FORM 20-F
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 15, 2007.
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 20-F
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2006
Commission file number:
001-15030
COMPANHIA VALE DO RIO
DOCE
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
Federative Republic of Brazil
(Jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
Avenida Graça Aranha, No. 26
20030-900
Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
(Address of principal executive
offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Preferred class A shares of
CVRD, no par value per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange*
|
American Depositary Shares
(evidenced by American depositary receipts) each representing
one preferred
class A share of CVRD
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Common shares of CVRD, no par
value per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange*
|
American Depositary Shares
(evidenced by American
depositary receipts) each representing one common share of CVRD
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
6.875% Guaranteed Notes due 2036,
issued by Vale Overseas
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
8.250% Guaranteed Notes due 2034,
issued by Vale Overseas
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
6.250% Guaranteed Notes due 2017,
issued by Vale Overseas
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
6.250% Guaranteed Notes due 2016,
issued by Vale Overseas
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Shares are not listed for trading, but only in connection with
the registration of American Depositary Shares pursuant to the
requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant
to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
The number of outstanding shares of each class of stock of
CVRD as of December 31, 2006 was:
1,471,607,838 common shares, no par value per share
944,585,684 preferred class A shares, no par value per share
6 golden shares, no par value per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by
check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of
1934. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the
registrant has elected to
follow. Item 17 o Item 18 þ
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
GLOSSARY
|
|
|
Alumina |
|
Aluminum oxide. It is the main component of bauxite, and
extracted from bauxite ore in a chemical refining process. It is
the principal raw material in the electro-chemical process from
which aluminum is produced. |
|
Anthracite |
|
The hardest coal type which contains a high percentage of fixed
carbon and a low percentage of volatile matter. Anthracite is
the highest rank coal and it contains approximately 90% fixed
carbon, more than any other form of coal. Anthracite has a
semi-metallic luster and is capable of burning with little
smoke. Mainly used for metallurgical purposes. |
|
Austenitic stainless steel |
|
Steel that contains significant amount of chromium and
sufficient nickel to stabilize the austenite microstructure,
giving to the steel good formability and ductibility and
improving its high temperature resistance. On average,
austenitic stainless steels usually contain approximately 8-10%
nickel. They are used in a wide variety of applications, ranging
from consumer products to industrial process equipment, as well
as for power generation and transportation equipment, kitchen
appliances and many other applications where strength, corrosion
and high temperature resistance are required. Nickel use in
nickel-bearing or austenitic stainless steels accounts for
60%-65% of annual global primary nickel consumption. |
|
Austenitic stainless steel ratio |
|
The ratio of nickel-based stainless steels (austenitic steels)
relative to all stainless steels produced. |
|
Bauxite |
|
A rock composed primarily of hydrated aluminum oxides. It is the
principal ore of alumina, the raw material from which aluminum
is made. |
|
Beneficiation |
|
A variety of processes whereby extracted ore from mining is
reduced to particles that can be separated into mineral and
waste, the former suitable for further processing or direct use. |
|
Coal |
|
Coal is a black or brownish-black solid combustible substance
formed by the decomposition of vegetable matter without access
to air. The rank of coal, which includes anthracite, bituminous
coal (both are called hard coal), subbituminous coal, and
lignite, is based on fixed carbon, volatile matter, and heating
value. |
|
Cobalt |
|
Cobalt is a hard, lustrous, silver-gray metal found in ores, and
used in the preparation of magnetic, wear-resistant, and
high-strength alloys (particularly for jet engines and
turbines). Its compounds are also used in the production of
inks, paints, and varnishes. |
|
Coke |
|
Coal that has been processed in a coke oven, for use as a
reduction agent in blast furnaces and in foundries for the
purposes of transforming iron ore into pig iron. |
|
Coking coal |
|
A bituminous hard coal with a quality that allows the production
of coke. Normally used in coke ovens for metallurgical purposes. |
|
Concentration |
|
Physical, chemical or biological process to increase the grade
of the metal or mineral of interest. |
1
|
|
|
Copper |
|
A reddish brown metallic element. Copper is highly conductive,
both thermally and electrically. It is highly malleable and
ductile and is easily rolled into sheet and drawn into wire. |
|
Copper concentrate |
|
Material produced by concentration of copper minerals contained
in the copper ore. It is the raw material used in smelters to
produce copper metal. |
|
DR |
|
Direct Reduction. Process that removes oxygen from iron ore by
using natural gas or coal. The resulting product has an iron
content of
90-92%. |
|
DRI |
|
Direct Reduced Iron. Iron ore (lump or pellets) converted by the
Direct Reduction process, used mainly as a scrap substitute in
electric arc furnace steel making. |
|
DWT |
|
Deadweight ton. The measurement unit of a vessels capacity
for cargo, fuel oil, stores and crew, measured in metric tons of
1,000 kg. A vessels total deadweight is the total weight
the vessel can carry when loaded to a particular load line. |
|
Fe unit |
|
A measure of the iron content in the iron ore that is equivalent
to 1% iron content in one metric ton of iron ore. |
|
Ferritic steel |
|
Steel that contains significant amount of chromium, but does not
contain nickel to stabilize the austenite microstructure. |
|
Ferroalloys |
|
Ferroalloys are alloys of iron that contain one or more other
chemical elements. These alloys are used to add these other
elements into molten metal, usually in steel making. The
principal ferroalloys are those of manganese, silicon and
chromium. |
|
FOB |
|
Free on Board. It indicates that the purchaser pays for
shipping, insurance and all the other costs associated with
transportation of the goods to their destination. |
|
Gold |
|
A precious metal sometimes found free in nature, but usually
found in conjunction with silver, quartz, calcite, lead,
tellurium, zinc or copper. It is the most malleable and ductile
metal, a good conductor of heat and electricity and unaffected
by air and most reagents. |
|
Grade |
|
The proportion of metal or mineral present in ore or any other
host material. |
|
HBI |
|
Hot Briquetted Iron. Direct reduced iron that has been processed
into briquettes. Because DRI (direct reduced iron) may
spontaneously combust during transportation, HBI is preferred
when the metallic material must be stored or moved. |
|
Iridium |
|
A dense, hard, brittle, silvery-white transition metal of the
platinum family that occurs in natural alloys with platinum or
osmium. Iridium is used in high-strength alloys that can
withstand high temperatures, primarily in high-temperature
apparatus, electrical contacts, and as a hardening agent for
platinum. |
|
Kaolin |
|
A fine white aluminum silicate clay used as a coating agent,
filler, extender and absorbent in the paper, ceramics and
pharmaceutical industries. |
2
|
|
|
Lump ore |
|
Iron ore or manganese ore with the coarsest particle size in the
range of 6.35 mm to 50 mm diameter, but varying slightly between
different mines and ores. |
|
Manganese (Mn) |
|
A hard brittle metallic element found primarily in the minerals
pyrolusite, hausmannite and manganate. Manganese is essential to
the production of virtually all steels and is important in the
production of cast iron. |
|
Methanol |
|
An alcohol fuel largely used in the production of chemical and
plastic compounds. |
|
Mineral deposit(s) or mineralized material(s)
|
|
A mineralized body that has been intersected by a sufficient
number of closely spaced drill holes
and/or
underground/surface samples to support sufficient tonnage and
grade of metal(s) or mineral(s) of interest to warrant further
exploration-development work. |
|
Mineral resource |
|
A concentration or occurrence of minerals of economic interest
in such form and quantity that could justify an eventual
economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological
characteristics and continuity of a Mineral Resource are known,
estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence
through drill holes, trenches
and/or
outcrops. Mineral Resources are
sub-divided,
in order of increasing geological confidence, into Inferred,
Indicated and Measured Resources. |
|
Nickel |
|
A silvery white metal that takes on a high polish. It is hard,
malleable, ductile, somewhat ferromagnetic, and a fair conductor
of heat and electricity. It belongs to the iron-cobalt group of
metals and is chiefly valuable for the alloys it forms, such as
stainless steel and other corrosion-resistant alloys. |
|
Nickel-in-matte |
|
An intermediate smelter product that must be further refined to
obtain pure metal. |
|
Ntk |
|
Net ton (the weight of the goods being transported excluding the
weight of the wagon) kilometer. |
|
Open-pit mining |
|
Method of extracting rock or minerals from the earth by their
removal from an open pit. Open-pit mines for extraction of ore
are used when deposits of commercially useful minerals or rock
are found near the surface; that is, where the overburden
(surface material covering the valuable deposit) is relatively
thin or the material of interest is structurally unsuitable for
underground mining. |
|
Oxides |
|
Compounds of oxygen with another element. For example, magnetite
is an oxide mineral formed by the chemical union of iron with
oxygen. |
|
Palladium |
|
A silver-white metal that is ductile and malleable, used
primarily in automobile-emissions control devices, jewelry,
electrical and chemical applications. |
|
Pellet feed fines or PFF (Ultra-fine) |
|
Ultra-fine iron ore (less than 0.15 mm) generated by mining
and grinding. This material is aggregated into pellets through
an agglomeration process. |
3
|
|
|
Pellets |
|
Agglomerated ultra-fine iron ore particles of a size and quality
suitable for particular iron making processes. Our pellets range
in size from 8 mm to 18 mm. |
|
Pig iron |
|
Product of smelting iron ore usually with coke and limestone in
a blast furnace. |
|
Platinum |
|
A dense, precious, grey-white transition metal that is ductile
and malleable and occurs in some nickel and copper ores.
Platinum is resistant to corrosion and is used in jewelry,
laboratory equipment, electrical contacts, dentistry,
automobile-emissions control devices, flat panel TVs and hard
disk drives. |
|
Platinum-group metals (PGMs) |
|
Consist of platinum, palladium, rhodium, ruthenium, osmium and
iridium, of which osmium has no industrial application (no
economic interest), while platinum and palladium have the
greatest economic interest. |
|
Potash |
|
A potassium chloride compound, chiefly KCl, used as simple
fertilizer and in the production of mixture fertilizer. |
|
Precious metals |
|
Metals valued for their color, malleability, and rarity, with a
high economic value driven not only by their practical
industrial use, but also by their role as investments and a
store of value. The widely-traded precious metals are gold,
silver, platinum and palladium. |
|
Primary aluminum |
|
White metal that is obtained in the electro-chemical process of
reduction of the aluminum oxide. |
|
Probable ore reserves |
|
The economically mineable part of an Indicated, and in some
circumstances, Measured Mineral Resource. It implies that
appropriate assessments have been carried out, with
consideration of mining, beneficiation process, economic,
marketing, legal, environmental, social and governmental
factors. These assessments demonstrate at the time of reporting
that extraction could be justified. |
|
Proven ore reserves |
|
The economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource.
It implies that appropriate assessments have been carried out,
with consideration of mining, beneficiation process, economic,
marketing, legal, environmental, social and governmental
factors. These assessments demonstrate at the time of reporting
that extraction could be justified. |
|
Reserve or ore reserve |
|
The part of a mineral resource that could be economically and
legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve
determination. Ore Reserves are
sub-divided
in order of increasing confidence into Probable Ore Reserves and
Proven Ore Reserves. |
|
Rhodium |
|
A hard, silvery-white, durable metal that has a high reflectance
and is primarily used in combination with platinum for
automobile-emission control devices and as an alloying agent for
hardening platinum. |
|
Run-of-mine
(ROM) |
|
Ore in its natural (unprocessed) state, as mined, without having
been crushed. |
4
|
|
|
Ruthenium |
|
A hard, white metal that can harden platinum and palladium used
to make severe wear-resistant electrical contacts and in other
applications in the electronics industry. |
|
Secondary, or scrap, nickel |
|
Stainless steel scrap containing small quantities of nickel. |
|
Seaborne market |
|
Comprises the total ore trade (exports) between countries using
ocean bulk vessels. |
|
Silver |
|
A ductile and malleable metal used in photography, coins and
medal fabrication, and in industrial applications. |
|
Sinter feed (Fines) |
|
Iron ore with particles in the range of 0.15 mm to 6.35 mm
diameter. Suitable for sintering. |
|
Sintering |
|
The agglomeration of sinter feed, binder and other materials,
into a coherent mass by heating without melting, to be used as
metallic charge into a blast furnace. |
|
Slabs |
|
The most common type of semi-finished steel. Traditional slabs
measure 10 inches thick and
30-85 inches
wide (and average approximately 20 feet long), while the
output of the recently developed thin slab casters
is approximately two inches thick. Subsequent to casting, slabs
are sent to the hot-strip mill to be rolled into coiled sheet
and plate products. |
|
Stainless steel |
|
Alloy steel containing at least 10% chromium and with superior
corrosion resistance. It may also contain other elements such as
nickel, manganese, niobium, titanium, molybdenum, copper, in
order to improve mechanical, thermal properties and service
life. It is primarily classified as austenitic (200 and 300
series), ferritic (400 series), martensitic, duplex or
precipitation hardening grades. |
|
Stainless steel scrap ratio |
|
The ratio of secondary nickel units (either in the form of
nickel-bearing, stainless steel scrap, or in alloy steel,
foundry and nickel-based alloy scrap) relative to all nickel
units consumed in the manufacture of new stainless steel. |
|
Thermal coal |
|
Refers to the type of coal that is suitable to energy generation
after its steaming properties (for use in thermal power
stations). |
|
Troy ounce |
|
One troy ounce equals 31.103 grams. |
|
Underground mining |
|
Mineral exploitation in which extraction is carried out beneath
the earths surface. |
5
PRESENTATION
OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
We have prepared our financial statements appearing in this
annual report in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States (U.S. GAAP), which differ
in certain respects from accounting practices adopted in Brazil
(Brazilian GAAP). Brazilian GAAP is determined by the
requirements of Law No. 6,404, dated December 15,
1976, as amended, which we refer to as the Brazilian corporation
law, and the rules and regulations of the Brazilian Securities
Commission (Comissão de Valores Mobiliários),
or CVM. We also publish Brazilian GAAP financial statements in
Brazil, which we refer to as our Brazilian corporation law
financial statements. We use our Brazilian corporation law
financial statements for:
|
|
|
|
|
reports to Brazilian shareholders;
|
|
|
|
filings with the CVM;
|
|
|
|
determination of dividend payments; and
|
|
|
|
determination of tax liability.
|
Our financial statements and the other financial information
appearing in this annual report have been translated from
Brazilian reais into U.S. dollars on the basis
explained in Note 3 to our financial statements, unless we
indicate otherwise.
References to real, reais or
R$ are to Brazilian reais (plural) and to the
Brazilian real (singular), the official currency of
Brazil. References to U.S. dollars or
US$ are to United States dollars.
Unless otherwise specified, we use metric units.
References to CVRD are to Companhia Vale do Rio
Doce. References to Vale Overseas are to our
subsidiary Vale Overseas Limited. References to CVRD
Inco are to our subsidiary, CVRD Inco Limited. References
to Inco are to Inco Limited, which we acquired and
subsequently renamed CVRD Inco Limited. References
to us or we are to CVRD and, except
where the context otherwise requires, its consolidated
subsidiaries.
References to our ADSs or American Depositary
Shares include both our common American Depositary Shares
(our common ADSs), each of which represents one common share of
CVRD, and our preferred American Depositary Shares (our
preferred ADSs), each of which represents one preferred
class A share of CVRD. American Depositary Shares are
represented by American depositary receipts (ADRs) issued by
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as depositary.
6
PRESENTATION
OF INFORMATION CONCERNING RESERVES
The estimates of proven and probable ore reserves at our mines
and projects and the estimates of mine life, as of
December 31, 2005 and 2006, included in this annual report
have been calculated according to the technical definitions
required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or
the SEC. Our staff of experienced geologists and engineers
prepares our reserve estimates. We derived estimates of mine
life described in this annual report from such reserve
estimates. For manganese ore and bauxite deposits, we have
adjusted ore reserve estimates for extraction losses and
metallurgical recoveries during extraction. For iron ore,
kaolin, copper, potash, nickel, PGMs and cobalt, our reserve
estimates are of in-place material after adjustments for mining
depletion and mining losses (or screening and drying in the
cases of PT International Nickel Indonesia Tbk, or PT Inco, and
Goro) and recoveries, with no adjustments made for metal losses
due to processing. See Item 3. Key
information Risk factors Risks relating
to our business for a description of risks relating to
reserves and reserve estimates.
As part of our mineral reserves reporting strategy, we
periodically engage independent mining and geological
consultants to review estimates of our mineral reserves for all
operations and new projects. Mineral reserves are subjected to
outside review when significant changes in the reserve model
occur due to the inclusion of new geological information,
changes in production schedules, or changes in economic
assumptions such as costs or product prices.
7
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This annual report contains statements that may constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor
provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. Many of those forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of forward-looking words such as
anticipate, believe, could,
expect, should, plan,
intend, estimate and
potential, among others. Those statements appear in
a number of places and include statements regarding our intent,
belief or current expectations with respect to:
|
|
|
|
|
our direction and future operation;
|
|
|
|
the implementation of our principal operating strategies,
including our potential participation in privatization,
acquisition or joint venture transactions or other investment
opportunities;
|
|
|
|
our acquisition or divestiture plans;
|
|
|
|
the implementation of our financing strategy and capital
expenditure plans;
|
|
|
|
the exploration of mineral reserves and development of mining
facilities;
|
|
|
|
the depletion and exhaustion of mines and mineral reserves;
|
|
|
|
the future impact of competition and regulation;
|
|
|
|
the declaration or payment of dividends;
|
|
|
|
industry trends, including the direction of prices and expected
levels of supply and demand;
|
|
|
|
other factors or trends affecting our financial condition or
results of operations; and
|
|
|
|
the factors discussed under Item 3. Key
information Risk factors.
|
We caution you that forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future performance and involve risks and
uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those
in the forward-looking statements as a result of various
factors. These risks and uncertainties include factors relating
to the Brazilian and Canadian economies and securities markets,
factors relating to the iron ore and nickel businesses and their
dependence on the global steel industry, which is cyclical in
nature, and factors relating to the highly competitive
industries in which we operate. For additional information on
factors that could cause our actual results to differ from
expectations reflected in forward-looking statements, see
Item 3. Key information Risk factors.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are
made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update them in
light of new information or future developments. All
forward-looking statements attributed to us or a person acting
on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this
cautionary statement, and you should not place undue reliance on
any forward-looking statement.
PART I
|
|
Item 1.
|
Identity
of directors, senior management and advisors
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Offer
statistics and expected timetable
|
Not applicable.
8
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
The table below presents selected consolidated financial
information as of and for the periods indicated. You should read
this information together with our consolidated financial
statements appearing in this annual report.
Statement
of income data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Net operating revenues
|
|
US$
|
4,123
|
|
|
US$
|
5,350
|
|
|
US$
|
8,066
|
|
|
US$
|
12,792
|
|
|
US$
|
19,651
|
|
Cost of products and services
|
|
|
(2,263
|
)
|
|
|
(3,128
|
)
|
|
|
(4,081
|
)
|
|
|
(6,229
|
)
|
|
|
(10,147
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
(452
|
)
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
Research and development
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,429
|
|
|
|
1,644
|
|
|
|
3,123
|
|
|
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income (expenses)
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
(589
|
)
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
|
|
(1,011
|
)
|
Foreign exchange and monetary
losses, net
|
|
|
(580
|
)
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
(828
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, equity
results and minority interests
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
|
|
3,003
|
|
|
|
5,420
|
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
Income taxes benefit (charge)
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
|
|
(880
|
)
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
Equity in results of affiliates and
joint ventures and change in provision for gains and (losses) on
equity investments
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
(579
|
)
|
Change in accounting practice for
asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
US$
|
680
|
|
|
US$
|
1,548
|
|
|
US$
|
2,573
|
|
|
US$
|
4,841
|
|
|
US$
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash paid to shareholders(1)
|
|
US$
|
602
|
|
|
US$
|
675
|
|
|
US$
|
787
|
|
|
US$
|
1,300
|
|
|
US$
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Total cash paid to shareholders
consists of cash paid during the period in respect of interest
on shareholders equity and dividends.
|
Per share
data earnings and dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2002(1)
|
|
|
2003(1)
|
|
|
2004(1)
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
|
(US$, except recorded dividends and interest on
shareholders
|
|
|
|
equity per share in reais and share numbers)
|
|
|
Basic earnings per Common and
Preferred Class A Share(2)
|
|
US$
|
0.30
|
|
|
US$
|
0.67
|
|
|
US$
|
1.12
|
|
|
US$
|
2.10
|
|
|
US$
|
2.69
|
|
Diluted Earnings per Common and
Preferred Class A Share(2)
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
0.67
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
Distributions to shareholders per
share in US$(3)
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
Distributions to shareholders per
share in reais(3)
|
|
R$
|
0.83
|
|
|
R$
|
0.84
|
|
|
R$
|
0.98
|
|
|
R$
|
1.34
|
|
|
R$
|
1.15
|
|
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares(2)
|
|
|
1,499,184
|
|
|
|
1,471,608
|
|
|
|
1,471,608
|
|
|
|
1,471,608
|
|
|
|
1,471,608
|
|
Preferred class A shares(2)
|
|
|
810,252
|
|
|
|
831,428
|
|
|
|
831,432
|
|
|
|
831,432
|
|
|
|
954,426
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,309,436
|
|
|
|
2,303,036
|
|
|
|
2,303,040
|
|
|
|
2,303,040
|
|
|
|
2,426,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We carried out a
two-for-one
stock split in May 2006 and a
three-for-one
stock split in August 2004. Share and per-share amounts for all
periods give effect to the stock splits.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Each common American depositary
share represents one common share and each preferred American
depositary share represents one preferred class A share.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Our distributions to shareholders
may take the form of dividends or of interest on
shareholders equity. From 1997 to 2003, all distributions
were in the form of interest on shareholders equity. In
2004, 2005 and 2006, part of the distribution was made in the
form of interest on shareholders equity and part as
dividends. The amount shown represents distributions paid during
the year.
|
9
Balance
sheet data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
US$
|
2,589
|
|
|
US$
|
2,474
|
|
|
US$
|
3,890
|
|
|
US$
|
4,775
|
|
|
US$
|
12,940
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
|
|
6,484
|
|
|
|
9,063
|
|
|
|
14,166
|
|
|
|
38,007
|
|
Investments in affiliated companies
and joint ventures and other investments
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
1,159
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
1,603
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
7,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
US$
|
7,955
|
|
|
US$
|
11,434
|
|
|
US$
|
15,715
|
|
|
US$
|
22,644
|
|
|
US$
|
60,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
US$
|
1,508
|
|
|
US$
|
2,253
|
|
|
US$
|
2,455
|
|
|
US$
|
3,325
|
|
|
US$
|
7,312
|
|
Long-term liabilities(1)
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
|
|
10,036
|
|
Long-term debt(2)
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
|
2,767
|
|
|
|
3,214
|
|
|
|
3,714
|
|
|
|
21,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
4,641
|
|
|
|
6,221
|
|
|
|
7,536
|
|
|
|
9,449
|
|
|
|
38,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
2,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
|
|
2,869
|
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
5,868
|
|
|
|
8,119
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
Reserves and retained earnings
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
|
3,684
|
|
|
|
5,611
|
|
|
|
11,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
|
|
4,884
|
|
|
|
7,391
|
|
|
|
11,977
|
|
|
|
19,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
US$
|
7,955
|
|
|
US$
|
11,434
|
|
|
US$
|
15,715
|
|
|
US$
|
22,644
|
|
|
US$
|
60,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Excludes long-term debt.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Excludes current portion of
long-term debt.
|
10
RISK
FACTORS
Risks
relating to our business
Due to
our dependence on the global steel industry, fluctuations in
demand for steel could adversely affect our
business.
Sales prices and volumes in the global iron ore market depend on
the prevailing and expected levels of demand and supply for iron
ore, and global iron ore demand depends on the global steel
industry. In addition, the stainless steel sector is the largest
global consumer of primary nickel. Primary nickel use in
stainless steel production accounts for over 60% of total
primary nickel demand. Global demand for steel is cyclical. A
number of factors, the most significant of which is the
prevailing level of global demand for steel products, influence
the performance of the global steel industry. During periods of
sluggish or declining regional or world economic growth, demand
for steel products generally decreases, which usually leads to
corresponding reductions in demand for iron ore and nickel.
Driven primarily by strong demand from Chinese steelmakers,
together with a modest expansion in other markets, the global
iron ore market experienced high demand and rising iron ore and
pellet prices from 2003 to 2005. In 2006, the price of iron ore
increased further, due to a continued imbalance between global
demand and supply that was driven by a significant expansion in
demand. However, in 2006 there was a reduction in the price of
blast furnace and direct reduction pellets. For 2007, iron ore
prices increased by 9.5%, while blast furnace and direct
reduction pellet prices increased by 5.28%. Since 2001, global
demand for iron ore has grown at an average annual rate of 9.8%.
We cannot guarantee that iron ore demand will remain at its
current high level or the direction of future prices. Sustained
declines in world contract prices or sales volumes for iron ore
could have a material adverse effect on our revenues.
Consolidation in the steelmaking industry may also lead to
backward integration, which might reduce global demand for iron
ore.
Driven by strong global economic activity and customers
need to replenish inventories, global stainless steel production
grew 15.8% in 2006, with a significant portion of the increased
production coming from China, which led the way in stainless
steel capacity expansion in 2006. This expansion has driven an
increase in global demand for nickel, which exceeds supply and
has led to higher prices for nickel. We cannot guarantee that
demand for nickel will remain at its current high level or the
direction of future prices for nickel. Sustained declines in
stainless steel production could have a material adverse effect
on our revenues from nickel.
Increased
substitution for nickel applications could adversely affect our
nickel business.
Nickel prices and demand may be negatively impacted by an
increase in scrap nickel usage and by the substitution of
materials other than nickel in current applications. Scrap
nickel competes directly with primary nickel as a source of
nickel for use in the production of stainless steel, and the
choice between them is largely driven by their relative prices
and availability. In 2006, the stainless steel scrap ratio was
48%, compared to 49% in 2005. Recently, Chinese steelmakers have
developed a pig-iron product containing low grades of nickel
that competes with both primary and scrap nickel in the
production of stainless steel.
A
reduction of global demand for Brazilian steel
and/or
agriculture products could reduce the demand for our logistics
services.
The Brazilian agriculture and steel industries are currently the
primary drivers of demand for our logistics services to
customers. The percentage of our logistics revenues attributable
to these industries was approximately 78.6% in 2005, and 71.9%
in 2006. A reduction in world demand for Brazilian steel
and/or
agriculture products could reduce demand for our logistics
services and harm the profitability of our logistics business.
11
Adverse
economic developments in our principal markets, especially
China, could reduce demand for our products, leading to lower
revenues and profitability.
The global economy is the primary driver of demand in the global
market for iron ore and pellets. In recent years, China has been
the main driver of our sales increases. The percentage of our
total gross revenues attributable to sales to customers in China
was 15.0% in 2005 and 16.7% in 2006 (including CVRD Inco sales
as though we had acquired Inco on January 1, 2006). The
percentage of our gross revenues attributable to sales to
customers from Asian countries other than China was 14.9% in
2005 and 22.7% in 2006 (on the same basis). The percentage of
our gross revenues attributable to sales to European customers
was 28.5% in 2005 and 23.0% in 2006 (on the same basis). A
weakened global economy or a weakened economy in specific
markets where we sell our products, such as China, could reduce
demand for our products, leading to lower revenues and
profitability.
Nickel,
aluminum and copper are actively traded on world commodity
exchanges and their prices are subject to significant
fluctuations.
Nickel, aluminum and copper are sold in an active global market
and traded on commodity exchanges, such as the London Metal
Exchange (LME) and the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX).
Prices for these metals are subject to wide fluctuations and are
affected by many factors, including actual and expected global
economic and political conditions, levels of supply and demand,
the availability and cost of substitutes, inventory, investments
by commodity funds and others and actions of participants in the
commodity markets. Prices for these metals are more volatile
than iron ore and pellet prices because they respond more
quickly to actual and expected changes in market conditions.
The
mining industry is an intensely competitive industry, and we may
have difficulty effectively competing with other mining
companies in the future.
Intense competition characterizes the global iron ore and nickel
industries. We compete with a number of large mining companies.
Some of these competitors possess substantial iron ore and
nickel deposits at locations closer to our principal Asian and
European customers. Competition from iron ore and nickel
producers may result in our loss of market share and revenues.
Our aluminum, ferroalloys, copper and other businesses are also
subject to intense competition and to similar risks.
Demand
for our products in peak periods may outstrip our production
capacity, rendering us unable to satisfy customer
demand.
Our ability to rapidly increase production capacity to satisfy
increases in demand for our products is limited. In periods when
customer demand exceeds our production capacity, we generally
meet excess customer demand by reselling iron ore, iron ore
pellets or nickel purchased from joint ventures or third
parties. If we are unable to satisfy excess customer demand by
purchasing from joint ventures or third parties, we may lose
customers. Similarly, because it takes time to increase
production capacity, we may fail to complete expansion projects
and greenfield projects in time to take advantage of the current
high levels of worldwide demand for iron ore and nickel. In
addition, operating at or above full capacity may expose us to
higher costs, including demurrage fees due to capacity
restraints in our mines, railroads and ports.
Political,
economic, regulatory and social conditions in the countries in
which we operate or have projects could adversely impact our
business and the market price of our securities.
Our financial performance may be negatively affected by general
economic, political, regulatory and social conditions in
countries in which we have significant operations or projects,
particularly Brazil, Canada, New Caledonia and Indonesia. Actual
or potential political changes and changes in economic policy
may undermine investor confidence, result in economic slowdowns
and otherwise adversely affect the economic and other conditions
under which we operate in ways that could have a material
adverse effect on our business. Governments in emerging
economies such as Brazil, New Caledonia and Indonesia frequently
intervene in the economy and occasionally make substantial
changes in policy that could adversely affect
12
exchange rates, inflation, interest rates, rates of taxes or
royalties and the economic and regulatory environment in which
we operate. In New Caledonia, a planned referendum in 2014 may
result in New Caledonia becoming fully independent from France,
which could result in significant political and economic changes
in New Caledonia and may adversely affect our Goro project. In
addition, actions by non-governmental organizations or community
activist groups may disrupt our operations or projects.
Acts
by protestors may hamper our mining and logistics operations and
projects.
Protestors, including protestors from indigenous communities
living near areas where we operate, have taken actions to
disrupt our operations and projects, and they may continue to do
so in the future. Although we vigorously defend ourselves
against illegal acts, while continuing to support the
communities living near our operations, future attempts by
protestors to harm our operations could adversely affect our
business. For more information, see Item 4. Information
on the company Regulatory matters
Environmental matters Brazil.
Our PT
Inco operations are subject to significant risks.
In addition to political, economic and other risks described
separately, our PT Inco nickel operations in Indonesia are
subject to significant risks. In particular:
|
|
|
|
|
Groundwork on PT Incos new hydroelectric power project on
the Larona River near the village of Karebbe has been suspended
since January 2006 pending the amendment of a required permit
issued by the Minister of Forestry on terms acceptable to PT
Inco. Delays in obtaining the required permits may adversely
affect the timing and cost of the Karebbe project, impair PT
Incos ability to achieve planned increases in
nickel-in-matte
production and raise PT Incos production costs.
|
|
|
|
Under PT Incos Contract of Work with the Indonesian
government, PT Inco is required, subject to economic and
technical feasibility, to construct production plants at Pomalaa
in Southeast Sulawesi and Bahodopi in Central Sulawesi. The
obligation to build a commercial plant at Pomalaa is deemed
satisfied through the later of 2008 or the termination of PT
Incos Cooperative Resources Agreement with PT Antam Tbk
(an agreement providing for the supply by PT Inco of saprolite
ore to PT Antam), after which PT Inco must deliver a report
evaluating the technical and economic feasibility of
constructing a commercial plant at Pomalaa. Subject to technical
and economic feasibility, the Contract of Work requires PT Inco
to build the Bahodopi facility by about 2010. Failure to meet
these commitments under the Contract of Work would entitle the
Indonesian government, after a cure period of 180 days
following the date of a notice of default, to close and require
PT Inco to relinquish the mining areas related to the expansion
project.
|
|
|
|
Regulations issued by the Indonesian Minister of Forestry
relating to mining activities have imposed new restrictions on
mining in protected forests. If these regulations restrict PT
Incos ability to mine in certain areas included in its
Contract of Work, they could result in a reduction of PT
Incos estimated ore reserves and adversely affect PT
Incos long-term mining plans.
|
|
|
|
PT Incos Contract of Work may not be extended beyond its
scheduled expiration in 2025. For more information about the
Contract of Work, see Item 4. Information on the
company Regulatory matters
Mining Indonesia.
|
The
requirement to build a nickel processing facility in the
Canadian Province of Newfoundland and Labrador by the end of
2011 involves risks.
Under definitive agreements with the Canadian Province of
Newfoundland and Labrador, we have agreed to build a commercial
nickel processing facility in this Province by the end of 2011
to treat all nickel ores or
13
intermediate products from our Voiseys Bay operations for
the production of finished nickel and cobalt products. This
project involves several risks and challenges, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Failure to complete the facility on the timetable agreed with
the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador could subject us to
sanctions under our agreements with the Province, including the
potential forfeiture of the lease to conduct our Voiseys
Bay operations.
|
|
|
|
As currently proposed, the new processing facility will rely on
new hydrometallurgical processing and other technologies, and
there can be no assurance that these technologies will be
successful on a commercial basis. Unforeseen challenges in
implementing these new technologies could lead to delays in the
start-up of
commercial production or lead to higher than expected capital or
operating costs that could adversely affect the projects
profitability.
|
|
|
|
We currently rely on the availability of Voiseys Bay
nickel concentrates to maintain production levels at our
facility in the Canadian Province of Manitoba, but such
shipments must eventually cease under the agreement with the
Province of Newfoundland and Labrador. If we are unable to
develop sufficient low-cost sources of nickel concentrate to
supply our Manitoba operations in the future, we may be unable
to maintain nickel production levels at our Manitoba facility
without purchasing third-party nickel intermediates, which could
increase our overall unit production costs for nickel.
|
Our
development projects are subject to risks that may result in
increased costs, or delay or prevent their successful
implementation.
We are investing heavily to further increase our production
capacity, logistics capabilities and to expand the scope of
minerals we produce. Our expansion and mining projects are
subject to a number of risks that may cause them to be less
successful than anticipated, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
We may encounter delays or higher than expected costs in
obtaining the necessary equipment or services to build and
operate our projects.
|
|
|
|
We may fail to obtain, or experience delays or higher than
expected costs in obtaining, the required permits to build our
projects. We have not yet obtained certain construction,
environmental and operating permits for the Goro project, the
most significant of which is an amended operating permit. Our
ability to obtain the amended operating permit, given the
expiration and cancellation of the prior permit, is crucial for
the completion of the Goro project. While we currently
anticipate that we will be able to obtain all necessary permits
on a timely basis, including the amended operating permit, any
failure to obtain, or any delay in the issuance of, such permits
could adversely affect our ability to develop the Goro project.
|
|
|
|
Changes in market conditions may make our projects less
profitable than expected at the time we initiated work on the
project.
|
|
|
|
Adverse mining conditions may delay and hamper our ability to
produce the expected quantities of minerals.
|
|
|
|
Some of our development projects are located in regions where
tropical diseases, AIDS, malaria and other contagious diseases
are a major public health issue and pose health and safety risks
to our employees. If we are unable to ensure the health and
safety of our employees, our business may be adversely affected.
|
If we are unable to successfully manage these risks, our growth
prospects and profitability may suffer.
Our
principal shareholder could have significant influence over our
company.
At December 31, 2006, Valepar S.A., or Valepar, owned 53.3%
of our outstanding common stock and 32.5% of our total
outstanding capital. For a description of our ownership
structure, see Item 7. Major shareholders and related
party transactions Major shareholders
Principal shareholder. As a result of its share ownership,
Valepar can control the outcome of any action requiring
shareholder approval, except for
14
the appointment of certain directors and certain members of our
fiscal council. Moreover, the Brazilian government owns six CVRD
golden shares that give it limited veto power over certain
actions that we could otherwise take. For a detailed description
of the Brazilian governments veto power by virtue of its
ownership of these golden shares, see Item 10.
Additional information Common shares and preferred
shares General.
Many
of our operations depend on joint ventures or consortia, and our
business could be adversely affected if our partners fail to
observe their commitments.
We currently operate important parts of our pelletizing, nickel,
bauxite, coal and steel businesses through joint ventures with
other companies. Important parts of our electricity business are
operated through consortia. Our forecasts and plans for these
joint ventures and consortia assume that our partners will
observe their obligations to make capital contributions,
purchase products and, in some cases, provide managerial
personnel. If any of our partners fails to observe its
commitments, the affected joint venture or consortium may not be
able to operate in accordance with its business plans, or we may
have to increase the level of our investment to effectuate these
plans. For more information on our joint ventures, see
Item 4. Information on the company Lines of
business.
Our
mining and logistics activities depend on authorizations from
regulatory agencies, and changes in regulations could adversely
affect our business.
Our mining and logistics activities depend on authorizations
from and concessions by governmental regulatory agencies of the
countries in which we operate. Our exploration, mining, mineral
processing and logistics activities are also subject to laws and
regulations that can change at any time. If these laws and
regulations change in the future, modifications to our
technologies and operations could be required, and we could be
required to make unexpected capital expenditures. For example,
in Indonesia, the pending new mining legislation could have a
material adverse effect on our PT Inco operations. For a more
detailed description of the authorizations and concessions upon
which our mining and logistics activities depend, see
Item 4. Information on the company
Regulatory matters.
Our
mining and energy businesses may be adversely affected by
environmental regulation.
Our operations often involve using, handling, disposing and
discharging hazardous materials into the environment or the use
of natural resources, and nearly all aspects of our operations
and development projects around the world are subject to
environmental regulation. Such regulation requires us to obtain
operating licenses, permits and other approvals and to conduct
environmental assessments prior to initiating projects or
undertaking significant changes to existing operations.
Difficulties in obtaining licenses may lead to construction
delays or cost increases, and in some cases may lead us to
abandon a project. Environmental regulation also imposes
standards and controls on activities relating to mining,
exploration, development, production, reclamation, closure, and
the refining, distribution and marketing of our products. Such
regulation may give rise to significant costs and liabilities.
Environmental regulation in many countries in which we operate
has become stricter in recent years, and it is possible that
more regulation or more aggressive enforcement of existing
regulations will adversely affect us by imposing restrictions on
our activities, creating new requirements for the issuance or
renewal of environmental licenses, raising our costs or
requiring us to engage in expensive reclamation efforts. Some of
the significant environmental risks that could affect our
business are summarized below. For more information on
environmental regulation applicable to our operations, see
Item 4. Information on the company
Regulatory matters Environmental matters and
Item 8. Financial information Legal
proceedings.
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian laws restricting development in the Amazon region may
limit our ability to expand certain of our operations and to
fully exploit our mineral rights in those regions.
|
|
|
|
We are subject to Brazilian environmental legislation requiring
companies that undertake projects with a significant
environmental impact to pay an environmental
compensation fee in the amount of at least 0.5% of the
total investment in the venture. There are numerous
uncertainties regarding the
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
application of this law. An increase in the level of the fees
charged above 0.5% would significantly increase our costs and,
depending on the magnitude of the fees involved, could have a
material adverse effect on our liquidity and return on
investments. Uncertainties regarding calculation and payment of
these fees may strain our relations with the Brazilian
environmental authorities or lead to delays in obtaining
necessary environmental permits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Several Brazilian states in which we operate are currently
considering implementing water usage fees under the National
Hydrological Resources Policy. This may require us to pay usage
fees in the future for water rights that we currently use for
free, which could considerably increase our costs in areas where
water resources are scarce.
|
|
|
|
We are subject to limits on sulfur dioxide and nickel emissions,
as a result of which we will be required to make significant
investments. We may be subject to additional emission limits in
the future, including potential limits on the emission of
greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act in both Canada and the
United States. Complying with these or other future emission
limits could require significant capital expenditures or the
development of new technologies. Complying with such limits
could also have an adverse impact on production levels, to the
extent we are required to operate our facilities at reduced
levels to comply with emission limits or are unable to bank or
trade sufficient emission allowances in emissions trading
markets (where available).
|
|
|
|
We have been working with regulatory authorities and other
interested parties to evaluate elevated levels of nickel and
other metals in soils in the vicinity of our processing
facilities in Ontario, Canada that may have been affected by the
historical emission of windblown metal-containing particulates.
Any efforts we are required to undertake to remediate or
investigate these matters may involve significant expenditures.
We are also subject to related litigation in connection with
soils near our Port Colborne, Ontario facilities, and
environmental health studies and risk assessments are underway
to evaluate risks from chemicals of concern found in soils near
our smelters in Port Colborne and Sudbury. Given the existence
of various legal appeals and scientific and medical studies
currently underway, it is not possible to predict the effect
these actions and studies could have on our business, results of
operation or financial condition.
|
|
|
|
PT Incos facilities are subject to environmental
regulations and permits issued by the Government of Indonesia.
PT Inco has in the past exceeded regulatory limits on dust
emission levels from its facilities and could be subject to
regulatory actions by governmental authorities for any
non-compliance.
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations for our Canadian facilities and
projects could differ materially from amounts currently
estimated by us.
|
|
|
|
The European Commission has adopted draft legislation for a new
policy (known as REACH) establishing an all-encompassing system
for the management of both new and existing chemicals that are
manufactured in or imported into the EU. The draft legislation
contains a broad definition of chemicals that
includes metals, alloys and all metal-containing compounds and
establishes a complex authorization process that may apply to
nickel and cobalt substances.
|
We are
involved in ongoing antitrust proceedings that could result in
divestitures, fines or other restrictions that could harm our
business.
Nearly all of our acquisitions and joint ventures are subject to
post-transaction review by the Brazilian antitrust regulator
(the Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica),
or CADE. We are currently involved in five proceedings before
CADE, three of which involve post-transaction review of
acquisitions (including the acquisition of Inco) or joint
venture transactions. The other two are administrative
proceedings involving claims that we have violated antitrust
laws in connection with our logistics business. If CADE were to
rule against us, it could order us to cease the conduct in
question
and/or to
pay fines. We intend to defend these claims vigorously, but we
cannot predict their outcome.
We are appealing a CADE decision from August 2005 regarding
various transactions completed by us. The CADE decision
conditions approval of these transactions on our acceptance of
one of the following
16
alternatives: we must either (i) waive certain rights
obtained from CSN (Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional)
with respect to a particular iron ore mine (Casa de
Pedra) and restructure our equity stake in the railway
company MRS Logística S.A., or (ii) sell all the
assets we obtained through our 2001 acquisition of Ferteco
Mineração S.A. We are in the process of requesting an
injunction to suspend the implementation of the CADE decision,
but if we were ultimately required to comply with this decision
our iron ore and logistics operations could be adversely
affected. For more information, see Item 8. Financial
information Legal proceedings.
Our
reserve estimates may materially differ from mineral quantities
that we may be able to actually recover; our estimates of mine
life may prove inaccurate; and market price fluctuations and
changes in operating and capital costs may render certain ore
reserves or mineral deposits uneconomical to mine.
Our reported ore reserves and mineral deposits are estimated
quantities of ore and minerals that have the potential to be
economically mined and processed under present and anticipated
conditions to extract their mineral content. There are numerous
uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves and
in projecting potential future rates of mineral production,
including many factors beyond our control. Reserve engineering
is a subjective process of estimating underground deposits of
minerals that cannot be measured in an exact manner, and the
accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of
available data and engineering and geological interpretation and
judgment. As a result, no assurance can be given that the
indicated amount of ore will be recovered or that it will be
recovered at the rates we anticipate. Estimates of different
engineers may vary, and results of our mining and production
subsequent to the date of an estimate may lead to revision of
estimates. Reserve estimates and estimates of mine life may
require revision based on actual production experience and other
factors. For example, fluctuations in the market prices of ores
and metals, reduced recovery rates or increased operating and
capital costs due to inflation, exchange rates or other factors
may render proven and probable reserves uneconomic to exploit
and may ultimately result in a restatement of reserves.
We may
not be able to replenish our reserves, which could adversely
affect our mining prospects.
We engage in mineral exploration, which is highly speculative in
nature, involves many risks and frequently is nonproductive. Our
exploration programs, which involve significant capital
expenditures, may fail to result in the expansion or replacement
of reserves depleted by current production. If we do not develop
new reserves, we will not be able to sustain our current level
of production beyond the remaining lives of our existing mines.
Even
if we discover mineral deposits, we remain subject to drilling
and production risks, which could adversely affect the mining
process.
Once mineral deposits are discovered, it can take a number of
years from the initial phases of drilling until production is
possible, during which the economic feasibility of production
may change. Substantial time and expenditures are required to:
|
|
|
|
|
establish mineral resources through drilling;
|
|
|
|
determine appropriate mining and metallurgical processes for
optimizing the recovery of metal contained in ore;
|
|
|
|
obtain environmental and other licenses;
|
|
|
|
construct mining, processing facilities and infrastructure
required for greenfield properties; and
|
|
|
|
obtain the ore or extract the metals from the ore.
|
If a project proves not to be economically feasible by the time
we are able to exploit it, we may incur substantial write-offs.
In addition, potential changes or complications involving
metallurgical and other technological processes arising during
the life of a project may result in cost overruns that may
render the project not economically feasible.
17
We
face rising extraction costs over time as reserves
deplete.
Reserves are gradually depleted in the ordinary course of a
given mining operation. As mining progresses, distances to the
primary crusher and to waste deposits become longer, pits become
steeper and underground operations become deeper. As a result,
over time, we usually experience rising unit extraction costs
with respect to each mine. Several of our mines have been
operating for long periods, and we will likely experience rising
extraction costs per unit in the future at these operations.
We may
face a shortage in our supply of mining equipment due to
increased consumption by mining companies that exceeds
suppliers capacity.
Since early 2004, the global mining industry has experienced
shortages of
off-the-road
(OTR) tires, and we do not expect an improvement in
this situation in the short term. There are only five radial
tire factories worldwide, and each is working at maximum
capacity. Although the three major suppliers have announced
investments to increase capacity over the next three years,
these capacity increases are not expected to meaningfully reduce
the risk of shortages before 2009. In response to the risk of
shortages, mining industry participants are exploring
alternatives, such as bias ply tires, which have lower
performance ratings than radial tires. If we are unable to
secure sufficient OTR tires or alternative tires to maintain our
operations, we may suffer temporary reductions in our production
capacity.
We
have experienced labor disputes that have disrupted operations,
and such disputes could recur.
A substantial number of our employees and some of the employees
of our subcontractors are represented by labor unions and are
covered by collective bargaining or other labor agreements,
which are subject to periodic renegotiation. Strikes or work
stoppages have occurred recently in Canada and could reoccur in
connection with negotiations of new labor agreements or during
other periods for other reasons. Moreover, we could be adversely
affected by labor disruptions involving third parties who may
provide us with goods or services. Strikes and other labor
disruptions at any of our operations could adversely affect the
operation of facilities, or the timing of completion and the
cost of our capital projects.
An
increase in fuel costs may adversely affect our
business.
Our operations rely in part on oil by-products and gas, which
represented 9.0% of our cost of goods sold in 2006. Fuel costs
are a major component of our total costs in our logistics,
pellets and nickel businesses and indirectly affect numerous
other areas of our business, including our mining and aluminum
businesses. An increase in oil and gas prices adversely affects
margins in our logistics, mining, pellets, nickel and aluminum
businesses.
If we
are unable to maintain reliable access to electricity at
acceptable prices, our operations may be adversely
affected.
Electricity costs are a significant component of the cost of our
production, representing 6.1% of our total cost of goods sold in
2006. If we are unable to secure reliable access to electric
energy at acceptable prices, we may be forced to curtail
production or may experience higher production costs, either of
which would adversely affect our results of operations.
Electricity shortages have occurred in Brazil in the past and
could reoccur in the future, and there can be no assurance that
Brazilian government policies will succeed in encouraging growth
in generation capacity. Future shortages and government policies
to respond to or prevent shortages may adversely impact the cost
or supply of electricity for our Brazilian aluminum and
ferroalloy operations. Changes in the laws, regulations or
governmental policies regarding the power sector or concession
requirements could reduce our expected returns from our
investments in power generation.
Through our subsidiary PT Inco in Indonesia, we process
lateritic nickel ores, which is energy-intensive. Although PT
Inco currently generates a majority of the electricity for its
operations from its own hydroelectric facilities, certain
hydrological factors, such as low rainfalls or ineffective water
management practices, could
18
adversely affect electricity production at PT Incos plants
in the future, which could significantly increase PT Incos
costs or result in lower production. For more information on the
regulations governing energy production, see Item 4.
Information on the company Regulatory matters.
Price
volatility of the currencies in which we conduct operations
relative to the U.S. dollar could adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations
We are affected by fluctuations in the prices of the currencies
in which we conduct operations relative to the U.S. dollar.
A substantial portion of our revenues and debt is denominated in
U.S. dollars, and changes in exchange rates may result in
losses or gains on our net U.S. dollar-denominated
indebtedness and accounts payable. In 2006, 2005 and 2004,
changes in exchange rates led us to report foreign exchange
gains of US$452 million, US$227 million and
US$79 million, respectively. In addition, currency
fluctuations between the Brazilian real,
U.S. dollar, Canadian dollar, Indonesian rupiah and other
currencies of our subsidiaries affect our results. Currency
fluctuations are expected to continue to affect our financial
income, expense and cash flow generation.
Major volatility of any such currencies may also result in
disruption of the foreign exchange markets and may limit our
ability to transfer or to convert such currencies into
U.S. dollars and other currencies for the purpose of making
timely payments of interest and principal on our indebtedness.
The governments of countries in which we operate could institute
restrictive exchange rate policies in the future.
Investor
perceptions of risk in Brazil and other emerging economies may
undermine our ability to finance our operations at an acceptable
cost or reduce the trading price of our
securities.
Although our acquisition of Inco has significantly expanded the
proportion of our non-Brazilian operations, our largest
operations, corporate headquarters and senior management
continue to be located in Brazil. Investors generally consider
Brazil to be an emerging market. As a result, economic and
market conditions in other emerging market countries, especially
those in Latin America, influence the market for securities
issued by Brazilian companies. Economic crises in one or more
emerging market countries may reduce overall investor appetite
for securities of emerging market issuers. Past economic crises
in emerging markets, such as in Southeast Asia, Russia and
Argentina, have resulted in significant outflows of
U.S. dollars from Brazil and caused Brazilian companies to
face higher costs for raising funds, both domestically and
abroad, and have effectively impeded access to international
capital markets for extended periods. We cannot assure you that
global capital markets will remain open to Brazilian companies
or that prevailing interest rates in these markets will be
advantageous to us. In addition, future financial crises in
emerging market countries may have a negative impact on the
Brazilian markets, which could adversely affect the trading
price of our securities.
Our
market risk management strategy may not be
effective.
We are exposed to traditional market risks such as fluctuations
in interest rates, exchange rates and commodity prices. We earn
most of our revenues in U.S. dollars, but incur a
substantial portion of our costs and expenses in currencies
other than the U.S. dollar. The exchange rates for
converting such currencies into U.S. dollars have varied
substantially during the last three years. In order to protect
ourselves against market volatility, our Board of Directors has
approved a risk management policy. See Item 11.
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk.
Our strategy may not be successful in minimizing our exposure to
these fluctuations, and we may fail to identify correlations
between the various market risks to which we are subject. In
addition, to the extent we partially hedge our commodity price
exposure, we may limit the upside benefits that we would
otherwise experience if commodities prices were to increase.
We may
not have adequate, if any, insurance coverage for some business
risks.
Our businesses are generally subject to a number of risks and
hazards, including:
19
|
|
|
|
|
railroad accidents;
|
|
|
|
port accidents;
|
|
|
|
labor disputes;
|
|
|
|
slope or pit-wall failures, cave-ins or rock falls;
|
|
|
|
environmental hazards;
|
|
|
|
electricity stoppages;
|
|
|
|
equipment or vessel failures;
|
|
|
|
severe weather and other natural phenomena such as seismic
events;
|
|
|
|
unavailability or late delivery of materials, supplies or
equipment;
|
|
|
|
unexpected ground, grade or water conditions; and
|
|
|
|
unusual or unexpected geological formations or pressures.
|
These occurrences could result in damage to, or destruction of,
mineral properties, production facilities, transportation
facilities, equipment or vessels. They could also result in
personal injury or death, environmental damage, waste of
resources or intermediate products, delays or interruption in
mining, production or transportation activities, monetary losses
and possible legal liability. The insurance we maintain against
risks that are typical in our business may not provide adequate
coverage. Insurance against some risks (including liabilities
for environmental pollution or certain hazards or interruption
of certain business activities) may not be available at a
reasonable cost, or at all. As a result, accidents or other
negative developments involving our mining, production or
transportation facilities could have a material adverse effect
on our operations.
Risks
relating to our acquisition of Inco
We may
experience difficulties integrating CVRD Inco and may fail to
achieve the expected benefits from the
acquisition.
Integrating CVRD Inco with our operations will be a complex,
costly and time-consuming process, and may be made more
difficult due to the unsolicited, cross-border nature of the
acquisition. Risks and challenges that may impair our ability to
achieve the benefits of the acquisition include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Although we have experience integrating acquired companies into
our operations, we lack experience integrating operations as
substantial and geographically diverse as those of CVRD Inco.
The acquisition of CVRD Inco is significantly larger than any
other acquisition we have completed.
|
|
|
|
Integrating CVRD Inco and gaining familiarity with its
operations and challenges will require significant management
time and resources and may divert managements attention
from our
day-to-day
business.
|
|
|
|
Although we have two nickel projects under development, we have
no significant prior experience producing or marketing nickel,
cobalt or PGMs or operating businesses in Canada, Indonesia,
New Caledonia, the United Kingdom, Japan, and China.
|
|
|
|
The successful integration of CVRD Inco will require us to
assimilate personnel with diverse backgrounds, languages and
cultures. We may have difficulty retaining and integrating key
employees and may be required to make substantial payments to
departing executives. The performance of CVRD Incos
operations could be adversely affected if we cannot retain key
employees to assist in the integration of CVRD and CVRD Inco and
operation of CVRD Inco.
|
|
|
|
We may encounter difficulties or delays in implementing common
information systems, operating procedures and financial controls.
|
20
If we are unable to successfully respond to these risks and
challenges, we may experience higher than expected operating
costs or fail to achieve the anticipated benefits of the
acquisition.
If
CVRD Incos business does not perform well or we do not
integrate it successfully, we may incur significant charges to
net income to write down the goodwill recognized as a result of
the acquisition.
As a result of the acquisition, we recognized, on a preliminary
basis, goodwill of US$3,876 million. Under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, we must test our goodwill
annually for impairment and, if we determine that the goodwill
has been impaired, we must write down the goodwill by the amount
of the impairment, with a corresponding charge to net income. If
CVRD Incos business does not perform well or if we are
unable to successfully integrate it with our operations, we may
incur significant charges to net income to write down the
goodwill, which could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition.
We
have incurred a substantial amount of indebtedness in connection
with the acquisition of CVRD Inco, which could limit our
operating flexibility and make it more difficult for us to
maintain our investment grade rating.
As of December 31, 2006, as a result of the consolidation
of CVRD Incos indebtedness and the incurrence by CVRD of
indebtedness of US$14,600 million to fund the purchase
price for 100% of CVRD Incos shares, we had
US$22,556 million of debt outstanding, compared to
US$4,947 million outstanding at December 31, 2005. The
substantial increase in our outstanding debt and related
covenants could limit our operating flexibility. In particular:
|
|
|
|
|
A substantial portion of our cash flow from operations must be
dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our
indebtedness, reducing the funds available to us for other
purposes.
|
|
|
|
Our higher levels of indebtedness and the need to comply with
financial covenants may impair our ability to adjust to changing
market conditions or withstand competitive pressures.
|
|
|
|
Our higher level of outstanding debt may make it more difficult
to maintain the financial ratios the rating agencies require in
order to maintain our investment grade credit rating.
|
Commitments
made to Canadian government authorities in connection with the
acquisition of CVRD Inco may limit our flexibility in managing
CVRD Incos operations.
In connection with the approval under the Investment Canada Act
of our acquisition of Inco, we made a series of commitments to
the Canadian Minister of Industry, in the form of undertakings,
including commitments to manage our global nickel business from
Canada, to refrain from making layoffs at our Canadian operating
facilities for three years and to maintain aggregate employment
at these facilities at a specified level for an agreed period.
We also committed to increase certain expenditures by specified
amounts over previously existing levels and expressed our wish
to accelerate the development of our Voiseys Bay project.
See Item 4. Information on the company
Regulatory matters Investment Canada Act
undertakings. These commitments could limit our flexibility
in managing our business and responding to changing market
conditions, which could adversely affect our results of
operations.
Risks
relating to the American Depositary Shares
Restrictions
on the movement of capital out of Brazil may hinder your ability
to receive dividends and distributions on American Depositary
Shares and the proceeds from any sale of American Depositary
Shares.
The Brazilian government may impose restrictions on capital
outflows whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazils
balance of payments or reason to foresee a serious imbalance.
This would hinder or prevent the custodian who acts on behalf of
the depositary for the American Depositary Shares from
converting proceeds from the shares underlying the American
Depositary Shares into U.S. dollars and remitting those
proceeds abroad.
21
The Brazilian government imposed remittance restrictions for
approximately six months in 1989 and early 1990. If enacted
in the future, similar restrictions would hinder or prevent the
conversion of dividends, distributions or the proceeds from any
sale of shares from reais into U.S. dollars and the
remittance of the U.S. dollars abroad. In that event, the
custodian, acting on behalf of the depositary, will hold the
reais it cannot convert for the account of the holders of
American depositary receipts who have not been paid. The
depositary will not invest the reais and will not be
liable for interest on those amounts. Furthermore, any reais
so held will be subject to devaluation risk.
If you
exchange American Depositary Shares for the underlying shares,
you risk losing the ability to remit foreign currency abroad and
Brazilian tax advantages.
The Brazilian custodian for the shares underlying our American
Depositary Shares will obtain an electronic registration from
the Central Bank to entitle it to remit U.S. dollars abroad
for payments of dividends and other distributions relating to
the shares underlying our American Depositary Shares or upon the
disposition of the underlying shares. If you decide to exchange
your American Depositary Shares for the underlying shares, you
will be entitled to continue to rely, for five business days
from the date of exchange, on the custodians electronic
registration. Thereafter, you may not be able to obtain and
remit U.S. dollars abroad upon the disposition of, or
distributions relating to, the underlying shares unless you
obtain your own electronic registration by registering your
investment in the underlying shares under Resolution
No. 2,689 of the National Monetary Council, which entitles
foreign investors to buy and sell securities on the São
Paulo stock exchange, or BOVESPA. For more information regarding
these exchange controls, see Item 10. Additional
information Exchange controls and other limitations
affecting security holders. If you attempt to obtain your
own electronic registration, you may incur expenses or suffer
delays in the application process, which could delay your
ability to receive dividends or distributions relating to the
underlying shares or the return of your capital in a timely
manner. We cannot assure you that the custodians
electronic registration or any certificate of foreign capital
registration obtained by you will not be affected by future
legislative changes, or that additional restrictions applicable
to you, the disposition of the underlying shares or the
repatriation of the proceeds from disposition will not be
imposed in the future.
Because
we are not obligated to file a registration statement with
respect to preemptive rights relating to our shares, you may be
unable to exercise those preemptive rights.
Holders of American depositary receipts that are residents of
the United States may not be able to exercise preemptive rights,
or exercise other types of rights, with respect to the
underlying shares. Your ability to exercise preemptive rights is
not assured unless a registration statement is effective with
respect to those rights or an exemption from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act is available. We are not
obligated to file a registration statement relating to
preemptive rights with respect to the underlying shares or to
undertake steps that may be needed to make exemptions from
registration available, and we cannot assure you that we will
file any registration statement or take such steps. If a
registration statement is not filed and an exemption from
registration does not exist, JPMorgan Chase Bank, as depositary
for our American Depositary Shares, will attempt to sell the
preemptive rights, and you will be entitled to receive the
proceeds of the sale. However, the preemptive rights will expire
if the depositary cannot sell them. For a more complete
description of preemptive rights with respect to the underlying
shares, see Item 10. Additional information
Common shares and preferred shares Preemptive
rights.
Holders
of our American Depositary Shares may encounter difficulties in
the exercise of voting rights.
Holders of our common and preferred class A shares are
entitled to vote on shareholder matters. You may encounter
difficulties in the exercise of some of your rights as a
shareholder if you hold our American Depositary Shares rather
than the underlying shares. For example, if we fail to provide
the depositary with voting materials on a timely basis, you may
not be able to vote by giving instructions to the depositary on
how to vote for you.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our bylaws and Brazilian
corporation law, which differ from the legal principles that
would apply if we were incorporated in a jurisdiction in the
United States or elsewhere
22
outside Brazil. Under Brazilian corporation law, holders of our
common and preferred class A shares may have fewer and less
well-defined rights to protect their interests relative to
actions taken by our Board of Directors or by Valepar than under
the laws of some jurisdictions outside Brazil.
Although Brazilian law imposes restrictions on insider trading
and price manipulation, the Brazilian securities markets are not
as highly regulated and supervised as the U.S. securities
markets or markets in certain other jurisdictions. In addition,
rules and policies against self-dealing and regarding the
preservation of minority shareholder interests may be less
well-developed and enforced in Brazil than in the United States,
which could potentially disadvantage you as a holder of the
underlying shares and American Depositary Shares. For example,
when compared to Delaware general corporation law, Brazilian
corporate law and practice has less detailed and
well-established rules and judicial precedents relating to the
review of management decisions against duty of care and duty of
loyalty standards in the context of corporate restructurings,
transactions with related parties, and
sale-of-
business transactions. In addition, shareholders in Brazilian
companies ordinarily do not have standing to bring a class
action.
In addition, as a foreign private issuer, we are not required to
follow many of the corporate governance rules that apply to
U.S. domestic issuers with securities listed on the New
York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE. For more information
concerning our corporate governance policies, see
Item 6. Directors, senior management and employees.
Depreciation
of the Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar reduces the
U.S. dollar value of dividends paid to holders of our
American Depositary Shares.
Depreciation of the Brazilian real against the
U.S. dollar reduces the U.S. dollar value of dividends
paid to holders of our American Depositary Shares. We attempt to
mitigate this risk by setting our dividends in
U.S. dollars. However, shareholders are still exposed to
currency volatility risk for a period of at least two weeks, as
the U.S. dollar value of dividends is converted into
reais at least two weeks prior to its distribution, due
to operational requirements to process dividend payments.
23
|
|
Item 4.
|
Information
on the Company
|
BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
General
We are the second-largest diversified metals and mining company
in the world, the largest metals and mining company in the
Americas, and one of the largest private-sector companies in
Latin America by market capitalization. We are the worlds
largest producer and exporter of iron ore and pellets and one of
the worlds largest producers of nickel. We also produce
copper, manganese, ferroalloys, bauxite, precious metals,
cobalt, kaolin, potash and other products. To support our growth
strategy, we are actively engaged in mineral exploration efforts
in 19 countries around the globe. We operate large logistics
systems in Brazil, including railroads, maritime terminals and
ports that are integrated with our mining operations. Directly
and through affiliates and joint ventures, we have major
investments in the aluminum, coal, energy and steel businesses.
The table below presents the breakdown of our total gross
revenues attributable to each of our main lines of business,
each of which is described following the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
Iron ore, pellets, manganese,
ferroalloys
|
|
|
75.0
|
%
|
|
|
61.7
|
%
|
|
|
48.9
|
%
|
Nickel(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
PGMs(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Other precious metals(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Copper (co-product)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Other non-ferrous minerals
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Aluminum and related products
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Percentages determined by adding
CVRD Inco 2006 pre-acquisition gross revenues to 2006 historical
gross revenues.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Figures included in the nickel
product segment in our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore, pellets, manganese and
ferroalloys. We operate two fully integrated
systems in Brazil for producing and distributing iron ore (the
Northern System and the Southeastern System), consisting of
mines, railroads and port facilities. We operate a third system
(the Southern System), consisting of the MBR and Oeste mines and
the Guaíba Island and Itaguaí maritime terminals. We
also operate nine pellet-producing facilities, five of which are
joint ventures. We have a 50% stake in a joint venture that owns
and operates two pelletizing plants. We are one of the
worlds largest producers of manganese ore and ferroalloys.
|
|
|
|
Nickel. We are one of the worlds largest
producers of nickel. Our principal nickel mines and processing
operations are located in Canada, specifically in the Sudbury
area of Ontario, the Thompson area of Manitoba and at
Voiseys Bay in Newfoundland and Labrador, and in Indonesia
through our 61%-owned subsidiary, PT International Nickel
Indonesia Tbk (PT Inco), on the Island of Sulawesi,
Indonesia. We also operate a nickel refinery in the United
Kingdom, own 67% of Inco TNC Limited, which operates a nickel
refinery in Japan, and have interests in nickel refining
operations in Taiwan and South Korea.
|
|
|
|
Copper. We have copper mining operations in
Brazil and Canada. We are Brazils largest copper
concentrate producer due to our operations at the Sossego copper
mine in Carajás. We also produce copper in conjunction with
our Canadian nickel mining operations at our Manitoba, Ontario
and Voiseys Bay operations.
|
|
|
|
PGMs. We produce platinum-group metals
(platinum, palladium, rhodium, ruthenium and iridium) as
by-products of our nickel mining and processing operations in
Canada. The PGMs are concentrated at our facilities in Port
Colborne, Ontario and refined at our precious metals refinery in
Acton, England.
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
Other precious metals. We produce gold and
silver as by-products of our nickel mining and processing
operations in Canada. Some of these precious metals are upgraded
at our facilities in Port Colborne, Ontario, and all are refined
by third parties in Canada.
|
|
|
|
Other non-ferrous minerals. We are the
worlds second-largest producer of kaolin in the paper
industry and Brazils sole producer of potash. We produce
and sell cobalt, sulphuric acid, liquid sulphur dioxide, and
modest quantities of selenium and tellurium as by-products of
our processing operations.
|
|
|
|
Aluminum operations. We conduct bauxite
mining, alumina refining, and aluminum metal smelting.
|
|
|
|
Logistics. We are a leading provider of
logistics services in Brazil, with railroad, coastal shipping
and port handling operations. Two of our three iron ore
complexes incorporate an integrated railroad network linked to
automated port and terminal facilities, which provide rail
transportation for our mining products, general cargo and
passengers, bulk terminal storage, and ship loading services for
our mining operations and for third parties.
|
|
|
|
Other investments. We currently have
investments in three steel companies and two joint ventures to
produce steel slab in Brazil. We have also invested in
hydroelectric power generation projects.
|
CVRDs legal and commercial name is Companhia Vale do Rio
Doce. CVRD is a stock corporation, or sociedade por
ações, duly organized on January 11, 1943,
and existing under the laws of the Federative Republic of
Brazil. CVRD was privatized in three stages between 1997 and
2002, beginning with the sale by the Brazilian government of a
controlling stake in CVRD to Valepar in 1997. The last stage of
the privatization took place in 2002, when the Brazilian
government sold a remaining minority stake of common shares
through a global equity offering. CVRD is organized for an
unlimited period of time. Its head offices are located at
Avenida Graça Aranha, No. 26,
20030-900
Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, and its telephone number is
55-21-3814-4477.
Business
strategy
Our goal is to strengthen our position as one of the
worlds leading diversified metals and mining companies by
building on our strengths in iron ore and nickel and increasing
our geographical and product diversification and logistics
capabilities. Over the past several years, we have developed a
robust long-term strategic planning process. Although we may
pursue strategic acquisitions, following the Inco acquisition we
are focused on organic growth in our core businesses. We are
pursuing disciplined capital management in order to maximize
return on invested capital and total return to shareholders.
Below we highlight our major strategies.
Maintaining
our leadership position in the global iron ore
market
We continue to consolidate our leadership in the global iron ore
market, having an estimated market share of 33% of the total
volume traded in the seaborne market in 2006. We are committed
to maintaining our position in the global iron ore market by
strengthening relationships with clients, focusing our product
line to capture industry trends, increasing our production
capacity in line with demand growth and controlling costs. We
believe that our strong relationships with major customers,
reinforced through long-term contracts, high quality products
and a strong technical marketing strategy, will help us achieve
this goal. We are also taking steps to encourage several steel
makers to develop steel slab plants in Brazil in order to create
additional demand for our iron ore.
Achieving
leadership in the nickel business
Following the acquisition of Inco in October 2006, we have
become one of the worlds largest nickel producers, with
large-scale, long-life, low-cost operations, a substantial
resource base, and a robust growth profile. We believe our
greenfield projects at Vermelho and Onça Puma in Brazil and
Goro in New Caledonia will further support our leadership
position in the nickel market.
25
Increasing
our aluminum activities
We are developing and increasing production capacity in our
aluminum operations, focusing on the upstream portion of the
production chain and developing low-cost bauxite and alumina
projects. We have large, undeveloped high-quality bauxite
reserves and opportunities for low-cost expansions in our
alumina refinery. We are working on the development of these
opportunities. We are also investing in mineral exploration to
increase our bauxite resources.
Improvements
in our manganese ore and ferroalloys operations
We have been taking steps to improve our competitive position
and reduce operating costs at our manganese ore and ferroalloys
operations through divestments, reduction of personnel, and
streamlining of the management structure.
Developing
our copper resources
We believe that our Brazilian copper projects, which are all
situated in the Carajás region, in the Brazilian state of
Pará, could be among the most competitive in the world in
terms of investment cost per metric ton of ore. We expect these
copper mines to benefit from our infrastructure facilities
serving the Northern System.
Investing
in coal
We are pursuing various opportunities to become a large global
player in coal businesses. In April 2007, we acquired AMCI
Holdings Australia Pty (AMCI HA), which has coal operating
assets and reserves in Australia. In the past several years, we
have invested in two joint ventures in China, and we intend to
continue pursuing organic growth in the coal business through
development of the Moatize project in Mozambique and the
Belvedere coal deposit in Australia.
Enhancing
our logistics capacity
We believe that the quality of our railway assets and our many
years of experience as a railroad and port operator, together
with the lack of efficient transportation for general cargo in
Brazil, position us as a leader in the logistics business in
Brazil. We are expanding the capacity of our railroads through
the purchase of additional locomotives and wagons to serve the
increasing needs of our own businesses and those of our
customers.
Global
exploration efforts
We are engaged in an active mineral exploration program, with
efforts in 19 countries around the globe. We are mainly seeking
new deposits of copper, manganese ore, iron ore, nickel, kaolin,
bauxite, phosphate, potash, coal, uranium and platinum group
metals. Mineral exploration is an important part of our organic
growth strategy.
Developing
power generation projects
Energy management and efficient supply have become a priority
for us. As a large consumer of electricity, we believe that
investing in power projects to support our operations will help
protect us against volatility in the price of energy, regulatory
uncertainties and the risk of energy shortages. Accordingly, we
have developed hydroelectric power generation plants in Brazil
and in Indonesia, and we are using the electricity from these
projects to supply our internal needs.
Recent
acquisitions and significant changes
We describe below significant acquisitions and other changes in
our business in 2006 and 2007 to date.
26
Acquisition
of Inco
In October 2006, we acquired 75.66% of the outstanding common
shares of Inco, then the worlds second-largest producer of
nickel, in an unsolicited cash tender offer. Following a
subsequent offering period and additional purchases, we
increased our stake to 87.73% by December 31, 2006. In
January 2007, the amalgamation of Inco with our subsidiary
Itabira Canada Inc. resulted in our acquisition of 100% of the
shares of Inco, and we formally changed Incos name to
CVRD Inco Limited (CVRD Inco). CVRD Inco
subsequently ceased to be a reporting issuer under both U.S. and
Canadian securities laws. The total acquisition cost for Inco
was US$18,931 million, which represents the purchase price
of US$17,744 million plus net debt of
US$1,187 million. US$15,691 million was paid to Inco
shareholders due to stock acquisitions in 2006, and
US$2,053 million was disbursed in 2007. Of the
US$17,744 million paid, US$593 million is attributable
to convertible debt and US$17,151 million to the
acquisition of outstanding shares.
Stock
merger with Caemi
In May 2006, we completed a stock merger with our controlled
company CAEMI. Pursuant to the stock merger, all preferred
shares of CAEMI owned by its public shareholders were exchanged
for new preferred shares issued by us, and CAEMI became our
wholly owned subsidiary. The exchange ratio was one CAEMI share
per 0.04115 CVRD preferred class A share. In December 2006,
we merged CAEMI into CVRD.
Iron
ore and pellets
Acquisition and usufruct agreement for MBR
shares. In May 2007, we entered into a
transaction by which we have effectively obtained 100% control
of MBR during the next thirty years, allowing us to maximize our
exposure to MBR, which we consider one of the best iron ore
assets in the world and to exploit synergies between the
companies. Prior to this transaction, we owned 89.9% of MBR,
directly and through our 80% stake in Empreendimentos
Brasileiros de Mineração S.A. (EBM), whose main asset
is a 51% stake in MBR. We acquired a further 6.25% of EBM for
US$231 million, and we simultaneously entered into a
usufruct agreement with respect to the 13.75% of EBMs
total capital that we do not own. This agreement grants us
during the next 30 years all rights and obligations with
respect to these EBM shares, including the right to dividends.
In exchange, CVRD will pay a total of US$61 million and an
annual fee of US$48 million.
Development of a dedicated Brazil-China shuttle
service. In May 2007, CVRD entered into long-term
freight contracts to develop dedicated shuttle service from
Brazil to China. We expect this service to enhance in the future
our ability to offer our products in the Chinese market at
competitive prices and to increase our market share in China and
the global seaborne market.
Start-up
of Brucutu mine. Our new Brucutu mine started
operations in September 2006. When Brucutu reaches full capacity
in 2008, it is expected to produce 30 million metric tons
of iron ore. In 2007, we expect production to amount to
23 million metric tons.
Carajás expansion. In January 2007, we
completed the expansion of iron ore production capacity at
Carajás to 100 million metric tons per year, after
completing an expansion to 85 million metric tons per year
in the third quarter of 2006. We are conducting studies for a
possible further expansion to 130 million metric tons of
iron ore per year by 2009.
Reclassification of operations in the Southern
System. In the third quarter of 2006, in order to
maximize existing synergies and to continue to achieve
efficiency gains, we divided the management of our former
Southern System for producing and distributing iron ore into two
departments: the Southeastern System and the Southern System,
and we have begun reporting production separately for each
system.
The Southeastern System consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
the Itabira mines,
|
|
|
|
the Mariana mines,
|
|
|
|
the Centrais mines,
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
the Vitória a Minas Railroad, and
|
|
|
|
the Tubarão port.
|
The new Southern System consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
the MBR mines,
|
|
|
|
the Oeste mines,
|
|
|
|
the Guaíba Island and Itaguaí maritime
terminals, and
|
|
|
|
the MRS railroad.
|
Samarco expansion. We are increasing pellet
production capacity at Samarco, our 50% joint venture with BHP
Billiton, located in the Brazilian state of Espírito Santo.
The expansion at Samarco is expected to add 7.6 million
metric tons per year of capacity. In 2006, the engineering and
ground-leveling projects were completed. In 2007, construction
works and the assembly of electrical and mechanical components
will be undertaken, with operational
start-up
planned for the first half of 2008. Samarco obtained its own
financing for the project.
Itabiritos project. We are building a pellet
plant, located in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais, with a
capacity of 7 million metric tons per year, an iron ore
concentration plant, and a short iron ore slurry pipeline. The
development of Itabiritos began in 2006, with the basic
engineering project and the commencement of civil engineering
works. Itabiritos operations are scheduled to begin in the
second half of 2008.
Joint venture in China. In September 2006, our
subsidiary MBR acquired a 25% stake in a joint venture, Zhuhai
YPM, to build a new pelletizing plant in Zhuhai, Guandong,
China. Our expected investment in this project will be
US$4 million and we will supply at least 70% of the iron
ore used to feed the plant, pursuant to a
30-year
contract. The plant is expected to become operational in 2008.
The other partners in this joint venture are Zhuhai Yueyufeng
Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. (with a 40% stake) and Pioneer
Iron & Steel Group Co. Ltd. (with a 35% stake).
Acquisition of Rio Verde Mineração
assets. In January 2006, we acquired certain
mineral resources, land and mining equipment of Rio Verde
Mineração for US$47 million. Rio Verde
Mineração is located in the Iron Quadrangle region of
the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais, near the operations of MBR
in the municipality of Nova Lima.
Nickel
Onça Puma. In the third quarter of 2006,
our Board of Directors approved our investment in the Onça
Puma nickel project, in the Brazilian state of Pará, which
is expected to have a nominal capacity of 58,000 metric tons per
year of nickel in the form of ferro-nickel, its final product.
Construction at the project site began in July 2006. We
currently estimate that the total investment in the project will
amount to US$1,437 million, and are targeting
start-up of
operations for the fourth quarter of 2008.
Goro. Following the acquisition of Inco, we
reviewed the Goro project and planned the implementation of
measures to reduce environmental, operational and technology
risks. The total cost of Goro is estimated to be
US$3,212 million, of which US$1,435 million was spent
from 2001 to 2006. The commissioning of Goro is scheduled for
the end of 2008.
Aluminum
Acquisition of remaining interest in
Valesul. In July 2006, we exercised our right of
first refusal under the Valesul Aluminio S.A.
(Valesul) shareholders agreement and acquired
BHP Billiton Metais S.A.s 45.5% indirect interest in
Valesul for US$28 million, as a result of which we now own
100% of Valesuls shares. We began consolidating Valesul in
our financial statements in the third quarter of 2006.
Paragominas project. We are developing a
bauxite mine in Paragominas, in the Brazilian state of
Pará, which was commissioned in the first quarter 2007,
with an initial capacity of 5.4 million metric tons per
year.
28
We have completed the first bauxite pipeline in the world, for
the transport of bauxite slurry from the Paragominas mine to the
alumina refinery in Barcarena, state of Pará. By 2008,
Paragominas capacity is expected to reach 9.9 million
metric tons per year, which will require further investment of
US$196 million. The bauxite produced at Paragominas will be
used to supply Alunortes expansion needs.
Alunorte expansion. In 2006 we completed our
alumina production capacity expansion at our Alunorte refinery
to 4.4 million metric tons per year, and we expect to
increase capacity further to 6.26 million metric tons per
year, at an estimated investment of US$846 million.
Expected startup for this project is in 2008.
New refinery project. We are studying a
potential investment in a greenfield alumina refinery in the
Brazilian state of Pará, near the existing facilities of
Alunorte in Brazil, expected to have an initial capacity of
1.8 million metric tons per year. Bauxite for the project
would be supplied from our Paragominas bauxite mine. If the
terms of the project are agreed, the first stage of the refinery
is expected to be completed and operational within three years.
The project is subject to the approval from our Board of
Directors.
Copper
Salobo. The Salobo project is located in
Brazil, in the Carajás region of the Brazilian state of
Pará. The environmental license was obtained in December
2006 and our Board of Directors approved the development of this
project in January 2007. However, the
start-up of
the development of the project is contingent on an appropriate
tax structure, which is currently being discussed with
government authorities. In its first stage, Salobo is expected
to produce 100,000 metric tons of copper in concentrate per year.
Project 118. The 118 copper project is
scheduled to begin operations in the first half of 2009, but we
are still awaiting the grant of a license without which
construction cannot begin. Therefore, the timing of
start-up
could be revised. A preliminary license was obtained in April
2006, and key equipment was ordered at the end of 2006. Basic
engineering for the project has been concluded.
Coal
and coke
We are pursuing several efforts to become a large global player
in the coal business.
|
|
|
|
|
Mozambique coal mine feasibility study. In
November 2004, a consortium controlled by CVRD won an
international auction to explore coal deposits in the Moatize
region, in the north of Mozambique for US$122.8 million. In
April 2005, Rio Doce Moçambique Limitada was incorporated
by CVRD under the laws of Mozambique, as the local entity to
hold the rights and obligations as developer of the Moatize
project. The projects financial and technical feasibility
studies were completed in November 2006 and delivered to the
government of Mozambique. In March 2007 we delivered the
development plan to the government of Mozambique. Additional
studies and reports are still being conducted to support the
final decision expected to be made in 2007 regarding investment
in the project. If the project proceeds, the total investment
will include mine development costs, the construction of a
maritime terminal for ship loading, related investments and
social projects.
|
|
|
|
Belvedere Coal Underground Project. In July
2005, we signed an agreement with two Australian mining
companies for an exploration study of the Belvedere Coal
Underground Project, or Belvedere, located in the state of
Queensland, Australia. At the conclusion of the pre-feasibility
study this year, we have the option to acquire a 51% interest in
Belvedere at a price of US$90 million. We have further
options to increase our stake in the project to 100% by
acquiring our partners interests at a fair market value
determined at the time of our exercise of each option. We have
also obtained exploration rights for related areas near
Belvedere (referred to as Belvedere West and Belvedere South).
|
|
|
|
AMCI Holdings Australia. In April 2007, we
paid US$656 million for the acquisition of 100% of AMCI
Holdings Australia Pty (AMCI HA). AMCI HA controls and operates
coal assets through unincorporated joint ventures, with nominal
production capacity of 8.0 million metric tons of coal
(predominantly coaking coal) and reserves of 103 million
metric tons. AMCI HA had net debt of US$129 million as of
April 30, 2007.
|
29
Steel
and metallics
We are taking steps to encourage steel makers to develop steel
slab plants in Brazil, in order to create value and additional
demand for our iron ore.
|
|
|
|
|
Ceará Steel. In November 2005, we agreed
to acquire a minority stake in Ceará Steel, an
export-oriented steel slab project in the Brazilian state of
Ceará, with a nominal capacity of 1.5 million metric
tons of slabs per year. The main shareholders are Dongkuk Steel,
a Korean steel maker, and Danieli S.P.A., an Italian equipment
supplier. We expect to invest US$25 million in the project,
which has an estimated total cost of US$750 million, and we
have put options to divest our stake in the future. We will be
the exclusive supplier of pellets for Ceará Steel. The
plant is expected to start production in 2009.
|
|
|
|
ThyssenKrupp Companhia Siderúrgica do
Atlântico (CSA). In December
2004, we signed a memorandum of understanding with ThyssenKrupp
Stahl A.G., one of the largest European steel makers, for the
construction of a 5 million metric ton integrated steel
slab plant in the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro. The project
has been formally approved by both ThyssenKrupp Stahl A.G. and
CVRD, and is now being implemented. Commissioning of the plant
is foreseen for 2009, and our Board of Directors has approved an
investment of US$200 million for a minority stake in CSA.
We have a put option to divest our stake in the future.
|
|
|
|
Entry into Usiminas control group. In November
2006, we announced the restructuring of our equity interest in
Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A.
USIMINAS (Usiminas). In connection with this
restructuring (i) we entered into a
15-year
shareholders agreement with the other members of
Usiminas control group, under which we will retain
6,608,608 common shares, and (ii) the Usiminas controlling
shareholders have agreed to carry out a feasibility study
regarding a potential investment by Usiminas in the construction
of a new steel slab plant.
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of remaining interest in Ferro Gusa Carajás
S.A. (Ferro-Gusa). In March 2007, we
acquired the 18% interest in Ferro-Gusa held by Nucor do Brasil
S.A. for US$20 million, as a result of which we now own
100% of Ferro-Gusas shares. Ferro-Gusa started operations
in October 2005 and produces 300,000 metric tons of pig iron per
year.
|
Divestitures
and asset sales
In line with our strategy, we have continued to reduce our
holdings of non-strategic assets. We summarize below our key
dispositions and asset sales since the beginning of 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
Foz do Chapecó and Santa Isabel hydroelectric power
projects. In February 2006, we sold to Furnas
Centrais Elétricas for US$4 million our 40% stake in
the consortium to build and operate the Foz do Chapecó
hydroelectric power plant. This transaction has been approved by
the Brazilian electricity regulatory agency (Agência
Nacional de Energia Elétrica), or ANEEL, and is
expected to close in 2007. We are also continuing our efforts to
return the concessions for the Santa Isabel hydroelectric power
project to ANEEL due to difficulties related to environmental
issues.
|
|
|
|
Nova Era Silicon. In February 2006, we sold to
our partner JFE Steel Corporation our 49% stake in Nova Era
Silicon, a ferrosilicon producer with operations in the
Brazilian state of Minas Gerais for US$14 million.
|
|
|
|
Sale of Interest in Gulf Industrial Investment
Company. In May 2006, we sold our 50% interest in
Gulf Industrial Investment Company (GIIC), a pellet
producer based in Bahrain, to our joint venture partner, Gulf
Investment Corporation, for US$418 million, due to
conflicting views about how GIICs business should be
managed. Although we have sold our interest in GIIC, we intend
to continue our strategy of pursuing the consolidation of our
global leadership position in the global market for pellets in
order to maximize the benefits arising from the significant
long-term growth potential we expect in pellet demand.
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
Usiminas. On November 13, 2006, we sold a
total of 5,362,928 common shares of Usiminas to Nippon Steel,
Votorantim Participações S.A. and Camargo Correa S.A.
for approximately US$176 million. We will keep 6,608,608
common shares of Usiminas pursuant to the Usiminas
shareholders agreement, which we signed in November 2006.
In May 2007, we sold in a public offering registered with the
CVM 13,802,499 Usiminas shares not subject to the
shareholders agreement and received total proceeds of
US$728 million. In connection with the offering, we entered
into a lockup agreement for a period of 90 days from
April 25, 2007. After the lockup period expires or is
waived, we intend to sell 36,691 additional shares that were not
sold pursuant to the offerings overallotment option.
|
|
|
|
Siderar. In December 2006, we sold to Ternium
S.A. our entire 4.85% stake in Siderar-S.A.I.C. (Siderar), a
steel company located in Argentina, for US$108 million.
|
|
|
|
Gerdau. In the second half of 2006, we sold
all of our shares of Gerdau S.A. for US$67 million.
|
LINES OF
BUSINESS
Our principal lines of business consist of mining and logistics.
We also invest in energy to supply part of our consumption. The
following map shows the locations of our current operations
worldwide.
31
Ferrous
minerals
Our ferrous minerals business segment includes:
|
|
|
|
|
iron ore mining,
|
|
|
|
pellet production,
|
|
|
|
manganese ore mining, and
|
|
|
|
ferroalloy production.
|
Iron
ore operations
We conduct our iron ore business primarily at the parent company
level and through our subsidiaries MBR and Urucum
Mineração S.A., or Urucum. Our iron ore mining and
related operations are concentrated in three systems in Brazil,
the Southeastern System, the Southern System and the Northern
System, further described below. The operation of these separate
systems, each with its own transportation capability, enhances
the reliability of the service we provide our customers.
Southeastern
System
The Southeastern System, carved out of our former Southern
System, recently became a separately managed department. Located
in the southeastern Brazilian state of Minas Gerais, in a region
known as the Iron Quadrangle, the iron ore mines of the
Southeastern System are divided into three mining areas:
Itabira, Centrais Mines, and Mariana. Our railroad, the
Vitória a Minas railroad, connects the mines in these areas
to the Tubarão port in Vitória, in the Brazilian state
of Espírito Santo.
Iron ore in the Southeastern System is mined by open-pit
methods. These ore reserves have high ratios of itabirite ore
relative to hematite ore. Itabirite is a quartz-hematite rock
with an average iron content ranging from
35-60%,
requiring concentration to achieve shipping grade, which is
above a 64% average iron content. Hematite is a high-grade ore
with an average iron content of approximately 66%.
Mines in the Southeastern System generally process their
run-of-mine
by means of standard crushing, classification and concentration
steps, producing sinter feed, lump ore and pellet feed in the
beneficiation plants located at the mining sites.
In 2006, we produced 100% of the electric energy consumed in the
Southeastern System at our Igarapava, Porto Estrela, Funil,
Candonga, Aimorés and Capim Branco I hydroelectric power
plants. The Southeastern System is accessible by road or by spur
tracks of the Vitória a Minas railroad.
Southern
System
The new Southern System, located in the Brazilian states of
Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro, consists of the Oeste mines and
the mines of MBR. MBR presently operates three major mining
complexes:
|
|
|
|
|
the Pico complex, comprised of the Pico, Sapecado and Galinheiro
mines, with one major plant and three secondary plants;
|
|
|
|
the Vargem Grande complex, comprised of the Tamanduá,
Capitão do Mato and Abóboras mines, and one major
beneficiation plant; and
|
|
|
|
the Paraopeba complex, comprised of the Jangada mine (with a
beneficiation plant), the Capão Xavier mine (with the
Mutuca beneficiation plant) and the Mar Azul mine (with a
beneficiation plant).
|
Wet beneficiation processes are used to convert
run-of-mine
obtained from open-pit mining operations into lump ore, sinter
feed fines and pellet feed fines, in addition to
hematitinha, a product used primarily by Brazilian
pig-iron producers.
The iron ore produced in our Southern System is transported by
MRS Logística S.A. (MRS), a railway company in
which we hold, directly and indirectly, 37.2% of the voting
capital and 40.5% of the total capital,
33
to the Guaíba Island and Itaguaí maritime terminals,
both located in the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro. In 2006,
we produced 22% of the electric energy consumed in the Southern
System at our Igarapava, Porto Estrela, Funil, Candonga,
Aimorés and Capim Branco I hydroelectric power plants.
Northern
System
The Northern System is comprised of open-pit iron ore mines and
an ore-processing complex in the Carajás region of the
Brazilian state of Pará. The mines are located in the north
of Brazil on public lands for which we hold mining concessions.
The Northern Systems reserves are among the largest iron
ore deposits in the world. These reserves are divided into two
main ranges (north and south), situated approximately
35 kilometers apart. Iron ore mining activities in the
Northern System are currently being conducted in the northern
range, which is divided into five main mining bodies (N4E, N4W,
N5W, N5E and N5EN).
Because of the high iron content (66.8% on average) in the
Northern System deposits, we do not have to operate a
concentration plant at Carajás. The beneficiation process
consists simply of sizing operations, including screening,
hydrocycloning, crushing and filtration. This allows us to
produce marketable iron ore in the Northern System at a lower
cost than in the Southern and Southeastern Systems. Output from
the beneficiation process consists of sinter feed, pellet feed,
special fines for direct reduction processes and lump ore. After
completion of the beneficiation process, our Carajás
railroad transports Northern System iron ore to the Ponta da
Madeira maritime terminal in the Brazilian state of
Maranhão.
Our complex in Carajás is accessible by road, air and rail.
It obtains electrical power at market rates from regional
utilities. To support our Carajás operations, we have
housing and other facilities in a nearby township.
Casa de
Pedra
In March 2001, we acquired certain rights of first refusal with
respect to the Casa de Pedra iron ore mine of CSN (Companhia
Siderúrgica Nacional): the right, for thirty years, to
purchase at market prices any excess iron ore as defined in the
agreement; the right, for thirty years, to purchase or lease the
mine if CSN decides to sell or lease it; and the right, for
thirty years, to become a joint venture partner if CSN decides
to form a pelletizing joint venture with a third party using
iron ore produced by the mine. On August 10, 2005, CADE
issued a decision approving certain of our acquisitions, which
imposed certain conditions on us, including a full waiver of our
preemptive rights relating to the Casa de Pedra iron ore mine.
See Item 3. Key information Risk
factors We are involved in ongoing antitrust
proceedings that could result in divestitures, fines or other
restrictions that could harm our business.
Iron
ore projects
We are developing the following iron ore projects in Brazil:
|
|
|
|
|
Carajás expansion to 130 Mtpa. This
expansion is a brownfield project to increase production
capacity in the northern part of the Carajás mineral
province. Investment in this project is estimated at
US$1.8 billion, covering costs of mine expansion, a primary
crushing plant, processing and classification units, locomotives
and wagons. In 2007 the detailed engineering project is to be
drawn up and completion is scheduled for 2009.
|
|
|
|
Fazendão. This project is expected to
produce 15.8 million metric tons of
run-of-mine
(unprocessed ore) iron ore per year and will allow the
commencement of operations at Samarcos third pellet plant.
Construction began in the second half of 2006, and operations
are scheduled to begin in the first quarter of 2008.
|
34
Iron
ore production and reserves
The table on the next page sets forth information regarding our
proven and probable iron ore reserves and projected exhaustion
dates for the periods indicated. The projected exhaustion dates
are estimated based on our estimates of future production levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Production for the
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
Began
|
|
|
Exhaustion
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Mine(1)
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Ore Tonnage(2)
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Ore Tonnage(2)
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Million metric tons)
|
|
|
(Million metric tons)
|
|
|
(% Fe)
|
|
|
(Million metric tons)
|
|
|
(% Fe)
|
|
|
Southeastern System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Itabira mines:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cauê(3)
|
|
|
1942
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conceição(4)
|
|
|
1957
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
395.6
|
|
|
|
54.4
|
|
|
|
367.7
|
|
|
|
54.3
|
|
Minas do Meio(5)
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635.7
|
|
|
|
54.8
|
|
|
|
592.4
|
|
|
|
54.6
|
|
Centrais mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Água Limpa / Cururu(6)
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
63.8
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
|
|
45.2
|
|
Gongo Soco(7)
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
96.2
|
|
|
|
64.0
|
|
|
|
86.7
|
|
|
|
64.4
|
|
Brucutu(8)
|
|
|
1994
|
|
|
|
2027
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
736.6
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
722.2
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
Baú(9)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.1
|
|
|
|
55.6
|
|
|
|
37.1
|
|
|
|
55.6
|
|
Maquiné(10)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278.7
|
|
|
|
58.3
|
|
|
|
278.7
|
|
|
|
58.3
|
|
Córrego do Meio(11)
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrade(19)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
129.2
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
127.0
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
Mariana mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alegria(12)
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
2029
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
281.8
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
|
258.0
|
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
Fábrica Nova(13)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
946.3
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
|
|
|
920.5
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
|
Fazendão(14)
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
2032
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
351.3
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
349.5
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Timbopeba(15)
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
81.7
|
|
|
|
55.0
|
|
|
|
75.1
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
Total Southeastern
System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80.0
|
|
|
|
90.4
|
|
|
|
96.6
|
|
|
|
4,029.4
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
|
|
3,871.8
|
|
|
|
51.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oeste mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Córrego do Feijão(16)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
45.3
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
Segredo/João Pereira(17)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2025
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
501.5
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
485.8
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBR System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pico/Sapecado/Galinheiro(20)
|
|
|
1942
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
662.0
|
|
|
|
54.6
|
|
|
|
633.2
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
Vargem Grande Complex
Tamanduá(21)
|
|
|
1993
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
99.3
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
86.1
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
Capitão do Mato(21)
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
147.5
|
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
Abóboras(22)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
Paraopeba Complex Jangada(23)
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
92.8
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
|
|
87.6
|
|
|
|
66.1
|
|
Capão Xavier(24)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
179.8
|
|
|
|
65.6
|
|
|
|
163.9
|
|
|
|
65.5
|
|
Mar Azul(25)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
|
|
56.6
|
|
Total Southern System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
|
|
70.0
|
|
|
|
84.3
|
|
|
|
1,766.4
|
|
|
|
57.4
|
|
|
|
1,698.3
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern
System(18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serra Norte
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N4W
|
|
|
1994
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
601.2
|
|
|
|
66.4
|
|
|
|
562.7
|
|
|
|
66.4
|
|
N4E
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
438.8
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
413.1
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
N5-W
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
325.4
|
|
|
|
66.3
|
|
|
|
308.8
|
|
|
|
66.3
|
|
N5E
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
|
|
43.1
|
|
|
|
67.2
|
|
N5E-N
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
65.9
|
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
65.9
|
|
N5S
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607.0
|
|
|
|
67.5
|
|
|
|
607.0
|
|
|
|
67.5
|
|
Serra Leste
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
Total Northern System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69.4
|
|
|
|
72.6
|
|
|
|
81.8
|
|
|
|
2,117.1
|
|
|
|
66.8
|
|
|
|
2,021.0
|
|
|
|
66.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urucum
|
|
|
1993
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
64.3
|
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
|
|
61.7
|
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
Total CVRD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211.3
|
|
|
|
233.9
|
|
|
|
264.2
|
|
|
|
7,981.8
|
|
|
|
57.2
|
|
|
|
7,619.3
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Open pit mines. CVRDs equity
interest in mines is 100% unless otherwise noted.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Reserves are in wet,
run-of-mine
(ROM) ore metric tons unless otherwise noted.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Reserves were not reported for 2005
due to the mines depleted state. The Cauê plant
beneficiates iron ore from Minas do Meio mines.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation at the Conceição plant was 77.7%. The
Conceição plant beneficiates iron ore from the
Conceição mine and Minas do Meio mines.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation at the Cauê plant was 70.5%. The
run-of-mine
from Minas do Meio is sent to the Cauê concentration plant
and the Conceição concentration plant. The production
is declared in Cauê and Conceição.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 48.1%. Água Limpa is owned by Baovale, in
which CVRD owns 100% of the voting shares and 50% of the total
shares.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 81.4%.
|
35
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 97%.
|
|
(9)
|
|
New project with audited reserves
under feasibility review.
|
|
(10)
|
|
New project with audited reserves
under feasibility review.
|
|
(11)
|
|
Reserves were not reported for 2006
due to the mines depleted state.
|
|
(12)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 69.7%. The Alegria plant processes ore from
the Alegria and Fabrica Nova mines.
|
|
(13)
|
|
Fabrica Nova ore is sent to the
Alegria and Timbopeba plants for processing.
|
|
(14)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 100% (direct shipping).
|
|
(15)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 78.9%.
|
|
(16)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 86.2%.
|
|
(17)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 66%. The
run-of-mine
is sent to the Fábrica concentration plant.
|
|
(18)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 90.1%.
|
|
(19)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 100% (direct shipping). In 2004, we entered
into an agreement to lease the Andrade iron ore mine, but we
only started to run this mine in January 2005.
|
|
(20)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 81.5%.
|
|
(21)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 78.6%. Tamanduá ore and Capitão do
Mato ore are processed at the Vargem Grande plant.
|
|
(22)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 100% (direct shipping).
|
|
(23)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 79.9%.
|
|
(24)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 78.6%.
|
|
(25)
|
|
Acquired in the first quarter of
2006. Average product recovery after beneficiation was 87.1%.
|
Changes
in iron ore reserves: 2005 versus 2006
Our 2006 iron ore reserve estimates reflect mining depletion in
2006 and the
build-up of
intermediate and buffer ore stocks, which are composed of ore
that has been mined out of in situ reserves but has
not been fed to the plants. These stocks may be partially
reclaimed during operations. Our 2006 reserve estimates also
reflect revisions to estimates in light of differences
identified in reconciliation testing between estimated ore
tonnages predicted by our reserves model and actual
run-of-mine.
We describe changes in reserves at our individual mines below.
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Conceição mine decreased from 395.6 to
367.7 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006 and, to a lesser extent, a reduction in our
reserves estimates to reflect differences between actual
recoveries and amounts predicted by our reserves model.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Minas do Meio mine decreased from 635.7 to
592.4 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006 and, to a lesser extent, a reduction in our
reserves estimates to reflect differences between actual
recoveries and amounts predicted by our reserves model.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Água Limpa mine decreased from 63.8 to
57.0 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006, which was partially offset by an upward
adjustment to our reserves estimates to reflect differences
between actual recoveries and amounts predicted by our reserves
model and by reclaimed stockpiles.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Gongo Soco mine decreased from 96.2 to
86.7 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006 and, to a lesser extent, the
build-up of
buffer stockpiles and a reduction in our reserves estimates to
reflect differences between actual recoveries and amounts
predicted by our reserves model.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Brucutu mine decreased from 736.6 to
722.2 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006 and, to a lesser extent, the
build-up of
buffer
run-of-mine
stockpiles and a reduction in our reserves estimates to reflect
differences between actual recoveries and amounts predicted by
our reserves model.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Andrade mine decreased from 129.2 to
127.0 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006 and, to a lesser extent, a reduction in our
reserves estimates to reflect differences between actual
recoveries and amounts predicted by our reserves model.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Alegria mine decreased from 281.8 to
258.0 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006 and, to a lesser extent, and a reduction in
our reserves estimates to reflect differences between actual
recoveries and amounts predicted by our reserves model.
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Fabrica Nova mine decreased from 946.3 to
920.5 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006 and, to a lesser extent, a net upward
adjustment to our reserves estimates to reflect differences
between actual recoveries and amounts predicted by our reserves
model.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Fazendão mine decreased from 351.3 to
349.5 million metric tons, primarily reflecting a reduction
in our reserves estimates to reflect differences between actual
recoveries and amounts predicted by our reserves model and, to a
lesser extent, mining depletion in 2006.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Timbopeba mine decreased from 81.7 to
75.1 million metric tons, primarily reflecting a reduction
in our reserves estimates to reflect differences between actual
recoveries and amounts predicted by our reserves model and, to a
lesser extent, mining depletion in 2006.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Córrego do Feijão mine decreased from
51.3 to 45.3 million metric tons, primarily reflecting
mining depletion in 2006 and, to a lesser extent, a reduction in
our reserves estimates to reflect differences between actual
recoveries and amounts predicted by our reserves model, which
decreases were partially offset by reclaimed stockpiles.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Segredo/João Pereira mine decreased from
501.5 to 485.8 million metric tons, primarily reflecting
mining depletion in 2006, which was partially offset by an
upward adjustment to our reserves estimates to reflect
differences between actual recoveries and amounts predicted by
our reserves model.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Pico/Sapecado/Galinheiro mine decreased from
662.0 to 633.2 million metric tons, primarily reflecting
mining depletion in 2006 and, to a lesser extent, the
build-up of
buffer
run-of-mine
stockpiles and a reduction in our reserves estimates to reflect
differences between actual recoveries and amounts predicted by
our reserves model.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Tamanduá mine decreased from 99.3 to
86.1 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006 and, to a lesser extent, a reduction in our
reserves estimates to reflect differences between actual
recoveries and amounts predicted by our reserves model.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Abóboras mine decreased from 32.2 to
30.1 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006, which was partially offset by an upward
adjustment to our reserves estimates to reflect differences
between actual recoveries and amounts predicted by our reserves
model.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Jangada mine decreased from 92.8 to
87.6 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006 and, to a lesser extent, a reduction in our
reserves estimates to reflect differences between actual
recoveries and amounts predicted by our reserves model.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Capão Xavier mine decreased from 179.8 to
163.9 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006, which was partially offset by a net upward
adjustment to our reserves estimates to reflect differences
between actual recoveries and amounts predicted by our reserves
model.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Serra Norte mine decreased from 2,056.3 to
1,960.2 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006 and, to a lesser extent, the
build-up of
buffer
run-of-mine
stockpiles and a reduction in our reserves estimates to reflect
differences between actual recoveries and amounts predicted by
our reserves model.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Urucum mine decreased from 64.3 to
61.7 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006 and a reduction in our reserves estimates to
reflect differences between actual recoveries and amounts
predicted by our reserves model.
|
37
Iron
ore pellets
We produce iron ore pellets in our own plants and through joint
ventures. The table below sets forth information regarding our
iron ore pellet business as of April 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Direct or Indirect Share of
|
|
|
|
|
Total Pellet Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
as of December 31,(1)
|
|
|
Nominal
|
|
|
|
System
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
(Million metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CVRD
|
|
Tubarão, Fábrica and
São Luís
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
GIIC(2)
|
|
Bahrain
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Hispanobras
|
|
Tubarão
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
Arcelor Mittal
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Itabrasco
|
|
Tubarão
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
Ilva
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Kobrasco
|
|
Tubarão
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
Posco
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Nibrasco
|
|
Tubarão
|
|
|
51.1
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
Nippon Steel Sumitomo JFE Steel
Kobe Steel Nisshin Steel SOJITZ Corp.
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
Samarco
|
|
Ponta do Ubú
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
BHP Billiton
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
56.1
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
53.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Total production by joint venture
entity.
|
|
(2)
|
|
We sold our interest in GIIC in May
2006.
|
We suspended operations at our São Luís pelletizing
plant from March to July 2006 due to a decrease in the global
demand for pellets, which is more concentrated in North America
and Europe.
We sell pellet feed to our pelletizing joint ventures at
market-based prices. Historically, we have supplied all of the
iron ore requirements of our wholly owned pelletizing plants and
our joint ventures, except for Samarco and GIIC, to which we
supply a portion of their needs. Of 2006 total pellet
production, 69% was attributable to blast furnace pellets, and
the remaining 31% to direct reduction pellets, which are used in
steel mills that use the direct reduction process rather than
blast furnace technology.
We are the operator of pelletizing joint ventures located in the
Tubarão Port area. In 2006, we received US$72 million
in fees for operating the plants of these joint ventures.
The table below sets forth information regarding our iron ore
sales to our pelletizing joint ventures for the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Million metric tons)
|
|
|
GIIC(1)
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Hispanobras
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Itabrasco
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Kobrasco
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Nibrasco
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Samarco(2)
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
|
|
27.7
|
|
|
|
25.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We sold our interest in GIIC in May
2006.
|
|
(2)
|
|
In 2004 we sold 2.0 million
metric tons of concentrate and 2.6 million metric tons of
run-of-mine;
in 2005 we sold 2.0 million metric tons of concentrate and
4.2 million metric tons of
run-of-mine;
and in 2006 we sold 1.9 million metric tons of concentrate
and 5.6 million metric tons of
run-of-mine.
|
38
Iron
ore pellets projects
We are developing the following iron ore pellets projects in
Brazil and in China:
Samarco expansion. We are increasing pellet
production capacity at Samarco, our 50% joint venture with BHP
Billiton, which pellet plant is located in the Brazilian state
of Espírito Santo. The expansion at Samarco is expected to
add 7.6 million metric tons per year of capacity. In 2006,
the engineering and ground-leveling projects were completed. In
2007, construction works and the assembly of electrical and
mechanical components will be undertaken, with operational
start-up
planned for the first half of 2008. Samarco obtained its own
financing for the project.
Itabiritos project. We are building a pellet
plant, located in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais, with a
capacity of 7 million metric tons per year, an iron ore
concentration plant, and a short iron-ore slurry pipeline. The
development of Itabiritos began in 2006, with the basic
engineering project and the commencement of civil engineering
works. Itabiritos operations are scheduled to begin in the
first half of 2008.
Joint venture in China. In September 2006 our
subsidiary MBR acquired a 25% stake in a joint venture, called
Zhuhai YPM, to build a new pelletizing plant in Zhuhai,
Guandong, China. We expect to invest US$4 million in this
project, and we will supply at least 70% of the iron ore used to
feed the plant, pursuant to a
30-year
contract. The plant is expected to become operational in 2008.
The other partners in this joint venture are Zhuhai Yueyufeng
Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. (with a 40% stake) and Pioneer
Iron & Steel Group Co. Ltd. (with a 35% stake).
Customers,
sales and marketing iron ore and
pellets
We use all of our iron ore and pellets (including our share of
joint-venture pellet production) to supply the steel-making
industry. Prevailing and expected levels of demand for steel
products affect demand for our iron ore and pellets. Demand for
steel products is influenced by many factors, such as expected
rates of economic growth.
In 2006, China accounted for 27.4% of our iron ore and pellets
shipments, Europe accounted for 24.8% and Brazil accounted for
21.3%. Sales to the Tubarão pelletizing joint ventures, at
which most iron ore is transformed into pellets and then sent
abroad, accounted for 8.1% of total shipments in 2006. Our 10
largest customers collectively purchased 145.2 million
metric tons of iron ore and pellets from us, representing 52.6%
of our 2006 iron ore and pellet shipments and 51.9% of our total
iron ore and pellets revenues. With the exception of Arcelor
Mittal, which accounted for 17.9% of our shipments of iron ore
and pellets in 2006, no individual customer accounted for more
than 10% of our shipments of iron ore and pellets for any of the
three years ended December 31, 2006.
We strongly emphasize customer service in order to improve our
competitiveness. We work with our customers to understand their
principal objectives and to provide them with iron ore solutions
to meet specific customer needs. Using our expertise in mining,
agglomeration and iron-making processes, we search for technical
solutions that will balance the best use of our world-class
mining assets and the satisfaction of our clients. We believe
that our ability to provide our customers with a total iron ore
solution and the quality of our products are very important
advantages helping us to improve our competitiveness in relation
to competitors who may be more conveniently located
geographically. In addition to offering technical assistance to
our customers, CVRD operates sales support offices in Tokyo,
Japan; Seoul, South Korea and Shanghai, China, which support the
sales made by our international sales subsidiary located in
Saint Prex, Switzerland. These offices also allow us to stay in
close contact with our customers, monitor their requirements and
our contract performance, and ensure that our customers receive
timely deliveries.
Distribution
iron ore and pellets
Our ownership and operation of transportation systems designed
for the efficient transportation of iron ore products complement
our iron ore mining business in the Northern and Southeastern
Systems where we operate an integrated railroad and terminal
network in each of them. These networks transport our iron ore
39
products from interior mining locations to maritime terminals
and Brazilian customers. For a more detailed description of the
networks, see Logistics, below.
We do not own or operate an integrated transportation system for
our Southern System. Instead, we enter into freight contracts
with our affiliated company, MRS, to transport our iron ore
products at market rates from MBRs mines and Oeste mines
to our Guaíba Island and Itaguaí maritime terminals.
Competition
iron ore and pellets
The global iron ore market is highly competitive. Several large
producers operate in this market. The main factors affecting
competition are price, quality, range of products offered,
reliability, operating costs and shipping costs. In 2006, the
Asian market (primarily China, Japan and South Korea) and the
European market were the primary markets for our iron ore.
Our biggest competitors in the Asian market are located in
Australia and include subsidiaries and affiliates of BHP
Billiton PLC and Rio Tinto Ltd. Although the transportation
costs of delivering iron ore from Australia to Asian customers
are generally lower than ours as a result of Australias
geographical proximity, we believe we are able to remain
competitive in the Asian market for two main reasons. First,
steel companies generally seek to obtain the types (or blends)
of iron ore and pellets that can produce the intended final
product in the most economic and efficient manner. Our iron ore
has low impurity levels and other properties that generally lead
to lower processing costs. For example, the alumina content of
our iron ore is very low compared to Australian ore and has high
iron content, improving productivity in blast furnaces, which is
important especially during periods of high demand. Second,
steel companies often develop sales relationships based on a
reliable supply of a specific mix of iron ore and pellets. We
have a customer-oriented marketing policy and place specialized
personnel in direct contact with our clients to help determine
the blend that best suits each particular customer. In general,
in the Northern and Southeastern Systems, our ownership of the
process of transporting iron ore to our ports makes it easier
for us to ensure that our products get to our ports on schedule
and at competitive costs.
We are competitive in the European market for the reasons we
described above, as well as the proximity of the Ponta da
Madeira and Tubarão port facilities to European customers.
Our principal competitors in Europe are:
|
|
|
|
|
Kumba Resources (South Africa);
|
|
|
|
Luossavaara Kiirunavaara AB LKAB (Sweden);
|
|
|
|
Société Nationale Industrielle et
Minière SNIM (Mauritania);
|
|
|
|
Rio Tinto PLC (UK), Rio Tinto Ltd (Australia) and their
subsidiaries and affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
BHP Billiton (Australia) and its subsidiaries and affiliates.
|
The Brazilian iron ore market is competitive, with a wide range
of smaller iron ore producers and integrated steel companies
such as CSN and Mannesmann. Although pricing is relevant,
quality and reliability are important competitive factors as
well. We believe that our integrated transportation systems,
high-quality ore and technical services make us a strong
competitor in Brazilian sales. Prices to Brazilian customers are
based on global reference prices decreased by the transportation
costs to their facilities.
Manganese
ore and ferroalloys
In 2006, we were one of the largest producers in the global
seaborne market, with total shipments of 779 thousand
metric tons of manganese ore and 522 thousand metric tons of
ferroalloys.
We conduct our manganese ore and ferroalloy businesses through
four subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
Rio Doce Manganèse Europe (RDME),
|
|
|
|
Rio Doce Manganese Norway AS (RDMN),
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
Rio Doce Manganês S.A. (RDM), and
|
|
|
|
Urucum Mineração S.A. (Urucum).
|
We produce manganese ore products from the Azul mine in the
Carajás region of the Brazilian state of Pará, and
from the Urucum mine of the Pantanal region of the Brazilian
state of Mato Grosso do Sul. We operate
on-site
beneficiation plants at both the Azul and Urucum mines. Both
mines are accessible by road, and the mines obtain electrical
power at market rates from regional electric utilities. We also
operate minor mines in the Brazilian states of Minas Gerais and
Bahia. Our Azul and Urucum mines have high-grade ores, and our
smaller mines in Minas Gerais and Bahia have low-grade ores.
Our manganese ore mines produce three types of manganese ore
products:
|
|
|
|
|
metallurgical ore used primarily for the production of
ferroalloys;
|
|
|
|
natural manganese dioxide suitable for the manufacture of
electrolytic batteries; and
|
|
|
|
chemical ore used in several industries for the production of
fertilizer, pesticides and animal food, and used as a pigment in
the ceramics industry.
|
The table below sets forth information regarding our manganese
ore production and reserves. We own 100% of all mines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Began
|
|
|
Exhaustion
|
|
|
Production for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Tonnage(1)
|
|
|
Grade(2)
|
|
|
Tonnage(1)
|
|
|
Grade(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Million metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Azul(3)
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
Open Pit
|
|
|
45.7
|
|
|
|
35.7
|
|
|
|
42.9
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
Urucum(4)
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
45.3
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
45.3
|
|
Morro da Mina(5)
|
|
|
1902
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
Open Pit
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
Bahia mines(6)
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
Open Pit
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.5
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
|
|
|
34.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Reserves reported as
run-of-mine
wet metric tons, in millions of metric tons.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Reported as
run-of-mine
Mn% grade.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 69% of ROM metric tons.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 75% of ROM metric tons.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Average product recovery after
beneficiation was 88% of ROM metric tons.
|
|
(6)
|
|
There are no proven and probable
manganese reserves at the mines located in the Brazilian state
of Bahia.
|
Changes
in manganese ore reserves: 2005 versus 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Azul mine decreased from 45.7 to
42.9 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006 and, to a lesser extent, the
build-up of
buffer
run-of-mine
stockpiles, which are mined out of in situ reserves
but have not been fed to the plants. These stocks may be
partially reclaimed during operations.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Urucum mine decreased from 8.2 to
7.7 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Morro da Mina mine decreased from 9.6 to
9.4 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006.
|
41
Ferroalloys
CVRD produces several types of ferroalloys, such as manganese
ferro-silicon alloys (SiMnFe), ferro-manganese high-carbon
alloys (HCFeMn), and ferro-manganese mediumcarbon alloys
(MCFeMn). We currently operate eight plants that produce
ferroalloys and special alloys:
|
|
|
|
|
the plants of Santa Rita, Barbacena, Ouro Preto and São
João del Rey (all in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais),
|
|
|
|
Simões Filho (in the Brazilian state of Bahia),
|
|
|
|
Corumbá (in the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso do Sul),
|
|
|
|
RDME (in Dunkerque, France), and
|
|
|
|
RDMN (in Mo I Rana, Norway).
|
The production of ferroalloys consumes significant amounts of
electricity, representing 13.2% of our total consumption in
2006. For information on the risks associated with potential
energy shortages, see Item 3. Key
Information Risk Factors. The table below sets
forth information regarding our production in 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Production
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
in 2006
|
|
|
|
(Thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
RDME (Rio Doce Manganèse
Europe)
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
RDMN (Rio Doce Manganese Norway )
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
RDM (Rio Doce Manganês S.A.)
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
Urucum (Urucum Mineração
S.A.)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
NES (Nova Era Silicon S.A.)(1)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We sold our interest in NES in
February 2006.
|
Given the global excess supply that resulted in inventory
accumulation and falling ferroalloy prices, we decided to shut
down our ferroalloy plant in Norway between August and November
2005. We also decided to operate our ferroalloy plant in France
below its nominal capacity. As ferroalloy inventories were
consumed and prices stabilized, we resumed full capacity
operation at our Norwegian and French plants in December 2005.
On the other hand, given the weakness in Brazilian demand for
ferroalloys, we have shut down three furnaces at our Simões
Filho plant since January 2006.
Competition
manganese ore and ferroalloys
The markets for manganese ore and ferroalloys are highly
competitive. Competition in the manganese ore market takes place
in two segments. High-grade (40% Mn or more) manganese ore
competes on a global seaborne basis, while low grade ore
competes on a regional basis. For some ferroalloys, high-grade
ore is mandatory, while for others high- and low-grade ores are
complementary. Besides manganese ore content, cost and
physical-chemical features play an important role in competition
(e.g. moisture, impurities). The main suppliers of
high-grade ores are located in South Africa, Gabon and
Australia. The main producers of low-grade ores are located in
Ukraine, China, Ghana, Kazakhstan, India and Mexico.
The ferroalloy market is characterized by a large number of
market players who compete primarily on the basis of price
(which is a function of the producers operating costs).
The principal competitive factors in this market are costs of
manganese ore, electricity, logistics and carbon. We compete
both with standalone producers and integrated producers that
also mine their own ore. Our competitors are located principally
in manganese-ore or steel producing countries.
We are taking steps to improve our competitive position and
reduce operating costs at our manganese ore and ferroalloys
operations through divestments, reduction of personnel, and
streamlining of the management structure.
42
Nickel
Nickel
operations
We conduct our nickel business through our wholly owned
subsidiary CVRD Inco and its 61%-owned subsidiary PT Inco. CVRD
Inco operates two nickel production systems, one in North
America and Europe, and another in Asia.
Our principal nickel operations in North America and Europe are
set forth in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Operations
|
|
Canada:
|
|
|
|
|
Ontario
|
|
Sudbury, Ontario
|
|
Fully integrated mines, mill,
smelter and refinery (producing finished nickel)
|
Manitoba
|
|
Thompson, Manitoba
|
|
Fully integrated mines, mill,
smelter and refinery (producing finished nickel)
|
Voiseys Bay
|
|
Voiseys Bay,
Newfoundland & Labrador
|
|
Mine and mill (producing an
intermediate product: nickel concentrates)
|
U.K.
|
|
Clydach, Wales
|
|
Stand-alone nickel refinery
(producing finished nickel)
|
At our Ontario, Manitoba and Voiseys Bay operations, we
mine nickel sulfide ore bodies. Sulfide deposits, which
currently account for about 28% of the worlds estimated
nickel resources, are generally found in bedrock, deep below the
earths surface. They can contain significant co-deposits
of copper, cobalt, platinum-group metals, and other precious
metals. Our long-established mines in Ontario and Manitoba are
primarily underground operations. Our newest mine, Voiseys
Bay, which commenced commercial production in late 2005, is an
open-pit operation with the potential for underground operations
at a later stage.
In Ontario and Manitoba, we produce finished nickel at our
integrated mining, milling, smelting and refining operations. A
nickel intermediate product from our Ontario operations (nickel
oxide) is also shipped to our stand-alone nickel refinery in
Clydach, Wales for processing into finished nickel. Our
Voiseys Bay ore is milled on site in Labrador and then
shipped as an intermediate product (nickel concentrates)
primarily to our Ontario and Manitoba operations for final
processing. A portion of our Voiseys Bay nickel
concentrate is also toll-smelted and toll-refined by third
parties in Europe. Under our agreement with the Government of
Newfoundland & Labrador, we are committed to
constructing a nickel refinery in that Province by the end of
2011.
Our principal nickel operations in Asia are set forth in the
table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Operations
|
|
PT Inco (61%)
|
|
Sulawesi, Indonesia
|
|
Mining and processing operation
(producing an intermediate product:
nickel-in-matte)
|
Inco TNC Limited (67%)
|
|
Tokyo, Japan
|
|
Stand-alone nickel refinery
(producing finished nickel)
|
Our 61%-owned subsidiary, PT Inco, operates an open-pit mine and
related processing facility on the Island of Sulawesi,
Indonesia. PT Inco mines nickel laterite ore. Laterite deposits,
which currently account for around 72% of the worlds
estimated nickel resources, are generally located at or near the
surface and are amenable to open-pit production methods. PT Inco
produces an intermediate product
(nickel-in-matte),
which is shipped primarily to nickel refineries in Japan. PT
Inco is a public company whose shares are traded on the Jakarta
Stock Exchange. 20% of PT Incos shares are held by
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. (Sumitomo) of Japan,
with the remaining shares (18%) being widely held. PT Inco sells
80% of its production to CVRD Inco and 20% of its production to
Sumitomo, pursuant to
life-of-mine
off-take agreements.
43
Our 67%-owned subsidiary, Inco TNC Limited (Inco
TNC), operates a refinery near Tokyo, Japan, which
produces intermediate and finished nickel products primarily
using
nickel-in-matte
sourced from PT Inco. Inco TNC is a private company. Thirteen
percent (13%) of Inco TNCs shares are held by Sumitomo, 7%
are held by Mitsui & Co., Ltd. (Mitsui) of
Japan, and the remaining shares (13%) are held by a number of
Japanese investors.
We also have investment interests in nickel refining operations
in Taiwan and South Korea, through Taiwan Nickel Refining
Corporation (TNRC) (49.9%) and Korea Nickel
Corporation (KNC) (25%). TNRC and KNC produce
finished nickel for the local stainless steel industry in Taiwan
and Korea, primarily using intermediate products from Inco TNC
and a product containing about 75% nickel from our Ontario
operations.
Through our Inco Special Products business unit, we develop,
manufacture and sell value-added specialty nickel products,
including powders, foams, flakes, oxides and nickel-coated
graphite. These products, which are generally sold at premium
prices, are used for such applications as consumer electronics,
rechargeable batteries for consumer and hybrid vehicle use, fuel
cells, powder metallurgy, automotive parts, electromagnetic
interference shielding for computers and cellular telephones,
catalysts and salts, metal injection molding, and hard metal
binders. Our nickel specialty products offices and operations
are located in Canada, in China, through our 76.7%-owned
subsidiary Inco Advanced Technology Materials (Dalian) Co.,
Ltd., our 77%-owned subsidiary Inco Advanced Technology
Materials (Shenyang) Co. Ltd. and our 65%-owned subsidiary Jinco
Nonferrous Metals Co. Ltd.; in Japan, in the United Kingdom, in
Germany, through our wholly-owned subsidiary Inco GmbH and our
50%-owned subsidiary Alantum GmbH & Co. KG; and in the
United States, through our wholly-owned subsidiary Novamet
Specialty Products Corporation.
Through our wholly-owned subsidiary The International Metals
Reclamation Company, Inc. (INMETCO), we process
stainless steel wastes,
end-of-life
batteries and other waste products primarily containing nickel,
chromium, iron and cadmium and sell the resulting recovered
metals as a remelt alloy ingot to the stainless steel industry.
INMETCOs facilities are located in the state of
Pennsylvania in the United States.
Nickel
projects
We are developing the following nickel projects in Brazil and
New Caledonia:
|
|
|
|
|
Onça Puma. Construction at the project
site, in the Brazilian state of Pará, began in the third
quarter of 2006. Operations at Onça Puma are expected to
begin in the fourth quarter of 2008. Onça Puma is expected
to have a nominal capacity of 58,000 metric tons per year of
nickel in the form of ferro-nickel, its final product. We
currently estimate that the total investment in the project will
amount to US$1,437 million.
|
|
|
|
Vermelho. The process of obtaining the
necessary licenses for the development of this project, in the
Brazilian Province of Carajás, is still ongoing. Vermelho
has an estimated production capacity of 46,000 metric tons of
nickel per year and 2,800 metric tons of cobalt per year, and
has proven and probable reserves of 290 million metric
tons. Its lateritic (limonitic) ores have an estimated nickel
content of 0.8%. The technology to be used to extract the nickel
from the ore is high-pressure acid leaching (HPAL), with a
hydrometallurgical process. The project has an estimated cost of
US$1,452 million.
|
|
|
|
Goro. As a result of our acquisition of Inco,
we now hold a 74% interest in the Goro nickel-cobalt project in
New Caledonia through the project company Goro Nickel S.A.S. The
other investors are Sumic Nickel Netherlands, a joint venture
between Sumitomo and Mitsui (with a 21% stake), and SPMSC
(Société de Participation Minière du Sud
Calédonien) (with a 5% stake). Goro is a major
greenfield project consisting of an open-pit mine and processing
facility, which is expected to have an annual production
capacity of 60,000 metric tons of nickel upon completion. As a
result of a recent review of the project, we have planned the
implementation of measures to reduce environmental, operational
and technology risks. The total cost of Goro is estimated to be
US$3,212 million, of which
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
US$1,435 million was spent from 2001 to 2006. The
commissioning of operations at Goro is scheduled for the end of
2008.
|
Nickel
production and reserves
The table below sets forth information regarding production and
reserve data for finished nickel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves as of December 31,(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
Production for the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Exhaustion
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Thousand
|
|
|
|
|
(Million
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(Million
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ontario(2)
|
|
|
1885
|
|
|
|
2042
|
|
|
|
109.1
|
|
|
|
96.5
|
|
|
|
93.8
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
1.18
|
|
Manitoba(2)
|
|
|
1960
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
34.9
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
Voiseys Bay(3)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
2.67
|
|
PT Inco(4)(5)
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
|
2039
|
|
|
|
75.1
|
|
|
|
73.9
|
|
|
|
70.0
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
External(6)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Goro Project(5)(7)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2036
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
Vermelho Project(8)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2050
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
0.81
|
|
Onça Puma Project(9)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2039
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
Total(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236.8
|
|
|
|
219.8
|
|
|
|
234.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
1.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Ore reserves listed are totals for
the operation and projects indicated and assume that we own, or
have all of the necessary rights to mine, extract and process,
all of such ore reserves and, accordingly, are not based upon
our ownership interest in the operation or project or properties.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes some finished nickel
produced by CVRD Inco from third-party purchased feeds. Primary
nickel production only (does not include secondary nickel from
INMETCO).
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes finished nickel produced
at CVRD Incos Ontario and Manitoba operations, as well as
some finished nickel produced by third parties under
toll-smelting and toll-refining arrangements.
|
|
(4)
|
|
We have a 61% interest in PT Inco
(Indonesia) and these figures include the minority interests.
|
|
(5)
|
|
We have rights to other properties
in Indonesia, New Caledonia and in other locations, which have
not yet been fully explored.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Excludes finished nickel produced
under toll-smelting and refining arrangements covering purchased
intermediates with third parties. Third-party tolling of
purchased intermediates was 1.0 thousand metric tons in 2005 and
16.1 thousand metric tons in 2006. There was no third-party
tolling of purchased intermediates in 2004.
|
|
(7)
|
|
CVRD has a 74% interest in the Goro
project through CVRD Inco. Completion of comprehensive project
reviews, governmental or regulatory permitting and other
approvals
and/or
significant capital expenditures would be required before
operations could commence at this project.
|
|
(8)
|
|
New project. Reserve estimates are
reported for in situ metric tons and grades, without
adjustment.
|
|
(9)
|
|
New project.
|
Changes
in nickel reserves: 2005 versus 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Ontario operations increased 7%, from 163 to
175 million metric tons, after mining depletion, as a
result of exploration additions and mine plan re-evaluation due
to increased metal values. Nickel grades declined by
approximately 3% due to additions of lower grade material in the
mine plan, which were previously considered marginal.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Manitoba operations decreased from 25 to
24 million metric tons, primarily due to mining depletion,
which was partially offset by ore reserve additions resulting
from exploration and mine plan re-evaluation. The estimated
average nickel grade declined by 1%.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Voiseys Bay operations decreased from 32
to 31 million metric tons, primarily due to mining
depletion, which was partially offset by a reduction in the
cut-off grade. The reduction in the cut-off grade has also
contributed to a 3% decline in the estimated average nickel
grade.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at PT Inco increased 29%, from 147 to 177 million
metric tons, after adjustments for mining depletion of
5 million metric tons and a reclassification of ore reserve
to mineral resource categories of 7 million metric tons due
to an increase in the minimum distance required between mining
activities and Lake Matano. The increase in reserves includes
12 million metric tons from recent detailed core drilling
to meet processing feed plant chemistry, 10 million metric
tons of estimated limonite reserves required for blending
purposes, 9 million metric tons of added open pit contact
dilution material and an
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
estimated 11 million metric tons of reserves from the Petea
deposit due to confirmation of a higher recovery factor
established through reconciliation studies.
|
Customers,
sales and marketing nickel
Nickel is an exchange-traded commodity, listed on the London
Metal Exchange, or the LME. Although only about 5% of global
nickel consumption is physically delivered through the LME, the
LME nickel price is used as a reference price in supply
contracts for nickel products between nickel suppliers and their
customers. Most nickel products are priced according to a
discount or premium to the LME price, depending on the nickel
products physical and technical characteristics.
CVRD Incos finished nickel products represent what is
known in the industry as primary nickel, meaning
nickel produced principally from nickel ores. Finished primary
nickel products may be essentially distinguished in terms of
purity level, shape and size. As regards purity, historically
three broad categories of products have been identified:
(i) ferronickel
(20-40%
nickel), (ii) standard LME grade nickel (minimum 99.8%
nickel) and (iii) high purity nickel (99.9% nickel). In
addition to nickel content, the presence or absence of specific
elemental impurities (such as carbon, nitrogen, etc.) also play
an important role in defining high purity nickel.
The shape and size of a nickel product may affect its
suitability for various end use applications. In 2006, a new
primary nickel product entered the market, known as
nickel-chromium pig iron. This is a low-grade nickel product
made in China from imported lateritic ores (primarily from the
Philippines, Indonesia and New Caledonia), suitable primarily
for use in stainless steel production. The other type of nickel
used in industrial applications is known as secondary
nickel, also referred to as recycled or
scrap nickel. Secondary nickel units are largely
recovered from austenitic stainless steel manufacturing
operations or other recycled nickel-containing material.
The principal end-use applications for nickel are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Stainless steel
(60-65%
of global nickel consumption). Stainless steel is the
main application of nickel. Approximately 75% of global
stainless steel consumption consists of nickel-bearing or
austenitic, grades of stainless steel, with an average of 8%
nickel content. Austenitic stainless steel is used in consumer
products, industrial processing equipment, power generation,
transportation equipment and kitchen appliances, in addition to
many other applications where strength, corrosion resistance and
aesthetics are required. While austenitic stainless steel
production drives global nickel demand, stainless steel is
generally the least demanding end use application for nickel in
terms of its technical requirements. Stainless steel producers
can use a variety of nickel products, including secondary nickel
and ferronickel as well as higher purity nickel products.
|
|
|
|
Melting applications (other than stainless steel)
(15-20%
of global nickel consumption). Nickel is used in a
number of other melting applications, including low alloy
steels, non-ferrous alloys and foundry industry castings.
Low-alloy steels are used primarily in construction. Non-ferrous
alloys, which contain no iron, are used typically in energy,
oil, gas, aerospace and electronic applications. They offer
superior strength, corrosion resistance and the ability to
withstand high temperatures. Primary nickel and reverted scrap
are the main source of nickel for these melting applications.
|
|
|
|
Plating and electroforming (10% of global nickel
consumption). Electroplating is used to coat objects
with nickel to achieve decorative and functional finishes. For
these applications, malleability of the nickel is important as
the materials must be adapted to customer equipment. Secondary
nickel is not used in these applications.
|
|
|
|
Specialty applications (5-10% of global nickel
consumption). Intermediate and finished nickel
products may be processed to obtain a variety of specialty
nickel products, such as powders, foams and oxides, which are
used in a wide range of products, such as batteries, fuel cells,
powder metallurgy and automotive parts. These specialty products
generally do not use secondary nickel.
|
CVRD Inco has a well-established global marketing network for
finished nickel, based at its head office in Toronto, Canada,
with sales offices in Saddle Brook, New Jersey and
San Antonio, Texas in the United States, in London,
England, in Tokyo, Japan, in Hong Kong and Shanghai, China, in
Kaohsiung,
46
Taiwan, in Bangkok, Thailand and in Bridgetown, Barbados. Over
the years, we have built strong customer relationships and a
brand name recognized for quality in the nickel market. We
believe that our global market reach is one of our key strengths
in the highly competitive global nickel industry. Our customers
are broadly distributed on a global basis and our global
marketing network works to direct our products to the regions
with the most attractive market dynamics. In 2006, CVRD Inco
made 26.0% of its total nickel deliveries to customers in the
United States and Canada, 61.3% to customers in Asia, 9.8% to
customers in Europe, and 2.9% to customers in other destinations.
In addition, we sell an above-average share of our products into
higher value-added, differentiated applications (such as alloys,
plating and specialty products). In 2006, approximately 61% of
CVRD Incos sales were made into non-stainless steel
applications, as compared to primary nickel producers
industry average of approximately 37%. By virtue of our focus on
higher-value segments, our average realized nickel prices have
consistently exceeded LME cash nickel prices.
We have fixed-volume contracts with customers for a substantial
portion of our expected annual nickel sales. These contracts,
together with our sales of proprietary nickel products, provide
stable demand for a significant portion of our annual production.
Competition
nickel
The global nickel market is highly competitive. In 2006, CVRD
Incos nickel deliveries, including intermediates and
purchased nickel, represented an estimated 20% of global demand
for primary nickel.
In addition to us, the largest suppliers in the nickel industry,
each with its own integrated facilities, including nickel
mining, processing, refining and marketing operations, are:
|
|
|
|
|
MMC Norilsk Nickel (with operations in Russia),
|
|
|
|
BHP Billiton plc (with operations in Australia and Colombia),
|
|
|
|
Xstrata plc (with operations in Canada, Norway and the Dominican
Republic), and
|
|
|
|
Jinchuan Nonferrous Metals Corporation (with operations in
China).
|
Including us, these companies accounted for about 59% of global
primary nickel production in 2006. In addition to these five
industry participants, about 25 other producers in various
countries also participate in the nickel industry.
The stainless steel and alloy sectors can satisfy their nickel
requirements by choosing secondary nickel instead of primary
nickel. The choice between primary and secondary nickel is
largely based on their relative prices and availability. In
recent years, secondary nickel has accounted for about
44-49% of
total nickel used for austenitic stainless steels, and primary
nickel has accounted for about
51-56%.
We believe that our key competitive strengths include our
long-life mines, which are supported by an industry leading
nickel ore reserve base; our low cash costs of production
relative to other nickel producers; and technological leadership
in nickel exploration, processing technology and specialty
products research and development; and our global marketing
reach, which directs our products to the applications and
geographic regions which offer the highest margins for our
products. We also offer sales and technical support to our
customers on a global basis.
Copper
Copper
operations
We conduct our copper operations in Brazil at the parent company
level and in Canada through CVRD Inco.
47
Brazilian
copper operations
Our Sossego copper mine is in Carajás, in the Brazilian
state of Pará. The Sossego mine has two main copper ore
bodies, Sossego and Sequeirinho. The copper ore is mined by
open-pit method and the
run-of-mine
ore is processed by means of standard primary crushing and
conveying, SAG milling (a semi-autogenous mill which uses a
large rotating drum filled with ore, water and steel grinding
balls which transforms the ore into a fine slurry), ball
milling, copper concentrate flotation, tailings disposal,
concentrate thickening, filtration and load out.
Projected annual operating capacity is 15 million metric
tons of
run-of-mine
ore, to produce an average of 140,000 metric tons of copper
contained in concentrate (30% grade). The
ramp-up
process was completed in 2006. The concentrate is trucked to a
storage terminal in Parauapebas and then transported via the
Carajás railroad to the Ponta da Madeira maritime terminal
in São Luís, in the Brazilian state of Maranhão.
We have constructed an
85-kilometer
road to link Sossego to the Carajás air and rail facilities
and a power line that allows us to purchase electrical power at
market rates. We have a long-term energy supply contract with
Eletronorte, which sells us energy from the Tucuruí
hydroelectric power plant located on the Tocantins River.
We are constructing a semi-industrial scale plant for copper
processing, Usina Hidrometalúrgica de
Carajás UHC, that is designed to produce copper
cathode using the hydro-metallurgical technology process route.
We will use Sossego copper concentrate to feed this plant, which
is located at our Sossego mine in Carajás. Operations are
scheduled to begin in the third quarter of 2007, with an annual
production capacity of 10,000 metric tons of copper. If proven
to be efficient, we believe this technology could be used to
process the sulphide ore produced by the mines of Carajás
region at a very competitive cost.
Canadian
copper operations
In Canada, we recover copper in conjunction with our nickel
operations, principally in Ontario and Voiseys Bay. At our
Ontario operations, we produce two intermediate copper products:
copper concentrate and copper anodes. We expect to increase our
production of copper concentrate (and proportionately decrease
our production of copper anodes) over time as we streamline our
Ontario operations to separate nickel and copper production
streams. We also produce a lower-purity refined copper
(electrowon copper) in Ontario as by-product of our nickel
refining operations. At our Voiseys Bay operations, we
produce copper concentrate. CVRD Inco commenced commercial
production of copper concentrate at Voiseys Bay in
September 2005 and sold its first shipment in January 2006.
Copper
projects
We are developing the following copper projects in Brazil:
|
|
|
|
|
Salobo. We own a 100% stake in the Salobo
project in Brazil, for which feasibility study was concluded in
January 2007. Our Board of Directors has approved an investment
in Salobo of US$855 million. However, the
start-up of
the development of the project is contingent to an appropriate
tax structure, which is being currently discussed with
government authorities.
|
|
|
|
Project 118. We are developing the 118 copper
project, which has an average production capacity of
approximately 36,000 metric tons of copper per year, and its
estimated total cost is US$232 million. A preliminary
license was obtained in April 2006, and key equipment was
ordered at the end of 2006. Basic engineering for the project
has been concluded. Project 118 is scheduled to begin operations
in the first half of 2009, but we are still awaiting the grant
of a license without which construction cannot begin. Therefore,
the timing of
start-up
could be revised. In 2005, in accordance with the Mineral Risk
Contract, we entered into a specific agreement with the
Brazilian Development Bank (Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento
Econômico e Social), or BNDES, which establishes that
CVRD shall pay to BNDES a specified percentage of Project
118s net revenues that will vary in accordance with copper
market prices.
|
48
Copper
production and reserves
The following table shows copper production and reserves data
for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Exhaustion
|
|
|
Production for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Since
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Ore tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Ore tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
(Million
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(Million
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sossego(1)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
225.1
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
214.8
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
Salobo(2)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
385.3
|
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
118(2)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
77.7
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
Canadian Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ontario(3)
|
|
|
1885
|
|
|
|
2042
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
163.0
|
|
|
|
1.31
|
|
|
|
175.0
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
Manitoba
|
|
|
1960
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
Voiseys Bay
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
External(3)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
445.1
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
907.8
|
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Average metal recovery was 91.7%.
|
|
(2)
|
|
New project.
|
|
(3)
|
|
For 2004 and 2005, Ontario-source
production includes copper produced from third-party-purchased
feeds. For 2006, such External-source production is
stated as a separate line item.
|
Changes
in Copper Reserves: 2005 versus 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves at the Sossego complex decreased 4.6%, from 225.1 to
214.8 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006 and, to a lesser extent, the
build-up of
buffer
run-of-mine
stockpiles and a reduction in our reserves estimates to reflect
differences between actual recoveries and amounts predicted by
our reserves model, which were partially offset by reclaimed
stockpiles.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Ontario operations increased 7%, from 163 to
175 million metric tons, after mining depletion in 2006, as
a result of exploration additions and mine plan re-evaluation
due to increased metal values. Copper grades declined by
approximately 3%, reflecting additions of lower grade material
in the mine plan that had previously been considered marginal.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Manitoba operations decreased 5%, from 25.0 to
24.0 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006, which was partially offset by ore reserve
additions due to exploration and mine plan re-evaluation. Copper
grade declined by less than 1%.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Voiseys Bay operations decreased from 32
to 31 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006, which was partially offset by a reduction in
the cut-off grade. The reduction in the cut-off grade also
contributed to a 3% decline in copper grade.
|
Customers
and sales copper
In June 2005, Inco (now CVRD Inco) entered into a long-term
agreement with Noranda Inc. (now Xstrata Copper Canada, or
Xstrata) under which Inco agreed to sell to Xstrata
about 115,000 metric tons of copper in anode form each year for
a period of 10 years beginning January 1, 2006 (the
Anode Agreement). In addition, in August 2006, Inco
entered into an interim agreement with Falconbridge Limited (now
Xstrata) for the sale to Xstrata of approximately 150,000 metric
tons of copper concentrate (containing about 46,500 metric tons
of copper) each year for a term ending on the same date as the
Anode Agreement. The parties are currently working towards
replacing this interim agreement with a formal agreement. The
sale of copper concentrate to Xstrata under this agreement
reduces the quantity of copper anodes sold to Xstrata under the
Anode Agreement by about 30%, with the total annual quantity of
contained copper sold to Xstrata remaining fixed at
approximately 115,000 metric tons per year for the term of these
two agreements. Copper in
49
concentrate from Voiseys Bay is sold under long-term
contracts to customers in Europe. Electrowon copper from Ontario
is sold to a single customer in the United States.
PGMs and
other precious metals
We recover significant quantities of platinum-group metals, as
well as small quantities of gold and silver, as by-products of
our Canadian nickel operations. We operate a precious metals
upgrading facility at Port Colborne, Ontario, Canada, which
produces PGMs, gold and silver intermediate products.
We refine our PGM intermediate products, as well as
third-party-purchased and toll-refined materials, at our
refinery in Acton, England. In 2006, about 29% of our PGM
production was supplied by concentrates from our Canadian
operations, while about 71% was supplied by third-party feeds
(including purchased and toll-refined materials). CVRD
Incos global marketing department sells our own PGMs and
other precious metals, as well as third-party toll-refined
products on a sales agency basis.
PGMs
and precious metal production and reserves
The table below shows production and reserve data for PGMs and
other precious metals produced at our Canadian operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Exhaustion
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since(1)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Thousand troy ounces)
|
|
|
|
|
(Million
|
|
|
(Grams per
|
|
|
(Million metric
|
|
|
(Grams per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric tons)
|
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
tons)
|
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
Platinum
|
|
|
1885
|
|
|
|
2042
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Palladium
|
|
|
1885
|
|
|
|
2042
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
1885
|
|
|
|
2042
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Source of ore is Ontario operations
and excludes third-party purchased or toll-refined materials.
|
Changes
in PGM reserves: 2005 versus 2006
Our reserve estimates of platinum, palladium and gold are based
on estimated amounts of these metals contained in extracted
nickel ore. For a description of changes in nickel reserves
between 2005 and 2006, see Nickel
Nickel production and reserves Changes in Nickel
Reserves: 2005 versus 2006. We do not have the drill hole
assays data required to update our estimate of their grades. As
a result, no change has occurred in the reserve grade for these
metals.
Other
products
Kaolin
We conduct our kaolin business through our subsidiaries, CADAM
S.A. (CADAM) and Pará Pigmentos S.A.
(PPSA). We hold 82.04% of PPSA total capital and
61.48% of CADAMs total capital. These companies produce
kaolin for paper coating and conduct research and development in
other uses for kaolin products to create a more diversified
portfolio.
PPSAs open-pit Rio Capim mine and beneficiation plant are
located in Ipixuna, in the Brazilian state of Pará. These
operations are linked to the land and port facilities in
Barcarena, also in the Brazilian state of Pará, via a
180-km
pipeline. The beneficiated kaolin is pumped through a slurry
pipeline. PPSA produces the following products: Century, Century
S, Paraprint, Paraplate and Paralux. They are sold mainly in the
European, Asian and North American markets.
CADAM is located on the border of the Brazilian states of
Pará and Amapá, in the Amazon area in northern Brazil.
CADAMs reserves are principally concentrated in the
open-pit Morro do Felipe mine, in Mazagão, in the Brazilian
state of Amapá. The beneficiation plant and private port
are situated on the west bank of the Jari River, in Munguba, in
the Brazilian state of Pará.
50
The table below sets forth information regarding our kaolin ore
mines and kaolin ore production for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves as of December 31,(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Began
|
|
|
Exhaustion
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Thousand
|
|
|
|
|
(Million
|
|
|
Brightness
|
|
|
(Million
|
|
|
Brightness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
metric tons)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
metric tons)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Morro do Felipe(2)
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
701.0
|
|
|
|
755.0
|
|
|
Open Pit
|
|
|
36.7
|
|
|
|
86.7
|
|
|
|
35.4
|
|
|
|
86.7
|
|
Rio Capim(3)
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
517.0
|
|
|
|
597.0
|
|
|
Open Pit
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
|
|
82.8
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
|
|
82.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Expressed as dry in
situ ore metric tons.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Owned by CADAM.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Owned by PPSA. Average recovery of
Century product is 55% of the ore metric tons.
|
Changes
in kaolin reserves: 2005 versus 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves at the Morro do Felipe mine decreased from 36.7 to
35.4 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006 and, to a lesser extent, a reduction in
estimates to reflect differences between actual recoveries and
amounts predicted by our reserves model.
|
Reserves at the Rio Capim mine decreased from 33.5 to
31.6 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006, the
build-up of
buffer
run-of-mine
stockpiles and a reduction in our reserves estimates to reflect
differences between actual recoveries and amounts predicted by
our reserves model.
Potash
We conduct our potash operations at the parent company level. We
lease a potash mine (the Taquari-Vassouras mine) in Rosario do
Catete, in the Brazilian state of Sergipe, from
Petrobras Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras),
a Brazilian state-owned oil company. The lease was signed in
1991, but was effective from 1992 for a period of 25 years,
and is renewable for another 25 years. The mine is the only
potash mine in Brazil and has a current nominal capacity of
850,000 metric tons per year. Taquari-Vassouras is an
underground mine. All sales from the Taquari-Vassouras mine are
to the Brazilian market.
The table below sets forth information regarding reserves and
production at the Taquari-Vassouras mine for the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Exhaustion
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Type
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Thousand
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Million
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(Million
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taquari-Vassouras(1)
|
|
|
1992
|
(2)
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
638.0
|
|
|
|
641.0
|
|
|
|
731.0
|
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Average mining extraction was 46%
of the in situ ore and average mass recovery was
87.5%.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The mine began operations in 1986.
|
Potash reserves at our Taquari-Vassouras mine decreased from
19.2 to 16.6 million metric tons, primarily reflecting
mining depletion in 2006.
Cobalt
We recover significant quantities of cobalt as a by-product of
our Canadian nickel operations and our reserve figures are based
on estimated amounts of cobalt contained in extracted nickel ore.
51
In 2006, we produced 1,245 metric tons of refined cobalt metal
at our cobalt refinery in Port Colborne, Ontario, Canada and 465
metric tons of cobalt hydrate at our nickel operations in
Thompson, in the Canadian Province of Manitoba. Our remaining
cobalt production consisted of 357 metric tons of cobalt
contained in intermediate products (such as nickel concentrates).
Cobalt metal is used in the production of various alloys,
particularly for aerospace applications, as well as the
manufacture of cobalt-based chemicals. We sell our cobalt metal
on a global basis. Our cobalt metal is of a very high purity
(99.8%), which commands a premium in the market.
Cobalt hydrate is used by chemical producers to make
cobalt-based chemicals. Our cobalt metal production is sold to a
single customer, for use at its facilities in Europe and the
United States. We expect to increase our production of cobalt
when we complete our Goro and Vermelho nickel development
projects, as the nickel laterite ore in these locations contains
significant co-deposits of cobalt.
The table below sets forth information on our cobalt production
and reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves as of December 31,(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Exhaustion
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Thousand
|
|
|
|
|
(Million
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(Million
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ontario(2)
|
|
|
1885
|
|
|
|
2042
|
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
1,378
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
Manitoba
|
|
|
1960
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Voiseys Bay
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
External(2)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Goro Project(3)(4)(5)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2036
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
Vermelho Project(6)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2050
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
|
|
1,660
|
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Ore reserves listed are totals for
the operation and projects indicated and assume that we own, or
have all of the necessary rights to mine, extract and process,
all of such ore reserves and, accordingly, are not based upon
our ownership interest in the operation or project or
properties. Ore reserves are of in-place material after
adjustment for mining dilution and mining (or screening in the
case of PT Inco) recoveries. However, no adjustments have been
made for metal losses due to processing.
|
|
(2)
|
|
For 2004 and 2005, Ontario-sourced
production includes cobalt produced from third-party purchased
feeds. For 2006, such External-source production is
stated as a separate line item and does not include third-party
tolling of third-party purchased feeds.
|
|
(3)
|
|
We have rights to other properties
in New Caledonia and in certain other locations, which have not
yet been fully explored.
|
|
(4)
|
|
We have a 74% interest in the Goro
Project through CVRD Inco.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Completion of comprehensive project
reviews, governmental or regulatory permitting and other
approvals
and/or
significant capital expenditures would be required before
operations could commence at this project.
|
|
(6)
|
|
New project. Reserve estimates are
reported for in situ metric tons and grades, without
adjustment.
|
Changes
in cobalt ore reserves: 2005 versus 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Ontario operations increased 7%, from 163 to
175 million metric tons, after mining depletion, as a
result of exploration additions and mine plan re-evaluation due
to increased metal values.
|
|
|
|
Reserves at our Voiseys Bay operations decreased by
1.3 million metric tons from 32 to 31 million metric
tons due to mining depletion in 2006, which was partially offset
by a reduction in the cut-off grade. The reduction in the
cut-off grade contributed to a less than 1% decline in cobalt
grade.
|
Coal
In April 2007, we paid US$656 million for the acquisition
of 100% of AMCI Holdings Australia Pty (AMCI HA). AMCI HA
controls and operates coal assets through unincorporated joint
ventures. Its stake is equivalent to nominal production capacity
of 8.0 million metric tons of coal (predominantly coking
coal) and reserves of 103 million metric tons. AMCI HA had
net debt of US$129 million as of April 30, 2007.
We have a 25% equity interest in Henan Longyu Energy Resources
Co., Ltd. (Longyu), a joint venture with Yongcheng
Coal & Electricity Co., Ltd., one of the largest
anthracite producers in China, and Baosteel
52
International, a subsidiary of the largest steel producer in
China. Longyu is located in the Henan Province, China. We
invested US$86.3 million for our participation in Longyu,
and we have the right to purchase 25% of coal produced by the
joint venture.
We have a 25% equity interest in Shandong Yankuang International
Coking Company Ltd. (Yankuang), a joint venture with Yankuang
Group Co., one of the main Chinese coal producers, and Itochu
Corp., one of the leading Japanese trading companies. The
Yankuang metallurgical coke plant, which has production capacity
of 2 million metric tons of coke per year and 200,000
metric tons of methanol per year, began production in June 2006.
Mineral
exploration
Our current mineral exploration efforts focus on copper, nickel,
iron ore, manganese, bauxite, coal, uranium, platinum-group
metals, potash and phosphates. We are actively exploring in 19
countries, with a large variety of projects. The costs of
exploration and feasibility studies are recorded as expenses
until the economic viability of mining activities is established
(see Note 3 to our financial statements). For 2007, the
capital expenditures budget for mineral exploration (included in
the research and development budget) is US$120 million. The
total research and development budget for 2007 is
US$452 million.
Mineral
Risk Contract
We and the Brazilian government development bank, BNDES, entered
into a contract in March 1997 relating to authorizations for
mining exploration. This contract, which we refer to as the
Mineral Risk Contract, provides for the joint development of
certain unexplored mineral deposits in approximately
2.5 million hectares of land in the Carajás region
(which is part of our Northern System), as well as proportional
participation in any profits earned from the development of such
resources. Iron ore and manganese ore deposits already
identified at the time we entered into the Mineral Risk Contract
were specifically excluded from the contract. An investment of
US$410 million was contemplated in the Mineral Risk
Contract, which amount had been invested by July 2006. We are
currently negotiating an extension of the Mineral Risk Contract.
Under the Mineral Risk Contract, BNDES has agreed to compensate
us for the contribution of some of our existing development and
ownership rights in the Carajás region by paying us a
royalty on mineral resources that are discovered and placed into
production. This royalty is equal to 3.5% of revenues from gold,
silver and platinum-group metals and 1.5% of revenues from other
minerals for extraction outside the Serra Leste region, and a
royalty of 6.5% of revenues from products originating from the
Serra Leste region.
Aluminum
operations
As of April 30, 2007, we operate our aluminum products
businesses through the subsidiaries and joint ventures in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Direct or Indirect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
Albras-Alumínio Brasileiro
S.A. (Albras)
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
Nippon Amazon Aluminum Co.,
Ltd. NAAC
|
Alunorte-Alumina do Norte do Brasil
S.A. (Alunorte)(1)
|
|
Alumina
|
|
|
61.74
|
|
|
|
57.03
|
|
|
Companhia Brasileira de
Alumínio CBA JAIC Mitsui Mitsubishi Nippon
Amazon Norsk Hydro
|
Mineração Rio do Norte
S.A. (MRN)
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
|
Abalco Alcoa Alcan Alcoa World
Alumina LLC AWA BHP Billiton Metais Companhia
Brasileira de Alumínio CBA Norsk Hydro
|
Valesul Aluminio S.A. (Valesul)(2)
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The percentages reflecting our
direct or indirect share of capital for Alunorte refer to
paid-in capital.
|
|
(2)
|
|
In July 2006, we exercised our
right of first refusal under the Valesul shareholders
agreement and acquired BHP Billiton Metais S.A.s 45.5%
interest in Valesul for US$28 million, as a result of which
we now own 100% of Valesuls shares. We began consolidating
Valesul in our financial statements in the third quarter of 2006.
|
53
These subsidiaries and MRN engage in:
|
|
|
|
|
mining bauxite,
|
|
|
|
refining bauxite into alumina, and
|
|
|
|
smelting alumina to produce primary aluminum and aluminum alloys.
|
Bauxite
MRN. Mineração Rio do Norte S.A.
(MRN), one of the largest bauxite operations in the
world, produces bauxite for sale to our joint venture partners
and us. Excess production may be sold to customers. MRNs
production totaled 16.7 million metric tons in 2004,
17.2 million metric tons in 2005, and 17.8 million
metric tons in 2006.
MRN operates five open-pit bauxite mines, which produce high
quality bauxite. In addition, MRN controls substantial
additional high quality bauxite resources that it believes can
be produced economically in the future. MRNs mines are
located in the northern region of the Brazilian state of
Pará.
MRN operates ore beneficiation facilities at its mines, which
are connected by rail to a loading terminal and port facilities
on the Trombetas River. The Trombetas River is a tributary of
the Amazon River and MRNs port facilities can handle
vessels of up to 60,000 DWT. MRN owns and operates the rail and
the port facilities serving its mines. The MRN bauxite mines are
accessible by road from the port area and obtain electricity
from their own thermoelectric power plant. Our MRN bauxite joint
venture produces bauxite for sale on a
take-or-pay
basis to us and our joint venture partners at a price that is
determined by a formula linked to the price of aluminum for
three-month contracts in the London Metal Exchange and to the
price of alumina sold from Australia. In 2006, our Alunorte
alumina subsidiary purchased all of its bauxite requirements
from MRN.
The table below sets forth information regarding MRNs
bauxite reserves as of December 31, 2005 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves as of December 31,(1)
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
MRN
|
|
Exhaustion Date
|
|
|
Type
|
|
|
Ore Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Ore Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Million metric tons)
|
|
|
(%
Al203)
|
|
|
(Million metric tons)
|
|
|
(%
Al203)
|
|
|
Almeidas
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
51.2
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
Aviso
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
48.2
|
|
|
|
51.1
|
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
|
51.1
|
|
Bacaba
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
Saracá V
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
48.1
|
|
Saracá W
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
50.3
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88.9
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
(2)
|
|
|
73.6
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
CVRDs ownership of MRNs
bauxite reserves is 40%.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Expressed as dry product metric
tons. Recovery of dry product from dry ROM bauxite ranges from
69-82%,
depending on the deposit, with a weighted average of 74%.
|
MRNs bauxite reserve decreased from 11.7 to
6.7 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2006.
Paragominas mine. We hold active mining rights
in the Paragominas region of the Brazilian state of Pará,
where a new wholly-owned bauxite mine was commissioned in the
first quarter of 2007 to supply Alunortes new expansion
with 5.4 million metric tons per year of wet 12% moisture
bauxite. The bauxite quality will be similar to MRNs, and
the project will use the strip mining method of extraction, and
have a beneficiation plant including milling and a
244-kilometer
long slurry pipeline. Total capital expenditures on this project
was US$352 million. Our Board of Directors has approved a
further expansion at Paragominas, which will require an
additional investment of US$196 million to produce an
additional 4.5 million metric tons. After the conclusion of
the expansion, we expect the Paragominas mine to achieve a
nominal production capacity of 9.9 million metric tons by
2008.
54
The table below sets forth information regarding
Paragominas bauxite reserves as of December 31, 2005
and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves as of December 31,(1)
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Ore Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Ore Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
|
(Million metric tons)
|
|
|
(%
Al203)
|
|
|
(Million metric tons)
|
|
|
(%
Al203)
|
|
|
Miltonia 3
|
|
|
204.9
|
|
|
|
49.4
|
|
|
|
204.8
|
|
|
|
49.4
|
|
Miltonia 5
|
|
|
98.6
|
|
|
|
47.3
|
|
|
|
98.6
|
|
|
|
47.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
303.5
|
|
|
|
48.7
|
|
|
|
303.6
|
|
|
|
48.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Expressed as dry product metric
tons. Planned product recovery is an average of 70% of the dry
ROM metric tons.
|
There was no production at Paragominas mines in 2006.
Consequently 2005 reserve estimates were not adjusted and
remained the same for 2006.
Alumina
Alunorte produces alumina by refining bauxite supplied by MRN.
The Alunorte plant concluded its first expansion of capacity
(stage 3) in 2003 and its second expansion
(stages 4 and 5) in the first quarter of 2006,
reaching a nominal production capacity of 4.4 million
metric tons of alumina per year and becoming the largest alumina
refinery in the world. Alunorte sells alumina to Albras, Valesul
and unaffiliated customers. The Alunorte plant is located in the
city of Barcarena, in the Brazilian state of Pará, next to
Albras aluminum production facilities. This allows
Alunorte and its principal customer, Albras, to share
infrastructure and other resources. This refinery has one of the
lowest conversion costs in the world (US$98.85 per metric
ton in 2006).
Each Alunorte partner must purchase on a
take-or-pay
basis all alumina produced by Alunorte in proportion to its
respective interest. The partners each pay the same price, which
is determined by a formula based on the price of aluminum for
three-month contracts on the London Metal Exchange. Alunorte
produced 3.939 million metric tons in 2006,
2.570 million metric tons in 2005 and 2.548 million
metric tons in 2004.
A US$846 million expansion at Alunorte is in progress,
which will increase refinery production capacity to
6.26 million metric tons of alumina per year, and is
expected to be completed in mid-2008.
Aluminum
Albras and Valesul each produce aluminum using alumina provided
by Alunorte. Alunorte supplied 100% of Albras alumina
requirements and 50% of Valesuls alumina requirements in
2006. Albras produces pure metal ingots and Valesul produces
foundry alloy ingots and billets. Aluminum is produced from
alumina by means of a continuous electro-chemical process, which
requires substantial amounts of electricity.
Albras. The Albras plant, located at
Barcarena, in the Brazilian state of Pará, started
operations in 1985 and is one of the largest aluminum plants in
the Americas, with a nominal capacity of 445,000 metric tons per
year. Albras produced 456, 446 and 435 thousand metric tons of
aluminum ingots in 2006, 2005, 2004, respectively.
The Albras partners must purchase on a
take-or-pay
basis all aluminum produced by Albras in proportion to their
ownership interests. We generally market our aluminum in the
global markets to clients in the aluminum industry.
Albras purchases electric power from Eletronorte, a state-owned
electric power utility. Eletronorte generates electricity at the
Tucuruí hydroelectric power plant located on the Tocantins
River. This plant is the sole source of electrical power in the
region in the quantities required for Albras operations.
Albras consumes approximately one-quarter of the non-peak period
output of the Tucuruí plant.
In May 2004, Albras successfully executed an auction to purchase
electricity for a
20-year
period. This agreement became effective beginning June 2004. The
basic purchase price is R$53.00 per MWh, indexed to the
general market price index, IGP-M, as calculated by
Fundação Getúlio Vargas, a Brazilian
economic
55
research institute. In addition to the basic price, a premium is
paid that is linked to the amount by which the price of primary
aluminum exceeds US$1,450.00 per metric ton on the London
Metal Exchange. See Item 4. Information on the
company Regulatory matters Energy.
Valesul. Valesul operates a plant located in
the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro with a nominal capacity of
95,000 metric tons per year. Valesul produces primary aluminum
and aluminum alloys in the form of ingots and billets.
Valesuls aluminum products are sold primarily in the
Brazilian market on a spot basis. Valesul produced 95, 93 and 96
thousand metric tons of aluminum and aluminum alloys and
recycled 13, 11 and 14 thousand metric tons of third-party
aluminum scrap in 2006, 2005, 2004, respectively.
Valesul currently obtains a portion of its electrical energy
requirements from four wholly-owned small hydroelectric power
plants located in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais, a portion
from the Machadinho hydroelectric power plant, in the Brazilian
state of Santa Catarina, in which Valesul has a share of 7.28%,
and the remainder from a third-party power company at market
rates. Valesul is able to supply 40% of its own energy
requirements. Valesul is engaged in litigation regarding the
prices charged by the electricity company of the State of Rio de
Janeiro (Light Serviços de Eletricidade S.A.)
for the transmission of electricity. See Item 8.
Financial information Legal proceedings.
Competition
bauxite, alumina and aluminum
The global aluminum market is highly competitive. The
worlds largest producers are Alcoa, Rusal, Alcan, Norsk
Hydro, BHP Billiton and Chalco. The alumina and bauxite markets
are also competitive, but are much smaller, because many of the
major aluminum-producing companies have integrated bauxite,
alumina and aluminum operations.
Bauxite. Most of global bauxite production is
not traded, as it is dedicated to integrated alumina refineries.
Competition in the bauxite market is based primarily on two key
factors: quality of bauxite and reliability of supply. We
believe that MRN remains competitive in this market because of
the high quality of Brazilian bauxite, and our aluminum
production system, which ensures internal use of our bauxite
production. We use a major part of our take of MRNs
bauxite production to supply Alunorte.
Alumina. Competition in the alumina market is
based primarily on quality, reliability of supply and price,
which is directly related to lower costs. We believe that
Alunorte is competitive in the alumina market because of the
high quality of its alumina, its advantages in scale and
technology, low conversion cost, its efficient port facilities,
and the ongoing commitment of its shareholders to purchase a
substantial portion of its annual production. We use a portion
of our share of Alunortes alumina production to supply the
Brazilian market (Albras and Valesul), and sell the remainder to
customers in other countries, such as Canada, Argentina, Norway
and China.
Aluminum. As primary aluminum is a commodity,
competition in the aluminum market is based primarily on the
economics of transportation and the costs of production. We
believe that Albras is competitive in the aluminum market
because of its relatively efficient and accessible port
facilities, and its generally prevailing lower costs of
production. We generally sell aluminum to customers in Asia and
Europe.
Logistics
Our logistics business comprises the transportation of
customers products and passengers. We conduct this
business at the parent-company level, through subsidiaries and
through joint ventures.
We have the following logistics businesses at the parent-company
level:
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads: Vitória a Minas and Carajás;
|
|
|
|
A port complex: Tubarão;
|
|
|
|
Maritime terminals: Inácio Barbosa and Ponta da Madeira.
|
56
Our subsidiaries conduct the following logistics activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Operation of railroads (Ferrovia Centro-Atlântica S.A., or
FCA);
|
|
|
|
Operation of ports and maritime terminals (Cia. Portuária
Baía de Sepetiba, or CPBS, and Terminal de Vila Velha S.A.,
or TVV);
|
|
|
|
Shipping activities (Log-In Logística Intermodal S.A., or
Log-In, previously Navegação Vale do Rio Doce, or
Docenave, and DCNDB Overseas S.A., or DCNDB).
|
We also hold, directly and indirectly, 37.2% of the voting
capital and 40.5% of the total capital in MRS Logística
S.A., a railroad joint venture with Brazilian steel
manufacturers.
Railroads
Vitória a Minas railroad. The
Vitória a Minas railroad links our Southeastern System
mines in the Iron Quadrangle region in the Brazilian state of
Minas Gerais with the Tubarão Port, in Vitória, in the
Brazilian state of Espírito Santo. We operate this
905-kilometer
railroad under a
30-year
renewable concession, which expires in 2027. The Vitória a
Minas railroad consists of two lines of track extending for a
distance of 601 kilometers to permit continuous railroad travel
in opposite directions, and single-track branches of 304
kilometers. Industrial manufacturers are located in this area
and major agricultural regions are also accessible to it. The
Vitória a Minas railroad has a daily capacity of 312,000
metric tons of iron ore. In 2006, the Vitória a Minas
railroad carried a total of 71.7 billion ntk of iron ore
and other cargo, of which 17.7 billion ntk, or 25%,
consisted of cargo transported for customers, including iron ore
for Brazilian customers. The Vitória a Minas railroad also
carried approximately 1.1 million passengers in 2006.
The principal cargo of the Vitória a Minas railroad
consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
iron ore and pellets, carried for us and customers;
|
|
|
|
steel, coal, pig iron, limestone and other raw material carried
for customers with steel mills located along the railroad;
|
|
|
|
agricultural products, such as soybean, soybean meal and
fertilizers; and
|
|
|
|
other general cargo, such as building materials, pulp, fuel and
chemical products.
|
We charge market rates for customer freight, including pellets
originating from joint ventures and other enterprises in which
we do not have a 100% equity interest. Market rates vary based
on the distance traveled, the type of product transported and
the weight of the freight in question, and are regulated by the
Brazilian transportation regulatory agency (Agência
Nacional de Transportes Terrestres, or ANTT).
Carajás railroad. We operate the
Carajás railroad under a
30-year
renewable concession, which expires in 2027. This railroad,
located in the Northern System, starts at our Carajás iron
ore mine in the Brazilian state of Pará, and extends 892
kilometers to our Ponta da Madeira maritime terminal complex
facilities located near the São Luís Port in the
Brazilian state of Maranhão. The Carajás railroad
consists of one line of track, with spur tracks and turnouts to
permit the passage of trains in opposite directions. The
Carajás railroad has a daily capacity of 255,000 metric
tons of iron ore. In 2006, the Carajás railroad carried a
total of 78.0 billion ntk of iron ore and other cargo (of
which 7.0 billion ntk, or 9% consisted of cargo transported
for customers, including iron ore for Brazilian customers). The
Carajás railroad also carried approximately 372 thousand
passengers in 2006. The main cargo of the Carajás railroad
consists of iron ore, principally carried for us. In 2007, we
also intend to begin operations of the largest capacity train in
Latin America. This train will have 340 cars, measure 3.2
kilometers and weigh 37,900 gross metric tons when loaded.
Ferrovia Centro-Atlântica. Our subsidiary
FCA operates the central-east regional railway network of the
Brazilian national railway system under a
30-year
renewable concession, which expires in 2026. The central east
network contains approximately 7,000 kilometers of track
extending into the states of Sergipe, Bahia, Espírito
Santo, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro and Goiás and
Brasília, the Federal District, Brazil. It connects with
our Vitória a Minas railroad near the cities of Belo
Horizonte, in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais and
57
Vitória, in the Brazilian state of Espírito Santo. FCA
operates on the same track gauge as our Vitória a Minas
railroad and provides access to the Santos Port in the Brazilian
state of São Paulo. In 2006, the FCA railroad transported a
total of 10.8 billion ntk of cargo for clients.
MRS railroad. We own, directly and indirectly,
37.2% of the voting capital and 40.5% of the total capital of
the company that operates the MRS railroad. MRS, which
transported 113 million metric tons in 2006, is
1,674-kilometers long and links the Brazilian states of Rio de
Janeiro, São Paulo and Minas Gerais. It is operated under a
30-year
renewable concession granted in 1996.
As a result of our acquisitions of CAEMI and Ferteco, our
current participation in the voting capital of MRS is higher
than the limit of 20% imposed at the time of the bid for the MRS
railroad concession. We are currently challenging a decision by
the Brazilian antitrust authority requiring us to restructure
our equity stake in MRS as a condition to its approval of other
transactions we have completed. See Item 3. Risk
factors Risks related to our nusiness We
are involved in ongoing antitrust proceedings that could result
in divestitures, fines or other restrictions that could harm our
business and Item 8. Financial
information Legal proceedings.
In April 2006, the Brazilian agency that regulates ground
transportation, or ANTT (Agência Nacional de Transportes
Terrestres), published a resolution requiring us to:
(i) sell those common shares we hold in MRS as a result of
our acquisition and consolidation of Ferteco which are covered
by the MRS Shareholders Agreement; or
(ii) (a) cause the shareholders of MRS to approve
certain changes in the capital structure of MRS, or
(b) waive our voting and veto rights specifically in
connection with the MRS shares we hold as a result of our
acquisition and consolidation of Ferteco. In May 2006, we
informed ANTT of our decision to waive our voting and veto
rights with respect to such MRS shares, which represent 10.9% of
the total capital stock and 19.3% of voting capital stock of MRS
and ANTT approved our election and suspended its recommendation
to consolidate our MRS shareholdings pending the outcome of the
CADE proceeding. See Item 4. Information on the
company Regulatory matters Railroads
and Item 8. Financial information Legal
proceedings.
Ports
and maritime terminals
We operate ports and terminals principally as a means to
complete the distribution of our iron ore and pellets to
seaborne vessels serving the export seaborne market. See
Item 4. Information on the Company Lines of
business Mining Ferrous
minerals Pellets
Distribution iron ore and pellets. We also use
our ports and terminals to handle third-party cargo. In 2006,
15% of the cargo handled by our ports and terminals represented
cargo handled for third parties.
Tubarão Port. The Tubarão Port,
which covers an estimated area of 18 square kilometers, is
located near the Vitória Port in the Brazilian state of
Espírito Santo. The iron ore maritime terminal located in
this area has two piers. Pier I can accommodate two vessels at a
time, one of up to 170,000 DWT on the southern side and one of
up to 200,000 DWT on the northern side. Pier II can accommodate
one vessel of up to 365,000 DWT at a time, limited at 20 meters
draft plus tide. In Pier I there are two ship loaders, which can
load up to a combined total of 14,000 metric tons per hour. In
Pier II there are two ship loaders that work alternately
and can each load up to 16,000 metric tons per hour. In 2006,
88.1 million metric tons of iron ore and pellets were
shipped through the terminal for us. Praia Mole Terminal, also
located in the Tubarão Port, is principally a coal terminal
and handled 10.9 million metric tons in 2006. We operate a
grain terminal called Terminal de Produtos Diversos, in the
Tubarão area, which handled 4.8 million metric tons of
grains and fertilizers in 2006. We also operate a bulk liquid
terminal that handled 1.2 million metric tons in 2006.
Vitória Port. CVRD operated the Paul
Terminal, located near the Vitória Port in the Brazilian
state of Espírito Santo, which specializes in the handling
of pig iron. This terminal has one pier that can accommodate one
vessel up to 75,000 DWT, which can load up to 900 tons per hour.
The Paul Terminal handled 1.7 million metric tons of pig
iron in 2006.
The lease for the terminal expired in February 2007, and the
lessor, CODESA (Companhia Docas do Espírito Santos,
a state-owned company), has postponed for over two years the
bidding process for the right to
58
operate the terminal. At the request of the labor union SINDIFER
(Sindicato dos Ferroviários do Espírito Santo/Minas
Gerais), the Federal Courts in the state of Espírito
Santo granted an order under which CVRD operated the terminal
from February 2007 until April 2007, and CVRD no longer operates
it. CVRD subsequently entered into equipment leasing contracts
with SINDIFER for a period of 180 days, with the
possibility of sale to SINDIFER, CODESA or the new port operator.
Ponta da Madeira maritime terminal. The Ponta
da Madeira maritime terminal is located near the Itaqui Port in
the Brazilian state of Maranhão. The terminal facilities
can accommodate three vessels. Pier I can accommodate vessels
displacing up to 420,000 DWT. Pier II can accommodate
vessels of up to 155,000 DWT. The two berths have a maximum
loading rate of 16,000 tons per hour at Pier I and 8,000 tons
per hour at Pier II. In February 2004, Pier III began
operations. Pier III has two berths, can accommodate
vessels of up to 220,000 DWT and has a maximum loading rate of
8,000 metric tons per hour in each berth.
Cargo shipped through our Ponta da Madeira maritime terminal
consists principally of our own iron ore production. Other cargo
includes manganese ore and copper concentrate produced by us and
pig iron and soybeans for third parties. In 2006,
77.0 million metric tons were handled through the terminal
for us and 4.7 million metric tons for customers.
Inácio Barbosa maritime terminal
(TMIB). Since November 1994, CVRD has operated
the Inácio Barbosa maritime terminal located in the
Brazilian state of Sergipe. This terminal was built by
Petrobras Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. and
transferred to Sergiportos, a state-owned company. In December
2002, Petrobras took over control of the Inácio Barbosa
maritime terminal in exchange for the cancellation of a
liability of the Brazilian state of Sergipe. CVRD and Petrobras
entered into an agreement in December 2002, which allows CVRD to
run this terminal for a period of 10 years ending in
December 2012. In 2006, 1,000 metric tons of fuel and
agricultural and steel products were shipped through the
Inácio Barbosa maritime terminal.
Terminal de Vila Velha S.A. (TVV). In May
1998, we entered into a
25-year
lease for the Capuaba maritime terminal in Vitória, in the
Brazilian state of Espírito Santo. To run this terminal
CVRD established Terminal de Vila Velha S.A. (TVV). TVV is a
terminal for loading and unloading of containers, in addition to
being an alternative for general cargo and automobile operations
in Southeast and Midwest Brazil. It is connected to the
Vitória a Minas railroad and with easy access to the BR101
and BR262 highways. The terminal is formed by berths 203 and 204
at the Capuaba Quay and has a 450-meter berth area and
retro-area measuring nearly 100,000 square meters. It has a
covered storage area measuring 13,300 square meters and a
yard with capacity for 3,300 containers. TVV is equipped with
two quays cranes, two portainers and four transtainers. In 2006,
184.9 thousand containers and 500 metric tons of general cargo
were shipped through TVV. CVRD has transferred its shares in TVV
to Log-In, which holds assets related to container-based
logistics services businesses.
Cia. Portuária Baía de Sepetiba (CPBS)
Itaguaí maritime terminal, CPBS is a wholly-owned
subsidiary that operates the Itaguaí terminal, in the
Sepetiba Port, in the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro.
Itaguaís maritime terminal has a pier that allows the
loading of ships up to 18.1 meters and up to 230,000 DWT. In
2006, the terminal uploaded approximately 21.8 million
metric tons of iron ore.
Guaíba Island maritime terminal. MBR has
its own maritime terminal on Guaíba Island in the Sepetiba
Bay, in the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro. The iron ore
terminal has a pier that allows the loading of ships of up to
300,000 DWT. In 2006, the terminal uploaded approximately
45.7 million metric tons of iron ore.
Shipping
In December 2006, we reorganized our container-based logistics
services business. TVV, Mineração Andirá and the
intermodal terminal TERCAM were transferred to Docenave, which
later became Log-In. In February 2007, CVRD and Log-In filed
with the CVM a request for the registration of a primary and
secondary offering to be listed in the Novo Mercado of the
São Paulo Stock Exchange (Bovespa).
59
We operate in three distinct shipping areas: seaborne dry bulk
transportation services, coastal shipping liner service and tug
boat services. The table below sets forth information on the
volume of cargo that our seaborne dry bulk shipping service
carried for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
Iron ore:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CVRD
|
|
|
5,291
|
|
|
|
1,981
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Third party
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
2,196
|
|
|
|
2,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,739
|
|
|
|
4,325
|
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the transportation of the cargo shown above for 2006, we
operated a fleet of bulk vessels, which is comprised of three
capesize vessels owned by us and a few other capesize and
panamax vessels chartered on a spot basis. Our own capesize
vessels have been trading worldwide carrying primarily iron ore.
The chartered vessels (two capesize and eight panamax) have been
contracted for the transportation of iron ore from Ponta da
Madeira maritime terminal, in the Brazilian state of
Maranhão, to Praia Mole Terminal, in the Tubarão Port,
in the Brazilian state of Espírito Santo.
The coastal shipping liner service is operated by five vessels,
chartered on a bare boat basis, which cover the South American
east coast from Buenos Aires, in Argentina to Fortaleza, in the
Brazilian state of Ceará, in the northeast of Brazil,
providing weekly service. This service transported 90,370
twenty-foot equivalent units (teus) in 2006.
We also operate a fleet of 19 tug boats (seven owned and 12
chartered) in the ports of Vitória in the Brazilian state
of Espírito Santo, Trombetas in the Brazilian state of
Pará, São Luís in the Brazilian state of
Maranhão and Aracaju in the Brazilian state of Sergipe.
Competition in the logistics industry. Our
railroads compete with road transport, including trucks, with
the main factors being cost, safety and shipping time. We also
have many competitors in the coastal shipping liner service.
Investments
in steelmaking
We have investments in the following joint ventures in the steel
business, as of May 7, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Direct or Indirect Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Capital(4)
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
Principal Products
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
CSI (California, United States)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
JFE Steel
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
Hot-rolled steel; cold-rolled
steel; galvanized steel; steel tubes
|
Siderar (Argentina)(1)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Ternium Employees
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
Hot-rolled, cold-rolled, hot dip
galvanized, sheet products
|
Ferro Gusa Carajás (Brazil)(2)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Pig iron
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usiminas (Brazil)(3)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Nippon Usiminas Previ Caixa dos
Empregados da Usiminas Others
|
|
|
5,703
|
|
|
Hot-rolled steel; cold-rolled
steel; heavy steel plates; electro galvanized steel
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We sold our 4.85% interest in
Siderar in December 2006.
|
|
(2)
|
|
In March 2007, we acquired
Nucors 18% interest in Ferro Gusa Carajás for
US$20 million, as a result of which we now own 100% of
Ferro Gusa.
|
|
(3)
|
|
In November, we sold 5% of our
voting shares and 2% of our total shares. As of December 2006,
we had 18% of the voting capital and 9% of the total capital. In
May, we sold 12% of our voting shares and 6% of our total
shares, and we plan to sell a further 36,691 shares that
were not sold pursuant to the overallotment option in the
registered public offering of Usiminas shares concluded in May
2007.
|
60
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
We owned 4,740,925 shares of
Gerdau S.A. until the end of the first half of 2006. Since our
holdings represented only 0.7% of its total capital stock,
Gerdau was not included in our financial results. We sold all of
our shares of Gerdau S.A. in the second half of 2006.
|
The market value of our investments in Usiminas, which is a
publicly traded company, was US$844 million at
December 31, 2006. The net book value of this investment
was US$744 million at December 31, 2006. We earned
US$48 million in dividends from this investment in 2006. In
November 2006, we sold a total of 5,362,928 common shares of
Usiminas to Nippon Steel, Votorantim Participações
S.A. and Camargo Correa S.A. for US$176 million. We applied
the net proceeds from the sale of our Usiminas shares to reduce
principal amounts payable under our senior acquisition facility.
We entered into a shareholders agreement with the other
members of Usiminas control group, under which (i) we
will retain 6,608,608 common shares, and (ii) the Usiminas
controlling shareholders will conduct a feasibility study
regarding a potential investment by Usiminas in the construction
of a steel slab plant. In March 2007, we filed with the CVM an
application for the registration of a public offering of our
Usiminas shares not subject to the shareholders
agreement. In May 2007, we sold in a public offering registered
with the CVM 13,802,499 Usiminas shares and received total
proceeds of US$728 million. In connection with the
offering, we entered into a lockup agreement for a period of
90 days from April 25, 2007. After the lockup period
expires or is waived, we intend to sell 36,691 additional shares
that were not sold pursuant to the offerings overallotment
option.
We also operate an environmentally-friendly pig iron project in
northern Brazil, through our subsidiary, Ferro Gusa Carajás
S.A. (Ferro-Gusa). Ferro-Gusa was operated as a
joint venture with Nucor Corporation (Nucor) until
March 27, 2007, when we acquired Nucors entire
interest (18%) in Ferro-Gusa for US$20 million. Ferro-Gusa
utilizes two conventional mini-blast furnaces to produce
approximately 400,000 metric tons of pig iron per year, using
iron ore from our Carajás mines in Northern Brazil. The
charcoal source is exclusively from eucalyptus trees grown in a
cultivated forest of 82,000 acres, with the total project
encompassing approximately 200,000 acres.
Energy
Brazil
Energy management and efficient supply in Brazil are priorities
for us, driven by the uncertainties associated with changes in
the regulatory framework, and the risk of rising electricity
prices and electrical energy shortages, such as the one Brazil
experienced in the second half of 2001. We perceived favorable
investment opportunities in the Brazilian electricity sector and
took advantage of them by investing in eight hydroelectric power
generation projects in Brazil. See Note 12 to the
consolidated financial statements. We plan to use the
electricity produced by these projects for our internal needs.
We may experience construction delays in certain generation
projects due to environmental and regulatory issues, which may
lead to higher costs. As a large consumer of electricity, we
expect that investing in power projects will help to reduce
costs and protect us against energy price volatility.
We currently have seven hydroelectric power plants in operation
and one under construction in Brazil. We also hold 43.85% of a
consortium that has a concession to build the Santa Isabel
hydroelectric power plant at the Araguaia River, Brazil. In
2006, we continued our efforts to return the concessions for the
Santa Isabel hydroelectric project to the Brazilian electricity
regulatory agency (ANEEL) due to difficulties in obtaining the
necessary environmental license to begin its construction. In
addition, some of our affiliates generate part of their own
electric energy.
The Capim Branco I began commercial operations in February 2006.
Capim Branco II began operations in the first quarter of
2007, contributing to supply a portion of our electricity
consumption needs in southeastern Brazil.
Valesul currently obtains a portion of its electrical energy
requirements from four wholly-owned small hydroelectric power
plants located in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais, a portion
from the Machadinho hydroelectric power plant, in the Brazilian
state of Santa Catarina, in which Valesul has a share of 7.28%,
and the remainder from a third-party power company at market
rates. Valesul is able to supply 40% of its own
61
energy requirements. Valesul is engaged in litigation regarding
the rates that Light Serviços de Eletricidade
S.A., or Light, charges Valesul for the transmission of
electricity. See Item 8. Financial
information Legal proceedings.
Canada
Energy requirements for production from our Canadian sulphide
ores are generally only about one-fifth of the energy required
to process lateritic ores. In addition, low-cost energy is
available from our hydroelectric facilities in Ontario and from
purchased hydroelectric power at our Manitoba operations. In
2006, our hydroelectric facilities in Ontario generated
approximately 19% of our Ontario operations electricity
requirements.
Indonesia
Nickel production is energy-intensive, and energy costs are a
significant component of our nickel production costs, especially
for the processing of lateritic ores at our PT Inco operations
in Indonesia.
Virtually all of PT Incos electric furnace power
requirements are supplied at low-cost by its hydroelectric
generating facilities on the upper Larona River, generating an
average of 165 megawatts, and its facilities near the village of
Balambano which began operation in 2000, generating an average
of 110 megawatts.
PT Inco announced plans in 2004 to construct a third dam on the
Larona River near the village of Karebbe. The new dam is the
first stage of a multi-year capital program aimed at raising PT
Incos annual production by 25% to about 90 thousand metric
tons of
nickel-in-matte
by 2010. The new dam is expected to increase PT Incos
hydroelectric generating capacity by an average of 90 megawatts
annually. In January 2006, PT Inco temporarily suspended
groundwork at the new dam site, pending the receipt of a
required permit issued by the Minister of Forestry on terms
acceptable to PT Inco. While we are optimistic that we will
receive the necessary approvals to continue the groundwork, any
delay will affect the overall project timing and PT Incos
ability to reach the annual 90 thousand metric tons of
nickel-in-matte
production by 2010 and increase PT Incos production costs.
REGULATORY
MATTERS
Mining
Brazil
Under the Brazilian Constitution, all mineral resources in
Brazil belong to the Brazilian government. The Brazilian
Constitution requires that mining companies incorporate in
accordance with Brazilian law.
The Brazilian Constitution and Mining Code impose on mining
companies various regulatory restrictions relating to, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the manner in which mineral deposits are exploited,
|
|
|
|
the health and safety of workers and the safety of residential
areas located near mining operations,
|
|
|
|
the protection and restoration of the environment,
|
|
|
|
the prevention of pollution, and
|
|
|
|
the promotion of local communities where mines are located.
|
Mining companies in Brazil can only prospect and mine for
mineral resources pursuant to prospecting authorizations or
mining concessions granted by the National Mineral Production
Department (Departamento Nacional de Produção
Mineral), or DNPM, an agency of the Ministry of Mines and
Energy of the Brazilian government. DNPM grants prospecting
authorizations to a requesting party for an initial period of
three years. These authorizations are renewable at DNPMs
discretion for another period of one to three years, provided
that the requesting party is able to show that the renewal is
necessary for proper conclusion of prospecting
62
activities.
On-site
prospecting activities must start within 60 days of
official publication of the issuance of a prospecting
authorization. Upon completion of prospecting activities and
geological exploration at the site, the grantee must submit a
final report to DNPM. If the geological exploration reveals the
existence of a mineral deposit that is economically exploitable,
the grantee will have one year (which DNPM may extend) from
approval of the report by DNPM to apply for a mining concession
or to transfer its right to apply for a mining concession to a
third party. When a mining concession is granted, the holder of
the concession must begin
on-site
mining activities within six months. DNPM grants mining
concessions for an indeterminate period of time lasting until
the exhaustion of the mineral deposit. Extracted minerals that
are specified in the concession belong to the holder of the
concession. With the prior approval of DNPM, the holder of a
mining concession can transfer it to a third party that is
qualified to own concessions. In some cases, mining concessions
are challenged by third parties.
The Brazilian government charges us a royalty known as the CFEM
(Compensação Financeira pela Exploração
de Recursos Minerais) on the revenues from the sale of
minerals we extract, net of taxes, insurance costs and costs of
transportation. The current annual rates we pay on our products
are listed below.
|
|
|
|
|
bauxite, potash and manganese ore: 3%;
|
|
|
|
iron ore, kaolin, copper, nickel, fertilizers and other
minerals: 2%; and
|
|
|
|
gold: 1%.
|
The Mining Code and ancillary mining laws and regulations also
impose other financial obligations. For example, mining
companies must compensate landowners for the damages and loss of
income caused by the use and occupation of the land (either for
exploitation or exploration) and must also share with the
landowners the results of the exploration based on 50% of the
CFEM. Mining companies must also compensate the government for
damages caused to public lands. A substantial majority of our
mines and mining concessions are on lands owned by us or on
public lands for which we hold mining concessions.
We are currently engaged in a series of administrative and other
legal proceedings alleging that we have failed to collect the
proper amount of CFEM. In addition, we are discussing with DNPM
the applicable rate for potash. Because potash is used as a
fertilizer, we believe the applicable rate is the 2% rate that
applies to fertilizers, but DNPM has asserted that CFEM should
be levied on all potash products, regardless of how they are
used, at the higher rate of 3% that generally applies to potash
products. See Item 8. Financial information
Legal proceedings.
Canada
Licenses and permits. The following discussion
reflects a summary of the property rights, mining rights,
licenses, leases or other concessionary rights to mine for or
extract metals and other associated minerals from the areas that
we currently mine or expect to mine as part of our long-term
mine plans in Canada. With respect to those properties which are
not currently owned but are subject to leases or licenses with
finite terms that are not perpetual or cannot be automatically
renewed or extended and on which estimated ore reserves are
located
and/or are
covered by our current long-term mine plans, we currently
believe that we will be able to obtain renewals or extensions of
such leases or licenses, if required as part of our long-term
mine plans on a timely basis.
Ontario operations. All operating mines,
non-operating mines and undeveloped properties which contain
estimated proven and probable ore reserves for our Ontario
operations are on lands owned by us, with the exception of a
portion of Copper Cliff South Mine (known as Kelly Lake) and a
portion of the Victor non-operating mine. These portions of the
Copper Cliff South and Victor mines are located on lands under
21-year
leases.
In the Canadian Province of Ontario, we also hold mining rights,
surface rights, licenses of occupation and mining claims granted
to us by the Province. Mining rights are rights to exploit and
extract minerals on, in or under the land, and surface rights
are rights to use the surface of the land. These rights remain
in effect so long as we own the land to which these rights
apply. We also own a combination of mining and surface
63
rights covering land leased from the Province of Ontario. These
leased lands, which include a combination of mining and surface
rights, are leased for either 10 or 21 years. Annual
rentals are paid to the Province of Ontario to keep the leases
in good standing. These leases are renewed for further 10- or
21-year
terms as they come up for renewal. CVRD Inco currently holds 165
licenses of occupation for mining, hydroelectric installations
and various other industrial purposes in Ontario. These licenses
of occupation allow CVRD Inco to use the land in the manner
specified in each license, including the right to dig, excavate
and remove ores and minerals from and under the land. CVRD Inco
currently also has a number of mining claims in Ontario. Mining
claims represent rights to explore the land covered by the claim.
The permission of the government of the Province of Ontario is
required for CVRD Inco to export from Canada intermediate
products derived from its Ontario ores. In December 2005, the
Ontario government granted us permission to continue to export
intermediate nickel products to our nickel refinery in Clydach,
Wales until December 31, 2015. In December 2005, the
Ontario government also granted us permission to continue to
export semi-refined PGMs concentrate to our precious metals
refinery in Acton, England until December 31, 2015. We are
not aware of any information or other factors at this time that
would prevent us from reaching an agreement with the Province of
Ontario to extend these permits for additional periods upon
their expiration.
Manitoba operations. CVRD Incos
landholdings or mining rights in Manitoba consist of
order-in-council
leases (OIC Leases), mineral leases and mining
claims. OIC Leases were negotiated as part of an agreement
entered into in 1956 between Inco and the Province of Manitoba
covering the development of the Thompson, Manitoba nickel
deposits. OIC Leases entitle the lessee to explore for, and
mine, all minerals in the subsurface (except hydrocarbons,
industrial minerals and superficial deposits that are not
incidental to the mining, milling, smelting and refining
processes). OIC Leases provide for an initial
21-year term
and two subsequent guaranteed renewals of 21 years each,
for a total guaranteed lease period of 63 years. Subsequent
lease renewals beyond the three guaranteed
21-year
terms, can be granted at the discretion of the Province of
Manitoba. All of our current OIC Leases have now been renewed
twice (each is in its third guaranteed
21-year
term) and remain in effect through the
2020-2025
period. Mineral leases are
21-year
leases that are renewable at the discretion of the Province of
Manitoba. CVRD Inco holds seven mineral leases in the Thompson,
Manitoba nickel belt. CVRD Inco also holds mining claims, a
right issued by the Province of Manitoba under provincial
legislation which conveys to the holder exclusive rights to the
minerals (other than quarry minerals) that occur on or under the
land covered by the claim and access rights to explore for and
develop minerals owned by the Province. A mining claim does not,
however, entitle the holder to extract minerals from the land
covered by the claim. In order to extract minerals from the land
covered by a mining claim, the holder must obtain a mineral
lease from the Province of Manitoba.
Voiseys Bay project. Our wholly-owned
subsidiary Voiseys Bay Nickel Company Limited
(VBNC), holds mineral claims (which have been
grouped into mineral licenses), a mining lease and surface
rights in the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador. All of the
Voiseys Bay projects current estimated proven and
probable ore reserves are located on lands covered by a
25-year
mining lease. Since September 30, 2002, VBNC has had the
exclusive right to extract minerals and carry out mineral
exploration, mining operations or mining processing and
development in, on or under the lands, or part of the lands,
covered by the lease so long as it and CVRD Inco continue to
meet the terms and conditions of the development agreement
entered into in October 2002 between VBNC, Inco and Her Majesty
the Queen in right of Newfoundland and Labrador. This mining
lease can be renewed for further
10-year
terms so long as VBNC has been in compliance with the terms of
the lease and has applied for such renewal at least three months
prior to the expiration of the then current lease. Under the
terms of the mining lease, production cannot exceed on
average 2.2 million metric tons of ore annually for
the first 10 years of mining operations and on
average 5.5 million metric tons of ore annually
thereafter. We are not aware of any information at this time
that would prevent us from reaching an agreement with the
Province on a new mining lease or an extension when the current
mining lease expires in September 2027. In conjunction with the
mining lease, VBNC received a surface lease entitling it to use
certain lands necessary for its mining operations. Like the
mining lease, the surface lease came into effect
September 30, 2002 for a period of 25 years, and may
be renewed for further
10-year
terms.
64
Pursuant to the terms of an option agreement originally entered
into in 1993, a royalty is payable to a third party on a
quarterly basis on the proceeds received by VBNC on the sale of
its production, equal to 3% of net smelter returns from mining
production from VBNCs Labrador properties, including the
Voiseys Bay deposit, and a 3% gross royalty (also payable
quarterly) is assessed on the gross value of raw diamonds
and/or
gemstones recovered from these properties.
There are also restrictions relating to the export of
intermediate products from the Province of Newfoundland and
Labrador. The mining lease for our Voiseys Bay project is
subject to an order issued by the provincial government
requiring us to complete primary production (smelting,
processing or refining) in the Province of all minerals
extracted under the lease. However, as part of our agreement
with the government for the development of the Voiseys Bay
project, the government has also issued an order allowing us to
export from the Province nickel concentrates containing up to
355,000 metric tons of nickel until we have completed the
construction of a processing plant in the Province.
Indonesia
PT Incos operations in Indonesia are conducted pursuant to
a Contract of Work with the Indonesian government. The Contract
of Work grants PT Inco all necessary licenses and permits to
conduct its operations and gives PT Inco the exclusive right to
mine certain areas on the Island of Sulawesi and to process and
sell the nickel and associated minerals recovered from those
areas. The original Contract of Work was signed in 1968 for a
40-year term
ending in 2008. In January 1996, it was modified and extended by
the parties and now continues until 2025.
Under the modified Contract of Work, PT Inco agreed to several
undertakings with regard to future expansions of its operations,
including an undertaking, subject to economic and technical
feasibility, to construct production plants at Pomalaa in
Southeast Sulawesi and Bahodopi in Central Sulawesi. One of
these plants was to be in operation by 2005 and the second by
2010. PT Incos obligations with respect to the
construction of a plant at Pomalaa has been deemed to be
satisfied through 2008 under certain ore supply arrangements
entered into with PT Antam Tbk, a government-controlled
diversified Indonesian mining company. PT Incos obligation
with respect to the construction of a commercial plant at
Bahodopi by 2010, subject to economic and technical feasibility,
remains in effect.
New
Caledonia
New Caledonia is an overseas territorial community
(collectivité territoriale) of France having special
legal status under the French constitution with significant
autonomy except in the areas of foreign relations, defense,
judicial, currency and certain other related areas. In a move
toward independence, the French government and two New
Caledonian political movements (one of them representing the
native population) entered into the Noumea Accord, setting forth
a process and timetable for increasing the autonomy of
New Caledonia over the coming years, culminating in a first
referendum to be held by 2014 on whether New Caledonia will
become fully independent from France. There is a possibility of
a second referendum to be held in 2018 if the outcome of the
first referendum is not in favor of independence. The initial
phase of this accord could include the enactment of a new mining
law. Although we do not believe that these developments will
have an adverse effect on the Goro project, there can be no
assurances in this regard.
Our 74%-owned subsidiary, Goro Nickel, currently holds 69 mining
concessions in the Massif du Sud (part of the south Province of
New Caledonia) covering 20,600 hectares and authorizing the
mining of nickel, cobalt, chrome, iron ore and manganese, and
approximately 26 surface rights. An additional 10 mining
concessions are held by a subsidiary of CVRD Inco, outside the
Goro project area, in a mining domain called Tiebaghi. Of the 69
concessions held by Goro Nickel, the Goro project covers 6,042
hectares within seven mining concessions, of which four are
perpetual in term, two are renewable prior to their expiry dates
in 2016 and one is renewable prior to its expiry date in 2051.
Concessions generally represent long-term permits (usually
75-year
terms, with some having longer or perpetual terms) granted for
mining large deposits which entitle the holder the exclusive
right to exploit, extract and mine. A concession applies to one
or several minerals defined by the granting decision along with
its geographical location. The granting of a concession is
65
based on the delineation of an exploitable orebody made during
exploration activities conducted pursuant to exploration
permits. Surface rights can be granted independently of mineral
rights. Goro Nickel holds surface rights, which are rights to
use surfaces on or outside mining permits for mining-related
activities, including surfaces of other owners.
With respect to exploration in New Caledonia, Goro was granted
an exploration permit for an area next to the Goro deposit known
as Prony West. Subsequently, following applications by nine
different third parties, the exploration permits were annulled.
Goro has appealed the decision to the Administrative Court of
Appeal in Paris, but a hearing date has not yet been set. If the
tribunals decision to annul the permit is upheld on
appeal, we expect that the Prony West exploration rights would
then be subject to the submission of a new application by Goro
Nickel for an exploration permit.
In order to mine the concessions it currently holds (once the
construction of the facilities are complete), Goro Nickel must
hold an operating permit. Goro Nickel was granted an operating
permit in October 2004 with an expiry of two years. Following
lengthy proceedings based on claims of alleged adverse
environmental impacts of the project brought by a New Caledonian
indigenous group called Comité Rheebu Nuu, the
New Caledonian Administrative Court cancelled Goros
operating permit. Although we are appealing the decision to
reinstate the operating permit, Goro Nickel had already begun an
application for an amended operating permit because of the
impending expiration of the original operating permit (October
2006) and the projects revised configuration. We
believe the process for obtaining a new operating permit is on
track. The fact that the Goro project does not currently have an
operating permit does not currently impact development because
the operating permit does not cover construction. The
Comité Rheebu Nuu and other individuals, however, have
filed an action to obtain an injunction against construction at
Goro based on the cancellation of the operating permit. Although
we succeeded in challenging this action upon appeal, the
plaintiffs have further appealed the decision.
Railroads
Brazil
The Brazilian Ministry of Transportation and the transportation
regulatory agency (ANTT) regulate and supervise the policies for
the railroad transportation sector. The federal government may
grant private companies concessions for the construction,
operation or commercial exploitation of railroads. Railroad
concession contracts granted by the Federal government impose
certain shareholder ownership limitations. For FCA, the
concession contract provides that each shareholder can only own
up to 20% of the voting capital of the concessionaire, unless
otherwise permitted by ANTT. The 20% ownership limitation does
not apply to our Vitória a Minas and Carajás
railroads. We are in compliance with the requirements imposed by
the concession contracts for our FCA railroad operations, for
which we have received an authorization from ANTT for our
current 99.99% ownership stake. ANTT also sets different tariff
limits for railroad services for each of the concessionaires and
each of the different products transported. So long as these
limits are respected, the actual prices charged can be
negotiated directly with the users of such services.
The MRS concession contract provides that each shareholder can
only own up to 20% of the voting capital of the concessionaire,
unless otherwise permitted by ANTT. As a result of our
acquisitions of CAEMI and Ferteco in 2003, we increased our
stake in MRS beyond the 20% threshold, to 37.2% of its voting
capital and 40.5% of its total capital. In April 2006, ANTT
published a resolution requiring us to (i) sell the MRS
shares we hold as a result of our acquisition and consolidation
of Ferteco which are covered by the MRS Shareholders
Agreement; or (ii) either (a) cause the shareholders
of MRS to approve certain changes in the capital structure of
MRS, or (b) waive our voting and veto rights with respect
to the MRS shares we hold as a result of our acquisitions and
consolidation of Ferteco. The ANTT resolution also recommends
that we comply with a CADE decision requirement to consolidate
our MRS shareholding into a single block. In May 2006, we
informed ANTT of our election to waive our voting and veto
rights with respect to the such MRS shares, representing 10.9%
of the total capital stock and 19.3% of voting capital stock of
MRS. ANTT approved our election and suspended their
recommendation to consolidate our MRS shareholdings pending the
outcome of
66
the CADE proceeding. See Item 4. Information on the
company Lines of business Logistics
and Item 8. Financial information Legal
proceedings.
Electric
energy
Brazil
The power industry in Brazil is regulated by the Ministry of
Mines and Energy and the regulatory agency ANEEL. The role of
ANEEL is to implement and enforce policies and regulations
designated by the Ministry of Mines and Energy and aimed at
organizing and regulating the electricity sector and power
companies. ANEEL is responsible for ensuring an efficient and
economical energy market through regulation, enforcement, as
well as monitoring prices and the operational efficiency of
power companies.
Under the law governing the electricity sector, concessions
grant exclusive rights to generate and transmit or to distribute
electricity in a particular area for a period of time that
should be sufficient for the concessionaire to recover its
investment. The concessions for power generation before
December 11, 2003 were granted for up to 35 years and
may be renewed at the Federal Governments discretion for
an additional period of up to 20 years. Concessions granted
after December 11, 2003 are granted for up to
35 years, without the possibility of renewal.
Concessionaires (distributors) are required to supply
electricity for public services, on a continuing basis, in
sufficient quantity and within approved standards of quality.
Given the hydrologic and integrated nature of the Brazilian
electricity generation matrix, Decree No. 2655/1998 created
the Mecanismo de Realocação de Energia (Energy
Reallocation Mechanism), known as MRE, a mechanism for sharing
hydrological risk, and consequently reducing generation
volatility among all generators. In order to implement the MRE,
ANEEL designates a level of energy production, known as Assured
Energy, for each generator that may be reviewed every five
years. Assured Energy is calculated in accordance with a
statistical model based on average rainfalls in the relevant
region, water flows of rivers and water levels in each
plants reservoir over a multi-year time frame. Each
generator is allowed to enter into contracts to sell up to 100%
of its Assured Energy. To the extent a generator has signed
contracts for the sale of its Assured Energy, and as long as MRE
members, as a whole, are able to meet MRE Assured Energy levels,
it receives payments based on these contractual terms,
regardless of its level of actual generation. If all MRE members
meet their contracted energy and there is a surplus of energy
remaining, the net regional surplus generation is allocated
among generators in different regions and this energy surplus
may be sold in the wholesale market.
All contracts for wholesale energy purchases and sales are
currently recorded in the wholesale market, the Câmara
de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica, known
as the CCEE. The CCEE is a nonprofit private entity subject to
the authorization, regulation and supervision of ANEEL, and is
responsible for operating the wholesale energy market and for
ensuring that energy transactions in the short-term market are
settled and cleared in an efficient manner. The CCEE is
primarily designed to effect the settlement of differences
between the amount of energy contracted under bilateral
contracts of the several market agents (generators,
distributors, traders and large consumers), and the amount of
energy actually consumed and produced. The settlement is done in
accordance with the CCEE spot prices, which are expressed in
R$/MWh and are calculated for each settlement period for each
sub-market.
In March 2004, the Brazilian government heightened regulation of
the electricity sector, especially in the generation segment,
with the approval of Law No. 10,848/2004 and the
regulations promulgated pursuant to it. The new law transfers
jurisdiction of some regulatory areas from ANEEL to the Ministry
of Mines and Energy. Under this new law, all consumers of
electricity, including large consumers, such as CVRD, must
contract the totality of their energy needs through contracts.
This law created two parallel markets for energy: a regulated
market, in which distributors enter into supply contracts with
regulated customers, subject to regulated prices, and an
unregulated market, in which a consumidores livres, or
free consumers, enter into contracts with
independent power producers at prevailing market prices.
Regulated consumers may migrate to the unregulated market, but
only after the termination of their long-term contracts.
67
The new law created an energy trading commission, or the CCEE,
to replace the Mercado Atacadista de Energia (the
MAE). Apart from the replacement of the MAE by the
CCEE as the wholesale energy market, we do not expect
significant changes in the settlement procedures for short-term
transactions. Self-generators of energy, such as CVRD, are
required to provide a pre-determined percentage of their
generated energy from new concessions acquired after 2004 to the
regulated market for distributors acquisition.
Because the regulation for the sector is subject to change, we
cannot be certain of the material impact that this new law could
have on our energy business. Changes in the regulatory
environment could adversely impact our energy investments.
Valesul is currently engaged in litigation regarding the rates
that Light charges Valesul for the transmission of electricity.
See Item 8. Financial information Legal
proceedings.
Indonesia
PT Incos existing hydroelectric facilities were
constructed and are operated pursuant to a 1975 decree of the
Indonesian government. These facilities generate virtually all
of PT Incos electricity requirements. The 1975 decree
gives the government the right to acquire PT Incos
hydroelectric facilities upon two years notice to PT Inco.
No such notice has been given by the government. If this right
were to be exercised, the decree provides that the hydroelectric
facilities would be acquired by the government at their
depreciated value, subject to the government providing PT Inco
with sufficient electricity to meet its operating requirements,
at a rate based on cost plus a normal profit margin, for the
remaining term of PT Incos Contract of Work. The new
hydroelectric dam that is to be constructed as part of PT
Incos latest expansion program is also expected to be
subject to this decree.
Environmental
matters
Environmental legislation is becoming stricter worldwide, which
could lead to greater costs for environmental compliance, for
instance if we are required to modify installations, develop new
procedures or purchase new equipment.
Brazil
Federal, state and municipal legislation contain provisions for
the control and protection of the environment in Brazil. These
laws govern the use of natural resources, the reclamation and
restoration of mined areas, the control of atmospheric
emissions, the treatment of industrial effluents, as well as the
use, handling and final disposal of hazardous materials and the
control of water resources.
In order to conduct our mining, energy generation and industrial
activities, we must prepare environmental impact assessments and
submit them to authorities that oversee the granting of
environmental permits. We seek to comply with all legal
requirements and to achieve good relationships with interested
parties, especially communities located near our operations. Our
environmental management system is designed to provide a
systematic approach to environmental issues.
Under Brazilian Federal Law
No. 9,605/1998,
non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations can
result in criminal penalties, such as imprisonment and other
restrictions for individuals (including directors, officers and
managers of companies), and fines and the mandatory rendering of
public services by companies. Administrative penalties range
from warnings and fines to the suspension of corporate
activities, and may also include the loss or reduction of
incentives, or the cancellation or interruption of credit
facilities granted by governmental institutions.
Issuance of environmental licenses. We must
obtain environmental licenses in order to build, develop, expand
and operate facilities that use natural resources or may pollute
the environment. License validities can vary from one to ten
years, and have to be renewed for the life of the undertaking.
We seek to obtain the legally required licenses for each of our
facilities and activities. In some cases, this process requires
a significant amount of time for the preparation of
comprehensive environmental reports and their evaluation, as
well as for the establishment of appropriate programs for
environmental education of communities residing in areas
affected by the proposed projects. We enter into agreements with
the appropriate federal and state
68
governmental environmental authorities with respect to
facilities whenever environmental non-compliance is detected in
order to make these facilities compliant.
Environmental compensation. Environmental Law
No. 9,985/2000 requires us to pay environmental
compensation to state and federal authorities, in order to
create and maintain protected sites, in the amount of at least
0.5% of the total investment of each venture with a material
environmental impact. There are a number of uncertainties
regarding the scope and application of this law, including what
rate will be applied by the federal or state governments
environmental agencies, how such a rate will be applied and
under what basis an investment will be valued. We are therefore
currently contesting this compensation payment requirement.
Amazônia Legal reserve. Economic
development in the Amazon basin is regulated under the Brazilian
Forest Code. In order to develop projects in the Amazon basin, a
certain threshold (80%) of each rural property must be allocated
for the purpose of forestry preservation. With respect to mining
operation projects under development, we are able to allocate
the land where there are no exploration activities for
preservation purposes, and we expect to be able to acquire
additional undeveloped land if needed to comply with the Code.
We have a number of projects in the Amazônia Legal reserve,
such as the mining sites of CVRD, MRN, PPSA and CADAM. We are
currently below the exploitation threshold in all of these
projects. Some of our mines may approach this threshold as we
expand our operations. There are a number of uncertainties
regarding the scope and application of the Brazilian Forest Code.
Prevention and environmental control
measures. Our environmental policies also aim to
prevent, control and reduce the environmental impact caused by
our business operations. To that end, we have made significant
environment-related investments in our facilities (approximately
US$86 million in 2006). We are also investing to develop
environmental projects directed at the communities located near
our facilities (approximately US$2 million in 2006).
Water use. We are intensive water users in
11 states with hydrological resources that vary from very
high water availability in the Amazon region to the scarcity in
the northeast of Brazil. The Hydrological Resources Management
System implemented throughout CVRD includes evaluation of the
availability of water in the areas where we operate and programs
to rationalize and control water use. We continually monitor new
water legislation and regulations and take particular interest
in requirements adopted under the National Policy of
Hydrological Resources, which defines the conditions for
obtaining water use grants and the fees applicable to that use
and for effluents disposal.
Environmental control systems. As a mining
company, air emissions control is one of our main objectives,
including in our pelletizing plants. Control equipment and
systems, such as stockpiles and road water aspersion and use of
chemical dust suppressants or installation of filters and
electrostatic precipitators at our facilities are complemented
by comprehensive monitoring systems and control software.
Besides achievement of legal compliance, air quality in the
installations and its effects in the neighboring communities are
continuously evaluated and we make necessary investments for air
quality improvement.
With respect to improvements in water quality, we strive to
treat and control the pollutants disposed into the sea and local
rivers or other water sources and also use extensive water
recycling in our operations. We are researching new processes
and technologies for the improvement of water use and recycling
and treatment. Through our comprehensive waste management
system, we aim to achieve greater control of the generation and
disposal of our waste, to develop opportunities to reuse,
recycle and to reduce waste.
In 2003, our mine decommissioning manual was developed, which
described a complete set of directives, including technical
practices and procedures to be followed during mine closures.
The manual outlines procedures for the rehabilitation and
monitoring of degraded areas, the main steps and sequence to be
followed during closure, and any liabilities that may result
after mine closure. The manual also provides standardized basic
criteria and procedures, based on the directives of the CVM and
the SEC (FAS 143), for cost evaluation, the establishment
of current budgets, future decommissioning and reclamation (see
Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements).
The mines water and tailings storage dams and sterile deposits
are classified according to a risk matrix involving all the
parameters related to construction, operation and safety
monitoring. A comprehensive audit
69
program has been established, which evaluates the stability of
all those structures and provides the inputs for the development
of corrective or preventative action plans when necessary.
Our environmental program also includes reforestation projects,
which are intended to protect the soil against erosion and to
create buffers between our activities and communities in the
surrounding areas. We partner with universities and governmental
research entities to conduct extensive research to develop
procedures for reforestation, soil protection using native
species of the managed regions and for the improvement of the
growth and growth rate of seedlings. Comprehensive fauna and
flora investigations are performed as an ongoing activity,
mainly in the Carajás region, to comprehend and avoid the
environmental risks involved in investing in potentially
sensitive areas.
We also participate in the maintenance and preservation of
approximately 1.3 million hectares of Brazilian forests,
including the federal Conservation Units and Xikrin Indigenous
Land located in the Carajás area in the Amazon, and we own
and preserve the Vale do Rio Doce Natural Reserve in the Mata
Atlântica forest in the Brazilian state of Espírito
Santo. In the last 25 years we have provided support to the
indigenous communities in the areas of education, health,
infrastructure development and technical assistance with the aim
of enhancing life quality and self-sustainability of these
communities. Expenditures on these programs amounted to
US$9 million in 2006.
In the first quarter of 2006, members of the indigenous Xikrin
community blocked the Carajás railroad, disrupting our
shipments of iron ore. In October 2006, protestors invaded our
installations in Carajás, halting operations at this site
for two days. On October 31, 2006, we announced the
suspension of a voluntary financial aid package for the Xikrin
community. In accordance with a judicial order, we have since
deposited specified amounts with the court to establish a
court-administered fund for the benefit of the Xikrin, and we
are exploring with the Brazilian Indian Foundation other
potential aid programs.
Mata Atlântica. The Mata Atlântica
forest is protected under the Brazilian constitution and other
laws aimed at ensuring its sustainable development. Certain laws
regulate activities that could interfere with the forests
vegetation, which is classified in terms of primary
and secondary stages of growth. The cutting of or
other interference with primary vegetation by companies
classified by law as public utilities (such as
railroad and power companies) is permitted subject to certain
conditions, and the law provides that mining activities are not
conducted by public utilities. However, this law
does permit interference with the forests secondary
vegetation in order to enable mining activities. The laws
compensatory provisions require us to set aside land in the Mata
Atlântica for preservation that is equivalent in area and
ecological characteristics to any land that we use for mining
activities in the forest. Our operations in the Brazilian states
of São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Espírito Santo could be
affected by such regulations
Canada
CVRD Incos operations in Canada are subject to numerous
environmental laws and regulations relating to air emissions,
water discharges, soils, recycling and waste management,
decommissioning and reclamation, and employee health and safety,
among other areas.
SO2
and CEPA metals emissions reduction. Our Ontario
smelting operations are subject to legislation of the Ontario
government requiring CVRD Inco to significantly reduce its
emissions of sulphur dioxide
(SO2).
In 2006,
SO2
emissions from our Ontario operations were 183,000 metric tons,
meeting the required limits. In 2007, we are required to comply
with a reduced emissions limit of 175,000 metric tons
(previously 265,000 metric tons) and to reduce
SO2
ground level concentrations from the previous limit of
0.50 ppm to 0.34 ppm. From 2008 to 2014, emissions
limits could be reduced below 175,000 metric tons depending on
actual production rates over a three-year rolling period. In
2015, the limit will fall to 66,000 metric tons for
SO2.
Based on our life of business plan, our production
in Ontario can be maintained well beyond the 2015 timeline. We
expect that our Sudbury operations will achieve the 2007 limits
as a result of the installation in 2006 of fluid bed roaster
off-gas scrubbing technology at our Ontario smelter. We believe
that this technology, together with our ability to bank and
purchase emission allowances as permitted by the 2005
legislation, should allow us to meet the limits in effect until
2014 without seriously affecting production rates at our
70
Ontario operations or requiring significant additional capital
expenditures. Compliance with the 2015 limit will require
significant capital expenditures, estimates of which are
included in our five-year capital plan. We are currently
investigating various technologies in order to meet the 2015
limit.
Emissions from our Manitoba smelting operations are also
regulated under Manitoba legislation limiting
SO2
emissions to 23,000 metric tons per month and 220,000 metric
tons per calendar year. In 2006, emissions from our Manitoba
operations were within these limits, at 191,000 metric tons for
the year.
We also expect that the Canadian federal government will
legislate emissions limits before 2015. In April 2006, the
federal government, through the Environment Canada department,
encouraged base metal smelters and refineries to voluntarily
prepare Pollution Prevention Plans, addressing
limit targets for
SO2,
particulate and other toxic metals. Following discussions with
Environment Canada, the target limits for 2015 for our Ontario
operations were set at 66,000 metric tons for
SO2,
matching the Ontario government requirements, 864 metric tons
for particulate and a 90% reduction of the CEPA toxic metals
(nickel, lead, arsenic and cadmium) from the 1988 baseline. For
Manitoba, the limit targets for 2015 are 22,800 metric tons for
SO2,
198 metric tons for particulate and a 90% reduction of the CEPA
toxic metals from the 1988 baseline. These target levels are
lower than the current emission limits and we will not be able
to meet these targets without making significant capital
expenditures, and compliance with these targets could adversely
affect our production levels, financial results and cash flow
particularly for our Manitoba operations.
Sudbury and Port Colborne soils. CVRD Inco has
been working with regulatory authorities and other interested
parties to evaluate elevated levels of nickel and other metals
in soils in the vicinity of our processing facilities in Sudbury
and Port Colborne, Ontario that may be related to the historical
emission of windblown metal-containing particulates. CVRD Inco
voluntarily agreed to conduct detailed risk assessments and to
remediate soils as necessary to reduce risks to negligible
levels in both the Sudbury and Port Colborne areas. Any efforts
we are required to undertake to remediate or investigate these
matters may involve significant expenditures. Given the
existence of various legal appeals and scientific and medical
studies currently underway, it is not possible to predict the
effect these actions and studies could have on our business,
results of operation or financial condition.
Smelter emissions. In 2010, a regulation
promulgated by the Ontario government (called Air
Pollution Regulation Local Air Quality) will
take effect with respect to base metal smelters. This regulation
incorporates existing air quality standards, but the Ontario
Ministry of the Environment plans to revise many of these
standards on an ongoing basis for priority contaminants, which
include nickel, lead, cadmium, arsenic and others. A proposed
new standard for lead and cadmium was issued in 2006. If the
proposed standard becomes law, compliance could require process
modifications. Our five-year capital plan includes estimates for
these changes. We expect the Ministry of the Environment to
release its proposed new standard for nickel in 2007.
Clean Air Act and greenhouse gases. The
Canadian government is in the process of amending provisions of
the Clean Air Act (CAA) related to control of
emissions of greenhouse gases,
SO2
and particulate matter, and metals. Some of the key proposals
affecting our business include (i) substitution for
carcinogenic substances (nickel and cobalt could be affected),
(ii) mandatory emissions targets (gradually reducing
targets every 15 years, reaching a reduction, based on 1990
levels, of an amount yet to be defined that will range from 60%
to 80% by 2050), (iii) carbon trading for non-compliance
and (iv) a proposal to regulate contaminants by sector and
region. At this stage in the legislative process, we do not know
what additional operating or capital expenditures will be
required to comply with enacted amendments or what effect they
would have on our business, financial results or cash flow from
operations.
Canadian Environmental Protection Act
(CEPA). Pursuant to the Canadian
Environmental Protection Act, in 2006 the government categorized
approximately 23,000 chemical substances in terms of two
criteria: (a) persistence, bioaccumulation, and inherent
toxicity to the environment; and (b) high hazard to humans
with a high likelihood of exposure to individuals in Canada. For
substances that meet either or both criteria for categorization,
screening or detailed assessments must be undertaken, and if
deemed necessary, risk management measures may be required. In
late 2006, the government began a study of 200 high-priority
chemical substances. Cobalt and cobalt chloride are among these
chemicals and specific studies with respect to them
71
could begin in late 2007 or early 2008. We cannot predict what
impact the CEPA data challenge will have on our business,
financial results of cash flow from operations.
Silica (Canada and United States). In 2006,
the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
(ACGIH) adopted new exposure limits for silica, with
TWA (time-weighted average) values of 0.025 µg/m3 for both
crystalline crystobalite silica and crystalline α-quartz.
These TWA values are half the value of the previous limits and
represent a significant challenge for compliance. Meeting the
proposed TWA values via engineering controls will require
significant operational resources. In some jurisdictions, the
ACGIH exposure limits become legal regulatory limits when they
are published. Consequently, at Thompson, Manitoba and
Voiseys Bay, Newfoundland, the ACGIH values are legally
binding. It is not clear at this time what impact, including in
terms of compensation claims, the ACGIH Silica TWA values will
have on our financial results.
Indonesia
PT Incos operations are subject to environmental
regulations and permits issued by the Indonesian government. PT
Inco is in compliance with these regulations and permits, except
dust emission levels from its facilities. For several years, PT
Inco has had a program in place with the Indonesian government
to explore the most effective ways to further reduce PT
Incos dust emissions. This program has included the
installation of electrostatic precipitators, wet and dry
scrubbers and other equipment to capture and reduce emissions of
dust and particulates, from PT Incos dryers, reduction
kilns and converters. In 2005, PT Inco installed dust control
equipment on one of its four furnaces, which has reduced dust
emissions to below the Indonesian emission limits and has also
addressed workplace air quality concerns with respect to dust
emissions. As a result of the success of this equipment on the
first furnace, similar equipment was installed on another
furnace in early 2007, and we plan to install such equipment on
the other two furnaces by the end of 2007. While PT Inco has not
received any indication from Indonesian governmental authorities
that it would be subject to any penalties or sanctions for
exceeding certain emissions limits as it works to correct these
problems, PT Inco may still be subject to regulatory actions for
non-compliance with these limits.
New
Caledonia
Our Goro project is subject to environmental regulations in New
Caledonia and in France. In preparation for the operation phase,
a new tree nursery capable of producing over 500,000 seedlings
was constructed and will begin operations in 2007. Environmental
baseline monitoring, particularly for the marine environment,
continued in 2006. Goro has also been subject to environmental
protests by certain groups in New Caledonia. Comité Rheebu
Nuu, a local environmental association opposed to the
development of the Goro project, has been making applications to
the governmental authorities in New Caledonia and in France,
based on various environmental claims. One of the applications
pertained to our operating permit. See
Mining New Caledonia.
United
States
Clean Air Act. Nickel compounds are among the
chemicals or chemical groups regulated as hazardous air
pollutants (HAPs) under the U.S. Clean Air Act.
Pursuant to this legislation, the EPA has been promulgating
stringent technology-based standards for controlling emissions
of HAPs from designated major source categories.
This process will continue in the future and ultimately may
include the promulgation of additional risk-based standards.
Some of these standards may limit emissions of nickel and its
compounds, most likely through limits on overall emissions of
particulate matter. While it does not appear that the
major source HAP control program will target
emissions at nickel producing or using industries, it is
possible that some nickel-emitting sources may ultimately be
covered by such standards. We are unable to predict what capital
expenditures or increases in operating costs CVRD Inco or its
customers may incur if that proves to be the case.
European
Union
REACH. In October 2003, the European
Commission adopted draft legislation intended to consolidate and
streamline 30 different EU laws. The new European Chemicals
Policy, better known as REACH (the
72
acronym for Registration, Evaluation, and Authorisation of
Chemicals), which takes effect on June 1, 2007, is
designed to protect human health and the environment from risks
posed by chemicals. Towards that end, it establishes an
all-encompassing system for the management of both new and
existing chemicals that are manufactured in or imported into the
EU. The definition of chemicals is very broad and includes
metals, alloys and all metal-containing compounds.
Under REACH, importers will be required to register certain
chemicals prior to their entry into the European market. Certain
substances, possibly including nickel and cobalt substances,
will be subject to an authorization process prior to import. The
authorization application must include an analysis of possible
substitutes and, if suitable substitutes are deemed available, a
substitution plan. If suitable substitutes are not available,
information on relevant research and development activities must
be provided, as appropriate. How this analysis of substitutes
and the development of a substitution plan will work in practice
remains to be seen. CVRD Inco and other companies that produce
and sell nickel and cobalt products have created a number of
consortia to manage the registration of similar products.
Comprehensive legislative review and risk
assessment. EU Regulation 793/93(EEC), a
regulation covering the evaluation of the risks of and controls
for existing substances, includes five nickel substances (nickel
sulphate, nickel chloride, nickel nitrate, nickel carbonate and
nickel metal) as targets. The Danish Environmental Protection
Agency (the Danish EPA) has been appointed the
principal agency for conducting risk assessments on these
substances. The Human Health risk assessment was completed in
early 2006 and the Danish EPA release a draft risk reduction
strategy in late 2006. The main recommendation is a review of
the occupational exposure limits for various nickel species. The
environmental risk assessment for nickel is expected to be
released in 2007.
International
ISO and OHSAS certifications. Our
environmental management system is based on the International
Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard 14001 and under
the Occupational Health and Safety Standards (OHSAS) 18001. We
have obtained ISO 14001 certificates covering iron ore and
pelletizing operations (Alegria, Timbopeba, Água Limpa,
Fábrica Nova, Fazendão, Cauê,
Conceição, Córrego do Feijão, Brucutu, Morro
da Mina, Gongo Soco, Fábrica, Mutuca, Tamanduá,
Capitão do Mato, Pico, Capão Xavier, Jangada and
Carajás complex), manganese and ferroalloys plants (Azul
mine, RDME and RDMN), nickel operations (Clydach Refinery, Acton
Refinery, Inco TNC Limited, Jinco Nonferrous Metal, IATM
Dalian & Shenyang), port operations (Tubarão
complex and CPBS), our research center, aluminum operations
(Alunorte, Albrás and Valesul) and kaolin production
facilities (PPSA and CADAM). Samarco and MRN are also certified
under this standard. We also have obtained OHSAS 18001
certificates for the MBR system, our Clydach refinery, Acton
refinery, as well as the operations of our IATM
Dalian & Shenyang and Jinco Nonferrous Metals Co.
subsidiaries.
Harmonization of classification and labeling of
chemicals. In 1990, the International Labour
Organization initiated a project to harmonize existing systems
for the classification and labeling of chemicals. This
ultimately led to the promulgation of a globally harmonized
hazard classification and compatible labeling system called the
Globally Harmonized System (GHS). Although adoption
of the GHS by individual countries is voluntary, the goal of the
Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety is to promote
widespread adoption of the GHS by 2008. Japan has recently
implemented the GHS, while the United States will be enforcing
the GHS for transportation purposes in January 2008. Other
countries will implement the GHS over the next several years. We
do not believe that the adoption of the GHS will have a material
impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
Investment
Canada Act undertakings
On October 20, 2006, we obtained approval under the
Investment Canada Act, in the form of a net benefit to
Canada ruling from the Canadian Minister of Industry, in
connection with our offer to acquire the
73
outstanding common shares of Inco Limited. In connection with
that approval, we made a number of undertakings in furtherance
of which we intend to take certain steps, including the
following:
Creation of a Canadian-based global nickel
business. We have committed to base our global
nickel business in Toronto, Ontario, with responsibility for the
global nickel business and related activities of CVRD and a
mandate to expand its business as a global leader in the nickel
industry. In furtherance of this mandate, we will transfer
management responsibility for our interest in existing and
future nickel projects to CVRD Inco, including our interest in
the Onça Puma and Vermelho projects in Brazil. CVRD
Incos global activities will be managed from its Toronto,
Ontario head office, which will continue to exercise head office
functions and activities with significant Canadian
participation. We have undertaken that there will be no layoffs
at Canadian operating facilities for at least three years, and
that, for an agreed period, aggregate employment at such
facilities will not fall below 85% of the aggregate employment
level as at the date on which the acquisition of CVRD Inco
occurred.
Acceleration of Voiseys Bay development
project. We have indicated that we fully support
the Voiseys Bay development project, and expressed our
wish to accelerate its implementation. We also indicated our
intention, upon completion of the acquisition of Inco Limited,
to approach the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador to
initiate discussions with respect to our desire to accelerate
the Voiseys Bay development project by a period of 12 to
18 months.
Enhanced investments in CVRD Incos long-term
future. To help strengthen CVRD Incos
position as a leader in the global nickel mining business and
contribute to ensuring the long-term viability of CVRD
Incos operations in Sudbury, Ontario, and Thompson,
Manitoba, Canadian expenditures will be increased in a number of
areas, including exploration and research and development, for a
three-year period.
Corporate social responsibility. We will
increase spending on apprenticeship programs for First Nations,
student employment programs and employee recruitment, education,
apprenticeship and training programs in Canada for a three-year
period. We will increase spending on environmental compliance
programs in Canada over that same period.
Continuing contributions to communities. We
will maintain our involvement and commitment to the growth of
Ontarios mining cluster, including its membership in the
Mineral Industry Cluster Council. We will respect all agreements
entered into by CVRD Inco with provincial governments, local
governments, labor unions and aboriginal groups, including the
Labrador Inuit Association and the Innu Nation, in Canada. We
will also honor all commitments made by CVRD Inco with regard to
the funding of educational institutions, including commitments
made with respect to the Centre for Excellence in Mining
Innovation at Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario.
Each of the undertakings made by us to the Canadian Minister of
Industry is subject to the Investment Canada Act,
Guidelines Administrative Procedures, Monitoring of
Investments. Among other things, these guidelines state
that performance is judged in the context of overall results and
that an investor who is unable to fulfill a commitment will not
be held accountable where such inability is clearly beyond its
control.
74
CAPITAL
EXPENDITURES
The table below sets forth our historical capital expenditures
by business area for the periods indicated. See Item 5.
Overview Key Factors Affecting Revenues and Results
of Operations Divestitures and Asset Sales, for
a description of our divestitures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Ferrous Minerals
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
Non-ferrous Minerals
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Corporate center
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
Acquisitions and other investments
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
15,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,092
|
|
|
|
4,998
|
|
|
|
20,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
capital expenditures and budgeted capital expenditures for
2007
During 2006, CVRD made capital expenditures and other
investments of US$20,628 million, of which
US$3,464 million was on organic growth, composed of
US$2,988 million on projects and US$476 million on
research and development, while US$1,360 million was
invested in maintaining existing business, and
US$15,804 million in acquisitions. Total capital
expenditures in 2006, excluding spending on acquisitions and
other investments and including US$324 million arising from
two-months of consolidation of CVRD Inco, were
US$4,824 million. This information on capital expenditures
includes research and development expenditures, which are
treated as a current expense for accounting purposes.
In 2006, we acquired two companies: Inco
(US$18,931 million) and Valesul (US$28 million). We
also acquired certain assets of Rio Verde Mineração
for US$47 million. See Item 4. Acquisitions, Asset
Sales and Significant Changes in 2005 and 2006. The
US$18,931 million invested in the acquisition of Inco
reflects the purchase price of US$17,744 million plus
Incos net debt of US$1,187 million.
US$15,691 million was paid to Inco shareholders in 2006,
and US$2,053 million was paid to Inco shareholders in 2007.
The purchase of the 39.8% minority stake in Caemi belonging to
minority shareholders, equivalent to US$2,552 million,
involved a share exchange, so there was no financial
disbursement.
In our financial planning for 2007, we have budgeted
US$7,351 million for capital expenditures in 2007. Of this
total, 72.9%, or US$5,356 million, will be allocated to
growth capital expenditures US$4,904 million on
projects and US$452 million on research and
development and the remaining US$1,995 million
will be allocated to capital expenditures for maintaining
existing operations
(stay-in-business
capital expenditures). The acquisition of AMCI Holdings
Australia Pty (announced in February 2007) for
US$656 million, excluding net debt, was not included in the
2007 capital expenditure-budget figure.
The 2007 capital expenditure budget consolidates planned capital
expenditure of CVRD Inco, which accounts for
US$1,950 million of the investments programmed for this
year. The
stay-in-business
capital expenditure budget for nickel operations in Ontario and
Manitoba, Canada has been set at US$477 million, due to the
age of these operations and the low level of investment in the
period
2003-2005
(an annual average of US$208 million). These investments
are important for the conservation of these operations and the
extension of their useful lives.
Global economic growth, the resumption in investment by the
mining and metals industry, rising raw material prices and the
appreciation of mineral-exporting countries currencies
against the U.S. dollar such as the Brazilian
real and the Canadian dollar have contributed
to a sharp increase in the cost of mining projects. The price of
equipment and engineering services has risen substantially since
2003, which has
75
contributed to a major increase in the unit cost of mining
projects around the world. We have been making efforts to
minimize the impact of this increase in investment costs.
Investment of US$1,869 million, or 25.4% of the total 2007
budget, has been earmarked for our ferrous minerals business.
Investment of US$885 million is allocated to the aluminum
division, while US$784 million is allocated to our
logistics business. Investment of US$3,125 million is
planned for our non-ferrous minerals businesses.
The following table describes our expenditures for our main
investment projects in 2006 and our budgeted expenditures for
projects in 2007, together with estimated total expenditures for
each project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Budgeted
|
|
|
|
Area
|
|
Project
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Status
|
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals
|
|
Expansion to iron ore production
capacity at Carajás to 85 Mtpa (Northern system)
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
This project has added
15 million metric tons per year of iron ore production
capacity. It was completed in the third quarter of 2006.
|
|
|
Expansion to iron ore production
capacity at Carajás to 100 Mtpa (Northern System)
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
This project has added
15 million metric tons per year of production capacity. It
was completed in January 2007.
|
|
|
Expansion to iron ore production
capacity at Carajás to 130 Mtpa (Northern System)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
1,828
|
|
|
This project, which is subject to
approval by our Board of Directors, is expected to add
30 million metric tons per year of production capacity,
with the construction of a new plant, consisting of primary
crushing, and processing and classification units. Completion is
scheduled for 2009.
|
|
|
Brucutu iron ore mine (Southeastern
System)
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
This project has added
30 million metric tons per year of production capacity. It
was completed in the third quarter of 2006.
|
|
|
Expansion of Fazendão iron ore
mine (Southeastern System)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
Project for the production of
15.8 million metric tons per year of
run-of-mine
(ROM), or unprocessed, iron ore. This project will enable
Samarcos third pellet plant to begin operations. Work
began in the second half of 2006 and is expected to be completed
in the first quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
Itabiritos pelletizing plant
(Southern System)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
This project involves construction
of a pelletizing plant in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais,
with a nominal production capacity of 7 million metric tons
per year, as well as construction of an iron ore concentration
plant. Start-up is targeted for the second half of 2008.
|
Non-ferrous minerals
|
|
Salobo copper mine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
This project is expected to have
production capacity of 100,000 metric tons per year of copper in
concentrate. Development
start-up is
contingent on obtaining an appropriate tax structure, which is
currently being discussed with government authorities.
|
|
|
Onça Puma nickel mine
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
Onça Puma is expected to have
a nominal annual nickel production capacity of 58,000 metric
tons. Construction began in July 2006 and the main equipment has
already been contracted.
Start-up is
planned for the second half of 2008.
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Budgeted
|
|
|
|
Area
|
|
Project
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Status
|
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vermelho nickel mine
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
Vermelho has an estimated
production capacity of 46,000 metric tons per year of finished
nickel, and 2,800 metric tons per year of cobalt. Work on
obtaining required environmental license is still in progress.
|
|
|
Goro nickel mine
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
3,212
|
|
|
Goro has an estimated production
capacity of 60,000 metric tons per year of finished nickel and
4,600 metric tons of cobalt. Commissioning is scheduled for the
end of 2008.
|
Aluminum
|
|
Expansion of Alunorte:
stages 4 and 5 alumina
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
Stages 4 and 5 began
operations in the first half of 2006, expanding the alumina
refinerys capacity to 4.3 million metric tons per
year from 2.4 million metric tons per year in 2005.
|
|
|
Paragominas I bauxite mine
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
The mines first module has a
nominal production capacity of 5.4 million metric tons per
year of bauxite. Operations began in January 2007.
|
|
|
Expansion of Alunorte:
stages 6 and 7 alumina
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
Stages 6 and 7 will increase
alumina refinery capacity to 6.26 million metric tons per
year. Completion of this project is scheduled for mid-2008.
|
|
|
Paragominas II
bauxite mine
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
The second phase of Paragominas
will add 4.5 million metric tons per year of bauxite to the
production capacity of 5.4 million metric tons per year
achieved on the first phase. Completion is scheduled for the
second quarter of 2008.
|
All figures reported in the table above are presented on a cash
basis, according to our financial planning for 2006 and 2007.
In addition to these projects, CVRD has budgeted
US$452 million for research and development. Of the total
budgeted, 72% is expected to be spent in Brazil and 28% in South
America, North America, Africa, Australasia and Europe.
|
|
Item 4A.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Operating
and Financial Review and Prospects
|
OVERVIEW
In the fourth quarter of 2006, we acquired 87.73% of Inco, the
worlds second largest nickel producer. The acquisition has
led us to become one of the worlds largest nickel
producers, with more diversified revenues in terms of products,
markets and geographical asset base, and the second largest
mining and minerals company in the world by market value.
The year 2006 was our fourth consecutive year of record growth
in revenues, operating income and net income. In spite of
increasing cost pressures due primarily to higher
prices for equipment and raw materials reflecting the high
production levels in the mining industry, higher costs for fuel
and energy, and the appreciation of the real against the
U.S. dollar we generated net income of
US$6,528 million in 2006, a
77
34.8% increase over 2005. Our results were driven primarily by a
40.6% increase in operating income, reflecting a 53.6% increase
in net revenues that was partially offset by a decline in
overall operating margins, from 42.5% of net revenues in 2005 to
38.9% in 2006.
The increase in revenues reflected strong demand and rising
prices for our principal products driven principally by
continued strong demand from China and expanded demand from our
other markets in Asia and Europe, as well as high production
levels supported by new projects coming on stream, operation at
full capacity at most of our units, productivity gains and the
acquisition of Inco in the fourth quarter of 2006. The decrease
in overall operating income margins primarily reflects the
impact of purchase accounting adjustments to inventory values in
connection with the acquisition of Inco.
Demand
Demand
for iron ore and pellets
Demand for our iron ore products is a function of global demand
for steel, which is, in turn, heavily influenced by worldwide
economic activity. In recent years, we have experienced a
significant increase in demand, particularly from China. Global
demand for steel has been growing since 2002, and global demand
for iron ore grew at a rate of approximately 8.3% in 2006. In
China, where we became the largest supplier of iron ore in 2006,
we expect that although steel production will tend to grow at a
more moderate rate in the near term than it has over the last
ten years, demand for imported iron ore will continue to require
additional quantities through the end of this decade, thus
maintaining pressure on global supply.
Demand for iron ore exceeded our production capacity throughout
2006, and we expect that this situation will also prevail in
2007. We continue to invest to increase capacity and our
programmed iron ore production for 2007 is higher than in 2006,
but we continue to face excess demand. We expect to continue
purchasing and reselling iron ore from third parties to meet the
shortfall. In 2006, we purchased 10.2 million metric tons
of iron ore and 8.9 million metric tons of pellets from
third parties.
In early 2006, global demand for pellets, which is more
concentrated in North America and the European Union, softened.
In order to adjust to the new demand level, we decided to
temporarily shut down our São Luís plant in late
March and accelerate planned maintenance, and to reallocate the
volume of iron ore fines. São Luís resumed
operations in July. We believe there is significant long-term
growth potential for pellet demand and are therefore expanding
our pellet production through two projects
Itabiritos, in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais, which
involves the construction of a pellet plant with an expected
production capacity of 7 million metric tons per year, and
the third pellet plant of Samarco, with an expected production
capacity of 7.6 million metric tons per year. Both of these
projects are targeted for
start-up in
2008.
Demand
for nickel
Demand for primary nickel is driven primarily by world economic
conditions and associated industrial production. World primary
nickel demand increased by approximately 8% to an estimated
1.384 million metric tons in 2006. The main drivers of
nickel demand in 2006 included strong global economic activity,
a robust rebound in global stainless steel production, and solid
nickel demand for non-stainless steel applications. Nickel
demand was strong in all global regions in 2006, but
particularly strong in China, which accounted for approximately
half of world demand growth.
Primary nickel use in stainless steel production accounts for
over 60% of total primary nickel demand. Global stainless steel
production grew 15.8% to an estimated 28 million metric
tons in 2006. We believe stainless steel production was aided by
rising demand due to strong global economic activity as well as
the need by consumers to replenish low stainless steel
inventories. China led the way in new stainless steel capacity
expansions in 2006, and we anticipate it will continue to lead
the way in coming years. Chinese stainless steel production in
2006 is estimated to have grown by over 2 million metric
tons to 5.3 million metric tons.
78
In 2006, the non-stainless steel sector contributed to strong
demand for alloys with high nickel content in the United States
and Europe, driven by the energy and aerospace sectors. The
growth in the energy sector included strength in applications in
the oil, liquid natural gas, and nuclear industries.
The global nickel market continues to face the effects of
structural constraints on the supply side. The source of current
global nickel production is mainly nickel sulphides, and as
these traditional sources are depleted, future production growth
will depend on laterite deposits. Development of greenfield
laterite projects has continued to face major delays resulting
from cost and technical and political challenges. The majority
of new supply projects are forecast to
ramp-up no
sooner than 2009. In 2006, primary nickel supply grew by
approximately 5% to 1.354 million metric tons. The increase
in supply from traditional sources was limited to below 3%, as
disruptions occurred at a number of producers. Traditional
supply was augmented by a new source of primary nickel
introduced during the year, known as NiCr pig iron.
Robust nickel demand, coupled with limited increases in nickel
supply, resulted in an estimated worldwide supply deficit of
about 30,000 metric tons in 2006. London Metal Exchange (LME)
inventories declined to just 6,594 metric tons by the end of
2006 a drop of 29,448 metric tons, or
82% representing less than two days of world nickel
consumption.
In 2007, we anticipate continued solid nickel demand from both
stainless and non-stainless steel applications, with China
continuing to drive nickel demand as its production of stainless
steel increases to meet expected strong economic growth and
domestic demand. We believe underlying nickel demand will
continue to be constrained by available supply.
Demand
for aluminum
Demand for aluminum products is driven primarily by world
economic conditions. In recent years, China has been the primary
driver of demand in the aluminum sector. Chinese producers have
announced plans for significant growth in alumina production in
the next few years. Growth in Chinese alumina production is
supported by a sharp increase in bauxite imports, which could
lead to upward pressure on the price of bauxite in the short
term.
Demand
for copper
Global demand for copper is driven primarily by world economic
conditions. In recent years, growth in copper demand has been
driven primarily by Chinese imports. The behavior of the copper
market in 2006 was characterized by shortages of concentrates
and refined metal. As in the nickel market, there are few shock
absorbers on the supply side inventories are
relatively low, producers already operate at full capacity and
significant increases in global capacity are not expected in the
short term.
Demand
for transportation services
Demand for our transportation services in Brazil is primarily
driven by growth in the Brazilian economy, mainly in the
agricultural and steel sectors. Demand for rail transportation
grew more slowly in the last two years, due to lower Brazilian
agricultural exports and lower Brazilian steel production. These
two industries are the main users of our railroads. Each of
these markets has begun to recover in 2007.
Production
capacity
Capacity expansions are a key factor influencing our revenues.
We continue to invest in expanding capacity at a large number of
facilities. Completed expansions that had a significant effect
on 2006 results included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The expansion project at Carajás to 85 million metric
tons per year was completed in the third quarter of 2006. In
2006 we produced 81.8 million metric tons of iron ore in
Carajás.
|
|
|
|
Our greenfield iron ore project at Fábrica Nova, which has
a capacity of 15 million metric tons per year, began
operations in the second quarter of 2005 and produced
13.2 million metric tons in 2006.
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
Operations at our Brucutu iron ore mine began in September 2006.
Production amounted to 7.7 million metric tons in 2006, and
is expected to reach 23 million metric tons in 2007 and
30 million metric tons in 2008.
|
|
|
|
The expansion of our Tubarão Port in the Southeastern
System was completed in December 2006.
|
|
|
|
Stages 4 and 5 of the expansion of Alunorte, designed to
increase its nominal capacity to 4.4 million metric tons
per year from the previous 2.4 million metric tons per
year, were completed in the first quarter of 2006. Production
amounted to 3.9 million metric tons in 2006 and is expected
to reach full capacity in 2007.
|
|
|
|
We purchased 26 locomotives (all for iron ore transportation)
and 1,416 wagons (primarily for iron ore transportation) in 2006.
|
|
|
|
We completed our capacity expansion project at the
Taquari-Vassouras potash mine in September 2005, increasing its
capacity from 600,000 metric tons per year to 850,000 metric
tons per year. In 2006 we produced 731 thousand metric tons of
potash.
|
|
|
|
Our Yankuang metallurgical coke plant, with an estimated
production capacity of 2 million metric tons of coke per
year and 200,000 metric tons per year of methanol, began trial
production in June 2006. Total production in 2006 was 268,000
metric tons of coke and we expect to produce 1.2 million
metric tons in 2007.
|
In addition to the above projects, the following major projects
will affect our results in 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
The expansion of Carajás to 100 million metric tons
per year was completed in January 2007.
|
|
|
|
The Paragominas mine, with an estimated production capacity of
5.4 million metric tons of bauxite per year, was
commissioned in the first quarter of 2007. The bauxite from
Paragominas will be used to supply Alunortes alumina
refinery.
|
See Item 4. Information on the company
Capital expenditures for more details concerning our 2007
capital expenditure budget.
Prices
The following table sets forth our average realized prices for
our principal products for each of the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(US$ per metric ton, except where indicated)
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
|
19.63
|
|
|
|
32.63
|
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
Pellets
|
|
|
39.81
|
|
|
|
70.79
|
|
|
|
75.21
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
75.85
|
|
|
|
84.90
|
|
|
|
70.60
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
956.49
|
|
|
|
846.88
|
|
|
|
886.97
|
|
Nickel(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,981.53
|
|
Copper(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,317.07
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
747.21
|
|
|
|
982.41
|
|
|
|
1,824.36
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
135.76
|
|
|
|
145.32
|
|
|
|
164.78
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
196.83
|
|
|
|
232.81
|
|
|
|
195.09
|
|
Platinum (US$/oz)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,115.59
|
|
Cobalt (US$/lb)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.93
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
1,686.05
|
|
|
|
1,841.16
|
|
|
|
2,558.76
|
|
Alumina
|
|
|
256.15
|
|
|
|
290.48
|
|
|
|
343.99
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
|
25.53
|
|
|
|
28.36
|
|
|
|
30.46
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents only the last two months
of 2006.
|
Ores
and metals
Iron ore. Our iron ore sales are made pursuant
to long-term supply contracts, which provide for annual price
adjustments. Cyclical changes in the global demand for steel
products affect sales prices and volumes in
80
the world iron ore market. Different factors influence price
differences in US-dollar per metric ton terms between the
various types of iron ore, such as the iron content of specific
ore deposits, the various beneficiation and purifying processes
required to produce the desired final product, particle size,
moisture content and the type and concentration of contaminants
(such as phosphorus, alumina and manganese ore) in the ore.
Fines, lump ore and pellets typically command different prices.
We generally conduct annual price negotiations beginning in
November of each year. Due to the wide variety of iron ore and
pellet quality and physical characteristics, iron ore and
pellets are not considered commodities. This factor combined
with the structure of the market has prevented the development
of an iron ore futures market. We do not hedge our exposure to
iron ore price volatility.
Driven by continued high levels of demand in the global iron ore
market, customer demand for iron ore continued to exceed our
production capacity in 2006. Reflecting this excess demand, we
reached agreements with major steelmakers in May 2006 under
which our reference prices for iron ore increased by an average
of 19.0% and prices for pellets decreased by 3.0%. These price
agreements had a significant positive effect on our gross
revenues in 2006. Our reference prices per Fe unit for iron ore
fines increased
across-the-board
in 2006 by 19.0%, after increasing by 71.5% in 2005 from 2004
levels. In December 2006, we reached agreements with major
steelmakers under which our 2007 reference prices for
Carajás (SFCJ) and Southern System (SSF) iron ore fines
increased by 9.5% relative to 2006. Blast furnace and direct
reduction pellet prices, both from the Tubarão and São
Luís plants, will increase by 5.28% relative to 2006.
Nickel. Prices for our nickel and other
primary metals products generally reflect prices at the LME, the
principal terminal market for primary nickel in the world, or
prices at other metal markets. Nickel prices depend principally
on the balance between demand for nickel products in the
marketplace relative to the supply available from us and our
competitors, including the supply of similar primary metals
materials in various producer, merchant and consumer
inventories, inventories of secondary or scrap materials
containing nickel and other metals in usable or recyclable form,
and supplies of other materials which may be substituted for
nickel. Over the long term, a particularly important determinant
of price will be the costs associated with bringing additional
nickel supply to market to meet overall nickel demand.
Our nickel price realizations tend to lag LME cash nickel price
movements, due primarily to the terms of our contractual sales
arrangements with certain customers. We realize a premium over
prevailing LME cash prices for our finished nickel products.
Aluminum products operations. Aluminum is sold
in an active world market where prices are determined by
reference to prices prevailing on terminal markets, such as the
London Metal Exchange and the New York Mercantile Exchange or
NYMEX, at the time of delivery.
We are engaged in the production and sale of bauxite, alumina
and aluminum primarily through several joint ventures. Some of
them are consolidated subsidiaries and others are accounted for
on the equity method. The basic arrangements are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
MRN (an unconsolidated joint venture in which we own 40%)
produces bauxite. It sells on a
take-or-pay
basis to us and the other joint venture partners, at a price
that is determined by a formula linked to the price of aluminum
for three-month contracts on the London Metal Exchange and to
the price of alumina exported from Australia. We sell part of
the bauxite we purchase from MRN to Alunorte and part to
unaffiliated customers.
|
|
|
|
Alunorte (a consolidated subsidiary in which we own 57%)
produces alumina. In 2006, it purchased substantially all of its
bauxite requirements from MRN, and its annual purchase
commitment for 2006 was approximately US$221 million. In
2007, Alunorte will also buy bauxite from the Paragominas mine.
It sells alumina on a
take-or-pay
basis to us and the other joint-venture partners in proportion
to their respective interests, at a price which is determined by
a formula based on the price of aluminum for three-month
contracts on the London Metal Exchange. In 2006, 23.3% of
Alunortes alumina production was sold to unaffiliated
customers.
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
Albras (a consolidated subsidiary in which we own 51%) produces
primary aluminum. It sells on a
take-or-pay
basis to us and the other joint-venture partners, in proportion
to their respective interests. We sell the aluminum we purchase
from Albras directly to customers.
|
|
|
|
Valesul (a former unconsolidated joint venture which became a
consolidated wholly-owned subsidiary in July 2006) also
produces aluminum and sells aluminum products directly to its
customers.
|
Manganese ore and ferroalloys. Manganese ore
and ferroalloy prices are influenced by trends in the steel
market. Manganese ore prices are generally negotiated on an
annual basis using a benchmark established in the Japanese
market based on the reference price for the related ferroalloys.
Ferroalloy prices are negotiated in open bids, quarterly
contracts (particularly in Europe) or on a spot basis. They are
influenced by a number of factors and are more volatile than
prices for manganese ore. Among the principal factors are the
price of manganese ore, the inventories held by producers or
traders, occasional interruptions in production and anti-dumping
tariffs in the main markets (U.S., Europe, Japan and South
Korea). Average realized manganese ore prices decreased 16.8% in
2006. Average realized ferroalloy prices increased 4.7% in 2006.
In response to continued global excess supply that resulted in
inventory accumulation and falling ferroalloy prices, we managed
our manganese and ferroalloys business in 2006 with the aim of
cutting costs and maximizing efficiency. In this context, we
reduced production, in part by shutting down inefficient
furnaces and some small manganese mines, and we also began
combining ore from our Azul mine with that acquired from other
producers, producing a blend capable of improving productivity
in the alloy manufacturing process.
Copper. We sell our copper concentrate in an
active world market where prices are determined on the basis of
(i) prices on terminal markets, such as the LME and the
COMEX, at the time of delivery and (ii) treatment and
refining charges negotiated with each customer. World copper
prices on the LME increased 42.8% in 2006 relative to 2005.
These high prices reflect increased global demand, primarily
from China, and the historically low level of inventories.
Logistics. We earn our logistics revenues
primarily from fees charged to customers for the transportation
of cargo via our railroads, ports and ships. Most of these
revenues are earned by our railways, and nearly all of our
logistics revenues are denominated in reais. Prices in
the Brazilian railroad market are subject to maximum levels set
by the Brazilian regulatory authorities, but they primarily
reflect competition with the trucking industry.
Acquisitions
and divestitures
We have made a number of significant acquisitions and
divestitures in recent years. For more information, see
Item 4. Information on the Company Business
overview Recent acquisitions and significant changes
and Divestitures and asset sales. During 2006 and
2007, the following transactions had a significant impact on our
performance:
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
In October 2006, we acquired 75.66% of Inco in an unsolicited
cash tender offer. Following a subsequent offer period and
additional purchases, we held 87.73% of the shares at
December 31, 2006, and in January 2007 the amalgamation of
Inco with our subsidiary resulted in our owning 100% of the
shares. We paid a total purchase price of
US$17,151 million, of which US$15,098 million was
disbursed in 2006 and US$2,053 million in 2007.
|
|
|
|
In April 2007, we paid US$656 million for the acquisition
of 100% of AMCI Holdings Australia Pty AMCI HA, an
Australian company that operates and controls coal assets
through joint ventures.
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
In May 2007, we entered into a transaction by which we have
effectively obtained control of 100% of MBRs total capital
during the next 30 years. Prior to this transaction, we
owned 89.9% of MBR, directly and through our 80% stake in
Empreendimentos Brasileiros de Mineração S.A. (EBM),
whose main asset is a 51% stake in MBR. We acquired a further
6.25% of EBM for US$231 million, and we simultaneously
entered into a usufruct agreement with respect to the 13.75% of
EBMs total capital that we do not own. This agreement
grants us during the next 30 years all rights and
obligations with respect to these EBM shares, including the
right to dividends. In exchange, CVRD will pay a total of
US$61 million and an annual fee of US$48 million.
Because we already consolidate MBR, this transaction will not
have a significant impact on our consolidated results of
operations.
|
|
|
|
In July 2006 we acquired the remaining 45.5% of Valesul
Alumínio S.A., which had previously been a joint venture
with equal voting rights, for US$28 million. Upon the
acquisition, we began consolidating Valesul. Valesul accounted
for US$153 million of our sales of primary aluminum in 2006.
|
|
|
|
In March 2006, we acquired the outstanding minority interest in
Caemi through a stock merger. In December 2006, Caemi was merged
with and into CVRD.
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2006, we sold our 4.85% interest in
Siderar S.A.I.C, a steel plant located in Argentina,
to Ternium S.A. for US$108 million.
|
|
|
|
In the second half of 2006, we sold all of our shares of Gerdau
S.A. for US$67 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2006, we announced our entry into the control group
of Usiminas and the concurrent sale of a portion of the shares
not subject to the controlling shareholders agreement for
US$176 million. In May 2007, we sold in a public offering
registered with the CVM 13,802,499 Usiminas shares and received
total proceeds of US$728 million. In connection with the
offering, we entered into a lockup agreement for a period of
90 days from April 25, 2007. After the lockup period
expires or is waived, we intend to sell 36,691 additional shares
that were not sold pursuant to the offerings overallotment
option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In May 2006, we sold our 50% interest in Gulf Industrial
Investment Company (GIIC), a pellet producer based in Bahrain,
to our joint venture partner, Gulf Investment Corporation, for
US$418 million.
|
|
|
|
In February 2006, we sold our 49% stake in Nova Era Silicon, a
ferrosilicon producer with operations in the Brazilian state of
Minas Gerais, to our partner JFE Steel Corporation for
US$14 million.
|
|
|
|
In February 2006, we sold our 40% stake in the consortium to
build and operate the Foz do Chapecó hydroelectric power
plant to Furnas Centrais Elétricas for US$4 million.
|
Impact
of Inco acquisition
Our 2006 results reflect just over two months of CVRD
Incos operations, as shown in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable
|
|
|
|
Total CVRD
|
|
|
to CVRD Inco
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Gross revenues
|
|
US$
|
20,363
|
|
|
US$
|
2,802
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
10,147
|
|
|
|
2,230
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
Of the cost of goods sold attributable to CVRD Inco,
US$953 million was generated by purchase accounting
adjustments in accordance with SFAS 141 and 142. Under
these standards, an acquired companys assets, including
inventories, must be adjusted to fair value upon acquisition.
When the related inventories are sold, the difference between
fair value and production cost is included in cost of goods
sold. Applying these principles, the market value of Incos
inventories at the time of acquisition was adjusted upward by
83
US$1,686 million at December 31, 2006, when we had
acquired 87.73% of the shares. US$946 million of the market
value difference was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2006
upon sale of a portion of the inventories. We booked
US$984 million for the first quarter of 2007 and an
adjustment of US$78 million will be made in the second
quarter of 2007, due to the completion of the acquisition of
Inco in January 2007 and a significant increase in nickel prices
since October 2006.
As a result of the acquisition of Inco, we recognized, on a
preliminary basis, US$3,876 million of goodwill at
December 31, 2006, which increased in the first quarter of
2007 when we paid the balance of the purchase price. We also
substantially increased our indebtedness to finance the
acquisition, as discussed in more detail below.
Currency
exchange rates
Most of our revenues are U.S. dollar-denominated, while
most of our costs (other than debt service expenses) have
historically been denominated in Brazilian reais. As a
result, the strength of the real in recent years has had
a negative effect on our reported financial results from
operations. On the other hand, because most of our debt is
dollar-denominated, appreciation of the real causes us to
record foreign exchange gains.
The acquisition of Inco has significantly changed the
composition of our non-debt service costs. As a result of the
acquisition, a significant portion of our costs are now
denominated in Canadian dollars and Indonesian rupiahs. The
diversification of our cost base should reduce the impact of the
appreciation of the real on our reported financial
results from operations in future periods.
Changes in exchange rates had a negative effect on our operating
income in 2006. The average R$/US$ exchange rate was R$2.4341
during 2005 and R$2.1771 during 2006, representing an 11.8%
appreciation of the real. Although the U.S. dollar
depreciated by 8.7% from year-end 2005 to year-end 2006,
compared to depreciation of 11.0% from year-end 2004 to year-end
2005, our overall foreign exchange gains were higher in 2006 due
primarily to the significant increase in debt incurred in
connection with the Inco acquisition.
Inflation
in Brazil
As measured by the IGP-M Index, the Brazilian inflation rate was
approximately 12.4% in 2004, 1.2% in 2005, and 3.8% in 2006. In
the first four months of 2007, the Brazilian inflation rate was
1.15%. Most of our costs are incurred in Brazil in reais,
while most of our revenues are earned outside of Brazil in
U.S. dollars. Brazilian inflation has a negative impact on
our operating margins.
Operating
expenses
Our principal operating expenses consist of cost of goods sold,
selling, general and administrative expenses and research and
development expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold. Our cost of goods sold
consists principally of costs for raw materials (especially
bauxite purchased under
take-or-pay
arrangements from MRN, and iron ore, pellets and nickel
purchased from third parties), services (especially mine waste
removal and freight), materials and supplies, labor, fuel,
energy and depreciation and depletion. As described above, our
cost of goods sold also reflect the non-cash effect of purchase
accounting adjustments in connection with our acquisition of
Inco.
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses. Our selling, general and administrative
expenses consist principally of personnel expense, sales expense
and depreciation.
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses. Our
research and development expenses consist primarily of
investments related to mineral exploration and studies for the
development of projects.
|
84
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS 2006 COMPARED TO 2005
Revenues
Our gross operating revenues rose to US$20,363 million in
2006, a 51.9% increase over 2005. Our net operating revenues
increased 53.6% to US$19,651 million in 2006. The following
table summarizes our gross revenues by product and our net
operating revenues for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore and pellets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
US$
|
10,027
|
|
|
US$
|
7,396
|
|
|
|
35.6
|
%
|
Pellets
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
|
|
2,083
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
12,006
|
|
|
|
9,479
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
Nickel and other products(1)
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Manganese and Ferroalloys
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
Potash
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
Copper concentrate(2)
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minerals and metals
|
|
|
16,511
|
|
|
|
10,767
|
|
|
|
53.3
|
|
Revenues from logistic services
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
2,381
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
69.1
|
|
Other products and services
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
578.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues
|
|
|
20,363
|
|
|
|
13,405
|
|
|
|
51.9
|
|
Value-added tax
|
|
|
(712
|
)
|
|
|
(613
|
)
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues
|
|
US$
|
19,651
|
|
|
US$
|
12,792
|
|
|
|
53.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes copper, precious metals,
cobalt and other by-products produced by CVRD Inco.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Does not include copper produced by
CVRD Inco.
|
Iron ore. Gross revenues from iron ore
increased by 35.6%, driven primarily by a 22.7% increase in
average selling prices and a 10.6% increase in shipments of iron
ore. The price increases resulted from agreements with major
steelmakers in May 2006 under which our reference prices for
iron ore increased by an average of 19%. This price increase,
which was retroactive to January for most clients in Europe and
to April for most clients in Asia, began to favorably affect our
gross revenues in the latter half of the second quarter of 2006.
The increase in shipments was made possible by higher production
at our existing mines, the expansion of our Carajás mine,
the startup of our Fábrica Nova mine in April 2005 and
production from MBRs Mar Azul mine, which we acquired in
the first quarter of 2006. Our Brucutu mine began operations in
the third quarter of 2006, further increasing our production
capacity.
Pellets. Gross revenues from pellets decreased
by 5.0%. Total shipments in 2006 of 25,354 million metric
tons were 11.0% lower than in 2005, primarily reflecting our
decision to temporarily shut down our São Luís pellet
plant from March until July 2006 in response to lower demand
resulting from steel production cuts in Europe and North
America. Reflecting the lower demand for pellets, we agreed to a
3% cut in the reference price for blast furnace and direct
reduction pellets in our negotiations with major steelmakers in
May 2006, which began to have an impact on gross revenues in the
latter part of the second quarter of 2006. Despite this
reduction in reference prices, average selling prices for 2006
were 6.8% higher in 2006 than in 2005. As described above, we
reached agreements with major steelmakers under which prices for
blast furnace and direct reduction pellets from our Tubarão
and São Luís plants will increase by 5.28% relative to
2006.
Nickel and other products. We acquired Inco in
the second half of October 2006, and our 2006 results include
two months of its operations. Nickel and other products sold by
CVRD Inco accounted for revenues of US$2,802 million in
2006.
85
Manganese ore and ferroalloys. Gross revenues
from sales of manganese ore and ferroalloys decreased by 1.4%.
Because of lower market prices for ferroalloys, we have reduced
production since 2005. See Item 5. Operating and
financial review and prospects Overview
Prices Manganese ore and ferroalloys.
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from ferroalloys increased by 2.8%, from
US$494 million in 2005 to US$508 million in 2006, due
to a 4.7% increase in average selling prices partially offset by
an 1.3% decrease in volume.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from manganese ore decreased by 28.6%, from
US$77 million in 2005 to US$55 million in 2006,
reflecting a 16.8% decrease in average selling prices and a
14.1% decrease in volume.
|
Potash. Gross revenues from sales of potash
decreased by 4.0%, from US$149 million in 2005 to
US$143 million in 2006. The decrease was driven by a 16.2%
decrease in average selling prices. Sales volume increased by
14.5%, reflecting a full year of operation at higher capacity of
the Taquari-Vassouras mine.
Kaolin. Gross revenues from sales of kaolin
increased by 23.2%, from US$177 million in 2005 to
US$218 million in 2006 due principally to a 13.4% increase
in average selling prices. Volume increased by 8.6%.
Logistics services. Gross revenues from
logistics services increased by 13.2%. The increase reflects the
appreciation of the real, since our prices are generally
denominated in reais, as well as price increases in
reais. In particular:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from railroad transportation increased by 14.8%, from
US$881 million in 2005 to US$1,011 million in 2006.
Average prices increased by 14.2%. Volume shipped remained
stable.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from port operations increased by 13.5%, from
US$230 million in 2005 to US$261 million in 2006.
Average prices increased by 17.1%. Volume decreased by 3.1%.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from shipping remained stable, at US$105 million
in 2005 and US$104 million in 2006.
|
Aluminum products. Gross revenues from
aluminum products increased by 69.1%. The main drivers were:
|
|
|
|
|
A 51.2% increase in gross revenues from sales of aluminum, from
US$823 million in 2005 to US$1,244 million in 2006.
This increase was mainly driven by a 39.0% rise in average
selling prices, reflecting strong worldwide demand for aluminum.
Volume increased by 8.5%, primarily due to the consolidation of
Valesul beginning in July 2006.
|
|
|
|
A 108.7% increase in gross revenues from sales of alumina, from
US$531 million in 2005 to US$1,108 million in 2006.
The increase in alumina gross revenues resulted from a 76.2%
increase in sales volume, reflecting the startup of
Stages 4 and 5 of Alunortes Barcarena refinery in the
first quarter of 2006. These expansion projects increased our
annual production capacity from 2.5 million metric tons to
4.4 million metric tons. The growth in alumina production
more than offset the accounting impact of eliminating sales of
alumina by Alunorte to Valesul upon its consolidation beginning
in July 2006. Higher LME prices for aluminum, the reference
price for our alumina sales, drove an 18.4% increase in average
selling prices.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from sales of bauxite decreased by 46.3%, from
US$54 million in 2005 to US$29 million in 2006. Volume
decreased by 50.0%, reflecting higher consumption of bauxite by
our Alunorte subsidiary, which reduced the amount of bauxite
available for sale to customers. This was partly offset by a
7.4% increase in average selling prices due to higher LME prices
for aluminum, the reference price for our bauxite sales.
|
Copper. Gross revenues from sales of copper
almost doubled, due to an 85.7% increase in average selling
prices and a 7.3% increase in sales volume. This reflects sales
of copper concentrate from our Brazilian operations but not
sales of copper from our CVRD Inco operations, which are
included in nickel and other products.
Other products and services. Gross revenues
from other products and services increased from
US$14 million in 2005 to US$95 million in 2006,
primarily reflecting a coal shipment realized in the first
quarter of 2006 and sales of pig iron.
86
Operating
costs and expenses
Like other mining and metals companies, we are currently
experiencing high prices for equipment, replacement parts,
energy, raw materials and services. The appreciation of the
real against the U.S. dollar has increased these
pressures, because of our costs denominated in reais. The
following table summarizes our operating costs and expenses for
the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of ores and metals
|
|
US$
|
7,946
|
|
|
US$
|
4,620
|
|
|
|
72.0
|
|
Cost of logistic services
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Cost of aluminum products
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
Others
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
527.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
10,147
|
|
|
|
6,229
|
|
|
|
62.9
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
73.6
|
|
Other costs and expense
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
110.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
US$
|
12,014
|
|
|
US$
|
7,360
|
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of goods sold
The following table summarizes the components of our cost of
goods sold for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
CVRD Inco
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outsourced services
|
|
US$
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
US$
|
1,483
|
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
Materials costs
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
|
|
40.7
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
Electric energy
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
1,535
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
Acquisition of iron ore and pellets
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Acquisition of other products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
Other
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
193.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
175.6
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
78.4
|
|
Depreciation and depletion
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
53.7
|
|
Inventory adjustment
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
10,147
|
|
|
US$
|
2,230
|
|
|
US$
|
6,229
|
|
|
|
62.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total cost of goods sold increased by 62.9%. This increase
resulted primarily from the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of Inco acquisition. CVRD Inco
operations in the fourth quarter of 2006 contributed total cost
of goods sold of US$2,230 million. As described above,
US$946 million of this amount relates to purchase
accounting adjustments under SFAS 141/142 that required us
to mark to market the inventories of Inco upon acquisition. The
excess of the market price over the production cost of these
inventories is included in cost of goods sold when the
inventories are sold. We expect to incur a further
US$1,062 million in increased cost of goods sold in 2007
related to the remaining inventories.
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of appreciation of the real. The
average value of the real increased 11.8% against the
U.S. dollar in 2006 compared to 2005. Because the majority
of our costs and expenses are denominated in reais, this
led to increased
U.S.-dollar
costs.
|
|
|
|
Outsourced services. Outsourced services costs
increased by 38.6% in 2006. Of the US$573 million increase,
US$132 million was attributable to CVRD Inco. The remaining
US$441 million increase was driven primarily by the
appreciation of the real and higher rail freight costs
due to higher iron ore production at our MBR subsidiary, which
uses the MRS railway to transport its iron ore to the port. The
higher outsourced services costs also reflect increased waste
material removal at our mines and higher costs for maintenance
services.
|
|
|
|
Material costs. Material costs increased by
40.7% in 2006. Of the US$573 million increase, CVRD Inco
contributed US$128 million. The remaining
US$330 million increase primarily reflected higher volumes
and the appreciation of the real against the
U.S. dollar.
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of iron ore and pellets. Cost of
iron ore and pellets purchased from other mining companies
remained stable, as price increases more than offset declines in
metric tons purchased. Iron ore purchased from third-party
suppliers in 2006 decreased by 33.8% to 10.2 million metric
tons in 2006 compared to 15.4 million metric tons purchased
in 2005. We purchased 8.9 million metric tons of pellets
from third parties in 2006, a decrease of 7.1% compared to
9.7 million metric tons purchased in 2005.
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of other products. Acquisition of
other products increased by US$583 million in 2006, of
which US$514 million was attributable to CVRD Inco. The
remaining US$69 million was driven primarily by higher
purchases of bauxite from third parties by Alunorte to supply
the expanded operation of Alunortes Barcarena alumina
refinery. We expect third-party bauxite purchases to decline
following the
start-up of
the Paragominas mine in 2007.
|
|
|
|
Energy costs. Energy costs increased by 41.3%
in 2006. Of the US$449 million increase,
US$122 million was attributable to CVRD Inco. Electricity
costs increased by US$167 million, of which
US$31 million was attributable to CVRD Inco. The remaining
increase in electricity costs primarily reflects 31.1% higher
electricity prices for aluminum production, driven by the Albras
electricity contract, under which a portion of the price is
indexed to the LME price for aluminum, and by the consolidation
of Valesul, which pays higher prices for its supply of
electricity. The volume of electricity consumed also increased
by 17.6%. Fuel costs increased by US$282 million, of which
CVRD Inco accounted for US$91 million. The remaining
US$191 million increase was driven by higher production,
the appreciation of the real and higher prices.
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs. Personnel costs increased by
78.4%. Of the US$403 million increase, US$210 million
was attributable to CVRD Inco. The remainder of the increase
reflects the impact in 2006 of salary increases agreed in July
2005, an increase in the number of our employees as a result of
our expansion projects and our consolidation of Valesul, the
appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar,
and the payment of a special bonus to employees in August 2006.
In July 2006, we agreed on a 3% wage increase that took effect
in January 2007.
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by 40.0%.
Of the US$233 million increase, US$62 million was
attributable to CVRD Inco. The remainder of the increase
resulted primarily from higher selling expenses due to the
increase in sales volume, an annual increase in the salary of
administrative employees and the appreciation of the real
against the U.S. dollar.
Research
and development expenses
Research and development expenses increased by 73.6%. Of the
US$204 million increase, US$39 million was
attributable to CVRD Inco. The remainder of the increase
primarily reflects an increase in mineral exploration and
project studies in several regions, including South America,
Asia, Africa and Australia. The
88
increase also includes US$25 million of expenses relating
to the construction of a hydrometallurgical plant for processing
copper.
Other
costs and expenses
Other costs and expenses more than doubled. The
US$299 million increase was primarily attributable to a
US$171 million provision for mine closure and other
environmental remediation matters, resulting from a
comprehensive review.
Operating
income by segment
The following table provides information concerning our
operating income by segment and as a percentage of revenues for
the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Segment Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of net operating
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of net operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
revenues)
|
|
|
|
|
|
revenues)
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
US$
|
5,168
|
|
|
|
53.0
|
%
|
|
US$
|
4,085
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
%
|
Pellets
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
33.0
|
|
Manganese ore
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
38.1
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alumina
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
51.9
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
48.3
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
Ports
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
Ships
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
38.9
|
%
|
|
US$
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
42.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operating income decreased as a percentage of net operating
revenues from 42.5% in 2005 to 38.9% in 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
This decrease was driven primarily by decreases in the margins
on our iron ore, manganese, ferroalloys and potash businesses,
which, together with the impact of consolidating Inco and its
operating margin of 14.6%, more than offset higher margins in
our copper, alumina and aluminum businesses.
|
|
|
|
The decrease in margins in our iron ore business primarily
reflects the impact of the appreciation of the real
against the U.S. dollar, higher research and
development expenditures, higher depreciation charges due to the
expansion of our asset base and higher freight and other
outsourced services costs. Together, these factors more than
offset the impact of higher average selling prices.
|
|
|
|
Revenues and operating margins increased in our copper, alumina
and aluminum businesses. In each of these segments, higher
prices more than offset the production cost increases described
above.
|
|
|
|
The significant margin declines in the manganese and ferroalloys
segments are due to lower market prices for these products and
the higher production costs described above.
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
The margin decline in the potash segment is due to the lower
potash prices noted above and higher production costs due
primarily to the appreciation of the real against the
U.S. dollar.
|
|
|
|
The operating margin for nickel and other products reflects in
part the impact of the purchase accounting adjustments relating
to inventories described above.
|
Non-operating
income (expenses)
The following table details our net non-operating income
(expenses) for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(US$ millions)
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
US$
|
327
|
|
|
US$
|
123
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(1,338
|
)
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
Foreign exchange and monetary gains
(losses) net
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expenses)
|
|
US$
|
192
|
|
|
US$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We had net non-operating revenues of US$192 million in
2006, compared to net non-operating expenses of
US$12 million in 2005. This change primarily reflects:
|
|
|
|
|
Higher exchange rate gains on our net
U.S. dollar-denominated liabilities caused by the exchange
rate variation of CVRD Incos debt.
|
|
|
|
An increase in financial income, due mainly to higher interest
rates and higher average cash balances.
|
|
|
|
An increase in financial expenses, principally due to a
significant increase in average debt incurred in connection with
the Inco acquisition.
|
|
|
|
A US$674 million gain on sales of investments in 2006, from
the sale of our interest in Siderar (US$96 million gain),
Usiminas (US$175 million gain), GIIC (US$338 million
gain), Nova Era Silicon (US$9 million gain) and Gerdau
(US$56 million gain), compared to gains in 2005 related to
the sale of the Quebec-Cartier Mining Company
(US$126 million gain).
|
Income
taxes
In 2006, we recorded a net income tax expense of
US$1,432 million, compared to US$880 million in 2005.
The effective tax rate on our pretax income was 18.3% in 2006
and 16.2% in 2005. Our effective tax rate is lower than the
statutory rate because (i) income of some non-Brazilian
subsidiaries is subject to lower rates of tax, (ii) we are
entitled to deduct the amount of our distributions that we
characterize as interest on shareholders equity and
(iii) we benefit from tax incentives applicable to our
earnings on production in particular regions of Brazil.
90
Affiliates
and joint ventures
Our equity in the results of affiliates and joint ventures and
provisions for losses on equity investments resulted in a gain
of US$710 million in 2006, compared to a gain of
US$760 million in 2005. The following table summarizes the
composition of our equity in results of affiliates and joint
ventures for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(US$ millions)
|
|
|
Equity in results of affiliates
and joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
US$
|
312
|
|
|
US$
|
435
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Steel
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity in results of
affiliates and joint ventures and provisions for losses
|
|
US$
|
710
|
|
|
US$
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change from 2005 to 2006 primarily reflected lower results
in ferrous minerals because of the sale of GIIC and higher
results in logistics because of better performance at MRS
Logistica.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS 2005 COMPARED TO 2004
Revenues
Our gross operating revenues rose to US$13,405 million in
2005, a 58.1% increase over 2004. Our net operating revenues
increased 58.6% to US$12,792 million in 2005. The following
table summarizes our gross revenues by product and our net
operating revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
US$
|
7,396
|
|
|
US$
|
3,995
|
|
|
|
85.1
|
%
|
Pellets
|
|
|
2,083
|
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
81.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
9,479
|
|
|
|
5,143
|
|
|
|
84.3
|
|
Manganese and Ferroalloys
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
(18.5
|
)
|
Potash
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
94.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minerals and metals
|
|
|
10,767
|
|
|
|
6,333
|
|
|
|
70.0
|
|
Revenues from logistic services
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
Other products and services
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(26.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues
|
|
|
13,405
|
|
|
|
8,479
|
|
|
|
58.1
|
|
Value-added tax
|
|
|
(613
|
)
|
|
|
(413
|
)
|
|
|
48.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues
|
|
US$
|
12,792
|
|
|
US$
|
8,066
|
|
|
|
58.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore. Gross revenues from iron ore
increased 85.1%, from US$3,995 million in 2004 to
US$7,396 million in 2005, driven primarily by a 66.3%
increase in average selling prices and a 11.4% increase in
shipments of iron ore. The price increases resulted mainly from
the 71.5% rise in iron ore prices agreed with major steelmakers
in February 2005, which was retroactive to January for most
clients in Europe and to April for most clients in Asia. We also
increased our shipments of iron ore by 23.1 million metric
tons, or 11.4%, compared to 2004. The increase in shipments was
made possible by higher production at our existing mines,
initial production increases under capacity expansion projects
at Capão Xavier and Fábrica
91
Nova, and an increase in iron ore purchases from third parties,
from 15.9 million metric tons to 16.4 million metric
tons, in response to strong demand growth.
Pellets. Gross revenues from pellets increased
by 81.4%, from US$1,148 million in 2004 to
US$2,083 million in 2005. The increase was driven primarily
by a 77.8% rise in average selling prices. The price increases
reflect the 86.67% rise in pellet prices we established with
major steelmakers in February 2005, which was retroactive to
January for most clients in Europe and to April for most clients
in Asia. Total shipments in 2005 of 28.5 million metric
tons were 3.6% higher than the 27.5 million metric tons in
the same period in 2004, primarily reflecting higher production
at our pelletizing plants in response to demand.
Manganese ore and ferroalloys. Gross revenues
from sales of manganese ore and ferroalloys decreased 18.5%,
from US$701 million in 2004 to US$571 million in 2005.
Because of lower market prices for ferroalloys, we reduced
production during 2005. See Item 5. Operating and
financial review and prospects Overview
Prices Manganese ore and ferroalloys. As a
result:
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from ferroalloys decreased 21.0%, from
US$625 million in 2004 to US$494 million in 2005, due
to a 14.1% decrease in sales volume and an 11.5% decrease in
average selling prices.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from manganese ore remained stable, at
US$76 million in 2004 and US$77 million in 2005,
reflecting an 11.2% increase in average selling prices and a
9.5% decrease in volume.
|
Potash. Gross revenues from sales of potash
increased 20.2%, from US$124 million in 2004 to
US$149 million in 2005. The increase was driven by an 18.3%
rise in average selling prices, reflecting strong demand. Sales
volume increased by 1.6%.
Kaolin. Gross revenues from sales of kaolin
increased 7.9%, from US$164 million in 2004 to
US$177 million in 2005, due principally to a 6.1% increase
in average selling prices. Volume remained relatively stable.
Logistics services. Gross revenues from
logistics services increased 38.7%, from US$877 million in
2004 to US$1,216 million in 2005. The increase reflects the
appreciation of the real, since our prices are generally
denominated in reais, as well as price increases in
reais. In particular:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from railroad transportation increased 44.0%, from
US$612 million in 2004 to US$881 million in 2005.
Average prices increased 50.0%. Volume shipped remained stable.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from port operations increased 32.9%, from
US$173 million in 2004 to US$230 million in 2005.
Average prices increased 25.7%. Volume increased 6.7%.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from shipping increased 14.1%, from US$92 million
in 2004 to US$105 million in 2005. Average selling prices
increased 25.0%. Volume decreased 5.0% due to operational
problems with one of our ships.
|
Aluminum products. Gross revenues from
aluminum products increased 12.6%, from US$1,250 million in
2004 to US$1,408 million in 2005. The main drivers were:
|
|
|
|
|
An 11.4% increase in gross revenues from sales of aluminum, from
US$739 million in 2004 to US$823 million in 2005. This
increase was mainly driven by an 8.9% rise in average selling
prices, reflecting strong worldwide demand for aluminum. Volume
increased 4.0% due to production increases.
|
|
|
|
A 15.9% increase in gross revenues from sales of alumina, from
US$458 million in 2004 to US$531 million in 2005. The
increase in alumina gross revenues resulted from a 2.2% increase
in sales volume and an increase in worldwide demand for alumina
that drove a 13.5% increase in average selling prices.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from sales of bauxite remained stable, at
US$54 million in 2005, compared to US$53 million in
2004. An 11.3% increase in average selling prices due to a
general rise in worldwide bauxite prices was partially offset by
an 8.3% decrease in volume, reflecting higher consumption of
bauxite by our Alunorte subsidiary, which reduced the amount of
bauxite available for sale to clients.
|
92
Copper. Copper production at CVRD started in
June 2004. Gross revenues from sales of copper nearly doubled to
US$391 million in 2005 from US$201 million in 2004,
when we had only seven months of copper production. The output
from our Sossego copper mine in 2005 was lower than initially
expected due to the need to replace equipment because of harder
than expected rock conditions. The new equipment started to
operate in the fourth quarter of 2005. Problems with the ball
mill caused significant production decreases in the first
quarter of 2006. We did not reach full capacity in 2006. Gross
revenues in 2005 were also positively impacted by copper prices,
which continue to post record levels, reflecting strong Chinese
demand, disruptions in production worldwide and lower levels of
reported inventories.
Other products and services. Gross revenues
from other products and services decreased 26.3%, from
US$19 million in 2004 to US$14 million in 2005.
Operating
costs and expenses
Like other mining and metals companies, we experienced high
prices for equipment, replacement parts, energy, raw materials
and services. The appreciation of the real against the
U.S. dollar increased these pressures for us, because
approximately 70% of our costs are denominated in
reais. The following table summarizes our
operating costs and expenses for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of ores and metals
|
|
US$
|
4,620
|
|
|
US$
|
2,881
|
|
|
|
60.4
|
%
|
Cost of logistic services
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
37.4
|
|
Cost of aluminum products
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
Others
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
6,229
|
|
|
|
4,081
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
81.0
|
|
Other costs and expense
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
US$
|
7,360
|
|
|
US$
|
4,943
|
|
|
|
48.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of goods sold
General. Total cost of goods sold increased
52.6%, from US$4,081 million in 2004 to
US$6,229 million in 2005. This increase resulted primarily
from the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
The average value of the real increased 16.8% against the
U.S. dollar in 2005 compared to the 2004. Because
approximately 70% of our costs and expenses are denominated in
reais, this led to increased U.S. dollar costs.
|
|
|
|
Material costs increased by US$646 million, or 58.3%, in
2005, driven primarily by the rise in the price of raw materials
and fuel, as well as expanded production and an increase in
prices for spare parts.
|
|
|
|
Outsourced services costs increased by US$670 million, or
82.4%, in 2005, driven primarily by higher sales volumes,
increases in rail freight charges, increased waste material
removal in the mines and higher prices for maintenance services.
|
|
|
|
Cost of iron ore and pellets purchased from other mining
companies increased by 60.5%, reflecting price increases in 2005
as well as higher volumes purchased. Iron ore purchased from
third party suppliers in 2005 increased to 16.4 million
metric tons, 3.2% more than the 15.9 million metric tons
purchased in 2004.
|
|
|
|
Energy costs increased by US$141 million, or 44.8%, in 2005
driven primarily by higher electricity prices under the Albras
long-term energy supply contract. In addition to the basic
price, the seller participates in earnings from our sale of
primary aluminum when the price exceeds US$1,450.00 per
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
metric ton, as registered at the London Metal Exchange (LME).
The LME price has exceeded the threshold during the entire
contract to date.
|
Cost of ores and metals. Cost of ores and
metals sold increased by 60.4% to US$4,620 million in 2005
from US$2,881 million in 2004, primarily due to higher
input prices, the appreciation of real against the
U.S. dollar and the increased production. The cost of ores
and metals during 2005 also reflected a US$130 million
increase in costs related to our Sossego copper mine, which
began operations in June 2004.
Cost of logistics services. Cost of logistics
services increased by 37.4%, from US$513 million in 2004 to
US$705 million in 2005 due to higher cargo volumes, higher
fuel costs, higher freight costs charged by MRS and the
appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar.
Cost of aluminum products. Cost of aluminum
products increased by 32.5%, from US$674 million in 2004 to
US$893 million in 2005, primarily reflecting higher prices
for the bauxite Alunorte acquires from MRN, higher fuel prices,
and higher prices under the Albras long-term energy supply
contract.
Cost of other products and services. Cost of
other products and services decreased from US$13 million
2004 to US$11 million in 2005.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 28.9%,
from US$452 million in 2004 to US$583 million in 2005.
The increase resulted primarily from higher selling expenses due
to the increase in sales volume, an annual increase in the
salary of administrative employees and the appreciation of the
real against the U.S. dollar.
Research
and development expenses
Research and development expenses increased by 81.0%, from
US$153 million in 2004 to US$277 million in 2005, due
to increase in mineral exploration and project studies in
several regions, including South America, Asia, Africa and
Australia.
Other
costs and expenses
Other costs and expenses increased from US$257 million in
2004 to US$271 million in 2005.
94
Operating
income by segment
The following table provides information concerning our
operating income by segment and as a percentage of revenues for
the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Segment Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of segment net
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of segment net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operating revenues)
|
|
|
|
|
|
operating revenues)
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
US$
|
4,085
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
%
|
|
US$
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
%
|
Pellets
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
33.0
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
Manganese ore
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
36.1
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
42.2
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
38.1
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alumina
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
48.3
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
59.1
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
|
Ports
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
35.4
|
|
Ships
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
42.5
|
|
|
US$
|
3,123
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operating income increased as a percentage of net operating
revenues from 38.7% in 2004 to 42.5% in 2005. This increase was
driven primarily by higher revenues and operating margins in the
iron ore and pellets businesses. In each of these segments,
higher prices more than offset the production cost increases
described above.
The improvement in the iron ore and pellet segments was
partially offset by a decline in the operating margins of most
of our other segments:
|
|
|
|
|
The decline in aluminum segment margins primarily reflects the
appreciation of the real and higher energy and other raw
material prices, which more than offset the impact of higher
aluminum prices.
|
|
|
|
The decline in kaolin operating margins is due to higher storage
and packaging costs and port expenses in Europe and higher fuel
costs.
|
|
|
|
The decline in copper operating margins resulted primarily from
higher unit operating costs and lower than expected volumes due
to the adverse drilling conditions described above.
|
|
|
|
The decline in the railroad segment operating margins primarily
reflects higher fuel prices, which were only partially offset by
higher average selling prices.
|
95
Non-operating
income (expenses)
The following table details our net non-operating income
(expenses) for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
US$
|
123
|
|
|
US$
|
82
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|
|
(671
|
)
|
Foreign exchange and monetary gains
(losses) net
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expenses)
|
|
US$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
US$
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We had net non-operating expenses of US$12 million in 2005,
compared to net non-operating expenses of US$120 million in
2004. This change primarily reflects:
|
|
|
|
|
The positive impact of exchange rate movements on our net
U.S. dollar-denominated liabilities caused by the
appreciation of the real, which was 11.0% in 2005 and
8.1% in 2004.
|
|
|
|
An increase in financial income from US$82 million in 2004
to US$123 million in 2005 due mainly to an increase in
treasury funds invested.
|
|
|
|
A decrease in financial expenses from US$671 million in
2004 to US$560 million in 2005, principally due to a
reduction in average debt.
|
|
|
|
A gain on sale of investments in 2005 of US$126 million due
to the sale of the Quebec Cartier Mining Company in July 2005,
compared to a gain of US$404 million in 2004, due to the
sale of CST.
|
Income
taxes
In 2005, we recorded a net income tax expense of
US$880 million, compared to US$749 million in 2004.
The effective tax rate on our pretax income was 16.2% in 2005
and 24.9% in 2004. Our effective tax rate is lower than the
statutory rate because (i) income of some non-Brazilian
subsidiaries is subject to lower rates of tax, (ii) we are
entitled to deduct the amount of our distributions that we
characterize as interest on shareholders equity and
(iii) we benefit from tax incentives applicable to our
earnings on production in particular regions of Brazil. The
effective tax rate decreased in 2005 because a higher proportion
of our income was generated by non-Brazilian subsidiaries or was
eligible for tax incentives.
Affiliates
and joint ventures
Our equity in the results of affiliates and joint ventures and
provisions for losses on equity investments resulted in a gain
of US$760 million in 2005, compared to a gain of
US$542 million in 2004. The following table summarizes the
composition of our equity in results of affiliates and joint
ventures and provisions for losses on equity investments for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Equity in results of affiliates
and joint ventures and provision for losses on equity
investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
US$
|
435
|
|
|
US$
|
170
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Steel
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity in results of
affiliates and joint ventures and provisions for losses
|
|
US$
|
760
|
|
|
US$
|
542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
Ferrous Minerals. Our equity in the results of
iron ore and pellet affiliates and joint ventures and provisions
for losses on equity investments amounted to a gain of
US$435 million in 2005, compared to a gain of
US$170 million in 2004. The improvements at each of these
affiliates were due to strong demand in the market for iron ore
and pellets and higher prices.
Logistics. In 2005, our equity in the results
of logistics affiliates and joint ventures and provisions for
losses on equity investments amounted to a gain of
US$54 million, compared with a gain of US$33 million
in 2004, reflecting improved results at MRS Logística S.A.
Aluminum products. Our equity in the results
of our aluminum affiliates and joint ventures and provisions for
losses on equity investments was US$65 million in 2005,
compared to US$71 million in 2004. This decrease resulted
primarily from lower results at Valesul due to higher fuel and
energy costs, which more than offset improved results at MRN.
Steel. In 2005, we recorded a net gain of
US$197 million with respect to our equity in the results of
steel affiliates and joint ventures, compared to a net gain of
US$271 million in 2004. The decrease primarily reflects the
impact of the sale of CST in 2004 and declining results at CSI
in 2005, both of which were partially offset by improved 2005
performance at Usiminas resulting primarily from higher average
selling prices.
Coal. In 2005, we recorded equity in the
results of our Longyu coal joint venture of US$9 million.
In January 2006, CVRD received its first trial shipment of coal,
approximately 40,000 metric tons, from China to Brazil.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
In the ordinary course of business, our principal uses of funds
are: capital expenditures, dividend payments and repayment of
debt. We have historically met these requirements by using cash
generated from operating activities and through short-term and
long-term debt. We believe these sources of funds, together with
our cash and cash equivalents on hand, will continue to be
adequate to meet our anticipated capital requirements.
In addition, from time to time, we review acquisition and
investment opportunities and will, if a suitable opportunity
arises, make selected acquisitions and investments to implement
our business strategy. We generally make investments directly or
through subsidiaries, joint ventures or affiliated companies,
and fund these investments through internally generated funds,
the issuance of debt or a combination of these methods.
Borrowings under our senior acquisition facility in connection
with the acquisition of Inco and refinancing of those
borrowings, together with debt of CVRD Inco, have led to a
significant increase in the amount of our consolidated
outstanding indebtedness and related debt service requirements.
At December 31, 2006, we had US$21,833 million of
long-term debt outstanding, compared with US$4,932 million
of long-term debt outstanding at the end of 2005. Our financial
expenses have increased as a result of these borrowings.
We financed the purchase price for Inco and related transaction
expenses using drawings of US$14,600 million under our
acquisition facility (all in 2006) and cash on hand. We
began refinancing the acquisition facility in November 2006, and
by December 31, 2006 we had arranged the refinancing of 84%
of the amount originally drawn. We paid off the acquisition
facility in full at the end of April 2007. The principal sources
of funds were the following:
|
|
|
|
|
A US$3,750 million issuance of
10-year and
30-year
guaranteed notes by our finance subsidiary Vale Overseas Limited
that closed in November 2006;
|
|
|
|
A US$2,544 million issuance of four-year and seven-year
real-denominated non-convertible debentures that closed
in December 2006; and
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
A US$6,000 million issuance of five-year and seven-year
pre-export finance transaction that closed in December 2006.
|
In 2007, in addition to the refinancing of the remaining balance
of our acquisition facility, we expect our major cash needs to
include repayment of long-term debt maturing during 2007,
budgeted capital expenditures of US$7,351 million,
announced minimum dividend payments for 2007 of
US$1,650 million and the US$656 million purchase price
for the acquisition of AMCI described below. We expect to meet
these cash needs primarily through a combination of operating
cash flow and cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Sources
of funds
Our principal sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents
on hand and cash flow from operating activities. At
December 31, 2006, we had cash and cash equivalents of
US$4,448 million. Our operating activities generated
positive cash flows of US$7,232 million in 2006.
In addition, CVRD has committed credit facilities for the
purpose of improving the efficiency of its cash management and
reducing debt refinancing risks during moments of instability in
financial markets. We currently have a committed credit facility
of US$650 million that is available through May 2007, with
an amortization period if drawn down of two years, and a
US$500 million revolving credit line that is available
through 2011. In May 2007, we concluded an agreement for a new
revolving credit line in the amount of US$650 million. We
have not used any of the funds available under either our
committed or revolving credit facilities. CVRD Inco also has a
revolving credit facility of US$750 million that is
available through 2011. Currently, US$642 million is
available under this credit facility, as the remaining portion
has been used. Subject to the lenders approval, certain
commitments under the facility may be extended for an additional
one-year period on each anniversary date. At December 31,
2006 there were no amounts drawn under the revolving credit
facility. However, two letters of credit totaling
US$108 million were issued and outstanding under this
facility. We generated a total of US$837 million in cash
through disposals of investments in 2006. On May 7, 2007,
we closed a transaction for the sale of Usiminas shares for
US$728 million.
We believe we are well positioned to raise additional capital,
given our access to global capital markets and our investment
grade rating. Following our acquisition of Inco, Moodys
confirmed our Baa3 foreign currency rating, Dominion Bond Rating
Services confirmed our BBB (high) rating, Fitch Ratings
confirmed our BBB- rating, and Standard & Poors
downgraded our rating from BBB+ to BBB and placed us on credit
watch with negative implications. In February 2007,
Standard & Poors removed us from credit watch
and affirmed our BBB rating.
Uses of
funds
Acquisitions
In 2006, we used cash of US$13,201 million, net of cash
acquired, to acquire subsidiaries. This amount includes cash
used to acquire Inco in October 2006 as well as cash used to
acquire the remaining 45.5% stake in Valesul for
US$28 million in July 2006. In April 2007, we acquired AMCI
Holdings Australia Pty-AMCI HA for US$656 million,
excluding net debt. In May 2007, we increased our stake in EBM
to 86.25% for US$231 million. EBMs main asset is a
51% stake in our subsidiary MBR, in which we already had an
89.9% interest. We simultaneously entered into a usufruct
agreement with respect to the 13.75% of EBMs total capital
that we do not own, which grants us all rights and obligations
with respect to these shares during the next 30 years and
consequently entitles us to 100% control of MBR. In exchange, we
will pay US$61 million plus an annual fee of
US$48 million to the owners of the shares.
Capital
expenditures
Capital expenditures amounted to US$4,538 million in 2006.
In 2007, we have budgeted US$7,351 million for capital
expenditures. This amount includes expenditures on projects as
well as expenditures for maintenance and exploration. For more
information about the specific projects for which we have
budgeted funds, see Item 4. Information on the
company Capital expenditures.
98
Dividends
We paid total dividends and interest on shareholders
equity of US$1,300 million in 2006. The announced minimum
dividend amount for 2007 is US$1,650 million. The first
installment of this dividend was approved by our Board of
Directors in the amount of US$825 million and was paid on
April 30, 2007. See Item 8. Financial
information Dividends and interest on
shareholders equity.
Share
buyback
We repurchased our preferred shares in the open market from June
through August 2006, pursuant to an announced repurchase program
limited to 5% of our preferred shares. We repurchased a total of
15,149,600 shares under this program at a cost of
US$301 million.
Debt
At December 31, 2006, we had an aggregate outstanding debt
of US$22,581 million, consisting of short-term debt of
US$1,459 million (including US$711 million in current
portion of long-term debt and US$25 million of loans from
related parties), and long-term debt (excluding current portion)
of US$21,122 million. At December 31, 2006,
approximately US$909 million of our debt was secured by
liens on some of our assets.
Our short-term debt consists primarily of
U.S. dollar-denominated trade financing, mainly in the form
of export prepayments and export sales advances with foreign and
Brazilian financial institutions.
Our major categories of long-term indebtedness (including the
current portion of long-term debt and excluding accrued charges)
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar-denominated loans and financing
(US$10,814 million at December 31,
2006). These loans include export financing
lines, import finance from export credit agencies, and loans
from commercial banks and multilateral organizations. They also
included our acquisition facility for CVRD Inco, which was
repaid in April 2007. The loans generally bear floating rate
interest at spreads over LIBOR. The amount outstanding at
December 31, 2006 does not include US$6,000 million
drawn under a pre-export finance transaction in January 2007,
proceeds of which were used to repay part of the drawings under
our senior acquisition facility.
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar-denominated fixed rate notes
(US$6,897 million at December 31,
2006). We have issued several series of
fixed-rate bonds through our finance subsidiary Vale Overseas
Limited with a CVRD guarantee. These include the
US$3,750 million of fixed-rate bonds issued in November
2006 to refinance a portion of the drawings under the senior
acquisition facility.
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar-denominated loans secured by future export
receivables (US$345 million at December 31,
2006). We have a US$550 million
securitization program based on existing and future receivables
generated by our subsidiary CVRD Overseas Ltd from exports of
iron ore and pellets to six of our customers in Europe, Asia and
the United States. The securitization transaction is divided
into three fixed-rate tranches and one floating-rate tranche.
|
|
|
|
Brazilian reais-denominated non-convertible debentures
(US$2,774 million at December 31,
2006). In November 2006, we issued
non-convertible debentures in the amount of approximately
US$2,500 million, in two series, with four- and seven-year
maturities. The first series, approximately US$700 million,
matures in 2010 and bears interest at 101.75% of the accumulated
variation of the Brazilian CDI (interbank certificate of
deposit) interest rate. The second series, approximately
US$1,800 million, matures in 2013 and bears interest at the
Brazilian CDI interest rate plus 0.25% per year. Proceeds
from these issuances were used to repay part of the drawings
under our senior acquisition facility.
|
|
|
|
Perpetual notes (US$86 million at December 31,
2006). We have issued perpetual notes that are
exchangeable for 48,000 million preferred shares of MRN.
Interest is payable on the notes in an amount equal to dividends
paid on the underlying preferred shares.
|
|
|
|
Other domestic debt. (US$728 million at
December 31, 2006). We have several
Brazilian loans, principally from BNDES and commercial banks,
most of which are linked to floating rates in Brazil, with the
balance mainly linked to U.S. dollars.
|
99
Some of our long-term debt instruments contain financial
covenants. Our principal covenants require us to maintain
certain ratios, such as debt to equity, net debt to EBITDA and
interest coverage. We were in full compliance with our financial
covenants as of December 31, 2006, and we believe that our
existing covenants will not significantly restrict our ability
to borrow additional funds as needed to meet our capital
requirements. We believe we will be able to operate within the
terms of our financial covenants for the foreseeable future.
None of these covenants directly restricts our ability to pay
dividends on equity securities at the parent company level.
SHAREHOLDER
DEBENTURES
At the time of the first stage of our privatization in 1997, we
issued shareholder revenue interests known in Brazil as
debentures to our then-existing shareholders. The
terms of the debentures were established to ensure that our
pre-privatization shareholders, including the Brazilian
government, would participate alongside us in potential future
financial benefits that we derive from exploiting certain
mineral resources that were not taken into account in
determining the minimum purchase price of our shares in the
privatization. In accordance with the debentures deed, holders
have the right to receive semiannual payments equal to an agreed
percentage of our net revenues (revenues less value-added tax,
transport fee and insurance expenses related to the trading of
the products) from certain identified mineral resources that we
owned at the time of the privatization, to the extent that we
exceed defined thresholds of sales volume relating to certain
mineral resources, and from the sale of mineral rights that we
owned at that time. Our obligation to make payments to the
holders will cease when the relevant mineral resources are
exhausted. Based on current production levels and estimates for
new projects, we began payments relating to copper resources in
2004 and expect to start payments relating to iron ore resources
beginning in approximately 2016 for the Northern System and
approximately 2028 for the Southeastern System, and payments
related to other mineral resources at the end of the current
decade.
The total payments made under the shareholder debentures
amounted to US$2 million in 2004, relating to 2003 results.
The total payments made under the shareholder debentures
amounted to US$5 million in 2005, relating to 2004 results.
In 2006, we made total payments under the shareholder debentures
in the amount of US$6 million. We also made a payment of
US$6 million in March 30, 2007, relating to the second
half of 2006 results. See Note 18 to our consolidated
financial statements for a description of the terms of the
debentures.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our long-term debt, short-term
debt, operating lease obligations, purchase obligations and
Alunorte
take-or-pay
obligations at December 31, 2006. This table excludes other
obligations that we may have, including pension obligations
(discussed in Note 17 to our consolidated financial
statements).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less Than 1 Year
|
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
|
2010-2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
US$
|
21,833
|
|
|
US$
|
711
|
|
|
US$
|
8,990
|
|
|
US$
|
1,792
|
|
|
US$
|
10,340
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments(1)
|
|
|
12,005
|
|
|
|
1,186
|
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
7,568
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
Purchase obligations(2)
|
|
|
12,292
|
|
|
|
3,653
|
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
4,573
|
|
Take-or-pay
obligation (MRN)(3)
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
48,629
|
|
|
US$
|
6,573
|
|
|
US$
|
14,029
|
|
|
US$
|
4,657
|
|
|
US$
|
23,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consists of estimated future
payments of interest on our loans, financings and debentures,
calculated based on interest rates and foreign exchange rates
applicable at December 31, 2006 and assuming (i) that
all amortization payments and payments at maturity on our loans,
financings and debentures will be made on their scheduled
payments dates, and (ii) that our perpetual bonds are
redeemed on the first permitted redemption date.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Amounts, including for purchases of
iron ore from mining companies located in Brazil, are based on
2006 prices.
|
|
(3)
|
|
We are committed under a
take-or-pay
agreement to purchase bauxite from MRN at a price that is
determined by a formula based on prevailing world prices of
aluminum.
|
100
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
At December 31, 2006, our off-balance sheet arrangements
consisted primarily of the following.
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006, we had extended guarantees for
borrowings obtained by affiliates and joint ventures in the
amount of US$3 million denominated in U.S. dollars. We
expect no losses to arise as a result of these guarantees. We
have made fee charges for extending these guarantees in the case
of Samarco. See Note 18 to our consolidated financial
statements for more information concerning these guarantees.
|
|
|
|
We have provided a guarantee covering certain termination
payments to the supplier under an electricity supply agreement
entered into in October 2004 for our Goro project in New
Caledonia. The amount of the termination payment depends on a
number of factors. If Goro defaults under the agreement,
termination payments could reach up to an amount of Euro
145 million. Once the supply of electricity under the
agreement begins, the guaranteed amounts will decrease over the
life of the agreement.
|
|
|
|
In connection with the Girardin tax-advantaged lease financing
related to the Goro project, we have provided certain guarantees
pursuant to which we have guaranteed payments up to a maximum
amount of US$100 million.
|
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
We believe that the following are our critical accounting
policies. We consider an accounting policy to be critical if it
is important to our financial condition and results of
operations and requires significant judgments and estimates on
the part of our management. For a summary of all of our
significant accounting policies, see Note 3 to our
consolidated financial statements.
Mineral
reserves and life of mines
We regularly evaluate and update our estimates of proven and
probable mineral reserves. Our proven and probable mineral
reserves are determined using generally accepted estimation
techniques. Calculating our reserves requires us to make
assumptions about future conditions that are highly uncertain,
including future ore prices, foreign currency exchange rates,
inflation rates, mining technology, availability of permits and
production costs. Changes in some or all of these assumptions
could have a significant impact on our recorded proven and
probable reserves.
One of the ways we use our ore reserve estimates is to determine
the mine closure dates used in recording the fair value
liability for our asset retirement obligations and the periods
over which we amortize our mining assets. Any change in our
estimates of total expected future mine or asset lives could
have an impact on the depreciation, depletion and amortization
charges recorded in our consolidated financial statements under
cost of goods sold. Changes in the estimated lives of our mines
could also significantly impact our estimates of environmental
and site reclamation costs, which are described in greater
detail below.
Environmental
and site reclamation costs
Expenditures relating to ongoing compliance with environmental
regulations are charged against earnings or capitalized as
appropriate. These ongoing programs are designed to minimize the
environmental impact of our activities.
101
SFAS 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations, requires that we recognize a liability for
the fair value of our estimated asset retirement obligations in
the period in which they are incurred, if a reasonable estimate
can be made. We consider the accounting estimates related to
reclamation and closure costs to be critical accounting
estimates because:
|
|
|
|
|
we will not incur most of these costs for a number of years,
requiring us to make estimates over a long period;
|
|
|
|
reclamation and closure laws and regulations could change in the
future or circumstances affecting our operations could change,
either of which could result in significant changes to our
current plans;
|
|
|
|
calculating the fair value of our asset retirement obligations
in accordance with SFAS 143 requires us to assign
probabilities to projected cash flows, to make long-term
assumptions about inflation rates, to determine our
credit-adjusted risk-free interest rates and to determine market
risk premiums that are appropriate for our operations; and
|
|
|
|
given the significance of these factors in the determination of
our estimated environmental and site reclamation costs, changes
in any or all of these estimates could have a material impact on
net income. In particular, given the long periods over which
many of these charges are discounted to present value, changes
in our assumptions about credit-adjusted risk-free interest
rates could have a significant impact on the size of our
provision.
|
Our Environmental Department developed a guide that defines the
rules and procedures that should be used to evaluate our asset
retirement obligations. The future costs of retirement of all of
our mines and sites are estimated annually, considering the
actual stage of exhaustion and the projected exhaustion date of
each mine and site. The future estimated retirement costs are
discounted to present value using a credit-adjusted risk-free
interest rate. At December 31, 2006, we estimated the fair
value of our aggregate total asset retirement obligations to be
approximately US$676 million.
Impairment
of long-lived assets and goodwill
We have made acquisitions that included a significant amount of
goodwill, intangible and tangible assets. Under generally
accepted accounting principles, except for goodwill and
indefinite-life intangible assets, these assets are amortized
over their estimated useful lives, and are tested to determine
if they are recoverable from operating earnings on an
undiscounted cash flow basis over their useful lives whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
value may not be recoverable. Factors that could trigger an
impairment review include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to expected historical or
projected future operating results of entities or business units
acquired;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner in which we use the acquired
assets or our overall business strategy; or
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends.
|
When we determine that the carrying value of definite-life
intangible assets and long-lived assets may not be recoverable
based upon verification of one or more of the above indicators
of impairment, we measure any impairment based on a projected
discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by
our management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our
current business model.
Beginning in 2002 we ceased to amortize the goodwill balance
that existed at December 31, 2001. We are required to
assign goodwill to reporting units and test each reporting
units goodwill for impairment at least annually, which we
perform on September 30 of each year. In the first step of
the test we compare a reporting units fair value and
carrying amount to identify any potential goodwill impairment
loss. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the
units fair value, we must carry out the second step of the
impairment test to measure the amount, if any, of the
units goodwill impairment loss. Goodwill arising from a
business combination with a continuing noncontrolling interest
must be tested for impairment by using an
102
approach that is consistent with the approach that the entity
used to measure the noncontrolling interest at the acquisition
date. For equity investees we determine annually whether there
is an
other-than-temporary
decline in the fair value of the investment.
Purchase
price allocation
As of December 31, 2006 we had acquired 87.73% of the
outstanding shares of Inco Limited, for total consideration of
US$15,009 million, generating US$3,876 million of
estimated goodwill, after recognition of the identifiable
(tangible and intangible) assets and liabilities acquired at
their respective fair values. SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Asset, was applied in
connection with our acquisition, and no amortization of the
goodwill generated as a result of this acquisition has been
recorded.
We use the purchase method to account for our
business combination transactions, which requires that we
reasonably determine the fair value of the identifiable assets
and liabilities of acquired companies individually, in order to
determine the amount of goodwill to be recognized as an
intangible asset. Upon the acquisition of assets, which include
rights to mine reserves of natural resources, the establishment
of values for these assets includes the placing of fair values
on purchased reserves, which are classified in the balance sheet
as property, plant and equipment.
The preliminary purchase price allocations based on the fair
values of acquired assets and liabilities were based on
managements preliminary internal valuation estimates. Such
allocations will be finalized based on valuation and other
studies underway, performed by us with the assistance of
external valuation specialists. Accordingly, the purchase price
allocation adjustments recognized in our consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2006 are preliminary and
subject to revision, which could be material.
Derivatives
and hedging activity
SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by
SFAS 137, SFAS 138 and SFAS 149, requires that we
recognize all derivative financial instruments as either assets
or liabilities on our balance sheet and measure such instruments
at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are
recorded in each period in current earnings or in other
comprehensive income (outside net income), in the latter case
depending on whether a transaction is designated as an effective
hedge. We have not designated any derivative financial
instruments as hedges and the fair value adjustments to our
derivatives were thus recorded in current net income. If we had
designated our hedging instruments as permitted under
SFAS 133, there would have been corresponding fair value
adjustments, for certain of our hedging instruments, to the
related hedged items in the case of fair value hedges or
directly to shareholders equity in the case of cash flow
hedges. In 2006, we recorded a charge of US$116 million in
relation to fair value adjustments on derivative instruments.
Income
taxes
In accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, we recognize deferred tax effects of tax loss
carryforwards and temporary differences in our consolidated
financial statements. We record a valuation allowance when we
believe that it is more likely than not that tax assets will not
be fully recoverable in the future.
When we prepare our consolidated financial statements, we
estimate our income taxes based on regulations in the various
jurisdictions where we conduct business. This requires us to
estimate our actual current tax exposure and to assess temporary
differences that result from differing treatment of certain
items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result
in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which we show on our
consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood
that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future
taxable income. To the extent we believe that recovery is not
likely, we establish a valuation allowance. When we establish a
valuation allowance or increase this allowance in an accounting
period, we record a tax expense in our statement of income. When
we reduce the valuation allowance, we record a tax benefit in
our statement of income.
103
Determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax
assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance to be
recorded against our net deferred tax assets requires
significant management judgment and estimates and assumptions
about matters that are highly uncertain. For each income tax
asset, we evaluate the likelihood of whether some portion or all
of the asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance made
in relation to accumulated income tax losses depends on our
assessment of the probability of generation of future taxable
profits within the legal entity in which the related deferred
tax asset is recorded based on our production and sales plans,
selling prices, operating costs, environmental costs, group
restructuring plans for subsidiaries and site reclamation costs
and planned capital costs.
Contingencies
We disclose material contingent liabilities unless the
possibility of any loss arising is considered remote, and
material contingent assets where the inflow of economic benefits
is probable. We discuss our material contingencies in
Note 18 to our financial statements.
We account for contingencies in accordance with SFAS 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, which requires that we
record an estimated loss from a loss contingency when
information available prior to issuance of our financial
statements indicates that it is probable that a future event
will confirm that an asset has been impaired or a liability has
been incurred at the date of the financial statements, and the
amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. In particular,
given the uncertain nature of Brazilian tax legislation, the
assessment of potential tax liabilities requires significant
management judgment. By their nature contingencies will only be
resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to
occur and typically those events will occur a number
of years in the future. Assessing such liabilities, particularly
in the uncertain Brazilian legal environment, inherently
involves the exercise of significant management judgment and
estimates of the outcome of future events.
The provision for contingencies at December 31, 2006,
totaling US$1,641 million, consists of provisions of
US$378 million, US$260 million, US$972 million
and US$31 million for labor, civil, tax and other claims,
respectively.
Employee
post-retirement benefits
We sponsor a defined benefit pension plan covering some of our
retirees. We account for these benefits in accordance with
SFAS No. 87, Employers Accounting for
Pensions, and amendments.
The determination of the amount of our obligations for pension
benefits depends on certain actuarial assumptions. These
assumptions are described in Note 17 to our consolidated
financial statements and include, among others, the expected
long-term rate of return on plan assets and increases in
salaries. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, actual results that
differ from our assumptions are accumulated and amortized over
future periods and generally affect our recognized expenses and
recorded obligations in such future periods.
|
|
Item 6.
|
Directors,
Senior Management and Employees
|
BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
Overview
Our Board of Directors, sets general guidelines and policies for
our business and monitors the implementation of those guidelines
and policies by our executive officers. The Board of Directors
holds regularly scheduled meetings on a monthly basis and holds
additional meetings when called by its chairman, vice-chairman
or any two directors. Decisions of the Board of Directors
require a quorum of a majority of the directors and are taken by
majority vote.
Under Brazilian corporation law, the Board of Directors must
have at least three members. Each director and his or her
respective alternate are elected at a general shareholders
meeting and are subject to removal at any time. Our bylaws state
that the Board of Directors consists of eleven members and
eleven alternates. Our employees have the right to appoint one
director and an alternate. Under Brazilian corporation law,
members
104
of the Board of Directors must be shareholders of CVRD. Members
of the Board of Directors are elected for two-year terms and can
be re-elected. Each alternate director serves on behalf of a
specific board member. In the absence of the director for whom
an alternate director is acting, that alternate director may
attend and vote at meetings of the Board of Directors.
Ten of our 11 current directors and nine of our current
alternate directors were appointed to their positions by
Valepar, our principal shareholder, pursuant to Valepars
shareholders agreement and the provisions of Brazilian
corporation law. For a description of the procedures under which
our directors are elected, see Item 10. Additional
information Memorandum and Articles of
Incorporation Common shares and preferred
shares General. For a description of
Valepars shareholders agreement, see Item 7.
Major shareholders and related party transactions
Major shareholders Principal shareholder.
Directors
of CVRD
The table below lists the current members of the Board of
Directors. All of our directors were elected or re-elected, as
the case may be, in 2007, and their terms will expire in 2009.
In addition, Demian Fiocca has been elected as director, but he
has not yet assumed office. The alternate position corresponding
to Mr. Francisco Augusto da Costa e Silva is vacant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elected
|
|
Position
|
|
Age
|
|
Sérgio Ricardo Silva Rosa(1)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Chairman
|
|
|
47
|
|
José Ricardo Sasseron(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
51
|
|
Jorge Luiz Pacheco(1)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
52
|
|
Sandro Kohler Marcondes(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
43
|
|
Mário da Silveira Teixeira
Júnior
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Vice-Chairman
|
|
|
61
|
|
Renato da Cruz Gomes(1)
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
54
|
|
Hiroshi Tada(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
62
|
|
Oscar Augusto de Camargo Filho(1)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
69
|
|
João Batista Cavaglieri(2)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
51
|
|
Francisco Augusto da Costa e
Silva(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Appointed by Valepar and approved
at the annual shareholders meeting.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Appointed by our employees and
approved at the annual general shareholders meeting.
|
The table below lists the alternate members of the Board of
Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elected
|
|
Position
|
|
Age
|
|
Sérgio Ricardo Lopes de
Farias(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
42
|
|
Rita de Cássia Paz Andrade
Robles(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
40
|
|
Luiz Mariano de Campos(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
65
|
|
José Mauro Guahyba de
Almeida(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
62
|
|
João Moisés de Oliveira(1)
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
62
|
|
Luiz Carlos de Freitas(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
54
|
|
Hidehiro Takahashi(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
51
|
|
Wanderlei Viçoso Fagundes(1)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
61
|
|
Paulo Soares de Souza(2)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
43
|
|
Caio Marcelo de Medeiros Melo(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Appointed by Valepar and approved
at the annual shareholders meeting.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Appointed by our employees and
approved at the annual general shareholders meeting.
|
Below is a summary of the business experience, areas of
expertise, and principal outside business interests of our
current directors.
Sérgio Ricardo Silva Rosa. Mr. Rosa
joined our Board of Directors in April 2003 and was designated
as Chairman in May 2003. Mr. Rosa is currently the chief
executive officer of PREVI Caixa de Previdência
dos Funcionários do Banco do Brasil, or Previ, where he has
been an executive officer since 2000. He is also a director of
Valepar and chief executive officer of Litel
Participações S.A. Mr. Rosa has been a director
of Brasil Telecom Participações since December 2000,
and of Sauípe S.A. since May 2001. Prior to joining Previ,
Mr. Rosa served as President of the Confederação
Nacional dos Bancários from June 1994 to May 2000. From
105
January 1995 to December 1996, Mr. Rosa was an alderman of
the municipality of São Paulo. He received his degree in
journalism from Universidade de São Paulo.
José Ricardo Sasseron. Mr. Sasseron
joined our Board of Directors in April 2007. Mr. Sasseron
began his career in 1980 at Banco do Brasil. From 1996 to 1998,
he was chairman of the fiscal council of Previ. In 2001, he was
a member of the Conselho de Gestão e Previdência
Complementar (CGPC) and was president of the
Associação Nacional dos Participantes de Fundo de
Pensão (ANAPAR). From 2005 to 2007, he was chairman of
the board of directors of Sauípe S.A., and in 2004 he
returned to Previ, where he was a member of the Conselho
Deliberativo until 2006. Mr. Sasseron is currently an
officer of Previ. He received his bachelors degree in
history from the Universidade de São Paulo.
Jorge Luiz Pacheco. Mr. Pacheco joined
our Board of Directors in April 2003. Mr. Pacheco has been
manager of strategic investments at Previ since December 2000,
and prior to this time worked at Banco do Brasil S.A. since
1973. He has also served as a director of Valepar and a director
of Litel, and has held an officer position in the fiscal council
of Companhia Siderúrgica Belgo-Mineira. He received his
degree in economics from Faculdade de Ciências
Econômicas FCPE Cândido
Mendes/RJ, and post-graduate degrees in finance and business
management from IBMEC/RJ.
Sandro Kohler Marcondes. Mr. Marcondes
joined our Board of Directors in April 2007. He is currently an
officer of Banco do Brasil, where he has worked in various
capacities both in Brazil and abroad since 1982. Since 2005, he
has been an officer of BB Leasing, Banco do Brasil Securities in
New York, BB Securities in London and BB Tur.
Mr. Marcondes received his bachelors degree in
business administration from the Universidade Estadual de
Guarapuava and a masters degree from the
Fundação Getulio Vargas in São Paulo.
Renato da Cruz Gomes. Mr. Gomes joined
our Board of Directors in April 2001. Mr. Gomes has been an
executive officer of Bradespar S.A. since 2000. From 1976
through 2000, Mr. Gomes held a variety of positions within
BNDES and has participated on the boards of directors of many
companies, in the last 15 years, namely Aracruz, Iochpe
Maxíon, Bahia Sul, Globo Cabo and Latasa. He was also a
member of the advisory board of Fator Sinergia Fundo
de Investimento de Valores Mobiliários em Ações
and the investment committee of Bradesco Templeton Value and
Liquidity Fund. Mr. Gomes has been an executive officer of
Valepar since April 2001 and is a member of Valepars Board
of Directors. He received his degree in engineering from
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
UFRJ, and his post-graduate degree in management development
from SDE.
Mário da Silveira Teixeira
Júnior. Mr. Teixeira joined our Board
of Directors in May 2003. In July 1971, Mr. Teixeira joined
Bradesco S.A. Corretora de Títulos e Valores
Mobiliários, where he served as an executive officer from
March 1983 to January 1984, when he was appointed as head
department officer of Banco Bradesco S.A. In 1992 he became
managing officer, in 1998 vice-president and from March 1999
until July 2001 he was a member of the Board of Directors. From
July 2001 to March 2002, Mr. Teixeira was CEO of Bradespar
and, in March 2002, he returned to the Board of Directors of
Banco Bradesco S.A. In addition, he is a director of Valepar,
VBC Participações S.A., VBC Energia S.A., Companhia
Paulista de Força e Luz CPFL, CPFL Energia
S.A., CPFL Geração de Energia S.A., Companhia
Piratininga de Força e Luz, Vice-chairman of the Board of
Directors of Banco Bradesco S.A., non-voting member of the
Managing Board of Banco Espírito Santo S.A., located in
Lisbon, Portugal, and Vice-chairman of the Board of Directors of
BES Investimento do Brasil S.A. Banco de
Investimento. He also served as Vice-President of
ANBID Associação Nacional dos Bancos de
Investimento, member of the Management Board of
ABRASCA Associação Brasileira das
Companhias Abertas, and director of Companhia Siderúrgica
Nacional CSN, Latasa S.A., Globo Cabo S.A., São
Paulo Alpargatas S.A. and Tigre S.A. Tubos e Conexões.
Mr. Teixeira received a degree in civil engineering and
business administration from Mackenzie Presbyterian University,
São Paulo.
Hiroshi Tada. Mr. Tada joined our Board
of Directors in April 2005. Since 1968, Mr. Tada has served
in a variety of positions at Mitsui & Co. Ltd., or
Mitsui, where he is currently the Executive Vice President. He
received his degree in engineering from the University of Kyoto,
Japan and an Advanced Management degree from Harvard University.
106
Oscar Augusto de Camargo
Filho. Mr. Camargo Filho joined our Board of
Directors in October 2003. He is currently a partner of CWA
Consultoria Empresarial. From 1999 to 2003, Mr. Camargo
Filho served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of MRS
Logística. From 1973 to 2003, he held various positions
with CAEMI, including CEO and member of its Board of Directors.
From 1963 until 1973, he held a variety of positions within
Motores Perkins S.A., including commercial officer and sales and
services manager. He received his law degree from Faculdade de
Direito at the Universidade de São Paulo.
João Batista
Cavaglieri. Mr. Cavaglieri joined the Board
of Directors in April 2007. Since 1990, Mr. Cavaglieri has
been a union leader, and in 1996 he became president of the
Espírito Santo and Minas Gerais Railway Employees Union,
which represents the employees living in Vitória and along
Estrada de Ferro Vitória-Minas (EFVM).
Francisco Augusto da Costa e
Silva. Mr. Costa e Silva joined our Board of
Directors in April 2005. He is also a partner of Bocater,
Camargo, Costa e Silva Advogados Associados, a law
firm in Rio de Janeiro. Mr. Costa e Silva also serves as a
director of Banco do Brasil S.A., Comitê de Ética de
Associação dos Analistas e Profissionais de
Investimento do Mercado de Capitais (APIMEC), and the
development committee of Pontifícia Universidade
Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC/RJ). He started his career
at Banco Nacional do Desenvolvimento Econômico e
Social BNDES, where he held a variety of positions,
including executive officer. Previously, he served on the Board
of Directors of several companies and entities namely Solpart
Participações S.A., Aracruz Celulose S.A., Pisa Papel
de Imprensa S.A., Fundação de Assistência e
Previdência Social do BNDES FAPES and Rio de
Janeiro Stock Exchange BVRJ. Mr. Costa e Silva
also served as President of the CVM and of the Council of
Securities Regulators of the Americas COSRA, joined
Comissão da Moeda e do Crédito COMOC and
the Supplemental Pension Plan Council and served on the
executive committee of the International Organization of
Securities Commissions IOSCO. Mr. Costa e Silva
received his law degree from Universidade do Estado da
Guanabara, currently Universidade do Estado do Rio de
Janeiro UERJ, and his MBA degree from COPPEAD, at
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro UFRJ.
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
Overview
The executive officers are our legal representatives and are
responsible for
day-to-day
operations and the implementation of the general policies and
guidelines set forth by the Board of Directors. Our bylaws
provide for a minimum of six and a maximum of nine executive
officers. The Board of Directors appoints executive officers for
two-year terms and may remove them at any time. According to
Brazilian corporation law, executive officers must be Brazilian
residents. The executive officers hold regularly scheduled
meetings on a weekly basis and hold additional meetings when
called by any executive officer.
Executive
officers
The table below lists our current executive officers. The term
of each of our executive officers expires in 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appointment
|
|
Position
|
|
Age
|
|
Roger Agnelli
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
48
|
|
Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
46
|
|
José Carlos Martins
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Executive Officer (Ferrous Minerals)
|
|
|
57
|
|
Murilo Ferreira
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Executive Officer (Nickel,
Marketing & Sales of Copper and Aluminum)
|
|
|
53
|
|
José Auto Lancaster Oliveira
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Executive Officer (Copper,
Coal & Aluminum)
|
|
|
60
|
|
Eduardo de Salles Bartolomeo
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Executive Officer (Logistics)
|
|
|
42
|
|
Gabriel Stoliar
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
Executive Officer (Planning &
Business Development)
|
|
|
53
|
|
Carla Grasso
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Executive Officer (Human Resources
and Corporate Services)
|
|
|
45
|
|
Tito Botelho Martins
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Executive Officer (Corporate
Affairs & Energy)
|
|
|
44
|
|
107
We have summarized below the experience, areas of expertise, and
principal outside business interests of our current executive
officers.
Roger Agnelli. Mr. Agnelli was appointed
CEO and President of CVRD in July 2001. Prior to his
appointment, he was the Chairman of the Board of Directors of
CVRD from May 2000 until July 2001. Mr. Agnelli developed
his professional career at the Bradesco financial group from
1981 to 2001, where he reached the position of executive
director of Banco Bradesco in 1998, remaining in that office
until the year 2000; he was also President and CEO of Bradespar
from March 2000 to July 2001. Due to his activities in the areas
of investment, mergers and acquisitions, and asset management,
he was a member of the board of directors of several major
companies in Brazil, such as Companhia Paulista de Força e
Luz, Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, Latas de Alumínio
S.A. LATASA, VBC Energia, Brasmotor, Mahle Metal
Leve, Rio Grande Energia and Serra da Mesa Energia.
Mr. Agnelli also was a director of UGB
Participações and Vice-President of ANBID
Brazils National Association of Investment Banks. He is a
member of the Economic and Social Development Council (CDES), an
advisory body to the President of Brazil, and a member of the
International Investments Council, formed to advise the
President of the Republic of South Africa, Dr. Thabo Mbeki.
Mr. Agnelli is a member of the board of directors of Asea
Brown Boveri (ABB), Spectra Energy Corporation and Suzano
Petroquímica S.A and vice-president of the board of the
Brazilian Symphonic Orchestra and vice-president of the
Centro Industrial of Rio de Janeiro. He recently became a
member of the International Advisory Committee of the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE), a member of the board of directors of
Petrobras Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. and a member
of the Conselho Consultivo do Setor Privado
Conex. Mr. Agnelli has a degree in economics from the
Fundação Armando Álvares Penteado, in São
Paulo, Brazil.
Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa. Mr. Barbosa
was appointed as our chief financial officer in May 2002. Until
May 2006, he was the Chairman of the Board of Directors of
CAEMI. Prior to that, Mr. Barbosa served as a member of our
Board of Directors from April 2000 to March 2002. Previously, he
served as chairman of the Board of Directors of
BANESPA Banco do Estado de São Paulo S.A., and
also served as a board member of the following companies: Banco
do Brasil S.A., Caixa Econômica Federal, CST and
TELESP Telecomunicações de São Paulo.
Prior to joining us, Mr. Barbosa has served as secretary of
the National Treasury at the Ministry of Finance since July
1999, after serving as assistant secretary in the previous four
years. From 1992 to 1995, he served as advisor to the Executive
Board of the World Bank, in Washington D.C. From 1990 to 1992,
he was Deputy and Head of the Fiscal Policy Unit at the Ministry
of Economy and Finance. From 1988 to 1990, he was economic
advisor and head of the Economic Analysis Unit, both at the
Ministry of Planning. Prior to that time, Mr. Barbosa held
a variety of positions at the Ministry of Industry and Commerce,
the Paraná State Development Institute, the Ministry of
Labor and the Institute for Applied Economic Research. He has a
B.A. degree in Economics from Universidade Federal de Minas
Gerais and a M.A. (abd) in Economics from the Universidade de
Brasília (UnB).
José Carlos Martins. Mr. Martins was
appointed as an executive officer of our ferrous minerals
division in April 2005, and he was originally appointed as an
executive officer of holdings, energy and business development
in April 2004. He has over 30 years of experience in the
metals industry. He was an officer and president of Aços
Villares from 1986 to 1996 and chief managing officer of the
steel area at CSN, from 1997 to 1999. In 1999, Mr. Martins
became President of Latasa, one of the largest aluminum can
producers in Latin America. Upon the purchase of Latasa by
Rexam, a United Kingdom company, in 2003, he became president
and CEO of Rexams South American beverage can division,
Rexam Beverage Can South America. Mr. Martins has a B.A.
degree in Economics from Pontifícia Universidade
Católica de São Paulo.
Murilo Ferreira. Mr. Ferreira was
appointed CVRD Incos President and Chief Executive Officer
in January 2007 and continues to serve on the CVRD Executive
Board. He oversees the Companys nickel business, as well
as marketing and sales of copper and aluminum products. He
previously served as an executive officer of our holdings,
energy and business development areas. He joined us in 1977 and
has vast experience in several areas of CVRD, particularly
aluminum and ferroalloys. In 1998 he was appointed executive
officer of commerce and finance at Vale do Rio Doce
Alumínio S.A. ALUVALE, a holding company of
CVRD that was merged into CVRD in December 2003.
Mr. Ferreira was the CEO of
108
ALBRAS Alumínio Brasileiro S.A. Aside from
being the Director of the Department of Aluminum since December
2003, Mr. Ferreira is also a member of the Board of
Directors of MRN Mineração Rio do Norte
S.A., Valesul Alumínio S.A. and ALUNORTE
Alumina do Norte do Brasil S.A. Mr. Ferreira has a B.A.
degree from Escola de Administração de Empresas,
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV), and an MBA from
EBAP-FGV.
José Auto Lancaster
Oliveira. Mr. Oliveira was appointed as an
executive officer of our non-ferrous minerals division in
September 2004 and currently oversees the Companys coal
business and aluminum operations. He is also a member of the
Board of Directors of Canico Resources Corp. and an officer of
Compañia Minera Andino Brasileira Ltd., Compañia
Minera Latino Americana Ltda., Tethys Mining LLC and Vale do Rio
Doce Kaolin S.A. Valekao. Previously,
Mr. Oliveira served as CEO of Mineração Serra do
Sossego S.A., and exploration manager of the Brazilian
subsidiary of British Petroleum. He graduated from the Federal
University of Minas Gerais, Brazil, with a degree in Geology and
holds a Ph.D in Economic Geology by Mackay School of Mines, from
the University of Nevada, Reno (United States).
Eduardo de Salles
Bartolomeo. Mr. Bartolomeo was appointed as
an executive officer of our logistics division in December 2006.
Previously, Mr. Bartolomeo served as logistics operations
department officer from January 2004 to July 2006. Thereafter,
Mr. Bartolomeo worked as Chief Executive Officer of
PETROFLEX from August to December 2006. He started his career at
COSIPA Cia. Siderúrgica Paulista as
a trainee in 1988 and was promoted to head officer of the slab
conditioning and conversion department, in 1989, where he stayed
until1991. From 1994 to 2003, Mr. Bartolomeo worked for
AMBEV Cia. de Bebidas das Américas, where he
held a variety of positions, including regional plant officer.
Mr. Bartolomeo obtained a metallurgical engineering degree
from the Universidade Federal Fluminense UFF and an
MBA from the Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.
Gabriel Stoliar. Since October 2001,
Mr. Stoliar has served as the chief planning and control
officer of CVRD, and currently oversees business development and
investments in the steel industry. In September 1997, he was
originally appointed as an executive officer of the Corporate
Center. He is also director of Usiminas and PPSA. In 1994, he
was appointed director of BNDESPAR. In 1991, Mr. Stoliar
assumed the position of superintendent of the operational
division responsible for the areas of mining, metallurgy,
chemicals, petrochemicals, pulp and paper of BNDESPAR. He was
appointed by BNDESPAR in 1988 as manager of operations in the
area of capital, electronic and consumer goods. In 1982, he was
promoted to manager of BNDES for the project area of FINSOCIAL.
In 1978, he was hired by BNDES as an analyst in the area of
pulp, paper and petrochemicals. Mr. Stoliar began his
career as a business organization analyst at the Institute of
Economic and Management Development of the Federation of
Industries of Rio de Janeiro. Mr. Stoliar obtained an
engineering degree from Universidade Federal do Rio de
Janeiro UFRJ, a post-graduate degree in production
engineering and an MBA from PDG/EXE-SDE in Rio de Janeiro.
Carla Grasso. Ms. Grasso was appointed as
an executive officer of the human resources and corporate
services area in October 2001. From December 1997 to October
2001, Ms. Grasso served as the personnel, management and IT
officer to CVRDs Corporate Centre. Before joining CVRD,
she acted as secretary of the Brazilian supplementary social
security office, from January 1994 to November 1997; as advisor
to the Ministry of Social Security, from December 1992 to
December 1993; as deputy coordinator of fiscal policy at the
Ministry of Finance, from October to December 1992; as finance
advisor and coordinator of the Macroeconomics and Social areas
of the Brazilian Presidency office, from March 1990 to October
1992; as advisor to the Ministry of Planning, from November 1988
to March 1990; and as advisor to the Presidency of
Sebrae Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio à
Pequena e Média Empresa, from January to November 1988. In
1997, she was appointed as an executive officer of
Fundação Vale do Rio Doce de Habitação e
Desenvolvimento Social. Ms. Grasso has both a B.A. degree
in Economics and an M.A. in Economics from UnB.
Tito Botelho Martins. Mr. Martins was
appointed as CVRDs executive officer for corporate affairs
in April 2006 and currently oversees the Companys energy
investments. Mr. Martins joined CVRD in 1985 and has broad
experience in corporate finance issues. He was CVRDs head
officer of the Corporate Finance department and also chief
financial officer of FCA between August 1999 and September 2003.
Mr. Martins has worked in a variety of positions in
companies affiliated with CVRD, such as FCA, Samarco, Ferroban,
109
Açominas, Gulf Industrial Investment Corporation, Itabrasco
and Hispanobrás. From October 2003 until December 2006,
Mr. Martins was the chief executive officer of CAEMI. Since
October 2003, Mr. Martins has been the chief executive
officer of MBR. Mr. Martins has a B.A. degree in economics
from the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais and has conducted
post-graduate studies at several institutions in Brazil and
abroad.
FISCAL
COUNCIL
Under Brazilian corporation law, corporations may have a fiscal
council, a corporate body whose members are elected by
shareholders and are independent of our management and external
auditors. The primary responsibility of the fiscal council under
the Brazilian corporation law is to monitor managements
activities and review the financial statements, reporting its
findings to the shareholders. We have established a permanent
fiscal council, which may have from three to five members. In
addition, CVRDs bylaws have empowered our fiscal council
to take responsibility for additional matters as described below.
In compliance with the listed company audit committee rules of
the NYSE and the SEC, effective July 31, 2005, we have
designated and empowered our fiscal council to perform the role
of the audit committee in reliance on the exemption set forth in
Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3(c)(3).
This measure was undertaken pursuant to an amendment to our
bylaws approved by the shareholders on July 19, 2005. Our
Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Aníbal
Moreira dos Santos is a financial expert.
Under our bylaws, our Fiscal Council is responsible for
establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment
of any complaints related to accounting, controls and audit
issues, as well as procedures for the confidential, anonymous
submission of concerns regarding such matters; recommending and
assisting our Board of Directors in the appointment,
establishment of compensation and dismissal of the independent
auditors; pre-approving the services to be rendered by our
independent auditors; and overseeing the work performed by the
external auditors, with powers to suspend the payment of
compensation to the independent auditors and to resolve
disagreements between management and the auditors regarding
financial reporting.
The members of our Fiscal Council must meet applicable
eligibility requirements under Brazilian corporation law. A
member of our Fiscal Council cannot (i) hold office as a
member of the Board of Directors, fiscal council or advisory
committee of any company that competes with CVRD or otherwise
has conflicting interests with CVRD, unless compliance with this
requirement is expressly waived by a decision taken by the
shareholders in a shareholders meeting, (ii) be an
employee or member of the management of CVRD or its subsidiaries
and affiliates, or (iii) be a spouse or relative within the
third degree by affinity or consanguinity of an officer or
director of CVRD.
On April 27, 2007, the shareholders re-elected the current
members of the Fiscal Council and their respective alternates.
The members of the Fiscal Council are elected for one-year
terms. Holders of preferred class A shares, including the
golden shares, may elect one member of the Fiscal Council and
the respective alternate. Non-controlling holders of common
shares comprising at least 10% of the common shares outstanding
may also elect one member of the Fiscal Council and the
respective alternate. The terms of the members of the fiscal
council expire at the next annual shareholders meeting
following their election.
The table below lists the current members of the Fiscal Council.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Year of
|
|
|
|
Appointment
|
|
|
Bernard Appy(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
José Bernardo de Medeiros
Neto(2)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Marcelo Amaral Moraes(2)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Aníbal Moreira dos Santos(2)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Appointed by the preferred
shareholders.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Appointed by Valepar.
|
110
The table below lists the alternate members of the Fiscal
Council.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Year of
|
|
|
|
Appointment
|
|
|
Tarcísio José Massote de
Godoy(1)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Marcos Coimbra(2)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Oswaldo Mário Pêgo de
Amorim Azevedo(2)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Vacant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Appointed by the preferred
shareholders.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Appointed by Valepar.
|
We have summarized below the experience, areas of expertise, and
principal outside business interests of the current members of
our Fiscal Council.
Bernard Appy. Mr. Appy was elected as a
member of the Fiscal Council of CVRD in April 2006. Since April
2006 he holds the office of Deputy Minister of the Ministry of
Finance of Brazil, which he previously held from January 2003 to
May 2005. From May 2005 to March 2006, he held the position of
Secretary for Economic Policies at the Ministry of Finance of
Brazil. Since 1997, Mr. Appy is a member of faculty of the
Economics Department of the School of Business, Economics and
Accounting of Pontifícia Universidade Católica de
São Paulo PUC-SP. From 1995 to 2002, he was a
partner of LCA Consultores Ltda., a consulting firm in
economics. Mr. Appy received a B.A. in Economics from the
Universidade de São Paulo USP, and concluded
M.A. classes in Economics at Universidade Estadual de
Campinas UNICAMP.
José Bernardo de Medeiros Neto. Since
2005, Mr. Medeiros Neto has served as a member of Fiscal
Council of CVRD. He is currently the president of AFABB-RS and
ANABB, the association of former employees of Banco do Brasil
S.A. He was the president of the fiscal council of Previ from
2002 to 2006 and of Gerdau from 2003 to 2005 and is currently
editing a book about fiscal councils in companies and pension
funds. From 1980 to 1982, he was the Chief Executive Officer of
Banrisul Financeira S.A. From 1975 to 1980, he was
Vice-President of Banco de Desenvolvimento do Estado do Rio
Grande do Sul BADESUL. He is a former employee of
Banco do Brasil S.A., where he worked in various positions from
1957 to 1974. Mr. Medeiros Neto has a degree in Law from
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Marcelo Amaral Moraes. Since 2004,
Mr. Moraes has served as a member of the Fiscal Council of
CVRD. He joined Darby Stratus in August 2006 as the officer
responsible for the development of Darby Brazil Mezzazine Fund.
Prior to joining Darby, Mr. Moraes worked at Bradespar S.A.
as an Investment Manager for six years. From 1995 to 2000, he
worked in the mergers and acquisitions and capital markets
departments of Banco Bozano, Simonsen. In 2004, he was an
alternate member of the board of directors of Net Serviços
S.A., and in 2003, he was an alternate member of the Board of
Directors of CVRD. Mr. Moraes has a B.A. in Economics from
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro UFRJ, and a
MBA from COPPEAD, also at UFRJ.
Aníbal Moreira dos Santos. Since 2005,
Mr. Santos has served as a member of the Fiscal Council of
CVRD. He was an executive officer of Caemi Canada Inc., Caemi
Canada Investments Inc., CMM Overseas, Ltd., Caemi International
Holdings BV and Caemi International Investments NV, subsidiaries
of CAEMI, from 1998 to 2003, when he retired. From 1983 to 2003,
he was chief accounting officer of CAEMI. From 1999 to 2003, he
was a member of the fiscal council of CADAM S.A., and he was an
alternate member of the board of directors of MBR and
Empreendimentos Brasileiros de Mineração S.A. from
1998 to 2003. Mr. Santos is an accountant with a degree
from Escola Técnica de Comércio da Fundação
Getúlio Vargas.
ADVISORY
COMMITTEES
Advisory
Committees
Our bylaws establish five technical and advisory committees to
the Board of Directors, as follows: Executive Development,
Strategy, Finance, Accounting, and Governance and
Sustainability. Not all committee members are members of the
Board of Directors. The membership of our advisory committees
will be determined at the meeting of the Board of Directors to
be held in May 2007.
111
|
|
|
|
|
The Executive Development Committee is responsible for
reporting on general human resources policies; recommending
compensation levels for our executive officers; establishing
guidelines for evaluating the performance of our executive
officers; and reporting on policies relating to corporate
responsibility, such as the environment, health, safety and
social responsibility of the company submitted by the executive
officers.
|
|
|
|
The Strategy Committee is responsible for reviewing and
making recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the
strategic guidelines and strategic plan submitted annually to
the board by our executive officers; the companys annual
and multi-annual investment budgets; investment
and/or
divestiture opportunities submitted by executive officers; and
mergers and acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
The Finance Committee is responsible for reviewing and
making recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning: the
financial policies and the internal financial control systems of
the company; compatibility between the level of distributions to
shareholders and the parameters established in the annual
budget; and consistency with the general policy on dividends and
the capital structure of the company.
|
|
|
|
The Accounting Committee is responsible for recommending
the appointment of the employee responsible for internal
auditing of the company to the Board of Directors; reporting on
the policies and the companys annual auditing plan
submitted by the employee responsible for internal auditing, and
on its execution; tracking the results of the companys
internal auditing, and identifying, prioritizing, and submitting
actions to be accompanied by the executive officers; and
analyzing the annual report, as well as the financial statements
of the company and making recommendations to the Board of
Directors.
|
|
|
|
The Governance and Sustainability Committee is
responsible for evaluating our corporate governance practices
and the workings of the Board of Directors, and recommending
improvements to the code of ethics and our system of management
in order to avoid conflicts of interests between the company and
its shareholders or administrators; and issuing reports on
potential conflicts of interest between the company and its
shareholders or administrators.
|
COMPENSATION
OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, FISCAL COUNCIL MEMBERS
AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES
General
Under our bylaws, our shareholders are responsible for
establishing the aggregate compensation we pay to the members of
our Board of Directors and our executive officers. Our
shareholders determine this annual aggregate compensation at the
general shareholders meeting each year. In order to
establish aggregate director and officer compensation, our
shareholders usually take into account various factors, which
range from attributes, experience and skills of our directors
and executive officers to the recent performance of our
operations. Once aggregate compensation is established, the
members of our Board of Directors are then responsible for
distributing such aggregate compensation in compliance with our
bylaws among the directors and executive officers, in the latter
case, at the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer. The
Executive Development Committee of our Board of Directors makes
recommendations to the board concerning the annual aggregate
compensation of the executive officers. In addition to fixed
compensation, our executive officers are also eligible for
bonuses and incentive payments.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, we paid approximately
US$14.9 million in aggregate to the executive officers, of
which approximately US$6.0 million was fixed remuneration
and approximately US$8.9 million was variable remuneration
and benefits in kind granted, and approximately US$605,000 in
aggregate to the members of our Board of Directors for services
in all capacities, all of which was fixed remuneration. The
amounts accrued to provide pension, retirement or similar
benefits for our executive officers was US$0.9 million.
There is no similar benefits payment for the members of our
Board of Directors.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, no board member or
executive officer had any financial or other interest in
transactions involving us, other than in his or her capacity as
a board member or executive officer.
112
As of April 30, 2007, the total number of common shares
owned by our directors and executive officers was 58,480, and
the total number of preferred class A shares owned by our
directors and executive officers was 285,341. None of our
directors or executive officers beneficially owns one percent or
more of any class of our shares.
Fiscal
Council
During 2006, the monthly amount we paid to each of the members
of the Fiscal Council was approximately US$5,000 excluding
benefits. We paid an aggregate of approximately US$197,000 to
members of the Fiscal Council in 2006. In addition, the members
of the Fiscal Council are reimbursed for travel expenses related
to the performance of their functions.
Advisory
Committees
We paid an aggregate of approximately US$169,000 to members of
CVRDs advisory committees in 2006. In addition, the
members of CVRDs advisory committees are reimbursed for
travel expenses related to the performance of their functions.
EMPLOYEES
General
The table below sets forth the number of our employees by
category as of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Ferrous Minerals
|
|
|
13,107
|
|
|
|
17,858
|
|
|
|
21,279
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
8,820
|
|
|
|
11,269
|
|
|
|
10,479
|
|
Non-Ferrous Minerals
|
|
|
1,332
|
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
14,644
|
|
Aluminum, Steel and Business
Development
|
|
|
2,149
|
|
|
|
4,400
|
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
5,563
|
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
|
|
2,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
30,971
|
|
|
|
38,560
|
|
|
|
52,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mainly due to the acquisition of Inco Limited in October 2006,
the total number of our employees increased by 14,086, from
38,650 in 2005 to 52,646 in 2006. Of these additional 14,086,
12,047 were employees of Inco Limited who are now CVRD Inco
employees and considered part of CVRDs non-ferrous
minerals group.
Labor
relations
Our employees are members of 40 different unions. We generally
have good relations with our employees and their unions,
although we have experienced strikes and work stoppages at our
Voiseys Bay operations as recently as September 2006 and
at our Ontario operations as recently as April 2007. We have
collective agreements with unionized employees at our Canadian,
U.K., New Caledonian and Indonesian operations.
Wages and
benefits
Wages and benefits for CVRD and its subsidiaries are generally
established on a
company-by-company
basis. CVRD establishes its wage and benefits programs for CVRD
and its subsidiaries other than CVRD Inco in periodic
negotiations with its unions. In July 2006, CVRD reached an
agreement with unions for a 3.0% salary increase and maintenance
of current benefits, which is valid until November 2007. The
provisions of CVRDs collective bargaining agreements with
its unions also apply to CVRDs non-union employees. CVRD
Inco establishes wages and benefits for unionized employees
through collective agreements. For non-unionized employees, CVRD
Inco establishes its annual wage program in January of each year
for all locations other
113
than the U.K., which establishes its annual wage program in
August. CVRD and its subsidiaries provide their employees and
their dependents with other benefits, including supplementary
medical assistance.
Pension
plans
Employees of CVRD and most of its Brazilian subsidiaries are
eligible to participate in pension plans managed by
Fundação Vale do Rio Doce de Seguridade Social-VALIA
(Valia). Sponsored by CVRD and such subsidiaries, Valia is a
closed, nonprofit, complementary social security foundation with
financial and administrative autonomy. Substantially all of the
participants in plans held by Valia are participants in a
new plan Valia implemented in May 2000. The new plan
is primarily a defined contribution plan with a defined benefit
feature relating to service prior to May 2000. Valia also holds
the old plan which is a defined benefit plan, with
benefits based on years of service, salary and social security
benefits. This plan covers retired participants and their
beneficiaries, as well as a relatively small number of employees
that declined to transfer from the old plan to the new plan when
it was established in May 2000. Employees of Albras, Alunorte,
MBR and CADAM participate in different pension plans maintained
by Bradesco Vida e Previdência S.A. For new employees of
CADAM and MBR, these companies sponsor the Valia plan.
CVRD Inco sponsors defined benefit pension plans principally in
Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom and
Indonesia. Each of the jurisdictions in which these plans are
located has legislation and regulations which, among other
statutory requirements, cover the minimum contributions to be
made to these plans to meet their potential liabilities as
calculated in accordance with such legislation and regulations.
CVRD Incos subsidiary, Voiseys Bay Nickel Company
Limited, has a defined contribution pension plan. In addition,
CVRD Inco provides supplemental retirement benefits arrangements
for eligible employees.
Equity
ownership
CVRDs bylaws authorize us to establish stock option plans,
but to date we have not done so.
Performance-based
compensation
All CVRD parent-company employees receive incentive compensation
each year in an amount based on the performance of CVRD, the
performance of the employees department and the
performance of the individual employee. Similar incentive
compensation arrangements are in place in other companies within
the CVRD group.
CVRDs executives also receive annual cash bonuses based on
individual and corporate performance, as well as deferred
bonuses with vesting periods of three years based on CVRDs
performance as measured by total shareholder return relative to
a group of peer companies over the vesting period.
114
|
|
Item 7.
|
Major
Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
|
MAJOR
SHAREHOLDERS
Overview
Major CVRD Shareholders. The table below sets
forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our
common and preferred class A shares as of April 30,
2007, by each person we know to be the beneficial owner of more
than 5% of any class of our outstanding capital stock, and by
all directors and executive officers as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Owned
|
|
|
% of Class
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valepar(1)
|
|
|
784,294,266
|
|
|
|
53.3
|
%
|
BNDESPAR(2)
|
|
|
100,578,860
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
Directors and executive officers as
a group
|
|
|
58,480
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Preferred Class A Shares
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and executive officers as
a group
|
|
|
285,341
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Golden Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian government
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
See the table below for more
information on Valepars shareholders. Because each of the
shareholders of Valepar has the right to veto the transfer by
Valepar of any shares it holds in CVRD, each of the Valepar
shareholders may be deemed a beneficial owner of the entire
Valepar stake under the rules of the SEC. In general, a person
who has or shares voting power or investment power with respect
to securities is treated as a beneficial owner of those
securities. This does not imply that the person has the economic
or other benefits of ownership.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Excludes common shares owned
directly by Valepar, in which BNDESPAR has an ownership interest.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The Brazilian government (National
Treasury) owns, through Fundo Garantidor das Parcerias
Público-Privadas, 30,452,046 preferred class A shares,
representing 3.2% of the outstanding preferred class A
shares, and BNDESPAR owns 728,668 preferred class A shares,
representing 0.1%% of the outstanding preferred class A
shares.
|
|
(*)
|
|
Represents less than 1% of the
outstanding shares of the class.
|
Valepar shareholders. The tables below set
forth information as of April 30, 2007 regarding share
ownership of the common shares of Valepar and Litel
Participações S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Valepar
|
|
|
Percent of Valepar
|
|
|
|
Common Shares Owned
|
|
|
Common Shares Owned
|
|
|
Valepar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litel Participações S.A(1)
|
|
|
315,982,596
|
|
|
|
49.00
|
%
|
Eletron S.A.
|
|
|
188,718
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
Bradespar S.A.(2)
|
|
|
136,796,982
|
|
|
|
21.21
|
|
Mitsui & Co. Ltd.
|
|
|
117,644,142
|
|
|
|
18.24
|
|
BNDESPAR
|
|
|
74,250,000
|
|
|
|
11.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
644,862,438
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Litel owns 99,568,944 preferred
Class B shares of Valepar, which represents 71.41% of the
preferred shares. Litela, an affiliate of Litel, owns 39,862,884
preferred Class B shares of Valepar, which represents
28.59% of the preferred shares.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Bradespar is controlled by a
control group consisting of Cidade de Deus Cia.
Comercial Participações, Fundação Bradesco,
NCF Participações S.A. and Nova Cidade de Deus
Participações S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litel Participações
S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BB Carteira Ativa 0(1)
|
|
|
202,753,508
|
|
|
|
73.59
|
%
|
BB Carteira Ativa II(1)
|
|
|
53,388,026
|
|
|
|
19.38
|
%
|
BB Renda Fixa IV(1)
|
|
|
19,371,990
|
|
|
|
7.03
|
%
|
Others
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers as
a group
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
275,514,349
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Each of BB Carteira Ativa 0, BB
Carteira Ativa II and BB Renda Fixa IV is a Brazilian
investment fund. BB Carteira Ativa 0 is 100% owned by Previ. BB
Carteira Ativa II is 59.36% owned by Funcef, 35.8% owned by
Petros and 4.84% owned by Fundação Cesp. BB Renda
Fixa IV is 100% owned by Previ. Each of Previ, Petros,
Funcef and Fundação Cesp is a Brazilian pension fund.
|
115
Brazilian Government holdings. In 1997, we
were privatized by the Brazilian government, which sold its
controlling share to Valepar. The National Treasury and BNDES,
the state-owned development bank, subsequently sold additional
shares in 2002. Currently, BNDESPAR, a wholly-owned subsidiary
of BNDES, owns common shares representing approximately 6.8% of
our outstanding common shares and 0.1% of our outstanding
preferred class A shares. The Brazilian government now owns
approximately 3.2% of our outstanding preferred class A
shares (not counting shares held by BNDESPAR), and six golden
shares of CVRD, which give it veto powers over certain actions
that we could propose to take. For a detailed description of the
veto powers granted to the Brazilian government by virtue of its
ownership of the golden shares, see Item 10. Additional
information Common and preferred shares
General.
Principal
shareholder
Our principal shareholder is Valepar. The shareholders of
Valepar have entered into a shareholders agreement, ending
in 2017. This agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
grants rights of first refusal on any transfer of Valepar shares
and preemptive rights on any new issue of Valepar shares;
|
|
|
|
prohibits the direct acquisition of CVRD shares by
Valepars shareholders unless authorized by the other
shareholders;
|
|
|
|
prohibits encumbrances on Valepar shares (other than in
connection with financing our acquisition);
|
|
|
|
requires each party generally to retain control of its special
purpose company holding its interest in shares of Valepar,
unless the rights of first refusal mentioned above are observed;
|
|
|
|
allocates Valepars and our board seats;
|
|
|
|
commits the Valepar shareholders to support a dividend policy by
CVRD of 50% distribution of CVRDs net profit for each
fiscal year, unless the Valepar shareholders commit to support a
different dividend policy for a given year;
|
|
|
|
provides for the maintenance by CVRD of a capital structure that
does not exceed specified debt to equity thresholds;
|
|
|
|
requires the Valepar shareholders to vote their indirectly held
CVRD shares and to cause their representatives on CVRDs
Board of Directors to vote only in accordance with decisions
made at Valepar pre-meetings held prior to meetings of
CVRDs Board of Directors or shareholders; and
|
|
|
|
establishes supermajority voting requirements for certain
significant actions relating to Valepar or to us.
|
Pursuant to the Valepar shareholders agreement, holders of
at least 75% of the Valepar common shares must agree to enable
Valepar to support any of the following matters:
|
|
|
|
|
any amendment of CVRDs bylaws;
|
|
|
|
any increase of CVRDs capital stock by share subscription,
creation of a new class of shares, change in the characteristics
of the existing shares or any capital reduction of CVRD;
|
|
|
|
any issuance of any debentures of CVRD, whether convertible into
shares of CVRD, participation certificates upon compensation,
call options or any other security of CVRD;
|
|
|
|
any determination of issuance price for any new shares of
capital stock or other security of CVRD;
|
|
|
|
any amalgamation, spin-off or merger to which CVRD is a party,
as well as any change to CVRDs corporate form;
|
|
|
|
any dissolution, receivership, bankruptcy or any other voluntary
act for financial reorganization or any suspension thereof;
|
|
|
|
the election and replacement of CVRDs Board of Directors,
including the chairman of the board, and any officer of CVRD;
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
the disposal or acquisition of equity participation in any other
company by CVRD, as well as the acquisition of any shares of
capital stock of CVRD or Valepar;
|
|
|
|
the participation by CVRD in a group of companies or in a
consortium of any kind;
|
|
|
|
the execution of distribution, investment, sales exportation,
technology transfer, trademark license, patent exploration,
license to use and lease agreements, to which CVRD will be a
party;
|
|
|
|
the approval and amendment of CVRDs business plan;
|
|
|
|
the determination of the compensation of the directors of CVRD,
as well as the duties of the board;
|
|
|
|
any profit sharing among the administrators of CVRD;
|
|
|
|
the determination of the compensation of CVRDs officers;
|
|
|
|
any change in the corporate purpose of CVRD;
|
|
|
|
the distribution or non-distribution of any dividends on any
shares of capital stock of CVRD other than as provided in
CVRDs bylaws and any payment of interest on
shareholders equity;
|
|
|
|
the appointment and replacement of CVRDs independent
auditor;
|
|
|
|
the creation of any in rem guarantee, granting of
guarantees including rendering of sureties by CVRD with respect
to obligations of any third party, including any affiliates or
subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
the passing of any resolution on any matter which, pursuant to
applicable law, entitles a shareholder to withdrawal rights;
|
|
|
|
the appointment and replacement by the Board of Directors of any
representative of CVRD in subsidiaries, companies related to
CVRD or other companies in which CVRD is entitled to appoint
directors and officers; and
|
|
|
|
any change in the debt to equity threshold, as defined in the
shareholders agreement.
|
In addition, the shareholders agreement provides that any
issuance of participation certificates by CVRD or any
disposition of CVRDs shares held by Valepar requires the
unanimous consent of all of Valepars shareholders.
American
Depositary Shares
As of April 30, 2007, American Depositary Shares
represented 26.9% of our outstanding common shares and 49.4% of
our outstanding preferred class A shares.
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
At December 31, 2006, we had extended guarantees for
borrowings obtained by our affiliate Samarco in the amount of
US$3 million. See Note 18 to our consolidated
financial statements.
We have commercial relationships in the ordinary course of our
business, on an arms-length basis, with a number of
companies that are affiliated with shareholders of Valepar, our
principal shareholder. The most significant of these are our
sales of iron ore and pellets to Usiminas, in which both Previ
and we hold interests. We also have arms-length commercial
relationships in the ordinary course of our business with
Mitsui, a shareholder of Valepar.
For information regarding investments in affiliated companies
and joint ventures and for information regarding transactions
with major related parties, see Notes 18 and 20 to our
consolidated financial statements.
117
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Information
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
We and our subsidiaries are defendants in numerous legal actions
in the normal course of business, including civil,
administrative, tax, social security and labor proceedings. We
have set aside or deposited in court amounts to cover estimated
contingency losses due to adverse legal judgments. We believe
that the provisions made against contingent losses are
sufficient to cover probable losses in connection with such
actions.
We are currently involved in five proceedings before the
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica, or CADE, which
is the primary Brazilian antitrust regulator. Three of these
proceedings involve post-transaction review of acquisition or
joint venture transactions, which is required for nearly all of
our acquisitions and joint ventures. The other two proceedings
are administrative proceedings alleging that we have engaged in
illegal anticompetitive conduct in connection with our logistics
business. We intend to defend these claims vigorously, but we
cannot predict their outcome. If CADE were to find that we have
engaged in anticompetitive conduct, it could order us to cease
the conduct
and/or to
pay fines.
On August 10, 2005, CADE rendered its decision in
connection with its post-transaction review of our acquisitions
of Mineração Socoimex S.A., S.A. Mineração
Trindade Samitri, Ferteco Mineração S.A.,
Belém Administrações e
Participações Ltda., and CAEMI Mineração e
Metalurgia S.A., and the agreement to unwind the
cross-shareholdings between Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional
and us. CADE approved these transactions, subject to the
following conditions: we must either (i) fully waive our
preemptive rights relating to the Casa de Pedra iron ore mine
and restructure our equity stake in MRS Logística S.A.
(MRS), or (ii) sell all our assets that were previously
owned by Ferteco Mineração S.A., a company we acquired
in 2001 and consolidated in August 2003. We filed a writ of
mandamus with the federal courts to challenge the procedural
defects in that part of CADEs decision related to the Casa
de Pedra mine and requested an injunction to suspend the effects
of the entire decision pending a decision on the writ of
mandamus. The injunction was granted on November 10, 2005
and confirmed, on a preliminary basis, by the Federal Circuit
Court on December 19, 2005. However, on February 2,
2006, the federal court issued an unfavorable decision on the
writ of mandamus, which was upheld on appeal by decision of the
Federal Circuit Court on March 26, 2007. We are now
appealing this decision to the Supreme Court (Superior
Tribunal de Justiça) and requesting a new injunction
suspending the effects of the CADE decision pending the outcome
of our appeal. In addition to the writ of mandamus, and as a
precautionary measure should we be unsuccessful in our case, we
filed a lawsuit with the Federal Court in the Federal District
on May 19, 2006, requesting a declaration of our right to
be indemnified for losses and damages incurred should we have to
comply with the portion of the CADE decision relating to the
Casa de Pedra mine, and a determination of the indemnification
amount prior to our choosing between the sale of Ferteco and the
Casa de Pedra/MRS option.
Numerous lawsuits challenging the legality of the minimum
auction price fixed in our 1997 privatization are still pending,
including a number of class action lawsuits. The lower courts
issued favorable decisions in these lawsuits that were appealed
by their respective plaintiffs. In the end of 2005, in the cases
in which plaintiffs are challenging the price paid for the
controlling block of CVRD, the lower court decisions were
overruled by higher courts, which determined that the
proceedings must be submitted back to the lower courts to
continue with the discovery phase under Brazilian rules of civil
procedure, regarding the basis for establishing the minimum
price in the privatization program. Such higher court decisions
are still subject to appeal by all defendants. In the remaining
cases, in which only irregular features of the invitation to bid
were being argued, the higher courts upheld the favorable
decisions. We do not believe that, individually or in the
aggregate, these actions will adversely affect the outcome of
the privatization process or otherwise have a material adverse
effect on us.
We are a defendant in a public civil action seeking to annul the
concession agreement through which we and certain other
defendants operate the Praia Mole port terminal in the Brazilian
state of Espírito Santo. The case, which was first filed in
1998, is still in its pre-trial stages and we believe the claim
to be without merit.
118
We are a defendant in two separate actions brought by the
municipality of Itabira, in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais.
In one of the actions, filed in August 1996, the municipality of
Itabira alleges that our Itabira iron ore mining operations have
caused environmental and social damages and claims damages with
respect to the degradation of the site of one of our mines, as
well as the immediate restoration of the affected ecological
complex and the performance of compensatory environmental
programs in the region. The damages sought, as adjusted from the
date of the claim, amount to US$767 million. We have
requested the annulment of this action, as it represents no
actual controversy. In fact, on June 5, 2000, the local
environmental authorities granted an operating license to our
Itabira iron ore mining operations. This license sets forth
conditions regarding the environmental restoration of the
degraded site and the performance of compensatory environmental
programs. Since then, we renewed the operating license and we
intend to continue to comply with the conditions set out in the
renewed operating license. In the other action, the municipality
of Itabira is claiming the right to be reimbursed for expenses
it has incurred in connection with public services rendered as a
consequence of our mining activities. The damages sought, as
adjusted from the date of the claim, amount to
US$888 million. We believe that this action is without
merit. We are vigorously defending both pending lawsuits.
We are currently a defendant in a series of administrative
proceedings brought by DNPM, the most significant of which were
brought against us in March 2006, alleging that we have failed
to pay the full amount of CFEM due in respect of revenues
generated by our iron ore and manganese activities. We believe
that the DNPMs allegations are without merit and intend to
vigorously contest them. The aggregate amount claimed in the
administrative proceedings is approximately
US$1,300 million. If we are not successful in the
administrative proceedings, we may be required to post judicial
deposits of the amounts claimed in order to appeal any adverse
decision. We are also a defendant in a similar judicial
proceeding brought by the Municipality of Mariana, alleging that
we have failed to pay the full amount of CFEM due with respect
to revenues generated by our pelletization activities. We
believe that the Municipality of Marianas allegations in
the case are without merit and intend to vigorously contest
them. We are also involved in litigation with the DNPM regarding
the applicable percentage of revenues to be applied to calculate
the CFEM due on potash. See Item 4. Information on the
company Regulatory matters Mining.
We are engaged in litigation with respect to certain aspects of
recent tax regulation that requires earnings from foreign
subsidiaries to be included in the determination of income taxes
payable in Brazil. We obtained an injunction in February 2003,
suspending our obligation to pay amounts in dispute. This
injunction continues to be in effect by virtue of a pending
appeal that we filed with the federal appellate courts on
September 2005 against an unfavorable decision issued by lower
federal courts on July 2005. We have not recorded provisions for
these taxes in our financial statements.
In accordance with ANEEL Resolution No. 591, dated as of
November 2003, ANEEL authorized LIGHT Serviços
de Eletricidade S.A. (Light) to charge certain persons in the
Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro, including Valesul, several
additional fees included in the tariff for the use of the
distribution system. In January 2004, Valesul commenced
litigation contesting the legality of this charge. In June 2004,
Valesul obtained a favorable decision relieving it from the
payment of such fees. Light appealed from this decision and in
September 2004, Light obtained a decision from the higher courts
that overruled the decision of the lower courts, thereby forcing
Valesul to resume making payments pending the resolution of the
matter. Valesul appealed to the Supreme Court (Superior
Tribunal de Justiça), and is awaiting its decision.
DIVIDENDS
AND INTEREST ON SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Under our dividend policy, our management proposes to our Board
of Directors, no later than January 31 of each year, a minimum
value per share, expressed in U.S. dollars that will be
distributed in that year to our shareholders. Dividends
and/or
interest on shareholders equity are determined in
U.S. dollars, considering our expected free cash flow
generation in the year of distribution. The proposal establishes
two semiannual installments to be paid in the months of April
and October of each year. It is submitted to the Board of
Directors in the meetings scheduled for the months of April and
October. Once approved, dividends
and/or
interest on shareholders equity are paid in reais,
and converted at prevailing exchange rates on the last
119
business day before the board meetings in April and October of
each year. Management can also propose to the Board of
Directors, depending on the evolution of our cash flow
performance, a further payment to shareholders of an additional
amount per share over and above the minimum dividend initially
established. For 2007, our management has proposed to the Board
of Directors a dividend of US$1,650 million. Our normal
practice is to pay the same dividend or interest on
shareholders equity on both common and preferred
class A shares. The first installment of this dividend
representing US$825 million was approved on April 16,
2007 and paid on April 30, 2007.
Under Brazilian law and our bylaws, we are required to
distribute to our shareholders, in the form of dividends or
interest on shareholders equity, an annual amount equal to
not less than 25% of the distributable amount, referred to as
the mandatory dividend, unless the Board of Directors advises
our shareholders at our shareholders meeting that payment
of the mandatory dividend for the preceding year is inadvisable
in light of our financial condition. For a discussion of
dividend distribution provisions under Brazilian corporation law
and our bylaws, see Item 10. Additional information.
We may make distributions either in the form of dividends or in
the form of interest on shareholders equity. Dividends
with respect to the American Depositary Shares, and to
non-resident holders of common shares or preferred class A
shares, will not be subject to Brazilian withholding tax, except
for dividends declared based on profits generated prior to
December 31, 1995. These dividends will be subject to
Brazilian withholding tax at varying rates. Distributions of
interest on shareholders equity to shareholders, including
holders of American depositary receipts, are currently subject
to Brazilian withholding tax. See Item 10. Additional
information Taxation Brazilian tax
considerations.
By law, we are required to hold an annual shareholders
meeting by April 30 of each year at which an annual
dividend may be declared. Additionally, our Board of Directors
may declare interim dividends. Under Brazilian corporation law,
dividends are generally required to be paid to the holder of
record on a dividend declaration date within 60 days
following the date the dividend was declared, unless a
shareholders resolution sets forth another date of
payment, which, in either case, must occur prior to the end of
the fiscal year in which the dividend was declared. A
shareholder has a three-year period from the dividend payment
date to claim dividends (or payments of interest on
shareholders equity) in respect of its shares, after which
we will have no liability for such payments. From 1997 to 2003,
all distributions took the form of interest on
shareholders equity. In 2004, 2005 and 2006, part of the
distribution was made in the form of interest on
shareholders equity and part as dividends. See
Item 10. Additional information Common
shares and preferred shares Payments on
shareholders equity.
We make cash distributions on the common shares and preferred
class A shares underlying the American Depositary Shares in
Brazilian currency to the custodian on behalf of the depositary.
The custodian then converts such proceeds into U.S. dollars
and transfers such U.S. dollars to be delivered to the
depositary for distribution to holders of American depositary
receipts. For more information on Brazilian tax policies
regarding dividend distributions, see Item 10.
Additional information Taxation
Brazilian tax considerations.
120
The table below sets forth the cash distributions we paid to
holders of common shares and preferred class A shares for
the periods indicated. A
three-for-one
stock split occurred in August 2004, and amounts for prior
periods have not been restated to give effect to the split. In
May 2006, we carried out a
two-for-one
stock split, and amounts for prior periods have not been
restated to give effect to this split. We have calculated
U.S. dollar conversions using the commercial selling rate
in effect on the date of payment. Amounts are stated gross of
any applicable withholding tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reais per
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share at
|
|
|
Share at
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
April 30
|
|
|
2.31
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 10
|
|
|
2.68
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
April 30
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31
|
|
|
3.42
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
April 30
|
|
|
2.06
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 29(1)(2)
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
April 29
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31(3)
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
April 28(4)(5)
|
|
|
1.15
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31(6)
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
April 30(7)
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
On October 29, 2004, we paid
1.03 reais per share in interest on shareholders
equity and 0.24 reais per share in dividends.
|
|
(2)
|
|
A
3-for-1
stock split occurred in August 2004.
|
|
(3)
|
|
On October 31, 2005, we paid
0.68 reais per share in interest on shareholders
equity and 0.89 reais per share in dividends.
|
|
(4)
|
|
A
2-for-1
stock split occurred in May 2006.
|
|
(5)
|
|
On April 28, 2006, we paid
0.67 reais per share in interest on shareholders
equity and 0.48 reais per share in dividends.
|
|
(6)
|
|
On October 31, 2006, we paid
0.56 reais per share in interest on shareholders
equity and 0.02 reais per share in dividends.
|
|
(7)
|
|
On April 30, 2006, we paid
0.26 reais per share in interest on shareholders
equity and 0.43 reais per share in dividends.
|
121
|
|
Item 9.
|
The
Offer and Listing
|
SHARE
PRICE HISTORY
The table below sets forth trading information for our preferred
and common American Depositary Shares, as reported by the New
York Stock Exchange and our preferred class A shares and
our common shares, as reported by the BOVESPA, for the periods
indicated. Share prices in the table have been adjusted to
reflect stock splits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Class A
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars per Common
|
|
|
|
Reais per Common
|
|
|
Reais per Preferred
|
|
|
American Depositary
|
|
|
American Depositary
|
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Class A Share
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
18.17
|
|
|
|
8.33
|
|
|
|
17.03
|
|
|
|
8.48
|
|
|
|
4.92
|
|
|
|
3.42
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
|
2003
|
|
|
28.47
|
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
24.67
|
|
|
|
12.91
|
|
|
|
8.65
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
|
|
9.93
|
|
|
|
4.29
|
|
2004
|
|
|
38.75
|
|
|
|
21.67
|
|
|
|
32.10
|
|
|
|
18.83
|
|
|
|
12.19
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
|
|
14.51
|
|
|
|
7.04
|
|
2005
|
|
|
49.95
|
|
|
|
32.00
|
|
|
|
43.50
|
|
|
|
27.50
|
|
|
|
19.78
|
|
|
|
10.97
|
|
|
|
22.54
|
|
|
|
12.80
|
|
2006
|
|
|
65.00
|
|
|
|
43.72
|
|
|
|
55.00
|
|
|
|
37.10
|
|
|
|
26.25
|
|
|
|
16.10
|
|
|
|
30.34
|
|
|
|
19.76
|
|
1Q05
|
|
|
47.88
|
|
|
|
35.50
|
|
|
|
39.51
|
|
|
|
29.75
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
11.03
|
|
|
|
18.28
|
|
|
|
13.03
|
|
2Q05
|
|
|
42.25
|
|
|
|
32.00
|
|
|
|
36.00
|
|
|
|
27.50
|
|
|
|
13.45
|
|
|
|
10.97
|
|
|
|
16.00
|
|
|
|
12.80
|
|
3Q05
|
|
|
49.95
|
|
|
|
35.02
|
|
|
|
43.43
|
|
|
|
29.88
|
|
|
|
19.78
|
|
|
|
12.66
|
|
|
|
22.39
|
|
|
|
14.76
|
|
4Q05
|
|
|
49.70
|
|
|
|
41.88
|
|
|
|
43.50
|
|
|
|
37.05
|
|
|
|
19.60
|
|
|
|
16.44
|
|
|
|
22.54
|
|
|
|
18.43
|
|
1Q06
|
|
|
56.40
|
|
|
|
45.51
|
|
|
|
48.90
|
|
|
|
39.95
|
|
|
|
22.19
|
|
|
|
18.50
|
|
|
|
25.64
|
|
|
|
21.14
|
|
2Q06
|
|
|
59.55
|
|
|
|
45.50
|
|
|
|
49.08
|
|
|
|
37.10
|
|
|
|
24.20
|
|
|
|
16.10
|
|
|
|
29.09
|
|
|
|
20.07
|
|
3Q06
|
|
|
53.40
|
|
|
|
43.72
|
|
|
|
45.50
|
|
|
|
37.33
|
|
|
|
20.95
|
|
|
|
16.86
|
|
|
|
24.43
|
|
|
|
19.76
|
|
4Q06
|
|
|
65.00
|
|
|
|
45.50
|
|
|
|
55.00
|
|
|
|
39.41
|
|
|
|
26.25
|
|
|
|
18.06
|
|
|
|
30.34
|
|
|
|
20.90
|
|
1Q07
|
|
|
77.15
|
|
|
|
58.80
|
|
|
|
65.90
|
|
|
|
50.84
|
|
|
|
31.82
|
|
|
|
23.65
|
|
|
|
37.60
|
|
|
|
27.51
|
|
December 2006
|
|
|
65.00
|
|
|
|
59.50
|
|
|
|
55.00
|
|
|
|
50.10
|
|
|
|
26.25
|
|
|
|
23.47
|
|
|
|
30.34
|
|
|
|
27.58
|
|
January 2007
|
|
|
71.65
|
|
|
|
58.80
|
|
|
|
60.53
|
|
|
|
50.84
|
|
|
|
28.73
|
|
|
|
23.65
|
|
|
|
33.93
|
|
|
|
27.51
|
|
February 2007
|
|
|
77.15
|
|
|
|
69.60
|
|
|
|
65.90
|
|
|
|
59.60
|
|
|
|
31.82
|
|
|
|
27.50
|
|
|
|
37.10
|
|
|
|
32.98
|
|
March 2007
|
|
|
76.85
|
|
|
|
67.50
|
|
|
|
64.61
|
|
|
|
56.85
|
|
|
|
31.55
|
|
|
|
26.76
|
|
|
|
37.60
|
|
|
|
31.85
|
|
April 2007
|
|
|
86.00
|
|
|
|
76.20
|
|
|
|
72.45
|
|
|
|
64.16
|
|
|
|
35.72
|
|
|
|
31.55
|
|
|
|
42.43
|
|
|
|
37.37
|
|
May 2007(1)
|
|
|
89.20
|
|
|
|
84.69
|
|
|
|
74.54
|
|
|
|
71.00
|
|
|
|
36.85
|
|
|
|
33.83
|
|
|
|
43.88
|
|
|
|
40.27
|
|
STOCK
TRADING MARKETS
Our publicly traded share capital consists of common shares and
preferred class A shares, each without par value. Our
common shares and our preferred class A shares are publicly
traded in Brazil on BOVESPA, under the ticker symbols VALE3 and
VALE5, respectively. Our common shares and preferred
class A shares also trade on the LATIBEX, under the ticker
symbols XVALO and XVALP, respectively. The LATIBEX is an
electronic market created in 1999 by the Madrid stock exchange
in order to enable trading of Latin American equity securities
in euro denomination.
In December 2003, we agreed to comply with heightened corporate
governance and disclosure requirements established by the
BOVESPA in order to qualify as a company admitted to
BOVESPAs Level 1 of Corporate Governance
Requirements.
To become a Level 1 company, an issuer must agree to:
|
|
|
|
|
ensure that shares of the issuer representing at least 25% of
its total capital are effectively available for trading;
|
|
|
|
adopt offering procedures that favor widespread ownership of
shares whenever making a public offering;
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
comply with minimum quarterly disclosure standards;
|
|
|
|
follow stricter disclosure policies with respect to transactions
made by controlling shareholders, directors and officers
involving securities issued by the issuer;
|
|
|
|
disclose any existing shareholders agreements and stock
option plans; and
|
|
|
|
make a schedule of corporate events available to the
shareholders.
|
Our common American Depositary Shares, each representing one
common share, have been traded on the New York Stock Exchange
since March 2002, under the ticker symbol RIO. Our preferred
American Depositary Shares, each representing one preferred
class A share, have been traded on the New York Stock
Exchange since June 2000, under the ticker symbol RIOPR. The
preferred class A American Depositary Shares had previously
traded in the
over-the-counter
market since 1994. JPMorgan Chase Bank serves as the depositary
for both the common and the preferred American Depositary
Shares. On April 30, 2007, there were 862,645,444 American
Depositary Shares outstanding, representing 49.4% of our
preferred class A shares, 26.9% of our common shares or
35.7% of our total share capital.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Additional
Information
|
MEMORANDUM
AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
Company
objectives and purposes
Our corporate purpose is defined by our bylaws to include:
|
|
|
|
|
the exploitation of mineral deposits in Brazil and abroad by
means of extraction, processing, industrialization,
transportation, shipment and commerce of mineral goods;
|
|
|
|
the building and operation of railways and the exploitation of
own or third-party rail traffic;
|
|
|
|
the building and operation of own or third-party maritime
terminals, and the exploitation of nautical activities for the
provision of support within the harbor;
|
|
|
|
the provision of logistics services integrated with cargo
transport, comprising generation, storage, transshipment,
distribution and delivery within the context of a multimodal
transport system;
|
|
|
|
the production, processing, transport, industrialization and
commerce of all and any source and form of energy, also
involving activities of production, generation, transmission,
distribution and commerce of its products, derivatives and sub
products;
|
|
|
|
the carrying-on, in Brazil or abroad, of other activities that
may be of direct or indirect consequence for the achievement of
its corporate purpose, including research, industrialization,
purchase and sale, importation and exportation, the
exploitation, industrialization and commerce of forest resources
and the provision of services of any kind whatsoever; and
|
|
|
|
constituting or participating in any fashion in other companies,
consortia or associations directly or indirectly related to its
business purpose.
|
Directors
powers
Under Brazilian corporation law, if a director or an executive
officer has a conflict of interest with the company in
connection with any proposed transaction, the director or
executive officer may not vote in any decision of the Board of
Directors or of the board of executive officers regarding such
transaction and must disclose the nature and extent of the
conflicting interest for transcription in the minutes of the
meeting. In any case, a director or an executive officer may not
transact any business with the company, including any
borrowings, except on reasonable or fair terms and conditions
that are identical to the terms and conditions prevailing in the
market or offered by third parties. Under our bylaws,
shareholders set the aggregate compensation payable to directors
and executive officers. The Board of Directors allocates the
compensation
123
among its members and the executive officers. See
Item 6. Directors, management and employees
Compensation. Our bylaws do not establish any mandatory
retirement age limits.
COMMON
SHARES AND PREFERRED SHARES
Set forth below is certain information concerning our authorized
and issued share capital and a brief summary of certain
significant provisions of our bylaws and Brazilian corporation
law. This description does not purport to be complete and is
qualified by reference to our bylaws (an English translation of
which has been filed with the SEC) and to Brazilian corporation
law.
General
Our bylaws authorize the issuance of up to 1.8 billion
common shares and up to 3.6 billion preferred class A
shares, in each case based solely on the approval of the Board
of Directors without any additional shareholder approval.
Each common share entitles the holder thereof to one vote at
meetings of our shareholders. Holders of common shares are not
entitled to any preference relating to our dividends or other
distributions.
Holders of preferred class A shares and the golden shares
are generally entitled to the same voting rights as holders of
common shares, except with respect to the election of members of
the Board of Directors, and are entitled to a minimum annual
non-cumulative preferential dividend of (i) at least 3% of
the book value per share, calculated in accordance with the
financial statements, which serve as reference for the payment
of dividends, or (ii) 6% of their pro rata share of our
paid-in capital, whichever is higher. Non-controlling
shareholders holding common shares representing at least 15% of
our voting capital, and preferred class A shares
representing at least 10% of our total share capital, have the
right to appoint each one member and an alternate to our Board
of Directors. If no group of common or preferred class A
shareholders meets the thresholds described above, shareholders
holding preferred class A or common shares representing at
least 10% of our total share capital are entitled to combine
their holdings to appoint one member and an alternate to our
Board of Directors. Holders of preferred class A shares and
the golden shares may elect one member of the permanent fiscal
council and the respective alternate. Non-controlling holders of
common shares comprising at least 10% of the common shares
outstanding may also elect one member of the fiscal council and
an alternate.
The Brazilian government holds six golden shares of CVRD. The
golden shares are preferred shares that entitle its holder to
the same rights (including with respect to voting and dividend
preference) as holders of preferred class A shares. In
addition, the holder of the golden shares is entitled to veto
any proposed action relating to the following matters:
(1) a change in our name;
(2) a change in the location of our head office;
(3) a change in our corporate purpose as regards the mining
activities;
(4) any liquidation of our company;
(5) any disposal or winding up of activities of any one or
more of the following stages of our iron ore mining integrated
systems:
(a) mineral deposits, ore deposits, mines;
(b) railways; or
(c) ports and maritime terminals;
(6) any change in the bylaws relating to the rights
accorded to the classes of capital stock issued by us; and
(7) any change in the bylaws relating to the rights
accorded the golden shares.
124
Calculation
of distributable amount
At each annual shareholders meeting, the Board of
Directors is required to recommend, based on the executive
officers proposal, how to allocate our earnings for the
preceding fiscal year. For purposes of Brazilian corporation
law, a companys net income after income taxes and social
contribution taxes for such fiscal year, net of any accumulated
losses from prior fiscal years and amounts allocated to
employees and managements participation in earnings
represents its net profits for such fiscal year. In
accordance with Brazilian corporation law, an amount equal to
our net profits, as further reduced by amounts
allocated to the legal reserve, to the contingency reserve or to
the unrealized income reserve established by us in compliance
with applicable law (discussed below) and increased by reversals
of reserves constituted in prior years, will be available for
distribution to shareholders in any particular year. Such
amount, the adjusted net profits, is herein referred to as the
distributable amount. We may also establish discretionary
reserves, reserves for investment projects and fiscal investment
reserves, as discussed below.
Legal reserve. Under Brazilian corporation
law, we are required to maintain a legal reserve to which we
must allocate 5% of our net profits for each fiscal
year until the amount of the reserve equals 20% of our paid-in
capital. Net losses, if any, may be charged against the legal
reserve.
Discretionary reserves. Under Brazilian
corporation law, a company may also provide for discretionary
allocations of net profits to the extent set forth
in its bylaws. Our bylaws provide for one discretionary
depletion reserve, which may be taken into account in allocating
net profits for any fiscal year. We currently maintain a tax
incentive depletion reserve established in respect of certain
mining operations. Appropriations to the tax incentive depletion
reserve are deductible for tax purposes. The discretionary
depletion reserve has not been used since 1996, when the related
tax incentive expired. For more details, see Note 16 to our
consolidated financial statements. There are no limits on the
size or amount of proceeds that may be retained in the
discretionary depletion reserve. However, the sum of the legal
reserve, the depletion reserve and the reserve for investment
projects, in an amount not greater than 50% of distributable net
profit up to a maximum of the companys share capital, may
not exceed the amount of our paid-in capital.
Contingency reserve. Under Brazilian
corporation law, a portion of our net profits may
also be discretionally allocated to a contingency
reserve for an anticipated loss that is deemed probable in
future years. Any amount so allocated in a prior year must be
either reversed in the fiscal year in which the loss was
anticipated if such loss does not in fact occur or charged off
in the event that the anticipated loss occurs. We have never
allocated an amount to the contingency reserve.
Reserve for investment projects. Under
Brazilian corporation law, we may allocate a portion of our
net profits for discretionary appropriations for
plant expansion and other capital investment projects, the
amount of which is based on a capital budget previously
presented by management and approved by shareholders. Under Law
No. 10,303/2001,
capital budgets with a duration longer than one year must be
reviewed at each annual shareholders meeting. After
completion of the relevant capital projects, we may retain the
appropriation until shareholders vote to transfer all or a
portion of the reserve to capital or retained earnings.
Unrealized income reserve. As of March 1,
2002, under Law
No. 10,303/2001,
the amount by which the mandatory dividend exceeds the
realized portion of net profits for any particular
year may be allocated to the unrealized income reserve. The
realized portion of net profits is the amount by
which net profits exceed the sum of (i) our net
positive results, if any, from the equity method of accounting
for earnings and losses of our subsidiaries and certain
affiliates, and (ii) the profits, gains or return obtained
on transactions completed after the end of the following fiscal
year.
Tax incentive investment reserve. Under the
Brazilian tax laws, a portion of net profits may
also be allocated to a general tax incentive investment
reserve in amounts corresponding to reductions in our
income tax generated by credits for particular
government-approved investments.
Brazilian corporation law provides that all discretionary
allocations of net profits, including discretionary
reserves, the contingency reserve, the unrealized income reserve
and the reserve for investment projects, are subject to approval
by the shareholders voting at the annual meeting and can be
transferred to capital or used for the payment of dividends in
subsequent years. The fiscal incentive investment reserve and
legal
125
reserve are also subject to approval by the shareholders voting
at the annual meeting and may be transferred to capital but are
not available for the payment of dividends in subsequent years.
Our calculation of net profits and allocations to
reserves for any fiscal year are determined on the basis of
financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian
corporation law. Our consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and, although our
allocations to reserves and dividends will be reflected in these
financial statements, investors will not be able to calculate
such allocations or required dividend amounts from our
consolidated financial statements.
Mandatory
dividend
Brazilian corporation law and our bylaws prescribe that we must
distribute to our shareholders in the form of dividends or
interest on shareholders equity an annual amount equal to
not less than 25% of the distributable amount, referred to as
the mandatory dividend, unless the Board of Directors advises
our shareholders at our general shareholders meeting that
payment of the mandatory dividend for the preceding year is
inadvisable in light of our financial condition. The fiscal
council must review any such determination and report it to the
shareholders. In addition to the mandatory dividend, our Board
of Directors may recommend to the shareholders payment of
dividends from other funds legally available therefore. Any
payment of interim dividends will be netted against the amount
of the mandatory dividend for that fiscal year. The shareholders
must also approve the recommendation of the Board of Directors
with respect to any required distribution. The amount of the
mandatory dividend is subject to the size of the legal reserve,
the contingency reserve, and the unrealized income reserve. The
amount of the mandatory dividend is not subject to the size of
the discretionary depletion reserve. See Item 10.
Additional information Common shares and preferred
shares Calculation of distributable amount. To
date, our Board of Directors has never determined that payment
of the mandatory dividend was inadvisable.
In November 2002, our Board of Directors approved a new dividend
policy. See Item 8. Financial information
Dividends and interest on shareholders equity.
Dividend
preference of preferred shares
Pursuant to our bylaws, holders of preferred class A shares
and the golden shares are entitled to a minimum annual
non-cumulative preferential dividend equal to (i) at least
3% of the book value per share, calculated in accordance with
the financial statements which serve as reference for the
payment of dividends, or (ii) 6% of their pro rata share of
our paid-in capital, whichever is higher. To the extent that we
declare dividends in any particular year in amounts which exceed
the preferential dividends on preferred class A shares, and
after holders of common shares have received distributions
equivalent, on a per share basis, to the preferential dividends
on preferred class A shares, holders of common shares and
preferred class A shares shall receive the same additional
dividend amount per share. Since the first step of our
privatization in 1997, we have had sufficient distributable
amounts to be able to distribute equal amounts to both common
and preferred shareholders.
Other
matters relating to preferred class A shares
Our bylaws do not provide for the conversion of preferred
class A shares into common shares. In addition, the
preferred class A shares do not have any preference upon
our liquidation and there are no redemption provisions
associated with the preferred class A shares.
Payments
on shareholders equity
Pursuant to a change in Brazilian tax law effective
January 1, 1996, Brazilian companies are permitted to pay
limited amounts to shareholders and treat such payments as an
expense for Brazilian income tax purposes. In accordance with
Law No. 9,249 dated December 26, 1995, our bylaws
provide for the distribution of interest on shareholders
equity as an alternative form of payment to shareholders. The
interest rate applied is limited to the Brazilian long-term
interest rate, or TJLP, for the applicable period. The deduction
of the amount of interest paid cannot exceed the greater of
(1) 50% of net income (after the deduction of the
126
provision of social contribution on net profits and before the
deduction of the provision of the corporate income tax) before
taking into account any such distribution for the period in
respect of which the payment is made or (2) 50% of the sum
of retained earnings and profit reserves. Any payment of
interest on shareholders equity to shareholders is subject
to Brazilian withholding income tax at the rate of 15%, except
for a beneficiary located in a tax haven jurisdiction
(i.e. a country that does not impose income tax or that
imposes it at a maximum rate lower than 20%), in which case the
rate is 25%. Under our bylaws, the amount paid to shareholders
as interest on shareholders equity (net of any withholding
tax) may be included as part of any mandatory and minimum
dividend. Under Brazilian corporation law, we are obligated to
distribute to shareholders an amount sufficient to ensure that
the net amount received, after payment by us of applicable
Brazilian withholding taxes in respect of the distribution of
interest on shareholders equity, is at least equal to the
mandatory dividend.
Voting
rights
Each common share entitles the holder thereof to one vote at
meetings of our shareholders. Holders of preferred class A
shares are entitled to the same voting rights as holders of
common shares except that they may not vote on the election of
members of the Board of Directors, except in the event of
dividend arrearages, as described below. One of the members of
the permanent fiscal council and his or her alternate are
elected by majority vote of the holders of preferred
class A shares. Holders of preferred class A shares
and common shares may, in certain circumstances, combine their
respective holdings to elect members of our Board of Directors.
The golden shares entitle the holder thereof to the same voting
rights as holders of preferred class A shares. The golden
shares also confer certain other significant voting rights in
respect of particular actions, as described under
Item 10. Additional information Common
shares and preferred shares General.
Brazilian corporation law provides that non-voting or
restricted-voting shares, such as the preferred class A
shares, acquire unrestricted voting rights beginning when a
company has failed for three consecutive fiscal years (or for
any shorter period set forth in a companys constituent
documents) to pay any fixed or minimum dividend to which such
shares are entitled and continuing until payment thereof is
made. Our bylaws do not set forth any such shorter period.
Any change in the preferences or advantages of our preferred
class A shares, or the creation of a class of shares having
priority over the preferred class A shares, would require
the approval of holders of a majority of the outstanding
preferred class A shares, voting as a class at a special
meeting.
Shareholders
meetings
A general shareholders meeting convenes each year to
decide all matters relating to our corporate purposes and to
pass such resolutions as they deem necessary for our protection
and well being.
Pursuant to Brazilian corporation law, shareholders voting at a
general shareholders meeting have the power, among other
powers, to:
|
|
|
|
|
amend the bylaws;
|
|
|
|
elect or dismiss members of the Board of Directors and members
of the fiscal council at any time;
|
|
|
|
receive annual reports by management and accept or reject
managements financial statements and recommendations
including the allocation of net profits and the distributable
amount for payment of the mandatory dividend and allocation to
the various reserve accounts;
|
|
|
|
authorize the issuance of debentures;
|
|
|
|
suspend the rights of a shareholder in default of obligations
established by law or by the bylaws;
|
|
|
|
accept or reject the valuation of assets contributed by a
shareholder in consideration for issuance of capital stock;
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
pass resolutions to reorganize our legal form, to merge,
consolidate or split us, to dissolve and liquidate us, to elect
and dismiss our liquidators and to examine their
accounts; and
|
|
|
|
authorize management to file for bankruptcy or to request a
concordata.
|
All shareholders meetings, including the annual
shareholders meeting, are convened by publishing, no fewer
than 15 days prior to the scheduled meeting date and no
fewer than three times, a notice in the Diário Oficial
do Estado do Rio de Janeiro and in a newspaper with general
circulation in the city where we have our registered office,
which is Rio de Janeiro. Our shareholders have previously
designated Jornal do Commercio for this purpose. Also, as
our shares are traded on BOVESPA, we must publish a notice in a
São Paulo based newspaper. Such notice must contain the
agenda for the meeting and, in the case of an amendment to our
bylaws, an indication of the subject matter. In addition, under
our bylaws, the holder of the golden shares is entitled to a
minimum of 15 days prior formal notice to its legal
representative of any general shareholders meeting to
consider any proposed action subject to the veto rights accorded
to the golden shares. See Item 10. Additional
information Common shares and preferred
shares General.
A shareholders meeting may be held if shareholders
representing at least one-quarter of the voting capital are
present. If no such quorum is present, notice must again be
given in the same manner as described above except for the
eight-days
prior notice, and a meeting may then be convened without any
specific quorum requirement, subject to the minimum quorum and
voting requirements for certain matters, as discussed below. A
shareholder without a right to vote may attend a general
shareholders meeting and take part in the discussion of
matters submitted for consideration.
Except as otherwise provided by law, resolutions of a
shareholders meeting are passed by a simple majority vote,
abstentions not being taken into account. Under Brazilian
corporation law, the approval of shareholders representing at
least one-half of the issued and outstanding voting shares is
required for the types of action described below, as well as, in
the case of clause (a) and clause (b), a majority of
issued and outstanding shares of the affected class:
(a) creating a new class of preferred shares or
disproportionately increasing an existing class of preferred
shares relative to the other classes of shares, other than to
the extent permitted by the bylaws;
(b) changing a priority, preference, right, privilege or
condition of redemption or amortization of any class of
preferred shares or creating any class of non-voting preferred
shares that has a priority, preference, right, condition or
redemption or amortization superior to an existing class of
shares, such as the preferred shares;
(c) reducing the mandatory dividend;
(d) changing the corporate purposes;
(e) merging us with another company or consolidating or
splitting us;
(f) dissolving or liquidating us;
(g) participating in a centralized group of companies as
defined under Brazilian corporation law; and
(h) canceling any ongoing liquidation of us.
Whenever the shares of any class of capital stock are entitled
to vote, each share is entitled to one vote. Annual
shareholders meetings must be held by April 30 of
each year. Shareholders meetings are called, convened and
presided over by the Chairman or by the Vice-Chairman of our
Board of Directors. A shareholder may be represented at a
general shareholders meeting by an
attorney-in-fact
appointed not more than one year before the meeting, who must be
a shareholder, a company officer or a lawyer. For a public
company, such as us, the
attorney-in-fact
may also be a financial institution.
128
Redemption
rights
Our common shares and preferred class A shares are not
redeemable, except that a dissenting shareholder is entitled
under Brazilian corporation law to obtain redemption upon a
decision made at a shareholders meeting by shareholders
representing at least 50% of the voting shares:
(1) to create a new class of preferred shares or to
disproportionately increase an existing class of preferred
shares relative to the other classes of shares (unless such
actions are provided for or authorized by the bylaws);
(2) to modify a preference, privilege or condition of
redemption or amortization conferred on one or more classes of
preferred shares, or to create a new class with greater
privileges than the existing classes of preferred shares;
(3) to reduce the mandatory distribution of dividends;
(4) to change our corporate purposes;
(5) to merge us with another company or consolidate us;
(6) to transfer all of our shares to another company in
order to make us a wholly-owned subsidiary of such company, a
stock merger;
(7) to approve the acquisition of control of another
company at a price which exceeds certain limits set forth in
Brazilian corporation law;
(8) to approve our participation in a centralized group of
companies as defined under Brazilian corporation law; or
(9) in the event that the entity resulting from (a) a
merger, (b) a stock merger as described in clause (6)
above or (c) a spin-off that we conduct fails to become a
listed company within 120 days of the general
shareholders meeting at which such decision was taken.
Only holders of shares adversely affected by the changes
mentioned in items (1) and (2) above may require us to
redeem their shares. The right of redemption mentioned in items
(5), (6) and (8) above may only be exercised if our
shares do not satisfy certain tests of liquidity at the time of
the shareholder resolution. The right of redemption lapses
30 days after publication of the minutes of the relevant
general shareholders meeting, unless, in the case of items
(1) and (2) above, the resolution is subject to
confirmation by the preferred shareholders (which must be made
at a special meeting to be held within one year), in which case
the 30-day
term is counted from the publication of the minutes of the
special meeting.
We would be entitled to reconsider any action giving rise to
redemption rights within 10 days following the expiration
of such rights if the redemption of shares of dissenting
shareholders would jeopardize our financial stability. Law
No. 9,457, dated May 5, 1997, which amended Brazilian
corporation law, contains provisions, which, among other
provisions, restrict redemption rights in certain cases and
allow companies to redeem their shares at their economic value,
subject to certain requirements. Our bylaws currently do not
provide that our capital stock will be redeemable at its
economic value and, consequently, any redemption pursuant to
Brazilian corporation law would be made at no less than the book
value per share, determined on the basis of the last balance
sheet approved by the shareholders; provided that if the
general shareholders meeting giving rise to redemption
rights occurred more than 60 days after the date of the
last approved balance sheet, a shareholder would be entitled to
demand that his or her shares be valued on the basis of a new
balance sheet dated within 60 days of such general
shareholders meeting.
Preemptive
rights
Each of our shareholders has a general preemptive right to
subscribe for shares in any capital increase, in proportion to
his or her shareholding. A minimum period of 30 days
following the publication of notice of a capital increase is
allowed for the exercise of the right and the right is
negotiable. Under our bylaws and Brazilian corporation law, our
Board of Directors may decide not to extend preemptive rights to
our shareholders, or to
129
reduce the
30-day
period for the exercise of preemptive rights, in each case with
respect to any issuance of shares, debentures convertible into
shares or warrants in the context of a public offering, subject
to the limit on the number of shares that may be issued with the
approval of the board without any additional shareholder
approval. In the event of a capital increase that would maintain
or increase the proportion of capital represented by preferred
class A shares, holders of preferred American depositary
receipts will have preemptive rights to subscribe only to newly
issued preferred class A shares. In the event of a capital
increase that would reduce the proportion of capital represented
by preferred class A shares, shareholders will have
preemptive rights to subscribe for preferred class A
shares, in proportion to their shareholdings, and for common
shares only to the extent necessary to prevent dilution of their
overall interest in us. In the event of a capital increase that
would maintain or increase the proportion of capital represented
by common shares, shareholders will have preemptive rights to
subscribe only to newly issued common shares. In the event of a
capital increase that would reduce the proportion of capital
represented by common shares, holders of common shares will have
preemptive rights to subscribe for preferred class A shares
only to the extent necessary to prevent dilution of their
overall interest in us.
Tag-along
rights
According to Brazilian corporation law, in the event of a sale
of control of the Company, the acquirer is obliged to offer to
holders of common voting shares the right to sell their shares
for a price equal to at least 80% of the price paid for the
common voting shares representing control.
Form and
transfer
Our preferred class A shares and common shares are in
book-entry form registered in the name of each shareholder or
its nominee. The transfer of such shares is made under Brazilian
corporation law, which provides that a transfer of shares is
effected by our transfer agent, Banco Bradesco S.A., upon
presentation of valid share transfer instructions to us by a
transferor or its representative. When preferred shares or
common shares are acquired or sold on a Brazilian stock
exchange, the transfer is effected on the records of our
transfer agent by a representative of a brokerage firm or the
stock exchanges clearing system. Transfers of shares by a
foreign investor are made in the same way and are executed by
the investors local agent, who is also responsible for
updating the information relating to the foreign investment
furnished to the Central Bank.
BOVESPA operates a central clearing system through Companhia
Brasileira de Liquidação e Custódia, or CBLC.
A holder of our shares may participate in this system and all
shares elected to be put into the system will be deposited in
custody with CBLC (through a Brazilian institution that is duly
authorized to operate by the Central Bank and maintains a
clearing account with CBLC). The fact that such shares are
subject to custody with the relevant stock exchange will be
reflected in our registry of shareholders. Each participating
shareholder will, in turn, be registered in the register of our
beneficial shareholders that is maintained by CBLC and will be
treated in the same way as registered shareholders.
MATERIAL
CONTRACTS
For information concerning our material contracts, see
Item 4. Information on the Company and
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.
EXCHANGE
CONTROLS AND OTHER LIMITATIONS
AFFECTING SECURITY HOLDERS
There are no restrictions on ownership of our capital stock by
individuals or legal entities domiciled outside Brazil. However,
the right to convert dividend payments and proceeds from the
sale of preferred class A shares or common shares into
foreign currency and to remit such amounts outside Brazil is
subject to restrictions under foreign investment legislation
which generally requires, among other things, that the relevant
investment be registered with the Central Bank. These
restrictions on the remittance of foreign capital abroad could
hinder or prevent the custodian for the preferred class A
shares or common shares represented by American Depositary
Shares, or holders who have exchanged American Depositary Shares
for preferred class A
130
shares or common shares, from converting dividends,
distributions or the proceeds from any sale of preferred
class A shares or common shares, as the case may be, into
U.S. dollars and remitting such U.S. dollars abroad.
Delays in, or refusal to grant any required government approval
for conversions of Brazilian currency payments and remittances
abroad of amounts owed to holders of American Depositary Shares
could adversely affect holders of American depositary receipts.
Under Resolution No. 2,689/2000, foreign investors may
invest in almost all financial assets and engage in almost all
transactions available in the Brazilian financial and capital
markets, provided that certain requirements are fulfilled. In
accordance with Resolution No. 2,689/2000, the definition
of foreign investor includes individuals, legal entities, mutual
funds and other collective investment entities, domiciled or
headquartered abroad.
Under Resolution No. 2,689/2000, a foreign investor must:
|
|
|
|
|
appoint at least one representative in Brazil, with powers to
perform actions relating to its investment,
|
|
|
|
complete the appropriate foreign investor registration form,
|
|
|
|
register as a foreign investor with the CVM, and
|
|
|
|
register its foreign investment with the Central Bank.
|
Securities and other financial assets held by foreign investors
pursuant to Resolution No. 2,689/2000 must be registered or
maintained in deposit accounts or under the custody of an entity
duly licensed by the Central Bank or the CVM. In addition,
securities trading is restricted to transactions carried out on
stock exchanges or through organized
over-the-counter
markets licensed by the CVM, except for subscription,
bonification, conversion of debentures into shares, securities
indexes, purchase and sale of investment funds quotas and, if
permitted by the CVM, going private transactions, canceling or
suspension of trading. Moreover, the offshore transfer or
assignment of the securities or other financial assets held by
foreign investors pursuant to Resolution No. 2,689/2000 are
prohibited, except for transfers resulting from a corporate
reorganization, or occurring upon the death of an investor by
operation of law or will.
Resolution
No. 1,927/1992
of the National Monetary Council, which is the restated and
amended Annex V to Resolution No. 1,289/1997, which we
call the Annex V Regulations, provides for the issuance of
depositary receipts in foreign markets in respect of shares of
Brazilian issuers. It provides that the proceeds from the sale
of American Depositary Shares by holders of American depositary
receipts outside Brazil are free of Brazilian foreign investment
controls and holders of American Depositary Shares who are not
resident in a tax haven jurisdiction (i.e., a country or
location that does not impose taxes on income or where the
maximum income tax rate is lower than 20%, or where the
legislation imposes restrictions on disclosure of the
shareholding composition or the ownership of the investment)
will be entitled to favorable tax treatment.
An electronic registration has been issued by the custodian in
the name of JPMorgan Chase Bank, the depositary, with respect to
the American Depositary Shares. Pursuant to this electronic
registration, the custodian and the depositary are able to
convert dividends and other distributions with respect to the
preferred class A shares or common shares represented by
American Depositary Shares into foreign currency and to remit
the proceeds outside Brazil. If a holder exchanges American
Depositary Shares for preferred class A shares or common
shares, the holder may continue to rely on the custodians
electronic registration for only five business days after the
exchange. After that, the holder must seek to obtain its own
electronic registration with the Central Bank under Law
No. 4,131/1962
or Resolution No. 2,689/2000. Thereafter, unless the holder
has registered its investment with the Central Bank, such holder
may not convert into foreign currency and remit outside Brazil
the proceeds from the disposition of, or distributions with
respect to, such preferred class A shares or common shares.
As of March 14, 2005, there is a single foreign exchange
market in Brazil. Foreign currencies may only be purchased
through a Brazilian bank authorized to operate in this market.
In the past, under Brazilian regulations, foreign exchange
transactions were carried out on either the commercial rate
exchange market or the floating rate exchange market. Rates in
the two markets were generally the same. Although rates are
freely
131
negotiated in the foreign exchange market, they may be strongly
influenced by the Central Banks intervention. See
Item 3. Key information Exchange rates.
Under Brazilian law, whenever there is a serious imbalance in
Brazils balance of payments or reasons to foresee a
serious imbalance, the Brazilian government may impose temporary
restrictions on the remittance to foreign investors of the
proceeds of their investments in Brazil, and on the conversion
of Brazilian currency into foreign currencies. Such restrictions
may hinder or prevent the custodian or holders who have
exchanged American Depositary Shares for underlying preferred
class A shares or common shares from converting
distributions or the proceeds from any sale of such shares, as
the case may be, into U.S. dollars and remitting such
U.S. dollars abroad.
TAXATION
The following summary contains a description of the principal
Brazilian and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
ownership and disposition of preferred class A shares,
common shares or American Depositary Shares. You should know
that it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of
all the tax considerations that may be relevant to a holder of
preferred class A shares, common shares or American
Depositary Shares.
Holders of preferred class A shares, common shares, or
American Depositary Shares should consult their own tax advisors
to discuss the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and
disposition of preferred class A shares, common shares or
American Depositary Shares, including, in particular, the effect
of any state, local or other national tax laws.
Although there is at present no income tax treaty between Brazil
and the United States, the tax authorities of the two countries
have had discussions that may result in such a treaty. We cannot
predict whether or when such a treaty will enter into force or
how it will affect the U.S. holders, as defined below, of
preferred class A shares, common shares, or American
Depositary Shares.
Brazilian
tax considerations
The following discussion summarizes the principal Brazilian tax
consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of
preferred class A shares, common shares or American
Depositary Shares by a holder not deemed to be domiciled in
Brazil for purposes of Brazilian taxation (non-Brazilian
holder). It is based on the tax laws of Brazil and
regulations thereunder in effect on the date hereof, which are
subject to change (possibly with retroactive effect). This
discussion does not specifically address all of the Brazilian
tax considerations applicable to any particular non-Brazilian
holder. Therefore, each non-Brazilian holder should consult his
or her own tax advisor concerning the Brazilian tax consequences
of an investment in preferred class A shares, common
shares, or American Depositary Shares.
Taxation of dividends. Dividends, including
dividends paid in kind, paid by us from profits of periods
beginning on or after January 1, 1996 (1) to the
depositary in respect of the preferred class A shares or
common shares underlying the American Depositary Shares or
(2) to a non-Brazilian holder in respect of preferred
class A shares or common shares will generally not be
subject to Brazilian withholding income tax. Dividends paid from
profits generated before January 1, 1996 may be subject to
Brazilian withholding income tax at varying rates depending on
the year the profits were generated.
Distributions of interest on shareholders
equity. Since January 1, 1996, Brazilian
corporations may attribute interest on shareholders equity
as an alternative form of making dividend distributions, which
they may pay in cash. They base the calculation on
shareholders equity as stated in the statutory accounting
records. The interest rate applied may not exceed the TJLP as
determined by the Central Bank of Brazil from time to time.
Also, the amount paid may not be higher, for tax purposes, than
the greater of (1) 50% of net income (after the deduction
of the provision of social contribution on net profits but
before taking into account such payment of interest and the
provision of corporate income tax) for the period in respect of
which the payment is made or (2) 50% of the sum of retained
earnings and profit reserves as of the date of the beginning of
the fiscal year in respect of which the payment is made.
132
The amount of interest attributed to shareholders is deductible
for corporate income tax and social contribution on net profit
purposes, as far as the limits described above are observed.
Therefore, the benefit to us, as opposed to making a dividend
payment, is a reduction in our corporate taxes charge equivalent
to 34% of such amount. Subject to certain limitations, income
tax is withheld from the shareholders on interest payments at
the rate of 15%, except if the beneficiary is exempt from tax in
Brazil, which payments are free of Brazilian tax, and except if
the beneficiary is located in a tax haven jurisdiction, i.e., a
country or location that does not impose income tax or where the
maximum income tax rate is lower than 20% or where the internal
legislation imposes restrictions to disclosure of shareholding
composition or the ownership of the investment, (tax haven
holder), in which case the applicable rate is 25%.
Taxation of capital gains. For purposes of
Brazilian taxation, two types of non-Brazilian holders should be
considered: (1) non-Brazilian holders that are not resident
or domiciled in tax haven jurisdictions (as defined below),
which are registered before the Central Bank of Brazil and the
CVM to invest in Brazil in accordance with Resolution
No. 2,689 or are holders of American Depositary Shares; and
(2) other non-Brazilian holders, which include any and all
non-residents in Brazil who invest in the country through any
other means and all type of investors that are located in a tax
haven jurisdiction (i.e., a jurisdiction that does not impose
income tax or where the maximum income tax rate is lower than
20% and/or
where internal legislation imposes restrictions on the
disclosure of share or investment ownership),. The investors
identified in item (1) are subject to a favorable tax
treatment, as described below.
According to the Law No. 10,833, dated December 29,
2003, capital gains earned abroad derived from the disposition
of assets located in Brazil by non-residents to other
non-residents may become subject to taxation in Brazil. In this
sense, upon the disposition of the preferred class A shares
or of the common shares, defined as assets located in Brazil,
the non-Brazilian holder may be subject to income tax on the
gains assessed, following the rules described below, no matter
if the transaction is conducted in Brazil or abroad, or with a
Brazilian resident or not. Regarding American Depositary Shares,
although we believe that the American Depositary Shares do not
fall within the definition of assets located in Brazil for the
purposes of this rule, considering the general and unclear scope
of the rule and the lack of judicial court rulings in respect
thereto, we are unable to predict whether such understanding
will ultimately prevail in the courts of Brazil. As a result,
gains on a disposition of American Depositary Shares by a
non-Brazilian holder to a Brazilian resident, or even to a
non-Brazilian resident in the event that courts determine that
the American Depositary Shares would constitute assets located
in Brazil, may be subject to income tax in Brazil according to
the rules described ahead.
The deposit of preferred class A shares or common shares in
exchange for American Depositary Shares may be subject to
Brazilian income tax if the acquisition cost of the preferred
class A shares or common shares is lower than (i) the
average price per preferred class A share or common share
on the Brazilian stock exchange in which the greatest number of
such shares were sold on the day of deposit; or (ii) if no
preferred class A shares or common shares were sold on that
day, the average price on the Brazilian stock exchange in which
the greatest number of preferred class A shares or common
shares were sold in the 15 trading sessions immediately
preceding such deposit. In such case, the difference between the
acquisition cost and the average price of the preferred
class A shares or common shares calculated as described
above will be considered to be a capital gain subject to
taxation. There are grounds to sustain that such taxation is not
applicable in case of investors registered under the rules of
Resolution No. 2,689/2000, which are not tax haven holders.
The withdrawal of American Depositary Shares in exchange for
preferred class A shares or common shares is not subject to
Brazilian income tax as long as the applicable regulations in
respect to the registration of the investment before the
Brazilian Central Bank are properly complied with.
It is important to clarify that, for purposes of Brazilian
taxation, the income tax rules on gains related to disposition
of preferred class A shares or common shares vary depending
on the domicile of the non-Brazilian holder, the form by which
such non-Brazilian holder has registered its investment before
the Central Bank
and/or how
the disposition is carried out, as described below. The gain
realized as a result of a transaction on a Brazilian stock,
future and commodities exchange is the difference between the
amount in Brazilian currency realized on the sale or disposition
and the acquisition cost, without any adjustment for inflation,
of the shares sold.
133
Gains assessed on the disposition of the preferred class A
shares or common shares carried out on a Brazilian stock
exchange (which includes the transactions carried out on the
organized
over-the-counter
market) are:
|
|
|
|
|
exempt from income tax when assessed by a non-Brazilian holder
that (i) has registered its investment in Brazil before the
Brazilian Central Bank under the rules of Resolution
No. 2,689/2000 (2,689 holder) and
(ii) is not a tax haven holder; or
|
|
|
|
subject to income tax at a rate of 15% in any other case,
including the gains assessed by a non-Brazilian holder that
(i) is not a 2,689 holder or (ii) is a tax haven
holder. In these cases, a withholding income tax at a rate of
0.005% of the sale value shall be levied on the transaction and
can be offset with the eventual income tax due on the capital
gain.
|
Any other gains assessed on the disposition of the preferred
class A shares or of the common shares that are not carried
out on a Brazilian stock exchange are subject to income tax at a
rate of 15%, except for tax haven holder which, in this case, is
subject to income tax at a rate of 25%. In case these gains are
related to transactions conducted on the Brazilian non-organized
over-the-counter
market, with brokerage, a withholding income tax at a rate
0.005% of the sale value shall also be levied on the transaction
and can be offset with the eventual income tax due on the
capital gain. There can be no assurance that the current
favorable treatment of 2,689 holders will continue in the future.
In the case of a redemption of preferred class A shares,
common shares, or the American Depositary Shares or a capital
reduction by a Brazilian corporation, the positive difference
between the amount received by the non-Brazilian holder and the
acquisition cost of the preferred class A shares, common
shares or the American Depositary Shares redeemed is treated as
capital gain derived from the sale or exchange of shares not
carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange market and is
therefore subject to income tax at the rate of 15%, or 25%, as
the case may be.
Any exercise of preemptive rights relating to the preferred
class A shares or common shares will not be subject to
Brazilian taxation. Any gain on the transaction will be subject
to Brazilian income taxation according to the same rules
applicable to the sale or disposition of preferred class A
shares or common shares.
Other Brazilian taxes. There are no Brazilian
inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the
ownership, transfer or disposition of preferred class A
shares or common shares or American Depositary Shares by a
non-Brazilian holder, except for gift and inheritance taxes
which are levied by some states of Brazil on gifts made or
inheritances bestowed non-Brazilian holder to individuals or
entities resident or domiciled within such states in Brazil.
There are no Brazilian stamp, issue, registration, or similar
taxes or duties payable by holders of preferred class A
shares or common shares or American Depositary Shares.
Brazilian law imposes a Tax on Foreign Exchange Transactions,
(the IOF/Exchange Tax) on the conversion of reais
into foreign currency and on the conversion of the foreign
currency to reais. Although the IOF/Exchange Tax rate is
currently 0% with some few specific exceptions, the Minister of
Finance has the legal power to increase the rate to a maximum of
25%, but only in relation to transactions occurred after the
relevant ruling (i.e. not on a retroactive basis).
Brazilian law imposes a Tax on Transactions Involving Bonds or
Securities (the IOF/Bonds Tax), due on transactions
involving bonds and securities, including those carried out on
the Brazilian stock, futures or commodities exchange. The rate
of the IOF/Bonds Tax with respect to preferred class A
shares or common shares or American Depositary Shares is
currently 0%. The Minister of Finance, however, has the legal
power to increase the rate to a maximum of 1.5% per day.
Any such increase will be applicable only prospectively.
In addition, as a general rule, transactions carried out in
Brazil that result in the transfer of reais from an
account maintained with a Brazilian financial institution are
subject to the Temporary Contribution on Financial Transactions
(CPMF Tax), at the rate of 0,38%. Currently, the
funds transferred for the acquisition of preferred class A
shares and common shares on Brazilian stock exchanges and the
remittance abroad of the proceeds earned from the disposition of
shares in Brazil by means of a currency exchange transaction are
exempt of the CPMF Tax. In addition to that, according to Law
No. 11,312, of June 27, 2006, the CPMF rate is reduced
to
134
zero on withdrawals from bank accounts used to buy common shares
in a public offering, provided the public offering is registered
with the CVM and that the issuer is listed in a Brazilian stock
exchange. The CPMF Tax will be in effect until December 31,
2007. However, it may be extended. When applicable, the CPMF Tax
must be withheld from the amounts transferred from such account
and must be collected in favor of the Brazilian government by
the financial institution that carries out the relevant
financial transaction.
U.S. federal
income tax considerations
This summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description
of all the tax consequences of the acquisition, holding or
disposition of the preferred class A shares or common
shares or American Depositary Shares. This summary applies to
U.S. holders, as defined below, who hold their preferred
class A shares or common shares or American Depositary
Shares as capital assets and does not apply to special classes
of holders, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
certain financial institutions,
|
|
|
|
insurance companies,
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities or foreign currencies,
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations,
|
|
|
|
securities traders who elect to account for their investment in
preferred class A shares or common shares or American
Depository Shares on a
mark-to-market
basis,
|
|
|
|
persons holding preferred class A shares, common shares or
American Depositary Shares as part of hedge, straddle,
conversion or other integrated financial transaction for tax
purposes,
|
|
|
|
holders whose functional currency for tax purposes is not the
U.S. dollar,
|
|
|
|
partnerships or other pass-through entities for
U.S. federal income tax purposes,
|
|
|
|
persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, or
|
|
|
|
persons owning, actually or constructively, 10% or more of our
voting shares.
|
This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended to the date hereof, administrative pronouncements,
judicial decisions and final, temporary and proposed Treasury
Regulations, changes to any of which may affect the tax
consequences described herein.
HOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS WITH REGARD TO THE
APPLICATION OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS TO
THEIR PARTICULAR SITUATIONS AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES
ARISING UNDER THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR
NON-U.S. TAXING
JURISDICTION.
This discussion is also based, in part, on representations of
the depositary and the assumption that each obligation in the
deposit agreement and any related agreement will be performed in
accordance with its terms.
As used herein, the term United States holder means
a beneficial owner of preferred class A shares, common
shares, or American Depositary Shares that is for
U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident alien individual of the United States,
|
|
|
|
a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States or of any political subdivision thereof, or
|
|
|
|
otherwise subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net
income basis with respect to the preferred class A shares,
common shares, or American Depositary Shares.
|
The term United States holder also includes certain former
citizens of the United States.
In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, holders
of American depositary receipts evidencing American Depositary
Shares will be treated as the beneficial owners of the preferred
class A shares or
135
common shares represented by those American Depositary Shares.
Deposits and withdrawals of preferred class A shares or
common shares by holders in exchange for American Depositary
Shares will not result in the realization of gain or loss for
U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Taxation of dividends. Distributions paid on
American Depositary Shares, preferred class A shares or
common shares, including distributions paid in the form of
payments of interest on capital for Brazilian tax purposes, out
of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as
determined for U.S. federal tax purposes, before reduction
for any Brazilian income tax withheld by us, will be taxable to
you as foreign source dividend income and will not be eligible
for the dividends-received deduction allowed to corporations.
You will be required to include dividends paid in reais
in income in an amount equal to their U.S. dollar value
calculated by reference to an exchange rate in effect on the
date such distribution is received by the depositary, or by a
United States holder in the case of a holder of common shares or
preferred class A shares. If the depositary, or United
States holder in the case of a holder of common or preferred
class A shares, does not convert such reais into
U.S. dollars on the date it receives them, it is possible
that the U.S. holder will recognize foreign currency loss
or gain, which would be ordinary loss or gain, when the reais
are converted into U.S. dollars. Dividends paid by us
will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction
allowed to corporations under the Code. If you hold American
Depositary Shares, you will be considered to receive a dividend
when the dividend is received by the depositary.
Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and hedged
positions, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends received by
an individual prior to January 1, 2011 with respect to the
American Depositary Shares will be subject to taxation at a
maximum rate of 15% if the dividends are qualified
dividends. Dividends paid on the American Depositary
Shares will be treated as qualified dividends if (i) the
American Depositary Shares are readily tradable on an
established securities market in the United States and
(ii) the Company was not, in the year prior to the year in
which the dividend was paid, and is not, in the year in which
the dividend is paid, a passive foreign investment company
(PFIC). The American Depositary Shares are listed on
the New York Stock Exchange and will qualify as readily tradable
on an established securities market in the United States so long
as they are so listed. Based on CVRDs audited financial
statements and relevant market and shareholder data, CVRD
believes that it was not treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal
income tax purposes with respect to its 2005 or 2006 taxable
year. In addition, based on CVRDs audited financial
statements and its current expectations regarding the value and
nature of its assets, the sources and nature of its income, and
relevant market and shareholder data, we do not anticipate
becoming a PFIC for its 2007 taxable year.
Based on existing guidance, it is not entirely clear whether
dividends received with respect to the preferred class A
shares and common shares will be treated as qualified dividends,
because the preferred class A shares and common shares are
not themselves listed on a U.S. exchange. In addition, the
U.S. Treasury has announced its intention to promulgate
rules pursuant to which holders of American Depositary Shares,
preferred class A shares or common stock and intermediaries
through whom such securities are held will be permitted to rely
on certifications from issuers to establish that dividends are
treated as qualified dividends. Because such procedures have not
yet been issued, it is not clear whether we will be able to
comply with them. Holders of American Depositary Shares,
preferred class A shares and common shares should consult
their own tax advisors regarding the availability of the reduced
dividend tax rate in the light of their own particular
circumstances.
Subject to generally applicable limitations and restrictions,
you will be entitled to a credit against your United States
federal income tax liability, or a deduction in computing your
U.S. federal taxable income, for Brazilian income taxes
withheld by us. You must satisfy minimum holding period
requirements to be eligible to claim a foreign tax credit for
Brazilian taxes withheld on dividends. The limitation on foreign
taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately for specific
classes of income. For this purpose dividends paid by us on our
shares will generally constitute passive income (or,
for some holders, financial services income).
Foreign tax credits may not be allowed for withholding taxes
imposed in respect of certain short-term or hedged positions in
securities or in respect of arrangements in which a United
States holders expected economic profit is insubstantial.
United States holders should consult their own tax advisors
concerning the implications of these rules in light of their
particular circumstances.
136
Taxation of capital gains. Upon a sale or
exchange of preferred class A shares, common shares or
American Depositary Shares, you will recognize a capital gain or
loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes equal to the
difference, if any, between the amount realized on the sale or
exchange and your adjusted tax basis in the preferred
class A shares, common shares or American Depositary
Shares. This gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss
if your holding period in the preferred class A shares,
common shares or American Depositary Shares exceeds one year.
The net amount of long-term capital gain recognized by
individual U.S. holders prior to January 1, 2011
generally is subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 15%. Your
ability to use capital losses to offset income is subject to
limitations.
Any gain or loss will be U.S. source gain or loss for
U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, if a
Brazilian withholding tax is imposed on the sale or disposition
of American Depositary Shares, preferred class A shares or
common shares, and you do not receive significant foreign source
income from other sources you may not be able to derive
effective U.S. foreign tax credit benefits in respect of
such Brazilian withholding tax. You should consult your own tax
advisor regarding the application of the foreign tax credit
rules to your investment in, and disposition of, American
Depositary Shares, preferred class A shares or common
shares.
If a Brazilian tax is withheld on the sale or disposition of
shares, the amount realized by a U.S. holder will include
the gross amount of the proceeds of such sale or disposition
before deduction of the Brazilian tax. See Item 10.
Additional information Taxation
Brazilian tax considerations.
Information reporting and backup
withholding. Information returns may be filed
with the Internal Revenue Service in connection with
distributions on the preferred class A shares, common
shares or American Depositary Shares and the proceeds from their
sale or other disposition. You may be subject to United States
backup withholding tax on these payments if you fail to provide
your taxpayer identification number or comply with certain
certification procedures or otherwise establish an exemption
from backup withholding.
The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to you will
be allowed as a credit against your U.S. federal income tax
liability and may entitle you to a refund, provided that the
required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue
Service.
DOCUMENTS
ON DISPLAY
We are subject to the information requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and accordingly file reports
and other information with the SEC. Reports and other
information filed by us with the SEC may be inspected and copied
at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100
F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can obtain
further information about the operation of the Public Reference
Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
You may also inspect CVRDs reports and other information
at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, 11 Wall Street,
New York, New York 10005, on which CVRDs American
Depositary Shares are listed. Our SEC filings are also available
to the public from the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov.
For further information on obtaining copies of CVRDs
public filings at the New York Stock Exchange, you should call
(212) 656-5060.
We also file financial statements and other periodic reports
with the CVM.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
RISK
MANAGEMENT POLICY
We consider the effective management of risk a key objective to
support our growth strategy and financial flexibility. In
furtherance of this objective, the Board of Directors has
established an enterprise risk management policy and a risk
management committee. Under the policy, we measure, monitor, and
manage risk at the portfolio level, using a single framework,
and consider the natural diversification of our portfolio. We
hedge our market risk only when considered necessary to support
our corporate strategy or to maintain our target level of
financial flexibility. The members of the risk management
committee in 2007 are Fabio de
137
Oliveira Barbosa, Chief Financial Officer, Gabriel Stoliar,
Executive Officer (Planning and Control), Murilo Ferreira,
Executive Officer (Nickel, Marketing & Sales of Copper
and Aluminum), Guilherme Cavalcanti, Corporate Finance Director
and Almir Ferreira, Procurement Director. The risk management
committee assists our Executive Directors in overseeing and
reviewing information regarding our enterprise risk management
and framework, including the significant policies, procedures
and practices employed to manage risk. Our enterprise risk
management policy is designed to promote an effective risk
management system and to ensure that enterprise-level risks are
reported at least quarterly to the risk management committee.
With the Inco acquisition, we will have to broaden our risk
management policy to ensure its effectiveness. During this
transition period, CVRD Inco will maintain its own risk
management policy, subject to the guidelines and strategies
established by our risk management committee.
CVRD Incos risk management policy sets forth the
responsibilities of its internal risk management committee, its
membership and conduct, reporting requirements, controls,
maximum hedging limits and related authorizations delegated by
our Board of Directors. Under its policy, hedging activities are
subject to maximum limits, which are specifically approved by
our Board of Directors. The maximum limits are usually linked to
a maximum percentage of forecasted annual production volume (or
annual requirements, in the case of supplies or currencies) for
current and future years, up to five years. These policies and
procedures were established to reduce both the uncertainties
associated with market risks specific to CVRD Incos
business and operations, and the effect of market fluctuations
on metals production and essential supplies on earnings and cash
flow.
Considering the nature of our business and operations, the
principal market risks we face are interest rate risk, exchange
rate risk and commodity price risk. We address some of these
risks through the use of derivative instruments. Our risk
management activities follow the risk management policy, which
generally prohibits speculative trading and short selling and
requires diversification of transactions and counter-parties. We
monitor and evaluate our overall position regularly in order to
evaluate financial results and impact on our cash flow. We also
periodically review the credit limits and creditworthiness of
our hedging counter-parties.
Under SFAS 133 Accounting for Derivative
Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended
by SFAS 137 and SFAS 138, we recognize all derivatives
on our balance sheet at fair value, and the gain or loss in fair
value is included in current earnings. The asset (liability)
balances at December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the movement in
fair value of derivative financial instruments are shown in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
(LIBOR)
|
|
|
Currencies
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
Platinum
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value at January 1,
2005
|
|
US$
|
(37
|
)
|
|
US$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
US$
|
4
|
|
|
US$
|
(182
|
)
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
US$
|
(232
|
)
|
Financial settlement
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) in the
year
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) at
December 31, 2005
|
|
US$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
US$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
US$
|
1
|
|
|
US$
|
(210
|
)
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
US$
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at January 1,
2006
|
|
US$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
US$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
US$
|
1
|
|
|
US$
|
(210
|
)
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
US$
|
(259
|
)
|
Gain (loss) recognized upon
consolidation of Inco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(364
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
Financial settlement
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) in the
year
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) at
December 31, 2006
|
|
US$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
US$
|
6
|
|
|
US$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
US$
|
(318
|
)
|
|
US$
|
(299
|
)
|
|
US$
|
17
|
|
|
US$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
US$
|
(683
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138
INTEREST
RATE AND CURRENCY RISK
The table below sets forth our floating and fixed rate long-term
debt, categorized by local and foreign currency, and as a
percentage of our total long-term debt portfolio at the dates
indicated, including loans from unrelated parties, except for
accrued charges and translation adjustments, as reflected in our
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(US$ million, except percentages)
|
|
|
Floating rate debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real-denominated
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
Denominated in other currencies
|
|
|
2,901
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
10,924
|
|
|
|
50.5
|
|
Fixed rate debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real-denominated
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Denominated in other currencies
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
|
|
7,543
|
|
|
|
34.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
4,811
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
21,613
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustments(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued charges
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Adjustment due to accounting
conversion method, which entails converting all assets and
liabilities into U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange
rate at each balance sheet date or the first available exchange
rate if a rate on December 31 is not available.
|
The table below provides information about our debt obligations
as of December 31, 2006, which are sensitive to changes in
interest rates and exchange rates. The table presents the
principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates
of these obligations by expected maturity date. Weighted average
variable interest rates are based on the applicable reference
rate at December 31, 2006. The debt obligations
actual cash flows are denominated mainly in U.S. dollars or
reais or other currencies, as indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Accounting at
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow at
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(%)(1)(2)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
To 2036
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12/31/06(3)
|
|
|
2006(3)
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
US$-denominated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds
|
|
|
6.90
|
%
|
|
|
111.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,774.4
|
|
|
|
6,885.8
|
|
|
|
7,185.2
|
|
|
|
7,509.5
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
5.91
|
%
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
61.4
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
|
|
102.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258.6
|
|
|
|
258.5
|
|
|
|
258.6
|
|
Securitization Notes
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
|
|
53.0
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
57.5
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
315.2
|
|
|
|
315.2
|
|
|
|
315.2
|
|
Trade Finance
|
|
|
5.99
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Floating Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
5.91
|
%
|
|
|
197.9
|
|
|
|
8,455.4
|
|
|
|
254.1
|
|
|
|
254.3
|
|
|
|
359.2
|
|
|
|
563.2
|
|
|
|
10,084.1
|
|
|
|
10,260.1
|
|
|
|
10,084.1
|
|
Securitization Notes
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
Trade Finance
|
|
|
5.99
|
%
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
|
|
215.0
|
|
|
|
478.7
|
|
|
|
495.4
|
|
|
|
478.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
477.9
|
|
|
|
8,550.5
|
|
|
|
374.7
|
|
|
|
477.9
|
|
|
|
556.7
|
|
|
|
7,615.1
|
|
|
|
18,052.8
|
|
|
|
18,544.8
|
|
|
|
18,676.5
|
|
Real-denominated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Loans
|
|
|
13.31
|
%
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
Floating Rate Loans
|
|
|
13.31
|
%
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
722.6
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
2,343.2
|
|
|
|
3,125.4
|
|
|
|
3,125.3
|
|
|
|
3,125.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.1
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
722.7
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
2,343.4
|
|
|
|
3,146.0
|
|
|
|
3,145.9
|
|
|
|
3,146.0
|
|
Denominated in other
currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Loan
|
|
|
7.14
|
%
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
71.5
|
|
|
|
81.6
|
|
|
|
81.6
|
|
|
|
81.6
|
|
Floating Rate Loan
|
|
|
4.73
|
%
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
42.4
|
|
|
|
74.5
|
|
|
|
74.4
|
|
|
|
74.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
113.9
|
|
|
|
156.1
|
|
|
|
156.0
|
|
|
|
156.1
|
|
No maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258.3
|
|
|
|
258.3
|
|
|
|
258.3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524.1
|
|
|
|
8,576.0
|
|
|
|
397.8
|
|
|
|
1,209.5
|
|
|
|
575.1
|
|
|
|
10,072.4
|
|
|
|
21,613.2
|
|
|
|
22,105.0
|
|
|
|
22,236.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Weighted average interest rates do
not take into account the effect of the derivatives.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Weighted average variable interest
rates are based on the applicable reference rate at
December 31, 2006.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes only long-term debt
obligations.
|
139
Interest
rate risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk on our outstanding
borrowings on future debt issuances. Our floating rate debt
consists principally of U.S. dollar borrowings related to
trade finance and loans from commercial banks and multilateral
organizations and real borrowings related to the debentures and
the property and services acquisition financing issued in the
local market. In general, our foreign currency floating rate
debt is principally subject to changes in the London Interbank
Offered Rate (USD LIBOR). Consequently, fluctuations in the USD
LIBOR may adversely impact our cash flows. To mitigate the
effects of interest rate volatility we sometimes make use of
natural hedges allowed by the positive correlation between
U.S. dollar floating interest rates and metals prices. When
natural hedges are not present, we sometimes try to realize the
same effect with the aid of financial instruments. Our floating
rate debt denominated in reais is mainly subject to
changes in the CDI (Interbank Certificate of Deposit) and TJLP,
as fixed by the BNDES.
We have entered into interest rate derivative transactions
primarily to hedge the exposure we hold on our US-dollar
floating rate debt. Our interest rate derivatives portfolio
consists of options and interest rate swaps to convert floating
rate exposures to fixed rate exposures or to cap our exposure to
interest rate fluctuations. A cap is the maximum rate we will be
required to pay on the notional amount of the debt. Conversely,
a floor is the minimum rate we will be required to pay on the
notional amount of the debt. The table below sets forth certain
information with respect to our interest rate derivatives
portfolio at December 31, 2005 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Rate Range
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Rate Range
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
(US$ million, except interest rate ranges)
|
|
|
Floor
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 2006
|
|
Cap
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
5.7 - 11.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
5.7 - 11.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2007
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
5.8 - 6.7
|
%
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
5.1 - 6.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
Dec 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
risk
We are exposed to exchange rate risk associated with the
denomination of our debt in currencies other than the Brazilian
real. On the other hand, a substantial proportion of our
revenues are denominated in, or automatically indexed to, the
U.S. dollar. This provides a natural hedge against any
changes in the Brazilian real against the
U.S. dollar. For instance, when a devaluation of the
Brazilian real occurs, the immediate negative impact on
our non-Brazilian real-denominated debt is offset over
time by the positive effect of devaluation on future cash flows.
In light of this framework, we generally do not use derivative
instruments to manage the currency exposure on our long-term
dollar-denominated debt. However, we may occasionally use
derivatives to minimize the effects of the volatility of the
exchange rates between reais and U.S. dollars in the
cash flow.
Our cash flows are also exposed to the volatility of other
currencies against the U.S. dollar. While prices for most
of our products are primarily in U.S. dollars, a
substantial portion of our costs, expenses and investments are
in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, in particular the
reais and the Canadian dollar. In projects developed
outside Brazil and Canada, we are also exposed to other
currencies, such as the Euro, Australian dollar and the Chinese
renminbi.
We use forward currency contracts to minimize the impact of
exchange rate fluctuations on a portion of the construction
costs for capital assets at our Ontario operations and the
planned production facilities for the Goro project.
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
(US$ million, average price and notional amount in millions
of local currency noted)
|
|
|
Chinese yuan forward purchase
contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
0.129
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
Dec 2007
|
|
Australian dollar forward purchase
contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
0.716
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
Dec 2007
|
|
Euro forward purchase contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
1.237
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
Nov 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pounds sterling forward purchase
contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1.766
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
Mar 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition of Inco, we used derivative
instruments to minimize the effects of fluctuations in the
exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and the
U.S. dollar, and hedged part of the acquisition amount. The
outstanding Canadian-dollar derivative transactions at
December 31,2006 are shown in the table below. These
derivative transactions were settled on January 3, 2007,
together with the acquisition of the remaining shares of Inco.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
(US$ million, except rate ranges)
|
|
|
CAD forward purchase contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
1.13 - 1.16
|
|
|
|
(28.5
|
)
|
|
|
Jan 2007
|
|
In connection with the refinancing of the acquisition facility,
we issued in the Brazilian capital markets debentures in
reais, indexed to the CDI (Interbank Certificate of
Deposit). During the last quarter of 2006, we also entered
into a local credit line, also indexed to the CDI, to finance
the acquisition of property and services. In order to protect
against the possible impact on cash flow caused by fluctuations
in the R$/US$ exchange rate on the Brazilian debt issuance, we
have entered into swap transactions with respect to which we
convert the cash flow in reais indexed to CDI to cash
flows in U.S. dollars indexed to a fixed rate. In March
2007, the swap transaction was concluded and the first series,
in the amount of US$700 million, maturing in 2010 and
bearing an interest rate of 101.75% of the accumulated variation
of the Brazilian CDI interest rate, was swapped into
U.S. dollars at an average rate of 5.80%. The second
series, in the amount of US$1,800 million, maturing in 2013
and bearing an interest at the Brazilian CDI interest rate plus
0.25% per year, was swapped into U.S. dollars at an average
rate of 5.71%.
We have other exposures associated with our outstanding debt
portfolio. We have a euro exposure associated with a credit line
extended by KFW (Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau). To
mitigate the foreign currency risk, we have entered into some
forward transactions that are specified in the next table. The
table below sets forth certain information with respect to our
exchange rate derivatives portfolio at December 31, 2005
and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Rate Range
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Rate Range
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
(US$ million, except rate ranges)
|
|
|
Floating Rate purchased
|
|
|
14.35
|
|
|
Euribor + Spread 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.96
|
|
|
Euribor + spread 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 2011
|
|
Floating Rate sold
|
|
US$
|
16.19
|
|
|
Libor + Spread 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$
|
13.49
|
|
|
Libor + spread 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 2011
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US $
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US $
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRODUCT
PRICE RISK
We are also exposed to various market risks relating to the
volatility of world market prices for the following products:
|
|
|
|
|
iron ore and pellets, which represented 46.7% (including CVRD
Inco 2006 pre-acquisition gross revenues in addition to 2006
historical gross revenues) of our 2006 gross consolidated
revenues;
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
nickel, which represented 25.7% (on the same basis) of our
2006 gross consolidated revenues;
|
|
|
|
manganese ore and ferroalloys, which represented 2.2% (on the
same basis) of our 2006 gross consolidated revenues;
|
|
|
|
aluminum products, which represented 9.3% (on the same basis) of
our 2006 gross consolidated revenues; and
|
|
|
|
copper concentrate, which represented 3.8% (on the same basis)
of our 2006 gross consolidated revenues.
|
Other products, such as platinum-group metals (PGMs) and potash,
represented a minor percentage of our consolidated revenues.
We do not enter into derivative transactions to hedge our iron
ore, pellets, kaolin, manganese ore or ferroalloys exposure. Our
risk management policy permits us to hedge market risk only when
necessary to support our corporate strategy or maintain
financial flexibility. Currently, our derivatives transactions
include nickel forward purchase and sale contracts, aluminum
forward contracts and options, copper call and put options, as
well as positions in gold, platinum and fuel oil derivative
instruments.
Our Executive Board approved the hedging of a portion of our
aluminum and copper production for 2007 and 2008 to reduce cash
flow risk in connection with the change in our capital structure
and the significant increase of our debt position after the
acquisition of Inco.
Nickel
We do not generally use derivative instruments to hedge our
exposure to fluctuations in nickel prices. However, we do enter
into LME forward purchase contracts, which are substantially
offset by fixed-price customer contracts, in order to maintain
exposure to nickel price risk. We also enter into LME forward
sales contracts to minimize nickel price risk associated with
purchased nickel inventories of intermediates and finished
nickel products.
The table below sets forth certain information with respect to
our nickel derivatives portfolio at December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Price Range
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
(Metric tons)
|
|
|
(US$ per metric ton)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(Metric tons)
|
|
|
(US$ per metric ton)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
Forward purchase contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,780
|
|
|
|
30,283
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
Sep 2008
|
Forward sales contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
31,580
|
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
April 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
In order to manage the risk associated with fluctuations in
aluminum prices, we engaged in hedging transactions involving
put and call options, as well as forward contracts. These
derivative instruments allowed us to establish minimum average
profits for our future aluminum production in excess of our
expected production costs and therefore ensure stable cash
generation. However, we also have the effect of reducing
potential gains from price increases in the spot market for
aluminum. Our policy has been to settle all commodity
derivatives contracts in cash without physical delivery of
product.
142
The table below sets forth certain information with respect to
our aluminum derivatives portfolio at December 31, 2005 and
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Price Range
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Price Range
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
(Metric tons of
|
|
|
(US$ per metric ton)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(Metric tons of
|
|
|
(US$ per metric ton)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aluminum)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aluminum)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puts purchased
|
|
|
78,500
|
|
|
|
1,375 - 1,625
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
564,100
|
|
|
|
1,375-2,500
|
|
|
|
54.8
|
|
|
|
Dec 2008
|
|
Forwards sold
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
1,502 - 1,700
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
81,000
|
|
|
|
1,502-2,650
|
|
|
|
(21.2
|
)
|
|
|
Dec 2008
|
|
Calls sold
|
|
|
96,500
|
|
|
|
1,535 - 1,640
|
|
|
|
(19.3
|
)
|
|
|
582,100
|
|
|
|
1,565-2,815
|
|
|
|
(144.8
|
)
|
|
|
Dec 2008
|
|
Other instruments
|
|
|
147,000
|
|
|
|
1,400 - 1,700
|
|
|
|
(94.9
|
)
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
1,400-1,700
|
|
|
|
(130.4
|
)
|
|
|
Dec 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
We had outstanding put option contracts, giving us the
right but not the obligation to sell
copper, and sold call option contracts, giving the buyer the
right but not the obligation to purchase
copper for time periods extending to 2008. A major part of the
copper derivative position was added to our books as a result of
the acquisition of Inco.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our copper derivatives portfolio at December 31, 2005
and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Price Range
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Price Range
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
(Metric tons)
|
|
|
(US$ per
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(Metric tons
|
|
|
(US$ per
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
|
|
|
of copper)
|
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puts purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
5,800 - 6,000
|
|
|
|
91.0
|
|
|
|
Dec 2008
|
|
Calls sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
7,650 - 8,500
|
|
|
|
(41.1
|
)
|
|
|
Dec 2008
|
|
Forwards sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
|
|
7,040
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range forward options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,376
|
|
|
|
2,205 - 2,891
|
|
|
|
(349.2
|
)
|
|
|
Dec 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(298.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PGMs and
other precious metals
We currently hold a small position in gold derivative
instruments, structured to manage the risks related to gold
price fluctuations, inherent from the content of gold associated
with copper concentrate production.
The table below sets forth certain information with respect to
our gold derivatives portfolio at December 31, 2005 and
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Price Range
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Price Range
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
(oz.)
|
|
|
(US$ per oz.)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(oz.)
|
|
|
(US$ per oz.)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puts purchased
|
|
|
222,200
|
|
|
|
285 - 385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,200
|
|
|
|
323-325
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
Dec 2008
|
|
Calls sold
|
|
|
286,240
|
|
|
|
343 - 440
|
|
|
|
(46.0
|
)
|
|
|
199,240
|
|
|
|
376-388
|
|
|
|
(53.9
|
)
|
|
|
Dec 2008
|
|
Other instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US $
|
(46.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US $
|
(53.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We enter into platinum hedging contracts in order to manage the
risk associated with the volatility of platinum prices. These
contracts, which were included in our portfolio after the
acquisition of Inco, are generally swap contracts or options,
are intended to provide certain minimum price realizations for a
portion of our future production of such metals. Under these
swap contracts, we receive fixed prices for platinum and pay a
floating price based on monthly average spot prices.
143
The table below set forth certain information with respect to
our platinum derivatives portfolio at December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Price Range
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Price Range
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
(oz.)
|
|
|
(US$ per oz.)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(oz.)
|
|
|
(US$ per oz.)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range forward options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,818
|
|
|
|
708 - 814
|
|
|
|
(19.6
|
)
|
|
|
Dec 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel
oil
We use fuel oil swap contracts to minimize the impact of
fluctuations in the prices of our energy requirements. These
contracts were included in our derivatives portfolio after the
acquisition of Inco. Under these contracts, we pay fixed prices
for energy and receive amounts based on monthly average spot
prices.
The table below set forth certain information about our energy
derivatives portfolio at December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Price Range
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
(Metric tons)
|
|
|
(US$ per metric ton)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(Metric tons)
|
|
|
(US$ per metric ton)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,600
|
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
Mar 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is an embedded derivative related to energy in our
subsidiary Albras on which we have an unrealized loss of
US$180.9 million as of December 31, 2006 and
US$124.1 million as of December 31, 2005.
CREDIT
RISK MANAGEMENT
Financial
institutions risk & exposure
We have a strict policy regarding financial credit risk arising
from derivative and other financial transactions executed with
financial institutions. The credit policy was approved by our
Board of Directors, who delegated to the Executive Board the
approval of individual limits and the total credit exposure of
the portfolio, to be proposed by our finance department. On a
semiannual basis, our financial institutions credit exposure is
submitted to the finance committee and the Executive Board. The
credit quality of each institution is evaluated based on its
financial strength, foreign currency ratings published by
international rating agencies, shareholders equity size
and range of financial products provided. The credit policy only
allows CVRD to perform financial transactions with institutions
that hold at least an A- foreign currency credit rating. In the
case the rating of the institution is capped by the sovereign
ceiling, the rating of the country in which the institution is
incorporated has to be at least equal to Brazil rating, and the
local currency rating of the institution has to be at least A-.
In addition, we can only invest our cash holdings and enter into
derivative transactions with institutions whose limits are
consistent with our credit policy. After the acquisition of
Inco, both the total credit exposure and the individual limits
with financial institutions, including CVRD Incos
portfolio, were evaluated under the credit policy terms and were
submitted to the Executive Board for approval.
Commercial
credit exposure
CVRDs commercial credit policy establishes a set of rules
under which the Executive Board approves an Annual Commercial
Exposure Limit, representing the maximum commercial credit
exposure CVRD is willing to take. This exposure limit is applied
to each business segment of CVRD. For those companies in which
CVRD is the controlling shareholder, the limits are established
according to such policy. For the other companies, CVRDs
Executive Board recommends a credit limit in line with
CVRDs policy. The policy outlines a procedure for
measuring, granting and controlling commercial credit within the
group, which requires that each customer
144
seeking commercial credit must be evaluated considering its
credit quality measured by the strength of its financial
statements, company size, past payment performance and country
risk.
While we integrate CVRD Inco into our operations, CVRD Inco will
maintain separate commercial credit procedures subordinated to
CVRD Incos corporate credit policy, which outlines a
procedure for measuring, granting and controlling commercial
credit exposure limits for CVRD Inco. This credit policy is
under review to ensure that the guidelines and objectives
concerning commercial exposure risk management comply with
CVRDs policies.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Description
of Securities Other than Equity Securities
|
Not applicable.
PART II
|
|
Item 13.
|
Defaults,
Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
|
None.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Material
Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of
Proceeds
|
None.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
EVALUATION
OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our disclosure committee, with the participation of our chief
executive officer, chief financial officer, investors relations
officer, general counsel, chief accounting officer and internal
controls officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2006.
There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any
system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding
of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective
disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable
assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our
evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed
or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in
the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of CVRD is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
The companys internal control over financial reporting is
a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. The companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance
that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
145
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, and that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
CVRDs management has assessed the effectiveness of the
companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006 based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on such assessment
and criteria, CVRDs management has concluded that the
companys internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of December 31, 2006.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of the
companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006 has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report
which appears herein.
CHANGES
IN INTERNAL CONTROLS
Our management identified no change in our internal control over
financial reporting during our fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006 that has materially affected or is
reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over
financial reporting.
|
|
Item 16A.
|
Audit
Committee Financial Expert
|
As described in Item 16D of this
Form 20-F,
in lieu of establishing an independent audit committee, we have
given our Fiscal Council the necessary powers to qualify for the
exemption from the audit committee requirements set forth in
Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3(c)(3).
Our Board of Directors has determined that one of the members of
our Fiscal Council, Mr. Aníbal Moreira dos Santos, is
an audit committee financial expert. Mr. Moreira dos Santos
meets the applicable independence requirements for Fiscal
Council membership under Brazilian law. He also meets the New
York Stock Exchange independence requirements that would apply
to audit committee members in the absence of our reliance on the
exemption set forth in Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3(c)(3).
CVRD has adopted a code of ethics that applies to all board
members, executive officers and employees, including the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of CVRD. We have posted copies of this code
of ethics on our website, at: http://www.cvrd.com.br (under
Investor Relations; Corporate Governance; Code of Ethics).
Copies of our code of ethics may be obtained without charge by
writing to us at the address set forth on the front cover of
this
Form 20-F.
We have not granted any implicit or explicit waivers from any
provision of our code of ethics to the officers described above
since adoption of the code.
146
|
|
Item 16C.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES
PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes billed the
following fees to us for professional services in 2005 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(US$ thousand)
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
5,072
|
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
|
4,291
|
|
|
|
6,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees are the aggregate fees billed by
PricewaterhouseCoopers for the audit of our consolidated and
annual financial statements, the audit of managements
assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,
reviews of interim financial statements and attestation services
that are provided in connection with statutory and regulatory
filings or engagements. Audit-Related Fees are fees
charged by PricewaterhouseCoopers for assurance and related
services that are reasonably related to the performance of the
audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported
under Audit Fees. In 2005 and 2006, Audit-Related
Fees consisted primarily of fees for services related to
CVRDs preparation for the assessment required under
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Tax Fees
relate primarily to the review of the annual federal tax return
and review of accuracy of the tax computation procedures with
respect to income tax and sales taxes.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Our Fiscal Council currently serves as our audit committee for
purposes of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our Fiscal Council
requires management to obtain the Fiscal Councils approval
before engaging our independent auditors to provide any audit or
permitted non-audit services to us or our consolidated
subsidiaries. Pursuant to this policy, our Fiscal Council is
required to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services
provided to CVRD and its consolidated subsidiaries by their
respective independent auditors.
Our Fiscal Council has adopted a pre-approval policy for audit
and non-audit services provided to CVRD and its consolidated
subsidiaries. Under the policy, the Fiscal Council has
pre-approved a detailed list of services based on detailed
proposals from our auditors up to specified monetary limits set
forth in the policy. Services that are not listed or that exceed
the specified limits must be separately pre-approved by the
Fiscal Council. The Fiscal Council is provided with reports on
the services provided under the policy on a periodic basis, and
the list of pre-approved services is updated periodically. The
policy also sets forth a list of prohibited services. Internal
control related services must be specifically pre-approved by
the Fiscal Council.
|
|
Item 16D.
|
Exemptions
from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
|
Under the listed company audit committee rules of the NYSE and
the SEC, we are required to comply with Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3,
which requires that we either establish an audit committee
composed of members of the Board of Directors that meets
specified requirements or designate and empower our fiscal
council to perform the role of the audit committee in reliance
on the exemption set forth in Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3(c)(3).
We have designated and empowered our Fiscal Council to perform
this role. In our assessment, our fiscal council will be able to
act independently and to satisfy the other requirements of
Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3.
147
|
|
Item 16E.
|
Purchases
of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated
Purchasers
|
On June 21, 2006 the Board of Directors approved a buy-back
program of our preferred shares, up to 47,986,763 preferred
shares, executed during 180 days. As of December 31,
2006, we had acquired 15,149,600 shares held in treasury
for subsequent disposal or cancellation at an average weighted
unit cost of US$19.98.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units)
|
|
|
Value) of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part
|
|
|
(or Units) that may
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Average Price Paid
|
|
|
of Publicly
|
|
|
yet be Purchased
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units)
|
|
|
per Share (or
|
|
|
Announced Plans or
|
|
|
Under the Plans or
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Units)
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
From June 22 to June 30, 2006
|
|
|
1,281,100
|
|
|
US$
|
19.20
|
|
|
|
1,281,100
|
|
|
|
46,705,663
|
|
From July 3 to July 17,
2006
|
|
|
13,868,500
|
|
|
US$
|
19.93
|
|
|
|
13,868,500
|
|
|
|
32,837,163
|
|
August 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,837,163
|
|
September 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,837,163
|
|
October 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,837,163
|
|
November 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,837,163
|
|
December 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15,149,600
|
|
|
US$
|
19.98
|
|
|
|
15,149,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
Item 17.
|
Financial
Statements
|
The Registrant has responded to Item 18 in lieu of
responding to this Item.
|
|
Item 18.
|
Financial
Statements
|
Reference is made to pages F-1 to S-1.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Bylaws of Companhia Vale do Rio
Doce, as amended April 27, 2006 (English translation)
|
|
8
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer of CVRD pursuant to
Rules 13a-14
and 15d-14
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
12
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer of CVRD pursuant to
Rules 13a-14
and 15d-14
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
13
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of CVRD, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
15
|
.1
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
|
The amount of long-term debt securities of CVRD or its
subsidiaries authorized under any outstanding agreement does not
exceed 10% of CVRDs total assets on a consolidated basis.
CVRD hereby agrees to furnish the SEC, upon its request, a copy
of any instruments defining the rights of holders of its
long-term debt or of its subsidiaries for which consolidated or
unconsolidated financial statements are required to be filed.
148
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on
Form 20-F
and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to
sign this annual report on its behalf.
COMPANHIA VALE DO RIO DOCE
Name: Roger Agnelli
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Fabio
de Oliveira Barbosa
|
Name: Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Date: May 15, 2007
149
COMPANHIA
VALE DO RIO DOCE
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
Supplemental Financial Information
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
F-1
Report of
independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Companhia Vale do Rio Doce
We have completed an integrated audit of Companhia Vale do Rio
Doces 2006 consolidated financial statements and of its
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006 and audits of its 2005 and 2004
consolidated financial statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are
presented below.
Consolidated
financial statements
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of income, of changes in
stockholders equity and of cash flows present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Companhia Vale
do Rio Doce and its subsidiaries (the Company) at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2006 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 17, to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts
for defined benefit pension and other retirement plans in 2006.
Internal
control over financial reporting
Also, in our opinion, managements assessment, included in
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting appearing under item 15,, that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006 based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on
those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the COSO. The Companys management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility
is to express opinions on managements assessment and on
the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit
of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal
control over financial reporting includes obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and
performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinions.
F-2
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance
that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Auditores Independentes
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
March 7, 2007
F-3
Expressed in millions of United States dollars
(Except numbers of Shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,448
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Unrelated parties
|
|
|
2,929
|
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
Loans and advances to related
parties
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
3,493
|
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Recoverable taxes
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
Others
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,940
|
|
|
|
4,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
38,007
|
|
|
|
14,166
|
|
Investments in affiliated companies
and joint ventures and other investments, net of provision for
losses on equity investments
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill on acquisition of
subsidiaries
|
|
|
4,484
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
Loans and advances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Unrelated parties
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Prepaid pension cost
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Judicial deposits
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
Advances to suppliers
energy
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
Recoverable taxes
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Others
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,654
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
60,954
|
|
|
|
22,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suppliers
|
|
|
2,382
|
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
Payroll and related charges
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
Minimum annual dividends attributed
to stockholders
|
|
|
1,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term
debt unrelated parties
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Loans from related parties
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Employees post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Others
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,312
|
|
|
|
3,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
Long-term debt
unrelated parties
|
|
|
21,122
|
|
|
|
3,714
|
|
Provisions for contingencies
(Note 18(c))
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivative
instruments
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
4,527
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Provisions for asset retirement
obligations
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
Others
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,158
|
|
|
|
6,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
2,811
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
(Note 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred class A
stock 3,600,000,000 no-par-value shares authorized
and 959,758,200 issued
|
|
|
4,702
|
|
|
|
2,150
|
|
Common stock
1,800,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no-par-value shares authorized and
1,499,898,858 issued
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
Treasury stock
15,172,516 preferred and 28,291,020 common shares
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
Other cumulative comprehensive
deficit
|
|
|
(1,004
|
)
|
|
|
(2,729
|
)
|
Undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
9,555
|
|
|
|
4,357
|
|
Unappropriated retained earnings
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
|
|
3,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,673
|
|
|
|
11,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
60,954
|
|
|
|
22,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Consolidated
Statements of Income
Expressed in millions of United States dollars
(Except number of shares and per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Operating revenues, net of
discounts, returns and allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of ores and metals
|
|
|
16,511
|
|
|
|
10,767
|
|
|
|
6,333
|
|
Revenues from logistic services
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
2,381
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
Other products and services
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,363
|
|
|
|
13,405
|
|
|
|
8,479
|
|
Taxes on revenues
|
|
|
(712
|
)
|
|
|
(613
|
)
|
|
|
(413
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues
|
|
|
19,651
|
|
|
|
12,792
|
|
|
|
8,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of ores and metals sold
|
|
|
(7,946
|
)
|
|
|
(4,620
|
)
|
|
|
(2,881
|
)
|
Cost of logistic services
|
|
|
(777
|
)
|
|
|
(705
|
)
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
Cost of aluminum products
|
|
|
(1,355
|
)
|
|
|
(893
|
)
|
|
|
(674
|
)
|
Others
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,147
|
)
|
|
|
(6,229
|
)
|
|
|
(4,081
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
|
|
(452
|
)
|
Research and development
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
Others
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,014
|
)
|
|
|
(7,360
|
)
|
|
|
(4,943
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
3,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(1,338
|
)
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|
|
(671
|
)
|
Foreign exchange and monetary
gains, net
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, equity
results and minority interests
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
5,420
|
|
|
|
3,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
(1,134
|
)
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
(433
|
)
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(316
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
|
|
(880
|
)
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in results of affiliates and
joint ventures
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(579
|
)
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per
Preferred Class A Share
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per
Common Share
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding (thousands of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
1,471,608
|
|
|
|
1,471,608
|
|
|
|
1,471,608
|
|
Preferred Class A shares
|
|
|
954,426
|
|
|
|
831,432
|
|
|
|
831,432
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Expressed in millions of United States dollars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
Dividends received
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Equity in results of affiliates and
joint ventures and change in provision for losses on equity
investments
|
|
|
(710
|
)
|
|
|
(760
|
)
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
Provisions for contingencies
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
Loss on sale of property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
(674
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(404
|
)
|
Foreign exchange and monetary
losses (gains)
|
|
|
(917
|
)
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
112
|
|
Unrealized derivative losses
(gains), net
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
Interest payable (receivable), net
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(438
|
)
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
Others
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(639
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suppliers
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Payroll and related charges
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
Others
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
7,232
|
|
|
|
5,161
|
|
|
|
3,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Repayments
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Guarantees and deposits
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
Additions to investments
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Additions to property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
(4,431
|
)
|
|
|
(3,977
|
)
|
|
|
(2,022
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of
investments
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
Proceeds from disposals of
property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Cash used to acquire subsidiaries,
net cash of acquired
|
|
|
(13,201
|
)
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(16,954
|
)
|
|
|
(4,646
|
)
|
|
|
(1,541
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt, additions
|
|
|
4,912
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
Short-term debt, repayments
|
|
|
(4,233
|
)
|
|
|
(849
|
)
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Issuances of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Others
|
|
|
21,993
|
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
Stock treasury
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Others
|
|
|
(7,635
|
)
|
|
|
(884
|
)
|
|
|
(1,283
|
)
|
Interest attributed to shareholders
|
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
|
|
(787
|
)
|
Dividends to minority interest
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities
|
|
|
13,345
|
|
|
|
(531
|
)
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
3,623
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
842
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
Initial cash in new consolidated
subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of year
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of
year
|
|
|
4,448
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on short-term debt
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
(295
|
)
|
Income tax
|
|
|
(586
|
)
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
Non-cash transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax paid with credits
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Issuance of preferred stock for the
acquisition of Caemi, net of cash acquired (Note 6)
|
|
|
(2,552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
Expressed in millions of United States dollars
(Except number of shares and per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Preferred class A stock
(including six special shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year
|
|
|
2,150
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
Capital increase (Note 6)
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from appropriated retained
earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year
|
|
|
4,702
|
|
|
|
2,150
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
1,902
|
|
Transfer from appropriated retained
earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning and end of the year
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other cumulative comprehensive
deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year
|
|
|
(2,856
|
)
|
|
|
(3,869
|
)
|
|
|
(4,449
|
)
|
Change in the year
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year
|
|
|
(1,628
|
)
|
|
|
(2,856
|
)
|
|
|
(3,869
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Change in the year
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Superavit (deficit) accrued pension
plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in the year
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial recognition effect
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other cumulative
comprehensive deficit
|
|
|
(1,004
|
)
|
|
|
(2,729
|
)
|
|
|
(3,774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year
|
|
|
4,357
|
|
|
|
4,143
|
|
|
|
3,035
|
|
Transfer from unappropriated
retained earnings
|
|
|
5,198
|
|
|
|
2,873
|
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
Transfer to capital stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,659
|
)
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year
|
|
|
9,555
|
|
|
|
4,357
|
|
|
|
4,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unappropriated retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year
|
|
|
3,983
|
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
2,857
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
Dividends and interest attributed
to stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred class A stock
|
|
|
(1,098
|
)
|
|
|
(469
|
)
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
Common stock
|
|
|
(1,710
|
)
|
|
|
(831
|
)
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
Appropriation to reserves
|
|
|
(5,198
|
)
|
|
|
(2,873
|
)
|
|
|
(1,448
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
|
|
3,983
|
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
19,673
|
|
|
|
11,977
|
|
|
|
7,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income is comprised
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Superavit (deficit) accrued pension
plan
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
7,793
|
|
|
|
5,886
|
|
|
|
3,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes effect on other comprehensive
income allocated to each component
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on investments
available-for-sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Superavit (deficit) accrued pension
plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred class A stock
(including six special shares)(1)
|
|
|
959,758,200
|
|
|
|
831,455,478
|
|
|
|
831,455,478
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
1,499,898,858
|
|
|
|
1,499,898,858
|
|
|
|
1,499,898,858
|
|
Treasury stock(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year
|
|
|
(28,313,936
|
)
|
|
|
(28,314,922
|
)
|
|
|
(28,316,118
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(15,149,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year
|
|
|
(43,463,536
|
)
|
|
|
(28,313,936
|
)
|
|
|
(28,314,922
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,416,193,522
|
|
|
|
2,303,040,400
|
|
|
|
2,303,039,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and interest attributed
to stockholders (per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred class A stock
(including six special shares)
|
|
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Increase of 128,302,722 preferred
shares (after split of shares) due to merger of shares from
Caemi.
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
As of December 31, 2006,
28,291,020 common shares and 15,172,516 preferred shares were
held in treasury in the amount of US$389. The 28,291,020 common
shares are provided as collateral to secure a loan of our
subsidiary Alunorte. On December 31, 2006 the market value
of 3,617,821 of these shares would be sufficient to offset the
balance of the debt.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements
Expressed in millions of United States dollars, unless
otherwise stated
|
|
1
|
The
Company and its operation
|
Companhia Vale do Rio Doce (CVRD) is a limited liability
company, duly organized and existing under the laws of the
Federative Republic of Brazil. Our operations are carried out
through CVRD and its subsidiary companies, joint ventures and
affiliates, and mainly consist of mining, non-ferrous metal
production and logistics, as well as energy, aluminum and steel
activities. Further details of our operations and those of our
joint ventures and affiliates are described in Note 13.
On December 31, 2006 the main operating subsidiaries we
consolidate are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Voting
|
|
|
Head Office
|
|
Principal
|
Subsidiary
|
|
% Ownership
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Activity
|
|
Alumina do Norte do Brasil
S.A. Alunorte (Alunorte)
|
|
|
57.03
|
|
|
|
61.74
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Alumina
|
Alumínio Brasileiro
S.A. Albras (Albras)
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Aluminum
|
CADAM S.A (CADAM)
|
|
|
61.48
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Kaolin
|
CVRD International S.A.(1)
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Swiss
|
|
Trading
|
CVRD Overseas Ltd.
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Cayman Islands
|
|
Trading
|
Inco Limited(3)
|
|
|
87.73
|
|
|
|
87.73
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
Nickel
|
Ferrovia Centro-Atlântica S. A
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Logistics
|
Minerações Brasileiras
Reunidas S.A. MBR
|
|
|
89.80
|
|
|
|
89.80
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Iron ore
|
Mineração Onça Puma
Ltda
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Nickel
|
Navegação Vale do Rio
Doce S.A. DOCENAVE
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Shipping
|
Pará Pigmentos S.A.
(PPSA)
|
|
|
82.05
|
|
|
|
85.57
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Kaolin
|
PT International Nickel Indonesia
Tbk (PT Inco)(4)
|
|
|
61.16
|
|
|
|
61.16
|
|
|
Indonesia
|
|
Nickel
|
Rio Doce Manganês S.A.
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Manganese and Ferroalloys
|
Rio Doce Manganèse
Europe RDME
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
France
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
Rio Doce Manganese
Norway RDMN
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Norway
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
Urucum Mineração
S.A.
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Iron ore, Ferroalloys and Manganese
|
Valesul Aumínio S.A.(2)
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Previously known as Itabira Rio Doce Company Ltd.
ITACO |
|
(2) |
|
Subsidiary consolidated as from July, 2006 (Note 6 and 13) |
|
(3) |
|
Subsidiary consolidated as from October, 2006 (Note 7) |
|
(4) |
|
Through Inco Limited |
All majority-owned subsidiaries in which we have both share and
management control are consolidated. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated. Our
variable interest entities in which we are the primary
beneficiary are consolidated. Investments in unconsolidated
affiliates and joint ventures are
F-8
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
reported at cost plus our equity in undistributed earnings or
losses. Included in this category are certain joint ventures in
which we have majority ownership but, by force of
shareholders agreements, do not have effective management
control. We provide for losses on equity investments with
negative shareholders equity where applicable (Note 13).
We evaluate the carrying value of our listed investments
relative to publicly available quoted market prices. If the
quoted market price is below book value, and such decline is
considered other than temporary, we write-down our equity
investments to quoted market value.
We define joint ventures as businesses in which we and a small
group of other partners each participate actively in the overall
entity management, based on a shareholders agreement. We define
affiliates as businesses in which we participate as a minority
shareholder but with significant influence over the operating
and financial policies of the investee.
Our investments in hydroelectric projects are made via
consortium contracts under which we have an undivided interest
in assets and are liable for our proportionate share of
liabilities and expenses, which is based on our proportionate
share of power output. We do not have joint liability for any
obligations, and all our recorded costs, income, assets and
liabilities relate to the entities within our group. Since there
is no separate legal entity for the project, there are no
separate financial statements, income tax return, net income or
shareholders equity. Brazilian corporate law explicitly
provides that no separate legal entity exists as a result of a
consortium contract, and our external legal counsel has
confirmed this conclusion. So, we recognize our proportionate
share of costs and our undivided interest in assets relating to
hydroelectric projects described in Note 12 (c).
|
|
3
|
Summary
of significant accounting policies
|
The preparation of financial statements requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Estimates are used for, but not limited to the selection
of useful lives of property, plant and equipment, provisions
necessary for contingent liabilities, fair values assigned to
assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, income
tax valuation allowances, employee post retirement benefits and
other similar evaluations. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
|
|
(a)
|
Basis
of presentation
|
We have prepared our consolidated financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (US GAAP), which differ in
certain respects from the accounting practices adopted in Brazil
that we use in preparing our statutory financial statements.
For Brazilian operations the U.S. dollar amounts for the
years presented have been remeasured (translated) from the
Brazilian currency amounts in accordance with the criteria set
forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
52 Foreign Currency Translation
(SFAS 52).
Prior to July 1, 1997, Brazil was considered under
SFAS 52 to have a highly inflationary economy and
accordingly, up to June 30, 1997, we adopted the
U.S. dollar as both our functional currency and reporting
currency.
As from July 1, 1997, we concluded that the Brazilian
economy had ceased to be highly inflationary and changed our
functional currency from the reporting currency
(U.S. dollars) to the Brazil currency (Brazilian Reais),
for Brazilian operations and extensions thereof. Accordingly, we
translated the U.S. dollar amounts of
F-9
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
non-monetary assets and liabilities into Reais at the current
exchange rate, and those amounts became the new accounting bases
for such assets and liabilities.
We have remeasured all assets and liabilities into
U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate at each balance
sheet date (R$2.1342 and R$2.3370 to US$1.00 or the first
available exchange rate if exchange on December 31, was not
available), and all accounts in the statements of income
(including amounts relative to Brazil currency indexation and
exchange variances on assets and liabilities denominated in
foreign currency) at the average rates prevailing during the
period. The translation gain or loss resulting from this
remesurement process is included in the cumulative translation
adjustments account in shareholders equity.
The net exchange transaction gain included in our statement of
income was US$452, US$227 and US$79 in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, included within the line Foreign exchange
and monetary gains (losses), net.
|
|
(b)
|
Business
combinations
|
We adopt the procedures determined by SFAS 141
Business Combinations to recognize acquisitions of
interests in other companies. The method of accounting used in
our business combination transactions is the purchase
method, which requires that acquirers reasonably determine
the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of
acquired companies, individually, in order to determine the
goodwill paid in the purchase to be recognized as an intangible
asset. On the acquisition of assets, which include the rights to
mine reserves of natural resources, the establishment of values
for these assets includes the placing of fair values on
purchased reserves, which are classified in the balance sheet as
property, plant and equipment.
Goodwill was amortized in a systematic manner over the periods
estimated to be benefited through December 31, 2001. As
required by SFAS 142 Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets from January 1, 2002 goodwill
resulting from the acquisitions is no longer amortized, but is
tested for impairment at least annually and reduced to fair
value to the extent any such impairment is identified.
Inventories are stated at the average cost of purchase or
production, lower than replacement or realizable values. We
record allowances for slow moving or obsolete inventories when
considered appropriate, reflecting our periodic assessment of
recoverability.
We classify proven and probable reserve quantities attributable
to stockpiled inventory as inventory and account for them as
processed when they are removed from the mine. These reserve
quantities are not included in the total proven and probable
reserve quantities used in the units of production,
depreciation, depletion and amortization calculations.
|
|
(d)
|
Property,
plant and equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, including
interest cost incurred during the construction of major new
facilities. We compute depreciation on the straight-line basis
at annual average rates which take into consideration the useful
lives of the items, such as: 3.20% for the railroads, 2.78% for
buildings, 2.97% for installations and 4.95% for mining
development costs and 9.89% for other equipment. Expenditures
for maintenance and repairs are charged to operating costs and
expenses as incurred.
We capitalize the costs of developing major new ore bodies or
expanding the capacity of operating mines and amortize these to
operations on the
unit-of-production
method based on the total probable and proven quantity of ore to
be recovered. Exploration costs are expensed. After economic
viability of mining activities
F-10
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
is established, subsequent development costs are capitalized. We
capitalize mine development costs as from the time we actually
begin such development.
|
|
(e)
|
Available-for-sale
equity securities
|
Equity securities classified as
available-for-sale
are recorded in accordance with SFAS 115 Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
Accordingly, we exclude unrealized holding gains and losses, net
of taxes, if applicable, from income and recognize them, net of
tax effects, as a separate component of shareholders
equity until realized.
|
|
(f)
|
Revenues
and expenses
|
Revenues are recognized when title has transferred to the
customer or services are rendered. Revenue from exported
products is recognized when such products are loaded on board
the ship. Revenue from products sold in the domestic market is
recognized when delivery is made to the customer. Revenue from
transportation services, other than shipping operations, is
recognized when the service order has been fulfilled. Shipping
operations are recorded on the completed voyage basis and net
revenue, costs and expenses of voyages not completed at
period-end are deferred. Anticipated losses on voyages are
provided when probable and can be reasonably estimated. Expenses
and costs are recognized on the accrual basis.
|
|
(g)
|
Asset
retirement obligations
|
Retirement of long-lived assets is accounted for in accordance
with SFAS 143 Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations. Our retirement obligations consist
primarily of costs associated with closure activities whose
initial measurement is recognized as liabilities at its fair
value calculated based on a present value discount rate and
accreted to full value over time through charges on earnings. An
asset retirement cost equivalent to the liabilities is
capitalized as part of the related assets carrying value
and subsequently depreciated over the assets useful life.
We fully accrue the employees compensation liability for
vacations vested during the year.
In accordance with SFAS 109 Accounting
for Income Taxes, the deferred tax effects of tax loss
carryforwards and temporary differences have been recognized in
the consolidated financial statements. A valuation allowance is
made when we believe that it is more likely than not that tax
assets will not be fully recoverable in the future.
|
|
(j)
|
Statement
of cash flows
|
Cash flows relating to overnight financing and investment are
reported net. Short-term investments that have a ready market
and maturity to us, when purchased, of 90 days or less are
considered cash equivalents.
Earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the
weighted average number of common and preferred shares
outstanding during the period.
F-11
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(l)
|
Interest
attributed to shareholders
|
As from January 1, 1996 Brazilian corporations are
permitted to distribute interest attributable to
shareholders equity. The calculation is based on the
shareholders equity amounts as stated in the statutory
accounting records and the interest rate applied may not exceed
the long-term interest rate (TJLP) determined by the Brazilian
Central Bank. Also, such interest may not exceed 50% of net
income for the year neither 50% of retained earnings plus
revenue reserves.
The amount of interest attributed to shareholders is deductible
for purposes of taxes on income. Accordingly, the benefit to us,
as opposed to making a dividend payment, is a reduction in our
income tax charge. Income tax is withheld from the shareholders
relative to interest at the rate of 15%.
Under Brazilian law, interest attributable to shareholders is
considered as part of the annual minimum dividend
(Note 16). Accordingly such distributions are treated as
dividends for accounting purposes.
|
|
(m)
|
Derivatives
and hedging activities
|
We apply SFAS 133 Accounting for
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities,
as amended by SFAS 137, SFAS 138 and SFAS 149.
Those standards require that we recognize all derivative
financial instruments as either assets or liabilities on our
balance sheet and measure such instruments at fair value.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded in each
period in current earnings or in other comprehensive income, in
the latter case depending on whether a transaction is designated
as an effective hedge. No contracts have been designed as an
effective hedge in the years presented.
We have disclosed comprehensive income as part of the Statement
of Changes in Shareholders Equity, in compliance with
SFAS 130 Reporting Comprehensive
Income. We disclose the components net of taxes and
reconcile them at the Consolidation Statements of changes
Shareholders equity.
|
|
(o)
|
Pension
and other post retirement benefits
|
Private pension and other post retirement benefits sponsored by
us for our employees are actuarially determined and recognized
in asset or liability or both depending on the funded or
unfunded status of each plan in accordance with
SFAS 158 Employees Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post retirement Plans
issued and adopted at the end of 2006. This statement amends
previous related ones used by us for that purpose. The cost of
our defined benefit and prior service costs or credits that
arise during the period and are not components of net periodic
benefit costs are recorded in other cumulative comprehensive
deficit.
|
|
(p)
|
Removal
of waste materials to access mineral deposits
|
During the development of a mine, before production commences,
stripping costs (i.e., the costs associated with the removal of
overburden and other waste materials) are capitalized as part of
the depreciable cost of developing the property. Such costs are
subsequently amortized over the useful life of the mine based on
proven and probable reserves.
Post-production stripping costs are recorded as cost of
production when incurred.
F-12
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
4
|
Recently-issued
accounting pronouncements
|
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.
SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure
many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by
providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility
in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge
accounting provisions. This Statement is expected to expand the
use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the
Boards long-term measurement objectives for accounting for
financial instruments. The fair value option established by this
Statement permits all entities to choose to measure eligible
items at fair value at specified election dates. This standard
is effective for fiscal years ending on or after
November 15, 2007. We are currently studying the impact of
this standard.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting
for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans. SFAS No. 158 requires employers to
recognize the over funded or under funded status of defined
benefit postretirement plans as an asset or a liability and to
recognize the changes in the funded status through comprehensive
income. Statement No. 158 also requires that defined
benefit plan assets and obligations be measured as of the fiscal
year-end. This standard is effective for fiscal years ending on
or after December 15, 2006. We adopted this Statement and
its effects are disclosed at Note 17.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. This statement applies under other
accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements, the Board having previously concluded in those
accounting pronouncements that fair value is relevant
measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not
require any new fair value measurements. Accordingly to the
Board, a single definition of fair value, together with a
framework for measuring fair value, should result in increased
consistency and comparability in fair value measurements. This
standard is effective for fiscal years ending on or after
November 15, 2007. We are currently studying the impact of
this standard.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a
comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure,
present, and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax
positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax
return (including a decision whether to file or not to file a
return in a particular jurisdiction). Under the Interpretation,
the financial statements will reflect expected future tax
consequences of such positions presuming the taxing
authorities full knowledge of the position and all
relevant facts, but without considering time values. This
standard is effective as from January 1, 2007. We do not
expect this statement to have any significant impact on our
financial position, results of operation and cash flows.
In May 1997, we were privatized by the Brazilian Government,
which transferred voting control to Valepar S.A.
(Valepar). The Brazilian Government has retained
certain rights with respect to our future decisions and those of
Valepar and has also caused us to enter into agreements which
may affect our activities and results of operations in the
future. These rights and agreements are:
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Special Share. The Brazilian Government holds six
preferred special shares of CVRD which confers upon it permanent
veto rights over changes in our (i) name,
(ii) location of our headquarters
|
F-13
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) corporate purpose with respect to mineral
exploration, (iv) continued operation of our integrated
iron ore mining systems and (v) certain other matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder revenue interests. On July 7, 1997, we issued
to shareholders of record on April 18, 1997 (including the
Brazilian Government) revenue interests providing holders
thereof with the right to receive semi-annual payments based on
a percentage of our net revenues above threshold production
volumes from identified mining resources. These instruments are
not secured by the corresponding mineral reserves and deposits
(Note 18(e)).
|
|
|
6
|
Major
acquisitions and disposals
|
In February 2007, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement
to acquire 100% of AMCI Holdings Australia Pty AMCI
HÁ, a private company held in Australia, which operates and
controls coal assets through joint ventures, for AUD
835 million (approximately US$660).
In December 2006, we sold our total interest in
Siderar S.A.I.C, corresponding to 4.85%, a steel
plant located in Argentina to Ternium S.A. for US$108 and a gain
of US$96.
In November 2006, we keep the shares necessary to be in part of
the control group at Usinas Siderúrgicas Minas
Gerais USIMINAS. Part of the remaining shares,
corresponding to 5,362,928 common shares, we sold to Nippon
Steel, Votorantim Participações S/A, and Camargo
Corrêa S/A, in the amount of US$176 and a gain of US$175.
We still have 13,839,192 Usiminas common shares that will be
sold through a public offer.
During the third quarter of 2006, we sold 1,361,100 shares
of Gerdau S.A. for US$19. During the fourth quarter we sold the
remaining 3,379,825 shares of Gerdau S.A. for US$48. The
total gain related to this operation amounted to US$56.
In July 2006 we acquired the remaining 45.5% of Valesul
Alumínio S. A., which was a jointly controlled company with
equal voting rights, for US$28, becoming our aluminum subsidiary
and therefore we have been consolidating it since then.
During the second quarter of 2006, we sold our total interest in
Gulf Industrial Investment Company for US$418, resulting in a
net gain of US$338.
At an Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting on March 31,
2006, the Capital Stock increased by US$2,552, corresponding to
128,302,722 preferred shares (64,151,361 before split), due to
the issuance of shares in relation to the acquisition of the
outstanding minority interest in Caemi and at an our
Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on
December 29, 2006, Caemi was merged. Had the acquisition of
the 39.77% preferred shares of CAEMI occurred on January 1,
2005, the only effects that would have changed were elimination
of minority interest and consequently increase of net income by
US$283 and a total amount concerning basic and diluted earnings
per share of US$2.11 in 2005 and increase of net income by US$54
and a total amount concerning basic and diluted earnings per
share of US$2.71 in 2006.
During the first quarter of 2006, we sold our total interest in
Nova Era Silicon (49%) to JFE Steel Corporation for US$14,
resulting in a net gain of US$9.
On November 2005, we acquired 93.0% of the voting capital of
Canico Resource Corp. (Canico) a Canadian-based junior resource
company focused on the development of the Onça-Puma nickel
laterite, for US$750. In December 2005, we acquired an
additional 6.20% of the voting capital of Canico for US$50.
Canicos only significant asset other than US$63 of cash
and cash equivalents was US$794 of mining rights. On
February 10, 2006, we concluded the acquisition of the
outstanding common shares of Canico, acquiring
F-14
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
the remaining voting capital of Canico, 0.8% of its total
capital for US$6, which is now a wholly owned subsidiary.
In October, 2006 we acquired Inco Limited (Inco), a
Canadian-based nickel company, and the worlds largest
nickel possessing capacity and reserve base, for
US$13 billion, corresponding to 174,623,019 common shares
for Cdn$86.00 each share, representing 75.66% of its outstanding
shares. By November 3, 2006 we had already acquired a total
of 196,078,276 shares by aproximatelly US$15 billion,
representing 86.57% of Incos capital. Due to the issuing
of new shares related to the convertible debt, on
December 31, we had 87.73% of the outstanding shares. On
January 3, 2007 the special meeting of shareholders of
Inco, approved the amalgamation of Inco with Itabira Canada Inc.
(Itabira Canada), our wholly-owned indirect subsidiary.
In December 2006 we concluded several transactions to take out
the bridge loan aiming to extend our average debt maturity close
to the pre-acquisition level, which is close to ten years, as
described in Note 15.
Pursuant to the amalgamation, occurred in January, 2007, Inco
changed its name to CVRD Inco Limited (CVRD Inco)
and we had 100% of the outstanding shares, corresponding to
US$2.1 billion.
The purchase price allocations based on the fair values of
acquired assets and liabilities was based on managements
preliminary internal valuation estimates. Such allocations will
be finalize based on valuation and other studies which are in
course, performed by us with the assistance of outside valuation
specialists. Accordingly, the purchase price allocation
adjustments set forth bellow are preliminary and are subject to
revision, which may be material.
Fair values used herein were calculated using current pension
and post retirement benefits obligation funded status, current
interest rates and sales prices for finished goods, estimated
future production, investment, costs, commodity prices and cash
flows.
The purchase price allocation in relation to the fair value of
assets and liabilities acquired will be finalize in 2007.
On the preparation of this information our acquisition is of
87.73%, in December 2006, of Incos shares.
|
|
|
|
|
Total disbursements
|
|
|
14,971
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
|
15,009
|
|
Book value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed, net
|
|
|
(3,993
|
)
|
Adjustment to fair value of
inventory
|
|
|
(1,686
|
)
|
Adjustment to fair value of
property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(9,044
|
)
|
Change of control obligations
|
|
|
839
|
|
Adjustment to fair value of other
liabilities assumed
|
|
|
223
|
|
Deferred taxes on the above
adjustments
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Pro forma information considers that our acquisition of 87.73%
of Inco as if it was completed at the beginning of each period
(unaudited).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
CVRD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CVRD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated(1)
|
|
|
Inco
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Inco
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Net operating revenues
|
|
|
19,651
|
|
|
|
5,351
|
|
|
|
25,002
|
|
|
|
12,792
|
|
|
|
4,518
|
|
|
|
17,310
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
(12,014
|
)
|
|
|
(3,738
|
)
|
|
|
(15,752
|
)
|
|
|
(7,360
|
)
|
|
|
(3,645
|
)
|
|
|
(11,005
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
6,305
|
|
Non-operating income
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
(486
|
)
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(1,065
|
)
|
|
|
(1,077
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes,
equity results and minority interests
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
|
|
8,956
|
|
|
|
5,420
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
5,228
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
|
(1,882
|
)
|
|
|
(880
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
Equity in results of affiliates
and joint ventures and change in provision for losses on equity
investments
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(579
|
)
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
(808
|
)
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
6,976
|
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
4,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes consolidation of INCO as from October 23, 2006. |
Income taxes in Brazil comprise federal income tax and social
contribution, which is an additional federal tax. The statutory
composite enacted tax rate applicable in the periods presented
is 34% represented by a 25% federal income tax rate plus a 9%
social contribution rate.
In other countries where we have operation the applicable
nominal tax rate varied from 3.29% to 43.15%.
F-16
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The amount reported as income tax expense in our consolidated
financial statements is reconciled to the statutory rates as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, equity
results and minority interests
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
5,420
|
|
|
|
3,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax and social
contribution expense at statutory enacted rates
|
|
|
(2,662
|
)
|
|
|
(1,843
|
)
|
|
|
(1,021
|
)
|
Adjustments to derive effective
tax rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit on interest attributed
to stockholders
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Difference on tax rates of foreign
income
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
Difference on tax basis of equity
investees
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
Tax incentives
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Valuation allowance reversal
(provision)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Non-deductible losses on
derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Other non-taxable gains (losses)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax and social
contribution expense in consolidated statements of income
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
|
|
(880
|
)
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have certain Brazilian tax incentives relative to our
manganese operations in Carajás, our potash operations in
Rosario do Catete, our alumina and aluminum operations in
Barcarena and our kaolin operations in Ipixuna and Mazagão.
The incentives relative to manganese comprise partial exemption
up to 2013. The incentive relating to alumina and potash
comprise full income tax exemption on defined production levels,
which expires in 2009 and 2013, respectively, while the partial
exemption incentives relative to aluminum and kaolin expire in
2013. An amount equal to the tax saving must be appropriated to
a reserve account within shareholders equity and may not
be distributed in the form of cash dividends. Brazilian tax loss
carry forwards have no expiration date.
We have also taxes incentives related to Goro Project in New
Caledonia. These incentives include an income tax holiday during
the construction phase of the project and throughout a
15-year
period commencing in the first year in which commercial
production, as defined by the applicable legislation, is
achieved followed by a five-year, 50 per cent income tax
holiday. In addition, Goro qualifies for certain exemptions from
indirect taxes such as import duties during the construction
phase and throughout the commercial life of the project. Certain
of these tax benefits, including the income tax holiday, are
subject to an earlier phase out should the project achieve a
specified cumulative rate of return. We are subject to a branch
profit tax commencing in the first year in which commercial
production is achieved, as defined by the applicable
legislation. To date, we have not realized any net income for
New Caledonia tax purposes. The benefits of this legislation are
expected to apply with respect to any taxes otherwise payable
once the Goro project is in operation.
F-17
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The major components of the deferred tax accounts in the balance
sheet are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Current deferred tax
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses deductible only
when disbursed
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax assets
and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to provision for losses
and write-downs of investments
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Employees post retirement benefits
provision
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Tax loss carryforwards
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
Other temporary differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflationary income
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Relative to equity investments
acquired
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
Prepaid retirement benefit
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
Fair value adjustments in business
combinations
|
|
|
(4,892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other temporary differences
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,689
|
)
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Change in allowance
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net long-term deferred tax
assets
|
|
|
(4,527
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Deposits denominated in Brazilian
Reais
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
Deposits denominated in other
currencies mainly United States dollars
|
|
|
2,669
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,448
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Other countries, all denominated
in United States dollars
|
|
|
3,164
|
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,681
|
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Allowance for ore weight credits
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,604
|
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable from customers in the steel industry
represent 37.2% of Brazilian receivables and 53.0% of other
countries receivables at December 31, 2006.
No single customer accounted for more than 10.0% of total
revenues.
In 2006 and 2005 there were US$15 and US$0 regarding change in
provisions, respectively. In 2006 and 2005 there were no
write-offs in the year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Finished products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore and pellets
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Manganese and ferroalloys
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
Alumina
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel (co-products and
by-products)
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Spare parts and maintenance
supplies
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,493
|
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was US$47 and US$39 million recorded as write down in
2006 and 2005, respectively.
F-19
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
12
|
Property,
plant and equipment
|
a) By
business area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In operation
|
|
|
15,440
|
|
|
|
4,550
|
|
|
|
10,890
|
|
|
|
9,795
|
|
|
|
3,607
|
|
|
|
6,188
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,090
|
|
|
|
4,550
|
|
|
|
13,540
|
|
|
|
11,844
|
|
|
|
3,607
|
|
|
|
8,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In operation
|
|
|
12,962
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
12,422
|
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
7,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,425
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,387
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
19,847
|
|
|
|
2,572
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
2,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In operation
|
|
|
1,262
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
1,236
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
925
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In operation
|
|
|
2,758
|
|
|
|
902
|
|
|
|
1,856
|
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,997
|
|
|
|
902
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
|
|
2,715
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Center
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In operation
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
44,564
|
|
|
|
6,557
|
|
|
|
38,007
|
|
|
|
19,024
|
|
|
|
4,858
|
|
|
|
14,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
1,970
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
Installations
|
|
|
7,751
|
|
|
|
2,034
|
|
|
|
5,717
|
|
|
|
4,917
|
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
|
|
3,321
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
3,301
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
2,285
|
|
|
|
1,855
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
3,964
|
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
2,696
|
|
|
|
2,846
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
Mine development costs
|
|
|
12,703
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
12,119
|
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
1,664
|
|
Others
|
|
|
2,753
|
|
|
|
1,095
|
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,002
|
|
|
|
6,557
|
|
|
|
26,445
|
|
|
|
14,211
|
|
|
|
4,858
|
|
|
|
9,353
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
11,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,562
|
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
44,564
|
|
|
|
6,557
|
|
|
|
38,007
|
|
|
|
19,024
|
|
|
|
4,858
|
|
|
|
14,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses on disposals and impairments of property, plant and
equipment totaled US$106, US$26 and US$34 in 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively. Disposals and impairments mainly relate to
impairment of sales of ships and trucks, locomotives and other
equipment which were replaced in the normal course of business.
Assets given in guarantee to judicial processes totaled US$115.
|
|
(c)
|
Power
generation assets
|
We participate in several jointly-owned hydroelectric power
plants, already in operation or under construction. We have an
undivided interest in these plants and are responsible for our
proportionate share of the costs of construction and operation
and entitled to our proportionate share of the energy produced.
We record our undivided interest in these assets as property,
plant and equipment.
The situation of these projects at December 31, 2006 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Plant in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Cost of Plant under
|
|
Project
|
|
Service
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Igarapava
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Porto Estrela
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funil
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Candonga
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aimorés
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capim Branco I
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larona(*)
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balambano(*)
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machadinho
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capim Branco II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Through PT Inco |
|
|
|
Income and expenses relating to operating plants are not
material. |
F-21
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
13
|
Investments
in affiliated companies and joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Adjustments
|
|
|
Dividends Received
|
|
|
|
in Capital (%)
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
for the
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companhia Nipo-Brasileira de
Pelotização NIBRASCO(1)
|
|
|
51.11
|
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companhia Hispano-Brasileira de
Pelotização HISPANOBRÁS(1)
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
|
50.89
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Companhia Coreano-Brasileira de
Pelotização KOBRASCO
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companhia Ítalo-Brasileira
de
Pelotização ITABRASCO(1)
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
|
50.90
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAMARCO Mineração
S.A. SAMARCO(2)
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Minas da Serra Geral
S.A. MSG
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Industrial Investment
Company GIIC(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MRS Logística S.A.
|
|
|
37.23
|
|
|
|
40.45
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas
Gerais
S.A. USIMINAS(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Companhia Siderúrgica de
Tubarão CST(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Steel Industries
Inc. CSI
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
SIDERAR (cost $15)
available-for-sale
investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Aluminum and bauxite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineração Rio do Norte
S.A. MRN
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Valesul Alumínio
S.A. VALESUL(5)
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henan Longyu Resources Co.
Ltd.
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shandong Yankuang International
Company Ltd.
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel
available-for-sale
investments(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jubilee Mines N.L (cost $30)
|
|
|
4.88
|
|
|
|
4.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lion Ore Mining International Ltd
(cost $21)
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mirabela Nickel Ltd (cost $12)
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skye Resources Inc (cost $-18)
|
|
|
9.60
|
|
|
|
9.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heron Resources Inc (cost $3)
|
|
|
9.80
|
|
|
|
9.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other affiliates and joint
ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
CVRD hold a majority of the voting interest of several entities
that were accounted for under the equity method, in accordance
with
EITF 96-16,
due to veto rights held by minority shareholders under
shareholders agreements; |
|
(2) |
|
Investment includes goodwill of US$50 and US$46 in 2006 and
2005, respectively; |
|
(3) |
|
Equity method used through November 2006, and
available-for-sale
subsequently; |
|
(4) |
|
Sold for US$418 in May 2006; |
|
(5) |
|
Subsidiary consolidated as from July 2006 (see note 6); |
|
(6) |
|
CST was sold is 2004; and |
|
(7) |
|
Investments hold through Inco Limited. |
Our short-term borrowings are mainly from commercial banks and
relate to export financing denominated in United States dollars.
Average annual interest rates on short-term borrowings were
5.5%, 4.2% and 2.3% at December 31, 2006 and 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Foreign debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and financing denominated in
the following currencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States dollars
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
10,483
|
|
|
|
1,617
|
|
Others
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Fixed Rate Notes US$
denominated
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,785
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
Securitization of export
receivables US$ denominated
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
Perpetual notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Accrued charges
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
17,765
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominated in Long-Term Interest
Rate TJLP/CDI
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Denominated in General Price
Index-Market (IGPM)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Basket of currencies
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Non-convertible debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,774
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
Denominated by U.S. dollars
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
Accrued charges
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
3,357
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
21,122
|
|
|
|
3,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The long-term portion at December 31, 2006 falls due in the
following years:
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
8,590
|
|
2009
|
|
|
400
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
2011
|
|
|
580
|
|
2012 thereafter
|
|
|
10,084
|
|
No due date (Perpetual notes and
non-convertible debentures)
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 annual interest rates on long-term
debt were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
3.1% to 5%
|
|
|
741
|
|
5.1% to 7%
|
|
|
15,204
|
|
7.1% to 9%
|
|
|
5,620
|
|
9.1% to 11%
|
|
|
124
|
|
Over 11%
|
|
|
53
|
|
Variable (Perpetual notes)
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The indices applied to debt and respective percentage variations
at December 31 of each year were as follows (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
TJLP Long-Term
Interest Rate (effective rate)
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
IGP-M General Price
Index Market
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
Devaluation of United States
Dollar against Real
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
Pursuant the acquisition of Inco we executed various operations
through December, 2006. After the execution of three financing
transactions totaling US$12.3 billion, completed a
significant part of the take out of the initial
US$14.6 billion bridge loan, used to finance the Inco
acquisition.
In the first of these three transactions, on November 16,
2006, we issued a US$3.75 billion
10-year and
30-year
notes. The US$1.25 billion notes due in January 2017 bear a
coupon rate of 6.25% per year, payable semi-annually. The
US$2.50 billion notes due in November 2036 bear a coupon
rate of 6.875% per year, payable semi-annually, and were
priced with a yield to maturity of 6.997% per year.
The second transaction involved the issue on December 20,
2006 in the Brazilian market of non-convertible debentures in
the amount of US$2.5 billion, in two series, with four and
seven-year maturities. The first series, due on
November 20, 2010, approximately US$700, will be
remunerated at 101.75% of the accumulated variation of the
Brazilian CDI (interbank certificate of deposit) interest rate,
payable semi-annually. The second series, due on
November 20, 2013, approximately US$1.8 billion, will
be remunerated at the Brazilian CDI interest rate plus
0.25% per year, also payable semi-annually. These
debentures can be traded in the secondary market, through the
Sistema Nacional de Debêntures (SND).
The third transaction which closed on December 21, 2006,
was a pre-export finance transaction of US$6.0 billion,
defining the final allocation among the members of a bank
syndicate. The transaction includes
F-24
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
a US$5.0 billion tranche, five-year maturity, at Libor plus
0.625% per year, and a US$1.0 billion tranche,
seven-year maturity, at Libor plus 0.75% per year.
In January 2006, the subsidiary Vale Overseas Limited issued
US$1 billion
10-year
6.250% per year notes, payable semi-annually due 2016,
fully and unconditionally guaranteed by us.
In January, 2006, the subsidiary Vale Overseas Limited concluded
its tender offer for any and all of its US$300 aggregate
principal amount outstanding 9.00% p.a. guaranteed Notes due
2013.
In October, 2005, we issued US$300 notes due 2034, bearing
interest of 7.65% per year in the same form as the US$500,
8.25% unconditionally guaranteed notes issued on
January 15, 2004.
On December 31, 2006 the US dollar denominated Fixed Rate
Notes of US$6,897 (2005 US$1,256) and other debt of
US$14,017 (2005 US$2,661) are unsecured. The export
securitization of US$345 (2005 US$427) is debt
securities secured by future receivables arising from certain
export sales of our subsidiary CVRD Overseas Ltd. Loans from
international lenders of US$106 (2005- US$135) are guaranteed by
the Brazilian Federal Government, to which we have given
counter-guarantees in the same amounts secured by our own shares
and accounts receivable of a subsidiary. We also have loans from
Brazil and international institutions secured by property, plant
and equipment in the amount of US$0 (2005 US$123).
The remaining long-term debt of US$458 (2005 US$330)
is secured mainly by assets of subsidiaries.
Certain loan contracts impose certain limitations on the Company
with respect to the incurrence of liens, indebtedness and
mergers.
Each holder of common and preferred class A stock is
entitled to one vote for each share on all matters that come
before a shareholders meeting, except for the election of
the Board of Directors, which is restricted to the holders of
common stock. As described in Note 5, the Brazilian
Government holds six preferred special share which confers to it
permanent veto rights over certain matters.
On May 22, 2006 a stock split was effected which had been
approved by the Extraordinary General Shareholders Meeting
on April 27, 2006. Each existing, common and preferred,
share was split into two shares. After the split our capital
comprises 2,459,657,058 shares, of which 1,499,898,858
common shares and 959,758,200 class A preferred
shares, including six special class shares without par value
(Golden Share). The share/ADR ratio was maintained
at 1/1; therefore, each common and preferred share, continued to
be represented by one ADR supported by one common share (NYSE:
RIO) or by one ADR supported by one class A
preferred share (NYSE: RIOPR) respectively. All numbers of share
and per share amounts included herein reflect retroactive
application of the stock split.
On June 21, 2006 the Board of Directors approved a buy-back
program of our preferred shares, executed during 180 days.
As of December 31, 2006, we had acquired
15,149,600 shares held in treasury for subsequent disposal
or cancellation at an average weighted unit cost of US$19.98
(minimum cost of US$18.89 and maximum of US$20.74).
During 2006 we paid US$1.3 billion to shareholders, the
first installment of US$650 was paid on April 2006 and the
second installment of US$650 was paid on October 2006. The
distribution was made in the form of interest on
shareholders equity and dividends.
Both common and preferred shareholders are entitled to receive a
dividend of at least 25% of annual adjusted net income based on
the statutory accounting records, upon approval at the annual
shareholders meeting. In the case of preferred
shareholders, this dividend cannot be less than 6% of the
preferred capital as
F-25
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
stated in the statutory accounting records or, if greater, 3% of
the statutory book equity value per share. For the year ended
December 31,2006, this annual minimum dividend achieve
US$1,508 of which US$14 was paid on October 2006 and therefore
we accrued the remaining value of US$1,494 with a direct charge
to shareholders equity. For each of the years 2005 and 2004 we
distributed dividends to preferred shareholders in excess of
this limit. Interest attributed to shareholders equity as from
January 1, 1996 is considered part of the minimum dividend.
Brazilian law permits the payment of cash dividends only from
retained earnings as stated in the statutory accounting records
and such payments are made in Reais. In addition, undistributed
retained earnings at December 31, 2006 includes US$8,542,
related to the unrealized income and expansion reserves, which
could be freely transferred to retained earnings and paid as
dividends, if approved by the shareholders.
No withholding tax is payable on distribution of profits earned
except for distributions in the form of interest attributed to
shareholders (Note 3 (l)).
F-26
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Brazilian laws and our By-laws require that certain
appropriations be made from retained earnings to reserve
accounts on an annual basis, all determined in accordance with
amounts stated in the statutory accounting records, as detailed
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized income reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
Transfer (to) from retained
earnings
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Expansion reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year
|
|
|
3,621
|
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
2,090
|
|
Transfer to capital stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,036
|
)
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
Transfer from retained earnings
|
|
|
4,864
|
|
|
|
2,566
|
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year
|
|
|
8,485
|
|
|
|
3,621
|
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
Legal reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
Transfer to capital stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from retained earnings
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
Fiscal incentive depletion reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
Transfer to capital stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
Fiscal incentive investment reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Transfer to capital stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Transfer from retained earnings
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total undistributed retained
earnings
|
|
|
9,555
|
|
|
|
4,357
|
|
|
|
4,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose and basis of appropriation to such reserves is
described below:
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized income reserve this represents
principally our share of the earnings of affiliates and joint
ventures, not yet received in the form of cash dividends.
|
|
|
|
Expansion reserve this is a general reserve
for expansion of our activities.
|
|
|
|
Legal reserve this reserve is a requirement
for all Brazilian corporations and represents the appropriation
of 5% of annual net income under Brazilian GAAP up to a limit of
20% of capital stock under Brazilian GAAP.
|
F-27
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal incentive depletion reserve this
represents an additional amount relative to mineral reserve
depletion equivalent to 20% of the sales price of mining
production, which is deductible for tax purposes providing an
equivalent amount is transferred from retained earnings to the
reserve account. This fiscal incentive expired in 1996.
|
|
|
|
Fiscal incentive investment reserve this
reserve results from an option to designate a portion of income
tax otherwise payable for investment in government approved
projects and is recorded in the year following that in which the
taxable income was earned. As from 2000, this reserve basically
contemplates income tax incentives (Note 8).
|
Basic and
diluted earnings per share
Basic and diluted earnings per share amounts have been
calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
|
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Thousands)
|
|
|
per-Share Amount
|
|
|
|
(US$ Million)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
(US$ per Share)
|
|
|
Net income for the year ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to preferred
stockholders
|
|
|
2,568
|
|
|
|
954,426
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
Income available to common
stockholders
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
1,471,608
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
Net income for the year ended
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to preferred
stockholders
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
831,432
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
Income available to common
stockholders
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
|
|
1,471,608
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
Net income for the year ended
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to preferred
stockholders
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
831,432
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
Income available to common
stockholders
|
|
|
1,644
|
|
|
|
1,471,608
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
There are no securities outstanding with any diluted effect on
earnings per shares.
Since 1973 we have sponsored a complementary security plan with
characteristics of defined benefit plan (the Old
Plan) covering substantially all employees, with benefits
calculation based on years of service, age, contribution salary
and complementary social security benefits. This plan is
administered by Fundação Vale do Rio Doce de
Seguridade Social VALIA and was funded by monthly
contributions made by us and our employees, calculated based on
periodic actuarial appraisals.
In May 2000, we implemented a new security complementary plan
with characteristics of variable contribution, which complements
to the earnings of programmed retirements and benefits from
risks (death, physical invalidity, and sickness benefit). When
the New Plan (a Benefit Mix Plan Vale
Mais) was created, our active employees had the opportunity of
transferring to it. Over 98% of our active employees opted to be
transfered. The Old Plan will continue in existence, covering
almost exclusively retired participants and their beneficiaries.
Additionally we provide supplementary payments to a specific
group of ex-employees, in addition to the regular benefit from
Valia, through the Abono Complementação,
which represents a postretirement health care, odontological and
pharmaceutical benefit to this group of participants.
F-28
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Pursuant the acquisition of Inco we assumed benefits through
defined benefit pensions that cover essentially all its
employees and postretirement benefits other than pensions that
provide certain health care and life insurance benefits for
retired employees as well.
The following information details the status of the defined
benefit elements of all plans in accordance with
SFAS 132 Employers Disclosure about
Pensions and Other Post retirement Benefits and
SFAS 158 Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, as
amended.
|
|
(a)
|
Change
in benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of
year
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Liability recognized upon
consolidation of Inco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,619
|
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Plan amendment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions changes
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of
year
|
|
|
2,531
|
|
|
|
3,743
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use a measurement date of December 31 for our pension
and post retirement benefit plans.
|
|
(b)
|
Change
in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at
beginning of year
|
|
|
2,781
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,079
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset recognized upon
consolidation of Inco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,924
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at
end of year
|
|
|
3,508
|
|
|
|
3,078
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2,781
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Plan assets at December 31, 2006 include US$312 and US$46
of portfolio investments in our own shares (US$409 at
December 31, 2005) and debentures, respectively, and
US$36 and US$7 of shares of related parties (US$42 at
December 31, 2005) and debentures, as well. They also
include US$607 of Federal Government Securities (US$455 at
December 31, 2005).
(C) Funded
Status and Financial Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
Assumptions
used in each year (expressed in nominal terms)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
11.30
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
11.30
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
11.30
|
% p.a.
|
|
|
13.40
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
13.40
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
13.40
|
%p.a.
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
14.98
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
14.98
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.40
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
13.40
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation
increase up to 47 years
|
|
|
8.15
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.15
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation
increase over 47 years
|
|
|
5.00
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflation
|
|
|
5.00
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
5.00
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
5.00
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
5.00
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
5.00
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
5.00
|
%p.a.
|
Health care cost trend rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.67
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.20
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.00
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
5.00
|
%p.a.
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
7.50
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
7.50
|
%p.a.
|
Rate of compensation
increase up to 47 years
|
|
|
3.00
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
3.00
|
%p.a.
|
Rate of compensation
increase over 47 years
|
|
|
3.00
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
3.00
|
%p.a.
|
Inflation
|
|
|
1.80
|
%p.a.
|
|
|
1.80
|
%p.a.
|
Health care cost trend rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.05
|
%p.a.
|
F-30
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(e)
|
Investment
targets and composition of plan assets
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
pension plans
|
The fair value of the Brazil overfunded pension plan assets is
US$3,508 and US$2,781 at the end of 2006 and 2005, respectively.
There are no foreign overfunded pension plans assets at the
period. The asset allocation for these plans at the end of 2006
and 2005, and the target allocation for 2007, by asset category,
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
Percentage of Plan Assets at
|
|
|
|
for 2007
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Real estate
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Loans
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Fixed Income
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underfunded
pension plans
|
The fair value of the underfunded pension plans assets is US$91
and US$63 at the end of 2006 and 2005, respectively, for
Brazilian plans and US$2,987 at the end of 2006 for
non-brazilian plans. The asset allocation for these plans at the
end of 2006 (Brazil and non-brazilian) and 2005 (Brazil), and
the target allocation for 2007, by asset category, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
for 2007
|
|
|
Plan Assets at December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Real estate
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Loans
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Fixed Income
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Plan Assets at
|
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
for 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
Fixed Income
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
Underfunded
other benefits
|
The fair value of the foreign underfunded other benefits assets
is US$4 at the end of 2006. There are no Brazil underfunded
other benefits assets in our postretirement benefits other than
pensions at the period. The assets allocation for these benefits
at the end of 2006 and target allocation for 2007, by asset
category, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Plan Assets at
|
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
for 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Income
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fixed income allocation target for Brazil plans was
established in order to match the asset with the benefit
payments and to be used for the payment of short-term plans. The
proposal for 2007 is to re-establish the investments in
inflation-indexed funds.
The target for equity securities of these plans reflects the
expected appreciation of the Brazilian stock markets as well as
the volatility of market.
The asset allocation policy for the foreign plans 40% fixed
income and 60% equity securities, is maintained fairly close to
the policy mix at most times by the use of a rigorous
rebalancing policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Service cost benefits
earned during the year
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit
obligation
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(391
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(295
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of initial transitory
obligation
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferral
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension
cost
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
Expected
contributions and benefits
|
Employer contributions expected for 2007 are US$238 (unaudited).
F-32
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The benefit payments, which reflect future service, as
appropriate, are expected to be paid as follows (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
2008
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
2009
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
2010
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
2011
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
2012 and there after
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
2,594
|
|
|
|
(h)
|
Accumulated
benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
3,680
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
2,531
|
|
|
|
3,743
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plain asset
|
|
|
(3,508
|
)
|
|
|
(3,078
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2,781
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
Impact
of 1% variation in assumed health care cost trend
rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% increase
|
|
|
1% decrease
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation (APBO)
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Interest and service costs
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(j)
|
Effect
of initial recognition provision of SFAS 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Aplication
|
|
|
|
Aplication
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
of SFAS 158
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
SFAS 158
|
|
|
Prepaid pension cost
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
60,500
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,954
|
|
Employees postretirement benefits
|
|
|
2,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
1,948
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
4,340
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
4,527
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
41,180
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
41,281
|
|
Other cumulative comprehensive
deficit
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(1,007
|
)
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
19,320
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
19,673
|
|
F-33
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(l)
|
Other
Cumulative Comprehensive Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Net transition obligation/(asset)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss/(gain)
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in other
cumulative comprehensive deficit
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(m)
|
Change
in Other Cumulative Comprehensive Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Net transition obligation/(asset)
not yet recognized in NPPC at beginnig of period
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss/(gain) not yet
recognized in NPPC at beginning of period
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Deferred income tax at beginning
of period
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of initial recognition of
cumulative comprehensive deficit
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Change in the period Amortization
of net transition obligation/(asset)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial
loss/(gain)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net actuarial loss/(gain)
arising during period
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
124
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other
cumulative comprehensive deficit
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(n)
|
Net
periodic pension cost for the next year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net transition obligation/(asset)
amortization
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss/(gain)
amortization
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
(a) At December 31, 2006, we had extended
guarantees for borrowings obtained by affiliates and joint
ventures in the amount of US$3, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Denominated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
Counter
|
|
Joint Venture
|
|
Guarantee
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Purpose
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Guarantees
|
|
|
SAMARCO
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
|
Debt guarantee
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
We expect no losses to arise as a result of the above
guarantees. We charge commission for extending these guarantees.
(b) We provided a guarantee covering certain
termination payments to the supplier under an electricity supply
agreement (ESA) entered into in October 2004 for our
Goro nickel-cobalt development project in New Caledonia. The
amount of the termination payments guaranteed depends upon a
number of factors. If Goro defaults under the ESA, the
termination payment could reach up to an amount of
145 million euros. Once the supply of electricity under the
ESA to the project begins, the guaranteed amounts will decrease
over the life of the ESA.
Additionally, in connection with a special tax-advantage lease
financing related with this project we provided certain
guarantees pursuant to which we guaranteed, in certain events of
default, payments up to a maximum amount of US$100.
(c) Our subsidiaries and we are defendants in
numerous legal actions in the normal course of business. Based
on the advice of our legal counsel, management believes that the
provision for contingent losses is sufficient to cover probable
losses in connection with such actions.
The provision for contingencies and the related judicial
deposits are composed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Provision for
|
|
|
Judicial
|
|
|
Provision for
|
|
|
Judicial
|
|
|
|
Contingencies
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
Contingencies
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
Labor and social security claims
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Civil claims
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Tax related actions
|
|
|
972
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Others
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Labor and social security related
actions principally comprise claims for (i) payment of time
spent traveling from their residences to the work-place,
(ii) additional health and safety related payments and
(iii) various other matters, often in connection with
disputes about the amount of indemnities paid upon dismissal and
the one-third extra holiday pay.
Civil actions principally related to claims
made against us by contractors in connection with losses alleged
to have been incurred by them as a result of various past
government economic plans during which full indexation of
contracts for inflation was not permitted and accidents.
Tax related actions principally comprise our
challenges of certain revenue taxes, value added tax and income
tax.
We continue to vigorously pursue our interests in all the above
actions but recognize that we probably will incur some losses in
the final instance, for which we have made provisions.
Our judicial deposits are made as required by the courts for us
to be able to enter or continue a legal action. When judgment is
favorable to us, we receive the deposits back; when unfavorable,
the deposits are delivered to the prevailing party.
Contingencies settled in 2006, 2005 and 2004 aggregated US$424,
US$114 and US$67, respectively, and additional provisions
aggregated US$439, US$141 and US$157, respectively, classified
in other operating expenses.
In addition to the contingencies for which we have made
provisions we are defending claims which in our opinion, and
based on the advice of our legal counsel, the likelihood of loss
is possible losses which total US$1,488 at December 31,
2006, for which no provision has been made.
(d) We are committed under a
take-or-pay
agreement to purchase approximately 24,899 thousand metric tons
of bauxite from Mineração Rio do Norte
S.A. MRN at a formula price, calculated based on the
current London Metal Exchange (LME) quotation for aluminum.
Based on a market price of US$26.00 per metric ton as of
December 31, 2006, this arrangement represents the
following total commitment:
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
252
|
|
2008
|
|
|
252
|
|
2009 and thereafter
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) At the time of our privatization in 1997, we
issued shareholder revenue interests known in Brazil as
debentures to our then-existing shareholders,
including the Brazilian Government. The terms of the
debentures, were set to ensure that our
pre-privatization shareholders, including the Brazilian
Government, would participate alongside us in potential future
financial benefits that we are able to derive from exploiting
our mineral resources.
In preparation for the issuance of the debentures, we issued
series B preferred shares on a
one-for-one
basis to all holders of our common shares and series A
preferred shares. We then exchanged all of the series B
shares for the debentures at par value. The debentures are not
redeemable or convertible, and do not trade on a stapled basis
or otherwise with our common or preferred shares. During 2002 we
registered the debentures with the Securities Commissions
(CVM) in order to permit trading.
F-36
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Under the terms of the debentures, holders will have the right
to receive semi-annual payments equal to an agreed percentage of
our net revenues (revenues less value added tax) from certain
identified mineral resources that we owned as of May 1997, to
the extent that we exceed defined threshold production volumes
of these resources, and from the sale of mineral rights that we
owned as of May 1997. Our obligation to make payments to the
holders will cease when the relevant mineral resources are
exhausted at which time we are required to repay the original
par value plus accrued interest. Based on current production
levels, and estimates for new projects, we began payments
relating to copper resources in 2004 and expect to start
payments relating to iron ore resources from approximately 2016
for the Northern System and 2028 for the Southern System, and
payments related to other mineral resources at the end of the
current decade.
The table below summarizes the amounts we will be required to
pay under the debentures based on the net revenues we earn from
the identified mineral resources and the sale of mineral rights.
|
|
|
|
|
Area
|
|
Mineral
|
|
Required Payments by CVRD
|
|
Southern System
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
1.8% of net revenue, after total
sales from May 1997 exceeds 1.7 billion tons.
|
Northern System
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
1.8% of net revenue, after total
sales from May 1997 exceeds 1.2 billion tons.
|
Pojuca, Andorinhas, Liberdade and
Sossego
|
|
Gold and copper
|
|
2.5% of net revenue from the
beginning of commercialization.
|
Igarapé Bahia and Alemão
|
|
Gold and copper
|
|
2.5% of net revenue, after total
sales from May 1997 exceeds 70 tons of gold.
|
Other areas, excluding
Carajás/Serra Leste
|
|
Gold
|
|
2.5% of net revenue.
|
Other areas owned as of
May 1997
|
|
Other minerals
|
|
1% of net revenue, 4 years
after the beginning of the commercialization.
|
All areas
|
|
Sale of mineral rights owned as of
May 1997
|
|
1% of the sales price.
|
On March 27 and October 2, 2006 we paid a distribution on
these debentures in the amount of US$2 and US$4,
respectively.
F-37
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(f) We use various judgments and assumptions when measuring
our asset retirement obligations. Changes in circumstances, law
or technology may affect our estimates and we periodically
review the amounts accrued and adjust them as necessary. Our
accruals do not reflect unasserted claims because we are
currently not aware of any such issues. Also the amounts
provided are not reduced by any potential recoveries under cost
sharing, insurance or indemnification arrangements because such
recoveries are considered uncertain. The changes are
demonstrated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Provisions for asset retirement
obligations beginning of year
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Liability recognized upon
consolidation of Inco
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Liabilities settled in the current
year
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Revisions in estimated cash flows
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for asset retirement
obligations end of year
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
Description
of Leasing Arrangements
|
We conduct part of our railroad operation from leased
facilities. The lease, which is for 30 years expiring in
August, 2026, is classified as an operating lease and can be
renewable for a further 30 years. At the end of the lease
term, we are required to return the concession and the lease
assets. In most cases, management expects that in the normal
course of business, leases will be renewed.
Operating
Leases
The following is a schedule by years of future minimum rental
payments required under operating leases that have initial or
remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
48
|
|
2008
|
|
|
48
|
|
2009
|
|
|
48
|
|
2010
|
|
|
48
|
|
2011
|
|
|
48
|
|
2012 and there after
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments
required
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total expenses of operating leases in 2006, 2005 and 2004
was US$48, US$42 and US$37, respectively.
|
|
19
|
Segment
and geographical information
|
We adopt SFAS 131 Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information with respect to the
information we present about our operating segments.
SFAS 131 introduced a management approach
concept for reporting segment information, whereby such
information is required to be reported on the basis
F-38
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
that the chief decision-maker uses internally for evaluating
segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources to
segments. We analyze our segment information on aggregated and
disaggregated basis as follows:
Ferrous products comprises iron ore mining
and pellet production, as well as the Northern and Southern
transportation systems, including railroads, ports and
terminals, as they pertain to mining operations. Manganese
mining and ferroalloys are also included in this segment.
Non-ferrous comprises the production of
non-ferrous minerals, including potash, kaolin, copper and
nickel (co-products and by-products).
Logistics comprises our transportation
systems as they pertain to the operation of our ships, ports and
railroads for third-party cargos.
Holdings divided into the following
sub-groups:
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum comprises aluminum trading
activities, alumina refining and aluminum metal smelting and
investments in joint ventures and affiliates engaged in bauxite
mining.
|
|
|
|
Others comprises our investments in joint
ventures and affiliates engaged in other businesses.
|
Information presented to senior management with respect to the
performance of each segment is generally derived directly from
the accounting records maintained in accordance with accounting
practices adopted in Brazil together with certain minor
inter-segment allocations.
F-39
Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Consolidated net income and principal assets are reconciled as
follows:
Results
by segment before eliminations
(Aggregated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
RESULTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues Export
|
|
15,729
|
|
|
|
4,199
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(7,029
|
)
|
|
|
16,145
|
|
|
|
12,655
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,461
|
)
|
|
|
9,840
|
|
|
|
7,589
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,725
|
)
|
|
|
6,112
|
|
Gross revenues Domestic
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(651
|
)
|
|
|
4,218
|
|
|
|
2,197
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
1,424
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
Cost and expenses
|
|
(12,004
|
)
|
|
|
(3,301
|
)
|
|
|
(970
|
)
|
|
|
(2,597
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
7,680
|
|
|
|
(11,248
|
)
|
|
|
(9,646
|
)
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
|
(1,639
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
5,866
|
|
|
|
(7,077
|
)
|
|
|
(6,459
|
)
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(622
|
)
|
|
|
(1,322
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
4,043
|
|
|
|
(4,804
|
)
|
Research and development
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
(632
|
)
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(997
|
)
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(619
|
)
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
5,708
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
4,661
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
2,213
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,123
|
|
Financial income
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(609
|
)
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
82
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
(1,541
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
(1,338
|
)
|
|
|
(751
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|
|
(637
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
(671
|
)
|
Foreign exchange and monetary gains
(losses), net
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
Equity in results of affiliates and
joint ventures and change in provision for losses on equity
investments
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
(976
|
)
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
|
|
(808
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(880
|
)
|
|
|
(726
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
Minority interests
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(579
|
)
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
4,784
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
3,898
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales classified by geographic
destination:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America, except United States
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(823
|
)
|
|
|
1,620
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
596
|
|
United States
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
389
|
|
Europe
|
|
5,465
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,667
|
)
|
|
|
5,183
|
|
|
|
4,847
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,256
|
)
|
|
|
3,813
|
|
|
|
3,223
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,607
|
)
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
Middle East/Africa/Oceania
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
386
|
|
Japan
|
|
1,779
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(662
|
)
|
|
|
2,188
|
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(469
|
)
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
788
|
|
China
|
|
4,781
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,716
|
)
|
|
|
3,706
|
|
|
|
3,018
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,135
|
)
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(606
|
)
|
|
|
996
|
|
Asia, other than Japan and China
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(684
|
)
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(423
|
)
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(313
|
)
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,729
|
|
|
|
4,198
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(7,028
|
)
|
|
|
16,145
|
|
|
|
12,655
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,461
|
)
|
|
|
9,840
|
|
|
|
7,589
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,725
|
)
|
|
|
6,112
|
|
Domestic market
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(651
|
)
|
|
|
4,218
|
|
|
|
2,197
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
1,424
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,467
|
|
|
|
4,475
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
|
3,599
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(7,679
|
)
|
|
|
20,363
|
|
|
|
14,852
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,866
|
)
|
|
|
13,405
|
|
|
|
9,013
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
1,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,043
|
)
|
|
|
8,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Operating
segment after eliminations (Disaggregated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
|
|
|
Addition to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant and
|
|
|
Property,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Cost and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion and
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Equipment,
|
|
|
Plant and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Added tax
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
|
8,167
|
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
10,027
|
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
9,756
|
|
|
|
(4,060
|
)
|
|
|
5,696
|
|
|
|
(528
|
)
|
|
|
5,168
|
|
|
|
13,235
|
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Pellets
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
1,893
|
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,138
|
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
|
12,569
|
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
|
|
12,166
|
|
|
|
(5,810
|
)
|
|
|
6,356
|
|
|
|
(604
|
)
|
|
|
5,752
|
|
|
|
14,079
|
|
|
|
2,779
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
Non ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products(*)
|
|
|
2,786
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
(2,267
|
)
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
17,193
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,664
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
3,942
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
3,905
|
|
|
|
(2,779
|
)
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
19,006
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alumina
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
(767
|
)
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
1,805
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
(558
|
)
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
2,381
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
2,344
|
|
|
|
(1,354
|
)
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
(488
|
)
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
Ports
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ships
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
(722
|
)
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
Others
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,145
|
|
|
|
4,218
|
|
|
|
20,363
|
|
|
|
(712
|
)
|
|
|
19,651
|
|
|
|
(11,017
|
)
|
|
|
8,634
|
|
|
|
(997
|
)
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
38,007
|
|
|
|
4,431
|
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Includes the product nickel co-products and by products (copper,
precious metals, cobalt and others) see note 3 (c). |
F-41
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Operating
segment after eliminations (Disaggregated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
|
|
|
Addition to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant and
|
|
|
Property,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Cost and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion and
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Equipment,
|
|
|
Plant and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Added Tax
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
|
5,890
|
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
|
|
7,396
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
7,162
|
|
|
|
(2,658
|
)
|
|
|
4,504
|
|
|
|
(419
|
)
|
|
|
4,085
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Pellets
|
|
|
1,722
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
2,083
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
2,005
|
|
|
|
(1,321
|
)
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,986
|
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
10,050
|
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
9,685
|
|
|
|
(4,404
|
)
|
|
|
5,281
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
4,818
|
|
|
|
8,878
|
|
|
|
2,872
|
|
|
|
614
|
|
Non ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
(465
|
)
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alumina
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
823
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
(891
|
)
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
(528
|
)
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Ports
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ships
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
(755
|
)
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Others
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,840
|
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
13,405
|
|
|
|
(613
|
)
|
|
|
12,792
|
|
|
|
(6,741
|
)
|
|
|
6,051
|
|
|
|
(619
|
)
|
|
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
14,166
|
|
|
|
3,977
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Operating
segment after eliminations (Disaggregated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
|
|
|
Addition to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant and
|
|
|
Property,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Cost and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion and
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Equipment,
|
|
|
Plant and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Added Tax
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
|
3,146
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
3,995
|
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
3,867
|
|
|
|
(1,761
|
)
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
5,374
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Pellets
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,523
|
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
|
|
5,844
|
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
5,616
|
|
|
|
(2,946
|
)
|
|
|
2,670
|
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
2,373
|
|
|
|
5,912
|
|
|
|
1,203
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
Non ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
1,324
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alumina
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
(684
|
)
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Ports
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ships
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Others
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,113
|
|
|
|
2,366
|
|
|
|
8,479
|
|
|
|
(413
|
)
|
|
|
8,066
|
|
|
|
(4,544
|
)
|
|
|
3,522
|
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
3,123
|
|
|
|
9,063
|
|
|
|
2,022
|
|
|
|
1,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-43
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
20
|
Related
party transactions
|
Transactions with major related parties resulted in the
following balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
AFFILIATED COMPANIES AND JOINT
VENTURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companhia Hispano-Brasileira de
Pelotização HISPANOBRÁS
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Companhia Ítalo-Brasileira de
Pelotização ITABRASCO
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Companhia Nipo-Brasileira de
Pelotização NIBRASCO
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Companhia Coreano-Brasileira de
Pelotização KOBRASCO
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Baovale Mineração
S.A.
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas
Gerais S.A. USIMINAS
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minas da Serra Geral
S.A. MSG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
MRS Logística S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Mineração Rio Norte
S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Samarco Mineração
S.A.
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
TAIWAN NICKEL REFINING CORPORATION
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KOREA NICKEL CORPORATION
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MITSUI & CO. LTD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These balances are included in the following balance sheet
classifications:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances to related
parties
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances to related
parties
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suppliers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Loans from related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The principal amounts of business and financial operations
carried out with major related parties are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
AFFILIATED COMPANIES AND JOINT
VENTURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companhia Siderúrgica de
Tubarão CST
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companhia Nipo-Brasileira de
Pelotização NIBRASCO
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Samarco Mineração
S.A.
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIDERAR S.A.I.C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companhia Ítalo-Brasileira de
Pelotização ITABRASCO
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Companhia Hispano-Brasileira de
Pelotização HISPANOBRÁS
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companhia Coreano-Brasileira de
Pelotização KOBRASCO
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas
Gerais
S.A. USIMINAS
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valesul Alumínio S.A.
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineração Rio Norte
S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Gulf Industrial Investment
Company GIIC
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
MRS Logística S.A.
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Others
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These amounts are included in the following statement of income
line items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Sales/Cost of iron ore and pellets
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Revenues/expense from logistic
services
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Sales/Cost of aluminum products
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Financial income/expenses
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
Fair
value of financial instruments
|
The carrying amount of our current financial instruments
generally approximates fair market value because of the
short-term maturity or frequent of these instruments.
F-45
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The market value of our listed long-term investments, where
available, is disclosed in Note 13 to these financial
statements.
Based on borrowing rates currently available to us for bank
loans with similar terms and average maturities, the fair market
value of long-term debt (current portion not included) at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 is estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Fair market value
|
|
|
21,746
|
|
|
|
4,076
|
|
Carrying value
|
|
|
21,122
|
|
|
|
3,714
|
|
Fair market value estimates are made at a specific point in
time, based on relevant market information and information about
the financial instruments. Changes in assumptions could
significantly affect the estimates.
|
|
22
|
Derivative
financial instruments
|
The main market risks we face are interest rate risk, exchange
rate risk and commodity price risk. We manage some of these
risks through the use of derivative instruments. Our risk
management activities follow the risk management policy, which
requires diversification of transactions and counter-parties. We
monitor and evaluate our overall position regularly in order to
evaluate financial results and impact on our cash flow. We also
periodically review the credit limits and creditworthiness of
our hedging counter-parties.
|
|
(a)
|
Interest
Rate and Exchange Rate Risk
|
We are exposed to interest rate risk on our outstanding
borrowing and in future debt issuances.
Our floating rate debt consists principally of U.S. dollar
borrowings related to trade finance and loans from commercial
banks and Real borrowings indexed to CDI (Interbank Certificate
of Deposit), related to the debentures issued in 2006 in the
Brazil market.
To mitigate the effects of interest rate volatility on our
foreign debt we sometimes make use of natural hedges allowed by
the positive correlation between floating interest rates and
metals prices. When natural hedges are not effective, we try
replicate the hedging effect by using derivatives.
Our floating rate debt denominated in reais is mainly subject to
changes in CDI, related to the debentures issued in 2006, and
associated with the takeout strategy of Inco acquisition.
To mitigate the foreign exchange exposure component in cash
flows, associated with the issuance of debt in Brazilian reais,
we have entered into swap agreements to convert cash flows in
Brazilian reais indexed to CDI into U.S. dollar cash flows
indexed to a fixed rate in dollars.
We are exposed to exchange rate risk associated with our foreign
currency denominated debt. On the other hand, a substantial
proportion of our revenues are denominated in, or automatically
indexed to, the U.S. dollar. This provides a natural hedge
against any devaluation of the Brazilian real against the
U.S. dollar. When devaluation occurs, the immediate
negative impact on foreign currency denominated debt is offset
over time by the positive effect of devaluation on future cash
flows. In light of this framework, we generally do not use
derivative instruments to manage the currency exposure on our
long-term dollar-denominated debt. However, we may occasionally
use derivatives to minimize the effects of the volatility of the
exchange rates between Brazilian reais and U.S. dollars in
the cash flow.
F-46
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
We use forward currency contracts to eliminate the risk of
exchange rate movements on a portion of our future construction
cost of capital assets at our Ontario operations and the planned
production facilities for the Goro project. These transactions
are performed under CVRD Inco. The outstanding transactions are
mainly executed to protect the risks arising from the volatility
of Euro, AUD, CNY and GBP.
We also use derivative instruments to manage exposure to the
fluctuation of commodity prices.
Nickel
We do not use derivatives instruments to hedge our exposure to
fluctuating nickel prices. We do enter into LME forward purchase
contracts which are substantially offset by fixed price customer
contracts in order to maintain our exposure to nickel price risk.
Copper
We had outstanding put option contracts, giving us the right,
but not the obligation, to sell copper, and sold call option
contracts, giving the buyer the right, but not the obligation,
to purchase copper, during the period extending to 2008.
Gold
We currently hold a small position in gold derivative
instruments, structured to manage the exposure associated with
the production of gold as a by-product of copper concentrate.
Aluminum
We had outstanding option contracts and forwards to protect our
exposure to aluminum prices in our aluminum and alumina
operations.
Platinum
We use derivatives to guaranty certain minimum price in respect
of a portion of our production of that metal.
Fuel Oil
and Natural Gas
We use fuel oil and natural gas swap contracts to reduce the
effect of energy price volatility on the operational costs.
Most of our commodity derivative transactions have been settled
in cash, without physical delivery of product.
The nickel, platinum, fuel oil and natural gas derivative trades
are performed under CVRD Inco. Copper derivative trades are
performed to protect CVRD and CVRD Inco production and provide
minimum cash flow requirements in accordance with our risk
management policy.
F-47
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The asset (liability) balances and the change in fair value of
derivative financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LIBOR)
|
|
|
Currencies
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
Platinum
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) at
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
Gain (Loss) recognized upon
consolidation of Inco
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(364
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
Financial settlement
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) in the
year
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) at
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) at
January 1, 2005
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
Financial settlement
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) in the
year
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) at
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) at
January 1, 2004
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Loss recognized upon consolidation
of Albras
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Financial settlement
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) in the
year
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) at
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains in the amount of US$50, US$1 and US$4 for
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, are
recorded as others in Other assets.
Unrealized gains (losses) in the period are included in our
income statement under the caption of financial expenses and
foreign exchange and monetary gains (losses), net.
F-48
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Final maturity dates for the above instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
December 2008
|
|
Interest rates(LIBOR)
|
|
|
December 2011
|
|
Currencies
|
|
|
December 2011
|
|
Products Aluminum
|
|
|
December 2008
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
December 2008
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
September 2008
|
|
Platinum
|
|
|
December 2008
|
|
F-49
Board of
Directors, Fiscal Council and Executive Officers
|
|
|
Board of Directors
|
|
Fiscal Council
|
|
|
|
Sérgio Ricardo Silva Rosa
|
|
Marcelo Amaral Moraes
|
Chairman
|
|
Chairman
|
Mário da Silveira Teixeira
Júnior
|
|
Anibal Moreira dos Santos
|
Vice Chairman
|
|
Bernard Appy
|
Arlindo Magno de Oliveira
|
|
José Bernardo de Medeiros Neto
|
Eduardo Fernando Jardim Pinto
|
|
|
Erik Persson
|
|
|
Francisco Augusto da Costa e Silva
|
|
Executive Officers
|
Hiroshi Tada
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jorge Luiz Pacheco
|
|
Roger Agnelli
|
Julio Sérgio Gomes de Almeida
|
|
Chief Executive
Officer
|
Oscar Augusto de Camargo Filho
|
|
|
Renato da Cruz Gomes
|
|
Carla Grasso
|
|
|
Executive Officer for
Human
|
Advisory Committees of the
Board of Directors
|
|
Resources and
Corporate
|
|
|
Services
|
Controlling Committee
|
|
|
Antonio José de Figueiredo
Ferreira
|
|
Eduardo de Salles Bartolomeo
|
Paulo Roberto Ferreira de Medeiros
|
|
Executive Officer for
Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Development
Committee
|
|
Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa
|
Arlindo Magno de Oliveira
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer
|
João Moisés de Oliveira
|
|
|
Oscar Augusto de Camargo Filho
|
|
Gabriel Stoliar
|
|
|
Executive Officer for Planning
and Business Development
|
Strategic Committee
|
|
|
Roger Agnelli
|
|
José Carlos Martins
|
Gabriel Stoliar
|
|
Executive Officer for
Ferrous
|
Demian Fiocca
|
|
Minerals
|
Mário da Silveira Teixeira
Júnior
|
|
|
Oscar Augusto de Camargo Filho
|
|
José Lancaster
|
Sérgio Ricardo Silva Rosa
|
|
Executive Officer for Copper,
Coal and
Aluminum
|
Finance Committee
|
|
|
Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa
|
|
Murilo de Oliveira Ferreira
|
Wanderlei Viçoso Fagundes
|
|
Executive Officer for
Nickel,
|
Ivan Luiz Modesto Schara
|
|
Marketing and Sales of
Copper and Aluminum
|
Governance and Sustainability
Committee
|
|
|
Renato da Cruz Gomes
|
|
Tito Botelho Martins
|
Ricardo Carvalho Giambroni
|
|
Executive Officer for
|
Ricardo Simonsen
|
|
Corporate Affairs and
Energy
|
S-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marcus Vinícius Dias
Severini
Chief Officer of Control
Department
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vera Lúcia de Almeida P.
Elias
Chief Accountant
CRC-RJ - 043059/O-8
|
S-2