e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission file number 000-26679
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
04-3141918 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
One Main Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts
(Address of principal executive offices)
02142
(Zip Code)
(617) 386-1000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Sections 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer þ |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of
July 30, 2010 there were 158,112,163 shares of the Registrants common stock outstanding.
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
38,038 |
|
|
$ |
57,319 |
|
Marketable securities (including restricted cash of $50 at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively) |
|
|
107,146 |
|
|
|
21,775 |
|
Accounts receivable (net of reserves of $623 and $1,060 at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively) |
|
|
44,963 |
|
|
|
41,522 |
|
Deferred costs, current |
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
6,298 |
|
|
|
3,789 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
198,033 |
|
|
|
125,172 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
14,017 |
|
|
|
9,934 |
|
Deferred costs, less current portion |
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
|
1,387 |
|
Marketable securities (including restricted cash of $738 at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively) |
|
|
25,823 |
|
|
|
6,439 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
8,391 |
|
|
|
4,064 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
77,442 |
|
|
|
65,683 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
329,221 |
|
|
$ |
214,036 |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
4,657 |
|
|
$ |
5,720 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
15,772 |
|
|
|
18,873 |
|
Deferred revenue, current portion |
|
|
44,549 |
|
|
|
42,640 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
64,978 |
|
|
|
67,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue, less current portion |
|
|
22,616 |
|
|
|
10,356 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized - 10,000,000
shares; issued and outstanding-no shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized - 200,000,000 shares;
164,675,523 shares and 134,117,921 shares issued, respectively;
and 157,985,428 shares and 127,427,826 shares outstanding,
respectively at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
425,955 |
|
|
|
326,925 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(168,903 |
) |
|
|
(175,150 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost (6,690,095 shares at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively) |
|
|
(16,075 |
) |
|
|
(16,075 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(2,346 |
) |
|
|
(1,130 |
) |
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
240,281 |
|
|
|
135,911 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
329,221 |
|
|
$ |
214,036 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product licenses |
|
$ |
16,351 |
|
|
$ |
13,576 |
|
|
$ |
29,208 |
|
|
$ |
26,506 |
|
Recurring services |
|
|
27,211 |
|
|
|
24,028 |
|
|
|
53,881 |
|
|
|
47,131 |
|
Professional and education services |
|
|
5,601 |
|
|
|
6,823 |
|
|
|
10,798 |
|
|
|
12,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
49,163 |
|
|
|
44,427 |
|
|
|
93,887 |
|
|
|
86,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product licenses |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
Recurring services |
|
|
10,254 |
|
|
|
8,722 |
|
|
|
19,970 |
|
|
|
17,619 |
|
Professional and education services |
|
|
4,807 |
|
|
|
5,505 |
|
|
|
9,647 |
|
|
|
10,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
15,573 |
|
|
|
14,684 |
|
|
|
30,663 |
|
|
|
29,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
33,590 |
|
|
|
29,743 |
|
|
|
63,224 |
|
|
|
57,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
8,149 |
|
|
|
7,663 |
|
|
|
16,810 |
|
|
|
15,133 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
15,450 |
|
|
|
12,541 |
|
|
|
29,879 |
|
|
|
24,829 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
5,114 |
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
10,239 |
|
|
|
9,159 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
29,065 |
|
|
|
24,874 |
|
|
|
57,280 |
|
|
|
49,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
4,525 |
|
|
|
4,869 |
|
|
|
5,944 |
|
|
|
7,944 |
|
Interest and other income (expense), net |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
4,601 |
|
|
|
5,208 |
|
|
|
5,799 |
|
|
|
8,494 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
(434 |
) |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,174 |
|
|
$ |
4,620 |
|
|
$ |
6,233 |
|
|
$ |
7,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
157,437 |
|
|
|
126,877 |
|
|
|
151,828 |
|
|
|
126,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
164,618 |
|
|
|
133,111 |
|
|
|
159,606 |
|
|
|
131,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
6,233 |
|
|
$ |
7,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,827 |
|
|
|
4,680 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
4,863 |
|
|
|
4,357 |
|
Amortization of investment premiums |
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash deferred tax benefit |
|
|
(1,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net changes in current assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(3,309 |
) |
|
|
(4,046 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(2,297 |
) |
|
|
515 |
|
Deferred costs |
|
|
(2,675 |
) |
|
|
148 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,417 |
) |
|
|
2,681 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(3,232 |
) |
|
|
(3,477 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
13,367 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
Accrued restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
17,618 |
|
|
|
13,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
(122,118 |
) |
|
|
(8,854 |
) |
Maturities of marketable securities |
|
|
15,818 |
|
|
|
9,325 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(6,860 |
) |
|
|
(3,642 |
) |
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(15,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(129,274 |
) |
|
|
(3,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
Net proceeds from equity offering |
|
|
94,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of acquired debt |
|
|
(1,573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments of employee restricted stock tax withholdings |
|
|
(2,174 |
) |
|
|
(828 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
92,916 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(541 |
) |
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(19,281 |
) |
|
|
10,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
57,319 |
|
|
|
47,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
38,038 |
|
|
$ |
58,236 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Organization, Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Art Technology Group, Inc. (ATG or the Company) develops and markets a comprehensive suite
of e-commerce software products, and provides related services including support and maintenance,
education, application hosting, professional services and Optimization service solutions for
enhancing online sales and support.
(a) Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have
been prepared pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for quarterly reports
on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the financial statements do not
include all of the information and footnotes required by United States generally accepted
accounting principles, and while the Company believes that the disclosures presented are adequate
to make the information presented not misleading, these financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes included in the Companys 2009
Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys financial position, results
of operations, and cash flows at the dates and for the periods indicated. The operating results for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for the full year ending December 31, 2010. The Company considers which events or
transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued
should be included to provide additional evidence relative to certain estimates or to identify
matters that require additional disclosures.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ATG and its wholly
owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
(b) Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. Such estimates relate to revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful
accounts, useful lives of fixed assets and identifiable intangible assets, deferred costs, software
development costs, accrued liabilities, accrued taxes, deferred tax valuation allowances, and
assumptions pertaining to share-based payments. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(c) Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable represents amounts currently due from customers. Accounts receivable also
include $5.9 million and $2.5 million of unbilled accounts receivable at June 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, respectively. Unbilled accounts receivable consist of future billings related to
transactions with extended payment terms, as well as future billings for professional services
performed but not yet invoiced to the customer. At June 30, 2010, $2.6 million of the $5.9 million
was unbilled due to extended payment terms. At December 31, 2009, $1.0 million of the $2.5 million
related to extended payment terms. Unbilled accounts receivable related to professional services
are generally invoiced the following month.
ATG records bad debt allowances for accounts receivable based upon a specific review of all
outstanding invoices and unbilled accounts receivable, known collection issues, and historical
experience. ATG also records a provision for estimated allowances on professional service fees and
hosting fees in the same period in which the related revenues are recorded as a reduction to
revenue. These estimates are based on historical allowances, analysis of credit memo data, and
other known factors and are generally recorded as a reduction in revenue.
6
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(d) Revenue Recognition
ATG derives revenue from the following sources: (1) perpetual software licenses, (2) recurring
services, which are comprised of support and maintenance services, application hosting services and
Optimization services, and (3) professional and education services. ATG sells certain of these
product and service offerings individually or more commonly in multiple element arrangements under
various arrangements as follows: 1. Sale of Perpetual Software Licenses and Professional and
Education Services, 2. Sale of Application Hosting Services, and 3. Sale of Optimization Services.
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with FASB ASC 985-605, Software Revenue
Recognition, (ASC 985-605), formerly known as AICPA Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue
Recognition (SOP 97-2), or Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104,
Revenue Recognition (SAB 104), applying the provisions of FASB ASC 605-25, Multiple Element
Arrangements, (ASC 605-25) formerly known as Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (EITF 00-21), depending on the nature of the
arrangement.
Revenue is recognized only when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed
or determinable, the product or service has been delivered, and collectability of the resulting
receivable is probable. ATG makes significant judgments when evaluating if fees are fixed or
determinable and in assessing the customers ability to pay for the products or services provided.
This judgment is based on a combination of factors, including the contractual terms of the
arrangement, completion of a credit check or financial review, payment history with the customer,
and other forms of credit evaluation. Upon the completion of these steps and provided all other
revenue recognition criteria are met, ATG recognizes revenue consistent with its revenue
recognition policies provided below.
ATGs standard payment terms are normally within 90 days. The Company in some circumstances
provides extended payment terms, and in certain cases considers amounts payable beyond 90 days but
less than 12 months to be fixed or determinable. In such cases, judgment is required in evaluating
the creditworthiness of the customer and the likelihood of a concession. The Company monitors its
ability to collect amounts due under the stated contractual terms of such arrangements and to date
has not experienced any concessions to this class of customer. If in the future the Company
experiences adverse changes in its ability to collect without concession the amounts due under
arrangements involving extended payment terms to this class of customer, it may no longer be able
to conclude that such amounts are fixed or determinable and probable of collection, which could
adversely affect the Companys revenue in future periods.
1. Sales of Perpetual Software Licenses and Professional and Education Services
ATG licenses software under perpetual license agreements and applies the provisions of ASC
985-605. In accordance with said provisions, revenue from software license agreements is recognized
when the following criteria are met: (1) execution of a legally binding license agreement, (2)
delivery of the software, which is generally through electronic license keys for the software, (3)
the fee is fixed or determinable, as determined by the Companys payment terms, and free of
contingencies or significant uncertainties as to payment, and (4) collection is deemed probable by
management based on a credit evaluation of the customer. In addition, under multiple element
arrangements, to recognize software license revenue up-front, the Company must have vendor specific
objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value of the undelivered elements in the transaction. The
Companys software license arrangements generally do not include acceptance provisions. However, if
conditions for acceptance subsequent to delivery are required, revenue is recognized upon customer
acceptance if such acceptance is not deemed to be perfunctory.
In connection with the sale of its software licenses, ATG sells support and maintenance
services, which are recognized ratably over the term of the arrangement, typically one year. Under
support and maintenance services, customers receive unspecified software product upgrades,
maintenance and patch releases during the term, and internet and telephone access to technical
support personnel. Support and maintenance is priced as a percent of the net software license fee
and is based on the contracted level of support.
7
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Many of the Companys software arrangements also include professional services for consulting
implementation services sold separately under separate agreements. Professional services revenue
from these arrangements is generally accounted for separately from the software license because the
services qualify as a separate element under ASC 985-605. The more significant factors considered
in determining whether professional services revenue should be accounted for separately include the
nature of services (i.e. consideration of whether the services are essential to the functionality
of the licensed product), degree of risk, availability of services from other vendors, timing of
payments, and impact of milestones or acceptance criteria on the realizability of the software
license fee. Professional services revenue under these arrangements is generally recognized as the
services are performed on a time and materials basis.
Education revenue, which is recognized as the training is provided to customers, is derived
from instructor led training classes either at ATG or onsite at the customer location.
For software arrangements with multiple elements, the Company applies the residual method in
accordance with ASC 985-605. The residual method requires that the portion of the total arrangement
fee attributable to the undelivered elements be deferred based on its VSOE of fair value and
subsequently recognized as the service is delivered. The difference between the total arrangement
fee and the amount deferred for the undelivered elements is recognized as revenue related to the
delivered elements, which is generally the software license. VSOE of fair value for all elements in
an arrangement is based upon the normal pricing for those products and services when sold
separately. The Company has established VSOE of fair value for support and maintenance services,
professional services, and education. The Company has not established VSOE for its software
licenses, application hosting services or Optimization services. In arrangements that do not
include application hosting services or Optimization services, product license revenue is generally
recognized upon delivery of the software products.
2. Sales of Application Hosting Services
ATG derives revenue from application hosting services either from hosting ATG perpetual
software licenses purchased by the customer or by providing the software as a service solution to
the customer in an arrangement in which the customer does not have the rights to the software
license itself but can use the software for the contracted term. In both situations, ATG recognizes
application hosting revenue in accordance with ASC 985-605, ASC 605-10, Revenue Recognition, (ASC
605-10) and ASC 605-25.
In accordance with ASC 985-605, these arrangements are generally within the scope of ASC
605-10, and the Company therefore applies the provisions of ASC 605-10 and ASC 605-25, and accounts
for the arrangement as a service contract. Pursuant to ASC 605-25, all elements of the arrangement
are considered to be one unit of accounting. The elements in these arrangements generally include
set-up and implementation services, support and maintenance services, the monthly hosting service
and in certain instances a perpetual software license. All fees received up-front under these
arrangements, regardless of the nature of the element, are deferred until the application hosting
service commences, which is referred to as the site-delivered date. Once the site-delivered date
has occurred, the up-front fees and hosting service fees are recognized ratably over the hosting
period or estimated life of the customer arrangement, whichever is longer. ATG currently estimates
the life of the customer arrangement to be four years. In addition, the monthly application hosting
service fee is recognized as the application hosting service is provided.
3. Sales of Optimization Services
ATG derives revenue from Optimization services, which are hosted services enabling ATGs
customers to provide click-to-call, click-to-chat and recommendations services to their customers.
Optimization services are site-independent and are not required to be used in conjunction with
ATGs software products. These services are a stand-alone independent service solution, which are
typically contracted for a one-year term. The Company recognizes revenue on a monthly basis as the
services are provided. Fees are generally based on monthly minimums and transaction volumes. In
certain instances Optimization services are bundled with ATG software arrangements, which typically
include perpetual software licenses, support and maintenance services and professional services for
the perpetual software license. In these situations the Company accounts for the arrangements in
accordance with ASC 985-605. The Company does not have VSOE of fair value for Optimization
services, and as a result, the up-front fees received under the arrangement regardless of the
nature of the element are deferred and recognized ratably
8
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
over the period of providing the Optimization services, provided that the professional
services, if applicable, have commenced.
In certain instances, the Company sells perpetual software licenses with application hosting
services and Optimization services. In these situations the Company accounts for the arrangements
in accordance with ASC 605-10. All elements in the arrangement for which the Company receives
up-front fees are recognized as revenue ratably over the period of providing the related service or
estimated life of the customer arrangement, whichever is longer.
The Company allocates and classifies revenue in its statement of operations based on its
evaluation of VSOE of fair value, or an estimate of fair value when VSOE has not been established,
for each applicable element of the transaction: professional services, support and maintenance
services, application hosting services, and/or Optimization services. ATG uses the residual method
to determine the amount of revenue to allocate to product license revenue. The fee for each element
is recognized ratably, and as such, a portion of software license revenue recorded in the statement
of operations is from these ratably recognized arrangements.
(e) Comprehensive Income
Accounting guidance requires financial statements to include the reporting of comprehensive
income, which includes net income and certain transactions that have generally been reported in the
statement of stockholders equity. ATGs comprehensive income consists of net income, foreign
currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,174 |
|
|
$ |
4,620 |
|
|
$ |
6,233 |
|
|
$ |
7,594 |
|
Net changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
(1,001 |
) |
|
|
640 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
3,502 |
|
|
$ |
5,637 |
|
|
$ |
5,017 |
|
|
$ |
8,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f) Concentrations of Credit Risk and Major Customers
Financial instruments that potentially subject ATG to concentrations of credit risk consist
principally of marketable securities and accounts receivable. ATG maintains cash, cash equivalents
and marketable securities with durations of twenty-three months or less.
The Company sells its products and services to customers in a variety of industries, including
consumer retail, financial services, manufacturing, communications and technology, travel, and
media and entertainment. The Company has credit policies and standards and routinely assesses the
financial strength of its customers through continuing credit evaluations. The Company generally
does not require collateral or letters of credit from its customers.
At June 30, 2010 and 2009 two customers and one customer respectively accounted for more than
10% of accounts receivable. Furthermore, one customer accounted for more than 10% of revenues for
the three month period ended June 30, 2010 and no customers accounted for more than 10% of revenues
for the three month period ended June 30, 2009 or the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and
2009.
9
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(g) New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-13, Multiple
Element Arrangements. ASU 2009-13 addresses the determination of when the individual deliverables
included in a multiple element arrangement may be treated as separate units of accounting. ASU
2009-13 also modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across
separately identified deliverables and establishes definitions for determining fair value of
elements in an arrangement. This standard must be adopted by the Company no later than January 1,
2011 with earlier adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that
this standard update will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures:
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which amends ASC 820-10, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures. ASU 2010-06 requires additional disclosures for transfers in and out
of Levels 1 and 2 fair value classifications and for activity in Level 3 and clarifies certain
other existing disclosure requirements. It also clarifies existing fair value disclosures regarding
the level of disaggregation and the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value.
The Company adopted ASU 2010-06 beginning January 15, 2010. This adoption had no impact on the
Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
(2) Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed
by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus
the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents using the treasury stock method. Common stock
equivalents consist of stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards. Under the
treasury stock method, the assumed proceeds, including the exercise price as well as the average
unrecognized compensation expense of dilutive stock options and restricted stock awards, are used
to effect an assumed buyback of additional shares, thereby reducing the dilutive impact of the
stock options and restricted stock awards.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share for
the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,174 |
|
|
$ |
4,620 |
|
|
$ |
6,233 |
|
|
$ |
7,594 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
used in computing basic net income per
share |
|
|
157,437 |
|
|
|
126,877 |
|
|
|
151,828 |
|
|
|
126,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive common stock equivalents |
|
|
7,181 |
|
|
|
6,234 |
|
|
|
7,778 |
|
|
|
4,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average common stock and
common stock equivalent shares outstanding
used in computing diluted net income per
share |
|
|
164,618 |
|
|
|
133,111 |
|
|
|
159,606 |
|
|
|
131,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive common stock equivalents |
|
|
13,375 |
|
|
|
12,852 |
|
|
|
12,338 |
|
|
|
13,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(3) Stock-Based Compensation
Grant-Date Fair Value of Stock Options
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant-date fair value
of stock options. Information pertaining to stock options granted during the three months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 and related weighted average assumptions is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
Stock Options |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Options granted (in thousands) |
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
Weighted-average exercise price |
|
$ |
4.45 |
|
|
$ |
2.48 |
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value |
|
$ |
2.81 |
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
66.07 |
% |
|
|
71.36 |
% |
Expected term (in years) |
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.65 |
% |
|
|
1.98 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility The Company has determined that the historical volatility of its common
stock is the best indicator of the future volatility of its common stock, and therefore uses
historical volatility to estimate the grant-date fair value of stock options. Historical volatility
is calculated for the period that is commensurate with the stock options expected term.
Expected term The expected term of an option is based on the historical experience for the
population of option holders.
Risk-free interest rate The yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury securities for a period that
is commensurate with the expected term is used as the risk-free interest rate.
Expected dividend yield The Companys Board of Directors historically has not declared cash
dividends and does not expect to issue cash dividends in the future.
The Company uses the straight-line attribution method to recognize stock-based compensation
expense for stock options. The amount of stock-based compensation recognized during a period is
based on the value of the portion of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Expected
forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if
actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The term forfeitures is distinct from
cancellations or expirations and represents only the unvested portion of the surrendered
option. The Company has applied a forfeiture rate of 9% to all unvested options as of June 30,
2010. This estimate is re-evaluated periodically and the forfeiture rate is adjusted as necessary.
Ultimately, the actual expense recognized over the vesting period will only be for those shares
that vest.
11
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Stock Option Award Activity
A summary of the activity under the Companys stock option plans as of June 30, 2010 and
changes during the six-month period then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Term in Years |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
13,003 |
|
|
$ |
2.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
4.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
13.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
13,682 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
16,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
10,259 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested or expected to
vest at June 30, 2010 (1) |
|
|
13,252 |
|
|
|
2.69 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
16,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In addition to the vested options, the Company expects a portion of the unvested
options to vest at some point in the future. Options expected to vest are calculated by
applying an estimated forfeiture rate to the unvested options. |
During the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the total intrinsic value of options
exercised (i.e. the difference between the market price at exercise and the price paid by the
employee to exercise the options) was $1.0 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and the total
amount of cash received by the Company from exercise of these options was $1.1 million and $0.5
million, respectively.
Restricted Stock Awards
A summary of the Companys restricted stock and restricted stock unit (RSU) award activity
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
Date Fair Value |
|
|
and RSUs |
|
Per Share |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Non-vested shares outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
5,446 |
|
|
$ |
2.89 |
|
Awards granted |
|
|
2,690 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
|
Restrictions lapsed |
|
|
(1,763 |
) |
|
|
2.88 |
|
Awards forfeited |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
|
|
Non-vested shares outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
6,192 |
|
|
|
3.31 |
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company granted 2.7 million RSUs to employees,
directors and executives. The fair value of the RSUs is based on the market value of ATGs common
stock price on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation expense related to RSUs is recognized on
a straight-line basis over the requisite service period provided there are no performance-based
measures. The Company has applied a forfeiture rate of 18% to its RSUs as of June 30, 2010.
The RSUs provide the holder with the right to receive shares of ATG common stock upon vesting.
RSUs granted to employees generally vest over four years. A majority of the RSUs vest based on the
lapsing of time. A portion of the RSUs granted to executives are subject to performance criteria.
Of the RSUs outstanding at June 30, 2010, 1.9 million were performance-based. The fair value of
these performance-based awards is being recognized over the requisite service period under the
accelerated method. All performance-based RSUs contain an additional condition which, if achieved,
would result in the immediate vesting of the awards. At June 30, 2010, the achievement of this
additional condition is not deemed probable by the Company.
12
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of June 30, 2010, there was $23.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to unvested awards of stock options and RSUs. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.2 years.
The Company recorded total stock-based compensation expense of $2.5 million and $2.4 million
respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and $4.9 million and $4.4 million
respectively, for the six months then ended.
(4) Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise
Operating segments are components of an enterprise for which separate discrete financial
information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker in making decisions
on how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Companys chief operating decision-maker
is its Chief Executive Officer. ATG views its operations and manages its business as one segment
with three product offerings: software licenses, recurring services, and professional and education
services. ATG evaluates these product offerings based on their respective revenues and gross
margins. As a result, the financial information disclosed in the consolidated financial statements
represents the material financial information related to our principal operating segment.
Revenues from foreign sources were approximately $13.4 million and $14.7 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively and $25.1 million and $25.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively. Revenues from foreign sources were primarily
generated from customers located in Europe and the Asia/Pacific region. All of the Companys
product sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were delivered from ATGs
headquarters located in the United States.
The following table represents the percentage of total revenue by geographic region for the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
United States |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
United Kingdom (UK) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa (excluding UK) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(5) Fair Value Measurement
As defined in ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820-10), fair value
is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In order to increase
consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, ASC 820-10 establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three
broad levels, which are described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement
date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1
inputs.
Level 2: Other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for
similar assets and liabilities or market corroborated inputs.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available, which
requires the Company to develop its own assumptions about how market participants would value the
assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
13
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible in its
assessment of fair value.
The following table presents the Companys financial assets that are measured at fair value on
a recurring basis at June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010 |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,824 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,824 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,482 |
|
Debt securities current (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits and certificate of deposits |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,250 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,346 |
|
U.S. Federal Government securities |
|
|
18,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,146 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities current |
|
|
21,396 |
|
|
|
85,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,621 |
|
Debt securities non-current (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal Government securities |
|
|
5,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,502 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities non-current |
|
|
5,502 |
|
|
|
19,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets: |
|
$ |
26,898 |
|
|
$ |
110,290 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
137,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included within cash and cash equivalents in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
|
(2) |
|
Included within marketable securities, current in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
|
(3) |
|
Included within marketable securities, non-current in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
When available, the Company uses unadjusted quoted market prices to measure the fair value and
classifies such items as Level 1. The valuation technique used to measure fair value for our Level
2 assets is a market approach, using prices and other relevant information generated by market
transactions involving identical or comparable assets.
As of June 30, 2010, the Companys marketable securities had a fair value of $137.2 million,
amortized cost of $137.4 million, and unrealized loss recorded in other comprehensive income of
$0.2 million. In addition, 82% of the marketable securities held by the Company at June 30, 2010
had a maturity of less than one year, and all investments had fair value greater than 90% of their
amortized cost.
14
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(6) Restricted Cash
At June 30, 2010, the Company has collateralized $0.8 million in outstanding letters of credit
with certificates of deposit. The letters of credit were issued in favor of various landlords to
secure obligations under ATGs facility leases expiring through December 2018. The collateral for
the letters of credit is reflected on the Companys balance sheet as restricted cash within
short-term and long-term marketable securities dependent on the underlying term of the leases.
(7) Acquisitions
On January 8, 2010, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of common stock of
privately held InstantService.com, Inc. (InstantService) in a non-material business combination.
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company did not record any material revisions to
any of the assumptions, estimates or amounts used to complete its preliminary purchase price
accounting as of March 31, 2010; however, pending the outcome of further analysis related to
certain other assets and contingencies recorded as part of the transaction, the preliminary
purchase price allocation could change.
(8) Restructuring
During the three month period ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a one time charge of
$0.4 million to exit a lease and write off certain assets acquired as part of the InstantService
acquisition. The leased facility and associated assets were located in an area where the Company
already had established office space. This was a one-time charge and is not associated with any
ongoing Company-wide restructuring plan.
(9) Commitments and Contingencies
Indemnifications
The Company in general agrees to indemnification provisions in its software license agreements
and service agreements in the ordinary course of its business.
With respect to software license and service agreements, these indemnifications generally
include provisions indemnifying the customer against losses, expenses, and liabilities from damages
that may be awarded against the customer in the event the Companys software is found to infringe
upon the intellectual property rights of others. The software license and service agreements
generally limit the scope of and remedies for such indemnification obligations in a variety of
industry-standard respects. The Company relies on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and
trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to protect its intellectual property rights. The
Company believes such laws and practices, along with its internal development processes and other
policies and practices, limit its exposure related to the indemnification provisions of the
software license agreements and service agreements. However, in recent years there has been significant litigation in the
United States involving patents and other intellectual property rights. Companies providing
Internet-related products and services are increasingly bringing and becoming subject to suits
alleging infringement of proprietary rights, particularly patent rights. From time to time, the
Companys customers have been subject to third party patent claims, and the Company has agreed to
indemnify these customers from claims to the extent the claims relate to the Companys products.
(10) Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in
circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. No impairment of
goodwill resulted from the Companys most recent evaluation of goodwill for impairment, which
occurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, nor in any of the periods presented. The Companys
next annual impairment assessment will be made in the fourth quarter of 2010. The following table
presents the changes in goodwill during fiscal 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
15
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Balance at the beginning of the period |
|
$ |
65,683 |
|
|
$ |
65,683 |
|
Acquisition of InstantService |
|
|
11,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
77,442 |
|
|
$ |
65,683 |
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets
The Company reviews identified intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability
of these assets is measured by comparison of their carrying value to future undiscounted cash flows
the assets are expected to generate over their remaining economic lives. If such assets are
considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized in the statement of operations equals
the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value determined by either
a quoted market price, if any, or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique.
Intangible assets, which will continue to be amortized, consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Net Book |
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Net Book |
|
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Value |
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
10,760 |
|
|
$ |
(7,274 |
) |
|
$ |
3,486 |
|
|
$ |
7,460 |
|
|
$ |
(6,032 |
) |
|
$ |
1,428 |
|
Developed technology |
|
|
9,510 |
|
|
|
(4,955 |
) |
|
|
4,555 |
|
|
|
6,110 |
|
|
|
(3,964 |
) |
|
|
2,146 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
21,670 |
|
|
$ |
(13,279 |
) |
|
$ |
8,391 |
|
|
$ |
14,970 |
|
|
$ |
(10,906 |
) |
|
$ |
4,064 |
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets are amortized based upon the pattern of estimated economic use or on a
straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from 1 to 5 years. Amortization
expense related to intangibles was $1.2 million and $0.9 million for the three-month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively and $2.4 million and $1.9 million for the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively.
The Company expects amortization expense for these intangible assets to be (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2010 |
|
$ |
1,958 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2,372 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,340 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,340 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1,340 |
|
2015 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,391 |
|
(11) Income Taxes
The Company records a deferred tax asset or liability based on the difference between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities, as measured by enacted tax rates
assumed to be in effect when these differences reverse. The Company believes there is significant
uncertainty in its future profits due to the growing breadth of its product mix and the effect that
can have on the timing of revenue recognition, and the related effect on reported U.S. income. At
June 30, 2010, the Company determined that it is more likely than not that the net U.S. deferred
tax assets may not be realized and a full valuation allowance continues to be recorded.
The income tax provision in the amount of $0.4 million and income tax benefit of $0.4 million
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, related to the U.S. alternative
minimum tax (AMT) state and foreign income taxes as well as interest related to uncertain tax
positions. The utilization of tax loss carryforwards is limited in the calculation of AMT and, as
a result, a federal tax charge was recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009. The AMT liability is available as a credit against future tax obligations upon the full
16
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
utilization or expiration of the Companys net operating loss carryforward. Included in the
$0.4 million benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is approximately $1.1 million related
to the reversal of the valuation allowance on certain deferred tax assets as described below.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded income tax provisions
of $0.6 million and $0.9 million, respectively, which related to foreign taxes on earnings in
certain of the Companys foreign subsidiaries as well as interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded net deferred tax liabilities of
approximately $1.1 million related to basis differences resulting from the acquisition of
InstantService. As a result of the InstantService acquisition, the Company released a portion of
its valuation allowance amounting to approximately $1.1 million to offset the impact of the
deferred tax liabilities acquired on its pre-acquisition net deferred tax asset balance. In
accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, the release of the valuation allowance was recorded
as a tax benefit in the statement of operations.
(12) Litigation
In December 2001, a purported class action complaint was filed against the Companys wholly
owned subsidiary Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc., two former officers of Primus and the
underwriters of Primus 1999 initial public offering. The complaints are similar and allege
violations of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
primarily based on the allegation that the underwriters received undisclosed compensation in
connection with Primus initial public offering. The litigation has been coordinated in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York with claims against approximately 300
other companies that had initial public offerings during the same general time period. The parties
have reached a global settlement of the litigation under which insurance will pay the full amount
of the settlement share allocated to Primus, and Primus bears no financial liability. In October
2009, the Court issued an order granting final approval of the settlement. Certain objectors are
appealing the final order. While the Company cannot predict the outcome of the litigation, it does
not expect any material adverse impact to its business, or the results of its operations, from this
matter.
In May 2009, LivePerson, Inc. (LivePerson) commenced an action in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York against InstantService. In the action,
LivePerson alleges that InstantService infringes two United States patents held by LivePerson and
seeks injunctive relief, damages and attorneys fees. In April
2010, InstantService asserted counter-claims against LivePerson, alleging that LivePerson
infringes one of InstantServices patents and is seeking injunctive relief, damages and attorneys
fees. In May 2010, the Company joined the action and asserted counter claims against
LivePerson, alleging that LivePerson infringes two of its patents and is seeking injunctive relief,
damages and attorneys fees against LivePerson. Discovery in the LivePerson action has not yet commenced. The Company
is investigating the claims made by LivePerson and has reached no conclusion as to the likelihood
of an adverse outcome in the litigation, which the Company intends to contest vigorously.
The Companys industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents,
trademarks and copyrights, and by increasingly frequent litigation based on allegations of
infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. Some of the Companys competitors
in the e-commerce software and services market have filed or may file patent applications covering
aspects of their technology that they may claim the Companys technology infringes. Such
competitors could make claims of infringement against the Company with respect to the Companys
products and technology. Additionally, third parties who are not actively engaged in providing
e-commerce products or services but who hold or acquire patents upon which they may allege the
Companys current or future products or services infringe may make claims of infringement against
the Company or the Companys customers. The Companys agreements with its customers typically
require it to indemnify them against claims of intellectual property infringement resulting from
their use of the Companys products and services with certain
industry-standard exceptions. The Company periodically receives notices from
customers regarding patent license inquiries they have received which may or may not implicate the
Companys indemnity obligations, and certain of its customers are currently parties to litigation
in which it is alleged that the patent rights of others are infringed by the Companys products or
services. Any litigation over intellectual property rights, whether brought by the Company or by
others, could result in the expenditure of significant financial resources and the diversion of
managements time and efforts. In addition,
17
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
litigation in which the Company or its customers are accused of infringement might cause
product shipment or service delivery delays, require the Company to develop alternative technology
or require the Company to enter into royalty or license agreements, which might not be available on
acceptable terms, or at all. ATG could incur substantial costs in prosecuting or defending any
intellectual property litigation. These claims, whether meritorious or not, could be time
consuming, result in costly litigation, require expensive changes in the Companys methods of doing
business or could require the Company to enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements, if
available. As a result, these claims could harm the Companys business.
The ultimate outcome of any litigation is uncertain, and either unfavorable or favorable
outcomes could have a material negative impact on the Companys financial position, results of
operations, consolidated balance sheets and cash flows, due to defense costs, diversion of
management resources and other factors.
18
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes
contained in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following discussion contains
forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements do not include the potential impact of
any mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures of business combinations that may be announced after the
date hereof.
We develop and market a comprehensive suite of e-commerce software solutions, as well as
provide related services in conjunction with our products, including support and maintenance,
professional services, managed application hosting services, and Optimization services for
enhancing online sales and support. We primarily derive revenue from the sale of software products
and related services. Our software licenses are priced based on the size of the customer
implementation. Our recurring services revenue is attributable to managed application hosting
services, Optimization services, and support and maintenance services. Managed application hosting
revenue is recognized monthly as the services are provided and pricing is based on a per
transaction, per CPU or percent of customers revenue basis. Optimization services are priced on a
per transaction basis and recognized monthly as the services are provided. Support and maintenance
arrangements are priced based on the level of support services provided as a percent of net license
fees per annum. Under support and maintenance services, customers are generally entitled to receive
software upgrades and updates, maintenance releases and technical support. Professional and
education services revenue includes implementation, technical consulting and education training. We
bill professional service fees primarily on a time and materials basis. Education services are
billed as services are provided.
Shift to Increasing Ratably Recognized Revenue
Before 2007, most of our revenue from arrangements involving the sale of our software was
derived from perpetual software licenses and in most circumstances was recognized at the time the
license agreement was executed and the software was delivered. Beginning in the first quarter of
2007, an increasing number of our perpetual software license arrangements have also included the
sale of our managed application hosting services or Optimization services. As a result of applying
the requirements of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
(GAAP) to our evolving business model, the revenue from these arrangements with combined product
offerings is recognized on a ratable basis over the estimated term of the contract or in certain
cases over the estimated term of the customer arrangement, commencing with the site-delivered
date for providing the managed application hosting services or Optimization services.
The addition of Optimization services and managed application hosting services solution
offerings introduced new products to our portfolio for which we do not have vendor-specific
objective evidence (or VSOE) of fair value. As a result, when we sell Optimization services and
managed application hosting services in conjunction with e-commerce software, we defer all up-front
fees, such as those for licenses, support and maintenance, and professional services, received
prior to the delivery of the managed application hosting services or Optimization services. We
recognize revenue from these fees ratably over either the term of the contract or estimated life of
the arrangement depending on the specific facts of the arrangement, commencing with the
site-delivered date for providing the managed application hosting services or Optimization
services. In addition, when professional services revenue is deferred in connection with these
arrangements and other instances in which there are undelivered elements to a transaction for which
we do not have VSOE of fair value, we defer the direct costs related to performing the professional
services prior to delivery of the element related to these services. These amounts are recognized
to cost of revenue ratably in the same manner as the related revenue.
Key measures that we use to evaluate our performance:
In addition to the traditional measures of financial performance that are reflected in our
results of operations determined in accordance with GAAP, we also monitor certain non-GAAP
financial measures related to the performance of our business. A non-GAAP financial measure is a
numerical measure of a companys historical or
19
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
future financial performance that excludes amounts that are included in the most directly
comparable measure calculated and presented in the GAAP statement of operations. Among the GAAP and
non-GAAP measures that we believe are most important in evaluating the performance of our business
are the following:
|
|
|
We use product license bookings, a non-GAAP financial measure, as an important measure
of growth in demand for our ATG e-commerce platform and the success of our sales and
marketing efforts. We define product license bookings as the sale of perpetual software
licenses regardless of the timing of revenue recognition under GAAP. When considering the
value of perpetual software licenses executed during the period we use our judgment in
assessing collectability and likelihood of granting future concessions. Factors that we
consider include the financial condition of the customer and contractual provisions
included in the license contract. See Results of Operations-Product license bookings
below. |
|
|
|
|
Product license revenue associated with a particular transaction may be deferred for reasons
other than the presence of a managed application hosting or Optimization services
arrangement, such as the presence of credit risk or other contractual terms that, under
GAAP, require us to defer the recognition of revenue. The deferred revenue for such a
transaction may be recognized in a single future period rather than ratably when the
conditions that originally required deferral have been resolved. We include all additions to
deferred product license revenue in our calculation of product license bookings. |
|
|
|
|
We use cash flow from operations as an indicator of the success of the business. Because
a portion of our revenue is deferred in the near term, our net income may be significantly
different from the cash that we generate from operations. |
|
|
|
|
We use recurring services revenue, as reported under GAAP, to evaluate the success of
our strategy to deliver site-independent online services and the growth of our recurring
revenue sources. Recurring services revenue includes Optimization services, application
hosting services, and support and maintenance related to ATG e-commerce platform sales. |
|
|
|
|
We use revenue and gross margins on our various lines of business to measure our success
at meeting cash and non-cash cost and expense targets in relation to revenue earned. |
|
|
|
|
We use days sales outstanding (DSO), calculated by dividing accounts receivable at
period end (including unbilled accounts receivable which may exist as a result of extended
payment terms) by revenue and multiplying the result by the number of days in the period.
The percentage of accounts receivable that are less than 60 days old is an important factor
that our management uses to understand the strength of our accounts receivable portfolio.
This measure is important because a disproportionate percentage of our product license
bookings often occur late in the quarter, which has the effect of increasing our DSO. |
Trends in On-Line Sales and our Business
Set forth below is a discussion of recent developments in our industry that we believe
offer us significant opportunities, or present us with significant challenges, and have the
potential to significantly influence our results of operations.
Impact of weak economy. As recovery from the recent global recession progresses, its
impact across all sectors of the U.S. and most foreign economies continues to create substantial
uncertainty for our business. These weakened economic conditions have led to delays or reductions
in capital spending, including purchases of information technology across industries and markets,
and some customers in markets that we serve, such as luxury retailers, have been particularly
affected. We cannot accurately predict the duration or severity of the current uncertainty
regarding economic conditions or its specific impact on our customers demand for our products and
services.
Trend in on-line sales. The growth of e-commerce as an important sales channel is the
principal driver for demand for our products and services. We believe that in the current
environment, the on-line channel is growing in importance for many of our customers, as e-commerce
may offer more opportunities for revenue growth as well as significant cost savings and operational
benefits such as improved inventory control and purchasing processes.
20
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
E-commerce replatforming. Enterprises periodically upgrade or replace the network and
enterprise applications software and the related hardware systems that they use to run their
e-commerce operations in order to take advantage of advances in computing power, system
architectures, and enterprise software functionality that enable them to increase the capabilities
of their e-commerce systems while simplifying operation and maintenance of these systems and
reducing their cost of ownership. In the e-commerce software industry, we refer to these major
system upgrades or replacements as replatforming. We believe that on average, customers in our
market replatform or refresh their e-commerce software approximately every four to five years. The
extent to which this trend will continue in light of current uncertain economic conditions is
unknown. However, we are cautiously optimistic that in the near term spending on e-commerce
technology will continue at levels comparable to those we have recently experienced, and that it
may even increase as a priority for some of our customers and prospects, due to the growing
importance and cost benefits of the on-line channel.
Emergence of the on demand model of Software as a Service (SaaS). An important trend
throughout the enterprise software industry in recent years has been the emergence of the SaaS
software delivery model whereby a software vendor that has developed a software application hosts
and operates it for use by its customers over the Internet. The emergence of SaaS has been driven
by customers desire to reduce the costs of owning and operating critical applications software,
while shifting the risks and burdens associated with operating and maintaining the software to the
software vendor, enabling the customer to focus its resources on its core business.
Rapidly evolving and increasingly complex customer requirements. The market for
e-commerce is constantly and rapidly evolving, as we and our competitors introduce new and enhanced
products, retire older ones, and react to changes in Internet-related technology and customer
demands. The market for e-commerce has seen diminishing product differentiators, increasing product
commoditization, and evolving industry standards. To succeed, we need to enhance our current
products and develop or acquire new products on a timely basis to keep pace with market needs,
satisfy the increasingly sophisticated requirements of customers, and leverage strategic alliances
with third parties in the e-commerce field who have complementary products. Our customers may
request that we structure our arrangements with them in new ways that may impact the timing of
revenue recognition and cash flows.
International expansion. Revenues derived from foreign sales as a percentage of our
total revenues were 27% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 27% and 30%
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The primary driver of the decrease in foreign
source revenues as a percentage of total revenues compared to similar periods in the prior year is
the addition of the InstantService business acquired January 8, 2010. InstantServices customer
portfolio is primarily US based. We continue to seek opportunities to invest resources into further
developing our reach internationally. In support of this initiative we have entered into
partnership agreements abroad that will support our continued growth. As the international market
opportunity continues to develop we will adjust our strategy accordingly.
Competitive trend. The market for online sales, marketing, and customer service software
is intensely competitive, subject to rapid technological change, and significantly affected by new
product introductions by large competitors with significantly greater resources and installed
customer bases, as well as increased competition from smaller
competitors entering this market. We expect competition to persist and intensify in the future.
Virtualization. The trend towards virtualization could challenge our current software
license pricing structure. Virtualization is an approach to computing wherein the actual, physical
hardware resources of a computer system are configured to simulate the operations of one or more
abstract computers, known as virtual machines, on which software can be executed. The
introduction of virtualization technologies may require us to consider alternative pricing
strategies.
Development of ATGs partner ecosystem. As we train and develop our ATG partner
ecosystem we will see a larger number of implementations outsourced to these partners resulting in
stable, or potentially lower, professional services revenue.
21
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
This managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its
estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, deferral of costs, the
allowance for accounts receivable, research and development costs, the impairment of long-lived
assets and goodwill, income taxes, and assumptions for stock-based compensation. Management bases
its estimates and judgments on historical experience, known trends, or events and various other
factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the
basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
We define our critical accounting policies as those that require us to make subjective
estimates about matters that are uncertain and are likely to have a material impact on our
financial condition and results of operations or that concern the specific manner in which we apply
GAAP. Our estimates are based upon assumptions and judgments about matters that are highly
uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made and applied and require us to assess a range
of potential outcomes.
We believe the following critical accounting policies are those that are most important
to the portrayal of our results of operations and financial condition and that require the most
subjective judgment.
Revenue Recognition
We generate revenue through the sale of perpetual software licenses, recurring services,
which are comprised of support and maintenance services, application hosting services, Optimization
services, and professional and education services. Please refer to the notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a
more comprehensive discussion of our revenue recognition policy.
Our policy is to recognize revenue when the applicable revenue recognition criteria have
been met, which generally include the following:
Persuasive evidence of an arrangement We use a legally binding contract signed by the
customer as evidence of an arrangement. We consider the signed contract to be the most persuasive
evidence of the arrangement.
Delivery has occurred or services rendered Software and the corresponding access keys
are generally delivered to customers electronically. Electronic delivery occurs when we provide the
customer access to the software. Our software license agreements generally do not contain
conditions for acceptance. Our support and maintenance services, Optimization services, and
application hosting services are delivered on a monthly basis. Professional services are generally
delivered on a time and material basis.
Fee is fixed or determinable We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable at the
outset of the arrangement, primarily based on the payment terms associated with the transaction.
Our standard payment terms are normally within 90 days. In some circumstances we provide extended
payment terms, and in certain cases consider amounts payable beyond 90 days but less than 12 months
to be fixed or determinable. Significant judgment is involved in assessing whether a fee is fixed
or determinable. Our experience has been that we are generally able to determine whether a fee is
fixed or determinable.
Our standard payment terms are normally within 90 days. In some circumstances we provide
extended payment terms, and in certain cases we consider amounts payable beyond 90 days but less
than 12 months to be fixed or determinable. In such cases, judgment is required in evaluating the
creditworthiness of the customer and the likelihood of a concession. We monitor our ability to
collect amounts due under the stated contractual terms of such arrangements and to date we have not
experienced any material concessions to this class of customer. Significant
22
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
judgment is involved in assessing whether a contractual amendment constitutes a concession. If
in the future we experience adverse changes in our ability to collect without concession the
amounts due under arrangements involving extended payment terms to this class of customer, we may
no longer be able to conclude that such amounts are fixed or determinable and probable of
collection, which could adversely affect our revenue in future periods.
Collection is probable We assess the probability of collection from each customer at
the outset of the arrangement based on a number of factors, including the customers payment
history and its current creditworthiness. If in our judgment collection of a fee is not probable,
we do not record revenue until the uncertainty is removed, which generally means revenue is
recognized upon our receipt of the cash payment. Our experience has been that we are generally able
to estimate whether collection is probable.
Generally we enter into arrangements that include multiple elements. Such arrangements
may include sales of software licenses and related support and maintenance services in conjunction
with application hosting services, Optimization services or professional and/or education services.
In these situations we must determine whether the various elements meet the applicable criteria to
be accounted for as separate elements. If the elements cannot be separated, revenue is recognized
once the revenue recognition criteria for the entire arrangement have been met or over the period
that our obligations to the customer are fulfilled, as appropriate. If the elements are determined
to be separable, revenue is allocated to the separate elements based on VSOE of fair value and
recognized separately for each element when the applicable revenue recognition criteria for each
element have been met. In accounting for these multiple element arrangements, we must make
determinations about whether elements can be accounted for separately and make estimates regarding
their relative fair values.
Recording revenue from arrangements that include application hosting services requires us
to estimate the expected life of the customer arrangement. Pursuant to the application of relevant
GAAP literature, ASC 605-25, Multiple Element Arrangements, our arrangements with application
hosting services are accounted for as one unit of accounting. In such situations, we recognize the
entire arrangement fee ratably over the term of the estimated life of the customer arrangement.
Based on our historical experience with our customers, we estimate the life of the typical customer
arrangement to be approximately four years.
Our VSOE of fair value for certain elements of an arrangement is based upon the pricing
in comparable transactions when the element is sold separately. VSOE of fair value for support and
maintenance is based upon our history of charging our customers stated annual renewal rates. VSOE
of fair value for professional services and education services is based on the price charged when
the services are sold separately. Annually, we evaluate whether or not we have maintained VSOE of
fair value for support and maintenance services and professional services. We have concluded that
we have maintained VSOE of fair value for both support and maintenance services and professional
services because the majority of our support and maintenance contract renewal rates and
professional service rates per personnel level fall in a narrow range of variability within each
service offering.
For multiple element arrangements, VSOE of fair value must exist to allocate the total
arrangement fee among all delivered and undelivered elements of a perpetual license arrangement. If
VSOE of fair value does not exist for all elements to support the allocation of the total fee among
all delivered and undelivered elements of the arrangement, revenue is deferred until such evidence
does exist for the undelivered elements, or until all elements are delivered, whichever is earlier.
If VSOE of fair value of all undelivered elements exists but VSOE of fair value does not exist for
one or more delivered elements, revenue is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual
method, the VSOE of fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred, and the remaining portion
of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue as the elements are delivered.
We also sell perpetual software licenses with application hosting services and/or
Optimization services. We do not have VSOE of fair value for either of these services. In these
situations all elements in the arrangement for which we receive up-front fees, which typically
include perpetual software fees, support and maintenance fees, and set-up and implementation fees,
are recognized as revenue either ratably over the period of providing the application hosting
service or Optimization services, or ratably over the longer of the service period or estimated
customer life, depending on the elements included in the arrangement. We allocate and classify
revenue in our statement of operations based on our evaluation of VSOE of fair value, or a proxy of
fair value thereof, available for each
23
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
applicable element of the transaction. We generally base our proxy of fair value on
arms-length negotiations for the contracted elements. This allocation methodology requires judgment
and is based on our analysis of our sales transactions.
Allowances for Accounts Receivable
We maintain allowances for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers
to make required payments. We perform credit reviews of each customer, monitor collections and
payments from our customers, and determine the allowance based upon historical experience and
specific customer collection issues. If the financial condition of our customers were to
deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances
would be required. In addition, we record allowances to revenue based on past credit memo history.
Research and Development Costs
We account for research and development costs for our software products that we license
to our customers in accordance with ASC 730-10, Accounting for Research and Development Costs, and
ASC 985-20, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise
Marketed, which specifies that costs incurred internally to develop computer software products
should be charged to expense as incurred until technological feasibility is reached for the
product. Once technological feasibility is reached, all software costs should be capitalized until
the product is made available for general release to customers. Judgment is required in determining
when technological feasibility is established. We believe that the time period from reaching
technological feasibility until the time of general product release is very short. Costs incurred
after technological feasibility is reached are not material, and accordingly, all such costs are
charged to research and development expense as incurred.
Costs incurred to develop software applications used internally in our Optimization
services are accounted for in accordance with ASC 350-10, Accounting for Computer Software
Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. Our capitalized costs include certain external direct costs
of materials and services incurred in developing or obtaining internal-use computer software and
payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who are directly associated with, and who devote
time to, the project. These costs generally consist of internal labor during configuration, coding,
and testing activities. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage or costs incurred for
data conversion activities, training, maintenance, and general and administrative or overhead costs
are expenses as incurred. Costs that cannot be separated between maintenance of, and relatively
minor upgrades and enhancements to, internal-use software are also expensed as incurred.
Capitalization begins when the preliminary project stage is complete, management with the relevant
authority authorizes and commits to the funding of the software project, it is probable the project
will be completed, the software will be used to perform the functions intended, and certain
functional and quality standards have been met. We evaluate any capitalized costs for impairment
whenever conditions or events indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be
recoverable.
Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets, including Intangible Assets
We review our long-lived assets, including intangible assets subject to amortization,
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such an asset may
not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of their carrying
amount to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If such assets
are considered impaired, the impairment to be recognized is equal to the amount by which the
carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value determined by either a quoted market price,
if any, or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique. In assessing
recoverability, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and discount
factors. If these estimates or related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to
record impairment charges. Intangible assets with determinable lives are amortized over their
estimated useful lives, based upon the pattern in which the expected benefits will be realized, or
on a straight-line basis, whichever is greater. We did not record any impairment charges in any of
the periods presented.
24
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and
intangible assets acquired in a business combination. In accordance with ASC 350-10, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, we evaluate goodwill for impairment annually on December 1, as well as
whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. Because we have one reporting segment under ASC 350-10, we utilize the entity-wide
approach for assessing goodwill for impairment and compare our market value to our net book value
to determine if impairment exists. No impairment of goodwill resulted from our evaluation of
goodwill in any of the periods presented, however in the future these impairment tests may result
in impairment losses that could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.
Accounting for Income Taxes
In connection with preparing our financial statements, we are required to compute income tax
expense in each jurisdiction in which we operate. This process requires us to project our current
tax liability and estimate our deferred tax assets and liabilities, including net operating loss
and tax credit carryforwards. We also are required to assess the need for a valuation allowance
against deferred tax assets. As part of this assessment, we have considered our recent operating
results, future taxable income projections, and all prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.
As of June 30, 2010 we maintained a full valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax
assets. We currently believe that we have not sustained profitability in amounts that are
sufficient to support a conclusion that a valuation allowance is no longer required. We believe
there is significant uncertainty in our future profits due to the growing breadth of our product
mix and the effect that can have on the timing of revenue recognition, and the related effect on
U.S. reported income. Specifically, we may be required to defer the recognition of revenue in
amounts greater than we are currently projecting. Assuming that, among other factors of positive
and negative evidence, we meet our estimates of 2010 forecasted earnings, we may release a portion
of our U.S. valuation allowance during the second half of 2010, which is consistent with the timing
of our annual forecasting exercise. Additionally, in connection with our January 2010 acquisition
of InstantService, we assessed the acquired deferred tax assets and liabilities and we released a
portion of our valuation allowance amounting to approximately $1.1 million as a result of acquired
net deferred tax liabilities. The release of the valuation allowance was recorded as a tax benefit
in our statement of operations in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations.
As of June 30, 2010, there was no change in our valuation allowance analysis relating to the
deferred tax assets in certain foreign jurisdictions. We continue to believe that the deferred tax
assets would more likely than not be realized based upon our expected future results from
operations in these jurisdictions.
We account for our uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740-10, Income Taxes. During
the quarter ended June 30, 2010, there was no change in our gross liability for unrecognized tax
benefits. As of June 30, 2010 we have recorded less than $0.1 million of interest and penalties in
our statement of operations and have accrued approximately $0.1 million of potential interest and
penalties in our statement of financial position. If the uncertain tax positions are ultimately
resolved in our favor, the effective tax rates in any future periods would be favorably affected by
approximately $0.4 million.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718-10, Compensation
Stock Compensation. Under the fair value recognition provisions of ASC 718-10, stock-based
compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is
recognized as expense over the vesting period. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to
estimate the fair value of our stock option awards. Estimating the fair value of stock-based awards
at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating the expected life of the stock awards and
the volatility of our underlying common stock. Changes to the assumptions may have a significant
impact on the fair value of stock options, which could have a material impact on our financial
statements. In addition, judgment is also required in estimating the amount of stock-based awards
that are expected to be forfeited. Should our actual forfeiture rates differ significantly from our
estimates, our stock-based compensation expense and results of operations could be materially
impacted.
25
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth statement of operations data as a percentage of total revenue
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product licenses |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
30.6 |
% |
|
|
31.1 |
% |
|
|
30.7 |
% |
Recurring services |
|
|
55.4 |
% |
|
|
54.1 |
% |
|
|
57.4 |
% |
|
|
54.6 |
% |
Professional and education services |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product licenses |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Recurring services |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
Professional and education services |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
31.7 |
% |
|
|
33.1 |
% |
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
|
33.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
68.3 |
% |
|
|
66.9 |
% |
|
|
67.3 |
% |
|
|
66.1 |
% |
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
31.4 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
31.8 |
% |
|
|
28.8 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
58.4 |
% |
|
|
56.0 |
% |
|
|
60.6 |
% |
|
|
56.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
Interest and other (expense) income, net |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
60.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
(0.4 |
)% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our cost of revenue as a percentage
of the related revenue and the related gross margins:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product license revenue |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
Gross margin on product license revenue |
|
|
96.9 |
% |
|
|
96.6 |
% |
|
|
96.4 |
% |
|
|
96.8 |
% |
Cost of recurring services revenue |
|
|
37.7 |
% |
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
37.1 |
% |
|
|
37.4 |
% |
Gross margin on recurring services revenue |
|
|
62.3 |
% |
|
|
63.7 |
% |
|
|
62.9 |
% |
|
|
62.6 |
% |
Cost of professional and education services revenue |
|
|
85.8 |
% |
|
|
80.7 |
% |
|
|
89.3 |
% |
|
|
85.1 |
% |
Gross margin on professional and education
services revenue |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
Product License Bookings
We use product license bookings, a non-GAAP financial measure, as an important measure of
growth in demand for our ATG Commerce and the success of our sales and marketing efforts. We define
product license bookings as the sale of perpetual software licenses regardless of the timing of
revenue recognition under GAAP. When considering the value of perpetual software licenses executed
during the period we use our judgment in
26
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
assessing collectability and likelihood of granting future concessions. Factors that we
consider include the financial condition of the customer and contractual provisions included in the
license contract.
The following table summarizes and reconciles to our product licenses revenue, as reported
under GAAP, our product license bookings for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
Product license bookings |
|
$ |
18,185 |
|
|
$ |
16,612 |
|
|
$ |
32,035 |
|
|
$ |
28,960 |
|
Increase in product license deferred revenue |
|
|
(5,632 |
) |
|
|
(7,292 |
) |
|
|
(10,851 |
) |
|
|
(11,978 |
) |
Product license deferred revenue recognized |
|
|
3,798 |
|
|
|
4,256 |
|
|
|
8,024 |
|
|
|
9,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product license revenue |
|
$ |
16,351 |
|
|
$ |
13,576 |
|
|
$ |
29,208 |
|
|
$ |
26,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product license bookings increased $1.6 million, or 9.5%, to $18.2 million and increased $3.1
million, or 10.6% to $32.0 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively,
when compared to the same periods in 2009. The increase in both cases reflects growth in the demand
for our e-commerce solutions and the success of our sales and marketing initiatives.
Product license bookings deferred was 31.0% and 44.0% of our total product license bookings
for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively and 34.0% and 41.4% respectively for
the six month periods then ended. The deferral of bookings is due to various factors which may
include e-commerce Optimization services or application hosting included in the arrangement for
which we do not have VSOE of fair value, extended payment terms in the arrangement, the inclusion
of hosting services in the arrangement which may require that revenue be deferred and recorded over
the estimated customer life, or other elements in our contracts that preclude recognition of
revenue at the time of booking. Deferred revenue will be recognized in future periods when delivery
of the service commences or as contractual requirements are met.
Product license deferred revenue recognized was $3.8 million and $4.3 million for the three
month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively and $8.0 million and $9.5 million
respectively for the six month periods then ended. All of the aforementioned amounts were
recognized upon the resolution of contractual conditions or other conditions that required their
initial deferral.
We expect third quarter 2010 product license bookings growth to be in the range of an 8% to
12% increase over the third quarter of 2009. We are currently forecasting that approximately 20% to
30% of our product license bookings will be deferred and recognized ratably and approximately $3.0
will be recognized from previously deferred license revenue.
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
Total revenue |
|
$ |
49,163 |
|
|
$ |
44,427 |
|
|
$ |
93,887 |
|
|
$ |
86,338 |
|
Total revenue increased $4.7 million, or 10.6%, to $49.2 million and increased $7.5 million,
or 8.7% to $93.9 million respectively in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 when compared
to the same periods in 2009. Revenue is derived from perpetual software licenses, recurring
services, which is comprised of support and maintenance services, application hosting services, and
e-commerce optimization services, and professional and education services. The revenue growth in
2010 is primarily due to a combined increase of $9.5 million, or 12.8%, product license and
recurring services revenues, which was partially offset by a decrease of $2.0 million, or 15.0%
27
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
in professional and education services. Information on revenue changes, by type, for the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same periods in 2009 is provided
below.
Revenue generated from international customers decreased to $13.4 million from $14.7 million
of total revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2010 when compared to the same period in
2009. In both the three month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 revenue generated from
international customers represented 27% of total revenues. International revenue also decreased to
$25.1 million, or 27% of total revenue from $25.4 million, or 30% of total revenue respectively for
the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The primary driver of the decrease in foreign
source revenues as a percentage of total revenues compared to similar periods in the prior year is
the addition of the InstantService business acquired January 8, 2010, as InstantServices customer
portfolio is primarily US based.
During the three month period ended June 30, 2010, one customer accounted for more than 10% of
total revenues and no customer accounted for more than 10% of revenues for the three month period
ended June 30, 2009 or the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
We expect third quarter 2010 revenues to be in the range of $47.0 million to $49.0 million.
Product Licenses Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
Product license revenue |
|
$ |
16,351 |
|
|
$ |
13,576 |
|
|
$ |
29,208 |
|
|
$ |
26,506 |
|
As a percent of total revenue |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
30.6 |
% |
|
|
31.1 |
% |
|
|
30.7 |
% |
Product license revenue increased $2.8 million, or 20.4%, to $16.4 million and increased $2.7
million, or 10.2% to $29.2 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively,
when compared to the same periods in 2009. The increase experienced in the three months ended June
30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 is based on an increase in product license bookings of
$1.6 million and a decrease in product license deferred revenue of $1.7 million offset by a
decrease in the recognition of previously deferred product license revenue of $0.5 million. The
increase experienced in the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 is
based on an increase in product license bookings of $3.1 million and a decrease in product license
deferred revenue of $1.1 million offset by a decrease in the recognition of previously deferred
product license revenue of $1.5 million. As noted above, bookings have increased due to increased
demand for our e-commerce solutions and the success of our sales and marketing initiatives.
Product license revenue generated from international customers was $4.4 million and $7.3
million respectively for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $3.8 million and
$10.5 million respectively for the same periods in 2009.
We expect product license revenues to be in the range of $11.0 million to $12.0 million in the
third quarter of 2010.
Recurring Services Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
Support and maintenance |
|
$ |
13,185 |
|
|
$ |
12,102 |
|
|
$ |
26,068 |
|
|
$ |
23,480 |
|
Optimization services and managed
application hosting services |
|
|
14,026 |
|
|
|
11,926 |
|
|
|
27,813 |
|
|
|
23,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recurring services revenue |
|
$ |
27,211 |
|
|
$ |
24,028 |
|
|
$ |
53,881 |
|
|
$ |
47,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percent of total revenue |
|
|
55.4 |
% |
|
|
54.1 |
% |
|
|
57.4 |
% |
|
|
54.6 |
% |
28
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
Our recurring services revenue increased $3.2 million, or 13.2%, to $27.2 million and
increased $6.7 million, or 14.3% to $53.9 million respectively in the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010 when compared to the same periods in 2009, as follows:
|
|
|
Support and maintenance revenue increased $1.1 million, or 8.9%, to $13.2 million and
increased $2.6 million, or 11.0% to $26.1 million respectively in the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010 when compared to the same periods in 2009 primarily based on continued
renewal rates in excess of 90% and growth in our installed base of ATG e-commerce software. |
|
|
|
|
e-Commerce optimization services and managed application hosting services revenue
increased $2.1 million, or 17.6%, to $14.0 million and increased $4.2 million, or 17.6% to
$27.8 million respectively in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 when compared to
the same periods in 2009 primarily based on the inclusion of the revenues of InstantService
not included in the prior year and growth in the average contract size for customers
purchasing e-commerce Optimization services. |
Recurring service revenue generated from international customers was $6.5 million and $13.3
million respectively for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $6.8 million and
$12.6 million respectively for the same periods in 2009.
We expect recurring services revenue to be in the range of $29.0 million to $30.0 million in
the third quarter of 2010.
Professional and Education Services Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
Professional and education services revenue |
|
$ |
5,601 |
|
|
$ |
6,823 |
|
|
$ |
10,798 |
|
|
$ |
12,701 |
|
As a percent of total revenue |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
Professional and education services revenue consists primarily of revenue from consulting and
implementation services, which typically are performed in the quarters closely following the
execution of a product license transaction. Our professional services and education revenue
decreased $1.2 million, or 17.9%, to $5.6 million and decreased $1.9 million, or 15.0% to $10.8
million respectively in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 when compared to the same
periods in 2009, primarily due to the winding down of the government funded research business that
we acquired with CleverSet in 2008.
Professional services and education revenue generated from international customers was $2.5
million and $4.5 million respectively for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to
$1.3 million and $3.2 million respectively for the same periods in 2009.
We expect professional and education services revenue to be in the range of $6.0 million to
$7.0 million in third quarter of 2010.
Cost of Product License Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
Cost of product license revenue |
|
$ |
512 |
|
|
$ |
457 |
|
|
$ |
1,046 |
|
|
$ |
847 |
|
As a percent of license revenue |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Gross margin on product license revenue |
|
$ |
15,838 |
|
|
$ |
13,118 |
|
|
$ |
28,161 |
|
|
$ |
25,658 |
|
As a percent of license revenue |
|
|
96.9 |
% |
|
|
96.6 |
% |
|
|
96.4 |
% |
|
|
96.8 |
% |
29
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
Cost of product license revenue includes salary, benefits and stock-based compensation costs
of fulfillment and engineering staff dedicated to maintenance of products that are in general
release, the amortization of licenses purchased in support of and used in our products, royalties
paid to vendors whose technology is incorporated into our products and amortization expense related
to acquired developed technology. Variations in our cost of product license revenue did not
materially influence our results of operations in the periods presented.
Cost of Recurring Services Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
Cost of recurring services revenue |
|
$ |
10,254 |
|
|
$ |
8,722 |
|
|
$ |
19,970 |
|
|
$ |
17,619 |
|
As a percent of recurring services revenue |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
Gross margin on recurring services revenue |
|
$ |
16,957 |
|
|
$ |
15,306 |
|
|
$ |
33,911 |
|
|
$ |
29,512 |
|
As a percent of recurring services revenue |
|
|
62.3 |
% |
|
|
63.7 |
% |
|
|
62.9 |
% |
|
|
62.6 |
% |
Cost of recurring services revenues includes salary, benefits, and stock-based compensation
and other costs for recurring services support staff, costs associated with the hosting centers,
third-party contractors, amortization of technology acquired in connection with acquisitions, and
royalties.
When we perform professional consulting and implementation services in connection with managed
application hosting arrangements we generally defer the direct costs incurred prior to delivery of
the element related to the performance of these services. Deferred costs are amortized to cost of
revenue ratably over the longer of the contract term or the estimated life of the arrangement once
services commence.
Cost of recurring services revenue increased $1.7 million, or 17.6%, to $17.0 million and
increased $4.4 million, or 13.3% to $33.9 million respectively in the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010 when compared to the same periods in 2009. The increase in cost of recurring
services in the three and six month periods in 2010 is primarily due to increased salary and
benefit related costs.
We expect third quarter 2010 recurring services gross margin to be in the low 60% range.
Cost of Professional and Education Services Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
Cost of professional and education services revenue |
|
$ |
4,807 |
|
|
$ |
5,505 |
|
|
$ |
9,647 |
|
|
$ |
10,807 |
|
As a percent of recurring professional and education
services revenue |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
Gross margin on professional and education services revenue |
|
$ |
794 |
|
|
$ |
1,318 |
|
|
$ |
1,151 |
|
|
$ |
1,894 |
|
As a percent of professional and education services revenue |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
30
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
Cost of professional and education services revenues includes salary, benefits, and
stock-based compensation and other costs for professional services and technical support staff and
third-party contractors.
Cost of professional and education services revenue decreased $0.7 million, or 12.7%, to $4.8
million and decreased $1.2 million, or 10.7% to $9.6 million respectively in the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010 when compared to the same periods in 2009. The decrease in cost of
professional and education services in the three and six month periods in 2010 primarily relates to
increases in costs deferred on multiple element arrangements that will not be recorded until
recognition of revenue commences, of $1.5 million and $2.4 million respectively in the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2010 over the same periods in 2009. These were partially offset
by an increase in salary and benefit related costs of $0.3 million and $0.5 million respectively in
the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same periods in 2009.
We expect third quarter 2010 professional and education services gross margin to be 5% to 10%.
Research and Development Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
Research and development expenses |
|
$ |
8,149 |
|
|
$ |
7,663 |
|
|
$ |
16,810 |
|
|
$ |
15,133 |
|
As a percent of total revenue |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salary, benefits, and stock-based
compensation costs to support product development. To date all of our software development costs
have been expensed as research and development costs in the period incurred.
Research and development expenses increased $0.5 million, or 6.3%, to $8.2 million and
increased $1.7 million, or 11.1% to $16.8 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2009. Over the same periods, research and
development expenses as a percentage of total revenue remained consistent. The increase for the
three month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 is primarily related to
increases in salary and benefit expenses of $0.7 million offset by a credit of $0.3 million
received in a grant from the government of the United Kingdom as part of their Invest in Northern
Ireland program as well as greater capitalization of costs over the prior year. Increases in salary
and benefits were a result of increased headcount over the prior year. The increase for the six
month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 primarily relates to increases
in salary and benefit expenses of $1.5 million offset by the aforementioned $0.3 received from the
government of the United Kingdom.
During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010, we capitalized $0.4 million and
$0.6 million, respectively, in certain internal use software development costs related to our
optimization and hosting services in accordance with ASC 350-40, Internal-Use Software. We
capitalized $0.2 million and $0.3 million respectively during the same periods in 2009.
Sales and Marketing Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
Sales and marketing expenses |
|
$ |
15,450 |
|
|
$ |
12,541 |
|
|
$ |
29,879 |
|
|
$ |
24,829 |
|
As a percent of total revenue |
|
|
31.4 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
31.8 |
% |
|
|
28.8 |
% |
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions, benefits, and
stock-based compensation and other related costs for sales and marketing personnel, travel, public
relations and marketing
31
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
materials and events. We generally recognize commission expense upon contract execution with
the result that commission expense may be recognized earlier than the related revenue.
Sales and marketing expenses increased $2.9 million, or 23.2%, to $15.5 million and increased
$5.1 million, or 20.3% to $29.9 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2009. Over the same periods, sales and marketing
expenses as a percentage of total revenue increased 3.0% compared to the three and six month
periods in the prior year. The increase for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to
the same period in 2009 is primarily related to increases in salary and benefit expenses, primarily
driven by commissions due to higher bookings, of $1.7 million and $0.4 million in travel related
expenses. The increase for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in
2009 primarily relates to increases in salary and benefit expenses, primarily driven by commissions
due to higher bookings, of $2.8 million, $0.7 million in travel related expenses and $0.6 million
in marketing costs.
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
5,114 |
|
|
$ |
4,670 |
|
|
$ |
10,239 |
|
|
$ |
9,159 |
|
As a percent of total revenue |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits, and stock-based
compensation and other related costs for internal systems, finance, human resources, legal and
executive related functions.
General and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million, or 9.5%, to $5.1 million and
increased $1.0 million, or 11.8% to $10.2 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2009. Over the same periods, general and
administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues remained relatively stable at 10-11%.
The increase for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 is
primarily related to an increase in salary and benefit expenses of $0.5 million and the increase
for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 primarily relates
to increases in salary and benefit expenses of $1.1 million.
We expect total operating expenses to be in the range of $28.0 million to $29.0 million in the
third quarter of 2010.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
Stock-based compensation expense was $2.4 million for both three month periods ended June 30,
2010 and 2009 and was $4.9 million and $4.4 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010
and 2009 respectively, and is reflected in our costs and expenses above based on the function of
the relevant personnel. As of June 30, 2010, the total compensation cost related to unvested
awards not yet recognized in the statement of operations was approximately $23.3 million, which
will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.2 years.
We expect stock-based compensation expense to be approximately $3.0 million in the third
quarter of 2010.
Interest and Other (Expense) Income, Net
Interest and other income, net was $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively and $(0.2) million and $0.6 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively. The decreases realized for both the three and six month
periods compared to the same periods in 2009 primarily related to unfavorable changes in foreign
exchange rates.
32
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
Provision for Income Taxes
The income tax provision in the amount of $0.4 million and income tax benefit of $0.4 million
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, related to the U.S. alternative
minimum tax (AMT) state and foreign income taxes as well as interest related to uncertain tax
positions. The utilization of tax loss carryforwards is limited in the calculation of AMT and, as
a result, a federal tax charge was recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009. The AMT liability is available as a credit against future tax obligations upon the full
utilization or expiration of our net operating loss carryforward. Included in the $0.4 million
benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is approximately $1.1 million related to the
reversal of the valuation allowance on certain deferred tax assets as described below.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded income tax provisions of $0.6
million and $0.9 million, respectively, which related to foreign taxes on earnings in certain of
our foreign subsidiaries as well as interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, we recorded net deferred tax liabilities of
approximately $1.1 million related to basis differences resulting from the acquisition of
InstantService. As a result of the InstantService acquisition, we released a portion of our
valuation allowance amounting to approximately $1.1 million to offset the impact of the deferred
tax liabilities acquired on our pre-acquisition net deferred tax asset balance. In accordance with
ASC 805, Business Combinations, the release of the valuation allowance was recorded as a tax
benefit in our statement of operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our capital requirements relate primarily to labor costs, facilities, employee and
customer infrastructure, and working capital requirements. Our primary sources of liquidity at June
30, 2010 were our cash, cash equivalents, short and long-term marketable securities of $171.0
million, including $0.8 million of restricted cash used to collateralize letters of credit, and our
cash flows from operations.
Cash provided by operating activities was $17.6 million for the six months ended June 30,
2010, an increase of $4.6 million compared to the same period in the prior year. This difference is
primarily driven by an increase in cash inflows related to deferred revenue of $12.7 million to
$13.4 million compared to $0.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009 being offset by
increased cash outflows related to deferred costs, accounts payable and prepaid and other assets
over the same periods of $2.8 million, $4.1 million and $2.8 million respectively. The increase in
deferred revenue is being driven by improved renewal rates for support maintenance contracts and
the entrance into certain hosting contracts and professional service engagements during the six
months ended June 30, 2010 which require the deferral of revenue. The change in deferred costs
relates to work performed on projects where both costs and revenues are being deferred until
certain contractual terms are met and the increased cash outflows related to accounts payable are
due to timing of vendor payments during the period. Finally, the change in our prepaid expenses
and other current assets account is primarily related to payment of rent and information technology
related support fees during the six months ended June 30, 2010 coupled with the recording of $1.4
million in interest receivable related to our portfolio of marketable securities.
Net cash used in investing activities was $129.3 million for the six months ended June 30,
2010, an increase of $126.1 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The difference
is primarily driven by a net cash outflow in purchases/settlements of marketable securities of
$106.7 million as a result of cash raised from our equity offering coupled with a cash outflow of
$15.2 million related to our acquisition of InstantService, net of cash acquired.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $92.9 million for the six months ended June
30, 2010, an increase of $92.7 million compared to the same period in the prior year. The
difference between the periods primarily relates to a cash inflow of $95.0 million in net proceeds
from our February 2010 equity offering being offset by cash outflows related to repayment of debt
acquired as part of the purchase of InstantService and increased payment of employee withholding
taxes related to RSU vesting in the amounts of $1.6 million and $1.3 million respectively.
33
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
We believe that our cash equivalents, and marketable securities, along with other working
capital and cash expected to be generated by our operations, will allow us to meet our liquidity
requirements over at least the next twelve months and for the foreseeable future; however, our
actual cash requirements will depend on many factors, including particularly, overall economic
conditions both domestically and abroad. We may find it necessary or advisable to seek additional
external funds through public or private securities offerings, strategic alliances or other
financing sources. There can be no assurance that if we seek external funding, it will be available
on favorable terms, if at all.
We expect third quarter 2010 cash flow from operations to be in the range of $8.0 million
to $10.0 million.
On October 27, 2009 our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program providing for
the repurchase of up to $25.0 million of our outstanding common stock in the open market or in
privately negotiated transactions, at times and prices considered appropriate depending on the
prevailing market conditions. This authorization was in addition to the remaining $3.9 million
under our existing $20.0 million repurchase program authorized in April 2007. During the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we repurchased no shares of our common stock. For the life of the
stock repurchase program through June 30, 2010, we have repurchased 6,690,095 shares of its common
stock at a cost of $16.1 million
Accounts Receivable and Days Sales Outstanding
Information about our accounts receivable balance and days sales outstanding for the quarters
ended June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the |
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Days sales outstanding |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
49,163 |
|
|
$ |
49,663 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
44,963 |
|
|
$ |
41,522 |
|
Percent of accounts receivable less than 60 days |
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
We evaluate our performance on collections on a quarterly basis. As of June 30, 2010, our days
sales outstanding increased from December 31, 2009 due to timing of sales and associated billings
during the quarter, as well as the effect of receiving payments on sales made during the current
and previous quarters.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, Multiple Element Arrangements. ASU 2009-13
addresses the determination of when the individual deliverables included in a multiple arrangement
may be treated as separate units of accounting. ASU 2009-13 also modifies the manner in which the
transaction consideration is allocated across separately identified deliverables and establishes
definitions for determining fair value of elements in an arrangement. This standard must be adopted
by us no later than January 1, 2011, with earlier adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating
the impact, if any, that this standard update will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures:
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which amends ASC 820-10, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures. ASU 2010-06 requires additional disclosures for transfers in and out
of Levels 1 and 2 fair value classifications and for activity in Level 3 and clarifies certain
other existing disclosure requirements. It also clarifies existing fair value disclosures regarding
the level of disaggregation and the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. We
adopted ASU 2010-06 beginning January 15, 2010. This adoption had no impact on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
34
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We maintain an investment portfolio consisting mainly of money market funds, commercial paper,
corporate obligations, and government obligations with a weighted average maturity of less than one
year. These available-for-sale securities are subject to interest rate risk. However, a 10% change
in interest rates would not have a material impact to the fair values of these securities at June
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 primarily due to their short maturity and our intent to hold the
securities to maturity. There have been no significant changes subsequent to June 30, 2010.
The majority of our operations are based in the U.S., and accordingly, the majority of our
transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars. However, we have foreign-based operations where
transactions are denominated in foreign currencies and are subject to market risk with respect to
fluctuations in the relative value of foreign currencies. Our primary foreign currency exposures
relate to our short-term intercompany balances with our foreign subsidiaries and accounts
receivables valued in the United Kingdom in U.S. dollars. Our primary foreign subsidiaries have
functional currencies denominated in the British pound and Euro, and foreign denominated assets and
liabilities are remeasured each reporting period with any exchange gains and losses recorded in our
consolidated statements of operations. Based on currency exposures existing at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, a 10% movement in foreign exchange rates would not expose us to significant
gains or losses in earnings or cash flows. We may use derivative instruments to manage the risk of
exchange rate fluctuations. However, at June 30, 2010, we had no outstanding derivative
instruments. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2010.
The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), means controls and other
procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a
company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure
controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the companys management, including its
principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter
how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives
and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures
as of June 30, 2010, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of
such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
As previously disclosed, in December 2001, a purported class action complaint was filed
against our wholly owned subsidiary Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc., two former officers of Primus
and the underwriters of Primus 1999 initial public offering. The complaints are similar and allege
violations of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
primarily based on the allegation that the underwriters received undisclosed compensation in
connection with Primus initial public offering. The litigation has been coordinated in
35
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York with claims against
approximately 300 other companies that had initial public offerings during the same general time
period. The parties have reached a global settlement of the litigation under which insurance will
pay the full amount of the settlement share allocated to Primus, and Primus bears no financial
liability. In October 2009, the Court issued an order granting final approval of the settlement.
Certain objectors are appealing the final order. While we cannot predict the outcome of the
litigation, we do not expect any material adverse impact to our business, or the results of our
operations, from this matter.
In May 2009, LivePerson, Inc. (LivePerson) commenced an action in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York against InstantService. In the action,
LivePerson alleges that InstantService infringes two United States patents held by LivePerson and
seeks injunctive relief, damages and attorneys fees. In April
2010, InstantService asserted counter-claims against LivePerson, alleging that LivePerson
infringes one of InstantServices patents and is seeking injunctive relief, damages and attorneys
fees. In May 2010, we joined the action and filed counter claims against LivePerson,
alleging that LivePerson infringes two of our patents and we are seeking injunctive relief, damages
and attorneys fees against LivePerson. Discovery in the LivePerson action has not yet commenced. We are investigating
the claims made by LivePerson and have reached no conclusion as to the likelihood of an adverse
outcome in the litigation, which we intend to contest vigorously.
Our industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents, trademarks and
copyrights, and by increasingly frequent litigation based on allegations of infringement or other
violations of intellectual property rights. Some of our competitors in the market for e-commerce
software and services have filed or may file patent applications covering aspects of their
technology that they may claim our technology infringes. Such competitors could make claims of
infringement against us with respect to our products and technology. Additionally, third parties
who are not actively engaged in providing e-commerce products or services but who hold or acquire
patents upon which they may allege our current or future products or services infringe may make
claims of infringement against us or our customers. Our agreements with our customers typically
require us to indemnify them against claims of intellectual property infringement resulting from
their use of our products and services with certain industry-standard
exceptions. We periodically receive notices from customers regarding
patent license inquiries they have received which may or may not implicate our indemnity
obligations, and certain of our customers are currently parties to litigation in which it is
alleged that the patent rights of others are infringed by our products or services. Any litigation
over intellectual property rights, whether brought by us or by others, could result in the
expenditure of significant financial resources and the diversion of managements time and efforts.
In addition, litigation in which we or our customers are accused of infringement might cause
product shipment or service delivery delays, require us to develop alternative technology or
require us to enter into royalty or license agreements, which might not be available on acceptable
terms, or at all. We could incur substantial costs in prosecuting or defending any intellectual
property litigation. These claims, whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming, result in
costly litigation, require expensive changes in our methods of doing business or could require us
to enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements, if available. As a result, these claims could
harm our business.
The ultimate outcome of any litigation is uncertain, and either unfavorable or favorable
outcomes could have a material negative impact on our results of operations, consolidated balance
sheets and cash flows, due to defense costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. To the best of our knowledge, as of the date of this report there has been no
material change in any of the risk factors described in that Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
36
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. (Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers
At our annual meeting of stockholders on May 24, 2010, our stockholders approved amendments to
the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan (the 1996 Plan), in which our executive officers
are entitled to participate. As more fully set forth in our definitive proxy materials for the
meeting, the principal purposes of the amendments were to:
|
|
|
Increase the number of shares issuable under the 1996 Plan by 14,000,000 shares; |
|
|
|
|
Alter the ratio within the 1996 Plan that determines how full value awards, such as
grants of restricted stock, are counted against the number of shares reserved for issuance
under the plan, which we refer to as the fungibility ratio, from the then-current ratio
of 1.24 to a new ratio of 1.39; and |
|
|
|
|
Extend the term of the 1996 Plan by six years until December 31, 2019. |
Additionally, on April 21, 2010, our Board of Directors (Board) approved an amendment to the
1996 Plan providing that (a) time-based awards, other than options or SARS, shall vest in full no
earlier than three (3) years from the date of grant and (b) performance-based awards, other than
options or SARS, shall vest in full no earlier than one year from the date of the grant.
Notwithstanding the above, the Board may grant awards that do not conform to such vesting
requirements, so long as the aggregate number of shares of common stock subject to all such
non-conforming awards outstanding at any time does not exceed ten percent (10%) of the shares of
common stock then subject to the 1996 Plan.
The 1996 Plan, as amended and restated, is attached as Exhibit 10.1 to this Quarterly Report.
37
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits
1.1 |
|
Equity Underwriting Agreement dated February 5, 2010 with Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and
Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated, as representatives of the several underwriters named
therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to our current report on Form 8-K filed on
February 1, 2010). |
|
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated June 12, 2003). |
|
3.2 |
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on April 23, 2008). |
|
4.1 |
|
Rights Agreement dated September 26, 2001 with EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 2, 2001). |
|
10.1 |
|
Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan*. |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
101++ |
|
The following materials from Art Technology Group, Inc.s
Quarterly Report on From 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2010, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i)
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv)
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,
tagged as blocks of text. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan. |
++ |
|
Furnished herewith |
38
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ ROBERT D. BURKE
|
|
|
|
Robert D. Burke |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ JULIE M.B. BRADLEY
|
|
|
|
Julie M.B. Bradley |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
Date: August 2, 2010
39