UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014

Commission File Number 001-34581

 

  

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Number of shares of Kraton Performance Polymers, Inc. Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of October 27, 2014: 32,829,732.

 

 

 

 

---

 

Index to Quarterly Report

on Form 10-Q for

Quarter Ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

2

---

 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Some of the statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q under the headings “Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We may also make written or oral forward-looking statements in our periodic reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, in press releases and other written materials and in oral statements made by our officers, directors or employees to third parties. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are often characterized by the use of words such as “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “projects,” “may,” “intends,” “plans” or “anticipates,” or by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions; anticipated benefits of or performance of our products; beliefs regarding opportunities for new, high-margin applications and other innovations; adequacy of cash flows to fund our working capital requirements; our investment in the joint venture with Formosa Petrochemical Corporation (“FPCC”); our expectations regarding indebtedness to be incurred by our joint venture with FPCC; debt payments, interest payments, capital expenditures, benefit plan contributions, and income tax obligations; our anticipated 2014 capital expenditures, compliance with the MACT rule, health, safety and environmental and infrastructure and maintenance projects, projects to optimize the production capabilities of our manufacturing assets and to support our innovation platform; our ability to ensure full access to our senior secured credit facilities; expectations regarding our counterparties’ ability to perform, including with respect to trade receivables; estimates regarding the tax expense of repatriating certain cash and short-term investments related to foreign operations; expectations regarding high-margin applications; our ability to realize certain deferred tax assets and our beliefs with respect to tax positions; expectations regarding our full year effective tax rate; estimates related to the useful lives of certain assets for tax purposes; expectations regarding our pension contributions for fiscal year 2014; estimates or expectations related to monomer costs, ending inventory levels and related estimated charges; the outcome and financial impact of legal proceedings; expectations regarding the spread between FIFO and ECRC in future periods; and projections regarding environmental costs and capital expenditures and related operational savings. Such forward-looking statements involve assumptions, known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other important factors that could cause the actual results, performance or our achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from historical results, any future results, or performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this report. Further description of these risks and uncertainties and other important factors are set forth in this report, in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K, including but not limited to “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” therein, and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and include, but are not limited to, risks related to:

3

---

 

There may be other factors of which we are currently unaware or that we deem immaterial that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we express in our forward-looking statements. Although we believe the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of these assumptions, and, therefore, also the forward-looking statements based on these assumptions could themselves prove to be inaccurate.

Forward-looking statements are based on current plans, estimates, assumptions and projections, and therefore you should not place undue reliance on them. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update them publicly in light of new information or future events.

4

---

 

Presentation of Financial Statements

The terms “Kraton,” “our company,” “we,” “our,” “ours” and “us” as used in this report refer collectively to Kraton Performance Polymers, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

This Form 10-Q includes financial statements and related notes that present the condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows of Kraton and its subsidiaries. Kraton is a holding company whose only material asset is its investment in its wholly owned subsidiary, Kraton Polymers LLC. Kraton Polymers LLC and its subsidiaries own all of our consolidated operating assets.

 

 

 

5

---

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Kraton Performance Polymers, Inc.:

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Kraton Performance Polymers, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 30, 2014, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, and the related condensed consolidated statements of changes in equity and cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. These condensed consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 27, 2014, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
October 30, 2014

 

 

 

6

---

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except par value)

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

7

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

8

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

9

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

10

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

11

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. General

Description of our Business. We are a leading global producer of styrenic block copolymers (“SBCs”) and other engineered polymers. We market our products under the Kraton^®, Cariflex^TM and NEXAR^TM brands. SBCs are highly-engineered synthetic elastomers, which we invented and commercialized almost 50 years ago, that enhance the performance of numerous end use products by imparting greater flexibility, resilience, strength, durability and processability. 

Our polymers are typically formulated or compounded with other products to achieve improved, customer-specific performance characteristics in a variety of applications. We seek to maximize the value of our product portfolio by emphasizing complex or specialized polymers and innovations that yield higher margins than more commoditized products. We sometimes refer to these complex or specialized polymers or innovations as being more “differentiated.”

Our products are found in many everyday applications, including personal care products such as disposable diapers and the rubberized grips of toothbrushes, razor blades and power tools. Our products are also used to impart tack and shear properties in a wide variety of adhesive products and to impart characteristics such as flexibility and durability in sealants and corrosion resistance in coatings. Our paving and roofing applications provide durability, extending road and roof life.

We also produce Cariflex isoprene rubber and isoprene rubber latex. Our Cariflex products are highly-engineered, non-SBC synthetic substitutes for natural rubber and natural rubber latex. Our Cariflex products, which have not been found to contain the proteins present in natural rubber latex and are, therefore, not known to cause allergies, are used in applications such as surgical gloves and condoms.

We have a portfolio of innovations at various stages of development and commercialization, including

We manufacture our polymers at five manufacturing facilities globally, including our flagship facility in Belpre, Ohio, as well as facilities in Germany, France, Brazil and Japan. The facility in Japan is operated by an unconsolidated manufacturing joint venture. The terms “Kraton,” “our company,” “we,” “our,” “ours” and “us” as used in this report refer collectively to Kraton Performance Polymers, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Basis of Presentation. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein are for us and our consolidated subsidiaries, each of which is a wholly-owned subsidiary, except our 50% investment in our joint venture, Kraton Formosa Polymers Corporation (“KFPC”), located in Mailiao, Taiwan. KFPC is a variable interest entity for which we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary and, therefore, have consolidated into our financial statements. Our 50% investment in our joint venture located in Kashima, Japan is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and reflect all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly our results of operations and financial position. Amounts reported in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are not necessarily indicative of amounts expected for the respective annual periods or any other interim period, in particular due to the effect of seasonal changes and weather conditions that typically affect our sales into our Paving and Roofing end use market.

12

---

 

Significant Accounting Policies. Our significant accounting policies have been disclosed in Note 1 Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no changes to the policies disclosed therein. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements we present in this report have been prepared in accordance with those policies.

Reclassifications. Certain amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements for the prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current reporting presentation.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include

Income Tax in Interim Periods. We conduct operations in separate legal entities in different jurisdictions. As a result, income tax amounts are reflected in these condensed consolidated financial statements for each of those jurisdictions. Tax laws and tax rates vary substantially in these jurisdictions and are subject to change based on the political and economic climate in those countries. We file our tax returns in accordance with our interpretations of each jurisdiction’s tax laws. We record our tax provision or benefit on an interim basis using the estimated annual effective tax rate. This rate is applied to the current period ordinary income or loss to determine the income tax provision or benefit allocated to the interim period.

Losses from jurisdictions for which no benefit can be realized and the income tax effects of unusual and infrequent items are excluded from the estimated annual effective tax rate. Valuation allowances are provided against the future tax benefits that arise from the losses in jurisdictions for which no benefit can be realized. The effects of unusual and infrequent items are recognized in the impacted interim period as discrete items.

The estimated annual effective tax rate may be significantly affected by nondeductible expenses and by our projected earnings mix by tax jurisdiction. Adjustments to the estimated annual effective income tax rate are recognized in the period during which such estimates are revised.

We have established valuation allowances against a variety of deferred tax assets, including net operating loss carryforwards, foreign tax credits and other income tax credits. Valuation allowances take into consideration our expected ability to realize these deferred tax assets and reduce the value of such assets to the amount that is deemed more likely than not to be recoverable. Our ability to realize these deferred tax assets is dependent on achieving our forecast of future taxable operating income over an extended period of time. We review our forecast in relation to actual results and expected trends on a quarterly basis. If we fail to achieve our operating income targets, we may change our assessment regarding the recoverability of our net deferred tax assets and such change could result in a valuation allowance being recorded against some or all of our net deferred tax assets. A change in our valuation allowance would impact our income tax expense/benefit and our stockholders’ equity and could have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial condition in future periods.

 

13

---

 

2. New Accounting Pronouncements

Adoption of Accounting Standards

We have implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that management believes would materially affect our financial statements.

New Accounting Standard

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and will supersede most current revenue recognition guidance.  The standard is effective for public entities for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016.  Early adoption is not permitted. Our evaluation of this standard is currently ongoing and therefore, the effects of this standard on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows are not yet known.

 

3. Share-Based Compensation

We account for share-based awards under the provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation.” Accordingly, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and we expense these costs using the straight-line method over the requisite service period. Share-based compensation expense was $2.3 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $8.5 million and $6.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We have historically recorded these costs in selling, general and administrative expenses; however, beginning in the second quarter of 2013, a portion of these costs were recorded in cost of goods sold and research and development expenses.

 

4. Detail of Certain Balance Sheet Accounts

     

 

14

---

 

 

5. Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income attributable to Kraton by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period.

Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income attributable to Kraton by the diluted weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period and, accordingly, reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other agreements to issue common stock, such as stock options, were exercised, settled or converted into common stock and were dilutive. The diluted weighted-average number of shares used in our diluted EPS calculation is determined using the treasury stock method.

Unvested awards of share-based payments with rights to receive dividends or dividend equivalents, such as our restricted stock awards are considered to be participating securities, and therefore, the two-class method is used for purposes of calculating EPS. Under the two-class method, a portion of net income is allocated to these participating securities and is excluded from the calculation of EPS allocated to common stock. Our restricted stock awards are subject to forfeiture and restrictions on transfer until vested and have identical voting, income and distribution rights to the unrestricted common shares outstanding. Our weighted average restricted stock awards outstanding were 491,926 and 454,726 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and 491,684 and 401,844 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We withheld 1,793 and 27,173 shares of restricted stock upon vesting to satisfy employee payroll tax withholding requirements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. We immediately retired all shares withheld and the transactions were reflected in additional paid in capital in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and as a purchase of treasury stock in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The computation of diluted EPS includes weighted average restricted share units of 87,696 and 80,335 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. All outstanding restricted share units of 57,591 are excluded from the computation of diluted EPS as they are anti-dilutive for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.

The computation of diluted EPS includes weighted average performance share units of 34,811 and 27,032 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. The computation of diluted earnings per share excludes the effect of performance share units for which the performance contingencies had not been met as of the reporting date, amounting to 102,396 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 67,585 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. .

The computation of diluted EPS includes stock options added under the treasury stock method, which amounted to 162,049 and 0 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively and 233,594 and 0 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The computation of diluted earnings per share excludes the effect of the potential exercise of stock options that are anti-dilutive, amounting to 1,008,497 and 1,643,950 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and 987,843 and 1,643,950 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

                                        

15

---

 

The calculations of basic and diluted EPS are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

---

 

6. Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:

 

Senior Secured Credit Facilities. In March 2013, we entered into an asset-based revolving credit facility consisting of a $150.0 million U.S. senior secured revolving credit facility (the “U.S. Facility”) and a $100.0 million Dutch senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Dutch Facility,” and together with the U.S. Facility, the “Senior Secured Credit Facilities”). Borrowing under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities is subject to borrowing base limitations based on the level of receivables and inventory available for security.

We may request up to an aggregate of $100.0 million of additional revolving facility commitments of which up to an aggregate of $40.0 million may be additional Dutch revolving facility commitments, provided that we satisfy additional conditions described in the Senior Secured Credit Facilities, and provided further that the U.S. revolver commitment is at least 60% of the commitments after giving effect to such increase.

Kraton Polymers U.S. LLC and Kraton Polymers Nederland B.V. are the borrowers under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities, and Kraton Performance Polymers, Inc., Kraton Polymers LLC, Elastomers Holdings LLC and Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation are the guarantors for both the U.S. Facility and the Dutch Facility. In addition, K.P. Global Holdings C.V. and Kraton Polymers Holdings B.V. are guarantors for the Dutch Facility. The Senior Secured Credit Facilities terminate on March 27, 2018; however, we may from time to time request that the lenders extend the maturity of their commitments. Availability under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities is limited to the lesser of the borrowing base and total commitments (less certain reserves).

The Senior Secured Credit Facilities are primarily secured by receivables and inventory. The U.S. Facility provides for borrowings in the United States and is secured by assets located in the United States. The Dutch Facility provides for borrowings outside of the United States and is secured by assets located outside of the United States.

Borrowings under the U.S. Facility (other than swingline loans) bear interest at a rate equal to, at the applicable borrower’s option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the greater of (1) the prime rate of Bank of America, N.A., (2) the federal funds rate plus 0.5% and (3) LIBOR plus 1.0%, or (b) a rate based on LIBOR, in each case plus an applicable margin. U.S. swingline loans shall bear interest at a base rate determined by reference to the greater of (1) the prime rate of Bank of America, N.A., (2) the federal funds rate plus 0.5% or (3) LIBOR plus 1.0%, in each case plus an applicable margin.

Borrowings under the Dutch Facility (other than swingline loans) bear interest at a rate equal to, at the applicable borrower’s option, either (a) a fluctuating rate, with respect to Euros, Pounds Sterling and Dollars outside of the U.S. and Canada, equal to the rate announced by the European Central Bank and used as a base rate by the local branch of Bank of America in the jurisdiction in which such currency is funded, or (b) a rate based on LIBOR, in each case plus an applicable margin. Dutch swingline loans shall bear interest at a fluctuating rate, with respect to Euros, Pounds Sterling and Dollars outside of the U.S. and Canada, equal to the rate announced by the European Central Bank and used as a base rate by the local branch of Bank of America in the jurisdiction in which such currency is funded.

The applicable margin is subject to a minimum of 0.5% and a maximum of 1.0% with respect to U.S. base rate loans, and a minimum of 1.5% and maximum of 2.0% for foreign base rate borrowings, and a minimum of 1.5% and maximum of 2.0% for both U.S. and foreign LIBOR loans and is subject to adjustment based on the borrowers’ excess availability of the applicable facility for the most recent fiscal quarter.

17

---

 

In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal amounts under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities, the borrowers will be required to pay a commitment fee in respect of the unutilized commitments at an annual rate of 0.375%.

The Senior Secured Credit Facilities contain a financial covenant that if either (a) excess availability is less than the greater of (i) 12.5% of the lesser of the commitments and the borrowing base and (ii) $31,250,000 or (b) U.S. availability is less than the greater of (i) 12.5% of the lesser of the U.S. commitments and U.S. borrowing base and (ii) $18,750,000, then following such event, Kraton and its restricted subsidiaries must maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.0 to 1.0 for four fiscal quarters (or for a shorter duration if certain financial conditions are met). The Senior Secured Credit Facilities contain certain customary events of default, including, without limitation, a failure to make payments under the facility, cross-default and cross-judgment default, certain bankruptcy events and certain change of control events.

As of September 30, 2014, our available borrowing capacity was $214.8 million of which $0.0 million was drawn. As of the date of this filing, our available borrowing capacity was $211.9 million, of which $0.0 million was drawn.

6.75% Senior Notes due 2019. Kraton Polymers LLC and its wholly-owned financing subsidiary Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation issued $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.75% senior notes that mature on March 1, 2019 pursuant to an indenture dated February 11, 2011 ($250.0 million senior notes) and supplemental indenture thereto dated March 20, 2012 ($100.0 million senior notes). The indenture provides that the notes are general unsecured, senior obligations and will be unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis. We pay interest on the notes at 6.75% per annum, semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1 of each year.

Capital Lease. In January 2014, we entered into a 10 year capital lease with a principal amount of $7.0 million to fund a portion of our capital expenditures. 

KFPC Loan Agreement. On July 17, 2014, KFPC executed a syndicated loan agreement (the “KFPC” Loan Agreement”) in the amount of 5.5 billion New Taiwan Dollars (“NTD”), or $182.9 million (converted at the July 17, 2014 exchange rate), to provide additional funding to construct the HSBC facility in Taiwan and to provide funding for working capital requirements and/or general corporate purposes.

The KFPC Loan Agreement is comprised of a NTD 4.29 billion Tranche A, or $142.7 million (converted at the July 17, 2014 exchange rate), to fund KFPC’s capital expenditures, and a NTD 1.21 billion Tranche B, or $40.2 million (converted at the July 17, 2014 exchange rate), to fund working capital requirements and/or general corporate purposes. As of September 30, 2014, no draws have been made on the KFPC Loan Agreement. The initial term of the KFPC Loan Agreement is five years from the date of the first drawing of either tranche. To the extent that the first drawing has not occurred within six months from the date of the KFPC Loan Agreement, the term will be five years from expiration of this six-month period. Subject to certain conditions, KFPC can request a two-year extension of the term of the KFPC Loan Agreement.

The total outstanding principal amount is payable in six semi-annual installments with the first payment due upon the expiry of a thirty-month period commencing on the date of the first drawing of loans and each subsequent payment due every six months thereafter. The first five installments shall be in an amount equal to 10% of the outstanding principal amount and the final installment shall be in an amount equal to the remaining 50% of the outstanding principal amount. In the event the extension period is granted, the final 50% of the outstanding principal amount shall be repaid in five equal semi-annual installments with the first installment due on the original final maturity date.

The KFPC Loan Agreement is subject to a variable interest rate composed of a fixed 0.8% margin plus the secondary market fixing rate in NTD denominated 90 day or 180 day commercial paper, (depending on the interest period as selected by KFPC in the drawdown request or the interest period notice), subject to a floor of 1.7%. Interest is payable on a monthly basis.

The KFPC Loan Agreement contains certain financial covenants which change during the term of the KFPC Loan Agreement. The financial covenants include a maximum debt to equity ratio of 3.0 to 1.0 commencing in 2014, which will decrease over time to 1.2 to 1.0 in 2018; a minimum tangible net worth requirement of $50.0 million commencing in 2014, which will increase to $100.0 million in 2019; and a minimum interest coverage ratio of 2.5 to 1.0 commencing in 2016, which will increase to 5.0 to 1.0 in 2017. In

18

---

 

each case, these covenants are calculated and tested on an annual basis. Formosa Petrochemical Corporation and Kraton Polymers LLC are the guarantors of the KFPC Loan Agreement with each guarantor guaranteeing fifty percent (50%) of the indebtedness.

Debt Maturities. The remaining principal payments on our outstanding total debt as of September 30, 2014, are as follows:

 

 

See Note 8 Fair Value Measurements, Financial Instruments and Credit Risk for fair value information related to our long-term debt.

 

7. Debt Issuance Costs

We capitalize the debt issuance costs related to issuing long-term debt and amortize these costs using the effective interest method, except for costs related to revolving debt, which are amortized using the straight-line method. Amortization of debt issuance costs and the accelerated write-off of debt issuance costs in connection with refinancing activities are recorded as a component of interest expense. We had net debt issuance costs of $10.1 million and $11.4 million (of which $2.3 million and $2.2 million were included in other current assets) as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. In connection with the March 2013 refinancing of our indebtedness, we charged to interest expense $5.0 million of unamortized debt issuance costs related to our previously existing indebtedness and we capitalized $4.8 million of debt issuance costs related to our new indebtedness. In the three months ended September 30, 2014, our consolidated joint venture, KFPC, capitalized $0.5 million of debt issuance costs related to the KFPC Loan Agreement executed in July 2014. We amortized $0.6 million and $0.5 million of debt issuance costs for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $1.7 million and $1.8 million (which excludes the $5.0 million of accelerated amortization) of debt issuance costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

8. Fair Value Measurements, Financial Instruments and Credit Risk

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. ASC 820 requires entities to, among other things, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

ASC 820 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market assumptions.

19

---

 

In accordance with ASC 820, these two types of inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy:

Recurring Fair Value Measurements. The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. These financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, which judgment may affect the valuation of their fair value and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The use of derivatives creates exposure to credit risk relating to potential losses that could be recognized in the event that the counterparties to these instruments fail to perform their obligations under the contracts, which we seek to minimize by limiting our counterparties to major financial institutions with acceptable credit ratings and by monitoring the total value of positions with individual counterparties. In the event of a default by one of our counterparties, we may not receive payments provided for under the terms of our derivatives.

20

---

 

The following table presents the carrying values and approximate fair values of our long-term debt.

 

 

Financial Instruments    

Interest Rate Swap Agreement. On March 27, 2013, in connection with the refinancing of our credit facility, we terminated and settled an interest rate swap agreement, and as a result, recognized $0.7 million of interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013. We did not have any interest rate swap agreements in effect during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Fair Value Hedges. In April 2012, we entered into a series of non-deliverable forward contracts to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in the Canadian dollar (“CAD”) against the U.S. dollar associated with the funding of certain capital expenditures. These non-deliverable forward contracts qualified for hedge accounting and were designated as fair value hedges in accordance with ASC 815-25 “Fair Value Hedges.” The only non-deliverable forward contract outstanding as of September 30, 2013 had a notional amount of CAD $1.6 million with a settlement date of October 8, 2013. This hedge was effective in offsetting our exposure to the CAD and therefore the $0.1 million gain on the hedge was offset by the $0.1 million loss on the exposure associated with the funding of our semi-works facility for the three months ended September 30, 2013. There was no net impact for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. We did not have any fair value hedges in place during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.                              

Net Investment Hedges. During 2012, we entered into a series of non-deliverable forward and foreign currency option contracts to protect our net investment in our European subsidiaries against adverse changes in exchange rates by fixing the U.S. dollar/Euro exchange rate. The notional amounts of these contracts ranged from €50.0 million to €100.0 million with all contracts expiring after thirty days. In June 2013, we entered into a TWD 450.0 million notional amount non-deliverable forward contract to protect our net investment in our subsidiary in Taiwan against adverse changes in exchange rates by fixing the New Taiwan Dollar/Euro exchange rate. These contracts qualify for hedge accounting and were designated as net investment hedges in accordance with ASC 815-35 “Net Investment Hedges.” We recorded an aggregate $0.5 million loss in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the settlement of the effective portion of these contracts during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. We did not have any net investment hedges in place during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Foreign Currency Hedges. Periodically, we enter into foreign currency agreements to hedge or otherwise protect against fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. These agreements typically do not qualify for hedge accounting and gains/losses resulting from both the up-front premiums and/or settlement of the hedges at expiration of the agreements are recognized in the period in which they are incurred. For the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we settled these hedges and recorded a loss of $3.9 million and a gain of $0.3 million, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we recorded a loss of $4.3 million and a loss of $1.5 million, respectively, which are recorded in cost of goods sold. These contracts are structured such that these gains/losses from the mark-to-market impact of the hedging instruments materially offset the underlying foreign currency exchange gains/losses to reduce the overall impact of foreign currency exchange movements throughout the period.

Credit Risk

We analyze our counterparties’ financial condition prior to extending credit and we establish credit limits and monitor the appropriateness of those limits on an ongoing basis. We also obtain cash, letters of credit or other acceptable forms of security from customers to provide credit support, where appropriate, based on our financial analysis of the customer and the contractual terms and conditions applicable to each transaction.

21

---

 

 

9. Income Taxes

 

Our income tax expense was $1.1 million and $2.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $3.4 million and $4.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Our effective tax rate was 6.4% and (52.8%) for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and 15.2% and (329.5%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Our effective tax rates differed from the U.S. corporate statutory tax rate of 35.0%, primarily due to the mix of pre-tax income or loss earned in certain jurisdictions and the change in our valuation allowance.

We record a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, a valuation allowance of $85.4 million and $90.0 million, respectively, has been provided for net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets. We decreased our valuation allowance by $4.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, of which $2.5 million represents utilization of net operating losses in the current period and $1.9 million relates to the assessment of our ability to utilize net operating losses in future periods. We increased our valuation allowance by $3.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, of which $3.5 million represents current period net operating losses and $0.1 million represents changes in other comprehensive income (loss). We decreased our valuation allowance by $4.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, of which $2.7 million represents utilization of net operating losses in the current period and $1.9 million relates to the assessment of our ability to utilize net operating losses in future periods. We increased our valuation allowance by $7.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, of which $8.0 million represents current period net operating losses, partially offset by $0.1 million which represents changes in other comprehensive income (loss). Excluding the change in our valuation allowance, our effective tax rate would have been a 31.7% expense and a 38.3% benefit for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and a 35.8% expense and a 276.9% benefit for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had total unrecognized tax benefits of $6.6 million and $6.4 million, respectively, related to uncertain foreign tax positions, all of which, if recognized, would impact our effective tax rate. During the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we had a decrease in uncertain tax positions of $0.3 million and an increase of $0.7 million, respectively, and an increase of $0.2 million and an increase of $1.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, primarily related to uncertain tax positions in Europe. We recorded interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes. We believe that no current tax positions that have resulted in unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within one year.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in various state and foreign jurisdictions. For our U.S. federal income tax returns, the statute of limitations has expired through the tax year ended December 31, 2003. As a result of net operating loss carryforwards from 2004, the statute of limitations remains open for all years subsequent to 2003. In addition, open tax years for state and foreign jurisdictions remain subject to examination.

      

    

 

10. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings. We received notice from the tax authorities in Brazil assessing R$6.1 million, or $2.5 million (converted at the September 30, 2014 exchange rate), in connection with tax credits that were generated from the purchase of certain goods which were subsequently applied by us against taxes owed. We have appealed the assertion by the tax authorities in Brazil that the goods purchased were not eligible to earn the credits. While the outcome of this proceeding cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect upon our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On January 28, 2014, we executed a definitive agreement (the “Combination Agreement”) to combine with the styrenic block copolymer (“SBC”) operations of Taiwan-based LCY Chemical Corp. (“LCY”). The Combination Agreement called for LCY to contribute its SBC business in exchange for newly issued shares in the combined company, such that Kraton’s stockholders and LCY would each own 50% of the outstanding shares of the combined enterprise.  

22

---

 

On June 30, 2014, Kraton notified LCY that its Board of Directors intended to withdraw its recommendation to Kraton’s stockholders to approve the Combination Agreement unless the parties could agree upon mutually acceptable revised terms to the Combination Agreement. This notice cited the decline in operating results for LCY’s SBC business in the first quarter of 2014 and a related decline in forecasted results thereafter, together with the decline in Kraton’s stock price and negative reactions from Kraton’s stockholders. Following Kraton’s notification of its Board’s intention to change its recommendation, the parties engaged in discussions to determine whether they could mutually agree to changes to the terms of the Combination Agreement that would enable the Kraton Board to continue to recommend that Kraton’s stockholders approve the Combination Agreement. The parties engaged in numerous discussions subsequent to June 30, 2014 regarding possible revisions to the terms of the Combination Agreement.

On July 31, 2014, an explosion occurred in a pipeline owned by LCY in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, causing substantial property damage and loss of life, and numerous governmental and private investigations and claims have been initiated and asserted against LCY. On August 4, 2014, LCY notified Kraton that it would no longer negotiate, and would not agree to, any revisions to the terms of the Combination Agreement.  On August 6, 2014, the Kraton Board withdrew its recommendation that Kraton’s stockholders approve the Combination Agreement. On August 8, 2014, Kraton received notice from LCY that LCY had exercised its right to terminate the Combination Agreement.

The provisions of the Combination Agreement provide for Kraton to pay LCY a $25 million break-up fee upon a termination of the Combination Agreement following a withdrawal of the Kraton Board’s recommendation, unless an LCY material adverse effect has occurred and is continuing at the time of the withdrawal of the Kraton Board’s recommendation. In LCY’s notice terminating the Combination Agreement, LCY requested payment of such $25 million termination fee. On October 6, 2014, LCY filed a lawsuit against Kraton in connection with Kraton’s refusal to pay the $25 million termination fee. We believe that the impact upon LCY of the July 31, 2014 explosion in a gas pipeline in Kaohsiung, Taiwan constitutes an LCY material adverse effect as defined in the Combination Agreement, and Kraton has notified LCY that accordingly Kraton is not obligated to pay the termination fee.  While the ultimate resolution of this matter cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect any material adverse effect upon our financial position, results of operations or cash flows from the ultimate outcome of this matter.

We and certain of our subsidiaries, from time to time, are parties to various other legal proceedings, claims and disputes that have arisen in the ordinary course of business. These claims may involve significant amounts, some of which would not be covered by insurance. A substantial settlement payment or judgment in excess of our accruals could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. While the outcome of these proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect any of these existing matters, individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect upon our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Asset Retirement Obligations.

The changes in the aggregate carrying amount of our ARO liability are as follows:

 

 

 

 

23

---

 

Production downtime. In the first quarter of 2014 we experienced weather-related downtime at our Belpre, Ohio facility. In addition, our facility in Berre, France, experienced an operating disruption resulting from a small fire that impacted one of the production lines at this facility. We incurred $12.0 million of net costs in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 associated with these two events, of which $2.6 million is included in other payables and accruals at September 30, 2014 based on management’s estimates of the remaining costs to be incurred. In the third quarter 2014, we recorded a $1.0 million reduction of costs due to the confirmation of a partial insurance recovery which is included in receivables as of September 30, 2014.

There have been no other material changes to our Commitments and Contingencies disclosed in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

11. Employee Benefits

Retirement Plans.

The components of net periodic benefit cost related to U.S. pension benefits are as follows:

 

 

 

We made contributions of $7.2 million and $4.8 million to our pension plan in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The components of net periodic benefit cost related to other post-retirement benefits are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

24

---

 

12. Industry Segment and Foreign Operations

We operate in one segment for the manufacturing and marketing of engineered polymers. In accordance with the provisions of ASC 280, “Segment Reporting,” our chief operating decision-maker has been identified as the President and Chief Executive Officer, who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire company. Since we operate in one segment and in one group of similar products, all financial segment and product line information required by ASC 280 can be found in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

We manufacture our products along the following primary product lines based upon polymer chemistry and process technologies:

Revenue for our product lines is as follows: 

 

 

For geographic reporting, revenue is attributed to the geographic location in which the customers’ facilities are located. Long-lived assets consist primarily of property, plant and equipment, which are attributed to the geographic location in which they are located and are presented at historical cost.

25

---

 

Revenue and long-lived assets by geographic region are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

26

---

 

13. Related Party Transactions

We own a 50% equity investment in a SBC manufacturing joint venture in Kashima, Japan. Our due to related party liability on the condensed consolidated balance sheet is related to this joint venture and the purchases from the joint venture amounted to $9.4 million and $15.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $30.0 million and $37.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

14. Variable Interest Entity

The following table summarizes the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 for KFPC before intercompany eliminations. See Note 6 Long Term Debt, for further discussion related to the KFPC Loan Agreement executed on July 17, 2014.

 

 

15. Subsequent Events

On October 27, 2014, Kraton’s board of directors approved a share repurchase program through which the Company may repurchase outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock having an aggregate purchase price of up to $50.0 million. Kraton intends to finance the share repurchase program through a combination of cash and debt. The Company plans to repurchase shares of its common stock over the next two years in the open market at prevailing market prices, through privately negotiated transactions, or through a trading program under Rule 10b5-1, subject to market and business conditions, applicable legal requirements and other considerations.

We have evaluated significant events and transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date and determined that there were no other events or transactions that would require recognition or disclosure in our condensed consolidated financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2014.

 

16. Supplemental Guarantor Information

Kraton Polymers LLC and Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation, a financing subsidiary, collectively, (“the Issuers”), are co-issuers of the 6.75% senior notes due March 1, 2019. Kraton Performance Polymers, Inc. and Elastomers Holdings LLC, a U.S. holding company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Kraton Polymers LLC, collectively, (“the Guarantors”), fully and unconditionally guarantee on a joint and several basis, the Issuers’ obligations under the 6.75% senior notes. Our remaining subsidiaries are not guarantors of the 6.75% senior notes. We do not believe that separate financial statements and other disclosures concerning the guarantor subsidiaries would provide any additional information that would be material to investors in making an investment decision.

27

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

September 30, 2014

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except par value)

 

 

 

 

28

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

December 31, 2013

(In thousands, except par value)

 

 

 

29

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Three months ended September 30, 2014

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

 

 

30

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Three months ended September 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

 

 

31

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Nine months ended September 30, 2014

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

32

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Nine months ended September 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

33

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Three months ended September 30, 2014

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

 

 

34

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Three months ended September 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

 

 

35

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Nine months ended September 30, 2014

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

 

 

36

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Nine months ended September 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

37

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Nine months ended September 30, 2014

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

38

---

 

KRATON PERFORMANCE POLYMERS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Nine months ended September 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

(1)Kraton Polymers LLC and Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation, a financing subsidiary, collectively, the Issuers, are co-issuers of the 6.75% senior notes due March 1, 2019. Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation has minimal assets and income. We do not believe that separate financial information concerning the Issuers would provide additional information that would be material to investors in making an investment decision.

39

---

 

 

INTRODUCTION

You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013. This discussion contains forward-looking statements and involves numerous risks, assumptions and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risk factors discussed in the “Risk Factors” section of our most recent Form 10-K, as well as in “Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

OVERVIEW

We are a leading global producer of styrenic block copolymers (“SBCs”) and other engineered polymers. We market our products under the Kraton^®, Cariflex^TM and NEXAR^TM brands. SBCs are highly-engineered synthetic elastomers, which we invented and commercialized almost 50 years ago, that enhance the performance of numerous end use products by imparting greater flexibility, resilience, strength, durability and processability.

Our polymers are typically formulated or compounded with other products to achieve improved, customer-specific performance characteristics in a variety of applications. We seek to maximize the value of our product portfolio by emphasizing complex or specialized polymers and innovations that yield higher margins than less differentiated products. We sometimes refer to these complex or specialized polymers or innovations as being more “differentiated.”

Our products are found in many everyday applications, including personal care products, such as disposable diapers, and in the rubberized grips of toothbrushes, razor blades and power tools. Our products are also used to impart tack and shear properties in a wide variety of adhesive products and to impart characteristics such as, flexibility and durability in sealants and corrosion resistance in coatings. Our paving and roofing applications provide durability, extending road and roof life.

We also produce Cariflex isoprene rubber and isoprene rubber latex. Our Cariflex products are highly-engineered, non-SBC synthetic substitutes for natural rubber and natural rubber latex. Our Cariflex products, which have not been found to contain the proteins present in natural rubber latex and are, therefore, not known to cause allergies, are used in applications such as surgical gloves and condoms. We believe the versatility of Cariflex provides opportunities for new, high margin applications.

We have a portfolio of innovations at various stages of development and commercialization, including

Our products are manufactured along the following primary product lines based upon polymer chemistry and process technologies:

 

40

---

 

The majority of worldwide SBC production is dedicated to USBCs, which are primarily used in paving and roofing, in adhesives, sealants and coatings, and in footwear applications. HSBCs, which are significantly more complex and capital-intensive to manufacture than USBCs, are primarily used in more differentiated applications, such as soft touch and flexible materials, personal hygiene products, medical products, automotive components, and certain adhesives and sealant applications.

 

 

 

 

2014 Third Quarter Financial Overview

41

---

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

Raw Materials. We use butadiene, styrene and isoprene as our primary raw materials in manufacturing our products, and our results of operations are directly affected by the cost of these raw materials. On a FIFO basis, these monomers together represented approximately $135.1 million and $158.4 million or 53.0% and 56.6% of our total cost of goods sold for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and approximately $393.7 million and $477.4 million or 51.7% and 57.2% of our total cost of goods sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Since the cost of our three primary raw materials comprise a significant amount of our total cost of goods sold, our selling prices for our products and therefore our total revenue are impacted by movements in our raw material costs, as well as the cost of other inputs.

The cost of these monomers has generally correlated with changes in energy prices and is generally influenced by supply and demand factors, and prices for natural and synthetic rubber. Average purchase prices for butadiene and isoprene decreased during the three months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014, whereas average purchase prices for styrene were relatively flat. Average purchase prices for butadiene increased during the three months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, whereas average purchase prices for styrene were relatively flat and average purchase prices for isoprene decreased. Average purchase prices for these monomers decreased during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

We use the first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis of accounting for inventory and cost of goods sold and therefore gross profit. In periods of raw material price volatility, reported results under FIFO will differ from what the results would have been if cost of goods sold were based on estimated current replacement cost (“ECRC”). Specifically, in periods of rising raw material costs, reported gross profit will be higher under FIFO than under ECRC. Conversely, in periods of declining raw material costs, reported gross profit will be lower under FIFO than under ECRC. In recognition of the fact that the cost of raw materials affects our results of operations and the comparability of our results of operations we provide the spread between FIFO and ECRC.

International Operations and Currency Fluctuations. We operate a geographically diverse business, serving customers in over 60 countries from five manufacturing facilities on four continents. Although we sell and manufacture our products in many countries, our sales and production costs are mainly denominated in U.S. dollars, Euro, Japanese Yen and Brazilian Real. From time to time, we use hedging strategies to reduce our exposure to currency fluctuations.

We generated our revenue from customers located in the following regions.

 

 

Our financial results are subject to gains and losses on currency translations, which occur when the financial statements of our foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars. The financial statements of operations outside the United States where the local currency is considered to be the functional currency are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate at each balance sheet date for assets and liabilities and the average exchange rate for each period for revenues, expenses, gains and losses and cash flows. The

42

---

 

effect of translating the balance sheet into U.S. dollars is included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Any appreciation of the functional currencies against the U.S. dollar will increase the U.S. dollar equivalent of amounts of revenues, expenses, gains and losses and cash flows, and any depreciation of the functional currencies will decrease the U.S. dollar amounts reported. Our results of operations are also subject to currency transaction risk. We incur currency transaction risk when we enter into either a purchase or sale transaction using a currency other than the local currency of the transacting entity. The impact from currency fluctuations amounted to pre-tax losses of $1.0 million and $3.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and pre-tax losses of $2.5 million and $5.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, the primary driver for the decrease in our pre-tax currency losses was the change in foreign exchange rates between the Euro and U.S. Dollar and the Japanese Yen and U.S. Dollar. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the primary driver for the decrease in our pre-tax currency losses compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was the change in foreign exchange rates between the Brazilian Real and U.S. Dollar and the Japanese Yen and U.S. Dollar.

Seasonality. Seasonal changes and weather conditions typically affect the Paving and Roofing end use market and generally result in higher sales volumes into this end use market in the second and third quarters of the calendar year compared to the first and fourth quarters of the calendar year. Our other end use markets tend to show relatively little seasonality.

Recent Developments

Share Repurchase Program. On October 27, 2014, Kraton’s board of directors approved a share repurchase program through which the Company may repurchase outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock having an aggregate purchase price of up to $50.0 million. Kraton intends to finance the share repurchase program through a combination of cash and debt. The Company plans to repurchase shares of its common stock over the next two years in the open market at prevailing market prices, through privately negotiated transactions, or through a trading program under Rule 10b5-1, subject to market and business conditions, applicable legal requirements and other considerations.

Terminated Combination Agreement with SBC Business of LCY. On January 28, 2014, we executed a definitive agreement (the “Combination Agreement”) to combine with the styrenic block copolymer (“SBC”) operations of Taiwan-based LCY Chemical Corp. (“LCY”). The Combination Agreement called for LCY to contribute its SBC business in exchange for newly issued shares in the combined company, such that Kraton’s stockholders and LCY would each own 50% of the outstanding shares of the combined enterprise.  

On June 30, 2014, Kraton notified LCY that its Board of Directors intended to withdraw its recommendation to Kraton’s stockholders to approve the Combination Agreement unless the parties could agree upon mutually acceptable revised terms to the Combination Agreement. This notice cited the decline in operating results for LCY’s SBC business in the first quarter of 2014 and a related decline in forecasted results thereafter, together with the decline in Kraton’s stock price and negative reactions from Kraton’s stockholders. Following Kraton’s notification of its Board’s intention to change its recommendation, the parties engaged in discussions to determine whether they could mutually agree to changes to the terms of the Combination Agreement that would enable the Kraton Board to continue to recommend that Kraton’s stockholders approve the Combination Agreement. The parties engaged in numerous discussions subsequent to June 30, 2014 regarding possible revisions to the terms of the Combination Agreement.

On July 31, 2014, an explosion occurred in a pipeline owned by LCY in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, causing substantial property damage and loss of life, and numerous governmental and private investigations and claims have been initiated and asserted against LCY. On August 4, 2014, LCY notified Kraton that it would no longer negotiate, and would not agree to, any revisions to the terms of the Combination Agreement.  On August 6, 2014, the Kraton Board withdrew its recommendation that Kraton’s stockholders approve the Combination Agreement. On August 8, 2014, Kraton received notice from LCY that LCY had exercised its right to terminate the Combination Agreement.

The provisions of the Combination Agreement provide for Kraton to pay LCY a $25 million break-up fee upon a termination of the Combination Agreement following a withdrawal of the Kraton Board’s recommendation, unless an LCY material adverse effect has occurred and is continuing at the time of the withdrawal of the Kraton Board’s recommendation. In LCY’s notice terminating the Combination Agreement, LCY requested payment of such $25 million termination fee. On October 6, 2014, LCY filed a lawsuit against Kraton in connection with Kraton’s refusal to pay the $25 million termination fee. We believe that the impact upon LCY of the

43

---

 

July 31, 2014 explosion in a gas pipeline in Kaohsiung, Taiwan constitutes an LCY material adverse effect as defined in the Combination Agreement, and Kraton has notified LCY that accordingly Kraton is not obligated to pay the termination fee.  While the ultimate resolution of this matter cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect any material adverse effect upon our financial position, results of operations or cash flows from the ultimate outcome of this matter.

KFPC loan agreement. On July 17, 2014, KFPC executed a syndicated loan agreement (the “KFPC Loan Agreement”) in the amount of 5.5 billion New Taiwan Dollars (“NTD”), or $182.9 million (converted at the July 17, 2014 exchange rate), to provide additional funding to construct the HSBC facility in Taiwan and to provide funding for working capital requirements and/or general corporate purposes. The KFPC Loan Agreement is comprised of  NTD 4.29 billion, or $142.7 million (converted at the July 17, 2014 exchange rate), to fund KFPC’s capital expenditures, and NTD 1.21 billion, or $40.2 million (converted at the July 17, 2014 exchange rate), to fund working capital requirements and/or general corporate purposes. Obligations under the KFPC Loan Agreement are guaranteed 50% by Formosa Petrochemical Corporation and 50% by Kraton Polymers LLC. See Note 6. Long Term Debt, for further discussion of the KFPC Loan Agreement.

Outlook

With respect to raw material costs, following declines in butadiene contract prices in September and October, the Company currently expects a continued downward bias for the balance of the year. Based upon these recent raw material price trends, the Company now expects the fourth quarter 2014 results will reflect a negative spread between FIFO and ECRC of approximately $12.0 million, resulting in a full-year 2014 negative spread between FIFO and ECRC of approximately $5.5 million.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2013

Revenue

Revenue was $319.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 compared to $327.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, a decrease of $8.1 million or 2.5%. Excluding the $1.5 million negative effect from currency movements, revenue declined $6.6 million, or 2.0%, with the decrease driven primarily by lower average selling prices associated with product mix, weakness in European paving and roofing markets and lower average raw material costs. Sales volumes declined 2.8 kilotons, or 3.4%, from 83.5 kilotons in the third quarter of 2013 to 80.7 kilotons in the third quarter of 2014. The decrease in total sales volume did not have a material impact on the period-over-period change in revenue, as the revenue impact from lower sales volume of USBC products was offset by the revenue contribution from increased sales volume in higher revenue per ton Cariflex products.

With respect to revenue in each of our end use markets:

44

---

 

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold was $255.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 compared to $279.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The $24.5 million, or 8.8%, decrease was primarily related to a period over period benefit of $18.8 million due to the spread between FIFO and ECRC and a $3.5 million reduction in turnaround costs associated with the third quarter 2013 MACT related production downtime.

Gross Profit

Gross profit was $63.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 compared to $47.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue was 20.0% and 14.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Operating Expenses

Interest expense, net

Interest expense, net was $6.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 compared to $5.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of $0.4 million or 6.2%.  

Income tax expense

Income tax expense was $1.1 million and $2.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.  Our effective tax rate was 6.4% and (52.8%) for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Our effective tax rates differed from the U.S. corporate statutory tax rate of 35.0%, primarily due to the mix of pre-tax income or loss earned in certain jurisdictions and changes in our valuation allowance.

We record a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, a valuation allowance of $85.4 million and $90.0 million, respectively, has been provided for net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets. We decreased our valuation allowance by $4.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, of which $2.5 million represents utilization of net operating losses in the current period and $1.9 million relates to the assessment of our ability to utilize net operating losses in future periods. We increased

45

---

 

our valuation allowance by $3.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, of which $3.5 million represents current period net operating losses and $0.1 million represents changes in other comprehensive income (loss). Excluding the change in our valuation allowance, our effective tax rate would have been a 31.7% expense and a 38.3% benefit for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Our pre-tax income is generated in a number of jurisdictions and is subject to a number of different effective tax rates that are significantly lower than the U.S. corporate statutory tax rate of 35.0%. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, we earned $12.3 million of pre-tax income in jurisdictions with an expected full year effective tax rate of 9.8%. For the three months ended September 30, 2013, we earned $1.1 million of pre-tax income in jurisdictions with an expected full year effective tax rate of 9.6%.

Net income (loss) attributable to Kraton

Net income attributable to Kraton was $16.6 million or $0.50 per diluted share for the three months ended September 30, 2014, an increase of $22.2 million compared to a net loss of $(5.6) million or $(0.17) per diluted share for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was positively impacted by the following items, net of tax:

In addition, net income for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was negatively impacted by the following items, net of tax:

Net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was negatively impacted by the following items, net of tax:

46

---

 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013

Revenue

Revenue was $954.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to $1,001.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, a decrease of $47.4 million or 4.7% with $46.9 million of the decline attributable to lower average selling prices associated with lower average raw material costs. Sales volumes declined 5.7 kilotons, or 2.4%, from 239.2 kilotons in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to 233.4 kilotons in the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease in total sales volume did not have a material impact on the period-over-period change in revenue, as the revenue impact from lower sales volume of USBC products was offset by the revenue contribution from increased sales volume in higher revenue per ton Cariflex products.

With respect to revenue in each of our end use markets:

 

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold was $761.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to $834.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The $73.1 million, or 8.8%, decrease was primarily driven by a $74.7 million reduction in raw material costs which includes a period over period benefit of $30.0 million due to the spread between FIFO and ECRC. In addition, cost of goods sold declined $3.5 million due to the absence of turnaround costs associated with the third quarter 2013 MACT related

47

---

 

production downtime, lower sales volumes, and favorable manufacturing absorption. Partially offsetting these decreases are $11.4 million of costs associated with the weather-related production downtime at our Belpre, Ohio, facility and an operating disruption from a small fire at our Berre, France, facility in the first quarter of 2014, foreign currency fluctuations of $4.9 million, and increases in other manufacturing costs.

Gross Profit

Gross profit was $193.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to $167.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue was 20.2% and 16.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Operating Expenses

Interest expense, net

Interest expense, net was $18.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to $24.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, a decrease of $6.3 million or 25.2%. The decrease was primarily due to charges aggregating $5.8 million incurred in connection with our March 2013 refinancing and to lower outstanding indebtedness.  

Income tax expense

Income tax expense was $3.4 million and $4.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Our effective tax rate was 15.2% and (329.5%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Our effective tax rates differed from the U.S. corporate statutory tax rate of 35.0%, primarily due to the mix of pre-tax income or loss earned in certain jurisdictions and changes in our valuation allowance.

We record a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, a valuation allowance of $85.4 million and $90.0 million, respectively, has been provided for net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets. We decreased our valuation allowance by $4.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, of which $2.7 million represents utilization of net operating losses in the current period and $1.9 million relates to the assessment of our ability to utilize net operating losses in future periods. We increased our valuation allowance by $7.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, of which $8.0 million represents current period net operating losses, partially offset by $0.1 million which represents changes in other comprehensive income (loss). Excluding the change in our valuation allowance, our effective tax rate would have been a 35.8% expense and a 276.9% benefit for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

48

---

 

Our pre-tax income is generated in a number of jurisdictions and is subject to a number of different effective tax rates that are significantly lower than the U.S. corporate statutory tax rate of 35.0%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we earned $16.4 million of pre-tax income in jurisdictions with an expected full year effective tax rate of 9.8%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we earned $17.1 million of pre-tax income in jurisdictions with an expected full year effective tax rate of 9.6%.

Net income (loss) attributable to Kraton

Net income attributable to Kraton was $19.8 million or $0.60 per diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, an increase of $25.4 million compared to a net loss of $(5.5) million or $(0.17) per diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was negatively impacted by the following items, net of tax:

In addition, net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was positively impacted by the following items, net of tax:

Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was negatively impacted by the following items, net of tax:

Critical Accounting Policies

For a discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates that require the use of significant estimates and judgments, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

 

49

---

 

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Gross Profit

We consider EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Gross Profit to be important supplemental measures of our performance and believe they are frequently used by investors, securities analysts and other interested parties in the evaluation of our performance including period-to-period comparisons and/or that of other companies in our industry. In addition, management uses these measures to evaluate operating performance, and our incentive compensation plan bases incentive compensation payments on our Adjusted EBITDA performance, along with other factors. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Gross Profit have limitations as analytical tools and in some cases can vary substantially from other measures of our performance. You should not consider any of them in isolation, or as substitutes for analysis of our results under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

 

 

50

---

 

Because of these and other limitations, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business.

Our presentation of non-GAAP financial measures and the adjustments made therein should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items, and in the future we may incur expenses or charges similar to the adjustments made in the presentation of our non-GAAP financial measures.

As a measure of our performance, Adjusted Gross Profit is limited because it often varies substantially from gross profit calculated in accordance with US GAAP due to volatility in raw material prices.

We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Gross Profit only as supplemental measures. See our financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

We reconcile Gross Profit to Adjusted Gross Profit as follows:

 

 

 

 

51

---

 

We reconcile consolidated net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as follows:

 

 

 

52

---

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Known Trends and Uncertainties

Kraton Performance Polymers, Inc. is a holding company without any operations or assets other than the operations of its subsidiaries. Cash flows from operations of our subsidiaries, cash on hand and available borrowings under our credit facility are our principal sources of liquidity.

In March 2013, we entered into an asset-based revolving credit facility consisting of a U.S. senior secured revolving credit facility of $150.0 million and a Dutch senior secured revolving credit facility of $100.0 million (the “Senior Secured Credit Facilities”), to replace our then-existing senior secured credit facility, and repaid in full all outstanding amounts payable under the previously existing facility.

The Senior Secured Credit Facilities are principally secured by receivables and inventory, and borrowing availability under the facilities is subject to borrowing base limitations based on the level of receivables and inventory available for security. The Senior Secured Credit Facilities include a $100.0 million uncommitted accordion feature that, subject to borrowing base availability and approval of the bank syndicate, could increase aggregate availability to $350.0 million. We cannot guarantee that all of the lending counterparties contractually committed to fund a revolving credit draw request will actually fund future requests, although we currently believe that each of the counterparties would meet their funding requirements. The Senior Secured Credit Facilities terminate on March 27, 2018; however we may, from time to time, request that the lenders extend the maturity of their commitments; provided that at no time shall there be more than four maturity dates under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities.

The Senior Secured Credit Facilities contain a financial covenant requiring us to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 if availability under the facilities is below specified amounts. Our failure to comply with this financial maintenance covenant would give rise to a default under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities. If factors arise that negatively impact our profitability, we may not be able to satisfy this covenant. In addition, the Senior Secured Credit Facilities contain customary events of default, including, without limitation, a failure to make payments under the facilities, cross-default with respect to other indebtedness and cross-judgment default, certain bankruptcy events and certain change of control events. If we are unable to satisfy the covenants or other provisions of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities at any future time we would need to seek an amendment or waiver of such covenants or other provisions. The respective lenders under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities may elect not to consent to any amendment or waiver requests that we may make in the future, and, if they do consent, they may do so on terms that are not favorable to us. In the event that we are unable to obtain any such waiver or amendment and we are not able to refinance or repay our Senior Secured Credit Facilities, our inability to meet the covenants or other provisions of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities would constitute an event of default, which would permit the bank lenders to accelerate the Senior Secured Credit Facilities. Such acceleration may in turn constitute an event of default under our senior notes or other indebtedness.

Kraton Polymers LLC and its wholly-owned financing subsidiary Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation issued $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.75% senior notes that mature on March 1, 2019. The notes are general unsecured, senior obligations and are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis. We pay interest on the notes at 6.75% per annum, semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1 of each year. Prior to March 1, 2015, we may redeem all or a part of the senior notes, at a redemption price equal to 100.00% of the principal amount of the senior notes redeemed plus the applicable premium as of such date, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable redemption date. After March 1, 2015, we may redeem all or a part of the senior notes for 103.375%, 101.688%, and 100.000% of the principal amount in 2015, 2016 and 2017 and thereafter, respectively.

On July 17, 2014, KFPC executed a syndicated loan agreement (the “KFPC Loan Agreement”) in the amount of 5.5 billion New Taiwan Dollars (“NTD”), or $182.9 million (converted at the July 17, 2014 exchange rate), to provide additional funding to construct the HSBC facility in Taiwan and to provide funding for working capital requirements and/or general corporate purposes.

The KFPC Loan Agreement is comprised of a NTD 4.29 billion Tranche A, or $142.7 million (converted at the July 17, 2014 exchange rate), to fund KFPC’s capital expenditures, and NTD 1.21 billion Tranche B, or $40.2 million (converted at the July 17, 2014 exchange rate), to fund working capital requirements and/or general corporate purposes. The initial term of the KFPC Loan Agreement is five years from the date of the first drawing of either tranche. To the extent that the first drawing has not occurred within six months from the date of the KFPC Loan Agreement, the term will be five years from expiration of this six-month period. Subject to certain conditions, KFPC can request a two-year extension of the term of the KFPC Loan Agreement.

53

---

 

The total outstanding principal amount is payable in six semi-annual installments with the first payment due upon the expiry of a thirty-month period commencing on the date of the first drawing of loans and each subsequent payment due every six months thereafter. The first five installments shall be in an amount equal to 10% of the outstanding principal amount and the final installment shall be in an amount equal to the remaining 50% of the outstanding principal amount. In the event the extension period is granted, the final 50% of the outstanding principal amount shall be repaid in five equal semi-annual installments with the first installment due on the original final maturity date.

The KFPC Loan Agreement is subject to a variable interest rate composed of a fixed 0.8% margin plus the secondary market fixing rate in NTD denominated 90 day or 180 day commercial paper, (depending on the interest period as selected by KFPC in the drawdown request or the interest period notice), subject to a floor of 1.7%. Interest is payable on a monthly basis.

The KFPC Loan Agreement contains certain financial covenants which change during the term of the debt agreement. The financial covenants include a minimum debt to equity ratio of 3.0 to 1.0 commencing in 2014, which will decrease over time to 1.2 to 1.0 in 2018; a minimum tangible net worth requirement of $50.0 million commencing in 2014, which will increase to $100.0 million in 2019; and a maximum interest coverage ratio of 2.5 to 1.0 commencing in 2016, which will increase to 5.0 to 1.0 in 2017. In each case, these covenants are calculated and tested on an annual basis. Formosa Petrochemical Corporation and Kraton Polymers LLC are the guarantors of the KFPC Loan Agreement with each guarantor guaranteeing fifty percent (50%) of the indebtedness.

At September 30, 2014, we were in compliance with the covenants under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities and the indenture governing our 6.75% senior notes.

Based upon current and anticipated levels of operations, we believe that cash flows from operations of our subsidiaries, cash on hand, and borrowings available to us will be sufficient to fund our expected financial obligations, planned capital expenditures and anticipated liquidity requirements, including working capital requirements, our investment in the joint venture with FPCC, debt payments, interest payments, benefit plan contributions and income tax obligations. However, these cash flows are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, earnings, sensitivities to the cost of raw materials, seasonality and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Because feedstock costs generally represent a substantial portion of our cost of goods sold, in periods of rising feedstock costs, we generally consume cash in operating activities due to increases in accounts receivable and inventory costs, partially offset by increased value of accounts payable. Conversely, during periods in which feedstock costs are declining, we generate cash flow from decreases in working capital.

Going forward there can be no assurance that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available under our senior secured credit facilities to fund liquidity needs and enable us to service our indebtedness. At September 30, 2014, we had $62.3 million of cash and cash equivalents, which includes $22.0 million of cash-on-hand at KFPC, the consolidated joint venture in Asia. As of September 30, 2014, our available borrowing capacity under the senior secured credit facility was $214.8 million of which $0.0 million was drawn and as of the date of this filing, our available borrowing capacity was $211.9 million, of which $0.0 million was drawn. As of September 30, 2014, no draws have been made on the KFPC Loan Agreement. Excluding the $22.0 million of KFPC cash, our liquidity at September 30, 2014 amounted to $255.1 million. Our available cash and cash equivalents are held in accounts managed by third-party financial institutions and consist of cash invested in interest bearing funds and operating accounts. To date, we have not experienced any losses or lack of access to our invested cash or cash equivalents; however, we cannot provide any assurance that adverse conditions in the financial markets will not impact access to our invested cash and cash equivalents.

For additional information regarding our Senior Secured Credit Facilities, our 6.75% Senior Notes and the KFPC Loan Agreement, see “Senior Secured Credit Facilities, 6.75% Senior Notes due 2019, and KFPC Loan Agreement” in Note 6 Long-Term Debt to the condensed consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.

We made contributions of $7.2 million to our pension plan in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and $4.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013. We expect our total pension plan contributions for the year ending December 31, 2014 to be $7.2 million. Our pension plan obligations are predicated on a number of factors, the primary ones being the return on our pension plan assets and the discount rate used in deriving our pension obligations. If the investment return on our pension plan assets does not meet or exceed expectations during 2014, and the discount rate decreases from the prior year, higher levels of contributions could be required in 2015 and beyond.

54

---

 

As of September 30, 2014, we had $56.1 million of cash and short-term investments related to foreign operations that management asserts are permanently reinvested. As a result of net operating loss carryforwards, management estimates that approximately $1.1 million of additional cash tax expense would be incurred if this cash were repatriated.

Turbulence in U.S. and international markets and economies may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition, the liquidity and financial condition of our customers, and our ability to timely replace maturing liabilities and access the capital markets to meet liquidity needs, resulting in adverse effects on our financial condition and results of operations. However, to date we have been able to access borrowings available to us in amounts sufficient to fund liquidity needs.

Our ability to pay principal and interest on our indebtedness, fund working capital, make anticipated capital expenditures and fund our investment in the joint venture with FPCC depends on our future performance, which is subject to general economic conditions and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. “See Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 for further discussion.

Operating Cash Flows and Liquidity

Net cash used in operating activities totaled $18.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to $58.1 million of net cash provided by operating activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2013. This decline in operating cash flow of $76.9 million was primarily the result of the timing of payments of current liabilities and an increase in inventories, partially offset by an increase in consolidated net income and the timing of accounts receivable which resulted in a smaller increase in accounts receivable in 2014 as compared to 2013.

Investing Cash Flows

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $84.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and $63.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, which includes $33.8 million and $8.3 million, respectively, related to capital expenditures incurred by KFPC, our 50/50 joint venture with FPCC.

Expected Capital Expenditures. We currently expect 2014 capital expenditures, excluding capital expenditures by the joint venture with FPCC, will be approximately $65.0 million to $70.0 million. Included in this estimate is approximately $28.3 million to comply with the boiler MACT regulations, and approximately $20.0 million to $22.0 million for health, safety and environmental and infrastructure and maintenance projects. The remaining anticipated 2014 capital expenditures are primarily associated with projects to optimize the production capabilities of our manufacturing assets and to support our innovation platform.

We currently anticipate the total KFPC joint venture project construction cost will be at least $200.0 million; of which, 2014 capital expenditures will be approximately $45.0 million to $50.0 million. The project will be funded with a combination of equity and debt financing. From the inception of the project to September 30, 2014, we and FPCC have each made equity investments of $41.6 million to KFPC. On July 17, 2014, KFPC executed a syndicated loan agreement in the amount of 5.5 billion New Taiwan Dollars, or $182.9 million (converted at the July 17, 2014 exchange rate), to provide the debt portion of the project financing including funding for working capital and/or general corporate purposes. Kraton Polymers LLC and FPCC are guarantors of the KFPC Loan Agreement with each guaranteeing fifty percent of the indebtedness. See Note 6 Long-Term Debt, for further discussion of the KFPC Loan Agreement.

Financing Cash Flows

Our consolidated capital structure as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was approximately 57% equity, 39% debt and 4% noncontrolling interest.

Net cash used in financing activities totaled $5.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to $72.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. In the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we repaid the remaining $96.9 million principal balance of term loans and received $30.2 million from FPCC, which represents their portion of the equity investment in the joint venture.  

55

---

 

Contractual Commitments

Our contractual obligations are summarized in Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.There have been no material changes to the contractual obligation amounts disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are not involved in any material off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30, 2014, other than operating leases.

 

 

 

56

---

 

For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, see Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. There have been no material changes to the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. See Note 8 Fair Value Measurements, Financial Instruments and Credit Risk for further discussion.

 

An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. As of September 30, 2014, based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 

57

---

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

We are subject to a number of contingencies, including litigation, from time to time. On October 6, 2014, we and two of our subsidiaries, Kraton Performance Polymers Limited and NY MergerCo, LLC, were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed by LCY Chemical Corp. and its subsidiary, LCY Synthetic Rubber Corp. (together, the “LCY Parties”), in connection with the previously announced termination of the Combination Agreement. The lawsuit alleges breach of contract by Kraton and seeks payment of the $25 million termination fee, along with awards of unspecified comepensatory, expectancy and consequential damages. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. While the ultimate resolution of this lawsuit cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect any material adverse effect upon our financial position, results of operations or cash flows from the ultimate outcome of this lawsuit.

In January 2014, our Belpre, Ohio facility experienced a mechanical equipment failure due to inclement weather that resulted in a release of process solvents into nearby waterways.

For further information regarding legal proceedings, see Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies, to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

Readers of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should carefully consider the risks described in our other reports and filings filed with or furnished to the SEC, including our prior and subsequent reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, in connection with any evaluation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

The risks and uncertainties in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known or those that are currently deemed immaterial may also affect our operations. Any of the risks, uncertainties, events or circumstances described therein could cause our future financial condition, results of operations or cash flows to be adversely affected.

 

 

 

58

---

 

 

 

 

 

59

---

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

60