UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland		43-1790877
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
30 West Pershing Road, Suite 201 Kansas City, Missouri		64108
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(816) 472-1700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ     No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o     No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o     No þ

At July 27, 2009, there were 34,949,515 common shares of beneficial interest outstanding.

 

 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

With the exception of historical information, certain statements contained or incorporated by reference herein constitute forward-looking statements as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The forward-looking statements may refer to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, acquisition or disposition of properties, future expenditures for development projects, capital resources, future financial performance and business. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve numerous risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our future results, financial condition and business may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as “will be,” “continue,” “hope,” “goal,” “forecast,” “approximates,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans” “would,” “may” or other similar expressions in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In addition, references to our budgeted amounts are forward looking statements. Factors that could materially and adversely affect us include, but are not limited to, the factors listed below:

	•		General international, national, regional and local business and economic conditions;
	•		Current levels of market volatility are unprecedented;
	•		Failure of current governmental efforts to stimulate the economy;
	•		The downturn in the credit markets;
	•		The failure of a bank to fund a request by us to borrow money;
	•		Failure of banks in which we have deposited funds;
	•		Defaults in the performance of lease terms by our tenants;
	•		Defaults by our customers and counterparties on their obligations owed to us;
	•		A mortgagor’s bankruptcy or default;
	•		A significant loan commitment for a development project that may not be completed as planned;
	•		The obsolescence of older multiplex theaters owned by some of our tenants;
	•		Risks of operating in the entertainment industry;
	•		Our ability to compete effectively;
	•		The majority of our megaplex theater properties are leased by a single tenant;
	•		A single tenant leases or is the mortgagor of all our ski area investments;
	•		A single tenant leases all of our charter schools;
	•		Risks associated with use of leverage to acquire properties;
	•		Financing arrangements that require lump-sum payments;
	•		Our ability to sustain the rate of growth we have had in recent years;
	•		Our ability to raise capital;

	•		Covenants in our debt instruments that limit our ability to take certain actions;
	•		Risks of acquiring and developing properties and real estate companies;
	•		The lack of diversification of our investment portfolio;
	•		Our continued qualification as a REIT;
	•		The ability of our subsidiaries to satisfy their obligations;
	•		Financing arrangements that expose us to funding or purchase risks;
	•		We have a limited number of employees and the loss of personnel could harm operations;
	•		Fluctuations in the value of real estate income and investments;
	•		Risks relating to real estate ownership, leasing and development, for example local conditions such as an oversupply of space or a reduction in demand for real estate in the area, competition from other available space, whether tenants and users such as customers of our tenants consider a property attractive, changes in real estate taxes and other expenses, changes in market rental rates, the timing and costs associated with property improvements and rentals, changes in taxation or zoning laws or other governmental regulation, whether we are able to pass some or all of any increased operating costs through to tenants, and how well we manage our properties;
	•		Our ability to secure adequate insurance and risk of potential uninsured losses, including from natural disasters;
	•		Risks involved in joint ventures;
	•		Risks in leasing multi-tenant properties;
	•		A failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act or other laws;
	•		Risks of environmental liability;
	•		Our real estate investments are relatively illiquid;
	•		We own assets in foreign countries;
	•		Risks associated with owning or financing properties for which the tenant’s or mortgagor’s operations may be impacted by weather conditions;
	•		Risks associated with the ownership of vineyards;
	•		Our ability to pay dividends in cash or at current rates;
	•		Fluctuations in interest rates;
	•		Fluctuations in the market prices for our shares;
	•		Certain limits on change in control imposed under law and by our Declaration of Trust and Bylaws;
	•		Policy changes obtained without the approval of our shareholders;
	•		Equity issuances could dilute the value of our shares;

	•		Risks associated with changes in the Canadian exchange rate; and
	•		Changes in laws and regulations, including tax laws and regulations

These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations and beliefs and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Many of the factors that will determine these items are beyond our ability to control or predict. For further discussion of these factors see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the SEC on February 24, 2009 and to the extent applicable, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or the date of any document incorporated by reference herein. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

				Page
PART I					6
Item 1.		Financial Statements			6
Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			34
Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			53
Item 4.		Controls and Procedures			55
PART II					55
Item 1.		Legal Proceedings			55
Item 1A.		Risk Factors			55
Item 2.		Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			56
Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities			57
Item 4.		Submission of Matter to a Vote of Security Holders			57
Item 5.		Other Information			57
Item 6.		Exhibits			57
EX-12.1
EX-12.2
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES TRUST
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands except share data)

		June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
		(Unaudited)
Assets
Rental properties, net of accumulated depreciation of $235,472 and $214,078 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively		$	1,745,000			$	1,735,026
Property under development			22,847				30,835
Mortgage notes and related accrued interest receivable			538,632				508,506
Investment in a direct financing lease, net			167,945				166,089
Investment in joint ventures			2,457				2,493
Cash and cash equivalents			16,202				50,082
Restricted cash			14,551				11,004
Intangible assets, net			10,188				12,400
Deferred financing costs, net			14,010				10,741
Accounts and notes receivable, net			73,241				73,312
Other assets			36,504				33,437
Total assets		$	2,641,577			$	2,633,925
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		$	27,122			$	35,665
Common dividends payable			22,732				27,377
Preferred dividends payable			7,552				7,552
Unearned rents and interest			12,836				8,312
Long-term debt			1,225,356				1,262,368
Total liabilities			1,295,598				1,341,274
Shareholders’ equity:
Common Shares, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; and 35,852,316 and 33,734,181 shares issued at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively			358				337
Preferred Shares, $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 3,200,000 Series B shares issued at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008; liquidation preference of $80,000,000			32				32
5,400,000 Series C convertible shares issued at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008; liquidation preference of $135,000,000			54				54
4,600,000 Series D shares issued at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008; liquidation preference of $115,000,000			46				46
3,450,000 Series E convertible shares issued at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008; liquidation preference of $86,250,000			35				35
Additional paid-in-capital			1,389,162				1,339,798
Treasury shares at cost: 904,824 and 860,084 common shares at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively			(27,698	)			(26,357	)
Loans to shareholders			(1,925	)			(1,925	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income			9,951				(6,169	)
Distributions in excess of net income			(36,170	)			(28,417	)
Entertainment Properties Trust shareholders’ equity			1,333,845				1,277,434
Noncontrolling interests			12,134				15,217
Shareholders’ equity			1,345,979				1,292,651
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	2,641,577			$	2,633,925

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)

		Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009				2008				2009				2008
Rental revenue		$	50,507			$	49,940			$	100,918			$	99,062
Tenant reimbursements			4,258				5,194				8,893				10,865
Other income			728				491				1,868				1,202
Mortgage and other financing income			11,224				13,130				21,742				23,484
Total revenue			66,717				68,755				133,421				134,613
Property operating expense			6,382				6,309				14,400				13,335
Other expense			854				622				1,472				1,557
General and administrative expense			4,278				3,938				8,404				8,352
Costs associated with loan refinancing			117				—				117				—
Interest expense, net			17,482				16,960				34,919				34,428
Depreciation and amortization			11,834				10,341				24,463				21,014
Income before equity in income from joint ventures and discontinued operations			25,770				30,585				49,646				55,927
Equity in income from joint ventures			225				245				444				1,527
Income from continuing operations		$	25,995			$	30,830			$	50,090			$	57,454
Discontinued operations:
Loss from discontinued operations			—				(16	)			—				(27	)
Gain on sale of real estate			—				119				—				119
Net income			25,995				30,933				50,090				57,546
Add: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests			1,709				478				2,943				986
Net income attributable to Entertainment Properties Trust			27,704				31,411				53,033				58,532
Preferred dividend requirements			(7,552	)			(7,552	)			(15,103	)			(13,162	)
Net income available to common shareholders of Entertainment Properties Trust		$	20,152			$	23,859			$	37,930			$	45,370
Per share data attributable to Entertainment Properties Trust common shareholders:
Basic earnings per share data:
Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders		$	0.58			$	0.78			$	1.09				1.54
Income from discontinued operations			—				—				—				0.01
Net income available to common shareholders		$	0.58			$	0.78			$	1.09			$	1.55
Diluted earnings per share data:
Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders		$	0.58			$	0.77			$	1.09			$	1.53
Income from discontinued operations			—				—				—				—
Net income available to common shareholders		$	0.58			$	0.77			$	1.09			$	1.53
Shares used for computation (in thousands):
Basic			34,970				30,577				34,678				29,351
Diluted			34,992				30,913				34,686				29,663
Dividends per common share		$	0.65			$	0.84			$	1.30			$	1.68

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES TRUST
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)

		Entertainment Properties Trust Shareholders
																														Accumulated
																		Additional												other				Distributions
		Common Stock								Preferred Stock								paid-in				Treasury				Loans to				comprehensive				in excess of				Noncontrolling
		Shares				Par				Shares				Par				capital				shares				shareholders				income				net income				Interests				Total
Balance at December 31, 2008			33,734			$	337				16,650			$	167			$	1,339,798			$	(26,357	)		$	(1,925	)		$	(6,169	)		$	(28,417	)		$	15,217			$	1,292,651
Restricted share units issued to Trustees			—				—				—				—				390				—				—				—				—				—				390
Issuance of nonvested shares, including nonvested shares issued for the payment of bonuses			218				2				—				—				2,413				—				—				—				—				—				2,415
Cancellation of 4,175 employee nonvested shares			—				—				—				—				139				(139	)			—				—				—				—				—
Amortization of nonvested shares			—				—				—				—				1,647				—				—				—				—				—				1,647
Share option expense			—				—				—				—				331				—				—				—				—				—				331
Foreign currency translation adjustment			—				—				—				—				—				—				—				10,477				—				—				10,477
Change in unrealized gain/loss on derivatives			—				—				—				—				—				—				—				5,643				—				—				5,643
Net income			—				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				53,033				(2,943	)			50,090
Purchase of 40,565 common shares for treasury			—				—				—				—				—				(1,202	)			—				—				—				—				(1,202	)
Issuances of common shares, net of costs of $227 thousand			1,900				19				—				—				44,444				—				—				—				—				—				44,463
Dividends to common and preferred shareholders			—				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				(60,786	)			—				(60,786	)
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests			—				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				(140	)			(140	)
Balance at June 30, 2009			35,852			$	358				16,650			$	167			$	1,389,162			$	(27,698	)		$	(1,925	)		$	9,951			$	(36,170	)		$	12,134			$	1,345,979

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)

		Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009				2008				2009				2008
Net income		$	25,995			$	30,933			$	50,090			$	57,546
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment			18,143				1,159				10,477				(6,984	)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives			(5,990	)			381				5,643				2,120
Comprehensive income			38,148				32,473				66,210				52,682
Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interests			1,709				478				2,943				986
Comprehensive income attributable to Entertainment Properties Trust		$	39,857			$	32,951			$	69,153			$	53,668

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)

		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009				2008
Operating activities:
Net income		$	50,090			$	57,546
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Loss from discontinued operations			—				(92	)
Costs associated with loan refinancing			117				—
Equity in income from joint ventures			(444	)			(1,527	)
Distributions from joint ventures			493				1,777
Depreciation and amortization			24,463				21,014
Amortization of deferred financing costs			1,449				1,622
Share-based compensation expense to management and trustees			2,155				1,987
Decrease in restricted cash			2,133				2,256
Increase in mortgage notes accrued interest receivable			(244	)			(9,835	)
Decrease (increase) in accounts and accrued interest on notes receivable			3,966				(3,175	)
Increase in direct financing lease receivable			(1,856	)			(486	)
Increase in other assets			(4,253	)			(3,011	)
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities			(30	)			(549	)
Decrease in unearned rents			(1,022	)			(3,997	)
Net operating cash provided by continuing operations			77,017				63,530
Net operating cash used by discontinued operations			—				(27	)
Net cash provided by operating activities			77,017				63,503
Investing activities:
Acquisition of rental properties and other assets			(2,450	)			(134,248	)
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture			(13	)			(38	)
Investment in mortgage notes receivable			(28,536	)			(24,627	)
Proceeds from mortgage note receivable paydown			3,512				—
Investment in promissory notes receivable			(3,858	)			(10,149	)
Proceeds from promissory note receivable paydown			1,000				—
Investment in direct financing lease, net			—				(121,785	)
Additions to properties under development			(12,337	)			(16,317	)
Net cash used in investing activities from continued operations			(42,682	)			(307,164	)
Net proceeds from sale of real estate from discontinued operations			—				986
Net cash used in investing activities			(42,682	)			(306,178	)
Financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt facilities			43,006				136,153
Principal payments on long-term debt			(84,283	)			(33,035	)
Deferred financing fees paid			(4,786	)			(925	)
Net proceeds from issuance of common shares			44,408				111,335
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred shares			—				83,438
Impact of stock option exercises, net			—				44
Purchase of common shares for treasury			(1,202	)			(777	)
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests			(140	)			(90	)
Dividends paid to shareholders			(65,379	)			(56,262	)
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities			(68,376	)			239,881
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash			161				(175	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents			(33,880	)			(2,969	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period			50,082				15,170
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period		$	16,202			$	12,201

Supplemental information continued on next page.

ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)

Continued from previous page.

		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009				2008
Supplemental schedule of non-cash activity:
Transfer of property under development to rental property		$	22,074			$	9,374
Issuance of nonvested shares at fair value, including nonvested shares issued for payment of bonuses		$	3,977			$	6,028
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest		$	34,469			$	34,441
Cash received during the period for income taxes		$	(607	)		$	(964	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES TRUST
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. Organization

Description of Business

Entertainment Properties Trust (the Company) is a Maryland real estate investment trust (REIT) organized on August 29, 1997. The Company develops, owns, leases and finances megaplex theatres, entertainment retail centers (centers generally anchored by an entertainment component such as a megaplex theatre and containing other entertainment-related properties), and destination recreational and specialty properties. The Company’s properties are located in the United States and Canada.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. In addition, operating results for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009.

The Company consolidates certain entities if it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary in a variable interest entity (VIE), as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation (FIN) No. 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (FIN 46R). The equity method of accounting is applied to entities in which the Company is not the primary beneficiary as defined in FIN 46R, or does not have effective control, but can exercise influence over the entity with respect to its operations and major decisions.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (SFAS No. 160), effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 160 effective January 1, 2009. Per SFAS No. 160, noncontrolling interest is the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. The ownership interests in the subsidiary that are held by owners other than the parent are noncontrolling interests. Under SFAS No. 160, such noncontrolling interests are reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity. On the consolidated statements of income, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries are reported at the consolidated amounts, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and noncontrolling interests. Consolidated statements of changes in shareholder’s equity are included for both quarterly and annual financial statements, including beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for shareholders’ equity, noncontrolling interests and total equity. The Company does not have any redeemable noncontrolling interests under Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) D-98, “Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities.”

The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 24, 2009.

Revenue Recognition

Rents that are fixed and determinable are recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum terms of the leases. Base rent escalation on leases that are dependent upon increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) is recognized when known. Straight-line rent receivable is included in accounts receivable and was $24.3 million and $23.1 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. In addition, most of the Company’s tenants are subject to additional rents if gross revenues of the properties exceed certain thresholds defined in the lease agreements (percentage rents). Percentage rents are recognized at the time when specific triggering events occur as provided by the lease agreements. Percentage rents of $649 thousand and $902 thousand were recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Lease termination fees are recognized when the related leases are canceled and the Company has no obligation to provide services to such former tenants. No termination fees were recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

Direct financing lease income is recognized on the effective interest method to produce a level yield on funds not yet recovered. Estimated unguaranteed residual values at the date of lease inception represent management’s initial estimates of fair value of the leased assets at the expiration of the lease, not to exceed original cost. Significant assumptions used in estimating residual values include estimated net cash flows over the remaining lease term and expected future real estate values. The estimated unguaranteed residual value is reviewed on an annual basis to determine if there are other than temporary impairments. The Company evaluates on an annual basis during the second quarter the collectibility of its direct financing lease receivable and unguaranteed residual value to determine whether they are impaired. A direct financing lease receivable is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the existing contractual terms. When a direct financing lease receivable is considered to be impaired, the amount of loss is calculated by comparing the recorded investment to the value determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at the direct financing lease receivable’s effective interest rate or to the value of the underlying collateral, less costs to sell, if such receivable is collateralized.

Rental Properties

Rental properties are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Costs incurred for the acquisition and development of the properties are capitalized. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which generally are estimated to be 40 years for buildings and 3 to 25 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Tenant improvements, including allowances, are depreciated over the shorter of the base term of the lease or the estimated useful life. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to operations in the period incurred. Significant renovations and improvements which improve or extend the useful life of the asset are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful life.

The Company applies SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, for the recognition and measurement of impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used.

Management reviews a property for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a property may not be recoverable. The review of recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. If impairment exists due to the inability to recover the carrying value of the property, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value of the property exceeds its estimated fair value.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company makes quarterly estimates of the collectibility of its accounts receivable related to base rents, tenant escalations (straight-line rents), reimbursements and other revenue or income. The Company specifically analyzes trends in accounts receivable, historical bad debts, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, when customers are in bankruptcy, the Company makes estimates of the expected recovery of pre-petition administrative and damage claims. These estimates have a direct impact on the Company’s net income.

Mortgage Notes and Other Notes Receivable

Mortgage notes and other notes receivable, including related accrued interest receivable, consist of loans originated by the Company and the related accrued and unpaid interest income as of the balance sheet date. Mortgage notes and other notes receivable are initially recorded at the amount advanced to the borrower and the Company defers certain loan origination and commitment fees, net of certain origination costs, and amortizes them over the term of the related loan. Interest income on performing loans is accrued as earned. The Company evaluates the collectibility of both interest and principal of each of its loans to determine whether it is impaired. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the existing contractual terms. When a loan is considered to be impaired, the amount of loss is calculated by comparing the recorded investment to the value determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at the loan’s effective interest rate or to the fair value of the underlying collateral, less costs to sell, if the loan is collateralized. For impaired loans, interest income is recognized on a cash basis, unless the Company determines based on the loan to estimated fair value ratio the loan should be on the cost recovery method, and any cash payment received would then be reflected as a reduction of principal. Interest income recognition is recommenced when the impaired loan becomes contractually current and performance is demonstrated to be resumed.

Concentrations of Risk

American Multi-Cinema, Inc. (AMC) is the lessee of a substantial portion (51%) of the megaplex theatre rental properties held by the Company (including joint venture properties) at June 30, 2009 as a result of a series of sale leaseback transactions pertaining to a number of AMC megaplex theatres. A substantial portion of the Company’s rental revenues (approximately $48.3 million or 48% and $48.9 million or 49% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively) result from the rental payments by AMC under the leases, or its parent, AMC Entertainment, Inc. (AMCE), as the guarantor of AMC’s obligations under the leases. AMCE had total assets of $3.7 billion and $3.8 billion, total liabilities of $2.7 billion and $2.7 billion and total stockholders’ equity of $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion at April 2, 2009 and April 3, 2008, respectively. AMCE had a net loss of $81.2 million for the fifty-two weeks ended April 2, 2009 and net earnings of $43.4 million for the fifty-three weeks ended April 3, 2008. AMCE has publicly held debt and accordingly, its consolidated financial information is publicly available.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, approximately $16.9 million, or 13%, and $19.5 million, or 15%, of total revenue was derived from the Company’s four entertainment retail centers in Ontario, Canada. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, $28.2

million, or 21%, of our total revenue was derived from the Company’s four entertainment retail centers in Ontario, Canada combined with the mortgage financing interest related to the Company’s mortgage note receivable held in Canada and initially funded on June 1, 2005. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, no mortgage financing interest income was recognized related to the Company’s mortgage note receivable held in Canada as further described in Note 4. The Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries that hold the Canadian entertainment retail centers, third party debt and mortgage note receivable represent approximately $233.5 million or 17% and $219.5 million or 17% of the Company’s net assets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

Share-Based Compensation

Share-based compensation is issued to employees of the Company and non-employee Trustees pursuant to the Annual Incentive Program and the Long-Term Incentive Plan. Prior to May 9, 2007, all common shares and options to purchase common shares (share options) were issued under the 1997 Share Incentive Plan. The 2007 Equity Incentive Plan was approved by shareholders at the May 9, 2007 annual meeting and this plan replaced the 1997 Share Incentive Plan. Accordingly, all common shares and options to purchase common shares granted on or after May 9, 2007 are issued under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.

The Company accounts for share based compensation under the SFAS No. 123R “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123R). Share based compensation expense consists of share option expense, amortization of nonvested share grants, and shares and share units issued to non-employee Trustees for payment of their annual retainers. Share based compensation is included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of income, and totaled $2.2 million and $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Share Options

Share options are granted to employees pursuant to the Long-Term Incentive Plan and to non-employee Trustees for their service to the Company. The fair value of share options granted is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Share options granted to employees vest over a period of four to five years and share option expense for these options is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, except for those unvested options held by a retired executive which were fully expensed as of June 30, 2006. Share options granted to non-employee Trustees vest immediately but may not be exercised for a period of one year from the grant date. Share option expense for non-employee Trustees is recognized on a straight-line basis over the year of service by the non-employee Trustees.

The expense related to share options included in the determination of net income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $331 thousand and $225 thousand, respectively. The following assumptions were used in applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model at the grant dates: risk-free interest rate of 2.6% to 2.8% and 3.2% to 3.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, dividend yield of 6.5% to 6.6% and 6.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, volatility factors in the expected market price of the Company’s common shares of 31.4% to 37.5% and 23.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, no expected forfeitures and an expected life of eight years. The Company uses historical data to estimate the expected life of the option and the risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Additionally, expected volatility is computed based on the average historical volatility of the Company’s publicly traded shares.

Nonvested Shares Issued to Employees

The Company grants nonvested shares to employees pursuant to both the Annual Incentive Program and the Long-Term Incentive Plan. The Company amortizes the expense related to the nonvested shares awarded to employees under the Long-Term Incentive Plan and the premium awarded under the nonvested share alternative of the Annual Incentive Program on a straight-line basis over the future vesting period (three to five years). Total expense recognized related to all nonvested shares was $1.6 million for each of the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

Shares Issued to Non-Employee Trustees

Prior to 2009, the Company issued shares to non-employee Trustees for payment of their annual retainers. These shares vested immediately but could not be sold for a period of one year from the grant date. This expense was amortized by the Company on a straight-line basis over the year of service by the non-employee Trustees. Total expense recognized related to shares issued to non-employee Trustees was $111 thousand and $173 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Restricted Share Units Issued to Non-Employee Trustees

In 2009, the Company issued restricted share units to non-employee Trustees for payment of their annual retainers. The fair value of the share units granted was based on the share price at the date of grant. The share units vest upon the earlier of the day preceding the next annual meeting of shareholders or a change of control. The settlement date for the shares is selected by the non-employee trustee, and ranges from three years from the grant date to upon termination of service. This expense was amortized by the Company on a straight-line basis over the year of service by the non-employee Trustees. Total expense recognized related to shares issued to non-employee Trustees was $65 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Derivative Instruments

The Company has acquired certain derivative instruments to reduce exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and variable interest rates. The Company has established policies and procedures for risk assessment and the approval, reporting and monitoring of derivative financial instrument activities. These derivatives consist of foreign currency forward contracts, cross currency swaps and interest rate swaps.

SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS No. 161), amends and expands the disclosure requirements of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 133) with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative instruments.

As required by SFAS No. 133, the Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions,

are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risk, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentation.

Subsequent Events

The Company evaluated subsequent events through the time of filing these financial statements with the SEC on July 28, 2009.

3. Rental Properties

The following table summarizes the carrying amounts of rental properties as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in thousands):

		June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
		(Unaudited)
Buildings and improvements		$	1,477,099			$	1,452,500
Furniture, fixtures & equipment			63,269				62,090
Land			440,104				434,514
			1,980,472				1,949,104
Accumulated depreciation			(235,472	)			(214,078	)
Total		$	1,745,000			$	1,735,026

Depreciation expense on rental properties was $21.2 million and $19.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

4. Investments in Mortgage Notes and Notes Receivable

On August 20, 2008, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company provided a secured first mortgage loan of $225.0 million to Concord Resorts, LLC (Concord Resorts), an entity controlled by Louis Cappelli, related to a planned casino and resort development in Sullivan County, New York. The Company’s investment is secured by a first mortgage on the resort complex real estate totaling 1,584 acres. In addition, the Company has a second mortgage on the remaining 139 acres of the casino related real estate and the loan is personally guaranteed by Louis Cappelli. The Company has certain rights to convert its mortgage interest into fee ownership as the project is further developed. The net carrying value of this mortgage note receivable at June 30, 2009 was $133.2 million which was funded under the original $225.0 million secured first mortgage commitment. Due to the economic downturn, certain other lenders on the development have either reduced their commitments or withdrawn from the project. The planned initial phase of the casino and resort development has been downsized from an estimated $1 billion to an estimated $600 million and Mr. Cappelli is attempting to secure the necessary financing. The New York legislature has passed legislation authorizing the

benefits of a special reduced tax rate on gaming receipts in Sullivan County, New York if at least $600 million is invested and 1,000 new jobs are created. As a result of these issues, the development project has been slowed, and there can be no assurance that Mr. Cappelli will obtain the financing necessary to complete the project. Due to these challenges, Concord Resorts has ceased making interest payments to the Company as contractually obligated under the loan agreement. The Company has evaluated its mortgage note receivable in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan” (SFAS No. 114) and has determined it is impaired due to the inability of the borrower to meet its contractual obligations per the agreement. The Company’s accounting policy is to recognize interest income on impaired loans on a cash basis. Accrual interest income recognition for book purposes was ceased on January 1, 2009 and therefore no interest income has been recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2009. Management of the Company determined that no loan loss reserve was necessary for this note taking into account an independent appraisal as of April 30, 2009 of the primary collateral, 1,584 acres of land, which indicated a value significantly in excess of the loan balance.

The Company’s original loan commitment to fund an additional $91.8 million to Concord Resorts is no longer applicable due to the developer’s decision to downsize the initial phase of the project to an investment level of $600 million. The funding of any additional investment in the project by the Company will be subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including but not limited to a reduction from the aforementioned $91.8 million.

The Company has two $10 million notes receivable that were due on February 28, 2009 and March 1, 2009, respectively. The notes bear interest at 10% and are included in accounts and notes receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Neither note was repaid at maturity. One of the notes is due from the Company’s minority joint venture partner in New Roc, an entertainment retail center in New Rochelle, New York, and this note is secured by such partner’s interest. The minority joint venture partner is an entity controlled by Louis Cappelli and Louis Cappelli has also personally guaranteed the loan. The other note is due from Louis Cappelli personally and in conjunction with this note, the Company received an option to purchase 50% of Louis Cappelli’s interest (or Louis Cappelli’s related interests) in three other projects.

The Company has evaluated these two notes receivable in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 114, and has determined that they are impaired due to the inability of the borrower to meet its contractual obligations per the original agreements. The Company’s accounting policy is to recognize interest income on impaired loans on a cash basis. Accordingly, accrual interest income recognition was ceased on January 1, 2009. Interest income of $833 thousand has been recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2009 which represents payments received by the Company. Interest income recognized on these loans for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $839 thousand. Management of the Company has evaluated the fair value of the underlying collateral of the notes and has concluded that no loan loss reserve was necessary at June 30, 2009.

On January 26, 2009, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into a credit agreement with Rb Wine Associates, LLC to provide a $2 million revolving credit facility that matures on January 1, 2010. This note is secured by certain pledge agreements and other collateral. Interest accrues on the outstanding principal balance at an annual rate of 15%. Interest is payable monthly at an annual rate of 9.25% and the remaining accrued but unpaid interest and principal is due at maturity. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company advanced $1.1 million under this agreement.

On February 6, 2009, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company invested an additional $950 thousand Canadian (CAD) ($768 thousand U.S.) in the mortgage note receivable from Metropolis Limited Partnership (the Partnership) related to the construction of Toronto Life Square, a 13 level entertainment retail center in downtown Toronto that was completed in May 2008 for a total cost of approximately CAD $330 million. This advance has a stated maturity of June 2, 2010 and bears interest at 15%. Additionally, as of June 30, 2009, the Company had posted irrevocable stand-by letters of credit related to this project totaling $7.6 million which are expected to be cancelled or drawn upon during 2009. The carrying value of this mortgage note receivable at June 30, 2009 was CAD $126.7 million ($108.9 million U.S.), which includes related accrued interest receivable on both the note and the letters of credit of CAD $45.3 million ($39.0 million U.S.). The loan is denominated in Canadian dollars and is secured by Toronto Life Square. On March 2, 2009, the Company’s 25% principal payment and all accrued interest to date on the second mortgage note receivable from the Partnership came due.

A group of banks (the bank syndicate) has provided first mortgage construction financing to the Partnership totaling approximately CAD $119.0 million ($102.3 million U.S.) as of June 30, 2009. The bank syndicate’s first mortgage was due February 27, 2009. An additional extension was not executed during the six months ended June 30, 2009 for either the bank’s first mortgage or amounts due under the Company’s second mortgage. In April 2009, the Company and the bank syndicate elected to pursue a receivership after it became apparent that a restructuring of the existing equity interests was no longer possible. On April 27, 2009, the court appointed a receiver who will now oversee the sale of the property. As a result of this process, the Company could become the owner of the property if it is the highest bidder or alternatively, could settle its mortgage note receivable with the proceeds from a higher bidder. The Company is currently negotiating a refinancing of the first mortgage should it be the highest bidder for the property. While there can be no assurance regarding the success of the first mortgage refinancing or its timing, based on preliminary negotiations, the Company currently estimates a new first mortgage loan would provide proceeds of CAD $100 to $120 million. If the Company becomes the owner through the sale process, the Company expects to consolidate the financial results of the property subsequent to the purchase.

The Company has evaluated its mortgage note receivable in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 114. Because repayment of the mortgage note receivable did not meet the contractual terms of the agreement, the Company has determined the loan is impaired and has ceased accruing interest income as of January 1, 2009 on the loan for book purposes. Accordingly, no interest income was recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and no interest income will be recognized in future periods unless collected from a third party buyer through the sale process. Interest income recognized on this loan for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was CAD $8.8 million ($8.7 million U.S.). Furthermore, management of the Company reviewed the fair market value of the property at June 30, 2009, taking into account an independent appraisal of CAD $277.0 million dated January 31, 2009 and changes in conditions from February 1, 2009 to June 30, 2009, and determined no loan loss reserve was necessary.

On February 20, 2009, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into a $3.0 million promissory note with Sapphire Wines LLC. The note bears interest at 15% and it matures on November 1, 2009. This note is secured by certain pledge agreements and other collateral. Interest has generally been paid late and because such payments are not being received per the contractual terms of the agreement, this note is considered impaired and is included in the $11.8 million of impaired notes receivable discussed further below.

On May 8, 2009, the Company received payment in full on its mortgage note receivable and related accrued interest of $3.7 million from Prairie Creek Properties, LLC. The Company advanced $3.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2007 under this agreement for the development of an approximately 9,000 seat amphitheatre in Hoffman Estates, Illinois.

On June 26, 2009, the Company received payment in full on its note receivable and related accrued interest of $1.0 million from an affiliate of one of its theatre operators. The Company advanced $1.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2007 under this agreement for the development of a megaplex theatre.

During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company advanced $27.8 million under its secured first mortgage loan agreement with SVV I, LLC for the development of a water-park anchored entertainment village in Kansas City, Kansas, the first phase of which opened in July 2009. On May 6, 2009, the Company reduced its commitment on this project from $175.0 million to $163.5 million and added to its collateral position by placing a mortgage on the two other water-parks, located in New Braunfels and South Padre Island, Texas, owned and operated by the entities controlled by the principals of SVVI, LLC. The mortgage note on the property in Kansas City, Kansas and the mortgage note on the Texas properties have cross-default and cross-collateral provisions. Per the mortgage on the Texas properties, only a seasonal line of credit secured by the Texas parks totaling not more than $5 million at any time ranks superior to the Company’s collateral position. Furthermore, the interest rate increased from LIBOR plus 350 basis points to 7% on June 30, 2009, and the loan was extended from September 30, 2012 to May 1, 2019. Interest income will continue to be recognized on the accrual basis. SVVI, LLC is required to fund a debt service reserve for off-season fixed payments (those due from September to May). The reserve is to be funded by equal monthly installments during the months of June, July and August. The Company also will receive a percentage of revenue from all three parks after certain threshold levels are achieved that may increase the return on the Company’s invested capital from 7% to as high as 10%. Through June 30, 2009, the Company has funded approximately $162.1 million on the mortgage notes.

Additionally, the Company has three notes receivable totaling $11.8 million at June 30, 2009 that were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 114. The Company determined that these notes are impaired due to the inability of the borrowers to meet their contractual obligations per the original agreements. The Company’s accounting policy is to recognize interest income on impaired loans on a cash basis. Accordingly, accrual interest income recognition for these notes was ceased on January 1, 2009. Interest income of $363 thousand has been recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2009 which represents payments received by the Company. Interest income recognized on these loans for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $401 thousand. Management of the Company has evaluated the fair value of the underlying collateral of the notes and has concluded that no loan loss reserve was necessary at June 30, 2009.

5. Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures

At June 30, 2009, the Company had a 21.7% and 21.8% investment interest in two unconsolidated real estate joint ventures, Atlantic-EPR I and Atlantic-EPR II, respectively. The Company accounts for its investment in these joint ventures under the equity method of accounting.

The Company recognized income of $278 and $262 (in thousands) from its investment in the Atlantic-EPR I joint venture during the first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company also received distributions from Atlantic-EPR I of $308 and $297 (in thousands) during the first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Unaudited condensed financial information for Atlantic-EPR I is as follows as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):

		2009				2008
Rental properties, net		$	27,635				28,279
Cash			141				369
Long-term debt (due May 2010)			15,211				15,609
Partners’ equity			12,470				12,713
Rental revenue			2,216				2,194
Net income			1,210				1,186

The Company recognized income of $166 and $163 (in thousands) from its investment in the Atlantic-EPR II joint venture during the first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company also received distributions from Atlantic-EPR II of $185 and $184 (in thousands) during the first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Unaudited condensed financial information for Atlantic-EPR II is as follows as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):

		2009				2008
Rental properties, net		$	21,728				22,189
Cash			99				240
Long-term debt (due September 2013)			13,117				13,436
Note payable to Entertainment Properties Trust			117				117
Partners’ equity			8,386				8,535
Rental revenue			1,433				1,389
Net income			670				678

The joint venture agreements for Atlantic-EPR I and Atlantic-EPR II allow the Company’s partner, Atlantic of Hamburg, Germany (Atlantic), to exchange up to a maximum of 10% of its ownership interest per year in each of the joint ventures for common shares of the Company or, at the discretion of the Company, the cash value of those shares as defined in each of the joint venture agreements. During 2008, the Company paid Atlantic-EPR I and Atlantic-EPR II cash of $133 and $79 (in thousands), respectively, in exchange for additional ownership in each joint venture of 0.7%. During the first quarter of 2009, the Company paid Atlantic cash of $105 (in thousands) in exchange for additional ownership of 0.7% for Atlantic-EPR I. These exchanges did not impact total partners’ equity in either Atlantic-EPR I or Atlantic-EPR II.

On April 2, 2008, the Company acquired, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, the remaining 50% ownership interest in CS Fund I and CS Fund I became a wholly-owned subsidiary. Prior to the date of this acquisition, CS Fund I was accounted for as an unconsolidated real estate joint venture. During the first six months of 2008, the Company recognized income of $1.1 million and received distributions of $1.3 million related to this investment.

6. Amendment and Restatement of Revolving Credit Facility

On June 30, 2009, the Company amended and restated its unsecured revolving credit facility (the facility). The size of the facility decreased from $235 million to $215 million and includes an accordion feature in which the facility can be increased to up to $300 million subject to certain conditions, including lender consent. The facility continues to be supported by a borrowing base of assets, and is secured by a pledge of the equity of each entity that holds a borrowing base asset. The facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 3.5%, and in the event LIBOR is less than 2%, LIBOR shall be deemed to be 2% for purposes of calculating the applicable interest rate for the period. The facility has a term expiring October 26, 2011 with a one year extension available at the Company’s option.

As a result of this amendment and restatement, the Company expensed certain unamortized financing costs, totaling approximately $117 thousand, in the second quarter of 2009.

7. Mortgage Notes Payable

On February 25, 2009, VinREIT, LLC (VinREIT), a subsidiary that holds the Company’s vineyard and winery assets, obtained a $4.0 million term loan under VinREIT’s $160.0 million credit facility. The loan matures on December 1, 2017, is secured by fixtures and equipment and bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.00%. Principal and interest is due monthly and this loan will be fully amortized at maturity. Subsequent to the closing of this loan, approximately $63.3 million of the facility remains available. The net proceeds from the loan were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness under the Company’s revolving credit facility.

8. Derivative Instruments

Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives

The Company is exposed to the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates on its LIBOR based borrowings. The Company limits this risk by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives. The Company’s objective in using derivatives is to add stability to reported earnings and to manage its exposure to foreign exchange and interest rate movements or other identified risks. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and foreign currency forwards.

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements on its LIBOR based borrowings. To accomplish this objective, the Company currently uses interest rate swaps as its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.

At June 30, 2009, the Company had nine interest rate swaps outstanding that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk and had a combined outstanding notional amount of $205.0 million.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of interest rate derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the six months ending June 30, 2009, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. No hedge ineffectiveness on cash flow hedges was recognized during the six months ending June 30, 2009.

Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt. As of June 30, 2009, the Company estimates that during the twelve months ending June 30, 2010, $6.2 million will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest expense.

Cash Flow Hedges of Foreign Exchange Risk

The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk against its functional currency, the US dollar, on its four Canadian properties and its mortgage note receivable denominated in Canadian

dollars. The Company uses a cross currency swap to mitigate its exposure to fluctuations in the CAD to U.S. dollar exchange rate on its four Canadian properties. This foreign currency derivative should hedge a significant portion of the Company’s expected CAD denominated cash flow of the four Canadian properties through February 2014 as their impact on the Company’s cash flow when settled should move in the opposite direction of the exchange rates utilized to translate revenues and expenses of these properties.

At June 30, 2009, the Company’s cross-currency swap had a fixed notional value of $76.0 million CAD and $71.5 million U.S. The net effect of this swap is to lock in an exchange rate of $1.05 CAD per U.S. dollar on approximately $13 million of annual CAD denominated cash flows.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of foreign currency derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of foreign exchange risk is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative, as well as amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, is recognized directly in earnings. No hedge ineffectiveness on foreign currency derivatives has been recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Net Investment Hedges

As discussed above, the Company is exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on its four Canadian properties and its mortgage note receivable denominated in Canadian dollars. As such, the Company also uses currency forward agreements to hedge its exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates on these investments. Currency forward agreements involve fixing the CAD to U.S. dollar exchange rate for delivery of a specified amount of foreign currency on a specified date. The currency forward agreements are typically cash settled in US dollars for their fair value at or close to their settlement date. In order to hedge the net investment in the Company’s four Canadian properties, the Company entered into a forward contract with a fixed notional value of $100 million CAD and $96.1 million U.S. with a February 2014 settlement which coincides with the maturity of the Company’s underlying mortgage on these four properties. The exchange rate of this forward contract is approximately $1.04 CAD per U.S. dollar. This forward contract should hedge a significant portion of the Company’s CAD denominated net investment in these four centers through February 2014 as the impact on accumulated other comprehensive income from marking the derivative to market should move in the opposite direction of the translation adjustment on the net assets of its four Canadian properties.

For foreign currency derivatives designated as net investment hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivatives are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income as part of the cumulative translation adjustment. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. No hedge ineffectiveness on net investment hedges has been recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Amounts are reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings when the hedged net investment is either sold or substantially liquidated.

See Note 9 for disclosures relating to the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments. Below is a summary of the effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 2009:

Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Income
for the six months ended June 30, 2009
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)

		Amount of Gain				Amount of Income				Amount of Gain
		or (Loss) Recognized				or (Expense) Reclassified				or (Loss) Recognzied
		in AOCI on				from AOCI				in Earnings
		Derivative				into Earnings				on Derivative
Description		(Effective Portion)				(Effective Portion)				(Ineffective Portion)
Interest Rate Swaps		$	6,503			$	(3,444	)*		$	—
Cross Currency Swaps			(2,158	)			780	**			—
Currency Forward Agreements			1,298				—				—
Total		$	5,643			$	(2,664	)		$	—

Credit-risk-related Contingent Features

The Company has agreements with each of its interest rate derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its interest rate derivative obligations.

As of June 30, 2009, the fair value of derivatives in a liability position related to these agreements was $9.1 million. If the Company breached any of the contractual provisions of the derivative contracts, it would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $10.6 million.

9. Fair Value Disclosures

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured at fair value under existing accounting pronouncements; accordingly, the standard does not require any new fair value measurements of reported balances.

SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions

that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).

Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses interest rate swaps, foreign currency forwards and cross currency swaps to manage its interest rate and foreign currency risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and implied volatilities. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts and the discounted expected variable cash payments. The variable cash payments are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. To comply with the provisions of SFAS No. 157, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.

Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives also utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are significant to the overall valuation of its interest rate derivatives and currency forward agreements, and therefore, has classified its interest rate derivatives and currency forward agreements as Level 3 within the fair value reporting hierarchy.

The table below presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall and by derivative type.

Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis at June 30, 2009
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)

		Quoted Prices in		Significant
		Active Markets		Other				Significant				Balance at
		for Identical		Observable				Unobservable				June 30,
Description		Assets (Level I)		Inputs (Level 2)				Inputs (Level 3)				2009
Interest Rate Swaps*		$ —		$	—			$	(9,061	)		$	(9,061	)
Cross Currency Swaps**		$ —		$	5,474			$	—			$	5,474
Currency Forward Agreements**		$ —		$	—			$	9,371			$	9,371

The table below presents a reconciliation of the Company’s beginning and ending balances of liabilities having fair value measurements based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)

		Beginning								Gains				Gains								Ending
		Balance as of								(Losses)				(Losses)								Balance as
		December 31,				Transfers				Included				Included				Total Gains				of June 30,
Description		2008				into Level 3				in Income				in OCI				(Losses)				2009
Interest Rate Swaps		$	—			$	(15,564	)		$	—			$	6,503			$	6,503			$	(9,061	)
Currency Forward Agreements		$	—			$	14,059			$	—			$	(4,688	)		$	(4,688	)		$	9,371

Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities

In February 2008, the FASB adopted FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” which allowed for a one-year deferral of fair value measurement

requirements for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not required or permitted to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Accordingly, for nonfinancial assets and liabilities SFAS No. 157 became effective for the Company as of January 1, 2009, and may impact the determination of goodwill and other long-lived assets’ fair values, when or if the Company has to apply fair value measurements for these. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company had no fair value measurements related to these assets.

10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Management compares the carrying value and the estimated fair value of our financial instruments. The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments at June 30, 2009:

Mortgage notes receivable and related accrued interest receivable:

The fair value of the Company’s mortgage notes receivable and related accrued interest receivable as of June 30, 2009 is estimated by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument using current market rates. At June 30, 2009, the Company had a variable rate mortgage note receivable outstanding with a carrying value of $162.6 million, including related accrued interest, with an interest rate of 4.01%. The variable mortgage note bears an interest rate of LIBOR plus 350 basis points. Discounting the future cash flows for the variable rate mortgage notes receivable using an estimated market rate of 7.0%, management estimates the variable rate mortgage notes receivable’s fair value to be approximately $128.6 million at June 30, 2009.

At June 30, 2009, the Company had a carrying value of $376.0 million in fixed rate mortgage notes receivable outstanding, including related accrued interest, with a weighted average interest rate of approximately 12.79%. The fixed rate mortgage notes bear interest at rates of 9.40% to 15.00%. Discounting the future cash flows for fixed rate mortgage notes receivable using an estimated weighted average market rate of 13.74%, management estimates the fixed rate mortgage notes receivable’s fair value to be approximately $365.6 million at June 30, 2009.

Investment in a direct financing lease

The fair value of the Company’s investment in a direct financing lease as of June 30, 2009 is estimated by discounting the future cash flows of the instrument using current market rates. At June 30, 2009, the Company had an investment in a direct financing lease with a carrying value of $167.9 million and a weighted average effective interest rate of 12.01%. The investment in direct financing lease bears interest at effective interest rates of 11.90% to 12.40%. Discounting the future cash flows for the investment in a direct financing lease using an estimated market rate of 13.01%, management estimates the investment in a direct financing lease’s fair value to be approximately $155.7 million at June 30, 2009.

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash:

Due to the highly liquid nature of our short term investments, the carrying values of our cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash approximate the fair market values.

Accounts and notes receivable:

The carrying values of our accounts receivable approximate the fair market value at June 30, 2009.

The fair value of the Company’s notes receivable as of June 30, 2009 is estimated by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument using current market rates. At June 30, 2009, the Company had a carrying value of $43.1 million in fixed rate notes receivable outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of approximately 10.64%. The fixed rate notes bear interest at rates

of 6.33% to 15.00%. Discounting the future cash flows for fixed rate notes receivable using an estimated market rate of 11.54%, management estimates the fixed rate notes receivable’s fair value to be approximately $42.4 million at June 30, 2009.

Derivative instruments:

Derivative instruments are carried at their fair market value.

Debt instruments:

The fair value of the Company’s debt as of June 30, 2009 is estimated by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument using current market rates. At June 30, 2009, the Company had a carrying value of $396.0 million in variable rate debt outstanding with an average weighted interest rate of approximately 5.39%. Discounting the future cash flows for variable rate debt using an estimated market rate of 5.56%, management estimates the variable rate debt’s fair value to be approximately $387.2 million at June 30, 2009. As described in Note 8, $205.0 million of variable rate debt outstanding at June 30, 2009 has been converted to a fixed rate by interest rate swap agreements.

At June 30, 2009, the Company had a carrying value of $829.4 million in fixed rate long-term debt outstanding with an average weighted interest rate of approximately 6.00%. Discounting the future cash flows for fixed rate debt using an estimated market rate of 5.90%, management estimates the fixed rate debt’s fair value to be approximately $826.0 million at June 30, 2009.

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:

The carrying value of accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates fair value due to the short term maturities of these amounts.

Common and preferred dividends payable:

The carrying values of common and preferred dividends payable approximate fair value due to the short term maturities of these amounts.

11. Earnings Per Share

The following table summarizes the Company’s common shares used for computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited, amounts in thousands except per share information):

		Three Months Ended June 30, 2009												Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
		Income				Shares				Per Share				Income				Shares				Per Share
		(numerator)				(denominator)				Amount				(numerator)				(denominator)				Amount
Basic earnings:
Income from continuing operations		$	25,995				34,970			$	0.74			$	50,090				34,678			$	1.44
Add: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests			1,709				—				0.05				2,943				—				0.09
Income from continuing operations attributable to Entertainment Properties Trust			27,704				—				0.79				53,033				—				1.53
Preferred dividend requirements			(7,552	)			—				(0.21	)			(15,103	)			—				(0.44	)
Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders of Entertainment Properties Trust			20,152				34,970				0.58				37,930				34,678				1.09
Effect of dilutive securities:
Share options			—				22				—				—				8				—
Diluted earnings: Income from continuing operations attributable to Entertainment Properties Trust		$	20,152				34,992			$	0.58			$	37,930				34,686			$	1.09
Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders of Entertainment Properties Trust		$	20,152				34,970			$	0.58			$	37,930				34,678			$	1.09
Income from discontinued operations			—				—				—				—				—				—
Income available to common shareholders of Entertainment Properties Trust		$	20,152				34,970			$	0.58			$	37,930				34,678			$	1.09
Effect of dilutive securities:
Share options			—				22				—				—				8				—
Diluted earnings attributable to Entertainment Properties Trust		$	20,152				34,992			$	0.58			$	37,930				34,686			$	1.09

		Three Months Ended June 30, 2008												Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
		Income				Shares				Per Share				Income				Shares				Per Share
		(numerator)				(denominator)				Amount				(numerator)				(denominator)				Amount
Basic earnings:
Income from continuing operations		$	30,830				30,577				1.01			$	57,454				29,351				1.96
Add: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests			478				—				0.02				986				—				0.03
Income from continuing operations attributable to Entertainment Properties Trust		$	31,308				—				1.03			$	58,440				—				1.99
Preferred dividend requirements			(7,552	)			—				(0.25	)			(13,162	)			—				(0.45	)
Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders of Entertainment Properties Trust			23,756				30,577				0.78				45,278				29,351				1.54
Effect of dilutive securities:
Share options			—				336				(0.01	)			—				312				(0.01	)
Diluted earnings: Income from continuing operations attributable to Entertainment Properties Trust		$	23,756				30,913			$	0.77			$	45,278				29,663			$	1.53
Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders of Entertainment Properties Trust		$	23,756				30,577			$	0.78			$	45,278				29,351			$	1.54
Income from discontinued operations			103				—				—				92				—				0.01
Income available to common shareholders of Entertainment Properties Trust		$	23,859				30,577			$	0.78			$	45,370				29,351			$	1.55
Effect of dilutive securities:
Share options			—				336				(0.01	)			—				312				(0.02	)
Diluted earnings attributable to Entertainment Properties Trust		$	23,859				30,913			$	0.77			$	45,370				29,663			$	1.53

The additional 1.9 million common shares that would result from the conversion of the Company’s 5.75% Series C cumulative convertible preferred shares and the additional 1.6 million common shares that would result from the conversion of the Company’s 9.0% Series E cumulative convertible preferred shares and the corresponding add-back of the preferred dividends declared on those shares are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 because the effect is anti-dilutive.

On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB Staff Position EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities,” (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting, and therefore need to be included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class method as described in SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” Accordingly, following the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1, the Company’s nonvested share awards are considered participating securities and are included in the calculation of earnings per share under the two-class method. Prior-period earnings per share data was computed using the treasury stock method and has been adjusted retrospectively for the adoption of this staff position which lowered basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.01 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and lowered basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.01 for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued 20,508 restricted share units to its non-employee trustees. The restricted share units are entitled to receive dividend payments from the date of grant and are therefore considered participating securities under FSP EITF 03-6-1. As such, the weighted average shares used in the computation of basic earnings per share include the nonvested restricted share units.

12. Equity Incentive Plans

All grants of common shares and options to purchase common shares were issued under the 1997 Share Incentive Plan prior to May 9, 2007, and under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan on and after May 9, 2007. Under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, an aggregate of 1,950,000 common shares, options to purchase common shares and restricted share units, subject to adjustment in the event of certain capital events, may be granted. At June 30, 2009, there were 1,059,818 shares available for grant under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.

Share Options

Share options granted under both the 1997 Share Incentive Plan and the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan have exercise prices equal to the fair market value of a common share at the date of grant. The options may be granted for any reasonable term, not to exceed 10 years, and for employees typically become exercisable at a rate of 20% per year over a five—year period, however, this was reduced to a rate of 25% per year over a four year period for options granted in the first quarter of 2009. For non-employee Trustees, share options are vested upon issuance, however, the share options may not be exercised for a one year period subsequent to the grant date. The Company generally issues new common shares upon option exercise. A summary of the Company’s share option activity and related information is as follows:

																		Weighted
		Number of				Option Price												Average
		Shares				Per Share												Exercise Price
Outstanding at
December 31, 2008			911,117			$	14.00				—			$	65.50			$	34.07
Exercised			—				—				—				—				—
Granted			422,093				18.18				—				19.41				18.36
Forfeited			(5,023	)			18.18				—				60.03				36.94
Outstanding at
June 30, 2009			1,328,187				14.00				—				65.50				29.06

The weighted average fair value of options granted was $2.68 and $4.31 during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, there were no stock options exercised. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, stock-option expense to be recognized in future periods was $1.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

The following table summarizes outstanding options at June 30, 2009:

Exercise		Options				Weighted avg.				Weighted avg.				Aggregate intrinsic
price range		outstanding				life remaining				exercise price				value (in thousands)
$14.00 - 19.99			609,167				6.9
20.00 - 29.99			264,127				3.5
30.00 - 39.99			82,222				4.8
40.00 - 49.99			256,959				7.0
50.00 - 59.99			10,000				8.9
60.00 - 65.50			105,712				7.6
			1,328,187				6.2			$	29.06			$	1,927

The following table summarizes exercisable options at June 30, 2009:

Exercise		Options				Weighted avg.				Weighted avg.				Aggregate intrinsic
price range		outstanding				life remaining				exercise price				value (in thousands)
$14.00 — 19.99			203,937				1.8
20.00 — 29.99			264,127				3.5
30.00 — 39.99			82,222				4.8
40.00 — 49.99			122,174				6.7
50.00 — 59.99			10,000				8.9
60.00 — 65.50			48,785				7.6
			731,245				4.0			$	29.43			$	1,085

Nonvested Shares

A summary of the Company’s nonvested share activity and related information is as follows:

						Weighted				Weighted
						Average				Average
		Number of				Grant Date				Life
		Shares				Fair Value				Remaining
Outstanding at
December 31, 2008			282,328			$	52.18
Granted			218,797				18.18
Vested			(96,309	)			50.61
Forfeited			(4,175	)			33.29
Outstanding at
June 30, 2009			400,641				34.19				1.55

The holders of nonvested shares have voting rights and receive dividends from the date of grant. These shares vest ratably over a period of three to five years. The fair value of the nonvested shares that vested during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 was $2.8 million and $3.6 million, respectively. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, unamortized share-based compensation expense related to nonvested shares was $7.7 million and $8.0 million, respectively.

Restricted share units

A summary of the Company’s restricted share unit activity and related information is as follows:

Weighted

Weighted

Average

Average

Number of

Grant Date

Life

Shares

Fair Value

Remaining

Outstanding at

December 31, 2008

—

$

—

Granted

20,508

19.02

Vested

—

—

Outstanding at

June 30, 2009

20,508

19.02

0.87