PART TWO—SUMMARY

The following summary highlights selected information from this prospectus/information statement and may not contain all the information that may be important to you. To understand the Restructuring more fully, you should read carefully this entire prospectus/information statement.

The Companies

Overview of Vivo

Vivo is incorporated under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil under the name Vivo Participações S.A., known as Vivo. Vivo has the legal status of a sociedade por ações, or a stock corporation, operating under Brazilian law. Vivo’s principal executive offices are located at Av. Dr. Chucri Zaidan, 860, Morumbi, 04583-110, São Paulo, SP – Brazil. Vivo’s telephone number is +55 11 7420-1172, its facsimile number is +55 11 7420-2247, and its website is www.vivo.com.br. Vivo’s agent for service of process in the United States is National Registered Agents, Inc., located at 875 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 501, New York, New York 10001.

Vivo is a holding company with two subsidiaries: a holding subsidiary, TCP, and an operating subsidiary, Vivo S.A. As of March 31, 2009, Vivo owns all of Vivo S.A.’s share capital 58.9% of TCP’s share capital and 7.4% of TC’s share capital. The shares of Vivo S.A., TCP, and TC that Vivo owns constitute substantially all of Vivo’s assets, other than cash and cash equivalents and temporary cash investments. Vivo relies almost exclusively on dividends from Vivo S.A., TCP and TC to meet its cash needs, including cash to pay dividends to its shareholders. TCP in turn owns a single operating subsidiary, TC. As of March 31, 2009, TCP owns 83.3% of TC’s share capital, and these shares constitute substantially all of TCP’s assets, other than cash and cash equivalents and temporary cash investments. TCP relies almost exclusively on dividends from TC to meet its cash needs, including cash to pay dividends to its shareholders.

According to market share data published by Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações—ANATEL, the Brazilian telecommunication regulatory agency, or ANATEL, Vivo is a leading provider of cellular telecommunications services in Brazil through its subsidiary Vivo S.A. Vivo S.A. is a cellular operator in the states of Acre, Alagoas, Amapá, Amazonas, Bahia, Ceará, Espírito Santo, Goiás (also encompassing the area of the Federal District), Maranhão, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Pará, Paraíba, Paraná, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul, Rondônia, Roraima, Santa Catarina, São Paulo, Sergipe and Tocantins. Additionally, Vivo acquired the control in April 3, 2008 of TCP and its operating subsidiary, TC, a wireless telecommunication provider in the state of Minas Gerais.

In April 2003, Brasilcel launched the brand name “Vivo,” under which Vivo’s former subsidiaries Telesp Celular Participações S.A., or Telesp, Tele Centro Oeste Celular Participações S.A. (“TCO”), Tele Leste Celular Participações S.A. (“TLE”), Tele Sudeste Celular Participações S.A. (“TSD”) and Celular CRT Participações S.A. (“Celular CRT”) operated before the merger of such companies in 2006. The creation of the Vivo brand constituted a consolidation of the commercial models throughout the entire country into a common commercial strategy and replaced the different brands under which the different companies within our group offered their services in their respective states. The commercial strategy of Vivo was to increase its customer base as well as revenues by retaining customers and maintaining their distribution channels. The launching of the Vivo brand was accompanied by customer loyalty programs and other measures designed to contribute to the success of the commercial strategy. Guided by a common management team, Vivo designs marketing, promotional and other initiatives common to all companies and then tailors those activities to the particular markets of each of those companies.

As of March 31, 2009, Vivo’s voting shares were indirectly controlled by two major shareholders: PT Móveis SGPS, S.A. and Telefónica, through Brasilcel, which is a holding company that holds, directly and

indirectly, 89.6% of Vivo’s common stock and 48.8% of Vivo’s preferred shares representing 63.6% of Vivo’s total capital stock, excluding treasury shares representing 63.8% of Vivo’s total capital stock. PT Móveis SGPS, S.A. is 100% controlled by Portugal Telecom. As Vivo’s preferred shareholders are entitled to vote regarding the approval of the Restructuring, Brasilcel and its affiliates will have the right to vote 63.61% of the total shares entitled to vote on the Restructuring. PT Móveis SGPS, S.A. and Telefónica share their participation in Brasilcel in equal percentages. As of March 31, 2009, Vivo owns 97% of TCP’s common shares and 37% of TCP’s preferred shares, representing 58.94% of TCP’s total capital stock. As of March 31, 2009, TCP currently owns 83.3% of the share capital, including 89.2% of the voting shares, of TC. As of March 31, 2009, Vivo holds 7.4% of the share capital of TC, including 8.8% of the voting shares and 6.6% of the preferred shares.

In accordance with the shareholders agreement between Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A., PT Movéis SGPS, S.A. and Telefónica S.A., PT Movéis is responsible for the appointment of Vivo’s Chief Executive Officer and Telefónica Móviles is responsible for the appointment of Vivo’s Chief Financial Officer. A majority of the Board of Directors of each of Vivo, TCP and TC were elected, directly or indirectly, by Brasilcel.

Overview of TCP and TC

TCP is incorporated under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil under the name Telemig Celular Participações S.A. TCP has the legal status of a sociedade por ações, or a stock corporation, operating under Brazilian law. TCP’s principal executive offices are located at Av. Dr. Chucri Zaidan, 860, Morumbi, 04583-110, São Paulo, SP—Brazil. TCP’s telephone number is +55 11 7420-1172, TCP’s facsimile number is +55 11 7420-2247, and its website is www.telemigholding.com.br. TCP’s agent for service of process in the United States is Puglisi & Associates, located at 850 Library Avenue, Suite 204, P.O. Box 885, Newark, Delaware 19715.

TCP operates in most of its authorization area on a frequency referred to as “A” band, initially under a concession granted in November 1997 by the federal government of Brazil. Previously, TCP operated under a permission granted on April 29, 1993 to TCP’s predecessor company, Telecomunicações de Minas Gerais S.A. On February 19, 2004, TCP signed a contract with ANATEL to migrate to the SMP regime from the SMC regime. TCP’s SMP authorization is for an indeterminate period of time and covers a region that includes 100% of the municipalities and 100% of the population in the State of Minas Gerais. TC started operating in the Triângulo Mineiro region on May 30, 2005, on a frequency referred to as “E” band. The Triângulo Mineiro network is fully based on Global System for Mobile Communications, or GSM/EDGE technology. As of December 31, 2008, TCP had approximately 4,627,000 subscribers, representing an estimated market share of 28.7% in its region, as opposed to 3,901,000 subscribers, or an estimated 29.1% market share, as of December 31, 2007.

Current Corporate Structure

The following chart shows Vivo’s and TCP’s corporate structure as of March 31, 2009:

Post-Restructuring Corporate Structure

The following chart shows Vivo’s and TCP’s expected corporate structure after the Restructuring:

Combined Region

The map below indicates that Vivo and TC operate in all regions in Brazil and TC operates exclusively in the state of Minas Gerais under the Vivo brand:

Additional information about Vivo, TCP and TC is included in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 20-F, or Vivo’s Annual Report, and TCP’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 20-F, or TCP’s Annual Report, which are incorporated by reference hereto, except for items 3A, 5A, 8A and 18, which were adjusted to reflect the retrospective adoption of SFAS No. 160 and are included in this prospectus/information statement.

Background of the Restructuring

On March 20, 2009, the Companies announced their intention to consummate the Restructuring and stated that they would retain the services of the specialized appraisal companies required under Brazilian law to prepare reports and would retain other appropriate financial advisory services to assist in the determination of the exchange ratios and other terms of the Restructuring, as recommended by the CVM. In this first public announcement of the Restructuring, the Companies indicated that they would comply with a recently issued CVM release (Parecer de Orientação 35) making certain recommendations with respect to the establishment of special committees in connection with transactions between affiliated companies. The Companies announced that each of TCP and TC would form a special committee to act in connection with the Restructuring and specifically to issue to the respective Board of Directors of TCP and TC its opinion regarding the appropriate exchange ratios and other terms of the Restructuring. The Companies also announced that, in accordance with one of CVM’s recommended methods for selecting member of special committees, each of these committees, which together are referred to as the Special Committees, would be comprised of one representative of Vivo, one representative of the non-controlling shareholders and one representative selected jointly by the other two representatives.

Each Special Committee met with the financial advisors to TCP and TC and retained its own financial advisor. With the assistance of these professionals, the Special Committees determined an appropriate exchange ratio for each of the TCP Merger and the Vivo Merger. On May 29, 2009, each Special Committee issued a report to its Boards of Directors unanimously recommending that its Board approve the Restructuring based on the exchange ratios set forth in this prospectus/information statement. On May 29, 2009, the Boards of Directors of Vivo, TCP and TC unanimously approved the Restructuring, the execution and delivery of the necessary Protocols of Merger of Shares and Instrument of Justification governing the Restructuring, or the Merger Agreement, the appraisal reports, the calling of the EGMs necessary to obtain the shareholder approvals required in connection with the Restructuring and the taking of other actions related to the Restructuring. For additional information regarding the Restructuring, the Special Committees and the Background of the Restructuring, see “Part Five: The Restructuring—Background, Special Committees and Board Position.”

Purpose of and Reasons for the Restructuring

Vivo and TCP believe the Restructuring will enable:

Valuation Reports

Vivo, TCP and TC do not generally publish their business plans and strategies or make external disclosures of their anticipated financial position or results of operations. However, the management of Vivo, TCP and TC has prepared prospective financial information set forth in valuation reports issued by Citi, BBI and Planconsult, as described below. The assumptions and estimates underlying the prospective financial information are inherently uncertain and, though considered reasonable by the management of Vivo, TCP and TC as of the date of its preparation, are subject to a wide variety of significant business, economic, and competitive risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the prospective financial information, including, among others things, risks and uncertainties. See “Part Three: Risk Factors.” Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the prospective results are indicative of the future performance of Vivo, TCP and TC or that actual results will not differ materially from those presented in the prospective financial information. This information is not fact and should not be relied upon as being necessarily indicative of future results, and readers of these valuation reports are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the prospective financial information. The accompanying prospective financial information was not prepared with a view toward public disclosure or with a view toward complying with the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants with respect to prospective financial information. None of Vivo’s, TCP’s or TC’s independent auditors, nor any other independent accountants, have compiled, examined, or performed

any procedures with respect to the prospective financial information contained herein or therein, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, the prospective financial information.

Citi

In connection with the Restructuring, the Boards of Directors of Vivo, TCP and TC and the Special Committees received a valuation report from Citigroup Global Markets Inc., or Citi, expressing the view that, as of the date of that report and based on and subject to the considerations and limitations of Citi’s analysis described in that report and based on other matters as Citi considered relevant, if the exchange ratios recommended by the Special Committees and approved by the Boards of Directors of Vivo, TCP and TC with respect to the Restructurings were within the implied exchange ratios derived from the valuation analyses performed by Citi with respect to Vivo, TCP and TC, applied on a consistent basis, then those exchange ratios as of May 27, 2009 would constitute equitable treatment as understood in the manner described in such report. The Boards of Directors of Vivo, TCP and TC and the Special Committees confirmed that the Exchange Ratios are within the implied exchange ratios derived from the valuation analyses performed by Citi.

BBI

In connection with the Restructuring, the Special Committees received a secondary analysis from Banco Bradesco BBI S.A., or BBI, expressing, as of the date of such secondary analysis, its view of the appropriate range for the exchange ratio in the TCP Merger and the appropriate range for the exchange ratio in the Vivo Merger, as well as its views of the Citi valuation report. BBI stated that it considered the Citi valuation report to be thorough, professionally prepared and based on reasonable assumptions. BBI then noted that while its valuation methodology differed in certain respects from that of Citi, the ranges of exchange ratios derived by Citi and those derived by BBI were substantially consistent. BBI also noted that, in both cases, the Citi ranges fell within the BBI ranges. BBI thus reported to the Special Committees that any exchange ratio between 16.870 TCP shares per TC share to 17.436 TCP shares per TC share for the TCP Merger and any exchange ratio between 1.282 Vivo shares per TCP share to 1.374 Vivo shares per TCP share for the Vivo Merger would be equitable from the perspective of the non-controlling shareholders.

Planconsult

In connection with the Restructuring, the Special Committees and the Boards of Directors of each of the Companies received from Planconsult Planejamento e Consultoria Ltda., or Planconsult, a Net Equity Report at market prices for each of Vivo, TCP and TC for purposes of Article 264 of Brazilian Law No. 6,404/76 and an Economic Value Report for each of TCP and TC from Planconsult expressing the view that, as of the date of those reports and based on and subject to the assumptions and considerations described in those reports and based on other matters as Planconsult considered relevant (1) the value of the net equity of TC, calculated as if all of its assets and liabilities had been sold at fair market value was, as of March 31, 2009, R$1,101,285,715.13 (or approximately US$475,676,276.40, converted to U.S. dollars at a rate of R$2.3152 to US$1.00, the Brazilian Central Bank’s PTAX selling rate on March 31, 2009), (2) the value of the net equity of TCP, calculated as if all of its assets and liabilities had been sold at fair market value was R$1,250,973,445.36 (or approximately US$540,330.617.37 converted to U.S. dollars at a rate of R$2.3152 to US$1.00, the Brazilian Central Bank’s PTAX selling rate on March 31, 2009), (3) the value of the net equity of Vivo, calculated as if all of its assets and liabilities had been sold at fair market value was R$7,335,835,336.03 (or approximately US$3,168,553,617.84 converted to U.S. dollars at a rate of R$2.3152 to US$1.00, the Brazilian Central Bank’s PTAX selling rate on March 31, 2009) (4) the fair market value of TC’s net equity calculated based on the discounted cash flow method was, as of March 31, 2009, R$4,030,200,000.00 (or approximately US$1,740,756,738.08 converted to U.S. dollars at a rate of R$2.3152 to US$1.00, the Brazilian Central Bank’s PTAX selling rate on March 31, 2009) and (5) the fair market value of TCP’s net equity, calculated based on the discounted cash flow method was, as of March 31, 2009, R$3,662,700,000.00 (or approximately US$1,582,023,151.35 converted to U.S. dollars at a rate of R$2.3152 to US$1.00, the Brazilian Central Bank’s PTAX selling rate on March 31, 2009).

Planconsult further concluded, based on these analyses performed in accordance with the criteria established by Brazilian law, that the indicative value of one share of TCP stock valued based on the critreia of net worth at market value as of March 31, 2009 was R$33.369841 and the indicative value of one share of TC stock valued on that basis as of March 31, 2009 was R$464.251267. Finally, Planconsult concluded that the exchange ratios calculated based on the criteria of net worth at market value as of March 31, 2009 and in accordance with the criteria established by Brazilian law were 13.912301 in the case of the Exchange Ratio in the TCP Merger and 1.697712 in the case of the Vivo Merger.

Vivo and TCP urge you to read carefully the summary of the reports set forth in “Part Five: The Restructuring—Valuation Reports of Citi,” “Part Five: The Restructuring—Secondary Analysis of BBI” and “Part Five: The Restructuring—Valuation Reports of Planconsult,” which includes information on how to obtain copies of the full reports.

Terms and Effects of the Restructuring

If the Restructuring is approved:

As a result of the Restructuring:

Effects of the Restructuring on Unaffiliated Shareholders

Despite the benefits of and reasons for the Restructuring, in considering the Restructuring, non-controlling shareholders should consider the following factors:

Material Tax Considerations

Approval of the Restructuring

Brasilcel holds, directly and indirectly, 89.6% of the common shares and 48.7% of the preferred shares of our company, representing 63.6% of our total voting shares, excluding treasury shares representing 63.8% of out total capital stock. Brasilcel has informed Vivo that it intends to vote all shares held by it, directly or indirectly,

in favor of the Restructuring. We hold 97% of the voting common shares of TCP. We intend to vote the shares of TCP we hold in favor of the Restructuring. TCP and Vivo hold 97.9% of the voting common shares of TC. TCP and Vivo intend to vote the shares of TC it holds in favor of the Restructuring.

The TCP Merger will require the affirmative vote of holders representing at least a majority of the TC common shares that are present at a duly convened EGM of TC and the affirmative vote of holders representing at least a majority of the common shares of TCP that are present at a duly convened EGM of TCP. The Vivo Merger will require the affirmative vote of holders representing at least a majority of the TCP common shares that are present at a duly convened EGM of TCP and the affirmative vote of holders representing at least a majority of the aggregate common shares and preferred shares, respectively, of Vivo that are present at a duly convened EGM of Vivo.

The EGMs of Vivo, TCP and TC are scheduled to be held as follows:

Vivo Participações S.A., [July 27], 2009 [2:00 p.m. (São Paulo time)]

Av. Dr. Chucri Zaidan, 860, Morumbi, 04583-110, São Paulo—SP, Brazil

Telemig Celular Participações S.A., [July 27], 2009 [12:00 p.m. (Belo Horizonte time)]

Rua Levindo Lopes, 258, Funcionários, Belo Horizonte—MG, Brazil

Telemig Celular S.A., [July 27], 2009 [10:00 a.m. (Belo Horizonte time)]

Rua Levindo Lopes, 258, Funcionários, Belo Horizonte—MG, Brazil

If you hold common shares of Vivo, TCP or TC or preferred shares of Vivo, you may attend and vote at the applicable meeting. If you hold preferred shares of TCP or TC directly, you may attend the applicable meeting, but you may not vote. Under Brazilian law, you may be required to show documents proving your identity to gain admittance to the meeting. If you grant a power of attorney under Brazilian law to someone to act for you at the meeting, your appointee will be required to show original or certified copies of the documents that grant him or her powers of representation. The power of attorney must be deposited in properly notarized and consularized form at the head office of Vivo, TCP or TC, as the case may be, no later than 48 hours before the occurrence of the applicable EGM and may be revoked in accordance with Brazilian law. While the form of power of attorney attached as Exhibit 99.7 to the registration statement of which this prospectus/information statement is a part provides an example of a power of attorney, shareholders should confirm, with Brazilian counsel if necessary, that any power of attorney or revocation thereof satisfies the requirements of Brazilian law, as Vivo, TCP and TC will not accept such forms or revocations if they do not comply with Brazilian law. Shareholders that have given a power of attorney may revoke it by issuing an instrument of revocation and depositing it, in properly notarized and consularized form at the head office of Vivo, TCP or TC, as the case may be, no later than 48 hours before the occurance of the applicable EGM. Shareholders wishing to attend an EGM and who hold shares through the Fungible Custody of Registered Shares of the Stock Exchanges must provide a statement containing their corresponding equity interest in the applicable company dated within 48 hours of the applicable EGM.

If you hold TCP ADSs, you are not entitled to attend, or vote through a representative at, the respective shareholders’ meeting. If you hold TCP ADSs and wish to attend this meeting, you must first exchange your ADSs for the preferred shares represented thereby in accordance with the terms of the deposit agreement governing the TCP ADSs, and then you may attend the TCP meeting, but you will not have any voting rights. No holder of Vivo ADSs may vote at the applicable meeting, although if you hold Vivo ADSs you have a right to instruct the depositary how to vote the amount of underlying Vivo preferred shares.

Under Brazilian law, there are no conditions to the completion of the TCP Merger other than shareholder approval by TC and TCP and no conditions for the completion of Vivo Merger other than approval by the common and preferred shares of Vivo and the common shares of TCP and the completion of the TCP Merger. The approval by the NYSE of the listing of the Vivo ADSs to be delivered in connection with the Vivo Merger,

for which we will apply, must be obtained for these ADSs to be traded by their holders. However, this approval is not a condition to the completion of the applicable merger of shares or the Restructuring.

The approval of the mergers of shares by the CVM is not a condition to the mergers of shares. See “Part Three: Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and the Companies—The CVM, the Brazilian securities regulator, may suspend for up to 15 days the shareholders’ meetings scheduled to approve the Restructuring.”

Receipt of Shares of Vivo and TCP and Vivo ADSs

If the Restructuring is approved, each common or preferred share:

in each case without any action by you. Because the common shares and preferred shares of Vivo and TCP are book-entry shares, an entry or entries will be made in the share registry of Vivo and TCP to evidence the common shares or preferred shares received in the Restructuring. Neither you nor any other person will receive certificates evidencing common shares or preferred shares of Vivo or TCP.

Holders of TCP ADSs representing TCP preferred shares will, subject to the procedures described below, receive 2.74 Vivo ADSs, each Vivo ADS representing 1 (one) preferred share of Vivo, in the Restructuring for each ADS of TCP they hold plus cash instead of any fractional ADSs.

After the mergers of shares pursuant to the Restructuring become effective and the end of the period for the exercise of withdrawal rights, Vivo will deposit with a custodian for the TCP Depositary Vivo preferred shares issuable in respect of the TCP preferred shares then held in the TCP ADS program. The TCP Depositary will deposit those Vivo preferred shares with the custodian for the Vivo Depositary and instruct the Vivo Depositary to cause to be issued and to deliver ADSs representing those Vivo preferred shares to the TCP Depositary. When the Vivo ADSs are received in the TCP ADS program, the TCP ADSs will represent a right to receive Vivo ADSs.

If you hold ADSs indirectly through a broker or other intermediary, you will automatically receive your Vivo ADSs (and cash in lieu of any fractions as described in “Part Five: The Restructuring—Fractional Shares and ADSs”).

If you hold ADSs directly as a registered holder, you must surrender your ADRs to the TCP Depositary. Registered holders of TCP ADSs will be provided with the necessary forms, which will contain instructions on how to surrender their ADRs representing TCP ADSs to the TCP Depositary. If you do not receive the necessary forms, you may call The Bank of New York Mellon toll-free at (800) 777-3674 or contact The Bank of New York Mellon at 101 Barclay Street, New York, NY 10286. Upon surrender of the TCP ADRs, the TCP Depositary will deliver the Vivo ADSs to the registered holders of former TCP ADSs (and cash in lieu of any fractions as described in “Part Five: The Restructuring—Fractional Shares and ADSs”). See “Part Five: The Restructuring—Receipt of Shares of Vivo and TCP and Vivo ADSs—Delivery of Vivo ADSs.”

If you hold TCP ADSs, you will not have to pay fees of the TCP Depositary for the cancellation of each TCP ADS that you hold in connection with the Restructuring or any ADS issuance fees charged by the Vivo Depositary for the Vivo ADSs issued to you in connection with the Restructuring. If you are a holder of common shares or preferred shares of Vivo or Vivo ADSs, you will continue to hold those securities after the Restructuring.

Management

Vivo is managed, and after the Restructuring will be managed, by a Board of Directors of nine members, each serving a three-year term expiring at the ordinary general meeting of shareholders to be held by April 2012. The board of executive officers of Vivo currently consists of six members, led by Roberto Oliveira de Lima as chief executive officer.

Vivo is headquartered in São Paulo, Brazil and will maintain that headquarters after the Restructuring.

Accounting Treatment of the Restructuring

Under Brazilian GAAP, the accounting principles used to prepare Vivo’s consolidated financial statements, the merger of shares will be accounted for by the fair value of the shares exchanged. Goodwill, the difference between fair and book value, will be recognized except for the shares that will be issued by TCP related to Vivo’s direct interest in TC, which goodwill, generated internally, will not be recognized.

Under U.S. GAAP, the merger of shares will be accounted for as equity transactions in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51.” This standard requires that the carrying amount of noncontrolling interest be adjusted to reflect the change in our ownership interest in the subsidiaries. Any difference between fair value of the consideration received or paid and the amount by which the noncontrolling interest is adjusted shall be recognized in equity attributable to the parent.

Stock Exchange Matters

Upon the completion of the Restructuring and the end of the period for the exercise of withdrawal rights, we will apply to list the preferred shares and Vivo ADSs on the NYSE. The common and preferred shares of Vivo are expected to trade under the ticker symbols “Vivo3” and “Vivo4,” respectively.

After the Restructuring is complete and the period for the exercise of withdrawal rights has ended, preferred shares and common shares of TCP and TC will be delisted from the BM&F BOVESPA and deregistered from the CVM, and TCP ADSs will be delisted from the NYSE.

Withdrawal Rights

According to article 137 of Brazilian law, the holders of common and preferred shares of TC and TCP that dissent from the TCP Merger and the holders of common and preferred shares of TCP and common shares of Vivo that dissent from the Vivo Merger shall have, as from the date of the EGMs of the Companies relating to the Restructuring, the right to withdraw from TC or TCP, as applicable, and be reimbursed for the value of the shares for which they are record holders on March 23, 2009.

Holders of preferred shares of Vivo are not entitled to exercise withdrawal rights in connection with the Restructuring nor are holders of Vivo ADSs. Holders of TCP ADSs will not have withdrawal rights or be entitled to instruct the TCP Depositary, either through their broker or other intermediary or directly, to exercise withdrawal rights on their behalf.

For more information on withdrawal rights, see “Part Five: The Restructuring—Withdrawal Rights.”

Timetable for the Restructuring

Financial Information

The following financial statements are included in this prospectus/information statement:

A summary of the historical financial data for Vivo and TCP for the five years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004, as adjusted to reflect the retrospective adoption of SFAS No. 160, is included in this prospectus/information statement.

References to the “real,” “reais” or “R$” are to Brazilian reais (plural) and the Brazilian real (singular), and references to “U.S. dollars” or “US$” are to United States dollars.

This prospectus/information statement contains translations of various reais amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates solely for your convenience. You should not construe these translations as representations by Vivo or TCP that the real amounts actually represent these U.S. dollar amounts or could be converted into U.S. dollars

at the rates indicated. Unless otherwise indicated, Vivo and TCP have translated some Brazilian currency amounts using a rate of R$2.3152 to US$1.00, as published by the Central Bank of Brazil (Banco Central do Brasil), or the Central Bank., on March 31, 2009.

Financial Statements

Vivo’s Financial Statements

Vivo’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, have been prepared in accordance with the accounting practices adopted in Brazil, as prescribed by Brazilian law, or Brazilian GAAP, which differs in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. Notes 39 and 40 to Vivo’s financial statements included in Vivo’s Annual Report describe the principal differences between Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP as they relate to us, and provide a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of net income (loss) and shareholders’ equity. These consolidated financial statements have been audited by Ernst & Young Auditores Independentes S.S. (“EY” or “Ernst & Young”) for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes (“Deloitte”) for the year ended December 31, 2006. As a result of a change in Brazilian law with respect to financial reporting (Law 11,638), certain changes in accounting criteria became effective for fiscal year 2008. Pursuant the CVM’s Resolution No. 565, which approved accounting statement CPC 13 (Initial Adoption of Law No. 11,638/2007), Vivo elected to apply these changes in accounting criteria retroactively to its financial statements with an effective date as of January 1, 2007. As a result, certain adjustments have been made to Vivo’s 2007 financial statements to make them comparable to its 2008 financial statements. Vivo has elected not to restate its financial statements for fiscal years prior to 2007. Please see Note 2 to Vivo’s 2008 financial statements for a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the changes resulting from the new accounting criteria. Vivo’s audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 have been adjusted for the retrospective effect of the adoption in 2009 of SFAS No. 160, and are included in this prospectus/information statement.

Vivo’s unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2009 and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are included in this prospectus/information statement. These unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP, which differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. Note 33 to Vivo’s quarterly financial statements included in this prospectus/information statement describe the principal differences between Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP as they relate to Vivo, and provide a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of net income (loss) and shareholders’ equity. Vivo’s financial results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily representative of the results that may be expected as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009 or any other period.

TCP’s Financial Statements

TCP’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. On August 20, 2008, we completed the acquisition of a 53.899% interest in TCP’s voting shares, thus resulting in our total interest of 58.90% in TCP. As discussed in Note 1(b) to TCP’s 2008 financial statements included in this prospectus/information statement, in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin—SAB No. 54 and EITF D-97, when a company acquires 95% or more of the voting rights of another entity, the resulting purchase price allocation should be pushed down to the accounts of the acquired subsidiary. Accordingly, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet dated as of December 31, 2008, the consideration and related costs paid by TCP and its former subsidiary TCO IP S.A. (which was merged into TCP in December 2008) in connection with the acquisition have been “pushed down” to TCP and have been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in accordance with FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations. Due to the impact of push down

accounting, the consolidated statement of operations and consolidated statement of cash flows and certain note presentations for TCP’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, are presented for two distinct periods to indicate the acquisition by TCP and the application of two different bases of accounting between the periods presented: (i) the period up to the acquisition date (January 1, 2008 through March 31, 2008, labeled “Pre-merger”) and (ii) the period after that date (April 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008, labeled “Post-merger”). All periods including and prior to the three months ended March 31, 2008 are also labeled “Pre-merger.” TCP’s consolidated financial statements have been audited by Ernst & Young for the year ended December 31, 2008 and by Deloitte for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. TCP’s audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 have been adjusted for the retrospective effect of the adoption in 2009 of SFAS No. 160, and are included in this prospectus/information statement.

TCP’s unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2009 and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are included in this prospectus/information statement. These unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP, which differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. Note 32 to TCP’s quarterly financial statements included in this prospectus/information statement describe the principal differences between Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP as they relate to TCP, and provide a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of net income (loss) and shareholders’ equity. TCP’s financial results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily representative of the results that may be expected as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009 or any other period.

Selected Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data

Selected Historical Financial Data

The following information is provided to aid you in your analysis of the financial aspects of the Restructuring. The historical information below is only a summary derived from the following financial statements included in this prospectus/information statement: the audited consolidated financial statements of Vivo and TCP for the three years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and the unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements of Vivo and TCP as of March 31, 2009 and 2008. A summary of the historical financial data for Vivo and TCP is provided below for the five years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Selected Historical Vivo Financial Data

Selected Historical TCP Financial Data

Unaudited Vivo Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Data under U.S. GAAP

The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet of Vivo as of March 31, 2009 gives effect to the Restructuring as if it had occurred on January 1, 2009. The unaudited pro forma combined statements of income of Vivo for the year ended December 31, 2008 combines the historical consolidated statements of income of Vivo, TCP and TC, giving effect to Vivo’s acquisition of TCP and TC, the consummation of all of the cash tender offers made by Vivo for shares of TCP and TC following this acquisition and the Restructuring, or collectively, the Pro Forma Transactions, as if they had occurred as of January 1, 2008. The only effect of the Restructuring to the unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of income of Vivo for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 as if the Restructuring had occurred on January 1, 2009 would be a reclassification of income attributable to non-controlling interests to income attributable to the parent company with no effect on the net income of Vivo and consolidated TCP.

The results of operations of Vivo for the three months ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the entire year ended December 31, 2009.

Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet