BLACKROCK MUNICIPAL INCOME TRUST
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company
Act file number: 811-10339
Name of Fund: BlackRock Municipal Income Trust (BFK)
Fund Address: 100 Bellevue Parkway, Wilmington, DE 19809
Name and address of agent for service: John M. Perlowski, Chief Executive Officer, BlackRock Municipal Income Trust, 55 East
52nd Street, New York, NY 10055
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (800) 882-0052, Option 4
Date of fiscal year end: 04/30/2017
Date of reporting period: 04/30/2017
Item 1 Report to Stockholders
APRIL 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL
REPORT |
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Investment Quality
Municipal Trust, Inc. (BKN)
BlackRock Long-Term Municipal Advantage Trust (BTA)
BlackRock Municipal 2020 Term Trust (BKK)
BlackRock Municipal Income Trust (BFK)
BlackRock Strategic Municipal Trust (BSD)
|
Not FDIC Insured May Lose Value No Bank Guarantee |
Dear Shareholder,
In the 12 months ended April 30, 2017, risk assets, such as stocks and high-yield bonds, delivered strong performance. These markets showed great resilience during a period with big surprises, including the
United Kingdoms vote to leave the European Union and the outcome of the U.S. presidential election, which brought only brief spikes in equity market volatility. However, high-quality assets with more interest rate sensitivity struggled. U.S.
Treasuries posted negative returns as rising energy prices, modest wage increases and steady job growth led to expectations of higher inflation and anticipation of interest rate increases by the U.S. Federal Reserve (the Fed).
The global reflationary theme rising nominal growth, wages and inflation was the dominant driver of asset returns during the
period, outweighing significant political upheavals and uncertainty. Reflationary expectations accelerated after the U.S. election and continued into the beginning of 2017, stoked by expectations that the new presidential administrations
policies would provide an extra boost to U.S. growth. More recently, however, growing skepticism about the likelihood of significant near-term U.S. tax reform and infrastructure spending has tempered enthusiasm around the reflation trade.
Nonetheless, markets have remained generally positive thus far in 2017 and continue to exhibit low levels of volatility by historical standards. Although political uncertainty persisted, benign credit conditions and expectations for economic growth
have kept markets fairly tranquil. The period ended with a global risk asset rally following centrist Emmanuel Macrons win in the first round of the French presidential election and better-than-expected U.S. and European corporate earnings.
Although economic momentum is gaining traction, the capacity for rapid global growth is restrained by structural factors, including an aging
population, low productivity growth and excess savings, as well as cyclical factors, like the Fed moving toward the normalization of monetary policy and the length of the current expansion. Tempered economic growth and high valuations across most
assets have set the stage for muted returns going forward.
Equity markets still present opportunities, although the disparity between winners and
losers is widening a dynamic that increases both the risk and return potential of active investing. Fixed income investors are also facing challenges as many sectors are exhibiting higher valuations while rates remain at historically low
levels.
In this environment, investors need to think globally, extend their scope across a broad array of asset classes, and be nimble as market
conditions change. We encourage you to talk with your financial advisor and visit blackrock.com for further insight about investing in todays markets.
Sincerely,
Rob Kapito
President, BlackRock Advisors, LLC
Rob Kapito
President,
BlackRock Advisors, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Returns as of April 30, 2017 |
|
|
|
6-month |
|
|
12-month |
|
U.S. large cap equities (S&P
500® Index) |
|
|
13.32 |
% |
|
|
17.92 |
% |
U.S. small cap equities (Russell
2000® Index) |
|
|
18.37 |
|
|
|
25.63 |
|
International equities (MSCI Europe, Australasia, Far East Index) |
|
|
11.47 |
|
|
|
11.29 |
|
Emerging market equities (MSCI Emerging Markets Index) |
|
|
8.88 |
|
|
|
19.13 |
|
3-month Treasury bills (BofA Merrill Lynch 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index) |
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
U.S. Treasury securities (BofA Merrill Lynch 10-Year U.S. Treasury Index) |
|
|
(3.13 |
) |
|
|
(2.68 |
) |
U.S. investment grade bonds (Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index) |
|
|
(0.67 |
) |
|
|
0.83 |
|
Tax-exempt municipal bonds (S&P Municipal Bond Index) |
|
|
(0.41 |
) |
|
|
0.57 |
|
U.S. high yield bonds (Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index) |
|
|
5.30 |
|
|
|
13.29 |
|
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only. You cannot invest
directly in an index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
THIS PAGE NOT PART OF YOUR FUND REPORT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
Municipal Market Overview |
|
|
|
For the Reporting Period Ended April 30, 2017 |
Municipal Market Conditions
Municipal bonds
generated modestly positive performance for the period, in spite of vastly rising interest rates as a result of generally stronger economic data, signs of inflation pressures, Federal Reserve (Fed) monetary policy normalization, and
market expectations for pro-growth fiscal policy. However, ongoing reassurance from the Fed that rates would be increased gradually and would likely remain low overall resulted in strong demand for fixed income investments. Investors favored the
income, relative yield, and stability of municipal bonds amid bouts of interest rate volatility (bond prices rise as rates fall) resulting from the United Kingdoms decision to leave the European Union, the contentious U.S. election, and
widening central bank divergence i.e., policy easing outside the United States while the Fed slowly commences policy tightening. During the 12 months ended April 30, 2017, municipal bond funds garnered net inflows of approximately $14
billion (based on data from the Investment Company Institute).
For the same 12-month period, total new issuance remained robust from a historical
perspective at $429 billion (significantly above the $384 billion issued in the prior 12-month period). A noteworthy portion of new supply during this period was attributable to refinancing activity (roughly 58%) as issuers continued to take
advantage of low interest rates and a flatter yield curve to reduce their borrowing costs.
|
S&P Municipal Bond Index |
Total Returns as of April 30,
2017 |
6 months:
(0.41)% |
12
months: 0.57% |
A Closer Look at Yields
From April 30, 2016 to
April 30, 2017, yields on AAA-rated 30-year municipal bonds increased by 44 basis points (bps) from 2.58% to 3.02%, while 10-year rates rose by 53 bps from 1.61% to 2.14% and 5-year rates increased 43 bps from 0.98% to 1.41% (as
measured by Thomson Municipal Market Data). The municipal yield curve modestly steepened over the 12-month period with the spread between 2- and 30-year maturities steepening by 10 bps and the spread
between 2- and 10-year maturities steepening by 19 bps.
During the same time period, on a relative basis,
tax-exempt municipal bonds broadly outperformed U.S. Treasuries with the greatest outperformance experienced in the front-end of the yield curve. In absolute terms, the positive performance of municipal bonds was driven largely by a supply/demand
imbalance within the municipal market as investors sought income and incremental yield in an environment where opportunities became increasingly scarce. More broadly, municipal bonds came under pressure post the November U.S. election as a result of
uncertainty surrounding potential U.S. tax-reform. The index has now recovered nearly 86% of performance lost post-election, which is quite impressive given that fund flows have only rebounded by about 31%.
The asset class is known for its lower relative volatility and preservation of principal with an emphasis on income as tax rates rise.
Financial Conditions of Municipal Issuers
The
majority of municipal credits remain strong, despite well-publicized distress among a few issuers. Four of the five states with the largest amount of debt outstanding California, New York, Texas and Florida have exhibited markedly
improved credit fundamentals during the slow national recovery. However, several states with the largest unfunded pension liabilities have seen their bond prices decline noticeably and remain vulnerable to additional price deterioration. On the
local level, Chicagos credit quality downgrade is an outlier relative to other cities due to its larger pension liability and inadequate funding remedies. BlackRock maintains the view that municipal bond defaults will remain minimal and in the
periphery while the overall market is fundamentally sound. We continue to advocate careful credit research and believe that a thoughtful approach to structure and security selection remains imperative amid uncertainty in a modestly improving
economic environment.
The opinions expressed are those of BlackRock as of April 30, 2017, and are subject to change at any time
due to changes in market or economic conditions. The comments should not be construed as a recommendation of any individual holdings or market sectors. Investing involves risk including loss of principal. Bond values fluctuate in price so the value
of your investment can go down depending on market conditions. Fixed income risks include interest-rate and credit risk. Typically, when interest rates rise, there is a corresponding decline in bond values. Credit risk refers to the possibility that
the bond issuer will not be able to make principal and interest payments. There may be less information on the financial condition of municipal issuers than for public corporations. The market for municipal bonds may be less liquid than for taxable
bonds. Some investors may be subject to Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). Capital gains distributions, if any, are taxable.
The
Standard & Poors Municipal Bond Index, a broad, market value-weighted index, seeks to measure the performance of the U.S. municipal bond market. All bonds in the index are exempt from U.S. federal income taxes or subject to the
alternative minimum tax. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging |
|
|
The Trusts may utilize leverage to seek to enhance the distribution rate on, and net asset value
(NAV) of, their common shares (Common Shares). However, these objectives cannot be achieved in all interest rate environments.
In general, the concept of leveraging is based on the premise that the financing cost of leverage, which is based on short-term interest rates, is normally lower than the income earned by a Trust on its
longer-term portfolio investments purchased with the proceeds from leverage. To the extent that the total assets of the Trusts (including the assets obtained from leverage) are invested in higher-yielding portfolio investments, the Trusts
shareholders benefit from the incremental net income. The interest earned on securities purchased with the proceeds from leverage is paid to shareholders in the form of dividends, and the value of these portfolio holdings is reflected in the per
share NAV.
To illustrate these concepts, assume a Trusts Common Shares capitalization is $100 million and it utilizes leverage for an
additional $30 million, creating a total value of $130 million available for investment in longer-term income securities. If prevailing short-term interest rates are 3% and longer-term interest rates are 6%, the yield curve has a strongly positive
slope. In this case, a Trusts financing costs on the $30 million of proceeds obtained from leverage are based on the lower short-term interest rates. At the same time, the securities purchased by a Trust with the proceeds from leverage earn
income based on longer-term interest rates. In this case, a Trusts financing cost of leverage is significantly lower than the income earned on a Trusts longer-term investments acquired from such leverage proceeds, and therefore the
holders of Common Shares (Common Shareholders) are the beneficiaries of the incremental net income.
However, in order to benefit
Common Shareholders, the return on assets purchased with leverage proceeds must exceed the ongoing costs associated with the leverage. If interest and other costs of leverage exceed the Trusts return on assets purchased with leverage proceeds,
income to shareholders is lower than if the Trusts had not used leverage. Furthermore, the value of the Trusts portfolio investments generally varies inversely with the direction of long-term interest rates, although other factors can
influence the value of portfolio investments. In contrast, the value of the Trusts obligations under their respective leverage arrangements generally does not fluctuate in relation to interest rates. As a result, changes in interest rates can
influence the Trusts NAVs positively or negatively. Changes in the future direction of interest rates are very
diffi-
cult to predict accurately, and there is no assurance that the Trusts intended leveraging strategy will be successful.
The use of leverage also generally causes greater changes in each Trusts NAV, market price and dividend rates than comparable portfolios without leverage. In a declining market, leverage is likely to
cause a greater decline in the NAV and market price of a Trusts Common Shares than if the Trust were not leveraged. In addition, each Trust may be required to sell portfolio securities at inopportune times or at distressed values in order
to comply with regulatory requirements applicable to the use of leverage or as required by the terms of leverage instruments, which may cause the Trusts to incur losses. The use of leverage may limit a Trusts ability to invest in certain types
of securities or use certain types of hedging strategies. Each Trust incurs expenses in connection with the use of leverage, all of which are borne by Common Shareholders and may reduce income to the Common Shares. Moreover, to the extent the
calculation of the Trusts investment advisory fees includes assets purchased with the proceeds of leverage, the investment advisory fees payable to the Trusts investment adviser will be higher than if the Trusts did not use leverage.
To obtain leverage, each Trust has issued Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares (VRDP Shares) or Variable Rate Muni Term Preferred
Shares (VMTP Shares) or Auction Market Preferred Shares (AMPS) (collectively, Preferred Shares) and/or leveraged its assets through the use of tender option bond trusts (TOB Trusts) as described in the
Notes to Financial Statements.
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), each Trust is permitted to issue
debt up to 33 1/3% of its total managed assets or equity securities (e.g., Preferred Shares) up to 50% of its total managed assets. A Trust may voluntarily elect to limit its leverage to less than the maximum amount permitted under the 1940 Act. In
addition, a Trust may also be subject to certain asset coverage, leverage or portfolio composition requirements imposed by the Preferred Shares governing instruments or by agencies rating the Preferred Shares, which may be more stringent than
those imposed by the 1940 Act.
If a Trust segregates or designates on its books and records cash or liquid assets having a value not less than
the value of a Trusts obligations under the TOB Trust (including accrued interest), a TOB Trust is not considered a senior security and is not subject to the foregoing limitations and requirements under the 1940 Act.
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
The Trusts may invest in various derivative financial instruments. These instruments are used to obtain
exposure to a security, commodity, index, market, and/or other asset without owning or taking physical custody of securities, commodities and/or other referenced assets or to manage market, equity, credit, interest rate, foreign currency exchange
rate, commodity and/or other risks. Derivative financial instruments may give rise to a form of economic leverage and involve risks, including the imperfect correlation between the value of a derivative financial instrument and the underlying asset,
possible default of the counterparty
to the transaction or illiquidity of the instrument. The Trusts successful use of a derivative financial instrument depends on the investment advisers ability to predict pertinent
market movements accurately, which cannot be assured. The use of these instruments may result in losses greater than if they had not been used, may limit the amount of appreciation a Trust can realize on an investment and/or may result in lower
distributions paid to shareholders. The Trusts investments in these instruments, if any, are discussed in detail in the Notes to Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
Trust Summary as of April 30,
2017 |
|
BlackRock Investment Quality Municipal Trust, Inc. |
BlackRock Investment Quality Municipal Trust, Inc.s (BKN) (the Trust) investment objective is to provide high current income exempt from
regular U.S. federal income tax consistent with the preservation of capital. The Trust seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal obligations exempt from U.S. federal income taxes (except that the
interest may be subject to the U.S. federal alternative minimum tax). Under normal market conditions, the Trust invests at least 80% of its assets in securities rated investment grade at the time of investment. The Trust may invest up to 20% of its
assets in unrated securities that are deemed by the investment adviser to be of comparable quality. The Trust may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Trusts investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
|
Trust Information |
|
|
Symbol on New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) |
|
BKN |
Initial Offering Date |
|
February 19, 1993 |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2017 ($14.59)1 |
|
5.10% |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
9.01% |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.0620 |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.7440 |
Economic Leverage as of April 30,
20174 |
|
37% |
|
1 |
|
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does
not guarantee future results. |
|
2 |
|
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal U.S. federal tax rate of 43.4%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based
on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields. |
|
3 |
|
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
4 |
|
Represents VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Trust, including any assets attributable
to VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of its accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Trust, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5. |
Returns for the 12 months ended April 30, 2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns Based On |
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
|
NAV |
|
BKN1,2 |
|
|
(7.55 |
)% |
|
|
(1.84 |
)% |
Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged)3 |
|
|
(2.05 |
)% |
|
|
(0.40 |
)% |
|
1 |
|
All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at actual reinvestment prices. |
|
2 |
|
The Trust moved from a premium to NAV to a discount during the period, which
accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. |
|
3 |
|
Average return. Returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at NAV on the ex-dividend date as calculated by Lipper.
|
|
|
|
Performance results may include adjustments made for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
|
The following discussion relates to the Trusts absolute performance based on NAV:
|
|
Municipal bonds registered a small, positive total return in the 12 months ended April 30, 2017. After moving modestly higher early in the period,
municipal bonds began to lose ground in September and October due to a pick-up in new tax-exempt issuance and rising yields in the U.S. Treasury market. (Prices and yields move in opposite directions.) Municipal issues subsequently plunged in
November once Donald Trumps election victory caused investors to adjust their expectations in favor of stronger growth and tighter Fed policy. However, municipal bonds retraced much of their November downturn in the final five months of the
period. The favorable combination of lower new issuance and recovering investor demand fueled a recovery in the market, which enabled it to finish with a return slightly above the break-even mark. |
|
|
In this environment, the Trusts holdings in the higher-quality, AA and A rated credit tiers did not generate enough yield to offset their price
declines. However, the Trusts performance was aided by its positions in higher-quality pre-refunded securities. |
|
|
At a time of rising yields, the Trusts positions in longer-dated and longer-duration bonds detracted from performance. At the sector level, holdings
in health care, tax-backed (local) and utilities issues further detracted. |
|
|
The Trusts positions in lower-rated, higher-yielding sectors contributed the most to performance. Specifically, holdings in the tobacco and
corporate municipal sectors added value. Positions in lower-quality issues rated BBB and below also made positive contributions. |
|
|
The Trust sought to manage interest rate risk using U.S. Treasury futures. Given that Treasury yields rose, as prices fell, this aspect of the
Trusts positioning had a positive impact on returns. |
|
|
The Trust continued to employ leverage, which helped augment income. However, since leverage also amplifies the effect of market movements, it was a net
detractor from overall performance. |
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of
this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Investment Quality Municipal Trust, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/17 |
|
|
4/30/16 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
Market Price |
|
$ |
14.59 |
|
|
$ |
16.94 |
|
|
|
(13.87 |
)% |
|
$ |
18.30 |
|
|
$ |
13.92 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
15.39 |
|
|
$ |
16.83 |
|
|
|
(8.56 |
)% |
|
$ |
17.52 |
|
|
$ |
14.92 |
|
|
Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five
Years |
|
Overview of the Trusts Total Investments* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sector Allocation |
|
4/30/17 |
|
|
4/30/16 |
|
Health |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
Education |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Transportation |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
State |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Tobacco |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
For Trust compliance purposes, the Trusts sector classifications refer to one or more of the sector
subclassifications used by one or more widely recognized market indexes or rating group indexes, and/or as defined by the investment adviser. These definitions may not apply for purposes of this report, which may combine such sector
subclassifications for reporting ease.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call/Maturity Schedule3 |
|
|
|
Calendar Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
4 |
% |
2018 |
|
|
5 |
|
2019 |
|
|
5 |
|
2020 |
|
|
8 |
|
2021 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
3 |
|
Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years. |
|
* |
|
Excludes short-term securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocation1 |
|
4/30/17 |
|
|
4/30/16 |
|
AAA/Aaa |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
AA/Aa |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
A |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
BBB/Baa |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
BB/Ba |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
B |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
N/R2 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
1 |
|
For financial reporting purposes, credit quality ratings shown above reflect the highest rating assigned by either Standard & Poors
(S&P) or Moodys Investors Service (Moodys) if ratings differ. These rating agencies are independent, nationally recognized statistical rating organizations and are widely used. Investment grade ratings are
credit ratings of BBB/Baa or higher. Below investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BB/Ba or lower. Investments designated N/R are not rated by either rating agency. Unrated investments do not necessarily indicate low credit quality. Credit
quality ratings are subject to change. |
|
2 |
|
The investment adviser evaluates the credit quality of unrated investments based upon certain factors including, but not limited to, credit ratings for
similar investments and financial analysis of sectors and individual investments. Using this approach, the investment adviser has deemed certain of these unrated securities as investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2017 and April 30, 2016, the
market value of unrated securities deemed by the investment adviser to be investment grade each represents less than 1% of the Trusts total investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
Trust Summary as of April 30, 2017 |
|
BlackRock Long-Term Municipal Advantage
Trust |
BlackRock Long-Term Municipal Advantage Trusts (BTA) (the Trust) investment objective is to provide current income exempt from regular U.S.
federal income tax. The Trust seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its assets in municipal obligations and derivative instruments with exposure to such municipal obligations, in each
case that are expected to pay interest or income that is exempt from U.S. federal income tax (except that the interest may be subject to the U.S. federal alternative minimum tax). The Trust invests, under normal market conditions, primarily in
long-term municipal bonds with a maturity of more than ten years at the time of investment and, under normal market conditions, the Trusts municipal bond portfolio will have a dollar-weighted average maturity of greater than 10 years. The
Trust may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the
Trusts investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
|
Trust Information |
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
BTA |
Initial Offering Date |
|
February 28, 2006 |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2017 ($11.66)1 |
|
5.61% |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
9.91% |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.0545 |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.6540 |
Economic Leverage as of April 30,
20174 |
|
40% |
|
1 |
|
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does
not guarantee future results. |
|
2 |
|
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal U.S. federal tax rate of 43.4%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based
on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields. |
|
3 |
|
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
4 |
|
Represents VRDP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Trust, including any assets attributable
to VRDP Shares and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of its accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Trust, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5. |
Returns for
the 12 months ended April 30, 2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns Based On |
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
|
NAV |
|
BTA1,2 |
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
|
0.53 |
% |
Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged)3 |
|
|
(2.05 |
)% |
|
|
(0.40 |
)% |
|
1 |
|
All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at actual reinvestment prices. |
|
2 |
|
The Trusts discount to NAV widened during the period, which accounts for
the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. |
|
3 |
|
Average return. Returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at NAV on the ex-dividend date as calculated by Lipper.
|
|
|
|
Performance results may include adjustments made for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
|
The following discussion relates to the Trusts absolute performance based on NAV:
|
|
Municipal bonds registered a small, positive total return in the 12 months ended April 30, 2017. After moving modestly higher early in the period,
municipal bonds began to lose ground in September and October due to a pick-up in new tax-exempt issuance and rising yields in the U.S. Treasury market. (Prices and yields move in opposite directions.) Municipal issues subsequently plunged in
November once Donald Trumps election victory caused investors to adjust their expectations in favor of stronger growth and tighter Fed policy. However, municipal bonds retraced much of their November downturn in the final five months of the
period. The favorable combination of lower new issuance and recovering investor demand fueled a recovery in the market, which enabled it to finish with a return slightly above the break-even mark. |
|
|
The Trusts positions in lower-quality securities, including BBB rated and non-investment grade bonds, outperformed higher-quality issues due to
their higher yields and tightening yield spreads. At the sector level, positions in tobacco and project-finance issues, both of which tend to be on the lower end of quality spectrum, were top performers. |
|
|
The Trust sought to manage interest rate risk using U.S. Treasury futures. Given that Treasury yields rose, as prices fell, this aspect of the
Trusts positioning had a positive impact on returns. |
|
|
The Trusts positions in intermediate and longer-dated maturities, which sold off more than short-dated maturities, detracted from performance. In
addition, its holdings in higher-quality securities lagged their lower-quality counterparts. |
|
|
Reinvestment was a further drag on results. The proceeds of higher-yielding bonds that matured or were called need to be reinvested at materially lower
prevailing rates, which led the Trust to cut its dividend during the period. (A call is when an issuer redeems a bond prior to its maturity date.) |
|
|
The Trust continued to employ leverage, which helped augment income. However, since leverage also amplifies the effect of market movements, it was a net
detractor from overall performance. |
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of
this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Long-Term Municipal Advantage
Trust |
|
Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share
Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/17 |
|
|
4/30/16 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
Market Price |
|
$ |
11.66 |
|
|
$ |
12.28 |
|
|
|
(5.05 |
)% |
|
$ |
13.44 |
|
|
$ |
10.73 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
12.27 |
|
|
$ |
12.89 |
|
|
|
(4.81 |
)% |
|
$ |
13.37 |
|
|
$ |
11.77 |
|
|
Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five
Years |
|
Overview of the Trusts Total Investments* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sector Allocation |
|
4/30/17 |
|
|
4/30/16 |
|
Health |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Transportation |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Education |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Tobacco |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
State |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Housing |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
For Trust compliance purposes, the Trusts sector classifications refer to one or more of the sector
subclassifications used by one or more widely recognized market indexes or rating group indexes, and/or as defined by the investment adviser. These definitions may not apply for purposes of this report, which may combine such sector
subclassifications for reporting ease.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call/Maturity Schedule3 |
|
|
|
Calendar Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
7 |
% |
2018 |
|
|
3 |
|
2019 |
|
|
16 |
|
2020 |
|
|
12 |
|
2021 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
3 |
|
Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years. |
|
* |
|
Excludes short-term securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocation1 |
|
4/30/17 |
|
|
4/30/16 |
|
AAA/Aaa |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
AA/Aa |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
A |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
BBB/Baa |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
BB/Ba |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
B |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
N/R2 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
1 |
|
For financial reporting purposes, credit quality ratings shown above reflect the highest rating assigned by either S&Ps or Moodys if
ratings differ. These rating agencies are independent, nationally recognized statistical rating organizations and are widely used. Investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BBB/Baa or higher. Below investment grade ratings are credit ratings of
BB/Ba or lower. Investments designated N/R are not rated by either rating agency. Unrated investments do not necessarily indicate low credit quality. Credit quality ratings are subject to change. |
|
2 |
|
The investment adviser evaluates the credit quality of unrated investments based upon certain factors including, but not limited to, credit ratings for
similar investments and financial analysis of sectors and individual investments. Using this approach, the investment adviser has deemed certain of these unrated securities as investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2017 and April 30,
2016, the market value of unrated securities deemed by the investment adviser to be investment grade each represents 1% of the Trusts total investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
9 |
|
|
|
Trust Summary as of April 30, 2017 |
|
BlackRock Municipal 2020 Term Trust |
BlackRock Municipal 2020 Term Trusts (BKK) (the Trust) investment objectives are to provide current income exempt from regular U.S. federal
income tax and to return $15 per Common Share (the initial public offering price per Common Share) to holders of Common Shares on or about December 31, 2020. The Trust seeks to achieve its investment objectives by investing, under normal market
conditions, at least 80% of its managed assets in municipal bonds exempt from U.S. federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the U.S. federal alternative minimum tax). The Trust invests, under normal market conditions, at
least 80% of its managed assets in municipal bonds that are investment grade, or if unrated, deemed to be of comparable quality by the investment adviser, at the time of investment. The Trust may invest directly in such securities or synthetically
through the use of derivatives. There is no assurance that the Trust will achieve its investment objective of returning $15.00 per Common Share.
|
|
|
Trust Information |
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
BKK |
Initial Offering Date |
|
September 30, 2003 |
Termination Date (on or about) |
|
December 31, 2020 |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2017 ($15.73)1 |
|
3.42% |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
6.04% |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.0448 |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.5376 |
Economic Leverage as of April 30,
20174 |
|
5% |
|
1 |
|
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does
not guarantee future results. |
|
2 |
|
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal U.S. federal tax rate of 43.4%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based
on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields. |
|
3 |
|
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
4 |
|
Represents AMPS and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Trust, including any assets attributable to AMPS
and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of its accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Trust, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5. |
Returns for the 12 months ended April 30, 2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns Based On |
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
|
NAV |
|
BKK1,2 |
|
|
0.85 |
% |
|
|
(0.78 |
)% |
Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged)3 |
|
|
(2.05 |
)% |
|
|
(0.40 |
)% |
|
1 |
|
All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at actual reinvestment prices. |
|
2 |
|
The Trust moved from a discount to NAV to a premium during the period, which
accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. |
|
3 |
|
Average return. Returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at NAV on the ex-dividend date as calculated by Lipper.
|
|
|
|
Performance results may include adjustments made for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
|
The following discussion relates to the Trusts absolute performance based on NAV:
|
|
Municipal bonds registered a small, positive total return in the 12 months ended April 30, 2017. After moving modestly higher early in the period,
municipal bonds began to lose ground in September and October due to a pick-up in new tax-exempt issuance and rising yields in the U.S. Treasury market. (Prices and yields move in opposite directions.) Municipal issues subsequently plunged in
November once Donald Trumps election victory caused investors to adjust their expectations in favor of stronger growth and tighter Fed policy. However, municipal bonds retraced much of their November downturn in the final five months of the
period. The favorable combination of lower new issuance and recovering investor demand fueled a recovery in the market, which enabled it to finish with a return slightly above the break-even mark. |
|
|
Holdings in the corporate municipal bond sector detracted from performance, as a specific issuer received a multi-notch downgrade due to its deteriorating
credit fundamentals. |
|
|
Reinvestment was a further drag on results, as the proceeds of higher-yielding bonds that matured or were called need to be reinvested at materially lower
prevailing rates. (A call is when an issuer redeems a bond prior to its maturity date.) |
|
|
The Trusts more-seasoned holdings, which produced generous yields compared to current market rates, were additive to performance. At the sector
level, tax-backed (state), education and health care issues were positive contributors. |
|
|
The Trust continued to employ leverage, which helped augment income. However, since leverage also amplifies the effect of market movements, it was a net
detractor from overall performance. |
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of
this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Municipal 2020 Term Trust |
|
Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share
Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/17 |
|
|
4/30/16 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
Market Price |
|
$ |
15.73 |
|
|
$ |
16.14 |
|
|
|
(2.54 |
)% |
|
$ |
17.01 |
|
|
$ |
15.17 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
15.60 |
|
|
$ |
16.27 |
|
|
|
(4.12 |
)% |
|
$ |
16.35 |
|
|
$ |
15.43 |
|
|
Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five
Years |
|
Overview of the Trusts Total Investments* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sector Allocation |
|
4/30/17 |
|
|
4/30/16 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
Transportation |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
State |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Health |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Education |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Tobacco |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Housing |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
For Trust compliance purposes, the Trusts sector classifications refer to one or more of the sector
subclassifications used by one or more widely recognized market indexes or rating group indexes, and/or as defined by the investment adviser. These definitions may not apply for purposes of this report, which may combine such sector
subclassifications for reporting ease.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call/Maturity Schedule3 |
|
|
|
Calendar Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
1 |
% |
2018 |
|
|
5 |
|
2019 |
|
|
19 |
|
2020 |
|
|
53 |
|
2021 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
3 |
|
Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years. |
|
* |
|
Excludes short-term securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocation1 |
|
4/30/17 |
|
|
4/30/16 |
|
AAA/Aaa |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
AA/Aa |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
A |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
BBB/Baa |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
BB/Ba |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
B |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
CCC |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
N/R2 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
1 |
|
For financial reporting purposes, credit quality ratings shown above reflect the highest rating assigned by either S&Ps or Moodys if
ratings differ. These rating agencies are independent, nationally recognized statistical rating organizations and are widely used. Investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BBB/Baa or higher. Below investment grade ratings are credit ratings of
BB/Ba or lower. Investments designated N/R are not rated by either rating agency. Unrated investments do not necessarily indicate low credit quality. Credit quality ratings are subject to change. |
|
2 |
|
The investment adviser evaluates the credit quality of unrated investments based upon certain factors including, but not limited to, credit ratings for
similar investments and financial analysis of sectors and individual investments. Using this approach, the investment adviser has deemed certain of these unrated securities as investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2017 and April 30, 2016, the
market value of unrated securities deemed by the investment adviser to be investment grade represents 2% and 4%, respectively, of the Trusts total investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
11 |
|
|
|
Trust Summary as of April 30, 2017 |
|
BlackRock Municipal Income Trust |
BlackRock
Municipal Income Trusts (BFK) (the Trust) investment objective is to provide current income exempt from regular U.S. federal income tax. The Trust seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in municipal bonds
exempt from U.S. federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the U.S. federal alternative minimum tax). The Trust invests, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds that are investment grade,
or if unrated, deemed to be of comparable quality by the investment adviser, at the time of investment. The Trust may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Trusts investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
|
Trust Information |
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
BFK |
Initial Offering Date |
|
July 27, 2001 |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2017 ($14.00)1 |
|
5.57% |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
9.84% |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.0650 |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.7800 |
Economic Leverage as of April 30,
20174 |
|
40% |
|
1 |
|
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does
not guarantee future results. |
|
2 |
|
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal U.S. federal tax rate of 43.4%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based
on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields. |
|
3 |
|
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
4 |
|
Represents VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Trust, including any assets attributable
to VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of its accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Trust, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5. |
Returns for
the 12 months ended April 30, 2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns Based On |
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
|
NAV |
|
BFK1,2 |
|
|
(3.96 |
)% |
|
|
(0.78 |
)% |
Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged)3 |
|
|
(2.05 |
)% |
|
|
(0.40 |
)% |
|
1 |
|
All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at actual reinvestment prices. |
|
2 |
|
The Trust moved from a premium to NAV to a discount during the period, which
accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. |
|
3 |
|
Average return. Returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at NAV on the ex-dividend date as calculated by Lipper.
|
|
|
|
Performance results may include adjustments made for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
|
The following discussion relates to the Trusts absolute performance based on NAV:
|
|
Municipal bonds registered a small, positive total return in the 12 months ended April 30, 2017. After moving modestly higher early in the period,
municipal bonds began to lose ground in September and October due to a pick-up in new tax-exempt issuance and rising yields in the U.S. Treasury market. (Prices and yields move in opposite directions.) Municipal issues subsequently plunged in
November once Donald Trumps election victory caused investors to adjust their expectations in favor of stronger growth and tighter Fed policy. However, municipal bonds retraced much of their November downturn in the final five months of the
period. The favorable combination of lower new issuance and recovering investor demand fueled a recovery in the market, which enabled it to finish with a return slightly above the break-even mark. |
|
|
Consistent with the broader market environment, Trust holdings with maturities of 15 years and above were hardest hit by the underperformance of
longer-term bonds relative to short-term issues. |
|
|
Lower-quality investments typically outperformed their higher-rated counterparts during the period. The Trusts holdings in non-investment grade and
unrated securities therefore generated healthy relative performance, as did its positions in the lower-quality corporate and tobacco sectors. While the Trusts positions in higher-quality issues generally lagged non-investment grade bonds, its
performance was helped by an allocation to higher-quality pre-refunded securities. The higher level of income in this segment translated to lower sensitivity to the market downturn of late 2016, aiding its return over the full 12 months.
|
|
|
The Trust sought to manage interest rate risk using U.S. Treasury futures. Given that Treasury yields rose, as prices fell, this aspect of the
Trusts positioning had a positive impact on returns. |
|
|
The Trust continued to employ leverage, which helped augment income. However, since leverage also amplifies the effect of market movements, it was a net
detractor from overall performance. |
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of
this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Municipal Income Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/17 |
|
|
4/30/16 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
Market Price |
|
$ |
14.00 |
|
|
$ |
15.44 |
|
|
|
(9.33 |
)% |
|
$ |
16.02 |
|
|
$ |
13.42 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
14.24 |
|
|
$ |
15.21
|
1
|
|
|
(6.38 |
)% |
|
$ |
15.64 |
|
|
$ |
13.87 |
|
|
1 |
|
The net asset value does not reflect adjustments made for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
and therefore differs from amount reported in the Financial Highlights. |
|
Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five
Years |
|
Overview of the Trusts Total Investments* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sector Allocation |
|
4/30/17 |
|
|
4/30/16 |
|
Transportation |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
Utilities |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Health |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
State |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Education |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Tobacco |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
For Trust compliance purposes, the Trusts sector classifications refer to one or more of the sector
subclassifications used by one or more widely recognized market indexes or rating group indexes, and/or as defined by the investment adviser. These definitions may not apply for purposes of this report, which may combine such sector
subclassifications for reporting ease.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call/Maturity Schedule3 |
|
|
|
Calendar Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
7 |
% |
2018 |
|
|
4 |
|
2019 |
|
|
16 |
|
2020 |
|
|
14 |
|
2021 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
3 |
|
Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years. |
|
* |
|
Excludes short-term securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocation1 |
|
4/30/17 |
|
|
4/30/16 |
|
AAA/Aaa |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
AA/Aa |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
A |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
BBB/Baa |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
BB/Ba |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
B |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
N/R2 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
1 |
|
For financial reporting purposes, credit quality ratings shown above reflect the highest rating assigned by either S&Ps or Moodys if
ratings differ. These rating agencies are independent, nationally recognized statistical rating organizations and are widely used. Investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BBB/Baa or higher. Below investment grade ratings are credit ratings of
BB/Ba or lower. Investments designated N/R are not rated by either rating agency. Unrated investments do not necessarily indicate low credit quality. Credit quality ratings are subject to change. |
|
2 |
|
The investment adviser evaluates the credit quality of unrated investments based upon certain factors including, but not limited to, credit ratings for
similar investments and financial analysis of sectors and individual investments. Using this approach, the investment adviser has deemed certain of these unrated securities as investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2017 and April 30, 2016, the
market value of unrated securities deemed by the investment adviser to be investment grade represents 1% and 2%, respectively, of the Trusts total investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
13 |
|
|
|
Trust Summary as of April 30, 2017 |
|
BlackRock Strategic Municipal Trust |
BlackRock
Strategic Municipal Trusts (BSD) (the Trust) investment objectives are to provide current income that is exempt from regular U.S. federal income tax and to invest in municipal bonds that over time will perform better than the
broader municipal bond market. The Trust seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its assets in investments exempt from U.S. federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject
to the U.S. federal alternative minimum tax). The Trust invests at least 80% of its assets in securities that are investment grade, or if unrated, deemed to be of comparable quality by the investment adviser, at the time of investment and, under
normal market conditions, primarily invests in municipal bonds with long-term maturities in order to maintain a weighted average maturity of 15 years or more, but the dollar-weighted average maturity of obligations held by the Trust may be
shortened, depending on market conditions. The Trust may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Trusts investment objectives will be achieved.
|
|
|
Trust Information |
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
BSD |
Initial Offering Date |
|
August 25, 1999 |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2017 ($13.67)1 |
|
5.71% |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
10.09% |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.0650 |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.7800 |
Economic Leverage as of April 30,
20174 |
|
40% |
|
1 |
|
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does
not guarantee future results. |
|
2 |
|
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal U.S. federal tax rate of 43.4%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based
on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields. |
|
3 |
|
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
4 |
|
Represents VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Trust, including any assets attributable
to VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of its accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Trust, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5. |
Returns for
the 12 months ended April 30, 2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns Based On |
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
|
NAV |
|
BSD1,2 |
|
|
(3.85 |
)% |
|
|
(0.19 |
)% |
Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged)3 |
|
|
(2.05 |
)% |
|
|
(0.40 |
)% |
|
1 |
|
All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at actual reinvestment prices. |
|
2 |
|
The Trusts discount to NAV widened during the period, which accounts for
the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. |
|
3 |
|
Average return. Returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at NAV on the ex-dividend date as calculated by Lipper.
|
|
|
|
Performance results may include adjustments made for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
|
The following discussion relates to the Trusts absolute performance based on NAV:
|
|
Municipal bonds registered a small, positive total return in the 12 months ended April 30, 2017. After moving modestly higher early in the period,
municipal bonds began to lose ground in September and October due to a pick-up in new tax-exempt issuance and rising yields in the U.S. Treasury market. (Prices and yields move in opposite directions.) Municipal issues subsequently plunged in
November once Donald Trumps election victory caused investors to adjust their expectations in favor of stronger growth and tighter Fed policy. However, municipal bonds retraced much of their November downturn in the final five months of the
period. The favorable combination of lower new issuance and recovering investor demand fueled a recovery in the market, which enabled it to finish with a return slightly above the break-even mark. |
|
|
The Trusts positions in lower-quality securities, including BBB rated and non-investment grade bonds, outperformed higher-quality issues due to
their higher yields and tightening yield spreads. At the sector level, positions in tobacco and corporate municipal issues, both of which tend to be on the lower end of quality spectrum, were top performers. Conversely, portfolio holdings in
higher-quality securities generally underperformed. |
|
|
Positions in pre-refunded securities aided performance, as short-term issues with lower durations (less interest rate sensitivity) outperformed
longer-dated bonds. Investments in bonds with intermediate and longer-dated maturities, which sold off more than short-dated securities, detracted. |
|
|
Reinvestment was a further drag on results. The proceeds of higher-yielding bonds that matured or were called need to be reinvested at materially lower
prevailing rates, which led the Trust to cut its dividend during the period. (A call is when an issuer redeems a bond prior to its maturity date.) |
|
|
The Trust sought to manage interest rate risk using U.S. Treasury futures. Given that Treasury yields rose, as prices fell, this aspect of the
Trusts positioning had a positive impact on returns. |
|
|
The Trust continued to employ leverage, which helped augment income. However, since leverage also amplifies the effect of market movements, it was a net
detractor from overall performance. |
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of
this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Strategic Municipal Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/17 |
|
|
4/30/16 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
Market Price |
|
$ |
13.67 |
|
|
$ |
15.02 |
|
|
|
(8.99 |
)% |
|
$ |
15.98 |
|
|
$ |
13.03 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
14.21 |
|
|
$ |
15.04 |
|
|
|
(5.52 |
)% |
|
$ |
15.50 |
|
|
$ |
13.80 |
|
|
Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five
Years |
|
Overview of the Trusts Total Investments* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sector Allocation |
|
4/30/17 |
|
|
4/30/16 |
|
Transportation |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
Health |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
State |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Education |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Tobacco |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Housing |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
For Trust compliance purposes, the Trusts sector classifications refer to one or more of the sector
subclassifications used by one or more widely recognized market indexes or rating group indexes, and/or as defined by the investment adviser. These definitions may not apply for purposes of this report, which may combine such sector
subclassifications for reporting ease.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call/Maturity Schedule3 |
|
|
|
Calendar Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
4 |
% |
2018 |
|
|
6 |
|
2019 |
|
|
17 |
|
2020 |
|
|
12 |
|
2021 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
3 |
|
Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years. |
|
* |
|
Excludes short-term securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocation1 |
|
4/30/17 |
|
|
4/30/16 |
|
AAA/Aaa |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
AA/Aa |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
A |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
BBB/Baa |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
BB/Ba |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
B |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
N/R2 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
1 |
|
For financial reporting purposes, credit quality ratings shown above reflect the highest rating assigned by either S&Ps or Moodys if
ratings differ. These rating agencies are independent, nationally recognized statistical rating organizations and are widely used. Investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BBB/Baa or higher. Below investment grade ratings are credit ratings of
BB/Ba or lower. Investments designated N/R are not rated by either rating agency. Unrated investments do not necessarily indicate low credit quality. Credit quality ratings are subject to change. |
|
2 |
|
The investment adviser evaluates the credit quality of unrated investments based upon certain factors including, but not limited to, credit ratings for
similar investments and financial analysis of sectors and individual investments. Using this approach, the investment adviser has deemed certain of these unrated securities as investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2017 and April 30, 2016, the
market value of unrated securities deemed by the investment adviser to be investment grade represents 1% and 2%, respectively, of the Trusts total investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
15 |
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments April 30, 2017 |
|
BlackRock Investment Quality Municipal Trust, Inc. (BKN)
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
Arizona 8.4% |
|
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, Phoenix Childrens Hospital, Series A, 5.00%, 2/01/42 |
|
$ |
3,300 |
|
|
$ |
3,482,457 |
|
City of Phoenix Arizona IDA, Refunding RB, Basis Schools, Inc. Projects, 5.00%, 7/01/45 (a) |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
457,698 |
|
County of Maricopa Arizona IDA, Refunding RB, Banner Health Obligation Group, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.25%, 1/01/37 |
|
|
2,895 |
|
|
|
2,764,754 |
|
4.00%, 1/01/38 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,020,720 |
|
County of Pinal Arizona Electric District No.3, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.75%, 7/01/21 (b) |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
773,833 |
|
4.75%, 7/01/31 |
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
3,359,378 |
|
Salt Verde Financial Corp., RB, Senior: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 12/01/32 |
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
1,191,958 |
|
5.00%, 12/01/37 |
|
|
4,585 |
|
|
|
5,351,383 |
|
University Medical Center Corp., RB, 6.50%, 7/01/19 (b) |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
836,272 |
|
University Medical Center Corp., Refunding RB, 6.00%, 7/01/21 (b) |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
1,898,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,136,597 |
|
Arkansas 2.0% |
|
City of Benton Arkansas, RB, 4.00%, 6/01/39 |
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
782,829 |
|
City of Fort Smith Arkansas Water & Sewer Revenue, Refunding RB, 4.00%, 10/01/40 |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1,281,463 |
|
City of Little Rock Arkansas, RB, 4.00%, 7/01/41 |
|
|
2,645 |
|
|
|
2,697,847 |
|
County of Pulaski Arkansas Public Facilities Board, RB, 5.00%, 12/01/42 |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
508,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,271,002 |
|
California 22.7% |
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, RB, Sutter Health, Series B, 5.88%, 8/15/31 |
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
2,614,502 |
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Refunding RB, Adventist Health System West, Series A, 3.00%,
3/01/39 |
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
944,499 |
|
California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank, Refunding RB, Academy Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, Series A
4.00%, 11/01/45 |
|
|
3,330 |
|
|
|
3,369,993 |
|
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, RB, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Series A, 5.25%, 12/01/56
(a) |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
396,437 |
|
Carlsbad California Unified School District, GO, Election of 2006, Series B, 0.00%, 5/01/34 (c) |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,616,820 |
|
City of San Jose California, Refunding ARB, Norman Y Mineta San Jose International Airport SJC, AMT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 4.00%, 3/01/42 |
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
|
2,456,039 |
|
Series A-1, 5.75%, 3/01/34 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,400,290 |
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., Refunding RB, Series A-1, 5.00%,
6/01/28 |
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
3,586,342 |
|
Hartnell Community College District California, GO, CAB, Election of 2002, Series D, 0.00%, 8/01/34 (c) |
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
|
2,454,532 |
|
Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District, GO, Refunding, CAB, Election of 2+002, Series E
(AGC), 0.00%, 8/01/38 (d) |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
4,737,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
California (continued) |
|
Palomar Community College District, GO, CAB, Election of 2006, Series B: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00%, 8/01/30 (d) |
|
$
|
2,270 |
|
|
$
|
1,457,158 |
|
0.00%, 8/01/33 (d) |
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
1,726,010 |
|
0.00%, 8/01/39 (c) |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
3,469,680 |
|
San Diego Community College District, GO, CAB, Election of 2002, 0.00%, 8/01/33 (c) |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
4,796,946 |
|
State of California, GO, Refunding, Various Purposes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/01/17 (b) |
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
3,081,912 |
|
5.00%, 6/01/17 (b) |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
1,937,488 |
|
5.00%, 2/01/38 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,238,060 |
|
4.00%, 10/01/44 |
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
2,580,153 |
|
State of California, GO, Various Purposes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75%, 4/01/31 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,268,890 |
|
6.00%, 3/01/33 |
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
|
2,559,879 |
|
6.50%, 4/01/33 |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
3,201,136 |
|
5.50%, 3/01/40 |
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
|
4,054,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,949,005 |
|
Connecticut 0.9% |
|
Connecticut State Health & Educational Facility Authority, Refunding RB, Lawrence & Memorial Hospital, Series F,
5.00%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
1,015,142 |
|
South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority, Refunding RB, 32nd Series B, 4.00%, 8/01/36 |
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
1,427,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,442,454 |
|
Delaware 2.6% |
|
County of Sussex Delaware, RB, NRG Energy, Inc., Indian River Power LLC Project, 6.00%, 10/01/40 |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
1,936,206 |
|
Delaware Transportation Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/01/45 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,303,540 |
|
5.00%, 6/01/55 |
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
|
1,546,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,786,205 |
|
Florida 5.6% |
|
Capital Trust Agency Inc., RB, M/F Housing, The Gardens Apartment Project, Series A, 4.75%, 7/01/40 |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
909,054 |
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, Subordinate Special Obligation, 0.00%, 10/01/32 (d) |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
2,570,200 |
|
CAB, Subordinate Special Obligation, 0.00%, 10/01/33 (d) |
|
|
15,375 |
|
|
|
7,498,234 |
|
Series B, AMT, 6.00%, 10/01/32 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,539,580 |
|
County of Orange Florida Health Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, Mayflower Retirement Center, 5.00%, 6/01/32 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
210,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,727,860 |
|
Hawaii 0.2% |
|
Hawaii State Department of Budget & Finance, Refunding RB, Special Purpose, Senior
Living, Kahala Nui, 5.25%, 11/15/37 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
637,584 |
|
Idaho 1.2% |
|
Idaho Health Facilities Authority, RB, St. Lukes Health System Project, Series A, 5.00%,
3/01/39 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,250,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGC |
|
Assured Guarantee Corp. |
|
CAB |
|
Capital Appreciation Bonds |
|
ISD |
|
Independent School District |
AGM |
|
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. |
|
COP |
|
Certificates of Participation |
|
M/F |
|
Multi-Family |
AMBAC |
|
American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. |
|
EDA |
|
Economic Development Authority |
|
NPFGC |
|
National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
AMT |
|
Alternative Minimum Tax (subject to) |
|
GARB |
|
General Airport Revenue Bonds |
|
PILOT |
|
Payment in Lieu of Taxes |
ARB |
|
Airport Revenue Bonds |
|
GO |
|
General Obligation Bonds |
|
RB |
|
Revenue Bonds |
BAM |
|
Build America Mutual Assurance Co. |
|
IDA |
|
Industrial Development Authority |
|
S/F |
|
Single-Family |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
|
BlackRock Investment Quality Municipal Trust, Inc. (BKN) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
Illinois 7.9% |
|
Chicago Public Building Commission, RB, Series A (NPFGC), 7.00%, 1/01/20 (e) |
|
$
|
5,000 |
|
|
$
|
5,590,300 |
|
City of Chicago Illinois, Refunding ARB, OHare International Airport Passenger Facility Charge, Series B, AMT, 4.00%,
1/01/29 |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
2,456,448 |
|
City of Chicago Illinois Midway International Airport, Refunding GARB, 2nd Lien, Series A, 5.00%, 1/01/41 |
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
1,872,568 |
|
City of Chicago Illinois Transit Authority, RB, Sales Tax Receipts, 5.25%, 12/01/40 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,066,610 |
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OSF Healthcare System, 6.00%, 5/15/39 |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
478,591 |
|
Roosevelt University Project, 6.50%, 4/01/44 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,585,785 |
|
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 6/01/24 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,018,300 |
|
6.00%, 6/01/28 |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
1,933,903 |
|
State of Illinois, GO, 5.00%, 2/01/39 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
998,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,001,115 |
|
Kansas 3.7% |
|
County of Johnson Kansas Unified School District No. 512 Shawnee Mission, GO, Refunding, Series B, 3.00%,
10/01/37 |
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
1,742,333 |
|
County of Seward Kansas Unified School District No. 480 Liberal, GO, Refunding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 9/01/39 |
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
1,252,274 |
|
5.00%, 9/01/39 |
|
|
4,915 |
|
|
|
5,401,733 |
|
Kansas Development Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Sisters Leavenworth: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 1/01/20 (b) |
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
1,104,384 |
|
5.00%, 1/01/28 |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
161,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,662,018 |
|
Kentucky 6.8% |
|
County of Boyle Kentucky, Refunding RB, Centre College of Kentucky, 5.00%, 6/01/37 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
4,452,320 |
|
County of Louisville & Jefferson Kentucky Metropolitan Government, Refunding RB, Norton Healthcare, Inc., Series A 4.00%,
10/01/35 |
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
880,214 |
|
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, RB, Catholic Health Initiatives, Series A, 5.38%, 1/01/40 |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
3,645,752 |
|
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Norton Healthcare, Inc., Series B (NPFGC), 0.00%, 10/01/23
(d) |
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
7,092,485 |
|
Kentucky Public Transportation Infrastructure Authority, RB, Downtown Crossing Project, Convertible CAB, 1st Tier, Series C
(c): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00%, 7/01/34 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
846,480 |
|
0.00%, 7/01/39 |
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
1,153,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,070,511 |
|
Louisiana 1.7% |
|
City of Alexandria Louisiana Utilities, RB, 5.00%, 5/01/39 |
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
1,960,247 |
|
Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority, RB, Westlake Chemical Corp. Project,
Series A-1, 6.50%, 11/01/35 |
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
1,782,770 |
|
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, RB, Belle Chasse Educational Foundation Project, 6.50%, 5/01/31 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
662,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,405,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
Maryland 0.8% |
|
County of Anne Arundel Maryland Consolidated, RB, Special Taxing District, Villages at Two Rivers Project: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.13%, 7/01/36 |
|
$
|
260 |
|
|
$
|
260,570 |
|
5.25%, 7/01/44 |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
260,179 |
|
County of Montgomery Maryland, RB, Trinity Health Credit Group, 5.00%, 12/01/45 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,668,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,189,679 |
|
Massachusetts 4.1% |
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emerson College Issue, Series A, 5.00%, 1/01/47 |
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
1,090,315 |
|
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Issue, Series N, 5.00%, 12/01/46 |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
691,144 |
|
Emerson College Issue, Series A, 5.25%, 1/01/42 |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
1,004,004 |
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston College Issue, Series T, 4.00%, 7/01/42 |
|
|
2,860 |
|
|
|
2,939,422 |
|
Emmanuel College Issue, Series A, 4.00%, 10/01/46 |
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
1,329,078 |
|
International Charter School, 5.00%, 4/15/40 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
630,126 |
|
Suffolk University, 4.00%, 7/01/39 |
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
1,357,015 |
|
WGBH Educational Foundation Issue, 3.00%, 1/01/42 |
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
1,932,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,973,837 |
|
Michigan 3.8% |
|
Michigan Finance Authority, RB, Detroit Water & Sewage Disposal System, Senior Lien, Series 2014 C-2, AMT, 5.00%, 7/01/44 |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
377,345 |
|
Michigan Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Henry Ford Health System, 4.00%, 11/15/46 |
|
|
2,305 |
|
|
|
2,261,804 |
|
Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Trinity Health Credit Group, Series C, 4.00%, 12/01/32 |
|
|
4,150 |
|
|
|
4,247,857 |
|
Royal Oak Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, Refunding RB, William Beaumont Hospital, Series V, 8.25%, 9/01/18
(b) |
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
3,015,100 |
|
State of Michigan Building Authority, Refunding RB, Facilities Program, Series I, 6.25%, 10/15/38 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
64,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,966,334 |
|
Minnesota 2.6% |
|
City of Minneapolis Minnesota, Refunding RB, Fairview Health Services, Series B (AGC), 6.50%, 11/15/38 |
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
2,044,675 |
|
Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission, Refunding ARB, Sub-Series D, AMT, 5.00%, 1/01/41 |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
508,636 |
|
Minnesota Higher Education Facilities Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Augsburg College, Series B, 4.25%, 5/01/40 |
|
|
1,895 |
|
|
|
1,897,028 |
|
College of St. Benedict, Series 8-K, 5.00%, 3/01/37 |
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
1,155,077 |
|
College of St. Benedict, Series 8-K, 4.00%, 3/01/43 |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
618,622 |
|
Minnesota Higher Education Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, University of St. Thomas,
Series 8-L, 4.00%, 4/01/39 |
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
635,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,859,953 |
|
Mississippi 2.1% |
|
County of Warren Mississippi, RB, Gulf Opportunity Zone Bonds, International Paper Co. Project, Series A, 5.38%,
12/01/35 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
660,492 |
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
17 |
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
|
BlackRock Investment Quality Municipal Trust, Inc. (BKN) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
Mississippi (continued) |
|
Mississippi Development Bank, RB, Special Obligation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, Hinds Community College District (AGM), 5.00%, 4/01/36 |
|
$
|
1,910 |
|
|
$
|
2,053,346 |
|
County of Jackson Limited Tax Note (AGC), 5.50%, 7/01/32 |
|
|
2,655 |
|
|
|
2,860,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,574,733 |
|
Missouri 3.0% |
|
Missouri Development Finance Board, RB, Annual Appropriation Sewer System, Series B, 5.00%, 11/01/41 |
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
1,433,200 |
|
Missouri State Health & Educational Facilities Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.T. Still University of Health Sciences, 5.25%, 10/01/31 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
556,865 |
|
A.T. Still University of Health Sciences, 4.25%, 10/01/32 |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
503,645 |
|
A.T. Still University of Health Sciences, 5.00%, 10/01/39 |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
823,710 |
|
Heartland Regional Medical Center, 4.13%, 2/15/43 |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
717,115 |
|
University of Central Missouri, Series C-2, 5.00%, 10/01/34 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,663,920 |
|
Missouri State Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences,
Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/01/42 |
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
954,179 |
|
5.00%, 6/01/47 |
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
1,359,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,011,735 |
|
Montana 0.6% |
|
County of Cascade Montana Elementary School District No. 1 Great Falls, GO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00%, 7/01/34 |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
807,135 |
|
4.00%, 7/01/35 |
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
905,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,712,696 |
|
Nebraska 5.3% |
|
Central Plains Energy Project Nebraska, RB, Gas Project No. 3, 5.00%, 9/01/42 |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
954,855 |
|
County of Douglas Nebraska Hospital Authority No. 3, Refunding RB, Health Facilities Nebraska Methodist Health System, 5.00%,
11/01/45 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
653,748 |
|
County of Sarpy Nebraska Hospital Authority No. 1, Refunding RB, Nebraska Medicine: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.00%, 5/15/46 |
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
2,549,513 |
|
4.00%, 5/15/51 |
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
1,568,506 |
|
Gretna Public Schools, GO, Refunding, School Building, 3.00%, 12/15/39 |
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
1,276,086 |
|
Nebraska Public Power District, Refunding RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 1/01/32 |
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
2,863,054 |
|
4.00%, 1/01/44 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
607,122 |
|
Public Power Generation Agency, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.13%, 1/01/35 |
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
1,658,064 |
|
3.25%, 1/01/36 |
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
|
1,876,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,007,599 |
|
Nevada 0.6% |
|
County of Clark Nevada, Refunding ARB, Department of Aviation, Subordinate Lien, Series A-2, 4.25%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,569,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
New Jersey 7.3% |
|
County of Atlantic New Jersey Improvement Authority, RB, Stockton University Atlantic City, Series A (AGM), 4.00%,
7/01/46 |
|
$
|
2,050 |
|
|
$
|
2,075,071 |
|
County of Middlesex New Jersey Improvement Authority, RB, Heldrich Center Hotel,
Sub-Series B, 6.25%, 1/01/37 (f)(g) |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
58,830 |
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, AMT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines, Inc. Project, 5.25%, 9/15/29 |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
1,444,390 |
|
Continental Airlines, Inc. Project, Series B, 5.63%, 11/15/30 |
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
1,097,484 |
|
Goethals Bridge Replacement Project (AGM), 5.13%, 7/01/42 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
327,567 |
|
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, College of New Jersey, Series G, 3.50%, 7/01/31 |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
1,150,449 |
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, Refunding RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RWJ Barnabas Health Obligated Group, 4.00%, 7/01/43 |
|
|
2,955 |
|
|
|
2,982,038 |
|
St. Barnabas Health Care System, 4.63%, 7/01/21 (b) |
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
870,346 |
|
St. Barnabas Health Care System, 5.63%, 7/01/21 (b) |
|
|
2,560 |
|
|
|
2,998,221 |
|
St. Barnabas Health Care System, 5.00%, 7/01/25 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
562,385 |
|
New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency, RB, S/F Housing, Series AA, 6.50%, 10/01/38 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15,441 |
|
New Jersey State Turnpike Authority, RB, Series E, 5.00%, 1/01/45 |
|
|
2,780 |
|
|
|
3,072,206 |
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, Transportation System, Series A, 0.00%, 12/15/35 (d) |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
584,368 |
|
Transportation Program, Series AA, 5.00%, 6/15/45 |
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
1,350,810 |
|
Transportation Program, Series AA, 5.00%, 6/15/46 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
600,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,189,966 |
|
New Mexico 1.1% |
|
New Mexico Finance Authority, RB, Senior Lien, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.25%, 6/01/33 |
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
867,206 |
|
3.25%, 6/01/34 |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
1,328,114 |
|
New Mexico Hospital Equipment Loan Council, Refunding RB, Presbyterian Healthcare Services, 5.00%, 8/01/44 |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
754,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,949,950 |
|
New York 6.2% |
|
City of New York New York Industrial Development Agency, RB, PILOT, Queens Baseball Stadium: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AMBAC), 5.00%, 1/01/39 |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,102,365 |
|
(AGC), 6.50%, 1/01/46 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
325,758 |
|
Counties of New York Tobacco Trust IV, Refunding RB, Settlement Pass-Through Turbo, Series A, 6.25%, 6/01/41
(a) |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
1,455,902 |
|
Counties of New York Tobacco Trust VI, Refunding RB, Settlement Pass-Through Turbo, Series C, 4.00%, 6/01/51 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
931,840 |
|
County of Nassau New York, GO, Series A, 5.00%, 1/15/30 |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1,470,700 |
|
Erie Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., Refunding RB, Asset-Backed, Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/45 |
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
1,774,466 |
|
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., RB, Series A (AGM), 5.00%, 2/15/47 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
503,550 |
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
|
BlackRock Investment Quality Municipal Trust, Inc. (BKN) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
New York (continued) |
|
Long Island Power Authority, Refunding RB, Electric System, Series A, 5.75%, 4/01/39 |
|
$
|
2,475 |
|
|
$
|
2,657,779 |
|
Metropolitan Transportation Authority Hudson Rail Yards Trust Obligations, Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%,
11/15/56 |
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
1,479,592 |
|
New York Liberty Development Corp., Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Priority, Bank of America Tower at One Bryant Park Project, Class 3, 6.38%, 7/15/49 |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1,358,587 |
|
3 World Trade Center Project, Class 2, 5.15%, 11/15/34 (a) |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
687,744 |
|
New York Transportation Development Corp., Refunding RB, American Airlines, Inc., AMT, 5.00%, 8/01/31 |
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
2,001,869 |
|
Niagara Area Development Corp., Refunding RB, Solid Waste Disposal Facility, Covanta Energy Project, Series A, AMT, 5.25%, 11/01/42
(a) |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
603,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,353,404 |
|
North Dakota 0.6% |
|
City of Fargo North Dakota, GO, Series D, 4.00%, 5/01/37 |
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
828,191 |
|
County of Burleigh North Dakota, Refunding RB, St. Alexius Medical Center Project, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/21 (b) |
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
823,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,651,360 |
|
Ohio 1.2% |
|
City of Dayton Ohio Airport Revenue, Refunding ARB, James M. Cox Dayton International
Airport, AMT, Series A, 4.00%, 12/01/32 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,066,510 |
|
Oklahoma 2.3% |
|
Norman Oklahoma Regional Hospital Authority, Refunding RB, 4.00%, 9/01/37 |
|
|
2,015 |
|
|
|
2,025,861 |
|
Oklahoma City Public Property Authority, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 10/01/36 |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
886,880 |
|
5.00%, 10/01/39 |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
308,476 |
|
Oklahoma Development Finance Authority, RB, Provident Oklahoma Education Resources Inc., Series A, 5.25%, 8/01/57 |
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
1,419,240 |
|
Oklahoma Water Resources Board, RB, Clean Water Program, 4.00%, 4/01/40 |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
1,531,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,172,303 |
|
Oregon 3.4% |
|
County of Lane Oregon School District No. 19 Springfield, GO, CAB, Series B, 0.00%, 6/15/40 (d) |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
566,655 |
|
Klamath Falls Intercommunity Hospital Authority, Refunding RB, Sky Lakes Medical Center Project: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.00%, 9/01/35 |
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
1,012,728 |
|
3.00%, 9/01/41 |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
805,676 |
|
Oregon Health & Science University, RB, Series A, 4.00%, 7/01/37 |
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
1,112,249 |
|
State of Oregon Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, Legacy Health Project, Series A, 4.00%, 6/01/41 |
|
|
2,610 |
|
|
|
2,653,770 |
|
State of Oregon State Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, University of Portland Project, Series A,
5.00%, 4/01/45 |
|
|
2,485 |
|
|
|
2,755,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,906,570 |
|
Pennsylvania 4.9% |
|
County of Allegheny Pennsylvania IDA, Refunding RB, U.S. Steel Corp. Project, 6.55%, 12/01/27 |
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
2,462,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
Pennsylvania (continued) |
|
Delaware River Port Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50%, 1/01/32 |
|
$
|
3,000 |
|
|
$
|
3,260,820 |
|
Series D (AGM), 5.00%, 1/01/40 |
|
|
3,640 |
|
|
|
3,952,749 |
|
Mckeesport Area School District, GO, CAB, Refunding (NPFGC), 0.00%, 10/01/31 (d)(e) |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
332,890 |
|
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Refunding RB, National Gypsum Co., AMT, 5.50%, 11/01/44 |
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
860,860 |
|
Pottsville Hospital Authority, Refunding RB, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Series B, 5.00%, 7/01/45 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,170,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,040,837 |
|
Puerto Rico 1.1% |
|
Childrens Trust Fund, Refunding RB, Tobacco Settlement, Asset-Backed Bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 5/15/39 |
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
1,472,205 |
|
5.63%, 5/15/43 |
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
1,395,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,868,000 |
|
Rhode Island 4.2% |
|
Rhode Island Commerce Corp., RB, Airport Corporation, Series D: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/01/41 |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
474,539 |
|
5.00%, 7/01/46 |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
593,725 |
|
Rhode Island Health & Educational Building Corp., Refunding RB, Series A (AGM), 3.75%, 5/15/32 |
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
1,866,088 |
|
Rhode Island Turnpike & Bridge Authority, Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 10/01/40 |
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
3,019,238 |
|
State of Rhode Island, COP, School for the Deaf Project, Series C (AGC), 5.38%, 4/01/28 |
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
1,420,467 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/40 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,057,880 |
|
Series B, 4.50%, 6/01/45 |
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
|
2,661,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,093,090 |
|
South Dakota 0.9% |
|
Dakota Valley School District No. 61-8, GO,
Refunding, 3.00%, 7/15/39 |
|
|
2,770 |
|
|
|
2,430,343 |
|
Tennessee 3.8% |
|
Chattanooga Health Educational & Housing Facility Board, RB, Catholic Health Initiatives, Series A, 5.25%,
1/01/40 |
|
|
2,945 |
|
|
|
3,088,922 |
|
County of Chattanooga-Hamilton Tennessee Hospital Authority, Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 10/01/44 |
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
916,956 |
|
County of Knox Tennessee Health Educational & Housing Facility Board, RB, University Health System, Inc., 4.00%,
9/01/40 |
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
1,293,918 |
|
County of Memphis-Shelby Tennessee Sports Authority, Inc., Refunding RB, Memphis Arena Project, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 11/01/27 |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
1,239,182 |
|
5.38%, 11/01/28 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,096,940 |
|
Johnson City Health & Educational Facilities Board, RB, Mountain States Health, Series A,
5.00%, 8/15/42 |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,272,576 |
|
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County Health & Educational Facilities Board, RB,
Health & Educational Facilities Board, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/40 |
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
1,196,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,104,593 |
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
19 |
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
|
BlackRock Investment Quality Municipal Trust, Inc. (BKN) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
Texas 6.9% |
|
County of Harris Texas-Houston Sports Authority, Refunding RB, CAB, Senior Lien, Series A (NPFGC), 0.00%, 11/15/38
(d) |
|
$
|
5,000 |
|
|
$
|
1,739,250 |
|
County of Matagorda Texas Navigation District No. 1, Refunding RB, Central Power & Light Co., Project, Series A,
6.30%, 11/01/29 |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
2,453,484 |
|
County of Midland Texas Fresh Water Supply District No. 1, RB, CAB, City of Midland Project, Series A, 0.00%, 9/15/38
(d) |
|
|
16,780 |
|
|
|
6,627,093 |
|
Leander ISD, CAB, Series D, 0.00%, 8/15/35 (d) |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
2,805,180 |
|
Red River Education Financing Corp., RB, Texas Christian University Project, 5.25%, 3/15/38 |
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
1,286,479 |
|
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., RB, Senior Lien, LBJ Infrastructure Group LLC,
7.00%, 6/30/40 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,399,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,311,176 |
|
Utah 0.2% |
|
Utah State Charter School Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Mountainville Academy,
4.00%, 4/15/42 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
605,082 |
|
Vermont 1.1% |
|
University of Vermont & State Agricultural College, Refunding RB, 4.00%, 10/01/37 |
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
1,905,626 |
|
Vermont Student Assistance Corp., RB, AMT, Series A, 4.25%, 6/15/32 |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
943,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,849,500 |
|
Virginia 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ballston Quarter Community Development Authority, Tax Allocation Bonds, Series A, 5.38%, 3/01/36 |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
757,614 |
|
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, RB, Senior Lien, Elizabeth River Crossings OpCo LLC Project, AMT,
6.00%, 1/01/37 |
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
|
1,616,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,374,187 |
|
West Virginia 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Berkeley West Virginia Public Service Sewer District, Refunding RB, Series B (BAM): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/01/36 |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
682,244 |
|
3.38%, 6/01/46 |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
834,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,516,371 |
|
Wisconsin 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Finance Authority, Refunding RB, National Gypsum Co., AMT, 4.00%, 8/01/35 |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
412,719 |
|
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc., 4.00%, 12/01/46 |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
963,280 |
|
The Monroe Clinic, Inc., 3.00%, 2/15/35 |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
822,085 |
|
The Monroe Clinic, Inc., 4.00%, 2/15/38 |
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
1,244,686 |
|
WPPI Energy Power Supply Systems, Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/37 |
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
1,476,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,918,804 |
|
Total Municipal Bonds 135.2% |
|
|
|
357,608,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts (h) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado 2.1% |
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, RB, Catholic Health, Series C-7 (AGM), 5.00%, 5/01/18 (b) |
|
|
5,250 |
|
|
|
5,466,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts (h) |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
Connecticut 1.6% |
|
Connecticut State Health & Educational Facility Authority, Refunding RB, Trinity
Health Credit Group, 5.00%, 12/01/45 |
|
$
|
3,902 |
|
|
$
|
4,350,667 |
|
Georgia 2.6% |
|
City of Atlanta Georgia Water & Wastewater Revenue, Refunding RB, 5.00%,
11/01/43 |
|
|
5,997 |
|
|
|
6,826,920 |
|
Minnesota 2.1% |
|
State of Minnesota, RB, Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/38 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,617,948 |
|
New Jersey 1.1% |
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, RB, Transportation System, Series B,
5.25%, 6/15/36 (i) |
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
2,926,483 |
|
New York 8.0% |
|
City of New York New York, GO, Fiscal 2015, Series B, 4.00%, 8/01/32 |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
1,716,560 |
|
City of New York New York Municipal Water Finance Authority, RB, Water & Sewer System, Fiscal 2009, Series
A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75%, 6/15/18 (b) |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
167,370 |
|
5.75%, 6/15/40 |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
559,758 |
|
City of New York New York Municipal Water Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Water & Sewer System, 2nd General
Resolution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2013, Series CC, 5.00%, 6/15/47 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
4,433,341 |
|
Series FF-2, 5.50%, 6/15/40 |
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
882,179 |
|
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., RB, Fiscal 2012, Series A, 5.75%, 2/15/47 (i) |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
1,988,502 |
|
New York Liberty Development Corp., RB, 1 World Trade Center Port Authority Consolidated Bonds, 5.25%, 12/15/43 |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
5,077,554 |
|
State of New York Dormitory Authority, RB, New York University, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/18 (b) |
|
|
3,359 |
|
|
|
3,518,794 |
|
State of New York Thruway Authority, Refunding RB, Transportation, Personal Income Tax, Series A,
5.00%, 3/15/31 |
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
2,687,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,031,060 |
|
Ohio 1.7% |
|
County of Montgomery Ohio, RB, Catholic Health, Series C-1 (AGM), 5.00%, 4/28/18
(b) |
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
|
1,810,696 |
|
Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission, RB, Cleveland Clinic Health, Series A, 5.25%, 1/01/33 |
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
2,667,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,477,828 |
|
Texas 1.0% |
|
City of San Antonio Texas Public Service Board, RB, Electric & Gas Systems, Junior
Lien, 5.00%, 2/01/43 |
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
|
2,661,935 |
|
Total Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts 20.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,359,508 |
|
Total Long-Term Investments (Cost $386,861,963) 155.4% |
|
|
|
410,968,000 |
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
|
BlackRock Investment Quality Municipal Trust, Inc. (BKN) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Class, 0.70% (j)(k) |
|
|
6,238,321 |
|
|
$
|
6,239,569 |
|
Total Short-Term Securities (Cost $6,239,569) 2.3% |
|
|
|
6,239,569 |
|
Total Investments (Cost $393,101,532) 157.7% |
|
|
|
417,207,569 |
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities 1.6% |
|
|
|
4,106,205 |
|
Liability for TOB Trust Certificates, Including Interest Expense and Fees Payable
(11.7)% |
|
|
|
(30,863,018 |
) |
VMTP Shares at Liquidation Value (47.6)% |
|
|
|
(125,900,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0% |
|
|
$ |
264,550,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Schedule of Investments |
(a) |
|
Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from
registration to qualified institutional investors. |
(b) |
|
U.S. Government securities, held in escrow, are used to pay interest on this security, as well as to retire the bond in full at the date indicated, typically at a premium
to par. |
(c) |
|
Step-up bond that pays an initial coupon rate for the first period and then a higher coupon rate for the following periods. Rate as
of period end. |
(e) |
|
Security is collateralized by municipal bonds or U.S. Treasury obligations. |
(f) |
|
Issuer filed for bankruptcy and/or is in default. |
(g) |
|
Non-income producing security. |
(h) |
|
Represent bonds transferred to a TOB Trust in exchange of cash and residual certificates received by the Trust. These bonds serve as collateral in a secured borrowing. See
Note 4 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details. |
(i) |
|
All or a portion of security is subject to a recourse agreement. The aggregate maximum potential amount the Trust could ultimately be required to pay under the agreements,
which expire between February 15, 2019 to June 15, 2019, is $3,148,884. See Note 4 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details. |
(j) |
|
During the year ended April 30, 2017, investments in issuers considered to be an affiliate of the Trust for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act
of 1940, as amended, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate |
|
Shares Held at April 30, 2016 |
|
|
Net Activity |
|
|
Shares Held at April 30, 2017 |
|
|
Value at April 30, 2017 |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Net Realized Gain1 |
|
|
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
|
BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Class |
|
|
1,080,099 |
|
|
|
5,158,222 |
|
|
|
6,238,321 |
|
|
$ |
6,239,569 |
|
|
$ |
19,430 |
|
|
$ |
4,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 Includes net capital gain
distributions. |
|
(k) |
Current yield as of period end. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments Outstanding as of Period
End |
Futures Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts Short |
|
|
Issue |
|
Expiration |
|
Notional Value |
|
|
Unrealized Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
5-Year U.S. Treasury Note |
|
June 2017 |
|
|
$ 2,841,750 |
|
|
$ |
(13,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
10-Year U.S. Treasury Note |
|
June 2017 |
|
|
$12,446,156 |
|
|
|
(100,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
Long U.S. Treasury Bond |
|
June 2017 |
|
|
$19,732,969 |
|
|
|
(243,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
Ultra U.S. Treasury Bond |
|
June 2017 |
|
|
$ 3,258,750 |
|
|
|
(41,516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(398,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
21 |
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (concluded) |
|
BlackRock Investment Quality Municipal Trust, Inc. (BKN) |
|
Derivative Financial Instruments Categorized by Risk
Exposure |
As of period end, the fair values of derivative financial instruments located in the Statements of
Assets and Liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
Commodity Contracts |
|
|
Credit Contracts |
|
|
Equity Contracts |
|
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
|
|
Interest Rate Contracts |
|
|
Other Contracts |
|
|
Total |
|
Futures Contracts |
|
Net unrealized depreciation1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
398,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
398,175 |
|
1 Includes cumulative
appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts, if any, as reported in the Schedule of Investments. Only current days variation margin is reported within the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. |
|
For the year ended April 30, 2017, the effect of derivative financial instruments in the Statements of
Operations was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized Gain (Loss) from: |
|
Commodity Contracts |
|
|
Credit Contracts |
|
|
Equity Contracts |
|
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
|
|
Interest Rate Contracts |
|
|
Other Contracts |
|
|
Total |
|
Futures contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,497,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,497,686 |
|
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(549,401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(549,401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Quarterly Balances of Outstanding Derivative Financial
Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures contracts: |
|
|
|
|
Average notional value of contracts long |
|
$ |
241,875 |
1 |
Average notional value of contracts short |
|
$ |
29,722,090 |
|
1 Actual amounts for
the period are shown due to limited outstanding derivative financial instruments as of each quarter. |
|
For more information about the Trusts investment risks regarding derivative financial instruments,
refer to the Notes to Financial Statements.
|
|
|
Fair Value Hierarchy as of Period End |
|
|
Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments. For information about the
Trusts policy regarding valuation of investments and derivative financial instruments, refer to the Notes to Financial Statements.
The following tables summarize the Trusts investments and derivative financial instruments categorized in the disclosure hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Investments1 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
410,968,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
410,968,000 |
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
$ |
6,239,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,239,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,239,569 |
|
|
$ |
410,968,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
417,207,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
(398,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(398,175 |
) |
1 See above Schedule
of Investments for values in each state or political subdivision. |
|
2 Derivative
financial instruments are futures contracts which are valued at the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the instrument. |
|
The Trust may hold assets and/or liabilities in which the
fair value approximates the carrying amount for financial statement purposes. As of period end, such assets and/or liabilities are categorized within the disclosure hierarchy as follows: |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOB Trust Certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(30,783,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(30,783,015 |
) |
VMTP Shares at Liquidation Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125,900,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125,900,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(156,683,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(156,683,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended April 30, 2017, there were no transfers between levels.
See Notes to Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments April 30, 2017 |
|
BlackRock Long-Term Municipal Advantage Trust
(BTA)
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
Alabama 1.9% |
|
County of Jefferson Alabama, RB, Limited Obligation School, Series A, 5.25%, 1/01/19 |
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
$ |
516,736 |
|
County of Jefferson Alabama Sewer, Refunding RB, Sub-Lien, Series D, 6.00%,
10/01/42 |
|
|
1,655 |
|
|
|
1,893,303 |
|
UAB Medicine Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Series B-2, 4.00%, 9/01/47
(a) |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
681,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,091,100 |
|
Arizona 2.8% |
|
Arizona IDA, Refunding RB, Basis Schools, Inc. Projects, Series A, 5.38%, 7/01/50 (b) |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
947,885 |
|
Arizona Industrial Development Authority, Refunding RB, Basis Schools, Inc. Projects, Series A,
5.13%, 7/01/37 (b) |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
367,772 |
|
City of Phoenix Arizona IDA, RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility, Eagle College Preparatory Project, 5.00%, 7/01/33 |
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
881,014 |
|
Legacy Traditional Schools Projects, 5.00%, 7/01/46 (b) |
|
|
1,255 |
|
|
|
1,258,803 |
|
City of Phoenix Arizona IDA, Refunding RB, Basis Schools, Inc. Projects, Series A (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/01/35 |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
126,750 |
|
5.00%, 7/01/46 |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
135,710 |
|
Salt Verde Financial Corp., RB, Senior, 5.00%, 12/01/37 |
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
846,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,564,118 |
|
California 13.3% |
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Joseph Health System, Series A, 5.75%, 7/01/39 |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
416,166 |
|
Sutter Health, Series B, 6.00%, 8/15/42 |
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
1,182,054 |
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, Series A, 6.00%, 7/01/19 (c) |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
752,957 |
|
Kaiser Permanente, Sub-Series A-2,
5.00%, 11/01/47 (a) |
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
1,324,679 |
|
California Municipal Finance Authority, RB, Senior, Caritas Affordable Housing, Inc. Projects, S/F Housing, Series
A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 8/15/39 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
76,551 |
|
5.25%, 8/15/49 |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
190,215 |
|
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, RB, Baverly Community Hospital Association,
5.00%, 11/01/48 (a) |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
367,184 |
|
City & County of San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, Tax Allocation Bonds, Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project, 0.00%,
8/01/31 (b)(d) |
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
567,833 |
|
City of Los Angeles California Department of Airports, Refunding ARB, Los Angeles International Airport,
Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior, 5.00%, 5/15/40 |
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
|
2,256,330 |
|
5.25%, 5/15/39 |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
291,616 |
|
City of San Francisco California Public Utilities Commission Water Revenue, RB, Series B,
5.00%, 11/01/19 (c) |
|
|
3,225 |
|
|
|
3,538,663 |
|
City of Stockton California Public Financing Authority, RB, Delta Water Supply Project, Series A,
6.25%, 10/01/38 |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
199,741 |
|
County of Los Angeles California Tobacco Securitization Agency, RB, Asset-Backed, Los Angeles County Securitization
Corp., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.60%, 6/01/36 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,034,540 |
|
5.70%, 6/01/46 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,001,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
California (continued) |
|
San Marcos Unified School District, GO, CAB, SAN, Election of 2010, Series B, 0.00%, 8/01/38 (d) |
|
$
|
3,725 |
|
|
$
|
1,529,932 |
|
State of California, GO, Various Purposes, 6.50%, 4/01/33 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,207,680 |
|
State of California Public Works Board, LRB, Various Capital Projects: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series I, 5.00%, 11/01/38 |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
398,033 |
|
Sub-Series I-1, 6.38%, 11/01/19 (c) |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
452,484 |
|
Tobacco Securitization Authority of Southern California, Refunding RB, Tobacco Settlement, Asset-Backed, Senior Series A-1: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/01/37 |
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
|
2,139,936 |
|
5.13%, 6/01/46 |
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
1,004,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,932,884 |
|
Colorado 6.1% |
|
Centerra Metropolitan District No. 1, Tax Allocation Bonds, 5.00%, 12/01/47 |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
274,986 |
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunny Vista Living Center Project, 6.13%, 12/01/45 (b) |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
166,542 |
|
Sunny Vista Living Center Project, 6.25%, 12/01/50 (b) |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
544,211 |
|
Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health System, 5.00%, 1/01/40 |
|
|
3,940 |
|
|
|
4,206,935 |
|
Denver Convention Center Hotel Authority, Refunding RB, 5.00%, 12/01/40 |
|
|
2,420 |
|
|
|
2,651,522 |
|
North Range Metropolitan District No. 2, GO, Limited Tax, 5.50%, 12/15/37 |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,199,940 |
|
Table Mountain Metropolitan District, GO, Series A, 5.25%, 12/01/45 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,011,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,055,316 |
|
Connecticut 0.5% |
|
Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut, Refunding RB, Public Improvement, Priority
Distribution, Series C, 6.25%, 2/01/30 (b) |
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
911,196 |
|
Delaware 1.9% |
|
County of Sussex Delaware, RB, NRG Energy, Inc., Indian River Power LLC Project, 6.00%, 10/01/40 |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
806,753 |
|
State of Delaware EDA, RB, Exempt Facilities, Indian River Power LLC Project, 5.38%, 10/01/45 |
|
|
2,240 |
|
|
|
2,325,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,132,007 |
|
District of Columbia 1.4% |
|
District of Columbia, Refunding RB, Kipp Charter School, Series A, 6.00%, 7/01/43 |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
299,070 |
|
District of Columbia, Tax Allocation Bonds, City Market at O Street Project, 5.13%, 6/01/41 |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
830,498 |
|
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, Refunding RB, Dulles Toll Road, 1st Senior Lien, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 10/01/39 |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
182,544 |
|
5.25%, 10/01/44 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,077,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,389,892 |
|
Florida 3.7% |
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida Water & Sewer System Revenue, RB, Water & Sewer System,
5.00%, 10/01/34 |
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
2,157,363 |
|
Lakewood Ranch Stewardship District, Special Assessment Bonds, Village of Lakewood Ranch Sector Projects: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00%, 5/01/21 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100,885 |
|
4.25%, 5/01/26 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
99,556 |
|
5.13%, 5/01/46 |
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
415,444 |
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
23 |
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
|
BlackRock Long-Term Municipal Advantage Trust
(BTA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
Florida (continued) |
|
Mid-Bay Bridge Authority, RB, Springing Lien, Series A, 7.25%, 10/01/21 (c) |
|
$
|
1,080 |
|
|
$
|
1,344,093 |
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Refunding, Special Assessment Bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible CAB, Series A2, 6.61%, 5/01/39 |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
88,206 |
|
Convertible CAB, Series A3, 0.00%, 5/01/40 (e) |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
134,048 |
|
Convertible CAB, Series A4, 0.00%, 5/01/40 (e) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
52,862 |
|
Series 2, 0.00%, 5/01/40 (e) |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
160,437 |
|
Series A1, 6.65%, 5/01/40 |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
340,020 |
|
Tolomato Community Development District: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series 1, 0.00%, 5/01/40 (e) |
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
310,035 |
|
Series 1, 6.65%, 5/01/40 (f)(g) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15,075 |
|
Series 3, 6.61%, 5/01/40 (f)(g) |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Series 3, 6.65%, 5/01/40 (f)(g) |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Village Community Development District No.10, Special Assessment Bonds, 5.13%, 5/01/43 |
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
864,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,082,268 |
|
Georgia 0.2% |
|
County of Gainesville Georgia & Hall Hospital Authority, Refunding RB, Northeast
Georgia Health System, Inc. Project, Series A, 5.50%, 8/15/54 |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
279,238 |
|
Guam 0.8% |
|
Guam Government Waterworks Authority, RB, Water & Wastewater System, 5.50%, 7/01/43 |
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
1,167,443 |
|
Territory of Guam, GO, Series A, 6.00%, 11/15/19 |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
132,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,299,664 |
|
Illinois 9.9% |
|
City of Chicago Illinois, GO, Refunding, Series A, 6.00%, 1/01/38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 1/01/38 |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
622,031 |
|
Project, 5.25%, 1/01/32 |
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
1,075,656 |
|
City of Chicago Illinois OHare International Airport, GARB, 3rd Lien, Series A, 5.75%, 1/01/39 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,817,250 |
|
City of Chicago Illinois Transit Authority, RB, Sales Tax Receipts, 5.25%, 12/01/40 |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
383,980 |
|
City of Chicago Illinois Waterworks, Refunding RB, 2nd Lien Project, 5.00%, 11/01/42 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,060,150 |
|
County of Cook Illinois Community College District No. 508, GO, City College of Chicago, 5.50%, 12/01/38 |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
372,012 |
|
Illinois Finance Authority, RB, Advocate Health Care Network: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.38%, 4/01/19 (c) |
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
939,774 |
|
5.38%, 4/01/44 |
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
1,027,903 |
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Dupage Health, Series B, 5.50%, 11/01/39 |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
602,673 |
|
Presence Health Network, Series C, 5.00%, 2/15/41 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,572,120 |
|
Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, RB, Series A, 5.00%, 1/01/38 |
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
899,442 |
|
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, Refunding RB, McCormick Place Expansion Project: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B-2, 5.25%, 6/15/50 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,011,430 |
|
Series B (AGM), 5.00%, 6/15/50 |
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
1,865,108 |
|
Series B-2, 5.00%, 6/15/50 |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
625,319 |
|
State of Illinois, GO, 5.00%, 2/01/39 |
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
743,964 |
|
State of Illinois, RB, Build Illinois, Series B, 5.25%, 6/15/19 (c) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
233,864 |
|
University of Illinois, RB, Auxiliary Facilities System, Series A, 5.00%, 4/01/44 |
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
512,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,365,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
Indiana 6.2% |
|
City of Valparaiso Indiana, RB, Exempt Facilities, Pratt Paper LLC Project, AMT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.75%, 1/01/34 |
|
$
|
365 |
|
|
$
|
431,828 |
|
7.00%, 1/01/44 |
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
1,057,141 |
|
City of Vincennes Indiana, Refunding RB, Southwest Indiana Regional Youth Village Project, 6.25%, 1/01/29 (b) |
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
1,103,429 |
|
County of Allen Indiana, RB, StoryPoint Fort Wayne Project, Series A-1 (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.63%, 1/15/34 |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
137,830 |
|
6.75%, 1/15/43 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
204,182 |
|
6.88%, 1/15/52 |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
418,553 |
|
Indiana Finance Authority, RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CWA Authority Project, 1st Lien, 5.25%, 10/01/38 |
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
1,451,253 |
|
Private Activity Bond, Ohio River Bridges East End Crossing Project, AMT, 5.00%, 7/01/44 |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
169,883 |
|
Private Activity Bond, Ohio River Bridges East End Crossing Project, AMT, 5.00%, 7/01/48 |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
552,120 |
|
Private Activity Bond, Ohio River Bridges East End Crossing Project, AMT, 5.25%, 1/01/51 |
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
2,354,469 |
|
Sisters of St. Francis Health Services, 5.25%, 11/01/39 |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
311,765 |
|
Indiana Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Parkview Health System, Series A, 5.75%, 5/01/31 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
646,044 |
|
Indiana Municipal Power Agency, RB, Series B, 6.00%, 1/01/19 (c) |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
378,868 |
|
Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, RB, Series A, 5.00%, 1/15/40 |
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
495,597 |
|
Town of Chesterton Indiana, RB, StoryPoint Chesterton Project, Series A-1,
6.38%, 1/15/51 (b) |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
557,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,270,044 |
|
Iowa 1.3% |
|
Iowa Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Midwestern Disaster Area, Iowa Fertilizer Co. Project: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 12/01/22 |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
844,002 |
|
5.25%, 12/01/25 |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
667,511 |
|
Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp., Refunding RB, Student Loan, Senior Series A-1, AMT,
5.15%, 12/01/22 |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
593,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,104,519 |
|
Kentucky 0.6% |
|
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, RB, Catholic Health Initiatives, Series A, 5.25%, 1/01/45 |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
467,192 |
|
Kentucky Public Transportation Infrastructure Authority, RB, Downtown Crossing Project, Convertible CAB, 1st Tier, Series C,
0.00%, 7/01/43 (e) |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
468,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
935,244 |
|
Louisiana 4.0% |
|
Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority, RB, Westlake Chemical Corp.
Project: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.75%, 11/01/32 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,043,840 |
|
Series A-1, 6.50%, 11/01/35 |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
1,292,935 |
|
Parish of St. John the Baptist Louisiana, RB, Marathon Oil Corp., Series A, 5.13%, 6/01/37 |
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
606,494 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Refunding RB, Asset-Backed, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 5/15/30 |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
374,336 |
|
5.25%, 5/15/31 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
322,224 |
|
5.25%, 5/15/32 |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
412,714 |
|
5.25%, 5/15/33 |
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
448,727 |
|
5.25%, 5/15/35 |
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
1,027,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,529,081 |
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
|
BlackRock Long-Term Municipal Advantage Trust
(BTA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
Maine 0.6% |
|
Maine Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, RB, Maine General Medical
Center, 6.75%, 7/01/41 |
|
$
|
970 |
|
|
$
|
1,050,849 |
|
Maryland 1.0% |
|
Maryland EDC, RB, Transportation Facilities Project, Series A, 5.75%, 6/01/35 |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
1,041,489 |
|
Maryland EDC, Refunding RB, CNX Marine Terminals, Inc., 5.75%, 9/01/25 |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
645,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,686,799 |
|
Massachusetts 7.1% |
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emerson College Issue, Series A, 5.00%, 1/01/47 |
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
928,387 |
|
Boston Medical Center, Series D, 5.00%, 7/01/44 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,172,950 |
|
North Hill Communities Issue, Series A, 6.50%, 11/15/43 (b) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,050,240 |
|
Seven Hills Foundation and Affiliates, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/45 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,057,020 |
|
UMass Boston Student Housing Project, 5.00%, 10/01/48 |
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
1,004,828 |
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emmanuel College Issue, Series A, 5.00%, 10/01/35 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
546,315 |
|
Suffolk University, 4.00%, 7/01/39 |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
157,907 |
|
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, Refunding RB, AMT, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50%, 12/01/47 |
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
2,168,626 |
|
4.45%, 12/01/42 |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
653,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,739,471 |
|
Michigan 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Detroit Michigan Sewage Disposal System, Refunding RB, Senior Lien, Series A, 5.25%, 7/01/39 |
|
|
1,970 |
|
|
|
2,125,019 |
|
Michigan Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Detroit Water & Sewage Department Project, Senior Lien, Series C-1, 5.00%, 7/01/44 |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
435,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,560,488 |
|
Minnesota 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Brooklyn Park Minnesota, RB, Athlos Leadership Academy Project, Series A, 5.75%, 7/01/46 |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
178,749 |
|
City of Ham Lake Minnesota, RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
215,206 |
|
5.00%, 7/01/47 |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
645,483 |
|
Housing & Redevelopment Authority of The City of State Paul Minnesota, Refunding RB, Hmong College Academy Project, Series
A, 5.50%, 9/01/36 |
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
694,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,734,393 |
|
Missouri 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District, Refunding RB,
Combined Lien, Series A, 5.00%, 10/01/44 |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
93,719 |
|
State of Missouri Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, St. Louis College of Pharmacy Project, 5.50%,
5/01/43 |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
124,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,170 |
|
Nebraska 0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Plains Energy Project Nebraska, RB, Gas Project No. 3,
5.25%, 9/01/37 |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
310,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
New Jersey 6.9% |
|
Casino Reinvestment Development Authority, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 11/01/22 |
|
$
|
2,035 |
|
|
$
|
2,205,248 |
|
5.25%, 11/01/39 |
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
478,805 |
|
5.25%, 11/01/44 |
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
1,163,561 |
|
County of Essex New Jersey Improvement Authority, RB, AMT, 5.25%, 7/01/45 (b) |
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
505,399 |
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, Continental Airlines, Inc. Project, AMT, 5.13%, 9/15/23 |
|
|
1,410 |
|
|
|
1,502,355 |
|
New Jersey EDA, Refunding RB, Series BBB, 5.50%, 6/15/31 |
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
1,307,969 |
|
New Jersey EDA, Refunding, Special Assessment Bonds, Kapkowski Road Landfill Project, 5.75%, 4/01/31 |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
865,031 |
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, Refunding RB, St. Josephs Healthcare System Obligated Group, 5.00%,
7/01/41 |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
804,105 |
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation Program, Series AA, 5.00%, 6/15/44 |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
830,440 |
|
Transportation System, Series B, 5.25%, 6/15/36 |
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
864,443 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. New Jersey, Refunding RB, Series 1A, 5.00%, 6/01/41 |
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
777,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,304,461 |
|
New York 30.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of New York New York Water & Sewer System, Refunding RB, 2nd General Resolution, Series HH,
5.00%, 6/15/31 |
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
3,191,193 |
|
Counties of New York Tobacco Trust IV, Refunding RB, Settlement Pass-Through Turbo, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 6/01/41 (b) |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
935,937 |
|
5.00%, 6/01/42 |
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
1,422,330 |
|
5.00%, 6/01/45 |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
527,910 |
|
County of Dutchess New York Industrial Development Agency, Refunding RB, Bard College Civic Facility,
Series A-1, 5.00%, 8/01/46 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,244,205 |
|
County of Nassau New York Tobacco Settlement Corp., Refunding RB, Asset-Backed, Series A-3,
5.13%, 6/01/46 |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
529,546 |
|
Erie Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., Refunding RB, Asset-Backed, Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/45 |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
884,802 |
|
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., RB, Series A, 5.75%, 2/15/47 |
|
|
6,510 |
|
|
|
7,397,899 |
|
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, RB, Series B: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 11/15/38 |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
1,292,400 |
|
5.25%, 11/15/39 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
457,328 |
|
New York Liberty Development Corp., RB, 1 World Trade Center Port Authority Consolidated, 5.25%, 12/15/43 |
|
|
6,140 |
|
|
|
6,928,253 |
|
New York Liberty Development Corp., Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Priority, Bank of America Tower at One Bryant Park Project, Class 3, 6.38%, 7/15/49 |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
456,485 |
|
3 World Trade Center Project, Class 1, 5.00%, 11/15/44 (b) |
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
2,499,197 |
|
3 World Trade Center Project, Class 2, 5.15%, 11/15/34 (b) |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
171,936 |
|
3 World Trade Center Project, Class 2, 5.38%, 11/15/40 (b) |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
426,600 |
|
4 World Trade Center Project, 5.75%, 11/15/51 |
|
|
2,220 |
|
|
|
2,527,248 |
|
New York Transportation Development Corp., RB, LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevelopment Project, Series A, AMT,
5.25%, 1/01/50 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,083,660 |
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
APRIL 30, 2017 |
|
25 |
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
|
BlackRock Long-Term Municipal Advantage Trust
(BTA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
New York (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York Transportation Development Corp., Refunding RB, American Airlines, Inc., AMT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/01/20 |
|
$
|
250 |
|
|
$
|
269,220 |
|
5.00%, 8/01/26 |
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
1,339,120 |
|
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, ARB, Special Project, JFK International Air Terminal LLC Project, Series 8, 6.00%,
12/01/42 |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
819,629 |
|
State of New York Dormitory Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 5.25%, 7/01/18 (c) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,050,230 |
|
Series B, 5.75%, 3/15/36 |
|
|
11,250 |
|
|
|
12,216,488 |
|
State of New York Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB, Orange Regional Medical Center, 5.00%, 12/01/33 (b) |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
496,410 |
|
Westchester Tobacco Asset Securitization, Refunding RB, Tobacco Settlement Bonds,
Sub-Series C, 4.00%, 6/01/42 |
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
|
1,765,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,933,781 |
|
North Carolina 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, RB, Health Care Facilities, Duke University Health System, Series A,
5.00%, 6/01/19 (c) |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
519,134 |
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Refunding RB, 1st Mortgage, Retirement Facilities Whitestone Project, Series A,
7.75%, 3/01/41 |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
285,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
804,627 |
|
Ohio 4.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, RB, Asset-Backed, Series
A-2: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Turbo Term, 5.88%, 6/01/47 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|