UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Compass Minerals International, Inc.

Delaware		36-3972986
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)

(Address of principal executive offices and telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes: R No: £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer R		Accelerated filer £		Non-accelerated filer £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes: £ No: R

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share, at July 24, 2006 was 32,019,534 shares.

 

 

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

				Page
		PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.		Financial Statements
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31, 2005			2
		Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, (unaudited)			3
		Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006, (unaudited)			4
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, (unaudited)			5
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, (unaudited)			6
Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			12
Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk			17
Item 4.		Controls and Procedures			17
		PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.		Legal Proceedings			17
Item 1A.		Risk Factors			17
Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			17
Item 3.		Defaults upon Senior Securities			18
Item 4.		Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			18
Item 5.		Other Information			18
Item 6.		Exhibits			18
SIGNATURES					19
Certification
Certification
Certification

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

		(Unaudited)
		June 30,				December 31,
		2006				2005
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	58.1			$	47.1
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.6 in 2006 and $1.7 in 2005			57.6				183.0
Inventories			106.2				81.5
Deferred income taxes, net			12.7				12.7
Other			7.1				10.1
Total current assets			241.7				334.4
Property, plant and equipment, net			367.2				366.1
Intangible assets, net			22.0				22.5
Other			33.1				27.3
Total assets		$	664.0			$	750.3
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt		$	3.3			$	3.5
Accounts payable			48.7				88.3
Accrued expenses			8.4				17.5
Accrued salaries and wages			12.4				21.4
Income taxes payable			7.7				7.8
Accrued interest			0.3				0.9
Total current liabilities			80.8				139.4
Long-term debt, net of current portion			574.3				612.4
Deferred income taxes, net			30.2				43.7
Other noncurrent liabilities			41.7				33.9
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Common stock: $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 authorized shares; 35,367,264 issued shares			0.4				0.4
Additional paid-in capital			0.4				1.0
Treasury stock, at cost - 3,347,730 shares at June 30, 2006 and 3,532,940 shares at December 31, 2005			(6.4	)			(6.7	)
Accumulated deficit			(106.0	)			(115.5	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income			48.6				41.7
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)			(63.0	)			(79.1	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)		$	664.0			$	750.3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2006				2005				2006				2005
Sales		$	108.1			$	97.7			$	326.0			$	351.7
Shipping and handling cost			31.2				25.5				107.5				108.5
Product cost			56.9				51.1				133.5				150.6
Gross profit			20.0				21.1				85.0				92.6
Selling, general and administrative expenses			12.8				12.5				27.0				27.5
Operating earnings			7.2				8.6				58.0				65.1
Other (income) expense:
Interest expense			13.1				15.3				26.6				30.3
Other, net			(1.6	)			0.8				(2.0	)			1.0
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes			(4.3	)			(7.5	)			33.4				33.8
Income tax expense (benefit)			(2.2	)			(7.3	)			6.9				11.5
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations			(2.1	)			(0.2	)			26.5				22.3
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit of $0.3 and $0.3 in 2005			—				(0.5	)			—				(0.4	)
Net earnings (loss)		$	(2.1	)		$	(0.7	)		$	26.5			$	21.9
Basic net earnings (loss) per share:
Continuing operations		$	(0.07	)		$	(0.01	)		$	0.82			$	0.71
Discontinued operations			—				(0.02	)			—				(0.01	)
Basic net earnings (loss) per share		$	(0.07	)		$	(0.03	)		$	0.82			$	0.70
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding			32,011,226				31,430,900				32,225,501				31,285,807
Diluted net earnings (loss) per share:
Continuing operations		$	(0.07	)		$	(0.01	)		$	0.82			$	0.69
Discontinued operations			—				(0.02	)			—				(0.01	)
Diluted net earnings (loss) per share		$	(0.07	)		$	(0.03	)		$	0.82			$	0.68
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding			32,011,226				31,430,900				32,499,975				31,966,910
Cash dividends per share		$	0.305			$	0.275			$	0.61			$	0.55

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

																		Accumulated
						Additional												Other
		Common				Paid In				Treasury				Accumulated				Comprehensive
		Stock				Capital				Stock				Deficit				Income				Total
Balance, December 31, 2005		$	0.4			$	1.0			$	(6.7	)		$	(115.5	)		$	41.7			$	(79.1	)
Dividends on common stock							(2.7	)							(17.0	)							(19.7	)
Stock options exercised							1.6				0.3												1.9
Stock-based compensation							0.5																0.5
Comprehensive income:
Net earnings															26.5								26.5
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges																			(1.0	)			(1.0	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments																			7.9				7.9
Total comprehensive income																							33.4
Balance, June 30, 2006		$	0.4			$	0.4			$	(6.4	)		$	(106.0	)		$	48.6			$	(63.0	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

		Six Months Ended
		June 30,
		2006				2005
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings		$	26.5			$	21.9
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization			20.3				21.5
Finance fee amortization			0.7				1.2
Accreted interest			14.3				12.7
Deferred income taxes			(12.1	)			(3.9	)
Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises			—				4.6
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables			127.3				82.2
Inventories			(23.7	)			4.2
Other assets			3.3				(0.6	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			(63.1	)			(42.0	)
Other noncurrent liabilities			1.2				1.8
Other, net			0.7				(0.2	)
Net cash provided by operating activities			95.4				103.4
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures			(15.9	)			(9.8	)
Other, net			(2.1	)			(0.3	)
Net cash used in investing activities			(18.0	)			(10.1	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Principal payments on long-term debt			(21.7	)			(20.2	)
Revolver activity			(31.0	)			(11.0	)
Dividends paid			(19.7	)			(17.2	)
Proceeds received from stock option exercises			0.3				0.9
Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises			1.6				—
Other, net			(0.1	)			—
Net cash used in financing activities			(70.6	)			(47.5	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents			4.2				—
Net change in cash and cash equivalents			11.0				45.8
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year			47.1				9.7
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		$	58.1			$	55.5
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized		$	12.0			$	17.5
Income taxes paid, net of refunds			16.2				16.6

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

1. Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation:

Compass Minerals International, Inc. (“CMP” or the “Company”), is a producer and marketer of inorganic mineral products with manufacturing sites in North America and Europe. Its principal products are salt and sulfate of potash (“SOP”). CMP serves a variety of markets, including highway deicing, agriculture, food processing, chemical processing and water conditioning. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CMP and its wholly owned subsidiary, Compass Minerals Group, Inc. (“CMG”), and the consolidated results of CMG’s wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of CMP for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in its Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair presentation, have been included.

The Company experiences a substantial amount of seasonality in salt sales. The result of this seasonality is that sales and operating income are generally higher in the first and fourth quarters and lower during the second and third quarters of each year. In particular, sales of highway and consumer deicing salt products are seasonal as they vary based on the severity of the winter conditions in areas where the product is used. Following industry practice in North America, we stockpile sufficient quantities of deicing salt in the second, third and fourth quarters to meet the estimated requirements for the winter season. Due to the seasonal nature of the highway deicing product lines, operating results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.

Discontinued Operations — On December 30, 2005, CMP sold its evaporated salt business in the U.K. Accordingly, the results of operations from this business have been reclassified to discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and related notes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005.

Recent Accounting Pronouncement — During the second quarter of 2006 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 — “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48). This guidance is intended to provide increased consistency in the application of FASB Statement No. 109 — “Accounting for Income Taxes” by providing guidance with regard to the recognition and measurement of tax positions, and provide increased disclosure requirements. In particular, this interpretation requires uncertain tax positions to be recognized only if they are “more-likely-than-not” to be upheld based on their technical merits. Additionally, the measurement of the tax position will be based on the largest amount that is determined to have greater than a 50% likelihood of realization upon ultimate settlement. Any resulting cumulative effect of applying the provisions of FIN 48 upon adoption would be reported as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings (deficit) in the period of adoption. Management is in the process of evaluating the effects of this guidance which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.

2. Inventories:

Inventories consist of the following (in millions):

		June 30,				December 31,
		2006				2005
Finished goods		$	89.9			$	67.7
Raw materials and supplies			16.3				13.8
Total inventories		$	106.2			$	81.5

3. Property, Plant and Equipment, Net:

Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following (in millions):

		June 30,				December 31,
		2006				2005
Land and buildings		$	135.0			$	137.6
Machinery and equipment			412.2				403.8
Furniture and fixtures			13.4				13.3
Mineral interests			179.5				178.0
Construction in progress			25.2				12.6
			765.3				745.3
Less accumulated depreciation and depletion			(398.1	)			(379.2	)
Net property, plant and equipment		$	367.2			$	366.1

4. Intangible Assets, Net:

Intangible assets consist of rights to produce SOP and a customer list acquired in connection with the purchase of an SOP marketing business. The accumulated amortization of intangible assets at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was $2.8 million and $2.3 million, respectively. Amortization expense during the three and six month periods was $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for both 2006 and 2005.

5. Income Taxes:

The Company recorded income tax benefits of $2.2 million and $7.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and income tax expense of $6.9 million and $11.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. During the second quarter of 2006, the Company filed foreign tax returns and recorded a $0.6 million benefit for a true-up of previous accruals. During the second quarter of 2005, the Internal Revenue Service and Canada Revenue Agency developed a framework to minimize the inconsistent treatment of tax matters involving the two taxing authorities causing management to change certain tax estimates and reverse previously recorded income tax reserves of $5.9 million, partially offset by other tax adjustments of $1.1 million ($0.15 per basic and diluted common share), related to matters previously determined to have an uncertain outcome. For the 2005 six-month period, this benefit was partially offset by $5.4 million of income tax expense resulting from a repatriation of funds. During the first quarter of 2005, the Company’s U.K. subsidiary made a one-time repayment of a pound-sterling-denominated loan to a U.S. subsidiary which resulted in a foreign exchange gain for tax purposes only. For financial reporting purposes, the unrealized foreign exchange gain is a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity and had not been recognized in the consolidated statements of operations.

In addition to the specific tax items discussed above, the Company’s income tax provision differs from the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate primarily due to U.S. statutory depletion, state income taxes (net of federal tax benefit), foreign income tax rate differentials, foreign mining taxes and interest expense recognition differences for book and tax purposes.

At June 30, 2006, the Company had approximately $70.3 million of NOLs expiring between 2006 and 2022. The Company records valuation allowances for portions of its deferred tax assets relating to NOLs that it does not believe will, more likely than not, be realized. As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company’s valuation allowance was $10.4 million. In the future, if the Company determines, based on the existence of sufficient evidence, that it should realize more or less of its deferred tax assets, an adjustment to any existing valuation allowance will be made in the period such determination is made.

6. Long-term Debt:

Long-term debt consists of the following (in millions):

		June 30,				December 31,
		2006				2005
10% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011		$	2.0			$	2.0
12 3/4% Senior Discount Notes due 2012			103.3				97.1
12% Senior Subordinated Discount Notes due 2013			143.9				135.8
Term Loan due 2012			328.4				350.0
Revolving Credit Facility due 2010			—				31.0
			577.6				615.9
Less current portion			(3.3	)			(3.5	)
Long-term debt, net of current portion		$	574.3			$	612.4

7. Pension Plans:

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are as follows (in millions):

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2006				2005				2006				2005
Service cost for benefits earned during the year		$	0.2			$	0.4			$	0.4			$	0.7
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation			0.9				0.9				1.8				1.8
Return on plan assets			(1.1	)			(0.9	)			(2.1	)			(1.8	)
Net amortization and deferral			0.2				0.2				0.2				0.4
Net pension expense		$	0.2			$	0.6			$	0.3			$	1.1

During 2006 the Company made $4.5 million of contributions to its plans including a special contribution of approximately $4.0 million in the first quarter to fund the portion of the U.K. plan for benefits earned and expected to be paid to former employees of the evaporated salt business that was sold in December 2005.

8. Commitments and Contingencies:

The Company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types from normal Company activities.

The Company is aware of an aboriginal land claim filed by The Chippewas of Nawash and The Chippewas of Saugeen (the “Chippewas”) in the Ontario Superior Court against The Attorney General of Canada and Her Majesty The Queen In Right of Ontario. The Chippewas claim that a large part of the land under Lake Huron was never conveyed by treaty and therefore belongs to the Chippewas. The land claimed includes land under which the Company’s Goderich mine operates and has mining rights granted to it by the government of Ontario. The Company is not a party to this court action. Similar claims are pending with respect to other parts of the Great Lakes by other aboriginal claimants. The Company has been informed by the Ministry of the Attorney General of Ontario that “Canada takes the position that the common law does not recognize aboriginal title to the Great Lakes and its connecting waterways.”

The Company does not believe that this action will result in a material adverse financial effect on the Company. Furthermore, while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, management presently believes that the outcome of each such proceeding or claim which is pending or known to be threatened, or all of them combined, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

9. Operating Segments:

     Segment information is as follows (in millions):

		Three Months Ended June 30, 2006
		Salt				Potash				Other (a)				Total
Sales to external customers		$	80.4			$	27.7			$	—			$	108.1
Intersegment sales			—				3.1				(3.1	)			—
Shipping and handling cost			27.5				3.7				—				31.2
Operating earnings (loss)(b)			4.8				8.3				(5.9	)			7.2
Depreciation, depletion and amortization			8.1				2.1				—				10.2
Total assets			479.9				147.5				36.6				664.0

		Three Months Ended June 30, 2005
		Salt				Potash				Other (a)				Total
Sales to external customers		$	70.4			$	27.3			$	—			$	97.7
Intersegment sales			—				2.8				(2.8	)			—
Shipping and handling cost			21.5				4.0				—				25.5
Operating earnings (loss)			5.0				9.0				(5.4	)			8.6
Depreciation, depletion and amortization(c)			8.2				2.1				—				10.3
Total assets			496.6				133.6				36.5				666.7

		Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
		Salt				Potash				Other (a)				Total
Sales to external customers		$	270.6			$	55.4			$	—			$	326.0
Intersegment sales			—				5.6				(5.6	)			—
Shipping and handling cost			99.6				7.9				—				107.5
Operating earnings (loss)(b)			54.1				16.2				(12.3	)			58.0
Depreciation, depletion and amortization			16.1				4.2				—				20.3

		Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
		Salt				Potash				Other (a)				Total
Sales to external customers		$	299.6			$	52.1			$	—			$	351.7
Intersegment sales			—				4.8				(4.8	)			—
Shipping and handling cost			100.5				8.0				—				108.5
Operating earnings (loss)			62.7				14.1				(11.7	)			65.1
Depreciation, depletion and amortization(c)			17.2				4.3				—				21.5

During the second quarter of 2006, the Company completed negotiations of a settlement with its insurers and recognized as a reduction to product cost for the salt segment the final $1.0 million of proceeds from the business interruption insurance recovery. The recovery recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2006 totaled $5.1 million. The business interruption claim was due to a temporary production interruption at the Goderich mine in late 2004 that resulted in reduced sales during the first quarter of 2005.

10. Stockholders’ Equity and Equity Instruments:

Effective January 1, 2006 the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 123(R) – “Share-Based Payment” for accounting for its equity compensation awards using the modified prospective transition method. Because the Company had previously recognized compensation expense for the fair value of its stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123 – “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, the adoption of SFAS 123(R) had no impact on the

amount of compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. However, beginning in 2006, the tax benefits realized upon the exercise of stock options in excess of amounts accrued for book purposes are included as a financing activity in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows whereas the excess tax benefits were included in operating activities in periods prior to 2006. SFAS 123(R) also includes additional disclosure requirements with respect to equity compensation plans beyond those previously required by SFAS 123. The following information should be read in conjunction with the disclosures provided in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 included in CMP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Company grants options and restricted stock units to a limited number of executive officers and other key employees under its 2005 Incentive Award Plan. The Company’s stock price on the day of grant is used to set the exercise price for the options and the fair value of the restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The options generally vest ratably over a four-year service period. Unexercised options expire after seven years. The RSUs vest on the third anniversary following the grant date. Both types of instruments entitle the holders to receive non-forfeitable dividends or other distributions equal to and at the same time as those declared on the Company’s common stock.

During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company granted to employees 57,400 RSUs with a weighted average grant-date fair value of $26.05. As of June 30, 2006, there were 71,400 RSUs outstanding with a weighted average grant-date fair value of $25.55.

During 2006 the Company also granted 243,800 stock options to employees. To estimate the fair value of options on the day of grant, the Company uses the Black Scholes option valuation model. Award recipients are grouped according to expected exercise behavior. Unless better information is available to estimate the expected term of the options, the estimate is based on historical exercise experience. The risk-free rate, using U.S. Treasury yield curves in effect at the time of grant, is selected based on the expected term of each group. The Company’s historical stock price is used to estimate expected volatility. The range of estimates and fair values for options granted during 2006 is included in the table below. The weighted average grant date fair value of these options was $8.47.

		Range
Fair value of options granted		$	4.52 - $10.02
Exercise price		$	25.69 - $26.52
Expected term (years)			2 - 6.5
Expected volatility			24	%
Dividend yield(a)			0	%
Risk-free rate of return			4.3% - 5.05	%

The following table provides a summary of stock option activity during 2006.

		Stock Options
		Number of				Weighted-
		Options				Average
		Outstanding				Exercise price
Outstanding at December 31, 2005			757,901			$	7.60
Granted			243,800				26.03
Exercised			(182,390	)			1.41
Outstanding at June 30, 2006			819,311			$	14.47

The intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2006 totaled approximately $4.3 million. The Company recorded additional tax benefits of $1.6 million from the exercise of these options as additional paid in capital. The Company’s common stock was issued from treasury shares. As of June 30, 2006, the intrinsic value of options outstanding aggregated approximately $8.6 million, of which 425,893 options with an intrinsic value of $8.5 million were exercisable. The number of shares held in treasury is sufficient to cover all outstanding equity awards as of June 30, 2006.

The Company recognizes compensation expense for its share-based awards over the vesting period using the straight-line method. Unrecognized compensation expense totaling approximately $3.6 million is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately two years. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recorded $0.4 million of compensation expense related to share-based awards ($0.3 million, net of tax benefit). No amounts have been capitalized.

Other Comprehensive Income

The Company’s comprehensive income is comprised of net earnings, the change in the unrealized gain (loss) on natural gas and interest rate swap cash flow hedges and foreign currency translation adjustments. The components of comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are as follows (in millions):

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2006				2005				2006				2005
Net earnings (loss)		$	(2.1	)		$	(0.7	)		$	26.5			$	21.9
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges			1.0				(1.1	)			(1.0	)			1.0
Cumulative translation adjustments			6.7				(3.0	)			7.9				(4.3	)
Total comprehensive income (loss)		$	5.6			$	(4.8	)		$	33.4			$	18.6

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income as of June 30, 2006 are provided below.

		Balance								Balance
		December 31,				2006				June 30,
		2005				Change				2006
Minimum pension liability		$	(3.3	)		$	—			$	(3.3	)
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges			2.2				(1.0	)			1.2
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment			42.8				7.9				50.7
Accumulated other comprehensive income		$	41.7			$	6.9			$	48.6

The minimum pension liability is adjusted annually during the fourth quarter. With the exception of the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment, for which no tax effect is recorded, the components of other comprehensive income are reflected net of applicable income taxes. A net deferred tax benefit of $0.6 million was recorded for the net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges during the six months ended June 30, 2006.

11. Earnings per Share:

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (in millions, except for share data):

		Three months ended								Six months ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2006				2005				2006				2005
Numerator:
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		$	(2.1	)		$	(0.2	)		$	26.5			$	22.3
Net loss from discontinued operations			—				(0.5	)			—				(0.4	)
Net earnings (loss)		$	(2.1	)		$	(0.7	)		$	26.5			$	21.9
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding, shares for basic earnings per share(a)			32,011,226				31,430,900				32,225,501				31,285,807
Weighted average stock options outstanding (b)			—				—				274,474				681,103
Shares for diluted earnings per share			32,011,226				31,430,900				32,499,975				31,966,910
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Net earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations, basic		$	(0.07	)		$	(0.01	)		$	0.82			$	0.71
Net loss per share from discontinued operations, basic			—				(0.02	)			—				(0.01	)
Earnings (loss) per share, basic		$	(0.07	)		$	(0.03	)		$	0.82			$	0.70
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Net earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations, diluted		$	(0.07	)		$	(0.01	)		$	0.82			$	0.69
Net loss per share from discontinued operations, diluted			—				(0.02	)			—				(0.01	)
Earnings (loss) per share, diluted		$	(0.07	)		$	(0.03	)		$	0.82			$	0.68

Share-based awards relative to 1,192,411 and 1,030,133 shares of common stock were outstanding at June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earning (loss) per share for each respective quarter because they were anti-dilutive.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

All statements, other than statements of historical fact, contained herein constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: general business and economic conditions; governmental policies affecting the agricultural industry or highway maintenance programs in localities where the Company or its customers operate; weather conditions; the impact of competitive products; pressure on prices realized by the Company for its products; constraints on supplies of raw materials used in manufacturing certain of the Company’s products and the availability of transportation services; capacity constraints limiting the production of certain products; labor relations including without limitation, the impact of work rules, strikes or other disruptions, wage and benefit requirements; difficulties or delays in the development, production, testing and marketing of products; difficulties or delays in receiving required governmental and regulatory approvals; market acceptance issues, including the failure of products to generate anticipated sales levels; the effects of and changes in trade, monetary, environmental and fiscal policies, laws and regulations; foreign exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates; the costs and effects of legal proceedings including environmental and administrative proceedings involving the Company; and other risk factors reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as updated quarterly on Form 10-Q.

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this quarterly report to the “Company,” “Compass,” “Compass Minerals,” “CMP,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Compass Minerals International, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Management believes the most complex and sensitive judgments result primarily from the need to make estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 24, 2006, describe the significant accounting estimates and policies used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Actual results in these areas could differ from management’s estimates.

Results of Operations

Deicing salt products, used by highway deicing and general trade customers, constitute a significant portion of the Company’s salt sales. Those sales are seasonal and can fluctuate from year to year depending on the severity of the winter season weather. Due to the relative low cost of salt, transportation costs constitute a relatively large portion of the cost of our delivered product.

Our sulfate of potash (SOP) product is used in the production of specialty fertilizers for high-value crops and turf. Agricultural activities are also affected by weather conditions, primarily in the western and southeastern portions of the United States where the crops and soil conditions favor SOP.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared to present the historical financial condition and results of operations and cash flows for the Company. The following table provides a summary of sales information of the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same periods of 2005. This table and the following discussion should be read in conjunction with the information contained in our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report.

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
Millions of dollars, except per ton data		2006				2005				2006				2005
Sales by Segment:
Salt sales		$	80.4			$	70.4			$	270.6			$	299.6
Less: salt shipping and handling			27.5				21.5				99.6				100.5
Salt product sales		$	52.9			$	48.9			$	171.0			$	199.1
Specialty potash sales		$	27.7			$	27.3			$	55.4			$	52.1
Less: specialty potash shipping and handling			3.7				4.0				7.9				8.0
Specialty potash product sales		$	24.0			$	23.3			$	47.5			$	44.1
Sales Volumes (thousands of tons)
Highway deicing			833				963				4,418				5,824
General trade			519				510				1,060				1,137
Specialty potash			95				104				192				208
Average Sales Price (per ton)
Highway deicing		$	29.50			$	23.30			$	35.59			$	32.47
General trade			107.66				94.09				106.99				97.29
Specialty potash			292.61				260.89				288.95				250.13

Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2005

Sales

Sales for the second quarter of 2006 of $108.1 million increased $10.4 million, or 11% compared to $97.7 million for the same quarter of 2005. Sales include revenues from the sale of our products, or “product sales,” as well as shipping and handling costs incurred to deliver salt and sulfate of potash (“SOP”) products to the customer. Such shipping and handling costs were $31.2 million during the first quarter of 2006, an increase of $5.7 million compared to the same quarter of 2005. Shipping and handling costs increased despite the lower sales volumes in 2006, reflecting higher per unit costs of transportation services due to increased demand for transportation services and increased fuel costs.

Product sales for the second quarter of 2006 of $76.9 million increased $4.7 million, or 7% compared to $72.2 million for the same period in 2005 reflecting increases in both the salt and specialty potash fertilizer segments.

Salt product sales for the second quarter of 2006 of $52.9 million increased $4.0 million, or 8% compared to $48.9 million for the same period in 2005 due to price increases in the general trade and highway deicing product lines. Price increases improved sales by approximately $4.5 million compared to the second quarter of 2005 though these increases were partially offset by lower sales volumes (approximately $1.7 million) in 2006. North American highway deicing sales volumes in the second quarter of 2006 fell by approximately 138,000 tons compared to the same period of 2005 due primarily to the eight-week strike at our Goderich mine which depleted inventory volumes resulting in lower sales to our chemical customers. As a portion of our salt sales are denominated in Canadian dollars, the strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar also increased sales by approximately $1.2 million.

SOP product sales for the second quarter of 2006 of $24.0 million increased $0.7 million, or 3% compared to $23.3 million for the same period in 2005. Higher sales prices contributed $3.3 million of additional sales over the same quarter of 2005. SOP sales volumes declined from 2005 levels however, partially offsetting the price improvement by approximately $2.3 million due in part to the prolonged wet weather conditions during the spring season in the western United States.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the second quarter of 2006 of $20.0 million decreased $1.1 million or 5% compared to $21.1 million in the second quarter of 2005. The lower gross profit for the quarter is primarily due to the lower sales volumes as discussed above, higher transportation costs, the impact of the strike at our Goderich mine and higher production costs, principally due to natural gas and increased raw material costs for SOP. While we believe our annual production level will be within a normal range, management estimates the impact of the reduced production and incremental costs caused by the Goderich mine strike reduced gross profit by approximately $3 million to $4 million during the second quarter of 2006 when compared to its planned production spending and volumes during that period. The unfavorable impact of the strike was partially offset by a final settlement of a business interruption insurance claim of $1.0 million recorded in the second quarter of 2006 as a reduction to product cost. The business interruption claim was due to a temporary production interruption at the Goderich mine in late

2004 which resulted in unavailable finished goods product inventory during the first quarter of 2005 when winter weather conditions continued to be more severe than normal in certain of the Company’s markets. Inventory levels at some locations in early 2005 were not adequate to meet the incremental demand for deicing salt products. As a result of these items, gross profit as a percent of sales decreased to 18% compared to 22% despite the sales price increases discussed above.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the second quarter of 2006 of $13.1 million decreased $2.2 million compared to $15.3 million for the same period in 2005. Our 2006 overall weighted average interest rate decreased for the second quarter of 2006 compared to 2005 due to the December 2005 refinancing of $323.0 million of our 10% senior subordinated notes with the lower-rate senior secured credit agreement. This decrease was partially offset by the higher principal balances on the discount notes due to interest accretion, and the prior year allocation of $0.6 million of interest expense to discontinued operations.

Other (Income) Expense, Net

Other (income) expense, net for the three months ended June 30, 2006 improved $2.4 million compared to the same quarter of 2005 primarily reflecting foreign currency exchange gains in 2006 compared to losses during the same period of 2005 and higher interest income on cash equivalents during 2006.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

Income tax benefit of $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 decreased from $7.3 million for the same period in 2005. During the second quarter of 2006, the Company filed foreign tax returns and recorded a $0.6 million benefit for a true-up of previous accruals. During the second quarter of 2005, the Internal Revenue Service and Canada Revenue Agency developed a framework to minimize the inconsistent treatment of tax matters involving the two taxing authorities causing management to change certain tax estimates and reverse previously recorded income tax reserves of $5.9 million, partially offset by other tax adjustments of $1.1 million ($0.15 per basic and diluted common share), related to matters previously determined to have an uncertain outcome. Excluding the effect of this repatriation, income tax expense in 2006 decreased reflecting the favorable impact of tax planning and a lower level of pretax earnings as compared to 2005.

Our income tax provision differs from the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate primarily due to U.S. statutory depletion, state income taxes (net of federal tax benefit), foreign income tax rate differentials, foreign mining taxes and interest expense recognition differences for book and tax purposes.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2005

Sales

Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2006 of $326.0 million decreased $25.7 million, or 7% compared to $351.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Sales include revenues from the sale of our products, or “product sales,” as well as shipping and handling costs incurred to deliver salt and SOP products to the customer. Such shipping and handling costs were $107.5 million during six months of 2006, a decrease of $1.0 million compared to $108.5 million for the same 2005 period. The decrease in shipping and handling-related costs for 2006 is due to the reduced volume of products sold as compared to 2005, although this was mostly offset by the higher per unit costs of transportation services due to increased demand for transportation services and increased fuel costs.

Product sales for the six months ended June 30, 2006 of $218.5 million decreased $24.7 million, or 10% compared to $243.2 million for the same period in 2005 reflecting a decrease in the salt segment partially offset by an increase in the SOP segment.

Salt product sales of $171.0 million for six months of 2006 decreased $28.1 million or 14% compared to $199.1 million in 2005. During 2006, we sold approximately 1,483,000 fewer tons of salt than in 2005, reducing sales by approximately $36.7 million, primarily due to the milder than normal winter weather in the first quarter of 2006 compared to the more severe than normal weather of 2005. The decline in sales volume was also due to the eight-week strike at our Goderich mine which depleted inventory levels resulting in lower sales to our chemical customers. Additionally, salt sales in 2005 reflect advance purchases by our North American customers in anticipation of later price increases. Partially offsetting this 2006 volume decrease, our salt product sales reflect higher average sales prices which improved sales by approximately $6.1 million. The change in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily the strengthening of the Canadian dollar, also improved sales by approximately $2.3 million.

Specialty potash fertilizer product sales of $47.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased $3.4 million over $44.1 million during the same period in 2005 despite fewer tons sold, reflecting an increase in sales price which improved sales by approximately $6.8 million. The lower sales volumes primarily reflect reduced domestic agricultural sales, due in part to the prolonged wet weather conditions during the 2006 spring season in the western United States.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2006 of $85.0 million decreased $7.6 million, or 8% compared to $92.6 million for the same period in 2005, though as a percentage of sales gross margin remained consistent with 2005 at 26% due to the price increases discussed above. The decrease in gross profit is primarily due to the lower sales volumes as discussed above ($20.1 million), higher transportation costs, the impact of our strike at the Goderich mine and higher production costs, principally due to natural gas and increased raw material costs for SOP. While we believe our annual production level will be within a normal range, management estimates the impact of the reduced production and incremental costs caused by the strike reduced gross profit by approximately $3 million to $4 million during the second quarter of 2006 when compared to planned production spending and volumes during that period. These reductions in gross margin were partially offset by a $5.1 million business interruption insurance recovery recorded as a reduction to product cost. The business interruption claim was due to a temporary production interruption at the Goderich mine in late 2004 which resulted in unavailable finished goods product inventory during the first quarter of 2005 when winter weather conditions continued to be more severe than normal in certain of the Company’s markets. Inventory levels at some locations in early 2005 were not adequate to meet the incremental demand for deicing salt products. The strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar also improved gross margin by approximately $1.7 million.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 of $26.6 million decreased $3.7 million compared to $30.3 million for the same period in 2005. Our 2006 overall weighted average interest rate decreased compared to 2005 due to the December 2005 refinancing of $323.0 million of our 10% senior subordinated notes with the lower-rate senior secured credit agreement. This decrease was partially offset by the higher principal balances on the discount notes due to interest accretion and the prior year allocation of $1.3 million of interest expense to discontinued operations.

Other (Income) Expense, Net

Other income, net for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased over the other net expenses for the same period of 2005 primarily due to foreign exchange gains in 2006 compared to losses in 2005 and increased interest income. The increased interest income reflects the higher average balance of cash and cash equivalents during 2006.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

Income tax expense of $6.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 decreased $4.6 million from $11.5 million for the same period in 2005. During the second quarter of 2006, the Company filed foreign tax returns and recorded a $0.6 million benefit for a true-up of previous accruals. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Internal Revenue Service and Canada Revenue Agency developed a framework to minimize the inconsistent treatment of tax matters involving the two taxing authorities causing management to change certain tax estimates and reverse previously recorded income tax reserves of $5.9 million, partially offset by other tax adjustments of $1.1 million ($0.15 per basic and diluted common share), related to matters previously determined to have an uncertain outcome. This benefit was partially offset by $5.4 million of income tax expense resulting from a repatriation of funds. During the first quarter of 2005, the Company’s U.K. subsidiary made a one-time repayment of a pound-sterling-denominated loan to a U.S. subsidiary which resulted in a foreign exchange gain for tax purposes only. For financial reporting purposes, the unrealized foreign exchange gain is a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity and has not been recognized in the consolidated statements of operations.

Our income tax provision differs from the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate primarily due to U.S. statutory depletion, state income taxes (net of federal tax benefit), foreign income tax rate differentials, foreign mining income taxes, and interest expense recognition differences for book and tax purposes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, we have used cash generated from operations to meet our working capital needs, fund capital expenditures, pay dividends and make payments on our debt. When we cannot meet our liquidity needs with cash flows from operations due to the seasonality of our business, we borrow under our revolving credit facility. We expect that ongoing cash requirements will be funded from our operations or available borrowing facilities. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.

During the six months ended June 30, 2006, cash flows from operations were $95.4 million. We used a portion of those cash flows to fund capital expenditures of $15.9 million, pay $19.7 million of dividends to the holders of our common stock, repay the $31.0 million balance of our revolving credit facility and voluntarily make $20.0 million of early principal payments on our term loan.

As of June 30, 2006, we had $577.6 million of principal indebtedness including $2.0 million of senior subordinated notes, $103.3 million of senior discount notes with a face value of $123.5 million, $143.9 million of senior subordinated discount notes with a face value of $179.6 million and $328.4 million of term loan under our senior secured credit agreement. Our senior secured credit agreement also includes a revolving credit facility which provides borrowing capacity up to an aggregate amount of $125.0 million. No amounts were borrowed under our revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2006 and we had cash

on hand totaling $58.1 million. As of June 30, 2006, borrowing availability under our revolving credit facility was reduced by $10.1 million of letters of credit, leaving an available balance of approximately $114.9 million. As of June 30, 2006, we are in compliance with all conditions and covenants related to these borrowings.

Our significant debt service obligations could, under certain circumstances, materially affect our financial condition and impair our ability to operate our business or pursue our business strategies. As a holding company, our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. Our senior secured credit agreement is collateralized by substantially all of the operating assets of our subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries have not guaranteed and have no legal obligation to make funds available to us for payment on our senior subordinated notes or discount notes (“Notes”) or to pay dividends on our capital stock. Accordingly, our ability to make payments on our Notes and distribute dividends to our stockholders is dependent on the earnings and the distribution of funds from our subsidiaries. The terms of our senior secured credit agreement limit the transferability of assets and the amount of dividends that our subsidiaries can distribute to us. The terms also restrict our subsidiaries from paying dividends to us in order to fund cash interest on our discount notes if we do not comply with the provisions relating to the adjusted total leverage ratio and consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, or if a default or event of default has occurred and is continuing under our senior secured credit agreement. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will maintain these ratios. We cannot assure you that the agreements governing the current and future indebtedness of our subsidiaries will permit our subsidiaries to provide us with sufficient dividends, distributions or loans to fund scheduled interest and principal payments on our Notes when due. If we consummate an acquisition, our debt service requirements could increase. Furthermore, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our Notes on or before maturity and we cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of it on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005

Net cash flows provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were $95.4 million and $103.4 million, respectively. Of these amounts, $40.5 million and $44.4 million for 2006 and 2005, respectively, were generated by net working capital reductions. In 2006, the decrease in receivables of $127.3 million was partially offset by increased inventory ($23.7 million) and reductions of accounts payable and accrued expenses ($63.1 million). During 2005, working capital was generated through reductions in receivables and inventory of $82.2 million and $4.2 million, respectively, partially offset by a reduction of $42.0 million in payables and accrued expenses. These net working capital reductions are indicative of the seasonal nature of our highway deicing product line sales.

Net cash flows used by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, of $18.0 million and $10.1 million, respectively, were primarily related to capital expenditures. The 2006 capital expenditures include $8.7 million of expenditures to expand our magnesium chloride facilities and replace an existing underground rock salt mill in Canada. The Company expects additional spending of approximately $4.8 million to complete these projects with approximately $4 million expected during the last half of 2006. The magnesium chloride facilities are expected to be placed in service by the end of the third quarter while the mill replacement is currently projected for early 2007. The remaining capital expenditures were primarily for routine maintenance and replacements at our North American facilities.

In July 2006, we announced plans to increase our rock salt production capacity at our Goderich mine by approximately 750,000 tons by 2008. This expansion, consisting primarily of new equipment, will begin immediately and is expected to cost approximately $11 million, with approximately $3 million to be spent in 2006.

Financing activities in the 2006 six-month period used $70.6 million, consisting primarily of $19.7 million of dividend payments and $52.7 million of payments to reduce our outstanding debt. During 2006, we repaid $31.0 million of borrowings under our revolving credit facility and voluntarily made early principal repayments totaling $20.0 million to reduce the balance of our term loan. As discussed below, beginning in 2006 the excess tax benefits realized from the exercise of stock options are classified as source of funds from financing activities. During 2005 these benefits were presented as operating cash flows. Net cash flow used in financing activities during 2005 was $47.5 million, primarily for $20.0 million of early principal repayments under our term loan, $11.0 million to pay down our revolving credit facility, and $17.2 million of dividends.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Effective January 1, 2006 the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 123(R) — “Share-Based Payment” for accounting for its equity compensation awards using the modified prospective transition method. Because the Company had previously recognized compensation expense for the fair value of its stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123, the adoption of SFAS 123(R) had no impact on the amount of compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. However, beginning in 2006, the tax benefits realized upon the exercise of stock options in excess of amounts accrued for book purposes have been included as a financing activity in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows whereas the excess benefits were included in operating activities in prior years. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the Company’s equity compensation awards.

During the second quarter of 2006 the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 — “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48). This guidance is intended to provide increased consistency in the application of FASB Statement No. 109 — “Accounting for Income Taxes” by providing guidance with regard to the recognition and measurement of tax positions, and provide increased disclosure requirements. In particular, this interpretation requires uncertain tax positions to be recognized

only if they are “more-likely-than-not” to be upheld based on their technical merits. Additionally, the measurement of the tax position will be based on the largest amount that is determined to have greater than a 50% likelihood of realization upon ultimate settlement. Any resulting cumulative effect of applying the provisions of FIN 48 upon adoption would be reported as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings (deficit) in the period of adoption. Management is in the process of evaluating the effects of this guidance which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.

Effects of Currency Fluctuations

We conduct operations in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States. Therefore, our results of operations are subject to both currency transaction risk and currency translation risk. We incur currency transaction risk whenever we or one of our subsidiaries enter into a purchase or sales transaction using a currency other than the local currency of the transacting entity. With respect to currency translation risk, our financial condition and results of operations are measured and recorded in the relevant local currency and then translated into U.S. dollars for inclusion in our consolidated financial statements. The majority of our revenues and costs are denominated in U.S. dollars, with pounds sterling and Canadian dollars also being significant. Exchange rates between those currencies and U.S. dollars in recent years have fluctuated significantly and may do so in the future. Significant changes in the value of the Canadian dollar or pound sterling relative to the U.S. dollar could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and our ability to meet interest and principal payments on U.S. dollar denominated debt.

Seasonality

We experience a substantial amount of seasonality in salt sales. The result of this seasonality is that sales and operating income are generally higher in the first and fourth quarters and lower during the second and third quarters of each year. In particular, sales of highway and consumer deicing salt products are seasonal as they vary based on the severity of the winter conditions in areas where the product is used. Following industry practice in North America, we stockpile sufficient quantities of deicing salt in the second, third and fourth quarters to meet the estimated requirements for the winter season.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our business is subject to various types of market risks that include, but are not limited to, interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk and commodity pricing risk. Management has taken actions to mitigate our exposure to commodity pricing and interest rate risk by entering into forward derivative instruments and an interest rate swap agreement, and may take further actions to mitigate our exposure to other risks. However, there can be no assurance that our hedging activities will eliminate or substantially reduce these risks. We do not enter into any financial instrument arrangements for speculative purposes. The Company’s market risk exposure related to these items has not changed materially since December 31, 2005.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures — As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2006 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports it files and submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting — There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company from time to time is involved in various routine legal proceedings. These primarily involve commercial claims, product liability claims, personal injury claims and workers’ compensation claims. We cannot predict the outcome of these lawsuits, legal proceedings and claims with certainty. Nevertheless, we believe that the outcome of these proceedings, even if determined adversely, would not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. There have been no material developments during 2006 with respect to legal proceedings.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously discussed in Item 1A of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The annual meeting of stockholders was held on May 11, 2006 in Overland Park, Kansas. Two items were submitted to a vote of stockholders as described in our 2006 Proxy Statement dated March 29, 2006. The following table briefly describes the proposals and result of the stockholders’ vote.

1. To elect the following persons as directors for a term of three years.

		Votes in Favor				Votes Withheld
David J. D’Antoni			29,767,405			408,487
Perry W. Premdas			29,766,027			409,865
Allan R. Rothwell			29,763,123			412,769

		Votes in Favor				Votes Against				Votes Abstaining
2. To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Compass’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2006.			30,132,122			33,845				9,925

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
No.		Description of Exhibit
31.1*		Section 302 Certifications of Angelo C. Brisimitzakis, President and Chief Executive Officer.
31.2*		Section 302 Certifications of Rodney L. Underdown, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
32*		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350 of Angelo C. Brisimitzakis, President and Chief Executive Officer and Rodney L. Underdown, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Date: July 31, 2006		/s/ ANGELO C. BRISIMITZAKIS
		Angelo C. Brisimitzakis
		President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: July 31, 2006		/s/ RODNEY L. UNDERDOWN
		Rodney L. Underdown
		Vice President and Chief Financial Officer