UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant    þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant    o

Check the appropriate box:

o    Preliminary Proxy Statement
o    CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14a-6(e)(2))
þ    Definitive Proxy Statement
o    Definitive Additional Materials
o    Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12

MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box):
þ		No fee required.
o		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
		1)		Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
		2)		Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
		3)		Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
		4)		Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
		5)		Total fee paid:
o		Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o		Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
		1)		Amount Previously Paid:
		2)		Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
		3)		Filing Party:
		4)		Date Filed:

PERSONS WHO POTENTIALLY ARE TO RESPOND TO THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FORM ARE NOT REQUIRED TO RESPOND UNLESS THE FORM DISPLAYS A CURRENTLY VALID OMB CONTROL NUMBER.

SEC 1913 (02-02)

 

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
To Be Held on April 28, 2011

 

To our Shareholders:

 

The 2011 annual meeting of shareholders of Mercantile Bank Corporation will be held at Kent Country Club, 1600 College Avenue NE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49505 on Thursday, April 28, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. local time. The meeting is being held for the purpose of considering and voting on the following matters:

 

 

All shareholders of record at the close of business on Tuesday, March 1, 2011 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting, and any postponements or adjournments of the meeting.

 

Your vote is important. We urge you to submit your proxy (1) over the internet, (2) by telephone or (3) by mail, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person. For specific instructions, please refer to the questions and answers beginning on the first page of the proxy statement and the instructions on the proxy card relating to the annual meeting. We would appreciate receiving your proxy by Monday, April 18, 2011.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

Michael H. Price

Chairman of the Board, President and

Chief Executive Officer

 

Dated: March 17, 2011

Mercantile Bank Corporation

 

 

Proxy Statement

 

For the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
To Be Held on April 28, 2011

 

 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

Mercantile Bank Corporation
310 Leonard Street NW
Grand Rapids, Michigan 49504

 

March 17, 2011

 

For the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
To Be Held on April 28, 2011

 

This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Mercantile Bank Corporation (“we,” “our” or “Mercantile”). The proxies are being solicited for use at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on Thursday, April 28, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., local time, at Kent Country Club, 1600 College Avenue NE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49505, and at any and all adjournments of the meeting. An annual report that consists of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and other information is first being mailed or made available to shareholders, along with these proxy materials, on or about March 17, 2011.

 

What is the purpose of the annual meeting?

 

At our annual meeting, shareholders will act upon the matters outlined in the accompanying notice of the meeting and described in this proxy statement. These matters include the election of directors, the ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm, and an advisory (non-binding) vote on the compensation of our executives disclosed in this proxy statement.

 

Please read this proxy statement carefully. You should consider the information contained in this proxy statement when deciding how to vote your shares at the annual meeting.

 

Who is entitled to vote?

 

The Board of Directors has set March 1, 2011 as the record date for the annual meeting. If you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on the record date, March 1, 2011, you are entitled to receive notice of the meeting and to vote your shares at the meeting. Holders of Mercantile common stock are entitled to one vote per share.

 

What is the difference between a “shareholder of record” and a “street name” holder?

 

These terms describe how your shares are held. If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you are a “shareholder of record.” If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trust or other nominee, then the broker, bank, trust or other nominee is considered to be the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. However, you still are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, and your shares are said to be held in “street name.” Street name holders generally cannot vote their shares directly and must instead instruct the broker, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote their shares using the voting instructions provided by it.

 

Who can attend the meeting?

 

All shareholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the meeting.

What is a proxy?

 

A proxy is your designation of another person to vote on your behalf. The other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document also is called a proxy or a proxy card. When you designate a proxy, you also may direct the proxy how to vote your shares. We sometimes refer to this as your “proxy vote.” By completing and returning the enclosed proxy card, or voting by internet or telephone, you are giving the persons appointed as proxies by our Board of Directors the authority to vote your shares.

 

What is a proxy statement?

 

It is a document that we are required to give you, or provide you access to, in accordance with regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), when we ask you to designate proxies to vote your shares of our common stock at a meeting of our shareholders. The proxy statement includes information regarding the matters to be acted upon at the meeting and certain other information required by regulations of the SEC and rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market (the “Nasdaq”).

 

How many shares must be present to hold the meeting?

 

At least a majority of the shares of our common stock outstanding on the record date must be present at the meeting in order to hold the meeting and conduct business. This is called a quorum. Your shares are counted as present at the meeting if:

 

 

As of the record date, 8,597,993 shares of our common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. Proxies that are received and voted as withholding authority, abstentions, and broker non-votes (where a bank, broker or nominee does not exercise discretionary authority to vote on a matter) will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the meeting.

 

How do I vote my shares?

 

If you are a shareholder of record as of the record date, you can give a proxy to be voted at the meeting in any of the following ways:

 

 

The telephone and internet voting procedures have been set up for your convenience. We encourage you to reduce corporate expense by submitting your vote by telephone or internet. The procedures have been designed to authenticate your identity, to allow you to give voting instructions, and to confirm that those instructions have been recorded properly. If you are a shareholder of record and you would like to submit your proxy by telephone or internet, please refer to the specific instructions provided on the enclosed proxy card. If you wish to submit your proxy by mail, please return your signed proxy card to us before the annual meeting.

 

If the shares you own are held in street name, your broker, bank or other nominee, as the record holder of your shares, is required to vote your shares according to your instructions. Your broker, bank or other nominee is required to send you directions on how to vote those shares. If you do not give instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, it will still be able to vote your shares with respect to certain “discretionary” items, but will not be allowed to vote your shares with respect to certain “non-

discretionary” items. In the case of non-discretionary items, the shares that do not receive voting instructions will be treated as “broker non-votes.”

 

If, as of the record date, you are a shareholder of record and you attend the meeting, you may vote in person at the meeting. Even if you currently plan to attend the meeting, we recommend that you also submit your proxy as described above so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the meeting. If you are a street name holder, you may vote your shares in person at the meeting only if you obtain a signed letter or other document from your broker, bank, trust or other nominee giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting. If you have questions about attending or would like directions to the annual meeting, please write to the Secretary, Mercantile Bank Corporation, 310 Leonard Street NW, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49504 or call 616-726-1601.

 

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card or voting instruction form?

 

If you receive more than one proxy card or voting instruction form, it means that you hold shares registered in more than one account. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, sign and return each proxy card, or if you submit your proxy vote by telephone or internet, vote once for each proxy card or voting instruction form you receive.

 

What if I do not specify how I want my shares voted?

 

If you submit a signed proxy card or submit your proxy by telephone or internet and do not specify how you want to vote your shares, the proxies will vote your shares:

 

 

Can I change my proxy after submitting my proxy?

 

Yes, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the annual meeting. If you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote by submitting a later-dated proxy by telephone, internet or mail, by voting in person at the meeting, or by delivering to our Secretary a written notice of revocation. Attending the meeting will not revoke your proxy unless you specifically request to revoke it.

 

If you hold your shares in street name, contact your broker, bank, trust or other nominee regarding how to revoke your proxy and change your vote.

 

What is the vote required to approve each matter?

 

Election of Directors.  The affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the votes cast on the election of directors at the meeting is required for nominees to be elected as directors. Votes withheld and broker non-votes are not counted toward a nominee’s total.

 

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.  The affirmative vote of a majority of the common stock present in person or by proxy at the meeting and voting on the matter is necessary to approve the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm. For purposes of counting votes on this matter, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as shares voted on the matter.

Advisory approval of compensation of our executives.  The affirmative vote of a majority of the common stock present in person or by proxy at the meeting and voting on the matter is necessary to approve the compensation of our executives. For purposes of counting votes on this matter, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as shares voted on the matter.

 

Are there other matters to be voted on at the meeting?

 

As of the date of this proxy statement, our Board of Directors does not know of any matters which may come before the meeting, other than the matters described in this proxy statement. Should any other matter requiring a vote of the shareholders arise and be properly presented at the annual meeting, the proxy gives the persons named in the proxy and designated to vote the shares discretionary authority to vote or otherwise act with respect to any such matter in accordance with their best judgment.

 

How does the Board recommend that I vote?

 

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote:

 

 

Who pays for this proxy solicitation?

 

All costs of soliciting proxies will be borne by us. Our directors, officers, and other employees, and employees of our subsidiary, Mercantile Bank of Michigan (the “Bank”), may, without compensation other than their regular compensation, solicit proxies by further mailing or personal conversation, or by telephone, facsimile or electronic means. We will reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding soliciting material to the beneficial owners of our common stock.

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting
to be Held on April 28, 2011:

 

Our proxy statement and 2010 annual report are available at
www.edocumentview.com/MBWM.

 

Stock Owned by Management

 

The following table presents information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock, as of February 1, 2011, by each of our directors, each nominee for election as a director, our executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, and all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Owned by 5% Beneficial Owners

 

The following table presents information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each person known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of February 1, 2011.

 

 

 

Our articles of incorporation and bylaws provide that our Board of Directors will consist of between six and fifteen directors, with the exact number of directors determined from time to time by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors currently has eleven members. Until 2008, our Board was divided into three classes and the members of each class were elected to serve a three-year term, with the term of office for each class ending in consecutive years. At the 2008 annual meeting, our shareholders approved amendments to our articles of incorporation that provided for the phased-in elimination of the classification of our Board and the annual election of our directors. These amendments provide for our directors at the 2009 and 2010 annual meetings, and at each following annual meeting, to be elected for one-year terms, though the amendments did not shorten the term of any director elected prior to our 2009 annual meeting.

 

The terms of all eleven of our current directors expire at this year’s annual meeting, and beginning with this year’s annual meeting, all of our directors will be elected annually.

 

Our Board of Directors has nominated David M. Cassard, Edward J. Clark, Doyle A. Hayes, Susan K. Jones, Lawrence W. Larsen, Calvin D. Murdock, Michael H. Price, Merle J. Prins, Timothy O. Schad, Dale J. Visser and Donald Williams, Sr. as directors for election at this year’s annual meeting for one-year terms expiring at the 2012 annual meeting. Each of the nominees is presently a director whose term expires at this year’s annual meeting.

 

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each of the eleven nominees named above. Unless otherwise instructed, the persons named as proxies intend to vote all proxies received for the election of the eleven nominees.

 

All of the nominees have indicated their willingness to continue to serve. If any nominee should become unwilling or unavailable to serve, our Board of Directors may select a substitute nominee, and in that event the proxies intend to vote all proxies for the person selected, as well as the other nominees. If a substitute nominee is not selected, the proxies intend to vote for the election of the remaining nominees. Our Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will become unavailable.

 

During 2010, Betty S. Burton and Peter A. Cordes retired from our Board of Directors, and Richard E. Posthumus resigned from our Board to accept a position as a senior adviser to the Governor of the State of Michigan. We thank them for their service on our Board.

 

Set forth below is information about the nominees for election as directors. The factual information about each nominee and director has been provided by that person. The particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led our Board of Directors to conclude that each should serve on our Board, in light of our business and structure, was determined by our Board or its Governance and Nominating Committee. Each nominee and continuing member of our Board of Directors is also a director of the Bank. There are no family relationships among any of our directors, nominees for director and executive officers.

 

David M. Cassard, age 57

Director since 2001

 

Mr. Cassard is Chairman, Treasurer and a member of the Board of Directors of Waters Corporation, which deals in commercial real estate within the Grand Rapids metropolitan area. He has served as President and Treasurer of Waters Corporation for over 20 years and became Chairman in 2005. Before joining Waters Corporation, he worked for an international firm of Certified Public Accountants. He is a graduate of the University of Michigan (BBA) and Michigan State University (MBA), and he is

a Certified Public Accountant and Certified Property Manager. He previously served as a member of the Board of Directors of First Michigan Bank-Grand Rapids and was a member of the Boards of Directors of First Michigan Bank Corporation and Butterworth Hospital. He holds memberships in several professional organizations and societies, including the American Institute of CPA’s, the Michigan Association of CPA’s, the Grand Rapids Association of Realtors, the National Association of Realtors and the Institute of Real Estate Management. Mr. Cassard’s combination of financial expertise and commercial real estate management experience were key factors in our determination that he should be a member of our Board. His strong accounting background was also considered, as Mr. Cassard serves as Chairperson of our Audit Committee.

 

Edward J. Clark, age 66
Director since 1998

 

Mr. Clark is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The American Seating Company, and has held this position since 1986. American Seating is headquartered in Grand Rapids, Michigan, and produces seating and furniture for offices, as well as seating for buses, rail cars, auditoriums, stadiums and performing arts centers. He is a graduate of Ohio State University (BSc) and the University of Pennsylvania (MBA). Mr. Clark is a member of the Board of Trustees of the Grand Valley State University Foundation. He is Chairman of the Membership Committee of the Grand Valley State University Foundation, and on the Advisory Board of the Seidman School of Business. From 1988 through 1997, he was a member of the Board of Directors and Executive Committee of First Michigan Bank-Grand Rapids. Mr. Clark has also previously served on the Boards of Directors of the Metropolitan YMCA, the Grand Rapids Symphony Orchestra, Red Cross of Kent County, The Blodgett/Butterworth Foundation, St. Mary’s Hospital, The Business and Institutional Furniture Manufacturer’s Association, the Ohio State University Alumni Association, and the Grand Rapids Employees’ Association. Mr. Clark’s experience leading and managing a substantial seating and furniture business, and involvement and relationships in the community, led us to conclude that he should serve on our Board.

 

Doyle A. Hayes, age 60
Director since 2001

 

Mr. Hayes has over 30 years of experience in the automotive industry and has held various positions within that industry. Currently, he is President of the dhayesGroup, a consulting and manufacturing business, and also serves as Business Acceleration Manager for Battle Creek Unlimited (“BCU”). At BCU, Mr. Hayes assists entrepreneurs with new business development and represents BCU in attracting business to the Calhoun County, Michigan area. From 1994 to 2009, Mr. Hayes was President and CEO of Pyper Products Corporation, a plastic injection molding company that supplied the auto and furniture industries. Mr. Hayes is also the majority member of TalentTrax LLC, a staffing organization. He has served on several non-profit boards in the Grand Rapids community and is currently Board Chair of Metro Health Hospital Corporation. Mr. Hayes is a member of the Boards of Directors of Borgess Hospital of Kalamazoo, Davenport University, Grand Valley State University Foundation, Battle Creek Chamber of Commerce and Grand Valley Metro Council, and a member of the National Small Business Association (NSBA), the Governor’s Workforce Commission and the Advisory Board of the Seidman School of Business, and is the Chair of the Ambulatory Care Committee of Borgess Hospital of Kalamazoo. Mr. Hayes is Past Chair of Small Business Association of Michigan (SBAM), and was formerly a Corporate Director of First Michigan Bank Corporation. We determined that Mr. Hayes should be a member of our Board based on a number of factors. He has extensive experience managing various manufacturing concerns and demonstrated leadership ability on numerous non-profit boards. Also, as an African American deeply involved in the business community, he brings us perspectives that allow us to serve our diverse communities in a better way.

Susan K. Jones, age 61
Director since 1998

 

Mrs. Jones is a tenured, full-time Professor of Marketing at Ferris State University in Big Rapids, Michigan, and has served as a Professor of Marketing since 1990. Mrs. Jones was also an associate partner of The Callahan Group, LLC, a marketing consulting firm, from 2005 to 2007, and was a partner of Callahan Group from 1998 to 2004. In addition, she has worked at her own marketing consulting firm, Susan K. Jones & Associates, since 1980. She enjoys an active volunteer career, currently serving as immediate Past-President of the Arts Council of Greater Grand Rapids, Member of the Council of 100 at Northwestern University, and Treasurer of the Northwestern Club of West Michigan. She is a past-president of the Junior League of Grand Rapids, a graduate of Leadership Grand Rapids, a member of the Christian Outreach Committee at the Mayflower Congregational Church, and currently serves as a trustee of the Chicago Association of Direct Marketing Educational Foundation. Mrs. Jones is a member of the Hall of Achievement of the Medill School of Journalism, Northwestern University, and is the recipient of several prestigious awards in the fields of direct and interactive marketing. Mrs. Jones’ academic background in general and her marketing expertise specifically, were important considerations in our determination that she should be a member of our Board. Also, as a female business owner, her perspective and experiences have proven valuable to us during a time when women owned businesses are more prevalent than ever.

 

Lawrence W. Larsen, age 71
Director since 1997

 

Mr. Larsen is Chief Executive Officer, President, and owner of Central Industrial Corporation of Grand Rapids, Michigan. He began his employment with Central Industrial Corporation in 1967, and purchased it in 1974. Central Industrial Corporation is a tier one supplier of various components and assemblies to several of the material handling industry’s largest forklift truck manufacturers and other related industries. Mr. Larsen founded Jet Products, Inc. in 1970 and served as its Vice President and President until June of 2007 when he sold his interest to an existing officer and employee of the corporation. Jet Products, Inc. designs, sells and manufactures various hydraulic components for the material handling industry. Mr. Larsen is a native of Wisconsin. He has spent the last 42 years in the Grand Rapids area. Mr. Larsen served as a director of First Michigan Bank-Grand Rapids from 1980 until June of 1997, and was a member of the Executive Loan Committee and Audit Committee. Mr. Larsen’s demonstrated success as a business owner was a key reason we concluded that he should serve on our Board. We also considered his lengthy prior tenure as a director at another successful bank.

 

Calvin D. Murdock, age 72
Director since 1997

 

Mr. Murdock retired October 4, 2010 from his position as President of SF Supply (“SF”) of Grand Rapids, Michigan. He had held that position since 1994. From 1992 to 1994, he served as the General Manager of SF, and in 1991, served as SF’s Controller. SF is a wholesale distributor of commercial and industrial electronic, electrical and automation parts, supplies and services. Mr. Murdock is a Michigan native and a graduate of Ferris State University with a degree in accounting. Prior to joining SF, Mr. Murdock owned and operated businesses in the manufacturing and supply of automobile wash equipment. As a banking organization highly focused on lending to small businesses, Mr. Murdock’s extensive success as a small business owner led us to conclude that he should serve as a member of our Board.

Michael H. Price, age 54
Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Mercantile, and Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Bank, Director since 1997

 

Mr. Price has over 25 years of commercial banking experience, and joined the Bank in 1997. Before being promoted to his current position in 2007, Mr. Price served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Mercantile and the Bank in 1997 and 1998, and as President and Chief Operating Officer of Mercantile and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank from 1999 to June of 2007. Mr. Price has been and continues to be very active in the Grand Rapids community. He currently serves on the Board of Directors of Metro Health Hospital. From 2005 to 2007, he served on the Board of Directors of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis. Mr. Price also served as the past Chairperson of The MBA Group 4 Committee and was a Co-Chair of the Habitat for Humanity of Kent County Capital Campaign, as well as its past Board President. Mr. Price has previously served as Vice Chair of the Board of Kent County Community Mental Health, and as a member of the Michigan State University College of Human Medicine-Secchia Center Capital Campaign Cabinet. Mr. Price was the founding President of our organization and has demonstrated excellent leadership qualities and a strong understanding of the fundamentals of our industry. These attributes led us to conclude that he should be a member of our Board and is the best person to serve as Chairman of our Board.

 

Merle J. Prins, age 71
Director since 2004

 

Mr. Prins retired from his positions as Executive Vice President and a member of the Board of Directors of First Michigan Bank Corporation in 1998, after 30 years of service as an officer of First Michigan Bank Corporation and nine years of service on its Board of Directors. Mr. Prins is a member of the Riverview Group, a community advisory group in Holland, Michigan, and Vice Chairman of the Brownfield Redevelopment Authority for the City of Holland. Mr. Prins had a long and distinguished career in banking, and his industry knowledge, combined with his strong community activity, were the reasons we concluded he should serve on our Board.

 

Timothy O. Schad, age 63
Director since 2007

 

Mr. Schad is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Nucraft Furniture Company, which produces high-end wood office furniture for executive offices, conference rooms and board rooms. He joined Nucraft in 1980 and served as Vice President and President prior to his appointment as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 1997. From 2001 to 2006, Mr. Schad also served as the Vice President for Finance and Administration, and Treasurer, of Grand Valley State University, a master level public university with 24,000 students and campuses in Allendale, Grand Rapids, Holland, Muskegon and Traverse City. Mr. Schad has served on the Boards of Trustees of Ferris State University and Kendall College of Art and Design. He is a graduate of Dartmouth College, Thayer School of Engineering and Harvard Business School. Mr. Schad is an active supporter of family businesses in Michigan, serving on several private company boards of directors and as a director of the Family Business Alliance in Grand Rapids. Mr. Schad’s very successful experiences in both the business and academic worlds, combined with his strong academic achievements, were the primary considerations leading us to conclude that he should be a member of our Board. His strong financial background was also considered, as Mr. Schad serves as Vice Chairperson of our Audit Committee.

 

Dale J. Visser, age 74
Director since 1997

 

Mr. Visser is Chairman and one of the owners of Visser Brothers Inc. of Grand Rapids, Michigan. He has served Visser Brothers in various officer positions since 1960. Visser Brothers is a construction

general contractor specializing in commercial buildings. Mr. Visser also has an ownership interest in several real estate projects in the Grand Rapids area. Mr. Visser served as a director of First Michigan Bank-Grand Rapids from 1972 until June of 1997. He is a Grand Rapids native and a graduate of the University of Michigan with a degree in civil engineering. Mr. Visser is active in the community. He has previously served on the Boards of the Grand Rapids YMCA, Christian Rest Home, and West Side Christian School. Mr. Visser’s very successful career and expertise in commercial real estate, combined with his 25 years of prior bank board experience, led us to conclude that he should serve on our Board.

 

Donald Williams, Sr., age 74
Director since 1998

 

Mr. Williams is Dean Emeritus of Grand Valley State University. During 2002, he was the Coordinator of the minority students teacher preparation program for the Grand Rapids Public Schools (secondary schools). Mr. Williams has over 30 years of experience in administration of educational programs with special emphasis on political sensitivity and equality. From 1989 to 2001, he was the Dean of Minority Affairs and Director of the Multicultural Center of Grand Valley State University. Mr. Williams also serves as President of the Concerned Citizens Council. He previously served as President of the Rotary Club of Grand Rapids, President of the Coalition for Representative Government (CRG), as a member of the Board of Directors of First Michigan Bank-Grand Rapids and the Grand Rapids Advisory Board of Michigan National Bank, as Treasurer and President of the Minority Affairs Council of Michigan Universities (MACMU), and as a member of the Board of Directors of the Grand Rapids Area Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Williams’ service on the First Michigan Bank-Grand Rapids Board of Directors and the Grand Rapids Advisory Board of Michigan National Bank provided Mr. Williams with extensive bank board experience prior to joining our Board. Mr. Williams has been the recipient of numerous awards in the Grand Rapids and Michigan area for community service and job performance, including most recently the Giant Among Giants award. His work has been cited in the Congressional Record of the United States by the late Representative Paul Henry. Mr. Williams has a unique and valuable background in the area of minority affairs, equality, political sensitivity and community action. His point of view regarding underserved markets was especially considered in determining that he should serve on our Board.

 

Our executive officers are listed in the table below.

 

 

Mr. Price is also a member of our Board of Directors, and information regarding his business experience is described above under the heading “Election of Directors.” Mr. Kaminski’s and Mr. Christmas’ business experience, for at least the past five years, is summarized below. Our executive officers are generally elected each year at the annual meeting of our Board of Directors that follows the annual meeting of the shareholders. Their terms of office are at the discretion of our Board of Directors.

 

Robert B. Kaminski, Jr., age 49
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary of Mercantile,
and President, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary of the Bank

 

Mr. Kaminski joined the Bank in 1997 and has over 20 years of commercial banking experience. Before being promoted to his current position in 2007, Mr. Kaminski served Mercantile and the Bank as Senior Vice President and Secretary from 1997 to 2003, and Executive Vice President and Secretary from 2003 to June of 2007. In addition, he has served as the Bank’s Chief Operating Officer since 2000. Mr. Kaminski serves on the Boards of Directors and Executive Committees for Boys and Girls Clubs of Grand Rapids Youth Commonwealth and Camp O’Malley, the Board of Directors of VSA Arts of Michigan-Grand Rapids-Very Special Arts, and is a career mentor for Aquinas College of Grand Rapids.

 

Charles E. Christmas, age 45
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Mercantile,
and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Bank

 

Mr. Christmas joined the Bank in 1998 and has more than 20 years of banking experience. Before being promoted to his current position in 2000, Mr. Christmas served as Vice President of Finance, Treasurer and Compliance Officer of Mercantile and the Bank in 1998, and Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Compliance Officer of Mercantile and the Bank in 1999. Prior to joining Mercantile, he examined various financial institutions for over ten years while serving as a bank examiner with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). He began his tenure with the FDIC upon his graduation from Ferris State University. Mr. Christmas holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Accountancy. Mr. Christmas serves on the Michigan Bankers Association Funds Management Committee and as a member of the Ferris State University College of Business Advisory Board. He also serves as a fundraising volunteer for the Make-A-Wish Foundation of Michigan, Finance Committee member for the Susan G. Komen Grand Rapids affiliate, and is an Instructor at the Robert Perry School of Banking at Central Michigan University.

 

Director Independence

 

Applicable Nasdaq rules require that a majority of our Board of Directors be independent. In February of 2011, our Board of Directors reviewed the independence of our directors and determined that each of the directors, including those nominated for election at the annual meeting, are independent as defined by applicable Nasdaq rules, with the exception of Messrs. Price and Visser. In making this determination, our Board of Directors has concluded that none of the independent directors has a relationship that in the opinion of our Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

 

Board Meetings

 

During 2010, our Board of Directors held a total of 11 meetings. During 2010, each director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of our Board and its committees on which he or she then served.

 

Our Board of Directors has a policy of encouraging members of the Board of Directors to attend the annual meetings of the shareholders. All of our directors attended last year’s annual meeting.

 

Board Committees

 

Our Board of Directors has, and appoints members to, three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Governance and Nominating Committee. The membership of these committees, as of March 1, 2011, was as follows:

 

 

 

 

Each of the members of these committees is an independent director as defined by applicable Nasdaq rules. Each of these committees has a charter that has been approved by our Board of Directors and is available on our website, www.mercbank.com.

 

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has four members and met five times in 2010. The Audit Committee assists our Board of Directors in overseeing our financial reporting process, internal controls and audit functions, and is directly responsible for the appointment, evaluation, retention and compensation of our independent registered public accounting firm. Our Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Cassard, Murdock and Schad, who are members of the Audit Committee, are qualified as audit committee financial experts, as that term is defined in the rules of the SEC. Each of them is independent, as independence for audit committee members is defined in the Nasdaq listing standards and the rules of the SEC. More information about the Audit Committee is included below under the heading “Audit Committee Report.”

 

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has five members and met five times in 2010. The Compensation Committee assists our Board of Directors in carrying out its responsibilities

relating to compensation and benefits for our directors, officers and employees. The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities and authority include:

 

 

The Compensation Committee charter grants the Compensation Committee the authority, in its discretion, to delegate appropriate matters to subcommittees of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may confer with our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer regarding his compensation, and receives recommendations from him regarding the compensation for our other executive officers.

 

In 2010, we did not use a compensation consulting firm. No fees were paid to any compensation consulting firm in 2010.

 

Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee has five members and met four times in 2010. The Governance and Nominating Committee advises our Board of Directors regarding corporate governance principles and practices, and recommends candidates to the Board for election as directors. It also makes recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding the composition, leadership and duties of the Board’s committees.

 

The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider as potential nominees persons recommended by shareholders. Recommendations should be submitted to the Governance and Nominating Committee in care of the Secretary, Mercantile Bank Corporation, 310 Leonard Street NW, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49504. Each recommendation should include a personal biography of the suggested nominee, an indication of the background or experience that qualifies the person for consideration, and a statement that the person has agreed to serve if nominated and elected.

 

The Governance and Nominating Committee has used an informal process to identify potential candidates for nomination as directors. Candidates for nomination have been recommended by an executive officer or director, and considered by the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors. Generally, candidates have been members of the West Michigan community who have been known to one or more of our Board members. The Governance and Nominating Committee has not adopted specific minimum qualifications that it believes must be met by a person it recommends for nomination as a director. In evaluating candidates for nomination, the Governance and Nominating Committee will consider the factors it believes to be appropriate. These factors would generally include the candidate’s personal and professional integrity, business judgment, relevant experience and skills, and potential to be an effective director in conjunction with the rest of our Board of Directors in collectively serving the long-term interests of our shareholders. We do not have a specific policy relating to the

consideration of diversity in identifying director candidates. However, the Governance and Nominating Committee does consider the diversity of our Board when identifying director candidates. The amount of consideration given to diversity varies with the Governance and Nominating Committee’s determination of whether we would benefit from expanding the Board’s diversity in a particular area. We believe that the composition of our Board has consistently demonstrated diversity as defined by race, gender, viewpoint, background and professional experience.

 

Although the Governance and Nominating Committee has the authority to retain a search firm to assist it in identifying director candidates, there has to date been no need to employ a search firm. The Governance and Nominating Committee does not evaluate potential nominees for director differently based on whether they are recommended by a shareholder.

 

Shareholders who themselves wish to effectively nominate a person for election to the Board of Directors, as contrasted with recommending a potential nominee to the Governance and Nominating Committee for its consideration, are required to comply with the advance notice and other requirements set forth in our articles of incorporation.

 

Board Leadership Structure

 

Our Board is led by Michael H. Price, our Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer. The decision as to who should serve as Chairman of the Board, and who should serve as Chief Executive Officer, and whether those offices should be combined or separate, is properly the responsibility of our Board. The members of our Board possess considerable experience and unique knowledge of the challenges and opportunities we face, and are in the best position to evaluate our needs and how best to organize the capabilities of the directors and senior officers to meet those needs. The Board believes that the most effective leadership structure for us now is for Mr. Price to serve as both Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.

 

Mr. Price was our founding President and Chief Operating Officer, and has been our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since July 1, 2007; as such the Board of Directors believes that he is uniquely qualified through his experience and expertise to be the person who generally sets the agenda for, and leads discussions of, strategic issues for our Board. Mr. Price was one of the key individuals behind our formation in 1997 and his leadership was instrumental in the drafting and implementing of our strategic plan as well as our mission and vision statements. Mr. Price’s leadership, in both his Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer roles, continues to ensure that we remain dedicated to and focused on our mission. Our Board believes that this dedication and focus is particularly important during these unusual economic times to ensure that we continue to differentiate ourselves from our competition while navigating the difficult economic waters and keeping us well poised for future market expansion. Our Board believes that we and our shareholders can be most advantaged by leaving these roles combined.

 

Unlike many companies, our Board of Directors does not have an executive committee through which a chief executive officer and chairman of the board is able to undertake decisions without the participation of the full Board of Directors. Instead, our Board of Directors accomplishes most of its corporate governance role, including new director and succession planning, through its committees which are chartered to undertake significant activities and are made up entirely of independent directors.

 

In addition, our independent directors participate in at least two executive sessions during the year, in which our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer does not participate. Any independent director may request additional executive sessions at any meeting. Our executive sessions are led by our executive session facilitator, who is an independent director recommended by our Governance and Nominating Committee and appointed by our Board. Our executive session facilitator is responsible for setting the agenda for executive sessions and leading them. Our current executive session facilitator is David M. Cassard.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

 

Our Board oversees our risk management practices. In carrying out its responsibilities, our Board appointed a Risk Management Director (our “Senior Risk Officer”). Our Senior Risk Officer, with supervision from our Board, is responsible for the definition, structure, implementation, and coordination of our risk management plan. Our Senior Risk Officer reports at least monthly to our Board.

 

Our Senior Risk Officer is the Chairman of our Enterprise Risk Management Committee. This committee is comprised of senior management. Its purpose is to provide high-level attention and coordination to the risk management process and to discuss and address significant risks that we face.

 

Our Senior Risk Officer meets at least every six months with the Compensation Committee to discuss, evaluate and review our compensation plans. The Senior Risk Officer, with the Compensation Committee, assesses whether our compensation plans encourage taking unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten our value, or encourage the manipulation of reported earnings to enhance the compensation of any employee.

 

Communications with Directors

 

Shareholders and other persons may send communications to members of our Board of Directors who serve on the Audit Committee by utilizing the webpage on our website, www.mercbank.com, designated for that purpose. Communications received through the webpage are reviewed by a member of our internal audit staff and the chairperson of the Audit Committee. Communications that relate to functions of our Board of Directors or its committees, or that either of them believe requires the attention of members of our Board of Directors, are provided to the entire Audit Committee and reported to our Board of Directors by a member of the Audit Committee. Directors may review a log of these communications, and request copies of any of the communications.

 

Code of Ethics

 

We have adopted a written code of ethics that applies to all our directors, officers and employees, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial and accounting officer. We have posted a copy of the code on our website, www.mercbank.com. In addition, we intend to post on our website all disclosures that are required by law or Nasdaq listing standards concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the code.

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

The members of our Compensation Committee during 2010 were David M. Cassard, Edward J. Clark, Peter A. Cordes (for part of the year), Lawrence W. Larsen, Calvin D. Murdock and Merle J. Prins. All members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors, and none of them are present or past employees or officers of ours or any of our subsidiaries. No member of the Compensation Committee has had any relationship with us requiring disclosure under Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K. None of our executive officers has served on the board or compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served on our Board or Compensation Committee.

 

Each member of the Audit Committee is independent, as independence for audit committee members is defined in the Nasdaq listing standards and the rules of the SEC. The Audit Committee’s primary purpose is to assist the Board of Directors in overseeing:

 

 

In carrying out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee supervises the relationship between Mercantile and its independent registered public accounting firm, including having direct responsibility for the independent registered public accounting firm’s appointment, compensation and retention, and reviewing the scope of its audit services, and approving audit and permissible non-audit services. The Audit Committee reviews and discusses the annual and quarterly financial statements, as well as the internal audit plan.

 

Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of Mercantile’s financial statements and for the appropriateness of the accounting principles and reporting policies that are used. Management is also responsible for testing the system of internal controls, and reporting to the Audit Committee on any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses that are found. Our independent registered public accounting firm for 2010, BDO USA, LLP (“BDO”), is responsible for auditing Mercantile’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and for reviewing its unaudited quarterly financial statements.

 

The Audit Committee reviewed with BDO the overall scope and plan of the audit. In addition, the Audit Committee met with BDO, with and without management present, to discuss the results of BDO’s audit, its evaluation of Mercantile’s internal control over financial reporting, the overall quality of Mercantile’s financial reporting and such other matters as are required to be discussed under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The Audit Committee has also received from, and discussed with, BDO the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communications with Audit Committees) as amended.

 

The Audit Committee has discussed with BDO that firm’s independence from management and Mercantile, and has received from BDO the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding BDO’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. The Audit Committee has also considered the compatibility of audit related and tax services with BDO’s independence.

 

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 with both management and our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee’s review included a discussion of the quality and integrity of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant estimates and judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

 

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on

Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee evaluated and appointed BDO as Mercantile’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2011.

 

Audit Committee

 

David M. Cassard
Calvin D. Murdock
Merle J. Prins
Timothy O. Schad

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis Recommendation

 

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement with management. Based on the review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement for filing with the SEC.

 

Compensation Plans

 

The compensation plans that one or more of our senior executive officers participate in are our 2000 Employee Stock Option Plan, 2004 Employee Stock Option Plan, Stock Incentive Plan of 2006, 401(k) plan, deferred compensation plan, and Performance Evaluation Plan. Under the 2000 and 2004 plans, options have been issued to our senior executive officers and other employees to acquire shares of our stock. Under our 2006 plan, options and restricted stock have been issued to our senior executive officers and other employees. Options granted under the 2000 and 2004 plans typically were exercisable over a period of ten years. Options granted under the 2006 plan typically fully vest over a two year period and are exercisable over a period of seven years. Restricted stock granted under the 2006 plan typically vests in full after four years. The exercise price for stock options has been the market price when the options were granted. The awards that have been made under the 2000, 2004 and 2006 plans have not included performance criteria. Contributions to our 401(k) plan and the deferred compensation plan are made by participants from compensation they receive from us. We have not provided any matching contribution for the 401(k) plan since the first quarter of 2009. Amounts contributed to our deferred compensation plan are credited with interest monthly at the prime rate. Our Performance Evaluation Plan is described below.

 

Many employees who are not senior executive officers participate in one or more of the plans identified above, as well as one or more of our Merc Pays Incentive Plan, Mortgage Commission Plan, and Employee Stock Purchase Plan of 2002. Some or all of these plans may be considered employee compensation plans. Our Merc Pays Incentive Plan, Mortgage Commission Plan, Performance Evaluation Plan, and Employee Stock Purchase Plan of 2002 are described below.

 

The Merc Pays Incentive Plan provides payments to employees ranging from $5 to $50 for products and services sold for each customer. The plan is primarily intended to encourage employees to better serve customers, and to help grow our core deposits and consumer customer base. Annual incentives granted to branch employees for 2010 under this plan typically ranged from $0 to $1,492 per employee.

 

The Mortgage Commission Plan applies to our mortgage lenders. It allows for commissions to be paid on mortgages that are closed and sold on the secondary market. Strict underwriting criteria is in place for the mortgages, and intended to encourage sound lending practices. The criteria is included in our internal policies and the requirements for mortgages to be sold to the secondary market. A

commission schedule has been established based on mortgages closed each month, and our mortgage lenders are paid basis points in relationship to the dollar volume of mortgages closed. In 2010, the average annual commission payout under the plan for our mortgage lenders was $87,400.

 

The Performance Evaluation Plan is used to evaluate employees annually for merit salary increases. The evaluation criteria used under the plan has five performance factors for non-supervisory employees and eight performance factors for supervisory employees. Employees are rated on a scale of 1-10 for each performance factor. The total score is applied to a salary grid that determines the merit increase. During 2010, only non-supervisory employees were eligible for increases, and when awarded, typically ranged from 1% to 3%.

 

The Employee Stock Purchase Plan of 2002 provides a convenient way for employees to purchase our stock through regular payroll deductions. Participation by employees is voluntary. Purchases are made for employees quarterly, at fair market value, using amounts, if any, that they have elected to withhold from their pay during the quarter.

 

The Compensation Committee has reviewed all of the plans described above, and does not believe that any of them encourage our senior executive officers to take unnecessary or excessive risks that threaten our value. The features of these plans do not make it likely that taking unnecessary or excessive risks that threaten our value will provide greater compensation than actions that involve a prudent level of risk. The equity-based plans encourage our senior executive officers and other employees to focus on increasing shareholder value over a period of years. The deferred compensation and 401(k) plans provide helpful ways for our employees to save for retirement. The Compensation Committee believes that the plans described above do not pose any unnecessary risks, and do not encourage employees to manipulate reported earnings to enhance the compensation of any employee. The features of our Merc Pays Incentive Plan, Mortgage Commission Plan and Performance Evaluation Plan primarily encourage employees to perform their jobs better and increase the value of our business. None of the plans provide compensation that is based on the level of our reported earnings.

 

Committee Certification

 

The Compensation Committee certifies that:

 

 

Compensation Committee

 

David M. Cassard
Edward J. Clark
Lawrence W. Larsen
Calvin D. Murdock
Merle J. Prins

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

Philosophy

 

Our philosophy in setting compensation policies for executive officers is to align pay with performance, while at the same time providing competitive compensation that will attract and retain executive talent. Our Compensation Committee believes that executive compensation should be directly linked to continuous improvements in corporate performance and increasing shareholder value over the long term. The design of executive compensation programs affects all employees by setting general levels of compensation and helping to create an environment of goals, rewards and expectations. Because we believe the performance of every employee is important to our success, we are mindful of the effect of executive compensation and incentive programs on all our employees.

 

We believe that the compensation of our executive officers should reflect their performance as a management team and as individuals. By setting key operating objectives, such as growth in revenues, growth of operating earnings and earnings per share, and growth or maintenance of market share, we expect to be successful in providing increasing value to our shareholders. We believe that the performance of our executive officers in managing our business, when considered in light of general economic and specific company, industry and competitive conditions, should be the basis for determining their overall compensation. We also believe that their compensation should not be based on short-term results, whether favorable or unfavorable, but rather on long-term operating results which truly reflect the ability of our executives to manage our business. Long-term gains in shareholder value will be reflected in executive compensation through our stock-based compensation and other equity incentive programs.

 

Our policy for allocating between currently paid and long-term compensation is to provide adequate base compensation to attract and retain personnel, while offering incentives to maximize long-term value for our shareholders. We provide cash compensation in the form of a base salary to meet competitive salary norms and reward good performance on an annual basis, and, in years when the Compensation Committee determines it appropriate, in the form of bonus compensation to reward superior performance against short-term goals. We have provided stock-based compensation to reward superior performance against specific objectives and long-term strategic goals; however, no stock-based compensation awards were granted in 2009 or 2010 reflecting stressed economic conditions and the resulting impact on our earnings performance and financial condition.

 

Our Compensation Committee reviews and takes into consideration elements such as the following in setting compensation policies:

 

 

 

Our Compensation Committee’s goal is to establish salary compensation for the executive officers based upon our operating performance relative to comparable peer companies over a three year period. In setting base salaries, consideration is given to salary compensation of executive officers with comparable qualification, experience and responsibilities at financial institutions within our peer group. Our peer group consists of 18 financial institutions of similar size conducting business in the Midwest. Operating performance and salary compensation information is obtained from the annual SNL Executive Compensation Review for Banks and Thrifts. We also utilize industry compensation studies prepared by the Michigan Bankers Association and an independent public accounting firm, but to a lesser degree. The peer group comparisons are used for guidance purposes only, with the Compensation Committee taking the peer group information into consideration in determining base salaries for the executive officers; however, the Compensation Committee does not utilize benchmarks in establishing our executive officer salary compensation. In addition, in 2009, our Compensation Committee utilized the services of an independent consultant in reviewing the compensation levels of our executive officers. The Compensation Committee intends to pay base salaries to our executive officers that are commensurate with their qualifications and demonstrated performance that bring continuing and increasing value to our shareholders and the communities that we serve.

 

Executive Officer Bonus Compensation

 

For most years, it has been our policy to provide cash bonus awards for eligible executive officers and employees based on predetermined performance goals. We believe that paying such cash awards:

 

 

Stressed economic conditions during the past several years have put significant pressure on our earnings performance and financial condition. Although we recognize the benefits of establishing bonus plans, we neither established a plan, nor paid our executive officers bonuses, for 2009 or 2010. Given these unprecedented times, we realize that it is not realistic to increase the salaries or establish bonus plans for our executive officers when we are not profitable. Due to economic and market conditions, and our current level of earnings, we have not increased the salaries of our executive officers or established a bonus plan for 2011.

 

Stock Incentive Plan

 

The overall objective for our stock-based compensation is to provide an equitable and competitive means to reward our executive and other officers for their contribution to our long-range success. Our goal is to meet the following objectives:

 

 

 

There is a direct relationship between the value of a stock option and the market price of our common stock. We believe that granting stock options is an effective method of motivating our executive and other officers to manage our business in a manner consistent with the interests of our shareholders. Due to the evolution of regulatory, tax and accounting treatment of stock-based compensation, and the importance of stock-based compensation in retaining and motivating our key employees, we have utilized other forms of stock-based compensation in addition to stock options. In 2006, 2007 and 2008, we granted restricted stock to our executive officers and other key employees. We believe this is an excellent way to reward them for, and to motivate them toward, superior performance. Restricted stock is an important retention instrument in that it has immediate value to the recipient. Unlike stock option grants that create economic value only if the stock price appreciates above the price at the date of grant, restricted stock provides value and motivation to the recipient even if the stock price declines.

 

Historically, we have made stock-based awards annually in the Fall in conjunction with the performance review of our executive and other officers. It has been our practice, when awards of stock options and restricted stock are made, to make them to all recipients on the same date. We made no stock-based compensation awards in 2009 or 2010, reflecting the stressed economic conditions and resulting impact on our earnings performance and financial condition.

 

We do not have stock ownership requirements or guidelines for our executive officers.

 

Perquisites

 

We limit the perquisites that we make available to our executive officers. We believe that providing excessive perquisites to executive officers sends mixed messages to the rest of our employees and can destroy the “team” effort. Our executive officers are entitled to a few benefits that are not generally available to all of our employees. We do not provide a defined benefit pension plan, post-retirement health coverage, or similar benefits for our executive officers or other employees.

 

During 2010, we provided the following perquisites for our executive officers:

 

 

IRC Section 162(m)

 

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to their chief executive officer or certain other highly compensated officers. Qualifying performance-based compensation is not subject to the deduction limitation if certain requirements are met. We periodically review the potential consequences of Section 162(m) and may structure some or all of the performance-based portion of our executive compensation so that it will not be subject to the deduction limitations of Section 162(m).

 

We are also subject to a lower threshold on the deduction of executive compensation due to our participation in the Capital Purchase Program of the Troubled Asset Relief Program. This lower threshold is set forth in Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)(5) and applies while we participate in the program. Section 162(m)(5) generally limits the amount we can deduct for compensation paid to each of our senior executive officers attributable to services performed in a year to $500,000. In calculating compensation for purposes of this $500,000 limit, there is no exception for performance-based

compensation. For Section 162(m)(5) purposes, a company’s senior executive officers are the chief executive officer, chief financial officer and the next three most highly compensated executive officers. Under Section 162(m)(5), compensation that is earned but deferred and paid to a senior executive officer in a later year cannot be deducted in the later year except to the extent of any unused portion of the $500,000 deduction limit in the year the compensation was earned. We consider the potential impact of Section 162(m)(5) when determining compensation for senior executive officers.

 

Post-Employment Compensation

 

We do not provide a defined benefit pension plan or post-retirement health insurance coverage for our executive officers or other employees. Our executive officers and most of our other employees are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan. Through the first quarter of 2009, we provided for each eligible participant a matching contribution to the 401(k) plan. The matching contribution was “dollar for dollar” for the first 5% of the participant’s contribution to the 401(k) plan. To help reduce our compensation expenses, we suspended our matching contribution effective April 1, 2009, and it has remained suspended. All our executive officers participated in our 401(k) plan during 2010.

 

All employees, except our executive officers, are employees-at-will and do not have an employment agreement. The employment agreements that we have with our executive officers are described below under the heading “Employment Agreements.” We do not provide post-employment health insurance coverage or other benefits to any employee, except those provided for executive officers in their employment agreements.

 

Overview of the Compensation Process

 

The composition of compensation for our executive officers can include: salary, cash bonus, stock-based awards, health, disability and life insurance and perquisites. The elements of executive compensation are discussed at the meetings of our Compensation Committee. During the Fall of each year, the Compensation Committee discusses the base salaries and cash bonus plan, if any, for the next year for our executive officers, and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors for its approval. The Board of Directors usually approves the Compensation Committee’s recommendations; though if it does not, it could ask the Compensation Committee to prepare revised recommendations. At or about the same time, in years when stock-based awards are to be made, the Compensation Committee grants stock-based awards to our executive and other officers.

 

As part of the Compensation Committee’s process, it meets with our Human Resource Director and reviews the elements of each executive officer’s compensation during the preceding three years. Typically, the Human Resource Director makes compensation recommendations to the Compensation Committee for each of our executive officers. The Compensation Committee may accept or reject all or any part of such recommendations. As part of our Human Resource Director’s process of formulating her recommendations, she may confer with our Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer. Our executive officers are not present when our Human Resource Director makes her recommendations, or during the Compensation Committee’s deliberations on the compensation of our executive officers.

 

Restrictions on Executive Compensation under Federal Law

 

On May 15, 2009, we sold 21,000 shares of our preferred stock and a warrant to purchase 616,438 shares of our common stock to the United States Department of the Treasury for $21 million. This sale was made under the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (the “Capital Purchase Program”). Participants in the Capital Purchase Program are subject to a number of limitations and restrictions on executive compensation that are set forth in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, as amended by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“EESA”), and in related rules issued by the Treasury.

As a general matter, until such time as we no longer participate in the Capital Purchase Program, we will be subject to the following requirements, among others:

 

 

Our compensation arrangements for executive officers and other employees are intended to comply with the requirements of the Capital Purchase Program, while we participate in the program. We expect to be a participant in the program for as long as any of the preferred stock that we issued under the program remains outstanding. We have the right to redeem the preferred stock, subject to certain conditions.

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table provides information regarding the compensation earned by the named executive officers for the three years ended December 31, 2010.

 

 

 

 

Employment Agreements

 

The Bank and Mercantile have entered into employment agreements with our executive officers, Messrs. Price, Kaminski and Christmas, that provide for their employment, annual base compensation, and severance, confidentiality and non-compete arrangements. Each agreement establishes an employment period that extends an additional year, each December 31, so that as of each December 31, there are three years remaining in the employment period. The annual extension of the employment period can be avoided by the Bank, Mercantile, or the officer giving notice to the others that the employment period is not to be extended.

 

The employment agreements provide the officers with annual base salaries for each year in the amounts established from year to year by the Board of Directors of the Bank. The annual base salary for

each year may not be less than the amount established for the immediately preceding year. The Board of Directors established the annual base salaries of each of the executive officers for 2010 as follows: for Mr. Price $474,000, for Mr. Kaminski, $305,000, and for Mr. Christmas, $255,000; and set their salaries at the same amounts for 2011. In addition to the annual base salary, the employment agreements provide that the officers are entitled to participate in our employee benefit and incentive compensation plans, including health insurance, life and disability insurance, stock option, profit sharing and retirement plans.

 

Additional information regarding the employment agreements, including compensation and benefits payable to the officers on termination of employment and officer confidentiality and non-compete obligations, are included below under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change In Control.”

 

Salary and Bonus Compared to Total Compensation

 

We have not established a proportion that salary and bonus should be of an executive officer’s total compensation. As indicated in the Summary Compensation Table above, the proportion for 2010 that salary and bonus were of total compensation was from 95% to 96% for our executive officers.

 

Grants Of Plan-Based Awards In 2010

 

As indicated in the following table, no plan-based awards were made to the named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards At 2010 Fiscal Year-End

 

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2010 regarding equity awards, including unexercised stock options and restricted stock that had not vested, for each of the named executive officers.

 

 

 

 

 

Option Exercises And Stock Vested In 2010

 

The following table provides information regarding the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock during 2010 for each of the named executive officers. None of the named executive officers exercised any stock options during 2010.

 

 

 

 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation For 2010

 

The following table provides information regarding our plan that provides for the deferral of compensation for the named executive officers on a basis that is not tax-qualified.

 

 

 

 

Executive Deferred Compensation Plan

 

The information in the table above pertains to our executive officers’ participation in the Bank’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Participants in the plan may elect to defer up to 100% of their salary and other cash compensation each year. Under the plan, the amount of any compensation deferred is credited with interest monthly at a rate equal to the prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal, determined quarterly, on the first day of each quarter.

The plan provides that the Bank will pay to each executive officer, from his deferred compensation account, a lump sum payment or installment payments, whichever he elected, after he leaves employment with us due to normal retirement, early termination, disability, or change of control. If the executive officer dies before leaving employment, the Bank will distribute the payments to the executive officer’s designated beneficiary in a lump sum, or installments, if installments were elected. If death occurs during the time that payments are being made, the Bank will distribute the remaining payments to the executive officer’s designated beneficiary at the same time and in the same amounts that would have been distributed if the executive officer had not died.

 

The plan was amended in 2008 to provide participating executive officers with additional options to select specified dates for withdrawal. The ability to select specified withdrawal dates applies to amounts already deferred, as well as amounts that are deferred in the future. The plan and the new withdrawal options are subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, which specifies requirements that non-qualified deferred compensation plans must meet in order to avoid adverse tax consequences for participants.

 

Potential Payments Upon Termination Or Change In Control

 

We have entered into employment agreements with our executive officers, Messrs. Price, Kaminski and Christmas. Each agreement establishes an employment period that extends an additional year, each December 31, so that as of each December 31, there are three years remaining in the employment period. The annual extension of the employment period can be avoided by giving notice that the employment period is not to be extended. These agreements include provisions that provide compensation and benefits to the executive officers in the event that their employment with us is terminated:

 

 

The terms “Cause” and “Good Reason” are defined in the employment agreements. Cause includes certain acts of dishonesty and intentional gross neglect, conviction of a felony, and certain intentional breaches of the officer’s obligations in the employment agreement relating to confidentiality of our information and not competing with us. Good Reason includes an assignment to the officer of a title or duties that are materially inconsistent with the officer’s position, titles, duties or responsibilities, and certain failure by us to comply in a material respect, even after notice to us, with our obligations to the officer under the employment agreement.

 

Termination During the Employment Period

 

Except for terminations that occur while we are a participant in the Capital Purchase Program, each employment agreement provides the executive officer with compensation and benefits in the event that his employment is terminated by us without Cause or the officer elects to terminate his employment for Good Reason during the employment period. In such event, the officer is entitled to receive the greater of (i) his annual base salary through the end of the employment period or (ii) for Mr. Price, $500,000, and for Mr. Kaminski or Mr. Christmas, $250,000; in either case payable over 18 months. In addition, in the case of such a termination of employment, and provided we are not then a participant in the Capital Purchase Program, the officer is entitled to continue his participation in our life, disability and health insurance plans for 18 months, to the extent permitted under the plans, to an assignment of any assignable term life insurance policies owned by us insuring his life, and to $10,000 for out-placement, interim office and related expenses. In the event that a termination occurs without Cause or for Good

Reason while we are a participant in the Capital Purchase Program, the officer is not entitled to any compensation or benefits under his employment agreement.

 

For a termination by us during the employment period to be with Cause, it must be done within 90 days of our learning of the Cause. For a termination by the officer during the employment period to be with Good Reason, it must be done by the officer within 90 days of the officer learning of the Good Reason.

 

If an executive officer becomes disabled or dies during the employment period, he is entitled to compensation and benefits under his employment agreement. In the event of disability, the officer continues to receive his then current annual base salary through the end of the employment period, and any disability benefits payable under disability plans that we provide. The officer also continues to participate in our life, disability, and health insurance plans, through age 65, to the extent permitted under the plans. If the officer dies during the employment period, we are obligated to pay the officer’s legal representative a death benefit. The death benefit for Mr. Price is $250,000. The death benefit for Mr. Kaminski and Mr. Christmas is $100,000. In addition, if we own any life insurance insuring the life of the officer, the proceeds of the policies are payable to the named beneficiaries.

 

In general, stock options granted under the 2000 Employee Stock Option Plan, 2004 Employee Stock Option Plan and Stock Incentive Plan of 2006 that are vested at the time employment terminates may be exercised by the executive officer within three months after his termination of employment. However, if his employment terminates due to death or disability, his vested stock options may be exercised within 12 months after the date of termination, but not later than the expiration date of the option.

 

Under the employment agreements, in the event that an officer’s employment is terminated for Cause, the officer is not entitled to any accrued rights that he may then have under any of our stock option plans. In addition, the Stock Incentive Plan of 2006 provides that all outstanding options granted under the plan are forfeited if an officer’s employment is terminated for cause, whether or not the options are vested.

 

If an executive officer terminates employment due to death or disability, then restricted stock granted to him under the Stock Incentive Plan of 2006 will be partially vested. Also, except while we are a participant in the Capital Purchase Program, if an executive officer terminates employment due to retirement, or we terminate his employment other than for cause, then restricted stock granted to him under the plan will be partially vested. The number of shares that will be vested is equal to the number of shares granted to the executive officer multiplied by the number of months that have elapsed since the grant date divided by the number of months in the vesting period. Our Compensation Committee also has discretion to accelerate the vesting of restricted stock.

 

Each executive officer will also receive a distribution of his account under the deferred compensation plan upon his termination of employment. Distributions will generally be delayed for six months after the termination of employment, to the extent required by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. However, if employment is terminated due to cause, or if an executive officer is subject to a final removal or prohibition order issued by a federal banking agency, then the executive officer will only receive a distribution of his own deferrals, without any interest credits.

 

Termination After the Employment Period

 

Except for terminations that occur while we are a participant in the Capital Purchase Program, the employment agreements provide compensation and benefits in the event that after the employment period and prior to the officer reaching the age of 65, the officer’s employment is terminated by us without Cause or the officer’s annual base salary is reduced without Cause, and the officer terminates his employment within 90 days of the reduction. In such event, the officer is entitled to receive an amount, for Mr. Price of $500,000, and for Mr. Kaminski or Mr. Christmas of $125,000; payable over 18 months.

In addition, in the case of such a termination of employment, and provided we are not then a participant in the Capital Purchase Program, the officer is entitled to continue his participation in our life, disability and health insurance plans for 18 months, to the extent permitted under the plans, to an assignment of any assignable term life insurance policies owned by us insuring his life, and to $10,000 for out-placement, interim office and related expenses. In the event that a termination occurs after the employment period, while we are a participant in the Capital Purchase Program, the officer is not entitled to any compensation or benefits under his employment agreement.

 

Obligations of Executive Officers

 

Under the employment agreements, the officers agree not to disclose, except as required by law, any confidential information relating to our business or customers, or use any confidential information in any manner adverse to us. In addition, each has agreed that for 18 months following his employment with us, he will not be employed by, or act as a director or officer of, any business engaged in banking within a 50 mile radius of Grand Rapids, Michigan that solicits customers of the Bank.

 

The employment agreements also provide that any bonus, retention award or incentive compensation paid to the officers while we are a participant in the Capital Purchase Program is subject to recovery, or “clawback,” from the officers if the payment is based on statements of earnings, revenues, gains or other criteria that are later found to be materially inaccurate. Our employment agreement with Mr. Price also includes a provision confirming that we will not pay or accrue any bonus, retention award or incentive compensation to or for him, while we are a participant in the Capital Purchase Program, that would violate the applicable provision of EESA.

 

Table of Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment

 

The following table provides information regarding compensation and benefits payable to Messrs. Price, Kaminski and Christmas under the employment agreements or the Stock Incentive Plan of 2006 upon termination of their employment. The amounts shown assume that termination of employment was effective as of December 31, 2010, the last business day of our 2010 fiscal year, and include estimates of the amounts that would be paid. The actual amounts would only be determined upon an officer’s termination of employment. The value of restricted stock that would have become vested due to death or disability is based on the closing stock price of $8.20 on December 31, 2010. The table below takes into account that we are a participant in the Capital Purchase Program and subject to the EESA restrictions on payments relating to termination of employment.

 

 

 

 

 

Change in Control

 

The employment agreements do not contain provisions that provide payments based on the occurrence of a change in control of Mercantile. Options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan of 2006, according to their terms when granted, become fully vested upon a change in control and are exercisable during their remaining term, even if an executive officer’s employment terminates during the option term. According to their terms when awarded, shares of restricted stock awarded under the Stock Incentive Plan of 2006 become fully vested upon a change in control. However, while we are a participant in the Capital Purchase Program, we are subject to restrictions that preclude accelerated vesting of options or restricted stock upon a change in control. These restrictions apply to options and restricted stock held by our executive officers and our next five most highly compensated employees. A “change in control” is defined in the Stock Incentive Plan of 2006 as (a) the failure of the continuing directors to constitute a majority of the Board of Directors; (b) the acquisition by any person of ownership of 40% or more of the outstanding common stock of Mercantile; (c) a reorganization, merger or consolidation after which the Mercantile shareholders do not own at least 50% of the value and voting power of the outstanding capital stock of the entity surviving the transaction; (d) a liquidation or dissolution of Mercantile, or a sale of all or substantially all of its assets; or (e) any other change in control transaction that is reportable to the SEC under Item 6(e) of Schedule 14A of Regulation 14A issued under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

Each executive officer will receive a distribution of his account under the deferred compensation plan, if his employment terminates within 12 months after a change in control. The value of each officer’s account as of December 31, 2010 is shown above in the table under the heading “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation For 2010.”

 

Potential Payments Upon a Change in Control

 

If a change in control occurred as of December 31, 2010, the last business day of our 2010 fiscal year, Messrs. Price, Kaminski and Christmas would receive no payments or benefits relating to that change in control. If the change in control were to occur at a time when we were not participating in the Capital Purchase Program and were not subject to the EESA restrictions on payments relating to changes in control, there could be benefits relating to the accelerated vesting of options and restricted stock.

Director Compensation For 2010

 

The following table provides information about the compensation of our directors for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

 

 

 

Compensation Arrangements for Non-employee Directors

 

Each of our directors is also a director of the Bank, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Mercantile. The table above includes compensation earned for service on the Boards of Directors of Mercantile and the Bank. For 2010, our non-employee directors of the Bank were paid an annual retainer of $5,000, and a fee of $350 for each meeting of the Board of Directors of the Bank that they attended. In addition, non-employee directors were paid a meeting fee of $350 for each meeting of the Audit Committee, $300 for each meeting of the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee, and $200 for each meeting of other committees of the Board of Directors of the Bank that they attended. Non-employee directors were also paid fees of the same amount for meetings of Mercantile’s Board of Directors and its committees, when for Board meetings there was not also a

meeting of the Board of Directors of the Bank on the same day, and for committee meetings when there was not also a meeting of a committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank having the same name or function on the same day. For meetings that were held by telephone or other remote communications equipment, the meeting fees were half the amount described above. One annual retainer fee was also paid to each director who served as Chairman of the Audit Committees, the Compensation Committees and the Governance and Nominating Committees of Mercantile’s and the Bank’s Boards of Directors. The annual retainer is, for the Chairman of the Audit Committees — $3,000, for the Chairman of the Compensation Committees — $2,000, and for the Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committees — $2,000.

 

Directors are eligible to receive stock-based awards under our Stock Incentive Plan of 2006 that was approved by our shareholders at their 2006 annual meeting, but no awards were made to directors under the plan for 2010. These director compensation arrangements, which were in effect for 2010, are also currently in effect. The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors reviews director compensation at least annually, and recommends to our Board of Directors for approval any changes that the Compensation Committee deems appropriate.

 

Director Deferred Compensation Plan

 

Directors are eligible to participate in the Bank’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan for directors. Directors who participate in the plan may elect to defer up to 100% of their annual retainer and meeting fees. Under the plan, the amount of any director’s fees that are deferred are credited with interest quarterly at a rate equal to the prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal, determined quarterly, on the first day of each quarter.

 

The plan provides that the Bank will pay to each director, from his or her deferred compensation account, a lump sum payment, or installment payments, whichever is elected, after the director’s term of office as a director ends. If installment payments are elected, the maximum payment period is ten years. In the event that a director dies before his or her term of office ends, the Bank will distribute the payments to the director’s designated beneficiary in a lump sum, or installments, if installments were elected. If death occurs during the time that payments are being made, the Bank will distribute the remaining payments to the director’s designated beneficiary at the same time and in the same amounts that would have been distributed if the director had not died.

 

The plan was amended in 2008 to provide participating directors with additional options to select specified dates for withdrawal. The ability to select specified withdrawal dates applies to amounts already deferred, as well as amounts that are deferred in the future. The plan and the new withdrawal options are subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, which specifies requirements that non-qualified deferred compensation plans must meet in order to avoid adverse tax consequences for participants.

 

We have a written policy requiring that our Audit Committee review and approve related person transactions that involve us and are of the type that are required to be disclosed in our proxy statement by SEC rules. A transaction may be a related person transaction if any of our directors, executive officers, owners of more than 5% of our common stock, or their immediate family have a material interest in the transaction and the amount involved exceeds $120,000. The policy authorizes the Audit Committee to approve a related person transaction if it determines that the transaction is at least as favorable to us as would have been expected if the transaction had been with a person who is not related to us, or is in our best interest. The policy does not cover loan transactions described in the next paragraph, which are generally subject to approval by the Bank’s Board of Directors to the extent required by applicable banking laws and regulations.

The Bank has had, and expects in the future to have, loan transactions in the ordinary course of business with our directors, executive officers, or their immediate family, or companies they have a material interest in, on substantially the same terms as those prevailing for comparable transactions with others. All such transactions (i) were made in the ordinary course of business, (ii) were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the Bank, and (iii) did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features.

 

We have a correspondent banking relationship with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo Bank”). Wells Fargo & Company, with several of its subsidiaries, including Wells Fargo Bank, reported that they beneficially owned in aggregate more than 5% of our outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2008, and through not later than February 27, 2009. Since 2004, we have had a correspondent banking relation with Wells Fargo Bank. We maintain a correspondent checking account with it through which we conduct certain foreign currency transactions, including wire transfers, drafts and check processing. During 2009, the average balance of our correspondent checking account with Wells Fargo Bank was $77,000, and we paid service charges totaling $5,500. In addition, certain of our commercial loan customers have entered into interest rate swap agreements with our correspondent banks, including Wells Fargo Bank. To assist our commercial customers in these transactions, and to encourage our correspondent banks to enter into the swap transactions with minimal credit underwriting analyses on their part, we have entered into risk participation agreements with the correspondent banks. These agreements obligate us to make payments to the correspondent banks under the interest rate swap agreement in the event that our customer does not make the payments. As of December 31, 2009, the total notional amount of interest rate swap agreements between Wells Fargo Bank and our customers for which we had agreed to make payments in the event that our customers did not was approximately $12.5 million. At no time during 2009 did we have a lending arrangement with Wells Fargo Bank. We had relationships and transactions and agreements with Wells Fargo Bank in 2010, and expect to continue our relationship with Wells Fargo Bank in 2011, and to have transactions and agreements with them in 2011 that are similar in nature to those that occurred in 2009 and 2010, though varying with our needs and best interests.

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Based on a review of filings, we believe that all reports required to be filed under Section 16(a) for 2010 were timely filed, except that our director, Dale J. Visser, filed one report late relating to one sale of Mercantile stock.

 

Our Audit Committee has selected BDO as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2011. BDO began serving as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. Services provided to us by BDO in 2010 are described under the heading “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” below.

 

Our Board of Directors is asking our shareholders to ratify the selection of BDO as our independent registered public accounting firm. Although ratification is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, our Board is submitting the selection of BDO to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice.

 

Representatives of BDO plan to attend the annual meeting of shareholders, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will respond to appropriate questions by shareholders.

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR ratification of the appointment of BDO as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2011. Unless otherwise instructed, the persons named as proxies intend to vote all proxies received for ratification of the appointment of BDO.

 

In the event shareholders do not ratify the appointment, the appointment will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in our best interest and the best interest of our shareholders.

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

The following table shows the fees for audit and other professional services provided to us by BDO for 2010 and 2009.

 

 

 

 

The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit services and non-audit services that are to be performed for us by our independent auditor. Under the Audit Committee’s policy, authority to pre-approve permitted services has been delegated to two members of the Audit Committee, either of whom can act alone, for circumstances when pre-approval is not obtained from the full Audit Committee. Any pre-approval by the delegated authority is required to be reported to the Audit Committee at its next meeting. All of the services described in the table above were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

 

Our executive compensation program is intended to attract, motivate, reward and retain the senior management talent required to achieve our corporate objectives and increase shareholder value. Our philosophy in setting compensation policies for executive officers is to align pay with performance, while at the same time providing competitive compensation. We believe that our compensation policies and procedures are aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders.

 

Under EESA, we are currently required to provide shareholders with the right to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our executives at each annual meeting of shareholders. As a result, we are presenting this proposal, which gives you as a shareholder the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our executive pay program by voting for or against the following resolution:

 

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve the compensation of Mercantile Bank Corporation’s executives, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the related disclosure contained in the proxy statement.”

 

Our Board of Directors urges you to endorse the compensation program for our executive officers by voting FOR the above resolution. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors believes that the executive compensation for 2010 is reasonable and appropriate, and is justified by Mercantile’s performance in an extremely difficult environment.

In deciding how to vote on this proposal, please consider that because of the economic and market conditions, and our recent lack of profitability, we have not increased the salaries of our executive officers during 2008, 2009, or 2010, or for 2011, have not paid any cash bonuses for 2008, 2009 or 2010, and have made no grants of stock options or restricted stock in 2009 or 2010.

 

Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board of Directors. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

 

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR approval of our executive compensation program as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the compensation tables and otherwise in this proxy statement. Unless otherwise instructed, the persons named as proxies intend to vote all proxies received for approval of our executive compensation program.

 

A proposal submitted by a shareholder for the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders must be sent to the Secretary, Mercantile Bank Corporation, 310 Leonard Street NW, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49504 and received by November 18, 2011 in order to be eligible to be included in our proxy statement for that meeting.

 

A shareholder who intends to present a proposal for the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, other than pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, must provide us with notice of such intention by at least February 1, 2012, or the persons named in the proxy to vote the proxies will have discretionary voting authority at the 2012 annual meeting with respect to any such proposal without discussion of the matter in our proxy statement.

 

Our Board of Directors does not know of any other matters to be brought before the annual meeting. If other matters are presented upon which a vote may properly be taken, it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy to vote the proxies in accordance with their best judgment.

002CS10759

								Electronic Voting Instructions You can vote by Internet or telephone! Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.
								Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on April 28, 2011.
										Vote by Internet      • Log on to the Internet and go to        www.envisionreports.com/MBWM      • Follow the steps outlined on the secured website.
										Vote by telephone      • Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA,         US territories & Canada any time on a touch tone         telephone. There is NO CHARGE to you for the call.
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.			x							• Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message.

Annual Meeting Proxy Card

▼ IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.  ▼

A  Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2 and 3.

1.

Election of Directors:

For

Withhold

For

Withhold

For

Withhold

+

01 - David M. Cassard

o

o

02 - Edward J. Clark

o

o

03 - Doyle A. Hayes

o

o

04 - Susan K. Jones

o

o

05 - Lawrence W. Larsen

o

o

06 - Calvin D. Murdock

o

o

07 - Michael H. Price

o

o

08 - Merle J. Prins

o

o

09 - Timothy O. Schad

o

o

10 - Dale J. Visser

o

o

11 - Donald Williams, Sr.

o

o

For

Against

Abstain

For

Against

Abstain

2.

Ratification of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

o

o

o

3.

Approval of the compensation of our executives.

o

o

o

4.

In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting, or at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.