deferred tax asset in the financial statements for an NOL carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward except in circumstances when the carryforward or tax loss is not available at the reporting date under the tax laws of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes or the tax law does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purposes. When those circumstances exist, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The new financial statement presentation provisions relating to this update are prospective and effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted. We are currently assessing the future impact of this update, but we do not anticipate a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 3—Acquisitions
AER Transaction Agreement
On March 14, 2013, Illinois Power Holdings, LLC (“IPH”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Dynegy, entered into a definitive agreement (the “AER Transaction Agreement”) with Ameren Corporation (“Ameren”) pursuant to which IPH will, subject to the terms and conditions in the AER Transaction Agreement, acquire from Ameren 100 percent of the equity interests of Ameren Energy Resources Company, LLC (“AER”) (or, following a pre-closing reorganization contemplated by Ameren, a successor thereto) for no cash consideration (the “AER Acquisition”). AER and its subsidiaries consist of a majority
DYNEGY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
of Ameren’s merchant generation and its wholesale and retail marketing business. Pursuant to the AER Transaction Agreement, IPH will indirectly acquire AER’s subsidiaries, including (i) Ameren Energy Generating Company (“Genco”), (ii) Ameren Energy Resources Generating Company (“AERG”) and (iii) Ameren Energy Marketing Company (“AEM”). Dynegy Inc. has provided a limited guaranty of certain obligations of IPH up to $25 million (the “Limited Guaranty”) as described below.
The transaction does not include AER’s gas-fired power generation facilities: Elgin, Gibson City and Grand Tower (the “Put Assets”). Prior to signing the AER Transaction Agreement, AERG, Genco and Ameren Energy Medina Valley Cogen L.L.C. (“Medina Valley”), an affiliate of AER that IPH will not be acquiring in the transaction, entered into an amendment to a put option agreement (the “Put Option Agreement”) whereby the Put Assets will be sold by Genco, subject to approval by FERC, to Medina Valley for a minimum of $133 million (the “Put Transaction”). New appraisals will be obtained for the Put Assets prior to closing, and if the average value of the appraisals exceeds $133 million, any excess amount will be remitted to Genco. Further, in the event Ameren sells the Put Assets within two years of closing, Ameren will pay to Genco any after-tax proceeds in excess of $133 million, or the higher appraised value, if applicable. The minimum amount of $133 million is based on an average of three appraisals obtained in October 2012. The amount may increase as a result of new appraisals, but cannot be reduced.
In connection with the transaction, Ameren will retain certain historical obligations of AER and its subsidiaries, including certain historical environmental and tax liabilities. Genco’s approximately $825 million of notes will remain outstanding as an obligation of Genco. The debt bears interest at rates from 6.30 percent to 7.95 percent and matures between 2018 and 2032.
In connection with the transaction, Ameren is required at closing to ensure that a minimum of $85 million of cash, plus approximately $8 million for the proceeds of certain real estate sales, is available at AER and its subsidiaries of which $70 million will be held at Genco plus the proceeds of the Put Transaction described above.
The AER Transaction Agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants by the parties. The closing of the transaction is expected to occur during the fourth quarter of 2013 and is subject to certain conditions, including (i) consummation of the Put Transaction under the Put Option Agreement; (ii) approval of FERC under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act, as amended (“FERC Approval”); (iii) approval of certain license transfers by the Federal Communications Commission; (iv) approval by the Illinois Pollution Control Board (the “IPCB”) of the transfer to IPH of AER’s air variance; (v) no injunction or other orders preventing the consummation of the transactions under the AER Transaction Agreement; (vi) the continuing accuracy of each party’s representations and warranties; and (vii) the satisfaction of other conditions. On June 6, 2013, the IPCB rejected, on procedural grounds, AER’s and IPH’s motion to transfer the air variance, which granted AER a temporary exemption for the coal plants of its subsidiaries from certain air pollution limitations under the Illinois’ Multi-Pollutant Standard. The IPCB indicated that IPH may file its own request for variance relief. IPH and AER are pursing such relief, and on July 22, 2013 IPH and certain co-petitioners filed their request for variance relief.
Each party has agreed to indemnify the other for breaches of representations and warranties, breaches of covenants and certain other matters, subject to certain exceptions. The AER Transaction Agreement contains certain termination rights for both IPH and Ameren, including if the closing does not occur within 12 months following the date of the AER Transaction Agreement (subject to extension to 13 months in certain circumstances, if necessary, in order to obtain FERC approval).
The AER Transaction Agreement provides for the payment of a termination fee by each party under specific circumstances. In certain circumstances, including failure to receive FERC Approval, IPH must pay a termination fee of $25 million to Ameren.
Concurrently with the execution of the AER Transaction Agreement, Dynegy Inc. entered into the Limited Guaranty, capped at $25 million in favor of Ameren, pursuant to which we will guarantee payout by IPH of any required termination fee and, for a period of two years after the closing (subject to certain exceptions), up to $25 million with respect to IPH’s indemnification obligations and certain reimbursement obligations under the AER Transaction Agreement.
DMG Acquisition
On June 5, 2012, pursuant to a settlement agreement entered into with certain of DH’s creditors, Legacy Dynegy and DH consummated the DMG Acquisition. The DMG Acquisition was accounted for as a business combination in DH’s financial statements as Legacy Dynegy deconsolidated DH effective November 7, 2011 as a result of the DH Chapter 11 Cases. Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their fair value as of the acquisition date.
DYNEGY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The purchase price was approximately $466 million. Consideration given by DH consisted of (i) approximately $402 million for the fair value of the Undertaking receivable, affiliate that was extinguished in connection with the transaction and (ii) approximately $64 million for the fair value of the Administrative Claim issued to Legacy Dynegy in the DH Chapter 11 Cases. As a result of entering into the settlement agreement, the Undertaking receivable was impaired to $418 million as of March 31, 2012, resulting in a charge of approximately $832 million. The carrying value of the Undertaking was adjusted to the value received in the DMG Acquisition plus interest payments received subsequent to March 31, 2012.
Pro Forma Results. The unaudited pro forma financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2012 show the effect of the DMG Acquisition as if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2012.
|
| | | | |
| | Predecessor |
(amounts in millions) | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
Revenues | | $ | 768 |
|
Income from continuing operations | | $ | 10 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations | | $ | (418 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (408 | ) |
Note 4—Chapter 11 Cases
On November 7, 2011, DH and four of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Dynegy Northeast Generation, Inc. (“DNE”), Hudson Power, L.L.C. (“Hudson”), Dynegy Danskammer, L.L.C. (“Danskammer”) and Dynegy Roseton, L.L.C. (“Roseton”, and together with DH, DNE, Hudson and Danskammer, the “DH Debtor Entities”) filed voluntary petitions (the “DH Chapter 11 Cases”) for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, Poughkeepsie Division (the “Bankruptcy Court”). The DH Chapter 11 Cases were jointly administered for procedural purposes only. On July 6, 2012, Legacy Dynegy filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court (the “Dynegy Chapter 11 Case,” and together with the DH Chapter 11 Cases, the “Chapter 11 Cases”). Only Legacy Dynegy and the DH Debtor Entities filed voluntary petitions for relief under the Bankruptcy Code and none of our other direct or indirect subsidiaries are or were debtors thereunder.
On the Plan Effective Date, we consummated our reorganization under Chapter 11 pursuant to the Plan and Dynegy exited bankruptcy. DNE, Hudson, Danskammer and Roseton (the “DNE Debtor Entities”) remain in Chapter 11 bankruptcy . As a result, we deconsolidated the DNE Debtor Entities on the Plan Effective Date and began accounting for our investment using the cost method. Accordingly, any activity related to our Roseton and Danskammer operations is reported in discontinued operations for all periods presented. Please read Note 5—Discontinued Operations for further discussion.
As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had approximately $1 million in net payables and less than $1 million in net receivables, respectively, from the DNE Debtor Entities related to the Service Agreements included in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. We account for our investment in the DNE Debtor Entities using the cost method and have a carrying amount of zero. Our maximum exposure to loss related to our investment in the DNE Debtor Entities is limited to our net receivables as we have no obligation to provide funding to the DNE Debtor Entities on an ongoing basis.
DYNEGY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
For the three and six months ended and as of June 30, 2013, we do not have any subsidiaries under Chapter 11 protection included in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The condensed combined financial statements of the Debtor Entities included in our results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 are set forth below:
Condensed Combined Statement of Operations of the Debtor Entities
|
| | | | | | | | |
(amounts in millions) | | Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
Revenues | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Cost of sales | | — |
| | — |
|
Operating expenses | | — |
| | — |
|
General and administrative expenses | | (2 | ) | | (4 | ) |
Operating loss | | (2 | ) | | (4 | ) |
Bankruptcy reorganization items, net | | (23 | ) | | 129 |
|
Equity losses | | (1,310 | ) | | (1,327 | ) |
Impairment of Undertaking receivable, affiliate | | — |
| | (832 | ) |
Other income and expense, net | | 1,270 |
| | 1,294 |
|
Income tax benefit | | 1 |
| | 7 |
|
Loss from continuing operations | | (64 | ) | | (733 | ) |
Loss from discontinued operations | | (5 | ) | | (418 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (69 | ) | | $ | (1,151 | ) |
Condensed Combined Statement of Cash Flows of the Debtor Entities
|
| | | | |
(amounts in millions) | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
Net cash provided by: | | |
Operating activities | | $ | 20 |
|
Investing activities | | — |
|
Financing activities | | — |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | 20 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | 33 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 53 |
|
Basis of Presentation. The condensed combined financial statements only include the financial statements of the DH Debtor Entities. Transactions among the DH Debtor Entities are eliminated in the condensed combined financial statements.
Interest Expense. The DH Debtor Entities discontinued recording interest on unsecured liabilities subject to compromise (“LSTC”) effective November 8, 2011. Contractual interest on LSTC not reflected in the condensed combined financial statements was approximately $70 million and $141 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.
Bankruptcy Reorganization Items, net. Bankruptcy reorganization items, net represent the direct and incremental costs of bankruptcy, such as professional fees, pre-petition liability claim adjustments and losses related to terminated contracts that are probable and can be estimated. Bankruptcy reorganization items, net, as shown in the condensed combined statement of operations above, consist of expense or income incurred or earned as a direct and incremental result of the bankruptcy filings.
DYNEGY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The following table lists the significant items within this category for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | |
(amounts in millions) | | Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
Adjustments of estimated allowable claims: | | | | |
DNE Leases (1) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (395 | ) |
Subordinated notes (2) | | — |
| | 161 |
|
Write-off of note payable, affiliate (3) | | — |
| | 10 |
|
Other | | — |
| | (4 | ) |
Total adjustments for estimated allowable claims | | — |
| | (228 | ) |
Change in value of Administrative Claim (4) | | (9 | ) | | (9 | ) |
Professional fees (5) | | (14 | ) | | (33 | ) |
Total Bankruptcy reorganization items, net | | (23 | ) | | (270 | ) |
Bankruptcy reorganization items, net included in discontinued operations | | — |
| | 399 |
|
Total Bankruptcy reorganization items, net in continuing operations | | $ | (23 | ) | | $ | 129 |
|
__________________________________________
| |
(1) | Amount represents adjustments to our estimate of the probable allowed claim associated with the DNE leases as a result of entering into the Settlement Agreement. Please read Note 3—Emergence from Bankruptcy and Fresh-Start Accounting in our Form 10-K for further discussion. |
| |
(2) | The estimated allowable claims related to the Subordinated Capital Income Securities were adjusted in the second quarter 2012 based on the terms of the Settlement Agreement, as amended. Please read Note 3—Emergence from Bankruptcy and Fresh-Start Accounting in our Form 10-K for further discussion. |
| |
(3) | It was determined that no claim related to a Note payable, affiliate would be made. Therefore, the estimated amount was reduced to zero. |
| |
(4) | The Administrative Claim was issued on the effective date of the Settlement Agreement. Please read Note 3—Acquisitions—DMG Acquisition for further discussion. |
| |
(5) | Professional fees relate primarily to the fees of attorneys and consultants working directly on the Chapter 11 Cases. |
Note 5—Discontinued Operations
Discontinued Operations
The DNE Debtor Entities remain in Chapter 11 bankruptcy and continue to operate their businesses as “debtors-in-possession.” As a result, Dynegy deconsolidated the DNE Debtor Entities, effective October 1, 2012. The Bankruptcy Court has approved agreements to sell the Danskammer and Roseton facilities for a combined cash purchase price of $23 million and the assumption of certain liabilities (the “Facilities Sale Transactions”). On January 23, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court approved the DNE Disclosure Statement. On March 12, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Plan of Liquidation for the DNE Debtor Entities. On April 30, 2013, we completed the sale of the Roseton facility. The Bankruptcy Court ordered the purchaser of the Danskammer facility to close the transaction by July 31, 2013. The purchaser did not close and Danskammer has terminated its obligations under the purchase agreement. The debtors are actively marketing the Danskammer assets. Should the debtors be unable to find a purchaser for the assets, the debtors will evaluate all alternatives for the Danskammer assets including liquidation of the remaining assets or conversion of the Danskammer Chapter 11 Case to Chapter 7 liquidation under the Bankruptcy Code. In such event, the proceeds from the Roseton Facility Sale Transaction will be distributed pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation, including any modification thereto.
Please read Note 3—Emergence from Bankruptcy and Fresh-Start Accounting and Note 6—Dispositions and Discontinued Operations in our Form 10-K for further discussion. Any activity related to DNE is reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
DYNEGY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
Summary. The amounts in the table below reflect the operating results of the businesses reported as discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | Predecessor |
(amounts in millions) | | Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 | | | Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
Revenues | | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | (2 | ) | | | $ | 20 |
| | $ | 27 |
|
Income (loss) from operations before taxes | | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | | $ | (5 | ) | | $ | (418 | ) |
Income (loss) from operations after taxes | | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | | $ | (5 | ) | | $ | (418 | ) |
Note 6—Risk Management Activities, Derivatives and Financial Instruments
The nature of our business necessarily involves market and financial risks. Specifically, we are exposed to commodity price variability related to our power generation business. Our commercial team manages these commodity price risks with financially settled and other types of contracts consistent with our commodity risk management policy. Our treasury team manages our financial risks and exposures associated with interest expense variability.
Our commodity risk management strategy gives us the flexibility to sell energy and capacity and purchase fuel through a combination of spot market sales and near-term contractual arrangements (generally over a rolling one- to three-year time frame). Our commodity risk management goal is to protect cash flow in the near-term while keeping the ability to capture value longer-term.
Many of our contractual arrangements are derivative instruments and are accounted for at fair value as part of Revenues in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. We also manage commodity price risk by entering into capacity forward sales arrangements, tolling arrangements, RMR contracts, fixed price coal purchases and other arrangements that do not receive recurring fair value accounting treatment because these arrangements do not meet the definition of a derivative or are designated as “normal purchase, normal sale.” As a result, the gains and losses with respect to these arrangements are not reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations until the delivery occurs.
Quantitative Disclosures Related to Financial Instruments and Derivatives
The following disclosures and tables present information concerning the impact of derivative instruments on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations. In the table below, commodity contracts primarily consist of derivative contracts related to our power generation business that we have not designated as accounting hedges that are entered into for purposes of economically hedging future fuel requirements and sales commitments and securing commodity prices. Interest rate contracts are entered into for purposes of reducing our exposure to interest rate fluctuations on our variable rate debt. Common stock warrants were issued in connection with our emergence from bankruptcy and allow the holder to purchase, on a one-to-one basis, one common share of Dynegy common stock at $40/share. We elect not to designate any of our derivatives as accounting hedges. As of June 30, 2013, our commodity derivatives were comprised of both purchases and sales of commodities. As of June 30, 2013, we had net purchases and sales of derivative contracts outstanding in the following quantities:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Contract Type | | Hedge Designation | | Quantity | | Unit of Measure | | Fair Value (1) |
(dollars in millions) | | | | | | | | |
Commodity contracts: | | | | |
| | | | |
|
Electricity derivatives (2) | | Not designated | | (25 | ) | | MWh | | $ | (19 | ) |
Natural gas derivatives (2) | | Not designated | | 156 |
| | MMBtu | | $ | (32 | ) |
Heat rate derivatives | | Not designated | | (1)/6 |
| | MWh/MMBtu | | $ | 1 |
|
Emissions derivatives | | Not designated | | 2 |
| | Metric Ton | | $ | — |
|
Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps | | Not designated | | 796 |
| | Dollars | | $ | (42 | ) |
Interest rate caps (3) | | Not designated | | 1,400 |
| | Dollars | | $ | — |
|
Common stock warrants | | Not designated | | 16 |
| | Warrants | | $ | (29 | ) |
DYNEGY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
__________________________________________
| |
(1) | Includes both asset and liability risk management positions, but excludes margin and collateral netting, as discussed below. |
| |
(2) | Mainly comprised of swaps, options and physical forwards. |
| |
(3) | The interest rate caps were terminated in July 2013. |
Derivatives on the Balance Sheet. We execute a significant volume of transactions through futures clearing managers. Our daily cash payments (receipts) with our futures clearing managers consist of three parts: (i) fair value of open positions (exclusive of options) (“Daily Cash Settlements”); (ii) initial margin requirements of open positions (“Initial Margin”); and (iii) fair value related to options (“Options,” and collectively with Daily Cash Settlements and Initial Margin, “Margin”). In addition to these transactions we execute through the futures clearing managers, we also execute transactions through multiple bilateral counterparties. Our transactions with these counterparties are collateralized using cash collateral (“Collateral”), letters of credit and first liens. We elect to offset fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master netting agreement, where the right of offset exists. We also offset Margin and Collateral paid to or received from all counterparties against the fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master netting agreement. As a result, the consolidated balance sheet presents derivative assets and liabilities, as well as cash paid to or received from all counterparties against those positions, on a net basis.
The following tables present the fair value and balance sheet classification of derivatives in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2013 and the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012 segregated by type of contract segregated by assets and liabilities.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | June 30, 2013 |
| | | | | | | Gross amounts offset in the balance sheet | | |
Contract Type | | Balance Sheet Location | | Gross Fair Value (1) | | Contract Netting | | Collateral or Margin Received or Paid | | Net Fair Value |
(amounts in millions) | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Commodity contracts | | Assets from risk management activities | | $ | 83 |
| | $ | (72 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 11 |
|
| Total derivative assets | | | | $ | 83 |
| | $ | (72 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 11 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Commodity contracts | | Liabilities from risk management activities | | $ | (133 | ) | | $ | 72 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | (39 | ) |
| Interest rate contracts | | Liabilities from risk management activities | | (42 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (42 | ) |
| Common stock warrants | | Other long-term liabilities | | (29 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (29 | ) |
| Total derivative liabilities | | | | $ | (204 | ) | | $ | 72 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | (110 | ) |
Total derivatives | | | | $ | (121 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | (99 | ) |
__________________________________________
| |
(1) | As of June 30, 2013, there were no gross amounts available to be offset that were not offset in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet. |
DYNEGY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | December 31, 2012 |
| | | | | | | Gross amounts offset in the balance sheet | | |
Contract Type | | Balance Sheet Location | | Gross Fair Value (1) | | Contract Netting | | Collateral or Margin Received or Paid | | Net Fair Value |
(amounts in millions) | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Commodity contracts | | Assets from risk management activities | | $ | 61 |
| | $ | (48 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 13 |
|
| Commodity contracts, affiliates | Assets from risk management activities, affiliates | | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4 |
|
| Total derivative assets | | | | $ | 65 |
| | $ | (48 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 17 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Commodity contracts | | Liabilities from risk management activities | | $ | (77 | ) | | $ | 48 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | (21 | ) |
| Interest rate contracts | | Liabilities from risk management activities | | (46 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (46 | ) |
| Common stock warrants | | Other long-term liabilities | | (20 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (20 | ) |
| Total derivative liabilities | | | | $ | (143 | ) | | $ | 48 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | (87 | ) |
Total derivatives | | | | $ | (78 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | (70 | ) |
__________________________________________
| |
(1) | As of December 31, 2012, there were no gross amounts available to be offset that were not offset in our consolidated balance sheet. |
The following table summarizes our cash collateral posted as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, along with the location on the balance sheet and the amount applied against our short-term risk management liabilities.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Location on balance sheet | | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Collateral posted | | Amount applied against short-term risk management liabilities | Collateral posted | | Amount applied against short-term risk management liabilities |
(amounts in millions) | | | | | | | | |
Broker margin | | $ | 58 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | 44 |
| | $ | 4 |
|
Prepayments and other current assets | | $ | 5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 4 |
|
Impact of Derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Operations
The following discussion and table presents the location and amount of gains and losses on derivative instruments in our consolidated statements of operations. We had no derivatives that were designated in qualifying hedging relationships during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
Financial Instruments Not Designated as Hedges. We elect not to designate derivatives related to our power generation business and interest rate instruments as cash flow or fair value hedges. Thus, we account for changes in the fair value of these derivatives within the consolidated statements of operations (herein referred to as “mark-to-market” accounting treatment). As a result, these mark-to-market gains and losses are not reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations in the same period as the underlying activity for which the derivative instruments serve as economic hedges. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, our Revenues include unrealized mark-to-market losses related to our commodity derivatives of $1 million and $2 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, our Revenues include unrealized mark-to-market gains related to our commodity derivatives of $37 million and $70 million, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, our Interest expense includes unrealized mark-to-market gains related to our interest rate derivatives of $4 million and losses of $10 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, our Interest expense includes unrealized mark-to-market gains related to our interest rate derivatives of $4 million and losses of $13 million, respectively.
DYNEGY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The realized and unrealized impact of derivative financial instruments on our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is presented below. Note that this presentation does not reflect the expected gains or losses arising from the underlying physical transactions associated with these financial instruments. Therefore, this presentation is not indicative of the economic gross margin we expect to realize when the underlying physical transactions settle and interest payments are made.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Successor | | | Predecessor |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges | | Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives | | Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 | | | Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
(amounts in millions) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commodity contracts | | Revenues | | $ | (16 | ) | | $ | (50 | ) | | | $ | (32 | ) | | $ | (24 | ) |
Commodity contracts, affiliates | | Revenues | | $ | — |
| | $ | (2 | ) | | | $ | — |
| | $ | (6 | ) |
Interest rate contracts | | Interest expense | | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | | $ | (14 | ) | | $ | (11 | ) |
Common stock warrants | | Other income (expense), net | | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | (9 | ) | | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Note 7—Fair Value Measurements
We primarily apply the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavor to utilize the best available information. Accordingly, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. We have consistently used this valuation technique for all periods presented. Please read Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Fair Value Measurements in our Form 10-K for further discussion.
The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and are presented on a gross basis before consideration of amounts netted under master netting agreements and the application of collateral and margin paid. These financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value as of June 30, 2013 |
(amounts in millions) | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
Assets: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Assets from commodity risk management activities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Electricity derivatives | | $ | — |
| | $ | 52 |
| | $ | 9 |
| | $ | 61 |
|
Natural gas derivatives | | — |
| | 20 |
| | — |
| | 20 |
|
Heat rate derivatives | | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
|
Emissions derivatives | | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Total assets from commodity risk management activities | | $ | — |
| | $ | 73 |
| | $ | 10 |
| | $ | 83 |
|
Liabilities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | . |
|
Liabilities from commodity risk management activities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Electricity derivatives | | $ | — |
| | $ | (68 | ) | | $ | (12 | ) | | $ | (80 | ) |
Natural gas derivatives | | — |
| | (52 | ) | | — |
| | (52 | ) |
Emissions derivatives | | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | (1 | ) |
Total liabilities from commodity risk management activities | | — |
| | (121 | ) | | (12 | ) | | (133 | ) |
Liabilities from interest rate contracts | | — |
| | (42 | ) | | — |
| | (42 | ) |
Liabilities from outstanding common stock warrants | | (29 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (29 | ) |
Total liabilities | | $ | (29 | ) | | $ | (163 | ) | | $ | (12 | ) | | $ | (204 | ) |
DYNEGY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value as of December 31, 2012 |
(amounts in millions) | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
Assets: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Assets from commodity risk management activities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Electricity derivatives | | $ | — |
| | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | 48 |
|
Natural gas derivatives | | — |
| | 14 |
| | — |
| | 14 |
|
Heat rate derivatives | | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| | 3 |
|
Total assets from commodity risk management activities | | $ | — |
| | $ | 51 |
| | $ | 14 |
| | $ | 65 |
|
Liabilities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Liabilities from commodity risk management activities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Electricity derivatives | | $ | — |
| | $ | (50 | ) | | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | (56 | ) |
Natural gas derivatives | | — |
| | (20 | ) | | — |
| | (20 | ) |
Heat rate derivatives | | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) |
Total liabilities from commodity risk management activities | | — |
| | (70 | ) | | (7 | ) | | (77 | ) |
Liabilities from interest rate contracts | | — |
| | (46 | ) | | — |
| | (46 | ) |
Liabilities from outstanding common stock warrants | | (20 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (20 | ) |
Total liabilities | | $ | (20 | ) | | $ | (116 | ) | | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | (143 | ) |
Level 3 Valuation Methods. The electricity derivatives classified within Level 3 are primarily financial swaps executed in illiquid trading locations, capacity contracts, off-peak power options and FTRs. The curves used to generate the fair value of the financial swaps are based on basis adjustments applied to forward curves for liquid trading points, while the curves for the capacity deals are based upon auction results in the marketplace, which are infrequently executed. Off-peak power options are valued using a Black-Scholes model which uses forward power prices and market implied volatility. The forward market price of FTRs is derived using historical congestion patterns within the marketplace and heat rate derivative valuations are derived using a Black-Scholes spread model, which uses forward natural gas and power prices, market implied volatilities and modeled power/natural gas correlation values.
DYNEGY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
Sensitivity to Changes in Significant Unobservable Inputs for Level 3 Valuations. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measure of our commodity instruments categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are estimates of future price correlation, future market volatility, forward congestion power price spreads and illiquid power location pricing basis to liquid locations. These estimates are generally independent of each other. Volatility curves and power price spreads are generally based on observable markets where available, or derived from historical prices and forward market prices from similar observable markets when not available. Increases in the price or volatility of the spread on a long/short position in isolation would result in a higher/lower fair value measurement. The significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of Dynegy's contracts classified as Level 3 as of June 30, 2013 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Transaction Type | | Quantity | | Unit of Measure | | Net Fair Value | | Valuation Technique | | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | Significant Unobservable Inputs Range |
(dollars in millions) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Electricity derivatives: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Forward contracts—power (1) | | (1 | ) | | Million MWh | | $ | (1 | ) | | Basis spread + liquid location | | Basis spread (per MWh) | | $6.26-$8.00 |
Capacity purchases | | 500 |
| | MW month | | $ | (2 | ) | | Most recent auction price | | Forward price | | $3.75-$4.15 |
Off-peak power options | | (397 | ) | | Thousand MWh | | $ | — |
| | Option models | | Power price volatility | | 19%-34% |
FTRs | | 4 |
| | Million MWh | | $ | — |
| | Historical congestion | | Forward price (per MWh) | | $3.14-$7.65 |
Heat rate derivatives | | (1 | ) | | Million MWh | | $ | 1 |
| | Option models | | Gas/power price correlation | | 77%-84% |
| | 6 |
| | Million MMBtu | | | | | | Power price volatility | | 19%-36% |
__________________________________________
| |
(1) | Represents forward financial and physical transactions at illiquid pricing locations. |
The following tables set forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of financial instruments classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 |
(amounts in millions) | | Electricity Derivatives | | Heat Rate Derivatives | | Total |
Balance at March 31, 2013 | | $ | — |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 3 |
|
Total gains (losses) included in earnings | | — |
| | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) |
Settlements (1) | | (3 | ) | | — |
| | (3 | ) |
Balance at June 30, 2013 | | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (2 | ) |
Unrealized gains (losses) relating to instruments held as of June 30, 2013 | | $ | — |
| | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | (2 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 |
(amounts in millions) | | Electricity Derivatives | | Heat Rate Derivatives | | Total |
Balance at December 31, 2012 | | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 7 |
|
Total gains (losses) included in earnings | | — |
| | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) |
Settlements (1) | | (8 | ) | | — |
| | (8 | ) |
Balance at June 30, 2013 | | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (2 | ) |
Unrealized gains (losses) relating to instruments held as of June 30, 2013 | | $ | — |
| | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (1 | ) |
DYNEGY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Predecessor |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
(amounts in millions) | | Electricity Derivatives | | Heat Rate Derivatives | | Administrative Claim | | Interest Rate Swaps (1) | | Total |
Balance at March 31, 2012 | | $ | 22 |
| | $ | (11 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | 2 |
|
Total gains (losses) included in earnings, net of affiliates | | (18 | ) | | 1 |
| | (9 | ) | | (9 | ) | | (35 | ) |
Settlements, net of affiliates (2) | | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
Issuance of Administrative Claim | | — |
| | — |
| | (64 | ) | | — |
| | (64 | ) |
DMG Acquisition | | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (7 | ) | | (3 | ) |
Balance at June 30, 2012 | | $ | 8 |
| | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | (73 | ) | | $ | (25 | ) | | $ | (98 | ) |
Unrealized gains (losses) relating to instruments (net of affiliates) held as of June 30, 2012 | | $ | 7 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | (17 | ) | | $ | (18 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Predecessor |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
(amounts in millions) | | Electricity Derivatives | | Heat Rate Derivatives | | Administrative Claim | | Interest Rate Swaps (1) | | Total |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | $ | 20 |
| | $ | (17 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | (3 | ) |
Total gains (losses) included in earnings, net of affiliates | | (16 | ) | | 3 |
| | (9 | ) | | (17 | ) | | (39 | ) |
Settlements, net of affiliates (2) | | — |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
|
Issuance of Administrative Claim | | — |
| | — |
| | (64 | ) | | — |
| | (64 | ) |
DMG Acquisition | | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | 2 |
|
Balance at June 30, 2012 | | $ | 8 |
| | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | (73 | ) | | $ | (25 | ) | | $ | (98 | ) |
Unrealized gains (losses) relating to instruments (net of affiliates) held as of June 30, 2012 | | $ | 10 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | (17 | ) | | $ | (15 | ) |
__________________________________________
| |
(1) | The interest rate contracts classified within Level 3 in the predecessor period include an implied credit fee that impacted the day one value of the instruments. We revalued the credit fee in connection with the application of fresh-start accounting. As a result, these instruments are classified within Level 2 in the successor period. |
| |
(2) | For purposes of these tables, we define settlements as the beginning of period fair value of contracts that settled during the period. |
Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) for Level 3 recurring items are included in Revenues and Interest expense on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for commodity derivatives and interest rate swaps, respectively. We believe an analysis of commodity instruments classified as Level 3 should be undertaken with the understanding that these items generally serve as economic hedges of our power generation portfolio. We did not have any transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities. Nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
We did not have any nonfinancial assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. We have determined the estimated fair-value amounts using available market information and selected valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions or valuation methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
DYNEGY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The carrying values of financial assets and liabilities (cash, accounts receivable, restricted cash and accounts payable) not presented in the table below approximate fair values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. Unless otherwise noted, the fair value of debt as reflected in the table has been calculated based on the average of certain available broker quotes as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
(amounts in millions) | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value |
Interest rate derivatives not designated as accounting hedges (1) | | $ | (42 | ) | | $ | (42 | ) | | $ | (46 | ) | | $ | (46 | ) |
Commodity-based derivative contracts not designated as accounting hedges (1) | | $ | (50 | ) | | $ | (50 | ) | | $ | (12 | ) | | $ | (12 | ) |
DPC Credit Agreement, due 2016 (2) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (880 | ) | | $ | (874 | ) |
DMG Credit Agreement, due 2016 (3) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (535 | ) | | $ | (537 | ) |
Tranche B-2 Term Loan, due 2020 (4) | | $ | (796 | ) | | $ | (794 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
5.875% Senior Notes, due 2023 (5) | | $ | (500 | ) | | $ | (458 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Common stock warrants | | $ | (29 | ) | | $ | (29 | ) | | $ | (20 | ) | | $ | (20 | ) |
__________________________________________
| |
(1) | Included in both current and non-current assets and liabilities on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
| |
(2) | Carrying amount includes an unamortized premium of $43 million at December 31, 2012. The fair value of the DPC Credit Agreement is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Please read Note 12—Debt for further discussion. |
| |
(3) | Carrying amount includes an unamortized premium of $18 million as of December 31, 2012. The fair value of the DMG Credit Agreement is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Please read Note 12—Debt for further discussion. |
| |
(4) | Carrying amount includes an unamortized discount of $4 million as of June 30, 2013. The fair value of the Tranche B-2 Term Loan is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Please read Note 12—Debt for further discussion. |
| |
(5) | The fair value of the Senior Notes is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Please read Note 12—Debt for further discussion. |
Note 8—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, by component, associated with pension and other post-employment benefit plans, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | Predecessor |
(amounts in millions) | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 | | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
Beginning of period | | $ | 11 |
| | | $ | 1 |
|
Current period other comprehensive income: | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | | — |
| | | (1 | ) |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (1) | | (7 | ) | | | — |
|
Net current period other comprehensive loss | | (7 | ) | | | (1 | ) |
DMG Acquisition | | — |
| | | (25 | ) |
End of period | | $ | 4 |
| | | $ | (25 | ) |
___________________________
| |
(1) | Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) relate to the DNE pension curtailment gain and are recorded in Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax on our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. See Note 16—Pension and Other Post-Employment Benefit Plans for further discussion. |
Note 9—Inventory
A summary of our inventories is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
(amounts in millions) | | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Materials and supplies | | $ | 44 |
| | $ | 46 |
|
Coal | | 23 |
| | 52 |
|
Fuel oil | | 3 |
| | 3 |
|
Emissions allowances | | 6 |
| | — |
|
Total | | $ | 76 |
| | $ | 101 |
|
Note 10—Asset Retirement Obligations
We record the present value of our legal obligations to retire tangible, long-lived assets on our balance sheets as liabilities when the liability is incurred. Significant judgment is involved in estimating future cash flows associated with such obligations, as well as the ultimate timing of the cash flows. A summary of changes in our AROs is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | Predecessor |
(amounts in millions) | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 | | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
Beginning of period | | $ | 83 |
| | |