def14a
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
þ
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12 |
Comstock Homebuilding Companies, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
þ
|
|
No fee required. |
o
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
) |
|
Amount previously paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMSTOCK HOMEBUILDING
COMPANIES, INC.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
June 1, 2006
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Comstock Homebuilding
Companies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be held at
9:00 a.m., on Thursday, June 1, 2006, at the Comstock
Sales Center, 1980 Isaac Newton Square, Reston, Virginia, for
the following purposes:
1. to elect three directors to serve for a three-year term
expiring in 2009;
2. to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as the independent registered public accounting firm of our
Company for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2006; and
3. to transact such other business as may properly come
before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
These items of business are more fully described in the proxy
statement accompanying this Notice.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on
April 7, 2006 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the
meeting.
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting and
vote in person. To assure your representation at the meeting,
however, you are urged to mark, sign, date, and return the
enclosed proxy as promptly as possible in the postage-prepaid
envelope enclosed for that purpose. You may vote in person at
the meeting even if you have previously returned a proxy.
Sincerely,
Jubal R. Thompson
General Counsel and Secretary
Reston, Virginia
April 14, 2006
COMSTOCK HOMEBUILDING
COMPANIES, INC.
11465 Sunset Hills Road, Suite 510
Reston, Virginia 20190
PROXY STATEMENT
VOTING
AND OTHER MATTERS
General
The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of Comstock
Homebuilding Companies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, by our
Board of Directors for use at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held on Thursday, June 1, 2006 at 9:00 a.m., or
at any adjournment thereof, for the purposes set forth in this
proxy statement and in the accompanying meeting notice. The
meeting will be held at the Comstock Sales Center, 1980 Isaac
Newton Square, Reston, Virginia.
These proxy solicitation materials were first mailed on or about
April 14, 2006 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the
meeting.
Voting
Securities and Voting Rights
Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 7,
2006, which we have set as the record date, are entitled to
notice of and to vote at the meeting. On the record date, there
were issued and outstanding 11,261,707 shares of our
Class A common stock and 2,733,500 shares of our
Class B common stock. Each holder of Class A common
stock voting at the meeting, either in person or by proxy, may
cast one vote per share of Class A common stock held on all
matters to be voted on at the meeting. Each holder of
Class B common stock voting at the meeting, either in
person or by proxy, may cast 15 votes per share of Class B
common stock held on all matters to be voted on at the meeting.
The meeting will be held only if there is a quorum present. A
quorum exists only if the holders of a majority of the voting
power of the stock outstanding are represented at the meeting.
Votes cast by proxy or in person at the meeting will be
tabulated by the inspector of elections appointed for the
meeting and will determine whether a quorum is present. The
inspector of elections will treat abstentions and broker
non-votes as shares that are present and entitled to vote for
purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.
At this years meeting, stockholders will (i) elect
three directors who will each serve a term of three years or
until they resign or are removed and (ii) vote on the
ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent
registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2006. In voting on the election of
directors, you may vote in favor of all nominees, withhold
authority for all nominees, or withhold votes as to specific
nominees. In the election of directors, broker non-votes will be
disregarded and have no effect on the outcome of the vote.
Assuming that a quorum is present, a plurality of affirmative
votes properly cast in person or by proxy will be required to
elect directors. In voting on the ratification of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, you may vote in favor of the
proposal, vote against the proposal or abstain from voting. A
majority of affirmative votes properly cast in person or by
proxy will be required to ratify the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. With respect to the ratification of
the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, abstentions from
voting will have the same
effect as a vote against such matter and broker non-votes will
be disregarded and have no effect on the outcome of the vote.
Voting of
Proxies
When a proxy is properly executed and returned, the shares it
represents will be voted at the meeting as directed. If no
specification is indicated, the shares will be voted
(1) for the election of the nominees set forth
in this proxy statement, and (2) for the
ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
the independent registered public accounting firm of our Company
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.
Any person giving a proxy may revoke the proxy at any time
before its use by delivering to the General Counsel and
Secretary of the Company either a written notice of revocation
or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending
the meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the meeting will
not in itself constitute revocation of your proxy.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote for
each of the nominees for director and for
ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm of
our Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.
Solicitation
We will pay for this solicitation. In addition, we may reimburse
brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners
of shares for expenses incurred in forwarding solicitation
materials to such beneficial owners. Proxies also may be
solicited by certain of our directors and officers, personally
or by telephone or
e-mail,
without additional compensation.
Annual
Report and Other Matters
Our 2005 Annual Report to Stockholders, which was mailed to
stockholders with or preceding this proxy statement, contains
financial and other information about our Company, but is not
incorporated into this proxy statement and is not to be
considered a part of these proxy soliciting materials or subject
to Regulations 14A or 14C or to the liabilities of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. The information contained in the Compensation
Committee Report on Executive Compensation, Report
of the Audit Committee, and Performance Graph
below shall not be deemed filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, or subject to Regulations
14A or 14C or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the
Exchange Act.
We will provide, without charge, additional copies of our
annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission (the SEC) to each
stockholder of record as of the record date that requests a copy
in writing. Any exhibits listed in the
Form 10-K
report also will be furnished upon request at the actual expense
we incur in furnishing such exhibit. Any such requests should be
directed to our Companys secretary at our executive
offices set forth in this proxy statement.
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
Nominees
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that the
number of our directors shall be fixed from time to time by
resolution of our Board of Directors. Presently, the number of
directors is fixed at eight and that number of directors is
divided into three classes, with one class standing for election
each year for a three-year term. At each annual meeting of
stockholders, directors of a particular class will be elected
for three-year terms to succeed the directors of that class
whose terms are expiring.
The Boards nominees for re-election this year to serve for
a three-year term or until their respective successors have been
elected and qualified are Gregory V. Benson, Norman D. Chirite
and Socrates Verses, each of whom is currently a director of the
Company. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will
vote the proxies received by them for each of the nominees named
above. In the event that any nominee is unable or declines to
serve as a director
2
at the time of the meeting, the proxies will be voted for any
nominee designated by the current Board of Directors to fill the
vacancy. It is not expected that any nominee will be unable or
will decline to serve as a director.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote for
the nominees named herein.
Information regarding the Board of Directors nominees and
the directors continuing in office is provided below. Unless
otherwise stated, each individual has held his or her current
occupation for the last five years. The age indicated for each
individual is as of March 31, 2006.
Nominees
for Director Standing for Election
Gregory V. Benson, 51, has been a director since May
2004. He became our President and Chief Operating Officer in
1991. Mr. Benson has over 30 years of home building
experience including over 13 years at national home
builders, including NVHomes, Ryan Homes and Centex Homes.
Norman D. Chirite, 44, has been a director and a member
of the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors since
March 2006. At that time, Mr. Chirite was nominated and
appointed by the independent members of the Board of Directors
to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Gary Martin
from the Board of Directors in February 2006. Mr. Chirite
currently serves as Corporate Development Adviser to inVentiv
Health, Inc., a provider of clinical, commercialization and
communications services to the pharmaceutical and life sciences
industries. He previously served as Executive Vice President and
General Counsel of Washington Football Inc. from August 2002
until October 2005, and from May 2001 until July 2002, served as
Managing Director of Counsel Corporation, an investment holding
company. Prior to that, Mr. Chirite was a partner at Weil,
Gotshal & Manges LLP in New York City, where he
practiced corporate law from 1987 until 2000.
Socrates Verses, 48, has been a director since June 2005
and is a member of the Compensation Committee of our Board of
Directors. Mr. Verses has been the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Realeum, Inc., a property management and
business integration software company, since March 2001. From
January 1995 to February 2001, Mr. Verses served as
President and a director of Technology Enablers, Inc., an
e-services
company. From 1987 to 1995, he served as Vice President of Sales
for the Recognition Equipment Software Division of IBM
Corporation.
Continuing
Directors with Terms Expiring in 2007
Christopher Clemente, 46, has been a director since May,
2004. He founded our Company in 1985 and since 1992, he has
served as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Clemente has over 20 years of experience in all
aspects of real estate development and home building, and over
25 years of experience as an entrepreneur.
A. Clayton Perfall, 47, has been a director since
December 2004, and is a member and Chairman of the Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors. He has served as the Chief
Executive Officer and as a director of AHL Services, Inc., a
provider of outsourced business services, since October 2001.
Prior to that, from December 2000 to September 2001,
Mr. Perfall served as the Chief Executive Officer of
Convergence Holdings, a marketing services company. From
September 1996 to October 2000, Mr. Perfall served as the
Chief Financial Officer and a director of Snyder Communications,
a marketing services company. Prior to that, Mr. Perfall
was a partner at Arthur Andersen LLP.
Continuing
Directors with Terms Expiring in 2008
David M. Guernsey, 58, has been a director since December
2004, and is a member of the Compensation Committee of our Board
of Directors. Mr. Guernsey has served as the President and
Chief Executive Officer of Guernsey Office Products, Inc., an
office supply company, since May 1971. Mr. Guernsey serves
on the Board of Directors of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc., a
banking company.
James A. MacCutcheon, 53, has been a director since
December 2004, and is a member of the Audit Committee of our
Board of Directors. Mr. MacCutcheon has served as the
President and Chief Executive Officer of Sunburst Hospitality
Corporation, a private hospitality company, since September 2000
and served as its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer from 1997 to September 2000.
3
Robert P. Pincus, 59, has been a director since June 2005
and is a member of the Audit Committee of our Board of
Directors. Since March 2005, Mr. Pincus has been the
director of Fidelity & Trust Financial
Corporation, a financial holding company, chairman of
Fidelity & Trust Bank, a regional banking
institution, and a director of Fidelity &
Trust Mortgage Inc., a regional mortgage lending company.
He also has served as chairman of Milestone Capital Partners, a
private equity firm, since October 2002, and director of the
Mills Corporation, a NYSE listed company, since April 1994. From
2000 to 2002, Mr. Pincus served as regional Chairman of the
Board and from 1998 to 2000 he served as regional chief
executive officer and president of the Branch Banking and Trust
Companys DC Metro Region. From 1991 to 1998,
Mr. Pincus served as President of Franklin Bank prior to
its acquisition by the Branch Banking and Trust Company.
Mr. Pincus currently serves on the Board of the University
of Maryland Foundation and is a Trustee of American University.
Information
Relating to Corporation Governance and the Board of
Directors
Our Board of Directors has determined, after considering all the
relevant facts and circumstances, that each of
Messrs. Chirite, Guernsey, MacCutcheon, Perfall, Pincus and
Verses are independent directors, as independence is
defined under the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market.
Our bylaws authorize our Board of Directors to appoint among its
members one or more committees, each consisting of one or more
directors. Our Board of Directors has established two standing
committees: an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee. The
Board of Directors does not have a standing nominating
committee. It is the Board of Directors view, given its
relatively small size and majority of independent directors,
that it is sufficient to select or recommend director nominees
itself. Each director has the opportunity to suggest any nominee
and such suggestions are comprehensively reviewed by the
independent directors. Director nominees are recommended for
selection by the Board of Directors by a majority of the
independent directors. The Board of Directors does not have a
charter for the Companys nominating process. However, the
qualities and skills sought in prospective members of the Board
of Directors generally require that director candidates be
qualified individuals who, if added to the Board of Directors,
would provide the mix of director characteristics, experience,
perspectives and skills appropriate for the Company. Criteria
for selection of candidates include, but are not limited to:
(i) business and financial acumen, as determined by the
independent directors in their discretion, (ii) qualities
reflecting a proven record of accomplishment and ability to work
with others, (iii) knowledge of the Companys
industry, (iv) relevant experience and knowledge of
corporate governance practices, and (v) expertise in an
area relevant to the Company. Such persons should not have
commitments that would conflict with the time commitments of a
director of the Company.
The Board of Directors does not have a specific policy for
consideration of nominees recommended by security holders due to
the fact that most of the voting control of the Company is held
by two individuals. However, security holders can recommend a
prospective nominee for the Board of Directors by writing to our
corporate secretary at the Companys corporate headquarters
and providing the information required by our bylaws, along with
any additional supporting materials the security holder
considers appropriate. There have been no recommended nominees
from security holders. The Company pays no fees to third parties
for evaluating or identifying potential nominees.
Our Board of Directors has adopted charters for the Audit and
Compensation Committees describing the authority and
responsibilities delegated to each committee by the Board of
Directors. Our Board of Directors has also adopted Corporate
Governance Guidelines, a Code of Conduct, a Code of Ethics for
the CEO and Senior Financial Officers, and a Whistleblower
Policy. We post on our website, at
www.comstockhomebuilding.com, the charters of our Audit
and Compensation Committees; our Corporate Governance
Guidelines, Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics for the CEO and
Senior Financial Officers, and Whistleblower Policy, and any
amendments or waivers thereto; and any other corporate
governance materials contemplated by SEC or Nasdaq National
Market regulations. These documents are also available in print
to any stockholder requesting a copy in writing from our
corporate secretary at our executive offices set forth in this
proxy statement. A copy of the Audit Committee charter was
included as Appendix A to our proxy statement for the 2005
Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Interested parties may communicate with our Board of Directors
or specific members of our Board of Directors, including our
independent directors and the members of our various board
committees, by submitting a
4
letter addressed to the Board of Directors of Comstock
Homebuilding Companies, Inc. c/o any specified individual
director or directors at the address listed herein. Any such
letters are then forwarded to the indicated directors.
The
Audit Committee
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to oversee the accounting
and financial reporting processes of our Company and the audits
of the financial statements of our Company. The Audit Committee
also provides assistance to our Board of Directors with respect
to its oversight of the integrity of the financial statements of
our Company, our Companys compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements, the qualifications and independence of
the Companys independent registered public accounting
firm, and the performance of our Companys audit function,
internally, if any, and by the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm. The primary responsibilities
of the Audit Committee are set forth in its charter and include
various matters with respect to the oversight of our
Companys accounting and financial reporting processes and
audits of the financial statements of our Company on behalf of
our Board of Directors. The Audit Committee also selects the
independent registered public accounting firm to conduct the
annual audit of the financial statements of our Company; reviews
the proposed scope of such audit; reviews accounting and
financial controls of our Company with the independent
registered public accounting firm and our financial accounting
staff; and reviews and approves transactions between us and our
directors, officers, and their affiliates.
The Audit Committee currently consists of
Messrs. MacCutcheon, Perfall and Pincus, each of whom is an
independent director of our Company under the Nasdaq rules as
well as under rules adopted by the SEC pursuant to the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Board of Directors has
determined that Mr. Perfall (whose background is detailed
above) qualifies as an Audit Committee financial
expert in accordance with applicable rules and regulations
of the SEC. Mr. Perfall serves as the Chairman of the Audit
Committee.
The
Compensation Committee
The purpose of the Compensation Committee includes determining,
or recommending to our Board of Directors for determination, the
compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive
officers of our Company, discharging the responsibilities of our
Board of Directors relating to our Companys compensation
programs and compensation of our Companys executives, and
to produce an annual report on executive compensation for
inclusion in our Companys annual proxy statement in
accordance with applicable rules and regulations of Nasdaq, the
SEC, and other regulatory bodies. The Compensation Committee
currently consists of Messrs. Chirite, Guernsey, and
Verses. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 through
February 28, 2006 upon his resignation from the Board of
Directors, Gary Martin served as Chairman and a member of the
Compensation Committee. Upon the resignation of Mr. Martin
in February 2006, Mr. Chirite was nominated and appointed
by the independent members of the Board of Directors to the
Board of Directors, was appointed to the Compensation Committee
to fill the vacancy created by Mr. Martins
resignation. Currently, Mr. Verses serves as Chairman of
the Compensation Committee.
Board and
Committee Meetings
Our Board of Directors held a total of seven meetings during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. During the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005, the Audit Committee held six
meetings and the Compensation Committee held two meetings. No
director attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of
(i) the total number of meetings of our Board of Directors,
and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all
Committees of our Board of Directors on which he was a member.
We encourage each of our directors to attend the annual meeting
of stockholders.
Director
Compensation and Other Information
We pay each non-employee director an annual retainer fee of
$36,000, plus $2,000 for each regular meeting of the Board of
Directors attended. We pay our non-employee directors $5,000 to
serve on the Audit Committee, $3,000 to serve on the
Compensation Committee and $2,000 for each committee meeting
attended. The chairman of the Compensation Committee is paid
$6,000, the chairman of the Audit Committee is paid $15,000 and
the Audit Committee designated financial expert is paid $32,500.
All payments to our non-employee directors are paid 50%
5
in cash and 50% in restricted stock grants based on the stock
price at the date of commencement of their term or the date of
the annual meeting in the case of members not up for re-election
in a given year. Directors are also eligible to participate in
our equity incentive plan. We also reimburse our directors for
travel and related expenses incurred in connection with
attendance at board and committee meetings. Employees who also
serve as directors receive no additional compensation for their
services as a director.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Summary
of Cash and Other Compensation
The following table sets forth the total compensation received
for services rendered in all capacities to our Company for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, by our
Chief Executive Officer and our four other most highly
compensated executive officers for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005. We refer to these individuals as the
named executive officers.
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation
|
|
|
Compensation Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
Name and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Awards ($)
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Christopher Clemente
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$
|
550,000
|
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
729,995
|
(1)
|
|
|
41,096
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
37,681
|
(3)
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
$
|
310,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
$
|
233,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory V. Benson
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$
|
550,000
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
13,699
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
12,200
|
(6)
|
President and Chief
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
$
|
307,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Officer
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
$
|
230,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce J. Labovitz
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
576,912
|
|
|
$
|
276,912
|
(7)
|
|
|
31,507
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
497,172
|
(9)
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
107,143
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
$
|
52,205
|
|
|
$
|
313,502
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William P. Bensten
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
|
$
|
126,918
|
|
|
$
|
126,918
|
(12)
|
|
|
6,849
|
(13)
|
|
$
|
5,890
|
(14)
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,043,836
|
|
|
$
|
1,800,000
|
(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
$
|
196,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jason Parikh
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$
|
156,667
|
|
|
$
|
116,500
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
(15)
|
|
|
6,849
|
(16)
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
$
|
108,654
|
(17)
|
|
$
|
97,500
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
(15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On February 24, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company
agreed, at the request of Mr. Clemente, to grant
Mr. Clemente 21,882 shares of restricted Class A
common stock which vest in full on January 1, 2007, in lieu
of $200,000 of Mr. Clementes 2005 cash bonus. On
March 31, 2006, Mr. Clemente received an additional
award of 76,586 restricted shares of Class A common stock
in connection with the Companys 2005 performance, all of
which vest over a four year period at a rate of 25% on
March 31, 2007 and 12.5% each six months thereafter. On
June 22, 2005, Mr. Clementes wife, Tracy Schar
received an award of 1,255 restricted shares of Class A
common stock, all of which were unvested as of December 31,
2005. On December 14, 2004, Mr. Clemente received an
award of 9,375 restricted shares of Class A common stock,
including 3,125 shares of Class A common stock granted to
Mr. Clementes wife, Tracy Schar, all of which were
unvested as of December 31, 2005. The value of these awards
as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table is based on the
fair market value of our Class A common stock on the date
of grant. The value of the aggregate unvested restricted shares
held by Mr. Clemente on December 31, 2005 was
$149,989, based on the fair market value of our Class A
common stock on December 31, 2005. 9,689 shares of the
restricted stock awards held by Mr. Clemente on
December 31, 2005 vest in full on December 31, 2006
and the balance of the shares of the restricted stock grant
awards vest at a rate of 12.5% per six months thereafter
until December 31, 2009. The restricted stock grants of
Mr. Clemente would immediately vest in full upon the
termination of Mr. Clementes employment by the
Company without cause, or by Mr. Clemente for good reason,
following a change of control of the Company. |
6
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The exercise price of the stock options granted in 2005 was
equal to the fair market value of our Class A common stock
on the date of grant. The stock options granted vest over a
two-year period, at a rate of 25% on December 31, 2006 and
25% upon the end of each six month period thereafter. The grant
would immediately vest in full upon the termination of
Mr. Clementes employment by the Company without
cause, or by Mr. Clemente for good reason, following a
change of control of the Company. |
|
(3) |
|
Paid as reimbursement for tax planning services provided to
Mr. Clemente in connection with the Companys initial
public offering in December 2004. |
|
(4) |
|
On March 31, 2006, Mr. Benson received an award of
54,705 restricted shares of Class A common stock in
connection with the Companys 2005 performance, all of
which vest over a four year period at a rate of 25% on
March 31, 2007 and 12.5% each six months thereafter. On
December 14, 2004, Mr. Benson received an award of
6,250 restricted shares of Class A common stock, all of
which were unvested as of December 31, 2005. The value of
these awards as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table is
based on the fair market value of our Class A common stock
on the date of grant. The value of the aggregate unvested
restricted shares held by Mr. Benson on December 31,
2005 was $88,188, based on the fair market value of our
Class A common stock on December 31, 2005.
6,250 shares of the restricted stock awards held by
Mr. Benson on December 31, 2005 vest in full on
December 31, 2006. The restricted stock grant awards would
immediately vest in full upon the termination of
Mr. Bensons employment by the Company without cause,
or by Mr. Benson for good reason, following a change of
control of the Company. |
|
(5) |
|
The exercise price of the stock options granted in 2005 was
equal to the fair market value of our Class A common stock
on the date of grant. The stock options granted vest over a
two-year period, at a rate of 25% on December 31, 2006 and
25% upon the end of each six month period thereafter. The grant
would immediately vest in full upon the termination of
Mr. Bensons employment by the Company without cause,
or by Mr. Benson for good reason, following a change of
control of the Company. |
|
(6) |
|
Paid as reimbursement for tax planning services provided to
Mr. Benson in connection with the Companys initial
public offering in December 2004. |
|
(7) |
|
On March 31, 2006, Mr. Labovitz received an award of
30,297 restricted shares of Class A common stock in
connection with the Companys 2005 performance, all of
which vest over a four year period at a rate of 25% on
March 31, 2007 and 12.5% each six months thereafter. On
December 14, 2004, Mr. Labovitz received an award of
25,000 restricted shares of Class A common stock, all of which
were unvested as of December 31, 2006. The value of these
awards as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table is based
on the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the
date of grant. The value of the aggregate unvested restricted
shares held by Mr. Labovitz on December 31, 2005 was
$352,750, based on the fair market value of our Class A
common stock on December 31, 2005. 25,000 shares of
the restricted stock awards held by Mr. Labovitz on
December 31, 2005 vest over a four-year period, at a rate
of 62.5% on December 31, 2006 and 9.375% upon the end of
each six month period thereafter until December 31, 2008.
The restricted stock grants would immediately vest in full upon
the termination of Mr. Labovitzs employment by the
Company without cause, or by Mr. Labovitz for good reason,
following a change of control of the Company. |
|
(8) |
|
The exercise price of the stock options granted in 2005 was
equal to the fair market value of our Class A common stock
on the date of grant. The stock options granted vest over a
two-year period, at a rate of 25% on December 31, 2006 and
25% upon the end of each six month period thereafter. The grant
would immediately vest in full upon the termination of
Mr. Labovitzs employment by the Company without
cause, or by Mr. Labovitz for good reason, following a
change of control of the Company. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes $125,000 in compensation from Investors Management,
LLC. For more information, please see Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions. |
|
(10) |
|
The exercise price of the stock options granted in 2004 was
equal to the fair market value of our Class A common stock
on the date of grant. The stock options granted vest over a
four-year period, at a rate of 25% on June 30, 2007 and 25%
upon the end of each six month period thereafter. The grant
would immediately vest in full upon the termination of Mr.
Labovitzs employment by the Company without cause, or by
Mr. Labovitz for good reason, following a change of control
of the Company. |
|
(11) |
|
Includes $85,000 in compensation from Investors Management, LLC.
For more information, please see Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions. |
7
|
|
|
(12) |
|
On March 31, 2006, Mr. Bensten received an award of
13,886 restricted shares of Class A common stock in
connection with the Companys 2005 performance, all of
which vest over a four year period at a rate of 25% on
March 31, 2007 and 12.5% each six months thereafter. On
December 14, 2004, Mr. Bensten received an award of
112,500 restricted shares of Class A common stock, all of which
were unvested as of December 31, 2005. The value of these
awards as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table is based
on the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the
date of grant. The value of the aggregate unvested restricted
shares held by Mr. Bensten on December 31, 2005 was
$1,587,375, based on the fair market value of our Class A
common stock on December 31, 2005. 112,500 shares of
the restricted stock awards held by Mr. Bensten on
December 31, 2005 vest over a
4-year
period, at a rate of 13.89% on December 31, 2006 and 21.53%
upon the end of each six month period thereafter until
December 31, 2008. The restricted stock grants would
immediately vest in full upon the termination of
Mr. Benstens employment by the Company without cause,
or by Mr. Bensten for good reason, following a change of
control of the Company. |
|
(13) |
|
The exercise price of the stock options granted in 2005 was
equal to the fair market value of our Class A common stock
on the date of grant. The stock options granted vest over a
two-year period, at a rate of 25% on December 31, 2006 and
25% upon the end of each six month period thereafter. The grant
would immediately vest in full upon the termination of
Mr. Benstens employment by the Company without cause,
or by Mr. Bensten for good reason, following a change of
control of the Company. |
|
(14) |
|
Paid as reimbursement for a life insurance policy for which the
Company is not the beneficiary. |
|
(15) |
|
On March 31, 2006, Mr. Parikh received an award of
9,300 restricted shares of Class A common stock in
connection with the Companys 2005 performance, all of
which vest over a four year period at a rate of 25% on
March 31, 2007 and 12.5% each six months thereafter. On
December 14, 2004, Mr. Parikh received an award of
3,125 restricted shares of Class A common stock, all of
which were unvested as of December 31, 2005. The value of
these awards as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table is
based on the fair market value of our Class A common stock
on the date of grant. The value of the aggregate unvested
restricted shares held by Mr. Parikh on December 31,
2005 was $44,094, based on the fair market value of our
Class A common stock on December 31, 2005.
3,125 shares of the restricted stock awards held by
Mr. Parikh on December 31, 2005 vest in full on
December 31, 2006. The restricted stock grants would
immediately vest in full upon the termination of
Mr. Parikhs employment by the Company without cause,
or by Mr. Parikh for good reason, following a change of
control of the Company. |
|
(16) |
|
The exercise price of the stock options granted in 2005 was
equal to the fair market value of our Class A common stock
on the date of grant. The stock options granted vest over a
two-year period, at a rate of 25% on December 31, 2006 and
25% upon the end of each six month period thereafter. The grant
would immediately vest in full upon the termination of
Mr. Parikhs employment by the Company without cause,
or by Mr. Parikh for good reason, following a change of
control of the Company. |
|
(17) |
|
Effective date of employment was April 12, 2004. |
8
Option
Grants
The following table sets forth information concerning the stock
option grant made to the named executive officers in the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005. The exercise price per share
for the options was equal to the fair market value of the
Class A common stock as of the grant date. Potential
realizable value is calculated net of exercise prices and before
taxes based on the assumption that our common stock appreciates
at the annual rate shown, compounded annually, from the date of
grant until the expiration of the option term. The potential
realizable value is calculated based on the requirements of the
SEC and does not reflect our estimate of future stock price
growth. Actual gains, if any, on stock option exercises will
depend on the future performance of our common stock and the
date on which the options are exercised. The options granted to
each of Messrs. Clemente, Benson, Labovitz and Bensten in
2005 vest in four semi-annual equal installments, beginning on
December 31, 2006, as long as each recipient continues to
serve as one of our employees.
OPTION
GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants
|
|
|
Potential Realizable
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value at Assumed
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Total Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Rates of Stock
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Granted to
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Appreciation for
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Employees in
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Option Term
|
|
Name
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
Christopher Clemente
|
|
|
41,096
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
23.90
|
|
|
|
07/05/2015
|
|
|
$
|
617,697
|
|
|
$
|
1,565,365
|
|
Gregory V. Benson
|
|
|
13,699
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
23.90
|
|
|
|
07/05/2015
|
|
|
$
|
205,904
|
|
|
$
|
52,180
|
|
Bruce J. Labovitz
|
|
|
31,507
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
23.90
|
|
|
|
07/05/2015
|
|
|
$
|
473,569
|
|
|
$
|
1,200,116
|
|
William P. Bensten
|
|
|
6,849
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
23.90
|
|
|
|
07/05/2015
|
|
|
$
|
102,944
|
|
|
$
|
260,881
|
|
Jason Parikh
|
|
|
6,849
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
23.90
|
|
|
|
07/05/2015
|
|
|
$
|
102,944
|
|
|
$
|
260,881
|
|
Option
Holdings
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to options held by the named executive officers as of
December 31, 2005. None of the named executive officers
exercised options during 2005. The value of the unexercised
in-the-money
options on December 31, 2005 was based on $14.11 per
share, the fair market value of our Class A common stock on
December 31, 2005.
AGGREGATED
OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND
FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Unexercised
|
|
|
Number of Unexercised
|
|
In-the Money Options at
|
|
|
Options at Fiscal
Year-End
|
|
Fiscal Year-End
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Christopher Clemente
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Gregory V. Benson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Bruce J. Labovitz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
William P. Bensten
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Jason Parikh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Employment
Arrangements with Executive Officers
Christopher
Clemente
Christopher Clemente, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of our Board of Directors, serves pursuant to the terms of an
executive employment agreement dated as of December 17,
2004. The agreement has an initial term of five years and will
automatically be extended for successive one-year periods
beginning on the one year anniversary of the date of the
agreement unless either party notifies the other that the term
will not be extended. Under the agreement,
Mr. Clementes minimum annual salary is $550,000,
subject to potential increase by our Board of Directors from
time to time. Mr. Clemente is eligible for a cash bonus of
not less than 200% of his then-
9
current salary, based upon the satisfaction of financial
performance criteria. Mr. Clemente is also eligible for
awards under our equity incentive plan and any similar executive
compensation plans we may adopt from time to time. If we
terminate Mr. Clementes employment without cause or
if he were to terminate his employment for good reason, each as
defined in the agreement, he is entitled to continue to receive
his then-current salary for 24 months. He will also be
entitled to receive a cash payment in an amount equal to two
times 100% of the bonus he would have been entitled to had he
remained our employee until the end of our fiscal year. This
cash payment will be due and payable on the earlier of
(i) 90 days after our last payment of
Mr. Clementes then-current salary or (ii) the
end of the our fiscal year in which our termination of
Mr. Clemente without cause or Mr. Clementes
termination for good reason occurs. In the event of our
termination of Mr. Clemente without cause or
Mr. Clementes termination for good reason within the
six calendar month period prior to the effective date of a
Change in Control (as defined in the agreement) or within the 12
calendar month period following the effective date of a Change
in Control, the cash payment will be due and payable in full
within 30 days of the effective date of the Change in
Control. Upon termination without cause, Mr. Clemente is further
entitled to continue to participate in employee benefit plans,
programs and arrangements for a period of 12 months
following termination.
Mr. Clemente has agreed not to compete with us during the
term of his employment and for two years after the termination
of the agreement. Mr. Clementes employment agreement and
non-competition agreement allow him to engage in the following
permitted business activities: (i) development of
commercial or for-rent residential (such as apartment buildings)
real estate investment properties; (ii) development of
speculative land holdings, provided that any such development as
residential lots intended for construction of for-sale
residential dwellings, by an entity in which Mr. Clemente
has a controlling interest or decision-making power, must first
be offered to us at a fair market value price and, if we decline
the offer, may not be pursued by such entity in any of our then
current geographic markets or any geographic market we intend to
enter within six months of the date on which the particular
project commenced; and (iii) secured real estate lending to
unrelated third parties. In addition, he agreed not to solicit
our employees or certain other third parties for 24 months.
Gregory
V. Benson
Gregory Benson, our President and Chief Operating Officer and a
member of our Board of Directors, serves pursuant to the terms
of an executive employment agreement dated December 17,
2004. The agreement has an initial term of four years and will
automatically renew for successive one-year periods beginning on
the one year anniversary of the date of the agreement unless
either party notifies the other that the term will not be
extended. Under the agreement, Mr. Bensons minimum annual
salary is $550,000, subject to potential increase by our Board
of Directors from time to time. Mr. Benson is eligible for
a cash bonus of not less than 200% of his then-current salary,
based upon the satisfaction of financial performance criteria.
Mr. Benson is also eligible for awards under our equity
incentive plan and any similar executive compensation plans we
may adopt from time to time. If we terminate
Mr. Bensons employment without cause or if he were to
terminate his employment for good reason, each as defined in the
agreement, he is entitled to continue to receive his
then-current salary for 18 months. He will also be entitled
to receive a cash payment in an amount equal to one and one half
times 100% of the bonus he would have been entitled to had he
remained our employee until the end of our fiscal year. This
cash payment will be due and payable on the earlier of
(i) 90 days after our last payment of
Mr. Bensons then-current salary or (ii) the end
of the fiscal year in which our termination of Mr. Benson
without cause or Mr. Bensons termination for good reason
occurs. In the event of the our termination of Mr. Benson
without cause or Mr. Bensons termination for good
reason within the six calendar month period prior to the
effective date of a Change in Control (as defined in the
agreement) or within the 12 calendar month period following the
effective date of a Change in Control, the cash payment will be
due and payable in full within 30 days of the effective
date of the Change in Control. Upon termination without cause,
Mr. Benson is further entitled to continue to participate
in employee benefit plans, programs and arrangements for a
period of 12 months following termination.
Mr. Benson has agreed not to compete with us during the
term of his employment and for 18 months after the
termination of the agreement. Mr. Bensons employment
agreement and non-competition agreement allow him to engage in
the following permitted business activities:
(i) development of commercial or for-rent residential (such
as apartment buildings) real estate investment properties;
(ii) development of speculative land holdings, provided
that any such development as residential lots intended for
construction of for-sale residential dwellings, by an entity in
10
which Mr. Benson has a controlling interest or
decision-making power, must first be offered to us at a fair
market value price and, if we decline the offer, may not be
pursued by such entity in any of our then current geographic
markets or any geographic market we intend to enter within six
months of the date on which the particular project commenced;
and (iii) secured real estate lending to unrelated third
parties. In addition, he agreed not to solicit our employees or
certain other third parties for 18 months.
Bruce
J. Labovitz
Bruce Labovitz, our Chief Financial Officer, serves pursuant to
the terms of an executive employment agreement dated
December 17, 2004. The agreement has an initial term of
three years and will automatically renew for successive one-year
periods beginning on the one year anniversary of the date of the
agreement unless either party notifies the other that the term
will not be extended. Under the agreement,
Mr. Labovitzs minimum annual salary is $300,000,
subject to potential increase by our Board of Directors from
time to time. Mr. Labovitz is eligible for a cash bonus of
up to 100% of his then-current salary, based upon the
satisfaction of financial performance criteria.
Mr. Labovitz is also eligible for awards under our equity
incentive plan and any similar executive compensation plans we
may adopt from time to time. If we terminate
Mr. Labovitzs employment without cause or if he were
to terminate his employment for good reason, each as defined in
the agreement, he is entitled to continue to receive his
then-current salary for 12 months. He will also be entitled
to receive a cash payment in an amount equal to 100% of the
bonus he would have been entitled to had he remained our
employee until the end of our fiscal year. This cash payment
will be due and payable on the earlier of (i) 90 days
after our last payment of Mr. Labovitzs then-current
salary or (ii) the end of the fiscal year in which our
termination of Mr. Labovitz without cause or
Mr. Labovitzs termination for good reason occurs. In
the event of the termination of Mr. Labovitz without cause
or Mr. Labovitzs termination for good reason within
the six calendar month period prior to the effective date of a
Change in Control (as defined in the agreement) or within the 12
calendar month period following the effective date of a Change
in Control, the cash payment will be due and payable in full
within 30 days of the effective date of the Change in
Control. Upon termination without cause, Mr. Labovitz is further
entitled to continue to participate in employee benefit plans,
programs and arrangements for a period of 12 months
following termination. Mr. Labovitz has agreed not to
compete with us during the term of his employment and for
12 months after the termination of the agreement. In
addition, he agreed not to solicit our employees or certain
other third parties for 12 months.
Furthermore, subject to certain termination events, we have
agreed to reimburse Mr. Labovitz for premium payments he
makes on his life insurance policy with a national insurer.
These reimbursements are in addition to the standard insurance
benefits provided by us to our employees. The reimbursement of
life insurance expenses covers the period January 1, 2005
through December 31, 2008. The annual premium reimbursement
payable by us shall not exceed $6,000.
William
P. Bensten
Subject to certain termination events, we have agreed to
reimburse Mr. Bensten for premium payments he makes on his life
insurance policy with a national insurer. These reimbursements
are in addition to the standard insurance benefits provided by
us to our employees. The reimbursement of life insurance
expenses covers the period January 1, 2005 through
December 31, 2008. The annual premium reimbursement payable
by us shall not exceed $6,000.
11
EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table sets forth information with respect to our
common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of stock
options under our 2004 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan and
other equity compensation plans, and the purchase of shares
under our 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan as of
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants, and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants, and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column
(a))
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Approved
by Stockholders
|
|
|
213,992
|
|
|
$
|
19.95
|
|
|
|
1,264,223
|
(1,2)
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not
Approved by Stockholders(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total
|
|
|
213,992
|
|
|
$
|
19.95
|
|
|
|
1,264,223
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The total number of shares of Class A common stock subject
to the granting of awards under our 2004 Long-Term Incentive
Compensation Plan may be increased January 1 of each year,
commencing on January 1, 2005 and ending on January 1,
2013, in an amount equal to the lesser of three percent (3%) of
the shares of Class A common stock outstanding on each such
date, 500,000 shares or such other number as may be
approved by our Board of Directors. Pursuant to the automatic
annual increase provided in the 2004 Long-Term Incentive
Compensation Plan, there was an increase of 337,757 shares
of Class A common stock available under our 2004 Long Term
Incentive Compensation Plan for 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
The total number of shares of Class A common stock that may
be subject to purchase under our 2004 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan shall be increased each year by the lowest of
100,000 shares, 1% of all shares outstanding at the end of
the previous year, or a lower amount determined by our Board of
Directors. There was no increase in shares of Class A
common stock under our 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan for
2006. |
|
(3) |
|
The Company does not have any equity compensation plans that
have not been approved by the stockholders. |
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Other than the transactions described below, since
January 1, 2005, there has not been nor is there currently
proposed any transaction or series of similar transactions to
which we are or will be a party in which the amount involved
exceeded or will exceed $60,000, and in which any director,
executive officer, holder of more than 5% of our common stock or
any member of their immediate family has or will have a direct
or indirect material interest. We believe that all of these
transactions are on terms that are comparable to or not less
favorable than terms which would or could have been obtainable
from unaffiliated third parties. All proposed future related
party transactions will be submitted to our Board of Directors
for review and will require a majority vote of the independent
directors for approval. Ongoing transactions are reviewed
annually to ensure that they are still comparable to or not less
favorable than terms which would have or could have been
obtainable from unaffiliated third parties. Our Chief Financial
Officer, assuming he is not party to the proposed transaction,
coordinates with the independent directors in evaluating the
fairness to us of the proposed transaction.
In May 2003 and December 2005, we hired a construction company
in which Christopher Clementes brother, Louis Clemente,
serves as the President and is a significant shareholder, to
provide construction services and act as a general contractor at
two of the Companys developments. The Company paid
approximately $10 million to this construction company
during the year ended December 31, 2005.
12
In April 2004, the Company entered into an additional three year
$5 million promissory note agreement, with an entity
controlled by Scott Kasprowicz, bearing interest at a rate of
12%. Mr. Kasprowicz became a related party on June 1,
2004 when we hired his son. Under the terms of the note, the
Company was advanced $2.5 million in April 2004 and an
additional $2.5 million in June 2004. As a result of our
consolidation in connection with our initial public offering,
the lender was entitled to a premium of up to 10% of the
outstanding principal balance. This note was paid in full in
June 2005.
On October 1, 2004, we entered into a lease agreement with
Comstock Asset Management, L.C., an entity owned by Christopher
Clemente, for 20,609 square feet for our corporate
headquarters. On August 1, 2005, the lease agreement was
amended to add another 8.4 square feet of leased space.
Total payments made under this lease agreement for 2005 were
$629,000.
In August 2004 the Company entered into a note agreement in the
amount of $163,000, which accrues interest at a rate of
10% per annum, with Investors Management, LLC. Investors
Management, LLC is a related party which was partially owned by
Christopher Clemente, Gregory Benson and Bruce Labovitz
(executive officers, directors
and/or
shareholders of the Company). In February 2005, the Company
received payment in full on this note. In March 2005 all other
members assigned their membership rights to Gregory Benson
giving him 100% ownership of Investors Management.
Christopher Clementes
mother-in-law,
Janice Schar, and Gary Martin, a former director who resigned
effective February 28, 2006, each invested $100,000 as
minority shareholders in one of our subsidiaries, and Judah and
Deborah Labovitz, the parents of Bruce Labovitz, loaned
approximately $300,000 to another of our subsidiaries. During
the first quarter 2005, the Company repurchased the minority
interests of Janice Schar and Gary Martin for an
approximate purchase price of $136,000. In April 2005, loan to
Judah and Deborah Labovitz was paid in full.
During 2003, the Company entered into agreements with I-Connect,
L.C., a company in which Investors Management, LLC holds a 25%
interest, for information technology consulting services and the
right to use certain customized enterprise software developed
with input from the Company. The intellectual property rights
associated with the software solution that was developed by
I-Connect along with any improvements made thereto by the
Company remained the property of I-Connect. During the year
ended December 31, 2005, the Company paid $485,000 to
I-Connect.
In October 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with
Comstock Asset Management Inc. to provide management services to
us for a fee of $20,000 a month. Comstock Asset Management Inc.
is a related party wholly owned by Christopher Clemente. For the
year ended December 31, 2005, the Company earned $240,000
in revenue and recorded no receivable from this entity. Also, in
November 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with
Comstock Asset Management to sell retail condo units #1
through #5 at Potomac Yard for $14.5 million. In
connection with this sale, the Company received a deposit of
$8 million upon execution of this agreement. The agreement
was modified in 2005 to reduce the deposit amount to
$6 million.
During the course of 2005, the Company provided bookkeeping
services to related party entities at no charge.
In August 2004, the Company entered into a $2.4 million
promissory note agreement with Belmont Models I, L.C., an
affiliate managed by Investors Management, LLC. The note bears
an interest rate of 12%, which is payable monthly and matured in
July 2005. In March 2005, the Company sold four condominium
units to Belmont Models I, L.C. under a sale and leaseback
arrangement. The four condominium units were delivered for a
total purchase price of $2 million and leased back at a
rate of $20,000 per month. The Company expects the lease to
continue for a period of twenty-four months. As a result of the
deliveries, the promissory note was reduced by the total
purchase price. At December 31, 2005 the Company owed
$663,000 under this note. Accrued interest payable on this note
totaled $6,000 at December 31, 2005.
During 2005 the Company entered into sales contracts to sell
homes to certain employees of the Company. The Company, in order
to attract, retain, and motivate employees maintains a homes
ownership benefit program. Under the home ownership benefits, an
employee receives certain cost benefits provided by us when
purchasing a home or having one built by us. Sales of homes to
employees for investment purposes are conducted at market prices.
13
In September 2005, Comstock Foundation, Inc., an affiliate, was
created. Comstock Foundation is a
not-for-profit
organization organized exclusively for charitable purposes
within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code. The affairs of Comstock Foundation are managed by
a five person board of directors with Christopher Clemente,
Gregory Benson, Bruce Labovitz and Tracy Schar (employee of the
Company and spouse of Christopher Clemente) being four of the
five. The Company will also provide bookkeeping services to the
affiliate. In October 2005 the Company made a $100,000 cash
donation to Comstock Foundation and granted the right to use
27 units at the Companys Penderbrook condominium
conversion project in Fairfax, Virginia for a period of six
months. Comstock Foundation will provide these units to the
victims of Hurricane Katrina. The fair market value of the
rental units donated is $237,000.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee is composed exclusively of
independent directors. The Committee reviews the compensation
program for the Chief Executive Officer and other members of
senior management, including the named executive officers, and
determines and administers their compensation. In the case of
the Chief Executive Officer, the compensation determination made
by the Committee is also subject to approval by the entire Board
of Directors. The Committee also oversees the administration of
employee benefits and benefit plans for the Company.
Compensation
Philosophy and Objectives
The Committees philosophy is to provide a compensation
package that attracts and retains executive talent and delivers
higher rewards for superior performance and consequences for
underperformance. It is also the Committees intention to
provide a balanced mix of cash and equity-based compensation
that the Committee believes is appropriate to align the short-
and long-term interests of the Companys executives with
that of its stockholders and to encourage executives to act as
equity owners of the Company.
The Committee seeks to attract and retain executive talent by
offering competitive base salaries, annual performance incentive
opportunities, and the potential for long-term rewards under the
Companys Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, which has
been approved by the Companys stockholders. It is the
Committees intention to provide incentives that promote
both the short- and long-term financial objectives of the
Company. Achievement of short-term objectives is rewarded
through base salary and annual performance incentives, while
long-term equity-based incentive grants encourage executives to
focus on the Companys long-term goals as well. These
incentives are based on financial objectives of importance to
the Company, including revenue and earnings growth, return on
invested capital, and profitability. The Companys
compensation program also accounts for individual performance,
which enables the Committee to differentiate among executives
and emphasize the link between personal performance and
compensation.
The long-term incentive component of the Companys
compensation program may consist of grants of bonus stock
awards, time-vested restricted stock, stock options or stock
appreciation rights, among other equity-linked vehicles. These
components reflect the Committees philosophy that
long-term incentive compensation serves three purposes: to align
the interests of executives with those of the Companys
stockholders (through stock options or stock appreciation
rights), to promote the Companys long-term performance
goals (through performance-based awards), and to further
executive retention (through time-vested restricted stock
grants).
Compensation
in 2005
The following generally describes how the Companys
executive officers and, in particular, the named executive
officers, were paid in 2005. Please see the tables under
Summary Compensation Table on page 6 for a
detailed presentation of the compensation earned by the named
executive officers in 2005. The specifics of the Chief Executive
Officers compensation are addressed separately in this
report.
14
Base
Salaries
Base salaries are viewed as compensation for an executives
ongoing contribution to the performance of the Company in the
area or areas for which he or she is responsible. Executive base
salaries are targeted to be competitive with average base
salaries paid to executives with comparable responsibilities at
other companies in the home building sector. Individual salaries
are reviewed annually and salary increases are based on the
Companys overall performance and the executives
attainment of individual objectives during the preceding year.
Annual
Incentive Awards
Annual incentive awards are paid in cash and are intended to
reward executives for improved short-term performance as
measured against specific performance criteria relative to both
the area or areas for which he or she is responsible and the
overall performance of the Company. Applicable performance
criteria are established by the Company at the beginning of the
fiscal year and include performance in pre-tax profit, pre-tax
return on investment, lot deliveries, community count,
controlled land inventory and other performance benchmarks
specific to the executives business. The Board considered
the Companys strong financial position at the end of the
fiscal year, including approximately $42 million of cash,
stockholders equity of approximately $145 million and
net profit of approximately $27.5 million. Additionally,
the Company increased total revenues approximately 135% to
$224.3 million. Based on these quantitative results and
specific performance criteria for each executive, annual
incentive awards were awarded to the named executive officers as
set forth in the table entitled Summary Compensation
Table on page 6.
Long-Term
Incentive Compensation
Long-term incentive compensation is generally awarded in the
form of grants of stock options and restricted stock under the
Companys Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan. Stock
options are granted at the market price of the Companys
stock at the date of grant, and provide compensation to the
optionee only to the extent the market price of the stock
increases between the date of grant and the date the option is
exercised. In general, grants of the Companys restricted
stock have vesting periods ranging from one to four years.
Furthermore, such grants are subject to certain restrictions.
By providing executives with an ownership stake in the Company,
grants of stock options and restricted stock are intended to
align executive interests with stockholder interests and to
motivate executives to continually improve the long-term
performance of the Company. As shown in the table entitled
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year on page 9, a
stock option grant was made in 2005 to four of the named
executive officers. Use of restricted stock as a part of the
annual grant process is intended to encourage direct share
ownership by executives and to provide an additional retention
incentive for members of the executive team. The named executive
officers options and restricted stock grants are reflected
in the table entitled Summary Compensation Table on
page 6.
Compensation
of Chief Executive Officer in 2005
Mr. Clementes compensation is largely driven by cash
and stock-based incentives that are directly tied to the
Companys financial performance. Mr. Clemente entered into
an employment agreement with the Company in 2004 for a term of
five years. The employment agreement provides that the Board of
Directors may, in its discretion, increase
Mr. Clementes base salary from time to time, above
his minimum salary of $550,000. In 2005,
Mr. Clementes base salary was $550,000. For 2005,
Mr. Clemente received an annual incentive award or cash
bonus of $700,000.
Under his employment agreement, Mr. Clemente is also
eligible to participate in the Companys 2004 Long-Term
Incentive Compensation Plan and other similar executive
compensation plans adopted from time to time. The Committee
employs generally the same criteria for grants of stock options
and restricted stock as apply to other executive officers,
taking into consideration the Chief Executive Officers
responsibility for the total enterprise as well as
Mr. Clementes individual performance. In 2005, Mr.
Clemente received a discretionary grant of 41,096 options to
purchase shares of the Companys Class A common stock,
in connection with his performance in successfully closing a
follow-on offering of the Companys shares.
15
Section 162(m)
of the Internal Revenue Code
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally
disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation
over $1,000,000 paid for any fiscal year to the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and the named executive officers. The
Company intends to attempt to qualify executive compensation for
deductibility under applicable tax laws to the fullest extent
practicable. The Committee will not, however, necessarily seek
to limit executive compensation to the amount deductible under
Section 162(m).
The
Committees Conclusion
The Committee has reviewed all components of the Companys
Chief Executive Officers and other named executive
officers compensation, including salary, bonus, equity and
long-term incentive compensation, the dollar value to the
executive and the cost to the Company of all other personal
benefits. The Committee believes that the total compensation
program for the Companys Chief Executive Officer and named
executive officers is consistent with the overall compensation
philosophy of the Company, is appropriately positioned
vis-à-vis their peers, and reflects the Committees
subjective assessment of their performance as Chief Executive
Officer and executive officers, respectively.
This report has been furnished by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors:
David M. Guernsey
Socrates Verses
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, our
Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Guernsey,
Verses and Martin. Mr. Martin resigned from the Board of
Directors, effective February 28, 2006. None of these
individuals had any contractual or other relationships with us
during the fiscal year except as directors.
16
REPORT OF
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the oversight of
our Board of Directors in the integrity of the financial
statements of our Company, our Companys compliance with
legal and regulatory matters, the independent registered public
accounting firms qualifications and independence, and the
performance of our Companys audit, both internally and by
the Companys independent registered public accounting
firm. The primary responsibilities of the Committee include
overseeing our Companys accounting and financial reporting
processes and audits of the financial statements of our Company.
Management has the primary responsibility for the financial
statements and the reporting process, including the systems of
internal controls.
In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Committee
reviewed with management the audited financial statements
contained in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005. The review included a
discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the
accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant
judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial
statements.
The Companys independent registered public accounting firm
is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of
the audited financial statements with generally accepted
accounting principles. The Committee reviewed with
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLPs judgment as to the quality, not just the
acceptability, of the Companys accounting principles. The
Committee discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the results
of the annual audit and any other matters required to be
communicated to the Committee by the independent registered
public accounting firm under generally accepted auditing
standards, applicable law, or listing standards, including
matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing
Standard No. 61 (Communication with Audit Committees), as
amended by Statement on Auditing Standard No. 90. In
addition, the Committee received from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
written disclosures and the letter required by Independence
Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions
with Audit Committees). The Committee discussed with the
independent registered public accounting firm the firms
independence from management and our Company, including the
matters covered by the written disclosures and letter provided
by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The Committee also considered
whether the provision of non-audit services by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is compatible with maintaining the
registered public accounting firms independence.
The Committee discussed with the independent registered public
accounting firm the overall scope and plans for their respective
audits. The Committee met with the independent registered public
accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss
the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting, and
the overall quality of the Companys financial reporting.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the
Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited
financial statements be included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 for filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Committee also appointed
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm for 2006, subject to
stockholder ratification.
This report has been furnished by the Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors:
James A. MacCutcheon
A. Clayton Perfall
Robert P. Pincus
17
PERFORMANCE
GRAPH
The following line graph compares cumulative total stockholder
returns for the period from December 14, 2004, the date of
our initial public offering, through December 31, 2005 for
(1) our Class A common stock; (2) the Nasdaq
Stock Market (U.S.) Index; and (3) the Standard &
Poors Homebuilding Index. The graph assumes an investment
of $100 on December 14, 2004, which was the first day on
which our stock was listed on the Nasdaq National Market. The
calculations of cumulative stockholder return on the Nasdaq
Stock Market (U.S.) Index and Standard & Poors
Homebuilding Index include reinvestment of dividends, but the
calculation of cumulative stockholder return on our Class A
common stock does not include reinvestment of dividends because
we did not pay dividends during the measurement period. The
performance shown is not necessarily indicative of future
performance.
COMPARISON
OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Public
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Investment on
|
|
|
Investment on
|
|
|
|
December 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
Comstock Homebuilding Companies,
Inc.
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
137.31
|
|
|
|
$
|
88.19
|
|
NASDAQ U.S. Index
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
100.73
|
|
|
|
$
|
102.86
|
|
S&P 500 Homebuilding Index
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
104.68
|
|
|
|
$
|
132.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS, DIRECTORS AND
OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock on April 7, 2006,
by (1) each director and named executive officer of our
Company, (2) all directors and executive officers of our
Company as a group, and (3) each person known by us to own
more than 5% of our common stock.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules
of the SEC. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned
by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, shares
of Class A common stock subject to options held by that
person that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable
within 60 days after April 7, 2006, are deemed
outstanding, while the shares are not deemed outstanding for
purposes of computing percentage ownership of any other person.
Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, the persons
and entities named in the table have sole voting or investment
power with respect to all shares beneficially owned, subject to
community property laws where applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Ownership of
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Class A and Class B
|
|
|
|
Common Stock(1)
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Economic
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
Name of Beneficial
Owner
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Class
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Class
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(%)(2)
|
|
|
Executive Officers and
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher Clemente(3)
|
|
|
1,184,531
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
|
1,366,750
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
41.2
|
%
|
Gregory V. Benson(4)
|
|
|
1,021,538
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,366,750
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
40.9
|
%
|
Bruce J. Labovitz(5)
|
|
|
57,038
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
William P. Bensten(6)
|
|
|
126,386
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jason Parikh(7)
|
|
|
26,126
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
A. Clayton Perfall(8)
|
|
|
3,756
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
David M. Guernsey(9)
|
|
|
3,964
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
James A. MacCuthcheon(10)
|
|
|
2,134
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gary Martin(11)
|
|
|
2,125
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert P. Pincus(12)
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Socrates Verses(13)
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Norman D. Chirite(14)
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All directors and officers as a
group (14 persons)
|
|
|
2,472,701
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
2,733,500
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
|
|
82.6
|
%
|
Other 5% Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Munder Capital Management(15)
|
|
|
1,411,256
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
Hayground Cove Asset Management(15)
|
|
|
867,300
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
Springhouse Asset Management,
LLC(15)
|
|
|
821,410
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Babson Capital Management, LLC(15)
|
|
|
599,510
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock |
|
(1) |
|
Does not include shares of Class A common stock issuable
upon conversion of Class B common stock. |
|
(2) |
|
Percentage total voting power represents voting power with
respect to all shares of our Class A and Class B
common stock, as a single class. Each holder of Class B
common stock shall be entitled to fifteen votes per share of
Class B common stock and each holder of Class A common
stock shall be entitled to one vote per share of Class A
common stock on all matters submitted to our stockholders for a
vote. The Class A common stock and the Class B common
stock vote together as a single class on all matters submitted
to a vote of our stockholders, except as may otherwise provided
in our certificate of incorporation or as required by law. The |
19
|
|
|
|
|
Class B common stock is convertible at any time by the
holder into shares of Class A common stock on a
share-for-share
basis. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 110,098 unvested shares of restricted stock grants,
5,380 of such shares are held by Christopher Clementes
wife, Tracy Schar. 69,333 shares of Class A common
stock and 1,366,750 shares of Class B common stock are
held by FR54, LLC, an entity that is wholly owned by Mr.
Clemente. 1,000 shares are held in trust for the benefit of
Nicholas Schar Clemente, 1,000 shares are held in trust for
the benefit of Michael Douglas Schar Clemente, 1,000 shares
are held in trust for the benefit Dylan Schar Clemente,
1,000 shares are held in trust for the benefit of Noah
Fitzgerald Schar Clemente, 1,000 shares are held in trust
for the benefit of Mary Madelene Schar Clemente, and
100 shares are held in trust for the benefit Christian
George Taylor. Mr. Clemente is the custodian for each trust. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 60,955 unvested shares of restricted stock grants.
350,083 shares of Class A common stock and
1,366,750 shares of Class B common stock are held by
Clareth LLC, an entity that is wholly owned by Mr. Benson. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 55,297 unvested shares of restricted stock grants and
shares purchased pursuant to the our employee stock purchase
program. 200 shares are held in trust for the benefit of
Jennifer Labovitz, 200 shares are held in trust for the
benefit of Jacob Labovitz, and 200 shares are held in trust
for the benefit of Sarah Labovitz. Mr. Labovitz is the
custodian for each trust. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes 126,386 unvested shares of restricted stock grants. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes 12,425 unvested shares of restricted stock grants. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 2,205 unvested shares of restricted stock grants. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes 1,180 unvested shares of restricted stock grants. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes 1,222 unvested shares of restricted stock grants. |
|
(11) |
|
Includes 1,304 unvested shares of restricted stock grants.
Mr. Martin resigned as a member of the Board of Directors
effective February 28, 2006. |
|
(12) |
|
Includes 1,180 unvested shares of restricted stock grants. |
|
(13) |
|
Includes 1,222 unvested shares of restricted stock grants.
2,000 shares of the Class A common stock, with respect
to which Mr. Verses disclaims beneficial ownership, are
held in trust for the benefit of Mr. Verses children.
Mr. Verses wife is the custodian of these trusts. |
|
(14) |
|
Mr. Chirite was nominated and appointed to succeed and
complete the unexpired term of Mr. Gary Martin as of
March 1, 2006. |
|
(15) |
|
This information is based on Schedule 13G, as amended,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the
stockholder. |
SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors,
officers, and persons that own more than 10% of a registered
class of our Companys equity securities to file reports of
ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Officers,
directors, and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC
regulations to furnish our Company with copies of all
Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely upon our review
of the copies of such forms received by us during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005, and written representations
that no other reports were required, we believe that each person
who, at any time during such fiscal year, was a director,
officer, or beneficial owner of more than 10% of our common
stock complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements
during such fiscal year, except that Form 4s for each of
Messrs. Guernsey, MacCutcheon, Martin, Perfall, Pincus and
Verses reporting the acquisition of 1,180, 1,222, 1,304, 2,205,
1,180 and 1,122 shares of restricted Class A common
stock, respectively, which were due to be filed on June 28,
2005 were filed late on June 30, 2005.
20
RATIFICATION
OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
The firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, has audited the consolidated
financial statements of our Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005. Our Audit Committee has appointed
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to audit the consolidated financial
statements of our Company for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2006. Our organizational documents do not
require that our stockholders ratify the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm. We are submitting the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to our stockholders for ratification
because we believe it is a matter of good corporate practice. In
the event of a negative vote on such ratification, the Audit
Committee will reconsider its selection, but may still retain
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. We anticipate that representatives
of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will be present at the meeting,
will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire,
and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote for
the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
The aggregate fees billed to our Company by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Audit-Related Fees(1)
|
|
$
|
948,800
|
|
|
$
|
1,025,000
|
|
Tax Fees(2)
|
|
$
|
145,979
|
|
|
$
|
191,450
|
|
Other Fees-Compensation and Peer
Comparison Study(3)
|
|
$
|
5,560
|
|
|
$
|
58,987
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes fees related to the annual independent audit of the
Companys financial statements and various fees related to
services provided in connection with the Companys filing
of Registration Statements with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and related comfort letters. |
|
(2) |
|
Tax Fees represent amounts billed for tax compliance and
advisory services. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents fees related to advisory services rendered in
connection with the Companys study of compensation
practices of peer companies. |
The charter of our Audit Committee provides that the duties and
responsibilities of our Audit Committee include the pre-approval
of all audit, audit-related, tax, and other services permitted
by law or applicable SEC regulations (including fee and cost
ranges) to be performed by our independent registered public
accounting firm. Any pre-approved services that will involve
fees or costs exceeding pre-approved levels will also require
specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Unless otherwise
specified by the Audit Committee in pre-approving a service, the
pre-approval will be effective for the
12-month
period following pre-approval. The Audit Committee will not
approve any non-audit services prohibited by applicable SEC
regulations or any services in connection with a transaction
initially recommended by the independent registered public
accounting firm, the purpose of which may be tax avoidance and
the tax treatment of which may not be supported by the Internal
Revenue Code and related regulations.
To the extent deemed appropriate, the Audit Committee may
delegate pre-approval authority to the Chairman of the Audit
Committee or any one or more other members of the Audit
Committee provided that any member of the Audit Committee who
has exercised any such delegation must report any such
pre-approval decision to the Audit Committee at its next
scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee will not delegate to
management the pre-approval of services to be performed by the
independent registered public accounting firm.
Our Audit Committee requires that our independent registered
public accounting firm, in conjunction with our Chief Financial
Officer, be responsible for seeking pre-approval for providing
services to us and that any request for pre-approval must inform
the Audit Committee about each service to be provided and must
provide detail as to the particular service to be provided.
All of the services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
described above under the captions Audit-Related
Fees, Tax Fees and Other Fees were
approved by our Audit Committee.
21
DEADLINE
FOR RECEIPT OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
In order to be included in the proxy statement and form of proxy
relating to our annual meeting of stockholders to be held during
2007, stockholder proposals that are intended to be presented by
stockholders must be received at our principal executive offices
(a) no later than December 21, 2006 if our 2007 annual
meeting of stockholders is held on a day that is between
May 3, 2007 and July 2, 2007; or (b) if the
annual meeting is to be held on another date, no earlier than
120 days in advance of such annual meeting and no later
than the close of business on the later of (i) 90 days
in advance of such annual meeting, or (ii) the
10th day following the date on which public announcement of
the date of such meeting is first made.
Pursuant to
Rule 14a-4
under the Exchange Act, we intend to retain discretionary
authority to vote proxies with respect to stockholder proposals
for which the proponent does not seek to have us include the
proposed matter in the proxy statement for the annual meeting to
be held during calendar 2007, except in circumstances where
(1) we receive notice of the proposed matter no earlier
than February 2, 2007 and no later than March 4, 2007,
and (2) the proponent complies with the other requirements
set forth in
Rule 14a-4.
INCORPORATED
BY REFERENCE
To the extent that this proxy statement is incorporated by
reference into any other filing by us under the Securities Act
of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the sections of
this proxy statement entitled Compensation Committee
Report on Executive compensation, Report of the
Audit Committee (to the extent permitted by the rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission) and Performance
Graph will not be deemed incorporated unless specifically
provided otherwise in such filing.
OTHER
MATTERS
We know of no other matters to be submitted to the meeting. If
any other matters properly come before the meeting, it is the
intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy card to
vote the shares they represent as our Board of Directors may
recommend.
Dated: April 14, 2006
22
This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
COMSTOCK HOMEBUILDING COMPANIES, INC.
2006 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
The undersigned stockholder of Comstock Homebuilding Companies, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, hereby acknowledges receipt of the notice of annual meeting of stockholders and proxy
statement, each dated April 14, 2006, and hereby appoints Bruce A. Labovitz and Jubal R. Thompson
and each of them, proxies and attorneys-in-fact, with full power to each of substitution, on behalf
and in the name of the undersigned, to represent the undersigned at the 2006 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of Comstock Homebuilding Companies, Inc. to be held on Thursday, June 1, 2006, at 9:00
a.m., local time, at the Comstock Sales Center, 1980 Isaac Newton Square, Reston, Virginia, and at
any adjournment or adjournments thereof, and to vote all shares of common stock which the
undersigned would be entitled to vote if then and there personally present on the matters set forth
on the reverse side of this proxy card.
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
COMSTOCK HOMEBUILDING COMPANIES, INC.
June 1, 2006
Please date, sign and mail your proxy card in the
envelope provided as soon as possible
â Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided. â
FOR EACH OF THE MATTERS SET FORTH BELOW, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE
MATTER SUBMITTED. PLEASE SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE INK AS SHOWN HERE x
1. |
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o FOR all nominees
|
|
o
|
|
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY for all nominees
|
|
|
o
|
FOR ALL EXCEPT (see instructions below) |
|
|
|
|
|
o Gregory V. Benson |
|
|
o Norman D. Chirite |
|
|
o Socrates Verses |
INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark FOR ALL EXCEPT
and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here: ¡
2. |
|
PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF OUR COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2006. |
o FOR o AGAINST o ABSTAIN
3. |
|
IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY BE
PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. |
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO CONTRARY DIRECTION IS INDICATED, FOR THE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS AND FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS
THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF OUR COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING
DECEMBER 31, 2006, AND AS SAID PROXIES DEEM ADVISABLE ON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY COME BEFORE THE
MEETING.
A majority of such attorneys or substitutes as shall be present and shall act at said meeting
or any adjournment or adjournments thereof (or if only one shall be present and act, then that one)
shall have and may exercise all of the powers of said attorneys-in-fact hereunder.
To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new
address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the
account may not be substituted via this method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature of Stockholder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature of Stockholder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held
jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or
guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full
corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership,
please sign in partnership name by authorized person.