e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _____ to _____
Commission file number: 000-22839
Globecomm Systems Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
11-3225567
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 Oser Avenue,
Hauppauge, NY
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
11788
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (631) 231-9800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of February 5, 2010, there were 21,308,673 shares of the registrants Common Stock
outstanding.
GLOBECOMM SYSTEMS INC.
Index to the December 31, 2009 Form 10-Q
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
GLOBECOMM SYSTEMS INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
49,694 |
|
|
$ |
44,034 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
38,849 |
|
|
|
45,438 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
25,001 |
|
|
|
17,043 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,149 |
|
|
|
2,292 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
116,751 |
|
|
|
109,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets, net |
|
|
36,552 |
|
|
|
33,379 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
26,728 |
|
|
|
25,613 |
|
Intangibles, net |
|
|
10,317 |
|
|
|
11,020 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8,749 |
|
|
|
10,214 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
200,541 |
|
|
$ |
191,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
24,419 |
|
|
$ |
22,468 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
7,012 |
|
|
|
5,259 |
|
Accrued payroll and related fringe benefits |
|
|
3,870 |
|
|
|
4,348 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
5,313 |
|
|
|
3,146 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
40,614 |
|
|
|
35,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Junior Participating, shares
authorized, issued and outstanding: none at
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value, 50,000,000
shares authorized, shares issued: 21,667,307
at December 31, 2009 and 21,339,807 at June
30, 2009 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
185,827 |
|
|
|
184,736 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(24,606 |
) |
|
|
(27,248 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 465,351 shares at
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 |
|
|
(2,781 |
) |
|
|
(2,781 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
158,561 |
|
|
|
154,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
200,541 |
|
|
$ |
191,539 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
GLOBECOMM SYSTEMS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from infrastructure solutions |
|
$ |
23,512 |
|
|
$ |
21,334 |
|
|
$ |
42,580 |
|
|
$ |
44,873 |
|
Revenues from services |
|
|
33,570 |
|
|
|
18,643 |
|
|
|
62,178 |
|
|
|
37,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
57,082 |
|
|
|
39,977 |
|
|
|
104,758 |
|
|
|
82,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs from infrastructure solutions |
|
|
19,838 |
|
|
|
17,009 |
|
|
|
35,633 |
|
|
|
37,309 |
|
Costs from services |
|
|
25,483 |
|
|
|
14,185 |
|
|
|
46,085 |
|
|
|
28,390 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
3,671 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
|
|
6,873 |
|
|
|
6,329 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
5,216 |
|
|
|
3,703 |
|
|
|
10,731 |
|
|
|
7,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and operating expenses |
|
|
54,970 |
|
|
|
38,622 |
|
|
|
100,835 |
|
|
|
80,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
3,923 |
|
|
|
2,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
2,245 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
2,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,401 |
|
|
$ |
948 |
|
|
$ |
2,642 |
|
|
$ |
1,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used in the
calculation of basic net income
per common share |
|
|
20,437 |
|
|
|
20,193 |
|
|
|
20,400 |
|
|
|
20,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used in the
calculation of diluted net income
per common share |
|
|
20,840 |
|
|
|
20,416 |
|
|
|
20,812 |
|
|
|
20,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
GLOBECOMM SYSTEMS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
21,340 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
184,736 |
|
|
$ |
(27,248 |
) |
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
$ |
(2,781 |
) |
|
$ |
154,812 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
Grant of restricted shares |
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,642 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
21,667 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
185,827 |
|
|
$ |
(24,606 |
) |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
$ |
(2,781 |
) |
|
$ |
158,561 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
GLOBECOMM SYSTEMS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,642 |
|
|
$ |
1,776 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,421 |
|
|
|
2,747 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
Tax benefit from stock compensation plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
5,806 |
|
|
|
13,987 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(7,945 |
) |
|
|
(3,861 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
(542 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,912 |
|
|
|
(5,683 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
1,753 |
|
|
|
(2,715 |
) |
Accrued payroll and related fringe benefits |
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
(1,476 |
) |
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
11,508 |
|
|
|
6,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of fixed assets |
|
|
(5,883 |
) |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(5,883 |
) |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
5,660 |
|
|
|
5,193 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
44,034 |
|
|
|
51,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
49,694 |
|
|
$ |
56,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
See accompanying notes.
6
GLOBECOMM SYSTEMS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial
information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments)
considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for such periods have been included.
The consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009 has been derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial
statements. The results of operations for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009, are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending June
30, 2010, or for any future period.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009
and the accompanying notes thereto contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 14, 2009.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Globecomm Network Services Corporation (GNSC), Globecomm Services Maryland (GSM),
Cachendo LLC (Cachendo), B.V. Mach 6 (Mach 6), Telaurus Communications LLC (Telaurus) and
Melat Networks Inc. (Melat) (collectively, the Company). All significant intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in for its production-type contracts that are sold separately
as standard satellite ground segment systems when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the
selling price is fixed or determinable, collectibility is reasonably assured, delivery has occurred
and the contractual performance specifications have been met. The Companys standard satellite
ground segment systems produced in connection with these contracts are typically short-term (less
than twelve months in term) and manufactured using a standard modular production process. Such
systems require less engineering, drafting and design efforts than the Companys long-term complex
production-type projects. Revenue is recognized on the Companys standard satellite ground segment systems
upon shipment and acceptance of factory performance testing which is when title transfers to the
customer. The amount of revenues recorded on each standard production-type contract is reduced by
the customers contractual holdback amount, which typically requires 10% to 30% of the contract
value to be retained by the customer until installation and final acceptance is complete. The
customer generally becomes obligated to pay 70% to 90% of the contract value upon shipment and
acceptance of factory performance testing. Installation is not deemed to be essential to the
functionality of the system since installation does not require significant changes to the features
or capabilities of the system, does not require complex software integration and interfacing and
the Company has not experienced any difficulties installing such equipment. In addition, the
customer or other third party vendors can install the system. The estimated relative fair value of
the installation services is determined by
7
management, which is typically less than the customers
contractual holdback percentage. If the holdback is less than the fair value of installation, the
Company will defer recognition of revenues, determined on a contract-by-contract basis equal to the
fair value of the installation services. Payments received in advance by customers are deferred
until shipment and are presented as deferred revenues in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
The Company recognizes revenue using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting upon
the achievement of certain contractual milestones for its non-standard, complex production-type
contracts for the production of satellite ground segment systems and equipment that are generally
integrated into the customers satellite ground segment network. The equipment and systems produced
in connection with these contracts are typically long-term (in excess of twelve months in term) and
require significant customer-specific engineering, drafting and design effort in order to
effectively integrate all of the customizable earth station equipment into the customers ground
segment network. These contracts generally have larger contract values, greater economic risks and
substantive specific contractual performance requirements due to the engineering and design
complexity of such systems and related equipment. Progress payments received in advance by
customers are netted against the inventory balances in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
Contract costs generally include purchased materials (including shipping and handling costs),
direct labor and related overhead expenses, project-related travel and living costs and
subcontractor salaries. Anticipated contracted losses are recognized, as they become known.
Revenues from services consist of managed network services and lifecycle support services for
a broad variety of communications applications. Service revenues are recognized ratably over the
period in which services are provided. Payments received in advance of services are deferred until
the period such services are provided and are presented as deferred revenues in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
Costs from Infrastructure Solutions
Costs from infrastructure solutions consist primarily of the costs of purchased materials
(including shipping and handling costs), direct labor and related overhead expenses,
project-related travel and living costs and subcontractor salaries.
Costs from Services
Costs from services relating to Internet-based services consist primarily of satellite space
segment charges, Internet connectivity fees, voice termination costs and network operations
expenses. Satellite space segment charges consist of the costs associated with obtaining satellite
bandwidth (the measure of capacity) used in the transmission of services to and from the satellites
leased from operators. Network operations expenses consist primarily of costs associated with the
operation of the network operation centers, on a twenty-four hour a day, seven-day a week basis,
including personnel and related costs and depreciation.
Research and Development
Research and development expenditures are expensed as incurred.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock compensation expense was approximately $632,000 and $1,064,000 for the three and
six months ended December 31, 2009, respectively. Stock compensation expense was approximately
$339,000 and $1,220,000 for the three and six months ended December 31, 2008, respectively. The
expense in the six months ended December 31, 2008 includes approximately $675,000 related to the
accelerated vesting of the Companys former Presidents outstanding restricted stock awards due to
his passing away on July 20, 2008. As of December 31, 2009, there was approximately $235,000 of
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested outstanding stock options. The cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years. As of December 31, 2009,
there was approximately $4,629,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested
stock-based compensation related to restricted shares. The cost is expected to be recognized over
a weighted-average period of 2.3 years.
8
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of businesses over the fair value of the
identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets are tested
for impairment at least annually. The impairment test for goodwill uses a two-step approach, which
is performed at the reporting unit level. Step one compares the fair value of the reporting unit
(calculated using a discounted cash flow method) to its carrying value. If the carrying value
exceeds the fair value, there is a potential impairment and step two must be performed. Step two
compares the carrying value of the reporting units goodwill to its implied fair value (i.e., fair
value of the reporting unit less the fair value of the units assets and liabilities, including
identifiable intangible assets). If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value,
the excess is required to be recorded as an impairment charge.
The net carrying value of goodwill was approximately $26,728,000 and $25,613,000 at December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively, which relates to the services reporting unit. The
Company performs the goodwill impairment test annually in the fourth quarter. There were no events
in the six months ended December 31, 2009 that would have indicated that goodwill and indefinite
life intangible assets were impaired. During the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company
recorded additional goodwill of approximately $1,115,000 related to the issuance of common shares
and cash on January 22, 2010 to the former owners of Telaurus, as the first milestone of the
earn-out provision under the terms of the purchase agreement was achieved.
Intangibles subject to amortization consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Est. useful life |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
10,574 |
|
|
$ |
10,574 |
|
|
8-18 years |
Software |
|
|
1,162 |
|
|
|
1,162 |
|
|
5 years |
Contracts backlog |
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
6- 8 months |
Covenant not to compete |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
3-4 years |
Trademark |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,883 |
|
|
|
12,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated amortization |
|
|
2,566 |
|
|
|
1,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles, net |
|
$ |
10,317 |
|
|
$ |
11,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense of approximately $269,000 and $703,000 was included in general and
administrative expenses in the three and six months ended December 31, 2009, respectively.
Amortization expense of $99,000 and $197,000 was included in general and administrative expenses in
the three and six months ended December 31, 2008, respectively.
Total remaining amortization expense for the following fiscal years related to these
intangible assets is expected to be as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
584 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,148 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,147 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,132 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1,107 |
|
Income Taxes
Deferred Tax Assets
The Company regularly estimates the ability to recover deferred income taxes, reports such deferred
tax assets at the amount that is determined to be more-likely-than-not recoverable, and estimates
income taxes in each of
9
the taxing jurisdictions in which the Company operates. This process involves estimating
current tax expense together with assessing any temporary differences resulting from the different
treatment of certain items, such as the timing for recognizing revenue and expenses for tax and
accounting purposes. These differences may result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are
included in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company is required to assess the likelihood that
the deferred tax assets, which include net operating loss carry forwards and temporary differences
that are expected to be deductible in future years, will be recoverable from future taxable income
or other tax planning strategies. If recovery is not likely, a valuation allowance must be provided
based on estimates of future taxable income in the various taxing jurisdictions, and the amount of
deferred taxes that are ultimately realizable. The provision for current and deferred taxes
involves evaluations and judgments of uncertainties in the interpretation of complex tax
regulations. This evaluation considers several factors, including an estimate of the likelihood of
generating sufficient taxable income in future periods, the effect of temporary differences, the
expected reversal of deferred tax liabilities, and available tax planning strategies.
Uncertainty in Tax Positions
The Company recognizes in its financial statements the benefits of tax return positions if
that tax position is more likely than not to be sustained on audit, based on its technical merits.
At December 31, 2009, the Company had a liability for unrecognized tax benefits of approximately
$106,000 which if recognized in the future, would favorably impact the Companys effective tax
rate. The Company records both accrued interest and penalties related to income tax matters, if
any, in the provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
At December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the Company had not accrued any amounts for the potential
payment of penalties and interest.
The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various state and foreign taxing
jurisdictions. The Companys federal tax returns for the 2006 through 2008 tax years remain subject
to examination. The Company files in numerous state jurisdictions with varying statutes of
limitation.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009 of approximately
$1,403,000 and $2,658,000 includes a foreign currency translation gain of approximately $2,000 and
$16,000, respectively.
Product Warranties
The Company offers warranties on its contracts, the specific terms and conditions of which
vary depending upon the contract and work performed. Generally, a basic limited warranty,
including parts and labor, is provided to customers for one year. The Company can recoup certain
of these costs through product warranties it holds with its original equipment manufacturers, which
typically have terms of one year. Historically, warranty expense has been minimal, however,
management periodically assesses the need for any additional warranty reserve.
Subsequent Events
In the preparation of its consolidated financial statements, the Company considered subsequent
events through February 9, 2010, which was the date the Companys consolidated financial statements
were issued.
In January 2010, the Company entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to
purchase approximately 2.3 million Euros (approximately $3.3 million) to cover
specific purchase commitments for an infrastructure program.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On July 1, 2009 the Company adopted the accounting pronouncement relating to business
combinations, including assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies. Changes
for business combination transactions pursuant to this pronouncement include, among others, expensing
acquisition-related transaction costs as
10
incurred, the recognition of contingent consideration arrangements at their acquisition date fair
value and capitalization of in-process research and development assets acquired at their
acquisition date fair value. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on
our financial position and results of operations in the six months ended December 31, 2009, but
could have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations depending on the
nature of any future acquisitions.
The Company adopted the accounting pronouncement regarding the general standards of accounting
for, and disclosure of, events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial
statements are issued. This pronouncement was effective prospectively for interim and annual
reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009.
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13 (ASU 2009-13),
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements which updates ASC Topic 605-25, Multiple Elements
Arrangements, of the FASB codification. ASU 2009-13 provides new guidance on how to determine if
an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting, and if so
allows companies to allocate arrangement considerations in a manner more consistent with the
economics of the transaction. ASU 2009-13 is effective for the Company, prospectively, for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15,
2010 (the Companys fiscal year 2011); early application is permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2009-13 on its financial statements.
2. Basic and Diluted Net Income Per Common Share
Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing the net income for the period by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. For diluted earnings per share
the weighted average shares include the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of
stock options, warrants, and unvested restricted shares (using the treasury stock method). The
incremental common shares for stock options, warrants and unvested restricted shares are excluded
from the calculation of diluted net income per share, if their effect is anti-dilutive. Diluted net
income per share for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009 excludes the effect of
approximately 791,000 stock options and restricted shares in the calculation of the incremental
common shares, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Diluted net income per share for the
three and six months ended December 31, 2008 excludes the effect of approximately 1,308,000 and
771,000 stock options and restricted shares in the calculation of the incremental common shares,
respectively, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
3. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Raw materials and component parts |
|
$ |
711 |
|
|
$ |
797 |
|
Work-in-progress |
|
|
25,601 |
|
|
|
18,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,312 |
|
|
|
19,040 |
|
Less progress payments |
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,001 |
|
|
$ |
17,043 |
|
|
|
|
4. Segment Information
The Company operates through two business segments. Its infrastructure solutions segment,
through Globecomm Systems Inc., is engaged in the design, assembly and installation of ground
segment systems and networks. Its services segment, through GNSC, GSM, Cachendo, Mach 6, Telaurus
and Melat, provides satellite communication services capabilities.
The Companys reportable segments are business units that offer different products and
services. The reportable segments are each managed separately because they provide distinct
products and services.
11
The following is the Companys business segment information for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 and as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure solutions |
|
$ |
23,670 |
|
|
$ |
21,420 |
|
|
$ |
43,344 |
|
|
$ |
44,996 |
|
Services |
|
|
37,423 |
|
|
|
19,045 |
|
|
|
66,996 |
|
|
|
38,066 |
|
Intercompany eliminations |
|
|
(4,011 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
(5,582 |
) |
|
|
(730 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
57,082 |
|
|
$ |
39,977 |
|
|
$ |
104,758 |
|
|
$ |
82,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure solutions |
|
$ |
(1,370 |
) |
|
$ |
(892 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,939 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,530 |
) |
Services |
|
|
3,481 |
|
|
|
2,245 |
|
|
|
6,917 |
|
|
|
4,637 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
Intercompany eliminations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
2,245 |
|
|
$ |
1,569 |
|
|
$ |
4,191 |
|
|
$ |
2,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure solutions |
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
$ |
508 |
|
|
$ |
967 |
|
|
$ |
1,016 |
|
Services |
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
2,471 |
|
|
|
1,754 |
|
Intercompany eliminations |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
1,643 |
|
|
$ |
1,376 |
|
|
$ |
3,421 |
|
|
$ |
2,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for long-lived assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure solutions |
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
542 |
|
|
$ |
539 |
|
Services |
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
5,341 |
|
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenditures for long-lived assets |
|
$ |
2,301 |
|
|
$ |
671 |
|
|
$ |
5,883 |
|
|
$ |
1,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure solutions |
|
$ |
193,543 |
|
|
$ |
191,677 |
|
Services |
|
|
82,005 |
|
|
|
72,544 |
|
Intercompany eliminations |
|
|
(75,007 |
) |
|
|
(72,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
200,541 |
|
|
$ |
191,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Line of Credit
On March 11, 2009, the Company entered into a committed secured credit facility with Citibank,
N.A, which expires on March 9, 2010. The credit facility is comprised of a $50 million borrowing
base line of credit (the Line) and a foreign exchange line in the amount of $10 million. The
Line includes the following sublimits: (a) $30 million available for standby letters of credit; (b)
$20 million available for commercial letters of credit; (c) a line for up to two term loans, each
having a term of no more than five years, in the aggregate amount of up to $25 million that can be
used for acquisitions; and (d) $7.5 million available for revolving credit borrowings. At the
discretion of the Company, advances under the Line bear interest at the prime rate or LIBOR plus
applicable margin based on the Companys leverage ratio and are collateralized by a first priority
security interest on all of the personal
12
property of the Company. At December 31, 2009 the applicable margin on the LIBOR rate was 200
basis points. The Company is required to comply with various ongoing financial covenants,
including with respect to the Companys leverage ratio, liquidity ratio, minimum cash balance, debt
service ratio and minimum capital base, with which the Company was in compliance at December 31,
2009. As of December 31, 2009, no borrowings were outstanding under this credit facility; however,
there were standby letters of credit of approximately $10.8 million, which were applied against and
reduced the amounts available under the credit facility.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations
with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q. This discussion contains, in addition to historical information,
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995, based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections. These
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ
materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain
factors, such as, among others, uncertain demand for our services and products due to economic and
industry-specific conditions, the risks associated with operating in international markets, our
dependence on a limited number of contracts for a high percentage of our revenues and the impact on
our customer or potential customers from the current worldwide economic issues. These risks and
others are more fully described in the Risk Factors section of this Quarterly Report and in our
other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K
and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any
forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available or other
events occur in the future.
Overview
Our business is global and subject to technological and business trends in the
telecommunications marketplace. We derive much of our revenue from government and government
related entities (government marketplace) and developing countries. Our business is therefore
affected by geopolitical developments involving areas of the world in which our customers are
located, particularly in developing countries and areas of the world involved in armed conflicts,
which directly impact our military-related sector business.
The products and services we offer include: pre-engineered systems, systems design and
integration services, access, hosted, and lifecycle support services. To provide these products
and services, we engineer all the necessary satellite and terrestrial facilities as well as provide
the integration services required to implement those facilities. We operate and maintain managed
networks and provide life cycle support services on an ongoing basis. Our customers generally have
network service requirements that include point-to-point or point-to-multipoint connections via a
hybrid network of satellite and terrestrial facilities. In addition to the government marketplace,
these customers are communications service providers, commercial enterprises and media and content
broadcasters.
Since our products and services are often sold into areas of the world which do not have fiber
optic land-based networks, a substantial portion of our revenue is derived from, and is expected to
continue to be derived from, developing countries. These countries carry with them more enhanced
risks of doing business than in developed areas of the world, including the possibility of armed
conflicts or the risk that more advanced land-based telecommunications will be implemented over
time, and less developed legal protection for intellectual property.
Although the identity of customers and contracts may vary from period to period, we have been,
and expect to continue to be, dependent on revenues from a small number of customers or contracts
in each period in order to meet our financial goals. From time to time these customers are located
in developing countries or otherwise subject to unusual risks.
Revenues related to contracts for infrastructure solutions and services have been fixed-price
contracts in a majority of cases. Profitability of such contracts is subject to inherent
uncertainties as to the cost of performance. In addition to possible errors or omissions in making
initial estimates, cost overruns may be incurred as a result of unforeseen obstacles, including
both physical conditions and unexpected problems encountered in engineering design and testing.
Since our business is frequently concentrated in a limited number of large contracts, a significant
13
cost overrun on any contract could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Contract costs generally include purchased material, direct labor, overhead and other direct
costs. Anticipated contract losses are recognized, as they become known. Costs from infrastructure
solutions consist primarily of the costs of purchased materials (including shipping and handling
costs), direct labor and related overhead expenses, project-related travel and living costs and
subcontractor salaries. Costs from services consist primarily of satellite space segment charges,
voice termination costs, network operations expenses and Internet connectivity fees. Satellite
space segment charges consist of the costs associated with obtaining satellite bandwidth (the
measure of capacity) used in the transmission of services to and from the satellites leased from
operators. Network operations expenses consist primarily of costs associated with the operation of
the network operations center on a twenty-four hour a day, seven-day a week basis, including
personnel and related costs and depreciation. Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of
salaries, travel and living costs for sales and marketing personnel. Research and development
expenses consist primarily of salaries and related overhead expenses. General and administrative
expenses consist of expenses associated with our management, finance, contract, administrative
functions and amortization of intangible assets.
Critical Accounting Policies
Certain of our accounting policies require judgment by management in selecting the appropriate
assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an
inherent degree of uncertainty. These judgments are based on our historical experience, the terms
of existing contracts, our observance of trends in the industry, information provided by our
customers, and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. Actual results may
differ from these judgments under different assumptions or conditions. Our accounting policies that
require management to apply significant judgment include:
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue for our production-type contracts that are sold separately as standard
satellite ground segment systems when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the selling
price is fixed or determinable, collectibility is reasonably assured, delivery has occurred and the
contractual performance specifications have been met. Our standard satellite ground segment systems
produced in connection with these contracts are typically short-term (less than twelve months in
term) and manufactured using a standard modular production process. Such systems require less
engineering, drafting and design efforts than our long-term complex production-type projects.
Revenue is recognized on our standard satellite ground segment systems upon shipment and acceptance
of factory performance testing which is when title transfers to the customer. The amount of
revenues recorded on each standard production-type contract is reduced by the customers
contractual holdback amount, which typically requires 10% to 30% of the contract value to be
retained by the customer until installation and final acceptance is complete. The customer
generally becomes obligated to pay 70% to 90% of the contract value upon shipment and acceptance of
factory performance testing. Installation is not deemed to be essential to the functionality of the
system since installation does not require significant changes to the features or capabilities of
the equipment, does not require complex software integration and interfacing and we have not
experienced any difficulties installing such equipment. In addition, the customer or other third
party vendors can install the equipment. The estimated relative fair value of the installation
services is determined by management, which is typically less than the customers contractual
holdback percentage. If the holdback is less than the fair value of installation, we will defer
recognition of revenues, determined on a contract-by-contract basis equal to the fair value of the
installation services. Payments received in advance by customers are deferred until shipment and
are presented as deferred revenues.
We recognize revenue using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting upon the
achievement of certain contractual milestones for our non-standard, complex production-type
contracts for the production of satellite ground segment systems and equipment that are generally
integrated into the customers satellite ground segment network. The equipment and systems produced
in connection with these contracts are typically long-term (in excess of twelve months in term) and
require significant customer-specific engineering, drafting and design effort in order to
effectively integrate all of the customizable earth station equipment into the customers ground
segment network. These contracts generally have larger contract values, greater economic risks and
substantive specific contractual
14
performance requirements due to the engineering and design complexity of such systems and
related equipment. Progress payments received in advance by customers are netted against the
inventories balance.
The timing of our revenue recognition is primarily driven by achieving shipment, final
acceptance or other contractual milestones. Project risks including project complexity, political
and economic instability in certain regions in which we operate, export restrictions, tariffs,
licenses and other trade barriers which may result in the delay of the achievement of revenue
milestones. A delay in achieving a revenue milestone may negatively impact our results of
operations.
Costs from Infrastructure Solutions
Costs related to our production-type contracts and our non-standard, complex production-type
contracts rely on estimates based on total expected contract costs. Typically, these contracts are
fixed price projects. We use estimates of the costs applicable to various elements which we believe
are reasonable. Our estimates are assessed continually during the term of these contracts and costs
are subject to revisions as the contract progresses to completion. These estimates are subjective
based on management assessment of project risk. These risks may include project complexity and
political and economic instability in certain regions in which we operate. Revisions in cost
estimates are reflected in the period in which they become known. A significant revision in an
estimate may negatively impact our results of operations. In the event an estimate indicates that
a loss will be incurred at completion, we record the loss as it becomes known.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Impairment
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of businesses over the fair value of the
identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets are tested
for impairment at least annually. The impairment test for goodwill uses a two-step approach, which
is performed at the reporting unit level. Step one compares the fair value of the reporting unit
(calculated using a discounted cash flow method) to its carrying value. If the carrying value
exceeds the fair value, there is a potential impairment and step two must be performed. Step two
compares the carrying value of the reporting units goodwill to its implied fair value (i.e., fair
value of the reporting unit less the fair value of the units assets and liabilities, including
identifiable intangible assets). If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value,
the excess is required to be recorded as an impairment charge. The impairment test is dependent
upon estimated future cash flows of the services segment. There have been no events during the six
months ended December 31, 2009 that resulted in any goodwill and other intangible assets
impairment.
Deferred tax assets
We regularly estimate our ability to recover deferred income taxes, report such deferred tax
assets at the amount that is determined to be more-likely-than-not recoverable, and we have to
estimate our income taxes in each of the taxing jurisdictions in which we operate. This process
involves estimating our current tax expense together with assessing any temporary differences
resulting from the different treatment of certain items, such as the timing for recognizing revenue
and expenses for tax and accounting purposes. These differences may result in deferred tax assets
and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheets.
We are required to assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets, which include net
operating loss carry forwards and temporary differences that are expected to be deductible in
future years, will be recoverable from future taxable income or other tax planning strategies. If
recovery is not likely, we have to provide a valuation allowance based on our estimates of future
taxable income in the various taxing jurisdictions, and the amount of deferred taxes that are
ultimately realizable. The provision for current and deferred taxes involves evaluations and
judgments of uncertainties in the interpretation of complex tax regulations. This evaluation
considers several factors, including an estimate of the likelihood of generating sufficient taxable
income in future periods, the effect of temporary differences, the expected reversal of deferred
tax liabilities and available tax planning strategies.
At December 31, 2009, we had a liability for unrecognized tax benefits of approximately
$106,000 which if recognized in the future, would favorably impact our effective tax rate. We
record both accrued interest and penalties related to income tax matters, if any, in the provision
for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated
15
statements of operations. At December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 we had not accrued any
amounts for the potential payment of penalties and interest.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award
and is recognized as expense over the appropriate vesting period. Determining the fair value of
stock-based awards at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating the expected term of
stock options and the expected volatility of our stock. In addition, judgment is required in
estimating the amount of stock-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. If actual results
differ significantly from these estimates or different key assumptions were used, it could have a
material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 2009, there was approximately $235,000 of unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested outstanding stock options. The cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.3 years. As of December 31, 2009, there was approximately $4,629,000
of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock-based compensation related to
restricted shares. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3
years.
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability
of our customers to make required payments. We assess the customers ability to pay based on a
number of factors, including our past transaction history with the customer and the
creditworthiness of the customer. An assessment of the inherent risks in conducting our business
with foreign customers is also made since a significant portion of our revenues is international.
Management specifically analyzes accounts receivable, historical bad debts, customer
concentrations, customer creditworthiness and current economic trends. If the financial condition
of our customers were to deteriorate in the future, resulting in an impairment of their ability to
make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Inventories
Inventories consist primarily of work-in-progress from costs incurred in connection with
specific customer contracts, which are stated at the lower of cost or market value. In assessing
the realizability of inventories, we are required to make estimates of the total contract costs
based on the various elements of the work-in-progress. It is possible that changes to these
estimates could cause a reduction in the net realizable value of our inventories.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On July 1, 2009 we adopted the accounting pronouncement relating to business combinations,
including assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies. Changes for business
combination transactions pursuant to this pronouncement include, among others, expensing
acquisition-related transaction costs as incurred, the recognition of contingent consideration
arrangements at their acquisition date fair value and capitalization of in-process research and
development assets acquired at their acquisition date fair value. The adoption of this
pronouncement did not have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations in
the six months ended December 31, 2009, but could have a material impact on our financial position
and results of operation depending on the nature of any future acquisitions.
We adopted the accounting pronouncement regarding the general standards of accounting for, and
disclosure of, events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements
are issued. This pronouncement was effective prospectively for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009.
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13 (ASU 2009-13),
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements which updates ASC Topic 605-25, Multiple Elements
Arrangements, of the FASB codification. ASU 2009-13 provides new guidance on how to determine if
an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting, and if so
allows companies to allocate arrangement
16
considerations in a manner more consistent with the economics of the transaction. ASU 2009-13
is effective for us, prospectively, for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in
fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010; early application is permitted. We are currently
evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2009-13 on its financial statements.
Results of Operations
Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
Our consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009
include results of Mach 6 and Telaurus. These acquisitions took place on February 27, 2009 and May
29, 2009, respectively, and were not included in the corresponding periods in fiscal 2009.
Revenues from Infrastructure Solutions. Revenues increased by $2.2 million, or 10.2%, to $23.5
million for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and decreased by $2.3 million, or 5.1%, to
$42.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2009 compared to $21.3 million and $44.9
million for the three and six months ended December 31, 2008, respectively. The increase in
revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2009 was due to the timing of revenue milestones
reached in the system design and integration offering. The decrease in revenues in the six months
ended December 31, 2009 was primarily driven by a decline in bookings of contract orders due to the
global economic slowdown, which resulted in government and commercial customers and prospects
delaying or cancelling projects which, in particular affected pre-engineered systems. Due to the
current global economic conditions it is currently difficult to assess whether or not future
bookings and revenue will meet or exceed levels experienced in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
Revenues from Services. Revenues increased by $14.9 million, or 80.1%, to $33.6 million for
the three months ended December 31, 2009 and increased by $24.7 million, or 66.0%, to $62.2 million
for the six months ended December 31, 2009 compared to $18.6 million and $37.5 million for the
three and six months ended December 31, 2008, respectively. The increase in revenues for the three
and six months ended December 31, 2009 was due to $8.3 million and $16.5 million, respectively, of
revenue from Mach 6 and Telaurus along with an increase in our access service offering primarily in
the government marketplace.
Costs from Infrastructure Solutions. Costs from infrastructure solutions increased
by $2.8 million, or 16.6%, to $19.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and
decreased by $1.7 million, or 4.5%, to $35.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2009
compared to $17.0 million and $37.3 million for the three and six months ended December 31, 2008,
respectively. The gross margin decreased to 15.6% in the three months ended December 31, 2009 and
decreased to 16.3% for the six months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 20.3% and 16.9% for the
three and six months ended December 31, 2008, respectively. This decrease in gross margin in the
three and six months ended December 31, 2009 was mainly attributable to a decrease in sales in the
higher margin pre-engineered systems product line in the government marketplace. The gross margin
in this segment is likely to continue at or somewhat below the level in the second quarter for
balance of the fiscal year.
Costs from Services. Costs from services increased by $11.3 million, or 79.6%, to
$25.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and increased by $17.7 million, or
62.3%, to $46.1 million for the six months ended December 31, 2009 compared to $14.2 million and
$28.4 million for the three and six months ended December 31, 2008, respectively. Gross margin
increased to 24.1% of revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and increased to 25.9%
of revenues for the six months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 23.9% and 24.2% for the three
and six months ended December 31, 2008. The increase in the margin for the three and six months
ended December 31, 2009 was primarily driven by an increase in revenue in the government
marketplace. The increase in gross margin in the services segment has been a key driver in the
increase in our consolidated income from operations. The future relationship between the revenue
and margin growth of our operating segments will depend on a variety of factors, including the
timing of major contracts, which are difficult to predict.
Selling and Marketing. Selling and marketing expenses increased by $0.5 million, or 14.1%, to
$3.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and increased by $0.5 million, or 8.6%,
to $6.9 million for
17
the six months ended December 31, 2009 compared to $3.2 million and $6.3 million for the three
and six months ended December 31, 2008, respectively. The increase was a result of marketing
expenses of $0.7 million and $1.3 million for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009,
respectively, incurred at Mach 6 and Telaurus, partially offset by a decrease in salary and
salary-related expenses and other marketing expenses due to cost savings initiatives.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses increased by $0.3 million, or
49.7%, to $0.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and increased by $0.7 million,
or 84.5%, to $1.5 million for the six months ended December 31, 2009 compared to $0.5 million and
$0.8 million for the three and six months ended December 31, 2008, respectively. The
increase was principally due to costs associated with expanding X and Ka band product capabilities,
along with research and development costs at Telaurus of $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the
three and six months ended December 31, 2009, respectively.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased by $1.5 million, or
40.9%, to $5.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and increased by $3.4 million,
or 45.7%, to $10.7 million for the six months ended December 31, 2009 compared to $3.7 million and
$7.4 million for the three and six months ended December 31, 2008, respectively. The
increase for the three months ended December 31, 2009 was a result of $1.2 million of general and
administrative expenses incurred at Mach 6 and Telaurus (inclusive of $0.2 million of amortization
of intangibles related to these acquisitions), and an increase in stock based compensation. The
increase for the six months ended December 31, 2009 was a result of $2.5 million of general and
administrative expenses incurred at Mach 6 and Telaurus (inclusive of $0.5 million of amortization
of intangibles related to these acquisitions), an increase in the accrual for the Companys pay for
performance plan based on current results of operations, and an increase in bad debt expense.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased by $0.1 million, or 37.9%, to $0.1 million for the
three months ended December 31, 2009 and decreased by $0.2 million, or 43.9%, to $0.3 million for
the six months ended December 31, 2009 compared to $0.2 million and $0.5 million for the three and
six months ended December 31, 2008, respectively, as a result of a decrease in interest rates. In
August 2009, our excess cash was transferred out of money market funds with portfolios in treasury
notes to an account with a financial institution bearing a higher interest rate.
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes increased as a result of the
increase in income before income taxes along with an increase in our effective rate to 37% for the
six months ended December 31, 2009 from 32% for the six months ended December 31, 2008. The
effective rate for the six months ended December 31, 2008 includes a discrete tax benefit
associated with non-taxable life insurance proceeds due to the passing of our former President.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2009, we had working capital of $76.1 million, including cash and cash
equivalents of $49.7 million, net accounts receivable of $38.8 million, inventories of $25.0
million, prepaid expenses and other current assets of $2.1 million and current deferred income
taxes of $1.1 million, offset by $24.4 million in accounts payable, $7.0 million in deferred
revenues, $3.9 million in accrued payroll and related fringe benefits and $5.3 million in other
accrued expenses.
At June 30, 2009, we had working capital of $74.6 million, including cash and cash equivalents
of $44.0 million, net accounts receivable of $45.4 million, inventories of $17.0 million, prepaid
expenses and other current assets of $2.3 million and deferred income taxes of $1.1 million, offset
by $22.5 million in accounts payable, $5.3 million in deferred revenue, $4.3 million in accrued
payroll and related fringe benefits and $3.1 million in other accrued expenses.
Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended December 31, 2009 was
$11.5 million. This primarily related to a decrease in accounts receivable of $5.8 million due to
the timing of billings and collections from customers, a non-cash item representing depreciation
and amortization expense of $3.4 million primarily related depreciation expense related to the
network operations center and satellite earth station equipment and amortization expense related to
acquisitions, net income of $2.6 million, an increase in accounts payable of $1.9 million due to
the
18
increase in inventories and timing of payments to vendors, an increase in deferred revenue of $1.8
million due to timing differences between project billings and revenue recognition milestones
resulting from specific customer contracts, a decrease in deferred income taxes of $1.5 million due
to net income generated in the period, non-cash stock compensation expense of $1.1 million and an
increase in accrued expenses of $1.0 million resulting from customer deposits received as part of
service agreements, offset by an increase in inventory of $7.9 million due to timing of shipments
and purchases of equipment for milestones to be reached in future periods.
Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended December 31, 2008 was
$6.8 million. This primarily related to a decrease in accounts receivable of $14.0 million due to
the timing of billings and collections from customers and a reduction in revenue in the three
months ended December 31, 2008, a non-cash item representing depreciation and amortization expense
of $2.7 million primarily related depreciation expense related to the network operations center and
satellite earth station equipment, net income of $1.8 million, non-cash stock compensation expense
of $1.2 million and decrease in deferred income taxes of $0.8 million due to net income generated
in the period, offset by a decrease in accounts payable of $5.7 million relating to the reduction
in revenue and the timing of vendor payments in the three months ended December 31, 2008, an
increase in inventories of $3.9 million due to the timing of shipments of certain jobs, a decrease
in deferred revenue of $2.7 million due to timing differences between project billings and revenue
recognition milestones resulting from specific customer contracts, and a decrease in accrued
payroll and related fringe benefits of $1.5 million primarily due to the payment in the three
months ended September 30, 2008 of awards under the pay for performance plan with respect to the
Companys fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, along with a significant reduction in fiscal 2009
accrual based on operating performance.
Net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended December 31, 2009 was $5.9
million, which related to the purchase of hosted mobile core switch asset, network operations
center and teleport assets.
Net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended December 31, 2008 was $1.6
million, which related to the purchase of network operations center and teleport assets.
Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended December 31, 2009 and
2008 of $27,000 and $55,000, respectively, related to proceeds from the exercise of stock options.
Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended December 31, 2008 was
$0.1 million, which related to proceeds from the exercise of stock options.
On March 11, 2009, we entered into a committed secured credit facility with Citibank, N.A,
which expires on March 9, 2010. We are currently negotiating a new credit facility and anticipate
entering into such new facility upon the expiration of the existing facility. The credit facility
is comprised of a $50 million borrowing base line of credit (the Line) and a foreign exchange
line in the amount of $10 million. The Line includes the following sublimits: (a) $30 million
available for standby letters of credit; (b) $20 million available for commercial letters of
credit; (c) a line for up to two terms loans, each having a term of no more than five years, in the
aggregate amount of up to $25 million that can be used for acquisitions; and (d) $7.5 million
available for revolving credit borrowings. At our discretion, advances under the Line bear
interest at the prime rate or LIBOR plus applicable margin based on our leverage ratio, and are
collateralized by a first priority security interest on all of personal property. At December 31,
2009 the applicable margin on the LIBOR rate was 200 basis points. We are required to comply with
various ongoing financial covenants, including with respect to the leverage ratio, liquidity ratio,
minimum cash balance, debt service ratio and minimum capital base, with which we were in compliance
at December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, no borrowings were outstanding under this credit
facility, however, there were standby letters of credit of approximately $10.8 million, which were
applied against and reduced the amounts available under the credit facility.
We lease satellite space segment services and other equipment under various operating lease
agreements, which expire in various years through fiscal 2015. Future minimum lease payments due on
these leases through December 31, 2010 are approximately $23.5 million.
At December 31, 2009, we had contractual obligations and other commercial commitments as
follows (in thousands):
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
Obligations |
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
4-5 |
|
|
than 5 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
43,371 |
|
|
$ |
23,516 |
|
|
$ |
15,080 |
|
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
43,371 |
|
|
$ |
23,516 |
|
|
$ |
15,080 |
|
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More |
|
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
4-5 |
|
|
Than 5 |
|
Other
Commercial Commitments |
|
Committed |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
10,822 |
|
|
$ |
6,183 |
|
|
$ |
4,163 |
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial commitments |
|
$ |
10,822 |
|
|
$ |
6,183 |
|
|
$ |
4,163 |
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We expect that our cash and working capital requirements for operating activities may increase
as we continue to implement our business strategy, including to fund any future acquisitions of
complementary businesses, technologies and intellectual property. Management anticipates
additional working capital requirements for work in progress for orders as obtained and that we may
periodically experience negative cash flows due to variances in quarter to quarter operating
performance. We will use existing working capital and, if required, use our credit facility to
meet these additional working capital requirements.
Our future capital requirements will depend upon many factors, including the success of our
marketing efforts in the infrastructure solutions and services business, the nature and timing of
customer orders and the level of capital requirements related to the expansion of our service
offerings. Based on current plans, we believe that our existing capital resources will be
sufficient to meet working capital requirements at least through December 31, 2010. However, we
cannot assure you that there will be no unforeseen events or circumstances that would consume
available resources significantly before that time.
Additional funds may not be available when needed and, even if available, additional funds may
be raised through financing arrangements and/or the issuance of preferred or common stock or
convertible securities on terms and prices significantly more favorable than those of the currently
outstanding common stock, which could have the effect of diluting or adversely affecting the
holdings or rights of our existing stockholders. If adequate funds are unavailable, we may be
required to delay, scale back or eliminate some of our operating activities, including, without
limitation, capital expenditures, research and development activities, the timing and extent of our
marketing programs, and we may be required to reduce headcount. We cannot assure you that
additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are subject to a variety of risks, including foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations
relating to certain purchases from foreign vendors. In the normal course of business, we assess
these risks and have established policies and procedures to manage our exposure to fluctuations in
foreign currency values.
20
Our objective in managing our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations is to
reduce the impact of adverse fluctuations in earnings and cash flows associated with foreign
currency exchange rates. Accordingly, we may utilize from time to time foreign currency forward
contracts to hedge our exposure on firm commitments denominated in foreign currency. At December
31, 2009, we had no significant outstanding foreign exchange contracts. However in January we
entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to purchase approximately 2.3 million
Euros (approximately $3.3 million) to cover specific purchase commitments for an
infrastructure program for material to be purchased within the next year.
Our results of operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in
interest rates primarily from rates earned on our excess available cash balances. Under our
current positions, we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to
interest rate changes.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2009 and, based on their evaluation, have
concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
Part II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Business
Reductions in telecommunications equipment and systems spending have negatively affected our
revenues and profitability of our infrastructure solutions segment.
During the past several years, as a consequence of the worldwide financial and economic crisis
the global economy has been adversely impacted and nearly all businesses, including ours, have
faced uncertain economic environments. As a result of the current global economic conditions, our
customers have reduced and may continue to reduce their budgets for spending on telecommunications
equipment and systems. As a consequence, our current customers and other prospective customers may
postpone, reduce or even forego the purchase of our products and systems, which could adversely
affect our revenues and profitability. For the three and six months ended December 31, 2009 our
infrastructure solutions segment in particular was impacted by these factors. It is currently
difficult to assess whether or not future bookings or revenues in this segment will meet or exceed
the levels experienced in the recent past.
A limited number of customer contracts account for a significant portion of our revenues, and the
inability to replace a key customer contract or the failure of the customer to implement its plans
would adversely affect our results of operations, business and financial condition.
We rely on a small number of customer contracts for a large portion of our revenue.
Specifically, we have agreements with five customers to provide equipment and services, from which
we expect to generate a significant portion of our revenues. In the three months ended December
31, 2009, we derived 11% of our revenues from
21
Northrop Grumman Information Technologies Inc. If our key customers are unable to implement their
business plans, the market for these customers services declines, political or military conditions
make performance impossible or if any or all of the major customers modify or terminate their
agreements with us, and we are unable to replace these contracts, our results of operations,
business and financial condition would be materially harmed.
We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from the government marketplace, and a downturn in
this marketplace would adversely affect us.
In the three and six months ended December 31, 2009, we derived 56% and 60%, respectively, of
our consolidated revenues from the government marketplace. This business tends to have higher
gross margins than other markets we serve. A future reduction in the proportion of our business
from the government marketplace would negatively impact our results of operations.
There are a number of other risks associated with the government marketplace; specifically
purchasing decisions of agencies are subject to political influence, contracts are subject to
cancellation if government funding becomes unavailable, and unsuccessful bidders may challenge
contracts that are awarded to us which can lead to increased costs, delays and possible loss of
contracts. In particular, the current government involvement in supporting various financial
institutions and mounting government deficits will likely result in failures to fund various
government programs. A withdrawal of military forces from areas of conflict could result in
curtailed spending in military programs in which we participate.
Risks associated with operating in international markets, including areas of conflict, could
restrict our ability to expand globally and harm our business and prospects.
We market and sell a substantial portion of our products and services internationally. We
anticipate that international sales will continue to account for a significant portion of our total
revenues for the foreseeable future, including revenues from our Mach 6 and Telaurus acquisitions
with a significant portion of the international revenue coming from developing countries, including
countries in areas of conflict like Afghanistan. There are a number of risks inherent in
conducting our business internationally, including:
|
|
|
general political and economic instability in international markets, including the
hostilities in Iraq and Afghanistan, could impede our ability to deliver our products
and services to customers; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in collecting accounts receivable; |
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory requirements could restrict our ability to deliver services to
our international customers, including the addition of a country to the list of
sanctioned countries under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act or similar
legislation; |
|
|
|
|
export restrictions, tariffs, licenses and other trade barriers could prevent us
from adequately equipping our network facilities; |
|
|
|
|
differing technology standards across countries may impede our ability to integrate
our products and services across international borders; |
|
|
|
|
protectionist laws and business practices favoring local competition may give
unequal bargaining leverage to key vendors in countries where competition is scarce,
significantly increasing our operating costs; |
|
|
|
|
increased expenses associated with marketing services in foreign countries could
affect our ability to compete; |
|
|
|
|
relying on local subcontractors for installation of our products and services could
adversely impact the quality of our products and services; |
22
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations could affect our ability
to compete; |
|
|
|
|
complex foreign laws and treaties could affect our ability to compete; and |
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse taxes could affect our results of operations. |
These and other risks could impede our ability to manage our international operations
effectively, limit the future growth and profitability of our business, increase our costs and
require significant management attention.
We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from fixed-price projects, under which we assume
greater financial risk if we fail to accurately estimate the costs of the projects.
We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from fixed-price projects. We assume greater
financial risks on a fixed-price project than on a time-and-expense based project. If we
miscalculate the resources or time we need for these fixed-price projects, the costs of completing
these projects may exceed our original estimates, which would negatively impact our financial
condition and results of operations.
Our service revenue has increased as a percentage of total revenue and if our service revenue
decreases or margins decrease, our results of operations will be harmed.
GNSCs, GSMs, Cachendos, Mach 6s, and Telauruss future revenues and results of operations
are dependent on the development of the market for their current and future services. In the six
months ended December 31, 2009, services revenues were 59% of total revenue, compared to 45% for
the six months ended December 31, 2008. In fiscal 2009, services revenues increased to 48% of
total revenues compared to 32% and 24% in fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. The service business
tends to have significantly higher gross margins than our infrastructure solutions business. A
future reduction in the proportion of our services business would disproportionately impact our
results of operations.
Future acquisitions and strategic investments may divert our resources and managements attention,
results may fall short of expectations and, as a result, our operating results may be difficult to
forecast and may be volatile.
We have made several recent acquisitions and intend to continue pursuing acquisitions of
investments in complementary businesses, technologies and product lines as a key component of our
growth strategy. Any future acquisitions or investments may result in the use of significant
amounts of cash, potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, incurrence of debt and
amortization expenses related to intangibles assets. Acquisitions involve numerous risks,
including:
|
|
|
failure of the acquisition or investment to meet
the expectations upon which we made a decision to
proceed; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in the integration of the operations,
technologies, products and personnel of an acquired
business; |
|
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention from other business concerns; |
|
|
|
|
substantial transaction costs; |
|
|
|
|
the potential of significant goodwill and
intangibles write-offs in the future in the event that
an acquisition does not meet expectations; |
|
|
|
|
increased expenses associated with the consummation and integration of the acquisition; and |
|
|
|
|
loss of key employees, customers or suppliers of any acquired business. |
23
We cannot assure you that any acquisition or strategic investments will be successful and
will not adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
In the event of a catastrophic loss affecting our operations in Hauppauge, New York or Laurel,
Maryland, our results of operations would be harmed.
GNSCs revenues and results of operations are dependent on the infrastructure of the network
operations center and the Kenneth A. Miller International Teleport at our headquarters in
Hauppauge, New York. Similarly, GSMs revenues and results of operations are dependent on the
infrastructure of the network operations center and teleport at our Laurel, Maryland facility. A
catastrophic event to either of these facilities or to the infrastructure of the surrounding areas
would result in significant delays in restoring a majority of the services capabilities. These
capabilities permit us to offer an integrated suite of products and services and the incapacity of
our communications infrastructure would also negatively impact our ability to sell our
infrastructure solutions. This would result in the loss of revenues and adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our markets are highly competitive and we have many established competitors, and we may lose market
share as a result.
The markets in which we operate are highly competitive and this competition could harm our
ability to sell our products and services on prices and terms favorable to us. Our primary
competitors in the infrastructure solutions market generally fall into two groups: (1) system
integrators, like Thales, Data Path, and SED Systems, and (2) equipment manufacturers who also
provide integrated systems, like General Dynamics, SATCOM Technologies, Viasat, Alcatel and ND
Satcom AG.
In the end-to-end satellite-based enterprise solutions and broadcast services markets, we
compete with other satellite communication companies who provide similar services, like Ascent
Media, Globecast, and Convergent Media Systems. In addition, in our services segment we may compete
with other communications service providers like Segovia and satellite owners like SES Americom,
Intelsat and Verizon. We anticipate that our competitors may develop or acquire services that
provide functionality that is similar to that provided by our services and that those services may
be offered at significantly lower prices or bundled with other services. These competitors may have
the financial resources to withstand substantial price competition, may be in a better position to
endure difficult economic conditions in international markets and may be able to respond more
quickly than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements. Moreover,
many of our competitors have more extensive customer bases, broader customer relationships and
broader industry alliances than we do that they could use to their advantage in competitive
situations.
The markets in which we operate have limited barriers to entry, and we expect that we will
face additional competition from existing competitors and new market entrants in the future.
Moreover, our current and potential competitors have established or may establish strategic
relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase the ability of their products and
services to address the needs of our current and prospective customers. The potential strategic
relationships of existing and new competitors may rapidly acquire significant market share, which
would harm our business and financial condition.
If our products and services are not accepted in developing countries with emerging markets, our
revenues will be impaired.
We anticipate that a substantial portion of the growth in the demand for our products and
services will come from customers in developing countries due to a lack of basic communications
infrastructure in these countries. However, we cannot guarantee an increase in the demand for our
products and services in developing countries or that customers in these countries will accept our
products and services at all. Our ability to penetrate emerging markets in developing countries is
dependent upon various factors including:
|
|
|
the speed at which communications infrastructure, including terrestrial microwave,
coaxial cable and fiber optic communications systems, which compete with
satellite-based services, is built; |
24
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our local resellers and sales representatives in marketing and
selling our products and services; and |
|
|
|
the acceptance of our products and services by customers. |
If our products and services are not accepted, or the market potential we anticipate does not
develop, our revenues will be impaired.
Since sales of satellite communications equipment are dependent on the growth of communications
networks, if market demand for these networks does not increase from recent depressed levels, our
revenue and profitability are likely to decline.
We derive, and expect to continue to derive, a significant amount of revenues from the sale of
satellite infrastructure solutions. If the long-term growth in demand for communications networks
does not increase from recent depressed levels, the demand for our infrastructure solutions may
decline or grow more slowly than we expect. Further, increased competition among satellite ground
segment systems and network manufacturers has increased pricing pressures and depressed margins.
As a result, we may not be able to grow our business, our revenues may decline from current levels
and our results of operations may be harmed. The demand for communications networks and the
products used in these networks is affected by various factors, many of which are beyond our
control. For example, the uncertain general economic conditions have affected the overall rate of
capital spending by many of our customers. Also, many companies have found it difficult to raise
capital to finish building their communications networks and, therefore, have placed fewer orders.
Past economic slowdowns resulted in a softening of demand from our customers. We cannot predict the
extent to which demand will increase, nor the timing of such demand.
We depend upon certain key personnel and may not be able to retain these employees. If we lose the
services of these individuals or cannot hire additional qualified personnel, our business will be
harmed.
Our success also depends to a substantial degree on our ability to attract, motivate and
retain highly-qualified personnel. There is considerable competition for the services of
highly-qualified technical and engineering personnel. We may not be able either to retain our
current personnel or hire additional qualified personnel if and when needed.
Our future performance depends on the continued service of our key technical, managerial and
marketing personnel; in particular, David Hershberg, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and
Keith Hall, our President and Chief Operating Officer, are key to our success based upon their
individual knowledge of the markets in which we operate. The employment of any of our key
personnel could cease at any time.
Satellites upon which we rely may malfunction or be damaged or lost.
In the delivery of our services, we lease space segment from various satellite transponder
vendors. The damage or loss of any of the satellites used by us, or the temporary or permanent
malfunction of any of the satellites upon which we rely, would likely result in the interruption of
our satellite-based communications services. This interruption could have a material adverse effect
on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We depend on our suppliers, some of which are our sole or a limited source of supply, and the loss
of these suppliers could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
We currently obtain most of our critical components and services from limited sources and
generally do not maintain significant inventories or have long-term or exclusive supply contracts
with our vendors. We have from time to time experienced delays in receiving products from vendors
due to lack of availability, quality control or manufacturing problems, shortages of materials or
components or product design difficulties. We may experience delays in the future and replacement
services or products may not be available when needed, or at all, or at commercially reasonable
rates or prices. If we were to change some of our vendors, we would have to perform additional
testing procedures on the service or product supplied by the new vendors, which would prevent or
delay the availability of our products and services. Furthermore, our costs could increase
significantly if we need to
25
change vendors. If we do not receive timely deliveries of quality products and services, or if
there are significant increases in the prices of these products or services, it could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our network may experience security breaches, which could disrupt our services.
Our network infrastructure may be vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins, denial of service
attacks and similar disruptive problems caused by our customers or other Internet users. Computer
viruses, break-ins, denial of service attacks or other problems caused by third parties could lead
to interruptions, delays or cessation in service to our customers. There currently is no existing
technology that provides absolute security. We may face liability to customers for such security
breaches. Furthermore, these incidents could deter potential customers and adversely affect
existing customer relationships.
If the satellite communications industry fails to continue to develop or new technology makes it
obsolete, our business and financial condition will be harmed.
Our business is dependent on the continued success and development of satellite communications
technology, which competes with terrestrial communications transport technologies like terrestrial
microwave, coaxial cable and fiber optic communications systems. Fiber optic communications systems
have penetrated areas in which we have traditionally provided services. If the satellite
communications industry fails to continue to develop, or if any technological development
significantly improves the cost or efficiency of competing terrestrial systems relative to
satellite systems, then our business and financial condition would be materially harmed.
We may not be able to keep pace with technological changes, which would make our products and
services become non-competitive and obsolete.
The telecommunications industry, including satellite-based communications services, is
characterized by rapidly changing technologies, frequent new product and service introductions and
evolving industry standards. If we are unable, for technological or other reasons, to develop and
introduce new products and services or enhancements to existing products and services in a timely
manner or in response to changing market conditions or customer requirements, our products and
services would become non-competitive and obsolete, which would harm our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Unauthorized use of our intellectual property by third parties may damage our business.
We regard our trademarks, trade secrets and other intellectual property as beneficial to our
success. Unauthorized use of our intellectual property by third parties may damage our business. We
rely on trademark, trade secret and patent protection and contracts, including confidentiality and
license agreements with our employees, customers, strategic collaborators, consultants and others,
to protect our intellectual property rights. Despite our precautions, it may be possible for third
parties to obtain and use our intellectual property without our authorization.
We currently have been granted six patents, and have one patent and one provisional patent
application pending in the United States. We currently have one Patent Cooperation Treaty patent
application pending. We also intend to seek further patents on our technology, if appropriate. We
cannot assure you that patents will be issued for any of our pending or future patent applications
or that any claims allowed from such applications will be of sufficient scope, or be issued in all
countries where our products and services can be sold, to provide meaningful protection or any
commercial advantage to us. Also, our competitors may be able to design around our patents. The
laws of some foreign countries in which our products and services are or may be developed,
manufactured or sold may not protect our products and services or intellectual property rights to
the same extent as do the laws of the United States and thus make the possibility of piracy of our
technology and products and services more likely.
We have registered the trademarks Globecomm, GSI and Telaurus in the United States and various
other countries, and the trademark Mach 6 in The Netherlands. We have various other trademarks and
service marks registered or pending for registration in the United States and in other countries
and may seek registration of other trademarks and service marks in the future. We cannot assure you
that registrations will be granted from any of our pending or future applications, or that any
registrations that are granted will prevent others from using similar
26
trademarks in connection with related goods and services.
Defending against intellectual property infringement claims could be time consuming and expensive,
and if we are not successful, could cause substantial expenses and disrupt our business.
We cannot be sure that the products, services, technologies and advertising we employ in our
business do not or will not infringe valid patents, trademarks, copyrights or other intellectual
property rights held by third parties. We may be subject to legal proceedings and claims from time
to time relating to the intellectual property of others in the ordinary course of our business.
Prosecuting infringers and defending against intellectual property infringement claims could be
time consuming and expensive, and regardless of whether we are or are not successful, could cause
substantial expenses and disrupt our business. We may incur substantial expenses in defending
against these third party claims, regardless of their merit. Successful infringement claims against
us may result in substantial monetary liability and/or may materially disrupt the conduct of, or
necessitate the cessation of, segments of our business.
Risks Related to the Securities Markets and Ownership of Our Common Stock
Our stock price is volatile.
From January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, our stock price ranged from a low of $4.29 per
share to a high of $8.57 per share. The market price of our common stock, like that of the
securities of many telecommunications and high technology industry companies, could be subject to
significant fluctuations and is likely to remain volatile based on many factors, including the
following:
|
|
|
quarterly variations in operating results; |
|
|
|
|
announcements of new technology, products or services by us or any of our
competitors; |
|
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts; |
|
|
|
|
general market conditions, including periods of significant volatility; or |
|
|
|
|
domestic and international economic factors unrelated to our performance. |
Additionally, numerous factors relating to our business may cause fluctuations or declines in
our stock price.
The stock markets in general and the markets for telecommunications stocks in particular have
experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of
particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of
our common stock.
Because our common stock is thinly traded, it may be difficult to sell shares of our common stock
into the markets without experiencing significant price volatility.
Our common stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq Global Market. Because of the relatively
small number of shares that are traded, it may be difficult for an investor to find a purchaser for
shares of our common stock without experiencing significant price volatility. We cannot guarantee
that an active trading market will develop, that our common stock will have a higher trading volume
than it has historically had or that it will maintain its current market price. This illiquidity
could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our stock.
A third party could be prevented from acquiring shares of our stock at a premium to the market
price because of our anti-takeover provisions.
Various provisions with respect to votes in the election of directors, special meetings of
stockholders, and advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and director nominations of
our amended and restated
27
certificate of incorporation, by-laws and Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so might be
beneficial to our stockholders. In addition, we are party to employment agreements with our senior
executives that have change of control provisions that would add substantial costs to an
acquisition of us by a third party.
We have not paid dividends in the past and do not expect to pay dividends in the future, and any
return on investment may be limited to the value of our stock.
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying cash
dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends on our common
stock will depend on our future earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, future
prospects and other factors as the board of directors might deem relevant. If we do not pay
dividends our stock may be less valuable because a return on your investment will only occur if our
stock price appreciates.
Risks Related to Government Approvals
We are subject to many government regulations, and failure to comply with them will harm our
business.
Operations and Use of Satellites
We are subject to various federal laws and regulations, which may have negative effects
on our business. We operate FCC licensed teleports in Hauppauge, New York, and Laurel, Maryland
subject to the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, or the FCC Act, and the rules and
regulations of FCC. We cannot guarantee that the FCC will grant renewals when our existing licenses
expire, nor are we assured that the FCC will not adopt new or modified technical requirements that
will require us to incur expenditures to modify or upgrade our equipment as a condition of
retaining our licenses. We are also required to comply with FCC regulations regarding the exposure
of humans to radio frequency radiation from our teleports. These regulations, as well as local land
use regulations, restrict our freedom to choose where to locate our teleports. In addition, prior
to a third party acquisition of us, we would need to seek approval from the FCC to transfer the
radio transmission licenses we have obtained to the third party upon the consummation of the
acquisition. However, we cannot assure you that the FCC will permit the transfer of these licenses.
These approvals may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us.
Foreign Regulations
Regulatory schemes in countries in which we may seek to provide our satellite-delivered
services may impose impediments on our operations. Some countries in which we intend to operate
have telecommunications laws and regulations that do not currently contemplate technical advances
in telecommunications technology like Internet/intranet transmission by satellite. We cannot assure
you that the present regulatory environment in any of those countries will not be changed in a
manner that may have a material adverse impact on our business. Either we or our local partners
typically must obtain authorization from each country in which we provide our satellite-delivered
services. The regulatory schemes in each country are different, and thus there may be instances of
noncompliance of which we are not aware. We cannot assure you that our licenses and approvals are
or will remain sufficient in the view of foreign regulatory authorities, or that necessary licenses
and approvals will be granted on a timely basis in all jurisdictions in which we wish to offer our
products and services or that restrictions applicable thereto will not be unduly burdensome.
Regulation of the Internet
Due to the increasing popularity and use of the Internet, it is possible that a number of
laws and regulations may be adopted at the local, national or international levels with respect to
the Internet, covering issues including user privacy and expression, pricing of products and
services, taxation, advertising, intellectual property rights, information security or the
convergence of traditional communication services with Internet communications. It is anticipated
that a substantial portion of our Internet operations will be carried out in countries that may
impose greater regulation of the content of information coming into the country than that which is
generally applicable in the United States, including but not limited to privacy regulations in
numerous European countries and content
28
restrictions in countries such as the Peoples Republic of China. To the extent that we provide
content as a part of our Internet services, it will be subject to laws regulating content.
Moreover, the adoption of laws or regulations may decrease the growth of the Internet, which could
in turn decrease the demand for our Internet services or increase our cost of doing business or in
some other manner have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition. In addition, the applicability of existing laws governing issues including property
ownership, copyrights and other intellectual property issues, taxation, libel, court jurisdiction
and personal privacy to the Internet is uncertain. The vast majority of these laws were adopted
prior to the advent of the Internet and related technologies and, as a result, the laws do not
contemplate or address the unique issues of the Internet and related technologies. Changes to these
laws intended to address these issues, including some recently proposed changes, could create
uncertainty in the marketplace which could reduce demand for our products and services, could
increase our cost of doing business as a result of costs of litigation or increased product
development costs, or could in some other manner have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Telecommunications Taxation, Support Requirements, and Access Charges
Telecommunications carriers providing domestic services in the United States are required to
contribute a portion of their gross revenues for the support of universal telecommunications
services, telecommunications relay services for the deaf, and/or other regulatory fees. We are
subject to some of these fees, and we may be subject to other fees or new or increased taxes and
contribution requirements that could affect our profitability, particularly if we are not able to
pass them through to customers for either competitive or regulatory reasons.
Broadband Internet access services provided by telephone companies are currently classified as
Information Services under the Communications Act and therefore not considered a telecommunications
service subject to payment of access charges to local telephone companies in the United States.
Should this situation change or other charges be imposed, the increased cost to our customers who
use telephone-company provided facilities to connect with our satellite facilities could discourage
the demand for our services. Likewise, the demand for our services in other countries could be
affected by the availability and cost of local telephone or other telecommunications services
required to connect with our facilities in those countries.
Export of Telecommunications Equipment
The sale of our infrastructure solutions outside the United States is subject to compliance
with the regulations of the United States Export Administration and, in certain circumstances, with
International Traffic in Arms Regulations. The absence of comparable restrictions on competitors in
other countries may adversely affect our competitive position. In addition, in order to ship our
products into and implement our services in some countries, the products must satisfy the technical
requirements of that particular country. If we were unable to comply with such requirements with
respect to a significant quantity of our products, our sales in those countries could be
restricted, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Foreign Ownership
We may, in the future, be required to seek FCC or other government approval if foreign
ownership of our stock exceeds certain specified criteria. Failure to comply with these policies
could result in an order to divest the offending foreign ownership, fines, denial of license
renewal and/or license revocation proceedings against the licensee by the FCC, or denial of certain
contracts from other United States Government Agencies.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On January 22, 2010, the Company issued 104,467 shares of its common stock in
connection with its acquisition of the business operations of Telaurus on May 29,
2009. The shares became issuable pursuant to certain earn-out targets having been met
in the period following the consummation of the acquisition. The
Company issued the shares only to those members of Telaurus being
accredited investors in reliance on
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
29
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Matters voted upon at the Annual Meeting of stockholders held on November 19, 2009 and
the results of the voting were as follows:
|
(i) |
|
The following individuals were elected by the
stockholders to serve as directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board Member |
|
For |
|
Withheld |
Richard E. Caruso |
|
|
19,478,240 |
|
|
|
783,184 |
|
Keith A. Hall |
|
|
19,451,701 |
|
|
|
809,723 |
|
David E. Hershberg |
|
|
19,472,853 |
|
|
|
788,571 |
|
Harry L. Hutcherson, Jr. |
|
|
19,500,365 |
|
|
|
761,059 |
|
Brian T. Maloney |
|
|
18,759,551 |
|
|
|
1,501,873 |
|
Jack A. Shaw |
|
|
19,502,865 |
|
|
|
758,559 |
|
A. Robert Towbin |
|
|
18,322,970 |
|
|
|
1,938,454 |
|
C.J. Waylan |
|
|
19,495,295 |
|
|
|
766,129 |
|
|
(ii) |
|
To approve the increase in shares authorized to be issued under
the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan was voted upon as follows: 12,068,883
shares for; 1,236,190 shares against; and 15,317 shares abstaining. |
|
|
(iii) |
|
To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP
as independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the
fiscal year ending June 30, 2010 was voted upon as follows: 20,016,239
shares for; 185,666 shares against; and 59,519 shares abstaining. |
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit No.
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to
the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated September 28, 1998 (Reg. No. 000-22839) (the Annual
Report), and hereby |
30
Exhibit No.
|
|
incorporated by reference. |
3.2 |
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Annual Report,
and hereby incorporated by reference. |
|
31.1 |
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification required by Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (filed herewith). |
|
31.2 |
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification required by Rules 13a- 14 and 15d- 14 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (filed herewith). |
|
32 |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GLOBECOMM SYSTEMS INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: February 9, 2010 |
/s/ DAVID E. HERSHBERG
|
|
|
David E. Hershberg |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: February 9, 2010 |
/s/ ANDREW C. MELFI
|
|
|
Andrew C. Melfi |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
32
Index to Exhibits:
Exhibit No.
31.1 |
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification required by Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (filed herewith). |
|
31.2 |
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification required by Rules 13a- 14 and 15d- 14 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (filed herewith). |
|
32 |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
33