UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
o Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the transition period from to .
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-51446
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
02-0636095 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
121 South 17th Street |
|
|
Mattoon, Illinois |
|
61938-3987 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(217) 235-3311
(Registrants Telephone Number, including Area Code)
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES o NO o
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer x |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each class of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date
Class |
|
Outstanding as of August 6, 2010 |
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value |
|
29,822,604 Shares |
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||
(In thousands except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net revenues |
|
$ |
95,737 |
|
$ |
102,042 |
|
$ |
194,039 |
|
$ |
203,752 |
|
Operating expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below) |
|
35,649 |
|
36,344 |
|
71,589 |
|
72,444 |
|
||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
21,390 |
|
25,850 |
|
44,193 |
|
53,727 |
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
21,460 |
|
20,981 |
|
43,002 |
|
42,658 |
|
||||
Operating income |
|
17,238 |
|
18,867 |
|
35,255 |
|
34,923 |
|
||||
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest income |
|
22 |
|
15 |
|
38 |
|
37 |
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
(13,069 |
) |
(14,564 |
) |
(25,990 |
) |
(29,056 |
) |
||||
Investment income |
|
7,136 |
|
6,761 |
|
13,438 |
|
11,809 |
|
||||
Other, net |
|
(516 |
) |
1,766 |
|
(452 |
) |
1,215 |
|
||||
Income before income taxes |
|
10,811 |
|
12,845 |
|
22,289 |
|
18,928 |
|
||||
Income tax expense |
|
3,638 |
|
5,186 |
|
8,064 |
|
7,572 |
|
||||
Net income |
|
7,173 |
|
7,659 |
|
14,225 |
|
11,356 |
|
||||
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
124 |
|
136 |
|
255 |
|
543 |
|
||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
7,049 |
|
$ |
7,523 |
|
$ |
13,970 |
|
$ |
10,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per common sharebasic |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per common sharediluted |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands except share and per share amounts) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
53,574 |
|
$ |
42,758 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,931 in 2010 and $1,796 in 2009 |
|
41,898 |
|
42,125 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
7,671 |
|
6,874 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
5,970 |
|
5,970 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
7,802 |
|
6,639 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
116,915 |
|
104,366 |
|
||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
365,195 |
|
377,200 |
|
||
Investments |
|
98,277 |
|
98,748 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
520,562 |
|
520,562 |
|
||
Customer lists, net |
|
91,019 |
|
102,088 |
|
||
Tradenames |
|
13,446 |
|
13,446 |
|
||
Deferred debt issuance costs, net and other assets |
|
5,838 |
|
6,633 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,211,252 |
|
$ |
1,223,043 |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
15,265 |
|
$ |
13,482 |
|
Advance billings and customer deposits |
|
21,797 |
|
20,025 |
|
||
Dividends payable |
|
11,553 |
|
11,476 |
|
||
Accrued expense |
|
17,249 |
|
26,268 |
|
||
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
344 |
|
||
Current portion of derivative liability |
|
3,308 |
|
6,074 |
|
||
Current portion of pension and postretirement benefit obligations |
|
2,908 |
|
2,908 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
72,080 |
|
80,577 |
|
||
Senior secured long-term debt |
|
880,000 |
|
880,000 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
74,095 |
|
74,711 |
|
||
Pension and other postretirement obligations |
|
81,972 |
|
80,298 |
|
||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
31,212 |
|
26,740 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
1,139,359 |
|
1,142,326 |
|
||
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 29,822,604 and 29,608,653, shares outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
298 |
|
296 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
101,733 |
|
109,746 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(36,608 |
) |
(35,540 |
) |
||
Noncontrolling interest |
|
6,470 |
|
6,215 |
|
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
71,893 |
|
80,717 |
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,211,252 |
|
$ |
1,223,043 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
Other |
|
Non- |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Paid in |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
controlling |
|
|
|
||||||||
(In thousands, except share amounts) |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Loss |
|
Interest |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance - December 31, 2009 |
|
29,608,653 |
|
$ |
296 |
|
$ |
109,746 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(35,540 |
) |
$ |
6,215 |
|
$ |
80,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
(4,626 |
) |
(6,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(11,546 |
) |
||||||
Shares issued under employee plan, net of forfeitures |
|
213,951 |
|
2 |
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Non-cash, stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503 |
|
||||||
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,920 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
7,051 |
|
||||||
Change in prior service cost and net loss, net of tax of $26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
||||||
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax of $54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,188 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance - March 31, 2010 |
|
29,822,604 |
|
$ |
298 |
|
$ |
105,621 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(35,403 |
) |
$ |
6,346 |
|
$ |
76,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
(4,504 |
) |
(7,049 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(11,553 |
) |
||||||
Non-cash, stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616 |
|
||||||
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,049 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
7,173 |
|
||||||
Change in prior service cost and net loss, net of tax of $26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
||||||
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax of $(722) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,253 |
) |
|
|
(1,253 |
) |
||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,968 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance - June 30, 2010 |
|
29,822,604 |
|
$ |
298 |
|
$ |
101,733 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(36,608 |
) |
$ |
6,470 |
|
$ |
71,893 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
Six Months ended June 30, |
|
||||
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
14,225 |
|
$ |
11,356 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
43,002 |
|
42,658 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
616 |
|
1,392 |
|
||
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
888 |
|
|
|
||
Cash distributions from wireless partnerships in excess of/(less than) current earnings |
|
177 |
|
(1,972 |
) |
||
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
1,119 |
|
932 |
|
||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
647 |
|
655 |
|
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
227 |
|
(1,137 |
) |
||
Inventories |
|
(797 |
) |
414 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
(1,015 |
) |
1,678 |
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
1,783 |
|
(1,546 |
) |
||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
(5,800 |
) |
(6,432 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
55,072 |
|
47,998 |
|
||
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Additions to property, plant and equipment, net |
|
(21,820 |
) |
(20,375 |
) |
||
Proceeds from the sale of assets |
|
972 |
|
300 |
|
||
Proceeds from the sale of investments |
|
35 |
|
|
|
||
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
(20,813 |
) |
(20,075 |
) |
||
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Payment of capital lease obligation |
|
(344 |
) |
(453 |
) |
||
Repurchase and retirement of common stock |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
||
Dividends on common stock |
|
(23,099 |
) |
(22,907 |
) |
||
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
(23,443 |
) |
(23,369 |
) |
||
Net increase in cash and equivalents |
|
10,816 |
|
4,554 |
|
||
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year |
|
42,758 |
|
15,471 |
|
||
Cash and equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
53,574 |
|
$ |
20,025 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Nature of Operations
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries, which are collectively referred to as Consolidated, the Company, we, our or us, unless the context otherwise requires. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
We have prepared the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented herewith reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal and recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for an entire year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
As of June 30, 2010, the Companys Summary of Critical Accounting Policies for the year ended December 31, 2009, which are detailed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, have not changed.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements through the day the financial statements are issued.
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2010, we adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) updated guidance related to fair value measurements and disclosures, which requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of the Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and to describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition, in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, or Level 3, a reporting entity should disclose separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than one net number). The updated guidance also requires that an entity provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and non-recurring Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. The guidance was effective for interim or annual financial reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and
settlements in the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. Therefore, we have not yet adopted the guidance with respect to the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. We have updated our disclosures to comply with the updated guidance. Adoption of the updated guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
3. Prepaid and other current assets
Prepaid and other current assets are as follows:
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Prepaid maintenance |
|
$ |
2,532 |
|
$ |
3,152 |
|
Prepaid taxes |
|
1,012 |
|
43 |
|
||
Deferred charges |
|
1,178 |
|
718 |
|
||
Prepaid insurance |
|
622 |
|
471 |
|
||
Prepaid expense - other |
|
2,393 |
|
2,200 |
|
||
Other current assets |
|
65 |
|
55 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
7,802 |
|
$ |
6,639 |
|
4. Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are as follows:
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Land and buildings |
|
$ |
65,623 |
|
$ |
66,700 |
|
Network and outside plant facilities |
|
846,349 |
|
833,879 |
|
||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
80,123 |
|
80,315 |
|
||
Assets under capital lease |
|
5,144 |
|
5,144 |
|
||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
(646,052 |
) |
(617,141 |
) |
||
|
|
351,187 |
|
368,897 |
|
||
Construction in progress |
|
14,008 |
|
8,303 |
|
||
Totals |
|
$ |
365,195 |
|
$ |
377,200 |
|
Depreciation expense totaled $15.9 million and $15.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $31.9 million and $31.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
5. Investments
We own 2.34% of GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited Partnership (the Mobilnet South Partnership). The principal activity of the Mobilnet South Partnership is providing cellular service in the Houston, Galveston, and Beaumont, Texas metropolitan areas. We also own 3.60% of Pittsburgh SMSA Limited Partnership (Pittsburgh SMSA), which provides cellular service in and around the Pittsburgh metropolitan area. Because of our limited influence over these partnerships, we use the cost method to account for both of these investments. For each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $3.0 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $6.0 million and $5.5 million, respectively.
We also own 17.02% of GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17 Limited Partnership (RSA #17), 16.6725% of Pennsylvania RSA 6(I) Limited Partnership (RSA 6(I)), and 23.67% of Pennsylvania RSA 6(II) Limited Partnership (RSA 6(II)). RSA #17 provides cellular service to a limited rural area in Texas. RSA 6(I) and RSA 6(II) provide cellular service in and around our Pennsylvania service territory. In addition, we have a 50% ownership interest in Boulevard Communications LLP, a competitive access provider in western Pennsylvania. Because we have significant influence over the operating and financial policies of these four entities, we account for the investments using the equity method. For the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $3.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $7.5 million and $4.2 million, respectively.
Our investments are as follows:
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies |
|
$ |
1,415 |
|
$ |
1,797 |
|
Cost method investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited Partnership (2.34%) |
|
21,450 |
|
21,450 |
|
||
Pittsburgh SMSA Limited Partnership (3.60%) |
|
22,950 |
|
22,950 |
|
||
CoBank, ACB Stock |
|
3,025 |
|
2,902 |
|
||
Other |
|
25 |
|
60 |
|
||
Equity method investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17 Limited Partnership (17.02% interest) |
|
18,984 |
|
19,080 |
|
||
Pennsylvania RSA 6(I) Limited Partnership (16.6725% interest) |
|
7,187 |
|
7,301 |
|
||
Pennsylvania RSA 6(II) Limited Partnership (23.67% interest) |
|
23,084 |
|
23,049 |
|
||
Boulevard Communications, LLP (50% interest) |
|
157 |
|
159 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
98,277 |
|
$ |
98,748 |
|
CoBank is a cooperative bank owned by its customers. Annually, CoBank distributes patronage in the form of cash and stock in the cooperative based on the Companys outstanding loan balance with CoBank, who has traditionally been a significant lender in the Companys credit facility. The investment in CoBank represents the accumulation of the equity patronage paid by CoBank to the Company.
6. Fair Value Measurements
The Companys derivative instruments related to interest rate swap agreements are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values of the interest rate swaps are determined using an internal valuation model which relies on the expected LIBOR-based yield curve and estimates of counterparty and Consolidateds non-performance risk as the most significant inputs. Because each of these inputs are directly observable or can be corroborated by observable market data, we have categorized these interest rate swaps as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
The Companys swap liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to disclosure requirements at June 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Current interest rate swap liabilities |
|
$ |
(3,308 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(3,308 |
) |
$ |
|
|
Long-term interest rate swap liabilities |
|
(30,623 |
) |
|
|
(30,623 |
) |
|
|
||||
Totals |
|
$ |
(33,931 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(33,931 |
) |
$ |
|
|
The change in the fair value of the derivatives is primarily a result of a change in market expectations for future interest rates.
We have not elected the fair value option for any of our financial assets or liabilities. The carrying value of other financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities or variable-rate nature of the respective balances. The following table presents the other financial instruments that are not carried at fair value but which require fair value disclosure as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
||||
Investments, equity basis |
|
$ |
49,412 |
|
|
(a) |
$ |
49,589 |
|
|
(a) |
||
Investments, at cost |
|
$ |
47,450 |
|
|
(a) |
$ |
47,362 |
|
|
(a) |
||
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
880,000 |
|
$ |
880,000 |
|
$ |
880,000 |
|
$ |
880,000 |
|
(a) The Companys investments at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 accounted for under both the equity and cost methods consist of minority positions in various cellular telephone limited partnerships. These investments are recorded using either the equity or cost methods, and it is not practical to estimate a fair value for these non-publicly traded entities.
Our long-term debt allows us to select a one month LIBOR repricing option, which we have elected. As such, the fair value of this debt approximates its carrying value.
7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, goodwill and tradenames are not amortized but are subject to impairment testingno less than annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate potential impairment.
The following table presents the carrying amount of goodwill by segment:
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Telephone Operations |
|
$ |
519,541 |
|
$ |
519,541 |
|
Other Operations |
|
1,021 |
|
1,021 |
|
||
Totals |
|
$ |
520,562 |
|
$ |
520,562 |
|
Our most valuable tradename is the federally registered mark CONSOLIDATED, which is used in association with our telephone communication services and is a design of interlocking circles. The Companys corporate branding strategy leverages a CONSOLIDATED naming structure. All of the Companys business units and several of our products and services incorporate the CONSOLIDATED
name. These tradenames are indefinitely renewable intangibles. The carrying value of the tradenames was $13.4 million at both June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
The Companys customer lists consist of an established base of customers that subscribe to its services. The carrying amount of customer lists is as follows:
|
|
Telephone Operations |
|
Other Operations |
|
||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
193,124 |
|
$ |
193,124 |
|
$ |
11,712 |
|
$ |
11,712 |
|
Less: accumulated amortization |
|
(103,207 |
) |
(92,358 |
) |
(10,610 |
) |
(10,390 |
) |
||||
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
89,917 |
|
$ |
100,766 |
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
$ |
1,322 |
|
Amortization associated with customer lists totaled approximately $5.6 million and $11.1 million in each of the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
8. Deferred Debt Issuance Costs, Net and Other Assets
Deferred financing costs, net and other assets are as follows:
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred debt issuance costs, net |
|
$ |
5,817 |
|
$ |
6,464 |
|
Other assets |
|
21 |
|
169 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
5,838 |
|
$ |
6,633 |
|
Deferred debt issuance costs are subject to amortization. Remaining deferred debt issuance costs of $5.8 million at June 30, 2010 related to our secured credit facility will be amortized over the remaining life of 4.5 years, resulting in amortization expense of $1.3 million yearly unless the facility is extinguished earlier.
9. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses are as follows:
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
8,511 |
|
$ |
11,727 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
936 |
|
7,766 |
|
||
Accrued interest |
|
1,458 |
|
1,177 |
|
||
Other accrued expenses |
|
6,344 |
|
5,598 |
|
||
Total accrued expenses |
|
$ |
17,249 |
|
$ |
26,268 |
|
10. Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Senior secured credit facility revolving loan |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Senior secured credit facility - term loan |
|
880,000 |
|
880,000 |
|
||
Obligations under capital lease |
|
|
|
344 |
|
||
|
|
880,000 |
|
880,344 |
|
||
Less: current portion |
|
|
|
(344 |
) |
||
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
880,000 |
|
$ |
880,000 |
|
Credit Agreement
The Company, through certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries, has outstanding a credit agreement with several financial institutions, which consists of a $50 million revolving credit facility (including a $10 million sub-limit for letters of credit) and an $880 million term loan facility. Borrowings under the credit agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company with the exception of Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company. The term loan requires no principal reductions prior to maturity and thus matures in full on December 31, 2014. The revolving credit facility matures on December 31, 2013. There were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2010.
At our election, borrowings under the credit facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus either a base rate or LIBOR. As of June 30, 2010, the applicable margin for interest rates was 2.50% per year for the LIBOR-based term loans and 1.50% for alternative base rate loans. The applicable margin for our $880 million term loan is fixed for the duration of the loan. The applicable margin for borrowings on the revolving credit facility is determined via a pricing grid. Based on our leverage ratio of 4.73:1 at June 30, 2010, borrowings under the revolving credit facility will be priced at a margin of 2.50% for LIBOR-based borrowings and 1.50% for alternative base rate borrowings for the three month period ending September 30, 2010. The applicable borrowing margin for the revolving credit facility is adjusted quarterly to reflect the leverage ratio from the prior quarter-end.
The weighted-average interest rate incurred on our term loan facility during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, including amounts paid on our interest rate swap agreements and the applicable margin, was 5.61% and 6.27% per annum, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate incurred on our term loan facility during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, including amounts paid on our interest rate swap agreements and the applicable margin, was 5.59% and 6.29% per annum, respectively. Interest is payable at least quarterly.
The credit agreement contains various provisions and covenants including, among other items, restrictions on the ability to pay dividends, incur additional indebtedness, issue capital stock, and commit to future capital expenditures. We have agreed to maintain certain financial ratios, including interest coverage, and total net leverage ratios, all as defined in the credit agreement. As of June 30, 2010, we were in compliance with our credit agreement covenants.
11. Derivatives
In order to manage the risk associated with changes in interest rates, we have entered into interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis, thereby reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future cash interest payments. We account for these transactions as cash flow hedges under the FASBs Accounting Standards Codification Topic 815 (ASC 815), Derivatives and Hedging. The swaps are designated as cash flow
hedges of our expected future interest payments. In a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in the fair value of the hedging derivative is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and is subsequently reclassified into earnings during the same period in which the hedged item affects earnings. The change in fair value of any ineffective portion of the hedging derivative is recognized immediately in earnings.
We currently have in place interest rate swap agreements whereby we receive 3-month LIBOR-based interest payments from the swap counterparties and pay a fixed rate. We also have interest rate swap agreements whereby we make 3-month LIBOR-based payments, less a fixed percentage to a counterparty and receive 1-month LIBOR. The combination effectively hedges the interest payments based on 1-month LIBOR resets on a portion of our credit facility. The net effect of these swaps is that we pay a weighted-average fixed rate of 4.42% to our swap counterparties on $605 million of notional amount and receive 1-month LIBOR less a fixed percentage, which amounted to 0.06% for the second quarter of 2010. At both June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, interest on 68.75% of our outstanding debt was fixed through the use of interest rate swap agreements.
Our credit facility requires us to maintain a minimum floating to fixed ratio of no less than 50%. On December 31, 2010, $175 million notional amount of existing interest rate swap agreements will expire, which would reduce our floating to fixed ratio to less than 50%. As a result of this, and because interest rates continue to be near historic lows, we have entered into $200 million notional amount of forward floating to fixed interest rate swap agreements which become effective on December 31, 2010. Under these floating to fixed rate forward swap agreements, we will make fixed payments to the swap counterparties at a weighted-average fixed rate of 1.83% and receive 1-month LIBOR. These forward swap agreements have a maturity date of March 31, 2013.
The counterparties to our various swaps are 5 major U.S. and European banks. None of the swap agreements provide for either Consolidated or the counterparties to post collateral nor do the agreements include any covenants related to the financial condition of Consolidated or the counterparties. The swaps of any counterparty that is a Lender as defined in our credit facility are secured along with the other creditors under the credit facility. Each of the swap agreements provides that in the event of a bankruptcy filing by either Consolidated or the counterparty, any amounts owed between the two parties would be offset in order to determine the net amount due between parties. This provision allows us to partially mitigate the risk of non-performance by a counterparty.
We report the gross fair value of our derivatives in either Current portion of derivative liability or Other long-term liabilities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The table below shows the balance sheet classification and fair value of our interest rate swaps designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
|
|
Fair Value |
|
||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current portion of derivative liability |
|
$ |
(3,308 |
) |
$ |
(6,074 |
) |
Other long-term liabilities |
|
(30,623 |
) |
(26,105 |
) |
||
Information regarding our cash flow hedge transactions is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Gain arising from ineffectiveness included in interest expense |
|
$ |
(107 |
) |
$ |
(39 |
) |
$ |
(78 |
) |
$ |
(62 |
) |
Losses reclassed from accumulated other comprehensive loss (OCI) to interest expense |
|
$ |
1,334 |
|
$ |
3,025 |
|
$ |
2,916 |
|
$ |
5,880 |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
||||
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Aggregate notional value of derivatives outstanding |
|
$ |
605,000 |
|
$ |
740,000 |
|
Period through which derivative positions currently exist |
|
March 2013 |
|
March 2013 |
|
||
Loss in fair value of derivatives |
|
$ |
33,931 |
|
$ |
37,326 |
|
Deferred losses included in OCI (pretax) |
|
$ |
33,721 |
|
$ |
36,993 |
|
Losses included in OCI to be recognized in the next 12 months |
|
$ |
2,711 |
|
$ |
8,086 |
|
Number of months over which loss in OCI is to be recognized |
|
33 |
|
45 |
|
12. Interest Expense
The following table summarizes interest expense:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest expense credit facility |
|
$ |
6,229 |
|
$ |
6,492 |
|
$ |
12,249 |
|
$ |
12,994 |
|
Payments on swap liabilities, net |
|
6,217 |
|
7,497 |
|
12,463 |
|
14,852 |
|
||||
Other interest |
|
354 |
|
282 |
|
717 |
|
631 |
|
||||
Amortization of deferred financing fees |
|
323 |
|
323 |
|
646 |
|
647 |
|
||||
Capitalized interest |
|
(54 |
) |
(30 |
) |
(85 |
) |
(68 |
) |
||||
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
13,069 |
|
$ |
14,564 |
|
$ |
25,990 |
|
$ |
29,056 |
|
13. Retirement and Pension Plans
We have 401(k) plans covering substantially all of our employees. We recognized expense with respect to these plans of $0.6 million and $0.7 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively, and $1.3 and $1.4 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Contributions made under our defined contribution plans include a match, at the Companys discretion, of employee salaries contributed to the plans.
Qualified Retirement Plan
We sponsor a defined-benefit pension plan (Retirement Plan) that is non-contributory covering substantially all of our hourly employees who fulfill minimum age and service requirements. Certain salaried employees are also covered by the Retirement Plan, although these benefits have previously been frozen.
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost for the qualified retirement plan for the three and six month periods ended June 30:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
467 |
|
$ |
527 |
|
$ |
934 |
|
$ |
1,054 |
|
Interest cost |
|
2,784 |
|
2,775 |
|
5,568 |
|
5,550 |
|
||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(2,546 |
) |
(2,355 |
) |
(5,092 |
) |
(4,710 |
) |
||||
Net amortization loss |
|
189 |
|
668 |
|
378 |
|
1,336 |
|
||||
Prior service credit amortization |
|
(11 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(22 |
) |
(20 |
) |
||||
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
883 |
|
$ |
1,605 |
|
$ |
1,766 |
|
$ |
3,210 |
|
Non-qualified Pension Plan
The Company also has non-qualified supplemental pension plans (Restoration Plans), which we acquired as part of our North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (North Pittsburgh) and TXU Communications Venture Company (TXUCV) acquisitions. The Restoration Plans cover certain former employees of our North Pittsburgh and TXUCV operations. The Restoration Plans restore benefits that were precluded under the Retirement Plan by Internal Revenue Service limits on compensation and benefits applicable to qualified pension plans, and by the exclusion of bonus compensation from the Retirement Plans definition of earnings. The Restoration Plans are unfunded and have no assets, and benefits paid under the Restoration Plans come from the general operating funds of the Company.
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost for the Restoration Plans for the three and six months ended June 30:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
15 |
|
14 |
|
30 |
|
28 |
|
||||
Net amortization loss |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
16 |
|
16 |
|
||||
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
22 |
|
$ |
46 |
|
$ |
44 |
|
Other Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Agreements
We also are liable for deferred compensation agreements with former members of the board of directors and certain other former employees of a subsidiary of TXUCV, which was acquired in 2004. The benefits are payable for up to the life of the participant and may begin as early as age 65 or upon the death of the participant. Participants accrue no new benefits as these plans had previously been frozen by TXUCVs predecessor company prior to our acquisition of TXUCV. Payments related to the deferred compensation agreements totaled approximately $0.2 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and $0.3 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The net present value of the remaining obligations was approximately $3.0 million at June 30, 2010 and $3.1 million at December 31, 2009, and is included in pension and postretirement benefit obligations in the accompanying balance sheets.
We also maintain 40 life insurance policies on certain of the participating former directors and employees. We did not recognize any proceeds in other income for the three or six month periods ended June 30, 2010 or 2009 due to the receipt of life insurance proceeds. The excess of the cash surrender value of the remaining life insurance policies over the notes payable balances related to these
policies is determined by an independent consultant, and totaled $1.4 million at June 30, 2010 and $1.8 million at December 31, 2009. These amounts are included in investments in the accompanying balance sheets. Cash principal payments for the policies and any proceeds from the policies are classified as operating activities in the statements of cash flows.
14. Postretirement Benefit Obligation
We sponsor a healthcare plan and life insurance plan that provides postretirement medical benefits and life insurance to certain groups of retired employees. Retirees share in the cost of healthcare benefits, making contributions that are adjusted periodicallyeither based upon collective bargaining agreements or because total costs of the program have changed. We generally pay the covered expenses for retiree health benefits as they are incurred. Postretirement life insurance benefits are fully insured. Our postretirement plan is unfunded and has no assets, and the benefits paid under the postretirement plan come from the general operating funds of the Company.
The following table summarizes the components of the net periodic costs for postretirement benefits for the three and six months ended June 30:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
206 |
|
$ |
216 |
|
$ |
412 |
|
$ |
433 |
|
Interest cost |
|
530 |
|
580 |
|
1,060 |
|
1,159 |
|
||||
Net prior service cost amortization |
|
(112 |
) |
(241 |
) |
(224 |
) |
(482 |
) |
||||
Net amortization gain |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
||||
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost |
|
$ |
624 |
|
$ |
549 |
|
$ |
1,248 |
|
$ |
1,099 |
|
In March 2010, President Obama signed into law comprehensive health care reform legislation under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (the Acts). Based on our analyses to date, we do not currently believe the provisions within the Acts will result in a material remeasurement of our postretirement health care liabilities. We will continue to assess the accounting implications of the Acts as related regulations and interpretations of the Acts become available. The actual extent of impact cannot be actuarially determined until related regulations are promulgated under the Acts and additional interpretations of the Acts become available. Provisions within the Acts for which financial impacts to our postretirement health care liabilities are possible, but not currently determinable, include application of the excise tax on high-cost employer coverage. We do not expect the other provisions within the Acts to materially impact our postretirement health care liabilities or results of operations.
15. Stock-based Compensation Plans
Pretax stock-based compensation expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30 was as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Restricted stock |
|
$ |
339 |
|
$ |
275 |
|
$ |
677 |
|
$ |
551 |
|
Performance shares |
|
277 |
|
225 |
|
442 |
|
381 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
616 |
|
$ |
500 |
|
$ |
1,119 |
|
$ |
932 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.
As of June 30, 2010, we had not yet recognized compensation expense on the following non-vested awards.
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Non-recognized |
|
Average Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock |
|
$ |
2,410 |
|
1.6 |
|
Performance shares |
|
1,709 |
|
1.3 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,119 |
|
1.5 |
|
The following table summarizes unvested restricted stock awards outstanding and changes during the six month periods ended June 30:
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||||
|
|
# of |
|
Price(1) |
|
# of |
|
Price(1) |
|
||
Non-vested restricted shares outstanding January 1 |
|
82,375 |
|
$ |
12.08 |
|
74,391 |
|
$ |
16.62 |
|
Shares granted |
|
115,949 |
|
18.65 |
|
96,447 |
|
9.05 |
|
||
Shares vested |
|
(3,000 |
) |
13.00 |
|
(6,000 |
) |
13.45 |
|
||
Non-vested restricted shares outstanding June 30 |
|
195,324 |
|
$ |
15.97 |
|
164,838 |
|
$ |
12.31 |
|
(1) Represents the weightedaverage fair value on date of grant.
The following table summarizes unvested performance share-based restricted stock awards outstanding and changes during the six month periods ended June 30:
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||||
|
|
# of |
|
Price(1) |
|
# of |
|
Price(1) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-vested performance shares outstanding January 1 |
|
46,578 |
|
$ |
11.72 |
|
31,137 |
|
$ |
15.68 |
|
Shares granted |
|
98,002 |
|
18.65 |
|
61,544 |
|
9.05 |
|
||
Shares vested |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,202 |
) |
13.42 |
|
||
Non-vested performance shares outstanding June 30 |
|
144,580 |
|
$ |
16.42 |
|
91,479 |
|
$ |
11.25 |
|
(1) Represents the weightedaverage fair value on date of grant.
16. Income Taxes
There have been no changes to the balance of our unrecognized tax benefits reported at December 31, 2009. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $5.7 million. The total amount of unrecognized benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $5.7 million. A decrease in unrecognized tax benefits of $5.4 million and $1.4 million of related accrued interest is expected in the third quarter of 2010 due to the expiration of the federal statute of limitation. This decrease will significantly reduce our effective tax rate.
Our practice is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in interest expense and general and administrative expense, respectively. We had $1.3 million of interest and
penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits recorded as of June 30, 2010, of which $0.1 million was recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2010.
The only periods subject to examination for our federal return are years 2006 through 2008. The periods subject to examination for our state returns are years 2005 through 2008. We are not currently under examination by either federal or state taxing authorities.
Our effective tax rate was 33.7% and 40.4%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively and 36.2% and 40.0%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our effective tax rates differ from the federal and state statutory rates primarily due to state tax planning and the changes to our state tax reporting structure resulting from the completion of internal restructuring and related intercompany agreements.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009 we settled an IRS exam covering years 2005 through 2007. As a result, we recorded additional income tax expense of $0.1 million.
17. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss,
Accumulated other comprehensive loss is comprised of the following components at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Fair value of cash flow hedges |
|
$ |
(33,721 |
) |
$ |
(31,891 |
) |
Prior service credits and net losses on postretirement plans |
|
(24,082 |
) |
(24,229 |
) |
||
|
|
(57,803 |
) |
(56,120 |
) |
||
Deferred taxes |
|
21,195 |
|
20,580 |
|
||
Totals |
|
$ |
(36,608 |
) |
$ |
(35,540 |
) |
The components of comprehensive income are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended June |
|
||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
7,173 |
|
$ |
7,659 |
|
$ |
14,225 |
|
$ |
11,356 |
|
Other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Prior service cost and net loss, net of tax |
|
48 |
|
261 |
|
95 |
|
521 |
|
||||
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
(1,253 |
) |
5,539 |
|
(1,163 |
) |
6,683 |
|
||||
Comprehensive income |
|
5,968 |
|
13,459 |
|
13,157 |
|
18,560 |
|
||||
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
124 |
|
136 |
|
255 |
|
543 |
|
||||
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
5,844 |
|
$ |
13,323 |
|
$ |
12,902 |
|
$ |
18,017 |
|
18. Environmental Remediation Liabilities
Environmental remediation liabilities were $0.4 million at June 30, 2010 and $0.3 million at December 31, 2009, and are included in other liabilities. These liabilities, which relate to anticipated remediation and monitoring costs, are undiscounted. The Company believes the amount accrued is adequate to cover the remaining anticipated costs of remediation.
19. Litigation and Contingencies
On April 15, 2008, Salsgiver Inc., a Pennsylvania-based telecommunications company, and certain of its affiliates filed a lawsuit against us and our subsidiaries North Pittsburgh Telephone Company and North Pittsburgh Systems Inc. in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, alleging that we have prevented Salsgiver from connecting their fiber optic cables to our utility poles. Salsgiver seeks compensatory and punitive damages as the result of alleged lost projected profits, damage to its business reputation, and other costs. It claims to have sustained losses of approximately $125 million, but does not request a specific dollar amount in damages. We believe that these claims are without merit and that the alleged damages are completely unfounded. We intend to defend against these claims vigorously. In the third quarter of 2008, we filed preliminary objections and responses to Salsgivers complaint. However, the court ruled against our preliminary objections. On November 3, 2008, we responded to Salsgivers amended complaint and filed a counter-claim for trespass, alleging that Salsgiver attached cables to our poles without an authorized agreement and in an unsafe manner. We are currently in the discovery and deposition stage. In addition, we have asked the FCC Enforcement Bureau to address Salsgivers unauthorized pole attachments and safety violations on those attachments. We believe that these are violations of an FCC order regarding Salsgivers complaint against us. We do not believe that these claims will have a material adverse impact on our financial results.
We are from time to time involved in various other legal proceedings and regulatory actions arising out of our operations. We do not believe that any of these, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results or financial condition.
20. Net Income per Common Share
The following illustrates the earnings allocation method as required by the FASBs authoritative guidance on the treatment of participating securities in the calculation of earnings per share which we utilize in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic Earnings Per Share Using Two-class Method: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
7,173 |
|
$ |
7,659 |
|
$ |
14,225 |
|
$ |
11,356 |
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
124 |
|
136 |
|
255 |
|
543 |
|
||||
Net income attributable to common shareholders before allocation of earnings to participating securities |
|
7,049 |
|
7,523 |
|
13,970 |
|
10,813 |
|
||||
Less: earnings allocated to participating securities |
|
132 |
|
146 |
|
182 |
|
181 |
|
||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
6,917 |
|
$ |
7,377 |
|
13,788 |
|
$ |
10,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |
|
29,483 |
|
29,389 |
|
29,483 |
|
29,388 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per common share attributable to common stockholders - basic |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share Using Two-class Method: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
7,173 |
|
$ |
7,659 |
|
$ |
14,225 |
|
$ |
11,356 |
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
124 |
|
136 |
|
255 |
|
543 |
|
||||
Net income attributable to common shareholders before allocation of earnings to participating securities |
|
7,049 |
|
7,523 |
|
13,970 |
|
10,813 |
|
||||
Less: earnings allocated to participating securities |
|
132 |
|
146 |
|
182 |
|
181 |
|
||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
6,917 |
|
$ |
7,377 |
|
13,788 |
|
$ |
10,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |
|
29,483 |
|
29,674 |
|
29,483 |
|
29,620 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income per common share attributable to common stockholders - diluted |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
We had additional potential dilutive securities including unvested restricted shares and performance shares outstanding representing 0.3 million and 0.2 million common shares that were not included in the computation of potentially dilutive securities at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, because they were anti-dilutive or the achievement of performance conditions had not been met at the end of the period.
21. Business Segments
The Company is viewed and managed as two separate, but highly integrated, reportable business segments: Telephone Operations and Other Operations. Telephone Operations consists of a wide range of telecommunications services, including local and long-distance service, VOIP service, custom calling features, private line services, dial-up and DSL Internet access, IPTV, carrier access services, network capacity services over a regional fiber optic network, mobile services and directory publishing. The Company also operates a number of complementary non-core businesses that comprise Other Operations, including telephone services to county jails and state prisons, equipment sales and operator services. Management evaluates the performance of these business segments based upon net revenue, operating income, and income before extraordinary items.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Telephone operations |
|
$ |
87,713 |
|
$ |
91,143 |
|
$ |
176,496 |
|
$ |
182,838 |
|
Other operations |
|
8,024 |
|
10,899 |
|
17,543 |
|
20,914 |
|
||||
Total net revenue |
|
95,737 |
|
102,042 |
|
194,039 |
|
203,752 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating expense telephone operations |
|
49,790 |
|
52,101 |
|
99,764 |
|
106,409 |
|
||||
Operating expense other operations |
|
7,249 |
|
10,093 |
|
16,018 |
|
19,762 |
|
||||
Total operating expense |
|
57,039 |
|
62,194 |
|
115,782 |
|
126,171 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization telephone operations |
|
21,247 |
|
20,670 |
|
42,573 |
|
42,029 |
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization other operations |
|
213 |
|
311 |
|
429 |
|
629 |
|
||||
Total depreciation expense |
|
21,460 |
|
20,981 |
|
43,002 |
|
42,658 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating income telephone operations |
|
16,676 |
|
18,372 |
|
34,159 |
|
34,400 |
|
||||
Operating income - other operations |
|
562 |
|
495 |
|
1,096 |
|
523 |
|
||||
Total operating income |
|
17,238 |
|
18,867 |
|
35,255 |
|
34,923 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest income |
|
22 |
|
15 |
|
38 |
|
37 |
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
(13,069 |
) |
(14,564 |
) |
(25,990 |
) |
(29,056 |
) |
||||
Investment income |
|
7,136 |
|
6,761 |
|
13,438 |
|
11,809 |
|
||||
Other, net |
|
(516 |
) |
1,766 |
|
(452 |
) |
1,215 |
|
||||
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
10,811 |
|
$ |
12,845 |
|
$ |
22,289 |
|
$ |
18,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Telephone operations |
|
$ |
10,833 |
|
$ |
10,118 |
|
$ |
21,744 |
|
$ |
20,305 |
|
Other operations |
|
53 |
|
100 |
|
76 |
|
70 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
10,886 |
|
$ |
10,218 |
|
$ |
21,820 |
|
$ |
20,375 |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Goodwill: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Telephone operations |
|
$ |
519,541 |
|
$ |
519,541 |
|
Other operations |
|
1,021 |
|
1,021 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
520,562 |
|
$ |
520,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Telephone operations (1) |
|
$ |
1,201,454 |
|
$ |
1,210,765 |
|
Other operations |
|
9,798 |
|
12,278 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
1,211,252 |
|
$ |
1,223,043 |
|
(1) Included within the telephone operations segment assets are our equity method investments totaling $49.4 million and $49.6 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
22. Subsequent Event
On July 16, 2010, we entered into a $100 million forward interest rate swap agreement which becomes effective on September 30, 2011 and matures on September 30, 2013. Under this forward interest rate swap agreement, we will pay a fixed rate of 1.65% and receive 1-month LIBOR.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our consolidated operating results and financial condition for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this report.
Consolidated Communications or the Company refers to Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. alone or with its wholly owned subsidiaries as the context requires. When this report uses the words we, our, or us, they refer to the Company and its subsidiaries.
Forward-Looking Statements
Any statements contained in this Report that are not statements of historical fact, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements and should be evaluated as such. The words anticipates, believes, expects, intends, plans, estimates, targets, projects, should, may, will and similar words and expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are contained throughout this Report, including, but not limited to, statements found in this Part I Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Part I Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk and Part II Item 1 Legal Proceedings. Such forward-looking statements reflect, among other things, our current expectations, plans, strategies, and anticipated financial results and involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including but not limited to:
· various risks to stockholders of not receiving dividends and risks to our ability to pursue growth opportunities if we continue to pay dividends according to our current dividend policy;
· the current volatility in economic conditions and the financial markets;
· adverse changes in the value of assets or obligations associated with our employee benefit plans;
· various risks to the price and volatility of our common stock;
· our substantial amount of debt and our ability to incur additional debt in the future;
· our need for a significant amount of cash to service and repay our debt and to pay dividends on our common stock;
· restrictions contained in our debt agreements that limit the discretion of our management in operating our business;
· the ability to refinance our existing debt as necessary;
· rapid development and introduction of new technologies and intense competition in the telecommunications industry;
· risks associated with our possible pursuit of future acquisitions;
· the length and severity of weakened economic conditions in our service areas in Illinois, Texas and Pennsylvania;
· system failures;
· loss of large customers or government contracts;
· risks associated with the rights-of-way for our network;
· disruptions in our relationship with third party vendors;
· loss of key management personnel and the inability to attract and retain highly qualified management and personnel in the future;
· changes in the extensive governmental legislation and regulations governing telecommunications providers, the provision of telecommunications services and access charges and subsidies, which are a material part of our revenues;
· telecommunications carriers disputing and/or avoiding their obligations to pay network access charges for use of our network;
· high costs of regulatory compliance;
· the competitive impact of legislation and regulatory changes in the telecommunications industry;
· liability and compliance costs regarding environmental regulations; and
· the additional risk factors outlined in Part I Item 1A Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and the other documents that we file with the SEC from time to time that could cause our actual results to differ from our current expectations and from the forward-looking statements discussed in this Report.
Many of these risks are beyond our ability to control or predict. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained throughout this Report. Because of these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Furthermore, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. Except as required under the federal securities laws or the rules and regulations of the SEC, we do not undertake any obligation to update or review any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We are an established rural local exchange company that provides communications services to residential and business customers in Illinois, Texas, and Pennsylvania. We offer a wide range of telecommunications services, including local and long-distance service, digital telephone (VOIP), custom calling features, private line services, dial-up and high-speed broadband Internet access (DSL), internet protocol digital television (IPTV), carrier access services, network capacity services over our regional fiber optic network, directory publishing and competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC) calling services. We also operate a number of non-core complementary businesses, including providing telephone services to county jails and state prisons and equipment sales.
Executive Summary
We generated net income attributable to common stockholders of $7.0 million, or $0.24 per diluted share in the second of quarter of 2010, as compared to net income attributable to common stockholders of $7.5 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2009. Higher depreciation expense and losses on asset disposals in the second quarter of 2010, along with the gain recognized in the second quarter of 2009 related to a settlement of a dispute with Verizon all affected quarter over quarter net income. Second quarter 2010 net income and revenue were also affected by reduced subsidy payments, primarily as a result of changes to the national average cost per loop component. We benefited during the second quarter of 2010 from lower operating costs, lower interest costs, and increased earnings from our wireless partnerships. Operating expenses declined principally due to lower pension expense and professional fees, and lower integration and restructuring costs. The operating expense reductions were offset somewhat by higher video equipment and programming costs. Operating expenses in the second quarter of 2009 included $1.6 million of integration and restructuring expense for which we are receiving cost savings on an ongoing basis.
Revenue in the second quarter of 2010 decreased to $95.7 million as compared to $102.0 million in the second quarter of 2009. Decreased revenue in the second quarter of 2010 resulted primarily from the sale of our telemarketing business in the first quarter of 2010, along with local access line loss, reduced subsidy payments and lower operator services revenue, offset partially by increases in DSL and IPTV subscriptions and increased revenue in our public services.
For the first half of 2010, net income attributable to common stockholders totaled $14.0 million, or $0.47 per diluted share, as compared to $10.8 million, or $0.36 per diluted share, in the first half of 2009. Net income in the first half of 2010 benefited from increased earnings from our wireless partnerships, significantly lower operating expenses and significantly lower interest costs. Operating expenses in the first half of 2009 included $4.0 million of integration and restructuring expense.
Late in the first quarter of 2010, we completed the sale of our telemarketing business, the assets and revenues of which were immaterial to our overall results of operations.
General
The following general factors should be considered in analyzing our results of operations:
Revenues
Telephone Operations and Other Operations. Our revenues are derived primarily from the sale of voice and data communication services to residential and business customers in our rural telephone companies service areas. Because we operate primarily in rural service areas, we do not anticipate significant growth in revenues in our Telephone Operations segment except through acquisitions. However, we do expect fairly consistent cash flow from year to year because of fairly stable customer demand, and a generally supportive regulatory environment.
Local access lines and bundled services. An access line is the telephone line connecting a home or business to the public switched telephone network. The number of local access lines in service directly affects the monthly recurring revenue we generate from end users, the amount of traffic on our network, the access charges we receive from other carriers, the federal and state subsidies we receive, and most other revenue streams. We had 242,282, 247,235 and 254,593 local access lines, respectively, in service as of June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009.
Most wireline telephone companies have experienced a loss of local access lines due to challenging economic conditions and increased competition from wireless providers, competitive local exchange carriers and, in some cases, cable television operators. We have not been immune to these conditions. Cable competitors in all of our markets offer a competing voice product. We estimate that cable companies have the capability to offer voice service to all of their addressable customers, covering 85% of our entire service territory. We expect to continue to experience modest erosion in access lines due to market forces.
We have been able in some instances to offset the decline in local access lines with increased average revenue per access line by:
· Aggressively promoting DSL service, including selling DSL as a stand-alone offering;
· Value bundling services, such as DSL or IPTV, with a combination of local service and custom calling features;
· Maintaining excellent customer service standards; and
· Keeping a strong local presence in the communities we serve.
We have implemented a number of initiatives to gain new local access lines and retain existing lines by making bundled service packages more attractive (for example, by adding unlimited long-distance) and by announcing special promotions, like discounted second lines. We also market a triple play bundle, which includes local telephone service, DSL, and IPTV.
As of June 30, 2010, IPTV was available to approximately 198,000 homes in our markets. Our IPTV subscriber base continues to grow and totaled 26,074, 23,127 and 19,731 subscribers at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
We also continue to experience growth in the number of DSL subscribers we serve. We had 103,428, 100,122 and 95,656 DSL lines in service as of June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. Currently over 95% of our rural telephone companies local access lines are DSL-capable.
In addition to our access line, DSL and video initiatives, we intend to continue to integrate best practices across our markets. We also continue to look for ways to enhance current products and introduce new services to ensure that we remain competitive and continue to meet our customers needs. These initiatives have included:
· Hosted VOIP service in all of our markets to meet the needs of small- to medium-sized business customers that want robust functionality without having to purchase a traditional key or PBX phone system;
· VOIP service for residential customers, which is being offered to our customers as a growth opportunity and as an alternative to the traditional phone line for customers who are considering a switch to a cable competitor.
· DSL serviceeven to users who do not have our access linewhich expands our customer base and creates additional revenue-generating opportunities;
· Metro-Ethernet services delivered over our copper infrastructure with speeds of 25 mbps to 40 mbps;
· DSL product with speeds up to 20 mbps for those customers desiring greater Internet speed; and
· High definition video service and digital video recorders in all of our IPTV markets.
These efforts may mitigate the financial impact of any access line loss we experience.
Expenses
Our primary operating expenses consist of the cost of services; selling, general and administrative expenses; and depreciation and amortization expenses.
Cost of services and products. Our cost of services includes the following:
· Operating expenses relating to plant costs, including those related to the network and general support costs, central office switching and transmission costs, and cable and wire facilities;
· General plant costs, such as testing, provisioning, network, administration, power, and engineering;
· The cost of transport and termination of long-distance and private lines outside our rural telephone companies service area.; and
· Video equipment and programming costs.
We have agreements with various carriers to provide long-distance transport and termination services. We believe we will meet all of our commitments in these agreements and will be able to procure services for periods after our current agreements expire. We do not expect any material adverse effects from any changes in any new service contract.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses include expenses associated with customer care; billing and other operating support systems; and corporate expenses, such as professional service fees and non-cash, stock-based compensation.
Our operating support and back-office systems enter, schedule, provision, and track customer orders; test services and interface with trouble management; and operate inventory, billing, collections, and customer care service systems for the local access lines in our operations. We have migrated most key business processes onto a single company-wide system and platform. We hope to improve profitability by reducing individual company costs through centralizing, standardizing, and sharing best practices. We incurred $4.0 million of integration and restructuring expenses during the first six months of 2009 related to moving the North Pittsburgh accounting, payroll and ILEC billings functions to our existing legacy systems.
Depreciation and amortization expenses. The provision for depreciation on property and equipment is recorded using the straight-line method based upon the following useful lives:
Years |
|
|
Buildings |
|
18 - 40 |
Network and outside plant facilities |
|
3 - 50 |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
3 - 15 |
Capital Leases |
|
11 |
Amortization expenses are recognized primarily for our intangible assets considered to have finite useful lives on a straight-line basis. In accordance with the applicable authoritative guidance, goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are not amortized but rather are tested at least annually for impairment. Because tradenames have been determined to have indefinite lives, they are not amortized. Customer relationships are amortized over their useful life. The net carrying value of customer lists at June 30, 2010 is being amortized at a remaining weighted-average life of approximately 3.1 years.
Results of Operations
Segments
We have two reportable business segments, Telephone Operations and Other Operations. The results of operations discussed below reflect our consolidated results.
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to June 30, 2009
The following summarizes our revenues and operating expenses on a consolidated basis for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009: