Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-13958
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
13-3317783 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
One Hartford Plaza, Hartford, Connecticut 06155
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(860) 547-5000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ |
As of April 28, 2009, there were outstanding 325,430,976 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par
value per share, of the registrant.
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
Hartford, Connecticut
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of The Hartford Financial
Services Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of March 31, 2009, and the related
condensed consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in equity, and cash
flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. These interim financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such
condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31,
2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity,
comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the year then ended prior to retrospective adjustment for
the adoption of FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, described in Note 1, (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 11, 2009
(which report includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Companys change in its method of
accounting and reporting for the fair value measurement of financial instruments in 2008, and
defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans in 2006), we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements. We also audited the adjustments described in
Note 1 that were applied to retrospectively adjust the December 31, 2008 consolidated balance sheet
of the Company (not presented herein). In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have
been properly applied to the previously issued consolidated balance sheet in deriving the
accompanying retrospectively adjusted condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
April 29, 2009
3
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In millions, except for per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
$ |
3,829 |
|
|
$ |
3,843 |
|
Fee income |
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale and other |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
Equity securities, held for trading |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(3,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net investment income (loss) |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
(2,385 |
) |
Other revenues |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
(1,371 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
5,394 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
4,637 |
|
|
|
3,357 |
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses returns credited on International
variable annuities |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(3,578 |
) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
7,411 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(2,017 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(808 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,209 |
) |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(3.77 |
) |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(3.77 |
) |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
320.8 |
|
|
|
313.8 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
and dilutive potential common shares |
|
|
320.8 |
|
|
|
315.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In millions, except for share and per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost of $76,259 and $78,238) |
|
$ |
62,563 |
|
|
$ |
65,112 |
|
Equity securities, held for trading, at fair value (cost of $32,447 and $35,278) |
|
|
27,813 |
|
|
|
30,820 |
|
Equity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value (cost of $1,318 and $1,554) |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
1,458 |
|
Policy loans, at outstanding balance |
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
6,389 |
|
|
|
6,469 |
|
Limited partnerships and other alternative investments |
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
3,121 |
|
|
|
1,723 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
11,189 |
|
|
|
10,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
116,333 |
|
|
|
120,107 |
|
Cash |
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
Premiums receivable and agents balances |
|
|
3,568 |
|
|
|
3,604 |
|
Reinsurance recoverables |
|
|
6,514 |
|
|
|
6,357 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
12,077 |
|
|
|
13,248 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
5,239 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
4,898 |
|
Separate account assets |
|
|
124,738 |
|
|
|
130,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
276,168 |
|
|
$ |
287,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for future policy benefits and unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and casualty |
|
$ |
21,804 |
|
|
$ |
21,933 |
|
Life |
|
|
18,562 |
|
|
|
16,747 |
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
52,952 |
|
|
|
53,753 |
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable International variable annuities |
|
|
27,793 |
|
|
|
30,799 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
|
5,379 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
5,757 |
|
|
|
5,823 |
|
Consumer notes |
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
9,688 |
|
|
|
11,997 |
|
Separate account liabilities |
|
|
124,738 |
|
|
|
130,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
268,281 |
|
|
|
278,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value 50,000,000 shares authorized,
0 and 6,048,387 shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value 750,000,000 shares authorized,
354,098,996 and 329,920,310 shares issued |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
|
7,569 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
10,111 |
|
|
|
11,336 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost 28,664,237 and 29,341,378 shares |
|
|
(2,054 |
) |
|
|
(2,120 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(7,801 |
) |
|
|
(7,520 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
7,860 |
|
|
|
9,268 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
7,887 |
|
|
|
9,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
276,168 |
|
|
$ |
287,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In millions, except for share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Preferred Stock |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
7,569 |
|
|
|
6,627 |
|
Issuance of shares under incentive and stock compensation plans |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
Reclassification of warrants from other liabilities to equity |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax (expense) benefit on employee stock options and awards |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
|
6,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period, before cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
11,336 |
|
|
|
14,686 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period, as adjusted |
|
|
11,336 |
|
|
|
14,683 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(1,209 |
) |
|
|
145 |
|
Dividends declared on common stock |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
10,111 |
|
|
|
14,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock, at Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
(2,120 |
) |
|
|
(1,254 |
) |
Issuance of shares under incentive and stock compensation plans from treasury stock |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Return of shares under incentive and stock compensation plans to treasury stock |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(2,054 |
) |
|
|
(1,184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
(7,520 |
) |
|
|
(858 |
) |
Total other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(1,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(7,801 |
) |
|
|
(2,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
7,860 |
|
|
|
17,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest (Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Change in noncontrolling interest ownership |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
Noncontrolling loss |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
$ |
7,887 |
|
|
$ |
17,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Common Shares (in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
300,579 |
|
|
|
313,842 |
|
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Conversion of preferred to common shares |
|
|
24,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares under incentive and stock compensation plans |
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
Return of shares under incentive and stock compensation plans to treasury stock |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
325,435 |
|
|
|
314,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,209 |
) |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized loss on securities |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(1,606 |
) |
Change in net gain/loss on cash-flow hedging instruments |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
Change in foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
142 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost and actuarial net
losses included in net periodic benefit costs |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(1,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(1,490 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,209 |
) |
|
$ |
145 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
Additions to deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
(734 |
) |
|
|
(956 |
) |
Change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for future policy benefits and unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses and
unearned premiums |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
Reinsurance recoverables |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
54 |
|
Receivables and other assets |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
Payables and accruals |
|
|
(396 |
) |
|
|
(525 |
) |
Accrued and deferred income taxes |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
Net realized capital (gains) losses |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
1,371 |
|
Net receipts to investment contracts related to policyholder funds
International variable annuities |
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
(3,175 |
) |
Net decrease in equity securities, held for trading |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
3,036 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale/maturity/prepayment of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
|
|
22,195 |
|
|
|
8,020 |
|
Equity securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Mortgage loans |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Partnerships |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
Payments for the purchase of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
|
|
(22,655 |
) |
|
|
(9,038 |
) |
Equity securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
(180 |
) |
Mortgage loans |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
Partnerships |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(162 |
) |
Proceeds from business sold |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price of businesses acquired |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
Change in policy loans, net |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
Change in payables for collateral under securities lending, net |
|
|
(1,450 |
) |
|
|
93 |
|
Change in all other securities, net |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
Additions to property and equipment, net |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
(1,820 |
) |
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits and other additions to investment and universal life-type contracts |
|
|
2,872 |
|
|
|
5,707 |
|
Withdrawals and other deductions from investment and universal life-type contracts |
|
|
(4,715 |
) |
|
|
(6,499 |
) |
Net transfers from separate accounts related to investment and universal life-type contracts |
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
Issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
496 |
|
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Change in short-term debt |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of consumer notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
Repayments at maturity of consumer notes |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of shares under incentive and stock compensation plans |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Excess tax expense on stock-based compensation |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Return of shares under incentive and stock compensation plans to treasury stock |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid on common stock |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
Foreign exchange rate effect on cash |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
140 |
|
Net increase in cash |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
Cash beginning of period |
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash end of period |
|
$ |
1,851 |
|
|
$ |
2,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Paid (Received) During the Period For: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
(598 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in millions, except for per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. is a financial holding company for a group of
subsidiaries that provide investment products and life and property and casualty insurance to both
individual and business customers in the United States and internationally (collectively, The
Hartford or the Company).
The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), which differ
materially from the accounting practices prescribed by various insurance regulatory authorities.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes as of March 31, 2009, and
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are unaudited. These financial statements
reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal accruals) which are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations,
and cash flows for the interim periods. These condensed consolidated financial statements and
notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
included in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report. The results of operations for the interim
periods should not be considered indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Hartford Financial
Services Group, Inc., companies in which the Company directly or indirectly has a controlling
financial interest and those variable interest entities in which the Company is the primary
beneficiary. The Company determines if it is the primary beneficiary using both qualitative and
quantitative analyses. Entities in which The Hartford does not have a controlling financial
interest but in which the Company has significant influence over the operating and financing
decisions are reported using the equity method. All material intercompany transactions and
balances between The Hartford and its subsidiaries and affiliates have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with U.S. GAAP, requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
The most significant estimates include those used in determining property and casualty reserves,
net of reinsurance; life estimated gross profits used in the valuation and amortization of assets
and liabilities associated with variable annuity and other universal life-type contracts; living
benefits required to be fair valued; valuation of investments and derivative instruments;
evaluation of other-than-temporary impairments on available-for-sale securities; pension and other
postretirement benefit obligations; contingencies relating to corporate litigation and regulatory
matters; and goodwill impairment. Certain of these estimates are particularly sensitive to market conditions, and deterioration and/or volatility in the worldwide debt or equity markets could have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Significant Accounting Policies
For a description of significant accounting policies, see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
8
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
1. Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies (continued)
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
Fair Value Measurements
In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial Statement of
Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP FAS 157-2) which
delays the effective date of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS 157) to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for certain
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. Examples of applicable nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities to which FSP FAS 157-2 applies include, but are not limited to:
|
|
Nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities initially measured at fair value in a
business combination that are not subsequently remeasured at fair value; |
|
|
|
Reporting units measured at fair value in the goodwill impairment test as described in SFAS
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), and nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities measured at fair value in the SFAS 142 goodwill impairment test, if
applicable; and |
|
|
|
Nonfinancial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment under SFAS
No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. |
The Company applied the provisions of SFAS 157 to the nonfinancial assets, nonfinancial liabilities
and reporting units within the scope of FSP FAS 157-2 on January 1, 2009. The Companys adoption of
FAS 157 did not materially impact the fair values of nonfinancial assets, nonfinancial liabilities
and reporting units within the scope of this FSP.
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 amends and expands
disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities with the intent of providing users
of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of (a) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133) and its
related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an
entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008,
with early application encouraged. SFAS 161 encourages, but does not require, comparative
disclosures. The Company adopted SFAS 161 on January 1, 2009. See Note 5 for the expanded
disclosures related to derivative instruments and hedging activities.
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements (SFAS 160). This statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated
Financial Statements. Noncontrolling interest refers to the minority interest portion of the
equity of a subsidiary that is not attributable directly or indirectly to a parent. SFAS 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards that require for-profit entities that prepare
consolidated financial statements to: (a) present noncontrolling interests as a component of
equity, separate from the parents equity, (b) separately present the amount of consolidated net
income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the income statement, (c) consistently account
for changes in a parents ownership interests in a subsidiary in which the parent entity has a
controlling financial interest as equity transactions, (d) require an entity to measure at fair
value its remaining interest in a subsidiary that is deconsolidated, and (e) require an entity to
provide sufficient disclosures that identify and clearly distinguish between interests of the
parent and interests of noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160 applies to all for-profit entities that
prepare consolidated financial statements, and affects those for-profit entities that have
outstanding noncontrolling interests in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a
subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning on or after December 15, 2008 with earlier adoption prohibited. The Company adopted SFAS
160 on January 1, 2009. Upon adoption, the Company reclassified $92 of noncontrolling interest,
recorded in other liabilities, to equity as of January 1, 2008. See the Companys Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity. The adoption of SFAS 160 did not have a material
effect on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss and
the adoption of SFAS 160 did not impact the Companys accounting for separate account assets and
liabilities. The FASB has added the following topic to the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
agenda, Consideration of an Insurers Accounting for Majority Owned Investments When the Ownership
Is Through a Separate Account. This topic will be discussed at a future EITF meeting. The FASB
has expressed three separate views on the treatment of noncontrolling interest in majority owned
separate accounts, upon implementation of SFAS 160, all of which are acceptable to the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company follows one of these three acceptable views
and currently excludes the noncontrolling interest from its majority owned separate accounts. The
resolution of this EITF agenda item on the Companys accounting for separate account assets and
liabilities is not known at this time.
9
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
1. Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies (continued)
Future Adoption of New Accounting Standards
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level
of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions
That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4). This FSP clarifies that the measurement objective in
determining fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have
significantly decreased, is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly
transaction between willing market participants under current market conditions, and not the value
in a hypothetical active market. The FSP includes additional factors for determining whether there
has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability
compared to normal activity for that asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities) and
provides additional guidance in estimating fair value in those instances. The FSP requires an
entity to base its conclusion about whether a transaction was not orderly on the weight of the
evidence. The FSP further requires an entity to disclose any change in valuation techniques, the
related inputs, and the effects resulting from the application of the FSP.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2). The FSP replaces the existing
requirement for debt securities, that in order for an entity to conclude impairment is not
other-than-temporary, it must have the intent and ability to hold an impaired security for a period
sufficient to allow for recovery in value of the investment. To conclude impairment is not
other-than-temporary, the FSP requires management assert that it does not have the intent to sell
the security and that it is more likely than not it will not have to sell the security before
recovery of its cost basis. The FSP also changes the presentation in the financial statements of
non-credit related impairment amounts for instruments within its scope. When the entity asserts it
does not have the intent to sell the security and it is more likely than not it will not have to
sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, only the credit related impairment losses are
to be recorded in earnings; non-credit losses are to be recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
income. The FSP also expands and increases the frequency of existing disclosures about
other-than-temporary impairments for debt and equity securities.
FSP FAS 157-4 and FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 are effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending after June 15, 2009 with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March,
15, 2009, provided both FSPs are adopted concurrently. The Company will adopt both FSPs for the
interim period ending on June 30, 2009. The Company has not yet determined the effect of the
adoption of these FSPs on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was 40% and (59%),
respectively. The principal causes of the difference between the effective rate and the U.S.
statutory rate of 35% were tax-exempt interest earned on invested assets and the separate account
dividends received deduction (DRD). This caused an increase in the tax benefit on the 2009
pre-tax loss, whereas the negative effective tax rate in 2008 is a result of a tax benefit on
pre-tax income.
The separate account DRD is estimated for the current year using information from the prior
year-end, adjusted for current year equity market performance and other appropriate factors,
including estimated levels of corporate dividend payments. The actual current year DRD can vary
from estimates based on, but not limited to, changes in eligible dividends received by the mutual
funds, amounts of distribution from these mutual funds, amounts of short-term capital gains at the
mutual fund level and the Companys taxable income before the DRD. Given recent financial markets
volatility, the Company is reviewing its DRD computations on a quarterly basis. The Company
recorded benefits related to the separate account DRD of $38 and $41 in the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Companys unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $8 during the first three months of 2009 as a
result of the settlement of the 2002-2003 Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audit, bringing the
total unrecognized tax benefits to $83 as of March 31, 2009. This entire amount, if it were
recognized, would increase the effective tax rate for the applicable periods.
The Companys federal income tax returns are routinely audited by the IRS. During the first
quarter of 2009, the Company received notification of the approval by the Joint Committee on
Taxation of the results of the 2002 through 2003 examination. As a result, the Company recorded a
tax benefit of $7. The 2004 through 2006 examination began during the second quarter of 2008, and
is expected to close in early 2010. In addition, the Company is working with the IRS on a possible
settlement of a DRD issue related to prior periods which, if settled, may result in the booking of
tax benefits in 2009. Such benefits are not expected to be material to the statement of
operations.
The Companys deferred tax asset valuation allowance has been determined pursuant to the provisions
of FASB SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109), including the Companys
estimation of future taxable income, if necessary, and is adequate to reduce the total deferred tax
asset to an amount that will more likely than not be realized. In assessing the need for a
valuation allowance, management considered future reversals of existing taxable temporary
differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards,
and taxable income in prior carry back years as defined in SFAS 109, as well as tax planning
strategies that include holding debt securities with market value losses until maturity, selling
appreciated securities to offset capital losses, and sales of certain corporate assets. Such tax
planning strategies are viewed by management as prudent and feasible and will be implemented if
necessary to realize the deferred tax asset.
10
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
2. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The following tables present a reconciliation of net income (loss) and shares used in calculating
basic earnings (loss) per share to those used in calculating diluted earnings (loss) per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share |
|
(Shares in millions) |
|
Loss |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to
common shareholders |
|
$ |
(1,209 |
) |
|
|
320.8 |
|
|
$ |
(3.77 |
) |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
|
313.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to
common shareholders plus assumed
conversions |
|
$ |
(1,209 |
) |
|
|
320.8 |
|
|
$ |
(3.77 |
) |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
|
315.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
As a result of the net loss in the three months ended March 31, 2009, SFAS No. 128, Earnings
per Share (SFAS 128) requires the Company to use basic weighted average common shares
outstanding in the calculation of the three months ended March 31, 2009 diluted loss per
share, since the inclusion of 0.7 million shares for stock compensation plans would have been
antidilutive to the earnings per share calculation. In the absence of the net loss, weighted
average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares would have totaled
321.5 million. |
3. Segment Information
The Hartford is organized into two major operations: Life and Property & Casualty, each containing
reporting segments. Within the Life and Property & Casualty operations, The Hartford conducts
business principally in eleven reporting segments. Corporate primarily includes the Companys debt
financing and related interest expense, as well as other capital raising activities and purchase
accounting adjustments.
Life
Life is organized into four groups which are comprised of six reporting segments: The Retail
Products Group (Retail) and Individual Life segments make up the Individual Markets Group. The
Retirement Plans and Group Benefits segments make up the Employer Markets Group. The Institutional
Solutions Group (Institutional) and International segments each make up their own group.
Life charges direct operating expenses to the appropriate segment and allocates the majority of
indirect expenses to the segments based on an intercompany expense arrangement. Inter-segment
revenues primarily occur between Lifes Other category and the reporting segments. These amounts
primarily include interest income on allocated surplus and interest charges on excess separate
account surplus. In addition, during the first quarter of 2009, Institutional and International
entered into a $1.5 billion funding agreement. The resulting interest income and interest expense in International and Institutional, respectively, are eliminated in consolidation.
Property & Casualty
Property & Casualty is organized into five reporting segments: the underwriting segments of
Personal Lines, Small Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial (collectively, Ongoing
Operations); and the Other Operations segment. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008, AARP accounted for earned premiums of $703 and $687, respectively, in Personal Lines.
Through inter-segment arrangements, Specialty Commercial reimburses Personal Lines, Small
Commercial and Middle Market for losses incurred from uncollectible reinsurance and losses incurred
under certain liability claims. Earned premiums assumed (ceded) under the inter-segment
arrangements were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Net assumed (ceded) earned premiums under |
|
March 31, |
|
inter-segment arrangements |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Personal Lines |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
Small Commercial |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Middle Market |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
3. Segment Information (continued)
Financial Measures and Other Segment Information
For further discussion of the types of products offered by each segment, see Note 3 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
One of the measures of profit or loss used by The Hartfords management in evaluating the
performance of its Life segments is net income. Within Property & Casualty, net income is a
measure of profit or loss used in evaluating the performance of Ongoing Operations and the Other
Operations segment. Within Ongoing Operations, the underwriting segments of Personal Lines, Small
Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial are evaluated by The Hartfords management
primarily based upon underwriting results. Underwriting results represent premiums earned less
incurred losses, loss adjustment expenses and underwriting expenses. The sum of underwriting
results, net servicing income, net investment income, net realized capital gains and losses, other
expenses, and related income taxes is net income.
The following tables present revenues and net income (loss) by segment. Underwriting results are
presented for the Personal Lines, Small Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial
segments, while net income (loss) is presented for each of Lifes reporting segments, total
Property & Casualty, Ongoing Operations, Other Operations, and Corporate.
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
$ |
1,205 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
Individual Life |
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Individual Markets Group |
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Retirement Plans |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Group Benefits |
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Employer Markets Group |
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
International [1] |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Institutional |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
Other [1] |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Life segment revenues |
|
|
3,536 |
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
Net investment loss on equity securities,
held for trading [2] |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(3,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Life |
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
(1,418 |
) |
Property & Casualty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines |
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
Small Commercial |
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
Middle Market |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations earned premiums |
|
|
2,511 |
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
Other revenues [3] |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Ongoing Operations |
|
|
2,525 |
|
|
|
2,909 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property & Casualty |
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
5,394 |
|
|
$ |
1,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Included in Internationals revenues for the three months ended March
31, 2009 is $11 of investment income from an inter-segment funding
agreement for $1.5 billion with Institutional. This investment income
is eliminated in Life Other. |
|
[2] |
|
Management does not include net investment income (loss) and the
mark-to-market effects of equity securities, held for trading,
supporting the international variable annuity business in its segment
revenues since corresponding amounts are credited to policyholders. |
|
[3] |
|
Represents servicing revenue. |
12
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
3. Segment Information (continued)
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
$ |
(744 |
) |
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
Individual Life |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Individual Markets Group |
|
|
(762 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Retirement Plans |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Group Benefits |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Employer Markets Group |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
International [1] |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
Institutional [1] |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
Other [1] |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Life |
|
|
(1,258 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
Property & Casualty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Small Commercial |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
Middle Market |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Ongoing Operations underwriting results |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
Net servicing income (loss) [2] |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Net investment income |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property & Casualty |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,209 |
) |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Included in net income (loss) for the three months ended March 31,
2009 of International and Institutional is investment income and
interest expense of $11, respectively, on an inter-segment funding
agreement for $1.5 billion. This investment income and interest
expense is eliminated in Life Other. |
|
[2] |
|
Net of expenses related to service business. |
13
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements
SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs in the valuation techniques
used to measure fair value into three broad Levels (Level 1, 2 or 3). The following table presents
assets and (liabilities) carried at fair value by SFAS 157 Hierarchy Level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
|
$ |
62,563 |
|
|
$ |
1,066 |
|
|
$ |
50,223 |
|
|
$ |
11,274 |
|
Equity securities, held for trading |
|
|
27,813 |
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
26,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customized derivatives used to hedge U.S. GMWB |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
937 |
|
Other derivatives used to hedge U.S. GMWB |
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
1,316 |
|
Macro hedge program |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
Other investments [1] |
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other investments |
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
11,189 |
|
|
|
6,969 |
|
|
|
4,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable for U.S. GMWB |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
Separate account assets [2] [3] |
|
|
119,224 |
|
|
|
87,230 |
|
|
|
31,355 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
$ |
225,904 |
|
|
$ |
97,244 |
|
|
$ |
112,779 |
|
|
$ |
15,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GMWB |
|
$ |
(5,829 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,829 |
) |
U.K. GMWB |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
Japan GMWB |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
Japan GMAB |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Institutional notes |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
Equity linked notes |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
(5,960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,960 |
) |
Other liabilities [4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other derivatives used to hedge U.S. GMWB |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
Macro hedge program |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
|
(352 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(228 |
) |
Consumer notes [5] |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring
basis |
|
$ |
(6,316 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(124 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes over-the-counter derivative instruments in a net asset value position which may require the counterparty to pledge
collateral to the Company. As of March 31, 2009, $2,350 of cash collateral liability was netted against the derivative asset value
in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and is excluded from the table above. See footnote 4 below for derivative liabilities. |
|
[2] |
|
Pursuant to the conditions set forth in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position No.
03-1 Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts
(SOP 03-1), the value of separate account liabilities is set to equal the fair value for separate account assets. |
|
[3] |
|
Excludes approximately $6 billion of investment sales receivable net of investment purchases payable that are not subject to SFAS 157. |
|
[4] |
|
Includes over-the-counter derivative instruments in a net negative market value position (derivative liability). In the SFAS 157
Level 3 roll-forward table included below in this Note, the derivative asset and liability are referred to as freestanding
derivatives and are presented on a net basis. |
|
[5] |
|
Represents embedded derivatives associated with non-funding agreement-backed consumer equity linked notes. |
14
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
Roll-forward of Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis Using Significant
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
income related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to financial |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
included in: |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
instruments |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
issuances, |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
as of |
|
|
still held at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
(out) of |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
2008 |
|
|
[1], [2] |
|
|
AOCI [3] |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 [4] |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 [2] |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities,
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
11,810 |
|
|
$ |
(221 |
) |
|
$ |
(449 |
) |
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
$ |
11,274 |
|
|
$ |
(93 |
) |
Equity securities,
available-for-sale |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Freestanding derivatives [5] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customized derivatives used
to hedge U.S. GMWB |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Other freestanding
derivatives used to hedge
U.S. GMWB |
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Macro hedge program |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Other freestanding derivatives |
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total freestanding derivatives |
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2,172 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable for U.S.
GMWB [1] |
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
(252 |
) |
Separate accounts [6] |
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total freestanding derivatives
used to hedge U.S. GMWB
including those in Levels 1, 2
and 3 [7] |
|
$ |
2,664 |
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(460 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,322 |
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholder funds and
benefits payable accounted for
at fair value [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GMWB |
|
$ |
(6,526 |
) |
|
$ |
728 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,829 |
) |
|
$ |
728 |
|
U.K. GMWB |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Japan GMWB |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Japan GMAB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Institutional notes |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
Equity linked notes |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other policyholder funds
and benefits payable accounted
for at fair value[1] |
|
|
(6,669 |
) |
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,960 |
) |
|
|
740 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Liabilities
Warrants [8] |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
Consumer notes |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net U.S. GMWB (Embedded
derivatives, freestanding
derivatives including those in
Levels 1, 2 and 3 and
reinsurance recoverable)[9] |
|
$ |
(2,560 |
) |
|
$ |
594 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(483 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,449 |
) |
|
$ |
594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The Company classifies all the gains and losses on GMWB reinsurance
derivatives and GMWB embedded derivatives as unrealized gains/losses
for purposes of disclosure in this table because it is impracticable
to track on a contract-by-contract basis the realized gains/losses for
these derivatives and embedded derivatives. |
|
[2] |
|
All amounts in these columns are reported in net realized capital
gains/losses except for $1 for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
which is reported in benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses.
All amounts are before income taxes and amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits (DAC). |
15
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
|
|
|
[3] |
|
AOCI refers to Accumulated other comprehensive income in the
condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive loss. All amounts
are before income taxes and amortization of DAC. |
|
[4] |
|
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3 during the three months ended
March 31, 2009 are attributable to a change in the availability of
market observable information for individual securities within the
respective categories. |
|
[5] |
|
The freestanding derivatives, excluding reinsurance derivatives
instruments, are reported in this table on a net basis for
asset/(liability) positions and reported in the condensed consolidated
balance sheet in other investments and other liabilities. |
|
[6] |
|
The realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in net income for
separate account assets are offset by an equal amount for separate
account liabilities, which results in a net zero impact on net income
for the Company. |
|
[7] |
|
The Purchases, issuances, and settlements primarily relates to the
receipt of cash on futures and option contracts classified as Level 1
and interest rate, currency and credit default swaps classified as
Level 2. |
|
[8] |
|
On March 26, 2009, certain of the Allianz warrants were reclassified
to equity, at their current fair value, as shareholder approval of the
conversion of these warrants to common shares was received. See Note
13 for further discussion. |
|
[9] |
|
The net gain on U.S. GMWB since December 31, 2008 was primarily
related to liability model assumption updates for withdrawals, lapses
and credit standing, which totaled $550, pre-tax, and $219, after-tax
and DAC amortization. |
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company updated the following assumptions used in its
estimates of fair value for living benefit obligations and related uncollateralized reinsurance
recoverable assets:
|
|
Credit Standing Adjustment. This assumption makes an adjustment that market participants
would make to reflect the risk that guaranteed benefit obligations or the GMWB reinsurance
recoverables will not be fulfilled (nonperformance risk). As a result of sustained
volatility in the Companys credit default spreads, the Company changed its estimate of the
Credit Standing Adjustment to incorporate observable Company and reinsurer credit default
spreads from capital markets, adjusted for market recoverability. Prior to the first quarter
of 2009, the Company calculated the Credit Standing Adjustment by using default rates provided
by rating agencies, adjusted for market recoverability. The changes made in the first quarter of 2009, resulted in a realized gain of $383,
before-tax, for U.S. GMWB liabilities and a realized loss of $185, before-tax, for
uncollateralized reinsurance recoverable assets. |
|
|
|
Behavior Risk Margin and Other Policyholder Behavior Assumptions. The behavior risk margin
adds a margin that market participants would require for the risk that the Companys
assumptions about policyholder behavior could differ from actual experience. The behavior
risk margin is calculated by taking the difference between adverse policyholder behavior
assumptions and best estimate assumptions. During the first quarter of 2009, the Company
revised certain adverse assumptions in the behavior risk margin for withdrawals, lapses and
annuitization behavior as emerging policyholder behavior experience suggested the prior
adverse policyholder behavior assumptions were no longer representative of an appropriate
margin for risk. These changes, as well as other policyholder behavior assumption updates, resulted in a realized gain of $352, before-tax. |
16
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
Assets (Liabilities) Carried at Fair Value by SFAS 157 Hierarchy Level
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
|
$ |
65,112 |
|
|
$ |
3,541 |
|
|
$ |
49,761 |
|
|
$ |
11,810 |
|
Equity securities, held for trading |
|
|
30,820 |
|
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
29,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other derivatives used to hedge U.S. GMWB |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
Other investments [1] |
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other investments |
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
10,022 |
|
|
|
7,025 |
|
|
|
2,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance recoverables for U.S. GMWB |
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
Separate account assets [2] [3] |
|
|
126,777 |
|
|
|
94,804 |
|
|
|
31,187 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
$ |
237,067 |
|
|
$ |
107,250 |
|
|
$ |
114,820 |
|
|
$ |
14,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GMWB |
|
$ |
(6,526 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(6,526 |
) |
U.K. GMWB |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
Japan GMAB |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Institutional notes |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
Equity linked notes |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
(6,669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,669 |
) |
Other liabilities [4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customized derivatives used to hedge U.S. GMWB |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
941 |
|
Other derivatives used to hedge U.S. GMWB |
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,109 |
|
Macro hedge program |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
|
1,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
Consumer notes [5] |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring
basis |
|
$ |
(4,812 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
(4,902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes over-the-counter derivative instruments in a net asset value position which may require the counterparty to pledge
collateral to the Company. As of December 31, 2008, $574 of cash collateral liability was netted against the derivative asset value
in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and is excluded from the table above. See footnote 4 below for derivative liabilities. |
|
[2] |
|
Pursuant to the conditions set forth in SOP 03-1, the value of separate account liabilities is set to equal the fair value for
separate account assets. |
|
[3] |
|
Excludes approximately $3 billion of investment sales receivable net of investment purchases payable that are not subject to SFAS 157. |
|
[4] |
|
Includes over-the-counter derivative instruments in a net negative market value position (derivative liability). In the SFAS 157
Level 3 roll-forward table included below in this Note, the derivative asset and liability are referred to as freestanding
derivatives and are presented on a net basis. |
|
[5] |
|
Represents embedded derivatives associated with non-funding agreement-backed consumer equity linked notes. |
17
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
Roll-forward of Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis Using Significant
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
income related |
|
|
|
SFAS 157 |
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to financial |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
included in: |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
instruments |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
issuances, |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
as of |
|
|
still held at |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
(out) of |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
2008 |
|
|
[1], [2] |
|
|
AOCI [3] |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 [4] |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 [2] |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
17,996 |
|
|
$ |
(103 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,110 |
) |
|
$ |
973 |
|
|
$ |
(1,309 |
) |
|
$ |
16,447 |
|
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
Equity securities,
available-for-sale |
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Freestanding derivatives [5] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customized derivatives used
to hedge U.S. GMWB |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Other freestanding
derivatives used to hedge
U.S. GMWB |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
Macro hedge program |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other freestanding derivatives |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total freestanding derivatives |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable for U.S.
GMWB [1] [6] |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Separate accounts [7] |
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total freestanding derivatives
used to hedge U.S. GMWB
including those in Levels 1, 2
and 3 [8] |
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,071 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholder funds and
benefits payable accounted for
at fair value [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GMWB |
|
$ |
(1,433 |
) |
|
$ |
(493 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,949 |
) |
|
$ |
(493 |
) |
U.K. GMWB |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Japan GMAB |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Institutional notes |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Equity linked notes |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other policyholder funds
and benefits payable accounted
for at fair value [1] |
|
|
(1,517 |
) |
|
|
(517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,058 |
) |
|
|
(517 |
) |
Consumer notes |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net U.S. GMWB (Embedded
derivatives, freestanding
derivatives including those in
Levels 1, 2 and 3 and
reinsurance recoverable) [9] |
|
$ |
(552 |
) |
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(587 |
) |
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The Company classifies all the gains and losses on GMWB reinsurance derivatives and GMWB embedded derivatives as unrealized
gains/losses for purposes of disclosure in this table because it is impracticable to track on a contract-by-contract basis
the realized gains/losses for these derivatives and embedded derivatives. |
|
[2] |
|
All amounts in these columns are reported in net realized capital gains/losses except for $1 for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, which is reported in benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses. All amounts are before income taxes
and amortization of DAC. |
|
[3] |
|
AOCI refers to Accumulated other comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss. All amounts
are before income taxes and amortization of DAC. |
|
[4] |
|
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3 during the three months ended March 31, 2008 are attributable to a change in the
availability of market observable information for individual securities within the respective categories. |
|
[5] |
|
The freestanding derivatives, excluding reinsurance derivatives instruments, are reported in this table on a net basis for
asset/(liability) positions and reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheet in other investments and other
liabilities. |
|
[6] |
|
The January 1, 2008 fair value of $238 includes the pre-SFAS 157 fair value of $128 and transitional adjustment of $110. |
18
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
|
|
|
[7] |
|
The realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in net income for
separate account assets are offset by an equal amount for separate
account liabilities, which results in a net zero impact on net income
for the Company. |
|
[8] |
|
The Purchases, issuances, and settlements primarily relates to the
receipt of cash on futures and option contracts classified as Level 1
and interest rate, currency and credit default swaps classified as
Level 2. |
|
[9] |
|
The net loss on U.S. GMWB since January 1, 2008 was primarily related
to liability model assumption updates for mortality in the first
quarter of 2008. |
Fair Value of Significant Asset Sectors within the SFAS 157 Level 3 Securities Classification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
ABS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below Prime |
|
$ |
1,261 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
$ |
1,643 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLOs) |
|
|
2,043 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
% |
Other |
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matrix priced private placements |
|
|
4,679 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
% |
|
|
4,641 |
|
|
|
37.6 |
% |
Other |
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
% |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
Preferred stock |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Other |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Level 3 securities |
|
$ |
11,784 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
12,351 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABS below prime primarily represents sub-prime and Alt-A securities which are classified as
Level 3 due to the lack of liquidity in the market. |
|
|
|
ABS CLOs represent senior secured bank loan CLOs which are primarily priced by independent
brokers. |
|
|
|
ABS Other primarily represents broker priced securities. |
|
|
|
Corporate-matrix priced represents private placement securities that are thinly traded and
priced using a pricing matrix which includes significant non-observable inputs. |
|
|
|
Corporate-Other primarily represents broker-priced public securities and private placement
securities qualified for sale under rule 144A, and long dated fixed maturities where the term
of significant inputs may not be sufficient to be deemed observable. |
|
|
|
CMBS primarily represents CMBS bonds and commercial real estate collateralized debt
obligations (CRE CDOs), which were either fair valued by the Company or by independent
brokers due to the illiquidity of this sector. |
|
|
|
Preferred stock primarily represents lower quality preferred securities that are less
liquid due to market conditions. |
19
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
The following table summarizes the notional amount and fair value of freestanding derivatives in
other investments, reinsurance recoverables, embedded derivatives in other policyholder funds and
benefits payable and consumer notes as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The notional
amount of derivative contracts represents the basis upon which pay or receive amounts are
calculated and are not necessarily reflective of credit risk. The fair value amounts of derivative
assets and liabilities are presented on a net basis in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
Reinsurance recoverables for U.S. GMWB [1] |
|
$ |
11,115 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
11,437 |
|
|
$ |
1,302 |
|
Customized derivatives used to hedge U.S. GMWB[2] |
|
|
9,341 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
10,464 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
Freestanding derivatives used to hedge U.S. GMWB[3] |
|
|
7,232 |
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
8,156 |
|
|
|
1,723 |
|
U.S. GMWB [1] |
|
|
46,137 |
|
|
|
(5,829 |
) |
|
|
46,734 |
|
|
|
(6,526 |
) |
U.K. GMWB |
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
Japan GMWB |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Japan GMAB |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
Macro hedge program [3] [4] |
|
|
7,102 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
Consumer Notes |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Equity Linked Notes |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
83,539 |
|
|
$ |
(2,362 |
) |
|
$ |
81,343 |
|
|
$ |
(2,530 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The decline in fair value for U.S. GMWB and Reinsurance recoverables
for U.S. GMWB was primarily related to model assumption updates for
withdrawals, lapses and credit standing. |
|
[2] |
|
The decrease in notional amount of customized derivatives used to
hedge U.S. GMWB was primarily due to current market conditions causing
policyholder account values to decrease. The notional amount on these
customized derivatives is the policyholder account value. |
|
[3] |
|
The increase in notional amount and fair value of the macro hedge
program and the related decrease in notional and fair value of
freestanding derivatives used to hedge U.S. GMWB are primarily due to
the rebalancing of the Companys risk management program to place a
greater relative emphasis on protection of statutory surplus. |
|
[4] |
|
The notional amount as of March 31, 2009, includes approximately $1.0
billion of short put option contracts, therefore resulting in a net
notional amount of approximately $6.1 billion. |
20
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Bonds and Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABS |
|
$ |
8,528 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
(2,938 |
) |
|
$ |
5,604 |
|
|
$ |
8,863 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
(2,608 |
) |
|
$ |
6,268 |
|
CMBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency backed |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449 |
|
Non-agency backed |
|
|
13,923 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(6,010 |
) |
|
|
7,948 |
|
|
|
14,303 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(6,005 |
) |
|
|
8,327 |
|
CMOs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency backed |
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
887 |
|
Non-agency backed |
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
290 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
31,621 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
(4,750 |
) |
|
|
27,351 |
|
|
|
31,059 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
(4,501 |
) |
|
|
27,181 |
|
Government/Government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
2,786 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
2,821 |
|
United States |
|
|
5,732 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
5,690 |
|
|
|
5,883 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
5,956 |
|
MBS |
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2,468 |
|
|
|
2,243 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
2,278 |
|
States, municipalities and
political subdivisions |
|
|
11,739 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
(733 |
) |
|
|
11,253 |
|
|
|
11,406 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
(953 |
) |
|
|
10,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
76,259 |
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
(14,727 |
) |
|
|
62,563 |
|
|
|
78,238 |
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
(14,310 |
) |
|
|
65,112 |
|
Equity securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities, available-for-sale |
|
$ |
77,577 |
|
|
$ |
1,243 |
|
|
$ |
(15,177 |
) |
|
$ |
63,643 |
|
|
$ |
79,792 |
|
|
$ |
1,387 |
|
|
$ |
(14,609 |
) |
|
$ |
66,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Lending
The Company participates in securities lending programs to generate additional income, whereby
certain domestic fixed income securities are loaned from the Companys portfolio to qualifying
third party borrowers, in return for collateral in the form of cash or U.S. government securities.
Borrowers of these securities provide collateral of 102% of the market value of the loaned
securities at the time of the loan and can return the securities to the Company for cash at varying
maturity dates. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, under terms of securities lending
programs, the fair value of loaned securities was approximately $1.5 billion and $2.9 billion,
respectively, which was included in fixed maturities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company held collateral associated with the loaned
securities in the amount of $1.5 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively.
21
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
Security Unrealized Loss Aging
As part of the Companys ongoing security monitoring process by a committee of investment and
accounting professionals, the Company identifies securities in an unrealized loss position that
could potentially be other-than-temporarily impaired. For further discussion regarding the
Companys other-than-temporary impairment policy, see the Investments section of Note 1 in The
Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report. Due to the issuers continued satisfaction of the
securities obligations in accordance with their contractual terms and the expectation that they
will continue to do so, managements intent and ability to hold these securities for a period of
time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value which includes the evaluation
of the fundamentals of the issuers financial condition and other objective evidence, the Company
believes that the prices of the securities in the sectors identified in the tables below were
temporarily depressed as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
The following tables present the Companys unrealized loss aging for total fixed maturity and
equity securities classified as available-for-sale, by investment type and length of time the
security was in a continuous unrealized loss position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
ABS |
|
$ |
2,527 |
|
|
$ |
1,952 |
|
|
$ |
(575 |
) |
|
$ |
5,797 |
|
|
$ |
3,434 |
|
|
$ |
(2,363 |
) |
|
$ |
8,324 |
|
|
$ |
5,386 |
|
|
$ |
(2,938 |
) |
CMBS Non-agency backed |
|
|
5,191 |
|
|
|
3,683 |
|
|
|
(1,508 |
) |
|
|
8,357 |
|
|
|
3,855 |
|
|
|
(4,502 |
) |
|
|
13,548 |
|
|
|
7,538 |
|
|
|
(6,010 |
) |
CMOs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency backed |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Non-agency backed |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
14,535 |
|
|
|
12,406 |
|
|
|
(2,129 |
) |
|
|
8,551 |
|
|
|
5,930 |
|
|
|
(2,621 |
) |
|
|
23,086 |
|
|
|
18,336 |
|
|
|
(4,750 |
) |
Government/Government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
United States |
|
|
2,762 |
|
|
|
2,644 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,762 |
|
|
|
2,644 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
MBS |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
States, municipalities and political
subdivisions |
|
|
2,428 |
|
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
4,762 |
|
|
|
4,171 |
|
|
|
(591 |
) |
|
|
7,190 |
|
|
|
6,457 |
|
|
|
(733 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
|
27,993 |
|
|
|
23,421 |
|
|
|
(4,572 |
) |
|
|
27,850 |
|
|
|
17,695 |
|
|
|
(10,155 |
) |
|
|
55,843 |
|
|
|
41,116 |
|
|
|
(14,727 |
) |
Equity securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities |
|
$ |
28,938 |
|
|
$ |
24,046 |
|
|
$ |
(4,892 |
) |
|
$ |
28,106 |
|
|
$ |
17,821 |
|
|
$ |
(10,285 |
) |
|
$ |
57,044 |
|
|
$ |
41,867 |
|
|
$ |
(15,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
ABS |
|
$ |
1,870 |
|
|
$ |
1,487 |
|
|
$ |
(383 |
) |
|
$ |
6,811 |
|
|
$ |
4,586 |
|
|
$ |
(2,225 |
) |
|
$ |
8,681 |
|
|
$ |
6,073 |
|
|
$ |
(2,608 |
) |
CMBS Non-agency backed |
|
|
5,986 |
|
|
|
4,354 |
|
|
|
(1,632 |
) |
|
|
8,110 |
|
|
|
3,737 |
|
|
|
(4,373 |
) |
|
|
14,096 |
|
|
|
8,091 |
|
|
|
(6,005 |
) |
CMOs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency backed |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Non-agency backed |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
16,604 |
|
|
|
14,145 |
|
|
|
(2,459 |
) |
|
|
7,028 |
|
|
|
4,986 |
|
|
|
(2,042 |
) |
|
|
23,632 |
|
|
|
19,131 |
|
|
|
(4,501 |
) |
Government/government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
United States |
|
|
4,120 |
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
4,186 |
|
|
|
4,147 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
MBS |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
States, municipalities and political
subdivisions |
|
|
5,153 |
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
2,578 |
|
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
7,731 |
|
|
|
6,778 |
|
|
|
(953 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
|
35,453 |
|
|
|
30,273 |
|
|
|
(5,180 |
) |
|
|
25,002 |
|
|
|
15,872 |
|
|
|
(9,130 |
) |
|
|
60,455 |
|
|
|
46,145 |
|
|
|
(14,310 |
) |
Equity securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities |
|
$ |
36,470 |
|
|
$ |
31,069 |
|
|
$ |
(5,401 |
) |
|
$ |
25,279 |
|
|
$ |
16,071 |
|
|
$ |
(9,208 |
) |
|
$ |
61,749 |
|
|
$ |
47,140 |
|
|
$ |
(14,609 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The majority of securities in an unrealized loss position are related to securitized assets, more
specifically CMBS and sub-prime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS), and corporate
securities, most significantly within the financial services sector, which have experienced
significant price deterioration. Based upon the Companys cash flow modeling and the expected
continuation of contractually required principal and interest payments, and the Companys assertion
of its intent and ability to retain the securities until recovery, it has been determined that
these securities are temporarily impaired as of March 31, 2009.
22
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
Mortgage Loans
The Company has whole loan commercial real estate investments with a carrying value of $6.4 billion
and $6.5 billion as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The Companys mortgage
loans are collateralized by a variety of commercial and agricultural properties and are diversified
both geographically throughout the United States and by property type. As of March 31, 2009, the
Company held four mortgage loans with a carrying value of $191 prior to valuation allowances of
$99. As of December 31, 2008, the Company held three mortgage loans with a carrying value $91
prior to valuation allowances of $26. The following table presents the activity in the Companys
valuation allowance for mortgage loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
Additions |
|
|
74 |
|
Deductions |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)
The Company is involved with VIEs primarily as a collateral manager and as an investor through
normal investment activities. The Companys involvement includes providing investment management
and administrative services for a fee and holding ownership or other interests as an investor. The
Company also has involvement with VIEs as a means of accessing capital.
The following table presents the carrying value of assets and liabilities and the maximum exposure
to loss relating to VIEs for which the Company has concluded that it is the primary beneficiary and
therefore are consolidated in the Companys consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Exposure |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Exposure |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities [1] |
|
|
to Loss [2] |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities [1] |
|
|
to Loss |
|
CLOs |
|
$ |
312 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
Limited partnerships |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
454 |
|
|
$ |
739 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Creditors have no recourse against the Company in the event of default
by the VIE. Includes noncontrolling interest in limited partnerships
and other investments of $21 and $82 as of March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively, that is reported as a separate component of
equity in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet pursuant
to SFAS 160. |
|
[2] |
|
The Companys maximum exposure to loss represents the maximum loss
amount that the Company could recognize as a reduction in net
investment income or as a realized capital loss and is the
consolidated assets at cost net of liabilities. The Company has no
implied or unfunded commitments to these VIEs. |
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company liquidated an investment trust and
partially liquidated a hedge fund limited partnership; in each case, the Company was an investor.
As a result, the Company is no longer the primary beneficiary and accordingly, it deconsolidated
the VIEs.
The following table presents the carrying value of assets and liabilities and the maximum exposure
to loss relating to VIEs for which the Company has concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary
and therefore are not consolidated. Each of these investments has been held by the Company for
over two years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
to Loss |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
to Loss |
|
CLOs [1] |
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
$ |
308 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
349 |
|
CDOs [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Other [2] |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total [3] |
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
348 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Maximum exposure to loss represents the Companys investment in securities issued by CLOs/CDOs at cost. |
|
[2] |
|
Maximum exposure to loss represents issuance costs that were incurred to establish the contingent capital facility. For
further information on the contingent capital facility, see the Variable Interest Entities section of Note 5 in The
Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report. |
|
[3] |
|
The Company has no implied or unfunded commitments to these VIEs. |
23
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
Derivative instruments
Derivative instruments are recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value and
are presented as assets or liabilities as determined by calculating the net position for each
derivative counterparty by legal entity, taking into account income accruals and cash collateral
held. The fair value of derivative instruments, excluding income accruals and cash collateral
held, are presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Derivatives |
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Other investments |
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
4,147 |
|
|
|
2,172 |
|
|
|
(1,170 |
) |
|
|
(596 |
) |
Reinsurance recoverables |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
(5,935 |
) |
|
|
(6,628 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,935 |
) |
|
|
(6,628 |
) |
Consumer notes |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Other liabilities [1] |
|
|
(352 |
) |
|
|
1,862 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
3,460 |
|
|
|
(1,010 |
) |
|
|
(1,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(2,267 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,896 |
) |
|
$ |
5,863 |
|
|
$ |
6,934 |
|
|
$ |
(8,130 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Included in Other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet is a liability
value of $(97) and $(2,531) related to derivative collateral as of March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively. |
The following table summarizes the derivative instruments used by the Company and the primary
hedging strategies to which they relate. Derivatives in the Companys separate accounts are not
included because the associated gains and losses accrue directly to policyholders. The Companys
derivative instruments are held for risk management purposes, unless otherwise noted in the tables
below. The notional amount of derivative contracts represents the basis upon which pay or receive
amounts are calculated and are not necessarily reflective of credit risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
Net Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging |
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash Flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps are primarily used to
convert interest receipts on floating-rate
fixed maturity securities to fixed rates.
These derivatives are predominantly used to
better match cash receipts from assets with
cash disbursements required to fund
liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company also enters into forward
starting swap agreements to hedge the
interest rate exposure related to the
purchase of fixed-rate securities or the
anticipated future cash flows of
floating-rate fixed maturity securities due
to changes in the benchmark interest rate,
London-Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR).
These derivatives are primarily structured
to hedge interest rate risk inherent in the
assumptions used to price certain
liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps are also used to hedge
a portion of the Companys floating-rate
guaranteed investment contracts. These
derivatives convert the floating-rate
guaranteed investment contract payments to
a fixed rate to better match the cash
receipts earned from the supporting
investment portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
$ |
7,035 |
|
|
$ |
4,760 |
|
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
3,066 |
|
|
|
4,270 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate swaps |
|
|
10,101 |
|
|
|
9,030 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
Net Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging |
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Foreign currency swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency swaps are used to convert
foreign denominated cash flows associated
with certain foreign denominated fixed
maturity investments to U.S. dollars. The
foreign fixed maturities are primarily
denominated in Euros and are swapped to
minimize cash flow fluctuations due to
changes in currency rates. In addition,
foreign currency swaps are also used to
convert foreign denominated cash flows
associated with certain liability payments
to U.S. dollars in order to minimize cash
flow fluctuations due to changes in
currency rates. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
$ |
582 |
|
|
$ |
570 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
$ |
(49 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign currency swaps |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash flow |
|
$ |
11,213 |
|
|
$ |
10,240 |
|
|
$ |
558 |
|
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
$ |
672 |
|
|
$ |
797 |
|
|
$ |
(114 |
) |
|
$ |
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps are used to hedge the
changes in fair value of certain fixed rate
liabilities and fixed maturity securities
due to changes in the benchmark interest
rate, LIBOR. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
$ |
1,051 |
|
|
$ |
1,043 |
|
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
$ |
(45 |
) |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
$ |
(61 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate swaps |
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
Foreign currency swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency swaps are used to hedge
the changes in fair value of certain
foreign denominated fixed rate liabilities
due to changes in foreign currency rates. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign currency swaps |
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value |
|
$ |
2,737 |
|
|
$ |
2,834 |
|
|
$ |
(149 |
) |
|
$ |
(143 |
) |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
(208 |
) |
|
$ |
(231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
$ |
13,950 |
|
|
$ |
13,074 |
|
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
$ |
490 |
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
885 |
|
|
$ |
(322 |
) |
|
$ |
(395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
Net Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging |
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest rate swaps, caps, floors, and forwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company uses interest rate swaps, caps and floors
to manage duration risk between assets and liabilities
in certain portfolios. In addition, the Company
enters into interest rate swaps to terminate existing
swaps, thereby offsetting the changes in value of the
original swap. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, the notional amount of interest rate swaps in
offsetting relationships was $6.8 billion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
$ |
5,052 |
|
|
$ |
3,139 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
618 |
|
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
$ |
(488 |
) |
|
$ |
(217 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
2,968 |
|
|
|
5,017 |
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
(811 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate swaps, caps, floors, and forwards |
|
|
8,020 |
|
|
|
8,156 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
(821 |
) |
|
|
(1,028 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
Net Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging |
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Foreign currency swaps, forwards, and swaptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into foreign currency swaps and
forwards to hedge the foreign currency exposures in
certain of its foreign fixed maturity investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company also enters into foreign currency interest
rate swaps and swaptions to hedge Yen interest rate
exposures related to certain liability contracts assumed from HLIKK. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Fixed maturities,
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign currency swaps, forwards, and swaptions |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Credit derivatives that purchase credit protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into credit default swap agreements in
which the Company reduces credit risk to an individual
entity. These contracts require the Company to pay a
derivative counterparty a periodic fee in exchange for
compensation from the counterparty should a credit event
occur on the part of the referenced security issuer. The
Company enters into these agreements as an efficient
means to reduce credit exposure to specified issuers or
sectors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
2,558 |
|
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit derivatives that purchase credit protection |
|
|
4,508 |
|
|
|
3,668 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Credit derivatives that sell credit protection [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into credit default swap agreements in
which the Company assumes credit risk of an individual
entity, referenced index or asset pool. These contracts
entitle the Company to receive a periodic fee in exchange
for an obligation to compensate the derivative
counterparty should a credit event occur on the part of
the referenced security issuers. Also included are
embedded derivatives associated with credit linked notes.
The maximum potential future exposure to the Company is
the notional amount of the swap contracts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Fixed maturities,
available-for-sale |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit derivatives that sell credit protection |
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
Credit derivatives in offsetting positions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into credit default swap agreements to
terminate existing credit default swaps, thereby
offsetting the changes in value of the original swap
going forward. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
1,946 |
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit derivatives in offsetting positions |
|
|
2,601 |
|
|
|
2,626 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
Contingent Capital Facility Put Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2007, the Company entered
into a put option agreement that provides the Company the
right to require a third party trust to purchase, at any
time, The Hartfords junior subordinated notes in a
maximum aggregate principal amount of $500. Under the
put option agreement, The Hartford will pay premiums on a
periodic basis and will reimburse the trust for certain
fees and ordinary expenses. The instrument is accounted
for as a derivative. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contingent capital facility |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
Net Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging |
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Japanese fixed annuity hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into currency rate swaps and
forwards to mitigate the foreign currency
exchange rate and Yen interest rate exposures
associated with the Yen denominated individual
fixed annuity product. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
$ |
2,031 |
|
|
$ |
922 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Japanese fixed annuity hedging instruments |
|
|
2,273 |
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed Minimum Accumulation Benefit (GMAB)
product derivatives [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007, the Company launched its 3Win
product with both GMAB and GMIB riders attached
to certain Japanese variable annuity products.
The GMAB is a bifurcated embedded derivative
that provides the policyholder with their
initial deposit in a lump sum after a specified
waiting period. The notional value of the
embedded derivative is the Yen denominated GRB
balance converted to U.S. dollars at the
current March 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008,
foreign spot exchange rate, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other policyholder
funds and benefits payable |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GMAB product derivatives |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Japan 3Win hedging derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Japan 3Win product offers both GMAB and GMIB
riders attached to certain variable annuity
contracts. If the policyholder account value
drops below 80% of the initial deposit, either a
GMIB must be exercised or the policyholder can
elect a lump sum payment. During the fourth
quarter of 2008, nearly all contract holder
account values had dropped below 80% of the
initial deposit, at which point the majority of
policyholders had elected to exercise the GMIB.
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company
traded foreign currency swaps to hedge the
foreign currency risk associated with the GMIB reinsurance
fixed payments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
2,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Japanese fixed annuity hedging instruments |
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
GMWB product derivatives [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company offers certain variable annuity
products with a GMWB rider, primarily in the U.S.
and, to a lesser extent, the U.K. and Japan. The
GMWB is a bifurcated embedded derivative that
provides the policyholder with a GRB if the
account value is reduced to zero through a
combination of market declines and withdrawals.
The GRB is generally equal to premiums less
withdrawals. Certain contract provisions can
increase the GRB at contractholder election or
after the passage of time. The notional value of
the embedded derivative is the GRB balance. For
a further discussion, see the Derivative
Instruments section of Note 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other policyholder
funds and benefits payable |
|
|
48,425 |
|
|
|
48,767 |
|
|
|
(5,927 |
) |
|
|
(6,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,927 |
) |
|
|
(6,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GMWB product derivatives |
|
|
48,425 |
|
|
|
48,767 |
|
|
|
(5,927 |
) |
|
|
(6,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,927 |
) |
|
|
(6,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
Net Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging |
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
GMWB reinsurance contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has entered into reinsurance
arrangements to offset a portion of its risk
exposure to the GMWB for the remaining lives of
covered variable annuity contracts. Reinsurance
contracts covering GMWB are accounted for as
free-standing derivatives. The notional amount of
the reinsurance contracts is the GRB amount. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Reinsurance recoverables |
|
$ |
11,115 |
|
|
$ |
11,437 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
1,302 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
1,302 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GMWB reinsurance contracts |
|
|
11,115 |
|
|
|
11,437 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMWB hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into derivative contracts to
partially hedge exposure to the income volatility
associated with the portion of the GMWB liabilities
which are not reinsured. These derivative contracts
include customized swaps, interest rate swaps and
futures, and equity swaps, put and call options, and
futures, on certain indices including the S&P 500
index, EAFE index, and NASDAQ index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
13,589 |
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
2,186 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
2,252 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
2,985 |
|
|
|
16,355 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GMWB hedging instruments |
|
|
16,574 |
|
|
|
18,620 |
|
|
|
2,322 |
|
|
|
2,664 |
|
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
2,697 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
Equity index swaps, options, and futures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company offers certain equity indexed products,
which may contain an embedded derivative that
requires bifurcation. The Company enters into S&P
index swaps and options to economically hedge the
equity volatility risk associated with these
embedded derivatives. In addition, the Company is
exposed to bifurcated options embedded in certain
fixed maturity investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company may also enter into equity indexed
futures to hedge the equity volatility of certain
liability contracts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Fixed maturities,
available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Balance sheet location Consumer notes |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other policyholder funds
and benefits payable |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity index swaps, options, and futures |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Japanese variable annuity hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into foreign currency forward and
option contracts that convert Euros to Yen in order
to economically hedge the foreign currency risk
associated with certain assumed Japanese variable annuity
products. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Japanese variable annuity hedging instruments |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Macro hedge program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company utilizes option contracts as well as
futures contracts to partially hedge the statutory
reserve impact of equity risk and foreign currency
risk arising primarily from GMDB and GMWB
obligations against a decline in the equity markets
or changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The
notional amount as of March 31, 2009, includes
approximately $1.0 billion of short put option
contracts, therefore resulting in a net notional
amount of approximately $6.1 billion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total macro hedge program |
|
|
7,102 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
Net Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging |
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Warrants [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the
Company issued warrants to purchase the
Companys Series C Non-Voting Contingent
Convertible Preferred Stock. See Note 21
of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K
Annual Report for a discussion of Allianz
SEs investment in The Hartford. These
warrants were subject to the receipt of
certain shareholder approvals and upon the
Companys inability to obtain such
approvals on a timely basis, the Company
was subject to a separate cash payment to
the investor. EITF 00-19 required that the
warrants and the separate cash payment be
accounted for as a derivative liability at
December 31, 2008. During the first
quarter of 2009, the requisite approvals
were obtained and the warrants were no
longer required to be accounted for as
derivatives and were reclassified to
equity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(163 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
$ |
106,133 |
|
|
$ |
102,198 |
|
|
$ |
(2,676 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,386 |
) |
|
$ |
5,132 |
|
|
$ |
6,049 |
|
|
$ |
(7,808 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
$ |
120,083 |
|
|
$ |
115,272 |
|
|
$ |
(2,267 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,896 |
) |
|
$ |
5,863 |
|
|
$ |
6,934 |
|
|
$ |
(8,130 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The derivative instruments related to these hedging strategies are held for other investment
purposes. |
Change in Notional Amount
The notional amount of derivatives in cash-flow hedge relationships increased $973 during the first
quarter of 2009 primarily due to an increase in interest rate swaps used to convert interest
receipts from floating-rate securities to fixed rates.
The notional amount of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 increased
$3.9 billion during the first quarter of 2009 primarily due to the following:
|
|
The Company increased the notional amount of derivatives associated with the macro hedge
program by approximately $4.9 billion as a result of the Company rebalancing its risk
management strategy to place a greater relative emphasis on the protection of statutory
surplus. Approximately $1.0 billion of the $4.9 billion increase in notional amount
represents short put option contracts, therefore resulting in a net increase in notional of
approximately $3.9 billion. |
|
|
|
The Company added approximately $2.7 billion in notional related to foreign currency swaps
used to hedge the GMIB fixed payments associated with the Japan 3Win product. |
|
|
|
These amounts were partially offset by a decrease in notional amount of derivatives
associated with GMWB riders. Refer to Note 4 for further discussion. |
Change in Fair Value
The decrease of $371 in the total fair value of derivative instruments since December 31, 2008, was
primarily related to the following:
|
|
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company began hedging the foreign currency risk
associated with the Japan 3Win product. The hedging derivatives declined in value due to the
Japanese Yen weakening against the U.S. dollar since inception of the hedges. |
|
|
|
The fair value of the Japanese fixed annuity hedging instruments decreased primarily due to
the Japanese Yen weakening against the U.S. dollar. |
|
|
|
The fair value related to credit derivatives that purchase credit protection decreased as a
result of credit spreads tightening. |
|
|
|
The fair value related to credit derivatives that sell credit protection decreased as a
result of credit spreads widening on certain credit default basket swaps. |
|
|
|
The decrease was partially offset by an increase in fair value of GMWB related derivatives
primarily due to liability model assumption updates. Refer to Note 4 for further
discussion. |
29
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
Cash-Flow Hedges
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash-flow hedges, the effective
portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive
income (OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged
transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing hedge
ineffectiveness are recognized in current earnings. All components of each derivatives gain or
loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
The following table presents the components of the gain or loss on derivatives that qualify as
cash-flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in Cash-Flow Hedging Relationships For The Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative (Effective |
|
|
Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on |
|
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion) |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Location |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
Net realized capital gain/(loss) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
Foreign currency swaps |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
Net realized capital gain/(loss) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(70 |
) |
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in Cash-Flow Hedging Relationships For The Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) |
|
|
|
Location |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Net realized capital gain/(loss) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Foreign currency swaps |
|
Net realized capital gain/(loss) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
Foreign currency swaps |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the before-tax deferred net gains on derivative
instruments recorded in AOCI that are expected to be reclassified to earnings during the next
twelve months are $39 and $(21), respectively. This expectation is based on the anticipated
interest payments on hedged investments in fixed maturity securities that will occur over the next
twelve months, at which time the Company will recognize the deferred net gains (losses) as an
adjustment to interest income over the term of the investment cash flows. The maximum term over
which the Company is hedging its exposure to the variability of future cash flows (for forecasted
transactions, excluding interest payments on existing variable-rate financial instruments) is four
years.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had no net reclassifications from
AOCI to earnings resulting from the discontinuance of cash-flow hedges due to forecasted
transactions that were no longer probable of occurring.
Fair-Value Hedges
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a fair-value hedge, the gain or loss
on the derivative as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the
hedged risk are recognized in current earnings. The Company includes the gain or loss on the
derivative in the same line item as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item. All components
of each derivatives gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
The Company recognized in income gains (losses) representing the ineffective portion of all
fair-value hedges as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in Fair-Value Hedging Relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedge Item |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
Location |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Net realized capital gain/(loss) |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
(83 |
) |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
82 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Foreign currency swaps |
|
Net realized capital gain/(loss) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
Foreign currency swaps |
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The amounts presented do not include the periodic net coupon settlements of the derivative or
the coupon income (expense) related to the hedged item. The net of the amounts presented
represents the ineffective portion of the hedge. |
30
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
For derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges under SFAS 133, including embedded
derivatives that are required to be bifurcated from their host contracts and accounted for as
derivatives, the gain or loss on the derivative is recognized currently in earnings within net
realized capital gains or losses. The following table presents the gain or loss recognized in
income on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as SFAS 133 Hedging Instruments |
|
Gain or (Loss) Recognized within Net Realized Capital Gains and Losses |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest rate swaps, caps, floors, and forwards |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
Foreign currency swaps, forwards, and swaptions |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Credit derivatives that purchase credit protection |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
137 |
|
Credit derivatives that sell credit protection |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(345 |
) |
Contingent capital facility put option |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Japanese fixed annuity hedging instruments[1] |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
182 |
|
GMAB product derivatives |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Japan 3Win hedging derivatives[2] |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
GMWB product derivatives |
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
(1,223 |
) |
GMWB reinsurance contracts |
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
158 |
|
GMWB hedging instruments |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
Equity index swaps, options, and futures |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Japanese variable annuity hedging instruments |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Macro hedge program |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Warrants |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
(739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The associated liability is adjusted for changes in spot rates through
realized capital gains and losses and was $205 and $(203) for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
|
[2] |
|
The associated liability is adjusted for changes in spot rates through
realized capital gains and losses and was $184 from inception of the
hedge through March 31, 2009. |
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the net realized capital gain of $280 related to
derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 was primarily due to the
following:
|
|
The net gain associated with GMWB related derivatives was primarily due to liability model
changes and assumption updates. For further discussion, refer to Note 4. |
|
|
|
The net gain on the macro hedge program was primarily the result of a decline in the equity
markets. |
|
|
|
The gain on warrants associated with the Allianz transaction was primarily due to a
decrease in the Companys stock price. See Note 21 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report for a discussion of Allianz SEs
investment in The Hartford. |
|
|
|
These gains were partially offset by a loss on credit derivatives that purchase credit
protection primarily due to corporate credit spreads tightening and a loss on credit
derivatives that sell credit protection driven by credit spreads widening on certain credit
default basket swaps. |
|
|
|
There were also losses on the Japanese fixed annuity hedging instruments and the Japan 3Win
hedging derivatives, primarily resulting from the Japanese Yen weakening against the U.S.
dollar. |
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, the net realized capital loss of $739 related to
derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 was primarily due to the
following:
|
|
For a discussion on the net loss associated with GMWB related derivatives, refer to Note 4. |
|
|
|
The loss on credit derivatives that sell credit protection and the gain on credit
derivatives that purchase credit protection were primarily due to credit spreads widening. |
|
|
|
These losses were partially offset by a gain on the Japanese fixed annuity hedging
instruments, primarily resulting from the Japanese Yen strengthening against the U.S. dollar. |
Refer to Note 9 for additional disclosures regarding contingent credit related features in
derivative agreements.
31
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
Credit Risk Assumed through Credit Derivatives
The Company enters into credit default swaps that assume credit risk from a single entity,
referenced index, or asset pool in order to synthetically replicate investment transactions. The
Company will receive periodic payments based on an agreed upon rate and notional amount and will
only make a payment if there is a credit event. A credit event payment will typically be equal to
the notional value of the swap contract less the value of the referenced security issuers debt
obligation. A credit event is generally defined as default on contractually obligated interest or
principal payments or bankruptcy of the referenced entity. The credit default swaps in which the
Company assumes credit risk primarily reference investment grade single corporate issuers, baskets
of up to five corporate issuers, and diversified portfolios of corporate issuers. The diversified
portfolios of corporate issuers are established within sector concentration limits and are
typically divided into tranches that possess different credit ratings.
The following tables present the notional amount, fair value, weighted average years to maturity,
underlying referenced credit obligation type and average credit ratings, and offsetting notional
amounts and fair value for credit derivatives in which the Company is assuming credit risk as of
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Referenced |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Credit Obligation(s) [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Offsetting |
|
|
|
|
Credit Derivative type by derivative |
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Years to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Offsetting |
|
risk exposure |
|
Amount [2] |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Type |
|
Rating |
|
|
Amount [3] |
|
|
Fair Value [3] |
|
Single name credit default swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
4 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
|
A- |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
Below investment grade risk
exposure |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
3 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
|
B- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basket credit default swaps [4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
5 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
BBB+ |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
8 years |
|
CMBS Credit |
|
AAA- |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Below investment grade risk
exposure |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
6 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
CCC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit linked notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
2 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
BBB+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,493 |
|
|
$ |
(515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,301 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Referenced |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Credit Obligation(s) [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Offsetting |
|
|
|
|
Credit Derivative type by derivative |
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Years to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Offsetting |
|
risk exposure |
|
Amount [2] |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Type |
|
Rating |
|
|
Amount [3] |
|
|
Fair Value [3] |
|
Single name credit default swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
4 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
|
A- |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
Below investment grade risk
exposure |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
4 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
|
B- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basket credit default swaps [4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
1,778 |
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
5 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
|
A- |
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
8 years |
|
CMBS Credit |
|
AAA |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Below investment grade risk
exposure |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
6 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
BB+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit linked notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
2 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
BBB+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,512 |
|
|
$ |
(407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,313 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The average credit ratings are based on availability and the midpoint
of the applicable ratings among Moodys, S&P, and Fitch. If no rating
is available from a rating agency, then an internally developed rating
is used. |
|
[2] |
|
Notional amount is equal to the maximum potential future loss amount.
There is no specific collateral related to these contracts or recourse
provisions included in the contracts to offset losses. |
|
[3] |
|
The Company has entered into offsetting credit default swaps to
terminate certain existing credit default swaps, thereby offsetting
the future changes in value of or losses paid related to the original
swap. |
|
[4] |
|
Includes $1.9 billion of standard market indices of diversified
portfolios of corporate issuers referenced through credit default
swaps. These swaps are subsequently valued based upon the observable
standard market index. Also includes $325 of customized diversified
portfolios of corporate issuers referenced through credit default
swaps. |
32
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
6. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Present Value of Future Profits
Life
Unlock Results
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company failed its quarterly tests resulting in an Unlock of
future estimated gross profits (the Unlock). The policy related in-force or account values at
March 31, 2009 were used to project future gross profits. The after-tax impact on the Companys
assets and liabilities as a result of the Unlock during the first quarter was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
DAC and |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Inducement |
|
|
|
|
After-tax (Charge) Benefit |
|
PVFP |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Reserves [1] |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Total |
|
Retail |
|
$ |
(666 |
) |
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
(328 |
) |
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
$ |
(985 |
) |
Retirement Plans |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Individual Life |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
International |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(422 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(879 |
) |
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
(663 |
) |
|
$ |
(45 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
As a result of the Unlock, death benefit reserves, in Retail, increased $1,048, pre-tax,
offset by an increase of $543, pre-tax, in reinsurance recoverables. In International, death
benefit reserves increased $536 pre-tax, offset by an increase of $25, pre-tax, in
reinsurance recoverables. |
Changes in deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
11,988 |
|
|
$ |
10,514 |
|
Deferred costs |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
Amortization Deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits [1] |
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
Amortization Unlock, pre-tax |
|
|
(1,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to unrealized gains and losses on securities, available-for-sale and other |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
Effect of currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31 |
|
$ |
10,828 |
|
|
$ |
11,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The increase in amortization from the prior year period is due to lower actual gross profits
in 2008 resulting from increased realized capital losses primarily from the adoption of SFAS
157 at the beginning of the first quarter of 2008. |
Property & Casualty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
1,260 |
|
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
Deferred costs |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
Amortization Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31 |
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
$ |
1,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
7. Separate Accounts, Death Benefits and Other Insurance Benefit Features
The Company records the variable portion of individual variable annuities, 401(k), institutional,
403(b)/457, private placement life and variable life insurance products within separate account
assets and liabilities. Separate account assets are reported at fair value. Separate account
liabilities are set equal to separate account assets. Separate account assets are segregated from
other investments. Investment income and gains and losses from those separate account assets, which
accrue directly to, and whereby investment risk is borne by the policyholder, are offset by the
related liability changes within the same line item in the condensed consolidated statements of
operations. The fees earned for administrative and contract holder maintenance services performed
for these separate accounts are included in fee income. For the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008, there were no gains or losses on transfers of assets from the general account to the
separate account.
Many of the variable annuity and universal life (UL) contracts issued by the Company offer
various guaranteed minimum death, withdrawal, income, accumulation, and UL secondary guarantee
benefits. UL secondary guarantee benefits ensure that the policy will not terminate, and will
continue to provide a death benefit, even if there is insufficient policy value to cover the
monthly deductions and charges. Guaranteed minimum death and income benefits are offered in
various forms as described in further detail throughout this Note 7. The Company reinsures a
portion of the death benefit guarantees associated with its in-force block of business. Changes in
the gross U.S. guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB), Japan GMDB/guaranteed minimum income
benefits (GMIB), and UL secondary guarantee benefits sold with annuity and/or UL products
accounted for and collectively known as SOP 03-1 reserve liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UL Secondary |
|
|
|
U.S. GMDB [1] |
|
|
Japan GMDB/GMIB [1] |
|
|
Guarantees [1] |
|
Liability balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
Incurred |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Paid |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unlock |
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability balance as of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,868 |
|
|
$ |
728 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The reinsurance recoverable asset related to the U.S. GMDB was $1,116 as of March 31, 2009.
The reinsurance recoverable asset related to the Japan GMDB was $49 as of March 31, 2009.
The reinsurance recoverable asset related to the UL secondary guarantees was $17 as of March
31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UL Secondary |
|
|
|
U.S. GMDB [1] |
|
|
Japan GMDB/GMIB [1] |
|
|
Guarantees [1] |
|
Liability balance as of January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
529 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
Incurred |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Paid |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability balance as of March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The reinsurance recoverable asset related to the U.S. GMDB was $332 as of March 31, 2008.
The reinsurance recoverable asset related to the Japan GMDB was $9 as of March 31, 2008. The
reinsurance recoverable asset related to the UL secondary guarantees was $11 as of March 31,
2008. |
The net SOP 03-1 reserve liabilities are established by estimating the expected value of net
reinsurance costs and death and income benefits in excess of the projected account balance. The
excess death and income benefits and net reinsurance costs are recognized ratably over the
accumulation period based on total expected assessments. The SOP 03-1 reserve liabilities are
recorded in reserve for future policy benefits in the Companys condensed consolidated balance
sheets. Changes in the SOP 03-1 reserve liabilities are recorded in benefits, losses and loss
adjustment expenses in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of operations. In a manner
consistent with the Companys accounting policy for deferred acquisition costs, the Company
regularly evaluates estimates used and adjusts the additional liability balances, with a related
charge or credit to benefit expense if actual experience or other evidence suggests that earlier
assumptions should be revised.
34
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
7. Separate Accounts, Death Benefits and Other Insurance Benefit Features (continued)
The following table provides details concerning GMDB and GMIB exposure as of March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Breakdown of Individual Variable and Group Annuity Account Value by GMDB/GMIB Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Net |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Account |
|
|
Net Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Attained Age of |
|
Maximum anniversary value (MAV) [1] |
|
Value |
|
|
at Risk [9] |
|
|
at Risk [9] |
|
|
Annuitant |
|
MAV only |
|
$ |
23,212 |
|
|
$ |
15,815 |
|
|
$ |
5,452 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
With 5% rollup [2] |
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
With Earnings Protection Benefit Rider (EPB) [3] |
|
|
4,698 |
|
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
With 5% rollup & EPB |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total MAV |
|
|
30,275 |
|
|
|
20,197 |
|
|
|
6,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Protection Benefit (APB) [4] |
|
|
23,290 |
|
|
|
9,335 |
|
|
|
6,212 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Lifetime Income Benefit (LIB) Death Benefit [5] |
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Reset [6] (5-7 years) |
|
|
3,093 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Return of Premium [7]/Other |
|
|
16,757 |
|
|
|
4,592 |
|
|
|
4,319 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal U.S. Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits |
|
|
74,453 |
|
|
|
35,987 |
|
|
|
18,726 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Japan Guaranteed Minimum Death and Income Benefit
[8] |
|
|
26,567 |
|
|
|
8,960 |
|
|
|
7,619 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
101,020 |
|
|
$ |
44,947 |
|
|
$ |
26,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
MAV: the death benefit is the greatest of current account value, net premiums paid and the highest account value on any
anniversary before age 80 (adjusted for withdrawals). |
|
[2] |
|
Rollup: the death benefit is the greatest of the MAV, current account value, net premium paid and premiums (adjusted for
withdrawals) accumulated at generally 5% simple interest up to the earlier of age 80 or 100% of adjusted premiums. |
|
[3] |
|
EPB: the death benefit is the greatest of the MAV, current account value, or contract value plus a percentage of the
contracts growth. The contracts growth is account value less premiums net of withdrawals, subject to a cap of 200% of
premiums net of withdrawals. |
|
[4] |
|
APB: the death benefit is the greater of current account value or MAV, not to exceed current account value plus 25% times
the greater of net premiums and MAV (each adjusted for premiums in the past 12 months). |
|
[5] |
|
LIB: the death benefit is the greatest of current account value, net premiums paid, or for certain contracts a benefit
amount that ratchets over time, generally based on market performance. |
|
[6] |
|
Reset: the death benefit is the greatest of current account value, net premiums paid and the most recent five to seven
year anniversary account value before age 80 (adjusted for withdrawals). |
|
[7] |
|
Return of premium: the death benefit is the greater of current account value and net premiums paid. |
|
[8] |
|
Death benefits include a Return of Premium and MAV (before age 80) paid in a single lump sum. The income benefit is a
guarantee to return initial investment, adjusted for earnings liquidity, paid through a fixed annuity, after a minimum
deferral period of 10, 15 or 20 years. The guaranteed remaining balance related to the Japan GMIB was $28 billion and
$30.6 billion as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. |
|
[9] |
|
Net amount at risk and retained net amount at risk are highly sensitive to equity markets movements for example, as equity
market declines, net amount at risk and retained net amount at risk will generally increase. |
See Note 4 for a description of the Companys guaranteed living benefits that are accounted for at
fair value.
8. Sales Inducements
The Company currently offers enhanced crediting rates or bonus payments to contract holders on
certain of its individual and group annuity products. The expense associated with offering a bonus
is deferred and amortized over the life of the related contract in a pattern consistent with the
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs. Amortization expense associated with expenses
previously deferred is recorded over the remaining life of the contract. Consistent with the
Companys Unlock, the Company unlocked the amortization of the sales inducement asset. See Note 6
for more information concerning the Unlock.
Changes in deferred sales inducement activity were as follows for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
553 |
|
|
$ |
467 |
|
Sales inducements deferred |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Amortization charged to income |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Amortization Unlock |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period, March 31 |
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
The Hartford is involved in claims litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, both as a
liability insurer defending or providing indemnity for third-party claims brought against insureds
and as an insurer defending coverage claims brought against it. The Hartford accounts for such
activity through the establishment of unpaid loss and loss adjustment expense reserves. Subject to
the uncertainties discussed below under the caption Asbestos and Environmental Claims, management
expects that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to such ordinary-course claims
litigation, after consideration of provisions made for potential losses and costs of defense, will
not be material to the consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of The
Hartford.
The Hartford is also involved in other kinds of legal actions, some of which assert claims for
substantial amounts. These actions include, among others, putative state and federal class actions
seeking certification of a state or national class. Such putative class actions have alleged, for
example, underpayment of claims or improper underwriting practices in connection with various kinds
of insurance policies, such as personal and commercial automobile, property, life and inland
marine; improper sales practices in connection with the sale of life insurance and other investment
products; and improper fee arrangements in connection with investment products and structured
settlements. The Hartford also is involved in individual actions in which punitive damages are
sought, such as claims alleging bad faith in the handling of insurance claims. Like many other
insurers, The Hartford also has been joined in actions by asbestos plaintiffs asserting, among
other things, that insurers had a duty to protect the public from the dangers of asbestos and that
insurers committed unfair trade practices by asserting defenses on behalf of their policyholders in
the underlying asbestos cases. Management expects that the ultimate liability, if any, with
respect to such lawsuits, after consideration of provisions made for estimated losses, will not be
material to the consolidated financial condition of The Hartford. Nonetheless, given the large or
indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these actions, and the inherent unpredictability of
litigation, an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse
effect on the Companys consolidated results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or
annual periods.
Broker Compensation Litigation Following the New York Attorney Generals filing of a civil
complaint against Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., and Marsh, Inc. (collectively, Marsh) in
October 2004 alleging that certain insurance companies, including The Hartford, participated with
Marsh in arrangements to submit inflated bids for business insurance and paid contingent
commissions to ensure that Marsh would direct business to them, private plaintiffs brought several
lawsuits against the Company predicated on the allegations in the Marsh complaint, to which the
Company was not party. Among these is a multidistrict litigation in the United States District
Court for the District of New Jersey. There are two consolidated amended complaints filed in the
multidistrict litigation, one related to conduct in connection with the sale of property-casualty
insurance and the other related to alleged conduct in connection with the sale of group benefits
products. The Company and various of its subsidiaries are named in both complaints. The
complaints assert, on behalf of a putative class of persons who purchased insurance through broker
defendants, claims under the Sherman Act, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
(RICO), state law, and in the case of the group benefits complaint, claims under ERISA. The
claims are predicated upon allegedly undisclosed or otherwise improper payments of contingent
commissions to the broker defendants to steer business to the insurance company defendants. The
district court has dismissed the Sherman Act and RICO claims in both complaints for failure to
state a claim and has granted the defendants motions for summary judgment on the ERISA claims in
the group-benefits products complaint. The district court further has declined to exercise
supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims, has dismissed those state law claims without
prejudice, and has closed both cases. The plaintiffs have appealed the dismissal of the claims in
both consolidated amended complaints, except the ERISA claims.
The Company is also a defendant in two consolidated securities actions and two consolidated
derivative actions filed in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. The
consolidated securities actions assert claims on behalf of a putative class of shareholders
alleging that the Company and certain of its executive officers violated Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by failing to disclose to the investing public that
The Hartfords business and growth was predicated on the unlawful activity alleged in the New York
Attorney Generals complaint against Marsh. The consolidated derivative actions, brought by
shareholders on behalf of the Company against its directors and an additional executive officer,
allege that the defendants knew adverse non-public information about the activities alleged in the
Marsh complaint and concealed and misappropriated that information to make profitable stock trades
in violation of their duties to the Company. In July 2006, the district court granted defendants
motion to dismiss the consolidated securities actions, and the plaintiffs appealed. In November
2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the decision and remanded
the case to the district court. The Company will renew its motion to dismiss with respect to
issues that the district court did not address in the prior ruling. Defendants filed a motion to
dismiss the consolidated derivative actions in May 2005. Those proceedings are stayed by agreement
of the parties.
In September 2007, the Ohio Attorney General filed a civil action in Ohio state court alleging that
certain insurance companies, including The Hartford, conspired with Marsh in violation of Ohios
antitrust statute. The trial court denied defendants motion to dismiss the complaint in July
2008. The Company disputes the allegations and intends to defend this action vigorously.
36
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
9. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
Investment and Savings Plan ERISA Class Action Litigation In November and December 2008,
following a decline in the share price of the Companys common stock, seven putative class action
lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut on behalf
of certain participants in the Companys Investment and Savings Plan (the Plan), which offers the
Companys common stock as one of many investment options. These lawsuits have been consolidated,
and a consolidated amended class-action complaint was filed in March 2009, alleging that the
Company and certain of its officers and employees violated ERISA by allowing the Plans
participants to invest in the Companys common stock and by failing to disclose to the Plans
participants information about the Companys financial condition. The lawsuit seeks restitution or
damages for losses arising from the investment of the Plans assets in the Companys common stock
during the period from December 10, 2007 to the present. The Company disputes the allegations and
intends to defend the actions vigorously.
Structured Settlement Class Action In October 2005, a putative nationwide class action was filed
in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut against the Company and several
of its subsidiaries on behalf of persons who had asserted claims against an insured of a Hartford
property & casualty insurance company that resulted in a settlement in which some or all of the
settlement amount was structured to afford a schedule of future payments of specified amounts
funded by an annuity from a Hartford life insurance company (Structured Settlements). The
operative complaint alleges that since 1997 the Company has systematically deprived the settling
claimants of the value of their damages recoveries by secretly deducting 15% of the annuity premium
of every Structured Settlement to cover brokers commissions, other fees and costs, taxes, and a
profit for the annuity provider, and asserts claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (RICO) and state law. The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, punitive
damages, pre-judgment interest, attorneys fees and costs, and injunctive or other equitable
relief. The Company vigorously denies that any claimant was misled or otherwise received less than
the amount specified in the structured-settlement agreements. In March 2009, the district court
certified a class for the RICO and fraud claims composed of all persons, other than those
represented by a plaintiffs broker, who entered into a Structured Settlement since 1997 and
received certain written representations about the cost or value of the settlement. The district
court declined to certify a class for the breach-of-contract and unjust-enrichment claims. The
Company has petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for permission to
file an interlocutory appeal of the class-certification ruling. Proceedings in the district court
are stayed until proceedings in the Second Circuit conclude.
Fair Credit Reporting Act Class Action In February 2007, the United States District Court for the
District of Oregon gave final approval of the Companys settlement of a lawsuit brought on behalf
of a class of homeowners and automobile policy holders alleging that the Company willfully violated
the Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to send appropriate notices to new customers whose initial
rates were higher than they would have been had the customer had a more favorable credit report.
The settlement was made on a claim-in, nationwide-class basis and required eligible class members
to return valid claim forms postmarked no later than June 28, 2007. The Company has paid
approximately $84.3 to eligible claimants in connection with the settlement. The Company has
sought reimbursement from the Companys Excess Professional Liability Insurance Program for the
portion of the settlement in excess of the Companys $10 self-insured retention. Certain insurance
carriers participating in that program have disputed coverage for the settlement, and one of the
excess insurers commenced an arbitration to resolve the dispute, which resulted in an award in the
Companys favor. The primary insurer on the program has agreed to be bound by that award.
Management believes it is probable that the Companys coverage position ultimately will be
sustained as to all applicable layers of coverage.
Asbestos and Environmental Claims As discussed in Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies, of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under the caption Asbestos and Environmental Claims,
included in the Companys 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report, The Hartford continues to receive asbestos
and environmental claims that involve significant uncertainty regarding policy coverage issues.
Regarding these claims, The Hartford continually reviews its overall reserve levels and reinsurance
coverages, as well as the methodologies it uses to estimate its exposures. Because of the
significant uncertainties that limit the ability of insurers and reinsurers to estimate the
ultimate reserves necessary for unpaid losses and related expenses, particularly those related to
asbestos, the ultimate liabilities may exceed the currently recorded reserves. Any such additional
liability cannot be reasonably estimated now but could be material to The Hartfords consolidated
operating results, financial condition and liquidity.
Shareholder Demand Like the boards of directors of many other companies, the Board has received a
demand from SEIU Pension Plans Master Trust, which purports to be a current holder of the Companys
common stock. The demand requests the Board to bring suit to recover alleged excessive
compensation paid to senior executives of the Company from 2005 through the present and to change
the Companys executive compensation structure. The Board is conducting an investigation of the
allegations in the demand.
37
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
9. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
Derivative Commitments
Certain of the Companys derivative agreements contain provisions that are tied to the financial
strength ratings of the individual legal entity with the derivative agreement as set by nationally
recognized statistical rating agencies. If the insurance operating entitys financial strength
were to fall below certain ratings, the counterparties to the derivative agreements could demand
immediate and ongoing full collateralization and in certain instances demand immediate settlement
of all outstanding derivative positions traded under each impacted bilateral agreement. The
settlement amount is determined by netting the derivative positions transacted under each
agreement. If the termination rights were to be exercised by the counterparties, it could impact
the insurance operating entitys ability to conduct hedging activities by increasing the associated
costs and decreasing the willingness of counterparties to transact with the insurance operating
entity. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent
features that are in a net liability position as of March 31, 2009, is $433. Of this $433, the
insurance operating entities have posted collateral of $325 in the normal course of business.
Based on derivative market values as of March 31, 2009, a downgrade of one level below the current
financial strength ratings by either Moodys or S&P could require approximately an additional $50
to be posted as collateral. Based on derivative market values as of March 31, 2009, a downgrade by
either Moodys or S&P of two levels below the insurance operating entities current financial
strength ratings could require approximately an additional $95 of assets to be posted as
collateral. These collateral amounts could change as derivative market values change or as a
result of changes in our hedging activities.
10. Pension Plans and Postretirement Health Care and Life Insurance Benefit Plans
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Total net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 include the
following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Amortization of prior service credit |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Stock Compensation Plans
The Company has two primary stock-based compensation plans, The Hartford 2005 Incentive Stock Plan
and The Hartford Employee Stock Purchase Plan. For a description of these plans, see Note 18 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Shares issued in satisfaction of stock-based compensation may be made available from authorized but
unissued shares, shares held by the Company in treasury or from shares purchased in the open
market. The Company typically issues shares from treasury in satisfaction of stock-based
compensation. The compensation expense recognized for the stock-based compensation plans was $13
and $18 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The income tax benefit
recognized for stock-based compensation plans was $4 and $6 for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company did not capitalize any cost of stock-based compensation.
As of March 31, 2009, the total compensation cost related to non-vested awards not yet recognized
was $61, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years.
38
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
12. Debt
Commercial Paper
The Federal Reserve Board authorized the Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF) on October 7,
2008 under Section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act to provide a liquidity backstop to U.S. issuers
of commercial paper. The CPFF is intended to improve liquidity in short-term funding markets by
increasing the availability of term commercial paper funding to issuers and by providing greater
assurance to both issuers and investors that firms will be able to roll over their maturing
commercial paper.
The Company registered with the CPFF in order to sell up to a maximum of $375 to the facility of
which it issued the full amount as of December 31, 2008. The Companys commercial paper must be
rated A-1/P-1/F1 by at least two ratings agencies to be eligible for the program. In the first
quarter of 2009, Moodys, S&P and Fitch downgraded the Companys commercial paper rating, rendering
the Company ineligible to sell additional commercial paper under the CPFF program going forward.
As a result, the Company will be required to pay the commercial paper issued under the CPFF program
from existing sources of liquidity. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has paid $21 of maturing
commercial paper with the remaining $354 paid as of April 30, 2009.
Consumer Notes
As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $1.2 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively, of
consumer notes were outstanding. As of March 31, 2009, these consumer notes have interest rates
ranging from 4.0% to 6.3% for fixed notes and, for variable notes, based on March 31, 2009 rates,
notes indexed to the consumer price index plus 80 to 267 basis points, or indexed to the S&P 500,
Dow Jones Industrials, foreign currency, or the Nikkei 225. For the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008, interest credited to holders of consumer notes was $13 and $13, respectively.
For additional information regarding consumer notes, see Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
13. Equity
Stockholders Equity
On March 26, 2009, the Companys shareholders approved the conversion of the Series C Preferred
Stock underlying certain warrants issued to Allianz SE in October 2008 into 34,308,872 shares of
The Hartfords common stock. As a result of this shareholder approval, the Company is not
obligated to pay Allianz SE any cash payment related to these warrants and therefore these warrants
no longer provide for any form of net cash settlement outside the Companys control. As such, the
warrants to purchase the Series C Preferred Stock were reclassified from other liabilities to
equity at their fair value. As of March 26, 2009, the fair value of these warrants was $93. For
the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recognized a gain of $70, representing the
change in fair value of the warrants through March 26, 2009.
Noncontrolling Interests
The Company adopted SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009. The scope of this Statement applies to all
entities that prepare consolidated financial statements and as such, includes VIEs in which the
Company has concluded that it is the primary beneficiary. See Note 5 for further discussion of the
Companys involvement in VIEs. The Company also holds the majority interest in certain general
account mutual funds, in which it has provided seed money. The scope of FAS 160 also applies to
these mutual fund investments. Upon adoption of SFAS 160, the Company reclassified $92 as of
January 1, 2008 from liabilities to equity, representing the noncontrolling interest of other
investors in these VIEs and mutual fund investments. The noncontrolling interest within these
entities is likely to change, as these entities represent investment vehicles whereby investors may
frequently redeem or contribute to these investments. As such, the change in noncontrolling
ownership interest represented in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Equity will primarily represent redemptions and additional subscriptions within these investment
vehicles.
The following table represents the change in noncontrolling ownership interest recorded in the
Companys Condensed Statement of Changes in Equity for the VIEs and Mutual Fund Seed Investments as
of March 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Redemptions of The Hartfords interest in VIEs and Mutual Fund
Investments resulting in deconsolidation [1] |
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
Net (Redemptions) and Subscriptions from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change in noncontrolling interest ownership |
|
$ |
(64 |
) |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The redemptions of The Hartfords interest in VIEs and Mutual Fund Investments in the first
quarter of 2009 and 2008 resulted in a loss of $1 and gain of less than $1, respectively which
were recognized in realized capital gains (losses). |
39
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
14. Goodwill
The carrying amount of goodwill allocated to reporting segments as of March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008 is shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
Individual Life |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
Retirement Plans |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Life |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
Property & Casualty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property & Casualty |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Goodwill |
|
$ |
1,036 |
|
|
$ |
1,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys goodwill impairment test performed during the first quarter of 2009 for the Life
reporting units, resulted in a write-down of $32 in the Institutional reporting unit of Corporate.
Goodwill within Corporate is primarily attributed to the Companys buy-back of Life in 2000 and
is allocated to the various Life reporting units. As a result of rating agency downgrades of
Lifes financial strength ratings during the first quarter of 2009 and high credit spreads related
to The Hartford, in the current market, the Company believes its ability to generate new business
in the Institutional reporting unit will remain pressured for ratings-sensitive products. The
Company believes goodwill associated with the Institutional line of business is impaired due to the
pressure on new sales for Institutionals ratings-sensitive business and the significant unrealized
losses in Institutionals investment portfolios.
15. Sale of First State Management Group
On March 31, 2009, the Company sold First State Management Group, Inc. (FSMG), its core excess
and surplus lines property business, to Beazley Group PLC (Beazley) for $24, resulting in a gain
on sale of $18 before-tax and $12 after-tax. Included in the sale were approximately $1 in net
assets of FSMG and the sale price is adjustable subsequent to closing based on the value of the net
assets at the closing date. The net assets sold to Beazley did not include invested assets,
unearned premium or deferred policy acquisition costs related to the in-force book of business.
Rather, the in-force book of business was ceded to Beazley under a separate reinsurance agreement,
whereby the Company ceded $26 of unearned premium, net of $10 in ceding commission. Under the
terms of the purchase and sale agreement, the Company continues to be obligated for all losses and
loss adjustment expenses incurred on or before March 31, 2009. The retained net loss and loss
adjustment expense reserves totaled $194 as of March 31, 2009.
40
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollar amounts in millions except share data unless otherwise stated)
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)
addresses the financial condition of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (collectively, The Hartford or the Company) as of March 31, 2009, compared with
December 31, 2008, and its results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
compared to the equivalent 2008 periods. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the
MD&A in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Certain of the statements contained herein are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 and include estimates and assumptions related to economic, competitive and
legislative developments. These forward-looking statements are subject to change and uncertainties
that are, in many instances, beyond the Companys control and have been made based upon
managements expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effect
upon the Company. There can be no assurance that future developments will be in accordance with
managements expectations or that the effect of future developments on The Hartford will be those
anticipated by management. Actual results could differ materially from those expected by the
Company, depending on the outcome of various factors, including, but not limited to, those set
forth in Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors as well as Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors in The Hartfords
2008 Form 10-K Annual Report. These important risks and uncertainties include, without limitation,
uncertainties related to the depth and duration of the current recession and financial market
conditions, which continued to adversely affect the Companys business and results in the first
quarter of 2009, the extent of the impact on the Companys results and prospects of recent
downgrades in the Companys financial strength and credit ratings and the impact of any further
downgrades on the Companys business and results; the success of managements initiatives to
stabilize the Companys ratings and mitigate and reduce risks associated with various business
lines; whether, if and to what extent the federal government will approve the Companys application
to participate in the Capital Purchase Program under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of
2008; changes in financial and capital markets, including changes in interest rates, credit
spreads, equity prices and foreign exchange rates; the inability to effectively mitigate the impact
of equity market volatility on the Companys financial position and results of operations arising
from obligations under annuity product guarantees; the amount of statutory capital that the Company
has, changes to the statutory reserves and/or risk based capital requirements, and the Companys
ability to hold sufficient statutory capital to maintain financial strength and credit ratings; the
possibility of general economic and business conditions that are less favorable than anticipated;
the potential for differing interpretations of the methodologies, estimations and assumptions that
underlie the valuation of the Companys financial instruments that could result in changes to
investment valuations; the subjective determinations that underlie the Companys evaluation of
other-than-temporary impairments on available-for-sale securities; losses due to nonperformance or
defaults by others; the availability of our commercial paper program; the potential for further
acceleration of DAC amortization; the potential for further impairments of our goodwill; the
difficulty in predicting the Companys potential exposure for asbestos and environmental claims;
the possible occurrence of terrorist attacks; the response of reinsurance companies under
reinsurance contracts and the availability, pricing and adequacy of reinsurance to protect the
Company against losses; the possibility of unfavorable loss development; the incidence and severity
of catastrophes, both natural and man-made; stronger than anticipated competitive activity;
unfavorable judicial or legislative developments; the potential effect of domestic and foreign
regulatory developments, including those which could increase the Companys business costs and
required capital levels; the Companys ability to distribute its products through distribution
channels, both current and future; the uncertain effects of emerging claim and coverage issues; the
ability of the Companys subsidiaries to pay dividends to the Company; the Companys ability to
adequately price its property and casualty policies; the ability to recover the Companys systems
and information in the event of a disaster or other unanticipated event; potential for difficulties
arising from outsourcing relationships; potential changes in federal or state tax laws, including
changes impacting the availability of the separate account dividend received deduction; the
Companys ability to protect its intellectual property and defend against claims of infringement;
and other factors described in such forward-looking statements.
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Overview |
|
|
42 |
|
Critical Accounting Estimates |
|
|
42 |
|
Consolidated Results of Operations |
|
|
45 |
|
Life |
|
|
52 |
|
Retail |
|
|
59 |
|
Individual Life |
|
|
61 |
|
Retirement Plans |
|
|
62 |
|
Group Benefits |
|
|
63 |
|
International |
|
|
64 |
|
Institutional |
|
|
65 |
|
Other |
|
|
66 |
|
Property & Casualty |
|
|
67 |
|
Total Property & Casualty |
|
|
76 |
|
Ongoing Operations |
|
|
77 |
|
Personal Lines |
|
|
80 |
|
Small Commercial |
|
|
84 |
|
Middle Market |
|
|
87 |
|
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
90 |
|
Other Operations (Including Asbestos and
Environmental Claims) |
|
|
93 |
|
Investments |
|
|
97 |
|
Investment Credit Risk |
|
|
106 |
|
Capital Markets Risk Management |
|
|
117 |
|
Capital Resources and Liquidity |
|
|
122 |
|
Accounting Standards |
|
|
129 |
|
41
OVERVIEW
The Hartford is an insurance and financial services company with operations dating back to 1810.
The Company is headquartered in Connecticut and is organized into two major operations: Life and
Property & Casualty, each containing reporting segments. Within the Life and Property & Casualty
operations, The Hartford conducts business principally in eleven reporting segments. Corporate
primarily includes the Companys debt financing and related interest expense, as well as other
capital raising activities and purchase accounting adjustments. To present its operations in a
more meaningful and organized way, management has included separate overviews within the Life and
Property & Casualty sections of MD&A. For further overview of Lifes profitability and analysis,
see page 52. For further overview of Property & Casualtys profitability and analysis, see page
67.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Company has identified the following estimates as critical in that they involve a higher degree
of judgment and are subject to a significant degree of variability: property and casualty reserves,
net of reinsurance; life estimated gross profits used in the valuation and amortization of assets
and liabilities associated with variable annuity and other universal life-type contracts; living
benefits required to be fair valued; valuation of investments and derivative instruments;
evaluation of other-than-temporary impairments on available-for-sale securities; pension and other
postretirement benefit obligations; contingencies relating to corporate litigation and regulatory
matters; and goodwill impairment. Certain of these estimates are particularly sensitive to market conditions, and deterioration and/or volatility in the worldwide debt or equity markets could have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements. In developing these estimates management makes subjective and
complex judgments that are inherently uncertain and subject to material change as facts and
circumstances develop. Although variability is inherent in these estimates, management believes
the amounts provided are appropriate based upon the facts available upon compilation of the
financial statements. For a discussion of the critical accounting estimates not discussed below,
see MD&A in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Life Estimated Gross Profits Used in the Valuation and Amortization of Assets and Liabilities
Associated with Variable Annuity and Other Universal Life-Type Contracts
Accounting Policy and Assumptions
Lifes deferred policy acquisition costs asset and present value of future profits (PVFP)
intangible asset (hereafter, referred to collectively as DAC) related to investment contracts and
universal life-type contracts (including variable annuities) are amortized in the same way, over
the estimated life of the contracts acquired using the retrospective deposit method. Under the
retrospective deposit method, acquisition costs are amortized in proportion to the present value of
estimated gross profits (EGPs). EGPs are also used to amortize other assets and liabilities on
the Companys balance sheet, such as sales inducement assets and unearned revenue reserves (URR).
Components of EGPs are used to determine reserves for guaranteed minimum death, income and
universal life secondary guarantee benefits accounted for and collectively referred to as SOP 03-1
reserves. The specific breakdown of the most significant EGP based balances by segment is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Variable Annuities - |
|
|
Individual Variable Annuities - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Japan |
|
|
Individual Life |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
DAC |
|
$ |
3,879 |
|
|
$ |
4,844 |
|
|
$ |
1,514 |
|
|
$ |
1,834 |
|
|
$ |
2,795 |
|
|
$ |
2,931 |
|
Sales Inducements |
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
URR |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,151 |
|
|
$ |
1,299 |
|
SOP 03-1 reserves |
|
$ |
1,864 |
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
|
$ |
728 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
For most contracts, the Company estimates gross profits over a 20 year horizon as estimated profits
emerging subsequent to that timeframe are immaterial. The Company uses other amortization bases
for amortizing DAC, such as gross costs (net of reinsurance), as a replacement for EGPs when EGPs
are expected to be negative for multiple years of the contracts life. Actual gross profits, in a
given reporting period, that vary from managements initial estimates result in increases or
decreases in the rate of amortization, commonly referred to as a true-up, which are recorded in
the current period. The true-up recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was an
increase to amortization of $171 and $24, respectively.
Products sold in a particular year are aggregated into cohorts. Future gross profits for each
cohort are projected over the estimated lives of the underlying contracts, and are, to a large
extent, a function of future account value projections for variable annuity products and to a
lesser extent for variable universal life products. The projection of future account values
requires the use of certain assumptions. The assumptions considered to be important in the
projection of future account value, and hence the EGPs, include separate account fund performance,
which is impacted by separate account fund mix, less fees assessed against the contract holders
account balance, surrender and lapse rates, interest margin, mortality, and hedging costs. The
assumptions are developed as part of an annual process and are dependent upon the Companys current
best estimates of future events.
42
The Companys current 20 year separate account return assumption is approximately 7.2% (after fund
fees, but before mortality and expense charges) for U.S. products and 5.1% (after fund fees, but
before mortality and expense charges) in aggregate for all Japanese products, but varies from
product to product. Through March 31, 2009, the Company estimated gross profits using the mean of
EGPs derived from a set of stochastic scenarios that had been calibrated to our estimated separate
account return. Beginning in the second quarter of 2009, the Company will derive EGPs from a
deterministic reversion to mean separate account return projection. Reversion to mean is a method
commonly used by insurance entities to project future separate account returns. Through this
method, the Company will true-up the DAC model account values to their actual amounts at the end
of each quarter and through a consideration of recent returns, we will initially adjust future
projected returns over a five year period so that the account value grows at the long-term expected
rate of return for the entire period, providing that those projected returns for the next five
years do not exceed certain caps or floors. This will result in a DAC unlock each quarter.
However, benefits and assessments used in the determination of SOP 03-1 reserves will still be
derived from a set of stochastic scenarios that have been calibrated to our reversion to mean
separate account returns. The following table summarizes the general impacts to individual
variable annuity EGPs and earnings for DAC amortization caused by changes in separate account
returns, mortality and future lapse rate assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on Earnings for DAC |
Assumption |
|
Impact to EGPs |
|
Amortization |
Future separate account return increases
|
|
Increase: As
expected fee income
would increase and
expected claims
would decrease.
|
|
Benefit |
Future separate account return decreases
|
|
Decrease: As
expected fee income
would decrease and
expected claims
would increase.
|
|
Charge |
Future mortality increases
|
|
Decrease: As
expected fee income
would decrease
because the time
period in which
fees would be
collected would be
reduced and claims
would increase.
|
|
Charge |
Future mortality decreases
|
|
Increase: As
expected fee income
would increase
because the time
period in which
fees would be
collected would
increase and claims
would decrease.
|
|
Benefit |
Future lapse rate increases
|
|
Decrease: As expected fee income would decrease because the time period in which fees would be collected would be reduced at a greater rate than claims would decrease. [1]
|
|
Charge [1] |
Future lapse rate decreases
|
|
Increase: As expected fee income would increase because the time period in which fees would be collected would increase at a greater rate than claims would increase. [1]
|
|
Benefit [1] |
|
|
|
[1] |
|
If a contract is significantly in-the-money such that expected lifetime claims exceed lifetime fee income, this relationship would reverse. |
In addition to changes to the assumptions described above, changes to other policyholder behaviors
such as resets, partial surrenders, reaction to price increases, and asset allocations could cause
EGPs to fluctuate.
Estimating future gross profits is a complex process requiring considerable judgment and the
forecasting of events well into the future. Even though the Company will be moving to a reversion
to mean process for determining future separate account returns, the Company will continue to
complete a comprehensive assumption study and refine its estimate of future gross profits, as a
result of that study, during the third quarter of each year. Upon completion of an assumption
study, the Company revises its assumptions to reflect its current best estimate, thereby changing
its estimate of projected account values and the related EGPs in the DAC, sales inducement and
unearned revenue reserve amortization models as well as SOP 03-1 reserving models. The DAC asset,
as well as the sales inducement asset, unearned revenue reserves and SOP 03-1 reserves are adjusted
with an offsetting benefit or charge to income to reflect such changes in the period of the
revision, a process known as Unlocking. An Unlock that results in an after-tax benefit generally
occurs as a result of actual experience or future expectations of product profitability being
favorable compared to previous estimates. An Unlock that results in an after-tax charge generally
occurs as a result of actual experience or future expectations of product profitability being
unfavorable compared to previous estimates.
43
Prior to adopting the reversion to mean process for determining future separate account returns, in
addition to the comprehensive assumption study performed in the third quarter of each year,
revisions to best estimate assumptions used to estimate future gross profits were also necessary
when the EGPs in the Companys models fell outside of an independently determined reasonable range
of EGPs. The Company performed a quantitative process each quarter to determine the reasonable
range of EGPs. This process involved the use of internally developed models, which ran a large
number of stochastically determined scenarios of separate account fund performance. Incorporated in
each scenario are assumptions with respect to lapse rates, mortality and expenses, based on the
Companys most recent assumption study. These scenarios were run for the Companys individual
variable annuity businesses in the United States and Japan, the Companys Retirement Plans
businesses, and for the Companys individual variable universal life business and were used to
calculate statistically significant ranges of reasonable EGPs. The statistical ranges produced
from the stochastic scenarios are compared to the present value of EGPs used in the Companys
models. If EGPs used in the Companys models fell outside of the statistical ranges of reasonable
EGPs, an Unlock would be necessary. If EGPs used in the Companys models fell inside of the
statistical ranges of reasonable EGPs, the Company would not solely rely on the results of the
quantitative analysis to determine the necessity of an Unlock. In addition, the Company
considered, on a quarterly basis, other qualitative factors such as product, regulatory and
policyholder behavior trends and would also revise EGPs if those trends were expected to be
significant and were not or could not be included in the statistically significant ranges of
reasonable EGPs. After reviewing both the quantitative test results and certain qualitative
factors as of March 31, 2009, the Company determined an interim Unlock was necessary.
Unlock
The after-tax impact on the Companys assets and liabilities as a result of the Unlock during the
first quarter of 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DAC |
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
and |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Inducement |
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax (Charge) Benefit |
|
PVFP |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Reserves [1] |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Total [2] |
Retail |
|
$ |
(666 |
) |
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
(328 |
) |
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
$ |
(985 |
) |
Retirement Plans |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Individual Life |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
International |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(422 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(879 |
) |
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
(663 |
) |
|
$ |
(45 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
As a result of the Unlock, death benefit reserves in Retail, increased
$1,048, pre-tax, offset by an increase of $543, pre-tax, in
reinsurance recoverables. In International, death benefit reserves
increased $536, pre-tax, offset by an increase of $25, pre-tax, in
reinsurance recoverables. |
|
[2] |
|
The most significant contributor to the Unlock amounts recorded during
the first quarter of 2009 was actual separate account returns from the
period ending October 1, 2008 to March 31, 2009 being significantly
below our aggregated estimated return. |
An Unlock only revises EGPs to reflect current best estimate assumptions. With or without an
Unlock, and even after an Unlock occurs, the Company must also test the aggregate recoverability of
the DAC and sales inducement assets by comparing the existing DAC balance to the present value of
future EGPs. In addition, the Company routinely stress tests its DAC and sales inducement assets
for recoverability against severe declines in its separate account assets, which could occur if the
equity markets experienced a significant sell-off, as the majority of policyholders funds in the
separate accounts is invested in the equity market. As of March 31, 2009, the Company believed
U.S. individual and Japan individual variable annuity EGPs could fall, through a combination of
negative market returns, lapses and mortality, by at least 24% and 48%, respectively, before
portions of its DAC and sales inducement assets would be unrecoverable.
44
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Operating Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Earned premiums |
|
$ |
3,829 |
|
|
$ |
3,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fee income |
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
(13 |
%) |
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale and other |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
(23 |
%) |
Equity securities, held for trading [1] |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(3,578 |
) |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net investment income (loss) |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
(2,385 |
) |
|
NM |
Other revenues |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
(1,371 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
5,394 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
NM |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
4,637 |
|
|
|
3,357 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses returns credited on International
variable annuities [1] |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(3,578 |
) |
|
|
80 |
% |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
NM |
|
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Interest expense |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
79 |
% |
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
7,411 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
NM |
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(2,017 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
|
NM |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(808 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,209 |
) |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes investment income and mark-to-market effects of equity securities, held for
trading, supporting the international variable annuity business, which are classified in net
investment income with corresponding amounts credited to policyholders within benefits,
losses and loss adjustment expenses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Results |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
$ |
(744 |
) |
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Individual Life |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Individual Markets Group |
|
|
(762 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Retirement Plans |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Group Benefits |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Employer Markets Group |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
NM |
|
International |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
NM |
|
Institutional |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Life |
|
|
(1,258 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
NM |
Property & Casualty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(29 |
%) |
Small Commercial |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
(27 |
%) |
Middle Market |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(41 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations underwriting results |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
(20 |
%) |
Net servicing income (loss) [1] |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
(40 |
%) |
Net realized losses |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
%) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
12 |
% |
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
(64 |
%) |
Other Operations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(93 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property & Casualty |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
(66 |
%) |
Corporate |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,209 |
) |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Net of expenses related to service business. |
45
The Hartford defines NM as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%, or
changes from a net gain to a net loss position, or vice versa.
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Net income decreased $1.4 billion primarily due to a decrease of $1.1 billion from Life and $214
from Property & Casualty.
The decrease in Lifes net income was due to the following:
|
|
Life recorded a DAC Unlock charge of $1.5 billion, after-tax, during the first quarter of
2009. See Critical Accounting Estimates with Managements Discussion and Analysis for a
further discussion on the DAC Unlock. |
|
|
Declines in assets under management in Retail, primarily driven by market depreciation of
$32.8 billion for Individual Annuity and $17.0 billion for retail mutual funds during the last
twelve months, drove declines in fee income. |
|
|
Net investment income on securities, available-for-sale, and other declined primarily due
to declines in limited partnership and other alternative investments income and a decrease in
investment yield for fixed maturities. |
Partially offsetting the decrease in Lifes net income were the following:
|
|
Life reported realized gains in the first quarter of 2009 as compared to realized losses in
the comparable prior year period. The change from realized losses to gains is primarily due
to gains related to changes in the GMWB liability in Retail and Other. For further discussion,
please refer to the Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment table under the Operating
Section of the MD&A. |
|
|
Earned premiums increased largely due to business growth in Group Benefits that was driven
by new sales and persistency. |
The decrease in Property & Casualtys net income was due to the following:
|
|
Ongoing Operations net income decreased by $201, from $312 for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 to $111 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Before income taxes,
Ongoing Operations results deteriorated by $328, primarily due to a $155 increase in realized
capital losses on investments, a $125 decrease in net investment income and a $64 decrease in
underwriting results. Net realized capital losses were higher in 2009 due to an increase in
realized losses on sales of securities, including sales of financial services securities and
lower quality securities. Contributing to the $125 decrease in net investment income was an
increase in losses from limited partnerships and other alternative investments and a decrease
in income on fixed maturity investments driven by lower pre-tax yields and a decrease in the
level of invested assets. The decrease in underwriting results of $64 in 2009 was primarily
due to lower earned premiums across all segments except Personal Lines, including the effect
of lower earned audit premium, and an increase in current accident year claim severity on
homeowners and Small Commercial package business, partially offset by a decrease in current
accident year loss costs on Personal Lines auto claims. |
|
|
Other Operations net income decreased by $13, from $14 for the three months ended March
31, 2008 to $1 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease in net income was
primarily due to an increase in net realized capital losses and a decrease in net investment
income, partially offset by a reduction in net unfavorable prior accident year reserve
development. |
Outlook
The Hartford provides projections and other forward-looking information in the Outlook section
within MD&A. The Outlook section contains many forward-looking statements, particularly relating
to the Companys future financial performance. These forward-looking statements are estimates
based on information currently available to the Company, are made pursuant to the safe harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are subject to the
precautionary statements set forth in the introduction to MD&A above. Actual results are likely to
differ, and in the past have differed, materially from those forecast by the Company, depending on
the outcome of various factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth in the Outlook
section, and in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report, and
in Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors in this Form 10-Q.
Life
Retail
In the long-term, management continues to believe the market for retirement products will expand as
individuals increasingly save and plan for retirement. Demographic trends suggest that as the
baby boom generation matures, a significant portion of the United States population will allocate
a greater percentage of their disposable incomes to saving for their retirement years due to
uncertainty surrounding the Social Security system and increases in average life expectancy.
Near-term, the industry and the Company are experiencing lower variable annuity sales as a result
of recent market turbulence and concerns over the U.S. financial system, and specifically in the
U.S. Life Insurance industry. Current market pressures are also increasing the expected claim
costs, the cost and volatility of hedging programs, and the level of capital needed to support
living benefit guarantees. Some companies have already begun to increase the price of their
guaranteed living benefits and change the level of guarantees offered. Management expects these
de-risking trends to continue for the foreseeable future. In 2009, the Company began to adjust
pricing levels and plans to take certain actions to de-risk its variable annuity product features
in order to address the risks and costs associated with variable annuity benefit features in the
current economic environment and continues to explore other risk limiting techniques such as
changes to hedging or other reinsurance structures.
46
Significant declines in equity markets and increased equity market volatility are also likely to
continue to impact the cost and effectiveness of our GMWB hedging program. Continued equity market
volatility could result in material losses in our hedging program. For more information on the
GMWB hedging program, see the Equity Risk Management section within Capital Markets Risk
Management.
During periods of volatile equity markets, policyholders may allocate more of their variable
account assets to the fixed account options and fixed annuities may see increased sales. Management
expects this trend to continue throughout 2009 or until the equity markets begin to stabilize and
improve. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company has also increased its crediting rates available
to renewals of its market-value adjusted fixed annuity business.
For the retail mutual fund business, net sales can vary significantly depending on market
conditions. The Company has seen a decline in mutual fund deposits and net flows during the first
quarter as a result of continued equity market volatility which is consistent with declines in
mutual fund industry deposits. As this business continues to evolve, success will be driven by
diversifying net sales across the mutual fund platform, delivering superior investment performance
and creating new investment solutions for current and future mutual fund shareholders.
The decline in assets under management as a result of continued declines in the equity markets
throughout the first quarter of 2009 have decreased the extent of the scale efficiencies that
Retail has benefited from in recent years. The significant reduction in assets under management
has resulted in revenues declining faster than expenses causing lower earnings during the first
quarter of 2009 and management expects this strain to continue throughout the year. Management
will continue to actively evaluate its expense structure to ensure the business is controlling
costs while maintaining an appropriate level of service to our customers.
Individual Life
Future sales for all products will be influenced by the Companys ratings, as published by the
various ratings agencies, and active management of current distribution relationships, including
recent merger and consolidation activity, and the development of new sources of distribution, while
offering competitive and innovative new products and product features. The current economic
environment poses challenges for future sales; while life insurance products respond well to
consumer demand for financial security and wealth accumulation solutions, individuals may be
reluctant to transfer funds when market volatility has recently resulted in significant declines in
investment values. In addition, the availability and terms of capital solutions in the
marketplace, as discussed below, to support universal life products with secondary guarantees, may
influence future growth.
Sales and account values for variable universal life products have been under pressure due to
continued equity market volatility and declines. For the three months ended March 31, 2009,
variable universal life sales and account values decreased 71% and 31%, respectively, compared to
prior year. Continued volatility and declines in the equity markets may reduce the attractiveness
of variable universal life products and put additional strain on future earnings as variable life
fees earned by the Company are driven by the level of assets under management. The variable
universal life mix was 40% of total life insurance in-force as of March 31, 2009.
Individual Life reinsured the policy liability related to statutory reserves in universal life with
secondary guarantees to a captive reinsurance subsidiary. These reserves are calculated under
prevailing statutory reserving requirements as promulgated under Actuarial Guideline 38, The
Application of the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation. An unaffiliated standby
third party letter of credit supports a portion of the statutory reserves that have been ceded to
this subsidiary. As of March 31, 2009, the transaction provided approximately $468 of statutory
capital relief associated with the Companys universal life products with secondary guarantees. At
the current level of sales, the Company expects this transaction to accommodate future statutory
capital needs for in-force business and new business written through 2009 and into 2010. Beginning
in 2007, the use of the letter of credit resulted in a decline in net investment income and
increased expenses in future periods for Individual Life. As its business evolves in this product
line, Individual Life will evaluate the need for, and availability of, an additional capital
transaction.
For risk management purposes, Individual Life accepts and retains up to $10 in risk on any one
life. Individual Life uses reinsurance where appropriate to protect against the severity of losses
on individual claims; however, death claim experience may continue to lead to periodic short-term
earnings volatility. In the first quarter of 2009, Individual Life began ceding insurance under a
new reinsurance structure for all new business excluding term life insurance. The new reinsurance
structure allows Individual Life greater flexibility in writing larger policies, while retaining
less of the overall risk associated with individual insured lives. This change helps balance the
overall profitability of Individual Lifes business while minimizing earnings volatility associated
with mortality experience.
Individual Life continues to face uncertainty surrounding estate tax legislation, aggressive
competition from other life insurance providers, reduced availability and higher price of
reinsurance, and the current regulatory environment related to reserving for term life insurance
and universal life products with no-lapse guarantees. These risks may have a negative impact on
Individual Lifes future earnings.
47
Retirement Plans
The future financial results of the Retirement Plans segment will depend on Lifes ability to
increase assets under management across all businesses, achieve scale in areas with a high degree
of fixed costs and maintain its investment spread earnings on the general account products sold
largely in the 403(b)/457 business. Disciplined expense management will continue to be a focus and
additional investments in service and technology will occur.
During 2008, the Company completed three Retirement Plans acquisitions. The acquisition of part of
the defined contribution record keeping business of Princeton Retirement Group gives Life a
foothold in the business of providing recordkeeping services to large financial firms which offer
defined contribution plans to their clients and at acquisition added $2.9 billion in mutual funds
to Retirement Plans assets under management and $5.7 billion of assets under administration. The
acquisition of Sun Life Retirement Services, Inc., at acquisition added $15.8 billion in Retirement
Plans assets under management across 6,000 plans and provides new service locations in Boston,
Massachusetts and Phoenix, Arizona. The acquisition of TopNoggin LLC., provides web-based
technology to address data management, administration and benefit calculations. These three
acquisitions were not accretive to 2008 net income. Furthermore, net income as a percentage of
assets is expected to be lower in 2009 reflecting a full year of the new business mix represented
by the acquisitions, which includes larger, more institutionally priced plans, predominantly
executed on a mutual fund platform, and the cost of maintaining multiple technology platforms
during the integration period.
Given the recent market declines and increased volatility during the fourth quarter of 2008 and the
first quarter of 2009, the Company has seen and expects that growth in Retirement deposits will be
negatively affected if businesses reduce their workforces and offer more modest salary increases
and as workers potentially allocate less to retirement accounts in the near term. The severe
decline in equity markets in the second half of 2008 has significantly reduced Retirement Plans
assets under management, which has strained its net income. This earnings strain is expected to
continue throughout 2009 or until the equity markets improve.
Group Benefits
Group Benefits sales may fluctuate based on the competitive pricing environment in the
marketplace. The Company anticipates relatively stable loss ratios and expense ratios based on
underlying trends in the in-force business and disciplined new business and renewal underwriting.
The Company has not seen a meaningful impact in its disability loss ratios as a result of the
recent economic downturn. While claims incidence may increase during a recession, the Company
would expect the impact to the disability loss ratio to be within the normal range of volatility.
The current economic downturn, which has resulted in rising unemployment, combined with the
potential for employees to lessen spending on the Companys products, which may impact future
premium growth. As employers design benefit strategies to attract and retain employees, while
attempting to control their benefit costs, management believes that the need for the Companys
products will continue to expand. This combined with the significant number of employees who
currently do not have coverage or adequate levels of coverage, creates opportunities for our
products and services.
International
Profitability depends on the account values of our customers, which are affected by equity, bond
and currency markets. Periods of favorable market performance will increase assets under
management and thus increase fee income earned on those assets, while unfavorable market
performance will have the reverse effect. In addition, higher or lower account value levels will
generally reduce or increase, respectively, certain costs for individual annuities to the Company,
such as guaranteed minimum death benefits (GMDB), guaranteed minimum income benefits (GMIB),
guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (GMAB) and guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits
(GMWB). Prudent expense management is also an important component of product profitability.
During 2009 the Company has experienced lower than expected surrenders and related surrender fees.
In addition, the Company has experienced significant market declines and therefore some of the
product guarantees have increased in cost. Lower surrender fees, net flows and market returns are
consequently expected to result in a lower return on assets than in prior years.
During the second quarter of 2009,
the Company determined to suspend all new sales in
Internationals Japan and European operations.
Institutional
The Company is evaluating strategic options with respect to our Institutional markets businesses. The Company expects stable value
products will experience negative net flows in 2009 as a result of contractual maturities and the
payments associated with certain contracts which allow an investor to accelerate principal
repayments (after a defined notice period of typically thirteen months). Approximately $3.3
billion of account value will be paid out on stable value contracts during the remainder of 2009.
Institutional will fund these obligations from cash and short-term investments presently held in
its investment portfolios along with projected receipts of earned interest and principal maturities
from long-term invested assets. As of March 31, 2009, Institutional has no remaining contracts
that contain an unexercised investor option feature that allows for contract surrender at book
value. The Company has the option to accelerate the repayment of principal for certain other
stable value products and will evaluate calling these contracts on a contract by contract basis
based upon the financial benefits to the Company.
48
During 2008, the Company ceased issuance of retail and institutional funding agreement backed
notes, largely due to the change in customer preference to FDIC-insured products. The net income
of this segment depends on Institutionals ability to retain assets under management, mix of
business, net investment spread and investment performance. The net investment spread, as
discussed in the Performance Measures section of this MD&A, has declined in the first quarter of
2009 versus prior year amounts and management expects investment spread will remain pressured
throughout the remainder of 2009 due to the anticipated performance of limited partnerships and
other alternative investments as well as the decline in short-term interest rates.
Property & Casualty
Ongoing Operations
In 2009, management expects Ongoing Operations written premium to be lower, reflecting the effects
of the downturn in the economy, the adverse impact of recent ratings downgrades on certain segments
of our portfolio, and a continuation of competitive market conditions. The effects of the downturn
in the economy, which intensified during the first quarter of 2009, are manifested in rapidly
declining new car and home sales, lower rates of small business formations, higher rates of small
business failures, and declining payrolls. A continuation of these negative economic trends will
adversely affect new business growth rates, increase mid-term cancellations, and exacerbate
declining levels of coverage and average written premium across all lines of business. Written
premium declines may be greater than expected if the economy deteriorates further or if the market
perceives greater uncertainty about the financial strength of the Company.
Excluding catastrophes and prior accident year development, Ongoing Operations underwriting margins
will likely decline in 2009 due primarily to increases in both the loss and loss adjustment expense
ratio as well as the expense ratio, partially offset by lower anticipated policyholder dividends.
The Ongoing Operations 2009 accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before
catastrophes is expected to increase due to mid single-digit increases in claim cost severity and
continued earned pricing decreases for Middle Market and large commercial lines, partially offset
by moderately favorable claim frequency.
The Ongoing Operations expense ratio is expected to increase in 2009, in part, due to a lower
expected earned premium in Small Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial, the
amortization of a higher amount of acquisition costs on AARP and other business and an increase in
the cost of investments in technology to support future growth. The policyholder dividend ratio
was unusually high in 2008 due to the accrual of $26 in dividends due to certain workers
compensation policyholders as a result of underwriting profits. See the Property and Casualty MD&A
section for further discussion.
Current accident year catastrophe losses in 2008, at 5.3% of Ongoing Operations earned premium,
were higher than the long-term historical average due principally to hurricane Ike and higher than
average losses from tornadoes and thunderstorms in the South and Midwest. While catastrophe losses
vary significantly from year to year and are unpredictable, management has assumed that catastrophe
losses in 2009 will be closer to 3% to 3.5% of earned premium. The Company will continue to manage
its exposure to catastrophe losses through the ongoing assessment of its risk, disciplined
underwriting and the use of reinsurance and other risk transfer alternatives, as appropriate. As
of January 1, 2009, the Companys retention under its principal property catastrophe reinsurance
program remained at $250 per catastrophe event. With the January 1, 2009 renewal, the cost of the
Companys principal property catastrophe reinsurance program increased modestly.
Driven primarily by an expected increase in loss costs and underwriting expenses, the Company
expects the Ongoing Operations combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year
development in 2009 to be higher than the 88.9 achieved in 2008.
Personal Lines
Within the Personal Lines segment, the Company expects written premium to be relatively flat in
2009, with growth in AARP largely offset by a decline in Agency. The Company expects personal auto
written premium to be slightly higher and homeowners written premium to be lower. The expected
increase in AARP written premium will be largely driven by continued direct marketing to AARP
members and an expansion of underwriting appetite through the continued roll-out of the Next Gen
Auto product. The expected decline in Agency written premium will be driven, in part, by the
Companys decision to stop renewing Florida homeowners policies sold through agents.
In 2009, the Company expects to increase its auto and homeowners written premium generated from
direct sales to the consumer and from agents selling the AARP product. In 2008, the Company
launched a brand and channel expansion pilot in four states: Arizona, Illinois, Tennessee and
Minnesota. In the targeted states, the Company will increase Personal Lines brand advertising and
launch direct marketing efforts beyond its existing AARP program. In addition, certain agents in
the targeted states will be authorized to offer the Companys AARP product.
While carriers in the personal lines industry will continue to compete on price, management expects
that written pricing in Personal Lines will continue to increase modestly in 2009 in response to
rising loss costs. For the Company, written pricing in 2008 increased in both auto and homeowners.
In addition, the Company has seen an increase in consumer shopping driven by higher rates
(instituted over the past year) and recessionary conditions. In the first quarter of 2009, the
Company has seen a host of economic factors affect its written premium growth, including lower new
car and home sales, higher deductibles selected and more uninsured motorists, and management
expects these trends to continue for the remainder of 2009.
49
The combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development for Personal Lines is
expected to be higher in 2009 than the 87.6 achieved in 2008 due to an expected increase in both
the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio and the expense ratio. For auto
business, emerged claim frequency in 2008 was favorable to the prior year and claim severity was
slightly higher. In 2009, management expects claim severity will increase and claim frequency will
be less favorable than it was in 2008. Non-
catastrophe loss costs of homeowners claims increased in 2008 due to higher claim frequency and
severity and management expects loss costs to continue to increase in 2009, driven by higher claim
severity. The expense ratio is expected to be higher in 2009 driven by higher amortization of AARP
acquisition costs and costs incurred on the direct-to-consumer initiative.
Small Commercial
Within Small Commercial, management expects written premium in 2009 will be lower, driven by a
decrease in new business growth and lower premium renewal retention in all lines. In the first
quarter of 2009, Small Commercials written premium decreased by 7% driven, in part, by the effects
of the economic downturn as the Company has seen an increase in cancellations, lower earned audit
premium, a reduction in endorsement activity and lower payrolls that has resulted in declining
average renewal premium. In addition to the effects of the economy, the adverse impact of ratings
downgrades could adversely affect written premium for the remainder of 2009. Written premium
decreases for workers compensation business are expected to be more modest than for package
business or commercial auto as management seeks to expand its underwriting appetite in selected
industries and expand business written through payroll service providers. In 2009, average premium
per policy in Small Commercial is expected to continue to decline due to written pricing decreases,
a lower average premium on commercial auto business and the effect of declining mid-term
endorsements. Written pricing in Small Commercial decreased by 2% in 2008.
The combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development for Small Commercial is
expected to be higher in 2009 than the 82.8 achieved in 2008 due to an expected increase in both
the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio and the expense ratio, partially
offset by a decrease in the policyholder dividend ratio. Small Commercial experienced favorable
frequency on workers compensation claims in recent accident years and management expects favorable
frequency to continue for the 2009 accident year though not as favorable as it has been. While the
Company experienced favorable non-catastrophe property losses on package business and commercial
auto claims in 2008, management expects that severity will increase for non-catastrophe property
claims in 2009 and that frequency will be less favorable.
Middle Market
Management expects that 2009 written premium for Middle Market will be lower due to a decrease in
premium renewal retention that is primarily driven by a downturn in the economy that is impacting
construction lines in Marine and payroll exposures for workers compensation. There is also the
potential for renewal accounts to be more actively marketed due to concerns over the Companys
financial strength ratings. Written premium in Middle Market decreased by 7% in the first quarter
of 2009 driven, in part, by lower earned audit premiums and the Company continuing to take a
disciplined approach to evaluating and pricing risks in the face of declines in written pricing.
Written pricing for Middle Market business declined by 5% in 2008 and while management expects
written pricing to begin to stabilize in 2009, management expects carriers will continue to price
new business more aggressively than renewals. Management will seek to compete for new business and
protect renewals in Middle Market by, among other actions, refining its pricing models, increasing
its willingness to write more workers compensation business on a mono-line basis and writing
larger property policies and umbrella general liability policies.
Carriers in the commercial lines market segment reported some moderation in the rate of price
declines during the fourth quarter of 2008 and first quarter of 2009. Like in the Personal Lines
and Small Commercial market segments, current economic conditions (lower payrolls, declines in
production, lower sales, etc.) are reducing written premium growth opportunities.
The combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development for Middle Market is
expected to be higher in 2009 than the 93.4 achieved in 2008 due to an expected increase in both
the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio and the expense ratio, partially
offset by a decrease in the policyholder dividend ratio. Management expects an increase in claim
cost severity in 2009 across all lines within Middle Market, although the increase in claim
severity for non-catastrophe property claims will not likely be as high as it was in 2008 when the
Company experienced a number of individually large property losses. Partially offsetting the
expected increase in severity is an expectation of moderately lower frequency.
50
Specialty Commercial
Within Specialty Commercial, management expects written premium to be significantly lower,
primarily driven by the sale of the Companys core excess and surplus lines property businesses and
a decrease in professional liability, fidelity and surety written premium, particularly for public
company directors and officers insurance and errors and omissions insurance. As a substantial
portion of the Companys professional liability, fidelity and surety portfolio is sensitive to
ratings changes, further adverse changes of the Companys ratings or market perception of our
financial strength could further deteriorate Specialty Commercials written premium for 2009.
Specialty Commercial written premium declined by 13% in the first quarter of 2009.
On professional liability business within Specialty Commercial, the Company expects its losses from
the fallout of the sub-prime mortgage market and the broader credit crisis to be manageable based
on several factors. Principal among them is the diversified nature of its product and customer
portfolio, with a majority of the Companys total in-force professional liability net written
premium derived from policyholders with privately-held ownership and, therefore, relatively low
shareholder class action exposure. Reinsurance substantially mitigates the net limits exposed per
policy and no single industry segment comprises 15% or more of the Companys professional liability
book of business by net written premium. About half of the Companys limits exposed to federal
shareholder class action claims filed in 2008 and the first quarter of 2009 are under Side-A D&O
insurance policies that provide protection to individual directors and officers only in cases where
their company cannot indemnify them. In addition, 95% of the exposed limits are on excess policies
rather than primary policies. Regarding the Madoff and Stanford alleged fraud cases which continue
to evolve, based on a detailed ground-up review of all claims notices received to date and an
analysis of potentially involved parties noted in press reports, the Company anticipates only a
limited number of its policies and corresponding net limits to be exposed. The Company expects its
losses from the sub-prime mortgage and credit crisis, as well as its exposure to the Madoff and
Stanford cases, to be within its expected loss estimates.
In 2009, the combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development for Specialty
Commercial is expected to be higher than the 97.3 achieved in 2008 due to an expected increase in
both the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio and the expense ratio,
partially offset by a decrease in the policyholder dividend ratio. A higher loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio for professional liability claims is expected in 2009, driven by an
expectation of earned pricing decreases.
Other Operations
The Other Operations segment will continue to manage the discontinued operations of the Company as
well as claims (and associated reserves) related to asbestos, environmental and other exposures.
The Company will continue to review various components of all of its reserves on a regular basis.
The Company expects to perform its regular reviews of asbestos liabilities in the second quarter of
2009, Other Operations reinsurance recoverables and the allowance for uncollectible reinsurance in
the second quarter of 2009, and environmental liabilities in the third quarter of 2009. If there
are significant developments that affect particular exposures, reinsurance arrangements or the
financial condition of particular reinsurers, the Company will make adjustments to its reserves, or
the portion of liabilities it expects to cede to reinsurers.
Investment Income
Property & Casualty operating cash flow is expected to be less favorable in 2009 than in 2008,
although still positive. Based upon expected losses from limited partnerships and other
alternative investments and an increased allocation of investments to lower-yielding U.S.
Treasuries and short-term instruments, Property & Casualty expects a lower investment portfolio
yield for 2009.
51
LIFE
Executive Overview
Life is organized into four groups which are comprised of six reporting segments: The Retail
Products Group (Retail) and Individual Life segments make up the Individual Markets Groups. The
Retirement Plans and Group Benefits segments make up the Employer Markets Group. The Institutional
Solutions Group (Institutional) and International segments each make up their own group. Life
provides investment and retirement products, such as variable and fixed annuities, mutual funds and
retirement plan services and other institutional investment products, such as structured
settlements; individual and private-placement life insurance and products including variable
universal life, universal life, interest sensitive whole life and term life; and group benefit
products, such as group life and group disability insurance.
The following provides a summary of the significant factors used by management to assess the
performance of the business. For a complete discussion of these factors, see MD&A in The
Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Performance Measures
Fee Income
Fee income is largely driven from amounts collected as a result of contractually defined
percentages of assets under management. These fees are generally collected on a daily basis. For
individual life insurance products, fees are contractually defined as percentages based on levels
of insurance, age, premiums and deposits collected and contract holder value. Life insurance fees
are generally collected on a monthly basis. Therefore, the growth in assets under management
either through positive net flows or net sales, or favorable equity market performance will have a
favorable impact on fee income. Conversely, either negative net flows or net sales, or unfavorable
equity market performance will reduce fee income.
Product/Key Indicator Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and For the |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail U.S. Individual Variable Annuities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
74,578 |
|
|
$ |
119,071 |
|
Net flows |
|
|
(1,964 |
) |
|
|
(1,239 |
) |
Change in market value and other |
|
|
(4,448 |
) |
|
|
(9,912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value, end of period |
|
$ |
68,166 |
|
|
$ |
107,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Mutual Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under management, beginning of period |
|
$ |
31,032 |
|
|
$ |
48,383 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
1,121 |
|
Change in market value and other |
|
|
(1,826 |
) |
|
|
(4,887 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under management, end of period |
|
$ |
28,706 |
|
|
$ |
44,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Life Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable universal life account value, end of period |
|
$ |
4,550 |
|
|
$ |
6,620 |
|
Universal life/interest sensitive whole life insurance in-force |
|
|
52,711 |
|
|
|
49,415 |
|
Variable universal life insurance in-force |
|
|
77,913 |
|
|
|
78,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans Group Annuities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
22,198 |
|
|
$ |
27,094 |
|
Net flows |
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
Change in market value and other |
|
|
(977 |
) |
|
|
(1,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value, end of period |
|
$ |
21,852 |
|
|
$ |
26,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans Mutual Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under management, beginning of period |
|
$ |
14,838 |
|
|
$ |
1,454 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,725 |
|
Change in market value and other |
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under management, end of period |
|
$ |
14,144 |
|
|
$ |
20,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan Annuities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
34,495 |
|
|
$ |
37,637 |
|
Net flows |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
663 |
|
Change in market value and other |
|
|
(722 |
) |
|
|
(3,739 |
) |
Effect of currency translation |
|
|
(2,698 |
) |
|
|
4,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value, end of period |
|
$ |
30,946 |
|
|
$ |
38,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P 500 Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period end closing value |
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
Daily average value |
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
52
Assets under management, across all businesses, shown above, have had substantial reductions in
values from prior year primarily due to declines in equity markets during 2008 and 2009. The
changes in line of business assets under management have also been affected by:
|
|
Retail U.S. individual variable annuity recorded lower net flows as a result of increased
competition and sharp equity market declines. |
|
|
Retail Mutual funds have seen a decline in net sales as a result of increasing surrenders
driven by equity market declines and volatility. |
|
|
Retirement Plans has seen positive net flows and net sales in group annuities and mutual
funds, although less than the prior year as a result of the challenging economic environment. |
|
|
International Japan Annuities has seen negative net flows and unfavorable effects from
currency exchange rates for 2009. Net flows have decreased in Japan annuities due to
increased competition from domestic and foreign insurers, particularly competition relating to
products offered with living benefit guarantees. |
Net Investment Spread
Management evaluates performance of certain products based on net investment spread. These
products include those that have insignificant mortality risk, such as fixed annuities, certain
general account universal life contracts and certain institutional contracts. Net investment
spread is determined by taking the difference between the earned rate and the related crediting
rates on average general account assets under management. The net investment spreads shown below
are for the total portfolio of relevant contracts in each segment and reflect business written at
different times. When pricing products, the Company considers current investment yields and not
the portfolio average. Net investment spread can be volatile period over period, which can have a
significant positive or negative effect on the operating results of each segment. Investment
earnings can also be influenced by factors such as the actions of the Federal Reserve and a
decision to hold higher levels of short-term investments. The volatile nature of net investment
spread is driven primarily by prepayment premiums on securities and earnings on limited partnership
and other alternative investments.
Net investment spread is calculated as a percentage of general account assets and expressed in
basis points (bps):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Retail Individual Annuity |
|
(18.8 |
) bps |
128.1 |
bps |
Individual Life |
|
64.4 |
bps |
125.5 |
bps |
Retirement Plans |
|
43.9 |
bps |
134.6 |
bps |
Institutional (GICs, Funding Agreements, Funding Agreement Backed Notes and Consumer Notes) |
|
(77.8 |
) bps |
85.7 |
bps |
|
|
Individual Annuity, Individual Life, Retirement Plans and Institutional net investment
spread decreased primarily due to significant losses on limited partnership and other
alternative investments in the first quarter of 2009 compared to earnings in these classes in
the first quarter of 2008 and lower yields on fixed maturities, partially offset by reduced
credited rates. In addition, lower market interest rates and higher balances in cash and
short-term investments have pressured spread levels. The Company expects these conditions to
persist throughout 2009. |
Premiums
Traditional insurance type products, such as those sold by Group Benefits, collect premiums from
policyholders in exchange for financial protection for the policyholder from a specified insurable
loss, such as death or disability. These premiums together with net investment income earned from
the overall investment strategy are used to pay the contractual obligations under these insurance
contracts. Two major factors, new sales and persistency, impact premium growth. Sales can
increase or decrease in a given year based on a number of factors, including but not limited to,
customer demand for the Companys product offerings, pricing competition, distribution channels and
the Companys reputation and ratings. Persistency refers to the percentage of premium remaining
in-force from year-to-year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
Group Benefits |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Total premiums and other considerations |
|
$ |
1,138 |
|
|
$ |
1,074 |
|
Fully insured ongoing sales |
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
|
The increase in premiums and other considerations, excluding buyouts, for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 was driven by growth in the block of business driven by new sales and
persistency over the last twelve months. |
53
Expenses
There are three major categories for expenses. The first major category of expenses is benefits
and losses. These include the costs of mortality and morbidity, particularly in the group benefits
business, and mortality in the individual life businesses, as well as other contractholder benefits
to policyholders. In addition, traditional insurance type products generally use a loss ratio
which is expressed as the amount of benefits incurred during a particular period divided by total
premiums and other considerations, as a key indicator of underwriting performance. Since Group
Benefits occasionally buys a block of claims for a stated premium amount, the Company excludes this
buyout from the loss ratio used for evaluating the underwriting results of the business as buyouts
may distort the loss ratio.
The second major category is insurance operating costs and expenses, which is commonly expressed in
a ratio of a revenue measure depending on the type of business. The third major category is the
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and the present value of future profits, which is
typically expressed as a percentage of pre-tax income before the cost of this amortization (an
approximation of actual gross profits). Retail individual annuity business accounts for the
majority of the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future
profits for Life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General insurance expense ratio (individual annuity) |
|
23.6 |
bps |
|
16.8 |
bps |
DAC amortization ratio (individual annuity) [1] |
|
|
(316.8 |
%) |
|
|
47.5 |
% |
DAC amortization ratio (individual annuity) excluding DAC Unlock [1] [2] |
|
|
64.5 |
% |
|
|
47.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death benefits |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
860 |
|
|
$ |
788 |
|
Loss ratio (excluding buyout premiums) |
|
|
75.6 |
% |
|
|
73.4 |
% |
Expense ratio (excluding buyout premiums) |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General insurance expense ratio |
|
47.7 |
bps |
|
41.8 |
bps |
DAC amortization ratio [3] |
|
|
(40.9 |
%) |
|
|
38.3 |
% |
DAC amortization ratio excluding DAC Unlock [2], [3], [4] |
|
|
52.6 |
% |
|
|
38.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General insurance expense ratio |
|
10.8 |
bps |
|
13.0 |
bps |
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Excludes the effects of realized gains and losses. |
|
[2] |
|
See Unlock and Sensitivity Analysis in the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A. |
|
[3] |
|
Excludes the effects of realized gains and losses except for net periodic settlements. Included in the net realized capital
gain (losses) are amounts that represent the net periodic accruals on currency rate swaps used in the risk management of
Japan fixed annuity products. |
|
[4] |
|
Excludes the effects of 3 Wins related charge of $62, pre-tax, on net income. |
|
|
The Retail general insurance expense ratio increased primarily due to the impact of a declining asset base on slightly
lower expenses. |
|
|
|
Individual Life death benefits increased due to growth of life insurance in-force and an increase in net amount at risk for
variable universal life policies caused by equity market declines. |
|
|
|
Group Benefits loss ratio increased due to unfavorable mortality in the experience rated financial institution business,
and morbidity, partially offset by favorable experience in certain specialty lines. |
|
|
|
Group Benefits expense ratio, excluding buyouts decreased primarily due to lower commission expense on the experience rated
business and lower operating expenses. |
|
|
|
International Japan and Retail DAC amortization ratio, excluding DAC Unlock and certain realized gains or losses,
increased due to actual gross profits being less than expected as a result of lower fees earned on declining assets
resulting in negative true-ups and a higher DAC amortization rate. |
|
|
|
Institutional general insurance expense ratio decreased, as reduced expenses more than offset lower assets under management. |
54
Profitability
Management evaluates the rates of return various businesses can provide as an input in determining
where additional capital should be invested to increase net income and shareholder returns. The
Company uses the return on assets for the individual annuity business for evaluating profitability.
In Group Benefits and Individual Life, after-tax margin is a key indicator of overall
profitability.
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual annuity return on assets (ROA) |
|
(360.0 |
) bps |
|
(29.1 |
) bps |
Effect of net realized gains (losses), net of tax and DAC on ROA [1] |
|
83.9 |
bps |
|
(85.0 |
) bps |
Effect of DAC Unlock on ROA [2] |
|
(475.3 |
) bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROA excluding realized gains (losses) and DAC Unlock |
|
31.4 |
bps |
|
55.9 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax margin |
|
|
(5.6 |
%) |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
Effect of net realized losses, net of tax and DAC on after-tax margin [1] |
|
|
(4.3 |
%) |
|
|
(6.3 |
%) |
Effect of DAC Unlock on after-tax margin [2] |
|
|
(10.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax margin excluding realized losses and DAC Unlock |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans ROA |
|
(96.4 |
) bps |
|
(5.3 |
) bps |
Effect of net realized losses, net of tax and DAC on ROA [1] |
|
(35.1 |
) bps |
|
(24.2 |
) bps |
Effect of DAC Unlock on ROA [2] |
|
(62.4 |
) bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROA excluding realized losses and DAC Unlock |
|
1.1 |
bps |
|
18.9 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax margin (excluding buyouts) |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Effect of net realized gains (losses), net of tax on after-tax margin [1] |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
(1.9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax margin excluding realized gains (losses) |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Japan ROA |
|
(321.5 |
) bps |
|
14.6 |
bps |
Effect of net realized gains (losses) excluding net periodic
settlements, net of tax and DAC on ROA [1] [3] |
|
201.7 |
bps |
|
(58.5 |
) bps |
Effect of DAC Unlock on ROA [2] |
|
(511.0 |
) bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROA excluding realized gains (losses) and DAC Unlock |
|
(12.2 |
) bps |
|
73.1 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional ROA |
|
(117.3 |
) bps |
|
(78.0 |
) bps |
Effect of net realized losses, net of tax and DAC on ROA [1] |
|
(104.5 |
) bps |
|
(92.3 |
) bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROA excluding realized losses |
|
(12.8 |
) bps |
|
14.3 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
See Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment table within the Life Section of the MD&A. |
|
[2] |
|
See Unlock and Sensitivity Analysis within the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A. |
|
[3] |
|
Included in the net realized capital gain (losses) are amounts that represent the net periodic accruals on currency
rate swaps used in the risk management of Japan fixed annuity products. |
|
|
The decrease in Individual Annuitys ROA, excluding realized gains (losses) and the effect of the DAC Unlock, reflects
significant losses on limited partnership and other alternative investments; and higher DAC rates due to lower actual
gross profits over the past year. |
|
|
|
The decrease in Individual Lifes after-tax margin, excluding realized gains (losses) and the effect of the DAC Unlock,
was due to lower net investment income from limited partnership and other alternative investments and lower fees from
equity market declines, partially offset by life insurance in-force growth and lower credited rates. |
|
|
|
The decrease in Retirement Plans ROA, excluding realized gains (losses) and the effect of the DAC Unlock, was primarily
driven by lower returns on limited partnership and other alternative investments, and the net effect of lower fee
income from the declining equity markets. |
|
|
|
The Group Benefit decrease in after-tax margin, excluding realized gains (losses), was primarily due to the unfavorable
loss ratio, partially offset by the favorable expense ratio. |
|
|
|
International-Japan ROA, excluding realized gains (losses) and the effect of the DAC Unlock, declined primarily due to
3 Win related charges of $40, after-tax. Excluding the effects of the 3 Win charge ROA would be 37 bps. The decline
of ROA excluding the 3 Win charge is due to lower earned fees as a result of declining account values, lower surrender
fees due to a reduction in lapses, an increase in the DAC amortization rate due to lower actual gross profits and a
higher benefit margin. |
|
|
|
The decrease in Institutionals ROA, excluding realized gains (losses), is primarily due to a decline in limited
partnership and other alternative investments income. The decrease is also due to lower yields on fixed maturity
investments. |
55
Life Operating Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Earned premiums |
|
$ |
1,318 |
|
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Fee income |
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
1,332 |
|
|
|
(13 |
%) |
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities, available-for-sale and other |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
(16 |
%) |
Equity securities, held for trading [1] |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(3,578 |
) |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net investment loss |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(2,759 |
) |
|
|
99 |
% |
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
(1,220 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues [2] |
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
(1,418 |
) |
|
NM |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
3,059 |
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
78 |
% |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses returns credited on International
variable annuities [1] |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(3,578 |
) |
|
|
80 |
% |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
(8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
4,823 |
|
|
|
(1,098 |
) |
|
NM |
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(2,011 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
NM |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(753 |
) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss [3] |
|
$ |
(1,258 |
) |
|
$ |
(155 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Net investment income includes investment income and mark-to-market effects of equity securities, held for trading, supporting the
international variable annuity business, which are classified in net investment income with corresponding amounts credited to
policyholders. |
|
[2] |
|
The transition impact related to the SFAS 157 adoption was a reduction in revenues of $650 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. |
|
[3] |
|
The transition impact related to the SFAS 157 adoption was a reduction in net income of $220 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. |
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
The decrease in Lifes net income was due to the following:
|
|
Life recorded a DAC Unlock charge of $1.5 billion, after-tax, during the first quarter of
2009. See Critical Accounting Estimates with Managements Discussion and Analysis for a
further discussion on the DAC Unlock. |
|
|
Declines in assets under management in Retail, primarily driven by market depreciation of
$32.8 billion for Individual Annuity and $17.0 billion for retail mutual funds during the last
twelve months, drove declines in fee income. |
|
|
Net investment income on securities, available-for-sale, and other declined primarily due
to declines in limited partnership and other alternative investments income and a decrease in
investment yield for fixed maturities. |
Partially offsetting the decrease in Lifes net income were the following:
|
|
Life reported realized gains in the first quarter of 2009 as compared to realized losses in
the comparable prior year period. The change from realized losses to gains is primarily due
to gains related to changes in the GMWB liability in Retail and Other. For further discussion,
please refer to the Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment table under the Operating
Section of the MD&A. |
|
|
Earned premiums increased largely due to business growth in Group Benefits that were driven
by new sales and persistency. |
56
Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment
Life includes net realized capital gains and losses in each reporting segment. Following is a
summary of the types of realized gains and losses by segment:
Net realized gains (losses) for three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual |
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Plans |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
International |
|
|
Institutional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Gains/(losses) on sales, net |
|
$ |
(204 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
(253 |
) |
Impairments |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(185 |
) |
Japanese fixed annuity
contract hedges, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
Periodic net coupon
settlements on credit
derivatives/Japan |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Results of variable annuity
hedge program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMWB derivatives, net |
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589 |
|
Macro hedge |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total results of variable
annuity hedge program |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net realized capital
gains/(losses) |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
365 |
|
Income tax expense
(benefit) and DAC |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains/(losses), net
of tax and DAC |
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
(155 |
) |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains (losses) for three months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual |
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Plans |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
International |
|
|
Institutional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Losses on sales, net |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
Impairments |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
Japanese fixed annuity
contract hedges, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Periodic net coupon
settlements on credit
derivatives/Japan |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
SFAS 157 transition impact |
|
|
(616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
Results of variable
annuity hedge program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMWB derivatives, net |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
Macro hedge |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total results of variable
annuity hedge program |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net realized
capital losses |
|
|
(756 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(1,220 |
) |
Income tax benefit and DAC |
|
|
(494 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(670 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses, net of tax
and DAC |
|
$ |
(262 |
) |
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
(64 |
) |
|
$ |
(142 |
) |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
(550 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the circumstances giving rise to the net realized
capital gains and losses in these components are as follows:
|
|
|
Gains/(losses) on
sales, net
|
|
Gross gains on sale for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were predominantly within foreign
government, corporate and U.S. government securities. Gross losses were primarily within financial
services, commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), U.S. government securities and residential
mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and were on securities that had declined in value since December 31,
2008. These losses resulted primarily from an effort to reduce portfolio risk and improve liquidity while
simultaneously reallocating the portfolio to securities with more
favorable risk/return profiles. |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross losses on sales for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were predominantly within fixed
maturities and were primarily comprised of corporate securities and CMBS, as well as, $17 of
collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) for which HIMCO was the collateral manager. Gross gains and
losses on sale, excluding the loss on CLOs, resulted from the decision to reallocate the portfolio to
securities with more favorable risk/return profiles. |
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
See the Other-Than-Temporary Impairments section for further
information. |
|
|
|
Variable Annuity Hedge Program
|
|
See Note 4 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for further information. |
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
Other, net losses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 primarily resulted from net losses on
credit derivatives and losses on the Japan 3Win contract hedges. Also contributing were valuation
allowances on impaired mortgage loans of $48. These losses were offset by net gains related to
transactional foreign currency gains predominately on the internal reinsurance of the Japan variable
annuity business, which is entirely offset in AOCI. |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net losses for the three months ended March 31, 2008 primarily resulted from the change in
value of non-qualifying derivatives due to credit spread widening. Credit spreads widened primarily due
to the deterioration in the U.S. housing market, tightened lending conditions, the markets flight to
quality securities, as well as increased likelihood of a U.S. recession. Also included in 2008 were
losses on HIMCO managed CLOs of $33. |
58
RETAIL
Operating
Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Fee income and other |
|
$ |
553 |
|
|
$ |
747 |
|
|
|
(26 |
%) |
Earned premiums |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
(756 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues [1] |
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
NM |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
NM |
|
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
(21 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
NM |
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(1,197 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
NM |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(453 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss [2] |
|
$ |
(744 |
) |
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Under Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual variable annuity account values |
|
$ |
68,166 |
|
|
$ |
107,920 |
|
|
|
(37 |
%) |
Individual fixed annuity and other account values |
|
|
11,747 |
|
|
|
10,130 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Other retail products account values [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
(100 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total account values [4] |
|
|
79,913 |
|
|
|
118,654 |
|
|
|
(33 |
%) |
Retail mutual fund assets under management |
|
|
28,706 |
|
|
|
44,617 |
|
|
|
(36 |
%) |
Other mutual fund assets under management |
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
2,143 |
|
|
|
(61 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mutual fund assets under management |
|
|
29,543 |
|
|
|
46,760 |
|
|
|
(37 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under management |
|
$ |
109,456 |
|
|
$ |
165,414 |
|
|
|
(34 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the transition impact related to the SFAS 157 adoption was a reduction in revenues of $616. |
|
[2] |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the transition impact related to the SFAS 157 adoption was a reduction in net income of
$209. |
|
[3] |
|
Specialty products / Other transferred to International, effective January 1, 2009 on a prospective basis. |
|
[4] |
|
Includes policyholders balances for investment contracts and reserves for future policy benefits for insurance contracts. |
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Net loss increased primarily as a result of the impact of the 2009 Unlock charge and the effect of
equity market declines on variable annuity and mutual fund fee income, partially offset by net
realized capital gains. For further discussion of realized capital gains and losses, see the
Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment table under Lifes Operating Section of the MD&A. For
further discussion of the 2009 Unlock, see the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A.
The following other factors contributed to the changes in net income:
|
|
|
Fee income and other
|
|
Fee income and other
decreased $194 primarily as a result
of lower variable annuity fee income
due to a decline in average account
values. The decrease in average
variable annuity account values can
be attributed to market depreciation
of $32.8 billion and net outflows of
$7.0 billion during the last 12
months. Net outflows were driven by
decreased sales, and continued
surrender activity resulting from
the aging of the variable annuity
in-force block of business. Also
contributing to the decrease in fee
income was lower mutual fund fees
due to declining assets under
management primarily driven by
market depreciation of $17.0
billion, partially offset by $1.2
billion of net flows. |
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
Net investment income was
lower primarily due to a $33 decline
in income from limited partnerships
and other alternative investments,
combined with lower yields on fixed
maturity investments due to interest
rate declines and a greater
percentage of short term investments
in the asset portfolio, partially
offset by an increase in general
account assets. |
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss
adjustment expenses increased
primarily as a result of the impact
of the 2009 Unlock which increased
the benefit ratio used in the
calculation of GMDB reserves. |
59
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs and other
expenses
|
|
Insurance operating costs
and other expenses decreased
primarily as a result of lower asset
based trail commissions due to
equity market declines. |
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs and present value
of future profits (DAC)
|
|
Amortization of DAC
increased primarily due to the
impact of the 2009 Unlock charge as
compared to the first quarter of
2008, when there was no unlock.
Additionally, the adoption of SFAS
157 at the beginning of the first
quarter of 2008 resulted in a DAC
benefit. |
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
The effective tax rate
decreased to 38% from 56% for the
three month periods ended March 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. This
change in rate was principally
driven by the increase in pre-tax
losses caused by the DAC Unlock.
The tax benefits of DRD and other
permanent differences were
relatively consistent for the three
month periods ending March 31, 2009
and 2008. |
60
INDIVIDUAL LIFE
Operating Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Fee income and other |
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
Earned premiums |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Net investment income |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account Values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable universal life insurance |
|
$ |
4,550 |
|
|
$ |
6,620 |
|
|
|
(31 |
%) |
Universal life/interest sensitive whole life |
|
|
4,788 |
|
|
|
4,485 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Modified guaranteed life and other |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total account values |
|
$ |
9,981 |
|
|
$ |
11,779 |
|
|
|
(15 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance In-force |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable universal life insurance |
|
$ |
77,913 |
|
|
$ |
78,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
Universal life/interest sensitive whole life |
|
|
52,711 |
|
|
|
49,415 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Term life |
|
|
65,318 |
|
|
|
54,369 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Modified guaranteed life and other |
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total life insurance in-force |
|
$ |
196,853 |
|
|
$ |
182,898 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Net income decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2009, driven primarily by the impact of
the Unlock in the first quarter of 2009. For further discussion on the Unlock, see the Critical
Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A. The following other factors contributed to the changes
in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
Fee income and other
|
|
|
|
Fee income and other
increased primarily due the impact
of the 2009 Unlock and an increase
in cost of insurance charges of $12
as a result of growth in guaranteed
universal life insurance in-force.
Partially offsetting this increase
is lower variable life fees as a
result of equity market declines. |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
Net investment income was
lower primarily due to a $12
decline in income from limited
partnership and other alternative
investments combined with lower
yields on fixed maturity
investments, partially offset by
growth in general account values. |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses
|
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss
adjustment expenses increased as a
result of higher death benefits
consistent with a larger life
insurance in-force and an increase
in net amount at risk for variable
universal life policies caused by
equity market declines, as well as
an increase in reserves related to
secondary guarantee universal life
business. |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs and other
expenses
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs
and other increased less than the
growth of in-force business as a
result of active expense management
efforts. |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of DAC
|
|
|
|
Amortization of DAC
increased primarily as a result of
the Unlock charge in the first
quarter of 2009, partially offset
by reduced DAC amortization
primarily attributed to net
realized capital losses. This
increase in DAC amortization had a
partial offset in amortization of
deferred revenues, included in fee
income. |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
March 31, 2009, the income tax
benefit as compared to the prior
years income tax expense was a
result of losses before income
taxes primarily due to an increase
in DAC amortization. |
61
RETIREMENT PLANS
Operating Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Fee income and other |
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Earned premiums |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
(13 |
%) |
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(25 |
%) |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
76 |
% |
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(88 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Under Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403(b)/457 account values |
|
$ |
10,004 |
|
|
$ |
11,926 |
|
|
|
(16 |
%) |
401(k) account values |
|
|
11,848 |
|
|
|
14,413 |
|
|
|
(18 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total account values [1] |
|
|
21,852 |
|
|
|
26,339 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
403(b)/457 mutual fund assets under management |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
401(k) mutual fund assets under management |
|
|
14,017 |
|
|
|
20,005 |
|
|
|
(30 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mutual fund assets under management |
|
|
14,144 |
|
|
|
20,071 |
|
|
|
(30 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under management |
|
$ |
35,996 |
|
|
$ |
46,410 |
|
|
|
(22 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under administration 401(k) |
|
$ |
5,024 |
|
|
$ |
5,666 |
|
|
|
(11 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes policyholder balances for investment contracts and reserves for future policy
benefits for insurance contracts. |
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Net loss in Retirement Plans increased due to higher net realized capital losses, the DAC Unlock in
the first quarter of 2009, lower net investment income and increased operating expenses partially
offset by growth in fee income. For further discussion of net realized capital losses, see
Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment table under Lifes Operating section of the MD&A. For
further discussion of the DAC Unlock, see the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A.
The following other factors contributed to the changes in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
Fee income and other
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, fee income and other increased primarily due to fees earned on assets relating to
the acquisition in the first quarter of 2008. Offsetting this increase was lower annuity fees driven by lower average account values
as market depreciation of $6.6 billion was partially offset by positive net flows of $2.1 billion. |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
Net investment income declined due to a decrease in the returns from limited partnership and other alternative investment
income. |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating
costs and other
expenses
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs and other expenses increased primarily attributable to 2009 including a full quarter of operating
expenses associated with the businesses acquired in the latter part of the first quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of DAC
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits increased for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 as a result of the DAC Unlock in the first quarter of 2009, partially offset by lower DAC amortization associated with
lower gross profits. |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 the income tax benefit is greater than the prior year periods income tax benefit due
to lower income before income taxes primarily due to increased realized capital losses and the DAC unlock. |
62
GROUP BENEFITS
Operating Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Premiums and other considerations |
|
$ |
1,138 |
|
|
$ |
1,074 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Net investment income |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
(14 |
%) |
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
108 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned Premiums and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully insured ongoing premiums |
|
$ |
1,126 |
|
|
$ |
1,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earned premiums and other |
|
$ |
1,138 |
|
|
$ |
1,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios, excluding buyouts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss ratio |
|
|
75.6 |
% |
|
|
73.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Loss ratio, excluding financial institutions |
|
|
78.7 |
% |
|
|
78.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Expense ratio |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Expense ratio, excluding financial institutions |
|
|
21.4 |
% |
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
The increase in net income for the three months ended March 31, 2009, was primarily due to realized
capital gains in 2009 as compared to realized capital losses in 2008. For further discussion, see
Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment table under Lifes Operating Section of the MD&A. The
following other factors contributed to the changes in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and other considerations
|
|
|
|
Premiums and other
considerations increased largely due
to business growth driven by new
sales and persistency over the last
twelve months. |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
March 31, 2009, net investment
income decreased primarily as a
result of lower yields on fixed
maturity investments and lower
limited partnership and other
alternative investment returns. |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses/Loss ratio
|
|
|
|
The segments loss ratio
(defined as benefits, losses and
loss adjustment expenses as a
percentage of premiums and other
considerations excluding buyouts)
increased primarily due to
unfavorable mortality in the
experience rated financial
institutions business, and
morbidity, partially offset by
favorable experience in certain
specialty lines. The impact of the
experience rated business inversely
affects the commission expense. |
|
|
|
|
|
Expense ratio
|
|
|
|
The segments expense ratio,
excluding buyouts decreased compared
to the prior year due primarily to
lower commission expense on the
experience rated business and lower
operating expenses. |
63
INTERNATIONAL
Operating Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Fee income |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
|
(20 |
%) |
Earned premiums |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues [1] |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
NM | |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
NM |
|
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
NM | |
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
NM | |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) [2] |
|
$ |
(293 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
NM | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Under Management Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan variable annuity account values |
|
$ |
26,567 |
|
|
$ |
36,777 |
|
|
|
(28 |
%) |
Japan MVA fixed annuity and other account values [3] |
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
2,198 |
|
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under management Japan |
|
$ |
30,946 |
|
|
$ |
38,975 |
|
|
|
(21 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The transition impact related to the SFAS 157 adoption was a reduction in revenues of $34 during the three months ended March 31, 2008. |
|
[2] |
|
The transition impact related to the SFAS 157 adoption was a reduction in net income of $11 during the three months ended March 31, 2008. |
|
[3] |
|
Japan fixed annuity and other account values includes an increase due to the net triggering
impact of the GMIB pay-out annuity account value for the 3 Win product of $1.8 billion as of March 31, 2009. |
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Net income decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as a result of the 2009 Unlock, a
decrease in fee income, and an increase in insurance operating costs and other expenses, partially
offset by realized capital gains. For further discussion on the Unlock, see the Critical Accounting
Estimates section of the MD&A. For further discussion of realized capital gains, see Realized
Capital Gains and Losses by Segment table under Lifes Operating Section of the MD&A. The
following other factors contributed to the changes in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
Fee income
|
|
|
|
Fee income decreased $46
primarily as a result of lower
variable annuity fee income due to a
decline in Japans variable annuity
assets under management. The
decrease in average assets under
management over the prior year
quarter was attributed to market
depreciation of $7.9 billion and net
outflows of $2.3 billion mainly
attributed to the 3 Win trigger. The
weakening of the yen also caused an
unfavorable foreign currency
exchange of $70. |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses
|
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss
adjustment expense increased for the
three months ended March 31, 2009,
as a result of the impacts of the
Unlock in the first quarter of 2009,
as well as higher GMDB net amount at
risk, increased claims costs and 3
Win related charges of $39,
after-tax. |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs and other
expenses
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs
and other expenses increased for the
three months ended March 31, 2009
due to the growth and strategic
investment in Other International
operations, as well as lower
capitalization of deferred policy
acquisition costs, as acquisition
costs exceeded pricing allowables. |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of DAC
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs and present
value of future profits increased
for the three months ended March 31,
2009 as a result of the impacts of
the Unlock in the first quarter of
2009. For further discussion on the
Unlock, see the Critical Accounting
Estimates section of the MD&A. |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit for the
three months ended March 31, 2009
was primarily a result of a decline
in income before taxes due to the
2009 Unlock. |
64
INSTITUTIONAL
Operating Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Fee income and other |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Earned premiums |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Net investment income |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
(34 |
%) |
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
(33 |
%) |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
%) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
|
$ |
(120 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Under Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional account values [1] |
|
$ |
24,954 |
|
|
$ |
25,284 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
Private Placement Life Insurance account values [1] |
|
|
32,154 |
|
|
|
32,784 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Mutual fund assets under management |
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
|
3,489 |
|
|
|
(31 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under management |
|
$ |
59,524 |
|
|
$ |
61,557 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes policyholder balances for investment contracts and reserves for future policy benefits
for insurance contracts. |
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Net loss in Institutional increased for the three months ended March 31, 2009, primarily due to a
decline in net investment spread and increased net realized capital losses. For further discussion
of net realized capital losses, see Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment table under Lifes
Operating Section of the MD&A. Further discussion of income is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums increased
compared to the prior year due to
greater life contingent structured
settlement business sold subsequent
to the first quarter of 2008. The
increase in earned premiums was
offset by a corresponding increase
in benefits, losses, and loss
adjustment expenses. |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
declined for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, due to decreased
returns on limited partnership and
other alternative investments of
$(42). The additional decline is
attributable to lower yields on
variable rate securities due to
declines in short term interest
rates, and an increased allocation
to lower yielding U.S. Treasuries
and short-term investments. The
lower yield on variable rate
securities was partially offset by a
corresponding decrease in interest
credited on liabilities reported in
benefits, losses, and loss
adjustment expenses. |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
The income tax benefit for
the three months ended March 31,
2009 increased compared to the prior
year primarily due to a decline in
income before taxes due to a decline
in net investment spread and
increased realized capital losses.
For further discussion of net
realized capital losses, see
Realized Capital Gains and Losses by
Segment table under the Operating
section of the MD&A. |
65
OTHER
Operating Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Fee income and other |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
(28 |
%) |
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for sale and other |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Equity securities, held for trading [1] |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(3,578 |
) |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net investment loss |
|
|
(700 |
) |
|
|
(3,559 |
) |
|
|
80 |
% |
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
(3,567 |
) |
|
|
80 |
% |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(30 |
%) |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses returns credited on International
variable annuities [1] |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(3,578 |
) |
|
|
80 |
% |
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(67 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
(691 |
) |
|
|
(3,523 |
) |
|
|
80 |
% |
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
57 |
% |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes investment income and mark-to-market effects of equity securities held for trading
supporting the international variable annuity business, which are classified in net investment
income with corresponding amounts credited to policyholders within benefits, losses and loss
adjustment expenses. |
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment loss
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
on securities available-for
sale and other increased for
the three months ended March
31, 2009 as compared to the
prior year period due to an
increase in the amount of
capital retained in corporate.
Offsetting this increase is a
charge from the elimination of
the impact of the
inter-segment funding
agreement as well declines in
yields on fixed maturity
investments and declines in
limited partnerships and other
alternative investment income. |
|
|
|
|
|
Realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
See Realized Capital
Gains and Losses by Segment
table under Lifes Operating
section of the MD&A. |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs and other
expenses
|
|
|
|
For the three months
ended March 31, 2008,
insurance operating costs and
other expenses included
interest charged by Corporate
on the amount of capital held
by the Life operations in
excess of the amount needed to
support the capital
requirements of the Life
Operations whereas no interest
was charged by Corporate in
the first quarter of 2009.
Offsetting this decrease is a
benefit from the elimination
of the impact of the
inter-segment funding
agreement. |
66
PROPERTY & CASUALTY
Executive Overview
Property & Casualty is organized into five reporting segments: the underwriting segments of
Personal Lines, Small Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial (collectively, Ongoing
Operations); and the Other Operations segment.
Property & Casualty provides a number of coverages, as well as insurance related services, to
businesses throughout the United States, including workers compensation, property, automobile,
liability, umbrella, specialty casualty, marine, livestock, fidelity, surety, professional
liability and directors and officers liability coverages. Property & Casualty also provides
automobile, homeowners and home-based business coverage to individuals throughout the United States
as well as insurance-related services to businesses.
Property & Casualty derives its revenues principally from premiums earned for insurance coverages
provided to insureds, investment income, and, to a lesser extent, from fees earned for services
provided to third parties and net realized capital gains and losses. Premiums charged for
insurance coverages are earned principally on a pro rata basis over the terms of the related
policies in-force.
Service fees principally include revenues from third party claims administration services provided
by Specialty Risk Services and revenues from member contact center services provided through the
AARP Health program.
Total Property & Casualty Financial Highlights
The following discusses Property & Casualty financial highlights for the three months ended March
31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Premium revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Written Premiums [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines |
|
$ |
944 |
|
|
$ |
936 |
|
Small Commercial |
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
Middle Market |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,459 |
|
|
$ |
2,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned Premiums [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines |
|
$ |
979 |
|
|
$ |
983 |
|
Small Commercial |
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
Middle Market |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,511 |
|
|
$ |
2,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The difference between written premiums and earned premiums is attributable to the change in
unearned premium reserve. |
67
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Earned Premiums
Total Property & Casualty earned premiums decreased $103, or 4%, primarily due to lower earned
premiums in Small Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial.
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
|
Earned premium remained relatively flat at
$979 as a $16, or 2%, increase in AARP earned
premiums was offset by a $20, or 7% decrease in
Agency and Other earned premiums. AARP earned
premiums grew primarily due to earned pricing
increases, an increase in the size of the AARP target
market, the effect of direct marketing programs and
the effect of cross selling homeowners insurance to
insureds who have auto policies. Agency earned
premium decreased $16, or 6%, largely due to a
decline in premium renewal retention since the middle
of 2008, partially offset by earned pricing
increases. |
|
|
|
|
|
Small Commercial
|
|
|
|
Earned premium decreased by $35, or 5%,
primarily due to lower earned audit premium on
workers compensation business and the effect of
non-renewals outpacing new business over the last
nine months of 2008 in all lines, including workers
compensation, package business and commercial auto. |
|
|
|
|
|
Middle Market
|
|
|
|
Earned premium decreased by $45, or 8%,
primarily driven by decreases in general liability
and commercial auto driven by earned pricing
decreases and the effect of a decline in new business
over the last nine months of 2008 and first three
months of 2009. Middle Market workers compensation
earned premium increased modestly as the effect of an
increase in new business written premium over the
last nine months of 2008 and first three months of
2009 was partially offset by lower earned audit
premium in the first quarter of 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Commercial
|
|
|
|
Earned premium decreased by $18, or 5%,
driven primarily by a decrease in property business
due largely to the Companys decision to stop writing
specialty property business with large, national
accounts and the effect of increased competition for
core excess and surplus lines business. |
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Underwriting results before
catastrophes and prior accident year
development |
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
313 |
|
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
Prior accident year reserve development |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
Net servicing income (loss) [1] |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Net investment income |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Net of expenses related to service business. |
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Gross gains on sales |
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
Gross losses on sales |
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
Impairments |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
Periodic net coupon settlements on credit derivatives |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital losses, before-tax |
|
$ |
(323 |
) |
|
$ |
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Net income decreased by $214, or 66%, primarily driven by higher net realized capital losses, lower
net investment income and lower underwriting results.
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital losses |
|
Gross gains (losses) on sales, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross gains on sales for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 were primarily
from sales of equity and U.S. government
securities. Gross losses on sales were
predominately from sales of financial
services securities and lower quality
securities, mainly CMBS, RMBS and below
investment grade corporate securities and
were on securities that had declined in
value since December 31, 2008. These
losses resulted primarily from an effort to
reduce portfolio risk
while simultaneously reallocating the
portfolio to securities with more favorable
risk/return profiles. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross losses on sales for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 were
predominantly within fixed maturities and
were comprised of corporate securities and
CMBS, as well as $19 of CLOs for which
HIMCO is the collateral manager. Gross
gains and losses on sales, excluding the
loss on CLOs, resulted from the decision to
reallocate the portfolio to securities with
more favorable risk/return profiles. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments of $36 in 2009
primarily consisted of impairments of
subordinated fixed maturities and preferred
equities within the financial services
sector as well as of securitized assets.
Impairments of $73 in 2008 primarily
consisted of the impairment of an
investment in a financial services company
that experienced a lack of liquidity and
impairments on commercial real estate CDOs.
See the Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
discussion within Investment Results in the
Investments section of the MD&A for more
information on the impairments recorded in
2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net losses for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 primarily
related to a $26 increase in the valuation
allowance on impaired mortgage loans and
net losses on credit derivatives. These
losses were partially offset by an $18 gain
on the sale of First State Management Group
(FSMG) and gains on currency derivatives
which were primarily driven by the
depreciation of the Euro against the U.S.
dollar. For more information regarding the
sale of FSMG, refer to Note 15 of Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net losses for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 primarily
resulted from the change in value
associated with credit derivatives due to
credit spread widening and losses on HIMCO
managed CLOs of $17. Credit spreads
widened primarily due to the deterioration
in the U.S. housing market, tightened
lending conditions, the markets flight to
quality securities, as well as increased
likelihood of a U.S. recession. |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
Primarily driving the $140 decrease
in net investment income was a $75 increase
in losses from limited partnerships and
other alternative investments and a $67
decrease in investment income from fixed
maturities. The increased losses from
limited partnerships and other alternative
investments were primarily driven by losses
on real estate and private equity
partnerships. The decrease in fixed
maturity income was primarily due to a
lower yield on variable rate securities due
to declines in short-term interest rates
and increased allocation to lower-yielding
U.S. Treasuries and short-term investments.
Also contributing to the decrease in fixed
maturity income was a decrease in the level
of invested assets. |
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results
|
|
|
|
The $67 decrease in underwriting
results before catastrophes and prior
accident year reserve development was
primarily driven by a $103 decrease in
earned premium and a 0.8 point increase in
the current accident year loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio before
catastrophes. The 0.8 point increase in the
current accident year loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio before
catastrophes was principally driven by an
increase in claim severity for homeowners
and Small Commercial package business,
partially offset by a decrease in loss
costs for Personal Lines auto claims. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year catastrophe
losses increased by $15 as 2009 losses from
ice storms and windstorms in the Southeast
and Midwest were greater than 2008 losses
from tornadoes and thunderstorms in the
South and winter storms along the Pacific
coast. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $32 increase in net favorable
prior accident year reserve development was
largely due to an increase in net favorable
reserve development in Ongoing Operations
and a decrease in net unfavorable reserve
development in Other Operations. Net
favorable reserve development for Ongoing
Operations in 2009 was largely due to
releases of reserves for general liability,
workers compensation and professional
liability claims. Refer to the Reserves
section of the MD&A for further discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
|
Income taxes changed from income
tax expense of $126 in 2008 to an income
tax benefit of $2 in 2009. Contributing to
the small income tax benefit in 2009 was a
$17 benefit from a tax true-up. Apart from
the tax true-up, the effective tax rate on
pre-tax income dropped from 28% in 2008 to
13% in 2009. Due primarily to the larger
amount of net realized losses from
investments in 2009, net investment income
generated from tax-exempt securities
represented a greater share of pre-tax
income in 2009 than in 2008. |
69
Key Performance Ratios and Measures
The Company considers several measures and ratios to be the key performance indicators for the
property and casualty underwriting businesses. For a detailed discussion of the Companys key
performance and profitability ratios and measures, see the Property & Casualty Executive Overview
section of the MD&A included in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report. The following table
and the segment discussions include the more significant ratios and measures of profitability for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. Management believes that these ratios and measures
are useful in understanding the underlying trends in The Hartfords property and casualty insurance
underwriting business. However, these key performance indicators should only be used in
conjunction with, and not in lieu of, underwriting income for the underwriting segments of Personal
Lines, Small Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial and net income for the Property &
Casualty business as a whole, Ongoing Operations and Other Operations. These ratios and measures
may not be comparable to other performance measures used by the Companys competitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Ongoing Operations earned premium growth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Small Commercial |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
1 |
% |
Middle Market |
|
|
(8 |
%) |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Ongoing Operations |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations combined ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes and prior year development |
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
|
87.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catastrophe ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Prior years |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total catastrophe ratio |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Non-catastrophe prior year development |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
89.9 |
|
|
|
87.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operations net income |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property & Casualty measures of net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment yield, after-tax |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Average invested assets at cost |
|
$ |
27,157 |
|
|
$ |
30,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Ongoing Operations earned premium growth
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
|
The change from 3% earned
premium growth in 2008 to no growth
in 2009 was primarily due to a
change to declining earned premium
in Agency and a lower growth rate on
AARP business. The effects of
declining auto and homeowners
renewal retention since the
beginning of 2008 were partially
offset by the effect of higher
earned pricing increases for both
auto and homeowners in 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
Small Commercial
|
|
|
|
The change from 1% earned
premium growth in 2008 to a 5%
earned premium decline in 2009 was
primarily attributable to decreasing
premium renewal retention since the
second quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
Middle Market
|
|
|
|
Earned premium declined at a
higher rate in 2009 than in 2008
primarily due to the effect of a
decrease in premium renewal
retention beginning in the fourth
quarter of 2008, partially offset by
a change to new business growth in
the last nine months of 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Commercial
|
|
|
|
Earned premium decreased by
5% in 2009 compared to a 4% decrease
in 2008. A larger earned premium
decrease in property was partially
offset by an improvement in the rate
of earned premium decline in
casualty. Property earned premium
decreased more significantly in 2009
than in 2008 due, in part, to a
decision to stop writing specialty
property business with large,
national accounts. |
70
Ongoing Operations combined ratio
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Ongoing Operations combined ratio increased 2.1
points, to 89.9, due to a 2.1 point increase in the combined ratio before catastrophes and prior
accident year development and a 1.3 point increase in the catastrophe ratio, partially offset by a
1.4 point improvement in non-catastrophe prior accident year reserve development.
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes
and prior accident year development
|
|
|
|
The 2.1 increase in the
combined ratio before catastrophes
and prior accident year development,
from 87.9 to 90.0, was due to a 1.3
point increase in the expense ratio
and a 0.8 point increase in the
current accident year loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio before
catastrophes. The expense ratio in
2009 benefited from a $14, or 0.6
point, reduction in assessments
related to hurricane Ike. Apart
from the reduction in Ike-related
assessments, the expense ratio
increased by 1.9 points primarily
due to a decrease in earned premium
coupled with an increase in
insurance operating costs and
expenses in Small Commercial and
Specialty Commercial and higher
amortization of acquisition costs on
AARP and other direct-to-consumer
Personal Lines business. The 0.8
point increase in the current
accident year loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio was
primarily due to an increase in
claim severity for homeowners and
Small Commercial package business,
partially offset by a decrease in
loss costs on Personal Lines auto
claims. |
|
|
|
|
|
Catastrophes
|
|
|
|
The catastrophe ratio
increased 1.3 points, to 2.8, due to
an increase in current accident year
catastrophes and a change from net
favorable prior accident year
catastrophe reserve development in
2008 to net unfavorable catastrophe
reserve development in 2009.
Current accident year catastrophes
in 2009 included losses from ice
storms and windstorms in the
Southeast and Midwest. |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-catastrophe
prior accident year development
|
|
|
|
Net non-catastrophe prior
accident year reserve development
was favorable in both 2009 and 2008.
Favorable reserve development in
2009 included, among other reserve
changes, the release of reserves for
general liability claims primarily
related to accident years 2005 to
2007, the release of reserves for
workers compensation claims,
primarily related to accident years
2003 to 2007 and the release of
reserves for directors and
officers claims for the 2006
accident year. See the Reserves
section for a discussion of prior
accident year reserve development
for Ongoing Operations in 2009. |
Other Operations net income
|
|
Other Operations reported net income of $1 in the three months ended March 31, 2009
compared to net income of $14 for the comparable period in 2008. The decrease in net income
was primarily due to an increase in net realized capital losses and a decrease in net
investment income, partially offset by a reduction in net unfavorable prior accident year
reserve development. See the Other Operations segment MD&A for further discussion. |
Investment yield and average invested assets
|
|
In 2009, the after-tax investment yield decreased due to larger losses in the first quarter
of 2009 on limited partnership and other alternative investments, driven by negative returns
on real estate and private equity partnerships. Also contributing to the decrease was a lower
yield on variable rate securities due to declines in short-term interest rates and increased
allocation to lower-yielding U.S. Treasuries and short-term investments. |
|
|
|
The average annual invested assets at cost decreased as a result of impairments of fixed
maturity investments, the return of borrowed securities to lenders and dividends paid to
Corporate, partially offset by positive operating cash flows. |
71
Reserves
Reserving for property and casualty losses is an estimation process. As additional experience and
other relevant claim data become available, reserve levels are adjusted accordingly. Such
adjustments of reserves related to claims incurred in prior years are a natural occurrence in the
loss reserving process and are referred to as reserve development. Reserve development that
increases previous estimates of ultimate cost is called reserve strengthening. Reserve
development that decreases previous estimates of ultimate cost is called reserve releases.
Reserve development can influence the comparability of year over year underwriting results and is
set forth in the paragraphs and tables that follow. The prior accident year development (pts) in
the following table represents the ratio of reserve development to earned premiums. For a detailed
discussion of the Companys reserve policies, see Notes 1, 11 and 12 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements and the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A included in The
Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Based on the results of the quarterly reserve review process, the Company determines the
appropriate reserve adjustments, if any, to record. Recorded reserve estimates are changed after
consideration of numerous factors, including but not limited to, the magnitude of the difference
between the actuarial indication and the recorded reserves, improvement or deterioration of
actuarial indications in the period, the maturity of the accident year, trends observed over the
recent past and the level of volatility within a particular line of business. In general, changes
are made more quickly to more mature accident years and less volatile lines of business. For
information regarding reserving for asbestos and environmental claims within Other Operations,
refer to the Other Operations segment discussion.
As part of its quarterly reserve review process, the Company is closely monitoring reported loss
development in certain lines where the recent emergence of paid losses and case reserves could
indicate a trend that may eventually lead the Company to change its estimate of ultimate losses in
those lines. If, and when, the emergence of reported losses is determined to be a trend that
changes the Companys estimate of ultimate losses, prior accident year reserves would be adjusted
in the period the change in estimate is made.
Reserves for Personal Lines auto liability claims have also emerged favorably in recent accident
years. Severity of reported claims for accidents years 2005 to 2007 has been lower than expected
and reserves were released in the first quarter of 2009 as a result. If these favorable trends
continue, future releases are possible.
While the Company expects its losses from the sub-prime mortgage and credit crisis, as well as its
exposure to the Madoff and Stanford cases to be manageable, there is nonetheless the risk that
claims under directors and officers (D&O) and errors and omissions (E&O) insurance policies
incurred in the 2007 and 2008 accident years may develop adversely as the claims are settled. On
the other hand, for the 2003 to 2006 accident years, reported losses for claims under D&O and E&O
policies have been emerging favorably to initial expectations due to lower than expected claim
severity. The Company released a total of $20 of reserves for D&O and E&O claims in the first
three months of 2009 related to the 2006 accident year. Any continued favorable emergence of
claims under D&O and E&O insurance policies for the 2006 and prior accident years could lead the
Company to reduce reserves for these liabilities in future quarters.
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company increased its estimate of unreported claims related
to customs bonds. Because the pattern of claim reporting for customs bonds has not been similar to
the reporting pattern of other surety bonds, future claim activity is difficult to predict. It is
possible that as additional claim activity emerges, our estimate of both the number of future
claims and the cost of those claims could change substantially, resulting in significant additional
reserve strengthening.
The Company expects to perform its regular reviews of asbestos liabilities in the second quarter of
2009, Other Operations reinsurance recoverables and the allowance for uncollectible reinsurance in
the second quarter of 2009 and environmental liabilities in the third quarter of 2009. If there
are significant developments that affect particular exposures, reinsurance arrangements or the
financial conditions of particular reinsurers, the Company will make adjustments to its reserves,
or the portion of liabilities it expects to cede to reinsurers.
72
A roll-forward follows of Property & Casualty liabilities for unpaid losses and loss adjustment
expenses by segment for the three months ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Personal |
|
|
Small |
|
|
Middle |
|
|
Specialty |
|
|
Ongoing |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Lines |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
P&C |
|
Beginning liabilities for unpaid losses and loss adjustment
expenses-gross |
|
$ |
2,052 |
|
|
$ |
3,572 |
|
|
$ |
4,744 |
|
|
$ |
6,981 |
|
|
$ |
17,349 |
|
|
$ |
4,584 |
|
|
$ |
21,933 |
|
Reinsurance and other recoverables |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
|
2,783 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
3,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning liabilities for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses-net |
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
|
|
4,871 |
|
|
|
14,566 |
|
|
|
3,781 |
|
|
|
18,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
Prior accident years |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(1,553 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(1,663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending liabilities for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses-net |
|
|
1,966 |
|
|
|
3,420 |
|
|
|
4,281 |
|
|
|
4,924 |
|
|
|
14,591 |
|
|
|
3,671 |
|
|
|
18,262 |
|
Reinsurance and other recoverables |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
2,063 |
|
|
|
2,749 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending liabilities for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses-gross
|
|
$ |
2,024 |
|
|
$ |
3,590 |
|
|
$ |
4,739 |
|
|
$ |
6,987 |
|
|
$ |
17,340 |
|
|
$ |
4,464 |
|
|
$ |
21,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
$ |
979 |
|
|
$ |
652 |
|
|
$ |
548 |
|
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
$ |
2,511 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,511 |
|
Loss and loss expense paid ratio [1] |
|
|
72.1 |
|
|
|
53.6 |
|
|
|
62.7 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
61.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense incurred ratio |
|
|
69.4 |
|
|
|
57.3 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
|
|
|
62.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior accident year development (pts) [2] |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The loss and loss expense paid ratio represents the ratio of paid losses and loss adjustment expenses to earned premiums. |
|
[2] |
|
Prior accident year development (pts) represents the ratio of prior accident year development to earned premiums. |
Prior accident year development recorded in 2009
Included within prior accident year development for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were the
following reserve strengthenings (releases):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal |
|
|
Small |
|
|
Middle |
|
|
Specialty |
|
|
Ongoing |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Lines |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
P&C |
|
Released general liability reserves primarily for accident years 2005 to 2007
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
Released workers compensation reserves, primarily related to accident years 2003 to 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Released reserves for directors and officers claims for accident year 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Released reserves for personal auto liability claims primarily related to accident years 2005 to 2007 |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Strengthened reserves for homeowners claims primarily related to accident years 2000 to 2008 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
Strengthened reserves for package business liability claims for accident years 2000 to 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Strengthened reserves for surety business primarily related to accident years 2004 to 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other reserve re-estimates, net [1] |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total prior accident year development for the three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes reserve discount accretion of $6, including $2 in Small Commercial, $2 in Middle
Market and $2 in Specialty Commercial. |
73
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Companys re-estimates of prior accident year
reserves included the following significant reserve changes:
Ongoing Operations
|
|
Released reserves for general liability claims by $38, primarily related to the 2005 to
2007 accident years. Beginning in the third quarter of 2007, the Company observed that
reported losses for high hazard and umbrella general liability claims, primarily related to
the 2001 to 2006 accident years, were emerging favorably and this caused management to reduce
its estimate of the cost of future reported claims for these accident years, resulting in a
reserve release in each quarter since the third quarter of 2007. During the first quarter of
2009, management determined that the lower level of loss emergence would likely continue for
recent accident years, including the 2007 accident year and, as a result, the Company reduced
the reserves. |
|
|
|
Released workers compensation reserves by $23, primarily related to allocated loss
adjustment expense reserves in accident years 2003 to 2007. During the first quarter of 2008,
the Company observed lower than expected expense payments on older accident years. As a
result, the Company reduced its estimate for future expense payments on more recent accident
years. |
|
|
|
Released reserves for professional liability claims for the 2006 accident year by $20.
Beginning in 2008, the Company observed that claim severity for both directors and officers
and errors and omissions claims for the 2003 to 2006 accident years was developing favorably
to previous expectations and the Company released reserves for these accident years in 2008.
During the first three months of 2009, the Company updated its analysis of certain
professional liability claims and the new analysis showed that claim severity for directors
and officers losses in the 2006 accident year continued to develop favorably to previous
expectations, resulting in a $20 reduction of reserves in the first quarter. |
|
|
|
Released reserves for Personal Lines auto liability claims by $18, principally related to
AARP business for the 2005 through 2007 accident years. Beginning in the first quarter of
2008, management observed an improvement in emerged claim severity for the 2005 through 2007
accident years attributed, in part, to changes made in claim handling procedures in 2007. In
the first quarter of 2009, the Company recognized that favorable development in reported
severity was a sustained trend and, accordingly, management reduced its reserve estimate. |
|
|
|
Strengthened reserves for homeowners claims by $18, primarily driven by increased claim
settlement costs in recent accident years and increased losses from underground storage tanks
in older accident years. In 2008, the Company began to observe increasing claim settlement
costs for the 2005 to 2008 accident years and, in the first quarter of 2009, determined that
this higher cost level would continue, resulting in a reserve strengthening of $9 for these
accident years. In addition, beginning in 2008, the Company observed unfavorable emergence of
homeowners casualty claims for accident years 2003 and prior, primarily related to
underground storage tanks. Following a detailed review of these claims in the first quarter of
2009, management increased its estimate of the magnitude of this exposure and strengthened
homeowners casualty claim reserves by $9. |
|
|
|
Strengthened reserves for liability claims under Small Commercial package policies by $16,
primarily related to allocated loss adjustment expenses for accident years 2000 to 2005.
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company identified higher than expected expense payments
on older accident years related to the liability coverage. As a result, the Company increased
its estimate for future expense payments on more recent accident years. |
|
|
|
Strengthened reserves for surety business by a net of $10, primarily related to accident
years 2004 to 2007. The net $10 of strengthening consists of $20 strengthening of reserves for
customs bonds, partially offset by a $10 release of reserve for contract surety claims.
During 2008, the Company became aware that there were a large number of late reported surety
claims related to customs bonds. During the first quarter of 2009, the high volume of late
reported claims continued and the Company determined that the higher level of reported claims
would continue to emerge and, as a result, strengthened reserves by $20. |
74
Risk Management Strategy
Refer to the MD&A in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report for an explanation of Property &
Casualtys risk management strategy.
The Texas Windstorm Insurance Association (TWIA)
The Texas Windstorm Insurance Association (TWIA) provides hail and windstorm coverage to Texas
residents of 14 counties along the Texas Gulf coast who are unable to obtain insurance from other
carriers. Insurance carriers who write property insurance in the state of Texas, including The
Hartford, are required to be members of TWIA and are obligated to pay assessments in the event that
TWIA losses exceed funds on hand, the available funds in the Texas Catastrophe Reserve Trust Fund
(CRTF) and any available reinsurance. Assessments are allocated to carriers based on their share
of premium writings in the state of Texas, as defined.
During 2008, the board of directors of TWIA notified its member companies that it would assess them
$430 to cover TWIA losses from hurricane Ike.
The TWIA board indicated that the first $370 of TWIA losses from hurricane Ike would be covered by
the CRTF, but that the cost of TWIA losses and reinstatement premium above that amount would be
funded by assessments. Of the $430 in assessments, $230 is to fund the first $230 of TWIA losses
in excess of the $370 available in the CRTF and $200 is to fund additional reinsurance premiums
that TWIA must pay to reinstate a layer of coverage that reimburses TWIA for up to $1.5 billion of
TWIA losses in excess of $600 per occurrence. Thus, TWIAs assessment notice for $430 is based on
an estimate that TWIA losses from hurricane Ike will total approximately $2.1 billion. If TWIA
losses exceed $2.1 billion, the entire amount in excess of $2.1 billion would be recovered from
assessing member companies according to their market share. In notifying member companies in 2008,
TWIAs board of directors stated that actual TWIA losses would likely be greater than $2.1 billion
and, in the third quarter of 2008, management accrued a total of $27 in assessments for Ike based
on an estimate that TWIAs Ike ultimate losses would be approximately $2.5 billion and that
ultimate TWIA assessments to the industry for hurricane Ike would be approximately $830. Of the
$27 in assessments for Ike recorded in the third quarter of 2008, $7 was recorded as incurred
losses within current accident year catastrophes and $20 was recorded as insurance operating costs
and expenses.
In the first quarter of 2009, management learned that TWIA reduced its estimate of ultimate losses
from hurricane Ike to an amount close to the $2.1 billion estimate on which TWIA based its
assessment notice. Given the reduction in estimated TWIA losses from hurricane Ike, the Company
reduced its estimated assessments by $14 in the first quarter of 2009, from $27 to $13, resulting
in a reduction in insurance operating costs and expenses.
Through premium tax credits, member companies may recoup a portion of Ike-related assessments made
to cover the first $2.1 billion of TWIA losses and may recoup all of the Ike-related assessments
made to fund losses in excess of that amount. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the
Company is required to accrue the assessments in the period the assessments become probable and
estimable and the obligating event has occurred. However, premium tax credits may not be recorded
as an asset until the related premium is earned and TWIA requires that premium tax credits be
spread over a period of at least five years. The Company estimates that of the $13 of accrued
assessments for Ike, it will ultimately be able to recoup $8 through premium tax credits.
Reinsurance Recoverables
Refer to the MD&A in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report for an explanation of Property &
Casualtys reinsurance recoverables.
Premium Measures
Written premium is a statutory accounting financial measure which represents the amount of premiums
charged for policies issued, net of reinsurance, during a fiscal period. Earned premium is a
measure under both U.S. GAAP and statutory accounting principles. Premiums are considered earned
and are included in the financial results on a pro rata basis over the policy period. Management
believes that written premium is a performance measure that is useful to investors as it reflects
current trends in the Companys sale of property and casualty insurance products. Written and
earned premium are recorded net of ceded reinsurance premium. Reinstatement premium represents
additional ceded premium paid for the reinstatement of the amount of reinsurance coverage that was
reduced as a result of a reinsurance loss payment.
Unless otherwise specified, the following discussion speaks to changes in the first quarter of 2009
as compared to the first quarter of 2008.
75
TOTAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY
Operating Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Earned premiums |
|
$ |
2,511 |
|
|
$ |
2,614 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Net investment income |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
(38 |
%) |
Other revenues [1] |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
(14 |
%) |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
Prior accident years |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Other expenses |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
(12 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and expenses |
|
|
2,421 |
|
|
|
2,495 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
(76 |
%) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
126 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income [2] |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
|
(66 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
312 |
|
|
|
(64 |
%) |
Other Operations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(93 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property & Casualty net income |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
|
(66 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents servicing revenue. |
|
[2] |
|
Includes net realized capital losses, after-tax, of $211 and $99 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Net income decreased by $214, or 66%, as a result of a $201 decrease in Ongoing Operations net
income and a $13 decrease in Other Operations net income. See the Ongoing Operations and Other
Operations segment MD&A discussions for an analysis of the underwriting results and investment
performance driving the decrease in net income.
76
ONGOING OPERATIONS
Ongoing Operations includes the four underwriting segments of Personal Lines, Small Commercial,
Middle Market and Specialty Commercial.
Operating Summary
Net income for Ongoing Operations includes underwriting results for each of its segments, income
from servicing businesses, net investment income, other expenses and net realized capital gains
(losses), net of related income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
2,458 |
|
|
$ |
2,584 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Change in unearned premium reserve |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
|
2,511 |
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
Prior accident years |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
1,624 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
(20 |
%) |
Net servicing income (loss) [1] |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
(40 |
%) |
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
%) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
(75 |
%) |
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
312 |
|
|
|
(64 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
62.2 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
62.8 |
|
|
|
62.2 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Expense ratio |
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Policyholder dividend ratio |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
89.9 |
|
|
|
87.8 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catastrophe ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total catastrophe ratio |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes |
|
|
87.1 |
|
|
|
86.4 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development |
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
|
87.9 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Net of expenses related to service business. |
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Net income
Net income decreased by $201, due primarily to an increase in net realized capital losses, a
decrease in net investment income and a decrease in underwriting results.
Net realized capital losses increased by $155
The increase in net realized capital losses of $155 in 2009 was primarily due to an increase in
realized losses on sales of securities, including sales of financial services securities and lower
quality securities, mainly CMBS, RMBS and below investment grade corporate securities and were on
securities that had declined in value since December 31, 2008. See the Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments discussion within Investment Results in the Investments section of the MD&A for more
information on the impairments recorded in 2009.
77
Net investment income decreased by $125
Primarily driving the $125 decrease in net investment income was an increase in losses from limited
partnerships and other alternative investments and a decrease in income on fixed maturity
investments. The increased losses on limited partnerships and other alternative investments was
largely driven by losses on real estate and private equity partnerships as a result of volatility
in the equity and credit
markets. The decrease in income from fixed maturities primarily resulted from lower income on
variable rate securities due to declines in short-term interest rates as well as an increased
allocation to lower-yielding U.S. Treasuries and short-term investments. Also contributing to the
decrease in fixed maturity income was a decrease in the level of invested assets.
Underwriting results decreased by $64
Underwriting results decreased by $64 with a corresponding 2.1 point increase in the combined
ratio, from 87.8 to 89.9, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in earned premiums |
|
$ |
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
Volume change Decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes due to the decrease in earned premium |
|
|
63 |
|
Ratio change An increase in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio
before catastrophes |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes |
|
|
44 |
|
Catastrophes Increase in current accident year catastrophe losses |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Reserve changes An increase in net favorable prior accident year reserve development |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
No change in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
Increase in insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase in operating expenses |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in underwriting results from 2008 to 2009 |
|
$ |
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Earned premium decreased by $102
Ongoing Operations earned premiums decreased by $102, or 4%, primarily due to an 8% decrease in
Middle Market and a 5% decrease in both Small Commercial and Specialty Commercial. Refer to the
Earned Premium discussion in the Executive Overview section of the Property & Casualty MD&A for
further discussion of the decrease in earned premium.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses decreased by $46
Current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes decreased by
$44
Ongoing Operations current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes
decreased by $44 due to a decrease in earned premium, partially offset by an increase in the
current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes. The current
accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes increased by 0.8 points,
to 63.0, driven by an increase in Small Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial,
partially offset by a decrease in Personal Lines.
78
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
|
The current accident year loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes in
Personal Lines decreased by 0.5 points, primarily due
to a lower current accident year loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio for auto claims, partially
offset by increased severity of non-catastrophe
losses on homeowners business. Contributing to the
lower loss and loss adjustment expense ratio for auto
claims was lower frequency on auto liability claims
and lower severity on physical damage claims, as well
as the effect of earned pricing increases. |
|
|
|
|
|
Small Commercial
|
|
|
|
The current accident year loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes in Small
Commercial increased by 1.7 points, primarily due
higher losses on package business, partially offset
by a modestly lower loss and loss adjustment expense
ratio on workers compensation business. On package
business, the Company experienced higher
non-catastrophe property losses and higher expected
liability losses, largely due to increased claim cost
severity. On workers compensation business, the
lower current accident year loss and loss adjustment
expense ratio reflects the continuation of a
favorable expected frequency trend, partially offset
by the effect of earned pricing declines and the
effect of a 2009 decrease in estimated audit premium
related to exposures earned in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
Middle Market
|
|
|
|
The current accident year loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes in
Middle Market increased by 1.4 points, primarily due
to a higher loss and loss adjustment expense ratio
for workers compensation, partially offset by lower
non-catastrophe losses on property business, driven
by favorable claim severity. The increase in the
loss and loss adjustment expense ratio for workers
compensation was largely due to the effect of a 2008
increase in estimated audit premium related to
exposures earned in 2007, which reduced the loss and
loss adjustment expense ratio in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Commercial
|
|
|
|
The current accident year loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes in
Specialty Commercial increased by 1.6 points,
primarily due to a higher loss and loss adjustment
ratio on both specialty casualty business and
directors and officers insurance for professional
liability business, driven largely by earned pricing
decreases. |
Current accident year catastrophes increased by $15
Current accident year catastrophe losses of $65, or 2.6 points, in 2009 were higher than current
accident year catastrophe losses of $50, or 1.9 points, in 2008, as 2009 losses from ice storms and
windstorms in the Southeast and Midwest were greater than 2008 losses from tornadoes and
thunderstorms in the South and winter storms along the Pacific coast.
Net favorable prior accident year reserve development increased by $17
Net favorable prior accident year reserve development increased from $51, or 2.0 points, in 2008,
to $68, or 2.7 points, in 2009. Among other reserve changes, net favorable reserve development of
$68 in 2009 included the release of general liability reserves in Middle Market, workers
compensation reserves in Small Commercial and Middle Market and professional liability claim
reserves in Specialty Commercial. Refer to the Reserves section of the MD&A for further
discussion of the prior accident year reserve development in 2009. Among other reserve changes,
net favorable reserve development of $51 in 2008 included workers compensation reserve releases in
Small Commercial and Middle Market.
Operating expenses increased by $8
Insurance operating costs and expenses increased by $8 primarily due to an increase in insurance
operating costs and expenses in Small Commercial and Specialty Commercial, partially offset by a
$14, or 0.6 point, reduction in TWIA assessments related to hurricane Ike. While earned premium
declined, amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs remained flat due to the amortization
of higher acquisition costs on AARP and other direct-to-consumer business. Apart from the
reduction in Ike-related assessments, the expense ratio increased by 1.9 points, to 27.4, primarily
due to a decrease in earned premium coupled with an increase in insurance operating costs and
expenses in Small Commercial and Specialty Commercial and the amortization of higher acquisition
costs on AARP and other direct-to-consumer business.
A $127 change from income tax expense to an income tax benefit
Income taxes changed from income tax expense of $124 in 2008 to an income tax benefit of $3 in
2009. Contributing to the small income tax benefit in 2009 was a $17 benefit from a tax true-up.
Apart from the tax true-up, the effective tax rate on pre-tax income dropped from 28% in 2008 to
13% in 2009. Due primarily to the larger amount of net realized losses from investments in 2009,
net investment income generated from tax-exempt securities represented a greater share of pre-tax
income in 2009 than in 2008.
79
PERSONAL LINES
Premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written Premiums [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AARP |
|
$ |
681 |
|
|
$ |
662 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Agency |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(13 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
944 |
|
|
$ |
936 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Line |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
707 |
|
|
$ |
698 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Homeowners |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
944 |
|
|
$ |
936 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned Premiums [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AARP |
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Agency |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(21 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
979 |
|
|
$ |
983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Line |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
$ |
706 |
|
|
|
|
|
Homeowners |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
979 |
|
|
$ |
983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The difference between written premiums and earned premiums is attributable to the change in
unearned premium reserve. |
Premium Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Policies in-force end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
2,347,967 |
|
|
|
2,339,871 |
|
Homeowners |
|
|
1,460,172 |
|
|
|
1,477,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total policies in-force end of period |
|
|
3,808,139 |
|
|
|
3,817,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New business premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
Homeowners |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Renewal Retention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
Homeowners |
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written Pricing Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Homeowners |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned Pricing Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Homeowners |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
Earned Premiums
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Earned premiums were relatively flat, primarily due to an increase in AARP earned premium, offset
by a decrease in Agency and Other earned premium.
|
|
AARP earned premium grew $16, or 2%, reflecting an increase in earned pricing, growth in
the size of the AARP target market, the effect of direct marketing programs and the effect of
cross selling homeowners insurance to insureds who have auto policies. The effects of earned
pricing increases and an increase in new business beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 were
partially offset by the effect of a decrease in premium renewal retention since the second
quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
Agency earned premium decreased $16, or 6%, due to a decline in premium renewal retention
since the second quarter of 2008 driven, in part, by the Companys decision to stop renewing
Florida homeowners policies sold through agents. Partially offsetting the effect of price
competition on retention was the effect of an increase in the number of agency appointments
and increased flow from existing agents. The decrease in renewal retention was partially
offset by the effect of increases in earned pricing. |
|
|
|
Other earned premium decreased by $4, or 21%, primarily due to a strategic decision to
reduce other affinity business. |
80
Auto earned premium was relatively flat as the effect of modest earned pricing increases was offset
by a decline in premium renewal retention over the last nine months of 2008 and first three months
of 2009. Homeowners earned premium was also relatively flat as the effect of earned pricing
increases was offset by a decline in new business and premium renewal retention over the last nine
months of 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
New business premium
|
|
|
|
Both auto and homeowners new
business written premium increased
in the three months ended March 31,
2009 with auto new business
increasing by $31, or 37%, to $115
and homeowners new business
increasing by $7, or 29%, to $31.
AARP new business written premium
increased primarily due to increased
direct marketing spend, higher auto
policy conversion rates and cross
selling homeowners insurance to
insureds who have auto policies.
Agency new business written premium
increased primarily due to an
increase in the number of policy
quotes and the policy conversion
rate. |
|
|
|
|
|
Premium renewal retention
|
|
|
|
Premium renewal retention
for auto decreased from 88% to 85%
as renewal retention decreased in
both AARP and Agency. The decrease
in auto premium renewal retention
was driven largely by lower than
expected average written premium as
a result of customers reducing
coverage or limits due to current
economic conditions. Premium
renewal retention for homeowners
remained flat at 88% for the three
months ended March 31, 2009, as a
modest increase for AARP business
was offset by a decrease in
retention for Agency business. |
|
|
|
|
|
Earned pricing increase
(decrease)
|
|
|
|
The trend in earned pricing
during 2008 was primarily a
reflection of the written pricing
changes in the last nine months of
2008. Consistent with the fourth
quarter of 2008, written pricing
increased in auto by 3% in the first
quarter of 2009 as the Company has
increased rates in certain states
for certain classes of business to
maintain profitability in the face
of rising loss costs. Homeowners
written pricing continued to
increase due largely to rate
increases and increases in insurance
to value. Insurance to value is the
ratio of the amount of insurance
purchased to the value of the
insured property. |
|
|
|
|
|
Policies in-force
|
|
|
|
The number of policies
in-force was relatively flat for
both auto and homeowners, as a 6%
decline in the number of Agency
policies in-force was largely offset
by a 2% increase in the number of
AARP policies in-force. The number
of Agency policies in-force was
reduced primarily by the Companys decision to
stop renewing Florida homeowners
policies. |
81
Personal Lines Underwriting Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
944 |
|
|
$ |
936 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Change in unearned premium reserve |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
Prior accident years |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
|
(29 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
64.1 |
|
|
|
64.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
69.4 |
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Expense ratio |
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
92.4 |
|
|
|
89.4 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catastrophe ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Prior years |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total catastrophe ratio |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes |
|
|
87.0 |
|
|
|
86.9 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Combined ratio before catastrophes and prior
accident years development |
|
|
87.0 |
|
|
|
87.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues [1] |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents servicing revenues. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
Combined Ratios |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Automobile |
|
|
89.3 |
|
|
|
92.6 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Homeowners |
|
|
100.3 |
|
|
|
81.1 |
|
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
92.4 |
|
|
|
89.4 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
Underwriting results and ratios
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Underwriting results decreased by $30, from $105 to $75, with a corresponding 3.0 point increase in
the combined ratio, from 89.4 to 92.4, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in earned premiums |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
Ratio change A decrease in the current accident loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before
catastrophes |
|
|
5 |
|
Volume change Decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes due to the decrease in earned premium |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes |
|
|
8 |
|
Catastrophes Increase in current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Reserve changes A change from net favorable to net unfavorable prior accident year reserve
development |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase in losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
Increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Decrease in insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in operating expenses |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in underwriting results from 2008 to 2009 |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Earned premium decreased by $4
Earned premiums decreased $4, as earned premium decreases in Agency and Other were largely offset
by growth in AARP. Refer to the Earned Premium section above for further discussion.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses increased by $22
Current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes decreased by
$8
Personal Lines current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes
decreased by $8, to $627, due to a decrease in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment
expense ratio before catastrophes and lower earned premiums. The current accident year loss and
loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes decreased by 0.5 points, to 64.1. The decrease
was primarily due to a lower current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio for auto
claims, partially offset by increased severity of non-catastrophe losses on homeowners business.
Contributing to the lower loss and loss adjustment expense ratio for auto claims was lower
frequency on liability claims, lower severity on physical damage claims and the effect of earned
pricing increases.
Current accident year catastrophes increased by $12
Current accident year catastrophe losses of $42, or 4.3 points, in 2009 were higher than current
accident year catastrophe losses of $30, or 3.1 points, in 2008, as 2009 losses from ice storms and
windstorms in the Southeast and Midwest were greater than 2008 losses from tornadoes and
thunderstorms in the South and winter storms along the Pacific coast.
An $18 change to net unfavorable prior accident year reserve development
Net unfavorable reserve development of $10 in 2009 included an $18 strengthening of reserves for
homeowners business. Net favorable reserve development of $8 in 2008 included a $9 release of
reserves for extra-contractual liability claims related to non-standard auto liability claims in
runoff.
Operating expenses increased by $4
The expense ratio increased by 0.6 points, to 23.0, in 2009, due largely to a $10 increase in
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, driven primarily by higher amortization of
acquisition costs, partially offset by a $6 reduction in insurance operating costs and expenses.
Amortization of acquisition costs increased for both AARP business and for business sold direct to
the consumer in four pilot states. The decrease in insurance operating costs and expenses was
driven by a $7, or 0.7 point, reduction in TWIA assessments related to hurricane Ike.
83
SMALL COMMERCIAL
Premiums [1]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
693 |
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
Earned premiums |
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The difference between written premiums and earned premiums is attributable to the change in
unearned premium reserve. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Measures |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
New business premium |
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
Premium renewal retention |
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
83 |
% |
Written pricing decrease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Earned pricing decrease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Policies in-force end of period |
|
|
1,053,568 |
|
|
|
1,048,057 |
|
Earned Premiums
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Earned premiums for the Small Commercial segment decreased $35, or 5%, primarily due to lower
earned audit premium on workers compensation business and the effect of non-renewals outpacing new
business over the last nine months of 2008 in all lines, including workers compensation, package
business and commercial auto. While the Company has focused on increasing new business from its
agents and expanding writings in certain territories, the effects of the economic downturn and
competitor actions to increase market share and increase business appetite in certain classes of
risks have contributed to the decrease in earned premium in the first quarter of 2009.
|
|
|
New business premium
|
|
New business written premium
was down $8, or 6%, in the three
months ended March 31, 2009
primarily driven by a decrease in
new package and commercial
automobile business. The effects of
the economic downturn and aggressive
competition have contributed to the
decline in new business. |
|
Premium renewal retention
|
|
Premium renewal retention
decreased from 83% to 79% in the
three month period due largely to
the effect of a decrease in
retention in all lines of business
and the effect of written pricing
decreases for workers compensation
business over the last nine months
of 2008 and first three months of
2009. |
|
Earned pricing decrease
|
|
Earned pricing increased for
package business, decreased for
workers compensation and was flat
for commercial auto business. As
written premium is earned over the
12-month term of the policies, the
earned pricing changes during the
three month period ended March 31,
2009 was primarily a reflection of
written pricing changes over the
last nine months of 2008. In
addition to the effect of written
pricing decreases in workers
compensation, average premium per
policy in Small Commercial has
declined due to a lower average
premium on Next Generation Auto
business, a reduction in the
payrolls of workers compensation
insureds and the effect of declining
mid-term endorsements. |
|
Policies in-force
|
|
While earned premium has
decreased by 5%, the number of
policies in-force has increased by
1%. The growth in policies in-force
does not correspond directly with
the change in earned premiums due to
the effect of changes in earned
pricing, changes in the average
premium per policy and because
policy in-force counts are as of a
point in time rather than over a
period of time. |
84
Small Commercial Underwriting Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
693 |
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
Change in unearned premium reserve |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(27 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(33 |
%) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
|
(27 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
55.5 |
|
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Prior accident years |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
57.3 |
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Expense ratio |
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
Policyholder dividend ratio |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
86.6 |
|
|
|
82.7 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catastrophe ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Prior years |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total catastrophe ratio |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes |
|
|
85.5 |
|
|
|
81.3 |
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
Combined ratio before catastrophes and prior
accident years development |
|
|
84.8 |
|
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results and ratios
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Underwriting results decreased by $32, from $119 to $87, with a corresponding 3.9 point increase in
the combined ratio, from 82.7 to 86.6, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in earned premiums |
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
Volume change Decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes due to the decrease in earned premium |
|
|
19 |
|
Ratio change An increase in the current accident loss and loss adjustment expense ratio
before catastrophes |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes |
|
|
8 |
|
Catastrophes Decrease in current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
3 |
|
Reserve changes A change from net favorable to net unfavorable prior accident year reserve
development |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
2 |
|
Increase in insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in operating expenses |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in underwriting results from 2008 to 2009 |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
85
Earned premium decreased by $35
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, earned premiums for the Small Commercial segment
decreased by $35, to $652. Refer to the Earned Premium section above for discussion.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses decreased by $4
Current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes decreased by
$8
Small Commercials current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes
decreased by $8 in 2009, to $362, primarily due to the decrease in earned premium, partially offset
by a 1.7 point increase in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before
catastrophes, to 55.5. The increase in this ratio was primarily due to higher losses on package
business, partially offset by a lower loss and loss adjustment expense ratio on workers
compensation business. On package business, the Company experienced higher non-catastrophe
property losses and higher expected liability losses, largely due to increased claim cost severity.
On workers compensation business, the lower current accident year loss and loss adjustment
expense ratio reflects the continuation of a favorable expected frequency trend, partially offset
by the effect of earned pricing declines and the effect of a 2009 decrease in estimated audit
premium related to exposures earned in 2008.
A $7 change to net unfavorable prior accident year reserve development
Net unfavorable prior accident year development of $5 in 2009 included a $16 strengthening of
reserves for package business related to accident years 2000 to 2005 and a $13 release of workers
compensation reserves related to accident years 2003 to 2007. While net favorable prior accident
year development was only $2 in 2008, reserve development included a $21 release of workers
compensation reserves related to accident years 2006 and prior, largely offset by a $17
strengthening of reserves for general liability and products liability claims for accident years
2004 and prior.
Operating expense increased by $1
Insurance operating costs and expenses increased by $3 largely due to a decrease in estimated
contingent commissions in 2008 related to 2007 agent compensation and higher IT costs in 2009,
partially offset by a $5, or 0.7 point, reduction in TWIA assessments related to hurricane Ike.
The decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs was driven by the decrease in
earned premium, partially offset by higher amortization of other underwriting expenses. The
expense ratio increased by 1.6 points, to 29.3, in 2009, primarily due to the decrease in earned
premium and the increase in insurance operating costs and expenses.
86
MIDDLE MARKET
Premiums [1]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
526 |
|
|
$ |
565 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
Earned premiums |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
(8 |
%) |
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The difference between written premiums and earned premiums is attributable to the change in
unearned premium reserve. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Measures |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
New business premium |
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
Premium renewal retention |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
Written pricing decrease |
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Earned pricing decrease |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Policies in-force end of period |
|
|
90,463 |
|
|
|
89,179 |
|
Earned Premiums
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Earned premiums for the Middle Market segment decreased by $45, or 8%, for the three months ended
March 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily driven by decreases in general liability and commercial
auto due to earned pricing decreases and the effect of a decline in new business over the last nine
months of 2008 and first three months of 2009. Middle Market workers compensation earned premium
increased modestly as the effect of an increase in new business written premium over the last nine
months of 2008 and first three months of 2009 was partially offset by lower earned audit premium in
the first quarter of 2009.
|
|
|
New business premium
|
|
New business written premium
increased by $10, or 10%, to $115 in
the first quarter of 2009. An
increase in new business written
premium for workers compensation
was partially offset by a decrease
in new business for marine,
commercial auto and general
liability. The Company has
increased new business for workers
compensation by targeting business
in selected industries and regions
of the country where attractive new
business opportunities remain,
despite continued price competition
and state-mandated rate reductions. |
|
Premium renewal retention
|
|
Premium renewal retention
decreased from 78% to 75% for the
three month period due largely to a
decrease in retention of workers
compensation, property, general
liability and marine. The Company
continued to take actions to secure
renewals in the first three months
of 2009, including the use of
reduced pricing on targeted
accounts, particularly on workers
compensation business.
Nevertheless, premium renewal
retention declined due to the
effects of the downturn in the
economy, particularly on Marine
construction lines, and the
Companys decision not to reduce its
pricing in many lines, including
property, auto and general liability
business. |
|
Earned pricing decrease
|
|
Earned pricing decreased in
all lines of business, including
workers compensation, commercial
auto, general liability, property
and marine. As written premium is
earned over the 12-month term of the
policies, the earned pricing changes
during the first quarter of 2009
were primarily a reflection of
written pricing decreases over the
last nine months of 2008. A number
of carriers have continued to
compete fairly aggressively on
price, particularly on larger
accounts within Middle Market, which
has contributed to mid-single digit
price decreases across the industry. |
|
Policies in-force
|
|
While the number of policies
in-force increased 1% from March 31,
2008 to March 31, 2009, due largely
to growth on smaller accounts,
earned premium declined due to the
reduction in the average premium per
policy. |
87
Middle Market Underwriting Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
526 |
|
|
$ |
565 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
Change in unearned premium reserve |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
(8 |
%) |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
78 |
% |
Prior accident years |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
(15 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
65.5 |
|
|
|
64.1 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
57.8 |
|
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Expense ratio |
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Policyholder dividend ratio |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
87.5 |
|
|
|
90.8 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catastrophe ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Prior years |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total catastrophe ratio |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes |
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
|
89.0 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes and prior
accident years development |
|
|
95.2 |
|
|
|
91.9 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results and ratios
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Underwriting results increased by $14, from $55 to $69, with a corresponding 3.3 point decrease in
the combined ratio, from 90.8 to 87.5, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in earned premiums |
|
$ |
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
Volume change Decrease in current accident year loss and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes due to the decrease in earned premium |
|
|
28 |
|
Ratio change An increase in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio
before catastrophes |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes |
|
|
21 |
|
Catastrophes Increase in current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Reserve changes An increase in net favorable prior accident year reserve development |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
56 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
4 |
|
Increase in insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in operating expenses |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in underwriting results from 2008 to 2009 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
88
Earned premium decreased by $45
Earned premiums for the Middle Market segment decreased by $45, or 8%, driven primarily by
decreases in general liability and commercial auto. Refer to the Earned Premium section for
further discussion.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses decreased by $56
Current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes decreased by
$21
Middle Market current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes
decreased by $21, primarily due to a decrease in earned premium, partially offset by the effect of
an increase in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before
catastrophes. Before catastrophes, the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense
ratio increased by 1.4 points, to 65.5, primarily due to a higher loss and loss adjustment expense
ratio on workers compensation business, partially offset by lower non-catastrophe losses on
property business, driven by favorable claim severity. The higher loss and loss adjustment expense
ratio on workers compensation business was primarily due to the effect of a 2008 increase in
estimated audit premium related to exposures earned in 2007, which reduced the loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio in 2008.
Current accident year catastrophes increased by $7
Current accident year catastrophe losses of $16, or 2.8 points, in 2009 were higher than current
accident year catastrophe losses of $9, or 1.6 points, in 2008, as 2009 losses from ice storms and
windstorms in the Southeast and Midwest were greater than 2008 losses from tornadoes and
thunderstorms in the South and winter storms along the Pacific coast.
A $42 increase in net favorable prior accident year development
Net favorable prior accident year reserve development increased by $42, from $16, or 2.6 points in
2008 to $58, or 10.5 points, in 2009. Net favorable reserve development of $58 in 2009 included a
$38 release of general liability reserves, primarily related to accident years 2005 to 2007. Net
favorable reserve development of $16 in 2008 included a $19 release of workers compensation
reserves and a $14 release of reserves for umbrella claims, partially offset by a $30 strengthening
of reserves for general liability and products liability claims.
Operating expenses decreased by $3
The expense ratio increased 1.8 points, to 29.3 in 2009, due to the decrease in earned premium
while insurance operating costs and expenses remained relatively flat. Insurance operating costs
and expenses included an increase in compensation-related costs and IT costs, partially offset by a
$2 reduction in TWIA assessments related to hurricane Ike. The decrease in the amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs was largely due to the decrease in earned premium, partially
offset by an increase in amortization of other underwriting expenses.
89
SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written Premiums [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
NM |
|
Casualty |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Professional liability, fidelity and surety |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(18 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
|
(13 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned Premiums [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
(52 |
%) |
Casualty |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Professional liability, fidelity and surety |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Other |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(14 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The difference between written premiums and earned premiums is attributable to the change in
unearned premium reserve. |
Earned premiums
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Earned premiums for the Specialty Commercial segment decreased by $18, or 5%, primarily due to a
decrease in property earned premiums.
|
|
Property earned premiums decreased by $14, or 52%, primarily due to the Companys decision
to stop writing specialty property business with large national accounts and the effect of
increased competition and capacity for core excess and surplus lines business. With its core
excess and surplus lines business, the Company experienced a decrease in earned pricing, lower
new business growth and lower premium renewal retention, particularly for catastrophe-exposed
business. Effective March 31, 2009, the Company sold its core excess and surplus lines
property business, to Beazley Group PLC. Concurrent with the sale, the in-force book of
business was ceded to Beazley under a separate reinsurance agreement, whereby the Company
ceded $26 of unearned premium, net of $10 in ceding commission. The ceding of the unearned
premium was reflected as a reduction of written premium in the three months ended March 31,
2009. |
|
|
Casualty earned premiums decreased slightly, primarily because of earned pricing decreases. |
|
|
Professional liability, fidelity and surety earned premium remained relatively flat as the
effects of lower new business and earned pricing decreases were offset by a decrease in the
portion of professional liability risks ceded to outside reinsurers. The adverse impact of
recent ratings downgrades has contributed to a decline in new business in the first quarter of
2009. |
|
|
Within the Other category, earned premium decreased $3, or 14%, from 2008 to 2009. The
Other category of earned premiums includes premiums assumed under inter-segment
arrangements. |
90
Specialty Commercial Underwriting Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
|
(13 |
%) |
Change in unearned premium reserve |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(50 |
%) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
(41 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
70.3 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Prior accident years |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
62.6 |
|
|
|
61.7 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Expense ratio |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Policyholder dividend ratio |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
92.8 |
|
|
|
88.6 |
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catastrophe ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Prior years |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total catastrophe ratio |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes |
|
|
92.9 |
|
|
|
90.2 |
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
Combined ratio before catastrophes and prior
accident years development |
|
|
100.5 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues [1] |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents servicing revenue. |
Underwriting results and ratios
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Underwriting results decreased by $16, from $39 to $23, with a corresponding 4.2 point increase in
the combined ratio, to 92.8, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in earned premiums |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
Volume change Decrease in current accident year loss and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes due to the decrease in earned premium |
|
|
13 |
|
Ratio change An increase in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio
before catastrophes |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes |
|
|
7 |
|
Catastrophes Decrease in current accident year catastrophe losses |
|
|
1 |
|
Reserve changes No change in net favorable prior accident year reserve development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
4 |
|
Increase in insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase in operating expenses |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in underwriting results from 2008 to 2009 |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
91
Earned premium decreased by $18
Earned premiums for the Specialty Commercial segment decreased by $18, or 5%, primarily due to a
decrease in property earned premium. Refer to the Earned Premium section above for further
discussion.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses decreased by $8
Current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes decreased by
$7
Specialty Commercial current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes
decreased by $7 in 2009, to $233, primarily due to a decrease in earned premium, partially offset
by an increase in the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes and prior accident
year development. The loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes and prior
accident year development increased by 1.6 points, to 70.3, primarily due to a higher loss and loss
adjustment ratio on both specialty casualty business and directors and officers insurance for
professional liability business, driven largely by earned pricing decreases.
No change in net favorable prior accident year development
Net favorable prior accident year reserve development of $25 in 2009 included a $20 release of
reserves for directors and officers insurance claims related to the 2006 accident year. Net
favorable prior accident year reserve development of $25 in 2008 included a $10 release of reserves
for directors and officers insurance claims related to accident year 2003 and a $10 release of
reserves for construction defect claims related to accident year 2001.
Operating expenses increased by $6
Insurance operating costs and expenses increased by $10, primarily due to a decrease in estimated
profit commissions on ceded property business, increased IT costs and increased
compensation-related costs. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs decreased by $4 due
to the decrease in earned premium. The expense ratio increased by 3.2 points, to 29.5, primarily
due to the increase in insurance operating costs and expenses coupled with the decrease in earned
premium.
92
OTHER OPERATIONS (INCLUDING ASBESTOS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLAIMS)
Operating Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
(50 |
%) |
Change in unearned premium reserve |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(100 |
%) |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses prior years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(100 |
%) |
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
74 |
% |
Net investment income |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(27 |
%) |
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
%) |
Other expenses |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(88 |
%) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
(93 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Other Operations segment includes operations that are under a single management structure,
Heritage Holdings, which is responsible for two related activities. The first activity is the
management of certain subsidiaries and operations of the Company that have discontinued writing new
business. The second is the management of claims (and the associated reserves) related to
asbestos, environmental and other exposures. The Other Operations book of business contains
policies written from approximately the 1940s to 2003. The Companys experience has been that this
book of run-off business has, over time, produced significantly higher claims and losses than were
contemplated at inception.
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased $13 compared to the prior year
period.
The decrease in Other Operations net income was driven primarily by the following:
|
|
A $16 increase in net realized capital losses in 2009, primarily due to an increase in
realized losses on sales of securities, including sales of financial services securities and
lower quality securities, mainly CMBS, RMBS and below investment grade corporate securities
and were on securities that had declined in value since December 31, 2008. See the
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments discussion within Investment Results in the Investments
section of the MD&A for more information on the impairments recorded in 2009. |
|
|
A $15 decrease in net investment income, primarily as a result of an increase in losses
from limited partnerships and other alternative investments and a decrease in income on fixed
maturity investments driven by lower pre-tax yields and a decrease in the level of invested
assets. |
Partially offsetting the decrease in Other Operations net income were the following:
|
|
A $14 increase in underwriting results, primarily due to a $15 decrease in unfavorable
prior year loss development. |
93
Asbestos and Environmental Claims
The Company continues to receive asbestos and environmental claims. Asbestos claims relate
primarily to bodily injuries asserted by people who came in contact with asbestos or products
containing asbestos. Environmental claims relate primarily to pollution and related clean-up
costs.
The Company wrote several different categories of insurance contracts that may cover asbestos and
environmental claims. First, the Company wrote primary policies providing the first layer of
coverage in an insureds liability program. Second, the Company wrote excess policies providing
higher layers of coverage for losses that exhaust the limits of underlying coverage. Third, the
Company acted as a reinsurer assuming a portion of those risks assumed by other insurers writing
primary, excess and reinsurance coverages. Fourth, subsidiaries of the Company participated in the
London Market, writing both direct insurance and assumed reinsurance business.
With regard to both environmental and particularly asbestos claims, significant uncertainty limits
the ability of insurers and reinsurers to estimate the ultimate reserves necessary for unpaid
losses and related expenses. Traditional actuarial reserving techniques cannot reasonably estimate
the ultimate cost of these claims, particularly during periods where theories of law are in flux.
The degree of variability of reserve estimates for these exposures is significantly greater than
for other more traditional exposures. In particular, the Company believes there is a high degree
of uncertainty inherent in the estimation of asbestos loss reserves.
In the case of the reserves for asbestos exposures, factors contributing to the high degree of
uncertainty include inadequate loss development patterns, plaintiffs expanding theories of
liability, the risks inherent in major litigation, and inconsistent emerging legal doctrines.
Furthermore, over time, insurers, including the Company, have experienced significant changes in
the rate at which asbestos claims are brought, the claims experience of particular insureds, and
the value of claims, making predictions of future exposure from past experience uncertain.
Plaintiffs and insureds also have sought to use bankruptcy proceedings, including pre-packaged
bankruptcies, to accelerate and increase loss payments by insurers. In addition, some
policyholders have asserted new classes of claims for coverages to which an aggregate limit of
liability may not apply. Further uncertainties include insolvencies of other carriers and
unanticipated developments pertaining to the Companys ability to recover reinsurance for asbestos
and environmental claims. Management believes these issues are not likely to be resolved in the
near future.
In the case of the reserves for environmental exposures, factors contributing to the high degree of
uncertainty include expanding theories of liability and damages, the risks inherent in major
litigation, inconsistent decisions concerning the existence and scope of coverage for environmental
claims, and uncertainty as to the monetary amount being sought by the claimant from the insured.
It is also not possible to predict changes in the legal and legislative environment and their
effect on the future development of asbestos and environmental claims. Although potential Federal
asbestos-related legislation was considered by the Senate in 2006, it is uncertain whether such
legislation will be reconsidered or enacted in the future and, if enacted, what its effect would be
on the Companys aggregate asbestos liabilities.
The reporting pattern for assumed reinsurance claims, including those related to asbestos and
environmental claims, is much longer than for direct claims. In many instances, it takes months or
years to determine that the policyholders own obligations have been met and how the reinsurance in
question may apply to such claims. The delay in reporting reinsurance claims and exposures adds to
the uncertainty of estimating the related reserves.
Given the factors described above, the Company believes the actuarial tools and other techniques it
employs to estimate the ultimate cost of claims for more traditional kinds of insurance exposure
are less precise in estimating reserves for its asbestos and environmental exposures. For this
reason, the Company relies on exposure-based analysis to estimate the ultimate costs of these
claims and regularly evaluates new information in assessing its potential asbestos and
environmental exposures.
94
Reserve Activity
Reserves and reserve activity in the Other Operations segment are categorized and reported as
asbestos, environmental, or all other. The all other category of reserves covers a wide range
of insurance and assumed reinsurance coverages, including, but not limited to, potential liability
for construction defects, lead paint, silica, pharmaceutical products, molestation and other
long-tail liabilities. In addition, within the all other category of reserves, Other Operations
records its allowance for future reinsurer insolvencies and disputes that might affect reinsurance
collectability associated with asbestos, environmental, and other claims recoverable from
reinsurers.
The following table presents reserve activity, inclusive of estimates for both reported and
incurred but not reported claims, net of reinsurance, for Other Operations, categorized by
asbestos, environmental and all other claims, for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Other Operations Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
Asbestos |
|
|
Environmental |
|
|
All Other [1] |
|
Total |
|
Beginning liability net [2][3] |
|
$ |
1,884 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
1,628 |
|
|
$ |
3,781 |
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses paid |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending liability net [2][3] |
|
$ |
1,845 |
[4] |
|
$ |
261 |
|
|
$ |
1,565 |
|
|
$ |
3,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
All Other includes unallocated loss adjustment expense reserves and the allowance for uncollectible reinsurance. |
|
[2] |
|
Excludes asbestos and environmental net liabilities reported in Ongoing Operations of $12 and $6, respectively, as of March
31, 2009 and $12 and $6, respectively, as of December 31, 2008. Total net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred in
Ongoing Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 includes $6 related to asbestos and environmental claims.
Total net losses and loss adjustment expenses paid in Ongoing Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 includes
$6 related to asbestos and environmental claims. |
|
[3] |
|
Gross of reinsurance, asbestos and environmental reserves, including liabilities in Ongoing Operations, were $2,453 and
$301, respectively, as of March 31, 2009 and $2,498 and $309, respectively, as of December 31, 2008. |
|
[4] |
|
The one year and average three year net paid amounts for asbestos claims, including Ongoing Operations, are $180 and $273,
respectively, resulting in a one year net survival ratio of 10.3 and a three year net survival ratio of 6.8. Net survival
ratio is the quotient of the net carried reserves divided by the average annual payment amount and is an indication of the
number of years that the net carried reserve would last (i.e. survive) if the future annual claim payments were consistent
with the calculated historical average. |
For paid and incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses reporting, the Company classifies its
asbestos and environmental reserves into three categories: Direct, Assumed Domestic and London
Market. Direct insurance includes primary and excess coverage. Assumed reinsurance includes both
treaty reinsurance (covering broad categories of claims or blocks of business) and facultative
reinsurance (covering specific risks or individual policies of primary or excess insurance
companies). London Market business includes the business written by one or more of the Companys
subsidiaries in the United Kingdom, which are no longer active in the insurance or reinsurance
business. Such business includes both direct insurance and assumed reinsurance.
Of the three categories of claims (Direct, Assumed Domestic and London Market), direct policies
tend to have the greatest factual development from which to estimate the Companys exposures.
Assumed reinsurance exposures are inherently less predictable than direct insurance exposures
because the Company may not receive notice of a reinsurance claim until the underlying direct
insurance claim is mature. This causes a delay in the receipt of information at the reinsurer
level and adds to the uncertainty of estimating related reserves.
London Market exposures are the most uncertain of the three categories of claims. As a participant
in the London Market (comprised of both Lloyds of London and London Market companies), certain
subsidiaries of the Company wrote business on a subscription basis, with those subsidiaries
involvement being limited to a relatively small percentage of a total contract placement. Claims
are reported, via a broker, to the lead underwriter and, once agreed to, are presented to the
following markets for concurrence. This reporting and claim agreement process makes estimating
liabilities for this business the most uncertain of the three categories of claims.
95
The following table sets forth, for the three months ended March 31, 2009, paid and incurred loss
activity by the three categories of claims for asbestos and environmental.
Paid and Incurred Losses and Loss Adjustment Expense (LAE) Development Asbestos and Environmental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos [1] |
|
|
Environmental [1] |
|
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Incurred |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
Losses & LAE |
|
|
Losses & LAE |
|
|
Losses & LAE |
|
|
Losses & LAE |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Assumed Domestic |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
London Market |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ceded |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Excludes asbestos and environmental paid and incurred loss and LAE reported in Ongoing
Operations. Total gross losses and LAE incurred in Ongoing Operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 includes $6 related to asbestos and environmental claims. Total gross
losses and LAE paid in Ongoing Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 includes
$5 related to asbestos and environmental claims. |
A number of factors affect the variability of estimates for asbestos and environmental reserves
including assumptions with respect to the frequency of claims, the average severity of those claims
settled with payment, the dismissal rate of claims with no payment and the expense to indemnity
ratio. The uncertainty with respect to the underlying reserve assumptions for asbestos and
environmental adds a greater degree of variability to these reserve estimates than reserve
estimates for more traditional exposures. While this variability is reflected in part in the size
of the range of reserves developed by the Company, that range may still not be indicative of the
potential variance between the ultimate outcome and the recorded reserves. The recorded net
reserves as of March 31, 2009 of $2.13 billion ($1.86 billion and $267 for asbestos and
environmental, respectively) is within an estimated range, unadjusted for covariance, of $1.75
billion to $2.38 billion. The process of estimating asbestos and environmental reserves remains
subject to a wide variety of uncertainties, which are detailed in the Companys 2008 Form 10-K
Annual Report. The Company believes that its current asbestos and environmental reserves are
reasonable and appropriate. However, analyses of future developments could cause the Company to
change its estimates and ranges of its asbestos and environmental reserves, and the effect of these
changes could be material to the Companys consolidated operating results, financial condition and
liquidity. If there are significant developments that affect particular exposures, reinsurance
arrangements or the financial condition of particular reinsurers, the Company will make adjustments
to its reserves or to the amounts recoverable from its reinsurers.
The Company expects to perform its regular reviews of asbestos liabilities in the second quarter of
2009, Other Operations reinsurance recoverables and the allowance for uncollectible reinsurance in
the second quarter of 2009, and environmental liabilities in the third quarter of 2009. Consistent
with the Companys long-standing reserve practices, the Company will continue to review and monitor
its reserves in the Other Operations segment regularly, and where future developments indicate,
make appropriate adjustments to the reserves. For a discussion of the Companys reserving
practices, see the Critical Accounting EstimatesProperty & Casualty Reserves, Net of Reinsurance
and Other Operations (Including Asbestos and Environmental Claims) sections of the MD&A included in
the Companys 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
96
INVESTMENTS
General
The Hartfords investment portfolios are primarily divided between Life and Property & Casualty.
The investment portfolios of Life and Property & Casualty are managed by Hartford Investment
Management Company (HIMCO), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Hartford. HIMCO manages the
portfolios to maximize economic value, while attempting to generate the income necessary to support
the Companys various product obligations, within internally established objectives, guidelines and
risk tolerances. The portfolio objectives and guidelines are developed based upon the
asset/liability profile, including duration, convexity and other characteristics within specified
risk tolerances. The risk tolerances considered include, for example, asset and credit issuer
allocation limits, maximum portfolio below investment grade (BIG) holdings and foreign currency
exposure. The Company attempts to minimize adverse impacts to the portfolio and the Companys
results of operations due to changes in economic conditions through asset allocation limits,
asset/liability duration matching and through the use of derivatives. For a further discussion of
how HIMCO manages the investment portfolios, see the Investments section of the MD&A under the
General section in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report. For a further discussion of how
the investment portfolios credit and market risks are assessed and managed, see the Investment
Credit Risk and Capital Markets Risk Management sections of the MD&A.
Return on general account invested assets is an important element of The Hartfords financial
results. Significant fluctuations in the fixed income or equity markets could weaken the Companys
financial condition or its results of operations. Additionally, changes in market interest rates
may impact the period of time over which certain investments, such as MBS, are repaid and whether
certain investments are called by the issuers. Such changes may, in turn, impact the yield on
these investments and also may result in re-investment of funds received from calls and prepayments
at rates below the average portfolio yield. Net investment income and net realized capital gains
contributed $280 to the Companys consolidated revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Net investment income and net realized capital losses reduced the Companys consolidated revenues
by $3.8 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Net investment income and net realized
capital gains, excluding net investment income from trading securities, contributed $1.0 billion to
the Companys consolidated revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Net investment
income and net realized capital losses, excluding net investment income from trading securities,
reduced the Companys consolidated revenues by $178 for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Fluctuations in interest rates affect the Companys return on, and the fair value of, fixed
maturity investments, which comprised approximately 54% of the fair value of its invested assets as
of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Other events beyond the Companys control,
including changes in credit spreads, a downgrade of an issuers credit rating or default of payment
by an issuer, could also adversely impact the fair value of these investments.
A decrease in the fair value of any investment that is deemed other-than-temporary would result in
the Companys recognition of a net realized capital loss in its financial results prior to the
actual sale of the investment. Following the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment for
fixed maturities, the Company accretes the new cost basis to par or to estimated future value over
the remaining life of the security based on future estimated cash flows by adjusting the securitys
yields. For a further discussion of the evaluation of other-than-temporary impairments, see the
Critical Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A under Evaluation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments on Available-for-Sale Securities in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
97
Life
The primary investment objective of Lifes general account is to maximize economic value consistent
with acceptable risk parameters, including the management of credit risk and interest rate
sensitivity of invested assets, while generating sufficient after-tax income to support
policyholder and corporate obligations.
The following table presents invested assets by type as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of Invested Assets |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
$ |
42,428 |
|
|
|
67.1 |
% |
|
$ |
45,182 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
% |
Equity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Policy loans, at outstanding balance |
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Mortgage loans, at amortized cost [1] |
|
|
5,633 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
5,684 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
Limited partnerships and other alternative investments |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Other investments [2] |
|
|
2,909 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
Short-term investments |
|
|
8,580 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
6,937 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments excl. equity securities, held for
trading |
|
|
63,227 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
63,324 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Equity securities, held for trading, at fair value [3] |
|
|
27,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
91,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
94,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Consist of commercial and agricultural loans. |
|
[2] |
|
Primarily relates to derivative instruments. |
|
[3] |
|
These assets primarily support the International variable annuity
business. Changes in these balances are also reflected in the
respective liabilities. |
Total investments decreased $3.1 billion since December 31, 2008 primarily as a result of a decline
in value of equity securities, held for trading, due to negative market performance of the
underlying investment funds supporting the Japanese variable annuity product, and losses resulting
from currency translation as the Yen weakened against the U.S. dollar. Fixed maturities decreased
due to security sales, primarily government and corporate securities, and increased unrealized
losses on available-for-sale securities. Life increased its investment in short-term securities in
preparation for funding liability outflows and to maintain higher than average liquidity while
waiting for market and asset valuations to stabilize.
Limited partnerships and other alternative investments decreased $174 since December 31, 2008
primarily due to hedge fund redemptions and losses incurred on real estate and private equity
partnerships. Life expects further hedge fund redemptions and does not expect significant
additions to limited partnerships and other alternative investments in 2009 except for unfunded
commitments.
The following table summarizes Lifes limited partnerships and other alternative investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of Limited Partnerships and Other Alternative Investments |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Hedge funds [1] |
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
% |
Mortgage and real estate [2] |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
% |
Mezzanine debt [3] |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
Private equity and other [4] |
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
49.8 |
% |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
44.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
955 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,129 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Hedge funds include investments in funds of funds as well as direct
funds. The hedge funds of funds invest in approximately 25 to 50
different hedge funds within a variety of investment styles. Examples
of hedge fund strategies include long/short equity or credit, event
driven strategies and structured credit. |
|
[2] |
|
Mortgage and real estate funds consist of investments in funds whose
assets consist of mortgage loans, participations in mortgage loans,
mezzanine loans or other notes which may be below investment grade
credit quality as well as equity real estate. Also included is the
investment in a real estate joint venture. |
|
[3] |
|
Mezzanine debt funds consist of investments in funds whose assets
consist of subordinated debt that often times incorporates
equity-based options such as warrants and a limited amount of direct
equity investments. |
|
[4] |
|
Private equity and other funds primarily consist of investments in
funds whose assets typically consist of a diversified pool of
investments in small non-public businesses with high growth potential. |
98
Investment Results
The following table summarizes Lifes net investment income (loss).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(Before-tax) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield [1] |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield [1] |
|
Fixed maturities [2] |
|
$ |
645 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
$ |
755 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Equity securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
Policy loans |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
Mortgage loans |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
Limited partnerships and other alternative
investments |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(41.7 |
%) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
%) |
Other [3] |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment expense |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net investment income excluding equity
securities, held for trading |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
Equity securities, held for trading [4] |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net investment income (loss), before-tax |
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Yields calculated using net investment income before investment expenses divided by the monthly weighted average invested
assets at cost, amortized cost, or adjusted carrying value, as applicable excluding collateral received associated with the
securities lending program and consolidated variable interest entity noncontrolling interests. Included in the fixed
maturity yield is Other income (loss) where it primarily relates to fixed maturities (see footnote [3] below). Included in
the total net investment income yield is investment expense. |
|
[2] |
|
Includes net investment income on short-term bonds. |
|
[3] |
|
Includes income from derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS 133. These derivatives hedge fixed
maturities. Also includes fees associated with securities lending activities of $(3) and $(22) as of March 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The income from securities lending activities is included within fixed maturities. |
|
[4] |
|
Includes investment income and mark-to-market effects of equity securities, held for trading. |
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Net investment income, excluding equity securities, held for trading, decreased $130, or 16%, for
the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to the prior year period, primarily due to lower
income on fixed maturities and limited partnerships and other alternative investments. The
decrease in fixed maturity income was primarily due to lower yield on variable rate securities due
to declines in short-term interest rates and increased allocation to lower yielding securities such
as U.S. Treasuries and short-term investments. A portion of this decline was offset by income from
interest rate swaps reported above as Other income. The decrease in limited partnerships and other
alternative investments income was largely due to negative returns on real estate and private
equity partnerships as a result of volatility in the equity, credit and real estate markets. Based
upon the current interest rate and credit environment, Life expects a lower average portfolio yield
for 2009 as compared to 2008, including a negative yield on limited partnerships and other
alternative investments.
The decrease in net investment losses on equity securities, held for trading, for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 compared to the prior year period was primarily attributed to less unfavorable
market performance of the underlying investment funds supporting the Japanese variable annuity
product.
99
The following table summarizes Lifes net realized capital gains and losses results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Before-tax) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Gross gains on sale |
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
Gross losses on sale |
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
Impairments |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
Japanese fixed annuity contract hedges, net [1] |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Periodic net coupon settlements on credit derivatives/Japan |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
SFAS 157 transition impact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
Results of variable annuity hedge program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMWB derivatives, net [2] |
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
Macro hedge program |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total results of variable annuity hedge program |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
Other, net [3] |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses), before-tax |
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
(1,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Relates to the Japanese fixed annuity product (product and related derivative hedging instruments excluding periodic net coupon settlements). |
|
[2] |
|
Includes a $550 gain related to liability model assumption updates for withdrawals, lapses and credit standing. |
|
[3] |
|
Primarily consists of changes in fair value on non-qualifying derivatives, hedge ineffectiveness on qualifying derivative instruments,
foreign currency gains and losses, valuation allowances and other investment gains and losses. |
The circumstances giving rise to the net realized capital gains and losses in these components are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Gains and
Losses on Sale
|
|
|
|
Gross gains on sale for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were predominantly within foreign
government, corporate and U.S. government securities. Gross losses were primarily within financial
services, CMBS, U.S. government securities and RMBS and were on securities that had declined in value
since December 31, 2008. These losses resulted primarily from an effort to reduce portfolio risk and
improve liquidity while simultaneously reallocating the portfolio to securities with more favorable
risk/return profiles. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross losses on sales for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were predominantly within fixed
maturities and were primarily comprised of corporate securities and CMBS, as well as, $17 of CLOs for
which HIMCO was the collateral manager. Gross gains and losses on sale, excluding the loss on CLOs,
resulted from the decision to reallocate the portfolio to securities with more favorable risk/return
profiles. |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
|
See the Other-Than-Temporary Impairments section that follows for further information. |
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Annuity
Hedge Program
|
|
|
|
See Note 4 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
Other, net losses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 primarily resulted from net losses on
credit derivatives and losses on the Japan 3Win contract hedges. Also contributing were valuation
allowances on impaired mortgage loans of $48. These losses were offset by net gains related to
transactional foreign currency gains predominately on the internal reinsurance of the Japan variable
annuity business, which is entirely offset in AOCI. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net losses for the three months ended March 31, 2008 primarily resulted from the change in
value of non-qualifying derivatives due to credit spread widening. Credit spreads widened primarily due
to the deterioration in the U.S. housing market, tightened lending conditions, the markets flight to
quality securities, as well as increased likelihood of a U.S. recession. Also included in 2008 were
losses on HIMCO managed CLOs of $33. |
100
Property & Casualty
The primary investment objective for Property & Casualtys Ongoing Operations segment is to
maximize economic value while generating sufficient after-tax income to meet policyholder and
corporate obligations. For Property & Casualtys Other Operations segment, the investment
objective is to ensure the full and timely payment of all liabilities. Property & Casualtys
investment strategies are developed based on a variety of factors including business needs,
regulatory requirements and tax considerations.
The following table presents invested assets by type as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of Invested Assets |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
$ |
20,040 |
|
|
|
84.5 |
% |
|
$ |
19,775 |
|
|
|
81.7 |
% |
Equity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Mortgage loans, at amortized cost [1] |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
Limited partnerships and other alternative investments |
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Other investments [2] |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Short-term investments |
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
23,743 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
24,204 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Consist of commercial and agricultural loans. |
|
[2] |
|
Primarily relates to derivative instruments. |
Total investments decreased $461 since December 31, 2008 primarily due to a decline in equity
securities, largely the result of sales within the financial service sector, and limited
partnerships and other alternative investments due to volatility in the equity, credit and real
estate markets. In addition, short-term investments were reallocated to fixed maturities primarily
within highly rated municipal and agency mortgage-backed securities.
Limited partnerships and other alternative investments decreased $140 since December 31, 2008
primarily due to hedge fund redemptions and losses incurred on real estate and private equity
partnerships. Property & Casualty expects further hedge fund redemptions and does not expect
significant additions to limited partnerships and other alternative investments in 2009 except for
unfunded commitments.
The following table summarizes Property & Casualtys limited partnerships and other alternative
investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of Limited Partnerships and Other Alternative Investments |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Hedge funds [1] |
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
% |
|
$ |
561 |
|
|
|
48.1 |
% |
Mortgage and real estate [2] |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
% |
Mezzanine debt [3] |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
Private equity and other [4] |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,026 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,166 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Hedge funds include investments in funds of funds as well as direct
funds. The hedge funds of funds invest in approximately 25 to 50
different hedge funds within a variety of investment styles. Examples
of hedge fund strategies include long/short equity or credit, event
driven strategies and structured credit. |
|
[2] |
|
Mortgage and real estate funds consist of investments in funds whose
assets consist of mortgage loans, participations in mortgage loans,
mezzanine loans or other notes which may be below investment grade
credit quality as well as equity real estate. Also included is the
investment in a real estate joint venture. |
|
[3] |
|
Mezzanine debt funds consist of investments in funds whose assets
consist of subordinated debt that often times incorporates
equity-based options such as warrants and a limited amount of direct
equity investments. |
|
[4] |
|
Private equity and other funds primarily consist of investments in
funds whose assets typically consist of a diversified pool of
investments in small non-public businesses with high growth potential. |
101
Investment Results
The following table below summarizes Property & Casualtys net investment income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(Before-tax) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield [1] |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield [1] |
|
Fixed maturities [2] |
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
$ |
371 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Equity securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
Mortgage loans |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
Limited partnerships and other
alternative investments |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(32.4 |
%) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
%) |
Other [3] |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment expense |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income, before-tax |
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income, after-tax [4] |
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Yields calculated using investment income before investment expenses divided by the monthly weighted average invested
assets at cost, amortized cost, or adjusted carrying value, as applicable excluding collateral received associated with the
securities lending program. Included in the fixed maturity yield is Other income (loss) where it primarily relates to
fixed maturities (see footnote [3] below). Included in the total net investment income yield is investment expense. |
|
[2] |
|
Includes net investment income on short-term bonds. |
|
[3] |
|
Includes income from derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS 133. These derivatives hedge fixed
maturities. Also includes fees associated with securities lending activities of $(1) and $(9), as of March 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The income from securities lending activities is included within fixed maturities. |
|
[4] |
|
Due to significant holdings in tax-exempt investments, after-tax net investment income and yield are also included. |
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Before-tax net investment income decreased $140, or 38%, and after-tax net investment income
decreased $96, or 35%, compared to the prior year period primarily due to lower income on fixed
maturities and limited partnerships and other alternative investments. The decrease in fixed
maturity income was primarily due to lower yield on variable rate securities due to declines in
short-term interest rates and increased allocation to lower yielding securities such as U.S.
Treasuries and short-term investments. The decrease in limited partnerships and other alternative
investments income was primarily due to negative returns on real estate and private equity
partnerships as a result of volatility in the equity, credit and real estate markets. Based upon
the current interest rate and credit environment, Property & Casualty expects a lower average
portfolio yield for 2009 as compared to 2008, including a negative yield on limited partnerships
and other alternative investments.
102
The following table summarizes Property & Casualtys net realized capital gains and losses results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Before-tax) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Gross gains on sale |
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
Gross losses on sale |
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
Impairments |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
Periodic net coupon settlements on credit derivatives |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Other, net [1] |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital losses, before-tax |
|
$ |
(323 |
) |
|
$ |
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Primarily consists of changes in fair value on non-qualifying derivatives, hedge
ineffectiveness on qualifying derivative instruments, valuation allowances and other
investment gains and losses. |
The circumstances giving rise to the net realized capital gains and losses in these components are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Gains and
Losses on Sale
|
|
|
|
Gross gains on sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were primarily within
equity and U.S. government securities. Gross losses on sales were predominately within
financial services securities and lower quality securities, mainly CMBS, RMBS and below
investment grade corporate securities and were on securities that had declined in value since
December 31, 2008. These losses resulted primarily from an effort to reduce portfolio risk
while simultaneously reallocating the portfolio to securities with more favorable risk/return
profiles. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross losses on sales for the three months ended March 31, 2008, were predominantly
within fixed maturities and were comprised of corporate securities and CMBS, as well as, $19
of CLOs for which HIMCO was the collateral manager. Gross gains and losses on sale,
excluding the loss on CLOs, resulted from the decision to reallocate the portfolio to
securities with more favorable risk/return profiles. |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
|
See the Other-Than-Temporary Impairments section that follows for further information. |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
Other, net losses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 primarily related to
valuation allowances on impaired mortgage loans of $26 and net losses on credit derivatives.
These losses were partially offset by a gain on the sale of First State Management Group
(FSMG) and gains on currency derivatives, which were primarily driven by the depreciation
of the Euro against the U.S. dollar. For more information regarding the sale of FSMG, refer
to Note 15 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net losses for the three months ended March 31, 2008 primarily resulted from
the change in value associated with credit derivatives due to credit spread widening and
losses on HIMCO managed CLOs of $17. Credit spreads widened primarily due to the
deterioration in the U.S. housing market, tightened lending conditions, the markets flight
to quality securities, as well as an increased likelihood of a U.S. recession. |
103
Corporate
The investment objective of Corporate is to raise capital through financing activities to support
the Life and Property & Casualty operations of the Company and to maintain sufficient funds to
support the cost of those financing activities including the payment of interest for The Hartford
Financial Services Group, Inc. (HFSG) issued debt and dividends to shareholders of The Hartfords
common stock. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Corporate held $95 and $155,
respectively, of fixed maturity investments, $1.3 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively, of
short-term investments and $73 of equity securities, available-for-sale. Short-term investments
are intended to be used for general corporate purposes, which may include the capital and liquidity
needs of our operations. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, a put option agreement for
the Companys contingent capital facility with a fair value of $39 and $43 was included in Other
invested assets. Realized capital gains of $42 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 included
gains of $70 resulting from a decrease in the liability related to certain warrants associated with
the Allianz transaction. These gains were offset by a $20 valuation allowance related to the
Federal Trust Corporation note receivable. For further information on the Federal Trust
Corporation, see Capital Resources and Liquidity.
Securities Lending
The Company participates in securities lending programs to generate additional income, whereby
certain domestic fixed income securities are loaned from the Companys portfolio to qualifying
third party borrowers, in return for collateral in the form of cash or U.S. government securities.
Borrowers of these securities provide collateral of 102% of the market value of the loaned
securities at the time of the loan and can return the securities to the Company for cash at varying
maturity dates. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, under terms of securities lending
programs, the fair value of loaned securities was approximately $1.5 billion and $2.9 billion,
respectively. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company held collateral associated
with the loaned securities in the amount of $1.5 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively. The
Company reduced its securities lending program by $1.4 billion since December 31, 2008 and plans to
continue to significantly reduce its term lending program throughout 2009.
The following table represents when the borrowers can return the loaned securities to the Company
and, in turn, when the collateral would be returned to the borrower.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Collateral |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Thirty days or less |
|
$ |
681 |
|
Thirty one to 90 days |
|
|
444 |
|
Over three to six months |
|
|
416 |
|
Over six to nine months |
|
|
|
|
Over nine months to one year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
104
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
The following table presents the Companys other-than-temporary impairments by type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ABS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMBS |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
Other |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
CMBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Commercial real estate collateralized debt obligations (CRE CDOs) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Interest Only (IOs) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial services |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Other |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Equities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial services |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Other |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairments |
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, impairments of $224 were concentrated in subordinated
fixed maturities and preferred equities within the financial services sector, as well as in RMBS
and CRE CDO securities.
Of the $118 of impairments on financial services companies for the three months ended March 31,
2009, $109 relates to securities that the Company expects to be sold or tendered in the near term
(three months or less). The remaining balance primarily relates to additional write-downs on
previously-impaired securities that the Company does not anticipate substantial recovery due to
bankruptcy, financial restructurings or concerns about the issuers ability to continue to make
contractual payments.
The Company determines impairments on securitized assets by using probabilistic discounted cash
flow models that considers losses under current and expected economic conditions. Assumptions used
over current recessionary period for our CMBS and RMBS portfolios in the first quarter 2009
impairment review include macro economic factors such as a continued increase in the unemployment
rate and a continued gross domestic product contraction, as well as sector specific
factors including but not limited to:
|
|
commercial property value declines that average approximately 30 percent from the valuation
peak but differ by property type and location |
|
|
residential property value declines that average approximately 40 percent from the valuation
peak of property values |
|
|
average cumulative CMBS collateral loss rates that vary by vintage year but reach
approximately 7 percent for the 2006 and 2007 vintage years |
|
|
average cumulative RMBS collateral loss rates that vary by vintage year but reach
approximately 35 percent for the 2007 vintage year |
If the cash flow modeling results in an economic loss and the Company believes the loss is probable
of occurring, an impairment is recorded. Impairments on securitized assets totaled $68 for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, of which $63 related to further write-downs on previously
impaired securities as a result of continued market value decline. The Company continues to
receive contractual principal and interest payments on substantially all of its impaired CMBS and a
majority of its impaired RMBS, however, the Company is uncertain of its ability to recover
principal and interest in accordance with the securitys original contractual terms. Future
impairments of CMBS and RMBS may develop if actual results underperform current modeling
assumptions, which may be the result of, but are not limited to, macro economic factors, property
value declines beyond current average assumptions or security loss rates exceeding average
assumptions.
The remaining impairments of $38 were primarily recorded on securities in various sectors,
primarily $21 on equity investments in affiliated mutual funds, which pursuant to the Companys
policy have been impaired due to the duration and severity of the loss associated with the securities. In addition,
the Company recorded impairments of $9 on certain privately placed fixed maturities where the
Company does not anticipate substantial recovery.
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, other-than-temporary impairments primarily consisted of
CMBS, RMBS and Corporate securities. The CMBS impairments were primarily related to CRE CDOs that
contained below investment grade 2006 and 2007 vintage year collateral. RMBS impairments were
primarily taken on securities backed by second lien residential mortgages. Corporate impairments
were primarily due to a financial services company which experienced a lack of liquidity.
105
INVESTMENT CREDIT RISK
The Company has established investment credit policies that focus on the credit quality of obligors
and counterparties, limit credit concentrations, encourage diversification and require frequent
creditworthiness reviews. Investment activity, including setting of policy and defining acceptable
risk levels, is subject to regular review and approval by senior management.
The Company invests primarily in securities which are rated investment grade and has established
exposure limits, diversification standards and review procedures for all credit risks including
borrower, issuer and counterparty. Creditworthiness of specific obligors is determined by
consideration of external determinants of creditworthiness, typically ratings assigned by
nationally recognized ratings agencies and is supplemented by an internal credit evaluation.
Obligor, asset sector and industry concentrations are subject to established Company limits and are
monitored on a regular basis.
The Company is not exposed to any credit concentration risk of a single issuer greater than 10% of
the Companys stockholders equity other than U.S. government and U.S. government agencies backed
by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. For further discussion of concentration of
credit risk, see the Concentration of Credit Risk section in Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Derivative Instruments
In the normal course of business, the Company uses various derivative counterparties in executing
its derivative transactions. The use of counterparties creates credit risk that the counterparty
may not perform in accordance with the terms of the derivative transaction. The Company has
developed a derivative counterparty exposure policy which limits the Companys exposure to credit
risk.
The derivative counterparty exposure policy establishes market-based credit limits, favors
long-term financial stability and creditworthiness of the counterparty and typically requires
credit enhancement/credit risk reducing agreements.
The Company minimizes the credit risk of derivative instruments by entering into transactions with
high quality counterparties rated A2/A or better, which are monitored and evaluated by the
Companys risk management team and reviewed by senior management. In addition, the internal
compliance unit monitors counterparty credit exposure on a monthly basis to ensure compliance with
Company policies and statutory limitations. The Company also maintains a policy of requiring that
derivative contracts, other than exchange traded contracts, certain currency forward contracts, and
certain embedded derivatives, be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives Association
Master Agreement which is structured by legal entity and by counterparty and permits right of
offset.
The Company has developed credit exposure thresholds which are based upon counterparty ratings.
Credit exposures are measured using the market value of the derivatives, resulting in amounts owed
to the Company by its counterparties or potential payment obligations from the Company to its
counterparties. Credit exposures are generally quantified daily based on the prior business days
market value and collateral is pledged to and held by, or on behalf of, the Company to the extent
the current value of derivatives exceeds the contractual thresholds. In accordance with industry
standards and the contractual agreements, collateral is typically settled on the next business day.
The Company has exposure to credit risk for amounts below the exposure thresholds which are
uncollateralized as well as for market fluctuations that may occur between contractual settlement
periods of collateral movements.
The maximum uncollateralized threshold for a derivative counterparty for a single legal entity is
$10. The Company currently transacts derivatives in five legal entities and therefore the maximum
combined threshold for a single counterparty over all legal entities that use derivatives is $50.
In addition, the Company may have exposure to multiple counterparties in a single corporate family
due to a common credit support provider. As of March 31, 2009, the maximum combined threshold for
all counterparties under a single credit support provider over all legal entities that use
derivatives is $100. Based on the contractual terms of the collateral agreements, these thresholds
may be immediately reduced due to a downgrade in a counterpartys credit rating. For further
discussion, see the Derivative Commitments section of Note 9 of the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company has incurred no losses on derivative
instruments due to counterparty default.
In addition to counterparty credit risk, the Company enters into credit derivative instruments to
manage credit exposure. Credit derivatives used by the Company include credit default swaps,
credit index swaps, and total return swaps.
Credit default swaps involve a transfer of credit risk of one or many referenced entities from one
party to another in exchange for periodic payments. The party that purchases credit protection
will make periodic payments based on an agreed upon rate and notional amount, and for certain
transactions there will also be an upfront premium payment. The second party, who assumes credit
exposure, will typically only make a payment if there is a credit event and such payment will be
equal to the notional value of the swap contract less the value of the referenced security issuers
debt obligation. A credit event is generally defined as default on contractually obligated
interest or principal payments or bankruptcy of the referenced entity.
Credit index swaps and total return swaps involve the periodic exchange of payments with other
parties, at specified intervals, calculated using the agreed upon index and notional principal
amounts. Generally, no cash or principal payments are exchanged at the inception of the contract.
106
The Company uses credit derivatives to assume credit risk from and reduce credit risk to a single
entity, referenced index, or asset pool. The credit default swaps in which the Company assumes
credit risk reference investment grade single corporate issuers, baskets of up to five corporate
issuers and diversified portfolios of corporate issuers. The diversified portfolios of corporate
issuers are established within sector concentration limits and are typically divided into tranches
which possess different credit ratings ranging from AAA through the CCC rated first loss position.
In addition to the credit default swaps that assume credit exposure, the Company also purchases
credit protection through credit default swaps to economically hedge and manage credit risk of
certain fixed maturity investments across multiple sectors of the investment portfolio.
The credit default swaps are carried on the balance sheet at fair value. The Company received
upfront premium payments on certain credit default swaps, which reduces the Companys overall
credit exposure. The following table summarizes the credit default swaps used by the Company to
manage credit risk within the portfolio, excluding credit default swaps in offsetting positions
which had a notional amount of $2.6 billion as of March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Default Swaps |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Received |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Received |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Assuming credit risk |
|
$ |
1,075 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(469 |
) |
|
$ |
1,082 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(399 |
) |
Reducing credit risk |
|
|
4,508 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
3,668 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit default swaps |
|
$ |
5,583 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(232 |
) |
|
$ |
4,750 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009, the Company continued to reduce overall credit risk exposure to general
credit spread movements within its fixed maturity portfolio by increasing the notional amount of
the credit default swaps that reduce credit risk. The Companys credit default swap portfolio has
experienced and may continue to experience market value fluctuations based upon certain market
conditions, including credit spread movement of specific referenced entities. For the three months
ended March 31, 2009, the Company realized losses of $184, including periodic net coupon
settlements, on credit default swaps. The loss on credit derivatives that reduce credit risk was
primarily due to corporate credit spreads tightening while the loss on credit derivatives that
assume credit risk was primarily driven by credit spreads widening on certain credit default basket
swaps.
Available-for-Sale Securities
The following table presents the Companys fixed maturities by credit quality on a consolidated
basis. The ratings referenced below are based on the ratings of a nationally recognized rating
organization or, if not rated, assigned based on the Companys internal analysis of such
securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Fixed Maturities by Credit Quality |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
United States Government/Government agencies |
|
$ |
9,205 |
|
|
$ |
9,306 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
$ |
9,409 |
|
|
$ |
9,568 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
AAA |
|
|
16,901 |
|
|
|
13,297 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
17,844 |
|
|
|
13,489 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
% |
AA |
|
|
12,166 |
|
|
|
9,806 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
14,093 |
|
|
|
11,646 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
A |
|
|
18,432 |
|
|
|
15,238 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
18,742 |
|
|
|
15,831 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
% |
BBB |
|
|
16,130 |
|
|
|
12,902 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
|
15,749 |
|
|
|
12,794 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
% |
BB & below |
|
|
3,425 |
|
|
|
2,014 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
$ |
76,259 |
|
|
$ |
62,563 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
78,238 |
|
|
$ |
65,112 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The movement within the Companys investment ratings as a percentage of total fixed maturities
since December 31, 2008 is primarily attributable to recent rating agency downgrades. Offsetting
the aforementioned downgrades were efforts to reallocate the portfolio to higher quality,
risk-averse securities.
107
The following table presents the Companys available-for-sale securities by type on a consolidated
basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Available-for-Sale Securities by Type |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
Fixed maturities,
available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLOs [1] |
|
$ |
2,843 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(800 |
) |
|
$ |
2,043 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
$ |
2,865 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(735 |
) |
|
$ |
2,130 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Consumer loans |
|
|
2,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(626 |
) |
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
2,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
RMBS [2] |
|
|
2,343 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(1,083 |
) |
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(891 |
) |
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
Other [3] |
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
CMBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency backed [4] |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Bonds |
|
|
10,856 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(4,366 |
) |
|
|
6,503 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
11,144 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(4,370 |
) |
|
|
6,784 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
CRE CDOs |
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1,377 |
) |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1,302 |
) |
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
IOs |
|
|
1,332 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
CMOs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency backed |
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Non-agency backed [5] |
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic industry |
|
|
2,221 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Capital goods |
|
|
2,522 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
2,245 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
2,480 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Consumer cyclical |
|
|
2,230 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
2,335 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Consumer non-cyclical |
|
|
4,169 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
4,049 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
3,243 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Energy |
|
|
2,184 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
1,669 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Financial services |
|
|
7,390 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
(2,114 |
) |
|
|
5,411 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
8,422 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
(1,543 |
) |
|
|
7,133 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
Tech. & comm. |
|
|
3,740 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
3,429 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
3,738 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
3,424 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
Transportation |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Utilities |
|
|
4,979 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
4,585 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
4,859 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Other [6] |
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(435 |
) |
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Gov./Gov. agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
2,786 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
2,821 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
United States |
|
|
5,732 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
5,690 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
5,883 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
5,956 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
MBS |
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2,468 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
2,243 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
2,278 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Municipal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Tax-exempt |
|
|
10,621 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
(505 |
) |
|
|
10,358 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
10,291 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
9,761 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities,
available-for-sale |
|
|
76,259 |
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
(14,727 |
) |
|
|
62,563 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
78,238 |
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
(14,310 |
) |
|
|
65,112 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Equity securities,
available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services |
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
securities,
available-for-sale |
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities,
available-for-sale [7] |
|
$ |
77,577 |
|
|
$ |
1,243 |
|
|
$ |
(15,177 |
) |
|
$ |
63,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
79,792 |
|
|
$ |
1,387 |
|
|
$ |
(14,609 |
) |
|
$ |
66,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
As of March 31, 2009, 99% of these senior secured bank loan CLOs were AAA rated with an average subordination of 29%. |
|
[2] |
|
Includes securities with an amortized cost and fair value of $14 and $10, respectively, as of March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008, which were backed by pools of loans issued to prime borrowers, and $90 and $51, respectively, as of March 31,
2009 and $91 and $62, respectively, as of December 31, 2008, which were backed by pools of loans issued to Alt-A borrowers. |
|
[3] |
|
Includes CDO securities with an amortized cost and fair value of $7 and $2, respectively, as of March 31, 2009 and $8 and
$5, respectively, as of December 31, 2008, that contain a sub-prime residential mortgage loan component. |
|
[4] |
|
Represents securities with pools of loans by the Small Business Administration whose issued loans are backed by the full
faith and credit of the U.S. government. |
|
[5] |
|
Includes securities with an amortized cost and fair value of $207 and $123, respectively, as of March 31, 2009 and $214 and
$135, respectively, as of December 31, 2008, which were backed by pools of loans issued to Alt-A borrowers. |
|
[6] |
|
Includes structured investments with an amortized cost and fair value of $526 and $346, respectively, as of March 31, 2009
and $526 and $364, respectively, as of December 31, 2008. The underlying securities supporting these investments are
primarily diversified pools of investment grade corporate issuers which can withstand a 15% cumulative default rate,
assuming a 35% recovery. |
|
[7] |
|
Gross unrealized gains represent gains of $715, $526, and $2 for Life, Property & Casualty, and Corporate, respectively, as
of March 31, 2009 and $860, $526, and $1, respectively, as of December 31, 2008. Gross unrealized losses represent losses
of $11,495, $3,675, and $7 for Life, Property & Casualty, and Corporate, respectively, as of March 31, 2009 and $10,766,
$3,835, and $8, respectively, as of December 31, 2008. |
108
The Companys investment sector allocations as a percentage of total fixed maturities that have
changed most significantly since December 31, 2008 are corporate, foreign government and tax-exempt
municipal securities. The shift in corporate securities from financial services to consumer
non-cyclical and other recession resistant sectors was primarily due to efforts to reallocate the
portfolio to higher quality, risk-averse securities.
The available-for-sale net unrealized loss position increased $712 since December 31, 2008
primarily as a result of rising interest rates and credit spread widening on the financial services
and home equity sectors. Credit spreads widened primarily due to a global recession, continued
deterioration in the U.S. housing market, and the markets flight to quality securities. The
sectors most significantly impacted include financial services, residential and commercial
mortgage-backed, and consumer loan-backed investments. The following sections illustrate the
Companys holdings and provide commentary on these sectors.
Financial Services
While financial services companies remain under stress, the many government actions taken
throughout 2008 and into 2009 to address the seizure in the financial and capital markets have
provided some stability to the financial system. Following the introduction of Treasurys Capital
Purchase Program (CPP) and the establishment of the FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
(TLGP) in 2008, the Treasury Department introduced a comprehensive Financial Stability Plan in
February 2009. The Financial Stability Plan provides for additional measures designed to provide
capital relief to financial institutions through a Capital Assistance Program, a means for
financial institutions to dispose of troubled assets through a Public-Private Investment Fund
(PPIF), and the commitment of additional funds to support consumer and business lending through
the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF). Financial services companies continue to
face a very difficult macroeconomic environment and remain vulnerable to deteriorating asset
performance and quality, weak earnings prospects and pressured capital positions. It is still too
early to determine the ultimate impact of the measures outlined in the Financial Stability Plan.
The Company has exposure to the financial services sector predominantly through banking, insurance
and finance firms. A comparison of fair value to amortized cost is not indicative of the pricing
of individual securities as impairments have occurred. The following table represents the
Companys exposure to the financial services sector included in the corporate and equity
securities, available-for-sale lines in the Consolidated Available-for-Sale Securities by Type
table above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services by Credit Quality [1] |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
AAA |
|
$ |
324 |
|
|
$ |
323 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
$ |
728 |
|
|
$ |
628 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
AA |
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
% |
A |
|
|
4,420 |
|
|
|
3,231 |
|
|
|
55.0 |
% |
|
|
5,479 |
|
|
|
4,606 |
|
|
|
58.1 |
% |
BBB |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
BB & below |
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,177 |
|
|
$ |
5,871 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
9,395 |
|
|
$ |
7,923 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The credit qualities above include downgrades that have shifted the portfolio from higher
rated assets to lower rated assets since December 31, 2008. |
109
Sub-Prime Residential Mortgage Loans
The Company has exposure to sub-prime and Alt-A residential mortgage-backed securities included in
the Consolidated Available-for-Sale Securities by Type table above. These securities continue to
be affected by uncertainty surrounding the decline in home prices, negative technical factors and
deterioration in collateral performance.
The following table presents the Companys exposure to ABS supported by sub-prime mortgage loans by
current credit quality and vintage year, including direct investments in CDOs that contain a
sub-prime loan component, included in the RMBS and ABS Other line in the Consolidated
Available-for-Sale Securities by Type table above. A comparison of fair value to amortized cost is
not indicative of the pricing of individual securities as impairments have occurred. Credit
protection represents the current weighted average percentage, excluding wrapped securities, of the
outstanding capital structure subordinated to the Companys investment holding that is available to
absorb losses before the security incurs the first dollar loss of principal. The table below
excludes the Companys exposure to Alt-A residential mortgage loans, with an amortized cost and
fair value of $297 and $174, respectively, as of March 31, 2009 and $305 and $197, respectively, as
of December 31, 2008. These securities were primarily backed by 2007 vintage year collateral.
Sub-Prime Residential Mortgage Loans [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
2003 & Prior |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
227 |
|
2004 |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
2005 |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
2006 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
2007 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
880 |
|
|
$ |
557 |
|
|
$ |
249 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
293 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
2,246 |
|
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit protection |
|
42.1% |
|
|
50.2% |
|
|
39.6% |
|
|
32.9% |
|
|
26.8% |
|
|
41.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
2003 & Prior |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
2004 |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
2005 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
2006 |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
2007 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
370 |
|
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
$ |
1,220 |
|
|
$ |
846 |
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
2,435 |
|
|
$ |
1,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit protection |
|
40.5% |
|
|
47.6% |
|
|
31.4% |
|
|
21.9% |
|
|
19.9% |
|
|
41.0% |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The vintage year represents the year the underlying loans in the pool were originated. |
|
[2] |
|
Includes second lien residential mortgages with an amortized cost and fair value of $133 and $46, respectively, as of March
31, 2009 and $173 and $82, respectively, as of December 31, 2008, which are composed primarily of loans to prime and Alt-A
borrowers. |
|
[3] |
|
As of March 31, 2009, the weighted average life of the sub-prime residential mortgage portfolio was 3.7 years. |
|
[4] |
|
Approximately 86% of the portfolio is backed by adjustable rate mortgages. |
|
[5] |
|
The credit qualities above include downgrades that have shifted the portfolio from higher rated assets to lower rated
assets since December 31, 2008. |
110
Commercial Mortgage Loans
The Company has observed weakness in commercial real estate market fundamentals and expects
continued pressure on these fundamentals including increased vacancies, rising delinquencies, lower
rent growth and declining property values. The following tables present the Companys exposure to
CMBS bonds, CRE CDOs and IOs by current credit quality and vintage year, included in the CMBS lines
in the Consolidated Available-for-Sale Securities by Type table above. A comparison of fair value
to amortized cost is not indicative of the pricing of individual securities as impairments have
occurred. Credit protection represents the current weighted average percentage of the outstanding
capital structure subordinated to the Companys investment holding that is available to absorb
losses before the security incurs the first dollar loss of principal. This credit protection does
not include any equity interest or property value in excess of outstanding debt.
CMBS Bonds [1] [2]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
2003 & Prior |
|
$ |
1,955 |
|
|
$ |
1,845 |
|
|
$ |
446 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
2,649 |
|
|
$ |
2,282 |
|
2004 |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
2005 |
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
|
1,343 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
3,781 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
2007 |
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,959 |
|
|
$ |
5,011 |
|
|
$ |
1,595 |
|
|
$ |
691 |
|
|
$ |
1,324 |
|
|
$ |
462 |
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
$ |
282 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
10,856 |
|
|
$ |
6,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit protection |
|
25.0% |
|
|
17.7% |
|
|
12.8% |
|
|
8.4% |
|
|
4.5% |
|
|
20.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
2003 & Prior |
|
$ |
2,057 |
|
|
$ |
1,869 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
2,760 |
|
|
$ |
2,322 |
|
2004 |
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
2005 |
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
1,498 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
3,841 |
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
2007 |
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,409 |
|
|
$ |
5,294 |
|
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
$ |
1,182 |
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
11,144 |
|
|
$ |
6,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit protection |
|
24.4% |
|
|
16.4% |
|
|
12.2% |
|
|
5.3% |
|
|
4.4% |
|
|
20.6% |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The vintage year represents the year the pool of loans was originated. |
|
[2] |
|
The credit qualities above include downgrades that have shifted the
portfolio from higher rated assets to lower rated assets since
December 31, 2008. |
111
CMBS CRE CDOs [1] [2] [3] [4]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
2003 & Prior |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
2004 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
2005 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
2006 |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
2007 |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
2008 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
2009 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
421 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
1,735 |
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit protection |
|
26.6% |
|
|
13.4% |
|
|
19.5% |
|
|
39.6% |
|
|
36.2% |
|
|
25.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
2003 & Prior |
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
2004 |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
2005 |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
2006 |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
2007 |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
2008 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
$ |
268 |
|
|
$ |
394 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
1,763 |
|
|
$ |
463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit protection |
|
29.7% |
|
|
21.3% |
|
|
18.2% |
|
|
19.4% |
|
|
57.0% |
|
|
25.4% |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The vintage year represents the year that the underlying collateral in the pool was originated. Individual CDO market value is
allocated by the proportion of collateral within each vintage year. |
|
[2] |
|
As of March 31, 2009, approximately 35% of the underlying CMBS CRE CDO collateral are seasoned, below investment grade securities. |
|
[3] |
|
For certain CDOs, the collateral manager has the ability to reinvest proceeds that become available, primarily from collateral
maturities. The increase in the 2008 and 2009 vintage years represents reinvestment under these CDOs. |
|
[4] |
|
The credit qualities above include downgrades that have shifted the portfolio from higher rated assets to lower rated assets
since December 31, 2008. |
CMBS IOs [1] [2]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
Total |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
2003 & Prior |
|
$ |
417 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
417 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
440 |
|
|
$ |
423 |
|
2004 |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
2005 |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
2006 |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
2007 |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,325 |
|
|
$ |
1,076 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1,332 |
|
|
$ |
1,082 |
|
|
$ |
1,396 |
|
|
$ |
1,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The vintage year represents the year the pool of loans was originated. |
|
[2] |
|
The credit qualities above include downgrades that have shifted the
portfolio from higher rated assets to lower rated assets since
December 31, 2008. |
112
ABS Consumer Loans
The Company continues to see weakness in consumer credit fundamentals. Rising delinquency and loss
rates have been driven by the recessionary economy and higher unemployment rates. Delinquencies
and losses on consumer loans rose during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and the Company
expects this trend to continue throughout the year. However, the Company expects its ABS consumer
loan holdings to face limited credit concerns, as the borrower collateral quality and structural
credit enhancement of the securities are sufficient to absorb a significantly higher level of
defaults than are currently anticipated. The following table presents the Companys exposure to
ABS consumer loans by credit quality, included in the ABS consumer loans line in the Consolidated
Available-for-Sale Securities by Type table above.
ABS Consumer Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Auto [1] |
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
534 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
Credit card [2] |
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
Student loan [3] |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total [4] |
|
$ |
777 |
|
|
$ |
596 |
|
|
$ |
420 |
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
$ |
477 |
|
|
$ |
351 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
2,149 |
|
|
$ |
1,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Auto [1] |
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
209 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
545 |
|
|
$ |
421 |
|
Credit card [2] |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
Student loan [3] |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total [4] |
|
$ |
848 |
|
|
$ |
635 |
|
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
560 |
|
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
2,251 |
|
|
$ |
1,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
As of March 31, 2009, approximately 11% of the auto consumer loan-backed securities were issued by lenders whose primary
business is to sub-prime borrowers. |
|
[2] |
|
As of March 31, 2009, approximately 7% of the securities were issued by lenders that lend primarily to sub-prime borrowers. |
|
[3] |
|
As of March 31, 2009, approximately half of the student loan-backed exposure is guaranteed by the Federal Family Education
Loan Program, with the remainder comprised of loans to prime-borrowers. |
|
[4] |
|
The credit qualities above include downgrades that have shifted the portfolio from higher rated assets to lower rated
assets since December 31, 2008. |
113
Security Unrealized Loss Aging
The following table presents the Companys unrealized loss aging for available-for-sale securities
on a consolidated basis by length of time the security was in a continuous unrealized loss
position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Securities |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Three months or less |
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
$ |
9,967 |
|
|
$ |
8,490 |
|
|
$ |
(1,477 |
) |
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
$ |
16,425 |
|
|
$ |
14,992 |
|
|
$ |
(1,433 |
) |
Greater than three to six months |
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
6,811 |
|
|
|
5,691 |
|
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
6,533 |
|
|
|
5,247 |
|
|
|
(1,286 |
) |
Greater than six to nine months |
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
5,912 |
|
|
|
4,733 |
|
|
|
(1,179 |
) |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
7,053 |
|
|
|
5,873 |
|
|
|
(1,180 |
) |
Greater than nine to twelve months |
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
6,248 |
|
|
|
5,132 |
|
|
|
(1,116 |
) |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
6,459 |
|
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
|
(1,502 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
2,736 |
|
|
|
28,106 |
|
|
|
17,821 |
|
|
|
(10,285 |
) |
|
|
2,417 |
|
|
|
25,279 |
|
|
|
16,071 |
|
|
|
(9,208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
6,169 |
|
|
$ |
57,044 |
|
|
$ |
41,867 |
|
|
$ |
(15,177 |
) |
|
|
6,612 |
|
|
$ |
61,749 |
|
|
$ |
47,140 |
|
|
$ |
(14,609 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables present the Companys unrealized loss aging for available-for-sale securities
by length of time the security was in a continuous greater than 20% unrealized loss position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized Assets Depressed over 20% |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Consecutive Months |
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Three months or less |
|
|
361 |
|
|
$ |
4,991 |
|
|
$ |
3,101 |
|
|
$ |
(1,890 |
) |
|
|
786 |
|
|
$ |
10,981 |
|
|
$ |
6,474 |
|
|
$ |
(4,507 |
) |
Greater than three to six months |
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
6,427 |
|
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
(3,077 |
) |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
(1,161 |
) |
Greater than six to nine months |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
(1,092 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
(755 |
) |
Greater than nine to twelve months |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
(837 |
) |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
(1,272 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
1,979 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
(1,620 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
$ |
16,211 |
|
|
$ |
7,695 |
|
|
$ |
(8,516 |
) |
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
$ |
16,133 |
|
|
$ |
8,142 |
|
|
$ |
(7,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Securities Depressed over 20% |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Consecutive Months |
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Three months or less |
|
|
464 |
|
|
$ |
4,069 |
|
|
$ |
2,709 |
|
|
$ |
(1,360 |
) |
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
$ |
10,531 |
|
|
$ |
7,009 |
|
|
$ |
(3,522 |
) |
Greater than three to six months |
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
6,189 |
|
|
|
3,647 |
|
|
|
(2,542 |
) |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
Greater than six to nine months |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
Greater than nine to twelve months |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
$ |
10,943 |
|
|
$ |
6,632 |
|
|
$ |
(4,311 |
) |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
$ |
11,332 |
|
|
$ |
7,440 |
|
|
$ |
(3,892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Securities Depressed over 20% |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Consecutive Months |
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Three months or less |
|
|
825 |
|
|
$ |
9,060 |
|
|
$ |
5,810 |
|
|
$ |
(3,250 |
) |
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
$ |
21,512 |
|
|
$ |
13,483 |
|
|
$ |
(8,029 |
) |
Greater than three to six months |
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
12,616 |
|
|
|
6,997 |
|
|
|
(5,619 |
) |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
2,139 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
(1,339 |
) |
Greater than six to nine months |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
(1,273 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
(830 |
) |
Greater than nine to twelve months |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
(898 |
) |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
1,989 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
(1,379 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
2,237 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
(1,787 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,351 |
|
|
$ |
27,154 |
|
|
$ |
14,327 |
|
|
$ |
(12,827 |
) |
|
|
2,328 |
|
|
$ |
27,465 |
|
|
$ |
15,582 |
|
|
$ |
(11,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
The following tables present the Companys unrealized loss aging for available-for-sale securities
(included in the tables above) by length of time the security was in a continuous greater than 50%
unrealized loss position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized Assets Depressed over 50% |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Consecutive Months |
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Three months or less |
|
|
316 |
|
|
$ |
3,887 |
|
|
$ |
1,498 |
|
|
$ |
(2,389 |
) |
|
|
521 |
|
|
$ |
7,045 |
|
|
$ |
2,374 |
|
|
$ |
(4,671 |
) |
Greater than three to six months |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
4,256 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
(3,128 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
Greater than six to nine months |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
Greater than nine to twelve months |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
682 |
|
|
$ |
8,773 |
|
|
$ |
2,704 |
|
|
$ |
(6,069 |
) |
|
|
590 |
|
|
$ |
7,679 |
|
|
$ |
2,477 |
|
|
$ |
(5,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Securities Depressed over 50% |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Consecutive Months |
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Three months or less |
|
|
150 |
|
|
$ |
2,607 |
|
|
$ |
1,007 |
|
|
$ |
(1,600 |
) |
|
|
129 |
|
|
$ |
1,305 |
|
|
$ |
549 |
|
|
$ |
(756 |
) |
Greater than three to six months |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than six to nine months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than nine to twelve months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
182 |
|
|
$ |
2,935 |
|
|
$ |
1,103 |
|
|
$ |
(1,832 |
) |
|
|
129 |
|
|
$ |
1,305 |
|
|
$ |
549 |
|
|
$ |
(756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Securities Depressed over 50% |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Consecutive Months |
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Three months or less |
|
|
466 |
|
|
$ |
6,494 |
|
|
$ |
2,505 |
|
|
$ |
(3,989 |
) |
|
|
650 |
|
|
$ |
8,350 |
|
|
$ |
2,923 |
|
|
$ |
(5,427 |
) |
Greater than three to six months |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
4,584 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
(3,360 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
Greater than six to nine months |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
Greater than nine to twelve months |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
864 |
|
|
$ |
11,708 |
|
|
$ |
3,807 |
|
|
$ |
(7,901 |
) |
|
|
719 |
|
|
$ |
8,984 |
|
|
$ |
3,026 |
|
|
$ |
(5,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized Assets
The majority of securitized assets depressed over 20%, as well as over 50% for six consecutive
months or greater are primarily related to CMBS and RMBS. Based upon the Companys cash flow
modeling, which shows no expectation of loss of principal and interest, and the Companys assertion
of its intent and ability to retain the securities until recovery, it has been determined that
these securities are temporarily impaired as of March 31, 2009.
115
All Other Securities
The majority of all other securities depressed over 20%, as well as over 50% for six consecutive
months or greater primarily relate to financial services sector securities that have experienced
significant price deterioration. Based upon the Companys analysis of these securities and current
macroeconomic conditions, the Company expects to see significant price recovery on these securities
and these securities continue to pay in accordance with their contractual terms; therefore, the
Company has determined that these securities are temporarily impaired as of March 31, 2009. For
further discussion on these securities, see the discussion below the Consolidated
Available-for-Sale Securities by Type table in this section above.
Future changes in the fair value of the investment portfolio are primarily dependent on the extent
of future issuer credit losses, return of liquidity and changes in general market conditions,
including interest rates and credit spread movements.
As part of the Companys ongoing security monitoring process by a committee of investment and
accounting professionals, the Company has reviewed its investment portfolio and concluded that
there were no additional other-than-temporary impairments as of March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008. During this analysis, the Company asserts its intent and ability to retain until recovery
those securities judged to be temporarily impaired. Once identified, these securities are
systematically restricted from trading unless approved by the committee. The committee will only
authorize the sale of these securities based on predefined criteria that relate to events that
could not have been reasonably foreseen at the time the committee rendered its judgment on the
Companys intent and ability to retain such securities until recovery. Examples of the criteria
include, but are not limited to, the deterioration in the issuers creditworthiness, a change in
regulatory requirements or a major business combination or major disposition.
The evaluation for other-than-temporary impairments is a quantitative and qualitative process,
which is subject to risks and uncertainties and is intended to determine whether declines in the
fair value of investments are other-than-temporary. The risks and uncertainties include changes in
general economic conditions, the issuers financial condition and/or future prospects, the effects
of changes in interest rates and/or credit spreads and the expected recovery period. In addition,
for securitized assets with contractual cash flows (e.g., ABS and CMBS), projections of expected
future cash flows may change based upon new information regarding the performance of the underlying
collateral. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, managements expectation of the discounted
future cash flows on these securities was in excess of the associated securities amortized cost.
For a further discussion, see Evaluation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments on Available-for-Sale
Securities discussion included in the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A and
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments on Available-for-Sale Securities section in Note 1 of The
Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report, and Future Adoption of New Accounting Standards section of
Note 1 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
116
CAPITAL MARKETS RISK MANAGEMENT
The Hartford has a disciplined approach to managing risks associated with its capital markets and
asset/liability management activities. Investment portfolio management is organized to focus
investment management expertise on the specific classes of investments, while asset/liability
management is the responsibility of a dedicated risk management unit supporting Life and Property &
Casualty operations. Derivative instruments are utilized in compliance with established Company
policy and regulatory requirements and are monitored internally and reviewed by senior management.
During the first quarter of 2009, a global recession, continued deterioration in the U.S. housing
market, and the markets flight to quality securities contributed to increased unrealized losses on
the Companys investment portfolio.
Market Risk
The Hartford is exposed to market risk, primarily relating to the market price and/or cash flow
variability associated with changes in interest rates, credit spreads including issuer defaults,
equity prices or market indices, and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company is also exposed
to credit and counterparty repayment risk. The Company analyzes interest rate risk using various
models including parametric models that forecast cash flows of the liabilities and the supporting
investments, including derivative instruments, under various market scenarios. For further
discussion of market risk, see the Capital Markets Risk Management section of the MD&A in The
Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Interest Rate Risk
The Companys exposure to interest rate risk relates to the market price and/or cash flow
variability associated with the changes in market interest rates. The Company manages its exposure
to interest rate risk through asset allocation limits, asset/liability duration matching and
through the use of derivatives. For further discussion of interest rate risk, see the Interest
Rate Risk discussion within the Capital Markets Risk Management section of the MD&A in The
Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
The Company is also exposed to interest rate risk based upon the discount rate assumption
associated with the Companys pension and other postretirement benefit obligations. The discount
rate assumption is based upon an interest rate yield curve comprised of bonds rated Aa or higher
with maturities primarily between zero and thirty years. For further discussion of interest rate
risk associated with the benefit obligations, see the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the
MD&A under Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Obligations and Note 17 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Credit Risk
The Company is exposed to credit risk within our investment portfolio and through counterparties.
Credit risk relates to the uncertainty of an obligors continued ability to make timely payments in
accordance with the contractual terms of the instrument or contract. The Company manages credit
risk through established investment credit policies which address quality of obligors and
counterparties, credit concentration limits, diversification requirements and acceptable risk
levels under expected and stressed scenarios. These policies are regularly reviewed and approved
by senior management and by the Companys Board of Directors.
The derivative counterparty exposure policy establishes market-based credit limits, favors
long-term financial stability and creditworthiness of the counterparty and typically requires
credit enhancement/credit risk reducing agreements. The Company minimizes the credit risk in
derivative instruments by entering into transactions with high quality counterparties rated A2/A or
better, which are monitored and evaluated by the Companys risk management team and reviewed by
senior management. In addition, the internal compliance unit monitors counterparty credit exposure
on a monthly basis to ensure compliance with Company policies and statutory limitations.
Derivative counterparty credit risk is measured as the amount owed to the Company based upon
current market conditions and potential payment obligations between the Company and its
counterparties. Credit exposures are generally quantified daily based on the prior business days
market value and collateral is pledged to and held by, or on behalf of, the Company to the extent
the current value of derivative instruments exceeds the contractual thresholds. In accordance with
industry standards and the contractual agreements, collateral is typically settled on the next
business day. The Company has exposure to credit risk for amounts below the exposure thresholds
which are uncollateralized, as well as, for market fluctuations that may occur between contractual
settlement periods of collateral movements.
The Company has developed credit exposure thresholds which are based upon counterparty ratings.
The maximum uncollateralized threshold for a derivative counterparty for a single legal entity is
$10. The Company currently transacts derivatives in five legal entities and therefore the maximum
combined threshold for a single counterparty over all legal entities that use derivatives is $50.
In addition, the Company may have exposure to multiple counterparties in a single corporate family
due to a common credit support provider. As of March 31, 2009, the maximum combined threshold for
all counterparties under a single credit support provider over all legal entities that use
derivatives is $100. Based on the contractual terms of the collateral agreements, these thresholds
may be immediately reduced due to a downgrade in a counterpartys credit rating. For further
discussion, see the Derivative Commitments section of Note 9 of the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In addition to counterparty credit risk, the Company enters into credit derivative instruments,
including credit default, index and total return swaps, in which the Company assumes credit risk
from or reduces credit risk to a single entity, referenced index, or asset pool, in exchange for
periodic payments. For further information on credit derivatives, see the Investment Credit Risk
section.
117
The Company is also exposed to credit spread risk related to security market price and cash flows
associated with changes in credit spreads. Credit spread widening will reduce the fair value of
the investment portfolio and will increase net investment income on new purchases. This will also
result in losses associated with credit based non-qualifying derivatives where the Company assumes
credit exposure. If issuer credit spreads increase significantly or for an extended period of
time, it may result in higher other-than-temporary impairments. Credit spread tightening will
reduce net investment income associated with new purchases of fixed maturities and increase the
fair value of the investment portfolio. Credit spread widening in certain sectors resulted in an
increase in the Companys unrealized losses. For further discussion of sectors most significantly
impacted, see the Investment Credit Risk section. Also, see Capital Resources and Liquidity
for a discussion of the movement of credit spread impacts on the Companys statutory financial
results as it relates to the accounting and reporting for market value fixed annuities.
Lifes Equity Product Risk
The Companys Life operations are significantly influenced by changes in the U.S., Japanese, and
other global equity markets. Appreciation or depreciation in equity markets impacts certain assets
and liabilities related to the Companys variable products and the Companys earnings derived from
those products. The Companys variable products include variable annuities, mutual funds, and
variable life insurance sold to retail and institutional customers. These variable products may
include product guarantees such as guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (GMWB), guaranteed
minimum death benefits (GMDB), and guaranteed minimum income benefits (GMIB).
Substantially all of the Companys variable annuity contracts contain GMDBs and a portion of those
contracts also contain GMWBs or GMIBs. The Companys maximum exposure disclosed below for death
and living benefits are calculated independently, however, these exposures are substantially
overlapping.
Generally, declines in equity markets, such as those experienced in 2008 and 2009, will and did:
|
|
reduce the value of assets under management and the amount of fee income generated from
those assets; |
|
|
reduce the value of equity securities, held for trading, for international variable
annuities, the related policyholder funds and benefits payable, and the amount of fee income
generated from those annuities; |
|
|
increase the liability for GMWB benefits resulting in realized capital losses; |
|
|
increase the value of derivative assets used to hedge product guarantees resulting in
realized capital gains; |
|
|
increase costs under the Companys hedging program; |
|
|
increase the Companys net amount at risk for GMDB and GMIB benefits; |
|
|
decrease the Companys actual gross profits, resulting in a negative true-up to current
period DAC amortization; |
|
|
increase the amount of required statutory capital necessary to maintain targeted risk based
capital (RBC) ratios; |
|
|
turn customer sentiment toward equity-linked products negative, causing a decline in sales;
and |
|
|
cause a significant decrease in the estimates of future gross profits used in the Companys
quantitative estimates of gross profits under the Companys stochastic DAC methodology. As a
result, during the first quarter of 2009, the Companys estimates of gross profits were
determined to be unreasonable, and the Company recorded an unlock charge of $1.6 billion after
tax. See Life Estimated Gross Profits Used in the Valuation and Amortization of Assets and
Liabilities Associated with Variable Annuity and Other Universal Life-Type Contracts within
Critical Accounting Estimates for further information on DAC and related equity market
sensitivities. |
Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefits
The majority of the Companys U.S. and U.K. variable annuities are sold with a GMWB living benefit
rider, which is accounted for under SFAS 133. Declines in the equity market will increase the
Companys exposure to benefits, under the GMWB contracts, leading to an increase in the Companys
existing liability for those benefits.
For example, a GMWB contract is in the money if the contract holders guaranteed remaining
benefit (GRB) becomes greater than the account value. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
90% and 88%, respectively, of all unreinsured U.S. GMWB in-force contracts were in the money.
For U.S. and U.K. GMWB contracts that were in the money the Companys exposure to the GRB, after
reinsurance, as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, was $9.3 billion and $7.7 billion,
respectively.
However, the only ways the GMWB contract holder can monetize the excess of the GRB over the account
value of the contract is upon death or if their account value is reduced to a contractually
specified minimum level, through a combination of a series of withdrawals that do not exceed a
specific percentage of the premiums paid per year and market declines. If the account value is
reduced to the contractually specified minimum level, the contract holder will receive an annuity
equal to the remaining GRB and, for the Companys life-time GMWB products, the annuity can
continue beyond the GRB. As the amount of the excess of the GRB over the account value can
fluctuate with equity market returns on a daily basis, and the ultimate life-time GMWB payments can
exceed the GRB, the ultimate amount to be paid by the Company, if any, is uncertain and could be significantly more or
less than $9.3 billion. For additional information on the Companys GMWB liability, see Note 4.
118
Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits and Guaranteed Minimum Income Benefits
In the U.S., the Company sells variable annuity contracts that offer various GMDBs. Declines in
the equity market will increase the Companys liability for death benefits under these contracts.
The Company accounts for these GMDB liabilities under SOP 03-1, Accounting and Reporting by
Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate
Accounts, and, as such, these liabilities are not carried at fair value under SFAS 157.
The Companys total gross exposure (i.e., before reinsurance) to U.S. GMDBs as of March 31, 2009 is
$36.0 billion. The Company will incur these GMDB payments in the future only if the policyholder
has an in-the-money guaranteed death benefit at their time of death. The Company currently
reinsures 48% of these GMDBs. Under certain of these reinsurance agreements, the reinsurers
exposure is subject to an annual cap. For these products, the Companys net exposure (i.e. after
reinsurance), referred to as the retained net amount at risk, is $18.7 billion, as of March 31,
2009. For additional information on the Companys GMDB liability, see Note 7 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In Japan, the Company offers certain variable annuity products with both a GMDB and a GMIB.
Declines in equity markets as well as a strengthening of the Japanese yen in comparison to the U.S.
dollar and other currencies may increase the Companys exposure to these guaranteed benefits. This
increased exposure may be significant in extreme market scenarios. The Company accounts for these
GMDB and GMIB liabilities under SOP 03-1.
The Companys total gross exposure (i.e., before reinsurance) to these GMDBs and GMIBs offered in
Japan as of March 31, 2009 is $9 billion. The Company will incur these guaranteed death or income
benefits in the future only if the contract holder has an in-the-money guaranteed benefit at either
the time of their death or if the account value is insufficient to fund the guaranteed living
benefits. The Company currently reinsures 15% of these death benefit guarantees. Under certain of
these reinsurance agreements, the reinsurers exposure is subject to an annual cap. For these
products, the Companys retained net amount at risk is $7.6 billion, as of March 31, 2009. For
additional information on the Companys GMDB/GMIB liability, see Note 7 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Lifes Product Guarantee Accounting Models
The accounting for various living benefit and death benefit guarantees is significantly different
and influences the form of risk management employed by the Company. GMWBs meet the definition of
an embedded derivative under SFAS 133 and are recorded at fair value under SFAS 157, incorporating
changes in equity indices and equity index volatility, with changes in fair value recorded in
earnings. However, for other benefit guarantees, certain contract features that define how the
contract holder can access the value and substance of the guaranteed benefit change the accounting
from SFAS 133 to SOP 03-1. For contracts where the contract holder can only obtain the value of
the guaranteed benefit upon the occurrence of an insurable event such as death (GMDB) or when the
benefit received is in substance a long-term financing (GMIB), the accounting for the benefit is
prescribed by SOP 03-1.
As a result of these significant accounting differences, the liability for guarantees recorded
under SOP 03-1 is significantly different than if it was recorded under SFAS 133 and vice versa.
In addition, the conditions in the capital markets in Japan versus those in the U.S. are
sufficiently different that if the Companys GMWB product currently offered in the U.S. were
offered in Japan, the capital market conditions in Japan would have a significant impact on the
valuation of the GMWB, irrespective of the accounting model. The same would hold true if the
Companys GMIB product currently offered in Japan were to be offered in the U.S. Capital market
conditions in the U.S. would have a significant impact on the valuation of the GMIB.
Lifes Equity Product Risk Management
The Company has made considerable investment in analyzing current and potential future market risk
exposures arising from a number of factors, including but not limited to; product guarantees (GMDB,
GMWB, and GMIB), equity market and interest rate risks (in the U.S., U.K., and Japan), and foreign
currency exchange rates. The Company evaluates these risks individually and, increasingly, in the
aggregate to determine the risk profiles of all of its products and to judge their potential
impacts on financial metrics including U.S. GAAP earnings and statutory surplus. The Company
manages the equity market, interest rate and foreign currency exchange risks embedded in these
product guarantees through a combination of product design, reinsurance, customized derivatives,
and dynamic hedging and macro hedging programs.
In consideration of current market conditions, the Companys risk management program for the
variable annuity market in the near term will include redesigned product features and offerings
which serve to lessen the financial risk of the product guarantees and increased rider fees charged
for the product guarantees. Depending upon competitors reactions with respect to product suites
and related rider charges, the Companys strategies of reducing product risk and increasing fees
may cause a decline in market share.
Reinsurance
The Company uses reinsurance to manage the risk exposure for a portion of contracts issued with
GMWB riders prior to the third quarter of 2003 and, in addition, in 2008, the Company entered into
a reinsurance agreement to reinsure GMWB risks associated with a block of business sold between the
third quarter of 2003 and the second quarter of 2006. The Companys GMWB reinsurance is accounted
for as a freestanding derivative and is reported at fair value under SFAS 157.
The Company also uses reinsurance to manage the risk exposure for a majority of the death benefit
riders issued in the U.S. and a portion of the death benefit riders issued in Japan.
119
Derivative Hedging Programs
The Company maintains derivative hedging programs for its product guarantee risk to meet multiple,
and in some cases, competing risk management objectives, including providing protection against
tail scenario equity market events, providing resources to pay product guarantee claims, and
minimizing U.S. GAAP earnings volatility, statutory surplus volatility and other economic metrics.
For reinsurance and derivatives, the Company retains credit risk associated with the third parties.
Refer to preceding section Credit Risk for the Companys discussion of credit risk.
The Company is continually exploring new ways and new markets to manage or layoff the capital
markets and policyholder behavior risks associated with its U.S. GMWB living benefits. During 2007
and 2008, the Company entered into customized derivative contracts to hedge certain capital market
risk components for the remaining term of specific blocks of non-reinsured U.S. GMWB riders. These
customized derivative contracts provide protection from capital markets risks based on policyholder
behavior assumptions specified by the Company at the inception of the derivative transactions. The
Company retains the risk for actual policyholder behavior that is different from assumptions within
the customized derivatives.
The Companys dynamic hedging program uses derivative instruments to manage the U.S. GAAP earnings
volatility associated with variable annuity product guarantees including equity market declines,
equity implied volatility, declines in interest rates and foreign currency exchange risk. The
Company uses hedging instruments including: interest rate futures and swaps; S&P 500, NASDAQ and
EAFE index put options; total return swaps; and futures contracts. The dynamic hedging program
involves a detailed monitoring of policyholder behavior and capital markets conditions on a daily
basis and rebalancing of the hedge position as needed depending upon the risk strategy employed.
While the Company actively manages this dynamic hedging program, increased U.S. GAAP earnings
volatility may result from factors including, but not limited to, policyholder behavior, capital
markets dislocation or discontinuity, divergence between the performance of the underlying funds
and the hedging indices, and the relative emphasis placed on various risk management objectives.
The Companys macro hedge program uses derivative instruments to partially hedge the statutory tail
scenario risk associated primarily with its U.S. and Japan living and death benefit statutory
reserves, providing an additional measure of protection, under tail scenarios, on statutory surplus
and the associated RBC ratios. A consequence of the macro hedge program will be additional cost
and volatility, under non-tail scenarios, as the macro hedge is intended to partially hedge certain
equity-market sensitive liabilities calculated under statutory accounting (see Capital Resources
and Liquidity) and changes in the value of the derivatives may not be closely aligned to changes in
liabilities determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, causing volatility in U.S. GAAP earnings.
Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008, the global economy experienced severe weakening resulting
from the dramatic decline in the equity markets, increasing equity index implied volatility,
widening of credit spreads, significant declines in interest rates, and volatility in foreign
currency exchanges rates. These significant and precipitous economic events increased, to varying
degrees, the Companys exposure to death and living benefit guarantees, the statutory product
guarantee liabilities, and the level of statutory surplus required to maintain the Companys RBC
ratios.
In response to these severe economic drivers, through the first quarter of 2009, the Company
initiated a redesign of the variable annuity product suite strategy designed to lessen the
financial risk of variable annuity product guarantees and increase the rider fees on new sales and
on in-force, as contractually permitted. The Company will continue to hedge the risk of the
product guarantees with a greater relative emphasis on protection of statutory surplus. This
rebalancing of the hedging program affords an additional measure of protection to improve the
Companys capital efficiency in managing tail risk for statutory surplus during periods of declines
in the equity markets. This shift in relative emphasis will likely result in greater U.S. GAAP
earnings volatility.
In the first quarter of 2009, the rebalancing of variable annuity hedging programs resulted in the
sale of certain derivative positions, a portion of which proceeds were used to purchase other
derivatives for the protection of statutory surplus and the associated target RBC ratios. The
Company maintains hedge positions on the S&P 500 index and the U.S. dollar/yen exchange rate to
economically hedge statutory reserves and to provide protection of statutory surplus arising
primarily from GMDB and GMWB obligations. Refer to Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information on hedging derivatives.
120
The following table summarizes the Companys U.S. GMWB account value by type of risk management
strategy as of March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMWB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account |
|
|
% of GMWB |
|
Risk Management Strategy |
|
Duration |
|
Value |
|
|
Account Value |
|
Entire GMWB risk reinsured with a third party |
|
Life of the product |
|
$ |
9,316 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets risk transferred to a third |
|
Designed to cover the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
party
behavior risk retained by the Company |
|
effective life of the product |
|
|
9,341 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynamic hedging of capital markets risk
using various derivative instruments [1] |
|
Weighted average of 5 years |
|
|
16,983 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,640 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Through the first quarter of 2009, the Company continued to maintain a reduced level of
dynamic hedge protection on U.S. GAAP earnings while placing a greater relative emphasis on
the protection of statutory surplus. This shift in emphasis includes the macro hedge program. |
Equity Risk Impact on Statutory Capital and Risked Based Capital
See Capital Resources and Liquidity, Ratings for information on the equity risk impact on statutory
results.
Derivative Instruments
The Company utilizes a variety of derivative instruments, including swaps, caps, floors, forwards,
futures and options through one of four Company-approved objectives: to hedge risk arising from
interest rate, equity market, credit spread including issuer default, price or currency exchange
rate risk or volatility; to manage liquidity; to control transaction costs; or to enter into
replication transactions.
Further downgrades to the credit ratings of The Hartfords insurance operating companies may have
adverse implications for its use of derivatives including those used to hedge benefit guarantees of
variable annuities. In some cases, further downgrades may give derivative counterparties the
unilateral authority to cancel and settle outstanding derivative trades or require additional
collateral to be posted. In addition, further downgrades may result in counterparties becoming
unwilling to engage in additional over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives or may require
collateralization before entering into any new trades. This will restrict the supply of derivative
instruments commonly used to hedge variable annuity guarantees, particularly long-dated equity
derivatives and interest rate swaps. Under these circumstances, The Hartfords operating
subsidiaries could conduct hedging activity using available OTC derivatives as well as a
combination of cash and exchange-traded instruments.
121
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Capital resources and liquidity represent the overall financial strength of The Hartford and the
Life and Property & Casualty insurance operations and their ability to generate cash flows from
each of their business segments, borrow funds at competitive rates and raise new capital to meet
operating and growth needs over the next twelve months.
Liquidity Requirements and Sources of Capital
Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. Holding Company
The liquidity requirements of the holding company of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
(HFSG Holding Company) have been and will continue to be met by HFSG Holding Companys cash and short-term investments of $1.3 billion, dividends from the Life and
Property & Casualty insurance operations as well as the issuance of commercial paper, common stock,
debt or other capital securities and borrowings from its credit facilities. Expected liquidity
requirements of the HFSG Holding Company during 2009 include repayment of $375 of commercial paper
during the first and second quarter of 2009, interest expense on debt of approximately $450 and
stockholder dividends, subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors, of $154.
Debt
For additional information regarding debt, see Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Commercial Paper Repayment
The Federal Reserve Board authorized the Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF) on October 7,
2008 under Section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act to provide a liquidity backstop to U.S. issuers
of commercial paper. The CPFF is intended to improve liquidity in short-term funding markets by
increasing the availability of term commercial paper funding to issuers and by providing greater
assurance to both issuers and investors that firms will be able to roll over their maturing
commercial paper.
The Company registered with the CPFF in order to sell up to a maximum of $375 to the facility, of
which it issued the full amount as of December 31, 2008. The Companys commercial paper must be
rated A-1/P-1/F1 by at least two ratings agencies to be eligible for the program. Moodys, S&P and
Fitch all recently downgraded our commercial paper rating, rendering the Company ineligible to sell
additional commercial paper under the CPFF program going forward. As a result, we will be required
to pay the maturing commercial paper issued under the CPFF program from existing sources of
liquidity. As of March 31, 2009 we have paid $21 of maturing commercial paper with the remaining
$354 paid as of April 30, 2009.
Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
While the Company has significant discretion in making voluntary contributions to the U. S.
qualified defined benefit pension plan (the Plan), the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974 as amended by the Pension Protection Act of 2006 mandates minimum contributions in certain
circumstances. The Company does not have a required minimum funding contribution for the U.S.
qualified defined benefit pension plan for 2009 and the funding requirements for all of the pension
plans are expected to be immaterial. The Company presently anticipates contributing approximately $200 to its pension plans and other postretirement plans in 2009, based upon certain
economic and business assumptions. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, equity market
performance, changes in interest rates and the Companys other capital requirements.
Dividends from the Insurance Operations
Dividends to the HFSG Holding Company from its insurance subsidiaries are restricted. The payment
of dividends by Connecticut-domiciled insurers is limited under the insurance holding company laws
of Connecticut. These laws require notice to and approval by the state insurance commissioner for
the declaration or payment of any dividend, which, together with other dividends or distributions
made within the preceding twelve months, exceeds the greater of (i) 10% of the insurers
policyholder surplus as of December 31 of the preceding year or (ii) net income (or net gain from
operations, if such company is a life insurance company) for the twelve-month period ending on the
thirty-first day of December last preceding, in each case determined under statutory insurance
accounting principles. In addition, if any dividend of a Connecticut-domiciled insurer exceeds the
insurers earned surplus, it requires the prior approval of the Connecticut Insurance Commissioner.
The insurance holding company laws of the other jurisdictions in which The Hartfords insurance
subsidiaries are incorporated (or deemed commercially domiciled) generally contain similar
(although in certain instances somewhat more restrictive) limitations on the payment of dividends.
Through October 30, 2009, substantially all dividend payments from the Companys property-casualty
insurance subsidiaries will be subject to prior approval of the Connecticut Insurance Commissioner
due to extraordinary dividend limitations under the insurance holding company laws of Connecticut.
It is estimated that, beginning on October 31, 2009, the Companys property-casualty insurance
subsidiaries will be permitted to pay up to a maximum of approximately $1.3 billion in dividends to
the HFSG Holding Company in 2009 without prior approval from the applicable insurance commissioner.
With respect to dividends to Hartford Life, Inc. (HLI), it is estimated that the Companys life
insurance subsidiaries non-extraordinary dividend limitation under the insurance holding company
laws of Connecticut is approximately $614 in 2009. However, because the life insurance
subsidiaries earned surplus was $598 as of December 31, 2008, the Companys life insurance
subsidiaries will be permitted to pay dividends only up to this amount to HLI in 2009 without prior
approval from the applicable insurance commissioner. During the first quarter of 2009, the HFSG
Holding Company and HLI received no dividends from their insurance subsidiaries. Through April 28,
2009, the HFSG Holding Company and HLI received $97 in dividends from their insurance subsidiaries.
122
Other Sources of Capital for the HFSG Holding Company
The Hartford endeavors to maintain a capital structure that provides financial and operational
flexibility to its insurance subsidiaries, ratings that support its competitive position in the
financial services marketplace (see the Ratings section below for further discussion), and
shareholder returns. As a result, the Company may from time to time raise capital from the
issuance of stock, debt or other capital securities and is continuously evaluating strategic
opportunities. The issuance of common stock, debt or other capital securities could result in the
dilution of shareholder interests or reduced net income due to additional interest expense.
Capital Purchase Program
On November 14, 2008, the Company announced that it applied to participate in the U.S. Treasury
Departments Capital Purchase Program (CPP). In conjunction with this application, the Company
also applied to the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) to become a savings and loan holding
company and signed a merger agreement to acquire the parent company of Federal Trust Bank (FTB),
a federally chartered, FDIC-insured savings bank. Federal Trust Bank is owned by Federal Trust
Corporation, a unitary thrift holding company headquartered in Sanford, Florida. The completion of
this acquisition will satisfy a key eligibility requirement for participation in the CPP. On
January 9, 2009, the Office of Thrift Supervision approved the Companys application to become a
savings and loan holding company and on January 26, 2009, Federal Trust Corporations shareholders
approved the acquisition. The Companys purchase of Federal Trust Corporation remains contingent on
the U.S. Treasurys approval of the Companys participation in the CPP. The Company estimates
that, if approved for participation in the CPP, it would be eligible for a capital purchase of
between $1.1 billion and $3.4 billion under existing Treasury guidelines. The final amount of
capital requested will be determined following approval by Treasury. The Companys application to
participate in the CPP is subject to approval by the U.S. Treasury. There can be no assurance that
the Company will participate in the CPP. On March 31, 2009, to preserve the viability of FTB for
possible acquisition by the Company, the Company lent $20 to Federal Trust Corporation in the form
of an interest bearing note maturing on March 31, 2010. The capital lent to Federal Trust
Corporation was contributed to FTB. In addition, if we are approved to participate in the CPP and
we acquire FTB, we have agreed with OTS to additionally contribute approximately $80 to the capital
of FTB and to serve as a source of strength to FTB, which could require even further contributions
of additional capital to FTB in the future.
Shelf Registrations
On April 11, 2007, The Hartford filed an automatic shelf registration statement (Registration No.
333-142044) for the potential offering and sale of debt and equity securities with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. The registration statement allows for the following types of securities
to be offered: (i) debt securities, preferred stock, common stock, depositary shares, warrants,
stock purchase contracts, stock purchase units and junior subordinated deferrable interest
debentures of the Company, and (ii) preferred securities of any of one or more capital trusts
organized by The Hartford (The Hartford Trusts). The Company may enter into guarantees with
respect to the preferred securities of any of The Hartford Trusts. In that The Hartford is a
well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act of 1933, the
registration statement went effective immediately upon filing and The Hartford may offer and sell
an unlimited amount of securities under the registration statement during the three-year life of
the shelf.
Contingent Capital Facility
On February 12, 2007, The Hartford entered into a put option agreement (the Put Option Agreement)
with Glen Meadow ABC Trust, a Delaware statutory trust (the ABC Trust), and LaSalle Bank National
Association, as put option calculation agent. The Put Option Agreement provides The Hartford with
the right to require the ABC Trust, at any time and from time to time, to purchase The Hartfords
junior subordinated notes (the Notes) in a maximum aggregate principal amount not to exceed $500.
Under the Put Option Agreement, The Hartford will pay the ABC Trust premiums on a periodic basis,
calculated with respect to the aggregate principal amount of Notes that The Hartford had the right
to put to the ABC Trust for such period. The Hartford has agreed to reimburse the ABC Trust for
certain fees and ordinary expenses. The Company holds a variable interest in the ABC Trust where
the Company is not the primary beneficiary. As a result, the Company did not consolidate the ABC
Trust, as they did not meet the consolidation requirements under FASB Interpretation No. 46
(revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No.
51 (FIN 46(R)). As of March 31, 2009, The Hartford has not exercised its right to require ABC
Trust to purchase the Notes. As a result, the Notes remain a source of capital for the HFSG
Holding Company.
123
Commercial Paper, Revolving Credit Facility and Line of Credit
The table below details the Companys short-term debt programs and the applicable balances
outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Available As of |
|
|
Outstanding As of |
|
|
|
Effective |
|
Expiration |
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Description |
|
Date |
|
Date |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Commercial Paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Hartford |
|
11/10/86 |
|
N/A |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
374 |
|
Revolving Credit Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-year revolving credit facility |
|
8/9/07 |
|
8/9/12 |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Japan Operations [1] |
|
9/18/02 |
|
1/5/10 |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Paper,
Revolving
Credit Facility
and Line of Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,951 |
|
|
$ |
3,955 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the line of credit in yen was ¥5 billion. |
The revolving credit facility provides for up to $1.9 billion of unsecured credit through August 9,
2012, which excludes a $100 commitment from an affiliate of Lehman Brothers. Of the total
availability under the revolving credit facility, up to $100 is available to support letters of
credit issued on behalf of The Hartford or other subsidiaries of The Hartford. Under the revolving
credit facility, the Company must maintain a minimum level of consolidated net worth of $12.5
billion. At March 31, 2009, the consolidated net worth of the Company as calculated in accordance
with the terms of the credit facility was $17.4 billion. The definition of consolidated net worth
under the terms of the credit facility, excludes AOCI and includes the Companys outstanding junior
subordinated debentures, net of discount. In addition, the Company must not exceed a maximum ratio
of debt to capitalization of 40%. At March 31, 2009, as calculated in accordance with the terms of
the credit facility, the Companys debt to capitalization ratio was 20.5%. Quarterly, the Company
certifies compliance with the financial covenants for the syndicate of participating financial
institutions. As of March 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.
While The Hartfords maximum borrowings available under its commercial paper program are $2.0
billion, the Company is dependent upon market conditions, including recent market conditions, to
access short-term financing through the issuance of commercial paper to investors. As discussed
above, as of April 30, 2009 all outstanding commercial paper has been paid-off.
Derivative Commitments
Certain of the Companys derivative agreements contain provisions that are tied to the financial
strength ratings of the individual legal entity with the derivative agreement as set by nationally
recognized statistical rating agencies. If the insurance operating entitys financial strength
were to fall below certain ratings, the counterparties to the derivative agreements could demand
immediate and ongoing full collateralization and in certain instances demand immediate settlement
of all outstanding derivative positions traded under each impacted bilateral agreement. The
settlement amount is determined by netting the derivative positions transacted under each
agreement. If the termination rights were to be exercised by the counterparties, it could impact
the insurance operating entitys ability to conduct hedging activities by increasing the associated
costs and decreasing the willingness of counterparties to transact with the insurance operating
entity. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent
features that are in a net liability position as of March 31, 2009, is $433. Of this $433, the
insurance operating entities have posted collateral of $325 in the normal course of business.
Based on derivative market values as of March 31, 2009, a downgrade of one level below the current
financial strength ratings by either Moodys or S&P could require approximately an additional $50
to be posted as collateral. Based on derivative market values as of March 31, 2009, a downgrade by
either Moodys or S&P of two levels below the insurance operating entities current financial
strength ratings could require approximately an additional $95 of assets to be posted as
collateral. These collateral amounts could change as derivative market values change or as a
result of changes in our hedging activities.
The table below presents the aggregate notional amount and fair value of derivative relationships
that could be subject to immediate termination in the event of further rating agency downgrades.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009 |
|
Ratings levels |
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Either BBB+ or Baa1 |
|
$ |
7,724 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
Both BBB+ and Baa1 [1] |
|
$ |
15,904 |
|
|
$ |
1,034 |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The notional amount and fair value include both the scenario where only one rating agency
takes action to this level as well as where both rating agencies take action to this level. |
The notional and fair value amounts in the table above include a customized GMWB derivative with a
fair value of $486 and a notional amount of $4.7 billion, for which the Company has a contractual
right to make a collateral payment in the amount of approximately $50 to prevent its termination.
124
Insurance Operations
Current and expected patterns of claim frequency and severity or surrenders may change from period
to period but continue to be within historical norms and, therefore, the Companys insurance
operations current liquidity position is considered to be sufficient to meet anticipated demands
over the next twelve months. For a discussion and tabular presentation of the Companys current
contractual obligations by period, refer to Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate
Contractual Obligations within the Capital Resources and Liquidity section of the MD&A included in
The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
The principal sources of operating funds are premiums, fees earned from assets under management and
investment income, while investing cash flows originate from maturities and sales of invested
assets. The primary uses of funds are to pay claims, claim adjustment expenses, commissions and
other underwriting expenses, to purchase new investments and to make dividend payments to the HFSG
Holding Company. The Companys insurance operations also participate in securities lending
programs to generate additional income. Through these programs, the Company loans fixed income
securities to third-party borrowers in exchange for cash collateral. Those loaned securities may
be returned to the Company at various maturity dates, at which time the Company would be required
to return the cash collateral. The Companys Life and Property & Casualty operating subsidiaries
would fund the return of cash collateral of $1.2 billion and $315, respectively, out of operating
funds, short-term investment holdings or, if necessary, from the sale of fixed maturity
investments.
Property & Casualty holds fixed maturity securities including a significant short-term investment
position (securities with maturities of one year or less at the time of purchase) to meet liquidity
needs. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Property & Casualty held total fixed maturity
investments of $21.3 billion and $21.4 billion, respectively, of which $1.3 and $1.6 billion were
short-term investments, respectively. As of March 31, 2009, Property & Casualtys cash and
short-term investments of $1.5 billion, included $76 of collateral received from, and held on
behalf of, derivative counterparties. Property & Casualty also held $756 of U.S. Treasuries, of
which $118 had been pledged to derivative counterparties.
Liquidity requirements that are unable to be funded by Property & Casualtys short-term investments
would be satisfied with current operating funds, including premiums received or through the sale of
invested assets. A sale of invested assets could result in significant realized losses.
As of March 31, 2009, Lifes total contractholder obligations were $271.7 billion. Of the total
contractholder obligations, approximately $199.0 billion were held in separate accounts, within
mutual funds or were held in international statutory separate accounts. Mutual funds are not
recorded on Lifes balance sheet. The remaining $72.7 billion was held in the Companys general
account supported by Lifes general account invested assets of $63.2 billion including a
significant short-term investment position to meet liquidity needs. As of March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, Life held total fixed maturity investments of $51.0 billion and $52.1 billion,
respectively, of which $8.6 billion and $6.9 billion were short-term investments, respectively. As
of March 31, 2009, Lifes cash and short-term investments of $10.2 billion, included $2.4 billion
of collateral received from, and held on behalf of, derivative counterparties and $599 of
collateral pledged to derivative counterparties. Life also held $4.9 billion of U.S. Treasury
securities, of which $250 had been pledged to derivative counterparties.
In the event customers elect to surrender separate account assets, international statutory separate
accounts or retail mutual funds, Life will use the proceeds from the sale of the assets to fund the
surrender and Lifes liquidity position will not be impacted. In many instances Life will receive
a percentage of the surrender amount as compensation for early surrender (surrender charge),
increasing Lifes liquidity position. In addition, a surrender of variable annuity separate
account or general account assets (see below) will decrease Lifes obligation for payments on
guaranteed living and death benefits.
Capital resources available to fund liquidity, upon contract holder surrender, is a function of the
legal entity in which the liquidity requirement resides. Generally, obligations of Group Benefits
will be funded by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company; Individual Annuity and Individual
Life obligations will be generally funded by both Hartford Life Insurance Company and Hartford Life
and Annuity Insurance Company; obligations of Retirement and Institutional will be generally funded
by Hartford Life Insurance Company; and obligations of International will be generally funded by
the legal entity in the country in which the obligation was generated.
Of the $72.7 billion of contractholder
obligations held in the general account, $36.6 billion
relates to contracts without a surrender provision and/or fixed payout dates such as payout
annuities or institutional notes, other than guaranteed investment products with a market value
adjustment feature (discussed below) or surrenders of term life, group benefit contracts or death
and living benefit reserves for which surrenders will have no current effect on Lifes liquidity
requirements.
$10.7 billion relates to Lifes Retail Fixed MVA annuities that are held in a statutory separate
account, but under U.S. GAAP are recorded in the general account as Fixed MVA annuity contract
holders are subject to the Companys credit risk. In the statutory separate account, Life is
required to maintain invested assets with a fair value equal to the market value adjusted surrender
value of the Fixed MVA contract. In the event assets decline in value at a greater rate than the
market value adjusted surrender value of the Fixed MVA contract, Life is required to contribute
additional capital to the statutory separate account. Life will fund these required contributions
with operating cash flows or short-term investments. In the event that operating cash flows or short-term investments are not sufficient to fund required contributions, the
Company may have to sell other invested assets at a loss, potentially
resulting in a decrease in statutory surplus. As the fair value of invested assets in the
statutory separate account are generally equal to the market value adjusted surrender value of the
Fixed MVA contract, surrender of Fixed MVA annuities will have an insignificant impact on the
liquidity requirements of Life. International also has $2.5 billion of Fixed MVA annuities which,
as a result of its market value adjustment feature, similarly limit Lifes liquidity requirements
in the event of surrender.
125
Approximately $1.6 billion of GIC contracts are subject to discontinuance provisions which allow
the policyholders to terminate their contracts prior to scheduled maturity at the lesser of the
book value or market value. Generally, the market value adjustment is reflective of changes in
interest rates and credit spreads. As a result, the market value adjustment feature in the GIC
contract serves to protect the Company from interest rate risks and limit Lifes liquidity
requirements in the event of a surrender. Approximately $2.5 billion of funding agreements allow
the policyholders to terminate at book value without a market value adjustment after a defined
notice period typically of thirteen months. All policyholders with this provision have exercised
it, and the associated account value will be paid out by December 31, 2009 and will be funded by
cash flows from Institutional operations or existing short-term investments within the
Institutional investment portfolio.
Surrenders of, or policy loans taken from, as applicable, the remaining $18.8 billion of general
account liabilities, which include the general account option for Retails individual variable
annuities and Individual Lifes variable life contracts, the general account option for Retirement
Plan annuities and universal life contracts sold by Individual Life may be funded through operating
cash flows of Life, available short-term investments, or Life may be required to sell fixed
maturity investments to fund the surrender payment. Sales of fixed maturity investments could
result in the recognition of significant realized losses and insufficient proceeds to fully fund
the surrender amount. In this circumstance, Life may need to take other actions, including
enforcing certain contract provisions which could restrict surrenders and/or slow or defer payouts.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes to the Companys off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate
contractual obligations since the filing of the Companys 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Capitalization
The capital structure of The Hartford as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of debt
and stockholders equity, summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Short-term debt (includes current
maturities of long-term debt and
capital lease obligations) |
|
$ |
419 |
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Long-term debt |
|
|
5,757 |
|
|
|
5,823 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt [1] |
|
|
6,176 |
|
|
|
6,221 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity excluding
accumulated other comprehensive
loss, net of tax (AOCI) |
|
|
15,661 |
|
|
|
16,788 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
AOCI, net of tax |
|
|
(7,801 |
) |
|
|
(7,520 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
7,860 |
|
|
$ |
9,268 |
|
|
|
(15 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization including AOCI |
|
$ |
14,036 |
|
|
$ |
15,489 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to stockholders equity |
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Debt to capitalization |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Total debt of the Company excludes $1.2 billion of consumer notes as of March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008. |
The Hartfords total capitalization decreased $1.5 billion, or 9%, from December 31, 2008 to March
31, 2009 primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
Stockholders
equity excluding
AOCI, net of tax
|
|
Decreased $1.1 billion primarily due to a net loss of $1.2 billion. |
|
|
|
AOCI, net of tax
|
|
Decreased $281 primarily due to loss on foreign currency
translation adjustments of $209 and unrealized losses on
available-for-sale securities of $33. |
126
Stockholders Equity
Preferred and Common Stock On March 26, 2009, the Companys shareholders approved the conversion
of the Series C Preferred Stock underlying certain warrants issued to Allianz SE in October 2008
into 34,308,872 shares of The Hartfords common stock. As a result of this shareholder approval,
the Company is not obligated to pay Allianz SE any cash payment related to these warrants and
therefore these warrants no longer provide for any form of net cash settlement outside the
Companys control. As such, the warrants to purchase the Series C Preferred Stock were
reclassified from other liabilities to equity at their fair value. As of March 26, 2009, the fair
value of these warrants was $93. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recognized
a gain of $70, representing the change in fair value of the warrants through March 26, 2009.
AOCI AOCI, net of tax, decreased by $281 as of March 31, 2009 compared with December 31, 2008.
The decrease in AOCI includes change in foreign currency translation adjustments of $(209) and
unrealized losses on securities of $33, primarily due to widening credit spreads associated with
fixed maturities. Because The Hartfords investment portfolio has a duration of approximately five
years, a 100 basis point parallel movement in rates would result in approximately a 5% change in
fair value. Movements in short-term interest rates without corresponding changes in long-term
rates will impact the fair value of our fixed maturities to a lesser extent than parallel interest
rate movements.
For additional information on stockholders equity and AOCI, see Notes 15 and 16, respectively, of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Cash Flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
1,010 |
|
|
$ |
567 |
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
$ |
(1,011 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,820 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
1,350 |
|
Cash end of period |
|
$ |
1,851 |
|
|
$ |
2,248 |
|
The increase in cash from operating activities compared to prior year period was primarily the
result of tax refunds in the first quarter of 2009 compared to no tax settlements in 2008. Net
purchases of available-for-sale securities continue to account for the majority of cash used for
investing activities. Cash from financing activities decreased primarily due to a decrease in net
flows from investment and universal life-type contracts and issuance of long-term debt in 2008.
Operating cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 have been adequate to meet
liquidity requirements.
Equity Markets
For a discussion of the potential impact of the equity markets on capital and liquidity, see the
Capital Markets Risk Management section of the MD&A under Market Risk above.
127
Ratings
Ratings are an important factor in establishing the competitive position in the insurance and
financial services marketplace. There can be no assurance that the Companys ratings will continue
for any given period of time or that they will not be changed. In the event the Companys ratings
are downgraded, the level of revenues or the persistency of the Companys business may be adversely
impacted.
On February 9, 2009, Fitch downgraded the senior debt to BBB from A-. Fitch also downgraded the
insurer financial strength rating of the Companys primary life insurance subsidiaries to A from
AA- and property/casualty insurance subsidiaries to A+ from AA-. The rating outlook is negative.
On February 26, 2009, Standard & Poors downgraded the senior debt ratings to BBB+ from A- and the
financial strength ratings on all life and property/casualty operating subsidiaries to A+ from AA-.
On March 3, 2009, Standard & Poors downgraded the senior debt ratings to BBB from BBB+ and the
financial strength ratings on all life and property/casualty operating subsidiaries to A from A+.
At the same time, the ratings were removed from credit watch with negative implications. The
outlook on ratings is negative.
On February 27, 2009, A.M. Best downgraded the financial strength ratings of the key life insurance
and property/casualty subsidiaries to A from A+. The outlook for the life subsidiaries is negative
while the outlook for the property/casualty subsidiaries is stable. Concurrently, A.M. Best
downgraded the senior debt ratings to bbb+ from a- with a negative outlook.
On March 30, 2009, Moodys downgraded the long-term senior debt rating to Baa3 from Baa1. In the
same action, Moodys downgraded the insurance financial strength ratings for the Companys lead
property and casualty insurance operating subsidiaries to A2 from A1 and the lead life insurance
operating subsidiaries to A3 from A1. The outlook for the ratings is negative.
The following table summarizes The Hartfords significant member companies financial ratings from
the major independent rating organizations as of April 28, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Financial Strength Ratings: |
|
A.M. Best |
|
Fitch |
|
Standard & Poors |
|
Moodys |
Hartford Fire Insurance Company |
|
A |
|
A+ |
|
A |
|
A2 |
Hartford Life Insurance Company |
|
A |
|
A |
|
A |
|
A3 |
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company |
|
A |
|
A |
|
A |
|
A3 |
Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company |
|
A |
|
A |
|
A |
|
A3 |
Hartford Life Insurance KK (Japan) |
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
|
Hartford Life Limited (Ireland) |
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Ratings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior debt |
|
bbb+ |
|
BBB |
|
BBB |
|
Baa3 |
Commercial paper |
|
AMB-2 |
|
F2 |
|
A-2 |
|
P-3 |
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
bbb- |
|
BBB- |
|
BB+ |
|
Ba1 |
Hartford Life, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior debt |
|
bbb+ |
|
BBB |
|
BBB |
|
Baa3 |
Hartford Life Insurance Company: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term rating |
|
|
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
P-2 |
Consumer notes |
|
a |
|
A- |
|
A |
|
Baa1 |
These ratings are not a recommendation to buy or hold any of The Hartfords securities and they may
be revised or revoked at any time at the sole discretion of the rating organization.
The agencies consider many factors in determining the final rating of an insurance company. One
consideration is the relative level of statutory surplus necessary to support the business written.
Statutory surplus represents the capital of the insurance company reported in accordance with
accounting practices prescribed by the applicable state insurance department.
128
The table below sets forth statutory surplus for the Companys insurance companies. The statutory
surplus amount as of December 31, 2008 in the table below is based on actual statutory filings with
the applicable regulatory authorities. The statutory surplus amount as of March 31, 2009 is an
estimate, as the 2009 statutory filings have not yet been made.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Life Operations |
|
$ |
5,601 |
|
|
$ |
6,046 |
|
Japan Life Operations |
|
|
2,054 |
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
Property & Casualty Operations |
|
|
6,078 |
|
|
|
6,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,733 |
|
|
$ |
13,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has received approval from the Connecticut Insurance Department regarding the use of
two permitted practices in the statutory financial statements of its Connecticut-domiciled life
insurance subsidiaries. The first permitted practice relates to the statutory accounting for
deferred income taxes. The second permitted practice relates to the statutory reserving
requirements for variable annuities with guaranteed living benefit riders. These permitted
practices will expire in the fourth quarter of 2009.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company received a benefit to Statutory surplus of $52 related to the
deferred income tax permitted practice and a Statutory surplus benefit of $965 related to the reserving permitted practice. When the reserving permitted practice expires in 2009, the
Company will be required to adopt VACARVM, which will differ from the current reserving standards. While it is difficult to predict what the
ultimate impact of adopting VACARVM will be at December 31, 2009, the adoption will likely result in increased required reserves.
Risk-Based Capital
State insurance regulators and the NAIC have adopted risk-based capital requirements for life insurance companies to evaluate the adequacy of statutory capital and surplus appropriate
for an insurance company to support its overall business operations based on its size and risk profile.
The calculation of certain risk-based capital elements requires the Company to project future tax benefits to offset projected losses. The
realizability of those tax benefits is subject to recoverability testing including the projection of future taxable income.
Contingencies
Legal Proceedings For a discussion regarding contingencies related to The Hartfords legal
proceedings, see Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings.
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
For a discussion of accounting standards, see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
included in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report and Note 1 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information contained in the Capital Markets Risk Management section of Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
The Companys principal executive officer and its principal financial officer, based on their
evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e)) have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective for
the purposes set forth in the definition thereof in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) as of March 31,
2009.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the Companys first fiscal quarter of 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
129
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
(Dollar amounts in millions)
Litigation
The Hartford is involved in claims litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, both as a
liability insurer defending or providing indemnity for third-party claims brought against insureds
and as an insurer defending coverage claims brought against it. The Hartford accounts for such
activity through the establishment of unpaid loss and loss adjustment expense reserves. Subject to
the uncertainties discussed below under the caption Asbestos and Environmental Claims, management
expects that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to such ordinary-course claims
litigation, after consideration of provisions made for potential losses and costs of defense, will
not be material to the consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of The
Hartford.
The Hartford is also involved in other kinds of legal actions, some of which assert claims for
substantial amounts. These actions include, among others, putative state and federal class actions
seeking certification of a state or national class. Such putative class actions have alleged, for
example, underpayment of claims or improper underwriting practices in connection with various kinds
of insurance policies, such as personal and commercial automobile, property, life and inland
marine; improper sales practices in connection with the sale of life insurance and other investment
products; and improper fee arrangements in connection with investment products and structured
settlements. The Hartford also is involved in individual actions in which punitive damages are
sought, such as claims alleging bad faith in the handling of insurance claims. Like many other
insurers, The Hartford also has been joined in actions by asbestos plaintiffs asserting, among
other things, that insurers had a duty to protect the public from the dangers of asbestos and that
insurers committed unfair trade practices by asserting defenses on behalf of their policyholders in
the underlying asbestos cases. Management expects that the ultimate liability, if any, with
respect to such lawsuits, after consideration of provisions made for estimated losses, will not be
material to the consolidated financial condition of The Hartford. Nonetheless, given the large or
indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these actions, and the inherent unpredictability of
litigation, an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse
effect on the Companys consolidated results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or
annual periods.
Broker Compensation Litigation Following the New York Attorney Generals filing of a civil
complaint against Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., and Marsh, Inc. (collectively, Marsh) in
October 2004 alleging that certain insurance companies, including The Hartford, participated with
Marsh in arrangements to submit inflated bids for business insurance and paid contingent
commissions to ensure that Marsh would direct business to them, private plaintiffs brought several
lawsuits against the Company predicated on the allegations in the Marsh complaint, to which the
Company was not party. Among these is a multidistrict litigation in the United States District
Court for the District of New Jersey. There are two consolidated amended complaints filed in the
multidistrict litigation, one related to conduct in connection with the sale of property-casualty
insurance and the other related to alleged conduct in connection with the sale of group benefits
products. The Company and various of its subsidiaries are named in both complaints. The
complaints assert, on behalf of a putative class of persons who purchased insurance through broker
defendants, claims under the Sherman Act, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
(RICO), state law, and in the case of the group benefits complaint, claims under ERISA. The
claims are predicated upon allegedly undisclosed or otherwise improper payments of contingent
commissions to the broker defendants to steer business to the insurance company defendants. The
district court has dismissed the Sherman Act and RICO claims in both complaints for failure to
state a claim and has granted the defendants motions for summary judgment on the ERISA claims in
the group-benefits products complaint. The district court further has declined to exercise
supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims, has dismissed those state law claims without
prejudice, and has closed both cases. The plaintiffs have appealed the dismissal of the claims in
both consolidated amended complaints, except the ERISA claims.
The Company is also a defendant in two consolidated securities actions and two consolidated
derivative actions filed in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. The
consolidated securities actions assert claims on behalf of a putative class of shareholders
alleging that the Company and certain of its executive officers violated Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by failing to disclose to the investing public that
The Hartfords business and growth was predicated on the unlawful activity alleged in the New York
Attorney Generals complaint against Marsh. The consolidated derivative actions, brought by
shareholders on behalf of the Company against its directors and an additional executive officer,
allege that the defendants knew adverse non-public information about the activities alleged in the
Marsh complaint and concealed and misappropriated that information to make profitable stock trades
in violation of their duties to the Company. In July 2006, the district court granted defendants
motion to dismiss the consolidated securities actions, and the plaintiffs appealed. In November
2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the decision and remanded
the case to the district court. The Company will renew its motion to dismiss with respect to
issues that the district court did not address in the prior ruling. Defendants filed a motion to
dismiss the consolidated derivative actions in May 2005. Those proceedings are stayed by agreement
of the parties.
In September 2007, the Ohio Attorney General filed a civil action in Ohio state court alleging that
certain insurance companies, including The Hartford, conspired with Marsh in violation of Ohios
antitrust statute. The trial court denied defendants motion to dismiss the complaint in July
2008. The Company disputes the allegations and intends to defend this action vigorously.
130
Investment and Savings Plan ERISA Class Action Litigation In November and December 2008,
following a decline in the share price of the Companys common stock, seven putative class action
lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut on behalf
of certain participants in the Companys Investment and Savings Plan (the Plan), which offers the
Companys common stock as one of many investment options. These lawsuits have been consolidated,
and a consolidated amended class-action complaint was filed in March 2009, alleging that the
Company and certain of its officers and employees violated ERISA by allowing the Plans
participants to invest in the Companys common stock and by failing to disclose to the Plans
participants information about the Companys financial condition. The lawsuit seeks restitution or
damages for losses arising from the investment of the Plans assets in the Companys common stock
during the period from December 10, 2007 to the present. The Company disputes the allegations and
intends to defend the actions vigorously.
Structured Settlement Class Action In October 2005, a putative nationwide class action was filed
in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut against the Company and several
of its subsidiaries on behalf of persons who had asserted claims against an insured of a Hartford
property & casualty insurance company that resulted in a settlement in which some or all of the
settlement amount was structured to afford a schedule of future payments of specified amounts
funded by an annuity from a Hartford life insurance company (Structured Settlements). The
operative complaint alleges that since 1997 the Company has systematically deprived the settling
claimants of the value of their damages recoveries by secretly deducting 15% of the annuity premium
of every Structured Settlement to cover brokers commissions, other fees and costs, taxes, and a
profit for the annuity provider, and asserts claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (RICO) and state law. The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, punitive
damages, pre-judgment interest, attorneys fees and costs, and injunctive or other equitable
relief. The Company vigorously denies that any claimant was misled or otherwise received less than
the amount specified in the structured-settlement agreements. In March 2009, the district court
certified a class for the RICO and fraud claims composed of all persons, other than those
represented by a plaintiffs broker, who entered into a Structured Settlement since 1997 and
received certain written representations about the cost or value of the settlement. The district
court declined to certify a class for the breach-of-contract and unjust-enrichment claims. The
Company has petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for permission to
file an interlocutory appeal of the class-certification ruling. Proceedings in the district court
are stayed until proceedings in the Second Circuit conclude.
Fair Credit Reporting Act Class Action In February 2007, the United States District Court for the
District of Oregon gave final approval of the Companys settlement of a lawsuit brought on behalf
of a class of homeowners and automobile policy holders alleging that the Company willfully violated
the Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to send appropriate notices to new customers whose initial
rates were higher than they would have been had the customer had a more favorable credit report.
The settlement was made on a claim-in, nationwide-class basis and required eligible class members
to return valid claim forms postmarked no later than June 28, 2007. The Company has paid
approximately $84.3 to eligible claimants in connection with the settlement. The Company has
sought reimbursement from the Companys Excess Professional Liability Insurance Program for the
portion of the settlement in excess of the Companys $10 self-insured retention. Certain insurance
carriers participating in that program have disputed coverage for the settlement, and one of the
excess insurers commenced an arbitration to resolve the dispute, which resulted in an award in the
Companys favor. The primary insurer on the program has agreed to be bound by that award.
Management believes it is probable that the Companys coverage position ultimately will be
sustained as to all applicable layers of coverage.
Asbestos and Environmental Claims As discussed in Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies, of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under the caption Asbestos and Environmental Claims,
included in the Companys 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report, The Hartford continues to receive asbestos
and environmental claims that involve significant uncertainty regarding policy coverage issues.
Regarding these claims, The Hartford continually reviews its overall reserve levels and reinsurance
coverages, as well as the methodologies it uses to estimate its exposures. Because of the
significant uncertainties that limit the ability of insurers and reinsurers to estimate the
ultimate reserves necessary for unpaid losses and related expenses, particularly those related to
asbestos, the ultimate liabilities may exceed the currently recorded reserves. Any such additional
liability cannot be reasonably estimated now but could be material to The Hartfords consolidated
operating results, financial condition and liquidity.
Shareholder Demand Like the boards of directors of many other companies, the Board has received a
demand from SEIU Pension Plans Master Trust, which purports to be a current holder of the Companys
common stock. The demand requests the Board to bring suit to recover alleged excessive
compensation paid to senior executives of the Company from 2005 through the present and to change
the Companys executive compensation structure. The Board is conducting an investigation of the
allegations in the demand.
131
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
The risk factors set forth below update the risk factors section previously disclosed in Item 1A of
Part I of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Persistent stress in financial markets and recessionary global economic conditions have continued
to adversely affect our business and results.
Persistent stress in financial markets and recessionary global economic conditions have continued
to adversely affect our operations and results in the first quarter of 2009, and the impact and
potential effects of governmental stimulus, budgetary and other financial measures in the worlds
major economies remain uncertain. Although there was no material net change in our
capital position at March 31, 2009 compared with the end of
2008, our capital position is likely to
remain under pressure if the recessionary economic environment is prolonged. In addition, our
long-term debt and financial strength ratings were downgraded by the major rating agencies in the
first quarter of 2009, in most cases with a negative outlook. Certain of our Life and
Property-Casualty lines of business have been particularly adversely affected by these conditions.
In light of these factors, we have been
undertaking a wide-ranging review of initiatives to
stabilize our ratings and to mitigate and reduce risks associated with various business lines
(including product and pricing changes) and our investment portfolio. We have also been reviewing a
number of strategic alternatives that could reduce risk and help stabilize ratings by improving the
Companys capital position, including the restructuring, discontinuation or disposition of various
business lines. In this regard, we are suspending all new sales in our Japan and European
operations, and we are evaluating strategic options with respect to our Institutional markets businesses. Another potential source of capital that could help stabilize ratings is the Capital
Purchase Program (CPP) administered by the U.S. Treasury Department. Our application to
participate in the CPP remains pending, and we cannot predict whether, when or in what amount our
participation may be approved. Our actions to date and other initiatives we may undertake,
including any participation in the CPP, may not be concluded successfully or on favorable terms and may not fully achieve the anticipated benefits. Any such actions or initiatives could
also significantly change the structure of our operations and perceptions of our prospects and
materially affect our results and financial position.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
The following table summarizes the Companys repurchases of its common stock for the three months
ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Value of Shares that |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
May Yet Be |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Paid Per |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Purchased Under |
|
Period |
|
Purchased [1] |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
the Plans or Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
January 1,
2009 January 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,946 |
|
|
$ |
16.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
807 |
|
February 1, 2009 February 28, 2009 |
|
|
36,388 |
|
|
$ |
11.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
807 |
|
March 1, 2009 March 31, 2009 |
|
|
159,497 |
|
|
$ |
12.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
197,831 |
|
|
$ |
12.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents shares acquired from employees of the Company primarily for tax withholding
purposes in connection with the Companys stock compensation plans. |
The Hartfords Board of Directors has authorized a $1 billion stock repurchase program. The
Companys repurchase authorization permits purchases of common stock, which may be in the open
market or through privately negotiated transactions. The Company also may enter into derivative
transactions to facilitate future repurchases of common stock. The timing of any future
repurchases will be dependent upon several factors, including the market price of the Companys
securities, the Companys capital position, consideration of the effect of any repurchases on the
Companys financial strength or credit ratings, restrictions applicable to the Companys potential
participation in the CPP, and other corporate considerations. The repurchase program may be
modified, extended or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time.
132
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS
On March 26, 2009, The Hartford held a special meeting of shareholders. The following matter was
considered and voted upon: A proposal to approve the conversion of any issued and outstanding
Series C Non-Voting Contingent Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company into common stock of the
Company and the exercise of the Series C Warrant to purchase common stock of the Company, as well
as other potential issuances of our common stock for anti-dilution and related purposes as
contemplated by our agreements with Allianz SE relating to the investment of Allianz SE and its
affiliates in the Company.
Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 5, 2009 were entitled to notice
of, and to vote at, the special meeting. As of February 5, 2009, 325,229,417 shares of common
stock of the Company were outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting.
Set forth below is the vote tabulation relating to the proposal presented to the shareholders at
the special meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
Shares For: |
|
|
220,707,699 |
|
Shares Against: |
|
|
4,689,530 |
|
Shares Abstained: |
|
|
588,618 |
|
Item 6. EXHIBITS
See Exhibits Index on page 135.
133
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. |
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: April 30, 2009 |
/s/ Beth A. Bombara
|
|
|
Beth A. Bombara |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Controller
(Chief accounting officer and duly
authorized signatory) |
|
134
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
FORM 10-Q
EXHIBITS INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10.01 |
|
|
Separation Agreement and General Release by and between the Company and Thomas M. Marra, dated as of February 24,
2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.01 |
|
|
Deloitte & Touche LLP Letter of Awareness. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.01 |
|
|
Certification of Ramani Ayer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.02 |
|
|
Certification of Lizabeth H. Zlatkus pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.01 |
|
|
Certification of Ramani Ayer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.02 |
|
|
Certification of Lizabeth H. Zlatkus pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
135