Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact name of the registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
OHIO
|
|
0-024399
|
|
34-1856319 |
|
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
(Commission File No.)
|
|
(IRS Employer I.D. No.) |
275 West Federal Street, Youngstown, Ohio 44503-1203
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (330) 742-0500
Not Applicable
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date. 30,937,704 common shares as of October 31, 2010.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and deposits with banks |
|
$ |
21,110 |
|
|
$ |
22,330 |
|
Federal funds sold and other |
|
|
19,613 |
|
|
|
22,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
40,723 |
|
|
|
45,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
390,636 |
|
|
|
281,348 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
15,376 |
|
|
|
10,497 |
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $40,884 and $42,287, respectively |
|
|
1,726,381 |
|
|
|
1,866,018 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost |
|
|
26,464 |
|
|
|
26,464 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
22,149 |
|
|
|
23,139 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
8,963 |
|
|
|
9,090 |
|
Real estate owned and other repossessed assets |
|
|
40,297 |
|
|
|
30,962 |
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance |
|
|
27,028 |
|
|
|
26,198 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
19,406 |
|
|
|
18,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,317,948 |
|
|
$ |
2,338,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing |
|
$ |
1,557,113 |
|
|
$ |
1,642,722 |
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
127,920 |
|
|
|
126,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
1,685,033 |
|
|
|
1,769,501 |
|
Borrowed funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
306,606 |
|
|
|
221,323 |
|
Repurchase agreements and other |
|
|
97,802 |
|
|
|
96,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds |
|
|
404,408 |
|
|
|
318,156 |
|
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
|
|
16,037 |
|
|
|
19,791 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
10,209 |
|
|
|
9,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,116,615 |
|
|
|
2,118,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock-no par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized and unissued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock-no par value; 499,000,000 shares authorized; 37,804,457
shares issued and 30,925,384 and 30,897,825 shares, respectively
outstanding |
|
|
142,899 |
|
|
|
145,775 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
128,476 |
|
|
|
148,674 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
2,622 |
|
|
|
4,110 |
|
Unearned employee stock ownership plan shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,821 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 6,879,073 and 6,906,632 shares, respectively |
|
|
(72,664 |
) |
|
|
(72,955 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
201,333 |
|
|
|
219,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,317,948 |
|
|
$ |
2,338,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
24,589 |
|
|
$ |
29,389 |
|
|
$ |
75,350 |
|
|
$ |
90,532 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
3,235 |
|
|
|
2,925 |
|
|
|
8,716 |
|
|
|
8,491 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
Other interest earning assets |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
28,240 |
|
|
|
32,755 |
|
|
|
85,230 |
|
|
|
100,574 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
7,528 |
|
|
|
11,037 |
|
|
|
25,254 |
|
|
|
35,762 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
|
4,775 |
|
Repurchase agreements and other |
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
2,796 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
9,454 |
|
|
|
13,350 |
|
|
|
30,757 |
|
|
|
43,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
18,786 |
|
|
|
19,405 |
|
|
|
54,473 |
|
|
|
56,821 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
17,116 |
|
|
|
5,579 |
|
|
|
39,876 |
|
|
|
26,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
13,826 |
|
|
|
14,597 |
|
|
|
30,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deposit investment income |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
Service fees and other charges |
|
|
1,563 |
|
|
|
2,012 |
|
|
|
3,738 |
|
|
|
6,245 |
|
Net gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
7,295 |
|
|
|
1,863 |
|
Other -than-temporary loss in equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment loss |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(722 |
) |
Loss recognized in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(722 |
) |
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
2,456 |
|
|
|
3,487 |
|
Real estate owned and other repossessed assets |
|
|
(1,273 |
) |
|
|
(3,964 |
) |
|
|
(4,512 |
) |
|
|
(6,301 |
) |
Gain on sale of retail branch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
3,799 |
|
|
|
3,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
15,420 |
|
|
|
9,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
7,568 |
|
|
|
7,558 |
|
|
|
24,847 |
|
|
|
23,345 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
2,693 |
|
|
|
2,798 |
|
Equipment and data processing |
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
4,949 |
|
|
|
4,968 |
|
Franchise tax |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
Advertising |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
Amortization of core deposit intangible |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
Deposit insurance premiums |
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
4,311 |
|
|
|
6,254 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
2,921 |
|
|
|
2,574 |
|
Real estate owned and other repossessed asset expenses |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
2,658 |
|
|
|
2,282 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
5,358 |
|
|
|
4,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses |
|
|
15,700 |
|
|
|
15,385 |
|
|
|
49,959 |
|
|
|
48,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(9,915 |
) |
|
|
(1,440 |
) |
|
|
(19,942 |
) |
|
|
(9,432 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(9,915 |
) |
|
|
(867 |
) |
|
|
(19,942 |
) |
|
|
(5,460 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income of Butler Wick Corp., net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(9,915 |
) |
|
$ |
(867 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,942 |
) |
|
$ |
(511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
(Continued)
(Continued)
UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Loss available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(9,915 |
) |
|
$ |
(867 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,942 |
) |
|
$ |
(511 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain/(loss) on securities, net |
|
|
(1,569 |
) |
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
(1,488 |
) |
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(11,484 |
) |
|
$ |
1,163 |
|
|
$ |
(21,430 |
) |
|
$ |
508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basiccontinuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.66 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
Basicdiscontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
Basic |
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.66 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
Dilutedcontinuing operations |
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.66 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
Diluteddiscontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.66 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Plan Shares |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
30,898 |
|
|
$ |
145,775 |
|
|
$ |
148,674 |
|
|
$ |
4,110 |
|
|
$ |
(5,821 |
) |
|
$ |
(72,955 |
) |
|
$ |
219,783 |
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,942 |
) |
Change in net unrealized gain
on securities, net of tax of $801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,430 |
) |
Shares allocated to ESOP participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,078 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,743 |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2010 |
|
|
30,925 |
|
|
$ |
142,899 |
|
|
$ |
128,476 |
|
|
$ |
2,622 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(72,664 |
) |
|
$ |
201,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Plan Shares |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
January 1, 2009 |
|
|
30,898 |
|
|
$ |
146,439 |
|
|
$ |
165,447 |
|
|
$ |
3,635 |
|
|
$ |
(7,643 |
) |
|
$ |
(72,955 |
) |
|
$ |
234,923 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
Change in net unrealized gain
on securities, net of tax of $549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508 |
|
Shares allocated to ESOP participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(946 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
420 |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2009 |
|
|
30,898 |
|
|
$ |
145,568 |
|
|
$ |
164,936 |
|
|
$ |
4,654 |
|
|
$ |
(6,277 |
) |
|
$ |
(72,955 |
) |
|
$ |
235,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(19,942 |
) |
|
$ |
(511 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
39,876 |
|
|
|
26,334 |
|
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
(2,456 |
) |
|
|
(3,487 |
) |
Net losses on real estate owned and other repossessed assets sold |
|
|
4,512 |
|
|
|
6,301 |
|
Net gain on retail branch sold |
|
|
(1,388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net gain on available for sale securities sold |
|
|
(7,295 |
) |
|
|
(1,863 |
) |
Net gains on other assets sold |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Other than temporary impairment of securities available for sale |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts |
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
2,148 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
Decrease in interest receivable |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
1,229 |
|
Decrease in interest payable |
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
(999 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in prepaid and other assets |
|
|
3,175 |
|
|
|
(4,977 |
) |
Increase in other liabilities |
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Net principal disbursed on loans originated for sale |
|
|
(157,723 |
) |
|
|
(295,926 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans originated for sale |
|
|
153,515 |
|
|
|
311,363 |
|
ESOP Compensation |
|
|
2,743 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
Purchase of interest rate caps |
|
|
(2,126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net change in interest rate caps |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flows from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities |
|
|
14,912 |
|
|
|
39,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from principal repayments and maturities of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
68,368 |
|
|
|
41,442 |
|
Proceeds from sale of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
247,129 |
|
|
|
76,190 |
|
Real estate owned and other repossessed assets |
|
|
14,931 |
|
|
|
11,459 |
|
Fixed assets |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Purchases of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
(421,856 |
) |
|
|
(196,295 |
) |
Net change in loans |
|
|
75,281 |
|
|
|
172,872 |
|
Loans purchased |
|
|
(4,729 |
) |
|
|
(2,090 |
) |
Purchases of premises and equipment |
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
(519 |
) |
Sale of retail branch |
|
|
(22,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investing cash flows from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from investing activities |
|
|
(43,501 |
) |
|
|
111,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in checking, savings and money market accounts |
|
|
33,952 |
|
|
|
38,612 |
|
Net decrease in certificates of deposit |
|
|
(92,212 |
) |
|
|
(169,040 |
) |
Net decrease in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
|
|
(3,754 |
) |
|
|
(6,856 |
) |
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
745,200 |
|
|
|
652,400 |
|
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(659,917 |
) |
|
|
(642,228 |
) |
Net change in repurchase agreements and other borrowed funds |
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
(29,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from financing activities |
|
|
24,238 |
|
|
|
(156,447 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(4,351 |
) |
|
|
(5,459 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
45,074 |
|
|
|
43,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
40,723 |
|
|
$ |
37,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
United Community Financial Corp. (United Community or the Company) was incorporated under Ohio law
in February 1998 by The Home Savings and Loan Company of Youngstown, Ohio (Home Savings) in
connection with the conversion of Home Savings from an Ohio mutual savings and loan association to
an Ohio capital stock savings association (Conversion). Upon consummation of the Conversion on
July 8, 1998, United Community became the unitary thrift holding company for Home Savings. Home
Savings, a state-chartered savings bank, conducts business from its main office located in
Youngstown, Ohio, 38 full-service branches and six loan production offices located throughout Ohio
and western Pennsylvania.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of United Community have been prepared in
accordance with instructions relating to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. However, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of
normal recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair
statement of results for the interim periods.
The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010. The consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited financial
statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2009, contained in United Communitys
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current
presentation.
2. REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT ACTION
As previously disclosed, on
August 8, 2008, the board of directors of United Community approved a
Stipulation and Consent to Issuance of Order to Cease and Desist (OTS Order)
with the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). Simultaneously with the original
OTS Order, the board of directors of Home Savings approved a Stipulation and
Consent to the Issuance of an Order to Cease and Desist (Bank Order) with the
FDIC and the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions (Ohio Division). Although
United Community and Home Savings have agreed to the issuance of the OTS Order
and the Bank Order, respectively, neither has admitted or denied any
allegations of unsafe or unsound banking practices, or any legal or regulatory
violations. No monetary penalties were assessed by the OTS, the FDIC, or the
Ohio Division.
The OTS Order requires United
Community to obtain OTS approval prior to: (i) incurring or increasing its
debt position; (ii) repurchasing any United Community stock; or
(iii) paying any dividends. The OTS Order also requires United Community
to develop a debt reduction plan and submit the plan to the OTS for approval.
The Bank Order requires Home
Savings, within specified timeframes, to take or refrain from certain actions,
including: (i) retaining a bank consultant to assess Home Savings
management needs and submitting a management plan that identifies officer
positions needed, identifies and establishes board and internal operating
committees, evaluates Home Savings’ senior officers, and provides for the
hiring of any additional personnel; (ii) seeking regulatory approval prior
to adding any individuals to the board of directors or employing any individual
as a senior executive officer of Home Savings; (iii) not extending
additional credit to classified borrowers; (iv) establishing a compliant
Allowance for Loan and Lease Loss methodology; (v) enhancing its risk
management policies and procedures; (vi) adopting and implementing plans
to reduce its classified assets and delinquent loans, and to reduce loan
concentrations in nonowner-occupied commercial real estate and construction,
land development, and land loans; (vii) establishing board of directors
committees to evaluate and approve certain loans and oversee Home
Savings’ compliance with the Bank Order; (viii) revising its loan
policy and enhancing its underwriting and credit administration functions;
(ix) developing a strategic plan and budget and profit plan;
(x) correcting all violations of laws, rules, and regulations and
implementing procedures to ensure future compliance; (xi) increasing its
Tier 1 leverage ratio to 8.0% and its total risk-based capital ratio to 12.0%
by December 31, 2008; and (xii) seeking regulatory approval prior to
declaring or paying any cash dividend.
Both the OTS Order and the Bank
Order remain in effect. Since the issuance of the Bank Order, there has been no
change in the requirements of that Order. The OTS Order, however, was
subsequently amended effective November 5, 2010. This amendment removed a
requirement in the original OTS Order to provide the OTS with a debt reduction
plan and added a requirement to provide the OTS with a capital plan. This
capital plan will be consistent with and incorporated into the strategic
planning process that Home Savings has already been undertaking for the past
two years under the terms of the Bank Order.
Because of the consent to the Bank
Order, Home Savings is deemed ‘adequately capitalized’ for
regulatory capital purposes, as discussed in Notes 3 and 17 of the
December 31, 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On August 12, 1999, United Community acquired Butler Wick Corp. (Butler Wick), the parent company
for two wholly owned subsidiaries: Butler Wick & Co., Inc. and Butler Wick Trust Company. On
December 31, 2008, the Company completed the sale of Butler Wick & Co., Inc., to Stifel Financial
Corp. for $12.0 million. On March 31, 2009, the Company completed the sale of Butler Wick Trust
Company to Farmers National Banc Corp. for $12.1 million. As a result, Butler Wick has been
reported as a discontinued operation and consolidated financial statement information for all
periods presented has been reclassified to reflect this presentation. Summarized Butler Wick
results of operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
32 |
|
Brokerage commissions |
|
|
|
|
Service fees and other charges |
|
|
1,287 |
|
Underwriting and investment banking |
|
|
|
|
Gain on the sale of Butler Wick Trust |
|
|
7,904 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income |
|
|
9,223 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on borrowings |
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
1,198 |
|
Occupancy expenses |
|
|
68 |
|
Equipment and data processing |
|
|
84 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
7,615 |
|
Income tax |
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
4. RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets: In June 2009, the FASB amended previous guidance
relating to transfers of financial assets. This removes the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity from existing GAAP and removes the exception from applying FASB ASC 810-10,
Consolidation (FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003) Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities) to qualifying special purpose entities. The objective of this new guidance is
to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that
a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets (which
includes loan participations); the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement in transferred financial
assets. The Companys adoption of this new guidance on January 1, 2010, did not have a material
impact on United Communitys consolidated financial statements.
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (ASC 810-10): In June 2009, FASB issued guidance
with the objective of amending certain requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December
2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to improve financial reporting by enterprises
involved with variable interest entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to
users of financial statements. The Companys adoption of this new guidance on January 1, 2010 had
no impact on United Communitys consolidated financial statements.
7
Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements: In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment
to Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, Topic 820, Improving Disclosures About Fair Value
Measurements. This amendment requires new disclosures regarding significant transfers in and out
of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and the reasons for the transfers. This amendment also
requires that a reporting entity must present separately information about purchases, sales,
issuances, and settlements on a gross basis rather than a net basis for activity in
Level 3 fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs. This amendment also
clarifies existing disclosures on the level of disaggregation, in that the reporting entity needs
to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities, and a reporting
entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair
value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements for Level 2 and 3. The new
disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures for ASC 820 were effective for interim and
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about
purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010,
and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of ASC 820 did not have a material
effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Pooled Purchased Loans: In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-18, Receivables (Topic 310):
Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is a Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single
Asset a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. ASU 2010-18 clarifies the treatment
for a modified loan that was acquired as part of a pool of assets. Refinancing or restructuring
the loan does not make it eligible for removal from the pool, the FASB said. The amendment is
effective for loans that are part of an asset pool and are modified during financial reporting
period that ends July 15, 2010 or later and did not have a significant impact on the Companys
financial statements.
Disclosure on Credit Quality: In July 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310):
Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.
ASU 2010-20 is intended to provide additional information to assist financial statement users in
assessing an entitys credit risk exposures and evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for credit
losses. The disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for interim and annual
reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs
during a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or
after December 15, 2010. The amendments in ASU 2010-20 encourage, but do not require, comparative
disclosures for earlier reporting periods that ended before initial adoption. However, an entity
should provide comparative disclosures for those reporting periods ending after initial adoption.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the
Companys financial position or results of operations.
5. STOCK COMPENSATION
Stock Options:
On April 26, 2007, shareholders approved the United Community Financial Corp. 2007 Long-Term
Incentive Plan, as amended (2007 Plan). The purpose of the 2007 Plan is to promote and advance the
interests of United Community and its shareholders by enabling United Community to attract, retain
and reward directors, directors emeritus, managerial and other key employees of United Community,
including Home Savings, by facilitating their purchase of an ownership interest in United
Community. The 2007 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 2,000,000 shares that are to be used
for awards of restricted stock, stock options, performance awards, stock appreciation rights
(SARs), or other forms of stock-based incentive awards. There were 418,200 stock options granted
in 2010, 32,000 stock options granted in 2009 and there were 243,721 stock options granted in 2008
under the 2007 Plan. All of the options awarded in 2008 became exercisable on the date of grant.
For the options granted in 2009, one-third of the total options granted became exercisable on
December 31, 2009, with the remaining two-thirds vesting equally on December 31, 2010 and 2011.
For the options granted in 2010, one-half of the total options vest equally on December 31, 2010
and 2011. All options expire 10 years from the date of grant.
On July 12, 1999, shareholders approved the United Community Financial Corp. 1999 Long-Term
Incentive Plan, as amended (1999 Plan). The purpose of the 1999 Plan was the same as the 2007
Plan. The 1999 Plan terminated on May 20, 2009, although the 1999 Plan survives so long as options
issued under the 1999 Plan remain outstanding and exercisable.
The 1999 Plan provided for the grant of either incentive or nonqualified stock options. Options
were awarded at exercise prices that were not less than the fair market value of the share at the
grant date. The maximum number of common shares that could be issued under the plan was 3,569,766.
Because the 1999 Plan terminated, no additional options may be issued. All of the options awarded
became exercisable on the date of grant except that options granted in 2009 became exercisable over
three years beginning on December 31, 2009. All options expire 10 years from the date of grant.
8
Expenses related to stock option grants are included with salaries and employee benefits. The
Company recognized $231,000 in stock option expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
The Company expects to recognize additional expenses of $121,000 for the remainder of 2010
approximately $391,000 in 2011.
A summary of activity in the plans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
intrinsic value |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
2,200,672 |
|
|
$ |
7.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
418,200 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(363,045 |
) |
|
|
8.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
2,255,827 |
|
|
$ |
6.83 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at end of period |
|
|
1,628,974 |
|
|
$ |
8.69 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information related to the stock option plans during the year follows (dollars in thousands, except
per share amount):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
Intrinsic value of options exercised |
|
|
n/a |
|
Cash received from option exercises |
|
|
n/a |
|
Tax benefit realized from option exercises |
|
|
n/a |
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted, per
share |
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
valuation model that uses assumptions including the risk-free interest rate, expected term,
expected stock volatility, and dividend yield. Expected volatilities are based on historical
volatilities of United Communitys common shares. United Community uses historical data to
estimate option exercises and post-vesting termination behavior. The expected term of options
granted is based on historical data and represents the period of time that options granted are
expected to be outstanding, which takes into account that the options are not transferable. The
risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield
curve in effect at the time of the grant.
The fair value of options granted was determined using the following weighted-average assumptions
as of grant date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 29, 2010 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.49 |
% |
Expected term (years) |
|
|
5 |
|
Expected stock volatility |
|
|
77.2 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
% |
Outstanding stock options have a weighted average remaining life of 5.03 years and may be exercised
in the range of $1.30 to $12.38.
Restricted Stock Awards:
The 2007 Plan, as amended by the 2010 Director Sub-Plan, permits the issuance of awards to
nonemployee directors. Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the awards
based on the market value of the shares at the issue date. Total restricted shares issued under
the 2007 plan were 27,559, all of which were issued on August 24, 2010. These restricted shares
vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. Expenses related to restricted stock awards are
included with salaries and employee benefits. The cost will be recognized over a weighted average
period of one year. The Company recognized approximately $6,000 in restricted stock award expenses
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The Company expects to recognize additional expenses
of approximately $8,000 for the remainder of 2010 approximately $21,000 in 2011.
9
A summary of changes in the Companys nonvested restricted shares for the year is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
date fair |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
value |
|
Nonvested shares at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
27,559 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested shares at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
27,559 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. SECURITIES
Components of the available for sale portfolio are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
U.S. Treasury and government
sponsored entities securities |
|
$ |
65,347 |
|
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
65,675 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities GSE
issued: residential |
|
|
321,352 |
|
|
|
3,624 |
|
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
324,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
386,948 |
|
|
$ |
4,100 |
|
|
$ |
(412 |
) |
|
$ |
390,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
U.S. Treasury and government
sponsored entities securities |
|
$ |
48,717 |
|
|
$ |
313 |
|
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
$ |
48,922 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
708 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities GSE
issued: residential |
|
|
226,182 |
|
|
|
5,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
275,371 |
|
|
$ |
6,085 |
|
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
$ |
281,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities available for sale by contractual maturity, repricing or expected call date are
shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
65,347 |
|
|
|
65,675 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: residential |
|
|
321,352 |
|
|
|
324,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
386,699 |
|
|
$ |
390,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Securities pledged for the Companys investment in VISA stock were approximately $818,000 at
September 30, 2010 and $1.2 million at December 31, 2009. Securities pledged for public funds
deposits were $0 at September 30, 2010, and $1.8 million at December 31, 2009. Securities sold
under an agreement to repurchase are secured primarily by mortgage-backed securities with a fair
value of approximately $114.6 million at September 30, 2010, and $125.7 million at December 31,
2009.
United Community had no securities classified as trading as of September 30, 2010 or December 31,
2009.
The following table summarizes the investment securities with unrealized losses at September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009 by aggregated major security type and length of time in a continuous
unrealized loss position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
U.S. Treasury and government
sponsored entities securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
GSE issued: residential |
|
|
91,644 |
|
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,644 |
|
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
91,644 |
|
|
$ |
(412 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
91,644 |
|
|
$ |
(412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
U.S. Treasury and government
sponsored entities securities |
|
$ |
27,898 |
|
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,898 |
|
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
GSE issued: residential |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
27,905 |
|
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,905 |
|
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the government sponsored entities securities that are temporarily impaired at
September 30, 2010, are impaired due to the current level of interest rates. All of these
securities continue to pay on schedule and management expects to receive all principal and interest
owed on the securities.
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale were $45.1 million and $27.6 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Gross gains of $781,000 and $481,000
and no gross losses were realized on these sales during the third quarter of 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale were $247.1 million and $76.2 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Gross gains of $7.3 million and $1.9
million and gross losses of $25,000 and $0 were realized on these sales during the first nine
months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
11
Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary-impairment (OTTI) at least on a quarterly
basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. The
investment securities portfolio is evaluated for OTTI by segregating the portfolio into two general
segments and applying the appropriate OTTI model.
The first segment represents securities classified as available for sale or held to maturity. In
evaluating this segment, management considers many factors, including: (1) the length of time and
the extent to which the fair value has been less
than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the
market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the entity has the intent
to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before
its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an OTTI exists involves a high degree of
subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in
time.
The second segment represents securities purchased that, on the purchase date, were rated below AA.
The Company compares the present value of the remaining cash flows as estimated at the preceding
evaluation date to the current expected remaining cash flows. An OTTI is deemed to have occurred
if there has been an adverse change in the remaining expected future cash flows.
When OTTI occurs under either model, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on
whether an entity intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not that it will be
required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period
credit loss. If an entity intends to sell or it is more likely than not it will be required to
sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss,
the OTTI recognized in earnings is equal to the entire difference between the investments
amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to
sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the
security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period loss, the OTTI is
separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors.
The amount of the total OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value
of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI
related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The
previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost
basis of the investment.
The Company evaluates its equity securities for impairment on a quarterly basis. In general, if a
security has been in an unrealized loss position for more than twelve months, the Company will
realize an OTTI charge on the security. If the security has been in an unrealized loss position
for less that twelve months, the Company examines the capital levels, nonperforming asset ratios,
and liquidity position of the issuer to determine whether or not an OTTI charge is appropriate.
The
Company recognized a $44,000 OTTI charge on an equity investment in
another financial institution in the third quarter of 2010. That
financial institution completed an equity offering which diluted the
Company's investment, making a chance of recovery remote in the
foreseeable future.
As of September 30, 2010, the Companys security portfolio consisted of 51 securities, seven of
which were in an unrealized loss position totaling approximately $412,000.
7. LOANS
Portfolio loans consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Real Estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
$ |
778,005 |
|
|
$ |
773,831 |
|
Multifamily residential |
|
|
136,681 |
|
|
|
150,480 |
|
Nonresidential |
|
|
355,914 |
|
|
|
397,895 |
|
Land |
|
|
25,413 |
|
|
|
23,502 |
|
Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
117,297 |
|
|
|
178,095 |
|
Multifamily and non-residential |
|
|
14,537 |
|
|
|
13,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate |
|
|
1,427,847 |
|
|
|
1,537,544 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
289,296 |
|
|
|
309,202 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
48,902 |
|
|
|
60,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
1,766,045 |
|
|
|
1,906,963 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
40,884 |
|
|
|
42,287 |
|
Deferred loan fees, net |
|
|
(1,220 |
) |
|
|
(1,342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
39,664 |
|
|
|
40,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
$ |
1,726,381 |
|
|
$ |
1,866,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Changes in the allowance for loan loss are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
40,728 |
|
|
$ |
39,832 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
17,116 |
|
|
|
5,579 |
|
Amounts charged off |
|
|
(17,307 |
) |
|
|
(6,728 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
40,884 |
|
|
$ |
38,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
Twelve months |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
42,287 |
|
|
$ |
35,962 |
|
|
$ |
35,962 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
39,876 |
|
|
|
26,334 |
|
|
|
49,074 |
|
Amounts charged off |
|
|
(42,005 |
) |
|
|
(24,234 |
) |
|
|
(43,692 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
40,884 |
|
|
$ |
38,845 |
|
|
$ |
42,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans were $142.9 million and $112.2 million at September 30, 2010, and December 31,
2009, respectively. Restructured loans were $28.2 million at September 30, 2010 and $22.6 million
at December 31, 2009. Loans greater than 90 days past due and still accruing interest were $4.3
million and $3.7 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Impaired loans consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the |
|
|
As of or for |
|
|
|
Nine |
|
|
the Year |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans on which no specific valuation allowance was provided |
|
$ |
73,027 |
|
|
$ |
82,443 |
|
Impaired loans on which a specific valuation allowance was provided |
|
|
68,865 |
|
|
|
36,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans at period-end |
|
$ |
141,892 |
|
|
$ |
118,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific valuation allowances on impaired loans at period-end |
|
$ |
10,657 |
|
|
$ |
4,064 |
|
Average impaired loans during the period |
|
|
130,349 |
|
|
|
103,026 |
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans during the period |
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
2,056 |
|
Interest income received on impaired loans during the period |
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
2,056 |
|
13
8. MORTGAGE BANKING ACTIVITIES
Mortgage loans serviced for others, which are not reported in United Communitys assets, totaled
$1.1 billion at September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009.
Activity for capitalized mortgage servicing rights, included in other assets, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
6,228 |
|
|
$ |
5,562 |
|
Originations |
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
3,220 |
|
Amortized to expense |
|
|
(1,779 |
) |
|
|
(2,554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
5,966 |
|
|
|
6,228 |
|
Less valuation allowance |
|
|
(1,598 |
) |
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance |
|
$ |
4,368 |
|
|
$ |
5,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in the valuation allowance for mortgage servicing rights was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
(423 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,233 |
) |
Impairment charges |
|
|
(1,279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Recoveries |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
(1,598 |
) |
|
$ |
(423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of mortgage servicing rights as of September 30, 2010 was approximately $5.5 million and
at December 31, 2009 was approximately $8.0 million.
Key economic assumptions in measuring the value of mortgage servicing rights at September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Weighted average prepayment rate |
|
529 PSA |
|
|
325 PSA |
|
Weighted average life (in years) |
|
3.52 |
|
|
3.65 |
|
Weighted average discount rate |
|
8% |
|
|
8% |
|
9. OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED AND OTHER REPOSSESSED ASSETS
Real estate owned and other repossessed assets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
Real estate owned and other repossessed assets |
|
$ |
48,250 |
|
|
$ |
38,829 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(7,953 |
) |
|
|
(7,867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
40,297 |
|
|
$ |
30,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Activity in the valuation allowance was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Beginning of year |
|
$ |
7,867 |
|
|
$ |
2,754 |
|
Additions charged to expense |
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
7,925 |
|
Direct write-downs |
|
|
(3,144 |
) |
|
|
(2,812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
7,953 |
|
|
$ |
7,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses related to foreclosed and repossessed assets include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net loss (gain) on sales |
|
$ |
407 |
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
1,282 |
|
|
$ |
1,287 |
|
Provision for unrealized losses, net |
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
3,827 |
|
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
5,014 |
|
Operating expenses, net of rental
income |
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
2,658 |
|
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
$ |
2,339 |
|
|
$ |
4,491 |
|
|
$ |
7,170 |
|
|
$ |
8,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
Home Savings sponsors a defined benefit health care plan. The plan was curtailed in 2000, but
continues to provide postretirement medical benefits for employees who had worked 20 years and
attained a minimum age of 60 by September 1, 2000, while in service with Home Savings. The plan is
contributory and contains minor cost-sharing features such as deductibles and coinsurance. In
addition, postretirement life insurance coverage is provided for employees who were participants
prior to December 10, 1976. The life insurance plan is non-contributory. Home Savings policy is
to pay premiums monthly, with no pre-funding.
Components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Recognized net actuarial gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost/(gain) |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used in the
valuations were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average discount rate |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
15
11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer
a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Furthermore, a fair
value hierarchy is established which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs
and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Three levels of inputs that
are used to measure fair values:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets
that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entitys own assumptions
about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on
nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a
mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying
exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities
relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).
The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses is
generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation
approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach.
Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the
independent appraisers to adjust for differences
between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are typically significant
and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2010 Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and government
sponsored entities
securities |
|
$ |
65,675 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
65,675 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities: residential |
|
|
324,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps |
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009 Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and government
sponsored entities
securities |
|
$ |
48,922 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48,922 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities: residential |
|
|
231,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
16
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2010 Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
58,208 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
58,208 |
|
Mortgage servicing assets |
|
|
4,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed assets |
|
|
14,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009 Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
32,298 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32,298 |
|
Mortgage servicing assets |
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed assets |
|
|
19,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,534 |
|
Impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses, carried at fair value,
which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent
loans, had a carrying amount of $68.9 million at September 30, 2010, with a specific valuation
allowance of $10.7 million; this resulted in additional provision for loan losses of $131,000
during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and $7.2 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
Mortgage servicing rights had a carrying amount of $6.0 million with a valuation allowance of $1.6
million at September 30, 2010, resulting in $19,000 in additional expenses during the three months
ended September 30, 2010 and $1.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Mortgage servicing rights are valued by an independent third party that is active in purchasing and
selling these instruments. The value reflects the characteristics of the underlying loans
discounted at a market multiple.
Foreclosed assets, carried at fair value, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of
the property less estimated selling costs, had a carrying amount of $22.5 million, with a valuation
allowance of $8.0 million at September 30, 2010; this resulted in additional expenses of $866,000
during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and $3.2 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
17
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the carrying value and estimated fair
values of financial instruments, at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
40,723 |
|
|
$ |
40,723 |
|
|
$ |
45,074 |
|
|
$ |
45,074 |
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
390,636 |
|
|
|
390,636 |
|
|
|
281,348 |
|
|
|
281,348 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
15,376 |
|
|
|
15,655 |
|
|
|
10,497 |
|
|
|
10,551 |
|
Loans, net |
|
|
1,726,381 |
|
|
|
1,749,133 |
|
|
|
1,866,018 |
|
|
|
1,873,776 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
26,464 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
26,464 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
8,963 |
|
|
|
8,963 |
|
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
9,090 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Checking, savings and money market accounts |
|
|
(756,987 |
) |
|
|
(756,987 |
) |
|
|
(729,512 |
) |
|
|
(729,512 |
) |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
(928,046 |
) |
|
|
(937,229 |
) |
|
|
(1,039,989 |
) |
|
|
(1,051,133 |
) |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(306,606 |
) |
|
|
(314,343 |
) |
|
|
(221,323 |
) |
|
|
(227,350 |
) |
Repurchase agreements and other |
|
|
(97,802 |
) |
|
|
(110,935 |
) |
|
|
(96,833 |
) |
|
|
(105,546 |
) |
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes
and insurance |
|
|
(16,037 |
) |
|
|
(16,037 |
) |
|
|
(19,791 |
) |
|
|
(19,791 |
) |
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
(928 |
) |
|
|
(928 |
) |
|
|
(1,421 |
) |
|
|
(1,421 |
) |
Fair value of financial instruments:
The estimated fair values of financial instruments have been determined by United Community using
available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is
required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the
estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that United Community
could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or
estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Cash and cash equivalents, accrued interest receivable and payable and advance payments by
borrowers for taxes and insuranceThe carrying amounts as reported in the Statements of Financial
Condition are a reasonable estimate of fair value due to their short-term nature.
SecuritiesFair values are based on quoted market prices, dealer quotes, and prices obtained from
independent pricing services.
Loans held for saleThe fair value of loans held for sale is based on market quotes.
LoansThe fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current market
rates for loans of similar maturities with adjustments for market and credit risks.
Federal Home Loan Bank stockIt is not practical to determine the fair value of Federal Home Loan
Bank stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.
DepositsThe fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and money market deposit accounts is
the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates
of deposit is estimated using rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Borrowed fundsFor short-term borrowings, fair value is estimated to be carrying value. The fair
value of other borrowings is based on current rates for similar financing.
18
LimitationsFair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market
information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any
premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time United Communitys entire
holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion
of United Communitys financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on
judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk
characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. These estimates are subjective
in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment, and therefore cannot be
determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
Fair value estimates are based on existing on and off balance sheet financial instruments without
attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and
liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. For example, a significant asset not
considered a financial asset is premises and equipment. In addition, tax ramifications related to
the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value
estimates and have not been considered in any of the estimates.
12. STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information are summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits and borrowings |
|
$ |
31,250 |
|
|
$ |
44,752 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
Supplemental schedule of noncash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers from loans to real estate owned and
other repossessed assets |
|
|
28,777 |
|
|
|
16,109 |
|
Transfers from loans to loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,842 |
|
13. SEGMENT INFORMATION
United Community monitors the revenue streams of the various Company products and services. The
identifiable segments and operations are managed, and financial performance is evaluated, on a
Company-wide basis. Accordingly, all of the Companys financial service operations are considered
by management to be aggregated in one reportable operating segment, which is banking services.
Discontinued operations are essentially the results of operations from Butler Wick, which were
previously reported as a separate segment, investment services. Refer to Note 3 for a discussion
on discontinued operations and its impact on segment reporting.
19
14. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average
number of common shares determined for the basic computation plus the dilutive effect of potential
common shares that could be issued under outstanding stock options. Stock options for 2,227,827
shares were anti-dilutive for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. There were 2,203,338 stock
options for shares that were anti-dilutive for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(9,915 |
) |
|
$ |
(867 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,942 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,460 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(9,915 |
) |
|
$ |
(867 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,942 |
) |
|
$ |
(511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
30,899 |
|
|
|
29,803 |
|
|
|
30,301 |
|
|
|
29,702 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstandingdilutive |
|
|
30,899 |
|
|
|
29,803 |
|
|
|
30,301 |
|
|
|
29,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.66 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
Basic earnings per common share-discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share |
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.66 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive earnings (loss) per common share continuing
operations |
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.66 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
Dilutive earnings per common share-discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
Dilutive earnings (loss) per common share |
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.66 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
15. BROKERED CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
Brokered deposits represent funds which Home Savings obtained, directly or indirectly, through a
deposit broker. A deposit broker places deposits from third parties with insured depository
institutions or places deposits with an institution for the purpose of selling interest in those
deposits to third parties. Under the terms of the Bank Order, Home Savings cannot obtain
additional brokered deposits without prior consent of the FDIC and Ohio Division. Home Savings had
brokered deposits of $15.0 million with a weighted average rate of 4.35% at December 31, 2009. All
brokered deposits matured in the third quarter of 2010 and, as a result, Home Savings had no
brokered deposits at September 30, 2010.
20
16. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Other comprehensive income (loss) included in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
consists of unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities and changes in unrealized
gains and losses on postretirement liability. The change includes reclassification of gains on
sales of securities of $7.3 million and impairment charges of $44,000 at September 30, 2010, and
gains on sales of securities of $1.9 million and impairment charges of $722,000 at September 30,
2009.
Other comprehensive income (loss) components and related tax effects for the three and nine month
periods are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on securities available for sale |
|
$ |
(1,677 |
) |
|
$ |
3,032 |
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses realized in income |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains |
|
|
(2,414 |
) |
|
|
3,123 |
|
Tax effect (35%) |
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
(1,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
$ |
(1,569 |
) |
|
$ |
2,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on securities available for sale |
|
$ |
4,962 |
|
|
$ |
2,709 |
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses realized in income |
|
|
(7,251 |
) |
|
|
(1,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains |
|
|
(2,289 |
) |
|
|
1,568 |
|
Tax effect (35%) |
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
(549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
$ |
(1,488 |
) |
|
$ |
1,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of accumulated other comprehensive income balances, net of
tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Period |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale |
|
$ |
3,885 |
|
|
$ |
(1,488 |
) |
|
$ |
2,397 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on post-retirement benefits |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,110 |
|
|
$ |
(1,488 |
) |
|
$ |
2,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17. REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
Home Savings is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal
banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and
possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct
material effect on Home Savings and United Community. The regulations require Home Savings to meet
specific capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action that
involve quantitative measures of Home Savings assets, liabilities, and certain off balance sheet
items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Home Savings capital classification is
also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and
other factors.
21
Quantitative measures established by regulation for capital adequacy require Home Savings to
maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Tier 1 (or Core) capital (as defined in the regulations) to
average total assets (as defined) and of total risk-based capital (as defined) to risk-weighted
assets (as defined). Actual and statutory required capital amounts and ratios for Home Savings are
presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Requirements |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Per Bank Order |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
212,223 |
|
|
|
13.12 |
% |
|
$ |
194,109 |
|
|
|
12.00 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
191,749 |
|
|
|
11.85 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Tier 1 capital to average total assets |
|
|
191,749 |
|
|
|
8.23 |
% |
|
|
186,352 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Minimum Capital |
|
|
To Be Well Capitalized |
|
|
|
Requirements |
|
|
Under Prompt Corrective |
|
|
|
Per Regulation |
|
|
Action Provisions |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
129,406 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
$ |
161,757 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
97,054 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to average total assets |
|
|
93,176 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
116,470 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Requirements |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Per Bank Order |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
220,395 |
|
|
|
12.80 |
% |
|
$ |
206,674 |
|
|
|
12.00 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
198,610 |
|
|
|
11.53 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Tier 1 capital to average total assets |
|
|
198,610 |
|
|
|
8.22 |
% |
|
|
193,316 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Minimum Capital |
|
|
To Be Well Capitalized |
|
|
|
Requirements |
|
|
Under Prompt Corrective |
|
|
|
Per Regulation |
|
|
Action Provisions |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
137,783 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
$ |
172,229 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
103,337 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to average total assets |
|
|
96,658 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
120,822 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Amount/Ratio is not required under the Bank Order or regulations. |
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the FDIC categorized Home Savings as
adequately capitalized pursuant to the Bank Order, as previously
disclosed. The Bank Order provided for Home Savings to increase its Tier 1 leverage ratio to 8.0%
and total risk-based capital ratio to 12.0%. As depicted in the previous tables, Home Savings
continues to exceed this requirement.
Management believes that, as of September 30, 2010, Home Savings meets all capital requirements to
which it is subject, inclusive of the Bank Order. Events beyond managements control, such as
fluctuations in interest rates or a downturn in the economy in areas in which Home Savings loans
and securities are concentrated, could adversely affect future earnings, and consequently Home
Savings ability to meet its future capital requirements.
22
18. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
In conjunction with the Conversion, United Community established an Employee Stock Ownership Plan
(ESOP) for the benefit of the employees of United Community and Home Savings. All full-time
employees who meet certain age and years of service criteria are eligible to participate in the
ESOP. The ESOP is a tax-qualified retirement plan designed to invest primarily in the stock of
United Community. The ESOP borrowed $26.8 million from United Community to purchase 2,752,615
shares in conjunction with the Conversion. The term of the loan was 15 years and was being repaid
primarily with contributions from Home Savings to the ESOP. Additionally, 1,643,817 shares were
purchased with the return of capital distribution in 1999. During 2008, 42,890 shares were added
to the plan from the stock dividend paid in the fourth quarter of that year. The cost of shares
issued, but not yet allocated to participants, is shown as a reduction of shareholders equity.
The loan was collateralized by the common shares held by the ESOP. As the note was repaid, shares
were released from collateral based on the proportion of the payment in relation to total payments
required to be made on the loan. The shares released from collateral are then allocated to
participants on the basis of compensation as described in the plan. Compensation expense is
determined by multiplying the per share market price of United Communitys shares at the end of the
period by the number of shares to be released. On June 29, 2010, the ESOP paid in full the
remaining balance of the loan and Home Savings recognized $1.3 million in additional compensation
expense in the second quarter and year-to-date as shares were allocated to plan participants.
Proceeds from the ESOP loan prepayment gave United Community the opportunity to infuse
approximately $9.0 million of capital into Home Savings, in addition to taking advantage of certain
tax benefits available for these types of plans.
19. DERIVATIVES
The Company utilizes interest rate cap agreements as part of its asset/liability management
strategy to help manage its interest rate risk position. The Company entered into two interest
rate cap agreements in August, 2010 with an outside counterparty, mirroring the terms of selected
FHLB advances in order to offset the risk of rising interest rates on these FHLB borrowings. The
Company receives proceeds from the counterparty if interest rates exceed the cap rate computed
based on the underlying notional amounts. The notional amount of the interest rate caps does not
represent amounts exchanged by the parties. The amount exchanged is determined by reference to the
notional amount and the other terms of the individual interest rate cap agreements. The interest
rate caps are carried as freestanding derivatives, considered an economic hedge classified as an
other asset with a carrying value of $2.0 million with changes in fair value of approximately
$(66,000) reported in current earnings through other noninterest income.
Summary information about the interest rate caps not designated hedges as of September 30, 2010, is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Notional amounts |
|
$ |
30,000,000 |
|
Weighted average strike rate, based on three-month Libor |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
Weighted average maturity |
|
|
7.5 years |
|
Fair value of combined interest rate caps |
|
$ |
2,030,377 |
|
The following table presents net gains/(losses) recorded in noninterest income relating to
instruments not designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest rate caps |
|
$ |
(65,992 |
) |
23
The following table reflects the fair value and location in the Consolidated Statement of Financial
Condition of interest rate caps:
Included in other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Freestanding derivative assets not designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps |
|
$ |
2,096,369 |
|
Valuation adjustment |
|
|
(65,992 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net derivative assets not designated as hedges |
|
$ |
2,030,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is subject to counterparty risk. Counterparty risk is the risk to the Company that the
counterparty will not live up to its contractual obligations. The ability of the Company to
realize the benefit of the derivative contracts is dependent on the creditworthiness of the
counterparty, which the Company expects will perform in accordance with the terms of the contracts.
20. Income Taxes
Management recorded a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets at year-end 2009 based on its
estimate of future reversal and utilization. When determining the amount of deferred tax assets
that are more-likely-than-not to be realized, and therefore recorded as a benefit, the Company
conducts a regular assessment of all available information. This information includes, but is not
limited to, taxable income in prior periods, projected future income, and projected future
reversals of deferred tax items. Based on these criteria, and in particular fourth quarter 2009
activity surrounding the provision for loan losses, the Company determined that it was necessary to
establish a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets of $7.6 million, resulting in a net
deferred tax asset of $3.7 million at December 31, 2009. An ongoing analysis of the Companys
deferred tax asset has resulted in a valuation allowance of $14.8 million at September 30, 2010,
resulting in a net deferred tax asset of $0 at September 30, 2010.
24
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Three |
|
|
At or For the Nine |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Selected financial ratios and other data: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets (2) |
|
|
-1.70 |
% |
|
|
-0.14 |
% |
|
|
-1.15 |
% |
|
|
-0.03 |
% |
Return on average equity (3) |
|
|
-18.41 |
% |
|
|
-1.45 |
% |
|
|
-12.11 |
% |
|
|
-0.28 |
% |
Interest rate spread (4) |
|
|
3.22 |
% |
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
2.86 |
% |
Net interest margin (5) |
|
|
3.42 |
% |
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
|
3.33 |
% |
|
|
3.16 |
% |
Non-interest expense to average assets |
|
|
2.69 |
% |
|
|
2.49 |
% |
|
|
2.88 |
% |
|
|
2.58 |
% |
Efficiency ratio (6) |
|
|
66.80 |
% |
|
|
65.02 |
% |
|
|
75.76 |
% |
|
|
68.72 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
112.08 |
% |
|
|
112.39 |
% |
|
|
112.78 |
% |
|
|
112.18 |
% |
Capital ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average equity to average assets |
|
|
9.23 |
% |
|
|
9.70 |
% |
|
|
9.49 |
% |
|
|
9.62 |
% |
Equity to assets, end of period |
|
|
8.69 |
% |
|
|
9.58 |
% |
|
|
8.69 |
% |
|
|
9.58 |
% |
Tier 1 leverage ratio |
|
|
8.23 |
% |
|
|
8.68 |
% |
|
|
8.23 |
% |
|
|
8.68 |
% |
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio |
|
|
11.85 |
% |
|
|
11.77 |
% |
|
|
11.85 |
% |
|
|
11.77 |
% |
Total risk-based capital ratio |
|
|
13.12 |
% |
|
|
13.03 |
% |
|
|
13.12 |
% |
|
|
13.03 |
% |
Asset quality ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans at end of period (7) |
|
|
8.27 |
% |
|
|
5.82 |
% |
|
|
8.27 |
% |
|
|
5.82 |
% |
Non-performing assets to average assets (8) |
|
|
8.74 |
% |
|
|
5.65 |
% |
|
|
7.91 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
Non-performing assets to total assets at end of
period (8) |
|
|
7.90 |
% |
|
|
5.66 |
% |
|
|
7.90 |
% |
|
|
5.66 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans |
|
|
2.31 |
% |
|
|
1.98 |
% |
|
|
2.31 |
% |
|
|
1.98 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of nonperforming loans (7) |
|
|
28.65 |
% |
|
|
34.75 |
% |
|
|
28.65 |
% |
|
|
34.75 |
% |
Texas ratio (9)
|
|
|
75.72 |
% |
|
|
50.86 |
% |
|
|
75.72 |
% |
|
|
50.86 |
% |
Total classified assets as a percent of Tier 1 capital |
|
|
108.87 |
% |
|
|
77.59 |
% |
|
|
108.87 |
% |
|
|
77.59 |
% |
Net charge-offs as a percent of average loans |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
Total 90+ days past due as a percent of total loans |
|
|
7.81 |
% |
|
|
5.11 |
% |
|
|
7.81 |
% |
|
|
5.11 |
% |
Office data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of full service banking offices |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Number of loan production offices |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Per share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) from continuing operations (10) |
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.66 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
Basic earnings from discontinued operations (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
Basic earnings (loss) (10) |
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.66 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
Diluted earnings (loss) from continuing operations (10) |
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.66 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
Diluted earnings from discontinued operations (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) (10) |
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.66 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
Book value (11) |
|
|
6.51 |
|
|
|
7.64 |
|
|
|
6.51 |
|
|
|
7.64 |
|
Tangible book value (12) |
|
|
6.49 |
|
|
|
7.61 |
|
|
|
6.49 |
|
|
|
7.61 |
|
|
|
|
Notes: |
|
1. |
|
Ratios for the three and nine month periods are annualized where appropriate |
|
2. |
|
Net income (loss) divided by average total assets |
|
3. |
|
Net income (loss) divided by average total equity |
|
4. |
|
Difference between weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities |
|
5. |
|
Net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets |
|
6. |
|
Noninterest expense, excluding the amortization of core deposit intangible, divided by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income, excluding gains and losses on securities, other than temporary
impairment charges, gains and losses on foreclosed assets and gain on the sale of a retail branch |
|
7. |
|
Nonperforming loans consist of nonaccrual loans and loans past due ninety days and still accruing |
|
8. |
|
Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans, real estate owned and other repossessed assets |
|
9. |
|
Nonperforming assets divided by the sum of tangible common equity and the allowance for loan losses |
|
10. |
|
Net income (loss) divided by the number of basic or diluted shares outstanding |
|
11. |
|
Shareholders equity divided by number of shares outstanding |
|
12. |
|
Shareholders equity minus core deposit intangible divided by the number of shares outstanding |
25
Forward Looking Statements
When used in this Form 10-Q the words or phrases will likely result, are expected to, will
continue, is anticipated, estimate, project or similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including changes in
economic conditions in United Communitys market area, changes in policies by regulatory agencies,
fluctuations in interest rates, demand for loans in Home Savings market area, and competition,
that could cause actual results to differ materially from results presently anticipated or
projected. United Community cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any such
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. United Community advises readers
that the factors listed above could affect United Communitys financial performance and could cause
United Communitys actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or
statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements. United Community
undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances
after the date on which the statement is made.
The
material terms of the Bank Order and the OTS Order (as amended) are
described in Note 2 to these financial statements. As further
described in Note 17 to these financial statements, under the
terms of the Bank Order, Home Savings has been deemed to be
adequately capitalized. The Bank Order imposed minimum capital
requirements of an 8.0% Tier 1 leverage ratio and a 12% total
risk-based capital ratio. Home Savings has maintained capital ratios
above these requirements since the imposition of the Bank Order.
Management does not believe that either the Bank Order or the OTS
Order (as amended) have had any material impact on the Banks
liquidity or operations. Management believes that it has taken all
necessary steps to be in compliance with both the Bank Order and the
OTS Order (as amended).
Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
Total assets decreased $20.5 million to $2.3 billion at September 30, 2010, compared to December
31, 2009. Contributing to the change were decreases in net loans of $139.6 million and cash and
cash equivalents of $4.4 million. These decreases were partially offset by increases in available
for sale securities of $109.3 million and real estate owned and other repossessed assets of $9.3
million.
Net loans decreased $139.6 million during the first nine months of 2010. The primary source of the
decrease was the overall decline in construction loans and commercial real estate loans. Home
Savings has, in the current economic environment, made a conscious effort to decrease its
construction and segments of its commercial real estate loan portfolios.
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $4.4 million to $40.7 million at September 30, 2010, compared
to $45.1 million at December 31, 2009. This change is primarily the result of a decrease in cash
required to fund ATM and debit card transactions on behalf of customers.
Available for sale securities increased $109.3 million during the first nine months of 2010 as a
result of various securities transactions initiated in the first nine months of the year. During
the first nine months of 2010, the Company sold approximately $239.8 million in securities,
realizing $7.3 million in gains on the sales. These sales were undertaken to monetize a portion of
the gains in the portfolio due to continued spread tightening on mortgage-backed and agency
securities. The Company offset these sales with $421.9 million in purchases of additional
securities. The additional purchases were primarily made in higher coupon mortgage-backed
securities, which will afford the Company some yield protection should longer term rates begin to
rise and/or prepayment speeds begin to slow. Maturities and paydowns of $68.4 million accounted
for the remainder of the change.
26
The allowance for loan losses decreased to $40.9 million, or 2.31% of the net loan portfolio and
28.65% of nonperforming loans as of September 30, 2010, down from $42.3 million or 2.22% of the net
loan portfolio and 36.49% of nonperforming loans as of December 31, 2009. Loan loss provisions
totaling $39.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were offset by net
charge-offs totaling $41.3 million. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for
probable credit losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the
uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to
the allowance for loan losses. Management estimates the required allowance balance based on an
analysis using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about
specific borrower situations, estimated collateral values, general economic conditions in the
market area and other factors. The allowance consists of specific and general components. The
specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired. The general
component of the allowance covers pools of loans not reviewed specifically by management that are
evaluated as a homogeneous group of loans (e.g., performing single-family residential mortgage
loans) using an historical charge-off experience ratio applied to each pool of loans. The
historical charge-off experience ratio considers historical loss rates adjusted for certain
environmental factors. The entire allowance is available for any loan or portion thereof that, in
managements judgment, should be charged-off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance For Loan Losses |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Provision |
|
|
Recovery |
|
|
Chargeoff |
|
|
2010 |
|
Real Estate Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential |
|
$ |
6,546 |
|
|
$ |
6,759 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
(5,320 |
) |
|
$ |
8,155 |
|
Multifamily residential |
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
3,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,812 |
) |
|
|
3,127 |
|
Nonresidential |
|
|
5,894 |
|
|
|
12,247 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(9,033 |
) |
|
|
9,124 |
|
Land |
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
15,288 |
|
|
|
23,404 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
(17,494 |
) |
|
|
21,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential |
|
|
18,787 |
|
|
|
8,137 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(19,654 |
) |
|
|
7,387 |
|
Multifamily and nonresidential |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
19,020 |
|
|
|
8,476 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(19,964 |
) |
|
|
7,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
2,390 |
|
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
(1,066 |
) |
|
|
2,960 |
|
Auto |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
109 |
|
Marine |
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
502 |
|
Recreational vehicle |
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(1,315 |
) |
|
|
1,295 |
|
Other |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,959 |
|
|
|
3,370 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
(3,555 |
) |
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured |
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
2,196 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
2,697 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
1,936 |
|
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
3,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,020 |
|
|
|
4,626 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(992 |
) |
|
|
6,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
42,287 |
|
|
$ |
39,876 |
|
|
$ |
726 |
|
|
$ |
(42,005 |
) |
|
$ |
40,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timing differences often exist between the period in which a provision is made and the period in
which the loss is confirmed and resulting chargeoff is taken. For example, in the second half of
2009, the Bank incurred substantial provision expense for probable incurred losses in the form of
both general and specific reserves, which were set aside at that time as an estimate of subsequent
chargeoffs. In the first nine months of 2010, certain loans were charged off for which provisions
had previously been set aside. Specifically, as shown in the table above, one-to four-family
residential construction loan chargeoffs of $19.7 million exceeded the provision for loan losses in
this category by approximately $11.5 million in the first nine months of 2010. Chargeoffs for this
category exceeded the loan loss provision in this period primarily as a result of $9.2 million of
chargeoffs that were attributable to five loan relationships. As a result, for the Company as a
whole, total chargeoffs of $42.0 million exceeded provisions of $39.9 million in the first nine
months of 2010, resulting in a decrease in the allowance for loan losses of $1.4 million for the
period.
27
In other cases, both the provision and the chargeoff occur in the same period. For example, a
substantial portion of the Companys nonperforming loans are completely collateral dependent (i.e.,
there is no secondary source of repayment other than the collateral). Such collateral-dependent
loans are charged down to the value of the collateral underlying the loan, less an estimate of
costs to sell. Therefore, no specific reserves exist for these loans since the collateral
shortfall has been completely charged off. When the collateral underlying such
collateral-dependent loans is re-appraised (for example, due to the passage of time, or because the
Bank has taken possession of the underlying collateral), any newly identified deterioration to the
appraised value of such collateral is immediately charged off. Since these chargeoffs would not
have been previously reserved, both the provision and the chargeoff occur simultaneously.
Furthermore, the one-to four-family contractor construction portfolio has decreased from $178.1
million to $117.3 million as of September 30, 2010, a decline of 34.1%. A substantial amount of
the adversely classified loans in this portfolio have migrated from requiring a general reserve to
the use of a specific reserve, with the measurement of impairment based primarily on collateral
value, oftentimes resulting in a decrease in the amount of allocated
reserves required. Specifically, in the first nine months of 2010,
not only has the total size of the loan portfolio declined, but, as
described above, a number of loans that had previously been subject
to a general reserve (because they were internally classified) became
impaired, and received a specific reserve based primarily on
collateral value instead of a general reserve.
Finally, general reserves are calculated based upon the application of loan loss reserve factors
derived from historical charge-off experience to loans without specific reserves. These factors
have, in the aggregate, increased over the course of the first nine months of 2010 based on an
increase in recent loan loss experience and an additional increase in
managements application of qualitative loan loss reserve factors in this period. Nevertheless, as
these factors are applied to a declining loan portfolio, a lower amount of general reserves are
required.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that
Home Savings will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement and the loan is non-homogeneous in nature.
Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral
value, and the strength of guarantors (if any). Loans that experience insignificant payment delays
and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the
significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into
consideration all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the loans and the borrower, including
the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrowers prior payment record, and the
amount of shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a
loan-by-loan basis by the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent, the
present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or
the market value of the loan. The following table summarizes the change in impaired loans during
the first nine months of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
Real Estate Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential |
|
$ |
23,904 |
|
|
$ |
18,764 |
|
|
$ |
5,140 |
|
Multifamily residential |
|
|
12,811 |
|
|
|
7,863 |
|
|
|
4,948 |
|
Nonresidential |
|
|
44,587 |
|
|
|
25,686 |
|
|
|
18,901 |
|
Land |
|
|
6,571 |
|
|
|
5,160 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
87,873 |
|
|
|
57,473 |
|
|
|
30,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential |
|
|
45,480 |
|
|
|
53,666 |
|
|
|
(8,186 |
) |
Multifamily and nonresidential |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
45,862 |
|
|
|
54,058 |
|
|
|
(8,196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
|
(881 |
) |
Auto |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Boat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
(1,103 |
) |
Recreational vehicle |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
Other |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
3,582 |
|
|
|
(2,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured |
|
|
2,790 |
|
|
|
3,365 |
|
|
|
(575 |
) |
Unsecured |
|
|
3,926 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
6,716 |
|
|
|
3,692 |
|
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Impaired Loans |
|
$ |
141,892 |
|
|
$ |
118,805 |
|
|
$ |
23,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Included in impaired loans above are certain loans Home Savings considers to be troubled debt
restructurings. A loan is considered a troubled debt restructuring if Home Savings grants a
concession to a borrower that would otherwise not be given based on economic or legal reasons
related to the borrowers financial difficulties. The objective of a troubled debt restructuring
is to make the best of a bad situation. A troubled debt restructuring may include, but is not
necessarily limited to, one or a combination of the following:
|
|
|
Transfer from the borrower to Home Savings of receivables from third parties, real
estate, or other assets to fully or partially satisfy a debt (including a transfer
resulting from foreclosure or repossession). |
|
|
|
Issuance or other granting of an equity interest to Home Savings by the borrower to
satisfy fully or partially a debt unless the equity interest is granted pursuant to
existing terms for converting the debt into an equity interest. |
|
|
|
Modification of the terms of a debt, such as one or a combination of: |
|
|
|
Reduction of the stated interest rate for the remaining original life of the debt. |
|
|
|
Extension of the maturity date or dates at a stated interest rate lower
than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk. |
|
|
|
Reduction of the face amount or maturity amount of the debt as stated
in the instrument or other agreement. |
|
|
|
Reduction of accrued interest. |
A debt restructuring is not necessarily a troubled debt restructuring for purposes of this
definition even if the borrower is experiencing some financial difficulties. In general, a
borrower that can obtain funds from other sources at market interest rates at or near those for
non-troubled debt is not considered to be involved in a troubled debt restructuring. A troubled
debt restructuring is not involved if:
|
|
|
the fair value of cash, other assets, or an equity interest accepted by Home Savings
from a borrower in full satisfaction of its receivable at least equals the recorded
investment in the loan; |
|
|
|
the fair value of cash, other assets, or an equity interest transferred by a borrower to
Home Savings in full settlement of its loan at least equals the carrying amount of the
loan; |
|
|
|
Home Savings reduces the effective interest rate on the loan primarily to reflect a
decrease in market interest rates in general or a decrease in the risk so as to maintain a
relationship with a borrower that can readily obtain funds from other sources at the
current market interest rate; or |
|
|
|
Home Savings issues, in exchange for the original loan, a new marketable loan having an
effective interest rate based on its market price that is at or near the current market
interest rates of loans with similar maturity dates and stated interest rates issued by
other banks. |
29
The change in troubled debt restructurings for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled Debt Restructurings |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Real Estate Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family |
|
$ |
7,545 |
|
|
$ |
2,167 |
|
|
$ |
5,378 |
|
Multifamily residential |
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,410 |
|
Nonresidential |
|
|
7,535 |
|
|
|
3,595 |
|
|
|
3,940 |
|
Land |
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
19,631 |
|
|
|
6,812 |
|
|
|
12,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential |
|
|
7,752 |
|
|
|
15,213 |
|
|
|
(7,461 |
) |
Multifamily and nonresidential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7,752 |
|
|
|
15,213 |
|
|
|
(7,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Auto |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Marine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreational vehicle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Unsecured |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Restructured Loans |
|
$ |
28,188 |
|
|
$ |
22,648 |
|
|
$ |
5,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a restructured loan has fallen into nonaccrual status, the restructured loan will remain on
nonaccrual status for a period of at least six months until the borrower has demonstrated a
willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments. Troubled debt restructured loans
that were on nonaccrual status aggregated $14.9 million and $5.0 million at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. Such loans are considered nonperforming loans. Troubled debt
restructured loans that were accruing according to their terms aggregated $13.3 million and $17.6
million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
30
Nonperforming loans consist of loans past due 90 days or more and loans past due less than 90 days
that are on nonaccrual status. Nonperforming loans were $142.7 million, or 8.27% of net loans, at
September 30, 2010, compared to $115.9 million, or 6.21% of net loans, at December 31, 2009. The
schedule below summarizes the change in nonperforming loans for the first nine months of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming Loans |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
Real Estate Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential |
|
$ |
27,505 |
|
|
$ |
26,766 |
|
|
$ |
739 |
|
Multifamily residential |
|
|
12,443 |
|
|
|
7,863 |
|
|
|
4,580 |
|
Nonresidential |
|
|
44,561 |
|
|
|
24,091 |
|
|
|
20,470 |
|
Land |
|
|
5,943 |
|
|
|
5,160 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
90,452 |
|
|
|
63,880 |
|
|
|
26,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
42,819 |
|
|
|
(2,819 |
) |
Multifamily and nonresidential |
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
42,414 |
|
|
|
43,211 |
|
|
|
(797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
3,156 |
|
|
|
3,168 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Auto |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
Marine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
(1,103 |
) |
Recreational vehicle |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
(621 |
) |
Other |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,543 |
|
|
|
5,383 |
|
|
|
(1,840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured |
|
|
2,440 |
|
|
|
3,061 |
|
|
|
(621 |
) |
Unsecured |
|
|
3,864 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
6,304 |
|
|
|
3,413 |
|
|
|
2,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Nonperforming Loans |
|
$ |
142,713 |
|
|
$ |
115,887 |
|
|
$ |
26,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first nine months of 2010, seven nonresidential loan relationships aggregating $16.2
million, one nonresidential construction loan aggregating $2.0 million and two unsecured commercial
loans aggregating $2.2 million all became nonperforming.
Loans held for sale increased $4.9 million, or 46.5%, to $15.4 million at September 30, 2010,
compared to $10.5 million at December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to the
volume of mortgage loan originations during the period. Home Savings sells a portion of newly
originated mortgage loans into the secondary market as part of its risk management strategy and
anticipates continuing to do so in the future.
Federal Home Loan Bank stock remained at $26.5 million for September 30, 2010, and December 31,
2009. During the first nine months of 2010, the Federal Home Loan Bank paid a cash dividend in
lieu of a stock dividend to its member banks.
31
Real estate owned and other repossessed assets increased $9.3 million, or 31.2%, during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. The following
table summarizes the activity in real estate owned and other repossessed assets during the period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Repossessed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
30,340 |
|
|
$ |
622 |
|
|
$ |
30,962 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
27,127 |
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
28,775 |
|
Sales |
|
|
(14,274 |
) |
|
|
(1,936 |
) |
|
|
(16,210 |
) |
Provision for unrealized losses |
|
|
(3,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
39,963 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
40,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table depicts the type of property secured in the satisfaction of loans and the
valuation allowance associated with each type as of September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family |
|
$ |
8,705 |
|
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
$ |
8,628 |
|
Multifamily residential |
|
|
6,377 |
|
|
|
(1,038 |
) |
|
|
5,339 |
|
Nonresidential |
|
|
7,278 |
|
|
|
(1,916 |
) |
|
|
5,362 |
|
One-to four-family residential construction |
|
|
25,556 |
|
|
|
(4,922 |
) |
|
|
20,634 |
|
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate owned |
|
|
47,916 |
|
|
|
(7,953 |
) |
|
|
39,963 |
|
Repossessed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
Recreational vehicle |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total repossessed assets |
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate owned and other
repossessed assets |
|
$ |
48,250 |
|
|
$ |
(7,953 |
) |
|
$ |
40,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property acquired in the settlement of loans is recorded at the lower of (a) the loans acquisition
balance less cost to sell or (b) the fair market value of the property secured less costs to sell.
Appraisals are obtained at least annually on properties that exceed $1.0 million in value. Based
on current appraisals, a valuation allowance may be established to reflect properly the asset at
fair market value. The increase in the valuation allowance on property acquired in relation to
one-to four-family residential construction loans was due to the decline in market value of those
properties. Home Savings engages experienced professionals to sell real estate owned and other
repossessed assets in a timely manner.
In the normal course of Home Savings business, Home Savings pursues borrowers who have defaulted
on their mortgage loans by foreclosing on the mortgage securing the promissory note. We have
evaluated our foreclosure documentation procedures given the recent announcements made by
governmental and regulatory authorities regarding foreclosure activities. The results of our
review to date have not given rise to any known demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that
we reasonably expect to have a material favorable or unfavorable impact on our results of
operations, liquidity or capital resources. We are implementing additional reviews and procedures
of pending and future foreclosures to ensure that all appropriate actions are taken to enable
foreclosure actions to continue. While we may from time to time consider filing supplemental
affidavits or dismissing and re-filing some foreclosure actions in which Home Savings is the owner
and servicer of the mortgage loan, we do not believe these actions are reasonably likely to result
in a material adverse effect on the Company, its operations or its efforts to collect on delinquent
mortgage loans.
Total deposits decreased $84.5 million to $1.7 billion at September 30, 2010, compared to $1.8
billion at December 31, 2009. The primary cause for the decline in deposits was the sale of Home
Savings Findlay, Ohio branch in March, 2010. Also affecting the change was the maturity and
paydown of $15.0 million in brokered certificates of deposit during the first nine months of 2010.
As of September 30, 2010, the Bank had no brokered deposits.
32
Federal Home Loan Bank advances increased $85.3 million during the first nine months of 2010, due
primarily to funding needs as a result of maturing certificates of deposit during the period. Home
Savings had approximately $153.2 million in unused borrowing capacity at the FHLB at September 30,
2010.
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance decreased $3.8 million during the first nine
months of 2010. Remittance of real estate taxes and property insurance made on behalf of customers
of Home Savings accounted for $2.8 million of the decrease. In addition, funds held for payments
received on loans sold where servicing was retained by Home Savings decreased $943,000.
Accrued expenses and other liabilities increased $434,000 to $10.2 million at September 30, 2010,
from $9.8 million at December 31, 2009. Home Savings had an increase in liabilities of $1.4
million due to issuing official checks for customers and accounts payable remittances.
Shareholders equity decreased $18.5 million to $201.3 million at September 30, 2010, from $219.8
million at December 31, 2009. The change occurred primarily due to the net loss recognized by the
Company in the period offset partially by the allocation of ESOP shares to plan participants during
the period, as discussed in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009
Net Income (Loss). United Community recognized a net loss for the three months ended September 30,
2010, of $9.9 million, or $(0.32) per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $867,000, or $(0.03)
per diluted share, for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The primary cause of the change
was lower net interest income, along with a higher provision for loan losses recognized during the
third quarter of 2010. Compared with the third quarter of 2009, net interest income decreased
$619,000, the provision for loan losses increased $11.5 million, non-interest income increased $4.0
million, and non-interest expense increased $315,000. United Communitys annualized return on
average assets and return on average equity were (1.70)% and (18.41)%, respectively, for the three
months ended September 30, 2010. The annualized return on average assets and return on average
equity for the comparable period in 2009 were (0.14)% and (1.45)%, respectively.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2010, was $18.8
million, compared to $19.4 million for the same period last year. Both interest income and
interest expense decreased, with a larger decline in interest income. Total interest income
decreased $4.5 million in the third quarter of 2010 compared to the third quarter of 2009,
primarily as a result of a decrease of $237.9 million in the average balance of outstanding loans.
United Community also experienced a decrease in the yield on net loans of 30 basis points.
Interest income was further impacted by the change in nonaccrual loans, which increased to $142.9
million at September 30, 2010 and caused a reduction in interest income of $1.4 million during the
three months ended September 30, 2010. The Companys construction and segments of its commercial
real estate loan portfolios declined as a result of executing its strategic objective of reducing
specific concentrations in these portfolios in the current economic environment.
Total interest expense decreased $3.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as compared
to the same quarter last year. The change was due primarily to reductions of $3.5 million in
interest paid on deposits, $364,000 in interest paid on Federal Home Loan Bank advances and $23,000
in interest paid on repurchase agreements and other borrowings. The overall decrease in interest
expense was attributable to a shift in deposit balances from certificates of deposit to relatively
less expensive non-time deposits. The average outstanding balance of certificates of deposit
declined by $153.4 million, while non-time deposits increased by $51.0 million. Also contributing
to the change was a reduction of 79 basis points in the cost of certificates of deposit, as well as
a decrease in the cost of non-time deposits of 26 basis points.
The primary cause of the decrease in interest expense on Federal Home Loan Bank advances was a
decrease in the average balance of those funds of $20.2 million, as well as a rate decrease on
those borrowings of 38 basis points in the third quarter of 2010 compared to the same quarter in
2009. The decrease in interest expense on repurchase agreements and other borrowings was due
primarily to a decrease in the cost of those liabilities of 13 basis points despite an increase in
their average balances of $810,000.
33
The following table shows the impact of interest rate and outstanding balance (volume) changes
compared to the third quarter of last year. The interest rate spread for the three months ended
September 30, 2010, grew to 3.22% compared to 3.04% for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The
net interest margin increased 10 basis points to 3.42% for the three months ended September 30,
2010 compared to 3.32% for the same quarter in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 vs. 2009 |
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(decrease) due to |
|
|
increase |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
(1,429 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,371 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,800 |
) |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
FHLB stock |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
Other interest-earning assets |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
(1,771 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,744 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
NOW and money market accounts |
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
(1,952 |
) |
|
|
(1,262 |
) |
|
|
(3,214 |
) |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
Repurchase agreements and other |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
(2,690 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,205 |
) |
|
|
(3,895 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses. A provision for loan losses is charged to income to bring the total
allowance for loan losses to a level considered by management to be adequate, based on managements
evaluation of such factors as the delinquency status of loans, current economic conditions, the net
realizable value of the underlying collateral, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio and
prior loan loss experience. The provision for loan losses increased to $17.1 million in the third
quarter of 2010, compared to $5.6 million in the third quarter of 2009. The increase in the
provision for loan losses is primarily a result of a $7.4 million increase in the nonresidential
real estate portfolio provision and a $4.5 million increase in the one-to four-family residential
construction portfolio due to the deterioration and chargeoff of loans in excess of reserves by the
Company.
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased in the third quarter of 2010 to $4.1 million, as
compared to the third quarter of 2009 of $119,000. Driving the increase in noninterest income was
the recognition of higher mortgage banking income during the third quarter of 2010 because of
higher loan origination volume and the value of loans in the Companys pipeline. Lower losses
attributable to valuations on the Companys real estate owned portfolio also had a positive effect
on noninterest income during the quarter. Gains of $781,000 recognized on the sale of available
for sale securities having a carrying amount of $44.4 million further contributed to the increase
in noninterest income.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense was $15.7 million in the third quarter of 2010, compared
to $15.4 million in the third quarter of 2009. The increase in noninterest expense was driven by
higher real estate owned and other repossessed asset expenses of approximately $500,000. The
increase in real estate owned and other repossessed asset expenses are a result of the higher
volume of properties the Company is maintaining and the level of expenses associated with keeping
the properties in saleable condition.
34
Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009
Net Income (Loss). United Community recognized a net loss for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, of $19.9 million, or $(0.66) per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $511,000, or
$(0.02) per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The primary cause of the
change was the recognition of lower net interest income during the first nine months of 2010,
higher noninterest expenses, and a higher provision for loan losses during the period. Compared
with the first nine months of 2009, net interest income decreased $2.3 million, the provision for
loan losses increased $13.5 million, non-interest income increased $6.4 million, and non-interest
expense increased $973,000. United Communitys annualized return on average assets and return on
average equity were (1.15)% and (12.11)%, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30,
2010. The annualized return on average assets and return on average equity for the comparable
period in 2009 were (0.03)% and (0.28)%, respectively.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, was $54.5
million, compared to $56.8 million for the same period last year. Both interest income and
interest expense decreased, with a larger decline in interest income. Total interest income
decreased $15.3 million in the first nine months of 2010 compared to the first nine months of 2009.
The change in interest income was primarily the result of a decline of $15.2 million in interest
earned on loans, which was a result of a decrease of $272.9 million in the average balance of
outstanding loans. United Community also experienced a decrease in the yield on net loans of 24
basis points. Interest income was further impacted by the change in nonaccrual loans, which
increased to $142.9 million at September 30, 2010 and caused a reduction in interest income of $2.4
million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The Companys construction and segments
of its commercial real estate loan portfolios declined as a result of executing its strategic
objective of reducing specific concentrations in these portfolios in the current economic
environment.
Total interest expense decreased $13.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as
compared to the same period last year. The change was due primarily to reductions of $10.5 million
in interest paid on deposits, $2.1 million in interest paid on Federal Home Loan Bank advances and
$420,000 in interest paid on repurchase agreements and other borrowings. The overall decrease in
interest expense was attributable to a shift in deposit balances from certificates of deposit to
relatively less expensive non-time deposits. The average outstanding balances of certificates of
deposit declined $163.5 million, while non-time deposits increased $49.2 million. Also
contributing to the change was a reduction of 70 basis points in the cost of certificates of
deposit, as well as a decrease in the cost of non-time deposits of 44 basis points.
The primary cause of the decrease in interest expense on Federal Home Loan Bank advances was a
decrease in the average balance of those funds of $80.5 million, as well as a rate decrease on
those borrowings of 48 basis points in the first nine months of 2010 compared to the same period in
2009. The rate on short-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank has decreased as the Bank
used short-term overnight advances to fund maturing term advances during the period. The decrease
in interest expense on repurchase agreements and other borrowings was due primarily to a decrease
in the average balances of $12.6 million in those liabilities.
35
The following table shows the impact of interest rate and outstanding balance (volume) changes
compared to the first nine months of last year. The interest rate spread for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, grew to 3.10% as compared to 2.86% for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The net interest margin increased 17 basis points to 3.33% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to 3.16% for the same period in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 vs. 2009 |
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(decrease) due to |
|
|
increase |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
(3,671 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,511 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,182 |
) |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
(330 |
) |
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
FHLB stock |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
Other interest-earning assets |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
(4,259 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,085 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
NOW and money market accounts |
|
|
(1,095 |
) |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
(793 |
) |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
(5,417 |
) |
|
|
(4,211 |
) |
|
|
(9,628 |
) |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(1,024 |
) |
|
|
(1,044 |
) |
|
|
(2,068 |
) |
Repurchase agreements and other |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
(7,757 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,239 |
) |
|
|
(12,996 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses. A provision for loan losses is charged to income to bring the total
allowance for loan losses to a level considered by management to be adequate, based on managements
evaluation of such factors as the delinquency status of loans, current economic conditions, the net
realizable value of the underlying collateral, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio and
prior loan loss experience. The provision for loan losses increased to $39.9 million in the first
nine months of 2010, compared to $26.3 million in the first nine months of 2009. The increase in
the provision for loan losses in the first nine months of 2010 is primarily the result of credit
downgrades within the commercial real estate portfolio and specific reserves assigned to a number
of commercial real estate properties. Also contributing to the increase is the effect of
charge-offs to record foreclosed and repossessed assets at fair market value before the Company
takes possession of the properties in satisfaction of outstanding loans.
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased in the first nine months of 2010 to $15.4
million, as compared to the first nine months of 2009 of $9.1 million. Driving the increase in
noninterest income was an increase in gains realized on the sale of available for sale securities
of $7.3 million, along with a gain recognized on the sale of Home Savings Findlay, Ohio branch of
$1.4 million. A decline in losses recognized in the valuation of the Companys real estate owned
portfolio further improved noninterest income. These increases were offset partially by a
valuation allowance of $1.3 million established on the Banks deferred mortgage servicing rights in
the second quarter and lower mortgage banking income due to fewer gains being recognized on loan
sales.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense was $50.0 million in the first nine months of 2010,
compared to $49.0 million in the first nine months of 2009. The increase in noninterest expense
was driven by higher salaries and employee benefit expenses of $1.5 million along with higher
professional fees associated with legal expenses paid by the Company during the first nine months
of 2010 as compared to the first half of 2009. Further contributing to the change was the
recognition of higher expenses associated with real estate owned and other repossessed assets
acquired in the settlement of loans. These increases were offset by a $1.9 million decline in
deposit insurance premiums recognized during the first nine months of 2010 as compared to the same
period in 2009.
Higher salaries and employee benefit expenses were the result of the prepayment of the ESOP loan
and subsequent allocation of shares to plan participants. Professional fees include legal, audit,
tax consulting and other professional services obtained by the Company. Legal fees were elevated
during the first nine months of 2010 primarily because of the continued resolution of asset quality
issues. Lower insurance premiums were incurred during the first nine months of 2010 as compared to
the first nine months of 2009 because of a special assessment imposed on member banks in the second
quarter of 2009. A similar assessment was not imposed in 2010.
36
UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS
The following table presents the total dollar amounts of interest income and interest expense on the indicated amounts of average
interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities together with the weighted average interest rates for the three month periods
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Average balance calculations were based on daily balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Earned/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Earned/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans (1) |
|
$ |
1,762,551 |
|
|
$ |
24,589 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
|
$ |
2,000,419 |
|
|
$ |
29,389 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
% |
Net loans held for sale |
|
|
7,966 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
% |
|
|
9,088 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
% |
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
372,280 |
|
|
|
3,235 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
281,343 |
|
|
|
2,925 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
% |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
26,464 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
% |
|
|
26,464 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
% |
Other interest-earning assets |
|
|
25,631 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
|
20,775 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
2,194,892 |
|
|
|
28,240 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
% |
|
|
2,338,089 |
|
|
|
32,755 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
% |
Noninterest-earning assets |
|
|
139,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,334,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,467,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW and money market accounts |
|
$ |
417,983 |
|
|
$ |
790 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
$ |
383,323 |
|
|
$ |
1,056 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
% |
Savings accounts |
|
|
213,269 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
% |
|
|
196,974 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
929,513 |
|
|
|
6,531 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
% |
|
|
1,082,946 |
|
|
|
9,745 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
% |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
299,384 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
|
319,551 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
1.69 |
% |
Repurchase agreements and other |
|
|
98,322 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
% |
|
|
97,512 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
3.96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,958,471 |
|
|
|
9,454 |
|
|
|
1.93 |
% |
|
|
2,080,306 |
|
|
|
13,350 |
|
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
160,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,119,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,228,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
215,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
2,334,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,467,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income and interest
rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,786 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,405 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.32 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets to
average interest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance at a yield of 0%. |
37
UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS
The following table presents the total dollar amounts of interest income and interest expense on the indicated amounts of average
interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities together with the weighted average interest rates for the nine month periods
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Average balance calculations were based on daily balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Earned/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Earned/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans (1) |
|
$ |
1,804,936 |
|
|
$ |
75,350 |
|
|
|
5.57 |
% |
|
$ |
2,077,786 |
|
|
$ |
90,532 |
|
|
|
5.81 |
% |
Net loans held for sale |
|
|
6,632 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
% |
|
|
16,918 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
% |
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
315,365 |
|
|
|
8,716 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
% |
|
|
257,371 |
|
|
|
8,491 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
% |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
26,464 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
% |
|
|
26,464 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
% |
Other interest-earning assets |
|
|
24,504 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
% |
|
|
20,473 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
2,177,901 |
|
|
|
85,230 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
% |
|
|
2,399,012 |
|
|
|
100,574 |
|
|
|
5.59 |
% |
Noninterest-earning assets |
|
|
134,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,312,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,533,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW and money market accounts |
|
$ |
409,788 |
|
|
$ |
2,477 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
% |
|
$ |
378,407 |
|
|
$ |
3,270 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
% |
Savings accounts |
|
|
210,975 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
% |
|
|
193,115 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
970,766 |
|
|
|
22,160 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
|
1,134,282 |
|
|
|
31,788 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
% |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
242,214 |
|
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
% |
|
|
322,725 |
|
|
|
4,775 |
|
|
|
1.97 |
% |
Repurchase agreements and other |
|
|
97,431 |
|
|
|
2,796 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
% |
|
|
110,029 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,931,174 |
|
|
|
30,757 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
% |
|
|
2,138,558 |
|
|
|
43,753 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
162,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,093,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,290,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
219,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
2,312,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,533,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income and interest
rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54,473 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
56,821 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.16 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets
to average interest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance at a yield of 0%. |
38
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Qualitative Aspects of Market Risk. The principal market risk affecting United Community is
interest rate risk. United Community is subject to interest rate risk to the extent that its
interest-earning assets reprice differently than its interest-bearing liabilities. Interest rate
risk is defined as the sensitivity of a companys earnings and net asset values to changes in
interest rates. As part of its efforts to monitor and manage the interest rate risk, Home Savings,
which accounts for substantially all of the assets and liabilities of United Community, has adopted
an interest rate risk policy that requires the Home Savings Board to review quarterly reports
related to interest rate risk and to set exposure limits for Home Savings as a guide to management
in setting and implementing day-to-day operating strategies.
Quantitative Aspects of Market Risk. As part of its interest rate risk analysis, Home Savings uses
the net portfolio value (NPV) methodology and a net interest income methodology. Generally, NPV
is the discounted present value of the difference between incoming cash flows on interest-earning
and other assets and outgoing cash flows on interest-bearing and other liabilities. The
application of the methodology attempts to quantify interest rate risk as the change in the NPV and
net interest income that would result from various levels of theoretical basis point changes in
market interest rates.
Home Savings uses a NPV and earnings simulation model prepared internally as its primary method to
identify and manage its interest rate risk profile. The model is based on actual cash flows and
repricing characteristics for all financial instruments and incorporates market-based and
bank-specific assumptions regarding the impact of changing interest rates on future volumes and the
prepayment rate of applicable financial instruments. Assumptions based on the historical behavior
of deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates also are incorporated into
the model. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot measure
NPV or net interest income precisely or accurately predict the impact of fluctuations in interest
rates on net interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management
strategies.
Presented below are analyses of Home Savings interest rate risk as measured by changes in NPV and
net interest income for instantaneous and sustained parallel shifts of 100 basis point increments
in market interest rates. Due to the current low level of treasury rates, values for a decline in
rates of 100, 200 and 300 basis points are not calculated for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
As noted, for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the percentage changes fall within the policy
limits set by the Board of Directors of Home Savings as the minimum NPV ratio, the maximum change
in the NPV ratio, and the maximum change in interest income the Home Savings Board deems advisable
in the event of various changes in interest rates. See the table below for Board-adopted internal
policy limitations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
NPV as % of portfolio value of assets |
|
|
Next 12 months net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
policy |
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
limitations |
|
|
|
|
in rates |
|
|
|
|
|
Internal policy limitations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on |
|
|
|
|
(Basis |
|
NPV |
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Change |
|
|
$ |
|
|
maximum |
|
|
% |
|
points) |
|
Ratio |
|
|
level |
|
|
change |
|
|
in % |
|
|
Change |
|
|
change |
|
|
Change |
|
300 |
|
|
8.24 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
-35.00 |
% |
|
|
-0.14 |
% |
|
$ |
(3,652 |
) |
|
|
-15.00 |
% |
|
|
-4.81 |
% |
200 |
|
|
9.01 |
% |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
(2,023 |
) |
|
|
-10.00 |
% |
|
|
-2.67 |
% |
100 |
|
|
9.08 |
% |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.70 |
% |
|
|
(968 |
) |
|
|
-5.00 |
% |
|
|
-1.28 |
% |
Static |
|
|
8.38 |
% |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
NPV as % of portfolio value of assets |
|
|
Next 12 months net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
policy |
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
limitations |
|
|
|
|
in rates |
|
|
|
|
|
Internal policy limitations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on |
|
|
|
|
(Basis |
|
NPV |
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Change |
|
|
$ |
|
|
maximum |
|
|
% |
|
points) |
|
Ratio |
|
|
level |
|
|
change |
|
|
in % |
|
|
Change |
|
|
change |
|
|
Change |
|
300 |
|
|
8.19 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
-35.00 |
% |
|
|
-1.76 |
% |
|
$ |
(4,414 |
) |
|
|
-15.00 |
% |
|
|
-5.67 |
% |
200 |
|
|
9.31 |
% |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.64 |
% |
|
|
(2,125 |
) |
|
|
-10.00 |
% |
|
|
-2.73 |
% |
100 |
|
|
10.03 |
% |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.80 |
% |
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
-5.00 |
% |
|
|
-0.82 |
% |
Static |
|
|
9.95 |
% |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to a low interest rate environment, it was not possible to calculate results for a drop in
interest rates.
As with any method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the NPV
approach. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or
periods of repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. In
addition, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of
changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in
market rates. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayment on
loans and early withdrawal levels from certificates of deposit may deviate significantly from those
assumed in making risk calculations.
Potential Impact of Changes in Interest Rates. Home Savings profitability depends to a large
extent on its net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from loans and
securities and interest expense on deposits and borrowings. Like most financial institutions, Home
Savings short-term interest income and interest expense are affected significantly by changes in
market interest rates and other economic factors beyond its control.
In the last twelve months, Home Savings has experienced the positive impact of a steeper yield
curve. The net interest margin has benefited from the repricing of certificates of deposit at
lower levels as loan yields have stabilized.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was carried out by United Communitys management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of United Communitys disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as
of September 30, 2010. Based on their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that United Communitys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as
of September 30, 2010. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, there were no changes in
United Communitys internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected or are
reasonably likely to materially affect United Communitys internal controls over financial
reporting.
40
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
ITEM 1 Legal Proceedings
United Community and its subsidiaries are parties to litigation arising in the normal course of
business. While it is impossible to determine the ultimate resolution of these contingent matters,
management believes any resulting liability would not have a material effect upon United
Communitys financial statements.
ITEM 1A Risk Factors
The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 may
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). This new law will significantly change the regulation
of financial institutions and the financial services industry. Because the Dodd-Frank Act requires
various federal agencies to adopt a broad range of regulations with significant discretion, many of
the details of the new law and the effects they will have on the Company will not be known for
months and even years.
Many of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act apply directly only to institutions much larger than
United Community, and some will affect only institutions with different charters than Home Savings
or institutions that engage in activities in which the Company does not engage. Among the changes
to occur pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act that can be expected to have an effect on the Company are
the following:
|
|
|
the Dodd-Frank Act abolishes the OTS and transfers its functions to other federal
banking agencies; |
|
|
|
the Dodd-Frank Act creates a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers to
adopt and enforce consumer protection regulations; |
|
|
|
new capital regulations for thrift holding companies will be adopted and any new trust
preferred securities will no longer count toward Tier I capital; |
|
|
|
the federal law prohibition on the payment of interest on commercial demand deposit
accounts will be eliminated effective in July 2011; |
|
|
|
the standard maximum amount of deposit insurance per customer is permanently increased
to $250,000, and non-interest bearing transaction accounts will have unlimited insurance
through December 31, 2013; |
|
|
|
the assessment base for determining deposit insurance premiums will be expanded to
include liabilities other than just deposits; and |
|
|
|
new corporate governance requirements applicable generally to all public companies in
all industries will require new compensation practices, including requiring companies to
claw back incentive compensation under certain circumstances, to provide shareholders
the opportunity to cast a non-binding vote on executive compensation, and to consider the
independence of compensation advisers, and new executive compensation disclosure
requirements. |
Although it is impossible for management to predict at this time all the effects the Dodd-Frank Act
will have on the Company and the rest of the financial institution industry, it is possible that
the Companys interest expense could increase and deposit insurance premiums could change, and
steps may need to be taken to increase qualifying capital. United Community expects that operating
and compliance costs will increase and could adversely affect its financial condition and results
of operations.
41
The Companys results of operations, financial condition or liquidity may be adversely impacted by
issues arising in foreclosure practices, including delays in the foreclosure process related to
certain industry deficiencies, as well as potential losses in connection with actual or projected
repurchases and indemnification payments related to mortgages sold into the secondary market.
Recent announcements of deficiencies in foreclosure documentation by several large seller/servicer
financial institutions have raised various concerns relating to mortgage foreclosure practices in
the United States. A group of state attorneys general and state bank and mortgage regulators in
all 50 states and the District of Columbia is currently reviewing foreclosure practices and a
number of mortgage sellers/servicers have temporarily suspended foreclosure proceedings in some or
all states in which they do business in order to evaluate their foreclosure practices and
underlying documentation.
The integrity of the foreclosure process is important to the Companys business as an originator
and servicer of residential mortgages. As a result of the Companys continued focus of
concentrating its lending efforts in its primary markets in Ohio, as well as servicing loans for
the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company
(Freddie Mac), the Company does not anticipate suspending any of its foreclosure activities.
During the past quarter, the Company has reviewed its foreclosure procedures. The results of our
review to date have not given rise to any known demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that
we reasonably expect to have a material favorable or unfavorable impact on our results of
operations, liquidity, or capital resources. We are implementing additional reviews and procedures
of pending and future foreclosures to ensure that all appropriate actions are taken to enable
foreclosure actions to continue. Nevertheless, the Company could face delays and challenges in the
foreclosure process arising from claims relating to industry practices generally, which could
adversely affect recoveries and the Companys financial results, whether through increased expenses
of litigation and property maintenance, deteriorating values of underlying mortgaged properties or
unsuccessful litigation results generally.
In addition, in connection with the origination and sale of residential mortgages into the
secondary market, the Company makes certain representations and warranties, which, if breached, may
require it to repurchase such loans, substitute other loans or indemnify the purchasers of such
loans for actual losses incurred in respect of such loans. Although the Company believes that its
mortgage documentation and procedures have been appropriate, it is possible that the Company will
receive repurchase requests in the future and the Company may not be able to reach favorable
settlements with respect to such requests. It is therefore possible that the Company may increase
its reserves or may sustain losses associated with such loan repurchases and indemnification
payments.
Other than the above, there have been no significant changes in United Communitys risk factors as
outlined in United Communitys Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009. The risk factors
described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional
risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company or that management currently deems to be
immaterial also may materially adversely affect the Companys business, financial condition and/or
operating results. Moreover, the Company undertakes no obligation and disclaims any intention to
publish revised information or updates to forward looking statements contained in such risk factors
or in any other statement made at any time by the Company or any of its directors, officers,
employees or other representatives, unless and until any such revisions or updates are expressly
required to be disclosed by securities laws or regulations.
ITEM 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
There were no purchases of UCFC shares during the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
ITEM 5 Other Information
On November 5, 2010, an amendment to the OTS Order became effective. This amendment removed a
requirement in the original OTS Order to provide the OTS with a debt reduction plan and added a
requirement to provide the OTS with a capital plan. This capital plan will be consistent with and
incorporated into the strategic planning process that Home Savings has already been undertaking for
the past two years under the terms of the Bank Order. A copy of the amendment to the OTS Order is
attached to this Form 10-Q as Exhibit 10.2 and is incorporated herein by reference.
42
ITEM 6 Exhibits
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Articles of Incorporation |
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended Code of Regulations |
|
10.1 |
|
|
2010 Director Sub-Plan to the United Community Financial Corp. Amended
and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan |
|
10.2 |
|
|
Amended Order to Cease and Desist |
|
10.3 |
|
|
Stipulation and Consent to Issuance of Amended Order to Cease and Desist |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification by Chief Executive Officer |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification by Chief Financial Officer |
|
32 |
|
|
Certification of Statements by Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer |
43
UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
|
|
Date: November 12, 2010 |
/S/ Douglas M. McKay
|
|
|
Douglas M. McKay |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
Date: November 12, 2010 |
/S/ James R. Reske
|
|
|
James R. Reske, CFA |
|
|
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
44
UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
Exhibit 3.1
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by United Community on
March 13, 1998 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Exhibit 3.1.
Exhibit 3.2
Incorporated by reference to the 1998 Form 10-K filed by United Community on March 31, 1999 with
the SEC, film number 99582343, Exhibit 3.2.