Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-04065
Lancaster Colony Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
13-1955943 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
37 West Broad Street
|
|
43215 |
Columbus, Ohio
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
614-224-7141
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of April 29, 2011, there were approximately 27,441,000 shares of Common Stock, without par
value, outstanding.
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements |
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except share data) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
107,702 |
|
|
$ |
100,890 |
|
Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts,
March$602; June$516) |
|
|
77,928 |
|
|
|
67,766 |
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
|
35,593 |
|
|
|
36,812 |
|
Finished goods and work in process |
|
|
68,528 |
|
|
|
84,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
|
104,121 |
|
|
|
121,509 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other current assets |
|
|
27,466 |
|
|
|
27,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
317,217 |
|
|
|
317,399 |
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, buildings and improvements |
|
|
137,446 |
|
|
|
129,747 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
259,204 |
|
|
|
242,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost |
|
|
396,650 |
|
|
|
371,771 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
215,576 |
|
|
|
205,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment net |
|
|
181,074 |
|
|
|
166,097 |
|
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
89,840 |
|
|
|
89,840 |
|
Other intangible assets net |
|
|
8,641 |
|
|
|
9,514 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
4,657 |
|
|
|
3,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
601,429 |
|
|
$ |
586,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
39,976 |
|
|
$ |
41,904 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
38,362 |
|
|
|
36,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
78,338 |
|
|
|
77,953 |
|
|
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
|
|
16,667 |
|
|
|
19,138 |
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
8,578 |
|
|
|
4,454 |
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock authorized 3,050,000 shares; outstanding none
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock authorized 75,000,000 shares; outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 27,437,047 shares; June 28,167,549 shares |
|
|
96,725 |
|
|
|
94,885 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,130,446 |
|
|
|
1,080,015 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(9,566 |
) |
|
|
(9,797 |
) |
Common stock in treasury, at cost |
|
|
(719,759 |
) |
|
|
(680,195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
497,846 |
|
|
|
484,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
601,429 |
|
|
$ |
586,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
252,623 |
|
|
$ |
250,328 |
|
|
$ |
833,912 |
|
|
$ |
808,603 |
|
|
Cost of Sales |
|
|
200,089 |
|
|
|
188,405 |
|
|
|
645,063 |
|
|
|
598,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
52,534 |
|
|
|
61,923 |
|
|
|
188,849 |
|
|
|
210,407 |
|
|
Selling, General and
Administrative Expenses |
|
|
23,060 |
|
|
|
24,328 |
|
|
|
72,441 |
|
|
|
69,196 |
|
|
Restructuring and Impairment Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
29,474 |
|
|
|
37,508 |
|
|
|
116,408 |
|
|
|
139,078 |
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income Continued Dumping and
Subsidy Offset Act |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
Interest income and other net |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
29,528 |
|
|
|
37,502 |
|
|
|
117,518 |
|
|
|
140,024 |
|
|
Taxes Based on Income |
|
|
10,087 |
|
|
|
13,280 |
|
|
|
40,447 |
|
|
|
47,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
19,441 |
|
|
$ |
24,222 |
|
|
$ |
77,071 |
|
|
$ |
92,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
.71 |
|
|
$ |
.86 |
|
|
$ |
2.77 |
|
|
$ |
3.27 |
|
|
Cash Dividends Per Common Share |
|
$ |
.33 |
|
|
$ |
.30 |
|
|
$ |
.96 |
|
|
$ |
.885 |
|
|
Weighted Average Common
Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
27,494 |
|
|
|
28,173 |
|
|
|
27,755 |
|
|
|
28,134 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
27,520 |
|
|
|
28,198 |
|
|
|
27,781 |
|
|
|
28,163 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
77,071 |
|
|
$ |
92,154 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,469 |
|
|
|
15,666 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other noncash changes |
|
|
5,643 |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
Restructuring and impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
528 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of property |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
Pension plan activity |
|
|
(1,442 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(10,803 |
) |
|
|
(19,204 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
17,388 |
|
|
|
4,990 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
(2,231 |
) |
|
|
(9,350 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(2,081 |
) |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
98,028 |
|
|
|
86,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on property additions |
|
|
(26,857 |
) |
|
|
(8,088 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Other net |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
(953 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(26,631 |
) |
|
|
(9,013 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(39,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends |
|
|
(26,640 |
) |
|
|
(24,959 |
) |
Proceeds from the exercise of stock awards |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
4,276 |
|
Increase in cash overdraft balance |
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(64,585 |
) |
|
|
(20,683 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and equivalents |
|
|
6,812 |
|
|
|
57,178 |
|
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
100,890 |
|
|
|
38,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
107,702 |
|
|
$ |
95,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Operating Cash Flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
|
$ |
37,821 |
|
|
$ |
55,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial
information and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In our opinion, the
interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation
of the results of operations and financial position for such periods. All such adjustments
reflected in the interim consolidated financial statements are considered to be of a normal
recurring nature. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative
of results for the full year. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Unless otherwise noted, the term year and references to a particular year pertain to our fiscal
year, which begins on July 1 and ends on June 30; for example, 2011 refers to fiscal 2011, which is
the period from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011.
Subsequent Events
We have evaluated events occurring between the end of our most recent fiscal quarter and the
date the financial statements were issued and, except as disclosed in Note 11 regarding receipts under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000, noted no events that would require recognition or
disclosure in these financial statements.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Purchases of
property, plant and equipment included in accounts payable at March 31, 2011 and 2010 were
approximately $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively. These purchases, less the preceding June
30 balances, have been excluded from the property additions and the change in accounts payable in
the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Held for Sale
As a result of various prior-years restructuring and divestiture activities, we have certain
held for sale properties with a total net book value of approximately $2.9 million at March 31,
2011. We have classified approximately $0.4 million of these held for sale assets as current
assets and they are included in Deferred Income Taxes and Other Current Assets on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet. The remaining balance of approximately $2.5 million is included in Other Noncurrent
Assets. In accordance with GAAP for property, plant and equipment, we are no longer depreciating
these held for sale assets and they are being actively marketed for sale.
Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share (EPS) is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of
common stock and common stock equivalents (stock options, restricted stock and stock-settled stock
appreciation rights) outstanding during each period. Unvested shares of restricted stock granted to
employees are considered participating securities since employees receive nonforfeitable dividends
prior to vesting and, therefore, are included in the earnings allocation in computing EPS under the
two-class method. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to
common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted EPS is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period, which includes the dilutive
potential common shares associated with outstanding stock options, restricted stock and
stock-settled stock appreciation rights.
6
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Basic and diluted net income per common share were calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
19,441 |
|
|
$ |
24,222 |
|
|
$ |
77,071 |
|
|
$ |
92,154 |
|
Net income available to participating securities |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
19,416 |
|
|
$ |
24,177 |
|
|
$ |
76,962 |
|
|
$ |
91,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
basic |
|
|
27,494 |
|
|
|
28,173 |
|
|
|
27,755 |
|
|
|
28,134 |
|
Incremental share effect from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Stock-settled stock appreciation rights |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
diluted |
|
|
27,520 |
|
|
|
28,198 |
|
|
|
27,781 |
|
|
|
28,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
.71 |
|
|
$ |
.86 |
|
|
$ |
2.77 |
|
|
$ |
3.27 |
|
Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011 was
approximately $19.5 million and $77.3 million, respectively. Total comprehensive income for the
three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately $24.3 million and $92.6 million,
respectively. The March 31, 2011 and 2010 comprehensive income consists of net income and pension
and postretirement amortization.
Significant Accounting Policies
There were no changes to our Significant Accounting Policies from those disclosed in our 2010
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Note 2 Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
There were no recently issued accounting pronouncements that impact our consolidated financial
statements.
Note 3 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill attributable to the Specialty Foods segment was approximately $89.8 million at March
31, 2011 and June 30, 2010.
7
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
The following table summarizes our identifiable other intangible assets, all included
in the Specialty Foods segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Trademarks (40-year life) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
370 |
|
|
$ |
370 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Carrying Value |
|
$ |
186 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Relationships (12 to 15-year life) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
13,020 |
|
|
$ |
13,020 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(4,757 |
) |
|
|
(4,054 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Carrying Value |
|
$ |
8,263 |
|
|
$ |
8,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-compete Agreements (5 to 8-year life) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
1,540 |
|
|
$ |
1,540 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(1,348 |
) |
|
|
(1,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Carrying Value |
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Carrying Value |
|
$ |
8,641 |
|
|
$ |
9,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense relating to these assets was approximately $0.3 million and $0.9 million
for both the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Total annual
amortization expense is estimated to be approximately $1.1 million next year, $0.9 million for each
of the following three years and $0.8 million for the fifth year.
Note 4 Long-Term Debt
At March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010, we had an unsecured revolving credit facility under which
we may borrow up to a maximum of $160 million at any one time, with the potential to expand the
total credit availability to $260 million based on obtaining consent of the issuing bank and
certain other conditions. The facility expires in October 2012, and all outstanding amounts are
then due and payable. At March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010, we had no borrowings outstanding under
this facility. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. At March 31, 2011, we had
approximately $6.6 million of standby letters of credit outstanding, which reduce the amount
available for borrowing on the unsecured revolving credit facility.
Based on the long-term nature of this facility, when we have outstanding borrowings under this
facility, we classify the outstanding balance as long-term debt. We paid no interest for the three
and nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
The facility contains two principal financial covenants: an interest expense test that
requires us to maintain an interest coverage ratio not less than 2.5 to 1 at the end of each fiscal
quarter; and an indebtedness test that requires us to maintain a leverage ratio not greater than 3
to 1 at all times. The interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated EBIT (as
defined more specifically in the credit agreement) by Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined
more specifically in the credit agreement), and the leverage ratio is calculated by dividing
Consolidated Debt (as defined more specifically in the credit agreement) by Consolidated EBITDA (as
defined more specifically in the credit agreement). We met the requirements of these financial
covenants at March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010.
Note 5 Pension Benefits
We and certain of our operating subsidiaries have sponsored multiple defined benefit pension
plans covering union workers at certain locations. As a result of restructuring activities in
recent years, at March 31, 2011 there were no active employees continuing to accrue service cost or
otherwise eligible to receive plan benefits. Benefits being paid under the plans are primarily
based on negotiated rates and years of service. We contribute to these plans at least the minimum
amount required by regulation or contract.
8
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
The following table discloses net periodic benefit cost for our pension plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(507 |
) |
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
(1,521 |
) |
|
|
(1,613 |
) |
Curtailment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
$ |
746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the first quarter of 2010, one of our plans became subject to curtailment accounting. This
resulted in the immediate recognition of all of the outstanding prior service cost of the plan,
which was approximately $0.3 million. This charge was recorded in Restructuring and Impairment
Charges and related to our Specialty Foods segment.
For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011, we made pension plan contributions
totaling approximately $1.8 million. We do not expect to make any further contributions to our
pension plans during the remainder of 2011.
Note 6 Postretirement Benefits
We and certain of our operating subsidiaries provide multiple postretirement medical and life
insurance benefit plans. We recognize the cost of benefits as the employees render service.
Postretirement benefits are funded as incurred.
The following table discloses net periodic benefit cost for our postretirement plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized gain |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Amortization of prior service asset |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011, we made less than $0.1 million and
approximately $0.1 million, respectively, in contributions to our postretirement medical and life
insurance benefit plans. We expect to make approximately $0.1 million more in contributions to our
postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans during the remainder of 2011.
Note 7 Stock-Based Compensation
As approved by our shareholders in November 1995, the terms of the 1995 Key Employee Stock
Option Plan (the 1995 Plan) reserved 3,000,000 common shares for issuance to qualified key
employees. All
9
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
options granted under the 1995 Plan were exercisable at prices not less than fair market value
as of the date of grant. In general, options granted under the 1995 Plan vested immediately and had
a maximum term of five years. The 1995 Plan expired in August 2005, but there were options issued
under this plan that were exercisable through February 2010. There were no options outstanding
under this plan at March 31, 2011.
Our shareholders have approved the adoption of and subsequent amendments to the Lancaster
Colony Corporation 2005 Stock Plan (the 2005 Plan). The 2005 Plan reserved 2,000,000 common
shares for issuance to our employees and directors, and all awards granted under the 2005 Plan will
be exercisable at prices not less than fair market value as of the date of the grant. The vesting
period for awards granted under the 2005 Plan varies as to the type of award granted, but generally
these awards have a maximum term of five years.
Stock Options
Until 2008, we used stock options as the primary vehicle for rewarding certain employees with
long-term incentives for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value. We
calculated the fair value of option grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. There were
no grants of stock options during the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
We recognized compensation expense over the requisite service period. Total compensation cost
related to stock options was zero for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
There were no stock option exercises during the nine months ended March 31, 2011, and there are no
outstanding stock options at March 31, 2011.
During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, we received approximately $0.3 million
and $4.0 million, respectively, in cash from the exercise of stock options. The aggregate intrinsic
value of these options was approximately $0.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively. A related tax
benefit of less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.3 million was recorded in the three and nine
months ended March 31, 2010, respectively. These tax benefits were included in the financing
section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and resulted from incentive stock option
disqualifying dispositions and exercises of non-qualified options. The benefits included less than
$0.1 million of gross windfall tax benefits for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010.
Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights
Since 2008, we have used periodic grants of stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SSSARs)
as a vehicle for rewarding certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping
to create long-term shareholder value. We calculate the fair value of SSSARs grants using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Our policy is to issue shares upon SSSAR exercise from new
shares that had been previously authorized.
In February 2011 and 2010, we granted 94,000 and 167,950 SSSARs, respectively, to various
employees under the terms of the 2005 Plan. The weighted average per right fair value of the 2011
SSSARs grant was $10.12 and was estimated at the date of grant using the following assumptions:
risk-free interest rate of 1.27%; dividend yield of 2.28%; volatility factor of the expected market
price of our common stock of 28.78%; and a weighted average expected life of 3.11 years. The
weighted average per right fair value of the 2010 SSSARs grant was $11.81 and was estimated at the
date of grant using the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.67%; dividend yield of
2.04%; volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock of 29.97%; and a weighted
average expected life of 3.5 years. For both grants, the volatility factor was estimated based on
actual historical volatility of our stock for a time period equal to the term of the SSSARs. The
SSSARs from both grants vest one-third on the first anniversary of the grant date, one-third on the
second anniversary of the grant date and one-third on the third anniversary of the grant date. We
are assuming a forfeiture rate of four percent for each of these grants.
We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period. Total compensation cost
related to SSSARs was approximately $0.3 million and $0.9 million for the three and nine months
ended March 31,
10
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
2011, respectively, as compared to approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three
and nine months ended March 31, 2010, respectively. These amounts were reflected in Cost of Sales
or Selling, General and Administrative Expenses based on the grantees salaries expense
classification and were allocated to each segment appropriately. We recorded a tax benefit of
approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011,
respectively, as compared to less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.1 million for the three
and nine months ended March 31, 2010, respectively. We also recorded gross windfall tax benefits of
approximately $0.1 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to
approximately $0.3 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010. These windfall tax
benefits were included in the financing section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The following table summarizes the activity relating to SSSARs granted under the 2005 Plan for
the nine months ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Rights |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life in Years |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
309 |
|
|
$ |
49.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
39.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
94 |
|
|
$ |
57.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
51.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
364 |
|
|
$ |
52.49 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
|
|
$ |
2,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable and vested at end of period |
|
|
139 |
|
|
$ |
46.39 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
1,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at end of period |
|
|
358 |
|
|
$ |
52.49 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
|
|
$ |
2,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the status of, and changes to, unvested SSSARs during the nine
months ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Rights |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Unvested at beginning of period |
|
|
266 |
|
|
$ |
9.77 |
|
Granted |
|
|
94 |
|
|
$ |
10.12 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
$ |
8.63 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
10.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at end of period |
|
|
225 |
|
|
$ |
10.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011, there was approximately $2.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost
related to SSSARs that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.23
years.
Restricted Stock
Since 2008, we have used periodic grants of restricted stock as a vehicle for rewarding our
nonemployee directors and certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping
to create long-term shareholder value.
In February 2011 and 2010, we granted a total of 6,750 and 25,000 shares of restricted stock,
respectively, to various key employees under the terms of the 2005 Plan. The restricted stock
granted in 2011 had a grant date fair value of approximately $0.4 million based on a per share
closing stock price of $57.78. The restricted stock granted in 2010 had a grant date fair value of
approximately $1.5 million based on a per share closing stock price of $58.79. The restricted stock
under each of these grants vests on the third anniversary of the grant date. We are assuming a
forfeiture rate of four percent for each of these grants. Under the terms of the grants, employees
will receive dividends on unforfeited restricted stock regardless of
11
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
their vesting status. An additional 21,500 shares of restricted stock that were granted to
various key employees in February 2008 vested during the third quarter of 2011.
In November 2010, we granted a total of 8,155 shares of restricted stock to our seven
nonemployee directors under the terms of the 2005 Plan. The restricted stock had a grant date fair
value of approximately $0.4 million based on a per share closing stock price of $51.52. This
restricted stock vests over a one-year period, and all of these shares are expected to vest.
Dividends earned on the stock during the vesting period are held in escrow and will be paid to the
directors at the time the stock vests. An additional 8,435 shares of restricted stock that were
granted to our seven nonemployee directors in November 2009 vested during the second quarter of
2011, and the directors were paid the related dividends that had been held in escrow.
We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period. Total compensation cost
related to restricted stock for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011 was approximately
$0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, as compared to approximately $0.2 million and $0.6
million in the corresponding periods of the prior year. These amounts were reflected in Cost of
Sales or Selling, General and Administrative Expenses based on the grantees salaries expense
classification and were allocated to each segment appropriately. We recorded a tax benefit of
approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011,
respectively, as compared to approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million in the corresponding
periods of the prior year. We recorded gross windfall tax benefits of approximately $0.1 million
for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011. We recorded gross windfall tax benefits of zero
and less than $0.1 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, respectively. These
windfall tax benefits were included in the financing section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows.
The following table summarizes the activity relating to restricted stock granted under the
2005 Plan for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Unvested restricted stock at beginning of period |
|
|
61 |
|
|
$ |
48.43 |
|
Granted |
|
|
15 |
|
|
$ |
54.35 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
41.83 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
49.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock at end of period |
|
|
44 |
|
|
$ |
54.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected to vest restricted stock at end of period |
|
|
44 |
|
|
$ |
54.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011, there was approximately $1.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense
related to restricted stock that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of approximately
1.88 years.
Note 8 Restructuring and Impairment Charges
Specialty Foods Segment Fiscal 2010
In 2010, we closed our dressings and sauces manufacturing operation located in Wilson, New
York. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded restructuring charges of
approximately $0.1 million (less than $0.1 million after taxes) and $2.3 million ($1.5 million
after taxes), respectively. The total costs associated with this plant closure were approximately
$2.3 million ($1.5 million after taxes) and were mainly recorded in the first half of 2010. This
closure was essentially complete at December 31, 2009. We do not expect any other restructuring
costs or cash expenditures related to this closure.
Note 9 Income Taxes
The gross tax contingency reserve at March 31, 2011 was approximately $1.5 million and
consisted of tax liabilities of approximately $0.8 million and penalties and interest of
approximately $0.7 million. We
12
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
have classified approximately $0.1 million of the gross tax contingency reserve as current
liabilities as these amounts are expected to be resolved within the next 12 months. The remaining
liability of approximately $1.4 million is included in long-term liabilities. We expect that the
amount of these liabilities will change within the next 12 months; however, we do not expect the
change to have a significant effect on our financial position or results of operations. We
recognize interest and penalties related to these tax liabilities in income tax expense.
During 2010, we executed several state tax voluntary disclosure agreements. The settlement of
these liabilities resulted in pre-tax income of approximately $0.9 million, which impacted our
effective tax rate for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 by approximately 0.5%.
Note 10 Business Segment Information
The following summary of financial information by business segment is consistent with the
basis of segmentation and measurement of segment profit or loss presented in our June 30, 2010
consolidated financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Foods |
|
$ |
217,436 |
|
|
$ |
216,471 |
|
|
$ |
692,539 |
|
|
$ |
675,911 |
|
Glassware and Candles |
|
|
35,187 |
|
|
|
33,857 |
|
|
|
141,373 |
|
|
|
132,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
252,623 |
|
|
$ |
250,328 |
|
|
$ |
833,912 |
|
|
$ |
808,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Foods |
|
$ |
31,664 |
|
|
$ |
38,702 |
|
|
$ |
121,025 |
|
|
$ |
138,000 |
|
Glassware and Candles |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
5,044 |
|
|
|
9,485 |
|
Corporate Expenses |
|
|
(2,866 |
) |
|
|
(2,866 |
) |
|
|
(9,661 |
) |
|
|
(8,407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
29,474 |
|
|
$ |
37,508 |
|
|
$ |
116,408 |
|
|
$ |
139,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11 Commitments and Contingencies
In addition to the items discussed below, at March 31, 2011, we were a party to various claims
and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Such matters did not have a
material adverse effect on the current-year results of operations and, in our opinion, their
ultimate disposition will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
statements.
The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (CDSOA) provides for the distribution
of monies collected by U.S. Customs from antidumping cases to qualifying domestic producers. Our
reported CDSOA receipts totaled approximately $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2011, as
compared to a distribution of approximately $0.9 million in the corresponding period of 2010. These
remittances related to certain candles being imported from the Peoples Republic of China.
Legislation was enacted in February 2006 to repeal the applicability of the CDSOA to duties
collected on products imported after September 2007. Accordingly, we may receive some level of
annual distributions for an undetermined period of years in the future as the monies collected that
relate to entries filed prior to October 2007 are administratively finalized by U.S. Customs.
Without further legislative action, we expect these distributions will eventually cease.
In addition to this legislative development, cases have been brought in U.S. courts
challenging the CDSOA. In two separate cases, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled
that the procedure for determining recipients eligible to receive CDSOA distributions is
unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed both CIT decisions and
the U.S. Supreme Court did not hear either
13
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
case. This effectively ended the constitutional
challenges brought in these cases, but other cases challenging the CDSOA remain active.
Subsequent to March 31, 2011, we received notice of special CDSOA distributions totaling approximately $12.5 million,
of which we have received $2.6 million and expect to receive the remainder by June 30,
2011. These distributions relate to the resolution of the constitutional challenges discussed
above.
We are unable to determine, at this time, what the ultimate outcome
of other litigation will be, and it is possible that further legal action, potential additional
changes in the law and other factors could affect the amount of funds available for distribution,
including funds relating to entries prior to October 2007. Accordingly, we cannot predict the
amount of future distributions we may receive. Any change in CDSOA distributions could affect our
earnings and cash flow.
14
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Tabular dollars in thousands)
OVERVIEW
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(MD&A) describes the matters that we consider to be important in understanding the results of our
operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011 and our financial condition as of
March 31, 2011. Our fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. Unless otherwise noted,
references to year pertain to our fiscal year; for example, 2011 refers to fiscal 2011, which is
the period from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011. In the discussion that follows, we analyze the
results of our operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011, including the trends
in our overall business, followed by a discussion of our financial condition.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated
financial statements and the notes thereto, all included elsewhere in this report. The
forward-looking statements in this section and other parts of this report involve risks and
uncertainties including statements regarding our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and
financial performance. Our actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated in
these forward-looking statements as a result of factors set forth under the caption
Forward-Looking Statements.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Business Overview
Lancaster Colony Corporation is a diversified manufacturer and marketer of consumer products
focusing primarily on specialty foods for the retail and foodservice markets. We also manufacture
and market candles for the food, drug and mass markets. Although not material to our consolidated
operations, we are also engaged in the distribution of various products, including glassware and
candles, to commercial markets. Our operations are organized in two reportable segments: Specialty
Foods and Glassware and Candles. Over 90% of the sales of each segment are made to customers in
the United States.
In recent years, our strategy has shifted away from operating businesses in a variety of
industries towards emphasizing the growth and success we have achieved in our Specialty Foods
segment. Fiscal years prior to 2009 were significant years in implementing this strategy as we
divested various nonfood operations and focused our capital investment in the Specialty Foods
segment.
We view our food operations as having the potential to achieve future growth in sales and
profitability due to attributes such as:
|
|
|
leading retail market positions in several branded products with a high-quality perception; |
|
|
|
|
a broad customer base in both retail and foodservice accounts; |
|
|
|
|
well-regarded culinary expertise among foodservice accounts; |
|
|
|
|
recognized leadership in foodservice product development; |
|
|
|
|
demonstrated experience in integrating complementary business acquisitions; and |
|
|
|
|
historically strong cash flow generation that supports growth opportunities. |
Our goal is to grow our specialty foods retail and foodservice business over time by:
|
|
|
leveraging the strength of our retail brands to increase current product sales and
introduce new products; |
|
|
|
|
growing our foodservice sales through the strength of our reputation in product
development and quality; and |
|
|
|
|
pursuing acquisitions that meet our strategic criteria. |
15
We have made substantial capital investments to support our existing food operations and
future growth opportunities. Based on our current plans and expectations, including a current plant
expansion at our Kentucky frozen roll facility, we believe that total capital expenditures for 2011
will approach $40 million.
Summary of 2011 Results
The following is a comparative overview of our consolidated operating results for the three
and nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Net sales for the third quarter ended March 31, 2011 increased 1% to approximately $252.6
million from the prior-year total of $250.3 million. This sales growth reflects higher sales in
both operating segments. The Specialty Foods segments increase reflects higher foodservice sales,
which were partially offset by lower retail sales. The increase in sales of the Glassware and
Candles segment primarily reflects product placement with new customers. Gross margin decreased 15%
to approximately $52.5 million from the prior-year third quarter total of $61.9 million. Increasing
raw-material costs, as well as a less favorable sales mix and higher freight costs within the
Specialty Foods segment, contributed to the lower gross margin. Net income for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 totaled approximately $19.4 million, or $.71 per diluted share. Net income
totaled approximately $24.2 million in the third quarter of 2010, or $.86 per diluted share.
Year-to-date net sales for the period ended March 31, 2011 increased 3% to approximately
$833.9 million from the prior year-to-date total of $808.6 million. Gross margin decreased to
approximately $188.8 million from the prior year-to-date total of $210.4 million. Net income for
the nine months ended March 31, 2011 totaled approximately $77.1 million, or $2.77 per diluted
share. Net income totaled approximately $92.2 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2010, or
$3.27 per diluted share.
RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
Net Sales and Gross Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Foods |
|
$ |
217,436 |
|
|
$ |
216,471 |
|
|
$ |
965 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
692,539 |
|
|
$ |
675,911 |
|
|
$ |
16,628 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Glassware and Candles |
|
|
35,187 |
|
|
|
33,857 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
141,373 |
|
|
|
132,692 |
|
|
|
8,681 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
252,623 |
|
|
$ |
250,328 |
|
|
$ |
2,295 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
833,912 |
|
|
$ |
808,603 |
|
|
$ |
25,309 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin |
|
$ |
52,534 |
|
|
$ |
61,923 |
|
|
$ |
(9,389 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
$ |
188,849 |
|
|
$ |
210,407 |
|
|
$ |
(21,558 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin
as a Percentage of Sales |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
24.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net sales for the third quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2011
increased 1% and 3%, respectively, reflecting higher sales in both operating segments.
For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011, net sales of the Specialty Foods segment
increased by less than 1% and approximately 2%, respectively. Contribution from higher pricing for
these respective periods was approximately 2% and less than 1%. The segments foodservice net sales
rose approximately 12% and 9% for the three and nine month periods, respectively, on increased
volumes, particularly from new programs with existing large chain restaurants, and higher pricing.
Retail net sales for the nine month period were approximately 3% lower than the prior-year
comparative period as influenced by the prior year rationalization of some product lines associated
with the December 2009 closing of one of our dressing facilities. Retail net sales for the
three-month period declined by approximately 9%, reflecting weaker demand for certain product
lines, especially frozen rolls and refrigerated dips. The later Easter holiday occurring in 2011
also affected the sales comparisons, with the impact being estimated to total approximately 3% and
1%, respectively, of the segments net sales for the three and nine month periods. The later Easter
timing should improve retail sales comparisons for the three months ended June 30, 2011, although
the ultimate effect on demand from recently implemented pricing actions is uncertain.
The increase in net sales of the Glassware and Candles segment for both the three and nine
months ended March 31, 2011 primarily reflected the addition of new customer accounts.
16
As a percentage of sales, our consolidated gross margin for the three and nine months ended
March 31, 2011 was 20.8% and 22.6%, respectively, as compared to 24.7% and 26.0% achieved in the
prior-year comparative periods.
In the Specialty Foods segment, gross margin percentages declined in both the three and nine
months ended March 31, 2011, reflecting comparatively higher ingredient costs (especially for
soybean oil, dairy products, sugar and eggs), higher distribution costs, a less favorable sales mix
and lower production levels within our frozen roll operations. We estimate that higher material
costs adversely affected our gross margins in these periods by approximately 3% and 2% of net
sales, respectively. The increase in freight and warehousing costs were, in part, influenced by
higher diesel costs. Looking forward, we see higher material and freight costs continuing to
persist, presenting a comparative challenge to the fourth fiscal quarter. Based on current market
conditions, we expect to offset most of the higher material costs with the benefit of recent price
increases, including various retail pricing actions taken late in the third fiscal quarter.
Despite the benefits of achieving higher sales volumes, gross margin percentages in the
Glassware and Candles segment declined from the prior-year periods primarily due to higher wax
costs, which we believe are likely to persist and adversely affect comparative results through at
least the end of our fiscal 2011. This segment also experienced a less favorable sales mix.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Selling, General and
Administrative Expenses |
|
$ |
23,060 |
|
|
$ |
24,328 |
|
|
$ |
(1,268 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
$ |
72,441 |
|
|
$ |
69,196 |
|
|
$ |
3,245 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A Expenses as a
Percentage of Sales |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated selling, general and administrative costs of approximately $23.1 million and
$72.4 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011 decreased by 5% and increased by
5%, respectively, from the $24.3 million and $69.2 million incurred for the three and nine months
ended March 31, 2010, respectively. The third quarter decrease reflects lower consumer-directed
marketing expenses and professional fees within the Specialty Foods segment. Higher sales-based
expenses, increased compensation expense, greater consumer-directed marketing costs and higher
corporate expenses related to idle real estate contributed to the overall increase for the nine
months ended March 31, 2011.
Restructuring and Impairment Charges
Specialty Foods Segment Fiscal 2010
In 2010, we closed our dressings and sauces manufacturing operation located in Wilson, New
York. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded restructuring charges of
approximately $0.1 million (less than $0.1 million after taxes) and $2.3 million ($1.5 million
after taxes), respectively. The total costs associated with this plant closure were approximately
$2.3 million ($1.5 million after taxes) and were mainly recorded in the first half of 2010. This
closure was essentially complete at December 31, 2009. We do not expect any other restructuring
costs or cash expenditures related to this closure.
17
Operating Income
The foregoing factors contributed to consolidated operating income totaling approximately
$29.5 million and $116.4 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011, respectively.
These amounts represent decreases of 21% and 16%, respectively, from the corresponding periods of
the prior year. By segment, our operating income can be summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Foods |
|
$ |
31,664 |
|
|
$ |
38,702 |
|
|
$ |
(7,038 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
)% |
|
$ |
121,025 |
|
|
$ |
138,000 |
|
|
$ |
(16,975 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
Glassware and Candles |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
(996 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
)% |
|
|
5,044 |
|
|
|
9,485 |
|
|
|
(4,441 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
)% |
Corporate Expenses |
|
|
(2,866 |
) |
|
|
(2,866 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
(9,661 |
) |
|
|
(8,407 |
) |
|
|
(1,254 |
) |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
29,474 |
|
|
$ |
37,508 |
|
|
$ |
(8,034 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
)% |
|
$ |
116,408 |
|
|
$ |
139,078 |
|
|
$ |
(22,670 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income as a Percentage of Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Foods |
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glassware and Candles |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act
The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (CDSOA) provides for the distribution
of monies collected by U.S. Customs from antidumping cases to qualifying domestic producers. Our
reported CDSOA receipts totaled approximately $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2011, as
compared to a distribution of approximately $0.9 million in the corresponding period of 2010. These
remittances related to certain candles being imported from the Peoples Republic of China.
Legislation was enacted in February 2006 to repeal the applicability of the CDSOA to duties
collected on products imported after September 2007. Accordingly, we may receive some level of
annual distributions for an undetermined period of years in the future as the monies collected that
relate to entries filed prior to October 2007 are administratively finalized by U.S. Customs.
Without further legislative action, we expect these distributions will eventually cease.
In addition to this legislative development, cases have been brought in U.S. courts
challenging the CDSOA. In two separate cases, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled
that the procedure for determining recipients eligible to receive CDSOA distributions is
unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed both CIT decisions and
the U.S. Supreme Court did not hear either case. This effectively ended the constitutional
challenges brought in these cases, but other cases challenging the CDSOA remain active.
Subsequent to March 31,
2011, we received notice of special CDSOA distributions totaling approximately $12.5 million,
of which we have received $2.6 million and expect to receive the remainder by June 30,
2011. These distributions relate to the resolution of the constitutional challenges discussed
above.
We are
unable to determine, at this time, what the ultimate outcome of other litigation will be, and it is
possible that further legal action, potential additional changes in the law and other factors could
affect the amount of funds available for distribution, including funds relating to entries prior to
October 2007. Accordingly, we cannot predict the amount of future distributions we may receive. Any
change in CDSOA distributions could affect our earnings and cash flow.
Interest Income and Other Net
Interest income and other was less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.1 million for the
three and nine months ended March 31, 2011, respectively, as compared to less than $0.1 million for
the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010.
18
Income Before Income Taxes
As impacted by the factors discussed above, income before income taxes for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 decreased by approximately $8.0 million to $29.5 million from the prior-year
total of $37.5 million. Income before income taxes for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 was approximately
$117.5 million and $140.0 million, respectively. Our effective tax rate of 34.4% for the nine
months ended March 31, 2011 increased slightly from the prior-year rate of 34.2%. This increase
reflected, in part, the prior-year favorable resolution of certain previously-reserved state tax
matters, as further discussed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.
Net Income
Third quarter net income for 2011 of approximately $19.4 million decreased from the preceding
years net income for the quarter of $24.2 million, as influenced by the factors noted above.
Year-to-date net income of approximately $77.1 million was lower than the prior year-to-date total
of $92.2 million. Net income per share for the third quarter of 2011 totaled $.71 per basic and
diluted share, as compared to $.86 per basic and diluted share recorded in the prior year.
Year-to-date net income per share was $2.77 per basic and diluted share, as compared to $3.27 per
basic and diluted share for the prior-year period.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
For the nine months ended March 31, 2011, net cash provided by operating activities totaled
approximately $98.0 million as compared to $86.9 million in the prior-year period. The increase
results from relative changes in working capital, including the effect of routine differences in
the timing and amounts associated with our Federal income tax accruals and payments, as partially
offset by lower net income. The increase in receivables since June 2010 relates to the strength of
sales in March relative to June.
Cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 was approximately
$26.6 million as compared to $9.0 million in the prior year. This increase reflects a higher level
of capital expenditures in 2011 due to the expansion of our frozen roll facility in Kentucky. This
project is anticipated to be completed by the middle of calendar 2011.
Cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 of approximately
$64.6 million increased from the prior-year total of $20.7 million due primarily to a higher level
of share repurchases and lower proceeds from the exercise of stock awards. At March 31, 2011,
approximately 1,679,000 shares remained authorized for future buyback under the existing share
repurchase program.
Under our unsecured revolving credit facility, we may borrow up to a maximum of $160 million
at any one time. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. We had no borrowings outstanding
under this facility at March 31, 2011. The facility expires in October 2012, and all outstanding
amounts are then due and payable. At March 31, 2011, we had approximately $6.6 million of standby
letters of credit outstanding, which reduce the amount available for borrowing on the unsecured
revolving credit facility.
The facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on indebtedness,
asset sales and acquisitions, and financial covenants relating to interest coverage and leverage.
At March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all applicable provisions and covenants of the
facility, and we met the requirements of the financial covenants by substantial margins.
We currently expect to remain in compliance with the facilitys covenants for the foreseeable
future. A default under the facility could accelerate the repayment of any outstanding indebtedness
and limit our access to additional credit available under the facility. Such an event could require
curtailment of cash dividends or share repurchases, reduce or delay beneficial expansion or
investment plans, or otherwise impact our ability to meet our obligations when due. At March 31,
2011, we were not aware of any event that would constitute a default under the facility.
We believe that internally generated funds and our existing aggregate balances in cash and
equivalents, in addition to our currently available bank credit arrangements, should be adequate to
meet our foreseeable cash requirements. If we were to borrow outside of our credit facility under
current market terms, our average interest rate may increase significantly and have an adverse
effect on our results of operations.
For additional information regarding our credit facility, see Note 4 to the consolidated
financial statements.
19
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
We have various contractual obligations that are appropriately recorded as liabilities in our
consolidated financial statements. Certain other items, such as purchase obligations, are not
recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. Examples of items not
recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements are commitments to purchase raw
materials or inventory that have not yet been received as of March 31, 2011 and future minimum
lease payments for the use of property and equipment under operating lease agreements. Aside from
expected changes in raw-material needs due to changes in product demand and the planned plant
expansion noted in the following paragraph, there have been no significant changes to the
contractual obligations disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In August 2010, Sister Schuberts Homemade Rolls, Inc. (SS), an indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of ours, entered into a Construction Contract (the Contract) with Gray Construction,
Inc. (Gray) for an addition to the existing SS production facility located in Hart County,
Kentucky. Subject to certain conditions, the Contract provides that the total cost to be charged SS
for Grays work is not to exceed a guaranteed maximum price of approximately $13 million. The
Contract was included as Exhibit 10.1 on our Form 8-K, which was filed on August 27, 2010. As of
March 31, 2011, we were still obligated for approximately $4 million under the Contract and we had
equipment purchase commitments of approximately $4 million outstanding.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
There have been no changes in critical accounting policies from those disclosed in our 2010
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
There were no recently issued accounting pronouncements that impact our consolidated financial
statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We desire to take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the PSLRA). This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains various
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the PSLRA and other applicable securities laws.
Such statements can be identified by the use of the forward-looking words anticipate, estimate,
project, believe, intend, plan, expect, hope or similar words. These statements discuss
future expectations; contain projections regarding future developments, operations or financial
conditions; or state other forward-looking information. Such statements are based upon assumptions
and assessments made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current
conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe to be appropriate. These
forward-looking statements involve various important risks, uncertainties and other factors that
could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking
statements. Actual results may differ as a result of factors over which we have no, or limited,
control including, without limitation, the specific influences outlined below. Management believes
these forward-looking statements to be reasonable; however, you should not place undue reliance on
such statements that are based on current expectations. Forward-looking statements speak only as of
the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking statements.
More detailed statements regarding significant events that could affect our financial results are
included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and also our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are available on our website at
www.lancastercolony.com.
Specific influences relating to these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the potential for loss of larger programs or key customer relationships; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of consolidation of customers within key market channels; |
|
|
|
|
the continued solvency of key customers; |
|
|
|
|
the success and cost of new product development efforts; |
|
|
|
|
the lack of market acceptance of new products; |
20
|
|
|
the reaction of customers or consumers to the effect of price increases we may implement; |
|
|
|
|
changes in demand for our products, which may result from loss of brand reputation
or customer goodwill; |
|
|
|
|
changes in market trends; |
|
|
|
|
the extent to which future business acquisitions are completed and acceptably integrated; |
|
|
|
|
the possible occurrence of product recalls or other defective product costs; |
|
|
|
|
efficiencies in plant operations, including the ability to optimize overhead
utilization in candle operations; |
|
|
|
|
the overall strength of the economy; |
|
|
|
|
changes in financial markets; |
|
|
|
|
slower than anticipated sales growth; |
|
|
|
|
the extent of operational efficiencies achieved; |
|
|
|
|
price and product competition; |
|
|
|
|
the uncertainty regarding the effect or outcome of any decision to explore further
strategic alternatives among our nonfood operations; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the cost and availability of raw materials; |
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in energy costs and other factors that may affect costs of
producing, distributing or transporting our products; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of fluctuations in our pension plan asset values on funding levels,
contributions required and benefit costs; |
|
|
|
|
maintenance of competitive position with respect to other manufacturers, including
import sources of production; |
|
|
|
|
dependence on key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
stability of labor relations; |
|
|
|
|
dependence on contract copackers and limited or exclusive sources for certain goods; |
|
|
|
|
effect of governmental regulations, including environmental matters; |
|
|
|
|
legislation and litigation affecting the future administration of the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000; |
|
|
|
|
access to any required financing; |
|
|
|
|
changes in income tax laws; |
|
|
|
|
unknown costs relating to the holding or disposition of idle real estate; |
|
|
|
|
changes in estimates in critical accounting judgments; and |
|
|
|
|
innumerable other factors. |
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Our market risks have not changed materially from those disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
evaluated, with the participation of management, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act)). Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
March 31, 2011 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is 1) recorded, processed,
21
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms and 2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in a manner that allows timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. No changes were made to our internal
control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the
Exchange Act) during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed under Item 1A in our 2010
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
(c) In November 2010, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization of
2,000,000 shares, of which approximately 1,679,000 shares remained authorized for future
repurchases at March 31, 2011. This share repurchase authorization does not have a stated
expiration date. In the third quarter, we made the following repurchases of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Average |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
of Shares That May |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Paid Per |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Yet be Purchased |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Under the Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 131, 2011 |
|
|
70,163 |
|
|
$ |
54.34 |
|
|
|
70,163 |
|
|
|
1,852,822 |
|
February 128, 2011(1) |
|
|
92,374 |
|
|
$ |
57.52 |
|
|
|
92,374 |
|
|
|
1,760,448 |
|
March 131, 2011 |
|
|
81,904 |
|
|
$ |
56.51 |
|
|
|
81,904 |
|
|
|
1,678,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
244,441 |
|
|
$ |
56.27 |
|
|
|
244,441 |
|
|
|
1,678,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 7,128 shares that were repurchased in satisfaction of tax withholding
obligations arising from the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees under the
Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock Plan. |
|
|
See Index to Exhibits following Signatures. |
22
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lancaster Colony Corporation
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: May 10, 2011 |
By: |
/s/John B. Gerlach, Jr.
|
|
|
|
John B. Gerlach, Jr. |
|
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
Date: May 10, 2011 |
By: |
/s/John L. Boylan
|
|
|
|
John L. Boylan |
|
|
|
Treasurer, Vice President,
Assistant Secretary,
Chief Financial Officer and Director
(Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer) |
|
23
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
MARCH 31, 2011
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Located at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
* |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for employees and consultants
under the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock Plan
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
* |
|
Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Award Agreement for employees and
consultants under the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock Plan
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of CEO under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of CFO under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification of CEO and CFO under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
Furnished herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
Furnished herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
Furnished herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
Furnished herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
Furnished herewith |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which any Director or any Executive
Officer participates. |
24