form10q.htm




UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 


FORM 10-Q
 
(Mark One)
þ
 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
OR
o
 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number: 000-51757

REGENCY ENERGY PARTNERS LP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE
16-1731691
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
1700 PACIFIC AVENUE, SUITE 2900
 
DALLAS, TX
75201
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
   
(214) 750-1771
 
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
NONE
 
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
 
 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.þ Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of “large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
þ         Large accelerated filer                                           o Accelerated filer                                           o Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
o  Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).o Yes þ No

The issuer had 54,796,675 common units, 7,276,506 Class D common units, and 19,103,896 subordinated units outstanding as of August 4, 2008.
 

 


 
 

 


 
Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
17 
26 
27
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
 
27 
27
27
27
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
i

 


Introductory Statement
References in this report to the “Partnership,” “we,” “our,” “us” and similar terms, when used in a historical context, refer to Regency Energy Partners LP, or the Partnership, and to Regency Gas Services LLC, all the outstanding member interests of which were contributed to the Partnership on February 3, 2006, and its subsidiaries.  When used in the present tense or prospectively, these terms refer to the Partnership and its subsidiaries.  We use the following definitions in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q:
Name
 
Definition or Description
ASC
 
ASC Hugoton LLC, an affiliate of GECC
Bbls/d
 
Barrels per day
Bcf
 
One billion cubic feet
Bcf/d
 
One billion cubic feet per day
BTU
 
A unit of energy needed to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit
CDM
 
CDM Resource Management LLC
CERCLA
 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
DOT
 
U.S. Department of Transportation
EIA
 
Energy Information Administration
EnergyOne
 
FrontStreet EnergyOne LLC
El Paso
 
El Paso Field Services, LP
EPA
 
Environmental Protection Agency
FASB
 
Financial Accounting Standards Board
FERC
 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FrontStreet
 
FrontStreet Hugoton LLC
GAAP
 
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
GE
 
General Electric Company
GE EFS
 
General Electric Energy Financial Services, a unit of GECC, combined with Regency GP Acquirer LP and Regency LP Acquirer LP
GECC
 
General Electric Capital Corporation, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of GE
General Partner
 
Regency GP LP, the general partner of the Partnership, or Regency GP LLC, the general partner of Regency GP LP, which effectively manages the business and affairs of the Partnership
GSTC
 
Gulf States Transmission Corporation
HLPSA
 
Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety Act
IRS
 
Internal Revenue Service
LIBOR
 
London Interbank Offered Rate
MMbtu
 
One million BTUs
MMbtu/d
 
One million BTUs per day
MMcf
 
One million cubic feet
MMcf/d
 
One million cubic feet per day
MQD
 
Minimum Quarterly Distribution
Nexus
 
Nexus Gas Holdings, LLC
NOE
 
Notice of Enforcement
NGA
 
Natural Gas Act of 1938
NGLs
 
Natural gas liquids
NGPA
 
Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978
NGPSA
 
Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, as amended
NPDES
 
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Nasdaq
 
Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC
NYMEX
 
New York Mercantile Exchange
OSHA
 
Occupational Safety and Health Act
Partnership
 
Regency Energy Partners LP
Pueblo
 
Pueblo Midstream Gas Corporation
RCRA
 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RGS
 
Regency Gas Services LLC
RIGS
 
Regency Intrastate Gas LLC
SEC
 
Securities and Exchange Commission
SFAS
 
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
Sonat
 
Southern Natural Gas Company
TCEQ
 
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Tcf
 
One trillion cubic feet
Tcf/d
 
One trillion cubic feet per day
TRRC
 
Texas Railroad Commission

 
ii

 

Cautionary Statement about Forward-Looking Statements
Certain matters discussed in this report include “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Forward-looking statements are identified as any statement that does not relate strictly to historical or current facts.  Statements using words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “project,” “plan,” “expect,” “continue,” “estimate,” “goal,” “forecast,” “may” or similar expressions help identify forward-looking statements.  Although we believe our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions and current expectations and projections about future events, we can not give assurances that such expectations will prove to be correct.  Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and assumptions including without limitation the following:
· 
changes in laws and regulations impacting the midstream and compression sectors of the natural gas industry;
· 
the level of creditworthiness of our counterparties and customers;
· 
our ability to access the debt and equity markets;
· 
our use of derivative financial instruments to hedge commodity and interest rate risks;
· 
the amount of collateral required to be posted from time to time in our transactions;
· 
changes in commodity prices, interest rates, demand for our services;
· 
weather and other natural phenomena;
· 
industry changes including the impact of consolidations and changes in competition;
· 
our ability to obtain required approvals for construction or modernization of our facilities and the timing of operations of such facilities; and
· 
the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by accounting standard setting boards.

If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated, estimated, projected or expected.

Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 
iii

 

Part1-Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
 

Regency Energy Partners LP
 
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
(in thousands except unit data)
 
             
   
June 30, 2008
   
December 31, 2007*
 
   
(Unaudited)
       
ASSETS
           
Current Assets:
           
     Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 29,985     $ 32,971  
     Restricted cash
    10,050       6,029  
     Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance of $242 in 2008 and $61 in 2007
    29,303       16,487  
     Accrued revenues
    200,078       117,622  
     Related party receivables
    493       61  
     Assets from risk management activities
    9,305       -  
     Other current assets
    9,637       6,723  
     Total current assets
    288,851       179,893  
                 
Property, plant and equipment
               
     Gas plants and buildings
    138,688       134,300  
     Gathering and transmission systems
    1,291,859       780,761  
     Other property, plant and equipment
    149,127       105,399  
     Construction-in-progress
    113,731       33,552  
Total property, plant and equipment
    1,693,405       1,054,012  
      Less accumulated depreciation
    (181,480 )     (140,903 )
Property, plant and equipment, net
    1,511,925       913,109  
                 
Other Assets:
               
     Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $15,216 in 2008 and $8,929 in 2007
    209,098       77,804  
     Long-term assets from risk management activities
    9,362       -  
     Other, net of accumulated amortization of debt issuance costs of $3,869 in 2008 and $2,488 in 2007
    18,075       13,529  
     Goodwill
    265,784       94,075  
Total other assets
    502,319       185,408  
                 
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 2,303,095     $ 1,278,410  
                 
LIABILITIES & PARTNERS' CAPITAL
               
Current Liabilities:
               
     Trade accounts payable
  $ 65,583     $ 48,904  
     Accrued cost of gas and liquids
    162,420       96,026  
     Related party payables
    -       50  
     Escrow payable
    10,050       6,029  
     Liabilities from risk management activities
    76,016       37,852  
     Other current liabilities
    24,711       9,397  
Total current liabilities
    338,780       198,258  
                 
Long-term liabilities from risk management activities
    40,461       15,073  
Other long-term liabilities
    15,963       15,393  
Long-term debt
    1,162,500       481,500  
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiary
    7,464       4,893  
                 
Commitments and contingencies
               
                 
Partners' Capital:
               
Common units (46,602,000 and 41,283,079 units authorized; 45,769,948 and 40,514,895 units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007)
    562,458       490,351  
Class D common units (7,276,506 units authorized, issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008)
    223,015       -  
Class E common units (4,701,034 units authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007)
    -       92,962  
Subordinated units (19,103,896 units authorized, issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007)
    (3,716 )     7,019  
General partner interest
    18,798       11,286  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (62,628 )     (38,325 )
Total partners' capital
    737,927       563,293  
                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
  $ 2,303,095     $ 1,278,410  
                 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
 
                 
* Recast to reflect an acquisition accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling of interests.
         

 
1

 


Regency Energy Partners LP
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
 
Unaudited
 
(in thousands except unit data and per unit data)
 
                         
   
Three Months Ended
   
Six Months Ended
 
   
June 30, 2008
   
June 30, 2007 *
   
June 30, 2008
   
June 30, 2007 *
 
                         
REVENUES
                       
Gas sales
  $ 362,769     $ 195,870     $ 599,462     $ 363,253  
NGL sales
    126,521       83,236       235,020       146,777  
Gathering, transportation and other fees, including related party amounts of $935, $431, $1,926 and $784
    70,175       19,196       132,161       39,074  
Net realized and unrealized loss from risk management activities
    (32,760 )     (2,625 )     (46,417 )     (2,710 )
Other
    20,000       7,153       31,714       12,862  
    Total revenues
    546,705       302,830       951,940       559,256  
                                 
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES
                               
Cost of sales, including related party amounts of $844, $7,755, $1,247 and $13,173
    446,687       249,760       760,276       461,698  
Operation and maintenance
    32,516       11,972       61,361       22,897  
General and administrative
    13,925       19,093       24,809       25,944  
Loss on asset sales, net
    442       532       468       2,339  
Management services termination fee
    -       -       3,888       -  
Transaction expenses
    147       -       534       -  
Depreciation and amortization
    26,476       12,703       48,216       24,130  
     Total operating costs and expenses
    520,193       294,060       899,552       537,008  
                                 
OPERATING INCOME
    26,512       8,770       52,388       22,248  
                                 
     Interest expense, net
    (16,782 )     (15,961 )     (32,188 )     (30,846 )
     Other income and deductions, net
    132       170       332       282  
     Minority interest
    69       (17 )     (3 )     (17 )
                                 
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
    9,931       (7,038 )     20,529       (8,333 )
                                 
     Income tax expense (benefit)
    (41 )     225       209       225  
                                 
NET INCOME (LOSS)
  $ 9,972     $ (7,263 )   $ 20,320     $ (8,558 )
                                 
General partner's interest in current period net income (loss), including IDR
    336       (152 )     1,069       (177 )
Beneficial conversion feature for Class C common units
    -       -       -       1,385  
Beneficial conversion feature for Class D common units
    1,866       -       3,425       -  
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss)
  $ 7,770     $ (7,111 )   $ 15,826     $ (9,766 )
                                 
Basic and diluted earnings per unit:
                               
Amount allocated to common and subordinated units
  $ 7,770     $ (7,425 )   $ 15,826     $ (10,080 )
Weighted average number of common and subordinated units outstanding
    62,174,317       47,151,689       60,701,912       44,767,568  
Income (loss) per common and subordinated unit
  $ 0.12     $ (0.16 )   $ 0.26     $ (0.23 )
Distributions per unit
  $ 0.42     $ 0.38     $ 0.82     $ 0.75  
                                 
Amount allocated to Class B common units
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
Weighted average number of Class B common units outstanding
    -       -       -       1,314,733  
Income per Class B common unit
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
Distributions per unit
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
                                 
Amount allocated to Class C common units
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 1,385  
Total number of Class C common units outstanding
    -       -       -       2,857,143  
Income per Class C common unit due to beneficial conversion feature
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 0.48  
Distributions per unit
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
                                 
Amount allocated to Class D common units
  $ 1,866     $ -     $ 3,425     $ -  
Total number of Class D common units outstanding
    7,276,506       -       7,276,506       -  
Income per Class D common unit due to beneficial conversion feature
  $ 0.26     $ -     $ 0.47     $ -  
Distributions per unit
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
                                 
Amount allocated to Class E common units
  $ -     $ 314     $ -     $ 314  
Total number of Class E common units outstanding
    4,701,034       4,701,034       4,701,034       4,701,034  
Income per Class E common unit
  $ -     $ 0.07     $ -     $ 0.07  
Distributions per unit
  $ -     $ 0.24     $ -     $ 0.24  
                                 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
 
                                 
* Recast to reflect an acquisition accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling of interests.
                 

 
2

 


Regency Energy Partners LP
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
 
Unaudited
 
(in thousands)
 
                         
   
Three Months Ended
   
Six Months Ended
 
   
June 30, 2008
   
June 30, 2007 *
   
June 30, 2008
   
June 30, 2007 *
 
                         
Net income (loss)
  $ 9,972     $ (7,263 )   $ 20,320     $ (8,558 )
Hedging amounts reclassified to earnings
    15,166       2,870       25,602       2,816  
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges
    (47,071 )     (8,933 )     (49,905 )     (21,378 )
Comprehensive loss
  $ (21,933 )   $ (13,326 )   $ (3,983 )   $ (27,120 )
                                 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
                                 
* Recast to reflect an acquisition accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling of interests.
         
 

 
3

 

Regency Energy Partners LP
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
Unaudited
 
(in thousands)
 
             
   
Six Months Ended
 
   
June 30, 2008
   
June 30, 2007 *
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
           
   Net income (loss)
  $ 20,320     $ (8,558 )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
         
   Depreciation and amortization, including debt issuance cost amortization
    49,598       24,823  
   Equity income and minority interest in earnings
    -       (26 )
   Risk management portfolio valuation changes
    20,582       (591 )
   Loss on asset sales
    468       2,340  
   Unit based compensation expenses
    1,839       14,085  
   Cash flow changes in current assets and liabilities:
               
       Trade accounts receivable and accrued revenues
    (72,784 )     (17,653 )
       Other current assets
    (2,914     365  
       Trade accounts payable, accrued cost of gas and liquids, and accrued liabilities
    53,088       18,350  
       Other current liabilities
    15,314       (41 )
 Other assets and liabilities
    1,423       (498 )
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
    86,934       32,596  
                 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
               
  Capital expenditures
    (148,888 )     (65,911 )
  Acquisitions
    (577,345 )     (35,228 )
  Acquisition of investment in unconsolidated subsidiary, net of $100 cash
    -       (5,000 )
  Proceeds from asset sales
    580       10,396  
Net cash flows used in investing activities
    (725,653 )     (95,743 )
                 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
               
   Net borrowings under revolving credit facilities
    681,000       114,230  
   Partner contributions
    7,663       6,244  
   Partner distributions
    (52,317 )     (34,309 )
   Proceeds from option exercises
    2,700       -  
   Debt issuance costs
    (3,313 )     -  
Net cash flows provided by financing activities
    635,733       86,165  
                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (2,986 )     23,018  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    32,971       11,932  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 29,985     $ 34,950  
                 
Supplemental cash flow information
               
   Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized
  $ 28,222     $ 29,996  
   Income taxes paid
    564       -  
   Non-cash capital expenditures in accounts payable
    17,907       11,943  
   Non-cash capital expenditures for consolidation of investment in previously unconsolidated subsidiary
    -       5,650  
   Non-cash capital expenditure upon entering into a capital lease obligation
    -       3,000  
   Issuance of common units for an acquisition
    219,590       19,724  
                 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
 
                 
* Recast to reflect an acquisition accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling of interests.
 


 
4

 

Regency Energy Partners LP
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital
 
Unaudited
 
(in thousands except unit data)
 
                                                                   
   
Units
                                           
   
Common
   
Class D
   
Class E
   
Subordinated
 
Common Unitholders
 
Class D Unitholders
 
Class E Unitholders
 
Subordinated Unitholders
 
General Partner Interest
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
 
Total
 
Balance - December 31, 2007 *
    40,514,895       -       4,701,034       19,103,896     $ 490,351     $ -     $ 92,962     $ 7,019     $ 11,286     $ (38,325 )   $ 563,293  
Issuance of Class D common units
    -       7,276,506       -       -       -       219,590       -       -       -       -       219,590  
Issuance of restricted common units and option exercises, net of forfeitures
    554,019       -       -       -       2,700       -       -       -       -       -       2,700  
Working capital adjustment on FrontStreet
    -       -       -       -       -       -       (858 )     -       -       -       (858 )
Conversion of Class E common units
    4,701,034               (4,701,034 )             92,104       -       (92,104 )     -       -       -       -  
Unit based compensation expenses
    -       -       -       -       1,839       -       -       -       -       -       1,839  
General partner contributions
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       7,663       -       7,663  
Partner distributions
    -       -       -       -       (35,432 )     -       -       (15,665 )     (1,220 )     -       (52,317 )
Net income
    -       -       -       -       10,896       3,425       -       4,930       1,069       -       20,320  
Net hedging amounts reclassified to earnings
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       25,602       25,602  
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       (49,905 )     (49,905 )
Balance - June 30, 2008
    45,769,948       7,276,506       -       19,103,896     $ 562,458     $ 223,015     $ -     $ (3,716 )   $ 18,798     $ (62,628 )   $ 737,927  
                                                                                         
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
 
                                                                                         
*Recast to reflect an acquisition accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling of interests.
   

 
5

 

Regency Energy Partners LP
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1.  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Basis of Presentation. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein contain the results of Regency Energy Partners LP, a Delaware limited partnership, and its wholly owned and consolidated subsidiaries.  The Partnership and its subsidiaries are engaged in the business of gathering, processing, contract compression, marketing, and transporting natural gas and NGLs.  The Partnership operates and manages its business as three reportable segments: a) gathering and processing, b) transportation, and c) contract compression.

On January 7, 2008, the Partnership acquired all of the outstanding equity and minority interest (the “FrontStreet Acquisition”) of FrontStreet from ASC and EnergyOne.  FrontStreet owns a gas gathering system located in Kansas and Oklahoma, which is operated by a third party.

The total purchase price consisted of (a) 4,701,034 Class E common units of the Partnership issued to ASC in exchange for its 95 percent interest and (b) the payment of $11,752,000 in cash to EnergyOne in exchange for its five percent minority interest and the termination of a management services contract valued at $3,888,000.  The Partnership financed the cash portion of the purchase price out of its revolving credit facility.

In connection with the FrontStreet Acquisition, the Partnership amended its Agreement of Limited Partnership to create the Partnership’s Class E common units.  The Class E common units have the same terms and conditions as the Partnership’s common units, except that the Class E common units were not entitled to participate in earnings or distributions of operating surplus by the Partnership.  The Class E common units were issued in a private offering conducted in accordance with the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 as afforded by Section 4(2) thereof.  The Class E common units converted into common units on a one-for-one basis on May 5, 2008.

Because the acquisition of ASC’s 95 percent interest is a transaction between commonly controlled entities (i.e., the buyer and the seller were each affiliates of GECC), the Partnership accounted for this portion of the acquisition in a manner similar to the pooling of interest method.  Under this method of accounting, the Partnership reflected historical balance sheet data for both the Partnership and FrontStreet instead of reflecting the fair market value of FrontStreet’s assets and liabilities.  Further, certain transaction costs that would normally be capitalized were expensed. Common control between the Partnership and FrontStreet began on June 18, 2007.  Accordingly, the statement of operations for periods ending June 30, 2007 has been recast to include the results of FrontStreet from June 18, 2007 through the end of the period.

Conversely, the acquisition of the five percent minority interest is a transaction between independent parties, for which the Partnership applied the purchase method of accounting.  The Partnership is in the process of obtaining third-party valuations of fixed and certain intangible assets; thus, the allocation of the purchase price is subject to refinement.

The following table summarizes the book values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of common control, following the as-if pooled method of accounting.
 

   
At June 18, 2007
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Current assets
  $ 8,840  
Property, plant and equipment
    91,556  
Total assets acquired
    100,396  
Current liabilities
    (12,556 )
Net book value of assets acquired
  $ 87,840  
 
The unaudited financial information as of, and for the three and six months ended, June 30, 2008 has been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as amended by Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2008 for the year ended December 31, 2007.  In the opinion of the Partnership’s management, such financial information reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations for such interim periods in accordance with GAAP.  All intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Use of Estimates. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP and, of necessity, include the use of estimates and assumptions by management.  Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Intangible Assets.  Intangible assets, net consist of the following.
 

   
Permits and Licenses
   
Customer Contracts
   
Trade Names
   
Total
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Balance at December 31,2007
  $ 9,368     $ 68,436     $ -     $ 77,804  
Additions
    -       102,480       35,100       137,580  
Disposals
    -       -       -       -  
Amortization
    (393 )     (4,811 )     (1,082 )     (6,286 )
Balance at June 30, 2008
  $ 8,975     $ 166,105     $ 34,018     $ 209,098  
 
6

The weighted average amortization period for permits and licenses, customer contracts, and trade names are 15, 16, and 15 years, respectively.  The expected amortization of the intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years is as follows.
 

Year ending December 31,
 
Total
 
   
(in thousands)
 
2008 (remaining)
  $ 6,911  
2009
    12,358  
2010
    12,264  
2011
    10,950  
2012
    10,713  
 
 
Recently Issued Accounting Standards.  In January 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”), which permits entities to measure many financial instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 in 2008 had no impact on the Partnership’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows, as the Partnership has elected to continue valuing its outstanding senior notes at historical cost.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R) “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”), which significantly changes the accounting for business acquisitions both during the period of the acquisition and in subsequent periods.  SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.  Generally, the effects of SFAS No. 141(R) will depend on future acquisitions.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No. 160”), which will significantly change the accounting and reporting related to noncontrolling interests in a consolidated subsidiary.  SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.  The Partnership is currently evaluating the potential impacts on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the adoption of this standard.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS No. 161”).  SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about derivative and hedging activities.  These enhanced disclosures will address (a) how and why a company uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133 and its related interpretations and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.  SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after November 15, 2008, with earlier adoption allowed.  The Partnership is currently evaluating the potential impacts on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the adoption of this standard.

In March 2008, the FASB issued EITF 07-4, “Application of the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128 to Master Limited Partnerships.”  EITF 07-4 defines how to allocate net income among the various classes of equity, including incentive distribution rights, narrowing the number of currently acceptable methods.  The standard becomes effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Earlier application is not permitted, and must be applied retrospectively for all financial statements presented.  Accordingly, in 2009 the Partnership will adopt the new method of calculating earnings per unit.  This new standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.”  Based on this guidance, the Partnership will include non-vested units granted under its LTIP in the calculation of basic earnings per unit.  The FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years.  All prior-period earnings per unit data will be adjusted.  Early application is not permitted.  This new standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

2.  Income (Loss) per Limited Partner Unit
In connection with the CDM acquisition, the Partnership issued 7,276,506 Class D common units.  At the commitment date, the sales price of $30.18 per unit represented a $1.10 discount from the fair value of the Partnership’s common units.  Under EITF No. 98-5, “Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios,” the discount represented a beneficial conversion feature that is treated as a non-cash distribution for purposes of calculating earnings per unit.  The beneficial conversion feature is reflected in income per unit using the effective yield method over the period the Class D common units are outstanding, as indicated on the statements of operations in the line item entitled “beneficial conversion feature for Class D common units.”

The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per unit computations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
 

   
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
   
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
 
   
Income (Numerator)
   
Units (Denominator)
   
Per-Unit Amount
   
Income (Numerator)
   
Units (Denominator)
   
Per-Unit Amount
 
   
(in thousands except unit and per unit data)
 
Basic Earnings per Unit
                                   
Limited partner's interest in net income
  $ 7,770       62,174,317     $ 0.12     $ 15,826       60,701,912     $ 0.26  
Effect of Dilutive Securities
                                               
Common unit options
    -       98,665               -       149,186          
Diluted Earnings per Unit
  $ 7,770       62,272,982     $ 0.12     $ 15,826       60,851,098     $ 0.26  

 
7

The following data show securities that could potentially dilute earnings per unit in the future that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because to do so would have been antidilutive for the periods presented.
 

   
Three Months Ended
   
Six Months Ended
 
   
June 30, 2008
   
June 30, 2007
   
June 30, 2008
   
June 30, 2007
 
Restricted common units
    713,925       355,000       713,925       355,000  
Common unit options
    -       868,568       -       868,568  
Class D common units
    7,276,506       -       7,276,506       -  
 
 
3.  Acquisitions and Dispositions
CDM Resource Management, Ltd. On January 15, 2008, the Partnership and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership consummated an agreement and plan of merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with CDM Resource Management, Ltd.  CDM provides its customers with turn-key natural gas contract compression services to maximize their natural gas and crude oil production, throughput, and cash flow in Texas, Louisiana, and Arkansas.  The Partnership operates and manages CDM as a separate reportable segment.

The total purchase price paid by the Partnership for the partnership interests of CDM consisted of (1) the issuance of an aggregate of 7,276,506 Class D common units of the Partnership, which were valued at $219,590,000, (2) the payment of an aggregate of $161,945,000 in cash, and (3) the payment of $316,500,000 to retire CDM’s debt obligations.  Of the Class D common units issued, 4,197,303 Class D common units were deposited with an escrow agent pursuant to an escrow agreement.  Such common units constitute security to the Partnership for a period of one year after the closing with respect to any obligations under the Merger Agreement, including obligations for breaches of representation, warranties and covenants.

In connection with the CDM merger, the Partnership amended its Agreement of Limited Partnership to create the Partnership’s Class D common units.  The Class D common units have the same terms and conditions as the Partnership’s common units, except that the Class D common units are not entitled to participate in distributions of operating surplus by the Partnership.  The Class D common units automatically convert into common units on a one-for-one basis on the close of business on the first business day after the record date for the quarterly distribution on the common units for the quarter ending December 31, 2008.  The Class D common units were issued in a private offering conducted in accordance with the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 under Section 4(2) thereof.

The total purchase price of $699,702,000, including direct transaction costs, was allocated preliminarily as follows.
 

   
At January 15, 2008
 
   
(in thousands)
 
       
Current assets
  $ 19,463  
Other assets
    4,547  
Gas plants and buildings
    1,528  
Gathering and transmission systems
    421,160  
Other property, plant and equipment
    2,728  
Construction-in-progress
    36,385  
Identifiable intangible assets
    80,480  
Goodwill
    164,522  
Assets acquired
    730,813  
Current liabilities
    (31,054 )
Other liabilities
    (57 )
Net assets acquired
  $ 699,702  
 
 
The final purchase price allocation, which management expects to be completed before year end, may differ from the above estimates.

Nexus Gas Holdings, LLC. On March 25, 2008, the Partnership acquired Nexus (“Nexus Acquisition”) by merger for $88,486,000 in cash, including customary closing adjustments and direct transaction costs.  Nexus Gas Partners LLC, the sole member of Nexus prior to the merger (“Nexus Member”), deposited $8,500,000 in an escrow account as security to the Partnership for a period of one year against indemnification obligations and any purchase price adjustment.  The Partnership funded the Nexus Acquisition through borrowings under the existing revolving credit facility.

Upon consummation of the Nexus Acquisition, the Partnership acquired Nexus’ rights under a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Sonat Agreement”) between Nexus and Sonat.  Pursuant to the Sonat Agreement, Nexus will purchase 136 miles of pipeline from Sonat (the “Sonat Asset Acquisition”) that could facilitate the Nexus gathering system’s integration into the Partnership’s north Louisiana asset base. The Sonat Asset Acquisition is subject to abandonment approval and jurisdictional redetermination by the FERC, as well as customary closing conditions.  Upon closing of the Sonat Asset Acquisition, the Partnership will pay Sonat $27,500,000, and, if the closing occurs on or prior to March 1, 2010, on certain terms and conditions as provided in the Merger Agreement, the Partnership will make an additional payment of $25,000,000 to the Nexus Member.

8

The total purchase price of $88,486,000 was allocated preliminarily as follows.
 
   
At March 25, 2008
 
   
(in thousands)
 
       
Current assets
  $ 3,457  
Buildings
    13  
Gathering and transmission systems
    16,960  
Other property, plant and equipment
    4,440  
Identifiable intangible assets
    57,100  
Goodwill
    7,187  
Assets acquired
    89,157  
Current liabilities
    (671 )
Net assets acquired
  $ 88,486  
 
The final purchase price allocation, which management expects to be completed before year end, may differ from the above estimates.
 
 
The following unaudited pro forma financial information has been prepared as if the acquisitions of FrontStreet, CDM and Nexus had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented.  In the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Partnership’s acquisition of Pueblo is included since that acquisition occurred in April 2007.  Such unaudited pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the transactions to which the Partnership is giving pro forma effect actually occurred on the date referred to above or the results of operations that may be expected in the future.
 

   
Pro Forma Results for the
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Six Months Ended
 
   
June 30, 2008
   
June 30, 2007
   
June 30, 2008
   
June 30, 2007
 
   
(in thousands except unit and per unit data)
       
Revenue
  $ 546,705     $ 333,353     $ 959,147     $ 630,529  
                                 
Net income (loss)
  $ 9,972     $ (4,643 )   $ 22,134     $ (1,157 )
Less:
                               
  General partner's interest in current period net income (loss), including IDR
    336       (92 )     1,068       (29 )
  Beneficial conversion feature for Class C common units
    -       -       -       1,385  
  Beneficial conversion feature for Class D common units
    1,866       -       3,425       -  
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss)
  $ 7,770     $ (4,551 )   $ 17,641     $ (2,513 )
                                 
Basic and Diluted earnings per unit:
                               
Amount allocated to common and subordinated units
  $ 7,770     $ (4,865 )   $ 17,641     $ (2,827 )
Weighted average number of common and subordinated units outstanding
    62,174,317       47,151,689       60,701,912       44,767,568  
Income (loss) per common and subordinated unit
  $ 0.12     $ (0.10 )   $ 0.29     $ (0.06 )
Distributions per unit
  $ 0.42     $ 0.38     $ 0.82     $ 0.75  
                                 
Amount allocated to Class B common units
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
Weighted average number of Class B common units outstanding
    -       -       -       1,314,733  
Income per Class B common unit
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
Distributions per unit
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
                                 
Amount allocated to Class C common units
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 1,385  
Total number of Class C common units outstanding
    -       -       -       2,857,143  
Income per Class C common unit due to beneficial conversion feature
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 0.48  
Distributions per unit
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
                                 
Amount allocated to Class D common units
  $ 1,866     $ -     $ 3,425     $ -  
Total number of Class D common units outstanding
    7,276,506       -       7,276,506       -  
Income per Class D common unit due to beneficial conversion feature
  $ 0.26     $ -     $ 0.47     $ -  
Distributions per unit
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
                                 
Amount allocated to Class E common units
  $ -     $ 314     $ -     $ 314  
Total number of Class E common units outstanding
    4,701,034       4,701,034       4,701,034       4,701,034  
Income per Class E common unit
  $ -     $ 0.07     $ -     $ 0.07  
Distributions per unit
  $ -     $ 0.24     $ -     $ 0.24  

9

4.  Risk Management Activities
The net fair value of the financial instruments related to the Partnership’s risk management activities constituted a net liability of $97,810,000 at June 30, 2008.  The Partnership expects to reclassify $51,871,000 of net hedging losses as an offset to revenues or interest expense from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the next twelve months.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Partnership recorded $18,694,000 and $22,007,000 of mark-to-market losses for certain commodity hedges that do not qualify for hedge accounting.  In the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 the Partnership recognized $262,000 and $486,000 of ineffectiveness gains, recovering all prior ineffectiveness losses.  The net liabilities from risk management activities have been reduced by $948,000 to reflect the effect of credit risk associated with these instruments.

The Partnership’s hedging positions help reduce exposure to variability of future commodity prices through 2010 and future interest rates on $300,000,000 of debt under its revolving credit facility through March 5, 2010.

Effective June 19, 2007, the Partnership elected to account for all outstanding commodity hedging instruments on a mark-to-market basis except for the portion pursuant to which all NGL products for a particular year were hedged and the hedging relationship was, for accounting purposes, effective.

In March 2008, the Partnership entered offsetting trades against its existing 2009 portfolio of mark-to-market hedges, which it believes will substantially reduce the volatility of its existing 2009 hedges.  This group of trades, along with the pre-existing 2009 portfolio, will continue to be accounted for on a mark-to-market basis.  Simultaneously, the Partnership executed additional 2009 NGL swaps which were designated under SFAS No. 133 as cash flow hedges. In May 2008, the Partnership entered into commodity swaps to hedge its 2010 NGL commodity risk, except for ethane, which are accounted for using mark-to-market accounting.

The Partnership accounts for a portion of its 2008 and all of its 2009 West Texas Intermediate crude oil swaps using mark-to-market accounting.  In May 2008, the Partnership entered into West Texas Intermediate crude oil swap to hedge its 2010 condensate price risk, which qualified for hedge accounting in June 2008.

On February 29, 2008, the Partnership entered into two-year interest rate swaps related to $300,000,000 of borrowings under its revolving credit facility, effectively locking the base rate for these borrowings at 2.4 percent, plus the applicable margin (2 percent as of June 30, 2008). These interest rate swaps were designated as cash flow hedges on March 7, 2008.
 

 
5.  Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt obligations of the Partnership are as follows:
 

   
June 30, 2008
   
December 31, 2007
 
   
(in thousands)
 
             
 Senior notes
  $ 357,500     $ 357,500  
 Revolving loans
    805,000       124,000  
 Total
    1,162,500       481,500  
 Less: current portion
    -       -  
 Long-term debt
  $ 1,162,500     $ 481,500  
                 
 Availability under revolving credit facility:
               
 Total credit facility limit
  $ 900,000     $ 500,000  
 Revolving loans
    (805,000 )     (124,000 )
 Letters of credit
    (27,257 )     (27,263 )
 Total available
  $ 67,743     $ 348,737  

 
RGS entered into Amendment No. 4 to its Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Facility on January 15, 2008, thereby expanding its revolving credit facility to $750,000,000.  RGS also entered into Amendment No. 5 to its Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Facility on February 13, 2008, expanding its revolving credit facility to $900,000,000 and availability for letters of credit to $100,000,000.  The Partnership has the option to request an additional $250,000,000 in revolving commitments with ten business days written notice provided that no event of default has occurred or would result due to such increase, and all other additional conditions for the increase of the commitments set forth in the credit facility have been met.  These amendments did not materially change other terms of the RGS revolving credit facility.

The outstanding balance of revolving debt under the credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin or Alternative Base Rate (equivalent to the U.S. prime lending rate) plus a margin, or a combination of both. The weighted average interest rates for the revolving loans and senior notes, including interest rate swap settlements, commitment fees, and amortization of debt issuance costs were 6.49 percent and 8.71 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively and 6.12 percent and 8.70 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively. The senior notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 8.375 percent. The estimated fair market value of the senior notes was $368,225,000 as of June 30, 2008.

The senior notes are guaranteed by the Partnership’s subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”) at the date the notes were issued. These note guarantees are the joint and several obligations of the Guarantors.  A guarantor may not sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its properties or assets if such sale would cause a default under the terms of the senior notes. Events of default include nonpayment of principal or interest when due; failure to comply with certain limits on the payment of distributions; failure to make a change of control offer; failure to comply with reporting requirements according to SEC rules and regulations; and defaults on the payment of obligations under other indebtedness of $20,000,000 or more. Since certain subsidiaries do not guarantee the senior notes, the condensed consolidating financial statements of the guarantors and non-guarantors as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 are disclosed below.
 
10

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
 
June 30, 2008
 
Unaudited
 
   
Guarantors
   
Non Guarantors
   
Elimination
   
Consolidated
 
ASSETS
 
(in thousands)
 
Total current assets
  $ 276,169     $ 12,682     $ -     $ 288,851  
Property, plant and equipment, net
    1,417,382       94,543       -       1,511,925  
Total other assets
    502,319       -       -       502,319  
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 2,195,870     $ 107,225     $ -     $ 2,303,095  
                                 
LIABILITIES & PARTNERS' CAPITAL
                               
Total current liabilities
  $ 336,492     $ 2,288     $ -     $ 338,780  
Long-term liabilities from risk management activities
    40,461       -       -       40,461  
Other long-term liabilities
    15,963       -       -       15,963  
Long-term debt
    1,162,500       -       -       1,162,500  
Minority interest
    7,464               -       7,464  
Partners' capital
    632,990       104,937       -       737,927  
TOTAL LIABILITIES & PARTNERS' CAPITAL
  $ 2,195,870     $ 107,225     $ -     $ 2,303,095  
 

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
 
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
 
Unaudited
 
   
Guarantors
   
Non Guarantors
 
Elimination
   
Consolidated
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Total revenues
  $ 928,544     $ 23,396     $ -     $ 951,940  
Total operating costs and expenses
    880,291       19,261       -       899,552  
OPERATING INCOME
    48,253       4,135       -       52,388  
Interest expense, net
    (32,188 )     -       -       (32,188 )
Other income and deductions, net
    357       (25 )     -       332  
Minority interest
    (3 )     -       -       (3 )
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
    16,419       4,110       -       20,529  
Income tax expense
    209       -       -       209  
NET INCOME
  $ 16,210     $ 4,110     $ -     $ 20,320  
 

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flow
 
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
 
Unaudited
 
   
Guarantors
   
Non Guarantors
   
Elimination
   
Consolidated
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities
  $ 89,683     $ (2,749 )   $ -     $ 86,934  
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
    (728,053 )     (2,400 )     -       (725,653 )
Net cash flows provided by financing activities
    635,733       -       -       635,733  
 
 
 
11

6.  Commitments and Contingencies
Legal. The Partnership is involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to its business.  In the opinion of management, these claims and lawsuits in the aggregate will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Contingent Purchase of Sonat Assets. In March of 2008, the Partnership, through its Nexus acquisition, obtained the rights to a contingent commitment to purchase 136 miles of pipeline that could facilitate the Nexus gathering system’s integration into the Partnership’s north Louisiana asset base. The purchase commitment is contingent upon the FERC declaring that the pipeline is no longer subject to its jurisdiction, together with approval of the current owner’s abandonment and other customary closing conditions.  In the event that all contingencies are satisfactorily resolved, the Partnership will pay Sonat $27,500,000.  Furthermore, if the closing occurs on or prior to March 1, 2010, the Partnership will pay an additional $25,000,000 to the sellers, subject to certain terms and conditions.

On April 3, 2008, Sonat filed an application with the FERC seeking authorization to abandon by sale to Nexus 136 miles of pipeline and related facilities.  The application also requested a determination that the facilities being sold to Nexus be considered non-jurisdictional, with certain facilities being gathering and certain facilities being intrastate transmission.  Four producers submitted letters in support of the application and several Sonat shippers protested the application.  The matter is currently pending.

Escrow Payable.  At June 30, 2008, $1,504,000 remained in escrow pending the completion by El Paso of environmental remediation projects pursuant to the purchase and sale agreement (“El Paso PSA”) related to assets in north Louisiana and the mid-continent area.  In the El Paso PSA, El Paso indemnified the predecessor of our operating partnership, RGS, against losses arising from pre-closing and known environmental liabilities subject to a limit of $84,000,000 and subject to certain deductible limits.  Upon completion of a Phase II environmental study, the Partnership notified El Paso of remediation obligations amounting to $1,800,000 with respect to known environmental matters and $3,600,000 with respect to pre-closing environmental liabilities.

In January 2008, pursuant to authorization by the Board of Directors of the General Partner, the Partnership agreed to settle the El Paso environmental remediation.  Under the settlement, El Paso will clean up and obtain “no further action” letters from the relevant state agencies for three owned Partnership facilities.  El Paso is not obligated to clean up properties leased by the Partnership, but it indemnified the Partnership for pre-closing environmental liabilities.  All sites for which the Partnership made environmental claims against El Paso are either addressed in the settlement or have already been resolved.  In May 2008, the Partnership released all but $1,500,000 from the escrow fund maintained to secure El Paso’s obligations.  This amount will be further reduced under a specified schedule as El Paso completes its cleanup obligations and the remainder will be released upon completion.

Nexus Escrow. Nexus deposited $8,500,000 in an escrow account as security to the Partnership for a period of one year against indemnification obligations and any purchase price adjustments related to the March 25, 2008 Nexus Acquisition.

Environmental.  A Phase I environmental study was performed on certain assets located in west Texas in connection with the pre-acquisition due diligence process in 2004.   Most of the identified environmental contamination had either been remediated or was being remediated by the previous owners or operators of the properties.  The aggregate potential environmental remediation costs at specific locations were estimated to range from $1,900,000 to $3,100,000.  No governmental agency has required the Partnership to undertake these remediation efforts.  Management believes that the likelihood that it will be liable for any significant potential remediation liabilities identified in the study is remote.  Separately, the Partnership acquired an environmental pollution liability insurance policy in connection with the acquisition to cover any undetected or unknown pollution discovered in the future. The policy covers clean-up costs and damages to third parties, and has a 10-year term (expiring 2014) with a $10,000,000 limit subject to certain deductibles.  No claims have been made.

TCEQ Notice of Enforcement. On February 15, 2008, the TCEQ issued a NOE concerning the Partnership’s Tilden processing plant located in McMullen County, Texas (the “Plant”).  The NOE alleges that, between March 9, 2006, and May 8, 2007, the Plant experienced 15 emission events of various durations from 4 hours to 41 days, which were not reported to TCEQ and other agencies within 24 hours of occurrence.  On April 3, 2008, TCEQ presented the Partnership with a written offer to settle the allegation in the NOE in exchange for payment of an administrative penalty of $480,000.  The Partnership is continuing to pursue this matter with the TCEQ.

RIGS FERC Petition.  On April 29, 2008, the Partnership filed a petition with the FERC seeking approval to maintain RIGS’ maximum Section 311 transportation rates.  The rate filing was required by a FERC Letter Order issued on September 26, 2005, which approved a settlement in which RIGS agreed to justify its existing rates or establish new rates for Section 311 service by May 1, 2008.  The triennial rate review requirement is a standard settlement provision in most intrastate pipeline rate proceedings.

In the petition, RIGS requests to maintain its current maximum rates for both firm and interruptible services as follows:
· 
firm service: reservation fee of $4.5625 per MMBtu monthly ($0.15 per MMBtu daily) and commodity fee of $0.05 per MMBtu and
· 
interruptible service: $0.20 per MMBtu.

RIGS also requested a continuation of its existing fuel retention percentage of up to two percent.  The proposed rates are subject to refund beginning May 1, 2008.

Keyes Litigation.  In August 2008, Keyes Helium Company, LLC (“Keyes”) filed suit against Regency Gas Services LP, Regency Energy Partners LP and its general partner.  Keyes entered into an output contract with the Partnership’s predecessor in 1996 under which it purchased all of the helium produced at the Lakin processing plant in southwest Kansas.  In September 2004, the Partnership decided to shut down the Lakin plant and contract with DEFS for the processing of volumes processed at Lakin, as a result of which the Partnership no longer delivered any helium to Keyes.  As a result, Keyes alleges it is entitled to an unspecified amount of damages for the costs of covering its purchases of helium.  The Partnership is evaluating this claim and plans to defend itself vigorously against the complaint.

12

7.  Related Party Transactions
The employees operating the assets of the Partnership and its subsidiaries and substantially all those providing staff and support services are employees of the General Partner and other affiliates of the Partnership.  Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, our General Partner receives a monthly reimbursement for all direct and indirect expenses that it incurs on behalf of the Partnership. Reimbursements of $8,433,000 and $7,189,000 were recorded in the Partnership’s financial statements during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and reimbursements of $15,321,000 and $13,238,000 were recorded in the Partnership’s financial statements during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, as operating expenses or general and administrative expenses, as appropriate.

In conjunction with distributions by the Partnership to its limited and general partner interests, GE EFS and affiliates received cash distributions of $15,738,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2008 as result of their ownership interests in the Partnership.

In conjunction with distributions by the Partnership to its limited and general partner interests, HM Capital Partners and affiliates received cash distributions of $6,682,000 and $16,152,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, as a result of their ownership interests in the Partnership.

In conjunction with distributions by the Partnership to its limited and general partner interests, certain members of management received cash distributions of $877,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008 as a result of their ownership interests in the Partnership.

In the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Partnership sold a small south Texas asset to a related party for $400,000 and recognized a $331,000 loss.
 
 
8.  Segment Information
The Partnership has three reportable segments: i) gathering and processing, ii) transportation, and iii) contract compression.  Gathering and processing involves collecting raw natural gas from producer wells and transporting it to treating plants where water and other impurities such as hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide are removed. Treated gas is then processed to remove the natural gas liquids. The treated and processed natural gas is then transported to market separately from the natural gas liquids. Revenues and the associated cost of sales directly expose the Partnership to commodity price risk, which is managed through derivative contracts and other measures. The Partnership aggregates the results of its gathering and processing activities across five geographic regions into a single reporting segment.

The transportation segment uses pipelines to transport natural gas from receipt points on its system to interconnections with larger pipelines or trading hubs and other markets. The Partnership performs transportation services for shipping customers under firm or interruptible arrangements. In either case, revenues are primarily fee based and involve minimal direct exposure to commodity price fluctuations. The Partnership also purchases natural gas at the inlets to the pipeline and sells this gas at its outlets. The north Louisiana intrastate pipeline operated by this segment serves the Partnership’s gathering and processing facilities in the same area and those transactions create a portion of the intersegment revenues shown in the table below.

The contract compression segment includes designing, sourcing, owning, insuring, installing, operating, servicing, repairing, and maintaining compressors and related equipment, with a focus on meeting the complex requirements of field-wide compression applications, as opposed to targeting the compression needs of individual wells within a field. These field-wide applications include compression for natural gas gathering, natural gas lift for crude oil production and natural gas processing. Revenues in this segment are fee-based, with minimal direct exposure to commodity price risk. The contract compression operations are primarily located in Texas, Louisiana, and Arkansas.  The contract compression segment also provides services to certain operations in the gathering and processing segment, creating a portion of the intersegment revenues shown in the table below.

Management evaluates the performance of each segment and makes capital allocation decisions through the separate consideration of segment margin and operation and maintenance expenses.  Segment margin, for the gathering and processing and for the transportation segments, is defined as total revenues, including service fees, less cost of sales. In the contract compression segment, segment margin is defined as revenues minus direct costs, which primarily consists of compressor repairs. Management believes segment margin is an important measure because it directly relates to volume and commodity price changes. Operation and maintenance expenses are a separate measure used by management to evaluate performance of field operations.  Direct labor, insurance, property taxes, repair and maintenance, utilities and contract services comprise the most significant portion of operation and maintenance expenses. These expenses fluctuate depending on the activities performed during a specific period.  The Partnership does not deduct operation and maintenance expenses from total revenues in calculating segment margin because management separately evaluates commodity volume and price changes in segment margin.

13

Results for each statement of operations period, together with amounts related to balance sheets for each segment, are shown below.
 

                                     
   
Gathering and Processing
   
Transportation
   
Contract Compression
   
Corporate
   
Eliminations
   
Total
 
   
(in thousands)
 
External Revenue
                                   
For the three months ended June 30, 2008
  $ 338,705     $ 175,413     $ 32,587     $ -     $ -     $ 546,705  
For the three months ended June 30, 2007
    213,961       88,869       -       -       -       302,830  
For the six months ended June 30, 2008
    600,290       293,796       57,854       -       -       951,940  
For the six months ended June 30, 2007
    391,078       168,178       -       -       -       559,256  
Intersegment Revenue
                                               
For the three months ended June 30, 2008
    -       51,982     $ 164       -       (52,146 )     -  
For the three months ended June 30, 2007
    -       33,183       -       -       (33,183 )     -  
For the six months ended June 30, 2008
    -       82,666       282       -       (82,948 )     -  
For the six months ended June 30, 2007
    -       48,001       -       -       (48,001 )     -  
Cost of Sales
                                               
For the three months ended June 30, 2008
    292,216       203,591       2,907