Edgar Filing: LAKE SHORE BANCORP, INC.

lsbk 20170930 10Q

United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No.: 000-51821


LAKE SHORE BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

United States			20-4729288
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)			(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

31 East Fourth Street, Dunkirk, New York			14048
(Address of principal executive offices)			(Zip code)

(716) 366-4070
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X]No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X]No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer ☐	Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company ☒
Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date:

There were 6,097,818 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding at November 6, 2017.


		TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM		PART I	PAGE

1	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	-	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2016	1
	-	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited)	2
	-	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited)	3
	-	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited)	4
	-	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited)	5
	-	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	6
2	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		34
3	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		51
4	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		51

		PART II

1A	RISK FACTORS		52
2	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS		52
6	EXHIBITS		52
SIGNATURES			53

PART I Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary


Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	7,220	$	8,089
Interest earning deposits		12,520		6,889
Federal funds sold		24,633		30,501
Cash and Cash Equivalents		44,373		45,479
Securities available for sale		73,108		86,335
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		1,631		1,340
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses 2017 $3,217; 2016 $2,882		362,408		326,365
Premises and equipment, net		9,391		8,747
Accrued interest receivable		1,834		1,600
Bank owned life insurance		17,987		17,719
Other assets		2,029		1,589
Total Assets	$	512,761	$	489,174
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Liabilities
Deposits:
Interest bearing	$	342,240	$	330,004
Non-interest bearing		58,683		55,889
Total Deposits		400,923		385,893
Long-term debt		26,950		18,950
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		1,708		3,183
Other liabilities		5,019		5,118
Total Liabilities	$	434,600	$	413,144
Commitments and Contingencies		-		-
Stockholders' Equity
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 6,827,236 shares issued and 6,097,818 shares outstanding at September 30, 2017 and 6,827,236 shares issued and 6,088,674 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016	$	68	$	68
Additional paid-in capital		30,667		30,532
Treasury stock, at cost (729,418 shares at September 30, 2017 and 738,562 shares at December 31, 2016)		(7,309)		(7,300)
Unearned shares held by ESOP		(1,556)		(1,620)
Unearned shares held by compensation plans		(618)		(578)
Retained earnings		55,785		53,546
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,124		1,382
Total Stockholders' Equity		78,161		76,030
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	512,761	$	489,174

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary


Consolidated Statements of Income
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016	2017		2016
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Interest Income
Loans, including fees	$	4,289	$	3,681	$	12,456	$	10,797
Investment securities, taxable		189		237		597		879
Investment securities, tax-exempt		388		449		1,259		1,351
Other		81		30		167		81
Total Interest Income		4,947		4,397		14,479		13,108
Interest Expense
Deposits		523		449		1,499		1,373
Long-term debt		139		93		328		280
Other		20		23		62		69
Total Interest Expense		682		565		1,889		1,722
Net Interest Income		4,265		3,832		12,590		11,386
Provision for Loan Losses		75		125		450		310
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses		4,190		3,707		12,140		11,076
Non-Interest Income
Service charges and fees		441		461		1,353		1,326
Earnings on bank owned life insurance		91		70		268		207
Recovery on previously impaired investment securities		25		39		96		107
Gain on sale of securities available for sale		22		-		244		1,636
Net gain on sale of loans		1		56		10		117
Other		37		32		83		78
Total Non-Interest Income		617		658		2,054		3,471
Non-Interest Expenses
Salaries and employee benefits		1,898		1,803		5,610		5,388
Occupancy and equipment		565		549		1,740		1,707
Data processing		320		289		937		815
Professional services		231		257		703		784
Advertising		127		81		439		383
Postage and supplies		53		69		197		179
FDIC Insurance		38		68		111		192
Other		381		304		955		865
Total Non-Interest Expenses		3,613		3,420		10,692		10,313
Income before Income Taxes		1,194		945		3,502		4,234
Income Tax Expense		254		188		704		859
Net Income	$	940	$	757	$	2,798	$	3,375
Basic and diluted earnings per common share	$	0.15	$	0.13	$	0.46	$	0.56
Dividends declared per share	$	0.08	$	0.07	$	0.24	$	0.21

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands)

Net Income	$	940	$	757

Other Comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit:
Unrealized holding losses on securities available for sale, net of tax benefit		(60)		(451)

Reclassification adjustments related to:
Recovery on previously impaired investment securities included in net income, net of tax expense		(16)		(26)
Net gain on sale of securities included in net income, net of tax expense		(15)		-
Total Other Comprehensive Loss		(91)		(477)

Total Comprehensive Income	$	849	$	280


	Nine Months Ended September 30,

	2017		2016
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands)

Net Income	$	2,798	$	3,375

Other Comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit:
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on securities available for sale, net of tax benefit (expense)		(34)		875

Reclassification adjustments related to:
Recovery on previously impaired investment securities included in net income, net of tax expense		(63)		(71)
Net gain on sale of securities included in net income, net of tax expense		(161)		(1,080)
Total Other Comprehensive Loss		(258)		(276)

Total Comprehensive Income	$	2,540	$	3,099

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited)


							Unearned		Unearned Shares				Accumulated
			Additional				Shares		Held by				Other
	Common		Paid-In		Treasury		Held by		Compensation		Retained		Comprehensive
	Stock		Capital		Stock		ESOP		Plans		Earnings		Income		Total
	(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Balance - January 1, 2016	$	67	$	29,359	$	(7,026)	$	(1,706)	$	(580)	$	50,919	$	2,843	$	73,876
Net income		-		-		-		-		-		3,375		-		3,375
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit of $142		-		-		-		-		-		-		(276)		(276)
Stock options exercised (98,986 shares)		1		1,108		-		-		-		-		-		1,109
ESOP shares earned (5,951 shares)		-		15		-		64		-		-		-		79
Compensation plan shares granted (20,354 shares)		-		-		197		-		(197)		-		-		-
Compensation plan shares earned (17,833 shares)		-		42		-		-		186		-		-		228
Purchase of treasury stock, at cost (25,000 shares)		-		-		(338)		-		-		-		-		(338)
Cash dividends declared ($0.21 per share)		-		-		-		-		-		(727)		-		(727)
Balance - September 30, 2016	$	68	$	30,524	$	(7,167)	$	(1,642)	$	(591)	$	53,567	$	2,567	$	77,326

Balance - January 1, 2017	$	68	$	30,532	$	(7,300)	$	(1,620)	$	(578)	$	53,546	$	1,382	$	76,030
Net income		-		-		-		-		-		2,798		-		2,798
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit of $133		-		-		-		-		-		-		(258)		(258)
ESOP shares earned (5,951 shares)		-		30		-		64		-		-		-		94
Stock based compensation		-		33		-		-		-		-		-		33
Compensation plan shares granted (27,348 shares)		-		-		270		-		(270)		-		-		-
Compensation plan shares forfeited (1,104 shares)		-		-		(10)		-		10		-		-		-
Compensation plan shares earned (20,569 shares)		-		72		-		-		220		-		-		292
Purchase of treasury stock, at cost (17,100 shares)		-		-		(269)		-		-		-		-		(269)
Cash dividends declared ($0.24 per share)		-		-		-		-		-		(559)		-		(559)
Balance - September 30, 2017	$	68	$	30,667	$	(7,309)	$	(1,556)	$	(618)	$	55,785	$	1,124	$	78,161

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	2,798	$	3,375
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net amortization of investment securities		88		138
Net amortization of deferred loan costs		425		412
Provision for loan losses		450		310
Recovery on previously impaired investment securities		(96)		(107)
Gain on sale of investment securities		(244)		(1,636)
Originations of loans held for sale		(796)		(4,628)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale		806		4,745
Gain on sale of loans		(10)		(117)
Depreciation and amortization		648		646
Increase in bank owned life insurance, net		(268)		(207)
ESOP shares committed to be released		94		79
Stock based compensation expense		325		228
Increase in accrued interest receivable		(234)		(84)
Decrease in other assets		161		326
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities		(99)		65
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		4,048		3,545
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Activity in available for sale securities:
Sales		6,510		14,406
Maturities, prepayments and calls		8,980		8,947
Purchases		(2,402)		-
Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		(375)		(3)
Redemptions of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		84		117
Loan origination and principal collections, net		(37,384)		(24,237)
Additions to premises and equipment		(1,294)		(240)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(25,881)		(1,010)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in deposits		15,030		5,311
Net decrease in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		(1,475)		(1,438)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		9,700		-
Repayment of long-term debt		(1,700)		(2,200)
Proceeds from stock options exercised		-		1,109
Purchase of treasury stock		(269)		(338)
Cash dividends paid		(559)		(727)
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		20,727		1,717
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(1,106)		4,252
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - BEGINNING		45,479		34,227
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - ENDING	$	44,373	$	38,479
SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOWS INFORMATION
Interest paid	$	1,869	$	1,728
Income taxes paid	$	750	$	760

SUPPLEMENTARY SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Foreclosed real estate acquired in settlement of loans	$	554	$	199

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

The interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”, “us”, “our”, or “we”) and Lake Shore Savings Bank (the “Bank”), its wholly owned subsidiary. All intercompany accounts and transactions of the consolidated subsidiary have been eliminated in consolidation.

The interim consolidated financial statements included herein as of September 30, 2017 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and therefore, do not include all information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of the consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The consolidated statement of financial condition at December 31, 2016 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of such information and to make the financial statements not misleading. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. The consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results for any subsequent period or the entire year ending December 31, 2017.

To prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management of the Company made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the reporting of revenue and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, securities valuation estimates, evaluation of impairment of securities and income taxes.

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the statement of financial condition as of September 30, 2017 for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these consolidated financial statements. The evaluation was conducted through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

Note 2 – New Accounting Standards

The following are new accounting standards that have been previously disclosed but not yet adopted, which includes additional information on the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements:

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). The guidance in this update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605 “Revenue Recognition”, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the industry topics of Codification. For public companies, this update will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company’s revenue is primarily comprised of interest income on financial instruments, including investment securities and loans, which are excluded from the scope of ASU 2014-09. The Company does not expect the guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The most significant impact of the update for the Company may be additional disclosure requirements relating to non-interest income, specifically service charges and fees.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“ASU 2016-01”). The update

enhances the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information by updating certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. Among other changes, the update requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, and clarifies that entities should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available for sale securities in combination with the entities’ other deferred tax assets. For public companies, this update will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and is to be applied on a modified retrospective basis. Upon the effective date, the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments will be presented using an exit price method and this will be disclosed. It is not expected that the use of the exit price method will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. At the effective date, the Company does not expect any impact on the valuation allowance of deferred tax assets related to available for sale securities as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-01.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 “Leases” (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). The guidance in the update supersedes the requirements in ASC Topic 840, Leases. The guidance is intended to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. For public companies, this update will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and is to be applied on a modified retrospective basis. The Company currently has one operating lease for its branch office located in Depew, NY as well as several operating leases for five off-site ATMs, land on which one branch office is situated, and for parking lot space, that will result in recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The amount of assets and liabilities added to the balance sheet are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements per preliminary estimates.

Note 3 – Investment Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of securities are as follows:


	September 30, 2017
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
		(Dollars in thousands)
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE:
Municipal bonds	$	42,307	$	1,495	$	(1)	$	43,801
Mortgage-backed securities:
Collateralized mortgage obligations-private label		34		-		-		34
Collateralized mortgage obligations-government sponsored entities		24,025		45		(363)		23,707
Government National Mortgage Association		246		19		-		265
Federal National Mortgage Association		2,975		117		-		3,092
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation		1,591		50		-		1,641
Asset-backed securities-private label		147		298		(3)		442
Asset-backed securities-government sponsored entities		58		4		-		62
Equity securities		22		42		-		64
	$	71,405	$	2,070	$	(367)	$	73,108


	December 31, 2016
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
		(Dollars in thousands)
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE:
Municipal bonds	$	48,869	$	1,847	$	(18)	$	50,698
Mortgage-backed securities:
Collateralized mortgage obligations-private label		37		-		-		37
Collateralized mortgage obligations-government sponsored entities		29,170		83		(423)		28,830
Government National Mortgage Association		306		23		-		329
Federal National Mortgage Association		3,457		128		(3)		3,582
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation		1,825		42		-		1,867
Asset-backed securities-private label		484		362		(14)		832
Asset-backed securities-government sponsored entities		71		5		-		76
Equity securities		22		62		-		84
	$	84,241	$	2,552	$	(458)	$	86,335

All of our collateralized mortgage obligations are backed by one- to four-family residential mortgages.

At September 30, 2017 and at December 31, 2016, equity securities consisted of 22,368 shares of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) common stock.

At September 30, 2017 thirty municipal bonds with a cost of $10.3 million and fair value of $10.7 million, were pledged under a collateral agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) of New York for liquidity borrowing. At December 31, 2016 thirty-four municipal bonds with a cost of $11.1 million and fair value of $11.5 million were pledged under a collateral agreement with the FRB of New York for liquidity borrowing. In addition at September 30, 2017 nineteen municipal bonds with a cost and fair value of $5.0 million and $5.1 million, respectively, were pledged as collateral for customer deposits in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance limits. At December 31, 2016 fourteen municipal bonds with a cost and fair value of $3.6 million and $3.7 million, respectively, were pledged as collateral for customer deposits in excess of “FDIC” insurance limits.

The following table sets forth the Company’s investment in securities available for sale with gross unrealized losses of less than twelve months and gross unrealized losses of twelve months or more and associated fair values as of the dates indicated:


	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
			Gross				Gross				Gross
			Unrealized				Unrealized				Unrealized
	Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses
	(Dollars In thousands)
September 30, 2017
Municipal bonds	$	453	$	(1)	$	-	$	-	$	453	$	(1)
Mortgage-backed securities		4,976		(43)		15,095		(320)		20,071		(363)
Asset-backed securities -private label		144		(3)		-		-		144		(3)
	$	5,573	$	(47)	$	15,095	$	(320)	$	20,668	$	(367)


December 31, 2016
Municipal bonds	$	1,430	$	(18)	$	-	$	-	$	1,430	$	(18)
Mortgage-backed securities		13,902		(197)		9,220		(229)		23,122		(426)
Asset-backed securities -private label		470		(14)		-		-		470		(14)
	$	15,802	$	(229)	$	9,220	$	(229)	$	25,022	$	(458)

The Company reviews investment securities on an ongoing basis for the presence of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) with formal reviews performed quarterly.

At September 30, 2017, the Company’s investment portfolio included several securities, including one private label asset-backed security, in the “unrealized losses less than twelve months” category. With the exception of the private label asset-backed security, the securities were not evaluated further for OTTI as the unrealized losses on the individual securities were less than 20% of book value, which management deemed to be immaterial, and the securities were issued by government sponsored enterprises.

At September 30, 2017, the Company had several securities in the “unrealized losses twelve months or more” category. These securities were not evaluated further for OTTI, as the unrealized losses were less than 20% of book value. The temporary impairments were due to declines in fair value resulting from changes in interest rates and/or increased credit liquidity spreads since the securities were purchased.

Any private label asset-backed security with unrealized losses is evaluated further for OTTI, if the probability of default is high and the Company’s analysis indicates a possible loss of principal. The following tables provide additional information relating to the private label asset-backed securities that were further evaluated as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):


At September 30, 2017
								Delinquent %
Security		Book Value		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss	Lowest Rating	Over 60 days	Over 90 days	Foreclosure%	OREO%
1	$	147	$	144	$	(3)	B-	17.80%	15.40%	5.50%	0.70%
Total	$	147	$	144	$	(3)


At December 31, 2016
									Delinquent %
Security			Book Value		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss	Lowest Rating	Over 60 days	Over 90 days	Foreclosure%	OREO%
1		$	355	$	342	$	(13)	B-	15.90%	14.90%	7.00%	0.30%
2	*		129		128		(1)	B-	12.70%	11.70%	4.50%	1.10%
Total		$	484	$	470	$	(14)

*This security was paid in full during the second quarter of 2017.

Management’s evaluation of the estimated discounted cash flows in comparison to the amortized book value for the security listed above did not reflect the need to record an OTTI charge against earnings as of September 30, 2017. The estimated discounted cash flows for this security did not show an additional principal loss under various prepayment and default rate scenarios.

Management also completed an OTTI analysis for two private label asset-backed securities, which did not have unrealized losses as of September 30, 2017. Management’s calculation of the estimated discounted cash flows did not show additional principal losses for these securities under various prepayment and default rate scenarios. As a result of the stress tests that were performed, management concluded that additional OTTI charges were not required as of September 30, 2017 on these securities.

The unrealized losses shown in the previous tables, were recorded as a component of other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity.

The following table presents a summary of the credit-related OTTI charges recognized as components of income:


	For The Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	554	$	696
Additions:
Credit loss not previously recognized		-		-
Reductions:
Losses realized during the period on OTTI previously recognized		-		-
Receipt of cash flows on previously recorded OTTI		(96)		(107)
Ending balance	$	458	$	589

A deterioration in credit quality and/or other factors that may limit the liquidity of a security in our portfolio might adversely affect the fair values of the Company’s investment portfolio and may increase the potential that certain unrealized losses will be designated as “other-than-temporary” and that the Company may incur additional write-downs in future periods.

Scheduled contractual maturities of available for sale securities are as follows:


	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2017:
After one year through five years	$	3,452	$	3,616
After five years through ten years		23,726		24,573
After ten years		15,129		15,612
Mortgage-backed securities		28,871		28,739
Asset-backed securities		205		504
Equity securities		22		64
	$	71,405	$	73,108

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company sold eighteen municipal bonds for total proceeds of $6.5 million resulting in realized gains of $244,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company sold nine U.S. treasury bonds for total proceeds of $14.4 million resulting in realized gains of $1.6 million.

Note 4 - Allowance for Loan Losses

Management segregates the loan portfolio into loan types and analyzes the risk level for each loan type when determining its allowance for loan losses. The loan types are as follows:

Real Estate Loans:

One- to Four-Family – are loans secured by first lien collateral on residential real estate primarily held in the Western New York region. These loans can be affected by economic conditions and the value of underlying properties. Western New York’s housing market has consistently demonstrated stability in home prices despite economic conditions. Furthermore, the Company has conservative underwriting standards and its residential lending policies and procedures ensure that its one- to four-family residential mortgage loans generally conform to secondary market guidelines.

Home Equity - are loans or lines of credit secured by first or second liens on owner-occupied residential real estate primarily held in the Western New York region. These loans can also be affected by economic conditions and the values of underlying properties. Home equity loans may have increased risk of loss if the Company does not hold the first mortgage resulting in the Company being in a secondary position in the event of collateral liquidation. The Company does not originate interest only home equity loans.

Commercial Real Estate – are loans used to finance the purchase of real property, which generally consists of developed real estate that is held as first lien collateral for the loan. These loans are secured by real estate properties that are primarily held in the Western New York region. Commercial real estate lending involves additional risks compared with one- to four-family residential lending, because payments on loans secured by commercial real estate properties are often dependent on the successful operation or management of the properties, and/or the collateral value of the commercial real estate securing the loan, and repayment of such loans may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or economic conditions to a greater extent than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Also, commercial real estate loans typically involve relatively large loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers.

Construction – are loans to finance the construction of either one- to four-family owner occupied homes or commercial real estate. At the end of the construction period, the loan automatically converts to either a one- to four-family or commercial mortgage, as applicable. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the property at completion compared to the actual cost of construction. The Company limits its risk during construction as disbursements are not made until the required work for each advance has been completed and an updated lien search is performed. The completion of the construction progress is verified by a Company loan officer or inspections performed by an independent appraisal firm. Construction loans also expose us to the risk of construction delays which may impair the borrower’s ability to repay the loan.

Other Loans:

Commercial – includes business installment loans, lines of credit, and other commercial loans. Most of our commercial loans have fixed interest rates, and are for terms generally not in excess of 5 years. Whenever possible, we collateralize these loans with a lien on business assets and equipment and require the personal guarantees from principals of the borrower. Commercial loans generally involve a higher degree of credit risk because the collateral underlying the loans may be in the form of intangible assets and/or inventory subject to market obsolescence. Commercial loans can also involve relatively large loan balances to a single borrower or groups of related borrowers, with the repayment of such loans typically dependent on the successful operation of the commercial business and the income stream of the borrower. Such risks can be significantly affected by economic conditions. Although commercial loans may be collateralized by equipment or other business assets, the liquidation of collateral in the event of a borrower default may be an insufficient source of repayment because the equipment or other business assets may be obsolete or of limited use, among other things. Accordingly, the repayment of a commercial loan depends primarily on the credit worthiness of the borrowers (and any guarantors), while liquidation of collateral is a secondary and often insufficient source of repayment.

Consumer – consist of loans secured by collateral such as an automobile or a deposit account, unsecured loans and lines of credit. Consumer loans tend to have a higher credit risk due to the loans being either unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciable assets. Furthermore, consumer loan payments are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and therefore are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.

The allowance for loan losses is a valuation account that reflects the Company’s evaluation of the losses inherent in its loan portfolio. In order to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the Company estimates losses by loan type using historical loss factors, as well as other environmental factors, such as trends in loan volume and loan type, loan concentrations, changes in the experience, ability and depth of the Company’s lending management, and national and local economic conditions. The Company's determination as to the classification of loans and the amount of loss allowances are subject to review by bank regulators, which can require the establishment of additional loss allowances.

The Company also reviews all loans on which the collectability of principal may not be reasonably assured, by reviewing payment status, financial conditions and estimated value of loan collateral. These loans are assigned an internal loan grade, and the Company assigns an amount of loss allowances to these classified loans based on loan grade.

The following tables summarize the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and the distribution of the allowance for loan losses and loans receivable by loan portfolio class and impairment method as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:


	Real Estate Loans								Other Loans
	One- to Four-Family		Home Equity		Commercial		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2017
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance – July 1, 2017	$	470	$	124	$	1,888	$	303	$	331	$	32	$	75	$	3,223
Charge-offs		-		-		(75)		-		(2)		(8)		-		(85)
Recoveries		1		1		-		-		-		2		-		4
Provision (Credit)		53		10		(145)		16		167		5		(31)		75
Balance – September 30, 2017	$	524	$	135	$	1,668	$	319	$	496	$	31	$	44	$	3,217

Balance – January 1, 2017	$	431	$	114	$	1,803	$	150	$	338	$	28	$	18	$	2,882
Charge-offs		-		(3)		(75)		-		(20)		(36)		-		(134)
Recoveries		2		4		-		-		1		12		-		19
Provision (Credit)		91		20		(60)		169		177		27		26		450
Balance – September 30, 2017	$	524	$	135	$	1,668	$	319	$	496	$	31	$	44	$	3,217
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	524	$	135	$	1,668	$	319	$	496	$	31	$	44	$	3,217

Gross Loans Receivable (1):
Ending balance	$	147,850	$	37,661	$	123,079	$	29,233	$	23,355	$	1,326	$	-	$	362,504
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	156	$	21	$	1,442	$	-	$	54	$	-	$	-	$	1,673
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	147,694	$	37,640	$	121,637	$	29,233	$	23,301	$	1,326	$	-	$	360,831

(1)

Gross Loans Receivable does not include allowance for loan losses of $(3,217) or deferred loan costs of $3,121.


	Real Estate Loans								Other Loans
	One- to Four-Family		Home Equity		Commercial		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2016
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance – July 1, 2016	$	424	$	129	$	1,064	$	129	$	275	$	22	$	17	$	2,060
Charge-offs		(16)		-		-		-		(46)		(8)		-		(70)
Recoveries		1		-		-		-		-		4		-		5
Provision (Credit)		12		(13)		50		-		72		12		(8)		125
Balance – September 30, 2016	$	421	$	116	$	1,114	$	129	$	301	$	30	$	9	$	2,120

Balance – January 1, 2016	$	351	$	120	$	1,204	$	59	$	197	$	22	$	32	$	1,985
Charge-offs		(65)		(18)		(1)		-		(76)		(40)		-		(200)
Recoveries		11		1		-		-		1		12		-		25
Provision (Credit)		124		13		(89)		70		179		36		(23)		310
Balance – September 30, 2016	$	421	$	116	$	1,114	$	129	$	301	$	30	$	9	$	2,120

The following table summarizes the distribution of the allowance for loan losses and loans receivable by loan portfolio class as of December 31, 2016:


	Real Estate Loans									Other Loans
	One- to Four-Family		Home Equity		Commercial		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)

December 31, 2016
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance – December 31, 2016	$	431	$	114	$	1,803	$	150	$	338	$	28	$	18	$	2,882
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	-	$	-	$	390	$	-	$	10	$	-	$	-	$	400
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	431	$	114	$	1,413	$	150	$	328	$	28	$	18	$	2,482

Gross Loans Receivable (1):
Ending Balance	$	149,333	$	35,534	$	107,243	$	12,361	$	20,447	$	1,313	$	-	$	326,231
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	190	$	22	$	3,162	$	-	$	163	$	-	$	-	$	3,537
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	149,143	$	35,512	$	104,081	$	12,361	$	20,284	$	1,313	$	-	$	322,694

⁽¹⁾

Gross Loans Receivable does not include allowance for loan losses of $(2,882) or deferred loan costs of $3,016.

Although the allocations noted above are by loan type, the allowance for loan losses is general in nature and is available to offset losses from any loan in the Company’s portfolio. The unallocated component of the

allowance for loan losses reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for existing specific and general losses in the portfolio.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will not be able to collect the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled payments when due. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial real estate loans and commercial loans. Larger groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual consumer, home equity, or one- to four-family loans for impairment disclosure, unless they are subject to a troubled debt restructuring.

The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans at or for the periods indicated:


			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
							For the Nine Months Ended
	At September 30, 2017						September 30, 2017
	(Dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	156	$	156	$	-	$	171	$	10
Home equity		21		21		-		22		-
Commercial real estate		1,442		1,442		-		1,674		217
Commercial loans		54		54		-		54		-
Total impaired loans with no related allowance		1,673		1,673		-		1,921		227

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate(1)		-		-		-		308		-
Commercial loans(2)		-		-		-		66		6
Total impaired loans with an allowance		-		-		-		374		6

Total of impaired loans:
Residential, one- to four-family		156		156		-		171		10
Home equity		21		21		-		22		-
Commercial real estate		1,442		1,442		-		1,982		217
Commercial loans		54		54		-		120		6
Total impaired loans	$	1,673	$	1,673	$	-	$	2,295	$	233

(1)This loan was foreclosed upon during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and was recorded in other assets at September 30, 2017.

(2)This loan was paid off in full during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.


			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
							For the Year Ended
	At December 31, 2016						December 31, 2016
	(Dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	190	$	190	$	-	$	224	$	14
Home equity		22		22		-		24		1
Commercial real estate		2,148		2,148		-		2,299		29
Commercial loans		54		54		-		71		-
Total impaired loans with no related allowance		2,414		2,414		-		2,618		44

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate		1,014		1,014		390		1,011		31
Commercial loans		109		109		10		135		5
Total impaired loans with an allowance		1,123		1,123		400		1,146		36

Total of impaired loans:
Residential, one- to four-family		190		190		-		224		14
Home equity		22		22		-		24		1
Commercial real estate		3,162		3,162		390		3,310		60
Commercial loans		163		163		10		206		5
Total impaired loans	$	3,537	$	3,537	$	400	$	3,764	$	80

The following table provides an analysis of past due loans and non-accruing loans as of the dates indicated:


					90 Days or
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		More		Total Past			Current	Total Loans		Loans on
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Due			Due	Receivable		Non-Accrual
	(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2017:
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	1,471	$	778	$	1,167	$	3,416	$	144,434	$	147,850	$	2,088
Home equity		85		59		209		353		37,308		37,661		323
Commercial		-		-		1,264		1,264		121,815		123,079		1,264
Construction		-		-		-		-		29,233		29,233		-
Other Loans:
Commercial		1		21		54		76		23,279		23,355		54
Consumer		1		-		21		22		1,304		1,326		5
Total	$	1,558	$	858	$	2,715	$	5,131	$	357,373	$	362,504	$	3,734

					90 Days or
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		More		Total Past			Current	Total Loans		Loans on
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Due			Due	Receivable		Non-Accrual
	(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2016:
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	1,192	$	782	$	1,038	$	3,012	$	146,321	$	149,333	$	2,165
Home equity		141		206		158		505		35,029		35,534		329
Commercial		-		-		2,977		2,977		104,266		107,243		2,977
Construction		-		-		-		-		12,361		12,361		-
Other Loans:
Commercial		-		19		56		75		20,372		20,447		205
Consumer		31		-		28		59		1,254		1,313		28
Total	$	1,364	$	1,007	$	4,257	$	6,628	$	319,603	$	326,231	$	5,704

The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet payments as they become due. A loan does not have to be 90 days delinquent in order to be classified as non-accrual. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. If ultimate collection of principal is in doubt, all cash receipts on impaired loans are applied to reduce the principal balance. Interest income not recognized on non-accrual loans during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $209,000 and $257,000 for each period.

The Company’s policies provide for the classification of loans as follows:

Pass/Performing;

Special Mention – does not currently expose the Company to a sufficient degree of risk but does possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving the Company’s close attention;

Substandard – has one or more well-defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. A substandard asset would be one inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or pledged collateral, if applicable;

Doubtful – has all the weaknesses inherent in substandard loans with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss; and

Loss – loan is considered uncollectible and continuance without the establishment of a specific valuation reserve is not warranted.

The Company’s Asset Classification Committee is responsible for monitoring risk ratings and making changes as deemed appropriate. Each commercial loan is individually assigned a loan classification. The Company’s consumer loans, including residential one- to four-family loans and home equity loans, are not classified as described above. Instead, the Company uses the delinquency status as the basis for classifying these loans. Generally, all consumer loans more than 90 days past due are classified and placed in non-accrual. Such loans that are well-secured and in the process of collection will remain in accrual status.

The following table summarizes the internal loan grades applied to the Company’s loan portfolio as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:


	Pass/Performing		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2017
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	144,993	$	-	$	2,857	$	-	$	-	$	147,850
Home equity		37,052		-		609		-		-		37,661
Commercial		119,406		810		2,863		-		-		123,079
Construction		29,233		-		-		-		-		29,233
Other Loans:
Commercial		21,879		1,122		354		-		-		23,355
Consumer		1,316		-		8		-		2		1,326
Total	$	353,879	$	1,932	$	6,691	$	-	$	2	$	362,504


	Pass/Performing		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2016
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	146,333	$	-	$	3,000	$	-	$	-	$	149,333
Home equity		35,025		-		509		-		-		35,534
Commercial		102,216		1,759		3,268		-		-		107,243
Construction		12,361		-		-		-		-		12,361
Other Loans:
Commercial		19,865		297		270		15		-		20,447
Consumer		1,306		-		6		-		1		1,313
Total	$	317,106	$	2,056	$	7,053	$	15	$	1	$	326,231

Troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) occur when we grant borrowers concessions that we would not otherwise grant but for economic or legal reasons pertaining to the borrower’s financial difficulties. A concession is made when the terms of the loan modification are more favorable than the terms the borrower would have received in the current market under similar financial difficulties. These concessions may include, but are not limited to, modifications of the terms of the debt, the transfer of assets or the issuance of an equity interest by the borrower to satisfy all or part of the debt, or the addition of borrower(s). The Company identifies loans for potential TDRs primarily through direct communication with the borrower and evaluation of the borrower’s financial statements, revenue projections, tax returns, and credit reports. Even if the borrower is not presently in default, management will consider the likelihood that cash flow shortages, adverse economic conditions, and negative trends may result in a payment default in the near future. Generally, we will not return a TDR to accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated the ability to make principal and interest payments under the restructured terms for at least six consecutive months. The Company’s TDRs are impaired loans, which may result in specific allocations and subsequent charge-offs if appropriate.

The following table summarizes the loans that were classified as TDRs as of the dates indicated:


					Non-Accruing				Accruing				TDRs That Have Defaulted on Modified Terms Year to Date
	Number of Loans		Recorded Investment		Number of Loans		Recorded Investment		Number of Loans		Recorded Investment		Number of Loans		Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
At September 30, 2017
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family		4	$	156		-	$	-		4	$	156		-	$	-
Home equity		2		21		1		19		1		2		-		-
Total		6	$	177		1	$	19		5	$	158		-	$	-


At December 31, 2016
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family		5	$	190		-	$	-		5	$	190		-	$	-
Home equity		2		22		1		19		1		3		-		-
Other Loans:
Commercial		1		109		1		109		-		-		-		-
Total		8	$	321		2	$	128		6	$	193		-	$	-

No additional loan commitments were outstanding to these borrowers at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

There were no loans restructured and classified as TDRs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

The following table details the activity in loans which were first deemed to be TDRs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016:



	For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family		-	$	-	$	-
Other Loans:
Commercial		1		118		118
Total		1	$	118	$	118

	For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family		1	$	31	$	31
Other Loans:		-		-		-
Commercial		1		118		118
Total		2	$	149	$	149

The loans above were deemed to be TDRs due to the borrower’s financial difficulties or due to modifications of the terms of the debt related to the bankruptcy of the borrower.

Some loan modifications classified as TDRs may not ultimately result in full collection of principal and interest, as modified, which may result in potential losses. These potential losses have been factored into our overall estimate of the allowance for loan losses.

Foreclosed real estate consists of property acquired in settlement of loans which is carried at its fair value less estimated selling costs. Write-downs from cost to fair value less estimated selling costs are recorded at the date of acquisition or repossession and are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Foreclosed real estate was $513,000 and $412,000 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and was included as a component of other assets on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The recorded investment of consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction was $1.0 million and $767,000 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Note 5 – Earnings per Share

Earnings per share was calculated for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Basic earnings per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, exclusive of unearned shares held by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan of Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (the “ESOP”), unearned shares held by the Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Recognition and Retention Plan (“RRP”), and unearned shares held by the Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (“EIP”). Diluted earnings per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common share equivalents that would arise from the exercise of dilutive securities. Stock options are regarded as potential common stock and are considered in the diluted earnings per share calculations to the extent they would be dilutive and computed using the treasury stock method.

The calculated basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016
Numerator – net income	$	940,000	$	757,000
Denominator:
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		6,115,140		6,036,026
Increase in weighted average shares outstanding due to:
Stock options		9,113		7,575
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (1)		6,124,253		6,043,601

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.15	$	0.13
Diluted	$	0.15	$	0.13

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016
Numerator – net income	$	2,798,000	$	3,375,000
Denominator:
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		6,109,468		6,000,501
Increase in weighted average shares outstanding due to:
Stock options		9,093		7,607
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (1)		6,118,561		6,008,108

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.46	$	0.56
Diluted	$	0.46	$	0.56

⁽¹⁾

Stock options to purchase 64,547 shares under the Company’s 2006 Stock Option Plan and 20,000 shares under the EIP at $14.38 under each plan were outstanding during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2017, but were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been anti-dilutive.

Note 6 – Commitments to Extend Credit

The Company has commitments to extend credit with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. There were no loss reserves associated with these commitments at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The Company follows the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

The following commitments to extend credit were outstanding as of the dates specified:


	Contract Amount
	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(Dollars in thousands)

Commitments to grant loans	$	19,910	$	24,707
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit	$	38,184	$	35,356

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. The commitments for lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Company, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company’s loan commitments that have fixed interest rates for the next five years totaled $9.7 million and $12.0 million, respectively. The range of interest rates on these fixed rate commitments was 3.75% to 6.25% at September 30, 2017.

Note 7 – Stock-based Compensation

As of September 30, 2017, the Company had four stock-based compensation plans, which are described below. The compensation cost that has been recorded under salary and benefits expense in the non-interest expense section of the consolidated statements of income for these plans was $146,000 and $110,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The compensation cost that has been recorded for these plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $418,000 and $309,000, respectively.

2006 Stock Option Plan

The Company’s 2006 Stock Option Plan (the “Stock Option Plan”), which was approved by the Company’s stockholders, permitted the grant of options to its employees and non-employee directors for up to 297,562 shares of common stock. The Stock Option Plan expired on October 24, 2016, and grants of options can no longer be awarded.

Both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options have been granted under the Stock Option Plan. The exercise price of each stock option equals the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and an option’s maximum term is ten years. The stock options generally vest over a five year period.

A summary of the status of the Stock Option Plan during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 is presented below:


	September 30, 2017				September 30, 2016
	Options		Exercise Price	Remaining Contractual Life	Options		Exercise Price	Remaining Contractual Life
Outstanding at beginning of year	82,826	$	12.95		118,087	$	10.68
Granted	-		-		-		-
Exercised	-		-		(98,986)		11.19
Forfeited	-		-		-		-
Outstanding at end of period	82,826	$	12.95	7.6 years	19,101	$	8.04	3.2 years

Options exercisable at end of period	18,279	$	7.88	7.6 years	19,101	$	8.04	3.2 years

Fair value of options granted		$	-			$	-

At September 30, 2017, stock options outstanding had an intrinsic value of $253,000 and there were no remaining options available for grant under the Stock Option Plan. There were no stock options exercised during the nine month period ended September 30, 2017. The intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the nine month period ended September 30, 2016 was $216,000. Compensation expense related to the Stock Option Plan for the three month period ended September 30, 2017 was $8,000. Compensation expense related to the Stock Option Plan for the nine month period ended September 30, 2017 was $25,000. There was no compensation expense related to the Stock Option Plan for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016. At September 30, 2017, $138,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to the Stock Option Plan is expected to be recognized over a period of 49 months.

2006 Recognition and Retention Plan

The Company’s 2006 Recognition and Retention Plan (“RRP”), which was approved by the Company’s stockholders, permitted the grant of restricted stock awards (“Awards”) to employees and non-employee directors for up to 119,025 shares of common stock. The RRP expired on October 24, 2016, and as of October 24, 2016 all shares permitted under the plan have been granted.

As of September 30, 2017, there were 99,889 shares vested or distributed to eligible participants under the RRP. Compensation expense amounted to $23,000 and $17,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Compensation expense amounted to $66,000 and $49,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. At September 30, 2017, $218,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to the RRP is expected to be recognized over a period of 49 months.

A summary of the status of unvested shares under the RRP for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:


	2017		Weighted Average Grant Price (per Share)	2016		Weighted Average Grant Price (per Share)
Unvested shares outstanding at beginning of year	24,110	$	12.96	21,397	$	12.25
Granted	-		-	-		-
Vested	(4,974)		12.14	(4,974)		12.14
Forfeited	-		-	-		-
Unvested shares outstanding at end of period	19,136	$	13.18	16,423	$	12.28

2012 Equity Incentive Plan

The Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “EIP”), which was approved by the Company’s stockholders on May 23, 2012, authorizes the issuance of up to 180,000 shares of common stock pursuant to grants of restricted stock awards and up to 20,000 shares of common stock pursuant to grants of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options, subject to permitted adjustments for certain corporate transactions. Employees and directors of Lake Shore Bancorp or its subsidiaries are eligible to receive awards under the EIP, except that non-employees may not be granted incentive stock options.

The Board of Directors granted restricted stock awards under the EIP during 2017 as follows:


Grant Date	Number of Restricted Stock Awards	Vesting		Fair Value per Share of Award on Grant Date	Awardees

February 8, 2017	21,675	100% on December 15, 2019, if three year performance metric is achieved	$	15.90	Employees
February 8, 2017	5,673	100% on December 15, 2017		15.90	Non-employee directors

A summary of the status of unvested restricted stock awards under the EIP for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:


	2017		Weighted Average Grant Price (per Share)	2016		Weighted Average Grant Price (per Share)
Unvested shares outstanding at beginning of year	26,072	$	12.77	27,769	$	12.64
Granted	27,348		15.90	20,354		13.38
Vested	(4,207)		12.16	(4,213)		12.16
Forfeited	(625)		13.76	-		-
Unvested shares outstanding at end of period	48,588	$	14.57	43,910	$	13.02

As of September 30, 2017, there were 26,124 of restricted stock shares vested or distributed to eligible participants under the EIP. Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards under the EIP amounted to $81,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and $68,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016. Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards under the EIP amounted to $224,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and $181,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. At September 30, 2017, $457,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards is expected to be recognized over a period of 3 to 27 months.

A summary of the status of stock options awarded in the fourth quarter of 2016 under the EIP for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is presented below:


	September 30, 2017
	Options		Exercise Price	Remaining Contractual Life
Outstanding at beginning of year	20,000	$	14.38
Granted	-		-
Exercised	-		-
Forfeited	-		-
Outstanding at end of period	20,000	$	14.38	9.1 years

Options exercisable at end of period	-	$	-

Fair value of options granted			-

At September 30, 2017, stock options outstanding had an intrinsic value of $32,000 and there were no remaining options available for grant under the EIP. Compensation expense related to stock options outstanding under the EIP amounted to $3,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and $8,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. There was no compensation expense for the three and nine months

ended September 30, 2016 related to stock options outstanding under the EIP. At September 30, 2017, $43,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options is expected to be recognized over a period of 49 months.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”)

The Company established the ESOP for the benefit of eligible employees of the Company and Bank. All Company and Bank employees meeting certain age and service requirements are eligible to participate in the ESOP. Participants’ benefits become fully vested after five years of service once the employee is eligible to participate in the ESOP. The Company utilized $2.6 million of the proceeds of its 2006 stock offering to extend a loan to the ESOP and the ESOP used such proceeds to purchase 238,050 shares of stock on the open market at an average price of $10.70 per share, plus commission expenses. As a result of the purchase of shares by the ESOP, total stockholders’ equity of the Company was reduced by $2.6 million. As of September 30, 2017, the balance of the loan to the ESOP was $1.6 million and the fair value of unallocated shares was $2.4 million. As of September 30, 2017, there were 62,956 allocated shares and 150,765 unallocated shares compared to 63,574 allocated shares and 158,699 unallocated shares at September 30, 2016. The ESOP compensation expense was $31,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and $25,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 based on 1,984 shares earned in each of those quarters. The ESOP compensation expense was $94,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and $79,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 based on 5,951 shares earned in each of those periods.

Note 8 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a sale transaction on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these consolidated financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. The estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported here.

The measurement of fair value under FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC Topic 820”) establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities measurements (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable input measurements (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820 are as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the measurement date.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

For assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows:


	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2017
			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
		(Dollars in thousands)
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Securities available for sale:
Municipal bonds	$	43,801	$	-	$	43,801	$	-
Mortgage-backed securities:
Collateralized mortgage obligations-private label		34		-		34		-
Collateralized mortgage obligations-government sponsored entities		23,707		-		23,707		-
Government National Mortgage Association		265		-		265		-
Federal National Mortgage Association		3,092		-		3,092		-
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation		1,641		-		1,641		-
Asset-backed securities:
Private label		442		-		-		442
Government sponsored entities		62		-		62		-
Equity securities		64		-		64		-
Total	$	73,108	$	-	$	72,666	$	442


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
		(Dollars in thousands)
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Securities available for sale:
Municipal bonds	$	50,698	$	-	$	50,698	$	-
Mortgage-backed securities:
Collateralized mortgage obligations-private label		37		-		37		-
Collateralized mortgage obligations-government sponsored entities		28,830		-		28,830		-
Government National Mortgage Association		329		-		329		-
Federal National Mortgage Association		3,582		-		3,582		-
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation		1,867		-		1,867		-
Asset-backed securities:
Private label		832		-		-		832
Government sponsored entities		76		-		76		-
Equity securities		84		-		84		-
Total	$	86,335	$	-	$	85,503	$	832

Any transfers between levels would be recognized as of the actual date of event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. There were no reclassifications between the Level 1 and Level 2 categories for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Level 2 inputs for assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the securities available for sale measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), specifically, asset-backed securities - private label, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:


	2017		2016
		(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning Balance	$	832	$	1,501
Total gains - realized/unrealized:
Included in earnings		-		-
Included in other comprehensive loss		11		42
Total losses - realized/unrealized:
Included in earnings		-		-
Included in other comprehensive loss		(64)		(72)
Sales		-		-
Principal paydowns		(337)		(480)
Transfers to (out of) Level 3		-		-
Ending Balance	$	442	$	991

Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis that the Company has classified within the Level 3 category. As a result, any unrealized gains and losses for assets within the Level 3 category may include changes in fair value attributable to both observable (e.g., changes in market interest rates) and unobservable (e.g., changes in unobservable long-dated volatilities) inputs.

The following table presents additional quantitative information about the Level 3 inputs for the asset-backed securities - private label category. The fair values for this category were developed using the discounted cash flow technique with the following unobservable input ranges as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):

Unobservable Inputs

Security Category

Fair Value

Loan Type/Collateral

Credit Ratings

Constant Prepayment Speed (CPR)

Probability of Default (Annual Default Rate)

Loss Severity

September 30, 2017

Asset-backed securities - private label

442

Sub-prime First and Prime Second Lien - Residential Real Estate

B- thru D

5-12

3.0-5.0%

75.0% - 100.0%

December 31, 2016

Asset-backed securities - private label

832

Sub-prime First and Prime Second Lien - Residential Real Estate

B- thru D

5 - 10

5.0%

70.0% - 100.0%

Level 3 inputs are determined by the Company’s management using inputs from its third party financial advisor on a quarterly basis. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the reporting entity’s asset-backed, private label securities are prepayment rates, probability of default and loss severity in the event of default. Significant increases or decreases in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the assumption used for the probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the loss severity and a directionally opposite change in the assumption used for prepayment rates.

In addition to disclosure of the fair value of assets on a recurring basis, ASC Topic 820 requires disclosures for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, such as impaired assets and foreclosed real estate. Loans are generally not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Periodically, the Company records non-recurring adjustments to the carrying value of loans based on fair value measurements for partial charge-offs of the uncollectible portions of these loans. Non-recurring adjustments also include certain impairment amounts for collateral-dependent loans calculated as required by ASC Topic 310, “Receivables – Loan Impairment,” when establishing the allowance for loan losses. An impaired loan is carried at fair value based on either a recent appraisal less estimated selling costs of underlying collateral or discounted cash flows based on current market conditions.

For assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows:


	Fair Value Measurements
			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
		(Dollars in thousands)
Measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:

At September 30, 2017
Impaired loans	$	35	$	-	$	-	$	35
Foreclosed real estate		513		-		-		513

At December 31, 2016
Impaired loans	$	760	$	-	$	-	$	760
Foreclosed real estate		241		-		-		241

The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:


	Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value Estimate		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range
At September 30, 2017
Impaired loans	$	35	Market valuation of underlying collateral (1)	Direct Disposal Costs (2)	7.00%
Foreclosed real estate		513	Market valuation of property (1)	Direct Disposal Costs (2)	7.00-10.00%
At December 31, 2016
Impaired loans	$	760	Market valuation of underlying collateral (1) and discounted cash flows (3)	Direct Disposal Costs (2)	7.00-33.00%
Foreclosed real estate		241	Market valuation of property (1)	Direct Disposal Costs (2)	7.00-10.00%

⁽¹⁾

Fair value is generally determined through independent third-party appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally includes various Level 3 inputs which are not observable.

⁽²⁾

The fair value basis of impaired loans and foreclosed real estate may be adjusted to reflect management estimates of disposal costs including, but not necessarily limited to, real estate brokerage commissions, legal fees, and delinquent property taxes.

⁽³⁾

Fair value is generally determined using a discounted future cash flow method for non-collateral dependent loans. This method takes into account interest rates currently being offered to customers for loans with similar terms and with estimated maturity. The estimate of maturity is based on the borrower’s contractual cash flows and may be adjusted for prepayment estimates based on current economic and lending conditions. This method was used for one loan during the period indicated and this loan was fully paid off during the second quarter of 2017.

At September 30, 2017, impaired loans valued using Level 3 inputs had a carrying amount of $35,000 and no valuation allowances. By comparison at December 31, 2016, impaired loans valued using Level 3 inputs had a carrying amount of $1.2 million and valuation allowances of $400,000.

Once a loan is determined to be impaired, the fair value of the loan continues to be evaluated based upon the market value of the underlying collateral securing the loan or by using a discounted future cash flow method if the loan is not collateral dependent. At December 31, 2016, impaired loans whose carrying amount was written down utilizing Level 3 inputs during the year ended December 31, 2016 were comprised of two loans with a fair value of $1.0 million and resulted in an additional provision for loan loss of $400,000.

At September 30, 2017, foreclosed real estate valued using Level 3 inputs had a carrying amount of $643,000 and valuation allowances of $130,000. By comparison at December 31, 2016, foreclosed real estate valued using Level 3 inputs had a carrying amount of $341,000 and valuation allowances of $100,000.

Once a loan is foreclosed, the fair value of the real estate owned continues to be evaluated based upon the market value of the repossessed real estate originally securing the loan. At September 30, 2017, foreclosed real estate whose carrying value was written down utilizing Level 3 inputs during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 comprised of four properties with a fair value of $480,000 and resulted in additional provision for loan losses of $75,000 and a subsequent write-downs recorded in non-interest expense of $18,000. At December 31, 2016, foreclosed real estate whose carrying value was written down utilizing Level 3 inputs during the year ended December 31, 2016 comprised of six properties with a fair value of $217,000 and resulted in an additional provision for loan losses of $73,000 and subsequent write-downs recorded in non-interest expense of $6,000.

The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, whether carried at cost or fair value, are as follows:


	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2017
	Carrying		Estimated		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
	Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	44,373	$	44,373	$	44,373	$	-	$	-
Securities available for sale		73,108		73,108		-		72,666		442
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,631		1,631		-		1,631		-
Loans receivable, net		362,408		355,157		-		-		355,157
Accrued interest receivable		1,834		1,834		-		1,834		-
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		400,923		404,160		-		404,160		-
Long-term debt		26,950		26,940		-		26,940		-
Accrued interest payable		52		52		-		52		-
Off-balance-sheet financial instruments		-		-		-		-		-


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
	Carrying		Estimated		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
	Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	45,479	$	45,479	$	45,479	$	-	$	-
Securities available for sale		86,335		86,335		-		85,503		832
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,340		1,340		-		1,340		-
Loans receivable, net		326,365		322,031		-		-		322,031
Accrued interest receivable		1,600		1,600		-		1,600		-
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		385,893		388,855		-		388,855		-
Long-term debt		18,950		18,984		-		18,984		-
Accrued interest payable		32		32		-		32		-
Off-balance-sheet financial instruments		-		-		-		-		-

The following valuation techniques were used to measure the fair value of financial instruments in the above table:

Cash and cash equivalents (carried at cost)

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value.

Securities available for sale (carried at fair value)

The fair value of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1) or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution date, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the security’s terms and conditions, among other

things. Level 2 securities which are fixed income instruments that are not quoted on an exchange, but are traded in active markets, are valued using prices obtained from our custodian, who use third party data service providers. Securities available for sale measured within the Level 3 category consist of private label asset-backed securities. The fair value measurement for these Level 3 securities is explained more fully earlier in this footnote.

Federal Home Loan Bank stock (carried at cost)

The carrying amount of Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value.

Loans Receivable, net (carried at cost)

The fair value of fixed-rate and variable rate performing loans is estimated using a discounted cash flow method. The discount rates take into account interest rates currently being offered to customers for loans with similar terms and with estimated maturity and market factors including liquidity. The estimate of maturity is based on the Company’s contractual cash flows adjusted for prepayment estimates based on current economic and lending conditions. Due to the significant judgment involved in evaluating credit quality, loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable (carried at cost)

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and payable approximates fair value.

Deposits (carried at cost)

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as savings, money market and checking is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of time deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows at current rates of interest for similar deposits using market rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. Due to the minimal amount of unobservable inputs involved in evaluating assumptions used for discounted cash flows of time deposits, these deposits are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Borrowings (carried at cost)

The fair value of long-term debt was calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows at current market rates of interest for similar borrowings through maturity of each instrument. Due to the minimal amount of unobservable inputs involved in evaluating assumptions used for discounted cash flows of long-term debt, they are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments (disclosed at cost)

Fair values of the Company’s off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments) are based on interest rates and fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account, the remaining terms of the commitments and the counterparties’ credit standing. Other than loan commitments, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on its financial condition.

Note 9 – Treasury Stock

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company repurchased 3,600 shares of common stock at an average cost of $15.85 per share. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company repurchased 17,100 shares of common stock at an average cost of $15.75 per share. These shares were repurchased pursuant to the Company’s publicly announced common stock repurchase program. As of September 30, 2017, there were 67,401 shares remaining to be repurchased under the existing stock repurchase program. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company transferred 27,348 shares of common stock out of the treasury stock reserved for the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, at an average cost of $9.88 per share to fund awards that had been granted under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, there were 904 and 1,104 shares, respectively, transferred back into treasury stock reserved for the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at an average cost of $9.59 and $9.58 per share, respectively due to forfeitures.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, the Company repurchased 5,000 shares of common stock at an average cost of $13.30 per share. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company repurchased 25,000 shares of common stock at an average cost of $13.51 per share. These shares were repurchased pursuant to the Company’s publicly announced common stock repurchase program. As of September 30, 2016, there were 92,701 shares remaining to be repurchased under the existing stock repurchase program. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company transferred 20,354 shares of common stock out of the treasury stock reserved for the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, at an average cost of $9.70 per share, to fund awards that had been granted under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

Note 10 – Other Comprehensive Income

In addition to presenting the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income herein, the following table shows the tax effects allocated to the Company’s single component of other comprehensive loss for the periods presented:


	For the Three Months Ended						For the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2017							September 30, 2016
	Pre-Tax Amount		Tax Benefit		Net of Tax Amount		Pre-Tax Amount		Tax Benefit		Net of Tax Amount
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Net unrealized losses on securities available for sale:
Net unrealized losses arising during the period	$	(91)	$	31	$	(60)	$	(684)	$	233	$	(451)
Less: reclassification adjustment related to:
Recovery on previously impaired investment securities included in net income		(25)		9		(16)		(39)		13		(26)
Gain on sale of securities included in net income		(22)		7		(15)		-		-		-
Total Other Comprehensive Loss	$	(138)	$	47	$	(91)	$	(723)	$	246	$	(477)


	For the Nine Months Ended							For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2017							September 30, 2016
	Pre-Tax Amount		Tax Benefit		Net of Tax Amount			Pre-Tax Amount		Tax (Expense) Benefit		Net of Tax Amount
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Net unrealized (losses) gains on securities available for sale:
Net unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period	$	(51)	$	17	$	(34)	$	1,325	$	(450)	$	875
Less: reclassification adjustment related to:
Recovery on previously impaired investment securities included in net income		(96)		33		(63)		(107)		36		(71)
Gain on sale of securities included in net income		(244)		83		(161)		(1,636)		556		(1,080)
Total Other Comprehensive Loss	$	(391)	$	133	$	(258)	$	(418)	$	142	$	(276)

The following table presents the amounts reclassified out of the single component of the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income for the indicated periods:


	Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other
Details about Accumulated Other	Comprehensive Income				Affected Line Item
Comprehensive Income	for the three months ended September 30,				on the Consolidated
Components	2017		2016		Statements of Income
	(Dollars in thousands)
Net unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale:
Recovery on previously impaired investment securities	$	(25)	$	(39)	Recovery on previously impaired investment securities
Sale of securities		(22)		-	Gain on sale of securities available for sale
		(47)		(39)
Provision for income tax expense		16		13	Income Tax Expense
Total reclassification for the period	$	(31)	$	(26)	Net Income


	Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other
Details about Accumulated Other	Comprehensive Income				Affected Line Item
Comprehensive Income	for the nine months ended September 30,				on the Consolidated
Components	2017		2016		Statements of Income
	(Dollars in thousands)
Net unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale:
Recovery on previously impaired investment securities	$	(96)	$	(107)	Recovery on previously impaired investment securities
Sale of securities		(244)		(1,636)	Gain on sale of securities available for sale
		(340)		(1,743)
Provision for income tax expense		116		592	Income Tax Expense
Total reclassification for the period	$	(224)	$	(1,151)	Net Income

Note 11 – Subsequent Events

On October 25, 2017, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.08 per share on the Company’s common stock, payable on November 20, 2017 to shareholders of record as of November 6, 2017. Lake Shore, MHC (the “MHC”), which holds 3,636,875 shares, or approximately 59.6% of the Company’s total outstanding stock, elected to waive its right to receive this cash dividend of approximately $291,000. On March 7, 2017, the MHC received the non-objection of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia to waive its right to receive dividends paid by the Company during the twelve months ending February 8, 2018, aggregating up to $0.32 per share. The MHC waived $291,000 of dividends during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and $873,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Cumulatively, Lake Shore, MHC has waived approximately $9.1 million of cash dividends as of September 30, 2017. The dividends waived by Lake Shore, MHC are considered a restriction on the retained earnings of the Company.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements may be identified by words such as “believe,” “will,” “expect,” “project,” “may,” “could,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “targets” and similar expressions. These statements are based upon our current beliefs and expectations and are subject to

significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors.

The following factors, including the factors set forth in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements:

general and local economic conditions;

changes in interest rates, deposit flows, demand for mortgages and other loans, real estate values and competition;

the ability of our customers to make loan payments;

our ability to continue to control costs and expenses;

changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines;

our success in managing the risks involved in our business;

inflation, and market and monetary fluctuations;

the impact of more stringent capital requirements being imposed by banking regulators;

changes in legislation or regulation, including the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act; and

other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing, products and services.

Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in any other public statements we make may differ from actual outcomes. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statements can be guaranteed. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview

The following discussion and analysis is presented to assist in the understanding and evaluation of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. It is intended to complement the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction therewith. The detailed discussion focuses on our consolidated financial condition as of September 30, 2017 compared to the consolidated financial condition as of December 31, 2016 and the consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

Our results of operations depend primarily on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income we earn on loans and investments and the interest expense we pay on deposits, borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is affected by the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates we earn or pay on these balances.

Our operations are also affected by non-interest income, such as service charges and fees and gains and losses on the sales of securities and loans, our provision for loan losses and non-interest expenses which include salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment costs, data processing, professional services, advertising and other general and administrative expenses.

Financial institutions like us, in general, are significantly affected by economic conditions, competition, and the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government. Lending activities are influenced by the demand for and supply of housing and commercial real estate, competition among lenders, interest rate conditions, and funds availability. Our operations and lending are principally concentrated in the Western New York area, and our operations and earnings are influenced by local economic conditions. Deposit balances and cost of funds are influenced by prevailing market rates on competing investments, customer preferences, and levels of personal income and savings in our primary market area. Operations are also significantly impacted by government policies and actions of regulatory authorities. Future changes in applicable law, regulations or government policies may materially impact the Company.

To operate successfully, we must manage various types of risk, including but not limited to, interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, operational and information technology risks, strategic risk, reputation risk and compliance risk. While all of these risks are important, the risks of greatest significance to us are interest rate risk and credit risk.

Interest rate risk is the exposure of our net interest income to adverse movements in interest rates. Since net interest income (the difference between interest earned on loans and investments and interest paid on deposits and borrowings) is our primary source of revenue, interest rate risk is the most significant non-credit related risk to which our Company is exposed. Net interest income is affected by changes in interest rates as well as fluctuations in the level and duration of our assets and liabilities. In addition to directly impacting net interest income, changes in interest rates can also affect the amount of new loan originations, the ability of borrowers and debt issuers to repay loans and debt securities, the volume of loan repayments and refinancing, the flow and mix of deposits and the fair value of available for sale securities.

Credit risk is the risk to our earnings and stockholders’ equity that results from customers, to whom loans have been made, and from issuers of debt securities in which the Company has invested, failing to repay their obligations. The magnitude of risk depends on the capacity and willingness of borrowers and debt issuers to repay and the sufficiency of the value of collateral obtained to secure the loans made or investments purchased.

The Company uses the current statutory U.S corporate income tax rate of 34.0% to value its deferred tax assets and liabilities. On September 27, 2017, the Trump Administration announced a comprehensive tax reform proposal that includes a reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate to 20.0%. If corporate tax rates were reduced, management expects the Company would be required to record an initial charge against earnings to lower the carrying amount of its net deferred tax asset, and then, going forward, would record lower tax provisions on an ongoing basis. The proposal is at the beginning stages of negotiations and will need to be addressed by both houses of Congress. It is too early in the process to determine if any of the proposals are actionable. Accordingly, management cannot assess the effect a change in the corporate tax rate would have on the Company’s operating results or financial position at the present time.

Management Strategy

There have been no material changes in the Company’s management strategy from what was disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Critical Accounting Policies

Disclosure of the Company’s significant accounting policies is included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. Some of these policies require significant judgment, estimates and assumptions to be made by management, most particularly in connection with determining the provision for loan losses and the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses, as well as management’s evaluation of securities valuation, impairment of securities and income taxes. There have been no material changes in critical accounting policies since December 31, 2016.

Analysis of Net Interest Income

Net interest income represents the difference between the interest we earn on our interest-earning assets, such as commercial and residential mortgage loans and investment securities, and the expense we pay on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. Net interest income depends on both the volume of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates we earn or pay on them.

Average Balances, Interest and Average Yields. The following tables set forth certain information relating to our average balance sheets and reflects the average yield on interest-earning assets and average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, interest earned and interest paid for the periods indicated. Such yields and costs are derived by dividing interest income or expense by the average balance of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, for the periods indicated. Average balances are derived from daily balances over the periods indicated. The average balances for loans are net of allowance for loan losses, but include non-accrual loans. Interest income on securities does not include a tax equivalent adjustment for bank qualified municipal bonds.


	For the Three Months Ended					For the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2017					September 30, 2016
	Average		Interest Income/		Yield/	Average		Interest Income/		Yield/
	Balance		Expense		Rate	Balance		Expense		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning deposits & federal funds sold	$	31,466	$	81	1.03%	$	30,464	$	30	0.39%
Securities(1)		76,678		577	3.01%		94,700		686	2.90%
Loans		362,198		4,289	4.74%		318,039		3,681	4.63%
Total interest-earning assets		470,342		4,947	4.21%		443,203		4,397	3.97%
Other assets		37,924					34,581
Total assets	$	508,266				$	477,784

Interest-bearing liabilities
Demand & NOW accounts	$	49,850	$	16	0.13%	$	45,156	$	9	0.08%
Money market accounts		87,099		72	0.33%		77,605		38	0.20%
Savings accounts		54,211		8	0.06%		49,403		8	0.06%
Time deposits		146,987		427	1.16%		148,360		394	1.06%
Borrowed funds		26,950		139	2.06%		18,950		93	1.96%
Other interest-bearing liabilities		856		20	9.35%		954		23	9.64%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		365,953		682	0.75%		340,428		565	0.66%
Other non-interest bearing liabilities		64,080					59,728
Stockholders' equity		78,233					77,628
Total liabilities & stockholders' equity	$	508,266				$	477,784
Net interest income			$	4,265				$	3,832
Interest rate spread					3.46%					3.31%
Net interest margin					3.63%					3.46%

⁽¹⁾

The tax equivalent adjustment for bank qualified municipals results in rates of 4.05% and 3.87% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.


	For the Nine Months Ended					For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2017					September 30, 2016
	Average		Interest Income/		Yield/	Average		Interest Income/		Yield/
	Balance		Expense		Rate	Balance		Expense		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning deposits & federal funds sold	$	29,798	$	167	0.75%	$	31,980	$	81	0.34%
Securities(1)		81,737		1,856	3.03%		101,399		2,230	2.93%
Loans		348,716		12,456	4.76%		308,759		10,797	4.66%
Total interest-earning assets		460,251		14,479	4.19%		442,138		13,108	3.95%
Other assets		37,325					34,380
Total assets	$	497,576				$	476,518

Interest-bearing liabilities
Demand & NOW accounts	$	50,688	$	48	0.13%	$	44,618	$	26	0.08%
Money market accounts		83,694		183	0.29%		78,053		108	0.18%
Savings accounts		53,933		23	0.06%		47,752		21	0.06%
Time deposits		147,664		1,245	1.12%		152,455		1,218	1.07%
Borrowed funds		21,792		328	2.01%		19,376		280	1.93%
Other interest-bearing liabilities		886		62	9.33%		971		69	9.47%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		358,657		1,889	0.70%		343,225		1,722	0.67%
Other non-interest bearing liabilities		61,424					56,858
Stockholders' equity		77,495					76,435
Total liabilities & stockholders' equity	$	497,576				$	476,518
Net interest income			$	12,590				$	11,386
Interest rate spread					3.49%					3.28%
Net interest margin					3.65%					3.43%

⁽¹⁾

The tax equivalent adjustment for bank qualified municipals results in rates of 4.09% and 3.85% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Rate Volume Analysis. The following tables analyze the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The tables show the amount of the change in interest income or expense caused by either changes in outstanding balances (volume) or changes in interest rates. The effect of a change in volume is measured by applying the average rate during the first period to the volume change between the two periods. The effect of changes in rate is measured by applying the change in rate between the two periods to the average volume during the first period. Changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately to the absolute value of the change due to volume and the change due to rate.


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
	Compared to
	Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
	Rate		Volume		Net Change
		(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning deposits & federal funds sold	$	50	$	1	$	51
Securities		26		(135)		(109)
Loans, including fees		87		521		608
Total interest-earning assets		163		387		550
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand & NOW accounts		6		1		7
Money market accounts		29		5		34
Savings accounts		(1)		1		-
Time deposits		37		(4)		33
Total deposits		71		3		74
Other interest-bearing liabilities:
Borrowed funds & other interest-bearing liabilities		4		39		43
Total interest-bearing liabilities		75		42		117
Total change in net interest income	$	88	$	345	$	433

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
	Compared to
	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
	Rate		Volume			Net Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning deposits & federal funds sold	$	92	$	(6)	$	86
Securities		70		(444)		(374)
Loans, including fees		236		1,423		1,659
Total interest-earning assets		398		973		1,371
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand & NOW accounts		18		4		22
Money market accounts		67		8		75
Savings accounts		(1)		3		2
Time deposits		66		(39)		27
Total deposits		150		(24)		126
Other interest-bearing liabilities:
Borrowed funds & other interest-bearing liabilities		11		30		41
Total interest-bearing liabilities		161		6		167
Total change in net interest income	$	237	$	967	$	1,204

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the average yield on interest-earning assets increased 24 basis points to 4.21% primarily due to a $44.2 million, or 13.9%, increase in the average loan portfolio as compared to the prior year quarter. The increase in the average balance of the loan portfolio was primarily due to an increase in the average balance of higher yielding commercial real estate loans. The average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities increased to 0.75% during the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to 0.66% during the same period in 2016 primarily due to an increase in the average interest rates being paid on demand deposits, money market accounts, time deposit accounts and borrowings due to an increase in market rates and competition for deposit accounts. The net interest margin for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was 3.63% as compared to a net interest margin of 3.46% for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The interest rate spread for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was 3.46% as compared to an interest rate spread of 3.31% for the three months ended September 30, 2016.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the average yield on interest-earning assets increased 24 basis points to 4.19% primarily due to a $40.0 million, or 12.9%, increase in the average loan portfolio compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase in the average balance of the loan portfolio was primarily due to an increase in the average balance of higher yielding commercial real estate loans. The increase was also due to the receipt of $202,000 of interest income on one non-performing commercial real estate loan that paid off during the first quarter of 2017 which increased the average yield earned on loans by three basis points. The average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities increased to 0.70% during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to 0.67% during the same period in 2016 primarily due to an increase in the average interest rates being paid on demand deposits, money market accounts, time deposit accounts and borrowings due to an increase in market rates and competition for deposit accounts. The net interest margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was 3.65% as compared to a net interest margin of 3.43% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The interest rate spread for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was 3.49% as compared to an interest rate spread of 3.28% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

The Bank’s Asset-Liability Committee continues to evaluate the options available to minimize the potential impact of a rising rate environment on its operations, as well as to prepare for the impact of a continued, prolonged, low-interest rate environment. The Committee and Bank management have implemented strategies to shorten the term of interest-earning assets and increase investments in liquid assets to position the Bank to

be able to take advantage of rising interest rates in the future. Furthermore, strategies to increase core deposits and the origination of adjustable-rate commercial loans are also in place to manage interest rate risk and the net interest margin.

Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Total assets at September 30, 2017 were $512.8 million, an increase of $23.6 million, or 4.8%, from $489.2 million at December 31, 2016. The increase in total assets was primarily due to a $36.0 million increase in loans receivable partially offset by a $13.2 million decrease in securities available for sale.

Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $1.1 million, or 2.4%, from $45.5 million at December 31, 2016 to $44.4 million at September 30, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to a $37.4 million net cash outflow relating to net loan originations and principal collections during 2017 partially offset by a $15.0 million increase in deposits, a net $13.1 million cash inflow from the receipt of principal paydowns, sales proceeds and maturities in the investment portfolio, and a net $8.0 million increase in long-term debt.

Securities available for sale decreased by $13.2 million, or 15.3%, to $73.1 million at September 30, 2017 compared to $86.3 million at December 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to the receipt of $9.0 million in principal paydowns and $6.5 million in proceeds from the sale of investments, partially offset by $2.4 million of new securities purchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The Company sold securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 for liquidity purposes, to originate adjustable rate loans and to be in a better position to take advantage of future increases in market interest rates.

Net loans receivable increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as shown in the table below:


	At September 30,		At December 31,		Change
	2017		2016		$		%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	147,850	$	149,333	$	(1,483)	(1.0)	%
Home equity		37,661		35,534		2,127	6.0	%
Commercial		123,079		107,243		15,836	14.8	%
Construction		29,233		12,361		16,872	136.5	%
Total real estate loans		337,823		304,471		33,352	11.0	%
Other Loans:
Commercial		23,355		20,447		2,908	14.2	%
Consumer		1,326		1,313		13	1.0	%
Total gross loans		362,504		326,231		36,273	11.1	%
Allowance for loan losses		(3,217)		(2,882)		(335)	11.6	%
Net deferred loan costs		3,121		3,016		105	3.5	%
Loans receivable, net	$	362,408	$	326,365	$	36,043	11.0	%

The increase in net loans receivable was primarily due to an increase in commercial real estate loans, construction loans, commercial business loans, and home equity loans, partially offset by a decrease in residential, one- to four-family real estate loans. As fixed rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans present additional interest rate risk to our loan portfolio as a result of the longer duration of these types of assets, we remain strategically focused in 2017 on originating shorter duration commercial real estate and commercial business loans to diversify our asset mix, to reduce interest rate risk, to take advantage of the opportunities available to serve small businesses in our market area, and to increase our net interest margin.

Loans Past Due and Non-performing Assets. The following table presents information regarding our non-accrual loans, accruing loans delinquent 90 days or more, non-performing loans, foreclosed real estate, and non-performing and performing loans classified as troubled debt restructurings, as of the dates indicated.


	At September 30,			At December 31,
	2017			2016
	(Dollars in thousands)
Loans past due 90 days or more but still accruing:
Real estate loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	-		$	136
Home equity		12			24
Commercial		-			-
Construction		-			-
Other loans:
Commercial		2			2
Consumer		-			-
Total	$	14		$	162
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis:
Real estate loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	2,088		$	2,165
Home equity		323			329
Commercial		1,264			2,977
Construction		-			-
Other loans:
Commercial		54			205
Consumer		5			28
Total non-accrual loans		3,734			5,704
Total non-performing loans		3,748			5,866
Foreclosed real estate		513			412
Total non-performing assets	$	4,261		$	6,278
Ratios:
Non-performing loans as a percent of total loans:		1.03	%		1.80	%
Non-performing assets as a percent of total assets:		0.83	%		1.28	%
Troubled debt restructuring:
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis
Real estate loans:
Home equity	$	19		$	19
Other loans:
Commercial	$	-		$	109
Performing loans
Real estate loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	156		$	190
Home equity		2			3

Total non-performing loans decreased by $2.2 million, or 36.1%, to $3.7 million at September 30, 2017 from $5.9 million at December 31, 2016, primarily due to a $1.7 million decrease in non-performing commercial real estate loans. The decrease in non-performing commercial real estate loans was primarily due to the payoff of two commercial real estate loans, with aggregate loan balances of $1.3 million as of December 31, 2016.

Management is actively pursuing all actions necessary to collect the outstanding balance on all non-performing loans, which may include foreclosure on the related properties.

The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for loan losses and other ratios at or for the dates indicated.


	At or for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	2,882	$	1,985
Provision for loan losses		450		310
Charge-offs:
Real estate loans:
Residential, one- to four-family		-		(65)
Home equity		(3)		(18)
Commercial		(75)		(1)
Construction		-		-
Other loans:
Commercial		(20)		(76)
Consumer		(36)		(40)
Total charge-offs		(134)		(200)
Recoveries:
Real estate loans:
Residential, one- to four-family		2		11
Home equity		4		1
Commercial		-		-
Construction		-		-
Other loans:
Commercial		1		1
Consumer		12		12
Total recoveries		19		25
Net charge-offs		(115)		(175)
Balance at end of period	$	3,217	$	2,120
Average loans outstanding	$	348,716	$	308,759
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total net loans		0.89%		0.66%
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans		85.83%		36.55%
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding(1)		0.04%		0.08%

(1) Annualized

The table below shows changes in deposit balances by type of deposit account between September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:


	At September 30,		At December 31,		Change
	2017		2016		$		%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Demand deposits and NOW accounts:
Non-interest bearing	$	58,683	$	55,889	$	2,794	5.0	%
Interest bearing		51,005		52,058		(1,053)	(2.0)	%
Money market		90,190		78,401		11,789	15.0	%
Savings		53,640		52,404		1,236	2.4	%
Time deposits		147,405		147,141		264	0.2	%
Total deposits	$	400,923	$	385,893	$	15,030	3.9	%

The increase in total deposits was primarily due to net growth in core deposits. The net growth in core deposits was the result of the Company’s continued strategic focus on growing low-cost core deposits among its retail and commercial customers in an effort to manage interest expense.

Our borrowings, consisting of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLBNY”), increased by $8.0 million, or 42.2%, to $27.0 million at September 30, 2017 from $19.0 million at December 31, 2016. The additional borrowings were incurred during the second quarter of 2017 to allow the Bank to take advantage of the low fixed-rates in order to fund loan growth.

Total stockholders’ equity increased by $2.1 million, or 2.8%, from $76.0 million at December 31, 2016 to $78.2 million at September 30, 2017. The increase in stockholders’ equity was primarily due to net income of $2.8 million partially offset by $559,000 in cash dividends paid.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

General. Net income was $940,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017, or $0.15 per diluted share, an increase of $183,000, or 24.2%, compared to net income of $757,000, or $0.13 per diluted share, for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in net income was primarily due to an increase in net interest income of $433,000, partially offset by a $193,000 increase in non-interest expense and a $66,000 increase in income tax expense.

Interest Income. Interest income increased by $550,000, or 12.5%, to $4.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to an increase in loan interest income. Loan interest income increased by $608,000, or 16.5%, to $4.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $3.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, primarily due to an increase in the average balance of the loan portfolio of $44.2 million, or 13.9%, from $318.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in the average balance of loans was primarily due to growth in the average balance of commercial real estate loans. The increase in loan interest income was also due to an 11 basis points increase in the average yield earned on loans during the three months ended September 30, 2017 when compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to the increased volume of commercial real estate loan originations. The average yield earned on loans was 4.74% and 4.63%, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

Investment interest income decreased $109,000, or 15.9%, to $577,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016, primarily due to a decrease in the average balance of the investment portfolio from $94.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 to $76.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease in the average balance of the investment portfolio was primarily due to the Company’s strategy to reinvest paydowns and sales proceeds received on the securities portfolio into loan originations, primarily commercial loans. The purpose of this

strategy is to shorten the duration of interest earning assets in order to be in a better position to take advantage of future increases in market interest rates as well as to manage interest rate risk. The average yield on the investment portfolio increased 11 basis points from 2.90% for the three months ended September 30, 2016 to 3.01% for the three months ended September 30, 2017, primarily due to paydowns and sales of lower yielding securities.

Other interest income increased by $51,000, or 170.0%, to $81,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016, primarily due to a 64 basis points increase in the average yield on the interest-earning deposits and federal funds sold portfolio. The average yield increased from 0.39% for the three months ended September 30, 2016 to 1.03% for the three months ended September 30, 2017. This increase in average yield was primarily due to a 75 basis points increase in the fed funds rate since September 30, 2016.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $117,000, or 20.7%, to $682,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $565,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016. Interest paid on deposits increased by $74,000, or 16.5%, to $523,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in deposit expense was primarily due to an increase in the average interest rates paid on demand deposit, money market and time deposit accounts of 5, 13 and 10 basis points, respectively, when compared to the prior year period. It was also due to a $19.0 million increase in average core deposits since the three months ended September 30, 2016, partially offset by a $1.4 million decrease in average time deposits as a result of the Company’s continued strategic focus on growing low-cost core deposits. The average balance of deposits for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $338.1 million with an average rate of 0.62% compared to the average balance of deposits of $320.5 million and an average rate of 0.56% for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The interest expense related to advances from the FHLBNY increased $46,000, or 49.5%, to $139,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to an $8.0 million increase in the average balance and a 10 basis points increase in the average interest rate paid on FHLBNY advances. The increase in the average balance was due to additional borrowings that will allow the Bank to take advantage of the low fixed-rates in order to fund loan growth.

Provision for Loan Losses. A $75,000 provision to the allowance for loan losses was recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2017, which was a $50,000 decrease as compared to the provision recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to a decrease in non-performing loans.

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded a $145,000 net credit provision for commercial real estate loans. This was primarily due to a $175,000 reduction in the reserve for one substandard criticized commercial real estate loan during the quarter. This credit provision was partially offset by a $30,000 provision recorded for a $264,000 increase in special mention criticized commercial real estate loans during the quarter.

A provision of $167,000 was recorded for commercial business loans during the three months ended September 30, 2017, primarily due to a $1.1 million increase in special mention criticized commercial business loans during the three months ended September 30, 2017. The Company also recorded a $16,000 general allowance during the three months ended September 30, 2017 on performing construction loans primarily due to a $1.3 million, or 4.5%, increase in the construction loan portfolio during the three months ended September 30, 2017 since June 30, 2017, to reflect inherent losses within the portfolio.

A $68,000 provision was recorded by the Company during the three months ended September 30, 2017 for one-to four-family, home equity and consumer loans primarily to reflect inherent losses within these portfolios as a result of an increase in the historical average net charge-offs for these loan types, as well as an increase in classified loans during the three months ended September 30, 2017.

The Company recorded a $31,000 unallocated credit provision for loan losses during the three months ended September 30, 2017, to reflect the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating allocated and general losses in the portfolio.

During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded a $125,000 provision for loan losses. A $122,000 provision was recorded for commercial real estate and commercial business loans primarily due to an increase in loan originations during the three months ended September 30, 2016, to reflect the inherent losses expected on these loan types. This provision also included $41,000 to reflect an increase in net charge-offs in commercial business loans during the three months ended September 30, 2016. The Company recorded a $24,000 provision for one- to four-family mortgages and consumer loans primarily due to an increase in net charge-offs during the three months ended September 30, 2016. The provision for loan losses was partially offset by a $13,000 credit for home equity loans in the three months ended September 30, 2016, due to an overall decrease in historical losses in this loan portfolio during the last five years. The Company recorded an $8,000 unallocated credit to the provision for loan losses during the three months ended September 30, 2016 to reflect the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating allocated and general losses in the portfolio.

Refer to Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details on the provision for loan losses.

Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income decreased by $41,000, or 6.2%, from $658,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $617,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease in non-interest income was primarily due to a $55,000, or 98.2% decrease in gains on the sales of loans as a result of a fourth quarter 2016 strategic decision to generally retain, rather than sell, residential loans originated due to stabilization of the Bank’s interest rate risk levels. Service charges and fees decreased by $20,000, or 4.3%, when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016, primarily due to a lower volume of deposit fees during the quarter. The decrease in non-interest income was partially offset by a $22,000 pre-tax gain on the sale of securities in the third quarter of 2017. The Bank did not sell any securities during the third quarter in 2016. Earnings on bank owned life insurance increased by $21,000, or 30.0%, during the three months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to the purchase of an additional $2.5 million in bank owned life insurance during the fourth quarter of 2016.

Non-Interest Expenses. Non-interest expenses increased $193,000, or 5.6%, for the three months ended September 30, 2017 to $3.6 million when compared to the same three month period in 2016. Salary and employee benefits increased $95,000, or 5.3%, primarily due to annual salary increases and grants of stock awards. Other expenses increased $77,000, or 25.3%, primarily due to an increase in loan origination related costs and expenses for other real estate owned. Advertising expenses increased $46,000, or 56.8%, for the three months ended September 30, 2017, primarily due to additional marketing campaigns during the 2017 period. Decreases in professional service fees, FDIC insurance expenses, and postage and supplies costs during the three months ended September 30, 2017 were partially offset by increases in data processing and occupancy and equipment expenses when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax increased by $66,000, or 35.1%, from $188,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 to $254,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The income tax increased primarily due to the increase in income before taxes. The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was 21.3% while the effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was 19.9%. The increase in the 2017 effective tax rate was primarily due to a decrease in the projected mix of tax-exempt income derived from our municipal bond portfolio and bank-owned life insurance in relation to our projection of pre-tax income for the current year.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

General. Net income was $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, or $0.46 per diluted share, a decrease of $577,000, or 17.1%, compared to net income of $3.4 million, or $0.56 per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The decrease in net income was primarily due to a $1.6 million pre-tax realized gain on the sale of securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to a $244,000 pre-tax gain on the sale of securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. 2017 year to date net income was also impacted by a $379,000 increase in non-interest expense and a $140,000 increase in the provision for loan losses which was partially offset by a $1.2 million increase in net

interest income and a $155,000 decrease in income tax expense when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Interest Income. Interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $14.5 million, an increase of $1.4 million, or 10.5%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to an increase in loan interest income. Loan interest income increased by $1.7 million, or 15.4%, to $12.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $10.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, primarily due to a $40.0 million, or 12.9%, increase in the average balance of loans from $308.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $348.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase in the average balance of loans was primarily due to an increase in the average balance of commercial real estate, home equity and commercial business loans. The increase in loan interest income was also due to the receipt of $202,000 of interest income on one non-performing commercial real estate loan which paid off during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The payoff of the non-performing commercial loan caused most of the increase in the average yield on the loan portfolio which increased from 4.66% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to 4.76% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The average yield on the loan portfolio would be 4.69% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 if the $202,000 of interest income received on the non-performing loan payoff was excluded.

Investment interest income decreased $374,000, or 16.8%, to $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016, primarily due to a decrease in the average balance of the investment portfolio from $101.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $81.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease in the average balance of the investment portfolio was primarily due to the Company’s strategy to reinvest sale proceeds and paydowns received on the securities portfolio into loan originations, primarily commercial loans. The purpose of this strategy is to shorten the duration of interest earning assets in order to be in a better position to take advantage of future increases in market interest rates as well as to manage interest rate risk. The average yield on the investment portfolio increased 10 basis points from 2.93% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to 3.03% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to paydowns and sales of lower yielding securities.

Other interest income increased by $86,000, or 106.2%, to $167,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016, primarily due to a 41 basis points increase in the average yield on the interest earning deposits and federal funds sold portfolio. The average yield increased from 0.34% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to 0.75% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase in average yield was primarily due to a 75 basis points increase in the fed funds rate since September 30, 2016. The average balance of the interest-earning deposits and federal funds sold portfolio decreased by $2.2 million, or 6.8%, from $32.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $29.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to the use of excess cash to fund commercial loan originations.

Interest Expense. Interest expense was $1.9 million, an increase of $167,000, or 9.7%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, when compared to the same nine month period in 2016. Interest paid on deposits increased by $126,000, or 9.2%, to $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Interest expense was impacted by a 5, 11 and 5 basis points increase, respectively, in the average interest rates paid on demand deposit, money market and time deposit accounts, as well as a $17.9 million increase in average core deposits since the nine months ended September 30, 2016, partially offset by a $4.8 million decrease in average time deposits during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as a result of the Company’s continued strategic focus on growing low-cost core deposits. The average balance of deposits for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $336.0 million with an average rate of 0.59% compared to the average balance of deposits of $322.9 million and an average rate of 0.57% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The interest expense related to advances from the FHLBNY increased $48,000, or 17.1%, to $328,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as a result of an increase in the average balance and average rate of FHLBNY advances. The average balance of advances from the FHLBNY for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $21.8 million with an average rate of 2.01% compared to an average

balance of $19.4 million and an average rate of 1.93% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in the average balance was due to additional borrowings that will allow the Bank to take advantage of the low fixed-rates in order to fund loan growth.

Provision for Loan Losses. A $450,000 provision to the allowance for loan losses was recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, which was a $140,000, or 45.2%, increase as compared to the provision recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in provision expense was primarily related to growth in construction and commercial loans.

The Company recorded a $177,000 provision during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 on commercial business loans, primarily due to a $2.9 million increase in the total loan portfolio balance to reflect inherent losses on new loan originations. The provision was also due to an $895,000 increase in criticized and classified loans in this portfolio since December 31, 2016.

The Company recorded a $169,000 general allowance during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 on performing construction loans, primarily due to a $16.9 million, or 16.5%, increase in the construction loan portfolio since December 31, 2016, to reflect inherent losses within the portfolio.

During the nine months end September 30, 2017, the Company recorded a net $60,000 credit provision for commercial real estate loans. A $390,000 decrease in reserves was recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 for impaired commercial real estate loans. The decrease in impaired reserves within this loan portfolio was primarily due to an increase in the estimated value of collateral for one impaired commercial real estate loan, as a result of an increase in the occupancy rate. A $176,000 credit provision was also recorded for changes in the related environmental factors used to qualitatively assess inherent loan losses on commercial real estate loans. These credit provisions were partially offset by a $215,000 provision to reflect inherent risk associated with growth in commercial real estate loan originations. The commercial real estate loan portfolio increased by $15.8 million, or 14.8%, since December 31, 2016. The credit provision was also partially offset by a $216,000 provision for the downgrade of certain performing commercial loan relationships and a $75,000 charge-off on one foreclosed loan during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

A $138,000 provision was recorded by the Company during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 for one-to four-family, home equity and consumer loans to reflect an increase in classified loans, an increase in the historical average net charge-offs for these loan types over the last five years and for net charge-offs recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

The Company recorded an unallocated provision for loan losses of $26,000, to reflect the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating allocated and general losses in the portfolio.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded a $310,000 provision to the allowance for loan losses. The provision included a $249,000 provision for construction and commercial business loans primarily due to an increase in loan originations during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, to reflect the inherent losses expected on these loan types and due to a $73,000 increase in net charge-offs for these loan types. The Company recorded a $173,000 provision for one- to four-family, home equity and consumer loans in which $73,000 of the provision reflected an increase in historical average net charge-offs for these loan types over the last five years and $97,000 was set aside for changes in the related environmental factors used to qualitatively assess inherent losses in these loan portfolios. The Company recorded an $89,000 net credit provision on commercial real estate loans. Specifically, the Company recorded a $314,000 credit provision to reflect a decrease in the historical average net charge-offs for these loan types over the last five years and to reflect a $3.4 million decrease in classified commercial real estate loans when compared to December 31, 2015. The credit provision for commercial real estate loans was partially offset by a $225,000 provision for loan losses to reflect inherent losses on commercial real estate loans originated during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The Company recorded an unallocated credit to the provision for loan losses of $23,000, to reflect the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating allocated and general losses in the portfolio.

Refer to Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details on the provision for loan losses.

Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income decreased by $1.4 million, or 40.8%, from $3.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $2.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to a $1.6 million pre-tax realized gain on the sale of securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to a $244,000 pre-tax realized gain on the sale of securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease was also due to a $107,000, or 91.5%, decrease in gains on sales of loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as a result of a fourth quarter 2016 strategic decision to generally retain, rather than sell, all residential loans that we originate due to the stabilization of the Bank’s interest rate risk levels. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in earnings on bank owned life insurance and service charges and fees. Earnings on bank owned life insurance increased $61,000, or 29.5%, primarily due to the purchase of an additional $2.5 million in bank owned life insurance in the fourth quarter of 2016. Service charges and fees increased by $27,000, or 2.0%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same nine months in 2016 due to increased growth in core deposits and new product offerings.

Non-Interest Expenses. Non-interest expenses increased by $379,000, or 3.7%, from $10.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $10.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Salaries and employee benefits increased by $222,000, or 4.1%, primarily due to annual salary increases and grants of stock awards, partially offset by lower health insurance costs and supplemental retirement benefit plan expenses. Data processing costs increased by $122,000, or 15.0%, primarily due to implementation of new technology associated with expanded product features and growth in deposit and loan accounts. Other expenses increased $90,000, or 10.4%, primarily due to an increase in collection and foreclosure expenses, as well as expenses related to loan originations. Advertising expenses increased $56,000, or 14.6%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, primarily due to additional marketing campaigns during the 2017 period. Decreases in professional service fees and FDIC insurance expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were partially offset by increases in postage and supply expenses and occupancy and equipment expenses when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense decreased by $155,000, or 18.0%, from $859,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $704,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease in income tax expense was primarily due to a decrease in pre-tax income during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year period. The effective tax rate was 20.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to an effective tax rate of 20.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity describes our ability to meet the financial obligations that arise during the ordinary course of business. Liquidity is primarily needed to fund loan commitments, to pay the deposit withdrawal requirements of our customers as well as to fund current and planned expenditures. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposits, fed funds balances, scheduled amortization and prepayments of loans and securities, maturities and sales of investments and loans, interest earning deposits at other financial institutions and funds provided from operations. We have written agreements with the FHLBNY, which allows us to borrow the maximum lending values designated by the type of collateral pledged. As of September 30, 2017, the maximum amount that we can borrow from the FHLBNY was $107.8 million and was collateralized by a pledge of certain fixed-rate residential, one- to four-family loans. At September 30, 2017, we had outstanding advances under this agreement of $27.0 million. We have a written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank discount window for overnight borrowings which is collateralized by a pledge of our securities, and allows us to borrow up to the value of the securities pledged, which was equal to a book value of $10.3 million and a fair value of $10.7 million as of September 30, 2017. There were no balances outstanding with the Federal Reserve Bank at September 30, 2017. We have also established lines of credits with correspondent banks for $22.0 million, of which $20.0 million is unsecured and the remaining $2.0 million will be secured by a pledge of our securities when a draw is made. There were no borrowings on these lines as of September 30, 2017.

Historically, loan repayments and maturing investment securities are a relatively predictable source of funds. However, deposit flows, calls of investment securities, and prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities are strongly influenced by interest rates, general and local economic conditions, and competition in the marketplace. These factors reduce the predictability of the timing of these sources of funds. To the extent possible, the Bank manages the cash flows of its loan and deposit portfolios by the rates it offers customers.

Our primary investing activities include the origination of loans and the purchase of investment securities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we originated loans of approximately $92.3 million as compared to approximately $68.3 million of loans originated during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Loan originations exceeded principal repayments and other deductions during the first nine months of 2017 by $37.4 million. The loan originations were funded through principal payments received on loans and securities, proceeds from the sale of securities, customer deposits, borrowings and cash reserves. Purchases of investment securities totaled $2.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. We did not purchase any investment securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

At September 30, 2017, we had loan commitments to borrowers of approximately $19.9 million and overdraft lines of protection, unused home equity lines of credit and unused commercial lines of credit of approximately $38.2 million. Total deposits were $400.9 million at September 30, 2017, as compared to $385.9 million at December 31, 2016. The increase in total deposits was primarily due to net growth in low-cost core deposits during the first nine months of 2017. The Company’s strategic focus is on growing low-cost core deposits among its retail and commercial customers in an effort to manage interest expense. Time deposit accounts scheduled to mature within one year were $56.3 million at September 30, 2017. Based on our deposit retention experience, current pricing strategy, and competitive pricing policies, we anticipate that a significant portion of these time deposits will remain with us following their maturity.

We are committed to maintaining a strong liquidity position; therefore, we monitor our liquidity position on a daily basis. We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds to meet our current funding commitments. The marginal cost of new funding, however, whether from deposits or borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank, will be carefully considered as we monitor our liquidity needs. Therefore, in order to minimize our cost of funds, we may consider additional borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank in the future.

We do not anticipate any material capital expenditures in 2017, other than the $325,000 capital project noted in the “Capital Expenditures” section below. We do not have any balloon or other payments due on any long-term obligations or any off-balance sheet items other than loan commitments as described in Note 6 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements and the borrowing agreements noted above.

Capital Expenditures

Significant planned expenditures for 2017 included plans to purchase the Orchard Park branch building from the landlord and build an addition to the Orchard Park branch office for the Commercial Lending division, which will include office space for commercial loan officers and administrative staff. The Company believes it has a sufficient capital base to support this capital project. The purchase of the building is completed and the construction project is currently underway. The expected cost is approximately $1.3 million, with an estimated $325,000 in costs remaining to complete the construction project.

Capital

As of January 1, 2015, new regulations that substantially amended the bank capital requirements became applicable to us. These regulations implement the Basel III regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act, as discussed in the “Supervision and Regulation – Federal Banking Regulation – Capital Requirements” section included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

As of September 30, 2017, as shown in the table below, the Bank’s Tier 1 and risk-based capital levels exceeded levels necessary to be considered “Well Capitalized” under Prompt Corrective Action provisions, as determined by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), our primary regulator.

The Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios and those required by the regulatory standards in effect as of the dates presented are as follows:


At September 30, 2017	Actual Ratio		Minimum For Capital Adequacy Purposes			To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") capital (to risk-weighted assets)	20.92	%	>=	4.50	%	>=	6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	20.92	%	>=	6.00	%	>=	8.00	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	21.84	%	>=	8.00	%	>=	10.00	%
Tier 1 Leverage (to adjusted total assets)	14.48	%	>=	4.00	%	>=	5.00	%
At December 31, 2016	Actual Ratio		Minimum For Capital Adequacy Purposes			To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
CET 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	22.23	%	>=	4.50	%	>=	6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	22.23	%	>=	6.00	%	>=	8.00	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	23.15	%	>=	8.00	%	>=	10.00	%
Tier 1 Leverage (to adjusted total assets)	14.73	%	>=	4.00	%	>=	5.00	%

In order to avoid limitations on distributions, including dividend payments, and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers, an institution must hold a capital conservation buffer above its minimum risk-based capital requirements. As of September 30, 2017, the Bank's capital conservation buffer was 13.84% exceeding the minimum of 1.25% for 2017.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Other than loan commitments, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material to investors. Refer to Note 6 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of loan commitments outstanding as of September 30, 2017.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable as the Company is a smaller reporting company.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the quarter ended September 30, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes in the Company’s risk factors from those disclosed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table reports information regarding repurchases by Lake Shore Bancorp of its common stock in each month of the quarter ended September 30, 2017:

COMPANY PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)

July 1 through July 31, 2017	-	$	-	-	71,001
August 1 through August 31, 2017	-		-	-	71,001
September 1 through September 30, 2017	3,600		15.85	3,600	67,401
Total	3,600	$	15.85	3,600	67,401

______________

⁽¹⁾

On December 11, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase plan pursuant to which we can repurchase up to 117,701 shares of our outstanding common stock. This amount represents approximately 5% of our outstanding common stock not owned by the MHC as of December 11, 2015. The repurchase plan does not have an expiration date and superseded all of the prior stock repurchase programs.

Item 6. Exhibits



			31.1				Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
			31.2				Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002*
			32.1				Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
			32.2				Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
			101.INS				XBRL Instance Document*
			101.SCH				XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*
			101.CAL				XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document*
			101.DEF				XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*
			101.LAB				XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document*
			101.PRE				XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document*

________________

*Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


		LAKE SHORE BANCORP, INC.
		(Registrant)

November 14, 2017	By:	/s/ Daniel P. Reininga
		Daniel P. Reininga
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

November 14, 2017	By:	/s/ Rachel A. Foley
		Rachel A. Foley
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)