UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
(Mark One) | |
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) or (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR |
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 OR |
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 OR |
|
SHELL
COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
BP
p.l.c. |
|
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter) England and Wales |
|
(Jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization) |
|
(Address
of principal executive offices) |
|
(Name, Telephone, Email and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person) |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
Ordinary Shares of 25c each |
New York Stock Exchange* Chicago Stock Exchange* |
47/8% Guaranteed Notes due 2010 | New York Stock Exchange |
Floating Rate Guaranteed Extendible Notes | New York Stock Exchange |
*Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission |
|
Securities
registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
|
|
None |
|
Securities
for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of
the Act: |
|
None |
|
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report. |
Ordinary Shares of 25c each | 18,922,785,598 |
Cumulative First Preference Shares of £1 each | 7,232,838 |
Cumulative Second Preference Shares of £1 each | 5,473,414 |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. |
Yes
|
No |
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes
|
No |
Note Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
|
No |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer |
Accelerated
filer |
Non-accelerated
filer |
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S.
GAAP
|
International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued by
the International Accounting Standards Board
|
Other
|
If Other has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item
17
|
Item 18 |
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
|
No |
2 | |
Cross reference to Form 20-F |
Pages | |||
Item 1. | Identify of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors | N/A | |
Item 2. | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable | N/A | |
Item 3. | Key Information | ||
A. | Selected financial data | 6 | |
B. | Capitalization and indebtedness | N/A | |
C. | Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds | N/A | |
D. | Risk factors | 8-9 | |
Item 4. | Information on the Company | ||
A. | History and development of the company | 11-12 | |
B. | Business overview | 13-44 | |
C. | Organizational structure | 44 | |
D. | Property, plants and equipment | 44 | |
Appendix A to Item 4D | 7, 16-18, 181-186, 188 | ||
Item 4A. | Unresolved Staff Comments | None | |
Item 5. | Operating and Financial Review and Prospects | ||
A. | Operating results | 45-52 | |
B. | Liquidity and capital resources | 53 | |
C. | Research and development, patent and licenses | 37-38, 125 | |
D. | Trend information | 53-54 | |
E. | Off-balance sheet arrangements | 54-55 | |
F. | Tabular disclosure of contractual commitments | 55 | |
G. | Safe harbour | 10 | |
Item 6. | Directors, Senior Management and Employees | ||
A. | Directors and senior management | 58-60 | |
B. | Compensation | 62-72, 164-165 | |
C. | Board practices | 58, 70, 73, 79, 164-165 | |
D. | Employees | 60-61 | |
E. | Share ownership | 68-69, 79-81, 160-163 | |
Item 7. | Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions | ||
A. | Major shareholders | 81 | |
B. | Related party transactions | 81-82, 134-135 | |
C. | Interests of experts and counsel | N/A | |
Item 8. | Financial Information | ||
A. | Consolidated financial statements and other financial information | 82-83, 93-189 | |
B. | Significant changes | None | |
Item 9. | The Offer and Listing | ||
A. | Offer and listing details | 84 | |
B. | Plan of distribution | N/A | |
C. | Markets | 84 | |
D. | Selling shareholders | N/A | |
E. | Dilution | N/A | |
F. | Expenses of the issue | N/A | |
Item 10. | Additional Information | ||
A. | Share capital | N/A | |
B. | Memorandum and articles of association | 85-86 | |
C. | Material contracts | None | |
D. | Exchange controls | 86 | |
E. | Taxation | 86-88 | |
F. | Dividends and paying agents | N/A | |
G. | Statements by experts | N/A | |
H. | Documents on display | 88 | |
I. | Subsidiary information | N/A | |
Item 11. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 136-141, 143-148 | |
Item 12. | Description of securities other than equity securities | N/A | |
Item 13. | Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies | None | |
Item 14. | Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds | 88 | |
Item 15. | Controls and Procedures | 88 | |
Item 16A. | Audit Committee Financial Expert | 88-89 | |
Item 16B. | Code of Ethics | 89 | |
Item 16C. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 89, 127, 175 | |
Item 16D. | Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees | N/A | |
Item 16E. | Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchases | 90 | |
Item 17. | Financial Statements | N/A | |
Item 18. | Financial Statements | 16-18, 93-189 | |
Item 19. | Exhibits | 91 |
3 | |
Certain definitions |
Unless the context indicates otherwise, the following terms have the meanings shown below:
Oil
and natural gas reserves |
||
(i) | Reservoirs are considered proved if economic producibility is supported by either actual production or conclusive formation test. The area of a reservoir considered proved includes: (A) that portion delineated by drilling and defined by gas-oil and/or oil-water contacts, if any; and (B) the immediately adjoining portions not yet drilled, but which can be reasonably judged as economically productive on the basis of available geological and engineering data. In the absence of information on fluid contacts, the lowest known structural occurrence of hydrocarbons controls the lower proved limit of the reservoir. | |
(ii) | Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (such as fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when successful testing by a pilot project, or the operation of an installed programme in the reservoir, provides support for the engineering analysis on which the project or programme was based. | |
(iii) | Estimates of proved reserves do not include the following: | |
(a) | oil that may become available from known reservoirs but is classified separately as indicated additional reserves; | |
(b) | crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, the recovery of which is subject to reasonable doubt because of uncertainty as to geology, reservoir characteristics, or economic factors; | |
(c) | crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that may occur in undrilled prospects; and | |
(d) | crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that may be recovered from oil shales, coal, gilsonite and other such sources. |
Proved developed reserves Proved reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Additional oil and natural gas expected to be obtained through the application of fluid injection or other improved recovery techniques for supplementing the natural forces and mechanisms of primary recovery are included as proved developed reserves only after testing by a pilot project or after the operation of an installed programme has confirmed through production response that increased recovery will be achieved.
Proved undeveloped reserves Proved reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those drilling units offsetting productive units that are reasonably certain of production when drilled. Proved reserves for other undrilled units can be claimed only where it can be demonstrated with certainty that there is continuity of production from the existing productive formation. Under no circumstances are estimates for proved undeveloped reserves attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual tests in the area and in the same reservoir.
4 | |
Miscellaneous terms
In this document, unless
the context otherwise requires,
the following terms shall have the meaning
set out below.
ADR American depositary receipt. | Liquids Crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids. |
ADS American depositary share. | LNG Liquefied natural gas. |
AGM Annual general meeting. | London Stock Exchange or LSE London Stock Exchange plc. |
Amoco The former Amoco Corporation and its subsidiaries. | LPG Liquefied petroleum gas. |
Atlantic Richfield Atlantic Richfield Company and its subsidiaries. | mb/d thousand barrels per day. |
Associate An entity over which the group has significant influence and | mboe/d thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day. |
that is neither a subsidiary nor joint venture. Significant influence is the | |
power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of an | mmBtu million British thermal units. |
entity without having control or joint control over those policies. | |
mmboe million barrels of oil equivalent. | |
Baker Panel, or panel BP US Refineries Independent Safety Review | |
Panel. | mmcf million cubic feet. |
Barrel 42 US gallons. | mmcf/d million cubic feet per day. |
b/d barrels per day. | MTBE Methyl tertiary butyl ether. |
boe barrels of oil equivalent. | MW Megawatt. |
BP, BP group or the group BP p.l.c. and its subsidiaries. | NGLs Natural gas liquids. |
Burmah Castrol Burmah Castrol plc and its subsidiaries. | OPEC Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries. |
Cent or c One-hundredth of the US dollar. | Ordinary shares Ordinary fully paid shares in BP p.l.c. of 25c each. |
The company BP p.l.c. | Pence or p One-hundredth of a pound sterling. |
Dollar or $ The US dollar. | Pound, sterling or £ The pound sterling. |
EU European Union. | Preference shares Cumulative First Preference Shares and Cumulative |
Second Preference Shares in BP p.l.c. of £1 each. | |
Gas Natural gas. | |
PSA Production-sharing agreement. | |
Hydrocarbons Crude oil and natural gas. | |
SEC The United States Securities and Exchange Commission. | |
IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards. | |
Subsidiary An entity that is controlled by the BP group. Control is the | |
Joint venture A contractual arrangement between the group and other | power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to |
venturers that undertake an economic activity that is subject to joint | obtain the benefits from its activities. |
control. Joint control exists only where the strategic financial and | |
operating decisions relating to the activity require the unanimous | Tonne 2,204.6 pounds. |
consent of the venturers. | |
UK United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. | |
Jointly controlled asset A joint venture where the venturers have a | |
direct ownership interest in, and jointly control, the assets of the venture. | US United States of America. |
Jointly controlled entity A joint venture that involves the establishment | |
of a company, partnership or other entity to engage in economic activity | |
that the group jointly controls with fellow venturers. |
5 | |
6 | Performance review | ||
58 | Directors, senior management and employees | ||
62 | Directors remuneration report | ||
73 | BP board performance report | ||
80 | Additional information for shareholders | ||
93 | Financial statements |
6 | |
Performance review |
Selected financial and operating information |
This information, insofar as it relates to 2007, has been extracted or derived from the audited financial statements of the BP group presented on pages 93-180. Note 1 to the Financial
statements includes details on the basis of preparation of these financial statements. The selected information should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related Notes elsewhere herein.
BP
sold its Innovene operations in December 2005. In the circumstances of discontinued
operations, IFRS require that the profits earned by the discontinued operations,
in this case the Innovene
operations, on sales to the continuing operations be eliminated on consolidation from the discontinued operations and attributed to the continuing operations and vice versa. This adjustment has two offsetting elements: the net margin on crude refined by Innovene, as substantially all crude for its refineries was supplied by BP and most of the refined products manufactured by Innovene were taken by BP; and the margin on sales of feedstock from BPs US refineries to Innovenes manufacturing plants. The profits attributable to individual segments are not affected by this adjustment. This representation does not indicate the profits earned by continuing or Innovene operations, as if they were standalone entities, for past periods or those likely to be earned in future periods.
$ million except per share amounts | |||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Income statement data | |||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues from continuing operationsa | 284,365 | 265,906 | 239,792 | 192,024 | 164,653 | ||||||
Profit before interest and taxation from continuing operationsa | 32,352 | 35,658 | 32,182 | 25,746 | 18,776 | ||||||
Profit from continuing operationsa | 21,169 | 22,626 | 22,133 | 17,884 | 12,681 | ||||||
Profit for the year | 21,169 | 22,601 | 22,317 | 17,262 | 12,618 | ||||||
Profit for the year attributable to BP shareholders | 20,845 | 22,315 | 22,026 | 17,075 | 12,448 | ||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitionsb | 20,641 | 17,231 | 14,149 | 16,651 | 19,623 | ||||||
Per ordinary share cents | |||||||||||
Profit for the year attributable to BP shareholders | |||||||||||
Basic | 108.76 | 111.41 | 104.25 | 78.24 | 56.14 | ||||||
Diluted | 107.84 | 110.56 | 103.05 | 76.87 | 55.61 | ||||||
Profit from continuing operations attributable to BP shareholders | |||||||||||
Basic | 108.76 | 111.54 | 103.38 | 81.09 | 56.42 | ||||||
Diluted | 107.84 | 110.68 | 102.19 | 79.66 | 55.89 | ||||||
Dividends paid per share | cents | 42.30 | 38.40 | 34.85 | 27.70 | 25.50 | |||||
pence | 20.995 | 21.104 | 19.152 | 15.251 | 15.658 | ||||||
Ordinary share datac | |||||||||||
Average number outstanding of 25 cent ordinary shares (shares million undiluted) | 19,163 | 20,028 | 21,126 | 21,821 | 22,171 | ||||||
Average number outstanding of 25 cent ordinary shares (shares million diluted) | 19,327 | 20,195 | 21,411 | 22,293 | 22,424 | ||||||
Balance sheet data | |||||||||||
Total assets | 236,076 | 217,601 | 206,914 | 194,630 | 172,491 | ||||||
Net assets | 94,652 | 85,465 | 80,450 | 78,235 | 70,264 | ||||||
Share capital | 5,237 | 5,385 | 5,185 | 5,403 | 5,552 | ||||||
BP shareholders equity | 93,690 | 84,624 | 79,661 | 76,892 | 69,139 | ||||||
Finance debt due after more than one year | 15,651 | 11,086 | 10,230 | 12,907 | 12,869 | ||||||
Net debt to net debt plus equity | 23% | 20% | 17% | 22% | 22% | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a | Excludes Innovene, which was treated as a discontinued operation in accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. (See Financial statements Note 3 on page 110.) |
b | 2007 included $1,132 million for the acquisition of Chevrons Netherlands manufacturing company. There were no significant acquisitions in 2006 or in 2005. Capital expenditure in 2006 included $1 billion in respect of our investment in Rosneft. Capital expenditure and acquisitions for 2004 included $1,354 million for including TNKs interest in Slavneft within TNK-BP and $1,355 million for the acquisition of Solvays interests in BP Solvay Polyethylene Europe and BP Solvay Polyethylene North America. |
Capital expenditure and acquisitions for 2003 included $5,794 million for the acquisition of our interest in TNK-BP. With the exception of the shares issued to Alfa Group and Access Renova (AAR) in connection with TNK-BP (2004-2006), all capital expenditure and acquisitions during the past five years have been financed from cash flow from operations, disposal proceeds and external financing. | |
c | The number of ordinary shares shown has been used to calculate per share amounts. |
7 | |
Production and net proved oil and natural gas reserves
The following table shows our production for the past five years and the estimated
net proved oil and natural gas reserves at the end of each of those years.
Production and net proved reservesa | ||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||
Crude oil production for subsidiaries (thousand barrels per day) | 1,304 | 1,351 | 1,423 | 1,480 | 1,615 | |||||
Crude oil production for equity-accounted entities (thousand barrels per day) | 1,110 | 1,124 | 1,139 | 1,051 | 506 | |||||
Natural gas production for subsidiaries (million cubic feet per day) | 7,222 | 7,412 | 7,512 | 7,624 | 8,092 | |||||
Natural gas production for equity-accounted entities (million cubic feet per day) | 921 | 1,005 | 912 | 879 | 521 | |||||
Estimated net proved crude oil reserves for subsidiaries (million barrels)b | 5,492 | 5,893 | 6,360 | 6,755 | 7,214 | |||||
Estimated net proved crude oil reserves for equity-accounted entities (million barrels)c | 4,581 | 3,888 | 3,205 | 3,179 | 2,867 | |||||
Estimated net proved natural gas reserves for subsidiaries (billion cubic feet)d | 41,130 | 42,168 | 44,448 | 45,650 | 45,155 | |||||
Estimated net proved natural gas reserves for equity-accounted entities (billion cubic feet)e | 3,770 | 3,763 | 3,856 | 2,857 | 2,869 | |||||
a | Crude oil includes natural gas liquids (NGLs) and condensate. Production and proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option to make lifting and sales arrangements independently, and include minority interests in consolidated operations. |
b | Includes 20 million barrels (23 million barrels at 31 December 2006 and 29 million barrels at 31 December 2005) in respect of the 30% minority interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
c | Includes 210 million barrels (179 million barrels at 31 December 2006 and 95 million barrels at 31 December 2005) in respect of the 6.51% minority interest in TNK-BP (6.29% at 31 December 2006 and 4.47% at 31 December 2005). |
d | Includes 3,211 billion cubic feet of natural gas (3,537 billion cubic feet at 31 December 2006 and 3,812 billion cubic feet at 31 December 2005) in respect of the 30% minority interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
e | Includes 68 billion cubic feet (99 billion cubic feet at 31 December 2006 and 57 billion cubic feet at 31 December 2005) in respect of the 5.88% minority interest in TNK-BP (7.77% at 31 December 2006 and 4.47% at 31 December 2005). |
During 2007, 414 million
barrels of oil and natural gas, on an oil equivalent* basis (mmboe), were
added to BPs proved reserves for subsidiaries (excluding
purchases and sales). After allowing for production, which amounted to
937mmboe, BPs proved reserves for subsidiaries were 12,583mmboe
at 31 December 2007. These proved reserves are mainly located in the US
(46%), Rest of Americas (19%), Asia Pacific (10%), Africa
(8%) and the UK (8%).
For equity-accounted
entities, 1,168mmboe were added to proved reserves (excluding purchases
and sales), production was 470mmboe and proved
reserves were 5,231mmboe at 31 December 2007.
* | Natural gas is converted to oil equivalent at 5.8 billion cubic feet (bcf) = 1 million barrels. |
8 | |
Risk factors |
We urge you to consider carefully the risks described below. If any of these
risks occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations
could suffer and the trading price and liquidity of our securities could
decline, in which case you could lose all or part of your investment.
Our
system of risk management provides the response to enduring risks of group
significance through the establishment of standards and other controls. Inability
to identify, assess and respond to risks through this and other controls
could lead to inability to capture opportunities, threats materializing,
inefficiency and legal non-compliance.
The
risks are categorized against the following areas: Strategy; Compliance and
ethics; Financial control; and Operations.
Strategic risks
Access and renewal
Successful execution of our group plan depends critically on implementing activities
to renew and reposition our portfolio. The challenges to renewal of our
upstream portfolio are growing due to increasing competition for access
to opportunities globally. Lack of material positions in new markets and/or
inability to complete disposals could result in an inability to capture
above-average market growth.
Prices and markets
Oil,
gas and product prices are subject to international supply and demand. Political
developments and the outcome of meetings of OPEC
can particularly affect world supply and oil prices. Previous oil price
increases have resulted in increased fiscal take, cost inflation and more
onerous
terms
for access to resources. As a result, increased oil prices may not improve
margin performance. In addition to the adverse effect on revenues,
margins and profitability from any future fall in oil and natural gas prices,
a prolonged period of low prices or other indicators would lead to a
review for impairment of the groups oil and natural gas properties. This review would reflect
managements view of long-term oil and natural gas prices. Such a review could result in a charge for impairment that could have a significant effect on the groups
results of operations in the period in which it occurs.
Refining
profitability can be volatile, with both periodic oversupply and supply tightness
in various regional markets. Sectors of the chemicals industry are also subject
to fluctuations in supply and demand within the petrochemicals market, with
consequent effect on prices and profitability.
Climate change and carbon pricing
Compliance with changes in laws, regulations and obligations relating to climate
change could result in substantial capital expenditure, reduced profitability
from changes in operating costs and revenue generation and strategic growth
opportunities being impacted.
Socio-political
We have operations in countries where political, economic and social transition
is taking place. Some countries have experienced political instability,
changes to the regulatory environment, expropriation or nationalization
of property, civil strife, strikes, acts of war and insurrections. Any
of these conditions occurring could disrupt or terminate our operations,
causing our development activities to be curtailed or terminated in
these areas or our production to decline and could cause us to incur additional
costs.
We
set ourselves high standards of corporate citizenship and aspire to contribute
to a better quality of life through the products and services we provide.
If it is perceived that we are not respecting or advancing the economic and
social progress of the communities in which we operate, our reputation and
shareholder value could be damaged.
Competition
The oil, gas and petrochemicals industries are highly competitive. There is
strong competition, both within the oil and gas industry and with other
industries, in supplying the fuel needs of
commerce, industry and the
home. Competition puts pressure on product prices, affects oil products marketing and requires continuous management focus on reducing unit costs and improving efficiency. The implementation of group strategy requires continued technological advances and innovation including advances in exploration, production, refining, petrochemical manufacturing technology and advances in technology related to energy usage. Our performance could be impeded if competitors developed or acquired intellectual property rights to technology that we required or if our innovation lagged the industry.
Compliance and ethics risks
Regulatory
The oil industry is subject to regulation and intervention by governments throughout the world in such matters as the award of exploration and production interests, the imposition of specific
drilling obligations, environmental protection controls, controls over the development and decommissioning of a field (including restrictions on production) and, possibly, nationalization, expropriation, cancellation or non-renewal of contract
rights. We buy, sell and trade oil and gas products in certain regulated commodity markets. The oil industry is also subject to the payment of royalties and taxation, which tend to be high compared with those payable in respect of other commercial
activities, and operates in certain tax jurisdictions that have a degree of uncertainty relating to the interpretation of, and changes to, tax law. As a result of new laws and regulations or other factors, we could be required to curtail or cease
certain operations, or we could incur additional costs.
Ethical misconduct and non-compliance
Our code of conduct, which applies to all employees, defines our commitment
to integrity, compliance with all applicable legal requirements, high ethical
standards and the behaviours and actions we expect of our businesses and
people wherever we operate. Incidents of non-compliance with applicable
laws and regulation or ethical misconduct could be damaging to our reputation
and shareholder value. Multiple events of non-compliance
could call into question the integrity of our operations.
Financial control risks
Liquidity,
financial capacity and financial exposure
The
group has established a financial framework to ensure that it is able to maintain
an appropriate level of liquidity and financial
capacity and to constrain the level of assessed capital at risk for the
purposes of
positions taken in financial instruments. Failure to operate within our
financial framework could lead to the group becoming financially distressed
leading
to a loss of shareholder value. Commercial credit risk is
measured and controlled to determine the groups total credit risk.
Inability to determine adequately our credit exposure could lead to financial
loss. Crude
oil prices are generally set in US dollars, while sales of refined products
may be in a variety of currencies. Fluctuations in exchange rates can therefore
give
rise to foreign exchange exposures, with a consequent impact on underlying
costs.
For
further information on financial instruments and financial risk factors
see Financial statements Note
28 on page 136 and Note 34 on page
143.
Liabilities and provisions
Changes in the external environment, such as new laws and regulations, market
volatility or other factors, could affect the adequacy of our provisions
for pensions, tax, environmental and
legal liabilities.
Operations risks
Operations safety
and operations
Process safety
Inherent in our operations are hazards that require continual oversight and
control. There are risks of technical integrity failure and loss of containment
of hydrocarbons and other hazardous material at operating sites or pipelines.
Failure to manage these risks could result in injury or loss of life, environmental
damage and/or loss of production.
9 | |
Personal safety
Inability to provide safe environments for our workforce and the public could
lead to injuries or loss of life.
Environmental
If we do not apply our resources to overcome the perceived trade-off between
global access to energy and the protection or improvement of the natural
environment, we could fail to live up to our aspirations of no or minimal
damage to the environment and contributing to human progress.
Product quality
Supplying customers with on-specification products is critical to maintaining
our licence to operate and our reputation in the marketplace. Failure to
meet product quality standards throughout the value chain could lead to
harm to people and the environment and loss of customers.
Drilling and production
Exploration and production require high levels of investment and are subject
to natural hazards and other uncertainties, including those relating to
the physical characteristics of an oil or natural gas field. The cost of
drilling, completing or operating wells is often uncertain. We may be required
to curtail, delay or cancel drilling operations because of a variety of
factors, including unexpected drilling conditions, pressure or
irregularities in geological formations, equipment failures or accidents, adverse
weather conditions and compliance with governmental requirements.
Transportation
All modes of transportation of hydrocarbons contain inherent risks. A loss
of containment of hydrocarbons and other hazardous material could occur
during transportation by road, rail, sea or pipeline. This is a significant
risk due to the potential impact of a release on the environment and people
and given the high volumes involved.
Operations planning
and performance management
Investment efficiency
Our organic growth is dependent on creating a portfolio of quality options
and investing in the best options. Ineffective investment selection could
lead to loss of value and higher capital
expenditure.
Major project delivery
Successful execution of our group plan (see page 11) depends
critically on implementing the activities to deliver the major projects
over
the plan
period. Poor delivery of any major project that underpins production growth and/or a major programme designed to enhance shareholder value could adversely affect our financial performance.
Reserves replacement
Successful execution of our group plan depends critically on sustaining long-term
reserves replacement. If upstream resources are not progressed to proved
reserves in a timely and efficient manner, we will be unable to sustain
long-term replacement of reserves.
Operations enterprise
systems, security and continuity
Digital infrastructure
The reliability and security of our digital infrastructure are critical to
maintaining our business applications availability. A breach of our digital
security could cause serious damage to business operations and, in some
circumstances, could result in injury to people, damage to assets, harm
to the environment and breaches of regulations.
Security
Security threats require continual oversight and control. Acts of terrorism
that threaten our plants and offices, pipelines, transportation or computer
systems would severely disrupt business and operations and could cause
harm to people.
Business continuity and disaster recovery
Contingency plans are required to continue or recover operations following
a disruption or incident. Inability to restore or replace critical capacity
to an agreed level within an agreed timeframe would prolong the impact
of any disruption and could severely affect business and operations.
Crisis management
Crisis management plans and capability are essential to deal with emergencies
at every level of our operations. If we do not respond or are perceived
not to respond in an appropriate manner to either an external or internal
crisis, our business and operations could be severely disrupted.
Operations people
management
People and capability
Employee training, development and successful recruitment of new staff are
key to implementing our plans. Inability to develop the human capacity
and capability across the organization could
jeopardize performance delivery.
10 | |
|
||
Forward-looking statements | Statements regarding competitive position | |
In order to utilize the Safe
Harbor provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995, BP is providing the following cautionary statement.
This document contains certain forward-looking statements with respect
to the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of BP
and certain of the plans and objectives of BP with respect to these items.
These statements may generally, but not always, be identified by the use
of words such as will, expects, is expected
to, should, may, objective, is
likely to, intends, believes, plans, we
see or similar expressions. In particular, among other statements,
(i) certain statements in Performance review (pages 6-55) with regard to
management aims and objectives, future capital expenditure, future hydrocarbon
production volume, date(s) or period(s) in which production is scheduled
or expected to come onstream or a project or action is scheduled or expected
to begin or be completed, capacity of planned plants or facilities and
impact of health, safety and environmental regulations; (ii) the statements
in Performance review (pages 6-44) with regard to planned expansion, investment
or other projects and future regulatory actions; and (iii) the statements
in Performance review (pages 45-55) with regard to the plans of the group,
cash flows, opportunities for material acquisitions, the cost of and provision
for future remediation programmes, liquidity and costs for providing pension
and other post-retirement benefits; and including under Liquidity
and capital resources with regard to future production, future refining
availability, future capital expenditure, sources of funding, future revenues
and financial performance, potential for cost efficiencies, level of free
cash flow allocated to share buybacks, shareholder distributions and share
buybacks, gearing, working capital and expected payments under contractual
and commercial commitments; are all forward-looking in nature.
By their nature, forward-looking statements involve
risk and uncertainty because they relate to events and depend on circumstances
that will or may occur in the future and are outside the control of BP. Actual
results may differ materially from those expressed in such statements, depending
on a variety of factors, including the specific factors identified in the discussions
accompanying such forward-looking statements; the timing of bringing new fields
onstream; future levels of industry product supply, demand and pricing; operational
problems; general economic conditions; political stability and economic growth
in relevant areas of the world; changes in laws and governmental regulations;
exchange rate fluctuations; development and use of new technology; the success
or otherwise of partnering; the actions of competitors; natural disasters and
adverse weather conditions; changes in public expectations and other changes
to business conditions; wars and acts of terrorism or sabotage; and other factors
discussed elsewhere in this report including under Risk factors on
pages 8-9. In addition to factors set forth elsewhere in this report, those set
out above are important factors, although not exhaustive, that may cause actual
results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied
by these forward-looking statements.
Statements referring to BPs competitive position are based on the companys belief and, in some cases, rely on a range of sources, including investment analysts reports, independent market studies and BPs internal assessments of market share based on publicly available information about the financial results and performance of market participants.
11 | |
Information on the company |
General
Unless otherwise
indicated, information in this document reflects 100% of the assets and operations
of the company and its subsidiaries that were consolidated at the date or
for the periods indicated, including minority interests. Also, unless otherwise
indicated, figures for business sales and other operating revenues include
sales between BP businesses.
The company, incorporated in 1909 in England
and Wales, became known as BP Amoco p.l.c. following the merger with Amoco
Corporation (incorporated in Indiana, US, in 1889). The company subsequently
changed its name to BP p.l.c.
BP is one of the worlds leading oil companies
on the basis of market capitalization and proved reserves. Our worldwide headquarters
is located at 1 St Jamess Square, London SW1Y 4PD, UK, tel +44 (0)20
7496 4000. Our agent in the US is BP America Inc., 4101 Winfield Road, Warrenville,
Illinois 60555, tel +1 630 821 2222.
Overview
of the group
BP is a global group,
with interests and activities held or operated through subsidiaries, jointly
controlled entities or associates established in, and subject to the laws
and regulations of, many different jurisdictions. These interests and activities
covered three business segments in 2007, supported by a number of organizational
elements comprising group functions and regions.
In 2007, the three business segments were Exploration
and Production, Refining and Marketing and Gas, Power and Renewables. With
effect from 1 January 2008, the Gas, Power and Renewables segment ceased
to report separately (see Resegmentation in 2008 on page 12). Exploration
and Productions activities include oil and natural gas exploration,
development and production (upstream activities), together with related pipeline,
transportation and processing activities (midstream activities). The activities
of Refining and Marketing include the supply and trading, refining, marketing
and transportation of crude oil, petroleum and chemicals products. Gas, Power
and Renewables activities included marketing and trading of gas and power,
marketing of liquefied natural gas (LNG), natural gas liquids (NGLs), and
low-carbon power generation through our Alternative Energy business. The group
provides high-quality technological support for all its businesses through
its research and engineering activities.
Group functions serve the business segments,
aiming to achieve coherence across the group, manage risks effectively and
achieve economies of scale. Each head of region ensures regional consistency
of the activities of business segments and group functions and represents
BP to external parties.
The groups system of internal control
is described in the BP management framework. It is designed to meet the expectations
of internal control of the Turnbull Guidance on the Combined Code in the UK
and of COSO (committee of the sponsoring organization for the Treadway Commission
in the US). The system of internal control is the complete set of management
systems, organizational structures, processes, standards and behaviours that
are employed to conduct the business of BP and deliver returns to shareholders.
The design of the system of internal control addresses risks and how to respond
to them. Each component of the system is in itself a device to respond to
a particular type or collection of risks.
The group strategy describes the groups
strategic objectives and the presumptions made by BP about the future. It
describes strategic risks that arise from making such presumptions and the
actions to be taken to manage or mitigate the risks. The board delegates to
the group chief executive responsibility for developing BPs strategy
and its implementation through the group plan that determine the setting of
priorities and allocation of resources. The group chief executive is obliged
to discuss with the board, on the basis of the strategy and group plan, all
material matters currently or prospectively affecting BPs performance.
As the groups business segments are managed
on a global, not regional, basis, geographical information for the group and
segments is
given to provide additional information for investors but does not reflect the way BP manages its activities. | |
We have well-established operations in Europe, the US, Canada, Russia, South America, Australasia, Asia and parts of Africa. Currently, around 65% of the groups capital is invested in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, with just under 40% of our fixed assets located in the US and around 25% located in Europe. | |
We believe that BP has a strong portfolio of assets: | |
– | In Exploration
and Production, we have upstream interests in 29 countries. Exploration
and Production activities are managed through operating units that
are
accountable for the day-to-day management of the segments activities.
An operating unit is accountable for one or more fields. Profit centres
comprise one or more operating units. Profit centres are, or are expected to become, areas that provide significant production and income for the segment. Our current areas of major development include the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, Azerbaijan, Algeria, Angola, Egypt and Asia Pacific where we believe we have competitive advantage and that we believe provide the foundation for volume growth and improved margins in the future. We also have significant midstream activities to support our upstream interests. |
– | In Refining and Marketing, we have a strong presence in the US and Europe. In the US, we market under the Amoco and BP brands in the Midwest, east and southeast and under the ARCO brand on the west coast, and under the BP and Aral brands in Europe. We have a long- established supply and trading activity responsible for delivering value across the crude and oil products supply chain. Our Aromatics & Acetyls business maintains a manufacturing position globally, with emphasis on growth in Asia. We also have, or are growing, businesses elsewhere in the world under the BP and Castrol brands, including a strong global lubricants portfolio and other business-to- business marketing businesses (aviation and marine) covering the mobility sectors. We continue to seek opportunities to broaden our activities in growth markets such as China and India. |
– | In our
Gas, Power and Renewables businesses, marketing and trading is undertaken
primarily in the US, Canada, the UK and the rest of Europe. Our marketing
and trading activities include natural gas, power and NGLs. Our LNG
activities
identify and capture worldwide opportunities for our upstream natural
gas resources and are focused on growing natural gas markets, including
the US, the UK, Spain and key consuming countries of the Asia Pacific
region. We have a significant NGLs processing and marketing business
in
North America. BP Alternative Energy, launched in November 2005, combines
all of BPs
interests in businesses that provide low-carbon energy solutions for
power generation: solar, wind, gas-fired power generation and hydrogen
power
with carbon capture and storage. Alternative Energy has solar production
facilities in the US, Spain, China, India and Australia; and wind
farms
in the Netherlands, India and the US. We are advancing development of
hydrogen power plants and are involved in gas-fired power projects
in
the US, the UK, Spain, Vietnam, Trinidad & Tobago and South Korea. |
Through non-US subsidiaries or other non-US entities, during the period covered by this report, BP conducted limited marketing, licensing and trading activities in, or with persons from, certain countries identified by the US Department of State as State Sponsors of Terrorism. BP believes that these activities are immaterial to the group. | |
BP has interests in, and is the operator of, two fields and a pipeline located outside of Iran in which the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) and an affiliated entity have interests. In Iran, BP buys small quantities of crude oil. This is primarily for sale to third parties in Europe and a small portion is used by BP in its own refineries in South Africa and Europe. In addition, BP sells small quantities of crude oil into Iran and blends and markets small quantities of lubricants for sale to domestic consumers through a joint venture there, which has a blending facility. However, BP does not seek to obtain from the government of Iran licences or agreements for oil and gas projects in Iran, is not conducting any technical studies in Iran and does not own or operate any refineries or chemicals plants in Iran. |
12 | |
BP sells small quantities of lubricants in Cuba through a 50/50 joint venture there. In Syria, small quantities of lubricants are sold through a distributor and BP obtains small volumes of crude oil supplies for sale to third parties in Europe. These sales and purchases are insignificant and BP does not provide other goods, technologies or services in these countries.
Acquisitions
and disposals
In 2007, BP acquired Chevrons Netherlands manufacturing company,
Texaco Raffiniderij Pernis B.V. The acquisition included Chevrons 31%
minority shareholding in Nerefco, its 31% shareholding in the 22.5 MW wind
farm co-located at the refinery as well as a 22.8% shareholding in the TEAM
joint venture terminal and shareholdings in two local pipelines linking the
TEAM terminal to the refinery. Disposal proceeds were $4,267 million,
which included $1,903 million from the sale of the Coryton refinery and
$605 million from the sale of our exploration and production gas infrastructure
business in the Netherlands.
In 2006, there were no significant acquisitions.
BP purchased 9.6% of the shares issued under Rosnefts IPO for a consideration
of $1 billion (included in capital expenditure). This represented an interest
of around 1.4% in Rosneft. Disposal proceeds were $6,254 million, which
included $2.1 billion on the sale of our interest in the Shenzi discovery
and around $1.3 billion from the sale of our producing properties on
the Outer Continental Shelf of the Gulf of Mexico to Apache Corporation.
In 2005, there were no significant acquisitions.
Disposal proceeds were $11,200 million, which included net cash proceeds
from the sale of Innovene to INEOS of $8,304 million after selling costs,
closing
adjustments and liabilities. Innovene represented the majority of the Olefins and Derivatives business. Additionally, disposal proceeds included proceeds from the sale of the groups interest in the Ormen Lange field in Norway. | ||
Resegmentation
in 2008 On 11 October 2007, we announced our intention to simplify the organizational structure of BP. From 1 January 2008, there are only two business segments: Exploration and Production and Refining and Marketing. A separate business, Alternative Energy, handles BPs low-carbon businesses and future growth options outside oil and gas. |
||
As a result, and with effect from 1 January 2008: | ||
– | The Gas, Power and Renewables segment ceased to report separately. | |
– | The NGLs, LNG and gas and power marketing and trading businesses were transferred from the Gas, Power and Renewables segment to the Exploration and Production segment. | |
– | The Alternative Energy business was transferred from the Gas, Power and Renewables segment to Other businesses and corporate. | |
– | The Emerging Consumers Marketing Unit was transferred from Refining and Marketing to Alternative Energy (which is reported in Other businesses and corporate). | |
– | The Biofuels business was transferred from Refining and Marketing to Alternative Energy (which is reported in Other businesses and corporate). | |
– | The Shipping business was transferred from Refining and Marketing to Other businesses and corporate. |
13 | |
Exploration and Production |
Our Exploration and Production segment includes upstream and midstream activities
in 29 countries, including the US, the UK, Angola, Azerbaijan, Canada, Egypt,
Russia, Trinidad & Tobago (Trinidad) and locations within Asia Pacific,
Latin America, North Africa and the Middle East. Upstream activities involve
oil and natural gas exploration and field development and production. Our exploration
programme is currently focused around the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, Algeria,
Angola, Azerbaijan, Egypt and Russia. Major development areas include the deepwater
Gulf of Mexico, Azerbaijan, Algeria, Angola, Egypt and Asia Pacific. During
2007, production came from 22 countries. The principal areas of production
are Russia, the US, Trinidad, the UK, Latin America, the Middle East, Asia
Pacific, Azerbaijan, Angola and Egypt.
Midstream
activities involve the ownership and management of crude oil and natural gas
pipelines, processing and export terminals and LNG processing facilities and
transportation. Our most significant midstream pipeline interests include the
Trans Alaska Pipeline System, the Forties Pipeline System and the Central Area
Transmission System pipeline, both in the UK sector of the North Sea, and the
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline, running through Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey.
Major LNG activities are located in Trinidad, Indonesia and Australia. Further
LNG businesses with BP involvement are being built up in Egypt and Angola.
Our
oil and gas production assets are located onshore or offshore and include wells,
gathering centres, in-field flow lines, processing facilities, storage facilities,
offshore platforms, export systems (e.g. transit lines), pipelines and LNG plant
facilities.
Key statistics | $ million | |||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Sales
and other operating revenues from continuing operations |
54,550 | 52,600 | 47,210 | |
Profit
before interest and tax from continuing operationsa |
26,938 | 29,629 | 25,502 | |
Total assets | 108,874 | 99,310 | 93,447 | |
Capital expenditure and acquisitions | 13,906 | 13,118 | 10,237 | |
|
|
|
|
|
million barrels of oil equivalent | ||||
Net proved reserves group | 12,583 | 13,163 | 14,023 | |
Net
proved reserves equity-accounted entities |
5,231 | 4,537 | 3,870 | |
|
||||
thousand barrels per day |
||||
Liquids production group | 1,304 | 1,351 | 1,423 | |
Liquids
production equity-accounted entities |
1,110 | 1,124 | 1,139 | |
|
||||
million cubic feet per day |
||||
Natural gas production group | 7,222 | 7,412 | 7,512 | |
Natural
gas production equity-accounted entities |
921 | 1,005 | 912 | |
|
||||
$ per barrel | ||||
Average BP crude oil realizationsb | 69.98 | 61.91 | 50.27 | |
Average BP NGL realizationsb | 46.20 | 37.17 | 33.23 | |
Average BP liquids realizationsb c | 67.45 | 59.23 | 48.51 | |
Average
West Texas Intermediate oil price |
72.20 | 66.02 | 56.58 | |
Average Brent oil price | 72.39 | 65.14 | 54.48 | |
|
||||
$ per thousand cubic feet |
||||
Average BP natural gas realizationsb |
4.53 | 4.72 | 4.90 | |
Average
BP US natural gas realizationsb |
5.43 | 5.74 | 6.78 | |
|
$ per million British thermal units | ||||
Average Henry Hub gas priced | 6.86 | 7.24 | 8.65 | |
|
||||
pence per therm | ||||
Average
UK National Balancing Point gas
price |
29.95 | 42.19 | 40.71 | |
|
a | Profit before interest and tax from continuing operations includes profit after interest and tax of equity-accounted entities. |
b | The Exploration and Production segment does not undertake any hedging activity. Consequently, realizations reflect the market price achieved. Realizations are based on sales of consolidated subsidiaries only, which excludes equity-accounted entities. |
c | Crude oil and natural gas liquids. |
d | Henry Hub First of Month Index. |
Upstream operations in Argentina, Bolivia, Abu Dhabi, Kazakhstan and the TNK-BP and some of the Sakhalin operations in Russia, as well as some of our operations in Indonesia and Venezuela, are conducted through equity-accounted entities. | |
The Exploration and Production strategy is to build production by: | |
| Focusing on finding the largest fields in the worlds most prolific hydrocarbon basins. |
| Building leadership positions in these areas. |
| Managing the decline of existing producing assets and divesting assets when they no longer compete in our portfolio. |
Through the application of advanced technology and significant investment, we have gained a strong position in many of our operating areas. | |
Total capital expenditure and acquisitions in 2007 was $13.9 billion (2006 $13.1 billion and 2005 $10.2 billion). There were no significant acquisitions in the period from 2005 to 2007. Capital expenditure in 2006 included our investment in Rosnefts IPO of $1 billion. Capital expenditure in 2008 is planned to be around $15 billion including approximately $0.5 billion in respect of the gas and power businesses that are now reported through Exploration and Production, as described below, and excluding the impact of our transaction with Husky Energy Inc., which is further described on page 21. This reflects our project programme, managed within the context of our disciplined approach to capital investment and taking into account sector-specific inflation. | |
Development expenditure incurred in 2007, excluding midstream activities, was $10,153 million, compared with $9,109 million in 2006 and $7,678 million in 2005. |
Resegmentation in 2008
With effect from 1 January 2008, the NGLs, LNG and the gas and power marketing and trading businesses were transferred from the Gas, Power and Renewables segment to the Exploration and
Production segment.
Upstream activities
Exploration
The group explores for oil and natural gas under a wide range of licensing, joint venture and other contractual agreements. We may do this alone or, more frequently, with partners. BP acts as
operator for many of these ventures.
Our
exploration and appraisal costs
in 2007 were $1,892 million, compared with $1,765 million in 2006 and $1,266
million in 2005. These costs include exploration and appraisal drilling expenditures,
which are capitalized within intangible fixed assets, and geological and geophysical
exploration costs, which are charged to income as incurred. Approximately 47% of 2007 exploration and appraisal costs were directed towards
appraisal activity. In 2007, we participated in 86 gross (37 net) exploration
and appraisal wells in 12 countries. The principal areas of activity were
the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, Angola, Egypt, North Sea, Canada and Pakistan.
Total
exploration expense in 2007
of $756 million (2006 $1,045 million and 2005 $684 million) included
the write-off of expenses related to
14 | |
unsuccessful drilling activities in Russia ($86 million excluding TNK-BP), Egypt ($49 million), Colombia ($49 million), the deepwater Gulf of Mexico ($36 million), onshore North America ($36 million), Angola ($27 million) and others ($11 million). | ||
In 2007, we obtained upstream rights in several new tracts, which include the following: | ||
– | In the Gulf of Mexico, we have been awarded 171 blocks (BP average equity 100%) through the Outer Continental Shelf Lease Sales 204 and 205. | |
– | In Oman, we signed a production-sharing agreement (PSA) to appraise and develop the Khazzan/Makarem gas fields. | |
– | In Colombia, BP was awarded operatorship in two blocks, RC4 (BP 35%) and RC5 (BP 100%), which cover approximately 6,200 square kilometres in the Caribbean Sea, offshore northern Colombia. | |
– | In Libya, BP signed a major exploration and production agreement with Libyas National Oil Company, covering over 53,000 square kilometres both onshore and offshore. | |
In 2007, we were involved in a number of discoveries. In most cases, reserves bookings from these fields will depend on the results of ongoing technical and commercial evaluations, including appraisal drilling. Our most significant discoveries in 2007 included the following: | ||
– | In Angola, we made further discoveries in the ultra deepwater (greater than 1,500 metres) Block 31 (BP 26.7% and operator) with the Miranda, Cordelia and Portia wells, bringing the total number of discoveries in Block 31 to 15. | |
– | In Azerbaijan, we made a further discovery in a new reservoir in Shah Deniz (BP 25.5% and operator) with the SDX-04 well. | |
– | In Egypt, we made three discoveries with the Giza North-1 (BP 60% and operator), Taurus Deep (BP 60% and operator) and Satis (BP 50% and operator) wells. | |
– | In the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, we made a discovery with the Isabela well (BP 67% and operator). |
Reserves and production
Compliance
IFRS does not provide specific guidance on reserves disclosures. BP estimates
proved reserves in accordance with SEC Rule 4-10 (a) and relevant guidance
notes and letters issued by the SEC
staff.
By
their nature, there is always some risk involved in the ultimate development
and production of reserves, including, but not limited to, final regulatory
approval, the installation of new or additional infrastructure as well as
changes in oil and gas prices and the continued availability of additional
development capital.
All
the groups oil and gas reserves held in consolidated companies have been estimated by the groups petroleum engineers. Of the equity-accounted
volumes in 2007, 16% were based on estimates prepared by group petroleum engineers and 84% were based on estimates prepared by independent engineering consultants, although all of the groups oil and gas reserves held in equity-accounted
entities are reviewed by the groups petroleum engineers before making the
assessment of volumes to be booked by BP.
Our
proved reserves are associated with both concessions (tax and royalty arrangements)
and agreements where the group is exposed to the upstream risks and rewards
of ownership, but where title to the hydrocarbons is not conferred, such
as PSAs. In a concession, the consortium of which we are a part is entitled
to the reserves that can be produced over the licence period, which may be
the life of the
field. In a PSA, we are entitled to recover volumes that equate to costs incurred
to develop and produce the reserves and an agreed share of the remaining
volumes or the economic equivalent. As part of our entitlement is driven
by the monetary amount of costs to be recovered, price fluctuations will
have an impact on both production volumes and reserves. Thirteen per cent
of our proved reserves are associated with PSAs. The main countries in which
we operate under PSAs are Algeria,
Angola, Azerbaijan, Egypt, Indonesia and Vietnam.
We
separately disclose our share of reserves held in equity-accounted entities
(jointly controlled entities and associates), although we do not control
these
entities or the assets held by such entities.
Resource progression
BP manages its hydrocarbon resources in three major categories: prospect inventory,
non-proved resources and proved reserves. When a discovery is made, volumes
usually transfer from the prospect inventory to the non-proved resource
category. The resources move through various non-proved resource sub-categories
as their technical and commercial maturity increases through appraisal
activity.
Resources
in a field will only be categorized as proved reserves when all the criteria
for attribution of proved
status have been met, including an internally imposed requirement for project
sanction or for sanction expected within six months and, for additional reserves
in existing fields, the requirement that the reserves be included in the business
plan and scheduled for development, typically within
three years. Where, on occasion, the group decides to book reserves where development
is scheduled to commence beyond three years, these reserves will be booked only
where they satisfy the SECs criteria for attribution of proved status.
Internal approval and final investment decision are what we refer to as project
sanction.
At
the point of sanction, all booked reserves will be categorized as proved
undeveloped (PUD). Volumes will subsequently
be recategorized from PUD to proved developed (PD) as a consequence of development
activity. When part of a wells reserves depends on a later phase of activity,
only that portion of reserves associated with existing, available facilities
and infrastructure moves to PD. The first PD bookings will occur at the point
of first oil or gas production. Major development projects typically take one
to four years from the time of initial booking of PUD reserves to the start of
production. Changes to reserves bookings may be made due
to analysis of new or existing data concerning production, reservoir performance,
commercial factors, acquisition and divestment activity and additional reservoir
development activity.
Governance BPs centrally controlled process for proved reserves estimation approval forms part of a holistic and integrated system of internal control. It consists of the following elements: |
||
– | Accountabilities of certain officers of the group to ensure that there is review and approval of proved reserves bookings independent of the operating business and that there are effective controls in the approval process and verification that the proved reserves estimates and the related financial impacts are reported in a timely manner. | |
– | Capital allocation processes, whereby delegated authority is exercised to commit to capital projects that are consistent with the delivery of the groups business plan. A formal review process exists to ensure that both technical and commercial criteria are met prior to the commitment of capital to projects. | |
– | Internal Audit, whose role includes systematically examining the effectiveness of the groups financial controls designed to assure the reliability of reporting and safeguarding of assets and examining the groups compliance with laws, regulations and internal standards. | |
– |
Approval hierarchy whereby proved reserves changes above certain threshold
volumes require central authorization and periodic
reviews. The frequency of review is determined according to field size and ensures that more than 80% of the BP reserves base undergoes central review every two years and more than 90% is reviewed every four years. |
|
For the executive directors and senior management, no specific portion of compensation bonuses is directly related to oil and gas reserves targets. Additions to proved reserves is one of several indicators by which the performance of the Exploration and Production segment is assessed by the remuneration committee for the purposes of determining compensation bonuses for the executive directors and senior management. Other indicators include a number of financial and operational measures. | ||
BPs variable pay programme for the other senior managers in the Exploration and Production segment is based on individual performance contracts. Individual performance contracts are based on agreed items from the business performance plan, one of which, if they choose, could relate to oil and gas reserves. |
15 | |
Reserve replacement
Total hydrocarbon proved reserves, on an oil equivalent basis and excluding
equity-accounted entities, comprised 12,583mmboe at 31 December 2007, a
decrease of 4.4% compared with 31 December 2006. Natural gas represents
about 56% of these reserves. The reduction includes net sales of 58mmboe,
largely comprising a number of assets in the Netherlands, Pakistan, Canada
and the US.
Total
hydrocarbon proved reserves, on an oil equivalent basis for equity-accounted
entities alone, comprised 5,231mmboe at 31 December 2007, an increase of
15.3% compared with 31 December 2006. Natural gas represents about 12% of
these proved reserves. The increase includes net sales of 3mmboe, largely
comprising a number of assets in Russia.
The
proved reserves replacement ratio (also known as the production replacement ratio)
is the extent to which production is replaced by proved reserves additions. This
ratio is expressed in oil equivalent terms and includes changes resulting from
revisions to previous estimates, improved recovery and extensions and discoveries,
and may be expressed as a replacement ratio excluding acquisitions and
divestments or as a total replacement ratio including acquisitions and divestments.
% | ||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Proved
reserves replacement ratio, excluding
equity-accounted entities |
44 | 34 | 68 | |
Proved
reserves replacement ratio, excluding
equity-accounted entities,
including sales and purchases
of reserves-in-place |
38 | 11 | 40 | |
Proved
reserves replacement ratio, for equity-accounted entities |
248 | 272 | 151 | |
Proved
reserves replacement ratio, for
equity-accounted entities, including
sales and purchases of reserves-in-place |
248 | 239 | 141 | |
|
||||
million barrels of oil equivalent | ||||
Additions
to proved developed reserves,
excluding equity-accounted
entities, including sales
and purchases of reserves-in-placea |
929 | 675 | 632 | |
Additions to proved developed reserves,
for equity-accounted entities, including sales and purchases of reserves-in-placea |
473 | 936 | 474 | |
|
||||
% | ||||
Proved developed reserves replacement
ratio, excluding equity-accounted entities, including sales and purchases
of reserves-in-place |
99 | 70 | 63 | |
Proved developed reserves replacement
ratio, for equity-accounted entities, including sales and purchases of reserves-in-place |
101 | 195 | 99 | |
|
a | This includes some reserves that were previously classified as proved undeveloped. |
In 2007, net additions to the groups proved reserves (excluding sales and purchases of reserves-in-place and equity-accounted entities) amounted to 414mmboe, principally through improved recovery from, and extensions to, existing fields and discoveries of new fields. Of the reserves additions through improved recovery from, and extensions to, existing fields and discoveries of new fields, 64% are associated with new projects and are proved undeveloped reserves additions. The remainder are in existing developments where they represent a mixture of proved developed and proved undeveloped reserves. The principal reserves additions were in the Norway (Skarv), the US (Liberty, Prudhoe Bay, Great White, Nakika, Thunder Horse), Trinidad (Immortelle, Manakin), Angola (Pazflor) and Canada (Noel).
Production
Our total hydrocarbon production during 2007 averaged 2,549 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day (mboe/d) for subsidiaries and 1,269mboe/d for equity-accounted entities, a decrease of
3% and 2% respectively compared with 2006. For subsidiaries, 35% of our production was in the US and 13% in the UK. For equity-accounted entities, 72% of production was from TNK-BP.
Total
production for 2008 is expected to be higher than in 2007. This is based
on the groups asset portfolio at 1 January 2008, expected startups in 2008
and Brent at $60/bbl, before any 2008 disposal effects and before any effects of prices above $60/bbl
on volumes in PSAs.
16 | |
The following tables show BPs estimated net proved reserves as at 31 December 2007.
Estimated net proved reserves of liquids at 31 December 2007a b c | million barrels | |||||
Developed | Undeveloped | Total | ||||
UK | 414 | 123 | 537 | |||
Rest of Europe | 105 | 169 | 274 | |||
US | 1,882 | 1,265 | 3,147 | d | ||
Rest of Americas | 115 | 203 | 318 | e | ||
Asia Pacific | 61 | 77 | 138 | |||
Africa | 256 | 350 | 606 | |||
Russia | | | | |||
Other | 104 | 368 | 472 | |||
Group | 2,937 | 2,555 | 5,492 | |||
Equity-accounted entities | 2,996 | 1,585 | 4,581 | f | ||
Estimated net proved reserves of natural gas at 31 December 2007a b c | billion cubic feet | |||||
Developed | Undeveloped | Total | ||||
UK | 2,049 | 553 | 2,602 | |||
Rest of Europe | 63 | 410 | 473 | |||
US | 10,670 | 4,705 | 15,375 | |||
Rest of Americas | 3,683 | 8,394 | 12,077 | g | ||
Asia Pacific | 1,822 | 4,817 | 6,639 | |||
Africa | 990 | 1,410 | 2,400 | |||
Russia | | | | |||
Other | 583 | 981 | 1,564 | |||
Group | 19,860 | 21,270 | 41,130 | |||
Equity-accounted entities | 2,473 | 1,297 | 3,770 | h | ||
Net proved reserves on an oil equivalent basis (mmboe) | ||||||
Group | 6,361 | 6,222 | 12,583 | |||
Equity-accounted entities | 3,422 | 1,809 | 5,231 | |||
a |
Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash
or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying
production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements
independently, and include minority interests in consolidated operations.
We disclose our share of reserves held in joint ventures and associates
that are accounted for by the equity method although we do not control
these entities or the assets held by such entities. |
b |
In certain deepwater fields, such as fields in the Gulf of
Mexico, BP has claimed proved reserves before production flow tests are
conducted, in part because of the significant safety, cost and environmental
implications of conducting these tests. The industry has made substantial
technological improvements in understanding, measuring and delineating
reservoir properties without the need for flow tests. The general method
of reserves
assessment to determine reasonable certainty of commercial recovery that BP employs
relies on the integration of three types of data: (1) well data used to
assess the local characteristics and conditions of reservoirs and fluids;
(2) field scale seismic data to allow the interpolation and extrapolation
of these characteristics outside the immediate area of the local well control;
and (3) data from relevant analogous fields. Well data includes appraisal
wells or sidetrack holes, full logging
suites, core data and fluid samples. BP considers the integration of this data
in certain cases to be superior to a flow test in providing a better understanding
of the overall reservoir performance. The collection of data from logs,
cores, wireline formation testers, pressures and fluid samples calibrated
to each other and to the seismic data can allow reservoir properties to
be determined over a greater volume than the localized volume of investigation
associated with a short-term flow test.
Historically, proved reserves recorded using these methods have been validated
by actual production levels. As at the end of 2007, BP had proved reserves
in 22 fields in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico that had been initially booked
prior to production
flow testing. Of
these fields, 19 are in production and one, Thunder Horse, is expected to begin
production by the end of 2008. Two other fields are in the early stages of development. |
c | The 2007 year-end marker prices used were Brent $96.02/bbl (2006 $58.93/bbl and 2005 $58.21/bbl) and Henry Hub $7.10/mmBtu (2006 $5.52/mmBtu and 2005 $9.52/mmBtu). |
d | Proved reserves in the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska include an estimated 98 million barrels upon which a net profits royalty will be payable over the life of the field under the terms of the BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. |
e | Includes 20 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 30% minority interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
f | Includes 210 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 6.51% minority interest in TNK-BP. |
g | Includes 3,211 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 30% minority interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
h | Includes 68 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 5.88% minority interest in TNK-BP. |
17 |
|
The following tables show BPs production by major field for 2007, 2006 and 2005.
Liquids | % | thousand barrels per day | |||||||
BP net share of productiona | |||||||||
Field or Area | Interest | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||
Alaska | Prudhoe Bayb | 26.4 | 74 | 71 | 89 | ||||
Kuparuk | 39.2 | 52 | 57 | 62 | |||||
Northstarb | 98.6 | 28 | 38 | 46 | |||||
Milne Pointb | 99.4 | 28 | 31 | 37 | |||||
Other | Various | 27 | 27 | 34 | |||||
Total Alaska | 209 | 224 | 268 | ||||||
Lower 48 onshorec | Various | Various | 108 | 125 | 130 | ||||
Gulf of Mexico deepwaterc | Na Kikab | 50.0 | 32 | 41 | 44 | ||||
Horn Mountainb | 100.0 | 18 | 23 | 26 | |||||
Kingb | 100.0 | 22 | 28 | 24 | |||||
Mars | 28.5 | 30 | 19 | 21 | |||||
Mad Dogb | 61.0 | 25 | 17 | 13 | |||||
Holsteinb | 50.0 | 17 | 15 | 22 | |||||
Other | Various | 52 | 52 | 48 | |||||
Gulf of Mexico Shelfc | Other | Various | | 3 | 16 | ||||
Total Gulf of Mexico | 196 | 198 | 214 | ||||||
Total US | 513 | 547 | 612 | ||||||
UK offshorec | ETAPd | Various | 32 | 49 | 49 | ||||
Foinavenb | Various | 37 | 37 | 39 | |||||
Magnusb | 85.0 | 16 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Schiehallion/Loyalb | Various | 20 | 26 | 28 | |||||
Hardingb | 70.0 | 14 | 17 | 22 | |||||
Andrewb | 62.8 | 8 | 7 | 12 | |||||
Other | Various | 59 | 69 | 75 | |||||
Total UK offshore | 186 | 235 | 255 | ||||||
Onshore | Wytch Farmb | 67.8 | 15 | 18 | 22 | ||||
Total UK | 201 | 253 | 277 | ||||||
Netherlandsc | Various | Various | | 1 | 1 | ||||
Norway | Valhallb | 28.1 | 17 | 21 | 25 | ||||
Draugen | 18.4 | 14 | 15 | 20 | |||||
Ulab | 80.0 | 12 | 14 | 17 | |||||
Other | Various | 8 | 10 | 12 | |||||
Total Rest of Europe | 51 | 61 | 75 | ||||||
Angola | Dalia | 16.7 | 31 | | | ||||
Girassol | 16.7 | 14 | 17 | 34 | |||||
Greater Plutoniob | 50.0 | 12 | | | |||||
Kizomba A | 26.7 | 36 | 54 | 56 | |||||
Kizomba B | 26.7 | 35 | 58 | 28 | |||||
Other | Various | 11 | 4 | 10 | |||||
Australia | Various | 15.8 | 34 | 34 | 36 | ||||
Azerbaijan | Azeri-Chirag-Gunashlib | 34.1 | 200 | 145 | 76 | ||||
Shah Denizb | 25.5 | 5 | | | |||||
Canadac | Variousb | Various | 8 | 8 | 10 | ||||
Colombia | Variousb | Various | 28 | 34 | 41 | ||||
Egypt | Various | Various | 43 | 42 | 47 | ||||
Trinidad & Tobagoc | Variousb | 100.0 | 30 | 40 | 40 | ||||
Venezuelac | Various | Various | 16 | 26 | 55 | ||||
Otherc | Various | Various | 36 | 28 | 26 | ||||
Total Rest of World | 539 | 490 | 459 | ||||||
Total groupe | 1,304 | 1,351 | 1,423 | ||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) | |||||||||
Abu Dhabif | Various | Various | 192 | 163 | 148 | ||||
Argentina Pan American Energy | Various | Various | 69 | 69 | 67 | ||||
Russia TNK-BPc | Various | Various | 832 | 876 | 911 | ||||
Otherc | Various | Various | 17 | 16 | 13 | ||||
Total equity-accounted entities | 1,110 | 1,124 | 1,139 |
a | Production excludes royalties due to others whether payable in cash or in kind where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b |
BP-operated. |
c | In 2007, BP divested its producing properties in the Netherlands and some producing properties in the US Lower 48 and Canada. TNK-BP disposed of its interests in several non-core properties. In 2006, BP divested its producing properties on the Outer Continental Shelf of the Gulf of Mexico and its interest in the Statfjord oil and gas field in the UK. Our interests in the Boqueron, Desarollo Zulia Occidental (DZO) and Jusepin projects in Venezuela were reduced following a decision by the Venezuelan government. TNK-BP disposed of its non-core interests in the Udmurtneft assets. In 2005, BP divested the Teak, Samaan and Poui assets in Trinidad and sold interests in certain properties in the Gulf of Mexico. In addition, BP exchanged the Gulf of Mexico deepwater Blind Faith prospect for Kerr McGees interest in the Arkoma Red Oak and Williburton fields, and TNK-BP disposed of non-core producing assets in the Saratov region. |
d | Volumes relate to six BP-operated fields within ETAP. BP has no interests in the remaining three ETAP fields, which are operated by Shell. |
e | Includes 54 net mboe/d of NGLs from processing plants in which BP has an interest (2006 55mboe/d and 2005 58mboe/d). |
f | The BP group holds interests, through associates, in onshore and offshore concessions in Abu Dhabi, expiring in 2014 and 2018 respectively. During the second quarter of 2007, we updated our reporting policy in Abu Dhabi to be consistent with general industry practice and as a result have started reporting production and reserves there gross of production taxes. This change resulted in an increase in our reserves of 153 million barrels and in our production of 33 thousand barrels per day (mb/d). |
18 | |
Natural gas | % | million cubic feet per day | |||||||
BP net share of productiona | |||||||||
Field or Area | Interest | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||
Lower 48 onshoreb | San Juanc | Various | 694 | 765 | 753 | ||||
Arkomac | Various | 204 | 225 | 198 | |||||
Hugotonc | Various | 123 | 137 | 151 | |||||
Tuscaloosac | Various | 78 | 86 | 111 | |||||
Wamsutterc | 70.5 | 120 | 113 | 110 | |||||
Jonahc | 65.0 | 173 | 133 | 97 | |||||
Other | Various | 458 | 461 | 465 | |||||
Total Lower 48 onshore | 1,850 | 1,920 | 1,885 | ||||||
Gulf of Mexico deepwaterb | Na Kikac | 50.0 | 50 | 97 | 133 | ||||
Marlinc | 78.2 | 13 | 16 | 52 | |||||
Other | Various | 205 | 210 | 235 | |||||
Gulf of Mexico Shelfb | Other | Various | 1 | 66 | 160 | ||||
Total Gulf of Mexico | 269 | 389 | 580 | ||||||
Alaska | Various | Various | 55 | 67 | 81 | ||||
Total US | 2,174 | 2,376 | 2,546 | ||||||
UK offshoreb | Braesd | Various | 69 | 101 | 165 | ||||
Brucec | 37.0 | 72 | 107 | 161 | |||||
West Solec | 100.0 | 55 | 56 | 55 | |||||
Marnockc | 62.0 | 25 | 42 | 47 | |||||
Britannia | 9.0 | 37 | 42 | 46 | |||||
Shearwater | 27.5 | 19 | 31 | 37 | |||||
Armada | 18.2 | 16 | 28 | 30 | |||||
Other | Various | 475 | 529 | 549 | |||||
Total UK | 768 | 936 | 1,090 | ||||||
Netherlandsb | P/18-2c | 48.7 | | 23 | 25 | ||||
Other | Various | 3 | 33 | 37 | |||||
Norway | Various | Various | 26 | 35 | 46 | ||||
Total Rest of Europe | 29 | 91 | 108 | ||||||
Australia | Various | 15.8 | 376 | 364 | 367 | ||||
Canadab | Variousc | Various | 255 | 282 | 307 | ||||
China | Yachengc | 34.3 | 85 | 102 | 98 | ||||
Egypt | Hapyc | 50.0 | 108 | 99 | 106 | ||||
Other | Various | 206 | 172 | 83 | |||||
Indonesia | Sanga-Sanga(direct)c | 26.3 | 75 | 84 | 110 | ||||
Otherc | 46.0 | 81 | 80 | 128 | |||||
Sharjah | Sajaac | 40.0 | 83 | 111 | 113 | ||||
Other | 40.0 | 9 | 9 | 10 | |||||
Azerbaijan | Shah Denizc | 25.5 | 73 | | | ||||
Trinidad & Tobagob | Kapokc | 100.0 | 984 | 946 | 1,005 | ||||
Mahoganyc | 100.0 | 454 | 321 | 303 | |||||
Amherstiac | 100.0 | 155 | 176 | 289 | |||||
Parangc | 100.0 | | 120 | 154 | |||||
Immortellec | 100.0 | 153 | 219 | 132 | |||||
Cassiac | 100.0 | 25 | 30 | 83 | |||||
Otherc | 100.0 | 663 | 453 | 21 | |||||
Otherb | Various | Various | 466 | 441 | 459 | ||||
Total Rest of World | 4,251 | 4,009 | 3,768 | ||||||
Total groupe | 7,222 | 7,412 | 7,512 | ||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) | |||||||||
Argentina Pan American Energy | Various | Various | 379 | 362 | 343 | ||||
Russia TNK-BPb | Various | Various | 451 | 544 | 482 | ||||
Otherb | Various | Various | 91 | 99 | 87 | ||||
Total equity-accounted entitiese | 921 | 1,005 | 912 |
a |
Production excludes royalties due to others whether payable in cash or
in kind where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying
production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements
independently. |
b | In 2007, BP divested its producing properties in the Netherlands and some producing properties in the US Lower 48 and Canada. TNK-BP disposed of its interests in several non-core properties. In 2006, BP divested its producing properties on the Outer Continental Shelf of the Gulf of Mexico and its interest in the Statfjord oil and gas field in the UK. Our interests in the Boqueron, Desarollo Zulia Occidental (DZO) and Jusepin projects in Venezuela were reduced following a decision by the Venezuelan government. TNK-BP disposed of its non-core interests in the Udmurtneft assets. In 2005, BP divested the Teak, Samaan and Poui assets in Trinidad and sold interests in certain properties in the Gulf of Mexico. In addition, BP exchanged the Gulf of Mexico deepwater Blind Faith prospect for Kerr McGees interest in the Arkoma Red Oak and Williburton fields, and TNK-BP disposed of non-core producing assets in the Saratov region. |
c | BP-operated. |
d | Includes 4 million cubic feet per day (mmcf/d) of natural gas received as in-kind tariff payments in 2005. None received in 2006 and 2007. |
e | Natural gas production volumes exclude gas consumed in operations within the lease boundaries of the producing field, but the related reserves are included in the groups reserves. |
19 | |
United
States 2007 liquids production at 513mb/d decreased 6% from 2006, while natural gas production at 2,174mmcf/d decreased 8% compared with 2006. Crude oil production showed a moderate decline of 18mb/d from 2006, with production from new projects (Gulf of Mexico) being offset by divestments and natural reservoir decline. The NGLs component of liquids production decreased by 15mb/d, driven mainly by commercial changes in NGL processing contracts, natural reservoir decline and divestments. Gas production was lower (201mmcf/d) because of divestments and natural reservoir decline. Development expenditure in the US (excluding midstream) during 2007 was $3,861 million, compared with $3,579 million in 2006 and $2,965 million in 2005. The annual increase is the result of various development projects in progress. Our activities within the US take place in three main areas. Significant events during 2007 within each of these are indicated below. |
|
Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Gulf of Mexico is our largest area of growth in the US. In 2007, our deepwater Gulf of Mexico liquids production was 196mb/d and gas production was 268mmcf/d. Significant events were: |
|
– | The Atlantis platform (BP 56% and operator) was successfully commissioned and started producing oil and gas during the fourth quarter of 2007. Atlantis employs the deepest moored platform of its kind in the world and a separate semi-submersible drilling and construction rig. The versatile modular design of the platform provides potential to add wells to increase recovery. |
– | At Thunder Horse (BP 75% and operator), as a result of a metallurgical failure during pre-commissioning checks in 2006, the decision was taken to repair all at-risk subsea components. All relevant components have been removed from the sea floor and progress made in reinstalling the repaired equipment. In 2007, the platforms drilling rig was commissioned and its first well successfully drilled and completed. Thunder Horse is expected to start production by the end of 2008. Designed to process 250,000 barrels of oil per day and 200 million cubic feet per day of natural gas, Thunder Horse is expected to be the largest field in the Gulf of Mexico. The field will be supported by a network of 25 subsea wells. |
– | In November, BP started production from two multi-phase subsea pump stations in the King field (BP 100% and operator). At a depth of 1,700 metres and 15 miles away from the Marlin platform, this sets a double world record for both depth and distance. The two pumps are expected to enhance production from the King field by an average of 20% and to extend the production life of the field by five years through improved recovery. |
– | BP was awarded 88 blocks in the western Gulf of Mexico lease sale and 83 blocks in the central Gulf of Mexico lease sale. |
– | On 6 June 2007, a discovery was made with the Isabela well (BP 67% and operator), located on Mississippi Canyon Block 562 in approximately 2,000 metres of water about 150 miles south-east of New Orleans. |
– | During the second quarter, we increased our ownership in Horn Mountain to 100% as part of an asset exchange agreement with Occidental Petroleum Corporation (Occidental). |
– | In April 2007, BP disposed of its 80% interest in the Entrada field to Callon Petroleum Company for a total price of $190 million. |
Lower 48 states In the Lower 48 states (onshore), our 2007 natural gas production was 1,850mmcf/d, which was down 4% compared with 2006. Liquids production was 108mb/d, down 14% compared with 2006. The year-on-year decrease in production is mainly attributed to normal field decline and divestment activity. In 2007, we drilled approximately 400 wells as operator and continued to maintain a stable programme of drilling activity throughout the year. |
Production is derived primarily from two main areas: | |
– | In the western basins (Colorado, New Mexico and Wyoming) our assets produced 222mboe/d in 2007. |
– | In the Gulf Coast and mid-continental basins (Kansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas) our assets produced 203mboe/d in 2007. |
The development of recovery technology continues to be a fundamental strategy in accessing our North America tight gas resources. Through the use of horizontal drilling and advanced hydraulic fracturing techniques, we are achieving well rates up to 10 times higher than more conventional techniques and per-well recoveries some five times higher. | |
Significant events were: | |
– | In January 2007, we announced our investment of up to $2.4 billion expected over 13 years in the coalbed methane field development project in the San Juan basin in Colorado. The project includes the drilling of more than 700 wells, nearly all from existing well sites, and the installation of associated field facilities. |
– | Drilling continued during 2007 on the Wamsutter natural gas expansion project. The multi-year drilling programme is expected to increase production significantly by the end of 2010. We are currently testing horizontal fracturing technology and carrying out wireless seismic studies on the reservoir. |
– | Significant progress has been made on decommissioning the Gulf of Mexico Shelf hurricane-damaged platforms, which is on track for completion in 2010. This work has been carried out almost exclusively using a diverless access approach, significantly reducing exposure to safety issues associated with diving. Late in 2007, we signed an agreement with Wild Well Control, an affiliate of Superior Energy Services, to sell seven damaged platforms and 59 associated wells and consequentially to transfer the decommissioning liability to them. They will assume responsibility for plugging and abandonment of all wells, salvage and removal or reefing of the damaged platforms and related facilities, and restoration of all sites. |
– | In 2007, BP divested its non-core Permian assets as part of the asset exchange agreement with Occidental. In consideration, BP received the remaining one-third interest in the Horn Mountain field in the Gulf of Mexico and approximately $100 million cash. |
– | In the third quarter of 2007, we ceased operations at the Whitney Canyon gas plant located near Evanston, Wyoming. By doing this we expect to extend the economic life of the field by re-routing the natural gas processed at the Whitney Canyon gas plant to Chevrons Carter Creek gas plant. BP intends to continue to operate the 28 wells in the Whitney Canyon field and the inlet facility, as well as the nearby Painter Complex gas plant. |
Alaska In Alaska, BP net oil production in 2007 was 209mboe/d, a decrease of 7% from 2006, due to normal decline in the large mature fields, partially offset by lower downtime. BP operates 13 North Slope oil fields (including Prudhoe Bay, Northstar and Milne Point) and four North Slope pipelines and owns a significant interest in six other producing fields. BPs 26.4% interest in Prudhoe Bay also includes a large undeveloped natural gas resource. Developing viscous oil production and unlocking large undeveloped heavy oil resources through the application of advanced technology are important parts of the Alaska business strategy. Significant events in 2007 were: |
|
– | On 20 June 2007, the Prudhoe Bay field and the Trans Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) celebrated the 30th anniversary of first production from the North Slope of Alaska. The original expectations for Prudhoe Bay were to drill 500 wells, produce for 20 years and recover 9 billion boe of hydrocarbon resources. After 30 years, more than 2,500 wells have been drilled, more than 11.5 billion boe have been recovered to date, and the field is expected to continue to produce for another 50 years or more. Prudhoe Bay production averaged 400mboe/d (gross) in 2007, with BPs net share being 102mboe/d. Overall, downtime during the year was consistent with plans for normal maintenance activity and there were no large unplanned production disruptions. |
20 | |
– | In 2007, we spent more than $250 million (BP net) in Alaska on a programme to upgrade or replace pipelines, increase inspection and corrosion monitoring, carry out preventative maintenance and repairs, expand capacity, and improve the efficiency of major facilities in all BP-operated fields. |
– | We have also made progress on the replacement of sections of oil transit lines in the Prudhoe Bay field, which for these transit lines has included adding pipeline pigging facilities to clean and inspect pipelines, direct corrosion inhibitor injection, new leak detection and corrosion monitoring systems. We aim to complete this activity in 2008. |
– | On 16 February 2007, BP temporarily shut down its Northstar production facility for 18 days to repair welds in the low pressure gas piping system. The facility was restarted on 6 March. The full-year impact of the production disruption resulting from this shutdown was more than offset by the beneficial impacts of an earlier-than-planned restart of the Milne Point K Pad pipeline replacement and strong reservoir performance throughout 2007 at Prudhoe Bay and Kuparuk. |
– | On 25 October 2007, BP Exploration Alaska (BPXA) entered into a plea agreement with the US Department of Justice (DOJ), which ended both federal and state government criminal investigations of BPXA on matters related to the March and August 2006 oil transit line spills in Alaska. On 29 November 2007, in accordance with the agreement, BPXA pleaded guilty to a misdemeanour violation of the US Federal Water Pollution Control Act. BPXA paid a $12 million (gross) fine and is subject to one-to-three years probation. BPXA also paid restitution of $4 million (gross) to the State of Alaska and paid another $4 million (gross) to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation for Arctic environmental research. The DOJ and the State of Alaska have agreed not to bring any further criminal charges against BPXA in connection with the March and August 2006 spills. |
– | On 2 June 2007, the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act (AGIA) was passed into law. AGIA sets out the terms and conditions for application for the exclusive right to build a natural gas pipeline to transport North Slope gas to market. BP stated publicly that it cannot submit a conforming bid under AGIA because of, in its view, unresolved risks and uncertainties related to project costs, fiscal terms and pipeline tariffs. BP continues to develop and assess options for commercializing the major undeveloped gas resources on Alaskas North Slope. |
– | On 16 November 2007, the Alaska State Legislature passed a new petroleum production tax law, which replaced the Petroleum Production Tax legislation enacted in 2006. The new legislation increases production taxes and is effective retrospectively from 1 July 2007. The key terms of the new production tax law include a base oil tax rate of 25% on net profits, with progressive increases expected in the oil tax rate as the net margin increases above $30/bbl. The new production tax law will be governed by regulations to be defined and promulgated in 2008 by the Alaska State Department of Revenue. |
– | On 26 December 2007, the Alaska Superior Court issued a ruling reversing the 2006 decision by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to terminate the Point Thomson Unit and remanded the matter to the DNR to provide the leaseholders their constitutional due process rights, including the right to a hearing. Although the judges decision found that the DNRs rejection of the latest plan of development (POD) was supported by substantial evidence, the ruling reinstated the leaseholders interests in the Point Thomson leases and unit, and instructed the DNR to consider good and diligent oil and gas . . . production practices in shaping an appropriate remedy for the rejected POD. The DNR is expected to call a hearing during the first quarter of 2008. |
– | On 3 October 2007, the Endicott field achieved its 20th year of production. Since start-up in 1987, Endicott has produced 500mmboe. During 2007, Endicott commenced a technology trial programme that is expected to progress BPs LoSal™Enhanced Oil Recovery process from technology development to technology deployment. LoSal™ is a patented technology that utililizes geochemically specific waters to attack the larger remaining residual oils present after conventional waterflooding. To gain partner approval for a full-field deployment, an |
interwell programme has been started at Endicott. Results from this programme are expected in the second half of 2008 and are expected to lead to a full-field project commitment in 2009. The LoSal2™ technology has implications for many fields beyond BPs Alaska portfolio and the work at Endicott and in Alaska will be extrapolated to BPs global portfolio. | |
– | On 3 January 2008, the US Minerals Management Service approved BPs development and production plan for the Liberty field. During 2007, $25 million was spent on pre-project planning for Liberty, including engineering, environmental studies and permit applications. Development plans for Liberty, which lies offshore to the east of the Endicott field, include ultra-extended reach wells to be drilled from pads at Endicott and processing Liberty oil production through existing Endicott facilities. |
United Kingdom We are the largest producer of oil, second largest producer of gas and the largest overall producer of hydrocarbons in the UK. In 2007, total liquids production was 201mb/d, a 20% decrease on 2006, and gas production was 768mmcf/d, an 18% decrease on 2006. This decrease in production was driven by natural decline and the unplanned shutdown of the Central Area Transmission System (CATS) pipeline. Our activities in the North Sea are focused on safe operations, efficient delivery of production and midstream operations, in-field drilling and selected new field developments. Our development expenditure (excluding midstream) in the UK was $804 million in 2007, compared with $794 million in 2006 and $790 million in 2005. Significant events in 2007 were: |
– | During the second quarter, we announced the decision not to proceed with the decarbonized fuel DF1 project in Scotland. This project was being led by BP, in partnership with Scottish and Southern Energy, and would have produced hydrogen as a decarbonized fuel for use in power generation, with the carbon dioxide (CO2 ) gases being exported to the Miller oil reservoir in the North Sea for increased oil recovery and ultimate storage. Significant investment had been made in front- end engineering and design activity. Development of the project was originally planned to begin at the end of 2006 and required UK government support. In May, the UK government announced that it would not decide which carbon capture storage project to support until 2008 at the earliest. The timing of this decision did not fit with the DF1 project timeline, which was constrained by the maturity of the Miller oil field, and therefore the decision was taken not to proceed. The Miller field, which began production in 1992, has now ceased production and decommissioning activity is in the planning stage. |
– | We sanctioned the Dimlington Onshore Compression and Terminals Integration project, a $250-million investment in new gas compression facilities at the BP-operated Dimlington Terminal, which receives gas from fields in the southern North Sea. This new equipment is expected to reduce pipeline pressure between the offshore fields and the terminal, allowing the gas fields to increase production. BP expects remaining recoverable reserves in the West Sole and Amethyst fields to increase by around 30% as a result of this project. |
– | In October, we announced changes to the structure of the North Sea operations that are intended to simplify the organization and improve the efficiency of work processes in response to the challenges of the increasingly mature North Sea, where declining production and rapidly- rising costs have created business conditions that are not sustainable in the long term. The new structure will mean fewer organizational units and reduced management layers. This will allow consolidation of onshore non-technical support activities, leading to economies of scale and reduced complexity. |
Rest of Europe Development expenditure (excluding midstream) in the Rest of Europe was $443 million, compared with $214 million in 2006 and $188 million in 2005. |
21 | |
Norway In 2007, our total production in Norway was 56mboe/d, a 15% decrease on 2006. This decrease in production was driven by natural decline. Significant activities were: |
|
– | Progress on the Valhall (BP 28.1% and operator) redevelopment project continued during 2007. A new platform is scheduled to become operational in 2010, with expected oil production capacity of 150mb/d and gas handling capacity of 175mmcf/d. |
– | In June, we announced the sanction of the combined Skarv and Idun development. This development is located in the Norwegian Sea approximately 200 kilometres west of Sandnessjøen. The fields will be developed using a Floating Production Storage and Offloading vessel (FPSO), subsea wells and an 80-kilometre gas export pipeline connecting to the Asgard Transport System. |
Netherlands On 1 February 2007, we completed the sale of our exploration and production and gas infrastructure business in the Netherlands to the Abu Dhabi National Energy Company, TAQA. This included onshore and offshore production assets and the onshore gas storage facility, Piek Gas Installatie, at Alkmaar. |
|
Rest of World Development expenditure in Rest of World (excluding midstream) was $5,045 million in 2007, compared with $4,522 million in 2006 and $3,735 million in 2005. |
|
Rest of Americas | |
Canada |
| In Canada, our natural gas and liquids production was 52mboe/d in 2007, a decrease of 9% compared with 2006. The year-on-year decrease in production is mainly due to natural field decline. |
| In January 2008, we sanctioned the Noel Cadomin sweet gas project. A total of 130 wells are planned to be drilled with first production expected in 2009. |
| The Mist Mountain coalbed gas project is in the appraisal stage, which is expected to last for a number of years. The purpose of this stage is to assess the viability of coalbed gas production in British Columbias Crowsnest coalfield by proving technologies and practices that will allow for the design of an environmentally sustainable commercial project. We are seeking British Columbia government approval to access public land for this project. |
| On 5 December 2007, BP announced it had signed a memorandum of understanding with Husky Energy Inc. to form an integrated North American oil sands business. The transaction is expected to be completed by the end of March 2008. |
Trinidad | |
| In Trinidad, natural gas production volumes increased by 7.5% to 2,434mmcf/d in 2007. The increase was delivered as a result of improved operating efficiency leading to increased throughput for Atlantic LNG Train 4, increased demand from the domestic market, full ramp up of the Cannonball field and the start-up of two new fields in 2007. Liquids production declined by 10mb/d (25%) to 30mb/d in 2007 from 40mb/d in 2006 as a result of the natural decline from high condensate fields. |
| The Mango and Cashima fields reached first gas on 17 November 2007 and 15 December 2007 respectively. Mango and Cashima were designed and built in Trinidad using a standardized design with 85% of fabrication hours and 65% of project management hours contributed by local Trinidad workers. |
Venezuela | |
| In Venezuela, due to the transition to the incorporated joint venture (IJV) entities in accordance with Venezuelan regulations that came into force in 2006, 2007 was the first full year of reduced interest. As a result of the aforementioned, and the OPEC quotas, our 2007 liquids production decreased by 10mb/d compared with 2006. |
– | On 26 June 2007, BP agreed to the migration of the Cerro Negro operations to an IJV without diluting its interest and signed a binding memorandum of understanding reflecting agreement to the significant terms and conditions for migration to, and operation of, the IJV. Signature of the final conversion contract, and finalization of the rest of the required procedures, is expected to take place in the first quarter of 2008. |
Colombia | |
| In Colombia, BPs net production averaged 46mboe/d. The reduction of 4mboe/d compared with 2006 is mainly due to natural field decline, partially compensated by additional gas sales. The main part of the production comes from the Cusiana, Cupiagua and Cupiagua South fields, with increasing new production from the Cupiagua extension into the Recetor Association Contract and the Floreña and Pauto fields in the Piedemonte Association Contract. |
| In September, BP was awarded two offshore blocks in the Caribbean that cover approximately 6,200 square kilometres. One block, RC4 (BP 35% and operator), will be a joint venture with state-owned Ecopetrol and Petrobras, while BP will have sole rights to develop the other, RC5 (BP 100% and operator). |
| In December 2006, the Colombian Congress passed new legislation to reduce corporate income taxes from 35% to 34% in 2007 and 33% in 2008. |
| After months of negotiations with Ecopetrol, agreement around extension of the current association contracts was not reached. However, new commercial agreements are in the final stages of negotiation to allow partners to access new investment opportunities. |
Argentina and Bolivia | |
| In Argentina and Bolivia, activity is conducted through Pan American Energy (PAE), in which BP holds a 60% interest, and which is accounted for by the equity method since it is jointly controlled. In 2007, total PAE gross production of 264mboe/d represented an increase of 1% over 2006. This increase came from the continued focus on drilling in Golfo San Jorge in Argentina. The field is now producing at its highest level since inception in 1958 and further expansion programmes are planned. PAE also has interests in gas pipelines, electricity generation plants and other midstream infrastructure assets. |
| On 27 April, PAE entered into an agreement with the Argentine province of Chubut, which provides for the concession term extension and includes certain investment commitments related to exploration and production on the Cerro Dragón block, located in Golfo San Jorge basin. On 25 June, PAE signed a similar agreement with Santa Cruz province. These are the first agreements entered into to extend the term of concessions in Argentina, and were formalized under the framework established by a law recently passed by the Argentine Congress that will allow PAE to undertake long-term projects. |
| On 13 July, PAE signed a loan agreement with the International Finance Corporation (IFC) for the amount of $550 million. This loan will be used to finance a programme of capital investment in the Cerro Dragón block in Argentina. The last tranche will mature in April 2018. |
| On 2 May, following notarization, the new agreements entered into by PAE and other oil and gas companies with Yacimientos Petroliferos Fiscales Bolivianos (YPFB) in Bolivia in November 2006 became effective. These agreements are intended to run until 31 December 2026 and establish the commitment assumed by each of the companies to supply the Bolivian domestic gas market. YPFB will be responsible for marketing all hydrocarbons produced in Bolivia and for determining the terms of relevant gas sales contracts. Along with these changes, the volumes that Chaco (an exploration and production company operated in Bolivia owned 50% by PAE and 50% by YPFB, 30% BP net) is allowed to export have been significantly increased resulting in higher overall gas sales realizations for Chaco. |
| In a continuation of changes made to the export tax since its inception in 2002, the Argentine government issued a resolution in November 2007 increasing the export tax rate on oil when the international crude oil price is US$60.9/bbl or higher. |
22 | |
Africa | |
Algeria | |
| BP, through its joint operatorships of the In Salah Gas (33.15%) and In Amenas (12.50%) projects, supplied 83bcf (BP net) of gas to markets in Algeria and southern Europe during 2007, an increase of 33% from 2006 due to the ramp up of In Amenas during 2007. The CO2 capture system, part of the In Salah project, is one of the worlds largest CO2 capture projects. |
Angola | |
| In Angola, BP net production in 2007 was 139mboe/d, an increase of 5% from 2006 due to the start up of the Greater Plutonio, Marimba and Rosa fields, and the ramp up of Dalia, more than offsetting PSA changes in the Kizomba A, Kizomba B and Girassol fields. |
| The first lifting from the Dalia field (BP 16.67%) was achieved during the first quarter of 2007, with gross field production ramping up to 245mb/d by the end of 2007. The Dalia field was discovered in 1997. It entered project execution phase in the first half of 2003 and production began on 13 December 2006. |
| During the second quarter, the Rosa project (BP 16.67%) achieved first production. Discovered in January 1998, some 135 kilometres off the coast of Angola in water depths of approximately 1,350 metres, the Rosa field is located 15 kilometres away from the Girassol FPSO to which it is tied back. It is the first deepwater field of this size to be tied back to such a remote installation and in such water depths. Rosa is expected to maintain the FPSOs production capacity above 250mb/d until early in the next decade. |
| Oil production at the Greater Plutonio offshore development area in Block 18 began in October 2007. The five fields making up the Greater Plutonio development were discovered between 1999 and 2001 in water depths of up to 1,450 metres and it is the first BP-operated asset in Angola (BP 50% and operator). The development utilizes an FPSO connected to the wells by a large subsea system. The subsea system is expected to ultimately encompass 43 wells and the longest single-riser tower system of its kind in the world. Many components of the project were constructed in Angola including the worlds largest Caternary Anchor Leg Mooring (CALM) buoy. |
| In October, production commenced from the Marimba North project (BP 26.67%), in Block 15. The field is in approximately 1,300 metres of water more than 145 kilometres off the coast of Angola. The Marimba North project is a tie-back to the Kizomba A development. The Marimba North production and control facilities have been integrated with the existing Kizomba A development to effectively and cost efficiently utilize the existing field facilities. Start-up of the field was achieved safely without any production impact to the Kizomba A operations. |
| In the ultra deepwater Block 31 there were three exploration successes, Miranda, Cordelia and Portia, bringing the total for Block 31 to 15. The Miranda well is located in a water depth of approximately 2,436 metres, some 375 kilometres northwest of Luanda. The Cordelia well is located in a water depth of approximately 2,308 metres, some 371 kilometres northwest of Luanda. The Portia well is located in a water depth of approximately 2,012 metres, some 386 kilometres northwest of Luanda. |
| In August, the Pazflor Project in Angola Block 17 (BP 16.67%) was sanctioned. Pazflor will be a standalone FPSO development, the third major production hub in Block 17, and is expected to deliver first oil in 2011. The development will be based on a new-build FPSO with subsea wells, rigid flowlines and subsea processing. |
| In January 2008, production began at the Mondo field (BP 26.67%) in Block 15. Located in water depths of approximately 800 metres, the field utilizes an FPSO and has a total of 36 subsea wells. |
Egypt | |
| In Egypt, BP net production was 97mboe/d, an increase of 10% from 88mboe/d in 2006. This increase was mainly due to an increase in the number of producing wells and the benefit of full-year production from producing wells drilled in 2006. |
| In Egypt, the Gulf of Suez Petroleum Company (GUPCO) (BP 50%), a joint venture operating company between BP and the Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation (EGPC), carries out our operated oil and gas production operations. GUPCO operates eight PSAs in the Gulf of Suez and Western Desert and one PSA in the Mediterranean Sea, encompassing a total of more than 40 fields. |
| Progress continued on the Saqqara field (BP 100%) development project, with first production expected in 2008. |
| Progress continued on the Egypt Gas Phase 1 (Taurt) (BP 50%) development project, with first production expected in 2008. |
| In January 2007, BP drilled a successful well, Giza North-1, in the North Alexandria concession (BP 60% and operator) held by BP, RWE DEA and EGPC/The Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Company (EGAS). The Giza North-1 was drilled in 668 metres of water, some 56 kilometres offshore in the Pliocene formation where BP has made three previous discoveries. |
| In May 2007, BP drilled a successful well, Taurus Deep, in the North Alexandria A Concession (BP 60% and operator) held by BP, RWE DEA and EGPC. The Taurus Deep well was drilled in approximately 400 metres of water, some 70 kilometres offshore, and is in the Middle Miocene formation. |
| In January 2008, BP finished drilling a successful well, Satis-1, in the North El Burg offshore concession (BP 50% and operator) held by BP, IEOC and EGAS. The Satis-1 well was drilled in approximately 90 metres of water, some 50 kilometres offshore, and is in the Oligocene formation. |
| In December 2007, BP had first production from the Denise field where it holds a 50% interest. |
Libya | |
| In May, BP and its partner, the Libyan Investment Corporation (LIC) signed a major exploration and production agreement with Libyas National Oil Company. The initial exploration commitment is set at a minimum of $900 million with significant appraisal and development expenditures dependent on exploration success. BP and the LIC will explore over 53,000 square kilometres of the onshore Ghadames and offshore frontier Sirt basins. Successful exploration could lead to the drilling of around 20 appraisal wells. The agreement was ratified by the Libyan General Peoples Council on 23 December. |
Asia Pacific | |
Indonesia | |
| BP produces crude oil and supplies natural gas to the island of Java through its holding in the Offshore Northwest Java PSA (BP 46%). In 2007, BP net production was 39mboe/d, a decrease of 8.8% from 43mboe/d in 2006 as a result of a higher-than-forecasted base decline, unplanned losses and the impact of higher realizations on the PSA. |
| During 2007, development continued on the Tangguh LNG project (BP 37.2% and operator). The project development includes offshore platforms, pipelines and an LNG plant with two production trains. First commercial delivery is expected in early 2009. |
Vietnam | |
| BP participates in one of the countrys largest projects with foreign investment, the Nam Con Son gas project. This is an integrated resource and infrastructure project, including offshore gas production, a pipeline transportation system and power plant. In 2007, BP net natural gas production was 82mmcf/d gross, a decrease of 15% over 2006. This decrease was mainly due to higher supply from another gas field brought onstream in late 2006. Gas sales from Block 6.1 (BP 35% and operator) are made under a long-term agreement for electricity generation in Vietnam, including the Phu My Phase 3 power plant (BP 33.3%). |
China | |
| In 2007, natural gas production was 85mmcf/d BP net, a decrease of 17% over 2006. This decrease was mainly due to the closure of a Rate Acceleration Agreement with a key customer at the end of 2006. |
23 | |
| The Yacheng offshore gas field (BP 34.3%) supplies, under a long-term contract, 100% of the natural gas requirement of Castle Peak Power Company, which provides around 50% of Hong Kongs electricity. Some natural gas is also piped to Hainan Island, where it is sold to the Fuel and Chemical Company of Hainan, also under a long- term contract. |
| In March, the National Peoples Congress reduced the rate of corporation tax from 33% to 25% with effect from 1 January 2008. |
Australia | |
| In Australia, BP net gas production in 2007 was 376mmcf/d, an increase of 3.3% from 2006 due to increased domestic gas demand in Western Australia. BP net liquids production at 34mb/d remained unchanged from 2006. |
| BP is one of seven partners in the North West Shelf (NWS) venture. Six partners (including BP) hold an equal 16.7% interest in the infrastructure and oil reserves and an equal 15.8% interest in the gas and condensate reserves with a seventh partner owning the remaining 5.32% of gas and condensate reserves. The operation covers offshore production platforms, an FPSO, trunklines and onshore gas processing plants. The NWS venture is currently the principal supplier to the domestic market in Western Australia. During 2007, progress continued on the construction of a fifth LNG train (4.7 million tonnes per year design capacity), with first throughput expected in the second half of 2008. |
Russia | |
TNK-BP | |
| TNK-BP, a joint venture between BP (50%) and Alfa Group and Access-Renova (AAR) (50%), is an integrated oil company operating in Russia and the Ukraine. The TNK-BP groups major assets are held in OAO TNK-BP Holding. Other assets include the BP-branded retail sites in Moscow and the Moscow region and interests in OAO Rusia Petroleum and the OAO Slavneft group. The workforce comprises more than 60,000 people. |
| BPs investment in TNK-BP is held by the Exploration and Production segment and the results of TNK-BP are accounted for under the equity method in this segment. |
| TNK-BP has proved reserves of 6.9 billion barrels of oil equivalent (including its 49.9% equity share of Slavneft), of which 4.5 billion are developed. In 2007, TNK-BPs average liquids production was 1.7mmboe/d, a decrease of just over 5% compared with 2006, reflecting the disposal of the Udmurt asset in 2006. The production base is largely centred in West Siberia (Samotlor, Nyagan and Megion), which contributes about 1.2mmboe/d, together with Volga Urals (Orenburg) contributing some 0.4mmboe/d. About 44% of total oil production is currently exported as crude oil and 19% as refined product. |
| Downstream, TNK-BP has interests in six refineries in Russia and the Ukraine (including Ryazan and Lisichansk and Slavnefts Yaroslavl refinery), with throughput of approximately 35 million tonnes per year. During December 2007, TNK-BP agreed to purchase additional retail and other downstream assets in Russia and the Ukraine from a number of small companies with completion due in 2008. TNK-BP supplies approximately 1,600 branded filling stations in Russia and the Ukraine and, with the additional sites, is expected to have more than 20% market share of the Moscow retail market. |
| In January 2007, TNK-BP announced the purchase of Occidentals 50% interest in the West Siberian joint venture, Vanyoganneft, for $485 million. The transaction closed during the first quarter of 2007 and TNK-BP now owns 100% of the Vanyoganneft asset. |
| On 22 June, BP and TNK-BP signed heads of terms to create strategic business alliances with OAO Gazprom. Under the terms of this agreement, TNK-BP agreed to sell to Gazprom its 62.89% stake in OAO Rusia Petroleum, the company that owns the licence for the Kovykta gas condensate field in East Siberia and its 50% interest in East Siberia Gas Company (ESGCo). BP and TNK-BP have an option to repurchase on market terms up to 25% + 1 share in OAO Rusia |
Petroleum and up to 25% of ESGCo in the event that a strategic business alliance is subsequently established with OAO Gazprom. | |
| In November 2006, following a review of the results of an inspection by the licensing authorities that had resulted in a request for the revocation of the two licences held by TNK-BP subsidiary Rospan International, an agreed rectification plan was put in place. All the Rospan licence compliance issues arising from the inspection by the licensing authorities in 2006 are now substantially resolved. |
Sakhalin | |
| BP participates in the KV licence area in offshore Sakhalin where it conducts exploration activities through Elvaryneftegas (BP 49%), an equity-accounted joint venture with Rosneft. Two discoveries have been made to date in the KV licence area. BP also participates in joint operations in two licence areas with Rosneft in East and West Shmidt (BP 49%). |
| Exploratory drilling continued in 2007 with the drilling of two wells in the West Shmidt licence area. Both wells were found to be dry and, as a result, BP wrote off all expenditures related to the West Shmidt licence area. |
| The 2008 work programme for the Sakhalin licence includes seismic re-processing in the East Shmidt licence area and a 2D seismic acquisition programme in the KV licence area. No drilling is planned for 2008. |
Other | |
Azerbaijan | |
| In Azerbaijan, BP net production in 2007 was 218mboe/d, an increase of 50% from 2006 due to the ramping up of three Azeri oil producing platforms and the Shah Deniz condensate gas platform commencing production in 2007. |
| BP, as operator of the Azerbaijan International Operating Company (AIOC), manages and has a 34.1% interest in the Azeri-Chirag- Gunashli (ACG) oil fields in the Caspian Sea, offshore Azerbaijan. Phase 3 of the project, which will develop the deepwater Gunashli area of ACG, remains on schedule to begin production in 2008 with platform topsides having been completed in September 2007. |
| BP is the operator of Shah Deniz (BP 25.5%), which is in the Azerbaijan sector of the Caspian Sea and will deliver gas to markets in Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey. First gas to Turkey was achieved in July 2007. Production from the field is expected to continue to ramp up as further wells are brought onstream. Plateau production from Stage 1 is expected to be 6.9 billion cubic metres of gas per annum and approximately 30,000 barrels of condensate per day. |
| In November, we announced a further major new gas-condensate discovery in the Shah Deniz field in the Caspian Sea. The SDX-04 exploration and appraisal well, some 70 kilometres south-east of Baku, discovered a new deeper structure below the currently producing reservoir. Drilled to a Caspian-record depth of more than 7,300 metres in the south-western part of Shah Deniz, the well encountered gas condensate in the main target horizons extending the field to the south. The well also discovered a new high pressure reservoir in a deeper structure. |
Middle East and south Asia | |
| Production in the Middle East consists principally of the production entitlement of associates in Abu Dhabi, where we have equity interests of 9.5% and 14.7% in onshore and offshore concessions respectively. In 2007, BPs share of production in Abu Dhabi was 192mb/d, down 3% from 2006 as a result of a major planned maintenance shutdown in the offshore concession in the fourth quarter of 2007. |
| In Pakistan, BP doubled its equity in the onshore Badin asset (BP 84%) as part of an international asset exchange with Occidental. As a result of this transaction, BP net oil production in 2007 was 6.3mboe/d, an increase of 24% from 2006, and BP net gas production was 122mmcf/d, an increase of 39.4% from 2006. |
| In the third quarter of 2007, BP signed a farm-in agreement with Petroleum Exploration (Private) Limited to obtain a 33% participating |
24 | |
interest in Blocks P, J and O in the deepwater Indus basin offshore Pakistan. | |
| In January 2007, BP signed a major PSA with the Sultanate of Oman to appraise sour tight gas reservoirs in Block 61. Major contracts were awarded in November with 3D seismic planned to commence in the first quarter of 2008 and drilling in the fourth quarter of 2008. The full appraisal programme is expected to take up to six years. |
| In September, BP signed a memorandum of understanding with Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd of India regarding co-operation in coalbed methane and deepwater offshore exploration. |
Midstream activities
Oil and natural gas transportation
The group has direct or indirect interests in certain crude oil transportation
systems, the principal ones being the Trans Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS)
in the US and the Forties Pipelines System (FPS) in the UK sector of the
North Sea. We also operate the Central Area Transmission System (CATS)
for natural gas in the UK sector of the North Sea.
BP,
as operator, manages and holds a 30.1% interest in the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
(BTC) oil pipeline. BP, as operator of AIOC, also operates the Western Export
Route Pipeline between Azerbaijan and the Black Sea coast of Georgia and
the Azeri leg of the Northern Export Route Pipeline between Azerbaijan and
Russia. Revenue is earned on pipelines through charging tariffs.
BPs
onshore US crude oil and product pipelines and related transportation assets
are included under
Refining
and Marketing (see page 26).
Assets
and activity during 2007 included:
Alaska | |
| BP owns a 46.9% interest in TAPS, with the balance owned by four other companies. Production transported by TAPS from Alaska North Slope fields averaged 738mb/d during 2007. |
| Work on the strategic reconfiguration project to upgrade and automate four pump stations continued to progress during 2007. This project will install electrically-driven pumps at four critical pump stations, combined with increased automation and upgraded control systems. Two of the reconfigured pump stations came online during 2007, one in the first quarter and another in the fourth quarter. The remaining two reconfigured pump stations are expected to come online sequentially in 2009 and 2010. |
| There are a number of unresolved challenges lodged by instate refiners, Tesoro and Flint Hills, against BP and the other TAPS carriers, regarding intrastate tariffs charged for shipping oil through TAPS. These challenges were filed between 1986 and 2003 with the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA). In 2002, the RCA determined that TAPS transportation rates charged since the beginning of 1997 have been excessive and that refunds should be paid. Proceedings relating to transportation charges covering the period between 1986 and mid-2003, including an appeal by BP and the other TAPS carriers of the RCAs 2002 determination, are progressing through the Alaska judicial system. No significant refunds have been paid pending the resolution of these matters in the courts. In the interim, the RCA has imposed intrastate rates effective from 1 July 2003 that are consistent with its 2002 order. Intrastate transport makes up roughly 7% of total TAPS throughput. |
| Tariffs for interstate and intrastate transportation on TAPS are calculated using the RCA and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)-accepted TAPS Settlement Methodology (TSM) entered into with the State of Alaska in 1985. The State of Alaska, Anadarko and Tesoro have challenged BPs and the other TAPS carriers 2005, 2006 and 2007 interstate tariffs with the FERC, and the State of Alaska and Anadarko have challenged BPs and the other TAPS carriers 2008 tariffs with the FERC. The challengers assert that the interstate transportation rates charged by BP (in accordance with the TSM) and the other TAPS carriers, are excessive and discriminatory and in violation of the Interstate Commerce Act, and that costs related to the TAPS Strategic Reconfiguration project were imprudently incurred. |
That portion of the challenges filed by the State, Anadarko and Tesoro relating to the TAPS Strategic Reconfiguration project costs, together with all aspects of the 2007 challenges, are being held in abeyance by the FERC until its decision on 2005 and 2006 rates is issued. There have been no proceedings in the recently filed challenges to BPs 2008 FERC tariff. The FERCs hearings on the consolidated proceedings commenced in October 2006 and concluded in January 2007. On 17 May 2007, a FERC Administrative Law Judge issued an Initial Decision as to 2005 and 2006 rates. This Initial Decision, which was adverse to BP and the other TAPS carriers, is now under consideration by the FERC Commissioners, who will issue the decision of the FERC. Pending the decision of the FERC Commissioners, BP is continuing to collect its TSM-based interstate tariffs; however, our tariffs are subject to refund depending on the decision of the FERC. Interstate transport makes up roughly 93% of total TAPS throughput. | |
North Sea | |
| FPS (BP 100%) is an integrated oil and NGLs transportation and processing system that handles production from more than 50 fields in the Central North Sea. The system has a capacity of more than 1 million barrels per day, with average throughput in 2007 at 653mb/d. The tie-in of the Buzzard field was completed, with first Buzzard production flowing through the system in January 2007. The Greater Kittiwake Area also joined the system in late 2007. |
| BP operates and has a 29.5% interest in CATS, a 400-kilometre natural gas pipeline system in the central UK sector of the North Sea. The pipeline has a transportation capacity of 1,700mmcf/d to a natural gas terminal at Teesside in north-east England. CATS offers natural gas transportation and processing services. In 2007, throughput was 778mmcf/d (gross), 230mmcf/d (net). During September, the CATS pipeline resumed operation after divers installed a metal sleeve at the location where a large vessel had dragged its anchor causing damage to the pipeline. The pipeline was shutdown for 10 weeks resulting in a loss of production of 11mboe/d for the year. |
| BP operates the Dimlington/Easington gas processing terminal (BP 100%) on Humberside and the Sullom Voe oil and gas terminal in Shetland. |
Asia (including the former Soviet Union) | |
| BP, as operator, manages and holds a 30.1% interest in the BTC oil pipeline. The 1,768-kilometre pipeline has a capacity of 1mmboe/d from the BP-operated ACG oil field in the Caspian Sea to the eastern Mediterranean port of Ceyhan. In the first quarter of 2007, the BTC pipeline celebrated the loading of its 100-millionth barrel at the Ceyhan terminal and loaded its 250th tanker in October 2007. |
| Transportation of first gas to Turkey from Shah Deniz in Azerbaijan via the South Caucasus Pipeline was achieved in July 2007. BP is technical operator and holds a 25.5% interest. |
| Through the LukArco joint venture, BP holds a 5.75% interest (with a 25% funding obligation) in the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) pipeline. CPC is a 1,510-kilometre pipeline from Kazakhstan to the Russian port of Novorossiysk and carries crude oil from the Tengiz field (BP 2.3%). In addition to our interest in LukArco, we hold a separate 0.87% interest (3.5% funding obligation) in CPC through a 49% holding in Kazakhstan Pipeline Ventures. In 2007, CPC total throughput reached 33.03 million tonnes. During 2007, shareholders agreed to restore the profitability of CPC by increasing the CPC tariff and cutting interest rates on shareholder loans. Negotiations continued between the CPC shareholders on an expansion plan and a plan for financial restructuring. The expansion would require the construction of 10 additional pump stations, additional storage facilities and a third offshore mooring point. |
Liquefied natural gas
Within
BP, Exploration and Production is responsible for the supply of LNG. BPs
Exploration and Production segment has interests in four major LNG plants: the
Atlantic
LNG plant in Trinidad (BP 34% in Train 1, 42.5%
in each of Trains 2 and 3 and 37.8% in Train 4); in Indonesia,
25 | |
through our interests in the Sanga-Sanga PSA (BP 38%), which supplies natural gas to the Bontang LNG plant, and Tangguh PSA (BP 37.2%), which is under construction; and in Australia through our share of LNG from the NWS natural gas development (BP 16.7% infrastructure and oil reserves and 15.8% gas and condensate reserves). | ||
Assets and activity during 2007 included: | ||
– | In Trinidad, the Atlantic LNG Train 4 (BP 37.8%) is the largest producing LNG train in the world and is designed to produce 5.2 million tonnes (253,000mmcf) per year of LNG. BP expects to continue to supply at least two-thirds of the gas to the train. The Atlantic LNG Trains 2, 3, and 4 facilities are operated under a tolling arrangement, with the equity owners retaining ownership of their respective gas. The LNG is sold in the US, Dominican Republic and other destinations. BPs net share of the capacity of Atlantic LNG Trains 1, 2, 3 and 4 is 6.5 million tonnes (310,000mmcf) of LNG per year. | |
– | In Indonesia, BP is involved in two of the three LNG centres in the country. BP participates in Indonesias LNG exports through its holdings in the Sanga-Sanga PSA (BP 38%). Sanga-Sanga currently delivers around 14% of the total gas feed to Bontang, one of the worlds largest LNG plants. The Bontang plant produced 18.4 million tonnes (831,000mmcf) of LNG in 2007, compared with 19.5 million tonnes in 2006. | |
– | Also in Indonesia, BP has interests in the Tangguh LNG joint venture (BP 37.2% and operator) and in each of the Wiriagar (BP 38% and operator), Berau (BP 48% and operator) and Muturi (BP 1%) PSAs in north-west Papua that are expected to supply feed gas to the Tangguh LNG plant. During 2007, construction continued on two |
trains, with commercial delivery planned in early 2009. Tangguh will be the third LNG centre in Indonesia, with an initial capacity of 7.6 million tonnes (388,000mmcf) per year. Tangguh has signed sales contracts for delivery to China, Korea and North Americas west coast. | |
– | In Australia, we are one of seven partners in the NWS venture. Six partners (including BP) hold an equal 16.7% interest in the infrastructure and oil reserves and an equal 15.78% interest in the gas and condensate reserves, with a seventh partner owning the remaining 5.32% of gas and condensate reserves. The joint venture operation covers offshore production platforms, an FPSO, trunklines, onshore gas and LNG processing plants and LNG carriers. Construction continued during 2007 on a fifth LNG train that is expected to process 4.7 million tonnes of LNG per year and is expected to increase the plants capacity to 16.6 million tonnes per year. The train is expected to be commissioned during the second half of 2008. NWS produced 1.96 million tonnes (102,000mmcf) of LNG, equal to 2006 production. |
– | We have a 10% equity shareholding in the Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Company, which in 2007 supplied 5.6 million tonnes (272,710mmcf) of LNG, up 4.2% on 2006. |
– | BP has a 13.6% share in the Angola LNG project, which is expected to receive approximately one billion cubic feet of associated gas per day from offshore producing blocks and produce 5.2 million tonnes per year of LNG, as well as related gas liquids products, with first LNG expected in 2012. With the completion of the necessary agreements and the approval of the Angolan government, the project investors have authorized Angola LNG Limited to proceed with the construction and implementation of the project. |
26 | |
Refining and Marketing |
Our Refining and Marketing business is responsible for the supply and trading, refining, manufacturing, marketing and transportation of crude oil, petroleum and chemicals products to wholesale and retail customers. BP markets its products in more than 100 countries. We operate primarily in Europe and North America but also manufacture and market our products across Australasia and in parts of Asia, Africa and Central and South America.
Key statistics | $ million | ||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |
Sales
and other operating revenues for continuing operations |
250,866 | 232,855 | 213,326 |
Profit
before interest and tax from continuing operationsa |
6,072 | 5,541 | 6,426 |
Total assets | 95,691 | 80,964 | 77,485 |
Capital expenditure and acquisitions | 5,586 | 3,144 | 2,860 |
|
|||
$ per barrel | |||
Global Indicator Refining Marginb | 9.94 | 8.39 | 8.60 |
|
a | Profit before interest and tax from continuing operations includes profit after interest and tax of equity-accounted entities. |
b | The Global Indicator Refining Margin (GIM) is the average of regional industry indicator margins, which we weight for BPs crude refining capacity in each region. Each regional indicator margin is based on a single representative crude with product yields characteristic of the typical level of upgrading complexity. The refining margins are industry-specific rather than BP-specific measures, which we believe are useful to investors in analyzing trends in the industry and their impact on our results. The margins are calculated by BP based on published crude oil and product prices and take account of fuel utilization and catalyst costs. No account is taken of BPs other cash and non-cash costs of refining, such as wages and salaries and plant depreciation. The indicator margin may not be representative of the margins achieved by BP in any period because of BPs particular refining configurations and crude and product slate. |
The key components of sales and other operating revenues are explained in more detail below.
$ million | |||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |
Sale
of crude oil through spot and term contracts |
43,004 | 38,577 | 36,992 |
Marketing,
spot and term sales of refined products |
194,979 | 177,995 | 155,098 |
Other
sales including non-oil and to other segments |
12,883 | 16,283 | 21,236 |
250,866 | 232,855 | 213,326 | |
|
|||
thousand barrels per day | |||
Sale
of crude oil through spot and term contracts |
1,885 | 2,110 | 2,464 |
Marketing,
spot and term sales of refined products |
5,624 | 5,801 | 5,888 |
|
The Refining and Marketing segment includes Refining, Fuels Marketing, Lubricants and Aromatics & Acetyls. Our strategy is to continue our focused investment in key assets and market positions with an increased focus on process safety, integrity and reliability following the operational issues at the Texas City and Whiting refineries. We aim to improve the quality and capability of our manufacturing portfolio. During the past five years, this has been taking place through upgrades of existing conversion units at several of our facilities and investment in new clean fuels units at most of our refineries. In 2007, we completed a major upgrade to the olefin cracker at the Gelsenkirchen refinery in Germany and an upgrade of an existing diesel hydrotreater at the Rotterdam refinery in the Netherlands. During the next five years, we expect to upgrade further our refining portfolio through the construction of a new coker at the Castellón refinery, a planned and announced investment in the Whiting refinery to increase its ability to process Canadian heavy crude, upgrades to diesel and gasoline desulphurization capability at the Rotterdam refinery in the Netherlands, the installation of modern naphtha reforming
technology at several refineries globally, the site reconfiguration and installation of a new hydrocracker at the Bayernoil refinery in Germany and the full recommissioning of the Texas City refinery in the US. | |
Our marketing businesses generate customer value by providing quality products and offers. Our retail network provides differentiated fuel and convenience offers to some of the most attractive markets. Our lubricants brands offer customers benefits through technology and relationships and we focus on increasing brand and product loyalty in Castrol lubricants. We continue to build deep customer relationships and strategic partnerships in the business-to-business sector. Marketing also includes the Aromatics & Acetyls business, which maintains world-class manufacturing positions globally, with an emphasis on the Asian market, particularly in China. At the end of 2007, the business increased its capacity in China by successfully commencing the commissioning of a new 900 thousand tonnes per annum (ktepa) worldscale purified terephthalic acid (PTA) plant at Zhuhai. | |
The segment manages a portfolio of assets that we believe are competitively advantaged across the chain of downstream activities. Such advantage may derive from several factors, including location (such as the proximity of manufacturing assets to markets), operating cost and physical asset quality. | |
We are one of the major refiners of gasoline and hydrocarbon products in the US, Europe and Australia. We have significant retail and business-to-business market positions in the US, UK, Germany and the rest of Europe, Australasia, Africa and Asia. We are enhancing our presence in China and exploring opportunities in India. | |
During 2007, significant events were: | |
– | BP continued recommissioning the Texas City refinery in the US. By the end of 2007, we had successfully recommissioned the three desulphurization and upgrading units necessary to allow restart of the remaining crude distillation capacity. The final sour crude unit is mechanically complete and is expected to be fully operational during the first quarter of 2008. By mid-2008, we expect most of the economic capability at the Texas City refinery to have been restored. |
– | On 23 March 2007, a fire at the Whiting refinery in the US caused damage to the hydrogen compressors and limited the sites throughput and ability to make low-sulphur gasoline or diesel fuel from sour crude oil. By the end of 2007, the Whiting refinery had recommenced sour crude processing and available distillation capacity exceeded 300,000b/d. |
– | On 1 February 2007, BP announced it had selected the University of California Berkeley, and its partners the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, to join in the previously announced $500-million research programme to explore how bioscience can be used to increase energy production and reduce the impact of energy consumption on the environment. |
– | On 31 March 2007, BP completed its acquisition of Chevrons Netherlands manufacturing company, Texaco Raffinaderij Pernis B.V., for $1.1 billion. The acquisition included Chevrons 31% interest in the Rotterdam (Nerefco) refinery. |
– | On 31 May 2007, BP completed the sale of its Coryton refinery in the UK to Petroplus Holdings AG for consideration of $1.4 billion, plus working capital. |
– | On 26 June 2007, BP, Associated British Foods and DuPont announced an investment of $400 million in the construction of a world-scale bioethanol plant with expected annual production capacity of some 420 million litres from wheat feedstock, expected to be commissioned in late 2009. |
– | On 29 June 2007, BP announced a joint venture with D1 Oils plc, a UK-based global producer of biodiesel, for the development of jatropha as a new energy crop. |
– | On 15 November 2007, BP announced that it would sell all of its company-owned and company-operated convenience sites in the US. The majority of sites will be sold to franchisees with the remaining sites sold to dealers and large distributors (jobbers). The sale of the sites is expected to be completed by the end of 2009. The sites will continue to market BP-branded fuels in the eastern US and ARCO- branded fuels in the western US. The franchise agreement is for 20 |
27 | |
years and requires sites to be supplied with BP or ARCO-branded fuels for the term of the contract. | |
– | In December 2007, the second PTA plant at the BP Zhuhai Chemical Company Limited site in Guangdong province, China, successfully commenced commissioning. |
– | On 5 December 2007, BP announced it had agreed to create an integrated North American oil sands business with Husky Energy Inc., by means of two separate joint ventures. In one, BP will take a 50% interest in Husky Energys Sunrise field in Alberta, Canada, while in the other, Husky will take a 50% interest in BPs Toledo refinery, between them forming an integrated North American oil sands business. As part of this agreement, and subject to negotiation of final agreements and obtaining the necessary approvals and permits, the Toledo refinery is intended to be expanded to process approximately 170mb/d of heavy oil and bitumen by 2015. |
– | BP continued to progress the planning for the previously mentioned investment in Canadian heavy crude oil processing capability at its Whiting refinery. This project is expected to reposition Whiting competitively as a top-tier refinery by increasing its Canadian heavy crude processing capability by 260mb/d and modernizing it with equipment of significant size and scale. |
– | In mid-January 2008, BP and Sinopec signed a memorandum of understanding to add a new 650ktepa acetic acid plant at their YARACO joint venture in Chongqing, upstream Yangtze River, south- west China. This world-scale acetic acid plant, using BPs leading Cativa™ technology, is expected to come onstream in 2011. |
Resegmentation in 2008 | |
With effect from 1 January 2008: | |
– | The Emerging Consumers Marketing Unit was transferred from Refining and Marketing to Alternative Energy (which is reported in Other businesses and corporate). |
– | The Biofuels business was transferred from Refining and Marketing to Alternative Energy (which is reported in Other businesses and corporate). |
– | The Shipping business was transferred from Refining and Marketing to Other businesses and corporate. |
Texas City refinery
On 23 March 2005, an explosion and fire at the Texas City refinery occurred in
the isomerization unit as the unit was starting up after routine planned maintenance.
The incident claimed the
lives of 15 workers and injured many others.
Throughout
2007, BP continued to implement the process safety enhancement programme
it initiated in response to the March
2005 incident, which included policies, practices and activities to address a
number of the factors that contributed to the incident, including the siting
of occupied portable buildings and the removal of blow-down stacks handling heavier-than-air
light hydrocarbons. BP also implemented,
across its US refining system and at other facilities worldwide, a number of
additional actions relating to safety and operations, atmospheric relief valves,
operating procedures and training, control of work systems, and process safety
culture and leadership. In the US, BP has committed to increase spending to an
average of $1.7 billion per year through 2010 to improve the integrity and reliability of its refining assets and has created an operations advisory board to assist BP America
Inc.s management in monitoring and assessing BPs US operations.
Governmental investigations
In 2007, BP continued its co-operation with the governmental entities investigating
the Texas City incident, including the US Department of Justice (DOJ), the US
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the US Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), the US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board
(CSB) and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). On 25 October
2007, the DOJ announced that it had
entered into a criminal plea agreement with BP Products North America Inc. (BP
Products) related to the March 2005 explosion and fire. On 4 February 2008, BP
Products pleaded guilty in
federal court, pursuant
to the plea agreement, to one felony violation of the risk management planning
regulations promulgated under the
US federal
Clean Air Act. At the plea hearing, the court advised that it would take the
matter under review and decide whether to accept or reject the plea. If the
court accepts the agreement, BP Products will pay a $50 million criminal fine and serve three years probation.
Separately, BP Products reached a civil settlement in principle with the EPA
and the DOJ related to issues identified in EPA inspections that followed the
March 2005 incident. BP expects the settlement to be finalized in 2008.
The
CSB issued its final report on the Texas City incident in March 2007. Although
BP disagreed with some of the
findings and conclusions in the report, BP gave full and careful consideration
to the CSBs recommendations and committed to implement actions in alignment with each of the CSBs
recommendations. BP has many activities under way, including activities around
reporting health and safety and operational incidents, and incident investigation,
in response to the recommendations of the BP US Refineries Independent Safety
Review Panel (the panel) (see below) to improve process safety, both at Texas
City (as recommended by the CSB) and across the group. BP and the CSB continue
to discuss BPs responses with the objective of the CSB agreeing to
close out its recommendations.
Civil tort actions
A
large number of civil claims have arisen from the Texas City incident, for which
BP has set aside $2,125 million in aggregate. Thus
far, BP has reached more than 2,000 settlements in respect of all the fatalities
and many of the personal injury claims arising from the incident. A number
of claims remain to be resolved.
See Legal proceedings on page 82 for further information.
Report of the BP US Refineries Independent Safety Review Panel
The panel was established by BP in 2005 at the recommendation of the CSB to
assess the effectiveness of safety management
systems at BPs five US refineries and the corporate safety culture. The panel, which was chaired by the former US Secretary of State, James A Baker, III, issued its report in January 2007. Although the panel did not specifically investigate
the Texas City incident or seek to determine its causes, the report contained observations applicable to all of BPs US refineries, including Texas City. The panels report acknowledged the measures taken by BP since the Texas City
incident, including dedicating significant resources and personnel in an effort to improve the process safety performance of BPs US refineries. The panels
report can be found at www.bp.com/bakerpanelreport. BP accepted the 10
recommendations of the panel and began (or, in some cases, continued) improvement
activities
addressing a number of the recommendations, including consistent implementation
of risk identification tools, improvements in incident reporting and investigation
systems, and enhancements to the groups reporting and monitoring
programmes. At the panels recommendation, in May 2007, the BP board also appointed an independent expert to monitor progress in implementing the panels recommendations to improve safety performance at BPs US refineries. The
independent expert, L. Duane Wilson, who was a member of the panel, reports directly to the BP boards
safety, ethics and environment assurance committee.
In
addition to these direct responses
to the panels recommendations, BP has also taken a number of additional steps that are in line with the spirit of the
panels report. BP has developed a comprehensive programme to implement the panels
recommendations within its US refining system and to share learnings from the
panel throughout the refining system. This programme makes use of the newly developed
group-wide operating management system (OMS). Each refinery is creating an implementation
plan to reduce process safety risk on a continuous improvement basis and to provide
for the future implementation of OMS. In 2007, BP also reached an
agreement in principle with the United Steel Workers Union to work jointly on
a 10-point plan to improve process safety across the four represented US refineries.
28 | |
Other regulatory actions
OSHA
In
January 2007, OSHA began a new inspection at the Texas City refinery focusing
on relief valves, flare capacity and other process safety
issues at one of the catalytic cracking units. OSHA issued citations in
July 2007 with a total penalty of $92,000. Separately, OSHA has questioned whether the process safety management expert (AcuTech), appointed in connection with the September 2005 settlement agreement with OSHA, adequately
reviewed equipment pressure relief valve issues. BP has entered into negotiations to resolve the cracking unit citations and, in the interim, has agreed to the assignment of this case to a settlement judge. On 16 January 2008, BP addressed
OSHAs concerns regarding the September 2005 settlement agreement by agreeing to retain an expert relief system consultant to audit individual hydrocarbon relief devices and flare systems on two units and to share the consultants
findings
with OSHA.
In
September 2007, BP and OSHA entered into a settlement agreement related
to citations stemming from OSHAs
inspection of the Toledo refinery in 2005. OSHA granted final approval
of the settlement
in November 2007.
BP
is attempting to negotiate a settlement relating to citations, with a total
penalty of $384,000, stemming from Indiana OSHAs inspection of the
Whiting refinery in 2006, but the case is still pending. In August 2007, Indiana OSHA initiated a separate inspection relating to an April 2007 incident that resulted in a crude unit shutdown and the release of 40,000 pounds of hydrocarbons. On 30
January 2008, OSHA issued a safety order that alleges two violations, for a total penalty of $10,000.
OSHA
conducted an inspection related to the death of a contract diver at the Cherry
Point refinery in August 2007. OSHA concluded its
investigation in October 2007 and informed BP that no citations would be issued
to it.
In
January 2008, an employee died at Texas City refinery. This incident is currently
being investigated by BP, OSHA and the CSB.
EPA
The EPA has asked the DOJ to file a civil lawsuit based on inspections it conducted
at the Whiting, Toledo, Cherry Point and Carson refineries following the
March 2005 Texas City incident. BP Products and the EPA/ DOJ have begun
settlement negotiations in an effort to avoid litigation of the matter.
Refining
The
groups global refining strategy is to own and operate strategically advantaged refineries that benefit from vertical integration with our marketing and trading operations, as well
as horizontal integration with other parts of the groups business. Refinings
focus is to maintain and improve its competitive position through sustainable,
safe, reliable and efficient operations of the refining system and disciplined
investment for growth.
For
BP, the strategic advantage of a refinery relates to its location, scale
and configuration to produce fuels from lower-cost feedstocks in line with
the demand of the region. Strategic investments in our refineries are focused
on securing the safety and reliability of our assets while improving our
competitive position. In addition, we continue to invest to develop the capability
to produce the
cleaner fuels that meet the requirements of our customers and their communities.
29 | |
The following table summarizes the BP groups interests in refineries and crude distillation capacities at 31 December 2007.
thousand barrels per day | ||||||||
Crude distillation capacitiesa | ||||||||
Refinery |
Group interestb % |
Total |
BP share |
|||||
Rest of Europe | ||||||||
Germany | Bayernoil | 22.5% | 272 | 61 | ||||
Gelsenkirchen* | 50.0% | 268 | 134 | |||||
Karlsruhe | 12.0% | 302 | 36 | |||||
Lingen* | 100.0% | 91 | 91 | |||||
Schwedt | 18.8% | 226 | 42 | |||||
Netherlands | Rotterdam* | 100.0% | 392 | 392 | ||||
Spain | Castellón* | 100.0% | 110 | 110 | ||||
Total Rest of Europe | 1,661 | 866 | ||||||
US | ||||||||
California | Carson* | 100.0% | 266 | 266 | ||||
Washington | Cherry Point* | 100.0% | 234 | 234 | ||||
Indiana | Whiting* | 100.0% | 405 | 405 | ||||
Ohio | Toledo*c | 100.0% | 155 | 155 | ||||
Texas | Texas City* | 100.0% | 475 | 475 | ||||
Total US | 1,535 | 1,535 | ||||||
Rest of World | ||||||||
Australia | Bulwer* | 100.0% | 101 | 101 | ||||
Kwinana* | 100.0% | 137 | 137 | |||||
New Zealand | Whangerei | 23.7% | 102 | 24 | ||||
Kenya | Mombasad | 17.1% | 94 | 16 | ||||
South Africa | Durban | 50.0% | 180 | 90 | ||||
Total Rest of World | 614 | 368 | ||||||
Total | 3,810 | 2,769 | ||||||
* | Indicates refineries operated by BP. |
a | Crude distillation capacity is gross rated capacity, which is defined as the maximum achievable utilization of capacity (24-hour assessment) based on standard feed. |
b | BP share of equity, which is not necessarily the same as BP share of processing entitlements. |
c | Subject to negotiation
of final agreements and obtaining the necessary approval and permits,
Husky Energy will
take a 50% interest in BPs Toledo refinery as described on
page 27. |
d | On 15 January 2008, it was announced that Essar Energy Overseas Ltd, a subsidiary of Essar Oil Limited, had entered into an agreement to acquire 50% of Kenya Petroleum Refineries Ltd. Subject to certain conditions, the acquisition, which includes all of BPs interest, is expected to complete in early 2008. |
The following table outlines by region the volume of crude oil and feedstock processed by BP for its own account and for third parties. Corresponding BP refinery capacity utilization data is summarized.
thousand barrels per day | ||||||
Refinery throughputsa | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||
UK | 67 | 165 | 180 | |||
Rest of Europe | 691 | 648 | 667 | |||
US | 1,064 | 1,110 | 1,255 | |||
Rest of World | 305 | 275 | 297 | |||
Total | 2,127 | 2,198 | 2,399 | |||
Refinery capacity utilization | ||||||
Crude distillation capacity at 31 Decemberb | 2,769 | 2,823 | 2,832 | |||
Crude distillation capacity utilizationc | 72% | 76% | 87% | |||
US | 62% | 70% | 82% | |||
Europe | 84% | 87% | 90% | |||
Rest of World | 84% | 78% | 88% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a | Refinery throughputs reflect crude and other feedstock volumes. |
b | Crude distillation capacity is gross rated capacity, which is defined as the maximum achievable utilization of capacity (24-hour assessment) based on standard feed. |
c | Crude distillation capacity utilization is defined as the percentage utilization of capacity per calendar day over the year after making allowances for average annual shutdowns at BP refineries (i.e. net rated capacity). |
At the Texas City refinery, the recommissioning work in the aftermath of Hurricane
Rita has involved the development of detailed plans to effect the repair, safety-upgrading
and safe restart of the process units. The refinery has restarted many process
units and the site is producing gasoline, diesel and chemicals products for
the US market. By the end of 2007, we had successfully recommissioned the three
desulphurization and upgrading units necessary to allow restart of the remaining
crude distillation capacity. The final sour crude unit is mechanically complete
and is expected to be fully operational during the first quarter of 2008. By
mid-2008 we expect most of the economic capability at the Texas City refinery
to have been restored.
Despite
the partial recommissioning of the Texas City refinery, our US throughputs declined
in 2007 due to several operational issues, including the March 2007 fire at the
Whiting refinery as well as planned maintenance at our other refineries. By the
end of 2007, the Whiting refinery had recommenced sour crude processing and available
distillation capacity exceeded 300,000b/d.
The
increase in Rest of Europe throughputs in 2007 is primarily related to
the purchase of Chevrons 31% interest in
the Rotterdam refinery. The decrease in UK throughputs is due to the sale of
the Coryton refinery to Petroplus.
30 | |
Marketing
Marketing
comprises three business areas: Fuels marketing (including ground, aviation and
marine fuels, bitumen and LPG), Lubricants (including
automotive, marine and industrial lubricants)
and Aromatics & Acetyls. We market a comprehensive range of refined products, including gasoline, gasoil, marine and aviation fuels, heating fuels, LPG, lubricants and bitumen. We also manufacture and market PTA, paraxylene (PX) and acetic acid
through our Aromatics & Acetyls business.
thousand barrels per day | ||||||
Sales of refined productsa | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||
Marketing sales | ||||||
UKb | 339 | 356 | 355 | |||
Rest of Europe | 1,294 | 1,340 | 1,354 | |||
US | 1,533 | 1,595 | 1,634 | |||
Rest of World | 640 | 581 | 599 | |||
Total marketing salesc | 3,806 | 3,872 | 3,942 | |||
Trading/supply salesd | 1,818 | 1,929 | 1,946 | |||
Total refined products | 5,624 | 5,801 | 5,888 | |||
$ million | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of refined products | 194,979 | 177,995 | 155,098 | |||
|
a | Excludes sales to other BP businesses and sales of Aromatics & Acetyls products. |
b | UK area includes the UK-based international activities of Refining and Marketing. |
c | Marketing sales are sales to service stations, end-consumers, bulk buyers and jobbers (i.e. third parties who own networks of a number of service stations and small resellers). |
d | Trading/supply sales are sales to large unbranded resellers and other oil companies. |
The following table sets out marketing sales by major product group.
thousand barrels per day | ||||||
Marketing sales by refined product | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||
Aviation fuel | 490 | 488 | 499 | |||
Gasolines | 1,572 | 1,603 | 1,603 | |||
Middle distillates | 1,119 | 1,170 | 1,185 | |||
Fuel oil | 429 | 388 | 379 | |||
Other products | 196 | 223 | 276 | |||
Total marketing sales | 3,806 | 3,872 | 3,942 | |||
Marketing volumes were 3,806mb/d, slightly lower than last year, reflecting reduced
industry demand in Europe and supply disruptions caused by the outage at Whiting
refinery.
BP
enjoys a strong market share and
leading technologies in the Aromatics & Acetyls business. In Asia, we continue
to develop a strong position in PTA and acetic acid. Our investment is biased
towards this high-growth region, especially China.
BP
supports its businesses through a dedicated Strategic Accounts organization.
Strategic Accounts develops strategic relationships with carefully selected large
multinational customers in targeted markets, where mutual strategic and financial
value can be created. Its operating model manages each relationship in a disciplined
manner to achieve growth and efficiency for BP and its partners through focused
offer development and capability building.
Fuels marketing
Our Fuels marketing strategy focuses on optimising the fuels value chain and
delivering refined products to the market. We do this by co-ordinating our marketing,
refining and trading activities to maximize synergies across the whole value
chain. Our priorities are to operate an advantaged infrastructure and logistics
network, drive excellence in operating and transactional processes and deliver
compelling customer offers in the
various markets where we operate. The fuels business markets a comprehensive
range of refined oil products focused on ground fuels, aviation, marine and bitumen
sectors.
Ground fuels
The ground fuels business supplies fuel to retail consumers through company-owned
and franchised retail sites as well as other channels
including wholesalers and jobbers. It also supplies commercial customers within the road and rail transport sectors.
BPs
value creation in ground fuels is obtained through the integration of the
value chain from the refinery
gates or import hubs across retail and commercial channels to market. Convenience
retail offers are managed as an autonomous business model focused on delivering
appealing convenience offers across the various markets in which we operate,
through the BP Connect, am/pm and Aral
brands.
Our
retail network is largely concentrated in Europe and the US, with established
operations in Australasia and southern and eastern Africa. We are also developing
networks in China with joint venture partners.
$ million | ||||||
Store salesa | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||
UK | 713 | 647 | 628 | |||
Rest of Europe | 2,974 | 2,821 | 3,069 | |||
US | 1,712 | 1,755 | 1,776 | |||
Rest of World | 670 | 591 | 610 | |||
Total | 6,069 | 5,814 | 6,083 | |||
Direct-managed | 2,609 | 2,528 | 2,489 | |||
Franchise | 3,460 | 3,286 | 3,533 | |||
Store alliances | | | 61 | |||
Total | 6,069 | 5,814 | 6,083 | |||
a |
Store sales reported are sales through direct-managed stations, franchisees and the BP share of store alliances and joint ventures. Sales figures exclude sales taxes and lottery sales but include quick-service restaurant sales. Fuel sales are not included in these figures. Not all retail sites include a BP convenience store. |
Number of retail sites | ||||||
Retail sitesa | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||
UK | 1,200 | 1,300 | 1,300 | |||
Rest of Europe | 7,400 | 7,700 | 7,900 | |||
US (excluding jobbers) | 2,500 | 2,700 | 3,100 | |||
US jobbers | 9,700 | 9,600 | 9,700 | |||
Rest of World | 3,300 | 3,300 | 3,200 | |||
Total | 24,100 | 24,600 | 25,200 | |||
|
a |
Retail sites includes all sites operated under a BP brand. Changes in the number of retail sites over time are affected by, among other things, dealer/jobber-owned sites that move to or from the BP brand as their fuel supply agreements expire and are renegotiated in the normal course of business. |
At 31 December 2007, BPs
worldwide network consisted of some 24,000 locations branded BP, Amoco, ARCO
and Aral, around the same as
in the previous year.
At
31 December 2007, BPs retail
network in the US comprised approximately 12,200 sites, of which approximately
9,700 were owned by jobbers and 500 by franchisees. Our European network amounted
to approximately 8,600 sites with a further approximately 3,300 sites in Rest
of World. The joint venture between BP and PetroChina (BP-PetroChina Petroleum
Company Ltd) started its operation in 2004. The
joint venture plans to operate and manage a total network of 500 locations in
the Guangdong province and 400 sites were operational as at 31 December 2007.
The joint venture with Sinopec commenced operations in 2005. The joint venture
plans to build, operate and manage a network of 500 sites in Hangzhou, Ningbo
and Shaoxing within Zhejiang province. As at 31 December 2007, 220 of these sites
were operational.
We
continue to improve the efficiency of our retail asset network and increase the
consistency of our site offer through a process of regular review. In 2007, we
sold 462 company-owned sites to dealers, jobbers and franchisees who continue
to operate these sites under the BP brand. We also divested an additional 204
company-owned sites to third parties.
Each
of our fuels brands, BP, Amoco, ARCO and Aral, carries a very strong offer
and we also aim to share best practices
between them. Since 2003, we have been upgrading our fuel offer with the introduction
of Ultimate gasoline and diesel products. In 2007, we launched Ultimate in Switzerland
and Luxembourg and now market Ultimate in 17 countries. In 2007, we launched
our Helios Power campaign in the US
aimed at reinforcing the BP brands positioning in key markets.
31 | |
Our
convenience retail strategy continues to focus on BPs advantaged
positions in major cities and growth markets and upgrading our retail offers,
while driving operational efficiencies through portfolio optimization including,
where appropriate, a transition to franchising. The convenience offer comprises
sales of convenience items to customers from advantaged locations in metropolitan
areas, while our fuels offer is deployed at locations in all our markets,
in many cases without the convenience offer. We execute our convenience
offer through a quality branded store format in each of our key markets.
Examples include the BP Connect offer in Europe, the UK partnership with
Marks & Spencer Simply Food at selected locations, the am/pm offer
in the US and the Aral offer in Germany. At 31 December 2007, our convenience
store network consisted of more than 960 BP Connect stores worldwide, and
around 1,000 am/pm stores in the US and 1,500 Aral stores in Germany.
In line with BPs intent to simplify the groups
operations and improve performance, as well as to position the business for future
growth by directly accessing the franchisees entrepreneurial experience
and local knowledge, BP has announced that it will sell all of its company-owned
and company-operated convenience sites in the US. The majority of sites will
be sold to franchisees, with the remaining sites to dealers and large distributors
(jobbers). The sale of the sites is expected to be completed by the end of 2009.
The sites will continue to market BP-branded fuels in the eastern US and ARCO-branded
fuels in the western US. The franchise agreement has a term of 20 years and requires
sites to be supplied with BP- or ARCO-branded fuels for the term of the contract.
Aviation
fuels
Air BP is one of the worlds largest aviation
businesses, supplying aviation fuel to the airline, military and general aviation
sectors. It supplies customers in approximately 80 countries, has annual marketing
sales of 27.4 billion litres (more than 470mb/d) and has relationships with
many of the major commercial airlines. Air BPs strategic aim is to
strengthen its position in its main existing markets (Europe/US/Middle East),
while creating
opportunities in emerging economies such as China, where it is the largest
foreign investor in the industry.
Marine
fuels
The marine fuels business focuses on the distribution
and resale of refined fuels to the shipping industry across the world. The
business has a strong presence in the marine fuels sector. It has offices
in 12 countries and operates in more than 150 ports.
Bitumen
The bitumen business focuses on the distribution and
sale of bitumen products for road construction and maintenance. It has a strong
presence in the US and in Europe and is exploring opportunities in developing
economies, where new infrastructure is being built. It markets bitumen products
in seven countries and product sales in 2007 were approximately 45mb/d.
LPG
The LPG business sells bulk, bottled, automotive and
wholesale LPG products to a wide range of customers in 14 countries. During
the past few years, our LPG business has consolidated its position in established
markets and pursued opportunities in new and emerging markets. BP is one of
the leading importers of LPG into the Chinese market, where we continued to
grow our retail LPG business. LPG product sales in 2007 were approximately 72mb/d.
Lubricants
We manufacture
and market lubricants products and also supply related products and services
to business customers and end-consumers
in more
than 60 countries directly and to the rest of the world through local distributors.
Our business is concentrated on the higher-margin sectors of automotive lubricants,
especially in the consumer sector, and also has a strong presence in the marine
and industrial business markets. Customer focus, distinctive brands and superior
technology remain the cornerstones of our long-term strategy. BP markets primarily
through its major brands, Castrol and BP, as well as Aral in specific markets.
The Castrol brand is recognized worldwide and we believe it provides us with
a significant competitive advantage. In the automotive lubricants segment,
we
supply lubricants, other products and related business services to intermediate
customers such as retailers and workshops, who in turn serve end-consumers
such
as car, motorcycle and leisure-craft owners in the mature markets of western
Europe and North America and also in the fast growing markets of the developing
world such as Russia, China, India, the Middle East, South America and Africa.
BPs marine lubricants business, operating under the BP and Castrol brands,
is a market leader with capability to supply in about 1,200 ports. BP also supplies
lubricants to the power generation, offshore oil and aviation industries. BPs
industrial lubricants business supplies lubricants and value-adding services
to the transportation, automotive and metal sectors.
Aromatics & Acetyls
The Aromatics & Acetyls business manufactures and markets
three main products lines: PTA, PX and acetic acid. PTA is a raw material for
the manufacture of polyesters used in textiles, plastic bottles, fibres and
films. PX is feedstock for the production of PTA. Acetic acid is a versatile
intermediate chemical used in a variety of products such as paints, adhesives
and solvents. It is also used in the production of PTA. In addition to these
three main products, we are involved in a number of other petrochemicals products,
namely Dimethyl 2, 6 Naphthalene dicarboxylate (NDC), which is used for optical
film and specialized packaging, and acetic anhydride, ethyl acetate and vinyl
acetate monomer (VAM), which are used in cellulose acetate, paints, adhesives
and solvents. Our Aromatics & Acetyls strategy is to invest to maintain
and grow our advantaged manufacturing positions globally, with an emphasis
on
growth in Asia, particularly in China. We are also investing in maintaining
and developing our technology leadership position to deliver both operating
and capital cost advantages.
32 | |
The following table shows BPs Aromatics & Acetyls production capacity at 31 December 2007. This production capacity is based on the original design capacity of the plants plus expansions.
thousand tonnes per year | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Total BP | ||||||||||||
Acetic | share of | |||||||||||
Geographic area | PTA | PX | acid | Other | capacity | |||||||
|
||||||||||||
UK | ||||||||||||
Hull | | | 549 | 616 | 1,165 | |||||||
Rest of Europe | ||||||||||||
Belgium | ||||||||||||
Geel | 1,075 | 597 | | | 1,672 | |||||||
USA | ||||||||||||
Cooper River | 1,309 | | | | 1,309 | |||||||
Decatur | 1,046 | 1,109 | | 29 | 2,184 | |||||||
Texas City | | 1,302 | 550 | a | 123 | 1,975 | ||||||
Rest of World | ||||||||||||
China | ||||||||||||
Chongqing | | | 211 | b | 52 | 263 | (51% of YARACO) | b | ||||
Zhuhai | 1,496 | c | | | | 1,496 | c | |||||
Indonesia | ||||||||||||
Merak | 255 | | | | 255 | (50% of PT Ami | ) | |||||
Korea | ||||||||||||
Ulsan | | | 245 | d | 59 | e | 304 | (51% of SS-BP | )d | |||
(34% of ASACCO | )e | |||||||||||
Malaysia | ||||||||||||
Kertih | | | 549 | | 549 | |||||||
Kuantan | 697 | | | | 697 | |||||||
Taiwan | ||||||||||||
Kaohsiung | 832 | f | | | | 832 | (61% of CAPCO | )f | ||||
Taichung | 469 | f | | | | 469 | (61% of CAPCO | )f | ||||
Mai Liao | | | 167 | g | | 167 | (50% of FBPC | )g | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
7,179 | 3,008 | 2,271 | 879 | 13,337 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a | Sterling Chemicals plant, the output of which is marketed by BP. |
b | Yangtze River Acetyls Company. |
c | Inclusive of 900ktepa capacity from the second BP Zhuhai PTA plant, which commenced commissioning at end of 2007. |
d | Samsung-BP Chemicals Ltd. |
e | Asian Acetyls Company Ltd. |
f | China American Petrochemical Company Ltd. |
g | Formosa BP Chemicals Corporation. |
During 2007, the following significant activities took place in the Aromatics & Acetyls business: | |
| Construction commenced on the new 500ktepa plant, in Jiangsu province, China, by BP YPC Acetyls Company (Nanjing) Limited (BYACO), BPs 50% equity-share acetic acid joint venture with Yangzi Petrochemical Co. Ltd (a subsidiary of Sinopec Corporation in China), and is scheduled to complete by mid-2009. |
| The second PTA plant at the BP Zhuhai Chemical Company Limited site in Guangdong province, China, successfully commenced commissioning at the end of 2007. The 900ktepa plant is the single largest PTA train in the world, employing the latest BP proprietary technology. |
| In the first quarter of 2007, BP announced its intention to sell its European VAM and ethyl acetate businesses. In January 2008, INEOS announced that it had reached an agreement to acquire these businesses. The transaction, which is subject to the approval of the EU competition authorities, is expected to complete in the first quarter of 2008. |
| In the fourth quarter of 2007, BP completed the disposal of its 47.41% equity interest in Samsung Petrochemical Co. Ltd (SPC) to our PTA joint venture partner, Samsung Group, in South Korea. |
| The development of a 350ktepa PTA expansion at Geel, Belgium, is expected to be operational in mid-2008 and to increase the sites PTA capacity to 1,425ktepa. |
| In January 2008, BP and Sinopec signed a memorandum of understanding to add a new acetic acid plant at their Yangtze River Acetyls Co. (YARACO) joint venture in Chongqing, upstream Yangtze River, south-west China. This world-scale acetic acid plant, using BPs leading Cativa™ technology, is expected to have an annual capacity of 650ktepa. The plant is expected to be onstream in 2011, when the |
total production at the YARACO site is expected to be well over one million tonnes per annum, which would make it one of the largest acetic acid production locations in China. |
Supply
and trading
The group has a
long-established supply and trading activity responsible for delivering value
across the overall crude and oil products supply chain. This activity identifies
the best markets and prices for our crude oil, sources optimal feedstock for
our refining assets and sources marketing activities with flexible and competitive
supply. Additionally, the function creates incremental trading opportunities
through holding commodity derivative contracts and trading inventory. To achieve
these objectives in a liquid and volatile international market, the group
enters into a range of commodity derivative contracts, including exchange-traded
futures and options, over-the-counter (OTC) options, swaps and forward contracts
as well as physical term and spot contracts.
Exchange-traded
contracts are traded on liquid regulated markets that transact in key crude
grades, such as Brent and West Texas Intermediate, and the main product grades,
such as gasoline and gasoil. These exchanges exist in each of the key markets
in the US, western Europe and Asia. OTC contracts include a variety of options,
forwards and swaps. These swaps price in relation to a wider set of grades
than those traded through the exchanges, where counterparties contract for
differences between, for example, fixed and floating prices. The contracts
we use are described in more detail below. Additionally, physical crude can
be traded forward by using specific OTC contracts pricing in reference to
Brent and West Texas Intermediate grades. OTC crude forward sales contracts
are used by BP to buy and sell the underlying physical commodity, as well
as to act as a risk management and trading instrument.
33 | |
Risk management is undertaken when the group is exposed to market risk, primarily due to the timing of sales and purchases, which may occur for both commercial and operational reasons. For example, if the group has delayed a purchase and has a lower-than-normal inventory level, the associated price exposure may be limited by taking an offsetting position in the most suitable commodity derivative contract described above. Where trading is undertaken, the group actively combines a range of derivative contracts and physical positions to create incremental trading gains by arbitraging prices, typically between locations and time periods. This range of contract types includes futures, swaps, options and forward sale and purchase contracts, which are described further below. | |
Through these transactions, the group sells crude production into the market, allowing more suitable higher-margin crude to be supplied to our refineries. The group may also actively buy and sell crude on a spot and term basis to further improve selections of crude for refineries. In addition, where refinery production is surplus to marketing requirements or can be sourced more competitively, it is sold into the market. This latter activity also encompasses opportunities to maximize the value of the whole supply chain through the optimization of storage and pipeline assets, including the purchase of product components that are blended into finished products. The group also owns and contracts for storage and transport capacity to facilitate this activity. | |
The range of transactions that the group enters into is described below in more detail: | |
| Exchange-traded commodity
derivatives These contracts are typically in the form of futures and options traded on a recognized exchange, such as Nymex, Simex, ICE and Chicago Board of Trade. Such contracts are traded in standard specifications for the main marker crude oils, such as Brent and West Texas Intermediate, and the main product grades, such as gasoline and gasoil. Though potentially settled physically, these contracts are typically settled financially. Gains and losses, otherwise referred to as variation margins, are settled on a daily basis with the relevant exchange. These contracts are used for the trading and risk management of both crude and products. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on exchange-traded commodity derivatives are included in sales and other operating revenues for accounting purposes. |
| OTC contracts These contracts are typically in the form of forwards, swaps and options. OTC contracts are negotiated between two parties and are not traded on an exchange. These contracts can be used both as part of trading and risk management activities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on OTC contracts are included in sales and other operating revenues for accounting purposes. The main grades of crude oil bought and sold forward using standard contracts are West Texas Intermediate and a standard North Sea crude blend (Brent, Forties and Osberg or BFO). Although the contracts specify physical delivery terms for each crude blend, a significant volume are not settled physically. The contracts contain standard delivery, pricing and settlement terms. Additionally, the BFO contract specifies a standard volume and tolerance given that the physically settled transactions are delivered by cargo. Swaps are contractual obligations to exchange cash flows between two parties: one usually references a floating price and the other a fixed price with the net difference of the cash flows being settled. Options give the holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell crude or oil products at a specified price on or before a specific future date. Amounts under these derivative financial instruments are settled at expiry, typically through netting agreements, to limit credit exposure and support liquidity. |
| Spot and term contracts Spot contracts are contracts to purchase or sell crude and oil products at the market price prevailing on and around the delivery date when title to the inventory is taken. Term contracts are contracts to purchase or sell a commodity at regular intervals over an agreed term. Though spot and term contracts may have a standard form, there is no offsetting mechanism in place. These transactions result in physical delivery with operational and price risk. Spot and term |
contracts relate typically to purchases of crude for a refinery, sales of the groups oil production and sales of the groups oil products. For accounting purposes, spot and term sales are included in sales and other operating revenues, when title passes. Similarly, spot and term purchases are included in purchases for accounting purposes. |
Trading
investigations
See Legal proceedings
on page 82 for details regarding investigations into various aspects of BPs
trading activities.
During
2007, the group has taken a series of measures in relation to its trading compliance
processes, systems and controls. These measures include increasing its compliance
resources in the US and elsewhere, continuing to implement an enhanced compliance
framework and programme that includes compliance monitoring of trading operations,
and the ongoing development and implementation of operating standards and processes.
In the US, the deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) between BP America Inc.
(BP America) and the US Department of Justice has resulted in the appointment
of an independent monitor to oversee compliance with the DPA. The independent
monitor has authority to investigate and report alleged violations of the US
Commodity Exchange Act
or US Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations and to recommend corrective
action.
Transportation
Our Refining and
Marketing segment owns, operates or has an interest in extensive transportation
facilities for crude oil, refined products and petrochemicals feedstock. We
transport crude oil to our refineries principally by ship and through pipelines
from our import terminals. We have interests in crude oil pipelines in Europe
and the US. Bulk products are transported between refineries and storage terminals
by pipeline, ship, barge and rail. Onward delivery to customers is primarily
by road. We have interests in major product pipelines in the UK, Rest of Europe
and the US.
Shipping
We transport our
products across oceans, around coastlines and along waterways, using a combination
of BP-operated, time-chartered and spot-chartered vessels. All vessels conducting
BP activities are subject to our health, safety, security and environmental
requirements.
International
fleet
In 2006, we managed
an international fleet of 57 vessels (42 medium-size crude and product carriers,
four very large crude carriers, one North Sea shuttle tanker, seven LNG carriers
and three new LPG carriers). At the end of 2007, we had 53 international vessels
(39 medium-size crude and product carriers, four very large crude carriers,
one North Sea shuttle tanker, five LNG carriers and four LPG carriers). All
these ships are double-hulled. Of the five LNG carriers, BP manages one on behalf
of a joint venture in which it is a participant and operates four LNG carriers.
Three further LNG carriers are on order for delivery in 2008.
Regional
and specialist vessels
In Alaska, we
redelivered one of our time-chartered vessels back to the owner, leaving a
fleet of five
double-hulled vessels. In the Lower 48, two of the four heritage Amoco barges
remain in service, both of which are due to be phased out of BPs service
in 2008. Outside the US, the specialist fleet has been reduced from 16 ships
in 2006 to 14 in 2007 (two double-hulled lubricants oil barges and 12 offshore
support vessels).
Time-charter
vessels
BP has 111 hydrocarbon-carrying
vessels above 600 deadweight tonnes on time-charter, of which 97 are double-hulled
and two are double-bottomed. All these vessels participate in BPs Time
Charter Assurance Programme.
Spot-charter
vessels
To transport the remainder
of the groups products, BP spot-charters vessels, typically for single
voyages. These vessels are always vetted for safety assurance prior to use.
34 | |
Other vessels
BP uses various craft
such as tugs, crew boats and seismic vessels in support of the groups business.
We also use sub-600 deadweight tonne barges to carry hydrocarbons on inland waterways.
Gas, Power and Renewables |
In 2007, the Gas, Power and Renewables segment included four main activities: marketing and trading of gas and power; marketing and trading of liquefied natural gas (LNG); production, marketing and trading of natural gas liquids (NGLs); and low-carbon power generation through our Alternative Energy business.
Resegmentation in 2008 | |
With effect from 1 January 2008: | |
– | The Gas, Power and Renewables segment ceased to report separately. |
– | The NGLs, LNG and the gas and power marketing and trading businesses were transferred from the Gas, Power and Renewables segment to the Exploration and Production segment. |
– | The Alternative Energy business was transferred from the Gas, Power and Renewables segment to Other businesses and corporate. |
Key statistics | $ million | |||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Sales and other operating
revenues from continuing operations |
21,369 | 23,708 | 25,696 | |||
Profit before
interest and tax from continuing operationsa |
674 | 1,321 | 1,172 | |||
Total assets | 19,889 | 27,398 | 28,952 | |||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions | 874 | 688 | 235 | |||
a | Profit before interest and tax from continuing operations includes profit after tax of equity-accounted entities. |
The changes in sales and other operating revenues are explained in more detail below:
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Gas marketing sales | 8,639 | 11,428 | 15,222 | |||
Other sales (including NGL marketing) | 12,730 | 12,280 | 10,474 | |||
21,369 | 23,708 | 25,696 | ||||
million cubic feet per day | ||||||
Gas marketing sales volumes | 3,382 | 3,685 | 5,096 | |||
Natural gas sales by Exploration and Production | 4,414 | 5,152 | 4,747 | |||
BP seeks to maximize the value of its gas by targeting high-value customer
segments in selected markets and to optimize supply around our physical and
contractual rights to assets. Marketing and trading activities are focused
on the relatively open and deregulated natural gas and power markets of North
America, the UK and the most liquid trading locations in Rest of Europe. Some
long-term natural gas contracting activity is included within the Exploration
and Production segment because of the nature of the gas markets when the long-term
sales contracts were agreed.
Our
LNG business develops opportunities to capture sales for our upstream natural
gas resources, working in close collaboration with the Exploration and Production
segment. For sales into non-liquid markets such as Japan and Korea, we aim
to secure contracts with high-value customers. For the majority of sales into
liquid wholesale markets such as the US and the UK, we are building integrated
supply chains covering production, liquefaction, shipping, re-gasification
and access to the wholesale transmission grid. Our strategy is to capture a
growing share of the internationally-traded gas market. We are focusing on
markets that offer significant prospects for growth. Our LNG activities involve
the marketing of third-party LNG as well as BP equity volumes, where this allows
us to optimize our existing asset and contractual positions.
Our
NGLs business is engaged in the processing, fractionation and marketing of ethane,
propane, butanes and pentanes extracted from natural gas. We have a significant
NGLs processing and marketing
35 | |
business
in North America. Our NGLs activity is underpinned by our upstream resources
and serves third-party markets for chemicals and clean fuels as well as
supplying BPs refining
activities.
Globally, the power sector is the largest source
of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, responsible for around twice the emissions
of transport, so creating low-carbon power is critical in the effort to stabilize
global GHG levels. BP is focused on power generation activities with low-carbon
emissions through its Alternative Energy business, extending significantly our
capabilities in solar, wind power,
hydrogen power and gas-fired power generation.
Capital expenditure and acquisitions in 2007 was $874
million, compared with $688 million in 2006 and $235 million in 2005.
In 2007, we acquired Wasatch Energy L.L.C. in the US and in 2006 our acquisitions
included Orion Energy, LLC and Greenlight Energy, Inc. In 2005 there were no
acquisitions.
Marketing
and trading activities Gas and power marketing and trading activity is undertaken primarily in the US, Canada, the UK and Europe to market BPs gas and power production and manage market price risk as well as to create incremental trading opportunities through the use of commodity derivative contracts. Additionally, this activity generates fee income and enhanced margins from sources such as the management of price risk on behalf of third-party customers. These markets are large, liquid and volatile and the group enters into these transactions on a large scale to meet these objectives. The group also has an NGLs trading activity in the US for delivering value across the overall NGLs supply chain, sourcing optimal feedstock for our processing assets and securing access to markets with flexible and competitive supply. In connection with the above activities, the group uses a range of commodity derivative contracts and storage and transport contracts. These include commodity derivatives such as futures, swaps and options to manage price risk and forward contracts used to buy and sell gas and power in the marketplace. Using these contracts, in combination with rights to access storage and transportation capacity, allows the group to access advantageous pricing differences between locations, time periods and arbitrage between markets. Gas futures and options are traded through exchanges, while over-the-counter (OTC) options and swaps are used for both gas and power transactions through bilateral arrangements. Futures and options are primarily used to trade the key index prices such as Henry Hub, while swaps can be tailored to price with reference to specific delivery locations where gas and power can be bought and sold. OTC forward contracts have evolved in both the US and UK markets, enabling gas and power to be sold forward in a variety of locations and future periods. These contracts are used both to sell production into the wholesale markets and as trading instruments to buy and sell gas and power in future periods. Capacity contracts allow the group to store, transport gas and transmit power between these locations. Additionally, activity is undertaken to risk-manage power generation margins related to the Texas City co-generation plant using a range of gas and power commodity derivatives. The range of contracts that the group enters into is described below in more detail: |
|
– |
Exchange-traded commodity derivatives Exchange-traded commodity derivatives include gas and power futures contracts. Though potentially settled physically, these contracts are typically settled financially. Gains and losses, otherwise referred to as variation margins, are settled on a daily basis with the relevant exchange. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on exchange-traded commodity derivatives are included in sales and other operating revenues for accounting purposes. |
– |
OTC contracts These contracts are typically in the form of forwards, swaps and options. OTC contracts are negotiated between two parties and are not traded on an exchange. These contracts can be used both as part of trading and risk management activities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on OTC contracts are included in sales and other operating revenues for accounting purposes. Highly-developed |
markets exist in
North America and the UK where gas and power can be bought and sold for
delivery in future periods. These contracts are negotiated between two
parties to purchase and sell gas and power at a specified price, with
delivery and settlement at a future date. Although these contracts specify
delivery terms for the underlying commodity, in practice a significant
volume of these transactions are not settled physically. This can be
achieved by transacting offsetting sale or purchase contracts for the
same location and delivery period that are offset during the scheduling
of delivery or dispatch. The contracts contain standard terms such as
delivery point, pricing mechanism, settlement terms and specification
of the commodity. Typically, volume and price are the main variable terms. Swaps are contractual obligations to exchange cash flows between two parties. One usually references a floating price and the other a fixed price, with the net difference of the cash flows being settled. Options give the holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell natural gas products or power at a specified price on or before a specific future date. Amounts under these derivative financial instruments are settled at expiry, typically through netting agreements to limit credit exposure and support liquidity. |
|
– |
Spot and term contracts Spot contracts are contracts to purchase or sell a commodity at the market price prevailing on the delivery date when title to the inventory passes. Term contracts are contracts to purchase or sell a commodity at regular intervals over an agreed term. Though spot and term contracts may have a standard form, there is no offsetting mechanism in place. These transactions result in physical delivery with operational and price risk. Spot and term contracts relate typically to purchases of third-party gas and sales of the groups gas production to third parties. Spot and term sales are included in sales and other operating revenues, when title passes. Similarly, spot and term purchases are included in purchases for accounting purposes. |
See Financial and operating performance Gas, Power and Renewables on page 49.
Trading investigations
See
Legal proceedings on page 82 for details regarding investigations into various
aspects of BPs trading activities.
During
2007, the group has taken a series of measures in relation to its trading compliance
processes, systems and controls. These measures include increasing its compliance
resources in the US and elsewhere, continuing to implement an enhanced compliance
framework and programme that includes compliance monitoring of trading operations,
and the ongoing development and implementation of operating standards
and processes. In the US, the deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) between BP
America Inc. (BP America) and the US Department of Justice has resulted in the
appointment of an independent monitor to oversee compliance with the DPA. The
independent monitor has authority to investigate and report alleged violations
of the US Commodity Exchange Act or US Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations
and to recommend corrective action.
North America
BP has
a significant wholesale gas and power marketing and trading business in North
America. Our business has been built on the foundation of
our position as one of the continents
leading producers of gas based on volumes. Our gas activity in the US and Canada
has grown during the past few years as the group increased its scale through
both organic growth of operations and the acquisition of smaller marketing
and trading companies, increasing reach into additional markets. At the same
time, the overall volumes in these markets have also increased. The group also
trades power, in addition to selling and risk managing production from the
Texas City co-generation
facility in the US.
Our
North American natural gas marketing and trading strategy seeks to provide
unconstrained market access for BPs
equity gas. Our marketing strategy targets high-value customer segments through
fully utilizing our rights to store and transport gas. These assets include those
36 | |
owned by BP and those contractually accessed through agreements with third parties such as pipelines and terminals.
Europe
The natural gas
market in the UK is significant in size and is one of the most progressive in
terms of deregulation when compared with
other
European markets. BP is one of the largest producers of natural gas in the
UK, based on volumes, with the majority of BPs volumes being sold to
power generation companies and to other gas wholesalers via long-term supply
deals.
In
addition to the marketing of BP gas, commodity derivative contracts are used
in combination with access
to storage, transport flow and assets to generate trading opportunities.
This may include storing physical gas to sell in future periods or moving
gas between markets to access higher prices. Commodity contracts such as
OTC forward contracts can be used to achieve this, while other commodity
contracts such as futures and options can be used to manage the market risk relating
to changes in prices.
In
Europe, we maintain a marketing presence in Spain, but are increasingly focused
on wholesale transactions
at the existing and new gas trading hubs and exchanges in Belgium, The Netherlands,
Germany and France.
Liquefied natural gas
Our LNG and new market development activities are focused on establishing international
market positions to create maximum value from our upstream natural gas
resources and on capturing third-party LNG supply to complement our equity
flows.
BP Exploration and Production
has interests in a number of major existing LNG supply projects: Atlantic
LNG in
Trinidad & Tobago, Bontang in Indonesia and
the North West Shelf (NWS) project in Australia. Additional LNG supplies are
being pursued through an expansion of the existing LNG facilities at the NWS
project in Australia and green-field developments in Indonesia (Tangguh) and
Angola.
We continue to access major growth
markets for the groups equity gas in the Pacific region. During 2007,
development continued on the Tangguh LNG project (BP 37.2% and operator) from
which the first
commercial delivery is expected in early 2009. Tangguh will be the third LNG
centre in Indonesia and has signed sales contracts for delivery to customers
in China, South Korea and the west coast of
Mexico. During 2007, further progress was made in securing contracts for LNG
to be derived from the remaining uncontracted reserves at the NWS project.
Agreements for the supply of LNG to Japan have been signed with Chugoku Electric,
Kyushu
Electric, Tohuku Electric and Toho Gas and for the supply of LNG to South Korea
with the Korean Gas Corporation (KOGAS). The Guangdong LNG re-gasification
and pipeline project in south-east China, in which BP is the only foreign partner,
completed
installation of its third storage tank in the third quarter of 2007, increasing
its throughput to 7 million tonnes per annum. In addition to LNG supplied under
a long-term contract with the NWS project, the terminal took delivery of an
additional
seven spot cargoes during the year, to meet rapidly growing local demand for
gas.
In
the Atlantic and Mediterranean regions, BP is creating opportunities to supply
LNG to North American and
European gas markets. The fourth LNG train at Atlantic LNG in Trinidad, with
a capacity of 5.2 million tonnes per annum (253,000mmcf), began operations
in late 2005. These BP-marketed volumes supplement a 2005 long-term agreement
with EGAS of Egypt to purchase 1.45 billion cubic metres per year
of LNG from the Spanish Egyptian Gas Company (SEGAS) plant at Damietta, and
a short-term contract to purchase LNG from Oman and periodic spot purchases
of LNG. BP is marketing its LNG entitlement directly, utilizing BP-controlled
LNG shipping and contractual rights to access import terminal capacity in
the liquid markets of the US (via Cove Point and Elba Island) and the UK
(via the Isle of Grain). In Spain, environmental permits have been issued
to allow an expansion of the Bilbao
re-gasification terminal in which BP has a 25% equity stake.
In
Nigeria, discussions are ongoing following the 2006 signing of a memorandum of
understanding for the
purchase of LNG from Brass
River LNG. A final investment decision is expected in 2008 and could lead to
first LNG in 2012.
BP continues to seek approvals
for a new terminal development in the US. The proposed 1.2 billion cubic
feet per
day (bcf/d) Crown Landing terminal is to be located on the Delaware River in
New Jersey. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) granted its approval
for the siting, construction and operation of this project during 2006. BP
continues to work with state agencies in New Jersey to
complete state permitting requirements and with the relevant federal, state
and local authorities to put in place security plans for the facility and
associated
shipping activities. BP is also monitoring the progress of a proceeding filed
by the State of New Jersey against the State of Delaware in the US Supreme
Court concerning New Jerseys jurisdiction over developments on its shores, including the projects
loading jetty that extends into the Delaware River. The US Supreme Court heard
the New Jersey versus Delaware case on 27 November 2007 and a decision from
the court is expected in 2008.
Natural gas liquids
Based on sales volumes, we are one of the largest producers and marketers of
NGLs in North America and hold interests for NGL volumes in the UK and Egypt.
NGLs
produced in North America from gas chiefly sourced out of Alberta, Canada
and the US onshore and Gulf
Coast, are used as a heating fuel and as a feedstock for refineries and chemicals
plants. In addition, a significant amount of NGLs are marketed on a wholesale
basis under annual supply contracts that provide for price re-determination
based on prevailing market prices.
In North America, BP operates
or has interests in NGL extraction plants with a processing capacity of 6.4bcf/d.
These
facilities are located in major production areas across North America, including
Alberta, Canada, the US Rockies, the San Juan basin and the Gulf of Mexico.
We also own or have an interest in fractionation plants (that separate the
NGL into
its component products) in Canada and the US, and
own or lease storage capacity in Alberta, eastern Canada, and the US Gulf Coast,
as well as the US west coast and mid-continent regions. Our North American
NGLs processing capacity utilization in 2007 was 72%. In 2006, we entered
into a long-term
supply contract with Aux Sable Liquid Products to secure additional NGLs to
supply our customers in the US Midwest. A major three-year programme to inspect,
assess
and repair or replace equipment is under way in BPs North American NGLs
business. On 20 March 2007, we completed the sale of BPs 50% equity and
operating interest in the Cochin pipeline system to Kinder Morgan Energy Partners.
BP
operates one NGLs plant (Central Area Transmission System, 30% owner and
operator with a capacity of 1.2bcf/d)
in the UK and we are a partner (33.33%) in a gas processing plant in Egypt
with 1.1bcf/d of gas processing capacity. We have also secured access to
the Abibes LPG terminal in Cremona, northern Italy.
Alternative energy
BP
Alternative Energy, launched in November 2005, combines all of BPs interests
in businesses that provide low-carbon energy solutions for power generation:
solar, wind,
gas-fired power generation and hydrogen
power with carbon capture and storage (CCS).
Solar
BP Solars main production facilities are located in Maryland (US), Madrid (Spain), Sydney (Australia), Xian (China) and Bangalore (India). During 2007, expansion of cell capacity
continued at our Madrid and Bangalore facilities, alongside a $100-million
project to expand casting capacity at Maryland, increasing our annual manufacturing
capacity to 228MW. BP Solar achieved sales of 115MW in 2007 (93MW in 2006 and
105MW in
2005).
In
2007, BP Solar and Banco Santander installed 14 Megawatts peak (MWp) of the
planned 20MWp installations
in Spain, while in the US, BP Solar won a bid to develop 4.3MW of solar energy
systems for seven Wal-Mart Stores in California, with the first three installations
completed by the end of December.
37 | |
We are developing a new silicon growth process named Mono2™, which significantly increases cell efficiency over traditional multicrystalline-based solar cells, making our first pilot shipment in 2007. Solar cells made with these wafers, in combination with other BP Solar advances in cell process technology, are expected to be able to produce between 5% and 8% more power than solar cells made with conventional processes. We are working with a number of research universities and institutes including the California Institute of Technology in the US where we are pursuing nanotube solar installations. This represents another step improvement in cost and efficiency. In Germany, we signed a co-operation agreement with the Institute of Crystal Growth (IKZ) in September 2006 to develop a technique to deposit silicon in very thin layers directly on glass instead of growing crystals. The programme has demonstrated this ability and work continues to improve the growth process and crystal structure. We are participating in a $40-million research and development programme (of which $20 million is provided by BP Solar) aimed at decreasing the cost of solar cells and increasing their efficiency. The programme is sponsored by the US Department of Energy.
Wind
Since 2005, we have increased our wind capacity from 32MW to more than 370MW,
with an aim to grow that to more than 1,000MW by the end of 2008. We operate
wind farms in the Netherlands, Maharashtra in India and Colorado in the
US.
In the US, we have a long-term
supply agreement with Clipper Windpower plc, with options to purchase Clipper
turbines with a total capacity of 2,250MW. During 2006, we also acquired
Orion Energy, LLC, and Greenlight Energy, Inc. With the acquisition of these
large-scale wind energy developers, our North American wind portfolio includes
projects with potential total generating capacity of some 15,000MW.
During 2007, we commenced construction on the Silver Star I project (60MW) in
Texas and commenced full commercial operation of our 300MW Cedar Creek project
in Colorado.
In India, we
commenced full commercial operations at our 40MW wind farm in Dhule, Maharashtra,
India
using 32 turbines supplied and installed by Suzlon, each with the capacity
to generate 1.25MW of electricity.
Gas-fired power
Gas-fired power stations typically emit around half as much CO2 as
conventional coal-fired plants. We have interests in a 785MW gas-fired power
generation facility and an associated LNG re-gasification
facility at
Bilbao, Spain (BP 25% share in each), a 1,074MW gas-fired combined cycle
power (CCGT) plant at Kwangyang, South Korea (BP 35%), a 724MW CCGT facility
at Phu
My, Vietnam (BP 33.3%), a 1,378MW gas turbine (BP 10%) in Trinidad & Tobago, a 392MW co-generation plant (BP 51%) in California,
US and a 744MW co-generation plant at Texas City, US (BP 50%), which supplies power and steam to BPs
largest refining and petrochemicals complex. Also, a 50MW combined heat and
power plant near Southampton, UK (BP 100%) has been in operation since the
first half
of 2005. Construction continues on the 250MW steam turbine power generating
plant at the Texas City refinery site, which is expected to bring the total
capacity
of the site to around 1,000MW when completed in 2008.
Hydrogen power
In May 2007, BP and Rio Tinto announced the formation of a new jointly owned
company, Hydrogen Energy, which will develop decarbonized energy projects
around the world. The venture will initially focus on hydrogen-fuelled
power generation, using fossil fuels and CCS technology to produce new
large-scale supplies of clean electricity.
We
are developing industrial-scale
hydrogen power projects with CCS technology.
General
Electric and BP have formed a global alliance to jointly develop and deploy technology
for hydrogen
power plants that could significantly reduce emissions of the greenhouse gas
CO2 from electricity generation.
Other businesses and corporate |
Other businesses and corporate comprises Treasury (which includes all the groups cash, cash equivalents and associated interest income), the groups aluminium asset and corporate activities worldwide.
Key statistics | $ million | |||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Sales
and other operating revenues for continuing operations |
843 | 1,009 | 668 | |||
Profit
(loss) before interest and tax from continuing operationsa |
(1,128 | ) | (885 | ) | (1,237 | ) |
Total assets | 17,188 | 14,184 | 12,144 | |||
Capital
expenditure and acquisitions |
275 | 281 | 817 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a | Includes profit after interest and tax of equity-accounted entities. |
Resegmentation in 2008 | |
With effect from 1 January 2008: | |
| The Alternative Energy business was transferred from the Gas, Power and Renewables segment to Other businesses and corporate. |
| The Emerging Consumers Marketing Unit was transferred from Refining and Marketing to Alternative Energy (which is reported in Other businesses and corporate). |
| The Biofuels business was transferred from Refining and Marketing to Alternative Energy (which is reported in Other businesses and corporate). |
| The Shipping business was transferred from Refining and Marketing to Other businesses and corporate. |
Treasury
Treasury
co-ordinates the management of the groups major financial assets and liabilities. From locations in the UK, the US and the Asia Pacific region, it provides the link between BP
and the international financial markets and makes available a range of financial services to the group, including supporting the financing of BPs
projects around the world.
Aluminium
Our aluminium business is a non-integrated producer and marketer of rolled aluminium products, headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky, US. Production facilities are located in Logan County,
Kentucky, and are jointly owned with Novelis. The primary activity of our aluminium business is the supply of aluminium coil to the beverage can business, which it manufactures primarily from recycled aluminium.
Research, technology and engineering
Research, technology and engineering activities are carried out by each of the major business segments on the basis of a distributed programme co-ordinated by a technology co-ordination
group. This body provides leadership for scientific, technical and engineering activities throughout the group and in particular promotes cross-business initiatives and the transfer of best practice between businesses. In addition, a group of
eminent industrialists and academics forms the Technology Advisory Council, which advises senior management on the state of technology within the group and helps to identify current trends and future developments in technology.
Research
and development is carried out using a balance of internal and external resources.
Involving third parties in the various steps of technology development and application
enables a wider range of technology solutions to be considered and implemented,
improving the productivity of research and development activities. External resources
includes investing in technology ventures as a platform
for promoting collaborative research. These ventures are not subsidiaries and,
as a result, their expenditure on research and development is not included directly
in the research and development expenditure stated below.
Across
the group, expenditure on research
and development for 2007 was $566 million, compared with $395 million in 2006 and $502
million in
38 | |
2005 (2005 includes $374 million in respect of continuing operations). See Financial statements note 14 on page 125. The 43% increase in 2007 compared with 2006 reflects increased investment in enhanced oil recovery, heavy oil, advanced refining, conversion, biosciences and renewables technology.
Insurance
The group generally restricts its purchase of insurance to situations where
this is required for legal or contractual reasons. This is because external
insurance is not considered an economic means of financing losses for the
group. Losses will therefore be borne as they arise, rather than being
spread over time through insurance premiums with attendant transaction
costs. This position is reviewed periodically.
Technology |
The realization of technological advancements is pivotal to our strategic progress and business performance. It is also the key to finding and developing solutions that meet the energy and climate challenges of the 21st century. | |
Our three-year technology plan provides sustained investment in our core technologies and increasing investment in long-term technologies. As we have deepened our current areas of leadership, extended their application in the field and broadened our long-term technology portfolio, our technology investment has grown at an average of 15% per annum during the period 2003-2007. In 2007, total technology investment was around $1.1 billion. | |
The sheer range and complexity of technologies that can impact our businesses, and the wide variety of sources for these technologies proprietary, energy service sector, universities and research institutions and other industries means that no single approach can meet all our needs. | |
The following guiding principles underpin our approach to technology: | |
– | Deliver technology leadership in a select few areas. |
– | Develop sustainable technology-based solutions for corporate renewal. |
– | Drive rapid take-up of proprietary and commercially available technologies. |
– | Innovate and test technology at material scale. |
– | Develop and access world-class skills; collaborate internally and externally. |
These principles are reflected in how we define technology investment. Whereas research and development is an externally reported number, internally we use a broader but very specific definition for technology investment. This consists of four elements: technology development for incremental improvement of our base businesses; technology leadership areas to create and sustain material, advantaged business positions; long-term technology investments to secure our future; and application and propagation of technology through formalized technology networks and knowledge management processes. | |
During 2007, we continued to advance and employ new technologies in drilling and well construction, unconventional gas development, enhanced oil recovery and seismic imaging. These technologies and know-how have enabled a new agreement with the Sultanate of Oman to develop gas resources, discoveries in Azerbaijan, Angola, Egypt and the Gulf of Mexico, increased production from tight gas fields in the continental US and increased recoveries from our fields in maturing basins such as Alaska and the North Sea. | |
Technology advancements are also broadening our refining capability to understand and process feedstocks of varying quality and optimize our assets in real time, enhancing the flexibility and reliability of our refineries and, in turn, improving the margins of our existing asset base. Our proprietary technologies in PTA have continued to reduce manufacturing costs and environmental impact: the new Zhuhai 2 unit in China, which started in 2007, has a lower energy consumption and environmental footprint than any other PTA unit in the world. | |
We also continue to progress our strategic longer-term technologies. In the field of bioscience, we selected the University of California |
Berkeley and its partners
the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign and the Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory to join us in the previously-announced $500-million
research programme to explore how bioscience can be used to increase energy
production and reduce the impact of energy consumption on the environment.
This energy research laboratory is now operational. We also entered into research
agreements with two biotechnology
companies in the US to focus on next generation energy crops for biofuels and
to research microbial processes in subsurface hydrocarbons. We have formed
a research partnership with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to complement
our internal technology capabilities in converting low-value carbon feedstocks
such as petcoke and coal to high-value products such as electricity, liquid
fuels and chemicals while minimizing CO2 emissions.
Carbon
capture and storage (CCS) technologies are a key enabler to the success of low-carbon
power generation and product manufacturing. Having integrated the learning from
our CO2 storage project in Algeria with our extensive Exploration
and Production capabilities, our CCS technologies are ready for deployment at
scale.
Regulation of the groups business |
BPs exploration and production activities are conducted in many different
countries and are therefore subject to a broad range of legislation and regulations.
These cover virtually all aspects of exploration and production activities,
including matters such as licence acquisition, production rates, royalties,
pricing, environmental protection, export, taxes and foreign exchange. The
terms and conditions of the leases, licences and contracts under which these
oil and gas interests are held vary from country to country. These leases,
licences and contracts are generally granted by or entered into with a government
entity or state company and are sometimes entered into with private property
owners. These arrangements with governmental or state entities usually take
the form of licences or production-sharing agreements. Arrangements with private
property owners are usually in the form of leases.
Licences
(or concessions) give the holder the right to explore for and exploit a commercial
discovery. Under a licence, the holder bears the risk of exploration, development
and production activities and provides the financing for these operations. In
principle, the licence holder is entitled to all production, minus any royalties
that are payable in kind. A licence holder is generally required to pay
production taxes or royalties, which may be in cash or in kind. Less typically,
BP may explore for and exploit hydrocarbons under a service agreement with the
host entity in exchange for reimbursement of costs and/or a fee paid in cash
rather than
production.
Production-sharing
agreements entered into with a government entity or state company generally require
BP to provide all the financing and bear the risk of exploration and production
activities in exchange for a share of the production remaining after royalties,
if any.
In
certain countries, separate licences are required for exploration and production
activities and, in certain cases,
production licences are limited to a portion of the area covered by the exploration
licence. Both exploration and production licences are generally for a specified
period of time (except for licences in the US, which typically remain in effect
until production ceases). The term of
BPs licences and the extent to which these licences may be renewed vary
by area.
Frequently,
BP conducts its exploration and production activities in joint venture with other
international oil companies, state companies or private
companies.
In
general, BP is required to pay income tax on income generated from production
activities (whether under a licence
or production-sharing agreement). In
addition, depending on the area, BPs production activities may be subject to a range of other taxes, levies and assessments, including special petroleum taxes and revenue taxes. The taxes imposed on oil and gas production profits and
activities may be substantially higher than those imposed on other activities, particularly in Angola, Norway, the UK, Russia, South America and Trinidad & Tobago.
39 | |
BPs
other activities, including its interests in pipelines and its commodities
and trading activities, are also subject to a broad range of legislation
and regulations in various countries
in which it operates.
Health,
safety and environmental regulations are discussed in more detail in Environment
on page 40.
For certain information regarding
environmental proceedings, see Environment US regional review on page
42.
Safety |
This
section reviews BPs 2007 performance with respect
to safety and the environment. An overview of our non-financial performance
will
appear in BP Sustainability Report 2007, expected to be published in May 2008.
In
total, there were seven workforce fatalities relating to BP operations in 2007,
compared with the same number
in 2006. Two were the result of shootings relating to our retail operations
in South Africa, two occurred in operations at our US refineries in Cherry
Point and Texas City, one was on board a BP marine vessel, one was road-related
and one an accident involving a defective fire extinguisher
in Indonesia. We deeply regret the loss of any lives. These incidents re-emphasize
the need for constant vigilance in seeking to secure the safety of all members
of our workforce.
Our employee
and contractor reported recordable injury frequency in 2007 was 0.48 per 200,000
hours worked,
the same as that for 2006 (2006 data was corrected from 0.47 to 0.48), and
below the industry average for 2006.
Implementing Baker Panel recommendations
Throughout 2007, BP continued to progress the process safety
enhancement programme initiated in response to the March 2005 incident at
the Texas City
refinery. We worked to implement the recommendations of the BP US Refineries
Independent Safety Review Panel (the panel), which issued its report on the
incident in January 2007 (see www.bp.com/bakerpanelreport).
We have made material progress
throughout the group across all of the panels 10 recommendations. Action
can be grouped under the following
headings:
Leadership
Our executive team
carried out site visits, which
included BPs
five US refineries. Board members also undertook site visits, including one
to the Texas City refinery. We have consistently communicated that safe and
reliable operations are our highest priority. Our safety and operations audit
group was strengthened and completed 28 audits in 2007.
Management systems
Implementation of our operating management
system (OMS) began at a first group of sites that included all five US refineries
(see page
40). We continued implementing the groups six-point plan,
which focuses on key priorities for investment and
action associated with safe operations (see below).
Knowledge and expertise
We established an executive-level training programme, ran process safety workshops
and launched an operations academy for site-based staff to enhance process
safety capability. Specialists have been deployed at our US refineries
to accelerate priority improvement programmes.
Culture
To reinforce the need
for a stronger safety culture,
our in-house team undertook assessments of BPs safety culture, supported
by communication
from leadership.
Indicators
Progress has been made in developing leading and lagging indicators, building
on metrics already reported to executive management. These
include measures on the competency of employees in roles critical to safety and on the development of appropriate operating procedures. We are working with the industry to develop indicators and this already includes progress to agree a metric covering loss of primary containment.
Progress at Texas City and our other US refineries
Across the US refining system, we have worked to address factors that contributed
to the Texas City refinery incident of 2005, including facility siting,
atmospheric relief systems, operating procedures and operator training,
as well as control of work systems and process safety culture and leadership.
The
refineries have engaged with employees on how to improve process safety. Each
refinery is creating
a strategic
implementation
plan to reduce process safety risk on a continuous improvement basis and to
implement the OMS. With the United Steel Workers Union, we have reached agreement
in principle
to work jointly to improve safety across four represented refineries. At Texas
City, face-to-face
communication with staff has been supplemented by The Future is Now, a monthly
magazine widely circulated across the
group.
Approximately 640 new
staff were hired across our US refineries, strengthening our support of engineering,
inspection and process safety.
Further
information on Texas City and other refineries can be found in the Refining and
Marketing section
on page 27.
Implementing the six-point plan | |
We set out our immediate priorities for improving process safety management and reducing risk at our operations worldwide through a six-point plan. This plan, launched in 2006, pre-dated the panels recommendations and creates a foundation for our approach. | |
Progress on the plans elements is reviewed each quarter by the executive-level group operations risk committee (GORC). | |
We have taken the following actions in relation to the six-point plan: | |
– | In 2007, we implemented a group practice on occupied portable buildings and removed all temporary buildings out of high-risk zones in refineries and major onshore plants. We continue to apply the practice and report progress on identification and removal of relevant buildings to the GORC. A total of 17 blow-down stacks all of those on heavier- than-air light hydrocarbon streams in refineries have been removed from service. The one remaining blow-down stack, at a chemical plant in Malaysia, is scheduled to be removed from service during 2008. |
– | We have completed 50 major accident risk assessments (MARs). The assessments identify high-level risks that, if they occur, would have a major effect on people or the environment. Many of these risks, such as a loss of containment from our operations, are common across the industry. Mitigation plans to manage and respond to identified risks form part of the MAR analysis. |
– | We are implementing group standards for integrity management and control of work on a locally risk-assessed and prioritized basis. Progress on implementing the standards is tracked quarterly. We have spent $6 billion on integrity management in the course of 2007, principally related to operating costs for maintenance and capital costs for plant improvement. |
– | We have continued to improve the way in which we seek to ensure our operations maintain compliance with health and safety laws and regulations. A project to establish a consistent compliance management framework has been under way in the US during the past two years and is expected to be completed globally by the end of 2008. |
– | Reviews have been undertaken resulting in many actions being closed out from past audits. Other actions requiring closure have been identified. |
– | Senior HSE advisors have carried out a preliminary assessment of the operational experience of BP management teams responsible for major production or manufacturing plant and any significant assessment findings have been addressed. |
40 | |
Operational
integrity
As part of monitoring operational integrity, we track
the number of major incidents during the year: oil spills of more than 100 barrels,
significant property damage or fatal accidents related to integrity management
failures. We also investigate any near-misses that could have resulted in a
major incident. Overall in 2007, the total number of high potentials
went down; however, more integrity management-related high potentials
were reported in 2007 than in previous years as a result of improved knowledge-sharing.
The number of oil spills of one barrel or more
in 2007 decreased to 340 from 417 in 2006. The volume of oil spilled was 1.05
million litres, of which 0.33 million litres were unrecovered.
Continuing
to focus on personal health and safety
In combination with our efforts to improve process safety,
we have continued to strive for excellence in occupational health and safety.
This is in line with our aspiration of no accidents, no harm to people and no
damage to the environment.
Continued focus on driving risks has resulted
in a significant reduction in major driving incidents, (those that cause a fatality
or result in a vehicle rollover) since 2005.
Health is an integral part of the OMS. In 2007,
work continued on developing practices in health management, covering industrial
hygiene, asbestos, fitness to work, health impact assessment, medical emergency
management, health promotion and wellness. These practices set minimum standards
of health performance in BP (see below).
We recognize that the health and safety of our
workforce and communities is affected by our operations and that meeting our
aspiration of no harm to people requires continuous effort, every day.
Implementation of the OMS
We began implementation of the OMS at 12 representative
pilot sites. Learnings from these pilots will be used to assess and improve
the OMS before widening its introduction. We intend for the whole of BP to have
commmenced use of the OMS by the end of 2010.
The OMS incorporates BPs principles for
operating and provides a framework to help deliver competence, then excellence,
in operations and safety. Standards for control of work and integrity management
and detailed practices in matters such as risk assessment provide
further underpinning. Training and development programmes have been strengthened
to develop the right capability and culture across the organization.
As described by BPs group chief executive,
the OMS is the foundation for a safe, effective, and high-performing
BP. It has two purposes: to further reduce HSE risks in our operations and to
continuously improve the quality of those operations. The systems
elements of operating describe eight dimensions of how people, processes,
plant and performance operate within BP. A continuous improvement process drives
and sustains improvement of these elements at a local level.
Capability development
We have initiated development programmes designed to
ensure that BP has the capability among its people to achieve operational excellence
and identify and manage risks.
The programmes support implementation of the OMS
by developing technical knowledge and skills. They seek to improve management,
behavioural, cultural and leadership skills to drive and sustain multi-year
change in operations across multiple geographies.
For instance, the operating essentials programme
is tailored to staff in maintenance, operations and safety who have responsibility
for managing front-line employees and contractors. We completed operating essentials
pilots in Anadarko (North America gas), Angola and Kwinana and started the first
phase of the implementation at 11 other sites.
The Operations Academy, provided in partnership
with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is directed towards senior operations
and safety leaders of sites or large units.
The
executive operations programme targets group vice presidents and senior business
leaders with accountability for multiple operations or sites. Its purpose is
to deepen insight into manufacturing and operations activities and the consequences
of leadership decisions.
In 2007, we began the development of programmes
for the wider workforce such as technicians and operators, graduate new hires
and managers in roles between supervisory and senior leadership levels.
Environment |
Health,
safety and environmental regulation
The group is subject to numerous international, national
and local environmental laws and regulations concerning its products, operations
and activities. Current and proposed fuel and product specifications and climate
change programmes under a number of environmental laws will have a significant
effect on the production, sale and profitability of many of our products. Environmental
laws and regulations also require the group to remediate or otherwise redress
the effects on the environment of prior disposal or release of chemicals or
petroleum substances by the group or other parties. Such contingencies may exist
for various sites, including refineries, chemicals plants, natural gas processing
plants, oil and natural gas fields, service stations, terminals and waste disposal
sites. In addition, the group may have obligations relating to prior asset sales
or closed facilities. Provisions for environmental restoration and remediation
are made when a clean-up is probable and the amount is reasonably determinable.
Generally, their timing coincides with the commitment to a formal plan of action
or, if earlier, on divestment or on closure of inactive sites. The provisions
made are considered by management to be sufficient for known requirements.
The
extent and cost of future environmental restoration, remediation and abatement
programmes are often inherently difficult to estimate. They depend on the magnitude
of any possible contamination, the timing and extent of the corrective actions
required, technological feasibility and BPs share of liability relative
to that of other solvent responsible parties. Though the costs of future restoration
and remediation could be significant and may be material to the results of operations
in the period in which they are recognized, it is not expected that such costs
will be material to the groups overall results of operations or financial
position. See Financial statements Note 37 on page 151 for the amounts
provided in respect of environmental remediation and decommissioning.
The groups operations are also subject to
environmental and common law claims for personal injury and property damage
caused by the release of chemicals, hazardous materials or petroleum substances
by the group or others. Fifteen proceedings involving governmental authorities
are pending or known to be contemplated against BP and certain of its subsidiaries
under federal, state or local environmental laws, each of which could result
in monetary sanctions of $100,000 or more. No individual proceeding is,
nor are the proceedings in aggregate, expected to be material to the groups
results of operations or financial position.
For information regarding Texas City and other
refineries see Texas City refinery on page 27, Other regulatory actions on page
28 and Legal proceedings on page 82.
For further information regarding spills in Alaska
in 2006 see Legal proceedings on page 82.
Management cannot predict future developments,
such as increasingly strict requirements of environmental laws and resulting
enforcement policies that might affect the groups operations or affect
the exploration for new reserves or the products sold by the group. A risk of
increased environmental costs and impacts is inherent in particular operations
and products of the group and there can be no assurance that material liabilities
and costs will not be incurred in the future. In general, the group does not
expect that it will be affected differently from other companies with comparable
assets engaged in similar businesses. Management believes that the groups
activities are in compliance in all material respects with applicable environmental
laws and regulations.
For a discussion of the groups environmental
expenditure see page 52.
BP operates in more than 100 countries worldwide.
In all regions of the world, BP has, or is developing, processes designed to
ensure
41 | |
compliance with applicable
regulations. In addition, each individual in the group is required to comply
with BP health, safety and environmental policies as embedded in the BP code
of conduct. Our partners, suppliers and contractors are also encouraged to adopt
them.
This Environment section focuses primarily on
the US and the EU, where around 65% of our fixed assets are located, and on
issues of a global nature such as our operations and the environment, climate
change programmes and maritime oil spills regulations.
Our
operations and the environment
During 2007, we continued to use environmental management
systems to seek improvements on a wide range of environmental issues. All our
major sites, except one, are certified to the ISO 14001 international environmental
management system standard. The Texas City refinery, after completing planned
work to strengthen its environmental management systems, is planning to seek
recertification in early 2009.
Following
its approval in November 2006, we began the implementation of the group practice
called the Environmental Requirements for New Projects (ERNP). This practice
is a full life-cycle environmental assessment process. It requires all new projects
to undertake screening to determine the potential environmental sensitivities
associated with the proposed projects. The highest level of environmental sensitivity
in a new project requires more rigorous specific environmental management activities.
By the end of 2007, more than 100 projects had begun implementation of ERNP
including those in our alternative energy, upstream and downstream businesses.
Since 2001, we have been focusing on measuring
and improving the carbon intensity of our operations. After six years, we estimate
that our operations have delivered some 7 million tones (Mte) of GHG reductions.
Our 2007 operational GHG emissions were 63.5Mte of CO2 equivalent
on a direct equity basis, nearly 1Mte lower than the reported figure of
64.4Mte in 2006.
Many of our EU assets have been subject to the
EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) since its launch in January 2005. The number
of installations actively participating in the scheme increased at the end of
2007 when a temporary exclusion of exploration and production assets expired.
After inclusion of these assets, around one-fifth of our reported 2007 global
GHG emissions are now covered by the scheme.
In 2007, no new decisions were taken by BP to
explore or develop in World Conservation Union (IUCN) category I-IV areas. We
constantly try to limit the environmental impact of our operations by seeking
to use natural resources responsibly and reducing waste and emissions.
Climate
change programmes
In response to rising concerns about climate change,
governments continue to identify fiscal and regulatory measures at local, national
and international levels.
In
December 1997, at the Third Conference of the Parties to the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Kyoto, Japan, the participants
agreed on a system of differentiated international legally-binding targets for
the first commitment period of 2008-2012. In 2005, the Kyoto protocol came into
force, committing the 176 participating countries to emissions targets. However,
Kyoto was only designed as a first step and policymakers continue to discuss
what new agreement might follow it after 2012, most recently at the UNFCCC conference
in Bali in December 2007.
In the EU, the first phase of the EU ETS was completed
at the end of 2007, with EU ETS phase II running from 2008-2012. The European
Commission has approved all member-state Phase-II national allocation plans.
The European Commission also announced an intention to propose a legislative
framework by mid-2008, to achieve the EU objective of 120 grams per kilometre
CO2 for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles.
The US congress continues to develop and review
proposed climate change legislation and regulation. President Bush signed an
Energy bill into law in December 2007, which included stricter corporate average
fuel emissions standards for automobiles sold in the US and biofuel mandates.
A number of other bills currently under consideration propose
stricter emissions limits
on large GHG sources and/or the introduction of a cap-and-trade programme on
CO2 and other GHG emissions.
In an April 2007 decision, the US Supreme Court
overruled a lower court that had upheld a decision by the US Environmental
Protection
Agency (EPA) not to regulate GHGs from motor vehicles under the Clean Air Act
for climate change purposes. The Supreme Courts ruling will require
the EPA to reconsider its prior decision on motor vehicle CO2 regulation
and render a new decision in keeping with the Supreme Courts holding.
The court opinion is expected to make it difficult for the EPA not to regulate
motor vehicle GHG
emissions in the future. It is also expected to increase pressure on the EPA
to regulate stationary sources of GHGs (e.g. refineries and chemical plants)
under other provisions of the Clean Air Act.
In September 2006, California governor Arnold
Schwarzenegger signed the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB
32) into law. In 2007, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) began the development
of regulations that will ultimately reduce Californias GHG emissions
to 1990 levels by 2020 (an approximately 25% reduction from current levels).
CARB
has initiated work on the Scoping Plan, which will identify reduction programme
mechanisms and timelines for achieving the 2020 target. In advance of the Scoping
Plan, CARB has taken early actions with the development of mandatory GHG reporting
and a Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS). The LCFS will require all refiners,
producers,
blenders and importers to reduce the carbon intensity of transport fuel sold
in California by 10% by 2020.
Since 1997, BP has been actively involved in policy
debate. We also ran a global programme that reduced our operational GHG emissions
by 10% between 1998 and 2001. We continue to look at two principal kinds of
emissions: operational emissions, which are generated from our operations such
as refineries, chemicals plants and production facilities; and product emissions,
generated by our customers when they use the fuels and products that we sell.
Since 2001, we have been focusing on measuring and improving the carbon intensity
of our operations as well as developing sustainable low-carbon technologies
and businesses for the future.
In 2007, as part of our engagement with technology
development, two major BP-backed research institutes came into full operation:
the Energy Biosciences Institute (EBI) in the US, and the Energy Technologies
Institute (ETI) in the UK. The EBI is a strategic partnership between BP, the
University of California, Berkeley, the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
and the University of Illinois, that will perform research into the production
of new and cleaner energy, initially focusing on advanced biofuels for road
transport. The EBI will also pursue bioscience-based research in three other
key areas: the conversion of heavy hydrocarbons to clean fuels, improved recovery
from existing oil and gas reservoirs and carbon sequestration. In the UK, the
ETI has been established as a 50:50 public private partnership, funded equally
by member companies, including BP, and the government. The ETI aims to accelerate
the development, demonstration and eventual commercial deployment of a focused
portfolio of energy technologies, which will increase energy efficiency, reduce
GHG emissions and help achieve energy security and climate change goals. The
ETI has issued its first Invitation for expressions of interest to participate
in programmes to develop new technologies for offshore wind and for marine,
tidal and wave energy.
Maritime
oil spill regulations
Within the US, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90)
imposes oil spill prevention requirements, spill response planning obligations
and spill liability for tankers and barges transporting oil and for offshore
facilities such as platforms and onshore terminals. To ensure adequate funding
for response to oil spills and compensation for damages, when not fully covered
by a responsible party, OPA 90 created a $1-billion fund that is financed
by a tax on imported and domestic oil. This has recently been amended by the
Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act 2006 to increase the size of the
fund from $1 billion to $2.7 billion, through the previously-mentioned
tax, together with an increase in the liability of double-hulled tankers from
$1,200 per gross ton to $1,900 per gross ton. In addition to OPA 90,
which imposes liability for oil spills on the owners
42 | |
and operators of the carrying
vessel, some states implemented statutes also imposing liability on the shippers
or owners of oil spilled from such vessels. Alaska, Washington, Oregon and California
are among these states. The exposure of BP to such liability is mitigated by
the vessels marine liability insurance, which has a maximum limit of $1
billion for each accident or occurrence. OPA 90 also provides that all new tank
vessels operating in US waters must have double hulls and existing tank vessels
without double hulls must be phased out by 2015. BP contracted with National
Steel and Ship Building Company (NASSCO) for the construction of four double-hulled
tankers in San Diego, California. The first of these new vessels began service
in 2004, demise-chartered to and operated by Alaska Tanker Company (ATC), which
transports BP Alaskan crude oil from Valdez. NASSCO delivered two more in 2005
and the fourth was delivered in 2006. At the end of 2007, the ATC fleet consisted
of five tankers, all double-hulled.
Outside the US, the BP-operated fleet of tankers
is subject to international spill response and preparedness regulations that
are typically promulgated through the International Maritime Organization (IMO)
and implemented by the relevant flag state authorities. The International Convention
for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (Marpol 73/78) requires vessels to
have detailed ship-board emergency and spill prevention plans. The International
Convention on Oil Pollution, Preparedness, Response and Co-operation requires
vessels to have adequate spill response plans and resources for response anywhere
the vessel travels. These conventions and separate Marine Environmental Protection
Circulars also stipulate the relevant state authorities around the globe that
require engagement in the event of a spill. All these requirements together
are addressed by the vessel owners in Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plans.
BP Shippings liabilities for oil pollution damage under the OPA 90 and
outside the US under the 1969/1992 International Convention on Civil Liability
for Oil Pollution Damage (CLC) are covered by marine liability insurance, having
a maximum limit of $1 billion for each accident or occurrence. This insurance
cover is provided by three mutual insurance associations (P&I Clubs): The
United Kingdom Steam Ship Assurance Association (Bermuda) Limited; The Britannia
Steam Ship Insurance Association Limited; and The Standard Steamship Owners
Protection and Indemnity Association (Bermuda) Limited. With effect from 20
February 2006, two new complementary voluntary oil pollution compensation schemes
were introduced by tanker owners, supported by their P&I Clubs, with the
agreement of the International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund at the IMO. Pursuant
to both these schemes, tanker owners will voluntarily assume a greater liability
for oil pollution compensation in the event of a spill of persistent oil than
is provided for in CLC. The first scheme, the Small Tanker Owners Pollution
Indemnification Agreement (STOPIA), provides for a minimum liability of 20 million
Special Drawing Rights (around $30 million) for a ship at or below 29,548
gross tons, while the second scheme, the Tanker Owners Pollution Indemnification
Agreement (TOPIA), provides for the tanker owner to take a 50% stake in the
2003 Supplementary Fund, that is, an additional liability of up to 273.5 million
Special Drawing Rights (around $430 million). Both STOPIA and TOPIA will
only apply to tankers whose owners are party to these agreements and who have
entered their ships with P&I Clubs in the International Group of P&I
Clubs, so benefiting from those clubs pooling and reinsurance arrangements.
All BP Shippings managed and time-chartered vessels participate in STOPIA
and TOPIA.
At the end of 2007, we had 53 international vessels
(39 medium-size crude and product carriers, four very large crude carriers,
one North Sea shuttle tanker, five LNG carriers and four LPG carriers). All
these ships are double-hulled. Of the five LNG carriers, BP manages one on behalf
of a joint venture in which it is a participant and operates four LNG carriers.
Three further LNG carriers are on order for delivery in 2008. In addition to
its own fleet, BP will continue to charter quality ships; all vessels will continue
to be vetted prior to each use in accordance with the BP group ship vetting
policy.
US
regional review
The following is a summary of significant US environmental
issues and legislation or regulations affecting the group.
The
Clean Air Act and its regulations require, among other things, stringent air
emission limits and operating permits for chemicals plants, refineries, marine
and distribution terminals; stricter fuel specifications and sulphur reductions;
enhanced monitoring of major sources of specified pollutants; and risk management
plans for storage of hazardous substances. This law affects BP facilities producing,
storing, refining, manufacturing and distributing oil and products as well as
the fuels themselves. Federal and state controls on ozone, particulate matter,
carbon monoxide, benzene, sulphur, MTBE, nitrogen dioxide, oxygenates and Reid
Vapor Pressure affect BPs activities and products in the US. BP is continually
adapting its business to these rules, which are subject to recent change. Beginning
January 2006, all gasoline produced by BP was subject to the EPAs stringent
low-sulphur standards. Furthermore, by June 2006, at least 80% of the highway
diesel fuel produced each year by BP was required to meet a sulphur cap of 15
parts per million (ppm) and 100% with effect from January 2010. By June 2007,
all non-road diesel fuel production had to meet a sulphur cap of 500ppm and
15ppm by June 2012. With effect from January 2011, EPAs Mobile Source
Air Toxics regulations will require a refinery annual average benzene level
of 0.62 volume percentage on all gasoline.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 also required several
changes to the US fuels market with the following fuel provisions: elimination
of the Federal Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) oxygen requirement in May 2006; establishment
of a renewable fuels mandate (4 billion gallons in 2006, increasing to 7.5 billion
in 2012); consolidation of the summertime RFG Volatile organic compound (VOC)
standards for Regions 1 and 2; provision to allow the Ozone Transport Commission
states on the east coast to opt any area into RFG; and a provision to allow
states to repeal the 1psi Reid Vapor Pressure waiver for 10% ethanol blends.
In 2001, BP entered into a consent decree with
the EPA and several states that settled alleged violations of various Clean
Air Act requirements related largely to emissions of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen
oxides at BPs refineries. Implementation of the decrees requirements
continues.
The Clean Water Act is designed to protect and
enhance the quality of US surface waters by regulating the discharge of wastewater
and other discharges from both onshore and offshore operations. Facilities are
required to obtain permits for most surface water discharges, install control
equipment and implement operational controls and preventative measures, including
spill prevention and control plans. Requirements under the Clean Water Act have
become more stringent in recent years, including coverage of storm and surface
water discharges at many more facilities and increased control of toxic discharges.
New regulations are expected during the next several years that could require,
for example, additional wastewater treatment systems at some facilities.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
regulates the storage, handling, treatment, transportation and disposal of hazardous
and non-hazardous wastes. It also requires the investigation and remediation
of locations at a facility where such wastes have been handled, released or
disposed of. BP facilities generate and handle a number of wastes regulated
by RCRA and have units that have been used for the storage, handling or disposal
of RCRA wastes that are subject to investigation and corrective action.
Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund), waste generators, site
owners, facility operators and certain other parties are strictly liable for
part or all of the cost of addressing sites contaminated by spills or waste
disposal regardless of fault or the amount of waste sent to a site. Additionally,
each state has separate laws similar to CERCLA.
BP has been identified as a Potentially Responsible
Party (PRP) under CERCLA or otherwise named under similar state statutes at
approximately 805 sites. A PRP or named party can incur joint and several liability
for site remediation costs under some of these statutes and so BP may be required
to assume, among other costs, the share attributed to insolvent, unidentified
or other parties. BP has the most significant exposure for remediation costs
at 52 of these sites. For the remaining sites, the number of parties can range
up to 200 or more. BP expects its share of remediation costs at these sites
to be small in comparison with the major sites. BP has estimated its potential
exposure
43 | |
at all sites where it has been identified as a PRP or is otherwise named and has established provisions accordingly. BP does not anticipate that its ultimate exposure at these sites
individually, or in aggregate, will be significant, except as reported for Atlantic Richfield Company in the matters below.
The US and the State of Montana
seek to hold Atlantic Richfield Company liable for environmental remediation,
related
costs and natural resource damages arising out of mining-related activities
by Atlantic Richfields predecessors in the upper Clark Fork River Basin (basin). Federal and state trustees also seek to recover damages for alleged injuries to natural resources in the basin. Past settlements
resolved Atlantic Richfields alleged liability for portions of these claims. In 2007, the parties reached an agreement in principle in which Atlantic Richfield agreed to pay approximately $169 million, plus interest, to settle all
remaining claims for natural resource damages in the basin, and federal and state claims for environmental remediation and related costs in the Clark Fork River operable unit and in portions of the Anaconda operable unit owned by the State of
Montana. Under the agreement, the State of Montana agreed to use most of the settlement funds to remediate and restore the identified areas. The settlement must be lodged in federal court and is contingent on government review of public comments on
the settlement, and court approval of the settlement. It includes limited reservations of rights against Atlantic Richfield. Other portions of the basin, principally in Anaconda and Butte, still require remediation. The estimated future cost of
completing remedies that the EPA has selected or proposed in the other remaining operable units in the basin is approximately $290
million. Past settlements between Atlantic Richfield, the US and the State
of Montana, including consent decree settlements in other portions of the basin,
may provide a framework for future settlement of the remaining claims.
The group is also subject to other
claims for natural resource damages (NRD) under CERCLA, OPA 90 and other federal
and state laws. NRD claims have been asserted by government trustees against
a number of group operations. This is a developing area of the law that could
affect the cost of addressing environmental conditions at some sites in the future.
In the US, many environmental clean-ups
are the result of strict groundwater protection standards at both the state and
federal level. Contamination or the threat of contamination of current or potential
drinking water resources can result in stringent clean-up requirements even if
the water is not being used for drinking water. Some states have even addressed
contamination of non-potable water
resources using similarly strict standards. BP has encouraged risk-based approaches
to these issues and seeks to tailor remedies at its facilities to match the level
of risk presented by the contamination.
Other significant legislation
includes the Toxic Substances Control Act, which regulates the development,
testing, import,
export and introduction of new chemical products into commerce; the Occupational
Safety and Health Act, which imposes workplace safety and health, training
and process safety requirements to reduce the risks of physical and chemical
hazards
and injury to employees; and the
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, which requires emergency
planning and spill notification as well as public disclosure of chemical usage
and emissions. In addition, the US Department of Transport (DOT), through the
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, comprehensively regulates
the transportation of the groups petroleum products such as crude oil,
gasoline and chemicals to protect the health and safety of the public.
BP is subject to the Marine Transportation
Security Act (MTSA) and the DOT Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) security compliance
regulations in the US. These regulations require many of our US businesses to
conduct security vulnerability assessments and prepare security mitigation plans
that require the implementation of upgrades to security measures, the appointment
and training of designated security
personnel and the submission of plans for approval and inspection by government
agencies.
The US government, in an effort
to further mitigate the threat of terrorism to critical US infrastructure, is
additionally mandating two new
security legislation initiatives, which began in the fourth quarter of 2007 and will continue through 2008: | |
– | Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standard (CFATS) rollout starting in 2007/2008. |
– | Transportation Workers Identification Credential (TWIC) rollout starting in 2007/2008. |
CFATS
is new legislation that began implementation in the fourth quarter
of 2007 and will continue through 2008. It is intended to provide an
enhanced security posture for US facilities that manufacture or store
fuels. Additionally, it will cover facilities that have national economic
impact to the US, should these facilities be a target for terrorism.
A number of BP facilities will be impacted by this legislation. Compliance
will require them to complete a screening review, and if not found
to be exempt, they will be required to conduct a detailed security
vulnerability assessment and a detailed security plan for each facility
impacted. TWIC is a new government employee background screening programme that is linked to the MTSA facilities. The programme requires all designated personnel with unescorted access to restricted areas of the MTSA designated facilities to submit to a detailed background screening programme and to be issued a bio-metric identification card. All of BPs MTSA-regulated facilities will be impacted and will be required to comply by the end of 2008 in a phased in approach. BP has a national spill response team, the BP Americas Response Team (BART), consisting of approximately 250 trained emergency responders at group locations throughout North America. In addition to the BART, there are five Regional Response Incident Management Teams, a number of HAZMAT Teams and emergency response teams at our major facilities. Collectively, these teams are ready to assist in a response to a major incident. See also Legal proceedings on page 82. |
European Union regional review
Within
the EU, European Community legislation is proposed by the European Commission
(EC) and usually adopted jointly by the European Parliament
and the Council of Ministers. It must then be implemented by each EU member
state. When implementing EU legislation, member states must ensure that penalties
for non-compliance are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, and must usually
designate a competent authority (regulatory
body) for implementation. Where the EC believes that a member state has failed
fully and correctly to transpose and implement EU legislation, it can take
the member state to the European Court of Justice, which can order the member
state to comply and in certain cases can impose monetary penalties on the member
state. A few non-EU states may also agree to apply EU environmental legislation,
in particular under the framework of the European Economic Area agreement.
An
EC directive for a system of integrated pollution prevention and control
(IPPC) was adopted in 1996. This system requires
certain listed industrial installations, including most activities and processes
undertaken by the oil and petrochemicals industry within the EU, to obtain an
IPPC permit, which is designed to address an installations environmental
impacts, air emissions, water discharges and waste in a comprehensive fashion.
The permit requires, among other things, the application of Best Available Techniques
(BAT), taking into account the costs and benefits, unless an applicable environmental
quality standard requires
more stringent restrictions, and an assessment of existing environmental impacts
and future site closure obligations. All such plants had to obtain such a permit
by 30 October 2007 and permits may include an environmental improvement programme.
The EC is currently reviewing the IPPC directive with the primary aim of merging
several separate directives related to industrial emissions into a single directive.
Initial indications suggest there is a strong desire by the EC to propose a more
prescriptive piece of legislation with a greater emphasis on mandating emission
limits contained in guidance documents. In particular, the review is likely to
propose more stringent regulations of combustion plant (with scope increased
to include
plants down to 20MW thermal input), extend IPPC to cover organic chemical manufacture
by biological treatment (biofuels) and may open the way for NOx and SOx trading
by member states.
44 | |
In
2005, the EC published its Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution, which
outlines EU-wide targets for health and environmental benefits from improved
air quality to be achieved through further controls on emissions of fine
particulates (PM 2.5 particulate matter less than 2.5 microns
diameter), sulphur dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, volatile organic compounds
and ammonia. Associated with this are two
important directives. The first is the Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe Directive (AAQD). This consolidates existing ambient air quality legislation (which prescribes ambient air quality limit values for sulphur dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter, lead, carbon monoxide, ozone, cadmium, arsenic, nickel, mercury and polyaromatic hydrocarbons) and introduces new controls on the concentration of fine particles in ambient air. If the concentration of a pollutant exceeds air quality limit values plus a margin of tolerance, or there is a risk of exceeding the limit, a member state is required to take action to reduce emissions. This may affect any BP operations whose emissions contribute to such exceedances. The second is a revision to the National Emissions Ceiling Directive (NECD). This will introduce new emissions ceilings for each member state for fine particles and will tighten existing ceilings for sulphur dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, volatile organic compounds and ammonia, in order to achieve the health and environmental benefits set in the Thematic Strategy referenced above. The ceilings set for a member state will trigger a range of abatement measures across industrial sectors that are assessed as being a cost effective means of achieving the ceiling. Recent climate change targets announced by the European Council in March 2007, together with developments in the atmospheric modeling that underpins the Thematic Strategy and NECD, mean that the proposal for the revision has been delayed until early summer 2008 and may be more stringent and therefore more costly for industry than anticipated. In early 2007, the EC published its proposal to amend the current EU Fuel Quality Directive. This directive seeks to set environment limits on gasoline and diesel road transport fuels, and as such is linked historically to the EU legislation on vehicle (passenger car and heavy duty) regulated emissions (the Euro standards) and has previously set the legislative timetable for the introduction of ultra-low sulphur (50ppm) and sulphur-free (<10ppm) fuels. However, a major theme of the ECs new proposal concerns biofuel policy, both directly in terms of a proposal to set life cycle GHG emission reductions and indirectly in terms of attempting facilitating the introduction of biofuels into gasoline and diesel. Specifically the key elements of the ECs current proposal are: |
|
– | Confirmation of the 1 January 2009 sulphur-free (<10ppm) deadline date for road diesel (alignment with the gasoline deadline). |
– | The reduction of non-road gasoil sulphur and inland waterway gasoil sulphur to 10ppm by 31 December 2009 and 31 December 2011 respectively. |
– | The reduction of the Poly-cyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) specification in diesel from 11% by weight to 8% by weight. |
– | The creation of a separate grade of gasoline allowing the blending to up to 10% by volume ethanol or its equivalent. |
– | The provision of a summer-time gasoline vapour pressure waiver for blends containing ethanol. |
– | Article 7a, requiring fuel suppliers to reduce the life-cycle GHG emissions from road transport fuels by 10% by 2020. |
The
key items of impact to BP are the attempt to create an additional gasoline
grade, and Article 7a and its potential impact on conventional gasoline
and diesel. Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH) legislation became effective 1 June 2007 across all member states of the EU. All chemical substances manufactured in, or imported into, the EU in quantities above 1 tonne per annum must be registered by each manufacturer/importer with the new European Chemical Agency (ECHA) based in Helsinki, Finland. Registration will occur during the period 2008-2018, with the exact timing being determined by the volumes of chemicals manufactured/imported, and by the hazard the chemical may |
pose to human health and
the environment. Time limited authorizations may be granted for substances
of high concern. Crude oil and natural gas are exempt, while fuels will be
exempted from authorization but not registration. In BP, REACH will affect our refining, petrochemicals and other chemical manufacturing operations, with many other businesses, such as lubricants, also being impacted in their roles as an importer or
downstream user of chemicals. BPs updated broad estimate (there are still many unknowns) indicates that the cost impacts of REACH for BP, covering hundreds of registrations, are expected to be in the region of $60
million over the period 2008-2018, with about two-thirds in the period 2008-2010.
Additional costs, for example submissions for authorization for relevant substances
and the modification of safety data sheets, will have to be assessed further
as the regulation is
implemented.
The
EC adopted a Directive on Environmental Liability on 21 April 2004. From 30
April 2007, member states must usually require the operators of activities
that cause
significant damage to water, ecological resources or land after that date to
undertake restoration of that damage. Provision is also made for reporting
and tackling imminent threats of such damage.
During
the past two years, BP has contributed actively to the High Level Group on
Competitiveness, Energy and the Environment chaired by the EC and involving
a range of stakeholders
from EU member states, industry, regulators, NGOs and trade unions. This group
worked successfully on a consensus basis, to offer a range of recommendations
to the EC intended to support energy and environmental policy
objectives while advancing the competitiveness of the European economy.
In
early 2008, the EC is expected to release a directive on thegeological storage
of CO2 and an accompanying
communication regarding incentives for carbon capture and storage (CCS).
The intention of the regulation is in part to identify regulatory barriers that
may restrict CCS technologies, so that those barriers can be appropriately addressed,
and to identify common methodologies to be implemented across EU member states.
In
2005, the EC published a proposed EC Marine Strategy Directive, which would
adopt an approach similar to that in
the Water Framework Directive by requiring
achievement of good environmental status for marine waters by 2021 through the implementation of programmes of measures. The legislation may have some impact on BPs
upstream operations in the North Sea.
Another
environment-related regulation
that may have an impact on BPs operations is the Major Hazards Directive,
which, for the sites to which it applies, requires emergency planning, public
disclosure of emergency plans and ensuring that hazards are assessed and effective
emergency management systems are in place.
Property, plants and equipment |
BP has freehold and leasehold interests in real estate in numerous countries, but no individual property is significant to the group as a whole. See Exploration and Production on page 13 for a description of the groups significant reserves and sources of crude oil and natural gas. Significant plans to construct, expand or improve specific facilities are described under each of the business headings within this section.
Organizational structure |
The significant subsidiaries of the group at 31 December 2007 and to the group percentage of ordinary share capital (to the nearest whole number) are set out in Financial statements Note 46 on page 167. See Financial statements Notes 26 and 27 on pages 134 and 135 respectively for information on significant jointly controlled entities and associates of the group.
45 | |
Financial and operating performance |
Group operating results
The
following summarizes the groups operating results.
$ million except per share amounts | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Sales and other operating revenues from continuing operationsa | 284,365 | 265,906 | 239,792 | |||
Profit from continuing operationsa | 21,169 | 22,626 | 22,133 | |||
Profit for the year | 21,169 | 22,601 | 22,317 | |||
Profit for the year attributable to BP shareholders | 20,845 | 22,315 | 22,026 | |||
Profit attributable to BP shareholders per ordinary share cents | 108.76 | 111.41 | 104.25 | |||
Dividends paid per ordinary share cents | 42.30 | 38.40 | 34.85 | |||
a | Excludes Innovene, which was treated as a discontinued operation in accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. See Financial statements Note 3 on page 110. |
Business environment
Crude
oil prices reached new record highs in 2007 in nominal terms. The average dated
Brent price rose to $72.39 per barrel, an increase of 11% over the $65.14 per barrel average seen
in 2006. Daily prices began the year at $58.62 per barrel and rose to $96.02
per barrel at year-end due to OPEC production cuts in early 2007, sustained consumption
growth and the resulting drop in commercial inventories after the
summer.
Natural
gas prices in the US and the UK declined in 2007. The Henry Hub First of
Month Index averaged $6.86 per mmBtu, 5% lower than the 2006 average of
$7.24 per mmBtu. Prices were pressured by record LNG imports in summer, continued
domestic production growth and inventories that set a new record at the end of
the storage injection season. Average UK gas prices fell to 29.95 pence per therm
at the National Balancing Point in 2007, 29% below the 2006 average of 42.19
pence per therm.
Refining
margins reached a new record high in 2007, with the BP Global Indicator
Margin (GIM) averaging $9.94 per
barrel. The premium for light products above fuel oils remained exceptionally
high, reflecting a continuing shortage of upgrading capacity and favouring fully
upgraded refineries over less complex sites.
The
retail environment continued to be extremely competitive in 2007 with market
volatility, high absolute prices, as well as a rising crude market.
The
business environment in 2006 was mixed compared with 2005, but still robust in
comparison with historical averages. Crude oil and UK natural gas prices increased,
while US natural gas prices and global refining margins fell.
The
dated Brent price averaged $65.14 per barrel, an increase of more than $10 per barrel over the $54.48 per barrel average seen in 2005, and varied
between $78.69 and $55.89 per barrel. Prices peaked in early August before
retreating in the face of a mild hurricane season and rising inventories. OPEC
action late in the year helped support prices.
Natural
gas prices in the US declined in 2006 compared with 2005, but remained
well above historical averages. The
Henry Hub First of Month Index averaged $7.24 per mmBtu, $1.41 per mmBtu below the 2005 average of $8.65
per mmBtu. Rising production and weak consumption resulted in above average inventories,
depressing gas prices relative to crude oil. UK gas prices rose slightly in 2006,
averaging 42.19 pence per therm at the National Balancing Point, compared with
a 2005 average of 40.71 pence per therm.
Refining
margins were only slightly
lower in 2006, with the BP GIM averaging $8.39 per barrel. This reflected
further oil demand growth, lingering effects on US refinery production from the
2005 hurricanes and gasoline formulation changes in several US states. The premium
for light products over fuel oils remained exceptionally high, favouring upgraded
refineries over less complex sites.
Retail
margins improved slightly in 2006, benefiting from a decline in the cost of product
during the second half of the year, despite intense
competition.
Hydrocarbon production
Our total hydrocarbon production during 2007 averaged 2,549mboe/d for subsidiaries
and 1,269mboe/d for equity-accounted entities, a decrease of 3% (3.5% for liquids
and 2.6% for gas) and 2% (1.3% for liquids and 8.4% for gas) respectively compared
with 2006. In aggregate, the decrease primarily reflected the effect of disposals
and net entitlement reductions in our PSAs. Compared with 2005, 2006 hydrocarbon
production for subsidiaries
decreased by 3.3% in 2006 reflecting a decrease of 5.1% for liquids and a decrease
of 1.3% for natural gas. Increases in production in our new profit centres were
offset by anticipated decline in our existing profit centres and the effect of
disposals. Hydrocarbon production for equity-accounted entities increased by
0.1%, reflecting a decrease of 1.3% for liquids and an increase of 10.2% for
natural gas.
Profit attributable to BP shareholders
Profit
attributable to BP shareholders for the year ended 31 December 2007 was $20,845 million, including inventory holding gains of $3,558 million. Inventory holding gains or losses
are described in footnote a below. Profit attributable to BP shareholders for the year ended 31 December 2006 was $22,315 million, after inventory holding losses of $253 million. Profit attributable to BP shareholders for the year ended 31
December 2005 was $22,026 million, including inventory holding gains of $3,027 million. The profit attributable to BP shareholders for the year ended 31 December 2006 included a loss from Innovene operations of $25 million, compared with
a profit of $184 million in the year ended 31 December 2005. The loss/profit from Innovene for the years 2006 and 2005 included losses on remeasurement to fair value of $184 million and $591 million respectively. Financial statements
Note 3 on page 110 provides further financial information for Innovene.
Profit
attributable to BP shareholders for the year ended 31 December 2007 included
net gains of $2,132 million on the disposal of assets; and was after net
impairment charges of $1,324 million, a further charge of $500 million in respect of the March 2005 Texas City refinery incident, a charge of $338 million associated with restructuring (with a further charge of $1 billion expected in
2008), a charge of $185 million in relation to new, and revisions to existing, environmental and other provisions, a charge of $91 million in respect of a donation to the BP Foundation, a net fair value loss of $7 million on embedded
derivatives (these embedded derivatives are fair valued at each period end with the resulting gains or losses taken to the income statement) and a charge of $410
million in respect of the reassessment of certain provisions.
Profit
attributable to BP shareholders for the year ended 31 December 2006 included
net gains of $3,286 million on the disposal of assets, net fair value
gains of $608 million on embedded derivatives and a credit of $44 million in relation to new, and revisions to existing, environmental and other provisions; and was after a charge of $425 million in respect of the March 2005 Texas City
refinery incident, a charge of $535 million relating to the reassessment of certain provisions, a charge of $155 million in respect of a donation to the BP Foundation and a net impairment charge of $121
million.
46 | |
Profit
attributable to BP shareholders for the year ended 31 December 2005 included
net gains of $1,429 million on the disposal of assets; and was after
net fair value losses of $2,047 million on embedded derivatives, a charge
of $1,200 million in respect of the March 2005 Texas City refinery incident,
a charge of $412 million in respect of new, and revisions to existing,
environmental and other provisions, an impairment charge of $359 million
and a charge of $134 million relating to the separation of the Olefins
and Derivatives business.
(See
Environmental expenditure
on page 52 for more information on environmental charges.)
The
primary additional factors reflected in profit for 2007, compared with 2006,
were higher liquids realizations,
stronger refining and marketing margins and improved NGLs performance;
however, these were more than offset by lower gas realizations, lower reported
production
volumes, higher production taxes in Alaska, higher costs (primarily reflecting
the impact of sector-specific inflation and higher
integrity spend), the impact of outages and recommissioning costs at the
Texas City and Whiting refineries, reduced supply optimization benefits and
a lower
contribution from the marketing and trading business in the Gas, Power
and Renewables
segment.
The primary additional
factors reflected in profit attributable to BP shareholders for the year ended
31
December 2006 compared with 2005 were higher oil realizations, higher refining
margins (including the benefit of supply optimization), higher retail margins
(although this was partially offset by a deterioration in other marketing
margins) and higher contributions from the operating businesses in
the Gas, Power and Renewables segment; these were offset by the ongoing impact
following the Texas City refinery shutdown, lower gas realizations, lower
production volumes and higher costs.
Profits
and margins for the group and for individual business segments can vary significantly
from period
to period as a result of changes in such factors as oil prices, natural
gas prices and refining margins. Accordingly, the results for the current and
prior periods do not necessarily reflect trends, nor do they provide indicators
of results for future periods.
Employee
numbers were approximately 97,600 at 31 December 2007, 97,000 at 31 December
2006 and 96,200 at 31 December
2005.
a
|
Inventory holding gains and losses represent the difference between the cost of sales calculated using the average cost of supplies incurred during the year and the cost of sales calculated on the first-in first-out (FIFO) method. Under the FIFO method, which we use for IFRS reporting, the cost of inventory charged to the income statement is based on the historic cost of acquisition or manufacture rather than the current replacement cost. In volatile energy markets, this can have a significant distorting effect on reported income. The amounts disclosed represent the difference between the charge to the income statement on a FIFO basis and the charge that would arise using average cost of supplies incurred during the period. For this purpose average cost of supplies incurred during the period is calculated by dividing the total cost of inventory purchased in the period by the number of barrels acquired. The amounts disclosed are not separately reflected in the financial statements as a gain or loss. |
BPs management believes this information is useful to illustrate to investors the fact that crude oil and product prices can vary significantly from period to period and that the impact on our reported result under IFRS can be significant. Inventory holding gains and losses vary from period to period due principally to changes in oil prices as well as changes to underlying inventory levels. In order for investors to understand the operating performance of the group excluding the impact of oil price changes on the replacement of inventories, and to make comparisons of operating performance between reporting periods, BPs management believes it is helpful to disclose this information. | |
Capital expenditure and acquisitions
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Exploration and Production | 13,661 | 13,075 | 10,149 | |||
Refining and Marketing | 4,447 | 3,122 | 2,757 | |||
Gas, Power and Renewables | 811 | 432 | 235 | |||
Other businesses and corporate | 275 | 281 | 797 | |||
Capital expenditure | 19,194 | 16,910 | 13,938 | |||
Acquisitions and asset exchanges | 1,447 | 321 | 211 | |||
20,641 | 17,231 | 14,149 | ||||
Disposals | (4,267 | ) | (6,254 | ) | (11,200 | ) |
Net investment | 16,374 | 10,977 | 2,949 | |||
|
Capital expenditure and acquisitions in 2007, 2006 and 2005 amounted to $20,641
million, $17,231 million and $14,149 million respectively. Acquisitions
in 2007 included the remaining 31% of the Rotterdam (Nerefco) refinery from
Chevrons Netherlands manufacturing company. There were no significant
acquisitions in 2006 or 2005.
Excluding
acquisitions and asset exchanges,
capital expenditure for 2007 was $19,194 million compared with $16,910 million in 2006 and $13,938
million in 2005. In 2006, this included $1 billion in respect of our investment
in Rosneft.
Finance costs and other finance income/expense
Finance
costs comprises group interest less amounts capitalized. Finance costs for continuing
operations in 2007 were $1,110 million compared with $718 million in 2006 and $616
million in 2005. The charge in 2007 reflected a higher average gross debt balance than in prior years, and lower capitalized interest than in 2006 as capital construction projects concluded. The increase for 2006 compared with 2005 reflected higher
interest rates, partially offset by increased capitalized interest. Finance costs in 2005 included a charge of $57
million arising from early redemption of finance leases.
Other
finance income/expense included net pension finance costs, the interest
accretion on provisions and, for 2005
and 2006, the interest accretion on the deferred consideration for the acquisition
of our investment in TNK-BP. Other finance income for continuing operations in
2007 was $369 million compared with $202 million in 2006 and a net expense of $145
million in 2005. The increase in income year on year largely reflects the higher
return on pension assets as the pension asset base applicable to each year increased,
reflecting rising asset market valuations.
Taxation
The charge
for corporate taxes for continuing operations in 2007 was $10,442 million, compared with $12,516 million in 2006 and $9,288
million in 2005. The effective rate was 33% in 2007, 36% in 2006 and 30% in
2005. The reduction in the effective rate in 2007 compared with 2006 primarily
reflects the reduction in the UK tax rate and a higher proportion of income
arising in countries bearing a lower tax rate and other
factors. The increase in the effective rate in 2006 compared with 2005 reflected
the impact of the increase in the North Sea tax rate enacted by the UK government
in July 2006 and the absence of non-recurring benefits that were present in
2005.
Business results
Profit
before interest and taxation from continuing operations, which is before finance
costs, other finance expense, taxation and minority
interests, was $32,352 million in 2007,
$35,658 million in 2006 and $32,182 million in 2005.
47 | |
Exploration and Production
$ million | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||
Sales and other operating revenues from continuing operations | 54,550 | 52,600 | 47,210 | ||||
Profit before interest and tax from continuing operationsa | 26,938 | 29,629 | 25,502 | ||||
Results include: | |||||||
Exploration expense | 756 | 1,045 | 684 | ||||
Of which: Exploration expenditure written off | 347 | 624 | 305 | ||||
$ per barrel | |||||||
Key statistics | |||||||
Average BP crude oil realizationsb | |||||||
UK | 70.36 | 62.45 | 51.22 | ||||
US | 68.51 | 62.03 | 50.98 | ||||
Rest of World | 70.86 | 61.11 | 48.32 | ||||
BP average | 69.98 | 61.91 | 50.27 | ||||
Average BP NGL realizationsb | |||||||
UK | 52.71 | 47.21 | 37.95 | ||||
US | 44.59 | 36.13 | 31.94 | ||||
Rest of World | 48.14 | 36.03 | 35.11 | ||||
BP average | 46.20 | 37.17 | 33.23 | ||||
Average BP liquids realizationsb c | |||||||
UK | 69.17 | 61.67 | 50.45 | ||||
US | 64.18 | 57.25 | 47.83 | ||||
Rest of World | 69.56 | 59.54 | 47.56 | ||||
BP average | 67.45 | 59.23 | 48.51 | ||||
$ per thousand cubic feet | |||||||
Average BP US natural gas realizationsb | |||||||
UK | 6.40 | 6.33 | 5.53 | ||||
US | 5.43 | 5.74 | 6.78 | ||||
Rest of World | 3.71 | 3.70 | 3.46 | ||||
BP average | 4.53 | 4.72 | 4.90 | ||||
$ per barrel | |||||||
Average West Texas Intermediate oil price | 72.20 | 66.02 | 56.58 | ||||
Alaska North Slope US West Coast | 71.68 | 63.57 | 53.55 | ||||
Average Brent oil price | 72.39 | 65.14 | 54.48 | ||||
$ per million British thermal units | |||||||
Average Henry Hub gas priced | 6.86 | 7.24 | 8.65 | ||||
pence per therm | |||||||
Average UK National Balancing Point gas price | 29.95 | 42.19 | 40.71 | ||||
thousand barrels per day | |||||||
Total liquids production for subsidiariesc e | 1,304 | 1,351 | 1,423 | ||||
Total liquids production for equity-accounted entitiesc e | 1,110 | 1,124 | 1,139 | ||||
million cubic feet per day | |||||||
Natural gas production for subsidiariese | 7,222 | 7,412 | 7,512 | ||||
Natural gas production for equity-accounted entitiese | 921 | 1,005 | 912 | ||||
thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day | |||||||
Total production for subsidiariese f | 2,549 | 2,629 | 2,718 | ||||
Total production for equity-accounted entitiese f | 1,269 | 1,297 | 1,296 | ||||
a | Includes profit after interest and tax of equity-accounted entities. |
b | The Exploration and Production segment does not undertake any hedging activity. Consequently, realizations reflect the market price achieved. |
c | Crude oil and natural gas liquids. |
d | Henry Hub First of Month Index. |
e | Net of royalties. |
f | Expressed in thousands of barrels of oil equivalent per day (mboe/d). Natural gas is converted to oil equivalent at 5.8 billion cubic feet = 1 million barrels. |
Sales and other operating revenues for 2007 were $55 billion, compared
with $53 billion in 2006 and $47 billion in 2005. The increase in 2007
primarily reflected an increase of
around $3.5 billion related to higher realizations, partially offset by a
decrease of around $1.5 billion due to lower volumes of subsidiaries. The
increase in 2006 primarily reflected an increase of around $6 billion related
to higher
liquids and gas realizations, partially offset by a decrease of around $1
billion due to lower volumes of subsidiaries.
Profit
before interest and tax for
the year ended 31 December 2007 was $26,938 million, including net gains of $907 million on the sales of assets
(primarily gains from the disposal of our production and gas infrastructure in the Netherlands, our interests in non-core Permian assets in the US and our interests in the Entrada field in the Gulf of Mexico), net fair value gains of $47
million on embedded derivatives (these embedded derivatives are fair valued at
each period end with the resulting gains or losses taken to the income statement)
and inventory
holding gains of $11 million; and was after a net impairment charge of $55 million, restructuring costs of $166 million, a charge of $168 million in respect of the
reassessment of certain provisions and a charge of $12 million in respect
of new, and revisions to existing, environmental and other provisions.
Profit
before interest and tax for
the year ended 31 December 2006 was $29,629 million, including net gains of $2,114 million on the sales of assets
(primarily gains from the sales of our interest in the Shenzi discovery in the Gulf of Mexico in the US and interests in the North Sea offset by a loss on the sale of properties in the Gulf of Mexico Shelf), net fair value gains of $515 million
on embedded derivatives and a net impairment credit of $203 million (comprising a $340 million credit for reversals of previously booked impairments partially offset by a charge of $109
million against intangible assets relating to properties in Alaska, and other
individually insignificant impairments), and was after inventory
48 | |
holding losses of $18 million and charges for legal provisions of $335
million.
Profit before interest and tax
for the year ended 31 December 2005 was $25,502 million, including inventory holding gains of $17 million and net gains of
$1,159 million on the sales of assets, primarily from our interest in the Ormen Lange field in Norway, and was after net fair value losses of $1,688 million on embedded derivatives, an impairment charge of $226 million in respect of
fields in the Gulf of Mexico, a charge for impairment of $40 million relating to fields in the UK North Sea and a charge of $265
million on the cancellation of an intra-group gas supply contract.
The primary additional factors
reflected in profit before interest and tax for the year ended 31 December
2007 compared
with the year ended 31 December 2006 were higher overall realizations contributing
around $3,000 million (liquids realizations were higher and gas realizations were lower) and a favourable effect from lagged tax reference prices in TNK-BP contributing around $500 million; however,
these factors were more than offset by decreases of around $1,000 million due to lower reported volumes, around $200 million due to higher production taxes in Alaska and around $2,800
million due to higher costs, reflecting the impacts of sector-specific inflation,
increased integrity spend and higher depreciation charges. Additionally, the
full-year result was lower by
around $1,000 million
due to the absence of disposal gains
in 2006 in equity-accounted entities.
The primary additional factors
reflected in profit before interest and tax for the year ended 31 December
2006 compared
with the year ended 31 December 2005 were higher overall realizations contributing
around $5,050 million (liquids realizations were higher and gas realizations were lower), partially offset by decreases of around $1,825 million due to lower reported volumes, $350 million due to
higher production taxes and $1,950 million due to higher costs, reflecting the impacts of sector-specific inflation, increased integrity spend and revenue investments. Additionally, BPs share of the TNK-BP result was higher by around
$500 million, primarily reflecting higher disposal gains.
Total
production for 2007 was 2,549mboe/d for subsidiaries and 1,269mboe/d for equity-accounted
entities,
compared with 2,629mboe/d and 1,297mboe/d respectively in 2006. In aggregate,
the decrease primarily reflected the effect of disposals and net entitlement
reductions in our PSAs.
Total
production for 2006 was 2,629mboe/d for subsidiaries and 1,297mboe/d for equity-accounted
entities,
compared with 2,718mboe/d and 1,296mboe/d respectively in 2005. For subsidiaries,
increases in production in our new profit centres were offset by anticipated
decline in our existing profit centres and the effect of disposals.
Refining and Marketing
$ million | ||||||
|
||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
|
||||||
Sales and other operating revenues from continuing operations | 250,866 | 232,855 | 213,326 | |||
Profit before interest and tax from continuing operationsa | 6,072 | 5,541 | 6,426 | |||
|
||||||
$ per barrel | ||||||
|
||||||
Global Indicator Refining Margin (GIM)b | ||||||
Northwest Europe | 4.99 | 3.92 | 5.47 | |||
US Gulf Coast | 13.48 | 12.00 | 11.40 | |||
Midwest | 12.81 | 9.14 | 8.19 | |||
US West Coast | 15.05 | 14.84 | 13.49 | |||
Singapore | 5.29 | 4.22 | 5.56 | |||
BP average | 9.94 | 8.39 | 8.60 | |||
|
||||||
% | ||||||
|
||||||
Refining availabilityc | 82.9 | 82.5 | 92.9 | |||
|
||||||
thousand barrels per day | ||||||
|
||||||
Refinery throughputs | 2,127 | 2,198 | 2,399 | |||
|
a | Includes profit after interest and tax of equity-accounted entities. |
b | The GIM is the average of regional industry indicator margins that we weight for BPs crude refining capacity in each region. Each regional indicator margin is based on a single representative crude with product yields characteristic of the typical level of upgrading complexity. The refining margins are industry-specific rather than BP-specific measures, which we believe are useful to investors in analyzing trends in the industry and their impact on our results. The margins are calculated by BP based on published crude oil and product prices and take account of fuel utilization and catalyst costs. No account is taken of BPs other cash and non-cash costs of refining, such as wages and salaries and plant depreciation. The indicator margin may not be representative of the margins achieved by BP in any period because of BPs particular refining configurations and crude and product slate. |
c | Refining availability is defined as the ratio of units that are available for processing, regardless of whether they are actually being used, to total capacity. Where there is planned maintenance, such capacity is not regarded as being available. During 2006 and 2007, there was planned maintenance of a substantial part of the Texas City refinery. |
The changes in sales and other operating revenues are explained in more detail below.
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Sale of crude oil through spot and term contracts | 43,004 | 38,577 | 36,992 | |||
Marketing, spot and term sales of refined products | 194,979 | 177,995 | 155,098 | |||
Other sales including non-oil and to other segments | 12,883 | 16,283 | 21,236 | |||
250,866 | 232,855 | 213,326 | ||||
|
||||||
thousand barrels per day | ||||||
Sale of crude oil through spot and term contracts | 1,885 | 2,110 | 2,464 | |||
Marketing, spot and term sales of refined products | 5,624 | 5,801 | 5,888 | |||
|
||||||
Sales and other operating revenues for 2007 was $251 billion, compared with $233 billion in 2006 and $213 billion in 2005. The increase in 2007 compared with 2006 was principally due to an increase of around $17 billion in marketing, spot and term sales of refined products. This was due to higher prices of $13 billion and a positive foreign exchange
impact due to a weaker dollar of $6 billion, partially offset by lower volumes of $2 billion. Additionally, sales of crude oil, spot and term contracts increased by $4 billion, primarily reflecting higher prices, and other sales decreased by $3 billion, due to lower volumes of $4 billion partially offset by a positive foreign exchange impact of $1 billion.
49 | |
Sales
and other operating revenues for 2006 was $233 billion, compared with
$213 billion in 2005 and $171 billion in 2004. The increase in 2006
compared with 2005 was principally due to an increase of around $23 billion
in marketing, spot and term sales of refined products. This was due to higher
prices of $25 billion, partially offset by lower volumes of $2 billion.
Additionally, sales of crude oil, spot and term contracts increased by $2
billion, reflecting higher prices of $6 billion and lower volumes of $4
billion, and other sales decreased by $5 billion, primarily due to lower
volumes.
Profit
before interest and tax for the year ended 31 December 2007 was $6,072
million, including net disposal gains of $1,151 million (primarily related
to the sale of BPs Coryton refinery in the UK, its interest in the West
Texas pipeline system in the US and its interest in the Samsung Petrochemical
Company in South Korea) and inventory holding gains of $3,455 million;
and was after impairment charges of $1,186 million (primarily related
to the sale of the majority of our US Convenience Retail business, a write-down
of certain assets at our Hull site and a write-down of our Mexico retail assets),
a charge of $500 million related to the March 2005 Texas City refinery
incident, a charge of $138 million relating to new, and revisions to existing,
environmental and other provisions, a restructuring charge of $118 million,
a charge of $91 million in respect of a donation to the BP Foundation
and a charge of $70 million related to the reassessment of certain provisions.
Profit
before interest and tax for the year ended 31 December 2006 was $5,541
million, including net disposal gains of $884 million (related primarily
to the sale of BPs Czech Republic retail business, the disposal of BPs
shareholding in Zhenhai Refining and Chemicals Company, the sale of BPs
shareholding in Eiffage, the French-based construction company, and pipelines
assets), and was after inventory holding losses of $242 million, a charge
of $425 million related to the March 2005 incident at the Texas City refinery,
an impairment charge of $155 million, a charge of $155 million in
respect of a donation to the BP Foundation and a charge of $33 million
relating to new, and revisions to existing, environmental and other provisions.
Profit
before interest and tax for the year ended 31 December 2005 was $6,426
million, including inventory holding gains of $2,532 million and net gains
of $177 million principally on the divestment of a number
of regional retail networks
in the US, and is after a charge of $1,200 million related to the March
2005 incident at the Texas City refinery, a charge of $140 million
relating to new, and revisions to existing, environmental and other provisions,
an impairment charge of $93 million and a charge of $33 million
for the impairment of an equity-accounted entity.
During
2007, the segment continued to focus on the restoration of operations at the
Texas City refinery and on investments in integrity management throughout
our refining portfolio. We have also focused on the repair and recommissioning
of the Whiting refinery following the operational issues in March 2007. In
many parts of the refining portfolio and the other market-facing businesses,
we delivered high reliability and improved results compared with 2006. However,
for the full year, compared with 2006, the impact of the outages and recommissioning
costs at the Texas City and Whiting refineries, as well as investments in
integrity management and scheduled turnarounds throughout our refining portfolio,
reduced the result by around $1,600 million, cost inflation reduced the
result by around $100 million and lower results from supply optimization
decreased the result by around $1,500 million. These factors more than
offset increased margins in both refining and marketing that contributed around
$1,150 million.
In
comparison with the year ended 31 December 2005, profit before interest and
tax for the year ended 31 December 2006 reflected higher refining margins
(including the benefit of supply optimization), which contributed around $900
million, higher retail margins by around $600 million (although this was
partially offset by a deterioration of around $150 million in other marketing
margins) and lower costs associated with rationalization programmes of around
$320 million. There was a reduction of around $1.1 billion due to
the impact of the progressive recommissioning of Texas City during the year.
Efficiency programmes delivered lower operating costs although the savings
were offset by higher turnaround and integrity management spend.
The
average refining Global Indicator Margin (GIM) in 2007 was higher than in
2006.
Refining
throughputs in 2007 were 2,127mb/d, 71mb/d lower than in 2006. Refining availability
was 82.9%, broadly consistent with 2006. Marketing volumes at 3,806mb/d were
around 2% lower than in 2006.
Gas, Power and Renewables
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Sales and other operating revenues from continuing operations | 21,369 | 23,708 | 25,696 | |||
Profit before interest and tax from continuing operationsa | 674 | 1,321 | 1,172 | |||
|
a | Includes profit after interest and tax of equity-accounted entities. |
The changes in sales and other operating revenues are explained in more detail below.
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Gas marketing sales | 8,639 | 11,428 | 15,222 | |||
Other sales (including NGL marketing) | 12,730 | 12,280 | 10,474 | |||
21,369 | 23,708 | 25,696 | ||||
|
||||||
million cubic feet per day | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Gas marketing sales volumes | 3,382 | 3,685 | 5,096 | |||
Natural gas sales by Exploration and Production | 4,414 | 5,152 | 4,747 | |||
|
||||||
Sales and other operating revenues for 2007 was $21 billion, compared with $24 billion in 2006. Gas marketing sales decreased by $2.8 billion reflecting a decrease of $0.9 billion related to lower volumes and a decrease of $1.9 billion related to lower prices. Other sales (including NGLs marketing) increased by $0.5 billion, reflecting an increase of $0.8 billion related to higher prices, partially offset by a decrease of $0.3 billion related to lower volumes. Sales and other operating revenues were $24 billion in 2006, compared with $26 billion in 2005. Gas
marketing sales declined
by $3.8 billion, reflecting a decrease of $4.2 billion related to
lower volumes, partially offset by an increase of $0.4 billion related
to higher prices. Other sales (including NGLs marketing) increased by $1.8
billion due to higher prices. Gas marketing sales volumes declined in 2007
and 2006 primarily due to customer portfolio changes.
Profit
before interest and tax for the year ended 31 December 2007 was $674
million, including inventory holding gains of $116 million and
50 | |
net disposal gains of $12
million; and was after a net fair value charge of $47 million on embedded
derivatives, impairment charges of $40 million and restructuring charges
of $22 million.
Profit
before interest and tax for the year ended 31 December 2006 was $1,321
million, including net gains of $193 million, primarily on the disposal
of our interest in Enagas, and net fair value gains of $88 million on
embedded derivatives, and was after inventory holding losses of $55 million
and a charge $100 million for the impairment of a North American NGLs
asset.
Profit
before interest and tax for the year ended 31 December 2005 was $1,172
million, including inventory holding gains of $95 million, compensation
of $265 million received on the cancellation of an intragroup gas supply
contract and net gains of $55 million primarily on the
disposal of BPs
interest in the Interconnector pipeline and a power plant in the UK, and
was after net fair value losses of $346 million on embedded derivatives
and a credit of $6 million related to new, and revisions to existing,
environmental and other provisions.
The
primary additional factors reflected in profit before interest and tax for
the year ended 31 December 2007, compared with the equivalent period in 2006,
were lower contributions from the marketing and trading businesses of around
$700 million partially offset by improved NGLs performance contributing
around $250 million.
The
primary additional factors reflected in profit before interest and tax for
the year ended 31 December 2006, compared with the equivalent period in 2005,
were higher contributions from the operating businesses of around $100
million.
Other businesses and corporate
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Sales and other operating revenues from continuing operations | 843 | 1,009 | 668 | |||
Profit (loss) before interest and tax from continuing operationsa | (1,128 | ) | (885 | ) | (1,237 | ) |
|
a | Includes profit after interest and tax of equity-accounted entities. |
Other businesses and
corporate comprises treasury (which includes all the groups cash,
cash equivalents and finance debt balances and associated interest income
and finance costs), the groups aluminium asset, and corporate activities
worldwide.
The
loss before interest and tax for the year ended 31 December 2007 was $1,128
million, including a net gain on disposal of $62 million; and was after
inventory holding losses of $24 million, a charge of $35 million in
relation to new, and revisions to existing, environmental and other provisions,
a charge of $32 million in respect of restructuring costs, an impairment
charge of $43 million, a net fair value loss of $7 million on embedded
derivatives and a charge of $172 million relating to the reassessment
of certain provisions.
The
loss before interest and tax for the year ended 31 December 2006 was $885
million, including inventory holding gains of $62 million, a credit
of $94 million in
relation to new, and revisions to existing, environmental and other provisions,
a net gain on disposal of $95 million and a net fair value gain of $5
million on embedded derivatives; and was after a charge of $200 million
relating to the reassessment of certain provisions and an impairment charge
of $69 million.
The
loss before interest and tax for the year ended 31 December 2005 was $1,237
million, including a net gain on disposal of $38 million; and was after
a net charge of $278 million relating to new, and revisions to existing,
environmental and other provisions and the reversal of environmental provisions
no longer required, a charge of $134 million in respect of the separation
of the Olefins and Derivatives business and net fair value losses of $13
million on embedded derivatives.
51 | |
Non-GAAP
information on fair value accounting effects
BP uses derivative
instruments to manage the economic exposure relating to inventories above
normal operating requirements of crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products
as well as certain contracts to supply physical volumes at future dates. Under
IFRS, these inventories and contracts are recorded at historic cost and on
an accruals basis respectively. The related derivative instruments, however,
are required to be recorded at fair value with gains and losses recognized
in income because hedge accounting is either not permitted or not followed,
principally due to the impracticality of effectiveness testing requirements.
Therefore, measurement differences in relation to recognition of gains and
losses occur. Gains and losses on these inventories and contracts are not
recognized until the commodity is sold in a subsequent accounting period.
Gains and losses on the related derivative commodity contracts are recognized
in the income statement from the time the derivative commodity contract is
entered into on a fair value basis using forward prices consistent with the
contract maturity.
IFRS
requires that inventory held for trading be recorded at its fair value using
period end spot prices whereas any related derivative commodity instruments
are required to be recorded at values based on
forward prices consistent
with the contract maturity. Depending on market conditions, these forward
prices can be either higher or lower than spot prices resulting in measurement
differences.
The Gas, Power and Renewables business enters into
contracts for pipelines and storage capacity that, under IFRS, are recorded on
an accruals basis. These contracts are risk managed using a variety of derivative
instruments that are fair valued under IFRS. This results in measurement differences
in relation
to recognition of gains and losses.
The way that BP manages the economic exposures
described above, and measures performance internally, differs from the way these
activities are measured under IFRS. BP calculates this difference by comparing
the IFRS result with managements internal measure of performance, under
which the inventory and the supply and capacity contracts in question are valued
based on fair value using relevant forward prices prevailing at the end of the
period. We believe that disclosing managements estimate of this difference
provides useful information for investors because it enables investors to see
the economic effect of these activities as a whole. The impacts of fair value
accounting effects, relative to managements internal measure of performance,
are shown in the table below.
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Refining and Marketing | ||||||
Unrecognized gains (losses) brought forward from previous period | 72 | 283 | (61 | ) | ||
Unrecognized (gains) losses carried forward | (429 | ) | (72 | ) | (283 | ) |
Favourable (unfavourable) impact relative to managements measure of performance | (357 | ) | 211 | (344 | ) | |
|
||||||
Gas, Power and Renewables | ||||||
Unrecognized gains (losses) brought forward from previous period | 155 | 123 | 147 | |||
Unrecognized (gains) losses carried forward | (107 | ) | (155 | ) | (123 | ) |
Favourable (unfavourable) impact relative to managements measure of performance | 48 | (32 | ) | 24 | ||
|
||||||
(309 | ) | 179 | (320 | ) | ||
Taxation | 105 | (96 | ) | 103 | ||
(204 | ) | 83 | (217 | ) | ||
|
||||||
By region | ||||||
Refining and Marketing | ||||||
UK | (52 | ) | 109 | (80 | ) | |
Rest of Europe | (110 | ) | 101 | (45 | ) | |
US | (165 | ) | 13 | (220 | ) | |
Rest of World | (30 | ) | (12 | ) | 1 | |
(357 | ) | 211 | (344 | ) | ||
|
||||||
Gas, Power and Renewables | ||||||
UK | 1 | 63 | 39 | |||
Rest of Europe | | | (9 | ) | ||
US | (77 | ) | (59 | ) | (32 | ) |
Rest of World | 124 | (36 | ) | 26 | ||
48 | (32 | ) | 24 | |||
|
||||||
Reconciliation of non-GAAP information | ||||||
Refining and Marketing | ||||||
Profit before interest and tax adjusted for fair value accounting effects | 6,429 | 4,830 | 7,270 | |||
Impact of fair value accounting effects | (357 | ) | 211 | (344 | ) | |
Profit before interest and tax | 6,072 | 5,041 | 6,926 | |||
|
||||||
Gas, Power and Renewables | ||||||
Profit before interest and tax adjusted for fair value accounting effects | 626 | 1,238 | 1,389 | |||
Impact of fair value accounting effects | 48 | 83 | (217 | ) | ||
Profit before interest and tax | 674 | 1,321 | 1,172 | |||
|
52 | |
Environmental expenditure
$ million | ||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Operating expenditure | 662 | 596 | 494 | |
Clean-ups | 62 | 59 | 43 | |
Capital expenditure | 1,033 | 806 | 789 | |
Additions
to environmental remediation
provision |
373 | 423 | 565 | |
Additions
to decommissioning provision |
1,163 | 2,142 | 1,023 | |
Operating and capital expenditure on the prevention, control, abatement or
elimination of air, water and solid waste pollution is often not incurred
as a separately identifiable transaction. Instead, it forms part of a larger
transaction that includes, for example, normal maintenance expenditure.
The figures for environmental operating and capital expenditure in the
table are therefore estimates, based on the definitions and guidelines
of the American Petroleum
Institute.
The
increase in environmental operating expenditure in 2007 compared with 2006
is primarily due to increased integrity
management activity and activity associated with the implementation of the Baker
Panel recommendations. The increase in environmental operating expenditure in
2006 compared with 2005 is largely related to expenditure incurred on reducing
air emissions at US refineries. Similar levels of operating and capital
expenditures are expected in the foreseeable future. In addition to operating
and capital expenditures, we also create provisions for future environmental
remediation. Expenditure against such provisions is normally in subsequent periods
and is not included in environmental operating expenditure reported for such
periods. The charge for environmental remediation provisions in 2007 includes $339 million resulting from a reassessment of existing site obligations and $34
million in
respect of provisions for new sites.
Provisions
for environmental remediation are made when a clean-up is probable and the
amount reasonably determinable. Generally, their timing coincides with commitment
to a formal plan of action or, if earlier, on divestment or on closure of
inactive sites.
The
extent and cost of future remediation programmes are inherently difficult
to estimate. They depend on the scale of
any possible contamination, the timing and extent of corrective actions and also
the groups share of liability. Although the cost of any future remediation could be significant and may be material to the result of operations in the period in which it is recognized, we do not expect that such costs will
have a material effect on the groups financial position or liquidity. We
believe our provisions are sufficient for known requirements; we do not believe
that our costs will differ significantly from those of other companies engaged
in similar industries, or that our competitive position will be adversely affected
as a result.
In
addition, we make provisions on installation of our oil- and gas-producing
assets and related pipelines to meet the cost of eventual decommissioning.
On installation of an oil or natural gas production facility a provision
is established that represents the discounted value of the expected future
cost of decommissioning the asset. Additionally, we undertake periodic reviews
of existing provisions. These reviews take account
of revised cost assumptions, changes in decommissioning requirements and any
technological developments. The level of increase in the decommissioning
provision varies with the number of new fields coming onstream in a particular
year and the outcome
of the periodic reviews.
Provisions
for environmental remediation and decommissioning are usually set up on
a discounted basis, as required by
IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent
Assets.
Further
details of decommissioning and environmental provisions appear in Financial
statements Note 37 on
page 151. See also Environment on page 40.
Suppliers and contractors
Our processes are designed to enable us to choose suppliers carefully on
merit, avoiding conflicts of interest and inappropriate gifts and entertainment.
We expect suppliers to comply with legal requirements and we seek to do business
with suppliers who act in line with BPs commitments to compliance and
ethics, as outlined in the code of conduct. We engage with suppliers in a
variety of ways, including performance review meetings to identify mutually
advantageous
ways to improve performance.
Creditor payment policy and practice
Statutory regulations issued under the UK Companies Act 1985
require companies to make a statement of their policy and practice in respect
of the
payment of trade creditors. In view of the international nature of the
groups operations there is no specific group-wide policy in respect of payments to suppliers. Relationships with suppliers are, however, governed by the groups
policy commitment to long-term relationships founded on trust and mutual advantage.
Within this overall policy, individual operating companies are responsible for
agreeing terms and conditions for their business transactions and ensuring that
suppliers are aware of the terms of payment.
Contributing to communities
We make direct contributions to communities through community
programmes. Our total contribution in 2007 was $135.8 million. This includes $0.7
million contributed by BP to UK charities. The growing focus of this is on
education, the development of local enterprise and providing access to energy
in remote locations.
In
2007, we spent $77.7 million
promoting education, with investment in three broad areas: energy and the environment;
business leadership skills; and basic education in developing countries where
we operate large projects.
53 | |
Liquidity and capital resources | |
Cash flow
The
following table summarizes the groups cash flows.
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations | 24,709 | 28,172 | 25,751 | |||
Net cash provided by operating activities of Innovene operations | | | 970 | |||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 24,709 | 28,172 | 26,721 | |||
Net cash used in investing activities | (14,837 | ) | (9,518 | ) | (1,729 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | (9,035 | ) | (19,071 | ) | (23,303 | ) |
Currency translation differences relating to cash and cash equivalents | 135 | 47 | (88 | ) | ||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 972 | (370 | ) | 1,601 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 2,590 | 2,960 | 1,359 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | 3,562 | 2,590 | 2,960 | |||
Net cash provided by operating
activities for the year ended 31 December 2007 was $24,709 million, compared with $28,172 million for the equivalent period of 2006 reflecting an increase in working capital
requirements of $6,282 million, a decrease in profit before taxation from continuing operations of $3,531 million, a decrease in dividends from jointly controlled entities and associates of $2,022 million; these were partially offset by
a decrease in income taxes paid of $4,661 million, a lower net credit for impairment and gain/loss on sale of businesses and fixed assets of $2,357 million and higher depreciation, depletion and amortization of $1,451
million.
Net cash provided by operating
activities for the year ended 31 December 2006 was $28,172 million, compared
with $26,721 million for the equivalent period of 2005, reflecting a decrease
in working capital requirements of $4,817 million, an increase in profit
before taxation from continuing operations of $3,721 million and an increase
in dividends from jointly controlled entities and associates of $1,662
million; these were partially offset by an increase in income taxes paid of
$4,705 million and a higher net credit for impairment and gain/loss on
sale of businesses and fixed assets of $2,095 million.
Net
cash used in investing activities
was $14,837 million in 2007, compared with $9,518 million and $1,729 million in 2006 and 2005. The increase in 2007 reflected a reduction
in disposal proceeds of $1,987 million and an increase in capital expenditure of $2,713 million. The increase in 2006 compared with 2005 reflected a reduction in disposal proceeds of $4,946 million and an increase in capital expenditure
of $2,844 million.
$ billion | ||
Sources | ||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 79 | |
Divestments | 22 | |
Movement in net debt | 6 | |
107 | ||
$ billion | ||
Uses | ||
Capital expenditure | 47 | |
Acquisitions | 2 | |
Net repurchase of shares | 34 | |
Dividends to BP shareholders | 23 | |
Dividends to minority interest | 1 | |
107 | ||
Acquisitions made for cash were more than offset by divestments. Net investment during the same period has averaged $9.0 billion per year. Dividends to BP shareholders, which grew on average by 15.4% per year in dollar terms, used $23 billion. Net repurchase of shares was $34 billion, which includes $35 billion in respect of our share buyback programme less proceeds from share issues. Finally, cash was used to strengthen the financial condition of certain of our pension funds. In the past three years, $2.3 billion has been contributed to funded pension plans.
Trend information
Total production for 2008 is expected to be higher than in
2007. This is based on the groups asset portfolio at 1 January 2008, expected startups in 2008 and Brent at $60/bbl, before any 2008 disposal effects
and before any effects of prices above $60/bbl on volumes in PSAs.
We
expect capital expenditure, excluding acquisitions and asset exchanges
and excluding the accounting related to our
entry into the Canadian oil sands via two joint ventures with Husky Energy Inc.,
to be between $21 billion and $22 billion in 2008. This amount includes
other investments in equity-accounted entities. The exact level will depend on
a number of things including: the actual level of sector inflation that we will
experience in the year; time-critical and material one-off investment opportunities
that further our strategy; and any acquisition opportunities that may arise.
We
expect to restore revenues by ramping up production following our recent
start-ups in the Gulf of Mexico, Angola and Trinidad and to bring refinery
production at the Texas City and
Whiting refineries back online.
Dividends and other distributions to shareholders and gearing
The total dividend paid in 2007 was $8,106 million, compared with $7,686
million for 2006. The dividend paid per share was 42.30 cents, an increase
of 10% compared with 2006. In sterling terms, the dividend remained flat
due to the weakness of the dollar. We determine the dividend in US dollars,
the
economic currency of BP.
54 | |
During 2007, the company repurchased
663 million of its own shares for cancellation at a cost of $7.5 billion. The repurchased shares had a nominal value of $166 million and
represented 3.4% of ordinary shares in issue, net of treasury shares, at the end of 2006. Since the inception of the share repurchase programme in 2000, we have repurchased 4,659 million shares at a cost of $48.2
billion.
Our dividend policy has been
to grow the dividend per share progressively, guided by several considerations
including the prevailing circumstances of the group, the future investment
patterns and sustainability of the group and the trading environment. We
have also been committed to returning all free cash flows in excess of dividend
needs to our shareholders. These broad principles remain, but changes in
our business and the
trading environment have given us greater confidence in our future cash flows
and have led us to rebalance the uses of this cash.
We now hold a more positive
view of the pricing environment, especially for oil, and we expect our financial
performance will be boosted by growing revenues, increased production and
improved refining availability. We also see significant potential for cost
efficiencies and improved performance across all our businesses. Our reduced
equity base, resulting from our share buyback programme, has made per-share
dividend increases
more affordable. In light of these factors, we have decided to increase organic
capital expenditure (that is capital expenditure excluding acquisitions and
assets exchanges) to support growth, and to rebalance our distributions between
dividends and share buybacks. We continue to believe that a gearing band
of 20-30% provides an efficient capital structure and the appropriate level
of financial flexibility. Taken together, these factors led us to increase
the dividend by 25% for the fourth
quarter, compared with the third quarter. As a result, the level of free cash
flow allocated to share buybacks is likely to be lower. We will, however,
continue to use share buybacks as a mechanism to return excess cash to shareholders
when appropriate and subject to renewed authority at the April 2008 annual
general meeting. At 31 December 2007, gearing was 23%, towards the bottom
of the targeted band.
BP intends to continue the operation
of the Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP) for shareholders who wish to receive
their dividend in the form of shares rather than cash. The BP Direct Access
Plan for US and Canadian shareholders also includes a dividend reinvestment
feature.
The discussion
above and following contains forward-looking statements with regard to future
production,
future
refining availability, future capital expenditure, sources of funding, future
revenues and financial performance, potential for cost efficiencies, level
of free cash flow allocated to share buybacks, shareholder distributions
and share
buybacks, gearing, working capital and expected payments under contractual
and commercial commitments. These forward-looking statements are based on
assumptions
that management believes to be reasonable in the light of the groups
operational and financial experience. However, no assurance can be given that
the forward-looking
statements will be realized. You are urged to read the cautionary statement
under
Forward-looking statements on page 10 and Risk factors on pages 8-9, which describe the risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. The company provides no commitment to update the forward-looking statements or to publish financial projections for forward-looking statements in the future.
Financing the groups activities
The
groups principal commodity, oil, is priced internationally
in US dollars. Group policy has been to minimize economic exposure to currency
movements by financing operations with US dollar debt wherever possible,
otherwise by using currency swaps when funds have been raised in currencies
other than
US dollars.
The groups finance debt is almost entirely in US dollars and at 31 December 2007 amounted to $31,045 million (2006 $24,010 million) of which $15,394 million (2006
$12,924 million) was short term.
Net debt was $27,483 million at the end of 2007, an increase of $6,063
million compared with 2006. The ratio of net debt to net debt plus equity was
23% at the end of 2007 and 20%
at the end of 2006.
The maturity profile and fixed/floating
rate characteristics of the groups debt are described in Financial statements Note
28 on page 136 and Note 35 on page 148.
We have in place a European Debt
Issuance Programme (DIP) under which the group may raise $15 billion of debt for maturities of one month or longer. At 31 December 2007, the amount
drawn down against the DIP was $10,438 million.
In addition, the group has in
place a US Shelf Registration under which it may raise $10 billion of debt with maturities of one month or longer. At 31 December 2007 the amount raised
under the US Shelf Registration was $2,500 million.
Commercial paper markets in the
US and Europe are a primary source of liquidity for the group. At 31 December
2007,
the outstanding commercial paper amounted to $5,881
million.
The group also has access to significant
sources of liquidity in the form of committed facilities and other funding
through the capital markets. At 31 December 2007, the group had available
undrawn committed
borrowing facilities of $4,950 million ($4,700 million at 31 December
2006).
BP believes that, taking into
account the substantial amounts of undrawn borrowing facilities available,
the group has sufficient working capital for foreseeable requirements.
Off-balance sheet arrangements
In addition to reported debt, BP uses conventional off-balance
sheet arrangements such as operating leases and borrowings in jointly controlled
entities and associates. At 31 December 2007, the groups share of
third-party finance debt of jointly controlled entities and associates was $5,894 million (2006 $4,942 million) and $870 million (2006 $1,143 million) respectively. These amounts are not reflected in the groups
debt on the
balance sheet.
The group has issued third-party guarantees under which amounts outstanding at 31 December 2007 are summarized below. Some guarantees outstanding are in respect of borrowings of jointly controlled entities and associates noted above. The analysis by time period indicates the ultimate expiry of the guarantees.
$ million | ||||||||
Guarantees expiring by period | ||||||||
2013 and | ||||||||
Total | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | thereafter | ||
Guarantees issued in respect ofa | ||||||||
Liabilities and borrowings of jointly controlled entities and associates | 443 | 180 | 19 | 6 | 3 | 56 | 179 | |
Liabilities and borrowings of other third parties | 601 | 83 | 27 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 467 | |
a | Of the amounts shown in the table, $284 million of the jointly controlled entities and associates guarantees relate to guarantees of borrowings and for other third parties guarantees $574 million relates to guarantees of borrowings. |
55 | |
Contractual commitments
The
following table summarizes the groups principal contractual obligations at 31 December 2007. Further information on borrowings and finance leases is given in Financial statements Note 35 on page 148
and further information on operating leases is given in Financial statements Note
15 on page 126.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||
Expected payments by period under contractual | 2013 and | |||||||||||||
obligations and commercial commitments | Total | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | thereafter | |||||||
Borrowingsa | 33,142 | 16,293 | 7,910 | 3,410 | 1,339 | 2,273 | 1,917 | |||||||
Finance lease future minimum lease payments | 1,291 | 268 | 101 | 105 | 108 | 79 | 630 | |||||||
Operating leasesb | 16,938 | 3,780 | 3,016 | 1,975 | 1,445 | 1,224 | 5,498 | |||||||
Decommissioning liabilities | 13,416 | 455 | 342 | 438 | 195 | 244 | 11,742 | |||||||
Environmental liabilities | 2,260 | 448 | 424 | 326 | 245 | 202 | 615 | |||||||
Pensions and other post-retirement benefitsc | 23,743 | 1,134 | 1,127 | 883 | 717 | 718 | 19,164 | |||||||
Purchase obligationsd | 164,943 | 105,922 | 16,739 | 9,446 | 5,986 | 4,711 | 22,139 | |||||||
|
a | Expected payments include interest payments on borrowings totalling $2,990 million ($1,145 million in 2008, $767 million in 2009, $401 million in 2010, $247 million in 2011, $191 million in 2012 and $239 million thereafter). |
b | The future minimum lease payments are before deducting related rental income from operating sub-leases. Where an operating lease is entered into solely by the group as the operator of a jointly controlled asset, the total cost is included irrespective of any amounts that will be reimbursed by joint venture partners. Where operating lease costs are incurred in relation to the hire of equipment used in connection with a capital project, some or all of the cost may be capitalized as part of the capital cost of the project. |
c | Represents the expected future contributions to funded pension plans and payments by the group for unfunded pension plans and the expected future payments for other post-retirement benefits. |
d | Represents any agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding and that specifies all significant terms. The amounts shown include arrangements to secure long-term access to supplies of crude oil, natural gas, feedstocks and pipeline systems. In addition, the amounts shown for 2008 include purchase commitments existing at 31 December 2007 entered into principally to meet the groups short-term manufacturing and marketing requirements. The price risk associated with these crude oil, natural gas and power contracts is discussed in Financial statements Note 28 on page 136. |
The following table summarizes the nature of the groups unconditional purchase obligations.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||
2013 and | ||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations | Total | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | thereafter | |||||||
Crude oil and oil products | 82,830 | 66,391 | 4,333 | 3,156 | 2,012 | 1,477 | 5,461 | |||||||
Natural gas | 41,064 | 21,314 | 5,757 | 2,893 | 1,926 | 1,520 | 7,654 | |||||||
Chemicals and other refinery feedstocks | 13,564 | 4,694 | 2,078 | 1,490 | 900 | 643 | 3,759 | |||||||
Power | 14,662 | 10,929 | 3,079 | 648 | 1 | 5 | | |||||||
Utilities | 1,545 | 182 | 135 | 119 | 118 | 116 | 875 | |||||||
Transportation | 3,921 | 1,116 | 615 | 452 | 330 | 266 | 1,142 | |||||||
Use of facilities and services | 7,357 | 1,296 | 742 | 688 | 699 | 684 | 3,248 | |||||||
Total | 164,943 | 105,922 | 16,739 | 9,446 | 5,986 | 4,711 | 22,139 | |||||||
|
The group expects its total capital expenditure, excluding acquisitions and asset exchanges and excluding the accounting related to our entry into the Canadian oil sands via two joint ventures with Husky Energy Inc., to be around $21-22 billion in 2008. This amount includes other investments in equity-accounted entities. The following table summarizes the groups capital expenditure commitments for property, plant and equipment at 31 December 2007 and the proportion of that expenditure for which contracts have been placed. Capital expenditure is considered to be committed when the project has received the appropriate level of internal management approval. For jointly controlled assets, the net BP share is included in the amounts shown. Where operating lease costs are incurred in connection with a capital project, some or all of the cost may be capitalized as part of the capital cost of the project. Such costs are included in the amounts shown.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2013 and | ||||||||||||||
Capital expenditure commitments | Total | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | thereafter | |||||||
Committed on major projects | 24,013 | 5,329 | 3,799 | 1,646 | 742 | 1,403 | 11,094 | |||||||
Amounts for which contracts have been placed | 8,263 | 5,200 | 1,999 | 747 | 187 | 57 | 73 | |||||||
|
In addition, at 31 December 2007, the group had committed to capital expenditure relating to investments in equity-accounted entities amounting to $4.5 billion. Contracts were in place for $1.1 billion of this total. The transaction with Husky Energy Inc., whereby BP will contribute $2.5 billion in return for an interest in an equity-accounted joint venture, is included in the committed capital expenditure. For further information, see Financial statements Note 3 on page 110.
56 | |
Critical accounting policies |
The significant accounting
policies of the group are summarized
in Financial statements Note 1 on page 100.
Inherent
in the application of many of the accounting policies used in preparing the financial
statements
is the need for BP management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual outcomes could differ from the estimates and assumptions used.
The following
summary provides further information about the critical accounting policies that
could have a significant impact on the results of the group and should be
read in conjunction with the Notes on financial statements.
The
accounting policies and areas that require the most significant judgements and
estimates used in
the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are in relation
to oil and natural gas accounting, including the estimation of reserves,
the recoverability of asset carrying values, deferred taxation, provisions
and contingencies, and pensions and other post-retirement benefits.
Oil and natural gas accounting
The group follows the successful efforts method of accounting for its oil and
natural gas exploration and production activities.
The
acquisition of geological and geophysical seismic information, prior to the discovery
of proved reserves,
is expensed as incurred.
Licence
and property acquisition costs are initially capitalized within intangible assets.
These costs are
amortized on a straight-line basis until such time that a determination is
made on whether exploratory drilling activity is successful. Where a determination
is made that the exploratory drilling is unsuccessful all costs are written
off. Each property is reviewed on an annual basis to confirm that drilling
activity is planned
and that it is not impaired. If no future activity is planned, the remaining
balance of the licence and property acquisition costs is written off.
For
exploration wells and exploratory-type stratigraphic test wells, costs directly
associated with the drilling of
wells are temporarily capitalized within non-current intangible assets, pending
determination of whether potentially economic oil and gas reserves have been
discovered by the drilling effort. These costs include employee remuneration,
materials and fuel used, rig costs, delay rentals and payments made to contractors.
The determination is usually made within one year after well completion,
but can take longer, depending on the complexity of the geological structure.
If the well did not encounter potentially economic oil and gas quantities,
the well costs are
expensed as a dry hole and are reported in exploration expense. Exploration
wells that discover potentially economic quantities of oil and gas and are
in areas where major capital expenditure (e.g. offshore platform or a pipeline)
would be required before production could begin, and where the economic viability
of that major capital expenditure depends on the successful completion of
further exploration work in the area, remain capitalized on the balance sheet
as long as additional exploration
appraisal work is under way or firmly planned.
It
is not unusual to have exploration wells and exploratory-type stratigraphic test
wells remaining suspended on
the balance sheet for several years while additional appraisal drilling and
seismic work on the potential oil and gas field is performed or while the
optimum development plans and timing are established.
All
such carried costs are subject to regular technical, commercial and management
review on at least an annual
basis to confirm the continued intent to develop, or otherwise extract value
from, the discovery. Where this is no longer the case, the costs are immediately
expensed.
Once a project is
sanctioned for development, the carrying values of licence and property acquisition
costs and exploration and appraisal costs are transferred to production assets
within property, plant and equipment. Field development costs subject to
depreciation are expenditures incurred to date, together with approved future
development expenditure required to develop reserves.
The
capitalized exploration and development costs for proved oil and gas
properties (which include the costs of drilling unsuccessful wells) are
amortized on the basis of oil-equivalent barrels that are produced in
a period as a percentage of the estimated proved
reserves. The estimated proved reserves used in these unit-of-production calculations vary with the nature of the capitalized expenditure. The reserves used in the calculation of the unit-of-production amortization are as follows: |
|
| Producing wells proved developed reserves. |
| Licence and property acquisition, field development and future decommissioning costs total proved reserves. |
The impact
of changes in estimated proved reserves is dealt with prospectively by
amortizing the remaining carrying value of the asset over the expected
future production. If proved reserves estimates are revised downwards,
earnings could be affected by higher depreciation expense or an immediate
write-down of the propertys carrying value (see discussion of
recoverability of
asset carrying values below). Given the large number of producing fields in the groups portfolio, it is unlikely that any changes in reserves estimates for individual fields, either individually or in aggregate, year on year, will have a significant effect on the groups prospective charges for depreciation. At the end of 2006, BP adopted the SEC rules for estimating reserves instead of the UK accounting rules contained in the UK Statement of Recommended Practice. These changes are explained in Financial statements Note 9 on page 120. The estimation of oil and natural gas reserves and BPs process to manage reserves bookings is described in Exploration and Production Reserves and production on page 14. As discussed below, oil and natural gas reserves have a direct impact on the assessment of the recoverability of asset carrying values reported in the financial statements. The 2007 movements in proved reserves are reflected in the tables showing movements in oil and gas reserves by region in Financial statements Supplementary information on oil and natural gas on pages 181 to 189. |
Recoverability of asset carrying values
BP
assesses its fixed assets, including goodwill, for possible impairment if there
are events or
changes in circumstances that indicate that
carrying values of the assets may not be recoverable and, as a result, charges
for impairment are recognized in the groups results from time to time. Such indicators include changes in the groups
business plans, changes in commodity prices leading to unprofitable performance,
low plant utilization and, for oil and gas properties, significant downward
revisions of estimated volumes or increases in estimated future development
expenditure. If there are low oil prices, natural gas prices, refining margins
or marketing margins during an extended period,
the group may need to recognize significant impairment charges.
The
assessment for impairment entails comparing the carrying value of the cash-generating
unit and associated goodwill with the recoverable amount of the asset, that
is, the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Value in
use is usually determined on the basis of discounted estimated future net
cash flows.
Determination
as to whether and how much an asset is impaired involves management estimates
on highly uncertain matters such as future commodity prices, the effects
of inflation on operating expenses, discount rates, production profiles and
the outlook for global or regional market supply-and-demand conditions for
crude oil, natural gas and refined products.
For
oil and natural gas properties, the expected future cash flows are estimated
based on the groups plans to continue to develop and produce proved reserves and associated
risk-adjusted probable and possible volumes. Expected future cash flows from the sale or production of these volumes are calculated based on the groups best estimate of future oil and gas prices. Prices for oil and natural gas used for future
cash flow calculations are based on market prices for the first five years and the groups long-term planning assumptions thereafter. As at 31 December 2007, the groups long-term planning assumptions were $60 per barrel for Brent and
$7.50 per mmBtu for Henry Hub (2006 $40
57 | |
per barrel and $5.50
per mmBtu). These long-term planning assumptions are subject to periodic
review and modification. The estimated
future level of production is based on assumptions about future commodity
prices, lifting and development costs, field decline rates, market demand
and supply,
economic regulatory climates and other factors.
The future cash flows are adjusted
for risks specific to the asset where appropriate and are discounted using
a pre-tax discount rate of 11% (2006 10%). This discount rate is derived
from the
groups post-tax weighted average cost of capital and is adjusted where
applicable to take into account country-specific risk.
Irrespective of whether there
is any indication of impairment, BP is required to test annually for impairment
of goodwill
acquired in a business combination. The group carries goodwill of
approximately $11.0 billion on its balance sheet, principally relating
to the Atlantic Richfield and Burmah Castrol acquisitions. In testing goodwill
for
impairment, the group uses a similar approach to that described above. The
cash-generating units for impairment testing in this case are one level below
business segments.
As noted above, if there are low oil prices or natural gas prices or refining
margins or marketing margins for an extended period, the group may need to
recognize significant goodwill impairment charges.
Deferred taxation
The group has carry-forward
tax losses in certain taxing jurisdictions that are available to offset against
future taxable
income. However, deferred
tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is considered more likely
than not that suitable taxable income will arise. Management judgement is
exercised in assessing whether this is the case. For further information
see Financial
statements Note 20 on page 128 and Note 44 on page 165.
Provisions and contingencies
The group holds provisions for the future decommissioning of oil and natural
gas production facilities and pipelines at the end of their economic lives.
The largest asset removal obligations facing BP relate to the removal and
disposal of oil and natural gas platforms and pipelines around the world.
The estimated discounted costs of dismantling and removing these facilities
are accrued on the installation of those facilities, reflecting our legal
obligations
at that time. A corresponding asset of an amount equivalent to the provision
is also created within property, plant and equipment. This asset is depreciated
over the expected life of the production facility or pipeline. Most of
these removal events are many years in the future and the precise requirements
that will have to be met when the removal event actually occurs are uncertain.
Asset removal technologies and costs are constantly changing, as well as
political, environmental, safety and
public expectations. Consequently, the timing and amounts of future cash flows
are subject to significant uncertainty. Changes in the expected future
costs are reflected in both the provision and the asset.
Decommissioning
provisions associated with downstream and petrochemicals facilities are generally
not provided
for, as such potential obligations cannot be measured, given their indeterminate
settlement dates. The group performs periodic reviews of its downstream and
petrochemicals long-lived assets for any changes in facts and circumstances
that might require the recognition of a decommissioning provision.
The
timing and amount of future expenditures are reviewed annually, together with
the interest rate used
in discounting the cash flows. The interest rate used to determine the balance
sheet obligation at the end of 2007 was 2%, unchanged from the end of 2006.
The interest rate represents the real rate (i.e. adjusted for inflation)
on long-dated government bonds.
Other
provisions and liabilities are recognized in the period when it becomes probable
that there will be
a future outflow of funds resulting from past operations or events and the
amount
of cash outflow can be
reliably estimated. The timing of recognition requires the application of judgement
to existing facts and circumstances, which can be subject to change. Since
the actual cash outflows can take place many years in the future, the carrying
amounts of provisions and liabilities are reviewed regularly and adjusted
to take account of changing facts and circumstances.
A
change in estimate of a recognized provision or liability would result
in a charge or credit to net income in
the period in which the change occurs (with the exception of decommissioning
costs as described above).
Provisions
for environmental clean-up and remediation costs are based on current legal
and constructive
requirements, technology, price levels and expected plans for remediation.
Actual costs and cash outflows can differ from estimates because of changes
in laws and regulations, public expectations, prices, discovery and analysis
of site conditions and changes in clean-up technology.
The
provision for environmental liabilities is reviewed at least annually. The
interest rate used to determine
the balance sheet obligation at 31 December 2007 was 2%, the same rate as
at
the previous balance sheet date.
As further described in Financial
statements Note 44 on page 165, the group is subject to claims and actions. The facts and circumstances relating to particular cases are evaluated
regularly in determining whether it is probable that there will
be a future outflow of funds and, once established, whether a provision relating
to a specific litigation should be adjusted. Accordingly, significant management
judgement relating to contingent liabilities is required, since the outcome
of
litigation is difficult to predict.
Pensions and other post-retirement benefits
Accounting for
pensions and other post-retirement benefits involves judgement about uncertain
events, including estimated retirement
dates, salary
levels at retirement, mortality rates, rates of return on plan assets, determination
of discount rates for measuring plan obligations, healthcare cost trend rates
and rates of utilization of healthcare services by retirees. These assumptions
are based on the environment in each country. Determination of the projected
benefit obligations for the groups defined benefit pension and post-retirement
plans is important to the recorded amounts for such obligations on the balance
sheet and to the amount of benefit expense in the income statement. The assumptions
used may vary from year to year, which will affect future results of operations.
Any differences between these assumptions and the actual outcome also affect
future results of operations.
Pension and other post-retirement
benefit assumptions are reviewed by management in December each year. These
assumptions are used to determine the projected benefit obligation at the
year end and hence
the surpluses and deficits recorded on the groups balance sheet, and
pension and post-retirement benefit expense for the following year.
The
pension and other post-retirement benefit assumptions at 31 December 2007, 2006
and 2005 are provided in Financial
statements Note 38 on page 152.
The assumed rate of investment
return, discount rate and the US healthcare cost trend rate have a significant
effect
on the amounts reported. A sensitivity analysis of the impact of changes in
these assumptions on the benefit expense and obligation is provided in Financial
statements Note
38 on page 152.
In addition to the financial assumptions,
we regularly review the demographic and mortality assumptions. Mortality assumptions
reflect best practice in the countries in which we provide pensions and have
been chosen with regard to the latest available published tables adjusted where
appropriate to reflect the experience of the group and an extrapolation of
past longevity improvements into the future. BPs most substantial
pension liabilities are in the UK, US and Germany and the mortality assumptions for these countries are detailed in Financial statements Note
38 on page 152.
58 | |
Directors, senior management and employees | |
The following lists the companys directors and senior management as at 19 February 2008.
Name | Initially elected or appointed | |
|
|
|
P D Sutherland | Chairman | Chairman since May 1997 |
Director since July 1995 | ||
Sir Ian Prosser | Non-Executive Deputy Chairman | Deputy chairman since February 1999 |
Director since May 1997 | ||
A Burgmans | Non-Executive Director | February 2004 |
C B Carroll | Non-Executive Director | June 2007 |
Sir William Castell | Non-Executive Director | July 2006 |
G David | Non-Executive Director | February 2008 |
E B Davis, Jr | Non-Executive Director | December 1998 |
D J Flint | Non-Executive Director | January 2005 |
Dr D S Julius | Non-Executive Director | November 2001 |
Sir Tom McKillop | Non-Executive Director | July 2004 |
Dr W E Massey | Non-Executive Director | December 1998 |
Dr A B Hayward | Executive Director (Group Chief Executive) | Group Chief Executive since May 2007 |
Director since February 2003 | ||
Dr D C Allen | Executive Director, Special Adviser (formerly Group Chief of Staff) | February 2003 |
I C Conn | Executive Director (Chief Executive, Refining and Marketing) | July 2004 |
Dr B E Grote | Executive Director (Chief Financial Officer) | August 2000 |
A G Inglis | Executive Director (Chief Executive, Exploration and Production) | February 2007 |
P B P Bevan | Group General Counsel | September 1992 |
S Bott | Executive Vice President, Human Resources | March 2005 |
V Cox | Executive Vice President, Alternative Energy | July 2004 |
R A Malone | Executive Vice President (Chairman and President of BP America Inc.) | July 2006 |
J Mogford | Executive Vice President, Safety and Operations | October 2007 |
S Westwell | Executive Vice President (Group Chief of Staff) | January 2008 |
|
At the companys 2007
annual general meeting (AGM), the following directors retired, offered themselves
for re-election and were duly re-elected: Dr D C Allen, The Lord Browne of Madingley,
Mr A Burgmans, Mr I C Conn, Mr E B Davis, Jr, Mr D J Flint, Dr B E Grote, Dr
A B Hayward, Dr D S Julius, Sir Tom McKillop, Mr J A Manzoni, Dr W E Massey,
Sir Ian Prosser and Mr P D Sutherland.
David
Jackson (55) was appointed company secretary in 2003. A solicitor, he is a director
of BP Pension Trustees Limited and a member of the Listing Authorities Advisory
Committee.
Directors
Changes
to the board
Set out below is a
statement by the chairman describing various changes to the composition of the
board that occurred during 2007.
In addition to John Brownes resignation and Tony Haywards appointment
as group chief executive, on which I have already commented in my letter
to shareholders, there have been some important changes to the board. John Manzoni agreed with the board that he would step down as a director on 31 August 2007. He has taken up a senior position in the industry in Canada. John has shown the most immense commitment and dedication to BP through a period of long and loyal service. David Allen will retire as a director on 31 March 2008. David has served on the board since 2003 and was group chief of staff until 1 January 2008. He has made a significant contribution to the group in many key areas, most particularly in shaping and applying corporate strategy. I would like to thank John Browne, John Manzoni and David Allen for their contributions. Walter Massey will stand down at the forthcoming AGM. Walter joined the BP board at the time of the Amoco merger in 1998 and has made a significant contribution in his tireless work as chairman of the safety, ethics and environment assurance committee. His strong scientific background, coupled with his broad experience of the US gained through his academic work and his role on a number of high-profile boards, has resulted in a very broad and significant contribution to the work of the board and its committees. He will be sorely missed and, on behalf of the board, I would like to thank him for all he has done. I am very pleased to welcome Cynthia Carroll and George David as new non-executive directors. Cynthia, who joined the board in June 2007, is the chief executive of Anglo American plc and has broad experience of the global extractive industries, having previously worked at Alcan and Amoco. Cynthia is a member of the chairmans committee and will join the safety, ethics and environment assurance committee in due course. George was appointed in February 2008. He is the chairman and chief executive of United Technologies Corporation and so has substantial experience of global industry. George is a member of the chairmans committee. I would also like to welcome Andy Inglis to the board. He was appointed as a director on 1 February 2007 as chief executive of the Exploration and Production segment. On 1 June 2007, Iain Conn became chief executive of the Refining and Marketing segment. During the year, we have kept under review the mix of skills on the board, particularly in light of the strategic and operational challenges that face the group both now and in the coming years. We have reviewed and refreshed our succession policy for non-executive directors and expect to make further appointments to the board shortly. |
||
Peter
Sutherland Chairman |
||
59 | |
P D Sutherland, SC, KCMG
Peter Sutherland (61) rejoined BPs board in 1995,
having been a non-executive director from 1990 to 1993, and was appointed chairman
in 1997. He is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a non-executive
director of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group.
Chairman of the chairmans and the
nomination committees
Sir Ian Prosser
Sir Ian (64) joined BPs board in 1997 and was appointed
non-executive deputy chairman in 1999. He is the senior non-executive director.
He retired as chairman of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC, a spin-off from
Bass PLC where he was chief executive, in 2003. He is the senior independent
non-executive director of GlaxoSmithKline plc and a non-executive director of
the Sara Lee Corporation. He was previously on the boards of The Boots Company
PLC and Lloyds TSB PLC.
Member of the chairmans, the nomination
and the remuneration committees and chairman of the audit committee
A Burgmans
Antony Burgmans (61) joined BPs board in 2004. He
was appointed to the board of Unilever in 1991. In 1999, he became chairman
of Unilever NV and vice chairman of Unilever PLC. In 2005, he became non-executive
chairman of Unilever PLC and Unilever NV, retiring from these appointments in
May 2007. He is also a member of the supervisory boards of Akzo Nobel NV and
Aegon NV.
Member of the chairmans and the
safety, ethics and environment assurance committees
C B Carroll
Cynthia Carroll (51) joined BPs board on 6 June 2007.
She started her career at Amoco and in 1989 she joined Alcan, where in 2002
she was appointed president and chief executive officer of Alcans primary
metals group and an officer of Alcan, Inc. She was appointed as chief executive
of Anglo American plc, the global mining group, in March 2007. She is also a
director of De Beers s.a. and Anglo Platinum Ltd.
Member of the chairmans committee
Sir William Castell, LVO
Sir William (60) joined BPs board in July 2006. From
1990 to 2004, he was chief executive of Amersham plc and subsequently president
and chief executive officer of GE Healthcare. He was appointed as a vice chairman
of the board of GE in 2004, stepping down from this post in 2006 when he became
chairman of the Wellcome Trust. He remains a non-executive director of GE.
Member of the chairmans, the audit
and the safety, ethics and environment assurance committees
G David
George David (65) joined BPs board on 11 February
2008. He has spent his career with United Technologies Corporation (UTC), becoming
its chief executive officer in 1994 and chairman in 1997. He joined UTCs
Otis elevator subsidiary in 1975. He is also a director of Citigroup Inc.
Member of the chairmans committee
E B Davis, Jr
Erroll B Davis, Jr (63) joined BPs board in 1998,
having previously been a director of Amoco. He was chairman and chief executive
officer of Alliant Energy, relinquishing this dual appointment in 2005. He continued
as chairman of Alliant Energy until February 2006, leaving to become chancellor
of the University System of Georgia. He is a member of the board of General
Motors Corporation, Union Pacific Corporation and the US Olympic Committee.
Member of the chairmans, the audit
and the remuneration committees
D J Flint, CBE
Douglas Flint (52) joined BPs board in 2005. He trained
as a chartered accountant and became a partner at KPMG in 1988. In 1995, he
was appointed group finance director of HSBC Holdings plc. He was chairman of
the Financial Reporting Councils review of the Turnbull Guidance on
Internal Control. Between 2001 and 2004, he served on the Accounting
Standards Board and the Standards Advisory Council of the International Accounting
Standards Board.
Member of the chairmans and the
audit committees
Dr D S Julius, CBE
DeAnne Julius (58) joined BPs board in 2001. She began
her career as a project economist with the World Bank in Washington. From 1986
until 1997, she held a succession of posts, including chief economist at British
Airways and Royal Dutch Shell Group. From 1997 to 2001, she was a full time
member of the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England. She is chairman
of the Royal Institute of International Affairs and a non-executive director
of Roche Holdings SA.
Member of the chairmans and the
nomination committees and chairman of the remuneration committee
Sir Tom McKillop
Sir Tom (64) joined BPs board in 2004. Sir Tom was
chief executive of AstraZeneca PLC from the merger of Astra AB and Zeneca Group
PLC in 1999 until December 2005. He was a non-executive director of Lloyds TSB
Group PLC until 2004 and is chairman of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group.
Member of the chairmans, the remuneration
and the safety, ethics and environment assurance committees
Dr W E Massey
Walter Massey (69) joined BPs board in 1998, having
previously been a director of Amoco. He is a non-executive director of Bank
of America, McDonalds Corporation and Delta Airlines and a member of President
Bushs Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. He was president
of Morehouse College from 1995 until his retirement in June 2007.
Member of the chairmans and the
nomination committees and chairman of the safety, ethics and environment assurance
committee
Dr A B Hayward
Tony Hayward (50) joined BP in 1982. He held a series of
roles in exploration and production, becoming a director of exploration and
production in 1997. In 2000, he was made group treasurer, and an executive vice
president in 2002. He was chief executive officer of exploration and production
between 2002 and February 2007. He became an executive director of BP in 2003
and was appointed as group chief executive on 1 May 2007. Dr Hayward is a non-executive
director of Corus Group plc.
Dr D C Allen
David Allen (53) joined BP in 1978 and subsequently undertook
a number of corporate and exploration and production roles in London and New
York. He moved to BPs corporate planning function in 1986, becoming group
vice president in 1999. He was appointed executive vice president and group
chief of staff in 2000 and an executive director of BP in 2003. Dr Allen relinquished
the role of group chief of staff on 1 January 2008, becoming a special adviser
to the group chief executive. He will retire from the board on 31 March 2008.
He is a director of BP Pension Trustees Limited.
I C Conn
Iain Conn (45) joined BP in 1986. Following a variety of
roles in oil trading, commercial refining, retail and commercial marketing
operations, and
exploration and production, in 2000 he became group vice president of BPs
refining and marketing business. From 2002 to 2004, he was chief executive
of petrochemicals.
He was appointed group executive officer with a range of regional and functional
responsibilities and an executive director in 2004. He was appointed chief
executive of refining and
marketing
in June 2007. He is a non-executive director of Rolls-Royce Group plc.
Dr B E Grote
Byron Grote (59) joined BP in 1987 following the acquisition
of The Standard Oil Company of Ohio, where he had worked since 1979. He
60 | |
became group treasurer in 1992 and in 1994 regional chief executive in Latin America. In 1999, he was appointed an executive vice president of exploration and production, and chief executive of chemicals in 2000. He was appointed an executive director of BP in 2000 and chief financial officer in 2002. He is a non-executive director of Unilever NV and Unilever PLC.
A G Inglis
Andy Inglis (48) joined BP in 1980, working on various North
Sea projects. Following a series of commercial roles in exploration, in 1996
he became chief of staff, exploration and production. From 1997 until 1999,
he was responsible for leading BPs activities in the deepwater Gulf of
Mexico. In 1999, he was appointed vice president of BPs US western gas
business unit. In 2004, he became executive vice president and deputy chief
executive of exploration and production. He was appointed chief executive of
BPs exploration and production business and an executive director on 1
February 2007.
Senior management
P B P Bevan
Peter Bevan (63) joined BP in 1970 after qualifying as a
solicitor with a City of London firm. He worked initially in the law department
of BPs chemicals business. He became group general counsel in 1992 following
roles as manager of the legal function of BP Exploration, assistant company
secretary and deputy group legal adviser. He was appointed an executive vice
president of BP in 1998.
S Bott
Sally Bott (58) joined BP in 2005 as an executive vice president
responsible for global human resources management. She joined Citibank in 1970
and, following a variety of roles, was appointed a vice president in human resources
in 1979 and subsequently held a series of positions as a human resources director
to sectors of Citibank. In 1994, she joined BZW, an investment bank, as head
of human resources and in 1996 became group human resources director of Barclays
Group. From 2000 to early 2005, she was managing director and head of global
human resources at insurance brokers Marsh Inc.
V Cox
Vivienne Cox (48) joined BP in 1981. Following a series
of commercial roles, she was appointed chief executive of Air BP in 1998. From
1999
until 2001, she was group vice president of BP Oil, responsible for business-to-business marketing and oil supply and trading. From 2001 to 2004, she was group vice president for integrated supply and trading. In 2004, she was appointed an executive vice president, responsible for gas, power and renewables in addition to the supply and trading businesses and, in late 2005, also became responsible for alternative energy. She is a non-executive director of Rio Tinto plc.
R A Malone
Bob Malone (55) was appointed chairman and president of
BP America Inc. and an executive vice president in mid-2006. He started his
career in 1974 at Kennecott Copper Corporation, holding various roles in environmental
engineering, operations and safety. From 1981 until 1988, he was director of
health, safety and environment for Kennecott and later held various other roles
for BP in America. In 1993, he became president of BP Pipelines Alaska and,
in 1996, president and chief operating officer of Alyeska Pipeline Service Company.
In 2000, he became western regional president for BP America and from 2002 until
2006 he was chief executive of BP Shipping Limited.
J Mogford
John Mogford (54) joined BP in 1977, spending the early
part of his career in a variety of drilling and production roles. In 1999, he
became group vice president for health, safety and the environment before being
appointed as group vice president for gas, power and renewables in 2002. In
2004, he returned to exploration and production as group vice president (technology
and functions). In 2005, he was appointed as senior group vice president of
safety and operations before becoming executive vice president, safety and operations
in October 2007. He will become chief operating officer of refining from 1 March
2008.
S Westwell
Steve Westwell (49) joined BP in the manufacturing and supply
division of BP Southern Africa in 1988. Following various retail positions in
the UK and the US he was appointed head of retail and a member of the board
of BP Southern Africa Pty. In 2003, he became president and chief executive
officer of BP solar, and in 2004, group vice president of natural gas liquids,
power, solar and renewables. In 2005, he was appointed group vice president
of alternative energy. He was appointed executive vice president and group chief
of staff on 1 January 2008.
Employees | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | ||||||||||
Number of employees at 31 December | UK | Europe | US | World | Total | ||||||
2007 | |||||||||||
Exploration and Production | 3,700 | 700 | 6,600 | 8,800 | 19,800 | ||||||
Refining and Marketing | 10,700 | 18,400 | 22,700 | 17,200 | 69,000 | ||||||
Gas, Power and Renewables | 300 | 800 | 1,900 | 1,500 | 4,500 | ||||||
Other businesses and corporate | 2,300 | | 1,800 | 200 | 4,300 | ||||||
17,000 | 19,900 | 33,000 | 27,700 | 97,600 | |||||||
2006 | |||||||||||
Exploration and Production | 3,500 | 700 | 6,200 | 8,600 | 19,000 | ||||||
Refining and Marketing | 11,300 | 18,600 | 23,900 | 15,700 | 69,500 | ||||||
Gas, Power and Renewables | 300 | 700 | 1,800 | 1,700 | 4,500 | ||||||
Other businesses and corporate | 1,800 | 200 | 1,800 | 200 | 4,000 | ||||||
16,900 | 20,200 | 33,700 | 26,200 | 97,000 | |||||||
2005 | |||||||||||
Exploration and Production | 3,100 | 700 | 5,600 | 7,600 | 17,000 | ||||||
Refining and Marketing | 11,300 | 19,700 | 25,200 | 14,600 | 70,800 | ||||||
Gas, Power and Renewables | 200 | 700 | 1,500 | 1,700 | 4,100 | ||||||
Other businesses and corporate | 1,900 | 200 | 2,100 | 100 | 4,300 | ||||||
16,500 | 21,300 | 34,400 | 24,000 | 96,200 | |||||||
|
61 | |
People
We had approximately 97,600 employees as at 31 December 2007, compared with approximately
97,000 at 31 December 2006.
In managing our people, we seek
to attract, develop and retain highly talented individuals in order to maintain
BPs capability to deliver our strategy and plans.
During
2007, the group people committee was formed, consisting of the group chief executive
and the executive
team. This committee takes overall responsibility for policy decisions relating
to employees. In 2007, these ranged from a new performance and reward approach
through to a new leadership model for the organization.
The
energy industry faces a shortage of professionals such as petroleum engineers
as the number of experienced
workers retiring is expected to exceed that of new graduate entrants. To
help address this issue in 2007, we took new steps to attract talented graduates,
including a new marketing campaign, a new selection process and stronger
relationships with a series of selected universities worldwide.
Our
policy is to ensure equal opportunity in recruitment, career development, promotion,
training and reward
for all employees, including those with disabilities. Where existing employees
become disabled, our policy is to provide continuing employment and training
wherever practicable.
We run
programmes designed to increase the number of local leaders and employees in
our operations so that
they reflect the communities in which we operate. For example, in Azerbaijan,
we achieved our 2007 target of 75% of professional positions to be filled
by national specialists.
At the end of 2007, 16% of our
top 624 leaders were female and 19% came from countries other than the UK
and the
US. When we started tracking the composition of our group leadership in 2000,
these percentages were 9% and 14% respectively. We have a number of programmes
in place to help raise our senior level leaders awareness of diversity and inclusion (D&I), such as our Managing Inclusion programme in the US. D&I
principles are also being incorporated into the Managing Essentials programme (see below).
We aim to develop
our leaders internally, although we recruit outside the group when we do not
have specialist
skills in-house or when exceptional people are available. In 2007, we appointed
72 people to positions in the 624-strong group leadership. Of these, 49 were
internal candidates.
We provide
development opportunities for our employees, including training courses, international
assignments,
mentoring, team development days, workshops, seminars and online learning.
We
encourage everyone to take five training days per year.
During
2007, we launched a top priority programme for BP managers called Managing Essentials,
designed to
enhance our leadership
development and drive
continuous improvement in performance. In 2007, we launched the programmes
first module on effective performance conversations, which helps managers
to have clear and constructive
discussions
with staff about their performance. By the end of the year, 36 programmes
had been run, with more than 700 managers attending. In 2008, we expect to
run
around 200 programmes for around 4,000 managers.
Through
our award-winning ShareMatch plan, run in more than 70 countries, we match BP
shares purchased by employees.
Communications
with employees include magazines, intranet sites, DVDs, targeted e-mails and
face-to-face
communication. Team meetings are the core of our employee consultation, complemented
by formal processes through works councils in parts of Europe. These communications,
along with training programmes, are designed to contribute to employee development
and motivation by raising awareness of financial, economic, social
and environmental factors affecting our performance.
The
group seeks to maintain
constructive relationships with labour unions.
The code of conduct
We have a code of conduct, launched in 2005, designed to ensure that all employees
comply with legal requirements and our own standards. The code defines
what BP expects of its people in key areas such as safety, workplace behaviour,
bribery and corruption and financial integrity. Our employee concerns programme,
OpenTalk, enables employees to seek guidance on the code of conduct as
well as to report suspected breaches of compliance or other concerns. The
number of cases raised through OpenTalk in 2007 was 975, compared with
1,064 in 2006. In the US, former US district court judge Stanley Sporkin
acts as an ombudsperson whom employees and contractors can contact confidentially
to report any suspected
breach of compliance, ethics or the code of conduct, including safety concerns.
We take steps to identify and
correct areas of non-compliance and take disciplinary action where appropriate.
In 2007,
944 dismissals were reported by BPs businesses for
non-compliance or unethical behaviour. This number excludes some dismissals
from the retail business, mainly at service station sites, for incidents such
as thefts
of small amounts of money.
BP
continues to apply a policy that the group will not participate directly in party
political activity
or make any political contributions, whether in cash or in kind. BP specifically
made no donations to UK or other EU political parties or organizations in
2007.
62 | |
Directors remuneration report |
This is the boards report to shareholders on directors remuneration. It covers both executive directors and non-executive directors. The first and second parts were prepared by the remuneration committee. The third part was prepared by the company secretary on behalf of the board. The report has been approved by the board and signed on its behalf by the company secretary. The report is subject to the approval of shareholders at the annual general meeting (AGM).
63 | |
Part 1: Summary |
Dear Shareholder
This
year has been a period of transition for the group and so the long-standing
principles that guide the remuneration committee have
been
particularly in evidence. These centre on a demanding performance link, for
the majority of executive directors remuneration, to support the creation
of long-term shareholder value; and the application of informed judgement
by the committee, using both quantitative and qualitative assessments, to
ensure
a fair and
appropriate reward for the executive directors.
Executive changes
Key
among the transitions was the appointment of Dr Hayward as group chief executive.
Mr Inglis was appointed chief executive of our
exploration
and production business and Mr Conn assumed the role of chief executive of
our refining and marketing business. They, along with Dr Grote in his continuing
role as chief financial officer, make up the new top team for the company.
The committee considered both the scale and importance of their roles as
well as the
operating style of the new team in reviewing their remuneration during the
year. Dr Haywards salary was increased to £950,000 per annum and the salary of both Mr Inglis and Mr Conn was set at £650,000 per annum. Dr Grotes
salary was increased to $1,300,000 per annum. All will have a target bonus opportunity of 120% of salary and long-term performance share awards of 5.5 times salary. These performance shares only vest to the extent that demanding performance
conditions are met. In addition to these ongoing plans, Mr Inglis and Mr Conn were each recently granted one-off retention awards in the form of restricted shares to a value of £1,500,000.
These will vest in equal tranches after three and five years, subject to their
continued service and satisfactory performance.
Both
Lord Browne and Mr Manzoni left the company during the year. Lord Browne
remained eligible for a lump
sum ex
gratia superannuation payment equal to one years salary but, in
light of his resignation, received no other compensation on his retirement. Mr Manzoni received one years
salary in line with his contractual entitlement. Both were eligible for a pro-rata
bonus for 2007, reflecting the results achieved as well as their time employed
during the year. Both retain full participation in the 2005-2007 and 2006-2008
share element but forfeit any participation in the 2007-2009 plan. They both
retain outstanding share options granted in earlier
years.
2007 performance
Overall performance for the year was constrained by the continuing impact of past operating challenges. Bonuses awarded reflect the balance of somewhat disappointing financial results coupled with good progress on
non-financial measures, including health, safety and environment (HSE), and very committed efforts by the executive directors to resolve past issues, advance the forward agenda and deliver results. These are set out in the summary table opposite,
along with all remuneration paid to executive directors in 2007.
The
impact of past operating problems affected the Executive Directors Incentive
Plan (EDIP) share element. Shares vest in this element based principally
on the total shareholder return
(TSR)
relative to the oil majors over the three-year performance period. Performance
failed to meet satisfactory levels and consequently no shares will vest in
the 2005-2007 plan. Although Lord Browne similarly did not receive shares under
the main 2005-2007 plan, around 15% of the shares of the separate leadership
portion vested.
Review
of policy With a new top team in place and having come through a testing time in terms of company performance, the committee decided to review remuneration policy during the year. The key area of review was the performance conditions applied to the EDIP share element. In particular, the committee considered whether additional performance measures or non-financial measures, such as health and safety indicators, should be included. The review included consultation with major shareholders and a comparison with other companies remuneration policies. The review reinforced our confidence in the current plan, approved by shareholders in 2005, in particular in the flexibility it gives us to exercise our judgement with regard to underlying performance and non-financial indicators without being formulaic. No changes to the policy are planned. For 2008, therefore, our policy is as follows: |
|
– | Salary Salaries are reviewed annually, based on independent advice, with regard to comparator companies and market conditions. |
– | Annual bonus On-target bonus is set at 120% of salary. The normal maximum bonus, also unchanged, is 150% of salary but, as in past years, the committee may in exceptional circumstances award bonus above that level if deemed justified by performance. Bonus for 2008 will reflect the business priorities of safety, people and performance as articulated by Dr Hayward. Of the 120% on-target bonus, 50 will be measured on financial results, principally earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), return on average capital employed and cash flow; 25 will be based on safety as assessed by the safety, ethics and environment assurance committee (SEEAC); 25 on people, behaviour and values; and 20 on individual performance, which will primarily reflect relevant operating results and leadership. |
– | EDIP
The share element will provide the primary long-term remuneration vehicle.
Shares will be awarded to a level of 5.5 times salary for each executive
director. These will vest after three years to the extent that performance
relative to the other oil majors merits it. Performance is measured principally on TSR versus ExxonMobil, Shell, Total and Chevron. 100% of shares vest if first, 70% if second, 35% if third and nothing if fourth or fifth. The committee will also apply informed judgement, looking at overall performance in determining the final vesting level. Shares that vest must be retained for a further three years before being released to the executive director. In addition, each executive director is expected to build a significant personal shareholding in BP. |
– | Pensions
Executive directors are eligible to participate in the appropriate pension
schemes applying to their home countries. With this policy, the majority of executive directors target remuneration is performance-based. |
Recognizing that unforeseen developments mean no remuneration structure is perfect, the committee will continue to apply its judgement in the implementation of the policy so as to reflect shareholders interests and also engage and retain our talented team of executives. |
Dr D S Julius
Chairman, Remuneration Committee
22 February 2008
64 | |
Annual remuneration | Long-term remuneration | ||||||||||||||
Share element of EDIPb | |||||||||||||||
2004-2006 plan | 2005-2007 plan | 2007-2009 plan | |||||||||||||
(vested
in Feb 2007) |
(vested
in Feb 2008) |
||||||||||||||
Salary
(thousand) |
Annual performance bonus (thousand) |
Non-cash
benefits and other emoluments (thousand) |
Total (thousand) |
Actual shares |
Valuec | Actual shares |
Valued | Potential maximum performance sharese |
|||||||
2006 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | vested | (thousand) | vested | (thousand) | ||||
Dr A B Hayward | £463 | £877 | £250 | £1,262 | £20 | £14 | £733 | £2,153 | 112,941 | £606 | 0 | 0 | 706,311 | ||
Dr D C Allen | £463 | £500 | £250 | £539 | £13 | £13 | £726 | £1,052 | 112,941 | £606 | 0 | 0 | 456,748 | ||
I C Conn | £463 | £581 | £250 | £698 | £42 | £45 | £755 | £1,324 | 54,600 | £293 | 0 | 0 | 456,748 | ||
Dr B E Grote | $973 | $1,175 | $525 | $1,551 | $1 | $10 | $1,499 | $2,736 | 127,601 | $1,338 | 0 | 0 | 491,640 | ||
A G Inglisf | n/a | £556 | n/a | £800 | n/a | £188 | n/a | £1,544 | 30,090 | £162 | 0 | 0 | 400,243 | ||
Directors leaving the board in 2007 | |||||||||||||||
Lord Browneg | £1,531 | £531 | £900 | £621 | £95 | £85 | £2,526 | £1,237 | 380,668 | £2,044 | 80,000 | £436 | 0 | ||
J A Manzonih | £463 | £323 | £250 | £311 | £45 | £33 | £758 | £667 | 112,941 | £606 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Amounts shown are in the currency received by executive directors. Annual bonuses are shown in the year they were earned.
a | This information has been subject to audit. |
b | Or equivalent plans in which the individual participated prior to joining the board. |
c | Based on market price on vesting date (£5.37 per share/$62.91 per ADS). |
d | Based on market price on vesting date (£5.45 per share). |
e | Maximum potential shares that could vest at the end of the three-year period depending on performance. |
f | Appointed to the board on 1 February 2007. |
g | Lord Browne resigned from the board on 1 May 2007. In addition to the above, he was awarded a lump sum ex gratia superannuation payment of one years salary (£1,575,000). |
h | Mr Manzoni resigned from the board on 31 August 2007. In addition to the above, he was awarded compensation for loss of office equal to one years salary (£485,000). He also received £30,000 in respect of statutory rights and retained his company car. |
Pensions
All
executive directors are part of a final salary pension scheme. Accrued annual
pension earned as at 31 December 2007 is £488,000 for Dr Hayward, £248,000 for Dr Allen, £238,000 for Mr Conn,
$778,000 for Dr Grote and £296,000 for Mr Inglis.
Historical
TSR performance
This
graph shows the growth in value of a hypothetical £100 holding in BP p.l.c. ordinary shares over five years, relative to the FTSE 100 Index (of which the company is a constituent). The values of the
hypothetical £100 holdings at the end of the five-year period were £172.09 and £188.23
respectively.
Remuneration of non-executive directors in 2007a | |||||
£ thousand | |||||
2006 | 2007 | ||||
A Burgmans | 85 | 86 | |||
Sir William Castell | 39 | 87 | |||
C B Carrollb | n/a | 43 | |||
E B Davis, Jr | 100 | 107 | |||
D J Flint | 100 | 86 | |||
Dr D S Julius | 105 | 106 | |||
Sir Tom McKillop | 85 | 87 | |||
Dr W E Massey | 130 | 133 | |||
Sir Ian Prosser | 130 | 137 | |||
P D Sutherland | 500 | 517 | |||
Directors leaving the board in 2007 | |||||
J H Bryanc | 110 | 45 | |||
a | This information has been subject to audit. |
b | Appointed on 6 June 2007. |
c | Also received a superannuation gratuity of £21,000. |
65 | |
Part 2: Executive directors remuneration |
Salary increases
During the
year, salary increases were awarded reflecting promotions and changed job responsibilities
as well as regular market movement. The
remuneration committee seeks to position salaries competitively relative
to appropriate
comparators in Europe and the US oil and gas sectors, as well as to reflect
the operating style of the team at the top. At the end of 2007, annual salaries were as follows: Dr Hayward £950,000, Dr Allen £510,000, Mr
Conn £650,000, Dr Grote $1,300,000 and Mr Inglis £650,000.
Annual bonus result
Performance measures and targets were set at the beginning of the year and formed the main basis for determining the 2007 bonus. Financial measures accounted for 50% weighting and focused on EBITDA, cash costs and
capital expenditure. Non-financial measures carried 30% weight and centred on HSE performance, growth and reputation. Individual performance, including segment deliverables and living the values of the group, made up the final 20%.
Financially,
underlying EBITDA results reflected a favourable price environment but also some
performance shortfall, related largely to reduced refining availability at Whiting
and Texas City, as well as delays in start-up of some major exploration and production
projects. Overall it was below expectation. Cash costs were marginally above
plan, largely due to higher expenditures in refining, especially Texas City.
Capital
expenditure was near plan, despite higher than expected sector inflation.
On
the non-financial side, safety was maintained as the highest priority of the
executive top team. Significant progress was made on many aspects of process
safety, ranging from development and testing of a process safety index, addressing
specific recommendations of the Baker Panel, implementing a holistic operating
management system (OMS) and ensuring clear accountability. Personal safety metrics
and greenhouse gas
emissions were also good.
Growth
was led by upstream, which had the strongest year of resource access since the
early 1990s and reserves replacement in excess of 100%. Refinery throughput was
below target, due to reduced availability at Texas City and Whiting. BP Alternative
Energy met plan targets, achieving some 40% growth compared with 2006.
External assessments indicate
that significant progress has been made to rebuild the companys reputation.
In
terms of individual performance during a transition year, the committee recognized
very high levels of personal and team effort to produce results, resolve past
issues and position the
company for future success.
The
strong individual performances, combined with above-target non-financial and
near-target financial performance, led the committee to award bonuses generally
around or just above
target, as set out in the summary table on page 64.
2005-2007 share element result
Performance
for the 2005-2007 share element was assessed relative to the TSR of the company
compared with the other oil majors ExxonMobil, Shell, Total and Chevron. BPs TSR result, reflecting past operating
problems, was last relative to the other majors. The committee also reviewed the underlying business performance relative to competitors, including financial (ROACE, EPS, cash flow etc.) and non-financial (HSE etc.) indicators. While this showed
some areas of strong performance, the committees overall assessment,
considering both the TSR result and the underlying performance, was that performance
failed
to meet satisfactory levels and consequently no shares will vest in the Plan
for
2005-2007.
Lord Browne also held an award
under the 2005-2007 share element related to long-term leadership measures.
These focused
on sustaining BPs financial, strategic and organizational
health. Performance relative to the award was assessed by the chairmans
committee and, based
on this assessment, 80,000 shares vested, representing about 15% of the award.
Salary
The
remuneration committee reviews salaries annually, taking into account other large
Europe-based global companies and companies in the US oil
and gas sector. These groups are each defined and analysed by the
committees independent remuneration advisers. The committee makes a judgement
on salary levels based on its assessment of market conditions and the external
advice.
Annual bonus
All executive directors are eligible to take part in an annual performance-based bonus scheme. The remuneration committee sets bonus targets and levels of eligibility each year.
The
target level for 2008 is 120% of base salary. In normal circumstances, the maximum
payment for substantially exceeding performance targets will continue to be 150%
of base
salary.
66 | |
Annual bonus awards for 2008 will be based on a mix of demanding financial targets, based on the annual plan and the leadership objectives set at the beginning of the year. The target-level bonus of 120% of base salary is split as follows: | |
| 50% financial metrics from the annual plan, principally EBITDA, cash costs and capital expenditure. |
| 25% safety performance, including satisfactory and improving key metrics as well as progress on OMS implementation. |
| 25% people, including behaviour, values and culture. |
| 20% individual performance, principally on relevant operating results and personal leadership. |
The remuneration committee will also review carefully the underlying performance of the group in light of company business plans and will look at competitors results, analysts reports and the views of the chairmen of other BP board committees when assessing results. | |
In exceptional circumstances, the remuneration committee can decide to award bonuses moderately above the maximum level. The committee can also decide to reduce bonuses where this is warranted and, in exceptional circumstances, bonuses could be reduced to zero. We have a duty to shareholders to use our discretion in a reasonable and informed manner, acting to promote the success of the company, and also to be accountable and transparent in our decisions. Any significant exercise of discretion will be explained in the subsequent directors remuneration report. |
Long-term incentives
Each executive director participates in the EDIP. It has three elements: shares, share options and cash. The remuneration committee did not use either share option or cash elements in 2007 and does not intend to do so
in 2008. We intend that executive directors will continue to receive performance shares under the EDIP, barring unforeseen circumstances, until it expires or is renewed in 2010.
Policy for performance share awards
The remuneration committee can award shares to executive directors that will only vest to the extent that demanding performance conditions are satisfied at the end of a three-year period. The maximum number of these
performance shares that can be awarded to an executive director in any year is at the discretion of the remuneration committee, but will not normally exceed 5.5 times base salary.
In
exceptional circumstances, the committee also has an overriding discretion to
reduce the number of shares that vest or to decide that no shares vest.
The
compulsory retention period will also be decided by the committee and will not
normally be less than three years. Together with the performance period, this
gives executive directors a six-year incentive structure, as shown in the timeline
below, which is designed to ensure their interests are aligned with those of
shareholders.
TIMELINE FOR 2008-2010 EDIP SHARE ELEMENT | ||
Where shares vest, the executive director will receive additional shares representing the value of the reinvested dividends.
The committees
policy continues to be that each executive director build a significant personal
shareholding,
with a target of shares equivalent in value to five times his or her base salary
within a reasonable timeframe from appointment as an executive director. This
policy is reflected in the terms of the EDIP, as shares awarded will normally
only be released at the end of the three-year retention period, described above,
if these minimum shareholding guidelines are met.
Performance conditions
For
performance share awards in 2008, the performance conditions will continue to
relate to BPs TSR compared with the other oil majors ExxonMobil, Shell, Total and Chevron over three years. We have
the discretion to alter this comparison group if circumstances change for
example, if there are significant consolidations in the industry.
We
consider this relative TSR to be the most appropriate measure of performance
for the purpose of long-term
incentives for executive directors. It best reflects the creation of shareholder
value while minimizing the impact of sector-specific effects such as the
oil price.
TSR is calculated as share price
performance over the relevant period, assuming dividends are reinvested.
All share prices
are averaged over the three months before the beginning and end of the performance
period. They are measured in US dollars. At the end of the performance period,
the companies TSRs will be ranked. Executive directors performance
shares will vest at 100%, 70% and 35% if BP is ranked first, second or third
respectively; none will vest if BP is in fourth or fifth place.
As the comparator group is small
and as the oil majors underlying businesses are broadly similar, a simple ranking could sometimes distort BPs underlying business performance
relative to the comparators. The committee is therefore able to exercise discretion in a reasonable and informed manner to adjust the vesting level upwards or downwards to reflect better the underlying health of BPs
business. This would be judged by reference to a range of measures including
ROACE, growth in EPS, reserves replacement and cash flow, as well as non-financial
reasons such as safety. The need to exercise discretion is most likely to arise
when the TSR of some companies is
clustered, so that a relatively small difference in TSR performance would produce
a major difference in vesting levels.
The remuneration committee will
explain any adjustments in the next directors remuneration report following
the vesting, in line with its commitment to transparency.
Special retention awards
The
committee reviews on an ongoing basis the overall approriateness of the long-term
incentive arrangements in ensuring the retention of key
executives. After careful review, the committee considered that it was appropriate
to strengthen
the retention element of remuneration for Mr Inglis and Mr Conn. Accordingly,
the committee in February 2008 granted, on a one-off basis, a restricted
stock award to both Mr Inglis and Mr Conn of shares worth £1,500,000 each. These awards recognize the importance of these individuals leadership in re-establishing the companys
competitive performance as well as their personal attractiveness for top
jobs externally. The shares will vest, subject to continued service, in equal
tranches
after three and five years. Vesting of each tranche is dependent on the committee
being satisfied, at each vesting date, with the performance of the individual.
These
retention awards have been granted under the EDIP, which permits awards to be
made, on an exceptional
basis, subject to a requirement of continued service over a specified
period.
Pensions
Executive directors are eligible to participate in the appropriate pension schemes
applying in their home countries. Additional details are given on page 67.
UK directors
UK directors are
members of the regular BP Pension Scheme. The core benefits under this scheme
are non-contributory. They include a pension
accrual of 1/60th of basic salary for each year of service, up to a maximum
of
two-thirds of final basic salary and a dependants benefit of two-thirds of the members
pension. The scheme pension is not integrated with state pension benefits.
The
rules of the BP Pension Scheme were amended in 2006 such that the normal retirement
age is 65. Prior
to 1 December 2006, scheme members could retire on or after age 60 without
reduction. Special early retirement terms apply to pre-1 December 2006 service
for members with long service as at 1 December 2006.
67 | |
Pension benefits in excess of the individual lifetime allowance set by legislation are paid via an unapproved, unfunded pension arrangement provided directly by the company.
US directors
Dr Grote participates in the US BP Retirement Accumulation Plan (US plan),
which features a cash balance formula. Pension benefits are provided through
a combination of tax-qualified and non-qualified benefit restoration plans,
consistent with US tax regulations as applicable.
The
Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefit (supplemental plan) is a non-qualified
top-up arrangement that became
effective on 1 January 2002 for US employees above a specified salary level.
The benefit formula is 1.3% of final average earnings, which comprise base
salary and bonus in accordance with standard US practice (and as specified
under the qualified arrangement), multiplied by years of service.
There is an offset for benefits payable under all other BP qualified and non-qualified
pension arrangements. This benefit is unfunded and therefore paid from corporate
assets.
Dr
Grote is eligible to participate under the supplemental plan. His pension
accrual for 2007, shown in the table
below, includes the total amount that could become payable under all
plans.
Other benefits
Executive directors are eligible to participate in regular employee benefit
plans and in all-employee share saving schemes and savings plans applying
in their home countries. Benefits in kind are not pensionable. Expatriates
may receive a resettlement allowance for a limited period.
Mr
Inglis is currently based in Houston, US, and the company provides accommodation
in London.
a | This information has been subject to audit. |
b | Additional pension earned during the year includes an inflation increase of 4.4% for UK directors and 2.3% for US directors. |
c | Transfer values have been calculated in accordance with version 8.1 of guidance note GN11 issued by the actuarial profession. |
d | Dr Allen is due to retire on 31 March 2008 and will be entitled to take an immediate unreduced pension. The figures in the table relate to 2007 and so do not include anticipated incremental cost of the unreduced pension (£1.36 million). |
68 | |
a | This information has been subject to audit. Includes equivalent plans in which the individual participated prior to joining the board. |
b | BPs performance is measured against the oil sector. For the 2005-2007 and subsequent awards, the performance condition is TSR measured against ExxonMobil, Shell, Total and Chevron other than the portion of Lord Brownes award that relates to leadership measures. Each performance period ends on 31 December of the third year. |
c | Represents awards of shares made at the end of the relevant performance period based on performance achieved under rules of the plan. |
d | On appointment to the board on 1 February 2007. |
e | Awards under 2007-2009 plan lapsed for Lord Browne and Mr Manzoni on leaving. |
69 | |
The closing market prices
of an ordinary share and of an ADS on 31 December 2007 were £6.15
and $73.17 respectively.
During
2007, the highest market prices were £6.34 and $79.70 respectively and the lowest
market prices were £5.07 and $58.80 respectively.
BPA = BP Amoco share
option plan, which applied to US executive directors prior to the adoption
of the EDIP.
EDIP = Executive Directors Incentive Plan adopted by
shareholders in April 2005 as described on page
66.
EXEC = Executive Share
Option Scheme. These options were granted to the relevant individuals prior
to their appointments as directors and are not subject to performance conditions.
SAR = Stock Appreciation
Rights under BP America Inc. Share Appreciation Plan.
SAYE = Save As You
Earn employee share scheme.
a | This information has been subject to audit. |
b | Closing market price for information. Shares were retained when exercised. |
c | Numbers shown are ADSs under option. One ADS is equivalent to six ordinary shares. |
d | On appointment to the board on 1 February 2007. |
e | On leaving the board on 1 May 2007. |
f | On leaving the board on 31 August 2007. |
70 | |
|
||||
Director | Contract date | Salary as at 31 Dec 2007 | ||
|
||||
Dr A B Hayward | 29 Jan 2003 | £950,000 | ||
Dr D C Allen | 29 Jan 2003 | £510,000 | ||
I C Conn | 22 Jul 2004 | £650,000 | ||
Dr B E Grote | 7 Aug 2000 | $1,300,000 | ||
A G Inglis | 1 Feb 2007 | £650,000 | ||
|
||||
Service contracts are expressed
to expire at a normal retirement age of 60 (subject to age discrimination).
The contracts have a notice period of one year.
The
service contracts of UK directors may be terminated by the company at any
time with immediate effect on payment
in lieu of notice equivalent to one years salary or the amount of
salary that would have been paid if the contract had terminated on the expiry
of the remainder of the notice period.
Dr
Grotes contract is with BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. He is seconded to BP p.l.c. under a secondment agreement of 7 August 2000, which expires on 31 March 2010. The secondment can
be terminated by one months notice by either party and terminates automatically on the termination of Dr Grotes
service contract.
There
are no other provisions for compensation payable on early termination of
the above contracts. In the event
of the early termination of any of the contracts by the company, other than for
cause (or under a specific termination payment provision), the relevant directors
then-current salary and benefits would be taken into account in calculating
any liability of the company.
Since
January 2003, new service contracts include a provision to allow for severance
payments to be phased, when appropriate. The committee will also consider mitigation
to reduce compensation to a departing director, when appropriate to do so.
Directors leaving the board
2007
Both
Lord Browne and Mr Manzoni, who were employed by the company under service contracts
dated 11 November 1993 and 29 January 2003 respectively,
left the company during the year. Lord Browne, who left on 1 May 2007, was
eligible for an ex gratia lump sum superannuation payment equal to one years salary (£1,575,000) but, in light of his resignation, did not receive the compensation for loss of office previously notified to shareholders. Mr Manzoni,
who left on 31 August 2007, was entitled to one years salary (£485,000)
as compensation on termination in accordance with his contractual entitlement.
Both individuals were eligible for a pro-rata bonus for 2007, reflecting achievement
of bonus targets and their period of employment during the year. As regards long-term
incentives, both individuals retain their performance awards under the EDIP in
respect of 2005-2007 and 2006-2008 share element and these will vest at the normal
time
to the extent the performance targets are met. Both individuals forfeited their
participation in the 2007-2009 share element. Further details of these awards
are set out in the table on page 68. Both individuals retained their outstanding
share
options, as set out in the table on page 69.
In
connection with the shareholder derivative actions brought in the US against
the directors of the company, the
company has agreed with the plaintiffs in the Alaska action, with the consent
of Lord Browne and Mr Manzoni, to defer the release of certain amounts and preserved
share awards to those individuals (other than Lord Brownes ex gratia superannuation
payment) pending resolution of the action. The company has agreed to pay the
individuals simple interest at the rate of 6.5% in respect of the period of deferral.
2008
As has been announced,
Dr Allen will leave the company at the end of March 2008. He will be entitled
to one years salary (£510,000)
as compensation in accordance with his contractual entitlement, as well as
a pro-rata bonus for 2008 and continued full participation in the 2006-2008
and 2007-2009 share elements, according to the normal rules of the plan.
Executive directors external appointments
The
board encourages executive directors to broaden their knowledge and experience
by taking up appointments outside the company. Each executive
director is permitted to accept one non-executive appointment, from which they
may retain any fee. External appointments are subject to agreement by the chairman
and must not conflict with a directors duties and commitments to BP.
During
the year, the fees received by executive directors for external appointments
were as follows:
|
||||
Executive director | Appointee company | Total fees | ||
|
||||
Dr A B Hayward | Corus | £62,250 | ||
Tata Steel | £177 | |||
|
||||
I C Conn | Rolls Royce | £57,166 | ||
Dr B E Grote | Unilever | Unilever PLC £31,000 | ||
Unilever NV €45,000 | ||||
|
||||
A G Inglis | BAE Systems | £39,661 | ||
|
Remuneration committee
All the members of the committee are independent non-executive directors. Throughout the year, Dr Julius (chairman), Mr Davis, Sir Tom McKillop and Sir Ian Prosser were members. Mr Bryan retired as a member in April
2007. The group chief executive at the time was consulted on matters relating to the other executive directors who report to him and on matters relating to the performance of the company; he was not present when matters affecting his own
remuneration were discussed.
Tasks | |
The remuneration committees tasks are: | |
| To determine, on behalf of the board, the terms of engagement and remuneration of the group chief executive and the executive directors and to report on these to the shareholders. |
| To determine, on behalf of the board, matters of policy over which the company has authority regarding the establishment or operation of the companys pension scheme of which the executive directors are members. |
| To nominate, on behalf of the board, any trustees (or directors of corporate trustees) of the scheme. |
| To review the policies being applied by the group chief executive in remunerating senior executives other than executive directors to ensure alignment and proportionality. |
Constitution and operation
Each member of the remuneration committee is subject to annual
reelection as a director of the company. The board considers all committee
members to be independent (see page
74).
They
have no personal financial interest, other than as shareholders, in the
committees decisions.
The
committee met six times in the period under review. There was a full attendance
record. Mr Sutherland, as chairman of the board, attended all the committee meetings.
The
committee is accountable to shareholders through its annual report on executive
directors remuneration. It will consider the outcome of the vote at the AGM on the directors remuneration
report and take into account the views of shareholders in its future decisions.
The committee values its dialogue with major shareholders on remuneration matters.
71 | |
Advice
Advice is provided
to the committee by the company secretarys office, which is independent of executive management and reports to the chairman of the board. Mr Aronson, an independent consultant, is the
committees secretary and special adviser. Advice was also received from
Mr Jackson, the company secretary.
The
committee also appoints external advisers to provide specialist advice and services
on particular remuneration matters. The independence of the advice is subject
to annual
review.
In
2007, the committee continued to engage Towers Perrin as its principal external
adviser. Towers Perrin also provided limited ad-hoc remuneration and benefits
advice to parts of the group, principally changes in employee share plans and
some market information on pay structures.
Freshfields
Bruckhaus Deringer provided legal advice on specific matters to the committee,
as well as providing some legal advice to the group.
Ernst & Young
reviewed the calculations on the financial-based targets that form the basis
of the performance-related
pay for executive directors, that is, the annual bonus and share element awards
described on page 65, to ensure they met an independent, objective standard.
They also provided audit, audit-related and taxation services for the group.
Part 3: Non-executive directors remuneration |
Policy The board sets the level of remuneration for all non-executive directors within a limit approved from time to time by shareholders. In accordance with BPs board governance principles, the remuneration of the chairman is set by the board rather than by the remuneration committee, as the performance of the chairman is seen as a matter for the board as a whole rather than any one committee. Key elements of BPs non-executive director remuneration policy include: |
|
| Remuneration should be sufficient to attract and retain world-class non-executive talent. |
| Remuneration of non-executive directors is set by the board and should be proportional to their contribution towards the interests of the company. |
| Remuneration practice should be consistent with recognized best practice standards for non-executive directors remuneration. |
| Remuneration should be in the form of cash fees, payable monthly. |
| Non-executive directors should not receive share options from the company. |
| Non-executive directors are encouraged to establish a holding in BP shares of the equivalent value of one years base fee. |
Remuneration
review In 2007, an ad-hoc board committee was formed to review the structure and quantum of BP non-executive directors remuneration (having previously been reviewed in 2004). The committee considered the existing BP policy on non-executive directors remuneration and concluded that it should remain unchanged. The committee evaluated non-executive director remuneration levels and trends in both the UK and internationally, using a number of external data sources. Outside the UK, particular focus was given to the remuneration practices for non-executive directors in the US. The committee also examined how the time commitment and workload for the board and its committees had changed in the three years since the previous review. Following the review, the committee proposed a revised structure and level of remuneration for BP non-executive directors. Key changes included: |
|
| Increases to the fees for the chairman and deputy chairman/senior independent director to reflect the market rates paid for those positions in companies of comparable size to BP. |
| The introduction of a flat fee for membership of the audit, the safety, ethics and environment assurance, the remuneration and the nomination committees (but not the chairmans committee) to reflect the increased time commitment for board committees over the past three years. |
| An increase in the fee for the chairmen of the audit committee and SEEAC to reflect the increase in time commitment and market rates for those committees. |
Consideration
was also given to abolishing the transatlantic attendance allowance, but
the committee concluded that this would be to the detriment of non-executives
based outside Europe, who would not otherwise be compensated for the
additional travel time required for UK
meetings. Changes to the structure and an increase to the level of non-executive directors fees were approved by the board and became effective 1 November 2007. |
72 | |
Fee structure
The table below shows the revised fee structure for non-executive directors.
£ thousand | ||||
|
||||
Fee level from | ||||
Fee level 2005-07 | 1 Nov 2007 | |||
|
||||
Chairmana | 500 | 600 | ||
Deputy chairmanb | 100 | 120 | ||
Board member | 75 | 75 | ||
Committee chairmanship flat feec | 20 | | ||
Audit committee and SEEAC chairmanship fees | | 30 | ||
Remuneration committee chairmanship fee | | 20 | ||
Transatlantic attendance allowance | 5 | 5 | ||
Committee membership fee | | 5 | ||
|
a | The chairman remains ineligible for committee chairmanship and membership fees or transatlantic attendance allowance. |
b | The role of deputy chairman is combined with that of senior independent director. The deputy chairman is still eligible for |
committee chairmanship fee and transatlantic attendance allowance plus any committee membership fees. | |
c | Committee chairmen will not receive an additional membership fee for the committee they chair. |
Remuneration of non-executive directors in 2007a | ||||||
£ thousand | ||||||
2006 | 2007 | |||||
A Burgmans | 85 | 86 | ||||
Sir William Castell | 39 | 87 | ||||
C B Carrollb | n/a | 43 | ||||
E B Davis, Jr | 100 | 107 | ||||
D J Flint | 100 | 86 | ||||
Dr D S Julius | 105 | 106 | ||||
Sir Tom McKillop | 85 | 87 | ||||
Dr W E Massey | 130 | 133 | ||||
Sir Ian Prosser | 130 | 137 | ||||
P D Sutherland | 500 | 517 | ||||
Directors leaving the board in 2007 | ||||||
J H Bryanc | 110 | 45 | ||||
a | This information has been subject to audit. |
b | Appointed on 6 June 2007. |
c | Also received a superannuation gratuity of £21,000. |
No share or share option awards were made to any non-executive director in respect of service on the board during 2007.
Non-executive directors have letters of appointment, which recognize that, subject to the Articles of Association, their service is at the discretion of shareholders. All directors stand
for re-election at each AGM.
Superannuation gratuities
Until
2002, BP maintained a long-standing practice whereby non-executive directors
who retired from the board after at least six years service were eligible for consideration for a superannuation gratuity. The
board was, and continues to be, authorized to make such payments under the companys Articles of Association and the amount of the payment is determined at the boards discretion, having regard to the directors
period of service as a
director and other relevant factors.
In 2002, the board revised its policy with respect to superannuation gratuities so that: | |
| Non-executive directors appointed to the board after 1 July 2002 would not be eligible for consideration for such a payment. |
| While non-executive directors in service at 1 July 2002 would remain eligible for consideration for a payment, service after that date would not be taken into account by the board in considering the amount of any such payment. |
The board made a superannuation gratuity of £21,000 during the year to Mr John Bryan, who retired in April 2007. This payment was in line with the policy arrangements agreed in 2002 and outlined above. |
Non-executive directors of Amoco Corporation
Non-executive
directors who were formerly non-executive directors of Amoco Corporation have
residual entitlements under the Amoco Non-Employee
Directors Restricted Stock Plan. Directors were allocated restricted
stock in remuneration for their service on the board of Amoco Corporation prior to its merger with BP in 1998. On merger, interests in Amoco shares in the plan were converted into interests in BP ADSs. The restricted stock will vest on the
retirement of the non-executive director at the age of 70 (or earlier at the discretion of the board). Since the merger, no further entitlements have accrued to any director under the plan. The residual interests, as interests in a long-term
incentive scheme, are set out in the table below, in accordance with the Directors Remuneration
Report Regulations 2002.
|
||||
Interest in BP ADSs | Date on | |||
at 1 Jan 2007 and | which director | |||
31 Dec 2007 | a | reaches age 70 | b | |
|
||||
E B Davis, Jr | 4,490 | 5 August 2014 | ||
Dr W E Massey | 3,346 | 5 April 2008 | ||
|
||||
Directors leaving the board in 2007 | ||||
|
||||
J H Bryanc | 5,546 | 5 October 2006 | ||
|
a | No awards were granted and no awards lapsed during the year. The awards were granted over Amoco stock prior to the merger but their notional weighted average market value at the date of grant (applying the subsequent merger ratio of 0.66167 of a BP ADS for every Amoco share) was $27.87 per BP ADS. |
b | For the purposes of the regulations, the date on which the director retires from the board at or after the age of 70 is the end of the qualifying period. If the director retires prior to this date, the board may waive the restrictions. |
c | Mr Bryan retired from the board on 12 April 2007. He had received awards of Amoco shares under the plan between 25 April 1989 and 28 April 1998 prior to the merger. These interests had been converted into BP ADSs at the time of the merger. In accordance with the terms of the plan, the board exercised its discretion over this award on 12 April 2007 and the shares vested on that date (when the BP ADS market price was $66.79) without payment by him. |
Past directors
Mr
Miles (who was a non-executive director of BP until April 2006) was appointed
as a director and non-executive chairman of BP Pension Trustees
Limited in October 2006 for a term of three years. During 2007, he
received £150,000 for this role.
This directors remuneration report was approved by the board and signed on its behalf by David J Jackson, Company Secretary, on 22 February 2008.
73 | |
BP board performance report |
Letter from the chairman |
Dear
Shareholder
During the past year, the board has carefully considered
the role it plays and its method of working. Central to this is the boards
review of its system of governance. This has been timely BP adopted its
prior governance framework for the board more than 10 years ago. This approach
has stood the board in good stead and has been robust when judged against the
standards of governance that have developed over time. This framework will continue
to underpin our approach.
It has, however, been important for the board to
consider the position of the company in the markets in which it operates and
to ensure that the manner in which the board works will meet the challenges that
BP will face in the future. As part of the review, each board member discussed
their evaluation of the existing policies and proposed their views on the role
and challenges for the BP board going forward. The review process also involved
benchmarking, identifying examples of governance best practice and a legal review
of US and UK board policies.
The board clearly needs to focus on its unique
tasks and these are described in the companys board governance principles,
which were approved in November and can now be found on our website.
The board will keep its work and performance under
regular review and will revisit the governance principles annually. Set out below
is a description of the board and its committees and an account of the work that
they have done during the year.
Peter Sutherland
Chairman
22 February 2008
Board governance principles |
The
board governance principles describe the boards relationship with shareholders and executive management, the conduct of board affairs and the tasks and requirements for board committees. They outline the
boards focus on activities that enable it to promote shareholders interests,
specifically the active consideration of strategy, the monitoring of executive
action and ongoing board and executive management succession.
The board believes that the governance
of BP is best achieved by the delegation of its authority for executive management
to the group chief executive, subject to monitoring by the board and the limitations
defined in the board governance principles. These executive limitations require
that any executive action taken in the course of business takes specific issues
into consideration, including health, safety and the environment, risk and
internal controls and financing.
BPs board governance principles can be viewed on the governance section
of bp.com at www.bp.com/corporategovernance.
Operating the principles
The group chief
executive describes to the board in the annual business plan how the strategy
is to be delivered,
together with an assessment
of the groups risks. During the year, the board monitors progress
and keeps the strategy under regular review.
The
group chief executive is obliged to review and discuss with the board all strategic
projects or developments and all material matters currently or prospectively
affecting the company
and its performance.
The board governance principles
further set out how the group chief executives performance will be
monitored during the year.
The boards engagement with shareholders |
The board is accountable
to shareholders for the performance and activities of the BP group. The board
takes steps to engage with shareholders and to evaluate the relevant financial,
social, environmental and ethical matters that may influence or affect the
business. The board recognizes that, in conducting its business, BP should
be responsive to other relevant constituencies.
During the year, the chairman met with institutional
shareholders to discuss issues relating to the board, governance and high-level
strategy and the remuneration committee consulted with larger shareholders on
elements of the executive remuneration
plan.
The group chief executive, other executive directors
and senior management, company secretarys office, investor relations and
other teams within BP also engage with a broad range of shareholders on wider
issues relating to the group, including in particular its safety, operations
and financial performance. Presentations given by the company to the investment
community are available to download from the investors section of www.bp.com,
as are speeches on topics of broad interest to shareholders made by the group
chief executive and other senior members of the management
team.
BPs AGM |
Shareholders are encouraged
to attend the AGM and use the opportunity to ask questions and hear the resulting
discussion about BPs performance. However, given the size and geographical
diversity of the companys shareholder base, attendance may not always
be practical and shareholders are encouraged to use proxy voting on the resolutions
put forward. Every vote cast, whether in person or by proxy at shareholder
meetings, is counted, because votes on all matters except procedural issues
are taken by a poll.
Copies of speeches and presentations given at the
AGM are available to download from the BP website after the event, together with
the outcome of voting on the resolutions.
Both the chairman and board committee chairmen
were present during the 2007 AGM. Board members met shareholders on an informal
basis after the main business of the meeting. In 2007, voting levels at the AGM
showed a slight decrease to 61%, compared with 64% in 2006. It is proposed that
the AGM in 2008 will also be webcast.
Director elections |
All directors stand for
re-election by shareholders each year, with new directors being subject to
election at the first opportunity following their appointment. All the names
submitted to shareholders for election are accompanied by a biography and a
description of the skills and experience that the company feels are relevant
in proposing each director for election.
Voting levels at the 2007 AGM demonstrated continued
support for all BP directors.
Board composition, skills and renewal |
The board governance principles
require the majority of the board to be composed of independent non-executive
directors and the size of the board not normally to exceed 16 directors. The
board is composed of the chairman, 10 non-executive and five executive directors;
in total, four nationalities are represented.
Lord Browne resigned as group chief executive on
1 May 2007 and was succeeded by Dr
Anthony Hayward, who
had been appointed group
74 | |
chief executive designate on 1 February 2007. Andy Inglis joined the board
on 1 February 2007 as chief executive of the exploration and production segment
succeeding Dr Hayward. John Manzoni resigned as an executive director and
chief executive of refining and marketing and left the company on 31 August
2007. Dr David Allen will retire from the board and the company at the end
of March 2008.
From the non-executive directors, Mr John Bryan
retired in April 2007 and, at the 2008 AGM, Dr Walter Massey will retire from
the board.
In June 2007, Mrs Cynthia Carroll and, in February
2008, Mr George David were appointed as a non-executive directors. External recruitment
consultants were used to identify Mrs Carroll and Mr David as candidates and
the board believes that their skills and experience will complement those of
existing board members and enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the board
as a whole, particularly from the aspect of BPs US operations.
The board remains actively engaged in orderly succession
planning for both executive and non-executive roles and manages this with the
assistance of the nomination committee. The committee assesses the balance of
executive and non-executive directors and the composition of the board in terms
of the skills and diversity required to ensure it remains relevant and effective.
Following an assessment by the nomination committee, the board will continue
its policy of regularly refreshing board membership.
The board has also begun the process for the identification
and selection of the boards chairman, as Peter Sutherland will step down
at the 2009 AGM. This is being led by Sir Ian Prosser, deputy chairman and the
boards senior independent director. The board is using an external adviser
to evaluate the boards mix of skills and experience and to assist in defining
the criteria to be used in identifying potential candidates. The adviser has
also been engaged to assist with the selection process.
Board independence |
Part of the qualification
for board membership of BP is the requirement that non-executive directors
be free from any relationship with
the companys executive management that could materially interfere with the
exercise of their independent judgement. In the boards view, BPs
non-executive directors fulfil this requirement and the board has determined
that those who served during 2007 were independent. BP is involved in a long-term
business of global scale and scope. Membership of the board needs to reflect
that not only in terms of skills but also in terms of tenure where artificial
restrictions on the duration of tenure may not be best for the company. It
is for this reason that all
non-executive directors have been subject to annual re-election since 2004.
Sir
Ian Prosser joined the board in 1997. It is the view of the board that he remains
independent. His experience and long-term perspective on
BPs business have provided and continue to provide a valuable contribution
to the board and to the audit committee, which he chairs. As deputy chairman
and senior independent director, Sir Ian is leading the boards search
for the successor to the current chairman. He has been asked by the board to
remain in post until April 2010 at the latest in order that he may conclude
both the chairmans succession process and the identification and appointment
by the new chairman
of a senior independent director.
BP completed the merger with Amoco
in December 1998. Dr Walter Massey and Erroll Davis, Jr are the two remaining
former Amoco directors. Dr Massey will retire as a director at the 2008 AGM.
Both directors have continued to be determined by the board to be independent
during the past year, with Dr Massey chairing the safety, ethics and environment
assurance committee (SEEAC). Mr Davis will remain on the board until such time
as he
steps down as part of the implementation of the boards succession policy.
The board believes Mr Davis continues to demonstrate his independence as a
director through his ongoing contribution and challenge at board and committee
discussions.
The board has
satisfied itself that there is no compromise to the independence of those directors
who serve together as directors on the boards of outside entities (or who have
other appointments in outside entities). Where necessary, the board ensures appropriate
processes are in place to manage any possible conflict of interest.
The board: terms of appointment |
The chairman and non-executive
directors of BP serve on the basis of letters of appointment. Executive directors
of BP have service
contracts with the company. Details of all payments to directors are described
in the
directors remuneration report.
The
service contracts of executive directors are expressed to expire at a normal
retirement age of 60 (subject
to age discrimination), while non-executive directors ordinarily retire
at the AGM following their 70th birthday.
In accordance with the companys Articles of Association, directors are granted an indemnity from the company in respect of liabilities incurred as a result of their office, to the
extent permitted by law. In respect of those liabilities for which directors may not be indemnified, the company maintained a directors and officers liability insurance policy throughout 2007. During the year, a review of the terms and
nature of the policy was undertaken and has been renewed for 2008. Although their defence costs may be met, neither the companys
indemnity nor insurance provides cover in the event that the director is
proved to have acted fraudulently or
dishonestly.
75 | |
Board and committees: meetings and attendance |
The board requires all members to devote sufficient time to the work of the board to discharge the office of director and to use their best endeavours to attend meetings.
In addition to the AGM (which 17 directors attended), the board met 12 times during 2007 for meetings of varying length: nine times in the UK, twice in the US and once in Brussels. Two of these meetings focused solely on strategy, one of them of two-days duration. A number of board committee meetings were held during the year; for details of these and their attendance by board members please see the table below.
Board | Audit | Chairmans | Remuneration | Nomination | ||||||||
meetings | committee | SEEAC | committee | committee | committee | |||||||
P D Sutherland | 12/12 | | | 5/5 | 6/6 | 5/5 | ||||||
J H Bryan | 6/6 | 7/7 | | 2/2 | 2/2 | | ||||||
A Burgmans | 12/12 | | 8/8 | 5/5 | | | ||||||
C B Carroll | 3/4 | | | 2/2 | | | ||||||
Sir William Castell | 11/12 | 14/14 | 7/8 | 5/5 | | | ||||||
E B Davis, Jr | 11/12 | 13/14 | | 5/5 | 6/6 | | ||||||
D J Flint | 11/12 | 12/14 | | 5/5 | | | ||||||
Dr D S Julius | 12/12 | | | 5/5 | 6/6 | 5/5 | ||||||
Sir Tom McKillop | 10/12 | | 7/8 | 5/5 | 6/6 | | ||||||
Dr W E Massey | 12/12 | | 8/8 | 5/5 | | 5/5 | ||||||
Sir Ian Prosser | 12/12 | 14/14 | | 5/5 | 6/6 | 5/5 | ||||||
Lord Browne | 6/6 | | | | | | ||||||
Dr D C Allen | 12/12 | | | | | | ||||||
I C Conn | 12/12 | | | | | | ||||||
Dr B E Grote | 11/12 | | | | | | ||||||
Dr A B Hayward | 12/12 | | | | | | ||||||
A G Inglis | 9/9 | | | | | | ||||||
J A Manzoni | 8/9 | | | | | | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
Serving as a director |
Induction
Following
their appointment to the board, new directors undertake an induction programme,
which includes matters such as the operation and activities
of the group (for example, key financial, business, social and environmental
risks to the groups activities), the board governance principles and
the duties of directors. The operational and business element of the induction
programme is tailored to the requirements of the new director and is targeted
for
completion within the first six to nine months of taking office.
The
chairman is accountable for the induction of new board members and is assisted
by the company secretarys
office in this task.
Training and site visits
Directors
are kept briefed on BPs business, the environment
in which it operates and other matters throughout their period in office. Non-executive
directors also receive training specific to the tasks of the particular board
committees on which they serve in order to complement their skills and knowledge
and enhance their effectiveness during their tenure. On appointment, directors
are advised of the legal and other duties and obligations they have as
directors of a listed company. The board regularly considers the implications
of these duties under the board governance principles.
During
2007, board members undertook visits to Thunder Horse in the Gulf of Mexico,
the refineries at Texas City and
Gelsenkirchen, BPs UK trading operations in Canary Wharf and
BPs offices in Houston. All non-executive directors are now required to
participate in at least one site visit per year.
Outside appointments
As part of their ongoing development, executive directors are permitted to take up one external board appointment, subject to the agreement
of the chairman (which is then reported to the BP board). The board is satisfied that these appointments do not conflict with their duties and commitments to BP. Executive directors retain any fees received in respect of such external appointments and this is reported in the directors remuneration report.
Non-executive directors may serve on a number of outside boards, provided they continue to demonstrate the requisite commitment to discharge their duties to BP effectively. The nomination committee keeps under review the nature of directors other interests to ensure that the efficacy of the board is not compromised and may make recommendations to the board if it concludes that a directors other commitments are inconsistent with those required by BP.
Evaluation
The board
continued its ongoing evaluation processes to assess its performance and identify
areas in which its effectiveness, policies and
processes might be enhanced. The board evaluated its performance during the
year through the use of a board skills evaluation completed by an external
facilitator and also individual director interviews held by the company secretary.
The process aimed at building on the outcome of the previous years evaluation
and assessing the way in which the board had responded to issues that occurred
during 2007. A report from the external facilitator was considered by the board
and recommendations adopted. The outcome from the evaluation has led the board
to focus on
certain areas for 2008, including a greater use of site visits and restructuring
of forward board agendas.
Separate
evaluations of the audit and remuneration committees and of SEEAC took
place during the year and are outlined
in the reports for those committees below (and in the directors remuneration
report in the case of the remuneration committee).
76 | |
The chairman and senior independent director |
BPs board governance
principles require that neither the chairman nor the deputy chairman is employed
as an executive of the group. During 2007, the posts were held by Mr Sutherland
and Sir Ian Prosser respectively. Sir Ian also acts as BPs senior independent
director and is available to shareholders who have concerns that cannot be
addressed through normal channels.
The
chairman is responsible for leading the board and facilitating its work. He
ensures that the governance principles and processes of the board are maintained
and encourages debate and discussion. The chairman also leads board performance
appraisals. He represents the views of the board to shareholders on key issues,
not least in succession planning for both executive and non-executive appointments.
Shareholders views
are fed back to the board by the chairman.
The company secretary reports to
the chairman and has no executive functions. His remuneration is determined
by the remuneration committee.
Between
board meetings, the chairman has responsibility for ensuring the integrity
and effectiveness of the relationship with executive management. This requires
his
interaction with the group chief executive between board meetings, as well
as his contact with other board members and shareholders.
The
chairman and all the non-executive directors meet periodically as the chairmans
committee. The performance of the chairman is evaluated each year, with the
evaluation discussion taking place when the chairman is not present. The BP
board governance principles require that the board develop and maintain a plan
for the succession of both the chairman and the deputy chairman.
The Board committees |
The board governance principles
allocate the tasks of monitoring executive actions and assessing performance
to certain board committees. These tasks prescribe the authority and role
of the board committees.
Reports
for each of the main board committees follow. In common with the board, each
committee has access to independent advice and counsel as required and each
is supported by the company secretarys office, which is independent of
the executive management of the group.
Audit
committee report
Membership
The audit committee
consists solely of independent non-executive directors who have been selected
to provide a wide range of financial, international and commercial expertise
appropriate to fulfil the committees duties.
Members
of the audit committee throughout the year were Sir Ian Prosser (chairman),
Douglas Flint, Erroll Davis, Jr and Sir William Castell. John Bryan was a member
until his retirement in April 2007. Support is provided by the committee secretary,
David Pearl (deputy company secretary).
The
board has determined that Douglas Flint possesses the financial and audit committee
experience, as defined by the Combined Code guidance and the SEC, and has nominated
him as the audit committees financial expert.
Meetings
and attendance
The audit committee
met 14 times during 2007.
At
the request of the audit committee chairman, each meeting is attended by the
lead partner of the external auditors (Ernst & Young). From BP, the group
chief financial officer, the general auditor (head of internal audit), the
chief
accounting officer and the deputy chief financial officer also attend each
meeting by invitation. Private sessions without executive management present
are held
regularly.
Role and
authority of the audit committee
The audit committee
monitors the observance of the executive limitations relating to financial matters
and does this on behalf of the board.
BPs
board governance principles set out the main tasks and requirements for each
of the board committees. Key tasks for the audit committee include gaining assurance
on the integrity of the groups reports, accounts and financial processes
and reviewing the management of financial risks and the internal controls designed
to address them. The audit committee believes that the tasks outlined in the
board governance principles meet each of the tasks and activities outlined
by
the Combined Code as falling within the remit of an audit committee.
Agendas
The audit committee
uses a forward agenda at the start of each year to establish an initial work
programme. This is compiled using a combination of regular items (including
those required by regulation) and items that reflect a current review of the
groups risks. The forward agenda also includes regular meetings during
the year with both the external and internal auditors in private sessions where
members of executive management are not present.
During
the year, the committee chairman reviews any issues that may arise with the
group chief financial officer, the external auditors and the BP general auditor
and will add items to the next meeting agenda where appropriate.
Information
Information
on audit committee agenda items are received from both internal and external
sources,
including Ernst & Young, the general auditor and the chief financial officer.
The committee receives presentations from a wide cross-section of BPs
business and financial control management, with the attendance of additional
Ernst & Young partners, if appropriate, to a particular business or functional
review.
The
audit committee is able to access independent advice and counsel when needed,
on an unrestricted basis. Further support is provided to the committee by the
company secretarys office and during 2007 external specialist legal and
regulatory advice was provided by Sullivan & Cromwell LLP.
The
board is kept informed of the activities of the committee and any issues that
have arisen through the regular report given by the audit committee chairman
after each meeting. Minutes of the committee are circulated to all board members.
Training
A programme has been
developed with the committee to enable committee members to update their skills
and knowledge with regard to the financial issues that may impact BP, for example
on developments in financial reporting and changes to financial standards.
Committee
activities in 2007
Financial
reports
During the year,
the committee reviewed all financial reports before recommending their publication
to the board.
Internal
controls and risk management
In 2007, the audit
committee reviewed reports on risks, controls and assurance for the BP business
segments (Exploration and Production and Refining and Marketing), together
with
gas, shipping, BP Alternative Energy and BPs trading function. A monitoring
review was also carried out on the performance of major BP projects against
their original sanctioned investment.
A
joint meeting with SEEAC was held in early 2007 to review the general auditors
report on internal controls and risk management; a further joint meeting took
place in early 2008 on the same theme.
The
committee discussed key regulatory issues during the year as part of its standing
agenda items, including a quarterly review of the companys evaluation
of its internal controls systems as part of the requirement of Section 404
of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The effectiveness
77 | |
of BPs enterprise level
controls was examined through the annual assessment undertaken by the internal
audit function.
In
addition to the standing items on the agenda, the committee considered a range
of other topics including an update on TNK-BP, a review of the groups
decommissioning provisions and the legal settlements reached in the US. The
committee also received an independent report on the groups US trading
operations and visited the trading operations in the UK.
External
auditors
The
lead audit partner from Ernst & Young attends all meetings of the audit
committee at the request of the committee chairman. Other audit partners are
invited to
attend meetings where they can utilize their areas of expertise, for example,
during business segment or function reviews.
The
committee held two private meetings during the year with the external auditors
without the presence of BP management, in order to discuss any issues or concerns
from either the committee or the auditors.
Performance
of the external auditors is evaluated by the audit committee each year, with
particular scrutiny of their independence, objectivity and viability. Independence
is assisted through the limiting of non-audit services to tax and audit-related
work that fall within defined categories. This work is pre-approved by the audit
committee and all non-audit services are monitored quarterly.
Fees
paid to the external auditors for the year (see Financial statements
Note 17 on page 126) were $75 million, of which 16% was for non-audit work.
Non-audit services provided by Ernst & Young have remained constant from
2006, and audit fees ($63 million in 2007 compared with $61 million
in 2006) are also little changed as the impact of inflation and exchange rate
movements have been offset by efficiency gains.
A
new lead audit partner is appointed every five years and other senior audit
partners and staff are rotated every seven years. No partners or senior staff
from Ernst & Young who are currently connected with the BP audit may transfer
to the group. During the year, the committee approved the appointment of a new
lead partner from Ernst & Young to replace the current partner who reaches
five years service in early 2008.
The
audit committee has considered both the proposed fee structure and the audit
engagement terms for 2008 and has recommended to the board that the reappointment
of the external auditors be proposed to shareholders at the 2008 AGM.
Internal
audit
BPs
internal audit function advises the committee on the companys identification
and control of risk. The general auditor attends each committee meeting at
the
invitation of the committee chairman and presents a quarterly internal audit
and controls report.
During
the year, the audit committee evaluated the performance of the internal audit
function and agreed to the proposed forward programme of work. The committee
was also involved with finding a successor to the general auditor who is due
to retire in 2008. An external consultant was engaged to undertake the search
and the committee approved the appointment of an external candidate with deep
audit experience.
In
2007, the committee met once with the general auditor in a private session
without the presence of executive management.
Fraud
reporting and employee concerns on financial matters
The
audit committee received a quarterly report from internal audit on instances
of actual
or potential fraud, and concerns relating to the financial accounting of the
company. The committee also received reports on a quarterly basis from the
group
compliance and ethics function, which captured issues relating to financial
matters raised through the employee concerns programme, OpenTalk, together
with
topics highlighted by the companys annual certification process.
Performance
evaluation
The committee
conducts a yearly evaluation of its performance. For 2007, the review methodology
included a survey of committee members and those individuals who regularly attend
committee meetings. The
survey results
were analysed by the company secretarys office and discussed at the
November audit committee meeting. Areas for future focus were identified following
the evaluation, including training opportunities for committee members. These
have been incorporated into the committees agenda for 2008.
The
audit committee plans to meet 12 times during 2008.
Safety,
ethics and environment assurance committee report
Membership
The committees members
consist solely of independent non-executive directors who have been selected
to provide a wide range of operational and international expertise appropriate
to fulfil the committees duties.
Members
of SEEAC during 2007 were Dr Walter Massey (chairman), Antony Burgmans, Sir
William Castell and Sir Tom McKillop. Support was provided by the committee
secretary, David Pearl (deputy company secretary).
The
committee chairman, Dr Massey, will retire as a director at the 2008 AGM. The
appointment of his successor will be announced at the 2008 AGM. Mrs Cynthia
Carroll will be joining the committee in due course.
Meetings
and attendance
SEEAC met eight times
during 2007.
At
the request of the committee chairman, each SEEAC meeting is attended by the
lead partner of the external auditors (Ernst & Young) and the BP general
auditor (head of internal audit).
Reports
and presentations to SEEAC are led by a member of executive management. Following
a change in executive responsibilities during the year, the executive liaison
with SEEAC changed from Iain Conn to Dr Anthony Hayward, who attended three
meetings of the committee in the second half of 2007. Private sessions without
executive management in attendance are held at the end of each meeting.
Role and
authority of the committee
On behalf of the board,
SEEAC monitors observance of the executive limitations policy relating to the
environmental, health and safety, security and ethical performance of the company
and compliance to its code of conduct.
In
common with the other BP board committees, the board governance principles
set out the main tasks and requirements for SEEAC. These include monitoring and
obtaining assurance that the management or mitigation of material non-financial
risks is appropriately addressed by the group chief executive.
Agendas
The committees
tasks are broad as they cover all non-financial risk, and in constructing the
forward agenda, the committee considers the risks identified in BPs business
and annual plans and also the review of risks conducted by the general auditor.
The
forward agenda includes standing items that enable the committee to monitor
and assess how the executive limitations policy is being observed (for example,
health, safety and environment reports) and to review the non-financial risks
identified in the business plan (for example, regional risk reviews). The committee
also holds a joint session with the audit committee to review the general auditors
report on internal controls and risk management.
During
the year, the forward agenda is supplemented with any emerging issues or developments
that may arise.
Information
The committee
receives information on agenda items from both internal and external sources,
including
internal audit, the safety and operations function, the group compliance and
ethics function and Ernst & Young. Like other board committees, SEEAC can
access independent advice and counsel if it requires, on an unrestricted basis.
The
activities of the committee and any issues that have arisen are reported back
to the main board by the committee chairman following each meeting.
78 | |
Committee
activities in 2007
Baker
Panel Report and appointment of independent expert
In January
2007, the Baker Panel published its report on BPs corporate safety culture
and the oversight of safety management systems at BPs five US refineries.
The company agreed to adopt all the panels recommendations, which were
aimed at improving process safety performance at the five US plants, including
the appointment of an independent expert for a period of at least five years
to monitor and report annually on the progress of such implementation to the
BP board.
In
May, the board announced that L Duane Wilson, a member of the Baker Panel, was
appointed as the independent expert to provide an objective assessment to the
board of the companys progress towards implementation of the panels
recommendations. Mr Wilson reports to the chairman of SEEAC, has attended three
of the committees meetings since his appointment and has also accompanied
the committee to its site visit of the Texas City refinery.
SEEAC
received a presentation on Mr Wilsons detailed work plan in early 2008
and he will now periodically report to SEEAC on his progress. On behalf of
the
board, SEEAC will receive an annual report by mid-2008 in which Mr Wilson will
address progress against the 10 Baker Panel recommendations.
Group
operations risk committee
The group
operations risk committee (GORC) was formed at the end of 2006 by executive
management. The GORC is chaired by the group chief executive and reports regularly
to SEEAC. GORC reports presented to SEEAC during the year included reviews of
the progress of the six-point plan and the development of leading and lagging
indicators of safety and operational performance.
Site
visits
The
committee visited BPs Gelsenkirchen refinery in Germany in March 2007 and the Texas
City refinery in September. The annual committee evaluation process concluded
that such site visits were valuable to the committees work and, as a
result, other site visits are planned for inclusion on the forward agenda for
2008.
Compliance
and ethics
The
committee is tasked with reviewing reports on the groups compliance with
its code of conduct and on the employee concerns programme (OpenTalk) as it
relates to
non-financial issues. During the year, the committee received quarterly compliance
and ethics reports, reviewed the 2006 certification process and the nature
and
resolution of cases raised through OpenTalk.
Other
topics
Other topics
reviewed during the year by SEEAC included a risk review of the Latin America
and Caribbean region; health, safety and environmental progress in TNK-BP; and
the BTC pipeline.
Performance
evaluation
The committee
conducts an annual review of its process and performance. The 2007 committee
review involved a facilitated
discussion at its November
meeting. The review concluded that overall the committee was functioning
as intended but that going forward more emphasis would be given to operational
risk. In terms of committee processes, the review concluded that greater
focus should be given to the effective use of the committees time,
as the committees workload had increased with the frequency and duration
of meetings lengthening.
SEEAC
plans to meet seven times during 2008.
Remuneration
committee report
Membership
The committees
members consist solely of non-executive directors who are considered by the
board to be independent.
Members
of the remuneration committee during the year were Dr DeAnne Julius (chairman),
Erroll Davis, Jr, Sir Tom McKillop and Sir Ian Prosser. John Bryan retired from
the committee in April 2007. The chairman of the board also attends meetings
of the committee.
Meetings
and attendance
The remuneration committee
met six times during 2007 and is independently advised.
Role and
authority of the committee
The committees
main task is to determine on behalf of the board the terms of engagement and
remuneration of the group chief executive and the executive directors and to
report on those to shareholders.
Further
details on the committees role, authority and activities during the year
are set out in the directors remuneration report, which is the subject
of a vote by shareholders at the 2008 AGM.
Chairmans
committee report
The
chairmans
committee completed the task that it commenced in 2006, formally concluding
the process for the identification and appointment of a group chief executive
to replace Lord Browne. This process involved establishing a clear definition
of the role description and benchmarking internal candidates against an external
population. The committee held detailed interviews with each of the candidates
and undertook an evaluation of the candidates strengths and weaknesses.
During
the year, the committee reviewed with Dr Hayward the short-and long-term challenges
facing the group and, in particular, Dr Haywards proposals for the forward
agenda.
The
committee also considered a number of management changes initiated by Dr Hayward
and discussed his proposals for executive succession. The committee reviewed
Lord Brownes performance at the start of the year and that of Mr Sutherland
at the end.
Nomination
committee report
During
the year, the nomination committee, through an external facilitator, carried
out
a detailed review of the boards skills aimed at identifying any perceived
deficiencies such that a comprehensive succession plan could be prepared. The
committee, under the chairmanship of Sir Ian Prosser, has acted as the working
group for the identification of a successor to Mr Sutherland as chairman.
79 | |
Directors interests |
Change from | ||||||
31 Dec 2007 | ||||||
Current directors | At 31 Dec 2007 | At 1 Jan 2007 | to 19 Feb 2008 | |||
Dr D C Allen | 597,568 | a | 530,933 | a | | |
A Burgmans | 10,000 | 10,000 | | |||
C B Carroll | | | | |||
Sir William Castell | 50,000 | | | |||
I C Conn | 229,969 | b | 209,449 | b | 123 | |
E B Davis, Jr | 70,602 | c | 68,992 | c | | |
D J Flint | 15,000 | 15,000 | | |||
Dr B E Grote | 1,193,137 | d | 1,105,825 | d | | |
Dr A B Hayward | 482,398 | 407,021 | 123 | |||
A G Inglis | 758,756 | e | 727,772 | f | (209,000 | ) |
Dr D S Julius | 15,000 | 15,000 | | |||
Sir Tom McKillop | 20,000 | 20,000 | | |||
Dr W E Massey | 49,722 | c | 49,722 | c | | |
Sir Ian Prosser | 16,301 | 16,301 | | |||
P D Sutherland | 30,906 | 30,079 | | |||
|
||||||
Directors leaving the board in 2007 | At resignation/retirement | At 1 Jan 2007 | ||||
Lord Browne | 2,750,521 | g | 2,525,313 | g | ||
J H Bryan | 158,760 | c | 158,760 | c | ||
J A Manzoni | 451,806 | 376,213 | ||||
|
||||||
Change from | ||||||
On appointment | 11 Feb 2008 to | |||||
Directors joining the board in 2008 | 11 Feb 2008 | 19 Feb 2008 | ||||
G David | | 9,000 | c | |||
|
a | Includes 25,368 shares held as ADSs. |
b | Includes 41,692 shares held as ADSs at 31 December 2007 and 40,155 shares held as ADSs at 1 January 2007. |
c | Held as ADSs. |
d | Held as ADSs, except for 94 that are held as ordinary shares. |
e | Includes 34,962 shares held as ADSs. |
f | Interest as at 1 February 2007 on appointment as a director. Includes 34,962 shares held as ADSs and 534,750 MTPPs granted prior to appointment as a director, 209,000 of which lapsed on 6 February 2008. |
g | Includes 61,800 held as ADSs at resignation and 61,186 at 1 January 2007. |
The above figures indicate and include all the beneficial and non-beneficial interests of each director of the company in shares of the company (or calculated equivalents) that have been disclosed to the company under the Disclosure and Transparency Rules and Companies Acts 1985 or 2006 (as the case may be) as at the applicable dates.
Executive
directors are also deemed to have an interest in such shares of the company
held from time to time by the
BP Employee Share Ownership Plan (No.2) to facilitate the operation of
the companys option schemes.
No
director has any interest in the preference shares or debentures of the company
or in the shares or loan stock of any subsidiary company.
80 | |
Share ownership |
Directors and senior management
As at 19 February 2008, the following directors of BP p.l.c. held interests in BP ordinary shares of 25 cents each or their calculated equivalent as set out below:
Dr D C Allen | 597,568 | 839,948 | a | | ||
I C Conn | 230,092 | 1,418,324 | a | 266,904 | b | |
Dr B E Grote | 1,193,137 | 1,543,820 | a | | ||
Dr A B Hayward | 482,521 | 1,934,830 | a | | ||
A G Inglis | 549,756 | 978,619 | a | 266,904 | b | |
A Burgmans | 10,000 | | | |||
C B Carroll | | | | |||
Sir William Castell | 50,000 | | | |||
G David | 9,000 | | | |||
E B Davis, Jr | 70,602 | | | |||
D J Flint | 15,000 | | | |||
Dr D S Julius | 15,000 | | | |||
Sir Tom McKillop | 20,000 | | | |||
Dr W E Massey | 49,722 | | | |||
Sir Ian Prosser | 16,301 | | | |||
P D Sutherland | 30,906 | | | |||
|
As at 19 February 2008, the following directors of BP p.l.c. held options under the BP group share option schemes for ordinary shares or their calculated equivalent as set out below:
Dr D C Allen | 794,950 | |
I C Conn | 206,390 | |
Dr B E Grote | 1,186,098 | |
Dr A B Hayward | 769,620 | |
A G Inglis | 415,300 | |
|
a | Performance shares awarded under the BP Executive Directors Incentive Plan. These represent the maximum possible vesting levels. The actual number of shares/ADSs that vest will depend on the extent to which performance conditions have been satisfied over a three-year period. |
b | Restricted share award under the BP Executive Directors Incentive Plan. These will vest in equal tranches after three and five years, subject to their continued service and satisfactory performance. |
There are no directors or members of senior management who own more than 1%
of the ordinary shares outstanding. At 19 February 2008, all directors and
senior management as a group held interests in 14,132,552 ordinary shares or
their calculated equivalent and 4,323,092 options for ordinary shares or their
calculated equivalent under the BP group share options schemes.
Additional
details regarding the options granted, including exercise price and expiry dates,
are found in the directors remuneration report
on page 69.
Employee share plans
The following table shows employee share options granted.
options thousands | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Employee share options granted during the yeara | 6,004 | 53,977 | 54,482 | |||
|
a | For the options outstanding at 31 December 2007, the exercise price ranges and weighted average remaining contractual lives are shown in Financial statements Note 41 on page 160. |
BP offers most of its employees the opportunity to acquire a shareholding in
the company through savings-related and/or matching share plan arrangements.
BP also uses long-term performance plans (see Financial statements Note
41 on page 160) and the granting of share options as elements of remuneration
for executive directors and senior employees.
Shares
acquired through the companys
employee share plans rank pari passu with shares in issue and have no special
rights, save as described below. For legal and practical reasons, the rules of
these plans set out the consequences of a change of control of the company, and
generally provide for options and conditional awards to vest on an accelerated
basis.
Savings and matching plans
BP ShareSave Plan
This is a savings-related share option plan, under which employees save on a
monthly basis over a three- or five-year period towards the purchase of shares
at a fixed price determined when the option is granted. This price is usually
set at a 20% discount to the market price at the time of grant. The option must
be exercised within six months of maturity of the savings contract otherwise
it lapses. The plan is run in the UK and options are granted annually,
usually in June. Participants leaving for a qualifying reason will have six months
in which to use their savings to exercise their options on a pro-rated basis.
81 | |
BP ShareMatch plans
These are matching share plans, under which BP matches
employees own contributions of shares up to a predetermined limit. The
plans are run in the UK and in more than 70 other countries. The UK plan is run
on a monthly basis with shares being held in trust for five years before they
can be released free of any income tax and national insurance liability. In other
countries, the plan is run on an annual basis, with shares being held in trust
for three years. The plan is operated on a cash basis in those countries where
there are regulatory restrictions preventing the holding of BP shares. When the
employee leaves BP, all shares must be removed from trust and units under the
plan operated on a
cash basis must be encashed.
Once
shares have been awarded to an employee under the plan, the employee may instruct
the trustee how
to vote their shares.
Local plans
In some countries, BP provides local scheme benefits, the rules and qualifications
for which vary according to local circumstances.
The
above share plans are indicated as being equity-settled. In certain countries,
however, it is not possible
to award shares to employees owing to local legislation. In these instances,
the award will be settled in cash, calculated as the cash equivalent of the
value to the employee of an equity-settled plan.
Cash plans
Cash-settled share-based payments/Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs)
These are cash-settled share-based payments available to certain employees
that require the group to pay the intrinsic value of the cash option/SAR/restricted
shares to the employee at the date of
exercise/maturity.
Employee share ownership plans (ESOPs)
ESOPs have been established
to acquire BP shares to satisfy any awards made to participants under the Executive
Directors Incentive Plan, the Medium-Term Performance Plan, the Long Term Performance Plan, the
Deferred Annual Bonus Plan and the BP ShareMatch plans. The ESOPs have waived their rights to dividends on shares held for future awards and are funded by the group. Pending vesting, the ESOPs have independent trustees which have the discretion in
relation to the voting of such shares. Until such time as the companys own shares held by the ESOP trusts vest unconditionally in employees, the amount paid for those shares is deducted in arriving at shareholders equity.
(See Financial statements Note 40 on page 158.) Assets and liabilities
of the ESOPs are recognized as assets and liabilities of the group.
At 31 December 2007, the ESOPs
held 6,448,838 shares (2006 12,795,887 shares and 2005 14,560,003 shares)
for potential
future awards, which had a market value of $79 million (2006
$142 million and 2005 $156 million).
Pursuant
to the various BP group share option schemes, the following options for ordinary
shares of the company
were outstanding at 19 February 2008:
Expiry dates | Exercise price | |||
Options outstanding (shares) | of options | per share | ||
352,819,401 | 2008-2016 | 5.0967-11.9210 | ||
|
Further details on share options appear in Financial statements Note 41 on page 160.
Major shareholders and related party transactions |
Register of members holding BP ordinary shares as at 31 December 2007
Number of | Percentage of | Percentage of | ||||
ordinary | total ordinary | total ordinary | ||||
Range of holdings | shareholders | shareholders | share capital | |||
1-200 | 62,098 | 19.06 | 0.02 | |||
201-1,000 | 124,075 | 38.08 | 0.31 | |||
1,001-10,000 | 125,886 | 38.63 | 1.81 | |||
10,001-100,000 | 11,944 | 3.66 | 1.15 | |||
100,001-1,000,000 | 1,061 | 0.33 | 1.83 | |||
Over 1,000,000a | 779 | 0.24 | 94.88 | |||
Totals | 325,843 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||
|
a | Includes JP Morgan Chase Bank holding 28.51% of the total ordinary issued share capital (excluding shares held in treasury) as the approved depositary for ADSs, a breakdown of which is shown in the table below. |
Register of holders of American depositary shares as at 31 December 2007a
Percentage of | ||||||
Number of | total ADS | Percentage of | ||||
Range of holdings | ADS holders | holders | total ADSs | |||
1-200 | 36,682 | 25.87 | 0.05 | |||
201-1,000 | 34,313 | 24.20 | 0.34 | |||
1,001-10,000 | 54,864 | 38.70 | 3.57 | |||
10,001-100,000 | 15,359 | 10.83 | 7.30 | |||
100,001-1,000,000 | 558 | 0.39 | 1.82 | |||
Over 1,000,000b | 12 | 0.01 | 86.92 | |||
Totals | 141,788 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||
|
a | One ADS represents six 25 cent ordinary shares. |
b | One of the holders of ADSs represents some 792,000 underlying shareholders. |
As at 31 December 2007, there were also 1,597 preference shareholders. Preference shareholders represented 0.44% and ordinary shareholders represented 99.56% of the total issued nominal share capital of the company as at that date.
Substantial shareholdings
As
at the date of this report, the company had been notified that JPMorgan Chase
Bank, as depositary for American depositary shares (ADSs) holds
interests through its nominee, Guaranty Nominees Limited, in 5,395,627,629
ordinary shares (28.34% of the companys ordinary share capital excluding shares held in Treasury). Legal & General Group plc hold interests in 870,551,838 ordinary shares (4.57% of the companys
ordinary share capital
excluding shares held in treasury).
At
the date of this report the company has also been notified of the following
interests in preference shares. Co-operative
Insurance Society Ltd. holds interests in 1,530,077 8% cumulative first preference
shares (21.15% of that class) and 1,789,796 9% cumulative second preference shares
(32.70% of that class). The National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society holds
interests in 945,000 8% cumulative first preference
shares (13.07% of that class) and 987,000 9% cumulative second preference shares
(18.03% of that class). M & G Investment Management Ltd. holds interests
in 528,150 8% cumulative first preference shares (7.30% of that class) and 644,450
9% cumulative second preference shares (11.77% of that class). Ruffer Limited
Liability Partnership holds interests in 653,000 9% cumulative second preference
shares (11.93% of that class). Lazard Asset Management Ltd. (U.K.) holds interests
in 443,000
8% cumulative first preference shares (6.12% of that class).
The
total preference shares in issue
comprise only 0.44% of the companys total issued nominal share capital,
the rest being ordinary shares.
Related party transactions
Transactions
between the group and its significant jointly controlled entities and associates
are summarized in Financial statements Note
26
82 | |
on page 134 and Financial statements Note 27 on page 135. In the ordinary course of its business, the group enters into transactions with various organizations with which certain of its directors or executive officers are associated. Except as described in this report, the group did not have material transactions or transactions of an unusual nature with, and did not make loans to, related parties in the period commencing 1 January 2007 to 19 February 2008.
Dividends |
BP has paid dividends on its ordinary shares in each year since 1917. In 2000 and thereafter, dividends were, and are expected to continue to be, paid quarterly in March, June, September and December. Former Amoco Corporation and Atlantic Richfield Company shareholders will not be able to receive dividends, or proxy material, until they send in their Amoco Corporation or Atlantic Richfield Company common shares for exchange.
BP
currently announces dividends for ordinary shares in US dollars and states
an equivalent pounds sterling dividend. Dividends on BP ordinary shares
will be paid in pounds sterling and on BP ADSs in US dollars. The rate
of exchange used to determine the sterling amount equivalent is the average
of the forward exchange rate in London over the five business days prior
to the announcement date. The directors may choose to declare dividends
in any currency provided that a sterling equivalent is announced, but it
is not the companys intention to change its current policy of announcing
dividends on ordinary shares in US dollars.
The following table shows dividends announced and
paid by the company per ADS for each of the past five years. In the case of dividends
paid before 1 May 2004, the dividends shown are before the deemed credit allowed
to shareholders resident in the US under the former income tax convention between
the US and the UK and the associated withholding tax in respect thereof equal
to the amount of such credit. (This deemed credit and associated withholding
tax do not apply to dividends paid after 30 April 2004 to shareholders resident
in the US.)
March | June | September | December | Total | |||||||
Dividends per American depositary share | |||||||||||
2003 | UK pence | 22.9 | 23.7 | 24.2 | 23.1 | 93.9 | |||||
US cents | 37.5 | 37.5 | 39.0 | 39.0 | 153.0 | ||||||
Canadian cents | 57.4 | 54.3 | 54.0 | 51.1 | 216.8 | ||||||
2004 | UK pence | 22.0 | 22.8 | 23.2 | 23.5 | 91.5 | |||||
US cents | 40.5 | 40.5 | 42.6 | 42.6 | 166.2 | ||||||
Canadian cents | 53.7 | 54.8 | 56.7 | 52.2 | 217.4 | ||||||
2005 | UK pence | 27.1 | 26.7 | 30.7 | 30.4 | 114.9 | |||||
US cents | 51.0 | 51.0 | 53.55 | 53.55 | 209.1 | ||||||
Canadian cents | 64.0 | 63.2 | 65.3 | 63.7 | 256.2 | ||||||
2006 | UK pence | 31.7 | 31.5 | 31.9 | 31.4 | 126.5 | |||||
US cents | 56.25 | 56.25 | 58.95 | 58.95 | 230.40 | ||||||
Canadian cents | 64.5 | 64.1 | 67.4 | 66.5 | 262.5 | ||||||
2007 | UK pence | 31.5 | 30.9 | 31.7 | 31.8 | 125.9 | |||||
US cents | 61.95 | 61.95 | 64.95 | 64.95 | 253.8 | ||||||
Canadian cents | 73.3 | 69.5 | 67.80 | 63.60 | 274.2 | ||||||
A dividend reinvestment
plan is in place whereby holders of BP ordinary shares can elect to reinvest
the net cash dividend in shares purchased on the London Stock Exchange. This
plan is not available to any person resident in the US or Canada or in any jurisdiction
outside the UK where such an offer requires compliance by the company with any
governmental or regulatory procedures or any similar formalities. A dividend
reinvestment plan is, however, available for holders of ADSs through JPMorgan
Chase Bank.
Future
dividends will be dependent on future earnings, the financial condition of
the group, the Risk factors set out on pages 8-9 and other matters that may affect
the business of the group set out in Financial and operating performance on
page 45.
Legal proceedings |
Save as disclosed in the
following paragraphs, no member of the group is a party to, and no property
of a member of the group is subject to, any pending legal proceedings that are
significant to the group.
On
28 June 2006, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a civil
enforcement action in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
against BP Products North America Inc. (BP Products), a wholly owned subsidiary
of BP, alleging that BP Products manipulated the price of February 2004 TET
physical propane. The CFTC also charged BP Products with attempting to manipulate
the price of February 2004 and April 2003 TET physical propane. On 28 June 2006,
the US Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a criminal charge against a former
BP Products propane trader, who entered a guilty plea, and on 8 November 2007,
four additional former BP Products traders were indicted on charges of conspiracy
and market corner and commodity price manipulation. Private class action complaints
have also been filed against BP Products that have been consolidated in the
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The complaints contain
allegations similar to those in the CFTC action as well as of violations of
federal and state antitrust and unfair competition laws and state consumer
protection
statutes and unjust enrichment.
The complaints seek actual and punitive damages and injunctive relief.
On
25 October 2007, BP America Inc. (BP America) entered into a deferred prosecution
agreement (DPA) with the DOJ relating to allegations that BP America manipulated
the price of February 2004 TET physical propane and attempted to manipulate
the price of TET propane in April 2003. The DPA requires BP Americas and
certain of its affiliates continued co-operation with the US government
investigations of the trades in question, as well as other trading matters
that
may arise. Pursuant to the DPA, an independent monitor has been appointed to
oversee compliance with the DPA. The independent monitor has authority to investigate
and report alleged violations of the US Commodity
Exchange Act or CFTC regulations and to recommend corrective action. The DPA
has a term of three years and contemplates dismissal of all charges at the
end
of the term following the DOJs determination that BP America has complied
with the terms of the DPA. BP America understands that its entry into the DPA
concludes the pending criminal investigations of it and its affiliates relating
to trading in various commodities, including propane, unleaded gasoline and
crude oil. On 25 October 2007, BP Products also entered a companion consent
order with the CFTC resolving all civil enforcement matters concerning BP Products propane
trading. The remit of the independent monitor includes overseeing compliance
with the Consent Order. BP Products
83 | |
understands that with its
entry into the Consent Order, the CFTC closed its investigation of trading
in unleaded gasoline without the
filing
of any charges against BP Products. In connection with the DPA and the Consent
Order, BP America and BP Products agreed to pay fines, penalties and restitution
totaling just over $303.5 million, including $53.5 million to a victim
restitution fund, a criminal penalty of $100 million, a civil penalty of
$125 million and a $25 million payment to the US Postal Inspection Service
Consumer Fraud Fund. Investigations into BPs trading activities continue
to be conducted from time to time.
On 23 March 2005, an explosion
and fire occurred in the isomerization unit of BP Products Texas City
refinery as the unit was coming out of planned maintenance. Fifteen workers
died in the incident and many others were injured. BP Products has reached more
than 2,000 settlements in respect of all the fatalities and many of the personal
injury claims arising from the incident and has set aside $2,125 million,
in aggregate, for the purpose. A number of claims remain to be resolved.
The US Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (OSHA), the US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation
Board (CSB), the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and the DOJ, among other
agencies, have conducted or are conducting investigations. At the conclusion
of their investigation, OSHA issued citations that BP Products agreed not
to contest. BP Products settled that matter with OSHA on 22 September 2005, paying
a $21.4 million penalty and undertaking a number of corrective actions designed
to make the refinery safer.
In June 2006, BP Products
and the TCEQ entered into an agreed order resolving a number of alleged violations
and, among other things, authorizing the refinery to construct certain new flares
needed to replace blowdown stacks. In addition, BP Products agreed to pay a
$336,556 civil penalty.
At the recommendation of
the CSB, BP appointed an independent safety panel, the BP US Refineries Independent
Safety Review Panel, under the chairmanship of former US Secretary of State
James A Baker, III. See Report of the BP US Refineries Safety Review Panel on
page 27 for a discussion of the panels report, which was published
on 16 January 2007.
In March 2007, the CSB issued
its final report, which contained recommendations to the Texas City refinery
and to the board of the company. In May 2007, BP responded to the CSBs
recommendations.
BP and the CSB continue
to discuss BPs responses with the objective of the CSB agreeing to
close-out its recommendations.
On 25 October 2007, the
DOJ announced that it had entered into a criminal plea agreement with BP Products
related to the March 2005 explosion and fire. On 4 February 2008, BP Products
pleaded guilty in federal court, pursuant to the plea agreement, to one felony
violation of the risk management planning regulations promulgated under the
US federal Clean Air Act. At the plea hearing the court advised that it would
take the matter under review and decide whether to accept or reject the plea.
If the court accepts the agreement, BP Products will pay a $50 million criminal
fine and serve three years probation. Compliance with the 2005 OSHA
settlement agreement and the 2006 TCEQ Agreed Order are conditions of probation.
On 2 March 2006, a crude
oil leak of approximately 4,800 barrels occurred on a low-pressure transit line
on the Alaskan North Slope in the Western Operating Area of the Prudhoe Bay
field operated by BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. (BPXA). The March 2006 leak was
determined to be the result of internal corrosion. On 6 August 2006, BPXA ordered
a phased shutdown of the Prudhoe Bay oil field following the discovery of unexpectedly
severe internal corrosion and a leak of 199 barrels of crude oil from the oil
transit line in the Eastern Operating Area of Prudhoe Bay. Shortly after the
March 2006 leak, the DOJ initiated an investigation of the spill through a federal
grand jury in Alaska. During the course of the following 17 months, BPXA co-operated
with the US governments investigation, including among other things, by
producing millions of pages of documents, encouraging its employees to co-operate
with the investigation and provide testimony to the grand jury, and by providing
the governments investigators with samples from and sections of the
segment of the failed transit line.
On
25 October 2007, BPXA entered into an agreement with the DOJ in which it
agreed to plead guilty to one US Federal Water Pollution Control Act misdemeanour
violation relating to the March 2006 crude oil leak. The plea agreement
resolved all of the federal and State of Alaska criminal culpability of
BPXA associated with the March and August leaks at Prudhoe Bay. On 29 November
2007, the US District Court for the District of Alaska accepted the plea
agreement, entered a misdemeanour guilty plea against BPXA and sentenced
BPXA to pay a combined $20 million in criminal fines, restitution and
community service payments and serve three years of probation. BPXA
has the right to petition the court for termination of the probation term
after one year if it meets certain benchmarks relating to replacement of
the transit lines, upgrades to its leak detection system and improvements
to its integrity management programme. All criminal fines and other payments
required by the plea agreement and sentence were made by BPXA on the date
of sentencing following entry of the plea.
BPXA continues to co-operate with a parallel State
of Alaska civil investigation into the March and August 2006 spills, including
three separate subpoenas issued to BPXA by the Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation. BPXA is also engaged in discussions with the DOJ, the EPA and the
US Department of Transport concerning civil regulatory claims relating to the
2006 Prudhoe Bay oil transit line incidents.
Shareholder derivative lawsuits have been filed
in US federal and state courts against the directors of the company and others,
nominally the company and certain US subsidiaries following the events relating
to, inter alia, Prudhoe Bay, Texas City and the trading cases, alleging breach
of fiduciary duty. These derivative lawsuits have been settled, subject to court
approval.
Approximately 200 lawsuits were filed in state
and federal courts in Alaska seeking compensatory and punitive damages arising
out of the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Prince William Sound in March 1989. Most
of those suits named Exxon (now ExxonMobil), Alyeska Pipeline Service Company
(Alyeska), which operates the oil terminal at Valdez, and the other oil companies
that own Alyeska. Alyeska initially responded to the spill until the response
was taken over by Exxon. BP owns a 47% interest (reduced during 2001 from 50%
by a sale of 3% to Phillips) in Alyeska through a subsidiary of BP America Inc.
and briefly indirectly owned a further 20% interest in Alyeska following BPs
combination with Atlantic Richfield. Alyeska and its owners have settled all
the claims against them under these lawsuits. Exxon has indicated that it may
file a claim for contribution against Alyeska for a portion of the costs and
damages that it has incurred. If any claims are asserted by Exxon that affect
Alyeska and its owners, BP will defend the claims vigorously.
Since 1987, Atlantic Richfield, a subsidiary of
BP, has been named as a co-defendant in numerous lawsuits brought in the US alleging
injury to persons and property caused by lead pigment in paint. The majority
of the lawsuits have been abandoned or dismissed against Atlantic Richfield.
Atlantic Richfield is named in these lawsuits as alleged successor to International
Smelting and Refining, which, along with a predecessor company, manufactured
lead pigment during the period 1920-1946. Plaintiffs include individuals and
governmental entities. Several of the lawsuits purport to be class actions. The
lawsuits seek various remedies including compensation to lead-poisoned children,
cost to find and remove lead paint from buildings, medical monitoring and screening
programmes, public warning and education of lead hazards, reimbursement of government
healthcare costs and special education for lead-poisoned citizens and punitive
damages. No lawsuit against Atlantic Richfield has been settled nor has Atlantic
Richfield been subject to a final adverse judgment in any proceeding. The amounts
claimed and, if such suits were successful, the costs of implementing the remedies
sought in the various cases could be substantial. While it is not possible to
predict the outcome of these legal actions, Atlantic Richfield believes that
it has valid defences and it intends to defend such actions vigorously and that
the incurrence of liability is remote. Consequently, BP believes that the impact
of these lawsuits on the groups results of operations, financial position
or liquidity will not be material.
For certain information regarding environmental
proceedings, see Environmental protection US regional review on page 42.
84 | |
The offer and listing |
Markets and market prices
The primary market for BPs ordinary shares is
the London Stock Exchange (LSE). BPs ordinary shares are a constituent
element of the Financial Times Stock Exchange 100 Index. BPs ordinary
shares are also traded on stock exchanges in France, Germany, Japan and Switzerland.
Trading of BPs shares on the LSE is primarily
through the use of the Stock Exchange Electronic Trading Service (SETS), introduced
in 1997 for the largest companies in terms of market capitalization whose primary
listing is the LSE. Under SETS, buy and sell orders at specific prices may be
sent to the exchange electronically by any firm that is a member of the LSE,
on behalf of a client or on behalf of itself acting as a principal. The orders
are then anonymously displayed in the order book. When there is a match on a
buy and a sell order, the trade is executed and automatically reported to the
LSE. Trading is continuous from 8.00 a.m. to 4.30 p.m. UK time but, in the event
of a 20% movement in the share
price either way, the LSE may impose a temporary halt in the trading of that
companys shares in the order book to allow the market to reestablish
equilibrium. Dealings in ordinary shares may also take place between an investor
and a market-maker, via a member firm, outside the electronic order book.
In the US and Canada, the companys securities
are traded in the form of ADSs, for which JPMorgan Chase Bank is the depositary
(the Depositary) and transfer agent. The Depositarys principal office is
4 New York Plaza, Floor 13, New York, NY 10004, US. Each ADS represents six ordinary
shares. ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange and are also traded on
the Chicago and Toronto Stock Exchanges. ADSs are evidenced by American depositary
receipts (ADRs), which may be issued in either certificated or book entry form.
The following table sets forth for the periods
indicated the highest and lowest middle market quotations for BPs ordinary
shares for the periods shown. These are derived from the Daily Official List
of the LSE and the highest and lowest sales prices of ADSs as reported on the
New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) composite tape.
Pence | Dollars | ||||||||
American | |||||||||
depositary | |||||||||
Ordinary shares | sharesa | ||||||||
High | Low | High | Low | ||||||
Year ended 31 December | |||||||||
2003 | 458.00 | 348.75 | 49.59 | 34.67 | |||||
2004 | 561.00 | 407.75 | 62.10 | 46.65 | |||||
2005 | 686.00 | 499.00 | 72.75 | 56.60 | |||||
2006 | 723.00 | 558.50 | 76.85 | 63.52 | |||||
2007 | 640.00 | 504.50 | 79.77 | 58.62 | |||||
Year ended 31 December | |||||||||
2006: | First quarter | 693.00 | 623.00 | 72.88 | 65.35 | ||||
Second quarter | 723.00 | 581.00 | 76.85 | 64.19 | |||||
Third quarter | 653.00 | 560.00 | 73.28 | 63.81 | |||||
Fourth quarter | 619.00 | 558.50 | 69.49 | 63.52 | |||||
2007: | First quarter | 574.50 | 504.50 | 67.27 | 58.62 | ||||
Second quarter | 606.50 | 542.50 | 72.49 | 64.42 | |||||
Third quarter | 617.00 | 516.00 | 75.25 | 61.10 | |||||
Fourth quarter | 640.00 | 548.00 | 79.77 | 67.24 | |||||
2008: | First quarter (to 19 February) | 648.00 | 498.00 | 75.87 | 57.85 | ||||
Month of | |||||||||
September 2007 | 600.00 | 548.00 | 72.11 | 66.76 | |||||
October 2007 | 639.50 | 548.00 | 78.58 | 67.24 | |||||
November 2007 | 640.00 | 564.00 | 79.77 | 69.81 | |||||
December 2007 | 624.00 | 585.00 | 76.50 | 72.10 | |||||
January 2008 | 648.00 | 498.00 | 75.87 | 57.85 | |||||
February 2008 (to 19 February) | 576.50 | 529.50 | 67.50 | 62.38 |
a | An ADS is equivalent to six 25 cent ordinary shares. |
Market prices for the ordinary
shares on the LSE and in after-hours trading off the LSE, in each case while
the NYSE is open, and the market prices for ADSs on the NYSE and other North
American stock exchanges are closely related due to arbitrage among the various
markets, although differences may exist from time to time due to various factors,
including UK stamp duty reserve tax. Trading in ADSs began on the LSE on 3
August 1987.
On
19 February 2008, 899,270,264 ADSs (equivalent to 5,395,621,585 ordinary
shares or some 28.34% of the total) were outstanding and were held by approximately
140,195 ADR holders. Of these, about 138,696
had registered addresses
in the US at that date. One of the registered holders of ADSs represents some
800,000 underlying holders.
On
19 February 2008, there were approximately 328,855 holders of record of ordinary
shares. Of these holders, around 1,487 had registered addresses in the US and
held a total of some 4,238,685 ordinary shares.
Since
certain of the ordinary shares and ADSs were held by brokers and other nominees,
the number of holders of record in the US may not be representative of the number
of beneficial holders or of their country of residence.
85 | |
Memorandum and Articles of Association | |
The following summarizes
certain provisions of the companys Memorandum and Articles of Association and applicable English law. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the UK Companies Act and
the companys Memorandum and Articles of Association. Information on where investors can obtain copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association is described under the heading Documents on display on
page 88.
On 24 April
2003, the shareholders of BP voted at the AGM to adopt new Articles of Association
to consolidate amendments that had been necessary to implement legislative
changes since the
previous Articles of Association were adopted in 1983.
At the AGM held
on 15 April 2004, shareholders approved an amendment to the Articles of Association
such that, at each AGM held after 31 December 2004, all directors shall retire
from office and may offer themselves for re-election. There have been no further
amendments to the Articles of Association.
At the upcoming
annual general meeting of the company, it will be proposed that the company
adopts new articles of association, largely to take account of changes in UK
company law brought
about by the Companies Act 2006.
Objects and purposes
BP
is incorporated under the name BP p.l.c. and is registered in England and Wales
with registered number 102498. Clause 4 of BPs
Memorandum of Association provides that its objects include the acquisition
of petroleum-bearing
lands; the carrying on of refining and dealing businesses in the petroleum,
manufacturing, metallurgical or chemicals businesses; the purchase and operation
of ships and all other vehicles and other conveyances; and the carrying on
of any other businesses calculated to benefit BP. The memorandum grants BP
a range of corporate capabilities to effect these objects.
Directors |
|
– | The giving of security or indemnity with respect to any money lent or obligation taken by the director at the request or benefit of the company. |
– | Any proposal in which he is interested concerning the underwriting of company securities or debentures. |
– | Any proposal concerning any other company in which he is interested, directly or indirectly (whether as an officer or shareholder or otherwise) provided that he and persons connected with him are not the holder or holders of 1% or more of the voting interest in the shares of such company. |
– | Proposals concerning the modification of certain retirement benefits schemes under which he may benefit and that have been approved by either the UK Board of Inland Revenue or by the shareholders. |
– |
Any proposal concerning the purchase or maintenance of any insurance policy under which he may benefit. The UK Companies Act requires a director of a company who is in any |
way interested in a contract or proposed contract with the company to declare the nature of his interest at a meeting of the directors of the company. The definition of interest now includes the interests of spouses, children, companies and trusts. The directors may exercise all the powers of the company to borrow money, except that the amount remaining undischarged of all moneys borrowed by the company shall not, without approval of the shareholders, exceed the amount paid up on the share capital plus the aggregate of the amount of the capital and |
revenue reserves of the company. Variation of the borrowing power of the board
may only be effected by amending the Articles of Association.
Remuneration
of non-executive directors shall be determined in the aggregate by resolution
of the shareholders. Remuneration
of executive directors is determined by the remuneration committee. This committee
is made up of non-executive directors only. Any director attaining the age of
70 shall retire at the next AGM. There is no requirement of share ownership for
a directors qualification.
Dividend
rights; other rights to share in company profits; capital calls If recommended by the directors of BP, BP shareholders may, by resolution, declare dividends but no such dividend may be declared in excess of the amount recommended by the directors. The directors may also pay interim dividends without obtaining shareholder approval. No dividend may be paid other than out of profits available for distribution, as determined under IFRS and the UK Companies Act. Dividends on ordinary shares are payable only after payment of dividends on BP preference shares. Any dividend unclaimed after a period of 12 years from the date of declaration of such dividend shall be forfeited and reverts to BP. The directors have the power to declare and pay dividends in any currency provided that a sterling equivalent is announced. It is not the companys intention to change its current policy of paying dividends in US dollars. Apart from shareholders rights to share in BPs profits by dividend (if any is declared), the Articles of Association provide that the directors may set aside: |
|
– | A special reserve fund out of the balance of profits each year to make up any deficit of cumulative dividend on the BP preference shares. |
– | A general reserve out of the balance of profits each year, which shall be applicable for any purpose to which the profits of the company may properly be applied. This may include capitalization of such sum, pursuant to an ordinary shareholders resolution, and distribution to shareholders as if it were distributed by way of a dividend on the ordinary shares or in paying up in full unissued ordinary shares for allotment and distribution as bonus shares. |
Any such
sums so deposited may be distributed in accordance with the manner of
distribution of dividends as described above. Holders of shares are not subject to calls on capital by the company, provided that the amounts required to be paid on issue have been paid off. All shares are fully paid. |
Voting rights
The
Articles of Association of the company provide that voting on resolutions at
a shareholders meeting will be decided on a poll other than resolutions
of a procedural nature, which may be decided on a show of hands. If voting
is on a poll, every shareholder who is present in person or by proxy has one
vote for every ordinary share held and two votes for every £5 in nominal
amount of BP preference shares held. If voting is on a show of hands, each
shareholder who is present at the meeting in person or whose duly appointed
proxy is present in person will have one vote, regardless of the number of
shares held, unless a poll is requested. Shareholders do not have cumulative
voting
rights.
Holders
of record of ordinary shares may appoint a proxy, including a beneficial
owner of those shares, to attend,
speak and vote on their behalf at any shareholders meeting.
Record
holders of BP ADSs are also
entitled to attend, speak and vote at any shareholders meeting of BP by
the appointment by the approved depositary, JPMorgan Chase Bank, of them as proxies
in respect of the ordinary shares represented by their ADSs. Each such proxy
may also appoint a proxy. Alternatively, holders of BP ADSs are entitled to vote
by supplying their voting instructions to the depositary, who will vote the
ordinary shares represented by their ADSs in accordance with their instructions.
Proxies may be delivered electronically.
Matters
are transacted at shareholders meetings
by the proposing and passing of resolutions, of which there are three types:
ordinary, special or extraordinary.
86 | |
An ordinary resolution requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes of those persons voting at a meeting at which there is a quorum. Special and extraordinary resolutions require the affirmative vote of not less than three-fourths of the persons voting at a meeting at which there is a quorum. Any AGM at which it is proposed to put a special or ordinary resolution requires 21 days notice. An extraordinary resolution put to the AGM requires no notice period. Any extraordinary general meeting at which it is proposed to put a special resolution requires 21 days notice; otherwise, the notice period for an extraordinary general meeting is 14 days.
Liquidation rights; redemption provisions
In the event of a liquidation of BP, after payment of all liabilities and applicable deductions under UK laws and subject to the payment of secured creditors, the holders of BP preference shares would be entitled to
the sum of (i) the capital paid up on such shares plus, (ii) accrued and unpaid dividends and (iii) a premium equal to the higher of (a) 10% of the capital paid up on the BP preference shares and (b) the excess of the average market price over par
value of such shares on the LSE during the previous six months. The remaining assets (if any) would be divided pro rata among the holders of ordinary shares.
Without prejudice to any special rights
previously conferred on the holders of any class of shares, BP may issue any
share with
such preferred, deferred or other special rights, or subject to such restrictions
as the shareholders by resolution determine (or, in the absence of any such
resolutions, by determination of the directors), and may issue shares that
are to be or may be redeemed.
Variation of rights
The rights attached to any class of shares may be varied with the consent in
writing of holders of 75% of the shares of that class or on the adoption of
an extraordinary resolution passed at a separate meeting of the holders of
the shares of that class. At every such separate meeting, all of the provisions
of the Articles of Association relating to proceedings at a general meeting
apply, except that the quorum with respect to a meeting to change the rights
attached to the preference shares is 10% or more of the shares of that class,
and the quorum to change the rights attached to the ordinary shares is one
third or more of the shares of that class.
Shareholders meetings and notices
Shareholders
must provide BP with a postal or electronic address in the UK in order to be
entitled to receive notice of shareholders meetings. In
certain circumstances, BP may give notices to shareholders by advertisement
in UK newspapers. Holders of BP ADSs are entitled to receive notices under
the terms of the deposit agreement relating to BP ADSs. The substance and timing
of notices is described above under the heading Voting Rights.
Under the Articles of Association,
the AGM of shareholders will be held within 15 months after the preceding AGM.
All other general meetings of shareholders shall be called extraordinary general
meetings and all general meetings shall be held at a time and place determined
by the directors within the UK. If any shareholders meeting is adjourned
for lack of quorum, notice of the time and place of the meeting may be given
in any lawful manner, including electronically. Powers exist for action to
be taken either before or at the meeting by authorized officers to ensure its
orderly
conduct and safety of those attending.
Limitations on voting and shareholding
There
are no limitations imposed by English law or the companys Memorandum
or Articles of Association on the right of non-residents or foreign persons
to hold or vote the companys ordinary shares or ADSs, other than limitations
that would generally apply
to all of the shareholders.
Disclosure of interests in shares
The UK Companies Act permits a public company, on written notice, to require
any person whom the company believes to be or, at any time during the previous
three years prior to the issue of the notice, to
have
been interested in its voting shares, to disclose certain information with respect to those interests. Failure to supply the information required may lead to disenfranchisement of the relevant shares and a prohibition on their transfer and receipt of dividends and other payments in respect of those shares. In this context the term interest is widely defined and will generally include an interest of any kind whatsoever in voting shares, including any interest of a holder of BP ADSs.
Exchange controls | |
There are currently no UK
foreign exchange controls or restrictions on remittances of dividends on
the ordinary shares or on the
conduct of the
companys operations.
There are no limitations, either
under the laws of the UK or under the companys Articles of Association,
restricting the right of non-resident or foreign owners to hold or vote BP
ordinary or preference
shares in the company.
Taxation | |
This
section describes the material US federal income tax and UK taxation consequences
of owning ordinary shares or ADSs to a US holder who holds the ordinary shares
or ADSs as capital assets for tax purposes. It does not apply, however, to
members of special classes of holders subject to special rules and holders
that, directly or indirectly, hold 10% or more of the companys voting
stock.
A US holder is any beneficial
owner of ordinary shares or ADSs that is for US federal income tax purposes
(i) a citizen
or resident of the US, (ii) a US domestic corporation, (iii) an estate whose
income is subject to US federal income taxation regardless of its source, or
(iv) a trust if a US court can exercise primary supervision over the trusts
administration and one or more US persons are authorized to control all substantial
decisions of the trust.
This section
is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its legislative
history, existing and proposed regulations thereunder, published rulings and
court decisions, and the taxation laws of the UK, all as currently in effect,
as well as the income tax convention between the US and the UK that entered
into force on 31 March 2003 (the Treaty). These laws are subject to change,
possibly on a retroactive basis. This
section is further based in part on the representations of the Depositary and
assumes that each obligation in the Deposit Agreement and any related agreement
will be performed in accordance with its terms.
For purposes of the Treaty and
the estate and gift tax Convention (the Estate Tax Convention), and for US federal income tax and UK taxation purposes, a holder of ADRs
evidencing ADSs will be treated as the owner of the companys ordinary
shares represented by those ADRs. Exchanges of ordinary shares for ADRs and
ADRs for
ordinary shares generally will not be subject to US federal income tax or to
UK taxation
other than stamp duty or stamp duty reserve tax, as described below.
Investors should
consult their own tax adviser regarding the US federal, state and local, the
UK and other tax consequences of owning and disposing of ordinary shares and
ADSs in their particular circumstances, and in particular whether they are
eligible for the benefits of the Treaty.
Taxation of dividends
UK taxation
Under current UK taxation law, no withholding tax will be deducted from dividends
paid by the company, including dividends paid to US holders. A shareholder
that is a company resident for tax purposes in the UK generally will not be
taxable on a dividend it receives from the company. A shareholder who is an
individual resident for tax purposes in the UK is entitled to a tax credit
on cash dividends paid on ordinary shares or ADSs of the company equal to one-ninth
of the cash dividend.
87 | |
US federal income taxation
A US holder is subject to US federal income taxation on the gross amount of
any dividend paid by the company out of its current or accumulated earnings
and profits (as determined for US federal income tax purposes). Dividends
paid to a non-corporate US holder in taxable years beginning before 1 January
2011 that constitute qualified dividend income will be taxable to the holder
at a maximum tax rate of 15%, provided that the holder has a holding period
in the
ordinary shares or ADSs of more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning
60 days before the ex-dividend date and meets other holding period requirements.
Dividends paid by the company with respect to the shares or ADSs will generally
be qualified dividend income.
As noted above
in UK taxation, a US holder will not be subject to UK withholding tax. A
US holder will include in gross income for US federal income tax purposes the
amount of the dividend actually received from the company and the receipt
of
a dividend will not entitle the US holder to a foreign tax credit.
For US federal income tax purposes,
a dividend must be included in income when the US holder, in the case of ordinary
shares, or the Depositary, in the case of ADSs, actually or constructively
receives the dividend, and will not be eligible for the dividends-received
deduction generally
allowed to US corporations in respect of dividends received from other US corporations.
Dividends will be income from sources outside the
US, and generally will be passive category income or, in the case of certain US holders, general category income, each
of which is treated separately for purposes of computing the allowable foreign
tax credit.
The amount of
the dividend distribution on the ordinary shares or ADSs that is paid in
pounds sterling will be the US dollar value of the pounds sterling payments
made,
determined at the spot pounds sterling/US dollar rate on the date the dividend
distribution is includible in income, regardless of whether the payment is
in fact converted into US dollars. Generally, any gain or loss resulting
from currency exchange fluctuations
during the period from the date the pounds sterling dividend payment is includible
in income to the date the payment is converted into US dollars will be treated
as ordinary income or loss and will not be eligible for the 15% tax rate
on qualified dividend income. The gain or loss generally will be income or
loss
from sources within the US for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.
Distributions in excess of the
companys earnings and profits, as determined for US federal income tax purposes, will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of the US
holders basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs and thereafter as capital gain, subject to taxation as described in Taxation of capital gains US
federal income taxation.
Taxation of capital gains
UK taxation
A US holder may be liable for both UK and US tax in respect of a gain on the
disposal of ordinary shares or ADSs if the US holder is (i) a citizen of the
US resident or ordinarily resident in the UK, (ii) a US domestic corporation
resident in the UK by reason of its business being managed or controlled in
the UK or (iii) a citizen of the US or a corporation that carries on a trade
or profession or vocation in the UK through a branch or agency or, in respect
of
corporations for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2003,
through a permanent establishment, and that have used, held, or acquired the
ordinary shares or ADSs for the purposes of such trade, profession or vocation
of such branch, agency or permanent establishment. However, such persons may
be entitled to a tax credit against their US federal income tax liability for
the amount of UK capital gains tax or UK corporation tax on chargeable gains
(as the case may be) that is paid
in respect of such gain.
Under the Treaty,
capital gains on dispositions of ordinary shares or ADSs generally will be
subject to tax only in the jurisdiction of residence of the relevant holder
as determined under both the laws of the UK and the US and as required by
the terms of the Treaty.
Under the Treaty,
individuals who are residents of either the UK or the US and who have been
residents of the other jurisdiction (the US or the UK, as the case may be)
at any time during the six years immediately preceding the relevant disposal
of ordinary shares or ADSs may be
subject to tax with respect to capital gains arising from a disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs of the company not only in the jurisdiction of which the holder is resident at the time of the disposition but also in the other jurisdiction.
US federal income taxation
A
US holder that sells or otherwise disposes of ordinary shares or ADSs will
recognize a capital gain or loss for US federal income tax purposes
equal to the difference between the US dollar value of the amount realized
and the holders tax basis, determined in US dollars, in the ordinary shares or ADSs. Capital gain of a non-corporate US holder that is recognized in taxable years beginning before 1 January 2011 is generally taxed at a maximum rate of
15% if the holders holding period for such ordinary shares or ADSs
exceeds one year. The gain or loss will generally be income or loss from
sources within
the US for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. The deductibility of capital
losses
is subject to limitations.
We do not believe that ordinary
shares or ADSs will be treated as stock of a passive foreign investment company,
or
PFIC, for US federal income tax purposes, but this conclusion is a factual
determination that is made annually and thus is subject to change. If we
are treated as a PFIC,
unless a US holder elects to be taxed annually on a mark-to-mark basis with
respect to ordinary shares or ADSs, gain realized on the sale or
other disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs would in general not be treated
as capital gain. Instead a US holder would be treated as if he or she had realized
such gain and certain excess distribution ratably over the holding
period for ordinary shares or ADSs and would be taxed at the highest tax
rate in effect for each such year to which the gain was allocated, in addition
to
which an interest charge in respect of the tax attributable to each such
year
would apply.
Additional tax considerations
UK inheritance tax
The
Estate Tax Convention applies to inheritance tax. ADSs held by an individual
who is domiciled for the purposes of the Estate Tax Convention
in the US and is not for the purposes of the Estate Tax Convention a national
of the UK will not be subject to UK inheritance tax on the individuals death or on transfer during the individuals
lifetime unless, among other things, the ADSs are part of the business
property of a permanent establishment situated in the UK used for the performance
of independent personal services. In the exceptional case where ADSs are
subject
both to inheritance tax and to US federal gift or estate tax, the Estate
Tax Convention generally provides for tax payable
in the US to be credited against tax payable in the UK or for tax paid in
the
UK to be credited against tax payable in the US, based on priority rules
set forth in the Estate Tax Convention.
UK stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax
The statements below relate to what is understood to be the current practice
of the UK Inland Revenue under existing law.
Provided that
the instrument of transfer is not executed in the UK and remains at all times
outside the UK and the transfer does not relate to any matter or thing done
or to be done in the UK, no UK stamp duty is payable on the acquisition or
transfer of ADSs. Neither will an agreement to transfer ADSs in the form
of ADRs give rise to a liability to stamp duty reserve tax.
Purchases of
ordinary shares, as opposed to ADSs, through the CREST system of paperless
share transfers will be subject to stamp duty reserve tax at 0.5%. The charge
will arise as soon as there is an agreement for the transfer of the shares
(or, in the case of a conditional agreement, when the condition is fulfilled).
The stamp duty reserve tax will apply to agreements to transfer ordinary
shares even if the agreement is made outside
the UK between two non-residents. Purchases
of ordinary shares outside the CREST system are subject either to stamp duty
at a rate of 50 pence per £100 (or part), or stamp duty reserve tax at
0.5%. Stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax are generally the liability of
the purchaser. A subsequent transfer of ordinary shares to the Depositarys
nominee will give rise to further stamp duty at
88 | |
the rate of £1.50 per £100 (or part) or stamp duty reserve tax at
the rate of 1.5% of the value of the ordinary shares at the time of
the transfer.
A transfer of the underlying ordinary
shares to an ADR holder on cancellation of the ADSs without transfer of beneficial
ownership will give rise to UK stamp duty at the rate of £5
per transfer.
An ADR holder electing to receive
ADSs instead of a cash dividend will be responsible for the stamp duty reserve
tax due on issue of shares to the Depositarys nominee and calculated
at the rate of 1.5% on the issue price of the shares. Current UK Inland Revenue
practice is to calculate the issue price by reference to the total cash receipt
to which a US holder would have been entitled had the election to receive ADSs
instead of a cash dividend not been made. ADR holders electing to receive ADSs
instead of the cash dividend authorize the Depositary to sell sufficient shares
to cover this liability.
Documents on display |
BPs Annual Report and Accounts is also available online at www.bp.com. Shareholders may obtain a hard copy of BPs complete audited financial statements, free of charge, by contacting BP Distribution Services at +44 (0)870 241 3269 or through an e-mail request addressed to bpdistributionservices@bp.com, or BPs US Shareholder Services office in Warrenville, Illinois at +1 800 638 5672 or through an e-mail request addressed to shareholderus@bp.com.
The company is subject to the information requirements of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934 applicable to foreign private issuers. In accordance with these requirements, the company files its Annual Report on Form 20-F and other related documents with the SEC. It is possible to read and copy documents that have been filed with the SEC at the SECs public reference room located at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, US. You may also call the SEC at +1 800-SEC-0330 or log on to www.sec.gov. In addition, BPs SEC filings are available to the public at the SECs web site at www.sec.gov. BP discloses on its website at www.bp.com/NYSEcorporategovernancerules significant ways (if any) in which its corporate governance practices differ from those mandated for US companies under NYSE listing standards.
Material modifications to the rights of security holders and use of proceeds |
Following the acquisition of the corporate trust business of JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. succeeded JP Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A. as the trustee under the Indenture, dated as of 8 March
2002, among BP Capital Markets p.l.c., BP p.l.c. and JPMorgan Chase Bank,
the Indenture, dated as of 27 September 2002, among BP Canada Finance Company,
BP p.l.c. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the Indenture, dated as of
4 June 2003, among
BP Capital Markets America Inc., BP p.l.c. and JPMorgan Chase Bank. The address
of The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. is 227 W. Monroe, 26th Floor,
Chicago, Illinois 60606.
During 2006, the transfer agent
for BPs ADRs changed to Mellon. BPs Registrar, LloydsTSB Registrars,
has changed its name to Equiniti in 2007.
Controls and procedures |
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
The company
maintains disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports the company
files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to
management, including the companys group chief executive and chief
financial
officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In designing and evaluating our
disclosure controls and procedures, our management, including the group chief
executive
and chief financial officer, recognize that any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance
that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Because
of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. Further,
in the design and evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures our
management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the
cost-benefit
relationship of possible controls and procedures. Also, we have investments
in certain unconsolidated entities. As we do not control these entities,
our disclosure
controls and procedures with respect to such entities are necessarily substantially
more limited than those we maintain with respect to our consolidated subsidiaries.
Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
mis-statements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. The companys
disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to meet, and management
believe that they meet, reasonable assurance standards.
The companys management, with the participation of the companys group chief executive and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the companys
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on that evaluation, the group chief executive and chief financial officer have concluded that the
companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable
assurance level.
Changes in internal controls over financial reporting
There
were no changes in the groups internal controls
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
Form 20-F
that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect
our internal controls over financial reporting.
Managements
report on internal control over financial
reporting
Management of BP is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. BPs internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of
the principal executive and principal financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of BPs
financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with
IFRS.
As of the end of the 2007 fiscal
year, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over
financial reporting in accordance with the Internal Control Revised Guidance
for Directors on the Combined Code (Turnbull). Based on this assessment, management
has determined that BPs internal control over financial reporting as
of 31 December 2007 was effective.
The companys internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS and that receipts and expenditures are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of BP; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of BPs
assets that could have a material effect
on our financial statements.
BPs internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2007 has been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report
appearing on page 94.
Audit committee financial expert |
The board determined that Douglas Flint is the audit committee member with recent and relevant financial experience as defined by the Combined Code guidance.
89 | |
The board also determined that Douglas Flint meets the independence criteria provisions of Rule 10A-3 of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that Mr Flint may be regarded as an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 16A of Form 20-F. Mr Flint is group finance director of HSBC Holdings plc and a former member of the Accounting Standards Board and the Standards Advisory Council of the International Accounting Standards Board.
Code of ethics |
The company has adopted a code of ethics for its group chief executive, chief
financial officer, general auditor, group chief accounting officer and
deputy chief financial officer (previously titled group controller) as
required by the provisions of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and the rules issued by the SEC. There have been no amendments to,
or waivers from, the code of ethics relating to any of those officers.
The code of ethics has been
filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 20-F.
In
June 2005, BP published a
code of conduct, which is applicable to all employees.
Principal accountants fees and services |
The audit committee has established policies and procedures for the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, to render audit and certain assurance and tax services. The policies provide for pre-approval by the audit committee of specifically defined audit, audit-related, tax and other services that are not prohibited by regulatory or other professional requirements. Ernst & Young is engaged for these services when its expertise and experience of BP are important. Most of this work is of an audit nature. Tax services were awarded either through a full competitive tender process or following an assessment of the expertise of Ernst & Young relative to that of other potential service providers. These services are for a fixed term.
Under the policy, pre-approval
is given for specific services within the following categories: advice on
accounting,
auditing and financial reporting matters; internal accounting and risk management
control reviews (excluding any services relating to information systems design
and implementation); non-statutory audit; project assurance and advice on business
and accounting process improvement (excluding any services relating to
information systems design and implementation relating to BPs financial statements or accounting records); due diligence in connection with acquisitions, disposals and joint ventures; income tax and indirect tax compliance and advisory
services; and employee tax services (excluding tax services that could impair independence); provision of, or access to, Ernst & Young
publications, workshops, seminars and other training materials; provision
of reports from data gathered on non-financial policies and information;
and assistance
with understanding non-financial regulatory requirements. Additionally,
any proposed service not included in the pre-approved services, must be
approved
in advance
prior to commencement of the
engagement. The audit committee has delegated to the chairman of the audit
committee authority to approve permitted services provided that the chairman
reports any
decisions to the committee at its next scheduled meeting.
The audit committee evaluates
the performance of the auditors each year. The audit fees payable to Ernst & Young
are reviewed by the committee in the context of other global companies for
cost effectiveness. The committee keeps under review the scope and results
of audit
work and the independence and objectivity of the auditors. It requires the
auditors to rotate their lead audit partner every five years.
(See Financial statements Notes
17 and 49 on pages 127 and 175 for details of audit fees.)
90 | |
Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers |
The following table provides details of ordinary shares repurchased.
Total number of shares | Maximum number of | |||||||
$ | purchased as part of | shares that may yet | ||||||
Total number of | Average price | publicly announced | be purchased under | |||||
shares purchased | a b | paid per share | programmes | the programme | c | |||
2007 | ||||||||
January | 73,361,264 | 10.80 | 73,361,264 | |||||
February | 83,747,871 | 10.52 | 83,747,871 | |||||
March | 80,807,070 | 10.21 | 80,807,070 | |||||
April | 74,516,902 | 11.31 | 74,516,902 | |||||
May | 52,957,411 | 11.33 | 52,957,411 | |||||
June | 48,331,426 | 11.50 | 48,331,426 | |||||
July | 50,630,000 | 12.29 | 50,630,000 | |||||
August | 44,808,000 | 11.08 | 44,808,000 | |||||
September | 32,815,000 | 11.61 | 32,815,000 | |||||
October | 43,067,439 | 12.36 | 43,067,439 | |||||
November | 46,775,350 | 12.34 | 46,775,350 | |||||
December | 31,331,795 | 12.44 | 31,331,795 | |||||
2008 | ||||||||
January | 41,187,000 | 11.26 | 41,187,000 | |||||
February (to 19 February) | 11,293,523 | 10.77 | 11,293,523 | |||||
|
a | All share purchases were open market transactions. |
b | All shares were repurchased for cancellation. |
c | At the AGM on 12 April 2007, authorization was given to repurchase up to 1.95 billion ordinary shares in the period to the next AGM in 2008 or 11 July 2008, the latest date by which an AGM must be held. This authorization is renewed annually at the AGM. |
The following table provides details of share purchases made by ESOP trusts.
Total number of shares | Maximum number of | |||||||
$ | purchased as part of | shares that may yet | ||||||
Total number of | Average price | publicly announced | be purchased under | |||||
shares purchased | paid per share | programmes | a | the programme | a | |||
2007 | ||||||||
January | 77,553 | 11.15 | ||||||
February | 326,535 | 10.75 | ||||||
March | 194 | 11.42 | ||||||
April | 8,207 | 11.56 | ||||||
May | 5,181,599 | 11.60 | ||||||
June | 13,140 | 11.37 | ||||||
July | 3,507,928 | 12.32 | ||||||
August | | | ||||||
September | | | ||||||
October | | | ||||||
November | | | ||||||
December | 2,000,000 | 11.78 | ||||||
2008 | ||||||||
January | | | ||||||
February (to 19 February) | 2,943,710 | 11.25 | ||||||
|
a | No shares were repurchased pursuant to a publicly announced plan. Transactions represent the purchase of ordinary shares by ESOP trusts to satisfy future requirements of employee share schemes. |
91 | |
Called up share capital |
Details of the allotted, called up and fully paid share capital
at 31 December 2007 are set out in Financial statements Note 39
on page 157.
At the AGM on 12 April 2007, authorization
was given to the directors to allot shares up to an aggregate nominal amount
equal to $1,626 million. Authority was also given to the
directors to allot shares for cash and to dispose of treasury shares, other than by way of rights issue, up to a maximum of $244
million, without having to offer such shares to existing shareholders. These
authorities are given for the period until the next AGM in 2008 or 11 July
2008, whichever is the earlier. These authorities are renewed annually at
the AGM.
Annual general meeting |
The 2008 AGM will be held on Thursday 17 April 2008 at 11.30 a.m. at ExCeL London, One Western Gateway, Royal Victoria Dock, London E16 1XL. A separate notice convening the meeting is distributed to shareholders, which
includes an explanation of the items of business to be considered at the meeting.
All
resolutions of which notice has been given will be decided on a poll.
Ernst & Young
LLP have expressed their willingness to continue in office as auditors and
a resolution for their
reappointment is included in Notice of BP Annual General
Meeting 2008.
By order of the board
David J Jackson
Secretary
22 February 2008
Exhibits |
The following documents are filed as part of this annual report: | |
Exhibit 1. | Memorandum and Articles of Association of BP p.l.c.* |
Exhibit 4.1 | The BP Executive Directors Incentive Plan** |
Exhibit 4.2 | Directors Service Contracts for Dr AB Hayward, Dr DC Allen, |
IC Conn and Dr BE Grote** | |
Exhibit 4.3 | Director Service Contract for AG Inglis |
Exhibit 4.4 | Medium Term Performance Plan |
Exhibit 4.5 | Deferred Annual Bonus Plan |
Exhibit 4.6 | Performance Share Plan |
Exhibit 7. | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
(Unaudited) | |
Exhibit 8. | Subsidiaries |
Exhibit 11. | Code of Ethics* |
Exhibit 12. | Rule 13a 14(a) Certifications |
Exhibit 13. | Rule 13a 14(b) Certifications# |
* | Incorporated by reference to the companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2003. |
** | Incorporated by reference to the companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2004. |
# | Furnished only. |
The total amount of long-term securities of the Registrant and its subsidiaries authorized under any one instrument does not exceed 10% of the total assets of BP p.l.c. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The company agrees to furnish copies of any or all such instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
Administration |
If you have any queries about the administration of shareholdings, such as change of address, change of ownership, dividend payments, the dividend reinvestment plan or the ADS direct access plan, or to change the way you receive your company documents (such as the Annual Report and Accounts, Annual Review and Notice of Meeting) please contact the BP Registrar or ADS Depositary.
UK Registrars
Office
The BP Registrar, Equiniti
Aspect House, Spencer Road, Lancing, West Sussex BN99 6DA
Tel: +44 (0)121 415 7005; Freephone in UK: 0800 701107
Textphone: 0871 384 2255; Fax: +44 (0)871 384 2100
Please note that any numbers quoted with the prefix 0871 will be charged at 8p per minute from a BT landline. Other network providers costs may vary.
US ADS Depositary
JPMorgan Chase Bank
PO Box 358408, Pittsburgh, PA 15252-8408
Tel: +1 201 680 6630
Toll-free in US and Canada: +1 877 638 5672
92 | |
This page is intentionally
left blank |
93 | |
Financial statements contents |
94 | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of BP p.l.c. |
We have audited the accompanying
group balance sheets of BP p.l.c. as of 31 December 2007 and 2006, and the related
group statements of income, cash flows, and recognized income and expense, for
each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 2007. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the companys management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the group financial position of BP p.l.c. at 31 December
2007 and 2006, and the group results of operations and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended 31 December 2007, in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union and International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards
Board.
We
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of BP p.l.c.s internal
control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2007, based on criteria established
in the Internal Control Revised Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code
(Turnbull) as issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and
Wales (the Turnbull criteria) and our report dated 22 February 2008 expressed
an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ | ERNST & YOUNG LLP Ernst & Young LLP London, England 22 February 2008 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of BP p.l.c. |
We have audited BP p.l.c.s
internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2007, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Revised Guidance for Directors on the Combined
Code (Turnbull) as issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England
and Wales (the Turnbull criteria). BP p.l.c.s management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for
its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the accompanying Managements report on internal control over
financial reporting on page 88. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the companys internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A
companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors
of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness
to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In
our opinion, BP p.l.c. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2007, based on the Turnbull
criteria.
We
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the group balance sheets of BP p.l.c. as of
31 December 2007 and 2006, and the related group statements of income, cash
flows and recognized income and expense, for each of the three years in the
period ended 31 December 2007, and our report dated 22 February 2008 expressed
an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ | ERNST & YOUNG LLP Ernst & Young LLP London, England 22 February 2008 |
95 | |
Consent of independent registered public accounting firm | |
We consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated
22 February 2008 with respect to the group financial statements of BP p.l.c.,
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of BP p.l.c.,
included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended 31 December 2007
in the following registration statements:
Registration Statements on Form F-3 (File Nos.
333-9790 and 333-65996) of BP p.l.c.,
Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File Nos.
333-110203) of BP Canada Finance Company, BP Capital Markets p.l.c., BP Capital
Markets America Inc, and BP p.l.c., and
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-21868, 333-9020, 333-09798, 333-79399, 333-34968, 333-67206, 333-74414,
333-102583, 333-103923, 333-103924, 333-119934, 333-123482, 333-123483, 333-132619,
333-131584, 333-131583, 333-146868, 333-146870 and 333-146873) of BP p.l.c.
/s/ERNST & YOUNG
LLP Ernst & Young LLP |
|
London, England 4 March 2008 |
96 | |
Group income statement | |
For the year ended 31 December | $ million | |||||||
Note | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||
Sales and other operating revenues | 5 | 284,365 | 265,906 | 239,792 | ||||
Earnings from jointly controlled entities after interest and tax | 3,135 | 3,553 | 3,083 | |||||
Earnings from associates after interest and tax | 697 | 442 | 460 | |||||
Interest and other revenues | 6 | 754 | 701 | 613 | ||||
Total revenues | 288,951 | 270,602 | 243,948 | |||||
Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 7 | 2,487 | 3,714 | 1,538 | ||||
Total revenues and other income | 291,438 | 274,316 | 245,486 | |||||
Purchases | 200,766 | 187,183 | 163,026 | |||||
Production and manufacturing expenses | 25,915 | 23,293 | 21,592 | |||||
Production and similar taxes | 8 | 4,013 | 3,621 | 3,010 | ||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 9 | 10,579 | 9,128 | 8,771 | ||||
Impairment and losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 10 | 1,679 | 549 | 468 | ||||
Exploration expense | 16 | 756 | 1,045 | 684 | ||||
Distribution and administration expenses | 12 | 15,371 | 14,447 | 13,706 | ||||
Fair value (gain) loss on embedded derivatives | 34 | 7 | (608 | ) | 2,047 | |||
Profit before interest and taxation from continuing operations | 32,352 | 35,658 | 32,182 | |||||
Finance costs | 18 | 1,110 | 718 | 616 | ||||
Other finance (income) expense | 19 | (369 | ) | (202 | ) | 145 | ||
Profit before taxation from continuing operations | 31,611 | 35,142 | 31,421 | |||||
Taxation | 20 | 10,442 | 12,516 | 9,288 | ||||
Profit from continuing operations | 21,169 | 22,626 | 22,133 | |||||
Profit (loss) from Innovene operations | 3 | | (25 | ) | 184 | |||
Profit for the year | 21,169 | 22,601 | 22,317 | |||||
|
||||||||
Attributable to | ||||||||
BP shareholders | 20,845 | 22,315 | 22,026 | |||||
Minority interest | 324 | 286 | 291 | |||||
21,169 | 22,601 | 22,317 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Earnings per share cents | ||||||||
Profit for the year attributable to BP shareholders | ||||||||
Basic | 22 | 108.76 | 111.41 | 104.25 | ||||
Diluted | 22 | 107.84 | 110.56 | 103.05 | ||||
Profit from continuing operations attributable to BP shareholders | ||||||||
Basic | 108.76 | 111.54 | 103.38 | |||||
Diluted | 107.84 | 110.68 | 102.19 | |||||
|
The notes on pages 100-180 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements of the BP group.
97 | |
Group balance sheet |
At 31 December | $ million | ||||||
Note | 2007 | 2006 | |||||
Non-current assets | |||||||
Property, plant and equipment | 23 | 97,989 | 90,999 | ||||
Goodwill | 24 | 11,006 | 10,780 | ||||
Intangible assets | 25 | 6,652 | 5,246 | ||||
Investments in jointly controlled entities | 26 | 18,113 | 15,074 | ||||
Investments in associates | 27 | 4,579 | 5,975 | ||||
Other investments | 29 | 1,830 | 1,697 | ||||
Fixed assets | 140,169 | 129,771 | |||||
Loans | 999 | 817 | |||||
Other receivables | 31 | 968 | 862 | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | 34 | 3,741 | 3,025 | ||||
Prepayments | 1,083 | 1,034 | |||||
Defined benefit pension plan surplus | 38 | 8,914 | 6,753 | ||||
155,874 | 142,262 | ||||||
|
|||||||
Current assets | |||||||
Loans | 165 | 141 | |||||
Inventories | 30 | 26,554 | 18,915 | ||||
Trade and other receivables | 31 | 38,020 | 38,692 | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | 34 | 6,321 | 10,373 | ||||
Prepayments | 3,589 | 3,006 | |||||
Current tax receivable | 705 | 544 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 32 | 3,562 | 2,590 | ||||
78,916 | 74,261 | ||||||
Assets classified as held for sale | 3 | 1,286 | 1,078 | ||||
80,202 | 75,339 | ||||||
Total assets | 236,076 | 217,601 | |||||
|
|||||||
Current liabilities | |||||||
Trade and other payables | 33 | 43,152 | 42,236 | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | 34 | 6,405 | 9,424 | ||||
Accruals | 6,640 | 6,147 | |||||
Finance debt | 35 | 15,394 | 12,924 | ||||
Current tax payable | 3,282 | 2,635 | |||||
Provisions | 37 | 2,195 | 1,932 | ||||
77,068 | 75,298 | ||||||
Liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held for sale | 3 | 163 | 54 | ||||
77,231 | 75,352 | ||||||
Non-current liabilities | |||||||
Other payables | 33 | 1,251 | 1,430 | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | 34 | 5,002 | 4,203 | ||||
Accruals | 959 | 961 | |||||
Finance debt | 35 | 15,651 | 11,086 | ||||
Deferred tax liabilities | 20 | 19,215 | 18,116 | ||||
Provisions | 37 | 12,900 | 11,712 | ||||
Defined benefit pension plan and other post-retirement benefit plan deficits | 38 | 9,215 | 9,276 | ||||
64,193 | 56,784 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 141,424 | 132,136 | |||||
Net assets | 94,652 | 85,465 | |||||
|
|||||||
Equity | |||||||
Share capital | 39 | 5,237 | 5,385 | ||||
Reserves | 88,453 | 79,239 | |||||
BP shareholders equity | 40 | 93,690 | 84,624 | ||||
Minority interest | 40 | 962 | 841 | ||||
Total equity | 40 | 94,652 | 85,465 | ||||
|
|||||||
P D Sutherland Chairman | |||||||
Dr A B Hayward Group Chief Executive |
The notes on pages 100-180 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements of the BP group.
98 | |
Group cash flow statement |
For the year ended 31 December | $ million | ||||||||||
Note | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||
Operating activities | |||||||||||
Profit before taxation from continuing operations | 31,611 | 35,142 | 31,421 | ||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile profit before taxation to net cash provided by operating activities | |||||||||||
Exploration expenditure written off | 16 | 347 | 624 | 305 | |||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 9 | 10,579 | 9,128 | 8,771 | |||||||
Impairment and (gain) loss on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 7, 10 | (808 | ) | (3,165 | ) | (1,070 | ) | ||||
Earnings from jointly controlled entities and associates | (3,832 | ) | (3,995 | ) | (3,543 | ) | |||||
Dividends received from jointly controlled entities and associates | 2,473 | 4,495 | 2,833 | ||||||||
Interest receivable | (489 | ) | (473 | ) | (479 | ) | |||||
Interest received | 500 | 500 | 401 | ||||||||
Finance costs | 18 | 1,110 | 718 | 616 | |||||||
Interest paid | (1,363 | ) | (1,242 | ) | (1,127 | ) | |||||
Other finance (income) expense | 19 | (369 | ) | (202 | ) | 145 | |||||
Share-based payments | 420 | 416 | 278 | ||||||||
Net
operating charge for pensions and other post-retirement benefits, less contributions and
benefit payments for unfunded plans |
(404 | ) | (261 | ) | (435 | ) | |||||
Net charge for provisions, less payments | (92 | ) | (160 | ) | 1,100 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in inventories | (7,255 | ) | 995 | (6,638 | ) | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in other current and non-current assets | 5,210 | 3,596 | (16,427 | ) | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in other current and non-current liabilities | (3,857 | ) | (4,211 | ) | 18,628 | ||||||
Income taxes paid | (9,072 | ) | (13,733 | ) | (9,028 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations | 24,709 | 28,172 | 25,751 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities of Innovene operations | 3 | | | 970 | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 24,709 | 28,172 | 26,721 | ||||||||
Investing activities | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures | (17,830 | ) | (15,125 | ) | (12,281 | ) | |||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (1,225 | ) | (229 | ) | (60 | ) | |||||
Investment in jointly controlled entities | (428 | ) | (37 | ) | (185 | ) | |||||
Investment in associates | (187 | ) | (570 | ) | (619 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets | 4 | 1,749 | 5,963 | 2,803 | |||||||
Proceeds from disposal of businesses, net of cash disposed | 4 | 2,518 | 291 | 8,397 | |||||||
Proceeds from loan repayments | 192 | 189 | 123 | ||||||||
Other | 374 | | 93 | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (14,837 | ) | (9,518 | ) | (1,729 | ) | |||||
Financing activities | |||||||||||
Net repurchase of shares | (7,113 | ) | (15,151 | ) | (11,315 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from long-term financing | 8,109 | 3,831 | 2,475 | ||||||||
Repayments of long-term financing | (3,192 | ) | (3,655 | ) | (4,820 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt | 1,494 | 3,873 | (1,457 | ) | |||||||
Dividends paid | |||||||||||
BP shareholders | 21 | (8,106 | ) | (7,686 | ) | (7,359 | ) | ||||
Minority interest | (227 | ) | (283 | ) | (827 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (9,035 | ) | (19,071 | ) | (23,303 | ) | |||||
Currency translation differences relating to cash and cash equivalents | 135 | 47 | (88 | ) | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 972 | (370 | ) | 1,601 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 2,590 | 2,960 | 1,359 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | 3,562 | 2,590 | 2,960 | ||||||||
|
The notes on pages 100-180 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements of the BP group.
99 | |
Group statement of recognized income and expense |
For the year ended 31 December | $ million | ||||||||
Note | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
Currency translation differences | 1,887 | 2,025 | (2,502 | ) | |||||
Exchange gain on translation of foreign operations transferred to gain or loss on sale of businesses and fixed assets | (147 | ) | | (315 | ) | ||||
Actuarial gain relating to pensions and other post-retirement benefits | 1,717 | 2,615 | 975 | ||||||
Available-for-sale investments marked to market | 200 | 561 | 322 | ||||||
Available-for-sale investments recycled to the income statement | (91 | ) | (695 | ) | (60 | ) | |||
Cash flow hedges marked to market | 155 | 413 | (212 | ) | |||||
Cash flow hedges recycled to the income statement | (74 | ) | (93 | ) | 36 | ||||
Cash flow hedges recycled to the balance sheet | (40 | ) | (6 | ) | | ||||
Tax on currency translation differences | 139 | (201 | ) | 11 | |||||
Tax on exchange gain on translation of foreign operations transferred to gain or loss on sale of businesses and fixed assets | | | 95 | ||||||
Tax on actuarial gain relating to pensions and other post-retirement benefits | (427 | ) | (820 | ) | (356 | ) | |||
Tax on available-for-sale investments | (14 | ) | 108 | (72 | ) | ||||
Tax on cash flow hedges | 26 | (47 | ) | 63 | |||||
Tax on share-based payments | 213 | 26 | | ||||||
Net income (expense) recognized directly in equity | 3,544 | 3,886 | (2,015 | ) | |||||
Profit for the year | 21,169 | 22,601 | 22,317 | ||||||
Total recognized income and expense for the year | 24,713 | 26,487 | 20,302 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Attributable to | |||||||||
BP shareholders | 24,365 | 26,152 | 20,011 | ||||||
Minority interest | 348 | 335 | 291 | ||||||
24,713 | 26,487 | 20,302 | |||||||
|
|||||||||
Effect of change in accounting policy adoption of IAS 32 and IAS 39 on 1 January 2005 | |||||||||
BP shareholders | 1 | | | (243 | ) | ||||
Minority interest | | | | ||||||
| | (243 | ) | ||||||
|
The notes on pages 100-180 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements of the BP group.
100 | |
Notes on financial statements |
1 Significant accounting policies
Authorization of financial statements and statement of compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards
The
consolidated financial statements of the BP group for the year ended 31 December
2007 were authorized for issue by the board of directors
on 22 February 2008 and the balance sheet was signed on the boards
behalf by P D Sutherland and Dr A B Hayward. BP p.l.c. is a public limited company incorporated and domiciled in England and Wales. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and IFRS as adopted by the European Union (EU). IFRS as adopted by the EU differs in certain respects from IFRS as issued by the IASB, however, the differences have no
impact on the groups consolidated financial statements for the years
presented. The significant accounting policies of the group are set out below.
Basis of preparation The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) interpretations issued and effective for the year ended 31 December 2007, or issued and early adopted. In preparing the consolidated financial statements for the current year, the group has adopted the following new IFRS, amendment to IFRS and IFRIC interpretations: |
|
– | IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures. |
– | Amendment to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements Capital Disclosures. |
– | IFRIC 10 Interim Financial Reporting and Impairment. |
– | IFRIC 11 IFRS 2 Group and Treasury Share Transactions. |
Further
information regarding the impact of adoption is given below. |
Basis of consolidation
The group financial statements consolidate the financial statements of BP p.l.c. and the entities it controls (its subsidiaries) drawn up to 31 December each year. Control comprises the power to govern the financial
and operating policies of the investee so as to obtain benefit from its activities and is achieved through direct and indirect ownership of voting rights; currently exercisable or convertible potential voting rights; or by way of contractual
agreement. Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date of their acquisition, being the date on which the group obtains control, and continue to be consolidated until the date that such control ceases. The financial statements of subsidiaries are
prepared for the same reporting year as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies. All intercompany balances and transactions, including unrealized profits arising from intragroup transactions, have been eliminated in full. Unrealized
losses are eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Minority interests represent the portion of profit or loss and net assets in subsidiaries that is not held by the group.
Interests in joint ventures
A joint venture is a contractual arrangement whereby two or more parties (venturers)
undertake an economic activity that is subject to joint control. Joint control
exists only when the strategic financial and operating decisions relating to
the activity require the unanimous consent of the venturers. A jointly controlled
entity is a joint venture that involves the establishment of a company, partnership
or other entity to engage in economic activity that the group
jointly controls with its fellow venturers.
The results, assets and liabilities
of a jointly controlled entity are incorporated in these financial statements
using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the investment
in a jointly controlled entity is carried in the balance sheet at cost, plus
post-acquisition changes in the groups share of net assets of the jointly
controlled entity, less distributions received and less any impairment in value
of the investment. Loans advanced to jointly controlled entities are also included
in the investment on the group balance sheet. The group income statement reflects
the groups share of the results after tax of the jointly controlled entity.
The group statement of recognized income and expense reflects the groups
share of any income and expense recognized by the jointly controlled entity outside
profit and loss.
Financial statements of jointly
controlled entities are prepared for the same reporting year as the group. Where
necessary, adjustments are made to those financial statements to bring the accounting
policies used into line with those of the group.
Unrealized gains on transactions
between the group and its jointly controlled entities are eliminated to the extent
of
the groups interest in the jointly controlled entities. Unrealized losses
are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment
of the asset transferred.
The group assesses investments
in jointly controlled entities for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If any such indication
of impairment exists, the carrying amount of the investment is compared with
its recoverable amount, being the higher of its fair value less costs to sell
and value in use. Where the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, the
investment is written down to its recoverable amount.
101 | |
1 Significant accounting policies continued
The
group ceases to use the equity method of accounting on the date from which
it no longer has joint control over, or significant influence in the joint
venture, or when the interest becomes held for sale.
Certain of the groups activities,
particularly in the Exploration and Production segment, are conducted through
joint ventures where the venturers have a direct ownership interest in and jointly
control the assets of the venture. The income, expenses, assets and liabilities
of these jointly controlled assets are included in the consolidated financial
statements in proportion to the groups
interest.
Interests in associates
An associate is an entity over which the group is in a position to exercise significant
influence through participation in the financial and operating policy decisions
of the investee, but that is not a subsidiary or a
jointly controlled entity.
The results, assets and liabilities
of an associate are incorporated in these financial statements using the equity
method of accounting as described above for jointly controlled
entities.
Foreign currency translation
Functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which an entity operates and is normally the currency in which the entity primarily generates and expends cash.
In individual companies, transactions
in foreign currencies are initially recorded in the functional currency by applying
the rate of exchange ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated into the functional
currency at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. Any resulting
exchange differences are included in the income statement. Non-monetary assets
and liabilities that are measured at historical cost and denominated in a foreign
currency are translated into the functional currency using the rates of exchange
as at the dates of the initial transactions. Non-monetary assets and liabilities
measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated into the functional
currency using the rate of exchange at the date the fair value was determined.
In the consolidated financial statements,
the assets and liabilities of non-US dollar functional currency subsidiaries,
jointly controlled entities and associates, including related goodwill, are translated
into US dollars at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. The
results and cash flows of non-US dollar functional currency subsidiaries, jointly
controlled entities and associates are translated into US dollars using average
rates of exchange. Exchange adjustments arising when the opening net assets and
the profits for the year retained by non-US dollar functional currency subsidiaries,
jointly controlled entities and associates are translated into US dollars are
taken to a separate component of equity and reported in the statement of recognized
income and expense. Exchange gains and losses arising on long-term intragroup
foreign currency borrowings used to finance the groups non-US dollar investments
are also taken to equity. On disposal of a non-US dollar functional currency
subsidiary, jointly controlled entity or associate, the deferred cumulative amount
recognized in equity relating to that particular non-US dollar operation is recognized
in the income statement.
Business combinations and goodwill
Business
combinations are accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The cost
of an acquisition is measured as the cash paid and
the fair value of other assets given, equity instruments issued and liabilities
incurred or assumed at the date of exchange, plus costs directly attributable
to the acquisition. The acquired identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent
liabilities are measured at their fair values at the date of acquisition. Any
excess of the cost of acquisition over the net fair value of the identifiable
assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired is recognized as goodwill.
Any deficiency of the cost of acquisition below the fair values of the identifiable
net
assets acquired (i.e. discount on acquisition) is credited to the income statement
in the period of acquisition. Where the group does not acquire 100% ownership
of the acquired company, the interest of minority shareholders is stated at
the
minoritys proportion of the fair values of the assets and liabilities recognized.
Subsequently, any losses applicable to the minority shareholders in excess of
the minority interest on the group balance sheet are allocated against the interests
of the parent.
At the acquisition date, any goodwill
acquired is allocated to each of the cash-generating units expected to benefit
from the combinations synergies. For this purpose, cash-generating units
are set at one level below a business segment.
Following initial recognition,
goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill
is reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired.
Impairment is determined by assessing
the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the goodwill relates.
Where the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than the carrying
amount, an impairment loss is recognized.
Goodwill arising on business combinations
prior to 1 January 2003 is stated at the previous carrying amount under UK generally
accepted accounting practice.
Goodwill may also arise upon investments
in jointly controlled entities and associates, being the surplus of the cost
of investment over the groups share of the net fair value of the identifiable
assets. Such goodwill is recorded within investments in jointly controlled entities
and associates, and any impairment of the goodwill is included within the earnings
from jointly controlled entities and associates.
Non-current assets held for sale
Non-current assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.
Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified
as held for sale if their carrying amounts will be recovered through a sale transaction
rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when
the sale is highly probable and the asset or disposal group is available for
immediate sale in its
present condition. Management must be committed to the sale, which should be
expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from
the date of classification.
Property,
plant and equipment and intangible assets once classified as held for sale are
not depreciated.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets are stated at the amount initially recognized, less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses. Intangible assets include expenditure on the exploration for and evaluation of oil and
natural gas resources, computer software, patents, licences and trademarks.
Intangible assets acquired separately
from a business are carried initially at cost. The initial cost is the aggregate
amount paid and the fair value of any other consideration given to acquire the
asset. An intangible asset acquired as part of a business combination is measured
at fair value at the date of acquisition and is recognized separately from goodwill
if the asset is separable or arises from contractual or other legal rights and
its fair value can be measured reliably.
102 | |
1 Significant accounting policies continued
Intangible
assets with a finite life are amortized on a straight-line basis over their
expected useful lives.
For patents, licences and trademarks, expected useful life is the shorter
of the duration of the legal agreement and economic useful life, which
can range from three to 15 years. Computer software costs have a useful
life
of three to five years.
The expected useful lives of
assets are reviewed on an annual basis and, if necessary, changes in useful
lives are
accounted for prospectively.
The
carrying value of intangible assets is reviewed for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying
value may not be recoverable.
Oil and natural gas exploration and development expenditure
Oil and natural gas exploration and development expenditure is accounted for using the successful efforts method of accounting.
Licence and property acquisition costs
Exploration
licence and leasehold property acquisition costs are capitalized within intangible
fixed assets and amortized on a straight-line
basis over the estimated period of exploration. Each property is reviewed on
an annual basis to confirm that drilling activity is planned and it is not
impaired. If no future activity is planned, the remaining balance of the licence
and property acquisition costs is written off. Upon determination of economically
recoverable
reserves (proved reserves or commercial reserves), amortization
ceases and the remaining costs are aggregated with exploration expenditure and
held on a field-by-field basis as proved properties awaiting approval within
other intangible assets. When development is approved internally, the relevant
expenditure is transferred to property, plant and equipment.
Exploration expenditure
Geological and geophysical exploration costs are charged against income as incurred. Costs directly associated with an exploration well are capitalized as an intangible asset until the drilling of the well is complete
and the results have been evaluated. These costs include employee remuneration, materials and fuel used, rig costs, delay rentals and payments made to contractors. If hydrocarbons are not found, the exploration expenditure is written off as a dry
hole. If hydrocarbons are found and, subject to further appraisal activity, which may include the drilling of further wells (exploration or exploratory-type stratigraphic test wells), are likely to be capable of commercial development, the costs
continue to be carried as an asset. All such carried costs are subject to technical, commercial and management review at least once a year to confirm the continued intent to develop or otherwise extract value from the discovery. When this is no
longer the case, the costs are written off. When proved reserves of oil and natural gas are determined and development is sanctioned, the relevant expenditure is transferred to property, plant and equipment.
Development expenditure
Expenditure on the construction, installation or completion of infrastructure
facilities such as platforms, pipelines and the drilling of development wells,
including unsuccessful development or delineation wells, is capitalized within
property, plant and equipment and is depreciated from the commencement of production
as described below in the accounting policy for Property, plant and equipment.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation
and accumulated impairment losses.
The initial cost of an asset comprises
its purchase price or construction cost, any costs directly attributable to bringing
the asset into operation, the initial estimate of any decommissioning obligation,
if any, and, for qualifying assets, borrowing costs. The purchase price or construction
cost is the aggregate amount paid and the fair value of any other consideration
given to acquire the asset. The capitalized value of a finance lease is also
included within property, plant and equipment.
Exchanges of assets are measured
at fair value unless the exchange transaction lacks commercial substance or the
fair value of neither the asset received nor the asset given up is reliably measurable.
The cost of the acquired asset is measured at the fair value of the asset given
up, unless the fair value of the asset received is more clearly evident. Where
fair value is not used, the cost of the acquired asset is measured at the carrying
amount of the amount given up. The gain or loss on derecognition of the asset
given up is recognized in profit or loss.
Expenditure on major maintenance
refits or repairs comprises the cost of replacement assets or parts of assets,
inspection costs and overhaul costs. Where an asset or part of an asset that
was separately depreciated is replaced and it is probable that future economic
benefits associated with the item will flow to the group, the expenditure is
capitalized and the carrying amount of the replaced asset is derecognized. Inspection
costs associated with major maintenance programmes are capitalized and amortized
over the period to the next inspection. Overhaul costs for major maintenance
programmes are expensed as incurred. All other maintenance costs are expensed
as
incurred.
Oil and natural gas properties,
including related pipelines, are depreciated using a unit-of-production method.
The cost of producing wells is amortized over proved developed reserves. Licence
acquisition, field development and future decommissioning costs are amortized
over total proved reserves. The unit-of-production rate for the amortization
of field development costs takes into account expenditures incurred to date,
together
with approved future development expenditure required to develop reserves.
Other
property, plant and equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis over its
expected useful
life.
The
useful lives of the groups other
property, plant and equipment are as follows:
|
||
Land improvements | 15 to 25 years | |
Buildings | 20 to 50 years | |
Refineries | 20 to 30 years | |
Petrochemicals plants | 20 to 30 years | |
Pipelines | 10 to 50 years | |
Service stations | 15 years | |
Office equipment | 3 to 7 years | |
Fixtures and fittings | 5 to 15 years | |
|
103 | |
1 Significant accounting policies continued
The
expected useful lives of property, plant and equipment are reviewed on an
annual basis and, if necessary, changes in useful lives are accounted for
prospectively.
The
carrying value of property, plant and equipment is reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may
not be recoverable.
An
item of property, plant and equipment is derecognized upon disposal or when no
future economic benefits are expected to arise from the continued use of the
asset. Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as
the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the
item) is included in the income statement in the period the item is derecognized.
Impairment of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment
The
group assesses assets or groups of assets for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset
may not be recoverable. If any such indication of impairment exists, the group
makes an estimate of its recoverable amount. Individual assets are grouped
for impairment assessment purposes at the lowest level at which there are identifiable
cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of
assets. An asset groups recoverable amount is the higher of its fair
value less costs to sell and its value in use. Where the carrying amount of
an asset group exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset group is considered
impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount. In assessing value
in use, the estimated future cash flows are adjusted for the risks specific
to the asset group and are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax
discount rate that reflects current
market assessments of the time value of money.
An
assessment is made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication
that previously recognized impairment
losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists,
the recoverable amount is estimated. A previously recognized impairment loss
is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine
the assets recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was
recognized. If that is the case, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount. That increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been
recognized for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognized in profit or loss. After such a reversal, the depreciation charge is adjusted in future periods to allocate the assets
revised carrying amount, less any residual value, on a systematic basis over
its remaining useful life.
Financial assets
Financial assets are classified as loans and receivables; available-for-sale financial assets; financial assets at fair value through profit or loss; or as derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective
hedge, as appropriate. Financial assets include cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, other receivables, loans, other investments, and derivative financial instruments. The group determines the classification of its financial assets at
initial recognition. Financial assets are recognized initially at fair value, normally being the transaction price plus, in the case of financial assets not at fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable transaction costs.
The subsequent measurement of financial assets depends on their classification, as follows:
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Such assets are carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method if
the time value of money is significant. Gains and losses are recognized in income when the loans and receivables are derecognized or impaired, as well as through the amortization process. This category of financial assets includes trade and other
receivables.
Available-for-sale financial assets
Available-for-sale financial assets are those non-derivative financial assets that are not classified as loans and receivables. After initial recognition, available-for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value,
with gains or losses recognized as a separate component of equity until the investment is derecognized or until the investment is determined to be impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in equity is included in the
income statement.
The
fair value of quoted investments is determined by reference to bid prices at
the close of business on the balance sheet date. Where there is no active market,
fair value is determined using valuation techniques. Where fair value cannot
be reliably estimated, assets are carried at cost.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Derivatives, other than those designated as effective hedging instruments, are classified as held for trading and are included in this category. These assets are carried on the balance sheet at fair value with gains or
losses recognized in the income statement.
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge
Such derivatives are carried on the balance sheet at fair value, the treatment of gains and losses arising from revaluation are described below in the accounting policy for Derivative financial instruments and hedging
activities.
Impairment of financial assets
The group assesses at each balance sheet date whether a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired.
Loans and receivables
If
there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on loans and receivables
carried at amortized cost has been incurred, the amount of
the loss is measured as the difference between the assets carrying amount
and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the financial assets
original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced,
with the amount of the loss recognized in profit or loss.
Available-for-sale financial assets
If an available-for-sale financial asset is impaired, an amount comprising the difference between its cost (net of any principal payment and amortization) and its fair value is transferred from equity to the income
statement.
104 | |
1 Significant accounting policies continued
If
there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on an unquoted equity
instrument that is not carried at fair
value because its fair value cannot be reliably measured has been incurred, the
amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the assets carrying
amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the
current market rate of return for a similar financial asset.
Financial assets are derecognized on sale or settlement.
Inventories
Inventories, other than inventory held for trading purposes, are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined by the first-in first-out method and comprises direct purchase costs, cost of
production, transportation and manufacturing expenses.
Inventories
held for trading purposes are stated at fair value less costs to sell and any
changes in net realizable value are recognized in the income statement.
Supplies are valued at cost to the group mainly using the average method or net realizable value, whichever is the lower.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are classified as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss; derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge; or as financial liabilities measured at amortized
cost, as appropriate. Financial liabilities include trade and other payables, accruals, finance debt and derivative financial instruments. The group determines the classification of its financial liabilities at initial recognition. The measurement
of financial liabilities depends on their classification, as follows:
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
Derivatives, other than those designated as effective hedging instruments, are classified as held for trading and are included in this category. These liabilities are carried on the balance sheet at fair value with
gains or losses recognized in the income statement.
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge
Such derivatives are carried on the balance sheet at fair value, the treatment of gains and losses arising from revaluation are described below in the accounting policy for Derivative financial instruments and hedging
activities.
Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost
All other financial liabilities are initially recognized at fair value. For interest-bearing loans and borrowings this is the fair value of the proceeds received net of issue costs associated with the
borrowing.
After
initial recognition, other financial liabilities are subsequently measured at
amortized cost using the effective interest method. Amortized cost is calculated
by taking into account any issue costs, and any discount or premium on settlement.
Gains and losses arising on the repurchase, settlement or cancellation of liabilities
are recognized respectively in interest and other revenues and finance costs.
This category of financial liabilities includes trade and other payables and finance debt.
Leases
Finance leases, which transfer to the group substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item, are capitalized at the commencement of the lease term at the fair value of the leased
property or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Finance charges are allocated to each period so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability and are charged directly against
income.
Capitalized leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term.
Operating
lease payments are recognized as an expense in the income statement on a straight-line
basis over the lease term.
Derivative
financial instruments and hedging activities The group uses derivative financial instruments to manage certain exposures to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices as well as for trading purposes. Such derivative financial instruments are initially recognized at fair value on the date on which a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at fair value. Derivatives are carried as assets when the fair value is positive and as liabilities when the fair value is negative. Contracts to buy or sell a non-financial item that can be settled net in cash or another financial instrument, or by exchanging financial instruments, as if the contracts were financial instruments, with the exception of contracts that were entered into and continue to be held for the purpose of the receipt or delivery of a non-financial item in accordance with the groups expected purchase, sale or usage requirements, are accounted for as financial instruments. Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of derivatives that are not designated as effective hedging instruments are recognized in the income statement. |
|
For the purpose of hedge accounting, hedges are classified as: | |
– | Fair value hedges when hedging the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability. |
– | Cash flow hedges when hedging exposure to variability in cash flows that is either attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognized asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction. |
– | Hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation. |
105 | |
1 Significant accounting policies continued
At
the inception of a hedge relationship the group formally designates and
documents the hedge relationship for which
the group wishes to claim hedge accounting, together with the risk management
objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge. The documentation includes
identification of the hedging instrument, the hedged item or transaction, the
nature of the risk being hedged, and how the entity will assess the hedging
instrument effectiveness in offsetting the exposure to changes in the hedged
items fair value or cash flows attributable to the hedged item. Such hedges
are expected at inception to be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes
in fair
value or cash flows.
Hedges meeting the criteria for hedge accounting are accounted for as follows:
Fair value hedges
The change in fair value of a hedging derivative is recognized in profit or
loss. The change in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the
risk being hedged is recorded as part of the carrying value of the hedged
item and is also recognized in profit or loss.
The
group applies fair value hedge accounting for hedging fixed interest rate
risk on borrowings. The gain or loss relating to the effective portion of
the interest rate swap is recognized in the income statement within finance
costs, offsetting the amortization of the interest on the underlying borrowings.
If
the criteria for hedge accounting are no longer met, or if the group revokes
the designation, the adjustment to the carrying amount of a hedged item for
which the effective interest rate method is used is amortized to profit or
loss over the period to maturity.
Cash flow hedges
For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging
instrument is recognized directly in equity, while the ineffective portion
is recognized in profit or loss. Amounts taken to equity are transferred
to the income statement when the hedged transaction affects profit or loss.
The gain or loss relating to the effective portion of interest rate swaps
hedging variable rate borrowings is recognized in the income statement
within finance
costs.
Where
the hedged item is the cost of a non-financial asset or liability, such as
a forecast transaction for the purchase of property, plant and equipment,
the amounts taken to equity are transferred to the initial carrying amount
of the non-financial asset or liability.
If
the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised without
replacement or rollover, or if its designation as a hedge is revoked, amounts
previously recognized in equity remain in equity until the forecast transaction
occurs and are transferred to the income statement or to the initial carrying
amount of a non-financial asset or liability as above. If a forecast transaction
is no longer expected to occur, amounts
previously recognized in equity are transferred to profit or loss.
Hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation
For hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation, the effective portion
of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized directly in
equity, while the ineffective portion is recognized in profit or loss.
Amounts taken to equity are transferred to the income statement when the
foreign operation is sold or partially disposed.
Embedded derivatives
Derivatives embedded in other financial instruments or other host contracts
are treated as separate derivatives when their risks and characteristics
are not closely related to those of the host contract. Contracts are assessed
for embedded derivatives when the group becomes a party to them, including
at the date of a business combination. Embedded derivatives are measured
at fair value at each balance sheet date. Any gains or losses arising from
changes in fair
value are taken directly to profit or loss.
Provisions and contingencies
Provisions are recognized when the group has a present obligation (legal or
constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow
of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the
obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
Where appropriate, the future cash flow estimates are adjusted to reflect
risks specific to the liability. Where the group expects some or all of
a provision to be
reimbursed, for example, under an insurance contract, the reimbursement is recognized
as a separate asset, but only when the reimbursement is virtually certain.
The expense relating to any provision is presented in the income statement
net of any
reimbursement.
If
the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are determined
by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects
current market assessments of the time value of money. Where discounting
is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized
as other finance expense.
A
contingent liability is disclosed where the existence of an obligation will
only be confirmed by future events or where the amount of the obligation
cannot be measured with reasonable reliability. Contingent assets are not
recognized, but are disclosed where an inflow of economic benefits is probable.
Environmental expenditures and liabilities
Environmental expenditures that relate to current or future revenues are expensed
or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures that relate to an existing
condition caused by past operations and do not contribute to current or
future earnings are expensed.
Liabilities
for environmental costs are recognized when environmental assessments or
clean-ups are probable and the associated costs can be reliably estimated.
Generally, the timing of recognition of these provisions coincides with the
commitment to a formal plan of action or, if earlier, on divestment or on
closure of inactive sites.
The
amount recognized is the best estimate of the expenditure required. Where
the liability will not be settled for a number of years, the amount recognized
is the present value of the
estimated future expenditure.
Decommissioning
Liabilities for decommissioning costs are recognized when the group has an
obligation to dismantle and remove a facility or an item of plant and to
restore the site on which it is located, and when a reliable estimate of
that liability can be made. Where an obligation exists for a new facility,
such as oil and natural gas production or transportation facilities, this
will be on construction or installation. An obligation for decommissioning
may also crystallize
during the period of operation of a facility through a change in legislation
or through a decision to terminate operations. The amount recognized is
the present value of the estimated future expenditure determined in accordance
with local conditions
and requirements.
106 | |
1 Significant accounting policies continued
A
corresponding item of property, plant and equipment of an amount equivalent
to the provision is also created. This is subsequently depreciated as part
of the asset.
Other
than the unwinding discount on the provision, any change in the present value
of the estimated expenditure is reflected as an adjustment to the provision
and the corresponding item
of property, plant and equipment.
Employee benefits
Wages, salaries, bonuses, social security contributions, paid annual leave and sick leave are accrued in the period in which the associated services are rendered by employees of the group. Deferred bonus arrangements
that have a vesting date more than 12 months after the period end are valued on an actuarial basis using the projected unit credit method and amortized on a straight-line basis over the service period until the award vests. The accounting policy for
pensions and other post-retirement benefits is described below.
Share-based payments
Equity-settled transactions
The cost of equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value at the date at which equity instruments are granted and is recognized as an expense over the vesting period, which ends
on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award. Fair value is determined by using an appropriate valuation model. In valuing equity-settled transactions, no account is taken of any vesting conditions, other than
conditions linked to the price of the shares of the company (market conditions).
No
expense is recognized for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards
where vesting is conditional upon a market condition, which are treated as vesting
irrespective of whether or not the market condition is satisfied, provided that
all other performance conditions are satisfied.
At
each balance sheet date before vesting, the cumulative expense is calculated,
representing the extent to which
the vesting period has expired and managements best estimate of the
achievement or otherwise of non-market conditions and the number of equity instruments
that will ultimately vest or, in the case of an instrument subject to a market
condition, be treated as vesting as described above. The movement in cumulative
expense since the previous balance sheet date is recognized in the income statement,
with a corresponding entry in equity.
Where
the terms of an equity-settled award are modified or a new award is designated
as replacing a cancelled or settled award, the cost based on the original award
terms continues to be recognized over the original vesting period. In addition,
an expense is recognized over the remainder of the new vesting period for the
incremental fair value of any modification, based on the difference between the
fair value of the original award
and the fair value of the modified award, both as measured on the date of the
modification. No reduction is recognized if this difference is negative.
Where
an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the
date of cancellation and any cost not yet recognized in the income statement
for the award is expensed immediately. Any compensation paid up to the fair value
of the award at the cancellation or settlement date is deducted from equity,
with any excess over fair value being treated as an expense in the income statement.
Cash-settled transactions
The cost of cash-settled transactions is measured at fair value using an appropriate
option valuation model. Fair value is established initially at the grant date
and at each balance sheet date thereafter until the awards are settled. During
the vesting period, a liability is recognized representing the product of the
fair value of the award and the portion of the vesting period expired as at the
balance sheet date. From the end of the vesting period until
settlement, the liability represents the full fair value of the award as at the
balance sheet date. Changes in the carrying amount of the liability are recognized
in profit or loss for the period.
Pensions and other post-retirement benefits
The cost of providing benefits under the defined benefit plans is determined separately for each plan using the projected unit credit method, which attributes entitlement to benefits to the current period (to determine
current service cost) and to the current and prior periods (to determine the present value of defined benefit obligation). Past service costs are recognized immediately when the company becomes committed to a change in pension plan design. When a
settlement (eliminating all obligations for benefits already accrued) or a curtailment (reducing future obligations as a result of a material reduction in the scheme membership or a reduction in future entitlement) occurs, the obligation and related
plan assets are remeasured using current actuarial assumptions and the resultant gain or loss is recognized in the income statement during the period in which the settlement or curtailment occurs.
The
interest element of the defined benefit cost represents the change in present
value of scheme obligations resulting from the passage of time, and is determined
by applying the discount rate to the opening present value of the benefit obligation,
taking into account material changes in the obligation during the year. The expected
return on plan assets is based on an assessment made at the beginning of the
year of long-term market
returns on scheme assets, adjusted for the effect on the fair value of plan assets
of contributions received and benefits paid during the year. The difference between
the expected return on plan assets and the interest cost is recognized in the
income statement as other finance income or expense.
Actuarial
gains and losses are recognized in full in the group statement of recognized
income and expense in the period in which they occur.
The defined benefit pension
asset or liability in the balance sheet comprises the total for each plan of
the present value of the defined benefit obligation (using a discount rate based
on high quality corporate bonds), less the fair value of plan assets out of which
the obligations are to be
settled directly. Fair value is based on market price information and, in the
case of quoted securities, is the published bid price.
Contributions to defined contribution schemes are recognized in the income statement
in the period in which they become payable.
Corporate taxes
Income tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred
tax. Interest and penalties relating to tax are also included in income tax expense.
The
tax currently payable is based on the taxable profits for the period. Taxable
profit differs from net profit
as reported in the income statement because it excludes items of income or expense
that are taxable or deductible in other periods and it further excludes items
that are never taxable or deductible. The groups liability for current
tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted
by the balance sheet date. Any liability relating to unrecognized tax benefits
is included in current tax payable on the group balance sheet.
Deferred
tax is provided, using the liability method, on all temporary differences at
the balance sheet date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their
carrying amounts for
financial reporting purposes.
107 | |
1 Significant accounting policies continued
Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for all taxable temporary differences: | |
| Except where the deferred tax liability arises on goodwill that is not tax deductible or the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss. |
| In respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates, except where the group is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. |
Deferred tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences and the carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses can be utilized: |
| Except where the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss. |
| In respect of deductible temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates, deferred tax assets are only recognized to the extent that it is probable that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilized. |
The
carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each balance
sheet
date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient
taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred
income tax asset to be utilized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Tax relating to items recognized directly in equity is recognized in equity and not in the income statement. |
Customs
duties and sales taxes Revenues, expenses and assets are recognized net of the amount of customs duties or sales tax except: |
|
| Where the customs duty or sales tax incurred on a purchase of goods and services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the customs duty or sales tax is recognized as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable. |
| Receivables and payables are stated with the amount of customs duty or sales tax included. |
The net amount of sales tax recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables in the balance sheet. |
Own equity instruments
The groups holding in its own equity instruments, including ordinary shares held by Employee Share Ownership Plans (ESOPs), are classified as treasury shares, and shown as deductions from
shareholders equity at cost. Consideration received for the sale of such
shares is also recognized in equity, with any difference between the proceeds
from sale and the original cost being taken to the profit and loss account
reserve. No gain or loss is recognized in the performance statements on the
purchase,
sale, issue or cancellation of equity shares.
Revenue
Revenue arising from the sale of goods is recognized when the significant risks
and rewards of ownership have passed to the buyer and it can be reliably
measured.
Revenue is measured
at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable and represents
amounts
receivable for goods provided in the normal course of business, net of discounts,
customs duties and sales taxes.
Revenues
associated with the sale of oil, natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied
natural gas, petroleum
and chemicals products and all other items are recognized when the title
passes to the customer. Physical exchanges are reported net, as are sales
and purchases made with a common counterparty, as part of an arrangement
similar to a physical exchange. Similarly, where the group acts as agent
on behalf of a third party to
procure or market energy commodities, any associated fee income is recognized
but no purchase or sale is recorded. Additionally, where forward sale and
purchase contracts for oil, natural gas or power have been determined to
be for trading purposes, the associated sales and purchases are reported
net within sales and other operating revenues whether or not physical delivery
has occurred.
Generally, revenues from the production
of oil and natural gas properties in which the group has an interest with joint
venture partners are recognized on the basis of the groups
working interest in those properties (the entitlement method). Differences between the production sold and the groups
share of production are not significant.
Interest
income is recognized as the interest accrues (using the effective interest rate
that is the rate
that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected
life of the financial instrument) to the net carrying amount of the financial
asset.
Dividend income from investments is recognized when
the shareholders right
to receive the payment is established.
Research
Research costs are expensed as incurred.
Finance costs
Finance costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production
of qualifying assets, which are assets that necessarily take a substantial
period of time to get ready for their intended use, are added to the cost
of those assets, until such time as the assets are substantially ready
for their intended use.
All other finance costs are recognized
in the income statement in the period in which they are incurred.
Use of estimates
The
preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as well as the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual outcomes
could differ from those estimates.
108 | |
1 Significant accounting policies continued
Impact of new International Financial Reporting Standards
Adopted for 2007
The
following new IFRS, amendment to IFRS and IFRIC interpretations have been adopted
by the group with effect from 1 January 2007.
IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures was issued in August 2005 and
replaced the disclosure requirements previously contained in IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation and Disclosure. The group has disclosed in its annual report additional information about its financial instruments, their
significance and the nature and extent of risks to which they give rise. More specifically, the group has also made specified disclosures about market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. There was no effect on the groups
reported income or
net assets as a result of adoption of this new standard.
Also
in August 2005, the IASB issued
Amendment to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements Capital Disclosures, which requires disclosures of an entitys
objectives, policies and processes for managing capital, quantitative data about what the entity regards as capital, whether the entity has complied with any capital requirements, and the consequences of any non-compliance. The group has included
the required disclosures in its annual report. There was no effect on the groups
reported income or net assets as a result of adoption of this amendment.
In
addition, in 2007 BP has adopted
IFRIC 10 Interim Financial Reporting and Impairment and early adopted IFRIC 11 IFRS 2 Group and Treasury Share
Transactions. There were no changes in the groups accounting policies
and no restatement of financial information consequent upon adoption of these
interpretations.
Not yet adopted
The
following pronouncements from the IASB will become effective for future financial
reporting periods and have not yet been adopted by the
group.
IFRS
8 Operating Segments was issued in October 2006 and
defines operating segments as components of an entity about which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The
new standard sets out the required disclosures for operating segments and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009. BP has not yet completed its evaluation of the impact on its disclosures of adopting IFRS 8. There will
be no effect on the groups reported income or net assets. IFRS 8 has been
adopted by the EU.
In
September 2007, the IASB issued
Amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements A Revised Presentation, which requires separate presentation of owner and
non-owner changes in equity by introducing the statement of comprehensive income. The statement of recognized income and expense will no longer be presented. Whenever there is a restatement or reclassification, an additional balance sheet, as at the
beginning of the earliest period presented, will be required to be published. The revised standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009. There will be no effect on the groups
reported income or net assets. IAS 1 revised has not yet been adopted by the
EU.
An
amendment to IAS 23 Borrowing Costs was issued by the IASB in March 2007 and eliminates the option of recognizing borrowing costs immediately as an expense if they are
directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset. The amended standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009. There will be no effect on the groups
reported income or net assets. This amendment has not yet been adopted by the
EU.
In
January 2008, the IASB issued a
revised version of IFRS 3 Business Combinations. The revised standard still requires the purchase method of accounting to be applied to
business combinations but will introduce some changes to existing accounting treatment. For example, contingent consideration should be measured at fair value at the date of acquisition and subsequently remeasured to fair value with changes
recognized in profit or loss. Goodwill may be calculated based on the parents share of net assets or it may include goodwill related to the minority interest. All transaction costs will be expensed. The standard is applicable to business
combinations occurring in accounting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009. Assets and liabilities arising from business combinations occurring before the date of adoption by the group will not be restated and thus there will be no effect on the
groups reported income or net assets on adoption. The revised standard
has not yet been adopted by the EU.
Also
in January 2008, the IASB issued
an amended version of IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements.
This requires the effects of all transactions with non-controlling interests
to be recorded in equity if there is no change in control. Such transactions
will no longer result in goodwill or gains or losses. When control is lost, any
remaining interest in the entity is remeasured to fair value and a
gain or loss recognized in profit or loss. The amendments are effective for annual
periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009 and are to be applied retrospectively,
with certain exceptions. BP has not yet completed its evaluation of the effect
of adopting this amendment. The revised standard has not yet been adopted by
the EU.
An
amendment to IFRS 2 Share-based Payment was
issued in January 2008, clarifying that only service conditions and performance
conditions are vesting conditions, and other features of a share-based payment
are not vesting conditions. In addition, it specifies that all cancellations,
whether by the entity or by other parties, should receive the same accounting
treatment. The amendment is effective for annual periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2009 and has not yet been adopted by the EU.
BP has not yet completed its evaluation of the effect of adopting this amendment.
In
February 2008, the IASB issued
Amendments to IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation and IAS
1 Presentation of Financial Statements Puttable
Financial Instruments and Obligations Arising on Liquidation. The amended standards
require entities to classify as equity certain financial instruments provided
certain criteria are met. The instruments to be classified as equity are puttable
financial
instruments and those instruments that impose an obligation on the entity to
deliver to another party a pro rata share of the net assets of the entity only
on liquidation. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on
or after 1 January 2009 and have not yet been adopted by the EU. BP has not yet
completed its evaluation of the effect of adopting these amendments.
Three IFRIC interpretations have been issued but
are not yet effective and have
not yet been adopted by the EU.
IFRIC
12 Service Concession Arrangements gives
guidance on the accounting by operators for public-to-private service concession
arrangements. The directors do not anticipate that the adoption of this interpretation
will have a material effect on the reported income or net assets of the group.
We plan to adopt this interpretation with effect from 1 January 2008.
IFRIC
13 Customer Loyalty Programmes addresses the accounting by entities that grant loyalty award credits (e.g. points or
travel miles) to customers who buy other goods or services. The directors do
not anticipate that the adoption of this interpretation will have a material
effect on the reported income or net assets of the group. We plan to adopt this
interpretation with effect from 1 January
2009.
IFRIC
14 IAS 19 The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements, and their Interaction provides
clarification regarding how to determine whether a surplus may be recognized
on the balance sheet in relation to a retirement benefit plan. The directors
do not anticipate that the adoption of this interpretation will have a material
effect on the reported income or net assets of the group. We plan
to adopt this interpretation with effect from 1 January 2008.
109 | |
Acquisitions
in 2007
BP made a number
of acquisitions in 2007 for a total consideration of $1,200 million. These
business combinations were predominantly in the Refining and Marketing segment,
the most significant of which was the acquisition of Chevrons Netherlands
manufacturing company, Texaco Raffiniderij Pernis B.V. The acquisition included
Chevrons 31% minority shareholding in Nerefco, its 31% shareholding in
the 22.5 megawatt wind farm co-located at the refinery as well as a 22.8% shareholding
in the TEAM joint venture terminal and shareholdings in two local pipelines
linking the TEAM terminal to the refinery. Fair value adjustments were made
to the acquired assets and liabilities. Goodwill of $270 million arose
on these acquisitions.
Acquisitions
in 2006
BP made a number
of acquisitions in 2006 for a total consideration of $256 million. All these
business combinations were in the Gas, Power and Renewables segment. Fair value
adjustments were made to the acquired assets and liabilities and goodwill of
$64 million arose on these acquisitions.
Acquisitions
in 2005
BP made a number
of acquisitions in 2005 for a total consideration of $84 million. No significant
fair value adjustments were made to the acquired assets and liabilities. Goodwill
of $27 million arose on these acquisitions. Also in 2005, additional goodwill
of $59 million was recognized relating to the 2004 acquisition from Solvay
of the remaining interests in two equity-accounted entities. This goodwill
arose
due to final closing adjustments and selling costs and was written off.
110 | |
3 Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations
Non-current
assets held for sale
On 5 December 2007, BP announced it had signed a memorandum of understanding
with Husky Energy Inc. to form an integrated North American oil sands business.
BP will contribute its Toledo refinery to a US joint venture in return for Husky
contributing its Sunrise field to a Canadian joint venture. The transaction is
expected to be completed by the end of March 2008. At 31 December 2007, certain
Toledo refinery assets and associated liabilities were classified as a disposal
group held for sale. No impairment loss has been recognized in relation to this
disposal group.
On 27 June 2006, BP announced its intention to
sell the Coryton refinery in the UK, following a review of its European refinery
portfolio, that concluded that the group would optimize its value by focusing
on a smaller, but more advantaged, refining portfolio in Europe. In addition,
given the integrated nature of the operations, the bitumen business in the UK
was also included with the divestment, along with the Coryton bulk terminal (together the
Coryton disposal group).
At 31 December 2006, negotiations for the sale
were in progress and the assets and associated liabilities were classified as
a disposal group held for sale. No impairment loss was recognized at the time
of reclassification of the Coryton disposal group as held for sale nor at 31
December 2006.
The major classes of assets and liabilities of
the Toledo and Coryton disposal groups, both reported within the Refining and
Marketing segment, classified as held for sale at 31 December 2007 and 2006 respectively,
are set out below.
$ million | ||||
2007 | 2006 | |||
Assets | ||||
Property, plant and equipment | 635 | 564 | ||
Goodwill | 90 | 60 | ||
Inventories | 561 | 454 | ||
Assets classified as held for sale | 1,286 | 1,078 | ||
Liabilities | ||||
Current liabilities | 163 | 54 | ||
Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale | 163 | 54 | ||
|
In addition, accumulated foreign exchange gains recognized directly in equity relating to the Coryton disposal group amounted to $122 million at 31 December 2006. On disposal such foreign exchange differences were recycled to the income statement. The disposal of the Coryton disposal group was completed in May 2007. For further information see Note 4.
Discontinued
operations
The sale
of Innovene, BPs olefins, derivatives and refining group, to INEOS was
completed on 16 December 2005.
The
Innovene operations represented a separate major line of business for BP. As
a result of the sale, these operations were treated as discontinued operations
for the year ended 31 December 2005. A single amount was shown on the face of
the income statement comprising the post-tax result of discontinued operations
and the post-tax loss recognized on the remeasurement to fair value less costs
to sell and on disposal of the discontinued operation. That is, the income and
expenses of Innovene are reported separately from the continuing operations
of the BP group. The table below provides further detail of the amount shown
in the income statement.
In
the cash flow statement, the cash provided by the operating activities of Innovene
was separated from that of the rest of the group and reported as a single line
item.
Gross
proceeds received amounted to $8,477 million. In 2005, there were selling
costs of $120 million and initial closing adjustments of $43 million.
In 2006, there was a final closing adjustment of $34 million. The remeasurement
to fair value less costs to sell resulted in a loss of $775 million before
tax ($184 million recognized in 2006 and $591 million in 2005).
Financial information
for the Innovene operations after group eliminations is presented below.
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Total revenues and other income | | | 12,441 | |||
Expenses | | | 11,709 | |||
Profit (loss) before interest and taxation | | | 732 | |||
Other finance income (expense) | | | 3 | |||
Profit (loss) before taxation and loss recognized on remeasurement to fair
value less costs to sell and on disposal |
| | 735 | |||
Loss recognized on the remeasurement to fair value less costs to sell and on disposal | | (184 | ) | (591 | ) | |
Profit (loss) before taxation from Innovene operations | | (184 | ) | 144 | ||
Tax (charge) credit | ||||||
on profit (loss) before loss recognized on remeasurement to fair value less costs to sell and on disposal | | 166 | (306 | ) | ||
on loss recognized on the remeasurement to fair value less costs to sell and on disposal | | (7 | ) | 346 | ||
Profit (loss) from Innovene operations | | (25 | ) | 184 | ||
|
||||||
Earnings (loss) per share from Innovene operations cents | ||||||
Basic | | (0.13 | ) | 0.87 | ||
Diluted | | (0.12 | ) | 0.86 | ||
|
||||||
The cash flows of Innovene operations are presented below | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 970 | |||
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (524 | ) | ||
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (446 | ) | ||
|
Further information is contained in Note 4.
111 | |
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of Innovene operations | | (34 | ) | 8,304 | ||
Proceeds from the sale of other businesses | 2,518 | 325 | 93 | |||
Proceeds from the sale of businesses | 2,518 | 291 | 8,397 | |||
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets | 1,749 | 5,963 | 2,803 | |||
4,267 | 6,254 | 11,200 | ||||
|
||||||
By business | ||||||
Exploration and Production | 1,276 | 4,005 | 1,416 | |||
Refining and Marketing | 2,953 | 1,789 | 888 | |||
Gas, Power and Renewables | 31 | 297 | 540 | |||
Other businesses and corporate | 7 | 163 | 8,356 | |||
4,267 | 6,254 | 11,200 | ||||
|
As part of the strategy
to upgrade the quality of its asset portfolio, the group has an active programme
to dispose of non-strategic assets. In the normal course of business in any
particular year, the group may sell interests in exploration and production
properties, service stations and pipeline interests as well as non-core businesses.
The group may also dispose of other assets, such as refineries, when this
meets strategic objectives.
Cash
received during the year from disposals amounted to $4.3 billion (2006 $6.3
billion and 2005 $11.2 billion). The major transactions in 2007 were the
disposals of our Coryton refinery, our exploration and production and gas infrastructure
business in the Netherlands, our interest in non-core Permian assets in the
US and our interest in the Entrada field in the Gulf of Mexico.
The
major transactions in 2006 were the disposals of our interests in the Gulf of
Mexico Shelf and our interest in the Shenzi discovery in the Gulf of Mexico.
The divestment of Innovene contributed $8.3 billion to the total in 2005.
The principal transactions generating the proceeds for each business segment
are described below.
Exploration
and Production
The group
divested interests in a number of oil and natural gas properties in all three
years. During 2007, the major transactions were the disposal of an exploration
and production and gas infrastructure business in the Netherlands and the divestments
of our interests in non-core Permian assets in the US and in the Entrada field
in the Gulf of Mexico. We also sold our interests in a number of fields in Egypt,
Canada and the US.
During
2006, the major transactions were disposals of our interests in the Gulf of
Mexico Shelf, in the Shenzi discovery in the Gulf of Mexico, in the Statfjord
oil and gas field and in the Luva gas field in the North Sea. We also divested
our interests in a number of onshore fields in South Louisiana, interests in
fields in the North Sea, the Gulf of Suez and Venezuela, and part of an interest
in Colombia.
During
2005, the major transaction was the sale of the groups interest in the
Ormen Lange field in Norway. In addition, the group sold interests in oil and
natural gas properties in Venezuela, Canada and the Gulf of Mexico.
Refining
and Marketing
The churn
of retail assets represents a significant element of the total in all three
years. In addition, in 2007, we disposed of the Coryton refinery in the UK,
our interest in the West Texas Pipeline in the US, our interest in the Samsung
Petrochemical Company in South Korea and other interests in France, Brazil and
Africa.
During
2006, we disposed of our interests in Zhenhai Refining and Chemicals Company
in China and in Eiffage, the French-based construction company. We also exited
the retail market in the Czech Republic and disposed of our interests in a number
of pipelines.
During 2005, the group
sold a number of regional retail networks in the US and in addition its retail
network in Malaysia.
112 | |
4 Disposals continued
Gas, Power and Renewables
There were no significant disposals in 2007. During 2006, we disposed of our shareholding in Enagas, the Spanish gas transport grid operator. In 2005, the group sold its interest in the Interconnector pipeline and a
power plant at Great Yarmouth in the UK.
Other businesses and corporate
There were no significant disposals in 2007. During 2006, the group disposed of miscellaneous non-core businesses and assets. 2005 includes the proceeds from the sale of Innovene.
Summarized financial information for the sale of businesses is shown below. | ||||||
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
The disposals comprise the following | ||||||
Non-current assets | 753 | 143 | 6,452 | |||
Other current assets | 587 | 169 | 4,779 | |||
Non-current liabilities | (64 | ) | (10 | ) | (364 | ) |
Current liabilities | (27 | ) | (70 | ) | (2,488 | ) |
Total carrying amount of net assets disposed | 1,249 | 232 | 8,379 | |||
Recycling of foreign exchange on disposal | (147 | ) | | | ||
Costs on disposal | 22 | | | |||
1,124 | 232 | 8,379 | ||||
Profit (loss) on sale of businesses | 1,384 | 167 | 18 | |||
Total consideration | 2,508 | 399 | 8,397 | |||
Consideration received (receivable)a | 10 | (74 | ) | | ||
Closing adjustments associated with the sale of Innovene | | (34 | ) | | ||
Proceeds from the sale of businessesb | 2,518 | 291 | 8,397 | |||
a | Consideration received from prior year disposals or not yet received from current year disposals. |
b | Net of cash and cash equivalents disposed of $115 million (2006 $2 million and 2005 $15 million). |
113 | |
The groups primary format for segment reporting is business segments and the secondary format is geographical segments. The risks and returns of the groups operations are primarily determined by the nature
of the different activities that the group engages in, rather than the geographical location of these operations. This is reflected by the groups
organizational structure and internal financial reporting systems.
In 2007, BP had three reportable
operating segments: Exploration and Production; Refining and Marketing; and
Gas, Power
and Renewables. Exploration and Productions activities include
oil and natural gas exploration, development and production, together with
related pipeline, transportation and processing activities. The activities
of Refining
and Marketing include the supply and trading, refining, manufacturing, marketing
and transportation of crude oil, petroleum and chemicals products. Gas, Power
and Renewables activities included marketing and trading of gas and power,
marketing of liquefied natural gas (LNG), natural gas liquids (NGLs) and low-carbon
power
generation
through our Alternative Energy business. The group is managed on an integrated
basis.
Other businesses and corporate
comprises Treasury (which in the segmental analysis includes all of the groups cash, cash equivalents and associated interest income), the groups
aluminium asset and corporate activities worldwide.
The
accounting policies of the operating segments are the same
as the groups accounting policies described in Note 1.
Sales
between segments are made at prices that approximate market prices, taking
into account the volumes
involved. Segment revenues and segment results include transactions between
business segments. These transactions and any unrealized profits and losses
are eliminated on consolidation, unless unrealized losses provide evidence
of an impairment of the asset transferred.
The groups geographical segments are based on the location of the groups
assets. The UK and the US are significant countries of activity for the group;
the other geographical segments are groupings of countries determined by geographical
location.
Sales
to external customers are based on the location of the seller, which in most
circumstances is not
materially different from the location of the customer. Crude oil and LNG
are commodities for which there is an international market and buyers and
sellers can be widely separated geographically. The UK segment includes the
UK-based international activities of Refining and Marketing.
$ million | ||||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||||
Gas, | Other | Consolidation | ||||||||||
Exploration | Refining | Power | businessess | adjustment | ||||||||
and | and | and | and | and | Total | |||||||
By business | Production | Marketing | Renewables | corporate | eliminations | group | ||||||
Sales and other operating revenues | ||||||||||||
Segment sales and other operating revenues | 54,550 | 250,866 | 21,369 | 843 | (43,263 | ) | 284,365 | |||||
Less: sales between businesses | (38,803 | ) | (2,024 | ) | (2,436 | ) | | 43,263 | | |||
Third party sales | 15,747 | 248,842 | 18,933 | 843 | | 284,365 | ||||||
Equity-accounted earnings | 3,061 | 538 | 233 | | | 3,832 | ||||||
Interest and other revenues | 330 | 134 | 123 | 167 | | 754 | ||||||
Total revenues | 19,138 | 249,514 | 19,289 | 1,010 | | 288,951 | ||||||
Segment results | ||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and tax | 26,938 | 6,072 | 674 | (1,128 | ) | (204 | ) | 32,352 | ||||
Finance costs and other finance income/expense | | | | | (741 | ) | (741 | ) | ||||
Profit (loss) before taxation | 26,938 | 6,072 | 674 | (1,128 | ) | (945 | ) | 31,611 | ||||
Taxation | | | | | (10,442 | ) | (10,442 | ) | ||||
Profit (loss) for the year | 26,938 | 6,072 | 674 | (1,128 | ) | (11,387 | ) | 21,169 | ||||
Assets and liabilities | ||||||||||||
Segment assets | 108,874 | 95,691 | 19,889 | 17,188 | (6,271 | ) | 235,371 | |||||
Current tax receivable | | | | | 705 | 705 | ||||||
Total assets | 108,874 | 95,691 | 19,889 | 17,188 | (5,566 | ) | 236,076 | |||||
Includes | ||||||||||||
Equity-accounted investments | 16,388 | 5,268 | 1,007 | 29 | | 22,692 | ||||||
Segment liabilities | (23,792 | ) | (41,053 | ) | (13,439 | ) | (14,940 | ) | 5,342 | (87,882 | ) | |
Current tax payable | | | | | (3,282 | ) | (3,282 | ) | ||||
Finance debt | | | | | (31,045 | ) | (31,045 | ) | ||||
Deferred tax liabilities | | | | | (19,215 | ) | (19,215 | ) | ||||
Total liabilities | (23,792 | ) | (41,053 | ) | (13,439 | ) | (14,940 | ) | (48,200 | ) | (141,424 | ) |
Other segment information | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions | ||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets | 2,153 | 581 | 98 | 21 | | 2,853 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment | 11,360 | 4,565 | 746 | 216 | | 16,887 | ||||||
Other | 393 | 440 | 30 | 38 | | 901 | ||||||
Total | 13,906 | 5,586 | 874 | 275 | | 20,641 | ||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 7,720 | 2,430 | 215 | 214 | | 10,579 | ||||||
Impairment losses | 292 | 1,186 | 40 | 43 | | 1,561 | ||||||
Impairment reversals | 237 | | | | | 237 | ||||||
Losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 42 | 313 | | | | 355 | ||||||
Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 949 | 1,464 | 12 | 62 | | 2,487 | ||||||
114 | |
5 Segmental analysis continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||
2006 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gas, | Other | Consolidation | Consolidation | |||||||||||||||
Exploration | Refining | Power | businesses | adjustment | adjustment | Total | ||||||||||||
and | and | and | and | and | Total | Innovene | and | continuing | ||||||||||
By business | Production | Marketing | Renewables | corporate | eliminations | group | operations | eliminations | a | operations | ||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment sales and other operating revenues | 52,600 | 232,855 | 23,708 | 1,009 | (44,266 | ) | 265,906 | | | 265,906 | ||||||||
Less: sales between businesses | (36,171 | ) | (4,076 | ) | (4,019 | ) | | 44,266 | | | | | ||||||
Third party sales | 16,429 | 228,779 | 19,689 | 1,009 | | 265,906 | | | 265,906 | |||||||||
Equity-accounted earnings | 3,517 | 341 | 138 | (1 | ) | | 3,995 | | | 3,995 | ||||||||
Interest and other revenues | 283 | 106 | 77 | 235 | | 701 | | | 701 | |||||||||
Total revenues | 20,229 | 229,226 | 19,904 | 1,243 | | 270,602 | | | 270,602 | |||||||||
Segment results | ||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and tax | 29,629 | 5,541 | 1,321 | (1,069 | ) | 52 | 35,474 | 184 | | 35,658 | ||||||||
Finance costs and other finance income/expense | | | | | (516 | ) | (516 | ) | | | (516 | ) | ||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation | 29,629 | 5,541 | 1,321 | (1,069 | ) | (464 | ) | 34,958 | 184 | | 35,142 | |||||||
Taxation | | | | | (12,357 | ) | (12,357 | ) | (159 | ) | | (12,516 | ) | |||||
Profit (loss) for the year | 29,629 | 5,541 | 1,321 | (1,069 | ) | (12,821 | ) | 22,601 | 25 | | 22,626 | |||||||
Assets and liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment assets | 99,310 | 80,964 | 27,398 | 14,184 | (4,799 | ) | 217,057 | |||||||||||
Current tax receivable | | | | | 544 | 544 | ||||||||||||
Total assets | 99,310 | 80,964 | 27,398 | 14,184 | (4,255 | ) | 217,601 | |||||||||||
Includes | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted investments | 15,510 | 4,675 | 853 | 11 | | 21,049 | ||||||||||||
Segment liabilities | (21,787 | ) | (33,399 | ) | (21,708 | ) | (14,555 | ) | 4,074 | (87,375 | ) | |||||||
Current tax payable | | | | | (2,635 | ) | (2,635 | ) | ||||||||||
Finance debt | | | | | (24,010 | ) | (24,010 | ) | ||||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities | | | | | (18,116 | ) | (18,116 | ) | ||||||||||
Total liabilities | (21,787 | ) | (33,399 | ) | (21,708 | ) | (14,555 | ) | (40,687 | ) | (132,136 | ) | ||||||
Other segment information | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets | 1,614 | 253 | 256 | 43 | | 2,166 | ||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment | 10,227 | 2,733 | 337 | 232 | | 13,529 | ||||||||||||
Other | 1,277 | 158 | 95 | 6 | | 1,536 | ||||||||||||
Total | 13,118 | 3,144 | 688 | 281 | | 17,231 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 6,533 | 2,244 | 192 | 159 | | 9,128 | | | 9,128 | |||||||||
Impairment losses | 137 | 155 | 100 | 69 | | 461 | | | 461 | |||||||||
Impairment reversals | 340 | | | | | 340 | | | 340 | |||||||||
Loss
on remeasurement to fair value less costs to sell and on disposal of Innovene
operations |
| | | 184 | | 184 | (184 | ) | | | ||||||||
Losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 195 | 228 | | 5 | | 428 | | | 428 | |||||||||
Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 2,309 | 1,112 | 193 | 100 | | 3,714 | | | 3,714 | |||||||||
115 | |
5 Segmental analysis continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||
2005 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gas, | Other | Consolidation | Consolidation | |||||||||||||||
Exploration | Refining | Power | businesses | adjustment | adjustment | Total | ||||||||||||
and | and | and | and | and | Total | Innovene | and | continuing | ||||||||||
By business | Production | Marketing | Renewables | corporate | eliminations | group | operations | eliminations | a | operations | ||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment sales and other operating revenues | 47,210 | 213,326 | 25,696 | 21,295 | (55,359 | ) | 252,168 | (20,627 | ) | 8,251 | 239,792 | |||||||
Less: sales between businesses | (32,606 | ) | (11,407 | ) | (3,095 | ) | (8,251 | ) | 55,359 | | 8,251 | (8,251 | ) | | ||||
Third party sales | 14,604 | 201,919 | 22,601 | 13,044 | | 252,168 | (12,376 | ) | | 239,792 | ||||||||
Equity-accounted earnings | 3,232 | 249 | 62 | (14 | ) | | 3,529 | 14 | | 3,543 | ||||||||
Interest and other revenues | 290 | 151 | 15 | 233 | | 689 | (76 | ) | | 613 | ||||||||
Total revenues | 18,126 | 202,319 | 22,678 | 13,263 | | 256,386 | (12,438 | ) | | 243,948 | ||||||||
Segment results | ||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and tax | 25,502 | 6,426 | 1,172 | (569 | ) | (208 | ) | 32,323 | (668 | ) | 527 | 32,182 | ||||||
Finance costs and other finance income/expense | | | | | (758 | ) | (758 | ) | (3 | ) | | (761 | ) | |||||
Profit (loss) before taxation | 25,502 | 6,426 | 1,172 | (569 | ) | (966 | ) | 31,565 | (671 | ) | 527 | 31,421 | ||||||
Taxation | | | | | (9,248 | ) | (9,248 | ) | 133 | (173 | ) | (9,288 | ) | |||||
Profit (loss) for the year | 25,502 | 6,426 | 1,172 | (569 | ) | (10,214 | ) | 22,317 | (538 | ) | 354 | 22,133 | ||||||
Other segment information | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 6,033 | 2,382 | 235 | 533 | | 9,183 | (412 | ) | | 8,771 | ||||||||
Impairment losses | 266 | 93 | | 59 | | 418 | (59 | ) | | 359 | ||||||||
Loss on remeasurement to
fair value less costs to sell and on disposal
of Innovene operations |
| | | 591 | | 591 | (591 | ) | | | ||||||||
Losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 39 | 64 | | 6 | | 109 | | | 109 | |||||||||
Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 1,198 | 241 | 55 | 47 | | 1,541 | (3 | ) | | 1,538 | ||||||||
a | In the circumstances of discontinued operations, IFRS requires that the profits earned by the discontinued operations, in this case the Innovene operations, on sales to the continuing operations be eliminated on consolidation from the discontinued operations and attributed to the continuing operations and vice versa. This adjustment has two offsetting elements: the net margin on crude refined by Innovene as substantially all crude for its refineries was supplied by BP and most of the refined products manufactured were taken by BP; and the margin on sales of feedstock from BPs US refineries to Innovenes manufacturing plants. The profits attributable to individual segments are not affected by this adjustment. This representation does not indicate the profits earned by continuing or Innovene operations, as if they were standalone entities, for past periods or likely to be earned in future periods. |
116 | |
5 Segmental analysis continued
$ million | ||||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||||
Consolidation | ||||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | adjustment and | ||||||||||
By geographical area | UK | Europe | US | World | eliminations | Total | ||||||
Sales and other operating revenues | ||||||||||||
Segment sales and other operating revenues | 109,800 | 78,366 | 105,120 | 74,462 | | 367,748 | ||||||
Less: sales between areas | (48,651 | ) | (12,024 | ) | (2,801 | ) | (19,907 | ) | | (83,383 | ) | |
Third party sales | 61,149 | 66,342 | 102,319 | 54,555 | | 284,365 | ||||||
Equity-accounted earnings | 1 | 55 | 144 | 3,632 | | 3,832 | ||||||
Interest and other revenues | 222 | 78 | 142 | 312 | | 754 | ||||||
Total revenues | 61,372 | 66,475 | 102,605 | 58,499 | | 288,951 | ||||||
Segment results | ||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and tax | 4,613 | 4,164 | 7,439 | 16,136 | | 32,352 | ||||||
Finance costs and other finance income/expense | (17 | ) | (287 | ) | (524 | ) | 87 | | (741 | ) | ||
Profit before taxation | 4,596 | 3,877 | 6,915 | 16,223 | | 31,611 | ||||||
Taxation | (2,027 | ) | (949 | ) | (2,593 | ) | (4,873 | ) | | (10,442 | ) | |
Profit for the year | 2,569 | 2,928 | 4,322 | 11,350 | | 21,169 | ||||||
Assets and liabilities | ||||||||||||
Segment assets | 53,065 | 34,658 | 81,911 | 76,504 | (10,767 | ) | 235,371 | |||||
Current tax receivable | 3 | 27 | 468 | 207 | | 705 | ||||||
Total assets | 53,068 | 34,685 | 82,379 | 76,711 | (10,767 | ) | 236,076 | |||||
Includes | ||||||||||||
Equity-accounted investments | 142 | 1,970 | 1,659 | 18,921 | | 22,692 | ||||||
Segment liabilities | (30,043 | ) | (18,985 | ) | (31,314 | ) | (18,307 | ) | 10,767 | (87,882 | ) | |
Current tax payable | (963 | ) | (658 | ) | (104 | ) | (1,557 | ) | | (3,282 | ) | |
Finance debt | (20,085 | ) | (200 | ) | (8,238 | ) | (2,522 | ) | | (31,045 | ) | |
Deferred tax liabilities | (3,397 | ) | (1,124 | ) | (10,656 | ) | (4,038 | ) | | (19,215 | ) | |
Total liabilities | (54,488 | ) | (20,967 | ) | (50,312 | ) | (26,424 | ) | 10,767 | (141,424 | ) | |
Other segment information | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions | ||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets | 453 | 298 | 817 | 1,285 | | 2,853 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment | 1,141 | 2,489 | 6,516 | 6,741 | | 16,887 | ||||||
Other | 78 | 253 | 154 | 416 | | 901 | ||||||
Total | 1,672 | 3,040 | 7,487 | 8,442 | | 20,641 | ||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 2,133 | 959 | 3,558 | 3,929 | | 10,579 | ||||||
Exploration expense | 46 | | 252 | 458 | | 756 | ||||||
Impairment losses | 315 | 136 | 723 | 387 | | 1,561 | ||||||
Impairment reversals | | | 237 | | | 237 | ||||||
Losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 2 | 77 | 233 | 43 | | 355 | ||||||
Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 893 | 655 | 770 | 169 | | 2,487 | ||||||
117 | |
5 Segmental analysis continued
$ million | ||||||||||||
2006 | ||||||||||||
Consolidation | ||||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | adjustment and | ||||||||||
By geographical area | UK | Europe | US | World | eliminations | Total | ||||||
Sales and other operating revenues | ||||||||||||
Segment sales and other operating revenues | 105,518 | 76,768 | 99,935 | 71,547 | | 353,768 | ||||||
Less: sales between areas | (50,942 | ) | (14,821 | ) | (5,032 | ) | (17,067 | ) | | (87,862 | ) | |
Third party sales | 54,576 | 61,947 | 94,903 | 54,480 | | 265,906 | ||||||
Equity-accounted earnings | 5 | 13 | 127 | 3,850 | | 3,995 | ||||||
Interest and other revenues | 258 | 7 | 107 | 329 | | 701 | ||||||
Total revenues | 54,839 | 61,967 | 95,137 | 58,659 | | 270,602 | ||||||
Segment results | ||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and tax from continuing operations | 5,897 | 3,282 | 11,664 | 14,815 | | 35,658 | ||||||
Finance costs and other finance income/expense | 43 | (262 | ) | (331 | ) | 34 | | (516 | ) | |||
Profit before taxation from continuing operations | 5,940 | 3,020 | 11,333 | 14,849 | | 35,142 | ||||||
Taxation | (3,158 | ) | (1,176 | ) | (3,738 | ) | (4,444 | ) | | (12,516 | ) | |
Profit for the year from continuing operations | 2,782 | 1,844 | 7,595 | 10,405 | | 22,626 | ||||||
Profit (loss) from Innovene operations | 31 | (76 | ) | (2 | ) | 22 | | (25 | ) | |||
Profit for the year | 2,813 | 1,768 | 7,593 | 10,427 | | 22,601 | ||||||
Assets and liabilities | ||||||||||||
Segment assets | 49,018 | 28,059 | 78,586 | 69,479 | (8,085 | ) | 217,057 | |||||
Current tax receivable | 13 | 65 | 450 | 16 | | 544 | ||||||
Total assets | 49,031 | 28,124 | 79,036 | 69,495 | (8,085 | ) | 217,601 | |||||
Includes | ||||||||||||
Equity-accounted investments | 78 | 1,538 | 1,529 | 17,904 | | 21,049 | ||||||
Segment liabilities | (26,048 | ) | (18,484 | ) | (32,979 | ) | (17,949 | ) | 8,085 | (87,375 | ) | |
Current tax payable | (757 | ) | (570 | ) | 11 | (1,319 | ) | | (2,635 | ) | ||
Finance debt | (12,666 | ) | (328 | ) | (7,201 | ) | (3,815 | ) | | (24,010 | ) | |
Deferred tax liabilities | (3,335 | ) | (938 | ) | (9,946 | ) | (3,897 | ) | | (18,116 | ) | |
Total liabilities | (42,806 | ) | (20,320 | ) | (50,115 | ) | (26,980 | ) | 8,085 | (132,136 | ) | |
Other segment information | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions | ||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets | 421 | 53 | 969 | 723 | | 2,166 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment | 1,120 | 916 | 5,531 | 5,962 | | 13,529 | ||||||
Other | 46 | 22 | 92 | 1,376 | | 1,536 | ||||||
Total | 1,587 | 991 | 6,592 | 8,061 | | 17,231 | ||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 2,139 | 840 | 3,459 | 2,690 | | 9,128 | ||||||
Exploration expense | 20 | | 633 | 392 | | 1,045 | ||||||
Impairment losses | | 171 | 114 | 176 | | 461 | ||||||
Impairment reversals | 176 | | 90 | 74 | | 340 | ||||||
Loss on remeasurement to
fair value less costs to sell and on disposal
of Innovene operations |
185 | 36 | (16 | ) | (21 | ) | | 184 | ||||
Losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 12 | 96 | 217 | 103 | | 428 | ||||||
Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 337 | 577 | 2,530 | 270 | | 3,714 | ||||||
118 | |
5 Segmental analysis continued
$ million | ||||||||||||
2005 | ||||||||||||
Consolidation | ||||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | adjustment and | ||||||||||
By geographical area | UK | Europe | US | World | eliminations | Total | ||||||
Sales and other operating revenues | ||||||||||||
Segment sales and other operating revenues | 95,375 | 72,972 | 101,190 | 60,314 | | 329,851 | ||||||
Less: sales attributable to Innovene operations | (2,610 | ) | (8,667 | ) | (4,309 | ) | (686 | ) | | (16,272 | ) | |
Segment revenues from continuing operations | 92,765 | 64,305 | 96,881 | 59,628 | | 313,579 | ||||||
Less: sales between areas | (38,081 | ) | (5,013 | ) | (2,362 | ) | (16,541 | ) | | (61,997 | ) | |
Less: sales by continuing operations to Innovene | (5,599 | ) | (4,640 | ) | (1,508 | ) | (43 | ) | | (11,790 | ) | |
Third party sales of continuing operations | 49,085 | 54,652 | 93,011 | 43,044 | | 239,792 | ||||||
Equity-accounted earnings | (8 | ) | 18 | 86 | 3,447 | | 3,543 | |||||
Interest and other revenues | (533 | ) | 152 | 695 | 299 | | 613 | |||||
Total revenues | 48,544 | 54,822 | 93,792 | 46,790 | | 243,948 | ||||||
Segment results | ||||||||||||
Profit before interest and tax from continuing operations | 1,167 | 5,206 | 12,639 | 13,170 | | 32,182 | ||||||
Finance costs and other finance expense | (80 | ) | (268 | ) | (366 | ) | (47 | ) | | (761 | ) | |
Profit before taxation from continuing operations | 1,087 | 4,938 | 12,273 | 13,123 | | 31,421 | ||||||
Taxation | (289 | ) | (1,646 | ) | (3,798 | ) | (3,555 | ) | | (9,288 | ) | |
Profit for the year from continuing operations | 798 | 3,292 | 8,475 | 9,568 | | 22,133 | ||||||
Profit (loss) from Innovene operations | 234 | 109 | (165 | ) | 6 | | 184 | |||||
Profit for the year | 1,032 | 3,401 | 8,310 | 9,574 | | 22,317 | ||||||
Other segment information | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 2,080 | 932 | 3,685 | 2,074 | | 8,771 | ||||||
Exploration expense | 32 | 2 | 425 | 225 | | 684 | ||||||
Impairment losses | 53 | 7 | 238 | 61 | | 359 | ||||||
Loss
on remeasurement to fair value less costs to sell and on disposal of Innovene
operations |
24 | 273 | 262 | 32 | | 591 | ||||||
Losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets | | 37 | 8 | 64 | | 109 | ||||||
Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 107 | 1,017 | 282 | 132 | | 1,538 | ||||||
119 | |
$ million | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||
Related to financial instruments | |||||||
Interest
income from available-for-sale financial assets |
5 | 13 | 14 | ||||
Dividend income from available-for-sale financial assets |
29 | 32 | 25 | ||||
Interest income from loans and receivables |
175 | 186 | 101 | ||||
209 | 231 | 140 | |||||
Not related to financial instruments | |||||||
Interest from equity-accounted investments |
172 | 176 | 141 | ||||
Other interest |
97 | 62 | 116 | ||||
Other income |
276 | 232 | 292 | ||||
545 | 470 | 549 | |||||
754 | 701 | 689 | |||||
Innovene operations | | | (76 | ) | |||
Continuing operations | 754 | 701 | 613 | ||||
7 Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets
$ million | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||
Gains on sale of businesses | |||||||
Exploration and Production |
534 | | | ||||
Refining and Marketing |
850 | 104 | 18 | ||||
Other businesses and corporate |
| 63 | | ||||
1,384 | 167 | 18 | |||||
Gains on sale of fixed assets | |||||||
Exploration and Production |
415 | 2,309 | 1,198 | ||||
Refining and Marketing |
614 | 1,008 | 223 | ||||
Gas, Power and Renewables |
12 | 193 | 55 | ||||
Other businesses and corporate |
62 | 37 | 47 | ||||
1,103 | 3,547 | 1,523 | |||||
2,487 | 3,714 | 1,541 | |||||
Innovene operations | | | (3 | ) | |||
Continuing operations | 2,487 | 3,714 | 1,538 | ||||
The principal transactions giving rise to these gains for each business segment are described below.
Exploration
and Production
The group divested
interests in a number of oil and natural gas properties in all three years.
The major divestments during 2007 that resulted in gains were the disposal of
an exploration and production and gas infrastructure business in the Netherlands
and the divestments of our interests in non-core Permian assets in the US and
in the Entrada field in the Gulf of Mexico.
The
major divestments during 2006 that resulted in gains were the sales of our interest
in the Shenzi discovery in the Gulf of Mexico in the US and interests in the
North Sea. In 2005 the major divestment was the sale of the groups interest
in the Ormen Lange field in Norway. BP also sold various oil and gas properties
in Trinidad & Tobago, Canada and the Gulf of Mexico.
Refining
and Marketing
During 2007, the group
divested the Coryton refinery in the UK, its interest in the West Texas Pipeline
in the US and its interest in the Samsung Petrochemical Company in South Korea.
During
2006, the group divested its retail business in the Czech Republic and fixed
assets including its shareholding in Zhenhai Refining and Chemicals Company
in China, its shareholding in Eiffage, the French-based construction company,
and pipeline assets. In 2005, the group divested a number of regional retail
networks in the US.
Gas, Power
and Renewables
There were no significant
disposals in 2007.
In
2006, the group divested its shareholding in Enagas. In 2005, transactions included
the disposal of the groups interest in the Interconnector pipeline and
power plant at Great Yarmouth in the UK.
Other businesses
and corporate
There were no significant
disposals in 2007.
During
2006, the group disposed of its ethylene oxide business.
Additional information on the sale of businesses and fixed assets is given in Note 4.
120 | |
8 Production and similar taxes
$ million | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||
UK | 197 | 260 | 495 | ||||
Overseas | 3,816 | 3,361 | 2,515 | ||||
4,013 | 3,621 | 3,010 | |||||
9 Depreciation, depletion and amortization
$ million | |||||||
By business | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Exploration and Productiona | |||||||
UK |
1,683 | 1,720 | 1,663 | ||||
Rest of Europe |
211 | 223 | 228 | ||||
US |
2,273 | 2,236 | 2,426 | ||||
Rest of World |
3,553 | 2,354 | 1,716 | ||||
7,720 | 6,533 | 6,033 | |||||
Refining and Marketing | |||||||
UKb |
286 | 303 | 316 | ||||
Rest of Europe |
729 | 603 | 687 | ||||
US |
1,077 | 1,048 | 1,082 | ||||
Rest of World |
338 | 290 | 297 | ||||
2,430 | 2,244 | 2,382 | |||||
Gas, Power and Renewables | |||||||
UK |
15 | 18 | 47 | ||||
Rest of Europe |
17 | 13 | 20 | ||||
US |
148 | 117 | 109 | ||||
Rest of World |
35 | 44 | 59 | ||||
215 | 192 | 235 | |||||
Other businesses and corporate | |||||||
UK |
149 | 98 | 203 | ||||
Rest of Europe |
2 | 1 | 130 | ||||
US |
60 | 58 | 187 | ||||
Rest of World |
3 | 2 | 13 | ||||
214 | 159 | 533 | |||||
By geographical area | |||||||
UKb |
2,133 | 2,139 | 2,229 | ||||
Rest of Europe |
959 | 840 | 1,065 | ||||
US |
3,558 | 3,459 | 3,804 | ||||
Rest of World |
3,929 | 2,690 | 2,085 | ||||
10,579 | 9,128 | 9,183 | |||||
Innovene operations | | | (412 | ) | |||
Continuing operations | 10,579 | 9,128 | 8,771 | ||||
a | At the end of 2006, BP adopted the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules for estimating oil and natural gas reserves instead of the UK accounting rules contained in the Statement of Recommended Practice Accounting for Oil and Gas Exploration, Development, Production and Decommissioning Activities (UK SORP). |
This change in accounting estimate had a direct impact on the amount of depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) charged in the income statement in respect of oil and natural gas properties which are depreciated on a unit-of-production basis as described in Note 1. The change in estimate was applied prospectively, with no restatement of prior periods results. The groups actual DD&A charge for 2006 was $9,128 million, whereas the charge based on UK SORP reserves would have been $9,057 million, i.e. an increase of $71 million due to the change in reserves estimates that was used to calculate DD&A for the last three months of 2006. For 2007, it was estimated that the DD&A charge would increase by approximately $400 million to $500 million as a result of the change. Over the life of a field this change would have no overall effect on DD&A. | |
The main differences between the UK SORP and SEC rules relate to the SEC requirement to use year-end prices, the application of SEC interpretations of SEC regulations relating to the use of technology (mainly seismic) to estimate reserves in the reservoir away from wellbores and the reporting of fuel gas (i.e. gas used for fuel in operations) within proved reserves. Consequently, reserves quantities under SEC rules differ from those that would be reported under application of the UK SORP. | |
The change to SEC reserves in 2006 represented a simplification of the groups reserves reporting, as only one set of reserves estimates is disclosed. In addition, the use of SEC reserves for accounting purposes makes our results more comparable with those of our major competitors. | |
b | UK area includes the UK-based international activities of Refining and Marketing. |
121 | |
10 Impairment and losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets
$ million | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||
Impairment losses | |||||||
Exploration and Production | 292 | 137 | 266 | ||||
Refining and Marketing | 1,186 | 155 | 93 | ||||
Gas, Power and Renewables | 40 | 100 | | ||||
Other businesses and corporate | 43 | 69 | 59 | ||||
1,561 | 461 | 418 | |||||
Impairment reversals | |||||||
Exploration and Production | (237 | ) | (340 | ) | | ||
(237 | ) | (340 | ) | | |||
Loss on sale of fixed assets | |||||||
Exploration and Production | 42 | 195 | 39 | ||||
Refining and Marketing | 313 | 228 | 64 | ||||
Other businesses and corporate | | 5 | 6 | ||||
355 | 428 | 109 | |||||
Loss on remeasurement to fair value less costs to sell and on disposal of Innovene operations | | 184 | 591 | ||||
1,679 | 733 | 1,118 | |||||
Innovene operations | | (184 | ) | (650 | ) | ||
Continuing operations | 1,679 | 549 | 468 | ||||
|
Impairment
In
assessing whether a write-down is required in the carrying value of a potentially
impaired asset, its carrying value is compared with
its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of the assets
fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Given the nature of the groups activities, information on the fair value of an asset is usually difficult to obtain unless negotiations with potential purchasers are taking place. Consequently,
unless indicated otherwise, the recoverable amount used in assessing the impairment charges described below is value in use. The group generally estimates value in use using a discounted cash flow model. The future cash flows are usually adjusted
for risks specific to the asset and discounted using a pre-tax discount rate of 11% (2006 10% and 2005 10%). This discount rate is derived from the groups post-tax weighted average cost of capital. In some cases the groups
pre-tax discount rate may be adjusted to account for political risk in the country
where the asset is located.
Exploration and Production
During
2007, the Exploration and Production segment recognized impairment losses of $292 million. The main elements were a charge of $112 million relating to the cancellation of the DF1 project in Scotland, a
$103 million partner loan write-off as a result of unsuccessful drilling in the West Shmidt licence block in Sakhalin and a $52 million write-off of the Whitney Canyon gas plant in US Lower 48 driven by managements decision to abandon
this facility. In addition, there were several individually insignificant impairment charges, triggered by downward reserves revisions, amounting to $25
million in total.
These
charges were largely offset by reversals of previously recognized impairment
charges amounting to $237 million. Of this total, $208 million resulted from a reassessment of
the decommissioning liability for damaged platforms in the Gulf of Mexico Shelf. The remaining $29 million related to other individually insignificant impairment reversals, resulting from favourable revisions to the estimates used in determining
the assets recoverable amounts.
During
2006, Exploration and Production recognized a net gain on impairment. The
main element was a $340 million credit for reversals of previously booked impairments relating to the
UK North Sea, US Lower 48 and China. These reversals resulted from a positive change in the estimates used to determine the assets recoverable amount since the impairment losses were recognized. This was partially offset by impairment losses
totalling $137 million. The major element was a charge of $109 million against intangible assets relating to properties in Alaska. The trigger for the impairment test was the decision of the Alaska Department of Natural Resources to
terminate the Point Thompson Unit Agreement. We are defending our right through the appeal process. The remaining $28
million relates to other individually insignificant impairments, the impairment
tests for which were triggered by downward reserves revisions and increased tax
burden.
During
2005, Exploration and Production
recognized total charges of $266 million for impairment in respect of producing oil and gas properties. The major element of this was a charge
of $226 million relating to fields in the Shelf and Coastal areas of the Gulf of Mexico. The triggers for the impairment tests were primarily the effect of Hurricane Rita, which extensively damaged certain offshore and onshore production
facilities, leading to repair costs and higher estimates of the eventual cost of decommissioning the production facilities and, in addition, reduced estimates of the quantities of hydrocarbons recoverable from some of these fields. The recoverable
amount was based on managements estimate of fair value less costs to sell
consistent with recent transactions in the area. The remainder related to fields
in the UK North Sea, which were tested for impairment following a review of the
economic
performance of these assets.
Refining and Marketing
The
main component of the 2007 impairment charge arose because of a decision to sell
our company-owned and company-operated sites in the US
resulting in a $610 million write-down of the carrying amount of the sites
to fair value less costs to sell. Following a decision to sell certain assets at our Acetyls plant in Hull, UK, we wrote down the carrying amount of these assets to fair value less costs to sell leading to an impairment charge of $186 million.
Changing marketing conditions led to impairments in Samsung Petrochemical Company, to fair value less costs to sell, and in China American Petrochemical Company amounting in total to $165
million. The balance relates principally to the write-downs of assets elsewhere
in the segment portfolio.
During
2006, certain assets in our
Retail and Aromatics & Acetyls businesses were written down to fair value
less costs to sell. During 2005, certain retail assets were written down to fair
value less costs to sell.
122 | |
10 Impairment and losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets continued
Gas, Power and Renewables
There were no significant impairments in 2007.
The
impairment charge for 2006 relates to certain North American pipeline assets.
The trigger for impairment testing was the reduction in future pipeline tariff
revenues and increased
ongoing operational costs.
Other businesses and corporate
There were no significant impairments in 2007.
The
impairment charge for 2006 relates to remaining chemical assets after the sale
of Innovene. The impairment charge for 2005 relates to the write-off of additional
goodwill on the Solvay
transactions.
Loss on sale of fixed assets
The principal transactions that give rise to the losses for each business segment are described below.
Exploration and Production
The group divested interests in a number of oil and natural gas properties in all three years.
For
2006, the largest component of the loss is attributed to the sale of properties
in the Gulf of Mexico Shelf, which included increases in decommissioning liability
estimates associated with the hurricane-damaged fields that were divested during
the year.
Refining and Marketing
For 2007, the principal transactions contributing to the loss were related to the decision to withdraw from the company-owned and company-operated channel of trade in the US and retail churn. Retail churn is the
overall process of acquiring and disposing of retail sites by which the group aims to improve the quality and mix of its portfolio of service stations.
For 2006, the principal transactions contributing to the loss were retail churn.
$ million | ||||
Goodwill at 31 December | 2007 | 2006 | ||
Exploration and Production | 4,247 | 4,282 | ||
Refining and Marketing | 6,626 | 6,390 | ||
Gas, Power and Renewables | 133 | 108 | ||
11,006 | 10,780 | |||
|
Goodwill acquired through business combinations has been allocated first to
business segments and then down to the next level of cash-generating unit that
is expected to benefit from the synergies of the acquisition. For Exploration
and Production, goodwill has been allocated to each geographic region, that
is UK, Rest of Europe, US and Rest of World, and for Refining and Marketing,
goodwill has been allocated to the following cash-generating units, namely
Refining, Retail, Lubricants and Other.
In
assessing whether goodwill has been impaired, the carrying amount of the cash-generating
unit (including goodwill) is compared with the recoverable amount of the cash-generating
unit. The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and
value in use. In the absence of any information about the fair value of a cash-generating
unit, the recoverable amount is deemed to be the value in use.
The
group generally estimates value in use using a discounted cash flow model.
The future cash flows are usually
adjusted for risks specific to the asset and discounted using a pre-tax discount
rate of 11% (2006 10%). This discount rate is derived from the groups post-tax weighted average cost of capital. In some cases the groups
pre-tax discount rate may be adjusted to account for political risk in the country
where
the asset is located.
The
five year business segment plans, which are approved on an annual basis by senior
management, are the source of information for the determination of the various
values in use. They contain implicit forecasts for oil and natural gas production,
refinery throughputs, sales volumes for various types of refined products (e.g.
gasoline and lubricants), revenues, costs and capital expenditure. As an initial
step in the preparation
of these plans, various environmental assumptions, such as oil prices, natural
gas prices, refining margins, refined product margins and cost inflation rates,
are set by senior management. These environmental assumptions take account of
existing prices, global supply-demand equilibrium for oil and natural gas, other
macroeconomic factors and historical trends and variability.
For
the purposes of impairment testing,
the groups Brent oil price assumption is an average $90 per barrel in 2008, $86 per barrel in 2009, $84 per barrel in 2010,
$84 per barrel in 2011, $84 per barrel in 2012 and $60 per barrel in 2013 and beyond (2006 average $65 per barrel in 2007, $68 per barrel in 2008, $67 per barrel in 2009, $66 per barrel in 2010, $64 per barrel in 2011
and $40 per barrel in 2012 and beyond). Similarly, the groups assumption for Henry Hub natural gas prices is an average of $7.87 per mmBtu in 2008, $8.33 per mmBtu in 2009, $8.26 per mmBtu in 2010, $8.12 per mmBtu in 2011,
$8.00 per mmBtu in 2012 and $7.50 per mmBtu in 2013 and beyond (2006 average of $8.10 per mmBtu in 2007, $8.31 per mmBtu in 2008, $7.88 per mmBtu in 2009, $8.21 per mmBtu in 2010, $7.50 per mmBtu in 2011 and $5.50
per mmBtu in 2012 and beyond). These prices are adjusted to arrive at appropriate
consistent price assumptions for different qualities of oil and gas.
123 | |
11 Impairment of goodwill continued
Exploration and Production
The
value in use is based on the cash flows expected to be generated by the projected
oil or natural gas production profiles up to the expected
dates of cessation of production of each producing field. The date of cessation
of production depends on the interaction of a number of variables, such as
the recoverable quantities of hydrocarbons, the production profile of the hydrocarbons,
the cost of the development of the infrastructure necessary to recover the
hydrocarbons, the production costs, the contractual duration of the production
concession and the selling price of the hydrocarbons produced. As each producing
field has specific reservoir characteristics and economic circumstances, the
cash flows of the fields are computed using appropriate individual economic
models and key assumptions agreed by BPs management for the purpose.
Cash outflows and hydrocarbon production quantities for the first five years
are agreed as part of the annual planning process. Thereafter, estimated production
quantities and cash outflows up to the date of cessation of production are
developed to be consistent with this.
Consistent
with prior years, the review for impairment was carried out during the fourth
quarter of 2007 using data that was appropriate at that time. As permitted by
IAS 36, the detailed calculations made in 2005 and 2006 were used for the 2007
impairment test on the goodwill in each geographical segment as the criteria
of IAS 36 were considered to be satisfied: the excess of the recoverable amount
over the carrying amount was
substantial for Rest of World in 2005 and the UK and the US in 2006; there had
been no significant change in the assets and liabilities; and the likelihood
that the recoverable amount would be less than the carrying amount at the time
of the test
was remote.
The
following table shows the carrying value of the goodwill allocated to each of
the regions of the Exploration and Production segment and, where required, the
amount by which the recoverable amount (value in use) exceeds the carrying amount
of the goodwill and other non-current assets in the cash-generating units to
which the goodwill has been allocated. No impairment charge is required.
The
key assumptions required for the value-in-use estimation are the oil and
natural gas prices, production volumes
and the discount rate. To test the sensitivity of the excess of the recoverable
amount over the carrying amount of goodwill and other non-current assets (the
headroom) to changes in production volumes and oil and natural gas prices, management
has developed rules of thumb for key assumptions. Applying
these gives an indication of the impact on the headroom of possible changes in
the key assumptions.
In
the prior year, it was estimated that the long-term price of Brent that
would cause the total recoverable amount
to be equal to the total carrying amount of goodwill and related non-current
assets for individual cash-generating units would be of the order of $31 per barrel for the UK and $28
per barrel for the US, and that no reasonably possible change in oil and gas
prices would cause the headroom in Rest of World to be reduced to zero. Since
that time, oil prices have continued to rise and the group has increased its
price assumptions as disclosed above. Management now believes that no reasonably
possible change in oil and gas prices would cause the headroom
in any of the geographical segments to be reduced to zero.
Estimated
production volumes are based on detailed data for the fields and take into account
development plans for the fields agreed by management as part of the long-term
planning process. It is estimated that, if all our production were to be reduced
by 10% for the whole of the next 15 years, this would not be sufficient to reduce
the excess of recoverable amount over the carrying amounts of the individual
cash-generating
units to zero. Consequently, management believes no reasonably possible change
in the production assumption would cause the carrying amount of goodwill and
other non-current assets to exceed their recoverable amount.
Management
also believes that currently there is no reasonably possible change in discount
rate that would reduce the groups headroom
to zero.
$ million | ||||
2007 | ||||
Rest of | ||||
UK | US | World | Total | |
Goodwill | 341 | 3,391 | 515 | 4,247 |
|
$ million | ||||
2006 | ||||
Rest of | ||||
UK | US | World | Total | |
Goodwill | 341 | 3,426 | 515 | 4,282 |
Excess of recoverable amount over carrying amount | 7,886 | 28,856 | n/a | n/a |
|
Refining and Marketing
For all cash-generating units, the cash flows for the next five years are derived from the five-year business segment plan. The cost inflation rate is assumed to be 2.5% (2006 2.5%) throughout the period. In
determining the value in use for each of the cash-generating units, cash flows for a period of 10 years have been discounted and aggregated with its terminal value.
Refining
Cash flows beyond the five-year period are extrapolated using a 2% growth rate (2006 2%).
The
key assumptions to which the calculation of value in use for the Refining
unit is most sensitive are gross margins, production
volumes and the terminal value. The average value assigned to the gross margin
during the plan period is based on a $7.90 per barrel global indicator margin (GIM), which is then adjusted for specific refinery configurations (2006 $7.25
per barrel). The average value assigned to the production volume is 850mmbbl
a year (2006 850mmbbl) over the plan period. The value assigned to the terminal
value assumption is 6 times earnings (2006 6 times), which is indicative of similar
assets in the current market. These key assumptions
reflect past experience and are consistent with external sources.
The
Refining units recoverable amount exceeds its carrying amount by $11.4 billion. Based on sensitivity analysis, it is estimated that if the GIM changes by $1 per barrel,
the Refining units value in use changes by $7.6 billion and, if there was an adverse change in the GIM of $1.50 per barrel, the recoverable amount of the Refining unit would equal its carrying amount. If the volume assumption changes
by 5%, the Refining units value in use changes by $5.1 billion and, if there was an adverse change in Refining volumes of 95mmbbl a year, the recoverable amount of the Refining unit would equal its carrying amount. If the multiple of
earnings used in the terminal value changes by 1 then the Refining units value in use changes by $1.7 billion. Management believes no reasonably possible change in the multiple of earnings used in the terminal value would lead to the
Refining units value in use being equal to its carrying amount.
124 | |
11 Impairment of goodwill continued
Retail
Cash flows beyond the five-year period are extrapolated using a 0.9% growth rate
(2006 assumption was 1.3%) reflecting a competitive marketplace within a
growing global economy.
The
key assumptions to which the calculation of value in use for the Retail unit
is most sensitive are unit gross margins, marketing volumes, the terminal
value and discount rate. The weighted average Retail fuel margin used in
the plan was 3.1 cents per litre (2006 2.6 cents per litre). The value assigned
to the unit gross margin varies between markets. For the purpose of planning,
each market develops a gross margin based upon
the different income streams within the market and other market-specific factors.
In 2007, all markets were provided with the same reference price, which was
then adjusted for specific market factors and income streams in each operating
unit. The gross margin assumption quoted this year is the weighted average
of the margins used by each operating unit. The comparative has been prepared
on the same basis. In the prior year each operating unit was provided with
a market-specific reference
price as a starting point. The weighted average of these assumptions was disclosed
as the gross margin assumption in the prior year. The average value assigned
to the marketing volume assumption is 125 billion litres a year (2006 134
billion litres a year). The unit gross margin assumptions increase on average
by 1% a year over the plan period and marketing volume assumptions grow by
an average of 1% a year over the plan period. The value assigned to the terminal
value assumption is 6.5 times
earnings (2006 6.5 times), which is indicative of similar assets in the current
market. These key assumptions reflect past experience and are consistent
with external sources.
The
Retail units recoverable amount exceeds its carrying amount by $4.1 billion. Based on sensitivity analysis, it is estimated that if there is an adverse change in the weighted
average fuel margin of 11%, the recoverable amount of the Retail unit would equal its carrying amount. It is estimated that, if the volume assumption changes by 5% the Retail units value in use changes by $1.8 billion and, if there is an
adverse change in marketing volumes of 14 billion litres a year, the recoverable amount of the Retail unit would equal its carrying amount. If the multiple of earnings used in the terminal value changes by 1 then the Retail units value in use
changes by $0.8 billion and, if the multiple of earnings falls to 1 then the Retail value in use would equal its carrying amount. A change of 1% in the discount rate would change the Retail value in use by $0.9
billion and, if the discount rate increases to 17%, the value in use of the Retail
unit would equal its carrying amount.
Lubricants
Cash flows beyond the five-year period are extrapolated using a 3% margin growth
rate (2006 3%), which is lower than the long-term average growth rate for
the first five years. The terminal value for the Lubricants unit represents
cash flows discounted to perpetuity.
For
the Lubricants unit, the key assumptions to which the calculation of value
in use is most sensitive are operating margin, sales volumes and the discount
rate. The average values assigned to the operating margin and sales volumes
over the plan period are 65 cents per litre (2006 53 cents per litre) and
3.3 billion litres a year (2006 3.5 billion litres) respectively. These key
assumptions reflect past experience.
The
Lubricants units recoverable amount exceeds its carrying amount by $5.0 billion. Based on sensitivity analysis, it is estimated that if there is an adverse change in the
operating margin of 14 cents per litre, the recoverable amount of the Lubricants unit would equal its carrying amount. If the sales volume assumption changes by 5%, the Lubricants units value in use changes by $1.2 billion and, if there is
an adverse change in Lubricants sales volumes of 700 million litres a year, the recoverable amount of the Lubricants unit would equal its carrying amount. A change of 1% in the discount rate would change the Lubricants units value in use by
$1.2 billion and, if the discount rate increases to 19% the value in use
of the Lubricants unit would equal its carrying amount.
$ million | ||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||
Refining | Retail | Lubricants | Other | Total | ||||||
Goodwill | 1,515 | 827 | 4,175 | 109 | 6,626 | |||||
Excess of recoverable amount over carrying amount | 11,443 | 4,062 | 5,028 | n/a | n/a | |||||
$ million | ||||||||||
2006 | ||||||||||
Refining | Retail | Lubricants | Other | Total | ||||||
Goodwill | 1,328 | 841 | 4,098 | 123 | 6,390 | |||||
Excess of recoverable amount over carrying amount | n/a | 2,100 | 2,012 | n/a | n/a | |||||
125 | |
12 Distribution and administration expenses
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Distribution | 14,028 | 13,174 | 13,187 | |||
Administration | 1,343 | 1,273 | 1,325 | |||
15,371 | 14,447 | 14,512 | ||||
Innovene operations | | | (806 | ) | ||
Continuing operations | 15,371 | 14,447 | 13,706 | |||
13 Currency exchange gains and losses
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Currency exchange (gains) losses (credited) charged to income | (189 | ) | 222 | 94 | ||
Innovene operations | | | (80 | ) | ||
Continuing operations | (189 | ) | 222 | 14 | ||
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Expenditure on research and development | 566 | 395 | 502 | |||
Innovene operations | | | (128 | ) | ||
Continuing operations | 566 | 395 | 374 | |||
126 | |
15 Operating leases
The table below shows the expense for the year in respect of operating leases. Where an operating lease is entered into solely by the group as the operator of a jointly controlled asset, the total cost is included in this analysis, irrespective of any amounts that have been or will be reimbursed by joint venture partners. Where BP is not the operator of a jointly controlled asset, operating lease costs and future minimum lease payments are excluded from the information given below.
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Minimum lease payments | 4,152 | 3,647 | 2,743 | |||
Contingent rentals | 105 | 13 | (6 | ) | ||
Sub-lease rentals | (191 | ) | (131 | ) | (114 | ) |
4,066 | 3,529 | 2,623 | ||||
Innovene operations | | | (49 | ) | ||
Continuing operations | 4,066 | 3,529 | 2,574 | |||
In addition to the above,
where operating lease costs are incurred in relation to the hire of equipment
used in connection with a capital
project,
some or all of the cost may be capitalized as part of the capital cost of the
project. For 2007, $1,300 million (2006 $895 million) of the cost for
the year has been capitalized.
The
future minimum lease payments at 31 December, before deducting related
rental income from operating sub-leases
of $618 million (2006 $626 million and 2005 $718 million),
are shown in the table below. This does not include future contingent rentals.
Where the lease rentals are dependent on a variable factor, the future minimum
lease payments are based on the factor as at inception of the lease.
$ million | ||||
Future minimum lease payments | 2007 | 2006 | ||
Payable within | ||||
1 year | 3,780 | 3,428 | ||
2 to 5 years | 7,660 | 8,440 | ||
Thereafter | 5,498 | 5,684 | ||
16,938 | 17,552 | |||
The following additional disclosures represent the net operating lease expense
and net future minimum lease payments, after deducting amounts reimbursed,
or to be reimbursed, by joint venture partners.
Where
BP is not the operator of a jointly controlled asset, operating lease costs
and future minimum lease payments are excluded from the information given
below.
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Minimum lease payments | 3,100 | 2,924 | 1,847 | |||
Contingent rentals | 80 | 13 | (6 | ) | ||
Sub-lease rentals | (183 | ) | (131 | ) | (110 | ) |
2,997 | 2,806 | 1,731 | ||||
Innovene operations | | | (49 | ) | ||
Continuing operations | 2,997 | 2,806 | 1,682 | |||
$ million | ||||
Future minimum lease payments | 2007 | 2006 | ||
Payable within | ||||
1 year | 2,826 | 2,732 | ||
2 to 5 years | 6,519 | 7,290 | ||
Thereafter | 5,050 | 5,221 | ||
14,395 | 15,243 | |||
The group enters into operating leases of ships, plant and machinery, commercial vehicles and land and buildings. Typical durations of the leases are as follows:
Years | |
Ships | up to 20 |
Plant and machinery | up to 10 |
Commercial vehicles | up to 15 |
Land and buildings | up to 40 |
127 | |
The group has entered into a number of structured operating leases for ships
and in most cases the lease rental payments vary with market interest rates.
The variable portion of the lease payments above or below the amount based
on the market interest rate prevailing at inception of the lease is treated
as contingent rental expense, but the amounts of such contingent rentals
are not significant for the years presented. The group also routinely enters
into
bareboat charters, time-charters and spot-charters for ships on standard industry
terms.
The most significant
items of plant and machinery hired under operating leases are drilling rigs
used in
the Exploration and Production segment. In some cases, drilling rig lease
rental rates are adjusted periodically to market rates that are influenced
by oil prices and may be significantly different from the rates at the
inception of the lease. Differences between the rate paid and rate at inception
of
the lease are treated as
contingent rental expense.
Commercial
vehicles hired under operating leases are primarily railcars. Retail service
station sites and
office accommodation are the main items in the land and buildings
category.
The terms and conditions of these
operating leases do not impose any significant financial restrictions on the
group. Some of the leases of ships and buildings allow for renewals at
BPs option.
16 Exploration for and evaluation of oil and natural gas resources
The following financial information represents the amounts included within the group totals relating to activity associated with the exploration for and evaluation of oil and natural gas resources. All such activity is recorded within the Exploration and Production segment.
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Exploration and evaluation costs | ||||||
Exploration expenditure written off | 347 | 624 | 305 | |||
Other exploration costs | 409 | 421 | 379 | |||
Exploration expense for the year | 756 | 1,045 | 684 | |||
|
||||||
Intangible assets exploration expenditure | 5,252 | 4,110 | 4,008 | |||
Net assets | 5,252 | 4,110 | 4,008 | |||
|
||||||
Capital expenditure | 2,000 | 1,537 | 950 | |||
|
||||||
Net cash used in operating activities | 409 | 421 | 379 | |||
Net cash used in investing activities | 2,000 | 1,498 | 950 | |||
|
$ million | ||||||
Fees Ernst & Young | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||
Fees payable to the companys auditors for the audit of the companys accountsa | 18 | 15 | 19 | |||
Fees payable to the companys auditors and its associates for other services | ||||||
Audit of the companys subsidiaries pursuant to legislation | 31 | 31 | 34 | |||
Other services pursuant to legislation | 14 | 15 | 6 | |||
63 | 61 | 59 | ||||
Tax services | 2 | 1 | 10 | |||
Services relating to corporate finance transactions | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
All other services | 8 | 9 | 23 | |||
Audit fees in respect of the BP pension plans | 1 | | 1 | |||
75 | 73 | 96 | ||||
Innovene operations | | | (9 | ) | ||
Continuing operations | 75 | 73 | 87 | |||
|
a | Fees in respect of the audit of the accounts of BP p.l.c. including the groups consolidated financial statements. |
Total fees for 2007 include $7 million of additional fees for 2006 (2006
includes $5 million of additional fees for 2005 and 2005 includes $4
million of additional fees for 2004). Auditors remuneration is included
in the income statement within distribution and administration
expenses.
The tax services relate to income tax and indirect tax compliance, employee tax
services and tax advisory services.
The
audit committee has established pre-approval policies and procedures for
the engagement of Ernst & Young to render audit and certain assurance and tax services. The audit fees
payable to Ernst & Young are reviewed by the audit committee in the context of other global companies for cost-effectiveness. Ernst & Young performed further assurance and tax services that were not prohibited by regulatory or other
professional requirements and were pre-approved by the committee. Ernst & Young is engaged for these services when its expertise and experience of BP are important. Most of this work is of an audit nature. Tax services were awarded either
through a full competitive tender process or following an assessment of the expertise of Ernst & Young
compared with that of other potential service providers. These services are for
a fixed term.
128 | |
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Bank loans and overdrafts | 89 | 130 | 44 | |||
Other loans | 1,302 | 1,020 | 828 | |||
Finance leases | 42 | 46 | 38 | |||
Interest payable | 1,433 | 1,196 | 910 | |||
Capitalized at 5.70% (2006 5.25% and 2005 4.25%)a | (323 | ) | (478 | ) | (351 | ) |
Early redemption of borrowings and finance leases | | | 57 | |||
1,110 | 718 | 616 | ||||
|
a | Tax relief on capitalized interest is $81 million (2006 $182 million and 2005 $123 million). |
19 Other finance income and expense
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Interest on pension and other post-retirement benefit plan liabilities | 2,203 | 1,940 | 2,022 | |||
Expected return on pension and other post-retirement benefit plan assets | (2,855 | ) | (2,410 | ) | (2,138 | ) |
Interest net of expected return on plan assets | (652 | ) | (470 | ) | (116 | ) |
Unwinding of discount on provisions | 283 | 245 | 201 | |||
Unwinding of discount on deferred consideration for acquisition of investment in TNK-BP | | 23 | 57 | |||
(369 | ) | (202 | ) | 142 | ||
Innovene operations | | | 3 | |||
Continuing operations | (369 | ) | (202 | ) | 145 | |
|
$ million | ||||||
Tax on profit | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||
Current tax | ||||||
Charge for the year | 10,006 | 11,199 | 10,511 | |||
Adjustment in respect of prior years | (171 | ) | 442 | (977 | ) | |
9,835 | 11,641 | 9,534 | ||||
Innovene operations | | 159 | (910 | ) | ||
Continuing operations | 9,835 | 11,800 | 8,624 | |||
Deferred tax | ||||||
Origination and reversal of temporary differences in the current year | 671 | 1,956 | 164 | |||
Adjustment in respect of prior years | (64 | ) | (1,240 | ) | (450 | ) |
607 | 716 | (286 | ) | |||
Innovene operations | | | 950 | |||
Continuing operations | 607 | 716 | 664 | |||
Tax on profit from continuing operations | 10,442 | 12,516 | 9,288 | |||
|
||||||
Tax on profit from continuing operations may be analysed as follows: | ||||||
Current tax charge | ||||||
UK | 2,067 | 2,657 | 880 | |||
Overseas | 7,768 | 9,143 | 7,744 | |||
9,835 | 11,800 | 8,624 | ||||
Deferred tax charge | ||||||
UK | 216 | 500 | (489 | ) | ||
Overseas | 391 | 216 | 1,153 | |||
607 | 716 | 664 | ||||
Total | ||||||
UK | 2,283 | 3,157 | 391 | |||
Overseas | 8,159 | 9,359 | 8,897 | |||
10,442 | 12,516 | 9,288 | ||||
|
129 | |
20 Taxation continued
$ million | ||||||
Tax included in the statement of recognized income and expense | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||
Current tax | (178 | ) | (51 | ) | 45 | |
Deferred tax | 241 | 985 | 214 | |||
63 | 934 | 259 | ||||
|
||||||
This comprises: | ||||||
Currency translation differences | (139 | ) | 201 | (11 | ) | |
Exchange gain on translation of foreign operations transferred to loss on sale of businesses | | | (95 | ) | ||
Actuarial gain relating to pensions and other post-retirement benefits | 427 | 820 | 356 | |||
Share-based payments | (213 | ) | (26 | ) | | |
Cash flow hedges | (26 | ) | 47 | (63 | ) | |
Available-for-sale investments | 14 | (108 | ) | 72 | ||
63 | 934 | 259 | ||||
|
Reconciliation of the effective tax rate
The following table provides a reconciliation of the UK statutory corporation
tax rate to the effective tax rate of the group on profit before taxation from
continuing operations.
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Profit before taxation from continuing operations | 31,611 | 35,142 | 31,421 | |||
|
||||||
Tax on profit from continuing operations | 10,442 | 12,516 | 9,288 | |||
Effective tax rate | 33 | % | 36 | % | 30 | % |
|
||||||
% of profit before taxation from continuing operations | ||||||
UK statutory corporation tax rate | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||
Increase (decrease) resulting from | ||||||
UK supplementary and overseas taxes at higher rates | 7 | 11 | 9 | |||
Tax reported in equity-accounted entities | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) |
Adjustments in respect of prior years | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | (3 | ) |
Restructuring benefits | | | (1 | ) | ||
Current year losses unrelieved (prior year losses utilized) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (3 | ) |
Other | | 1 | 1 | |||
Effective tax rate | 33 | 36 | 30 | |||
Deferred tax | $ million | |||||||||||
Income statement | Balance sheet | |||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||
Deferred tax liability | ||||||||||||
Depreciation | (54 | ) | 1,484 | (778 | ) | 21,757 | 21,463 | |||||
Pension plan surplus | 127 | 173 | 170 | 2,136 | 1,733 | |||||||
Other taxable temporary differences | 1,371 | 417 | 887 | 5,998 | 4,895 | |||||||
1,444 | 2,074 | 279 | 29,891 | 28,091 | ||||||||
Deferred tax asset | ||||||||||||
Petroleum revenue tax | 139 | 4 | 121 | (325 | ) | (457 | ) | |||||
Pension plan and other post-retirement benefit plan deficits | (72 | ) | 71 | 220 | (1,545 | ) | (1,824 | ) | ||||
Decommissioning, environmental and other provisions | (759 | ) | (615 | ) | (329 | ) | (3,746 | ) | (2,960 | ) | ||
Derivative financial instruments | 450 | (115 | ) | (629 | ) | (541 | ) | (974 | ) | |||
Tax credit and loss carry forward | (466 | ) | 220 | (245 | ) | (1,822 | ) | (1,118 | ) | |||
Other deductible temporary differences | (129 | ) | (923 | ) | 297 | (2,697 | ) | (2,642 | ) | |||
(837 | ) | (1,358 | ) | (565 | ) | (10,676 | ) | (9,975 | ) | |||
Net deferred tax liability | 607 | 716 | (286 | ) | 19,215 | 18,116 | ||||||
$ million | ||||||||||||
Analysis of movements during the year | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
At 1 January | 18,116 | 16,258 | ||||||||||
Exchange adjustments | 42 | 175 | ||||||||||
Charge for the year on ordinary activities | 607 | 716 | ||||||||||
Charge for the year in the statement of recognized income and expense | 241 | 985 | ||||||||||
Acquisitions | 199 | | ||||||||||
Other movements | 10 | (18 | ) | |||||||||
At 31 December | 19,215 | 18,116 | ||||||||||
130 | |
20 Taxation continued
Factors that may affect future tax charges
The
group earns income in many different countries and, on average, pays taxes at
rates higher than the rate of UK corporation tax. The overall
impact of these higher taxes, which include the supplementary charge on UK
North Sea profits, is subject to changes in enacted tax rates and the country
mix of the groups income.
The
2007 effective tax rate for the group reflects the impact of the use of
capital and other losses in the UK and
mainland Europe and audit closure of a variety of worldwide issues. The enactment
of a 2% reduction in the rate of UK corporation tax on profits arising from activities
outside the North Sea reduced the tax charge by $189 million.
Under
IFRS, the results of equity-accounted entities are reported within the
groups profit before taxation on a post-tax
basis. The impact of this treatment in 2007 has been to reduce the reported effective
tax rate by around 2%. This effect is expected to continue for the foreseeable
future assuming similar income levels from the entities.
At 31 December 2007, deferred tax liabilities were recognized for all taxable temporary differences: | |
– | Except where the deferred tax liability arises on goodwill that is not tax deductible or the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss. |
– | In respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled by the group and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. |
At 31 December 2007, deferred tax assets were recognized for all deductible temporary differences, carry forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences and the carry forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses can be utilized: |
– | Except where the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss. |
– | In respect of deductible temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates, deferred tax assets are only recognized to the extent that it is probable that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilized. |
The group has around $5.0 billion (2006 $4.9 billion) of carry-forward tax losses, predominantly in Europe, which would be available to offset against future taxable income. These tax losses do not have a fixed expiry date. At the end of 2007, a net deferred tax asset of $286 million was recognized on these losses (2006 $216 million). The gross deferred tax asset recognized for the losses was $972 million (2006 $680 million), of which $686 million (2006 $458 million) was offset by deferred tax liabilities. Deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is considered more likely than not that suitable taxable income will arise. | |
At the end of 2007, the group had around $4.1 billion (2006 $2.0 billion) of unused tax credits in the UK and US, in respect of which no net deferred tax assets have been recognized. A gross deferred tax asset of $820 million has been recognized in 2007 for these credits (2006 $459 million), which is offset by a gross deferred tax liability associated with unremitted profits from overseas entities in jurisdictions with a lower tax rate than the UK. The UK tax credits do not have a fixed expiry date. The US tax credits expire ten years after generation. In 2007, $411 million of tax credits were utilized (2006 $828 million and 2005 $774 million). | |
The major components of temporary differences at the end of the current year are tax depreciation, US inventory holding gains (classified under other taxable temporary differences) and provisions. |
pence per share | cents per share | $ million | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Dividends announced and paid | ||||||||||||||||||
Preference shares | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Ordinary shares | ||||||||||||||||||
March | 5.258 | 5.288 | 4.522 | 10.325 | 9.375 | 8.500 | 2,000 | 1,922 | 1,823 | |||||||||
June | 5.151 | 5.251 | 4.450 | 10.325 | 9.375 | 8.500 | 1,983 | 1,893 | 1,808 | |||||||||
September | 5.278 | 5.324 | 5.119 | 10.825 | 9.825 | 8.925 | 2,065 | 1,943 | 1,871 | |||||||||
December | 5.308 | 5.241 | 5.061 | 10.825 | 9.825 | 8.925 | 2,056 | 1,926 | 1,855 | |||||||||
20.995 | 21.104 | 19.152 | 42.300 | 38.400 | 34.850 | 8,106 | 7,686 | 7,359 | ||||||||||
Dividend
announced per ordinary share, payable in March
2008 |
6.813 | | | 13.525 | | | 2,554 | | | |||||||||
The group does not account for dividends until they are paid. The accounts for the year ended 31 December 2007 do not reflect the dividend announced on 5 February 2008 and payable in March 2008; this will be treated as an appropriation of profit in the year ended 31 December 2008.
131 | |
22 Earnings per ordinary share
cents per share | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Basic earnings per share | 108.76 | 111.41 | 104.25 | |||
Diluted earnings per share | 107.84 | 110.56 | 103.05 | |||
|
Basic earnings per ordinary share amounts are calculated by dividing the profit
for the year attributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted average
number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year. The average number of
shares outstanding excludes treasury shares and the shares held by the Employee
Share Ownership Plans.
For
the diluted earnings per share calculation, the weighted average number of
shares outstanding during the year is adjusted for the number of shares that
would be issued in connection with employee share-based payment plans using
the treasury stock method. In addition, for 2006 and 2005, the profit attributable
to ordinary shareholders has been adjusted for the unwinding of the discount
on the deferred consideration for the
acquisition of our interest in TNK-BP and the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the year has been adjusted for the number of shares to be
issued for the deferred consideration for the acquisition of our interest in
TNK-BP.
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Profit from continuing operations attributable to BP shareholders | 20,845 | 22,340 | 21,842 | |||
Less dividend requirements on preference shares | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
Profit from continuing operations attributable to BP ordinary shareholders | 20,843 | 22,338 | 21,840 | |||
Profit (loss) from discontinued operations | | (25 | ) | 184 | ||
20,843 | 22,313 | 22,024 | ||||
Unwinding of discount on deferred consideration for acquisition of investment in TNK-BP (net of tax) | | 16 | 40 | |||
Diluted profit for the year attributable to BP ordinary shareholders | 20,843 | 22,329 | 22,064 | |||
shares thousand | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Basic weighted average number of ordinary shares | 19,163,389 | 20,027,527 | 21,125,902 | |||
Potential dilutive effect of ordinary shares issuable under employee share schemes | 163,486 | 109,813 | 87,743 | |||
Potential dilutive effect of ordinary shares issuable as consideration for BPs interest in the TNK-BP joint venture | | 58,118 | 197,802 | |||
19,326,875 | 20,195,458 | 21,411,447 | ||||
|
The number of ordinary shares outstanding at 31 December 2007, excluding treasury
shares, was 18,922,785,598. Between 31 December 2007 and 19 February 2008,
the latest practicable date before the completion of these financial statements,
there has been a net decrease of 44,539,157 in the number of ordinary shares
outstanding as a result of share buybacks net of share issues. The number of
potential ordinary shares issuable through the exercise of employee share schemes
was 154,039,764 at 31 December 2007. There has been a decrease of 10,797,601
in the number of potential ordinary shares between 31 December 2007 and 19
February 2008.
Earnings
(loss) per share for the discontinued operations is derived from the net
profit (loss) attributable to
ordinary shareholders from discontinued operations of $nil (2006 $25
million loss and 2005 $184 million profit), divided by the weighted average
number of ordinary shares for both basic and diluted amounts as shown above.
132 | |
23 Property, plant and equipment
$ million | |||||||||||||||||
Land and | Plant, | Fixtures, fittings | Oil depots, | ||||||||||||||
land | Oil and gas | machinery | and office | storage tanks and | |||||||||||||
improvements | Buildings | properties | and equipment | equipment | Transportation | service stations | Total | ||||||||||
Cost | |||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2007 | 4,442 | 3,129 | 123,493 | 32,203 | 3,006 | 11,930 | 11,076 | 189,279 | |||||||||
Exchange adjustments | 271 | 148 | 22 | 1,182 | 73 | 32 | 733 | 2,461 | |||||||||
Acquisitions | | | | 910 | | | | 910 | |||||||||
Additions | 78 | 171 | 12,107 | 3,662 | 466 | 181 | 643 | 17,308 | |||||||||
Transfers | | | 422 | | | | | 422 | |||||||||
Reclassified as assets held for sale | (16 | ) | | | (1,114 | ) | | | | (1,130 | ) | ||||||
Deletions | (259 | ) | (298 | ) | (1,429 | ) | (478 | ) | (376 | ) | (277 | ) | (1,042 | ) | (4,159 | ) | |
At 31 December 2007 | 4,516 | 3,150 | 134,615 | 36,365 | 3,169 | 11,866 | 11,410 | 205,091 | |||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | |||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2007 | 675 | 1,470 | 66,189 | 16,189 | 1,762 | 6,876 | 5,119 | 98,280 | |||||||||
Exchange adjustments | 25 | 89 | 19 | 556 | 45 | 16 | 299 | 1,049 | |||||||||
Charge for the year | 52 | 98 | 7,370 | 1,266 | 341 | 373 | 741 | 10,241 | |||||||||
Impairment losses | 86 | 62 | 189 | 236 | 9 | 14 | 643 | 1,239 | |||||||||
Impairment reversals | | | (237 | ) | | | | | (237 | ) | |||||||
Reclassified as assets held for sale | (9 | ) | | | (486 | ) | | | | (495 | ) | ||||||
Deletions | (111 | ) | (186 | ) | (1,044 | ) | (344 | ) | (337 | ) | (153 | ) | (800 | ) | (2,975 | ) | |
At 31 December 2007 | 718 | 1,533 | 72,486 | 17,417 | 1,820 | 7,126 | 6,002 | 107,102 | |||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net book amount at 31 December 2007 | 3,798 | 1,617 | 62,129 | 18,948 | 1,349 | 4,740 | 5,408 | 97,989 | |||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Cost | |||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2006 | 4,576 | 2,835 | 114,413 | 30,341 | 2,247 | 13,196 | 11,100 | 178,708 | |||||||||
Exchange adjustments | 255 | 239 | 72 | 1,028 | 138 | 27 | 517 | 2,276 | |||||||||
Acquisitions | | | | 16 | | | | 16 | |||||||||
Additions | 81 | 381 | 11,264 | 2,146 | 841 | 22 | 918 | 15,653 | |||||||||
Transfersa | | | (628 | ) | | (1 | ) | | | (629 | ) | ||||||
Reclassified as assets held for sale | (15 | ) | (1 | ) | | (842 | ) | | (1 | ) | (47 | ) | (906 | ) | |||
Deletions | (455 | ) | (325 | ) | (1,628 | ) | (486 | ) | (219 | ) | (1,314 | ) | (1,412 | ) | (5,839 | ) | |
At 31 December 2006 | 4,442 | 3,129 | 123,493 | 32,203 | 3,006 | 11,930 | 11,076 | 189,279 | |||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | |||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2006 | 709 | 1,437 | 62,192 | 14,978 | 1,450 | 7,034 | 4,961 | 92,761 | |||||||||
Exchange adjustments | 15 | 147 | 54 | 552 | 107 | 12 | 154 | 1,041 | |||||||||
Charge for the year | 52 | 149 | 6,214 | 1,059 | 418 | 301 | 718 | 8,911 | |||||||||
Impairment losses | 87 | 5 | 4 | 98 | | 1 | 9 | 204 | |||||||||
Impairment reversals | | | (340 | ) | | | | | (340 | ) | |||||||
Transfersb | | | (887 | ) | | (1 | ) | | | (888 | ) | ||||||
Reclassified as assets held for sale | | (1 | ) | | (325 | ) | | (1 | ) | (15 | ) | (342 | ) | ||||
Deletions | (188 | ) | (267 | ) | (1,048 | ) | (173 | ) | (212 | ) | (471 | ) | (708 | ) | (3,067 | ) | |
At 31 December 2006 | 675 | 1,470 | 66,189 | 16,189 | 1,762 | 6,876 | 5,119 | 98,280 | |||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net book amount at 31 December 2006 | 3,767 | 1,659 | 57,304 | 16,014 | 1,244 | 5,054 | 5,957 | 90,999 | |||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Assets held under finance leases at | |||||||||||||||||
net book amount included above | |||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2007 | | 17 | 155 | 185 | | 11 | 24 | 392 | |||||||||
At 31 December 2006 | 5 | 18 | 42 | 341 | 1 | 9 | 29 | 445 | |||||||||
|
Decommissioning asset at net book amount included above | ||||||
Cost | Depreciation | Net | ||||
At 31 December 2007 | 7,851 | 3,328 | 4,523 | |||
At 31 December 2006 | 6,391 | 2,558 | 3,833 | |||
Assets under construction included above | ||||||
At 31 December 2007 | 18,658 | |||||
At 31 December 2006 | 17,800 | |||||
a | Includes $1,087 million transferred to equity-accounted investments. |
b | Includes $890 million transferred to equity-accounted investments. |
133 | |
$ million | ||||
2007 | 2006 | |||
Cost and net book amount | ||||
At 1 January | 10,780 | 10,371 | ||
Exchange adjustments | 126 | 524 | ||
Acquisitions | 270 | 64 | ||
Reclassified as assets held for sale | (90 | ) | (60 | ) |
Deletions | (80 | ) | (119 | ) |
At 31 December | 11,006 | 10,780 | ||
|
$ million | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||
Exploration | Other | Exploration | Other | |||||||||
expenditure | intangibles | Total | expenditure | intangibles | Total | |||||||
Cost | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 4,590 | 2,128 | 6,718 | 4,661 | 1,740 | 6,401 | ||||||
Exchange adjustments | 3 | 49 | 52 | 2 | 50 | 52 | ||||||
Acquisitions | | 35 | 35 | | 187 | 187 | ||||||
Additions | 2,000 | 548 | 2,548 | 1,537 | 378 | 1,915 | ||||||
Transfersa | (506 | ) | | (506 | ) | (698 | ) | | (698 | ) | ||
Deletions | (450 | ) | (130 | ) | (580 | ) | (912 | ) | (227 | ) | (1,139 | ) |
At 31 December | 5,637 | 2,630 | 8,267 | 4,590 | 2,128 | 6,718 | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
Amortization | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 480 | 992 | 1,472 | 653 | 976 | 1,629 | ||||||
Exchange adjustments | | 25 | 25 | | 20 | 20 | ||||||
Charge for the year | 347 | 338 | 685 | 624 | 217 | 841 | ||||||
Transfers | | | | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | ||||
Impairment losses | | | | 109 | | 109 | ||||||
Deletions | (442 | ) | (125 | ) | (567 | ) | (904 | ) | (221 | ) | (1,125 | ) |
At 31 December | 385 | 1,230 | 1,615 | 480 | 992 | 1,472 | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
Net book amount at 31 December | 5,252 | 1,400 | 6,652 | 4,110 | 1,136 | 5,246 | ||||||
|
a | Included in transfers of exploration expenditure is $84 million (2006 $240 million) transferred to equity-accounted investments. |
134 | |
26 Investments in jointly controlled entities
The significant jointly controlled entities of the BP group at 31 December 2007 are shown in Note 46. The principal joint venture is the TNK-BP joint venture. Summarized financial information for the groups share of jointly controlled entities is shown below.
$ million | |||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
TNK-BP | Other | Total | TNK-BP | Other | Total | TNK-BP | Other | Total | |||
Sales and other operating revenues | 19,463 | 7,245 | 26,708 | 17,863 | 6,119 | 23,982 | 15,122 | 4,255 | 19,377 | ||
Profit before interest and taxation | 3,743 | 1,299 | 5,042 | 4,616 | 1,218 | 5,834 | 3,817 | 779 | 4,596 | ||
Finance costs and other finance expense | 264 | 176 | 440 | 192 | 169 | 361 | 128 | 104 | 232 | ||
Profit before taxation | 3,479 | 1,123 | 4,602 | 4,424 | 1,049 | 5,473 | 3,689 | 675 | 4,364 | ||
Taxation | 993 | 259 | 1,252 | 1,467 | 260 | 1,727 | 976 | 220 | 1,196 | ||
Minority interest | 215 | | 215 | 193 | | 193 | 104 | | 104 | ||
Profit for the yeara | 2,271 | 864 | 3,135 | 2,764 | 789 | 3,553 | 2,609 | 455 | 3,064 | ||
Innovene operations | | | | | | | | 19 | 19 | ||
Continuing operations | 2,271 | 864 | 3,135 | 2,764 | 789 | 3,553 | 2,609 | 474 | 3,083 | ||
|
|||||||||||
Non-current assets | 12,433 | 9,841 | 22,274 | 11,243 | 7,612 | 18,855 | |||||
Current assets | 6,073 | 2,642 | 8,715 | 5,403 | 2,184 | 7,587 | |||||
Total assets | 18,506 | 12,483 | 30,989 | 16,646 | 9,796 | 26,442 | |||||
Current liabilities | 3,547 | 1,552 | 5,099 | 3,594 | 1,272 | 4,866 | |||||
Non-current liabilities | 5,562 | 3,620 | 9,182 | 4,226 | 3,370 | 7,596 | |||||
Total liabilities | 9,109 | 5,172 | 14,281 | 7,820 | 4,642 | 12,462 | |||||
Minority interest | 580 | | 580 | 473 | | 473 | |||||
8,817 | 7,311 | 16,128 | 8,353 | 5,154 | 13,507 | ||||||
|
|||||||||||
Group investment in jointly controlled entities | |||||||||||
Group share of net assets (as above) | 8,817 | 7,311 | 16,128 | 8,353 | 5,154 | 13,507 | |||||
Loans
made by group companies to jointly controlled entities |
| 1,985 | 1,985 | | 1,567 | 1,567 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
8,817 | 9,296 | 18,113 | 8,353 | 6,721 | 15,074 | ||||||
|
a | BPs share of the profit of TNK-BP in 2006 includes a net gain of $892 million (2005 $270 million) on the disposal of certain assets. |
Transactions between the significant jointly controlled entities and the group are summarized below. In addition to the amount receivable at 31 December 2005 shown below, a further $771 million was receivable from TNK-BP in respect of dividends: there was no dividend receivable at 31 December 2007 or at 31 December 2006.
Sales to jointly controlled entities | $ million | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
Amount | Amount | Amount | ||||||
receivable at | receivable at | receivable at | ||||||
Product | Sales | 31 December | Sales | 31 December | Sales | 31 December | ||
Atlantic 4 Holdings | LNG | 583 | 142 | 227 | 35 | | | |
Atlantic LNG 2/3 Company of Trinidad and Tobago | LNG | 989 | 137 | 1,123 | 99 | 1,157 | | |
Pan American Energy | Crude oil | 240 | 1 | 389 | | 75 | 2 | |
Ruhr Oel | Employee services | 374 | 539 | 330 | 597 | 169 | 527 | |
TNK-BP | Employee services | 150 | 69 | 189 | 99 | 125 | 14 | |
|
|
|||||||
Purchases from jointly controlled entities | $ million | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
Amount | Amount | Amount | ||||||
payable at | payable at | payable at | ||||||
Product | Purchases | 31 December | Purchases | 31 December | Purchases | 31 December | ||
Atlantic LNG 2/3 Company of Trinidad and Tobago | Plant
processing fee/natural gas |
241 | | 254 | | 190 | | |
Pan American Energy | Crude oil | 6 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 661 | 81 | |
Ruhr Oel | Refinery
operating costs |
902 | 18 | 758 | 32 | 384 | 134 | |
TNK-BP | Crude
oil and oil products |
918 | 46 | 2,662 | 85 | 908 | 17 | |
|
|
|
The terms of the outstanding balances receivable from jointly controlled entities are typically 30 to 45 days, except for the receivable from Ruhr Oel, which will be paid over several years as it relates partly to pension payments. The balances are unsecured and will be settled in cash. There are no significant provisions for doubtful debts relating to these balances and no significant expense recognized in the income statement in respect of bad or doubtful debts.
135 | |
The significant associates of the group are shown in Note 46. Summarized financial information for the groups share of associates is set out below.
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Sales and other operating revenues | 9,855 | 8,792 | 6,879 | |||
Profit before interest and taxation | 947 | 669 | 665 | |||
Finance costs and other finance expense | 57 | 63 | 57 | |||
Profit before taxation | 890 | 606 | 608 | |||
Taxation | 193 | 164 | 143 | |||
Profit for the year | 697 | 442 | 465 | |||
Innovene operations | | | (5 | ) | ||
Continuing operations | 697 | 442 | 460 | |||
|
||||||
Non-current assets | 5,012 | 6,573 | ||||
Current assets | 2,308 | 2,294 | ||||
Total assets | 7,320 | 8,867 | ||||
Current liabilities | 1,801 | 2,029 | ||||
Non-current liabilities | 2,423 | 2,600 | ||||
Total liabilities | 4,224 | 4,629 | ||||
Net assets | 3,096 | 4,238 | ||||
|
||||||
Group investment in associates | ||||||
Group share of net assets (as above) | 3,096 | 4,238 | ||||
Loans made by group companies to associates | 1,483 | 1,737 | ||||
4,579 | 5,975 | |||||
|
Transactions between the significant associates and the group are summarized below.
Sales to associates | $ million | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
Amount | Amount | Amount | ||||||
receivable at | receivable at | receivable at | ||||||
Product | Sales | 31 December | Sales | 31 December | Sales | 31 December | ||
Atlantic LNG Company of Trinidad and Tobago | LNG | 611 | 58 | 635 | 62 | 579 | | |
The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Co. |
Crude oil/employee services |
86 | 2 | 112 | 4 | 99 | 3 | |
|
|
Purchases from associates | $ million | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
Amount | Amount | Amount | ||||||
payable at | payable at | payable at | ||||||
Product | Purchases | 31 December | Purchases | 31 December | Purchases | 31 December | ||
Abu Dhabi Marine Areas | Crude oil | 547 | 303 | 866 | 91 | 1,355 | 164 | |
Abu Dhabi Petroleum Co. | Crude oil | 1,964 | 229 | 1,547 | 145 | 2,260 | 214 | |
The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Co. | Transportation
tariff |
394 | 42 | 155 | | | | |
|
The terms of the outstanding balances receivable from associates are typically 30 to 45 days. The balances are unsecured and will be settled in cash. There are no significant provisions for doubtful debts relating to these balances and no significant expense recognized in the income statement in respect of bad or doubtful debts.
136 | |
28 Financial instruments and financial risk factors
The accounting classification of each category of financial instruments, and their carrying amounts, are set out below.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||||||
Financial | ||||||||||||||
Available-for- | At fair value | Derivative | liabilities | |||||||||||
Loans and | sale financial | through profit | hedging | measured at | Total carrying | |||||||||
Note | receivables | assets | and loss | instruments | amortized cost | amount | ||||||||
Financial assets | ||||||||||||||
Other investments listed | 29 | | 1,617 | | | | 1,617 | |||||||
Other investments unlisted | 29 | | 213 | | | | 213 | |||||||
Loans | 1,164 | | | | | 1,164 | ||||||||
Trade and other receivables | 31 | 38,710 | | | | | 38,710 | |||||||
Derivative financial instruments | 34 | | | 9,155 | 907 | | 10,062 | |||||||
Cash at bank and in hand | 32 | 2,996 | | | | | 2,996 | |||||||
Cash equivalents listed | 32 | | 3 | | | | 3 | |||||||
Cash equivalents unlisted | 32 | | 563 | | | | 563 | |||||||
Financial liabilities | ||||||||||||||
Trade and other payables | 33 | | | | | (40,062 | ) | (40,062 | ) | |||||
Derivative financial instruments | 34 | | | (11,284 | ) | (123 | ) | | (11,407 | ) | ||||
Accruals | | | | | (7,599 | ) | (7,599 | ) | ||||||
Finance debt | 35 | | | | | (31,045 | ) | (31,045 | ) | |||||
42,870 | 2,396 | (2,129 | ) | 784 | (78,706 | ) | (34,785 | ) | ||||||
|
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2006 | ||||||||||||||
Financial | ||||||||||||||
Available-for- | At fair value | Derivative | liabilities | |||||||||||
Loans and | sale financial | through profit | hedging | measured at | Total carrying | |||||||||
Note | receivables | assets | and loss | instruments | amortized cost | amount | ||||||||
Financial assets | ||||||||||||||
Other investments listed | 29 | | 1,516 | | | | 1,516 | |||||||
Other investments unlisted | 29 | | 181 | | | | 181 | |||||||
Loans | 958 | | | | | 958 | ||||||||
Trade and other receivables | 31 | 38,474 | | | | | 38,474 | |||||||
Derivative financial instruments | 34 | | | 12,811 | 587 | | 13,398 | |||||||
Cash at bank and in hand | 32 | 2,052 | | | | | 2,052 | |||||||
Cash equivalents listed | 32 | | 29 | | | | 29 | |||||||
Cash equivalents unlisted | 32 | | 509 | | | | 509 | |||||||
Financial liabilities | ||||||||||||||
Trade and other payables | 33 | | | | | (38,227 | ) | (38,227 | ) | |||||
Derivative financial instruments | 34 | | | (13,490 | ) | (137 | ) | | (13,627 | ) | ||||
Accruals | | | | | (7,108 | ) | (7,108 | ) | ||||||
Finance debt | 35 | | | | | (24,010 | ) | (24,010 | ) | |||||
41,484 | 2,235 | (679 | ) | 450 | (69,345 | ) | (25,855 | ) | ||||||
|
The fair value of finance debt is shown in Note 35. For all other financial instruments, the carrying amount is either the fair value, or approximates the fair value.
Financial risk factors
The group is exposed to a number of different financial risks arising from natural business exposures as well as its use of financial instruments including market risks relating to commodity prices, foreign currency
exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices, credit risk and liquidity risk.
The
group financial risk committee (GFRC) advises the group chief financial
officer (CFO) who oversees the management
of these risks. The GFRC is chaired by the CFO and consists of a group of senior
managers including the group treasurer and the heads of the finance and the integrated
supply and trading functions. The purpose of the committee is to advise on financial
risks and the appropriate financial risk governance framework for
the group. The committee provides assurance to the CFO and the group chief executive
(GCE), and via the GCE to the board, that the groups financial risk-taking
activity is governed by appropriate policies and procedures and that financial
risks are identified, measured and managed in accordance with group policies
and group risk appetite.
The
groups trading activities
in the oil, natural gas and power markets are managed within the integrated supply
and trading function, while activities in the financial markets are managed by
the treasury function. All derivative activity, whether for risk management or
entrepreneurial purposes, is carried out by specialist teams that have the appropriate
skills, experience and supervision. These teams are subject to close
financial and management control, meeting generally accepted industry practice
and reflecting the principles of the Group of Thirty Global Derivatives Study
recommendations.
The
integrated supply and trading function maintains formal governance processes
that provide oversight of market risk. A policy and risk committee monitors and
validates limits and risk exposures, reviews incidents and validates risk-related
policies, methodologies and procedures. A commitments committee approves value-at-risk
delegations, the trading of new products, instruments and strategies and material
commitments.
137 | |
28 Financial instruments and financial risk factors continued
(a) Market risk
Market
risk is the risk or uncertainty arising from possible market price movements
and their impact on the future performance of a business. The
market price movements that the group is exposed to include oil, natural gas
and power prices (commodity price risk), foreign currency exchange rates, interest
rates, equity prices and other indices that could adversely affect the value
of the groups financial assets, liabilities or expected future cash flows.
The group has developed policies aimed at managing the volatility inherent
in certain of its natural business exposures and in accordance with these policies
the group enters into various transactions using derivative financial and commodity
instruments
(derivatives). Derivatives are contracts whose value is derived from one or more
underlying financial or commodity instruments, indices or prices that are defined
in the contract. The group also trades derivatives in conjunction with its
risk
management activities.
The
group mainly measures its market risk exposure using value-at-risk techniques.
These techniques are based on a variance/covariance model or a Monte Carlo simulation
and make a statistical assessment of the market risk arising from possible future
changes in market prices over a 24-hour period. The calculation of the range
of potential changes in fair value takes into account a snapshot of the end-of-day
exposures and the
history of one-day price movements, together with the correlation of these price
movements.
The
trading value-at-risk model takes account of derivative financial instrument
types such as: interest rate forward and futures contracts, swap agreements,
options and swaptions; foreign exchange forward and futures contracts, swap agreements
and options; and oil, natural gas and power price forwards, futures, swap agreements
and options. Additionally, where physical commodities or non-derivative forward
contracts are held as part
of a trading position, they are also included in these calculations. For options,
a linear approximation is included in the value-at-risk models when full revaluation
is not possible. Market risk exposure in respect of embedded derivatives is not
included in the value-at-risk table. A separate sensitivity analysis is disclosed
below.
Value-at-risk
limits are in place
for each trading activity and for the groups trading activity in total. The board has delegated a limit of $100
million value at risk in support of this trading activity. The high and low values
at risk indicated in the table below for each type of activity are independent
of each other. Through the portfolio effect the high value at risk for the group
as a whole is lower than the sum of the
highs for the constituent parts. The potential movement in fair values is expressed
to a 95% confidence interval. This means that, in statistical terms, one would
expect to see an increase or a decrease in fair values greater than the trading
value
at risk on one occasion per month if the portfolio were left unchanged.
Value at risk for 1 day at 95% confidence interval | $ million | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | ||||||||
High | Low | Average | Year end | High | Low | Average | Year end | ||
Group trading | 50 | 24 | 35 | 38 | 57 | 22 | 34 | 30 | |
Oil price trading | 46 | 16 | 26 | 34 | 56 | 16 | 29 | 22 | |
Natural gas price trading | 32 | 9 | 16 | 15 | 29 | 10 | 19 | 15 | |
Power price trading | 6 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 3 | |
Currency trading | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | | 2 | | |
Interest rate trading | 11 | | 5 | 2 | 1 | | 1 | | |
Other trading | 7 | | 2 | 1 | | | | | |
|
(i) Commodity price risk
The
groups risk management policy requires the management of only certain short-term exposures in respect of its equity share of oil and natural gas production and certain of its refinery and marketing
activities. The groups integrated supply and trading function uses conventional
financial and commodity instruments and physical cargoes available in the related
commodity markets. Natural gas swaps, options and futures are used to mitigate
price risk. Power trading is undertaken using a combination of over-the-counter
forward contracts and other derivative contracts, including options and futures.
This activity is on both a standalone basis and in conjunction with gas derivatives
in
relation to gas-generated power margin. In addition, NGLs are traded around certain
US inventory locations using over-the-counter forward contracts in conjunction
with over-the-counter swaps, options and physical inventories. Trading value-at-risk
information in relation to these activities is shown in the table above.
In
addition, the group has embedded derivatives relating to certain natural gas
and LNG contracts. Key information on these contracts is given below.
At 31 December 2007 | At 31 December 2006 | |||
Remaining contract terms | 9 months to 11 years | 2 to 12 years | ||
Contractual/notional amount | 3,889 million therms | 4,968 million therms | ||
Discount rate nominal risk free | 4.5% | 4.5% | ||
Net fair value liability | $2,085 million | $2,064 million | ||
|
For these derivatives the sensitivity of the fair value to an immediate 10% favourable or adverse change in the key assumptions is as follows.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||
Gas oil and | Discount | Gas oil and | ||||||||||||||
Gas price | fuel oil price | Power price | rate | Gas price | fuel oil price | Power price | Discount rate | |||||||||
Favourable 10% change | 317 | 72 | 37 | 31 | 332 | 7 | 45 | 31 | ||||||||
Unfavourable 10% change | (368 | ) | (84 | ) | (34 | ) | (32 | ) | (341 | ) | (7 | ) | (41 | ) | (32 | ) |
|
138 | |
28 Financial instruments and financial risk factors continued
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future performance. Changes in fair value generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of change in assumption to change in fair value may not be linear. In addition, for the purposes of this analysis, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the embedded derivatives is calculated independently of any change in another assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may contribute to changes in another, which may magnify or counteract the sensitivities. Furthermore, the estimated fair values as disclosed should not be considered indicative of future earnings on these contracts.
(ii) Foreign currency exchange risk
Where the group enters into foreign currency exchange contracts for entrepreneurial trading purposes the activity is controlled using trading value-at-risk techniques as explained above. This activity is described as
currency trading in the value at risk table above.
Since
BP has global operations fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates
can have significant effects on the groups reported results. The effects of most exchange rate
fluctuations are absorbed in business operating results through changing cost competitiveness, lags in market adjustment to movements in rates and conversion differences accounted for on specific transactions. For this reason, the total effect of
exchange rate fluctuations is not identifiable separately in the groups reported results. The main underlying economic currency of the groups cash flows is the US dollar. This is because BPs major product, oil, is priced
internationally in US dollars. BPs foreign currency exchange management
policy is to minimize economic and material transactional exposures arising from
currency movements against the US dollar. The group co-ordinates the handling
of foreign currency exchange risks centrally, by netting off naturally-occurring
opposite exposures wherever possible, and then dealing with any material residual
foreign currency exchange risks.
The
group manages these exposures by constantly reviewing the foreign currency
economic value at risk and managing
such risk to keep the 12-month foreign currency value at risk below $200 million. At 31 December 2007, the foreign currency value at risk was $60 million (2006 $107
million). At no point over the past two years did the value at risk exceed the
maximum risk limit. The most significant exposures relate to capital expenditure
commitments and other UK and European operational requirements, for which a hedging
programme is in place and hedge accounting is claimed as outlined in Note 34.
For
highly probable forecast capital expenditures the group locks in the US-dollar
cost of non-US dollar supplies
by using currency futures. The main exposures are sterling and euro, and at 31
December 2007 open contracts were in place for $732 million sterling and $931 million euro capital expenditures, with over 80% of the deals maturing within two years (2006 $630 million sterling and $957
million euro capital expenditures with over 95% of the deals maturing within
two years).
For
other UK and European operational requirements the group predominantly
uses cylinders to hedge the estimated exposures
on a 12-month rolling basis at minimal cost. At 31 December 2007, the main open
positions consisted of receive sterling, pay US dollar, purchased call and sold
put options for $2,800 million; and receive euro, pay US dollar cylinders for $1,400
million.
In
addition, most of the groups borrowings are in US dollars or are hedged with respect to the US dollar. At 31 December 2007, the total of foreign currency borrowings not swapped
into US dollars amounted to $1,045 million (2006 $957 million). Of this total, $268 million (2006 $300 million) of these borrowings were denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the individual operating unit,
$191 million in Canadian dollars and $77 million in Trinidad & Tobago dollars (2006 $224 million in Canadian dollars and $76 million in Trinidad & Tobago dollars). It is estimated that a 10% change in the corresponding
exchange rates would result in an exchange gain or loss in the income statement of $27 million (2006 $30
million).
(iii) Interest rate risk
Where the group enters into money market contracts for entrepreneurial trading purposes the activity is controlled using value-at-risk techniques as described above. This activity is described as interest rate trading
in the value at risk table above.
BP
is also exposed to interest rate risk from the possibility that changes in interest
rates will affect future cash flows or the fair values of its financial instruments,
principally finance debt. While the group issues debt in a variety of currencies
based on market opportunities, it uses derivatives to swap the debt to a US dollar
exposure with an overall profile of one-third fixed rate to two-thirds floating
rate. The
proportion of floating rate debt net of interest rate swaps at 31 December 2007
was 68% of total finance debt outstanding (2006 73%). The weighted average interest
rate on finance debt is 5% (2006 5%).
The
groups earnings are sensitive to changes in interest rates on the floating rate element of the groups finance debt. If the interest rates applicable to floating rate
instruments were to have increased by 1% on 1 January 2008, it is estimated that the groups profit before taxation for 2008 would decrease by approximately $168 million (2006 $180
million). This assumes that the amount and mix of fixed and floating rate debt,
including finance leases, remains unchanged from that in place at 31 December
2007 and that the change in interest rates is effective from the beginning of
the year. Where the interest rate applicable to an instrument is
reset during a quarter it is assumed that this occurs at the beginning of the
quarter and remains unchanged for the rest of the year. In reality, the fixed/floating
rate mix will fluctuate over the year and interest rates will change continually.
Furthermore, the effect on earnings shown by this analysis does not consider
the effect of an overall reduction in economic activity that could accompany
such an increase in interest rates.
(iv) Equity price risk
The
group holds equity investments that are classified as non-current available-for-sale
financial assets and are measured initially at fair value
with changes in fair value recognized directly in equity. On disposal, accumulated
fair value changes are recycled to the income statement. Such investments are
typically made for strategic purposes. At 31 December 2007, it is estimated
that a change of 10% in equity prices would result in an immediate charge or
credit
to equity of $162 million (2006 $152 million).
At
31 December 2007, 70% of the carrying amount of non-current available-for-sale
financial assets represented one equity
investment, thus the groups exposure is concentrated on
changes in the share prices of this equity in particular. For further information
see Note 29.
(b) Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument will fail to perform or fail to pay amounts due causing financial loss to the group and arises from cash and cash equivalents,
derivative financial instruments and deposits with financial institutions and principally from credit exposures to customers relating to outstanding receivables.
139 | |
28 Financial instruments and financial risk factors continued
The
group has a credit policy, approved by the CFO, that is designed to ensure
that consistent processes are in place throughout the group to measure
and control
credit risk. Credit risk is considered as part of the risk-reward balance of
doing business. On entering into any business contract the extent to which
the arrangement exposes the group to credit risk is considered. Key requirements
of the policy are formal delegated
authorities to the sales and marketing teams to incur credit risk and to a
specialized
credit function to set counterparty limits; the establishment of credit systems
and processes to ensure that counterparties are rated and limits set; and systems
to monitor exposure against limits and report regularly on those exposures,
and immediately on any excesses, and to track and report credit losses.
The treasury
function provides a similar credit risk management activity with respect to
group-wide exposures to banks and other financial institutions.
Before
trading with a new counterparty can start, its creditworthiness is assessed
and a credit rating is allocated
that indicates the probability of default, along with a credit exposure limit.
The assessment process takes into account all available qualitative and quantitative
information about the counterparty and the group, if any, to which the counterparty
belongs. The counterpartys business activities, financial resources
and business risk management processes are taken into account in the assessment, to the extent that this information is publicly available or otherwise disclosed to the group by the counterparty, together with external credit ratings, if any,
including ratings prepared by Moodys Investor Service and Standard & Poors.
Creditworthiness continues to be evaluated after transactions have been initiated
and a watchlist of higher-risk counterparties is maintained. Once assigned
a credit rating, each counterparty is allocated a maximum exposure limit.
The
group does not aim to remove credit risk but expects to experience a certain
level of credit losses. The group attempts
to mitigate credit risk by entering into contracts that permit netting and allow
for termination of the contract on the occurrence of certain events of default.
Depending on the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the group may require
collateral or other credit enhancements such as cash deposits or letters
of credit and parent company guarantees. Trade and other derivative assets and
liabilities are presented on a net basis where unconditional netting arrangements
are in place with counterparties and where there is an intent to settle amounts
due on a net basis. The maximum credit exposure associated with financial assets
is equal to the carrying amount. At 31 December 2007, the maximum credit exposure
was $53,498 million (2006 $55,420 million). This does not take into account collateral
held of $474 million (2006 $689 million). In addition, credit exposure exists in relation to guarantees issued by group companies under which amounts outstanding at 31 December 2007 were $443 million (2006 $1,123 million) in respect
of liabilities of jointly controlled entities and associates and $601 million (2006 $789
million) in respect of liabilities of other third parties.
Notwithstanding
the processes described above, significant unexpected credit losses can
occasionally occur. Exposure
to unexpected losses increases with concentrations of credit risk that exist
when a number of counterparties are involved in similar activities or operate
in the same industry sector or geographical area, which may result in their ability
to meet contractual obligations being impacted by changes in economic, political
or other conditions. The groups principal customers, suppliers and financial
institutions with which it conducts business are located throughout the world.
In addition, these risks are managed by maintaining a group watchlist and aggregating
multi-segment exposures to ensure that a material credit risk is not missed.
Reports
are regularly prepared and
presented to the GFRC that cover the groups overall credit exposure and
expected loss trends, exposure by segment, and overall quality of the portfolio.
The reports also include details of the largest counterparties by exposure
level and expected loss, and details of counterparties on the group watchlist.
It is
estimated that over 80% of the counterparties to the contracts comprising the
derivative financial instruments in an asset position are of investment grade
credit quality.
Trade
and other receivables of the group are analysed in the table below. By comparing
the BP credit ratings to the equivalent external credit ratings, it is estimated
that approximately 65-70% of the trade receivables portfolio exposure are of
investment grade quality. With respect to the trade and other receivables that
are neither impaired nor past due, there are no indications as of the reporting
date that the debtors will not
meet their payment obligations.
The
group does not typically renegotiate the terms of trade receivables; however,
if a renegotiation does take place, the outstanding balance is included in
the analysis based on the original payment terms. There were no significant renegotiated
balances outstanding at 31 December 2007 or 31 December 2006.
$ million | ||||
|
||||
Trade and other receivables at 31 December | 2007 | 2006 | ||
|
||||
Neither impaired nor past due | 35,167 | 34,737 | ||
Impaired (net of valuation allowance) | 145 | 101 | ||
Not impaired and past due in the following periods | ||||
within 30 days | 2,350 | 2,404 | ||
31 to 60 days | 273 | 475 | ||
61 to 90 days | 311 | 253 | ||
over 90 days | 464 | 504 | ||
|
||||
38,710 | 38,474 | |||
|
The movement in the valuation allowance for trade receivables is set out below.
$ million | ||||
|
||||
2007 | 2006 | |||
|
||||
At 1 January | 421 | 374 | ||
Exchange adjustments | 34 | 32 | ||
Charge for the year | 175 | 158 | ||
Utilization | (224 | ) | (143 | ) |
|
||||
At 31 December | 406 | 421 | ||
|
140 | |
28 Financial instruments and financial risk factors continued
(c) Liquidity risk
Liquidity
risk is the risk that suitable sources of funding for the groups business activities may not be available. The groups liquidity is managed centrally with operating units forecasting their cash and
currency requirements to the central treasury function. Unless restricted by local regulations, subsidiaries pool their cash surpluses to treasury, which will then arrange to fund other subsidiaries requirements, or invest any net surplus in
the market or arrange for necessary external borrowings, while managing the groups
overall net currency positions.
In
managing its liquidity risk, the group has access to a wide range of funding
at competitive rates through capital
markets and banks. The groups treasury function centrally
co-ordinates relationships with banks, borrowing requirements, foreign exchange requirements and cash management. The group believes it has access to sufficient funding through the commercial paper markets and by using undrawn committed borrowing
facilities to meet foreseeable borrowing requirements. At, 31 December 2007, the group had substantial amounts of undrawn borrowing facilities available, including committed facilities of $4,950 million, of which $4,550 million are in place
for at least four years (2006 $4,700 million of which $4,300 million
are in place for at least five years). These facilities are with a number of
international banks and borrowings under them would be at pre-agreed rates.
The
group has in place a European Debt Issuance Programme (DIP) under which
the group may raise $15 billion of debt for maturities of one month or longer. At 31 December 2007, the
amount drawn down against the DIP was $10,438 million (2006 $7,893 million). In addition, the group has in place a US Shelf Registration under which it may raise $10 billion of debt with maturities of one month or longer. At 31 December
2007, the amount drawn down under the US Shelf was $2,500 million (2006 nil).
The
group has long-term debt ratings of Aa1 (stable outlook) and AA+ (negative
outlook), assigned respectively by
Moodys and Standard and Poors.
The
amounts shown for finance debt in the table below include expected interest payments
on borrowings and the future minimum lease payments with respect to finance leases.
There
are amounts included within finance debt that we show in the table below
as due within one year to reflect
the earliest contractual repayment dates but that are expected to be repaid over
the maximum long-term maturity profiles of the contracts as described in Note
35. US Industrial Revenue/Municipal Bonds of $2,880 million (2006 $2,744 million) with earliest contractual repayment dates within one year have expected
repayment dates ranging from 1 to 35 years (2006 1 to 34 years). The bondholders typically have the option to tender these bonds for repayment on interest reset dates; however, any bonds that are tendered are usually remarketed and BP has not
experienced any significant repurchases. BP considers these bonds to represent long-term funding when internally assessing the maturity profile of its finance debt. Similar treatment is applied for loans associated with long-term gas supply
contracts totalling $1,899 million (2006 $1,976 million) that mature
over 10 years.
The table also shows the timing of cash outflows
relating to trade and other
payables and accruals.
$ million | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Trade and | Trade and | |||||||||||
other | Finance | other | Finance | |||||||||
payables | Accruals | debt | payables | Accruals | debt | |||||||
|
||||||||||||
Within one year | 39,576 | 6,640 | 16,561 | 37,696 | 6,147 | 13,864 | ||||||
1 to 2 years | 147 | 351 | 8,011 | 100 | 349 | 4,146 | ||||||
2 to 3 years | 62 | 245 | 3,515 | 80 | 227 | 4,354 | ||||||
3 to 4 years | 26 | 78 | 1,447 | 57 | 81 | 723 | ||||||
4 to 5 years | 30 | 49 | 2,352 | 68 | 61 | 776 | ||||||
5 to 10 years | 197 | 200 | 1,100 | 226 | 240 | 1,778 | ||||||
Over 10 years | 24 | 36 | 1,447 | | 3 | 1,650 | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
40,062 | 7,599 | 34,433 | 38,227 | 7,108 | 27,291 | |||||||
|
The group manages liquidity risk associated with derivative contracts on a
portfolio basis, considering both physical commodity sale and purchase
contracts together with financially-settled derivative assets and
liabilities.
The
held-for-trading derivatives amounts in the table below represent the total contractual
cash outflows by period for the purchases of physical commodities under derivative
contracts and the estimated cash outflows of financially-settled derivative liabilities.
The group also holds derivative contracts for the sale of physical commodities
and financially-settled derivative assets that are expected to generate cash
inflows that will
be available to the group to meet cash outflows on purchases and liabilities.
These contracts are excluded from the table below. The amounts disclosed for
embedded derivatives represent the contractual cash outflows of purchase contracts.
The embedded derivatives associated with these contracts are all financial assets.
There are no cash outflows associated with embedded derivatives that are financial
liabilities because these are all related to sales contracts.
$ million | ||||||||
|
||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
|
||||||||
Held-for- | Held-for- | |||||||
Embedded | trading | Embedded | trading | |||||
derivatives | derivatives | derivatives | derivatives | |||||
|
||||||||
Within one year | 699 | 82,465 | 707 | 68,369 | ||||
1 to 2 years | 659 | 8,541 | 602 | 8,535 | ||||
2 to 3 years | 641 | 2,906 | 472 | 2,852 | ||||
3 to 4 years | 627 | 707 | 483 | 913 | ||||
4 to 5 years | 624 | 338 | 490 | 413 | ||||
5 to 10 years | 2,342 | 592 | 2,335 | 1,626 | ||||
Over 10 years | | 447 | | 280 | ||||
|
||||||||
5,592 | 95,996 | 5,089 | 82,988 | |||||
|
141 | |
28 Financial instruments and financial risk factors continued
The table below shows cash outflows for derivative hedging instruments based upon contractual payment dates. The amounts reflect the maturity profile of the fair value liability where the instruments will be settled net, and the gross settlement amount where the pay leg of a derivative will be settled separately to the receive leg, as in the case of cross-currency interest rate swaps hedging non-US dollar finance debt. The swaps are with high investment-grade counterparties and therefore the settlement day risk exposure is considered to be negligible.
$ million | ||||
|
||||
2007 | 2006 | |||
|
||||
Within one year | 1,708 | 1,228 | ||
1 to 2 years | 1,220 | 1,711 | ||
2 to 3 years | 3,759 | 2,772 | ||
3 to 4 years | 365 | 117 | ||
4 to 5 years | 1,650 | | ||
5 to 10 years | 105 | 220 | ||
Over 10 years | | | ||
|
||||
8,807 | 6,048 | |||
|
$ million | ||||
|
||||
2007 | 2006 | |||
|
||||
Listed | 1,617 | 1,516 | ||
Unlisted | 213 | 181 | ||
|
||||
1,830 | 1,697 | |||
|
Other investments comprise equity investments that have no fixed maturity date
or coupon rate. These investments are classified as available-for-sale
financial assets and as such are recorded at fair value with the gain or
loss arising as a result of changes in fair value recorded directly in
equity.
The
fair value of listed investments has been determined by reference to quoted market
bid prices. Unlisted investments are stated at cost less accumulated impairment
losses.
The most
significant investment is the groups stake in Rosneft which had a fair value of $1,285
million at 31 December 2007.
$ million | ||||
|
||||
2007 | 2006 | |||
|
||||
Crude oil | 8,157 | 5,357 | ||
Natural gas | 160 | 127 | ||
Refined petroleum and petrochemical products | 14,723 | 10,817 | ||
|
||||
23,040 | 16,301 | |||
Supplies | 1,517 | 1,222 | ||
|
||||
24,557 | 17,523 | |||
Trading inventories | 1,997 | 1,392 | ||
|
||||
26,554 | 18,915 | |||
|
||||
Cost of inventories expensed in the income statement | 200,766 | 187,183 | ||
|
31 Trade and other receivables
$ million | ||||||||
|
||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
|
||||||||
Current | Non-current | Current | Non-current | |||||
|
||||||||
Financial assets | ||||||||
Trade receivables | 33,012 | | 32,460 | | ||||
Amounts receivable from jointly controlled entities | 888 | | 830 | | ||||
Amounts receivable from associates | 380 | | 268 | | ||||
Other receivables | 3,462 | 968 | 4,054 | 862 | ||||
|
||||||||
37,742 | 968 | 37,612 | 862 | |||||
|
||||||||
Non-financial assets | ||||||||
Other receivables | 278 | | 1,080 | | ||||
|
||||||||
38,020 | 968 | 38,692 | 862 | |||||
|
Trade and other receivables are predominantly non-interest bearing.
142 | |
$ million | |||||
2007 | 2006 | ||||
Cash at bank and in hand | 2,996 | 2,052 | |||
Cash equivalents | |||||
Listed | 3 | 29 | |||
Unlisted | 563 | 509 | |||
3,562 | 2,590 | ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
comprise cash in hand; current balances with banks and similar institutions;
and short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known
amounts of cash, are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value and have
a maturity of three months or less from the date of acquisition.
Cash
and cash equivalents at 31 December 2007 includes $1,294 million (2006 $773
million) that is restricted. This relates principally to amounts on deposit
to cover initial margins on trading exchanges.
$ million | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Current | Non-current | Current | Non-current | |||||
Financial liabilities | ||||||||
Trade payables | 30,735 | | 28,319 | | ||||
Amounts payable to jointly controlled entities | 66 | | 119 | | ||||
Amounts payable to associates | 650 | | 273 | | ||||
Other payables | 8,125 | 486 | 8,985 | 531 | ||||
39,576 | 486 | 37,696 | 531 | |||||
Non-financial liabilities | ||||||||
Production and similar taxes | 803 | 765 | 852 | 899 | ||||
Other payables | 2,773 | | 3,688 | | ||||
3,576 | 765 | 4,540 | 899 | |||||
43,152 | 1,251 | 42,236 | 1,430 | |||||
|
Trade and other payables are predominantly interest free.
143 | |
34 Derivative financial instruments
An outline of the groups
financial risks and the objectives and policies pursued in relation to those
risks is set out in Note 28.
IAS
39 prescribes strict criteria for hedge accounting, whether as a cash flow or
fair value hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, and
requires that any derivative that does not meet these criteria should be classified
as held for trading and fair valued, with gains and losses recognized in profit
or loss.
In the normal course of business the group enters
into derivative financial instruments (derivatives) to manage its normal business
exposures in relation to commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and
interest rates, including management of the balance between floating rate and
fixed rate debt, consistent with risk management policies and objectives. Additionally,
the group has a well-established entrepreneurial trading operation that is undertaken
in conjunction with these activities using a similar range of contracts.
The fair values of derivative financial instruments
at 31 December are set out below.
$ million | |||||||||
2007 | 2006 | ||||||||
Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | ||||||
value | value | value | value | ||||||
asset | liability | asset | liability | ||||||
Derivatives held for trading | |||||||||
Currency derivatives | 147 | (317 | ) | 137 | (32 | ) | |||
Oil price derivatives | 3,214 | (3,432 | ) | 2,664 | (2,368 | ) | |||
Natural gas price derivatives | 4,388 | (4,022 | ) | 6,558 | (5,703 | ) | |||
Power price derivatives | 1,121 | (1,140 | ) | 3,232 | (3,190 | ) | |||
Other derivatives | 30 | | 113 | | |||||
8,900 | (8,911 | ) | 12,704 | (11,293 | ) | ||||
Embedded derivatives | |||||||||
Natural gas and LNG contracts | 255 | (2,340 | ) | 107 | (2,171 | ) | |||
Interest rate contracts | | (33 | ) | | (26 | ) | |||
255 | (2,373 | ) | 107 | (2,197 | ) | ||||
Cash flow hedges | 348 | (97 | ) | 219 | (33 | ) | |||
Fair value hedges | |||||||||
Currency forwards, futures and swaps | 430 | (9 | ) | 228 | (13 | ) | |||
Interest rate swaps | 89 | (17 | ) | 33 | (91 | ) | |||
519 | (26 | ) | 261 | (104 | ) | ||||
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations | 40 | | 107 | | |||||
10,062 | (11,407 | ) | 13,398 | (13,627 | ) | ||||
Of which current | 6,321 | (6,405 | ) | 10,373 | (9,424 | ) | |||
non-current | 3,741 | (5,002 | ) | 3,025 | (4,203 | ) | |||
|
144 | |
34 Derivative financial instruments continued
Derivatives
held for trading
The group maintains
active trading positions in a variety of derivatives. The contracts may be entered
into for risk management purposes, to satisfy supply requirements or for entrepreneurial
trading. Certain contracts are classified as held for trading, regardless of
their original business objective, and are recognized at fair value with changes
in fair value recognized in the income statement. Trading activities are undertaken
by using a range of contract types in combination to create incremental gains
by arbitraging prices between markets, locations and time periods. The net of
these exposures is monitored using market value-at-risk techniques as described
in Note 28.
The
following tables show further information on the fair value of derivatives and
other financial instruments held for trading purposes. The fair values at the
year end are not materially unrepresentative of the position throughout the
year.
Changes
during the year in the net fair value of derivatives held for trading purposes
were as follows.
$ million | ||||||||||
Oil | Natural gas | Power | ||||||||
Currency | price | price | price | Other | ||||||
Fair value of contracts at 1 January 2007 | 105 | 296 | 855 | 42 | 113 | |||||
Contracts realized or settled in the year | (109 | ) | (289 | ) | (602 | ) | (68 | ) | (83 | ) |
Fair value of options at inception | | 28 | 168 | 36 | | |||||
Fair value of other new contracts entered into during the year |
| | 1 | | | |||||
Changes in fair values relating to price | (167 | ) | (253 | ) | (58 | ) | (20 | ) | | |
Exchange adjustments | 1 | | 2 | (9 | ) | | ||||
Fair value of contracts at 31 December 2007 | (170 | ) | (218 | ) | 366 | (19 | ) | 30 | ||
|
$ million | ||||||||||
Oil | Natural gas | Power | ||||||||
Currency | price | price | price | Other | ||||||
Fair value of contracts at 1 January 2006 | 23 | (61 | ) | 529 | 183 | | ||||
Contracts realized or settled in the year | (16 | ) | 85 | (327 | ) | (37 | ) | (106 | ) | |
Fair value of options at inception | | 36 | 247 | (70 | ) | 45 | ||||
Fair value of other new contracts entered into during the year |
| | 2 | 1 | | |||||
Change in fair value due to changes in valuation techniques or key assumptions |
| 1 | | | | |||||
Changes in fair values relating to price | 98 | 231 | 421 | (22 | ) | 174 | ||||
Exchange adjustments | | 4 | (17 | ) | (13 | ) | | |||
Fair value of contracts at 31 December 2006 | 105 | 296 | 855 | 42 | 113 | |||||
|
If at inception of a contract the valuation cannot be supported by observable market data, any gain determined by the valuation methodology is not recognized in the income statement but is deferred on the balance sheet and is commonly known as day-one profit. This deferred gain is recognized in the income statement over the life of the contract until substantially all of the remaining contract term can be valued using observable market data at which point any remaining deferred gain is recognized in income. Changes in valuation from this initial valuation are recognized immediately through income.
145 | |
34 Derivative financial instruments continued
The following table shows the changes in the day-one profits deferred on the balance sheet.
$ million | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Natural | Natural | |||||||
gas price | Power price | gas price | Power price | |||||
Fair value of contracts not recognized through the income statement at 1 January | 36 | | 39 | 10 | ||||
Fair value of new contracts at inception not recognized in the income statement | 1 | | 2 | 1 | ||||
Fair value recognized in the income statement | (1 | ) | | (5 | ) | (11 | ) | |
Fair value of contracts not recognized through profit at 31 December | 36 | | 36 | | ||||
Derivative assets held for trading have the following fair values and maturities.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||||||
Less than | Over | |||||||||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||||
Currency derivatives | 123 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 147 | |||||||
Oil price derivatives | 2,545 | 471 | 113 | 39 | 26 | 20 | 3,214 | |||||||
Natural gas price derivatives | 2,170 | 677 | 333 | 283 | 216 | 709 | 4,388 | |||||||
Power price derivatives | 819 | 250 | 52 | | | | 1,121 | |||||||
Other derivatives | 12 | 18 | | | | | 30 | |||||||
5,669 | 1,426 | 504 | 327 | 243 | 731 | 8,900 | ||||||||
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2006 | ||||||||||||||
Less than | Over | |||||||||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||||
Currency derivatives | 117 | | 12 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 137 | |||||||
Oil price derivatives | 2,520 | 116 | 20 | 7 | 1 | | 2,664 | |||||||
Natural gas price derivatives | 4,532 | 919 | 374 | 166 | 114 | 453 | 6,558 | |||||||
Power price derivatives | 2,845 | 274 | 86 | 27 | | | 3,232 | |||||||
Other derivatives | 64 | 26 | 23 | | | | 113 | |||||||
10,078 | 1,335 | 515 | 203 | 117 | 456 | 12,704 | ||||||||
Derivative liabilities held for trading have the following fair values and maturities.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||||||
Less than | Over | |||||||||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||||
Currency derivatives | (145 | ) | (99 | ) | (32 | ) | (16 | ) | (15 | ) | (10 | ) | (317 | ) |
Oil price derivatives | (2,735 | ) | (512 | ) | (135 | ) | (25 | ) | (22 | ) | (3 | ) | (3,432 | ) |
Natural gas price derivatives | (2,089 | ) | (527 | ) | (298 | ) | (219 | ) | (185 | ) | (704 | ) | (4,022 | ) |
Power price derivatives | (832 | ) | (246 | ) | (61 | ) | (1 | ) | | | (1,140 | ) | ||
(5,801 | ) | (1,384 | ) | (526 | ) | (261 | ) | (222 | ) | (717 | ) | (8,911 | ) | |
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2006 | ||||||||||||||
Less than | Over | |||||||||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||||
Currency derivatives | (8 | ) | (7 | ) | (12 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | (32 | ) |
Oil price derivatives | (2,230 | ) | (89 | ) | (29 | ) | (19 | ) | (1 | ) | | (2,368 | ) | |
Natural gas price derivatives | (3,931 | ) | (875 | ) | (273 | ) | (109 | ) | (86 | ) | (429 | ) | (5,703 | ) |
Power price derivatives | (2,777 | ) | (289 | ) | (98 | ) | (26 | ) | | | (3,190 | ) | ||
(8,946 | ) | (1,260 | ) | (412 | ) | (156 | ) | (89 | ) | (430 | ) | (11,293 | ) | |
146 | |
34 Derivative financial instruments continued
The following tables show the net fair value of derivatives held for trading at 31 December analysed by maturity period and by methodology of fair value estimation.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||||||
Less than | Over | |||||||||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||||
Prices actively quoted | 119 | 3 | 49 | 2 | (9 | ) | 1 | 165 | ||||||
Prices sourced from observable data or market corroboration | (212 | ) | 58 | (57 | ) | 82 | 37 | | (92 | ) | ||||
Prices based on models and other valuation methods | (39 | ) | (19 | ) | (14 | ) | (18 | ) | (7 | ) | 13 | (84 | ) | |
(132 | ) | 42 | (22 | ) | 66 | 21 | 14 | (11 | ) | |||||
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2006 | ||||||||||||||
Less than | Over | |||||||||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||||
Prices actively quoted | 191 | 62 | 60 | 33 | | 2 | 348 | |||||||
Prices sourced from observable data or market corroboration | 911 | 29 | 54 | 19 | 36 | 4 | 1,053 | |||||||
Prices based on models and other valuation methods | 30 | (14 | ) | (12 | ) | (6 | ) | (8 | ) | 20 | 10 | |||
1,132 | 77 | 102 | 46 | 28 | 26 | 1,411 | ||||||||
Prices actively quoted refers to the fair value of contracts valued solely
using quoted prices in an active market. Prices sourced from observable data
or market corroboration refers to the fair value of contracts valued in part
using active quotes and in part using observable, market-corroborated data,
for example, swaps and physical forward contracts. Prices based on models and
other valuation methods refers to the fair value of a contract valued in part
using internal models due to the absence of quoted prices, including over-the-counter
options. The net change in fair value of contracts based on models and other
valuation methods during the year was a loss of $94 million (2006 $117
million
loss and 2005 $130 million gain).
Gains and losses relating to derivative contracts
are included either within sales and other operating revenues or within purchases
in the income statement depending upon the nature of the activity and type of
contract involved. The contract types treated in this way include futures, options,
swaps and certain forward sales and forward purchases contracts. Gains or losses
arise on contracts entered into for risk management purposes, optimization activity
and entrepreneurial trading. They also arise on certain contracts that are for
normal procurement or sales activity for the group but that are required to be
fair valued under accounting standards. Also included within sales and other
operating revenues are gains and losses on inventory held for trading purposes.
The total amount relating to all of these items was a gain
of $376 million (2006 $2,842 million gain and 2005 $838 million gain).
Embedded derivatives
Prior to the development of an active gas trading market, UK gas contracts were priced using a basket of available price indices, primarily relating to oil products. After the development of an active UK gas market,
certain contracts were entered into or renegotiated using pricing formulae not directly related to gas prices, for example, oil product and power prices. In these circumstances, pricing formulae have been determined to be derivatives, embedded
within the overall contractual arrangements that are not clearly and closely related to the underlying commodity. The resulting fair value relating to these contracts is recognized on the balance sheet with gains or losses recognized in the income
statement.
These
contracts are valued using models with inputs that include price curves for each
of the different products that are built up from active market pricing data and
extrapolated to the expiry of the contracts in 2018 using the maximum available
external pricing information. Additionally, where limited data exists for certain
products, prices are interpolated using historic and long-term pricing relationships.
Price volatility data
is also an input for the models.
147 | |
34 Derivative financial instruments continued
The following table shows the changes during the year in the net fair value of embedded derivatives.
$ million | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Natural gas | Natural gas | |||||||
and LNG | Interest | and LNG | Interest | |||||
price | rate | price | rate | |||||
Fair value of contracts at 1 January | (2,064 | ) | (26 | ) | (2,511 | ) | (30 | ) |
Contracts realized or settled in the year | 449 | | 762 | | ||||
Changes in valuation techniques or key assumptions | 130 | | | | ||||
Changes in fair values relating to price | (567 | ) | (7 | ) | 21 | 4 | ||
Exchange adjustments | (33 | ) | | (336 | ) | | ||
Fair value of contracts at 31 December | (2,085 | ) | (33 | ) | (2,064 | ) | (26 | ) |
Embedded derivative assets have the following fair values and maturities.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||||||
Less than | Over | |||||||||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||||
Natural gas and LNG embedded derivatives | 193 | 18 | 15 | 7 | 10 | 12 | 255 | |||||||
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2006 | ||||||||||||||
Less than | Over | |||||||||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||||
Natural gas and LNG embedded derivatives | 49 | 58 | | | | | 107 | |||||||
Embedded derivative liabilities have the following fair values and maturities.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||||||
Less than | Over | |||||||||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||||
Natural gas and LNG embedded derivatives | (554 | ) | (437 | ) | (299 | ) | (244 | ) | (219 | ) | (587 | ) | (2,340 | ) |
Interest rate embedded derivatives | (33 | ) | | | | | | (33 | ) | |||||
(587 | ) | (437 | ) | (299 | ) | (244 | ) | (219 | ) | (587 | ) | (2,373 | ) | |
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2006 | ||||||||||||||
Less than | Over | |||||||||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||||
Natural gas and LNG embedded derivatives | (444 | ) | (433 | ) | (320 | ) | (218 | ) | (186 | ) | (570 | ) | (2,171 | ) |
Interest rate embedded derivatives | | (26 | ) | | | | | (26 | ) | |||||
(444 | ) | (459 | ) | (320 | ) | (218 | ) | (186 | ) | (570 | ) | (2,197 | ) | |
The following tables show the net fair value of embedded derivatives at 31 December analysed by maturity period and by methodology of fair value estimation.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||||||
Less than | Over | |||||||||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||||
Prices actively quoted | | | | | | | | |||||||
Prices sourced from observable data or market corroboration | 61 | | | | | | 61 | |||||||
Prices based on models and other valuation methods | (455 | ) | (419 | ) | (284 | ) | (237 | ) | (209 | ) | (575 | ) | (2,179 | ) |
(394 | ) | (419 | ) | (284 | ) | (237 | ) | (209 | ) | (575 | ) | (2,118 | ) | |
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2006 | ||||||||||||||
Less than | Over | |||||||||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||||
Prices actively quoted | | | | | | | | |||||||
Prices sourced from observable data or market corroboration | 49 | 58 | | | | | 107 | |||||||
Prices based on models and other valuation methods | (444 | ) | (459 | ) | (320 | ) | (218 | ) | (186 | ) | (570 | ) | (2,197 | ) |
(395 | ) | (401 | ) | (320 | ) | (218 | ) | (186 | ) | (570 | ) | (2,090 | ) | |
The net change in fair value of contracts based on models and other valuation methods during the year is a gain of $18 million (2006 gain of $423 million and 2005 loss of $1,773 million).
148 | |
34 Derivative financial instruments continued
The fair value gain (loss) on embedded derivatives is shown below.
$ million | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||
Natural gas and LNG embedded derivatives | | 604 | (2,034 | ) | |||
Interest rate embedded derivatives | (7 | ) | 4 | (13 | ) | ||
Fair value gain (loss) | (7 | ) | 608 | (2,047 | ) | ||
The fair value gain (loss) in the above table includes $12 million of exchange losses (2006 $179 million of exchange losses and 2005 $115 million of exchange gains) arising on contracts that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the individual operating unit.
Cash
flow hedges
At 31 December
2007, the group held futures currency contracts and cylinders that were being
used to hedge the foreign currency risk of highly probable forecast transactions,
as well as cross-currency interest rate swaps to fix the US dollar interest
rate and US dollar redemption value, with matching critical terms on the currency
leg of the swap with the underlying non-US dollar debt issuance. Note 28 outlines
the management of risk aspects for currency and interest rate risk. For cash
flow hedges the group only claims for the intrinsic value on the currency with
any fair value attributable to time value taken immediately to profit or loss.
There were no highly probable transactions for which hedge accounting has been
claimed that have not occurred and no significant element of hedge ineffectiveness
requiring recognition in the income statement. For cash flow hedges the pre-tax
amount removed from equity during the period and included in the income statement
is a gain of $74 million (2006 $93 million and 2005 $36 million
loss). Of this, a gain of $143 million is included in production and manufacturing
expenses (2006 $162 million gain and 2005 $33 million gain) and a loss
of $69 million is included in finance costs (2006 $69 million loss and
2005 $69 million loss). The amount removed from equity during the period
and included in the carrying amount of non-financial assets was a gain of $40
million (2006 $6 million gain and nil for 2005).
The
amounts retained in equity at 31 December 2007 are expected to mature and affect
the income statement by a $48 million gain in 2008, a loss of $10 million
in 2009 and a gain of $28 million in 2010 and beyond.
Fair
value hedges
At 31 December
2007, the group held interest rate and currency swap contracts as fair value
hedges of the interest rate risk on fixed rate debt issued by the group. The
receive leg of the swap contracts is largely identical for all critical aspects
to the terms of the underlying debt and thus the hedging is highly effective.
The gain on the hedging derivative instruments taken to the income statement
in 2007 was $334 million (2006 $257 million) offset by a loss on the
fair value of the finance debt of $327 million (2006 $257 million loss).
The
interest rate and currency swaps have an average maturity of one to two years,
(2006 two to three years) and are used to convert sterling, euro, Swiss franc
and Australian dollar denominated borrowings into US dollar floating rate debt.
Note 28 outlines the groups approach to interest rate risk management.
Hedges
of net investments in foreign operations
The group holds
currency swap contracts as a hedge of a long-term investment in a UK subsidiary
expiring in 2009. At 31 December 2007, the hedge had a fair value of $40
million (2006 $107 million) and the loss on the hedge recognized in equity
in 2007 was $67 million (2006 $105 million gain, 2005 $58 million
gain). US dollars have been sold forward for sterling purchased and match the
underlying liability with no significant ineffectiveness reflected in the income
statement.
$ million | |||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Within | After | Within | After | ||||||||||
1 year | a | 1 year | Total | 1 year | a | 1 year | Total | ||||||
Bank loans | 542 | 978 | 1,520 | 543 | 806 | 1,349 | |||||||
Other loans | 14,607 | 14,026 | 28,633 | 12,321 | 9,525 | 21,846 | |||||||
Total borrowings | 15,149 | 15,004 | 30,153 | 12,864 | 10,331 | 23,195 | |||||||
Net obligations under finance leases | 245 | 647 | 892 | 60 | 755 | 815 | |||||||
15,394 | 15,651 | 31,045 | 12,924 | 11,086 | 24,010 | ||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
a | Amounts due within one year include current maturities of long-term debt and borrowings that are expected to be repaid later than the earliest contractual repayment dates of within one year. US Industrial Revenue/Municipal Bonds of $2,880 million (2006 $2,744 million) with earliest contractual repayment dates within one year have expected repayment dates ranging from 1 to 35 years (2006 1 to 34 years). The bondholders typically have the option to tender these bonds for repayment on interest reset dates; however, any bonds that are tendered are usually remarketed and BP has not experienced any significant repurchases. BP considers these bonds to represent long-term funding when internally assessing the maturity profile of its finance debt. Similar treatment is applied for loans associated with long-term gas supply contracts totalling $1,899 million (2006 $1,976 million) that mature over 10 years. |
149 | |
35 Finance debt continued
The following table shows, by major currency, the groups finance debt at 31 December 2007 and 2006 and the weighted average interest rates achieved at those dates through a combination of borrowings and derivative financial instruments entered into to manage interest rate and currency exposures.
Fixed rate debt | Floating rate debt | ||||||||||||
Weighted | |||||||||||||
Weighted | average | Weighted | |||||||||||
average | time for | average | |||||||||||
interest | which rate | interest | |||||||||||
rate | is fixed | Amount | rate | Amount | Total | ||||||||
% | Years | $ million | % | $ million | $ million | ||||||||
2007 | |||||||||||||
US dollar | 5 | 2 | 9,541 | 5 | 20,460 | 30,001 | |||||||
Sterling | | | | 6 | 35 | 35 | |||||||
Euro | 4 | 4 | 81 | 5 | 107 | 188 | |||||||
Other currencies | 7 | 13 | 268 | 7 | 553 | 821 | |||||||
9,890 | 21,155 | 31,045 | |||||||||||
2006 | |||||||||||||
US dollar | 5 | 3 | 5,998 | 6 | 17,055 | 23,053 | |||||||
Sterling | | | | 5 | 35 | 35 | |||||||
Euro | 3 | 8 | 61 | 4 | 134 | 195 | |||||||
Other currencies | 7 | 8 | 299 | 8 | 428 | 727 | |||||||
6,358 | 17,652 | 24,010 | |||||||||||
Finance
leases
The group uses
finance leases to acquire property, plant and equipment. These leases have terms
of renewal but no purchase options and escalation clauses. Renewals are at the
option of the lessee. Future minimum lease payments under finance leases are
set out below.
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||
Future minimum lease payments payable within | ||||||
1
year |
268 | 82 | ||||
2
to 5 years |
393 | 376 | ||||
Thereafter |
630 | 873 | ||||
1,291 | 1,331 | |||||
Less finance charges | 399 | 516 | ||||
Net obligations | 892 | 815 | ||||
Of which | payable within 1 year | 245 | 60 | |||
payable within 2 to 5 years | 217 | 164 | ||||
payable thereafter | 430 | 591 | ||||
|
150 | |
35 Finance debt continued
Fair
values
The estimated
fair value of finance debt is shown in the table below together with the carrying
amount as reflected in the balance sheet.
Long-term borrowings in the table below include
the portion of debt that matures in the year from 31 December 2007, whereas
in the balance sheet the amount would be reported as current liabilities.
The
carrying amount of the groups short-term borrowings, comprising mainly
commercial paper, bank loans, overdrafts and US Industrial Revenue/ Municipal
Bonds, approximates their fair value. The fair value of the groups long-term
borrowings and finance lease obligations is estimated using quoted prices or,
where these are not available, discounted cash flow analyses based on the groups
current incremental borrowing rates for similar types and maturities of borrowing.
$ million | |||||||||
2007 | 2006 | ||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | ||||||||
Fair value | amount | Fair value | amount | ||||||
Short-term borrowings | 11,212 | 11,212 | 9,661 | 9,661 | |||||
Long-term borrowings | 19,094 | 18,941 | 13,580 | 13,534 | |||||
Net obligations under finance leases | 908 | 892 | 832 | 815 | |||||
Total finance debt | 31,214 | 31,045 | 24,073 | 24,010 | |||||
|
36 Capital disclosures and analysis of changes in net debt
The group defines
capital as the total equity of the group. The groups objective for
managing capital is to deliver competitive, secure and sustainable returns
to maximize
long-term shareholder value. BP is not subject to any externally-imposed
capital requirements.
The
groups approach to managing capital is set out in its financial framework.
The group aims to maintain capital discipline in relation to investing activities
while progressively growing the dividend per share. A managed share buyback
programme is used to return to shareholders all sustainable free cash flow in
excess of the groups investment and dividend needs. From 2008, the
group intends to rebalance returns to shareholders by increasing the dividend
component.
As a result, the level of free cash flow allocated to share buybacks is likely
to be lower; however, we will continue to use share buybacks as a mechanism
to return excess cash to shareholders when appropriate.
The
group monitors capital on the basis of the net debt ratio, that is, the ratio
of net debt to net debt plus equity. Net debt is calculated as gross finance
debt, as shown in the balance sheet, less cash and cash equivalents. All
components of equity are included in the denominator of the calculation. We believe
that
a net debt ratio in the range 20-30% provides an efficient capital structure
and an appropriate level of financial flexibility.
At 31 December 2007
the net debt ratio was 23% (2006 20%).
$ million | |||||
2007 | 2006 | ||||
Gross debt | 31,045 | 24,010 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | 3,562 | 2,590 | |||
Net debt | 27,483 | 21,420 | |||
|
|||||
Equity | 94,652 | 85,465 | |||
Net debt ratio | 23 | % | 20 | % | |
|
An analysis of changes in net debt is provided below.
$ million | |||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Cash and | Cash and | ||||||||||||
Finance | cash | Net | Finance | cash | Net | ||||||||
Movement in net debt | debt | equivalents | debt | debt | equivalents | debt | |||||||
At 1 January | (24,010 | ) | 2,590 | (21,420 | ) | (19,162 | ) | 2,960 | (16,202 | ) | |||
Exchange adjustments | (122 | ) | 135 | 13 | (172 | ) | 47 | (125 | ) | ||||
Debt acquired | | | | (13 | ) | | (13 | ) | |||||
Net cash flow | (6,411 | ) | 837 | (5,574 | ) | (4,049 | ) | (417 | ) | (4,466 | ) | ||
Fair value hedge adjustment | (368 | ) | | (368 | ) | (581 | ) | | (581 | ) | |||
Other movements | (134 | ) | | (134 | ) | (33 | ) | | (33 | ) | |||
At 31 December | (31,045 | ) | 3,562 | (27,483 | ) | (24,010 | ) | 2,590 | (21,420 | ) | |||
|
|||||||||||||
Equity | 94,652 | 85,465 | |||||||||||
|
151 | |
$ million | |||||||||
Litigation | |||||||||
Decommissioning | Environmental | and other | Total | ||||||
At 1 January 2007 | 8,365 | 2,127 | 3,152 | 13,644 | |||||
Exchange adjustments | 168 | 19 | 11 | 198 | |||||
New or increased provisions | 1,163 | 373 | 1,376 | 2,912 | |||||
Write-back of unused provisions | | (151 | ) | (196 | ) | (347 | ) | ||
Unwinding of discount | 195 | 44 | 44 | 283 | |||||
Utilization | (297 | ) | (305 | ) | (899 | ) | (1,501 | ) | |
Deletions | (93 | ) | | (1 | ) | (94 | ) | ||
At 31 December 2007 | 9,501 | 2,107 | 3,487 | 15,095 | |||||
Of which | expected to be incurred within 1 year | 447 | 431 | 1,317 | 2,195 | ||||
expected to be incurred in more than 1 year | 9,054 | 1,676 | 2,170 | 12,900 | |||||
$ million | |||||||||
Litigation | |||||||||
Decommissioning | Environmental | and other | Total | ||||||
At 1 January 2006 | 6,450 | 2,311 | 2,795 | 11,556 | |||||
Exchange adjustments | 13 | 31 | 44 | 88 | |||||
New or increased provisions | 2,142 | 423 | 1,611 | 4,176 | |||||
Write-back of unused provisions | | (355 | ) | (270 | ) | (625 | ) | ||
Unwinding of discount | 153 | 45 | 47 | 245 | |||||
Utilization | (179 | ) | (324 | ) | (1,068 | ) | (1,571 | ) | |
Deletions | (214 | ) | (4 | ) | (7 | ) | (225 | ) | |
At 31 December 2006 | 8,365 | 2,127 | 3,152 | 13,644 | |||||
Of which | expected to be incurred within 1 year | 324 | 444 | 1,164 | 1,932 | ||||
expected to be incurred in more than 1 year | 8,041 | 1,683 | 1,988 | 11,712 | |||||
The group makes full provision for the future cost of decommissioning oil and
natural gas production facilities and related pipelines on a discounted basis
on the installation of those facilities. The provision for the costs of decommissioning
these production facilities and pipelines at the end of their economic lives
has been estimated using existing technology, at current prices and discounted
using a real discount rate of 2.0% (2006 2.0%) . These costs are generally
expected to be incurred over the next 30 years. While the provision is based
on the best estimate of future costs and the economic lives of the facilities
and pipelines, there is uncertainty regarding both the amount and timing of
incurring these costs.
Provisions for environmental remediation are made
when a clean-up is probable and the amount is reliably determinable. Generally,
this coincides with commitment to a formal plan of action or, if earlier, on
divestment or closure of inactive sites. The provision for environmental liabilities
has been estimated using existing technology, at current prices and discounted
using a real discount rate of 2.0% (2006 2.0%) . The majority of these costs
are expected to be incurred over the next 10 years. The extent and cost of future
remediation programmes are inherently difficult to estimate. They depend on the
scale of any possible contamination, the timing and extent of corrective actions,
and also the groups share of the liability.
Included within the litigation and other category
at 31 December 2007 are provisions for litigation of $1,737 million (2006 $1,474
million) for deferred employee compensation of $761 million (2006 $760
million) and provisions for expected rental shortfalls on surplus properties
of $320 million (2006 $320 million). New or increased provisions made
for 2007 included an amount of $500 million (2006 $425 million) in respect
of the Texas City incident, of which, disbursements to claimants in 2007 were $314
million (2006 $863 million) and the provision at 31 December 2007 was $456
million (2006 $270
million).
To
the extent that these liabilities are not expected to be settled within the
next three years, the provisions are discounted using either a nominal discount
rate of 4.5% (2006 4.5%) or a real discount rate of 2.0% (2006 2.0%), as
appropriate.
152 | |
38 Pensions and other post-retirement benefits
Most group companies have
pension plans, the forms and benefits of which vary with conditions and practices
in the countries concerned. Pension
benefits may be provided through defined contribution plans (money purchase
schemes) or defined benefit plans (final salary and other types of schemes
with committed pension payments). For defined contribution plans, retirement
benefits are determined by the value of funds arising from contributions
paid in respect
of each employee. For defined benefit plans, retirement benefits are based
on such factors as the employees pensionable salary and length of service.
Defined benefit plans may be externally funded or unfunded. The assets of
funded plans are
generally held in separately administered trusts.
In
particular, the primary pension arrangement in the UK is a funded final salary
pension plan that remains open to new employees. Retired employees draw the majority
of their benefit as
an annuity.
In
the US, a range of retirement arrangements are provided. These include a funded
final salary pension plan for certain heritage employees and a cash balance arrangement
for new hires. Retired US employees typically take their pension benefit in the
form of a lump sum payment. US employees are also eligible to participate in
a defined contribution (401k) plan in which employee contributions are matched
with company
contributions.
The
level of contributions to funded defined benefit plans is the amount needed
to provide adequate funds
to meet
pension obligations as they fall due. During 2007, contributions of $524 million (2006 $438 million and 2005 $340 million) and $97 million (2006 $181 million and 2005 $279 million) were made to the UK plans and US plans respectively. In addition, contributions of $127 million (2006
$136 million and 2005 $140 million) were made to other funded defined benefit plans. The aggregate level of contributions in 2008 is expected to be approximately $500
million.
Certain
group companies, principally in the US, provide post-retirement healthcare and
life insurance benefits to their retired employees and dependants. The entitlement
to these benefits is usually based on the employee remaining in service until
retirement age and completion of a minimum period of service. The plans are funded
to a limited extent.
The
obligation and cost of providing pensions and other post-retirement benefits
is assessed annually using the projected unit credit method. The date of the
most recent actuarial review
was 31 December 2007.
The
material financial assumptions used for estimating the benefit obligations of
the various plans are set out below. The assumptions used to evaluate accrued
pension and other post-retirement benefits at 31 December in any year are used
to determine pension and other post-retirement expense for the following year,
that is, the assumptions at 31 December 2007 are used to determine the pension
liabilities at that date and
the pension cost for 2008.
% | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial assumptions | UK | US | Other | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Discount rate for pension plan liabilities | 5.7 | 5.1 | 4.75 | 6.1 | 5.7 | 5.50 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 4.00 | |||||||||
Discount
rate for post-retirement benefit plans |
n/a | n/a | n/a | 6.4 | 5.9 | 5.50 | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||
Rate of increase in salariesa | 5.1 | 4.7 | 4.25 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.25 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.25 | |||||||||
Rate of increase for pensions in payment | 3.2 | 2.8 | 2.50 | | | | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.75 | |||||||||
Rate of increase in deferred pensions | 3.2 | 2.8 | 2.50 | | | | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.00 | |||||||||
Inflation | 3.2 | 2.8 | 2.50 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.50 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.00 | |||||||||
a | This assumption includes an allowance for promotion-related salary growth, of between 0.3% and 0.4% depending on country. |
In addition to the financial assumptions, we regularly review the demographic and mortality assumptions. Mortality assumptions reflect best practice in the countries in which we provide pensions, and have been chosen with regard to the latest available published tables adjusted where appropriate to reflect the experience of the group and an extrapolation of past longevity improvements into the future. BPs most substantial pension liabilities are in the UK, the US and Germany where our assumptions are as follows:
Years | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortality assumptions | UK | US | Germany | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Life expectancy at age 60 for a male currently aged 60 | 24.0 | 23.9 | 23.0 | 24.3 | 24.2 | 21.9 | 22.4 | 22.2 | 22.1 | |||||||||
Life expectancy at age 60 for a female currently aged 60 | 26.9 | 26.8 | 26.0 | 26.1 | 26.0 | 25.6 | 27.0 | 26.9 | 26.7 | |||||||||
Life expectancy at age 60 for a male currently aged 40 | 25.1 | 25.0 | 23.9 | 25.8 | 25.8 | 21.9 | 25.3 | 25.2 | 25.0 | |||||||||
Life expectancy at age 60 for a female currently aged 40 | 27.9 | 27.8 | 26.9 | 27.0 | 26.9 | 25.6 | 29.7 | 29.6 | 29.4 | |||||||||
The assumed future US healthcare cost trend rate is as follows:
% | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Initial US healthcare cost trend rate | 9.0 | 9.3 | 10.3 | |||
Ultimate US healthcare cost trend rate | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | |||
Year in which ultimate trend rate is reached | 2013 | 2013 | 2013 | |||
Pension plan assets are generally held in trusts. The primary objective of the trusts is to accumulate pools of assets sufficient to meet the obligation of the various plans. The assets of the trusts are invested in a manner consistent with fiduciary obligations and principles that reflect current practices in portfolio management.
153 | |
38 Pensions and other post-retirement benefits continued
A significant proportion of the assets are held in equities, owing to a higher expected level of return over the long term with an acceptable level of risk. In order to provide reasonable assurance that no single security or type of security has an unwarranted impact on the total portfolio, the investment portfolios are highly diversified. The long-term asset allocation policy for the major plans is as follows:
Policy range | |
Asset category | % |
Total equity | 55-85 |
Fixed income/cash | 15-35 |
Property/real estate | 0-10 |
Some of the groups pension funds use derivatives as part of their asset mix and to manage the level of risk. The groups
main pension funds do not directly invest in either securities or property/real
estate
of the company or of any subsidiary.
Return on asset assumptions reflect
the groups expectations built up by asset class and by plan. The groups
expectation is derived from a combination of historical returns over the
long term and the forecasts of market professionals.
The
expected long-term rates of return and market values of the various categories
of asset held by the
defined benefit plans at 31 December are set out below. The market values
shown
include the effects of derivative financial instruments.
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Expected | Expected | Expected | ||||||||||
long-term | Market | long-term | Market | long-term | Market | |||||||
rate of return | value | rate of return | value | rate of return | value | |||||||
% | $ million | % | $ million | % | $ million | |||||||
UK pension plans | ||||||||||||
Equities | 8.0 | 24,106 | 7.5 | 23,631 | 7.50 | 18,465 | ||||||
Bonds | 4.4 | 5,279 | 4.7 | 3,881 | 4.25 | 2,719 | ||||||
Property | 6.5 | 1,259 | 6.5 | 1,370 | 6.50 | 1,097 | ||||||
Cash | 5.6 | 977 | 3.8 | 379 | 3.50 | 1,001 | ||||||
7.3 | 31,621 | 7.0 | 29,261 | 7.00 | 23,282 | |||||||
US pension plans | ||||||||||||
Equities | 8.5 | 6,610 | 8.5 | 6,528 | 8.50 | 5,961 | ||||||
Bonds | 5.0 | 1,347 | 5.0 | 1,371 | 4.75 | 1,079 | ||||||
Property | 8.0 | 16 | 8.0 | 15 | 8.00 | 21 | ||||||
Cash | 3.6 | 72 | 3.2 | 41 | 3.00 | 256 | ||||||
8.0 | 8,045 | 8.0 | 7,955 | 8.00 | 7,317 | |||||||
US other post-retirement benefit plans | ||||||||||||
Equities | 8.5 | 17 | 8.5 | 19 | 8.50 | 20 | ||||||
Bonds | 5.0 | 6 | 5.0 | 7 | 4.75 | 8 | ||||||
7.6 | 23 | 7.5 | 26 | 7.25 | 28 | |||||||
Other plans | ||||||||||||
Equities | 8.1 | 1,260 | 7.6 | 1,158 | 7.50 | 991 | ||||||
Bonds | 5.0 | 1,491 | 4.6 | 1,199 | 4.00 | 943 | ||||||
Property | 5.7 | 145 | 4.7 | 120 | 5.75 | 130 | ||||||
Cash | 4.2 | 214 | 3.0 | 191 | 1.50 | 216 | ||||||
6.4 | 3,110 | 5.8 | 2,668 | 5.50 | 2,280 | |||||||
The assumed rate of investment return and discount rate have a significant effect on the amounts reported. A one-percentage point change in these assumptions for the groups plans would have had the following effects:
$ million | ||||
One-percentage point | ||||
Increase | Decrease | |||
Investment return | ||||
Effect on pension and other post-retirement benefit expense in 2008 | (419 | ) | 415 | |
Discount rate | ||||
Effect on pension and other post-retirement benefit expense in 2008 | (84 | ) | 114 | |
Effect on pension and other post-retirement benefit obligation at 31 December 2007 | (5,039 | ) | 6,459 | |
The assumed US healthcare cost trend rate has a significant effect on the amounts reported. A one-percentage point change in the assumed US healthcare cost trend rate would have had the following effects:
$ million | ||||
One-percentage point | ||||
Increase | Decrease | |||
Effect on US other post-retirement benefit expense in 2008 | 32 | (26 | ) | |
Effect on US other post-retirement obligation at 31 December 2007 | 358 | (295 | ) | |
154 | |
38 Pensions and other post-retirement benefits continued
$ million | ||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||
US | ||||||||||
UK | US | other post- | ||||||||
pension | pension | retirement | ||||||||
Analysis of the amount charged to profit before interest and taxation | plans | plans | benefit plans | Other plans | Total | |||||
Current service costa | 492 | 227 | 43 | 132 | 894 | |||||
Past service cost | 5 | 10 | | | 15 | |||||
Settlement, curtailment and special termination benefits | 36 | | | 2 | 38 | |||||
Payments to defined contribution plans | | 184 | | 25 | 209 | |||||
Total operating chargeb | 533 | 421 | 43 | 159 | 1,156 | |||||
|
||||||||||
Analysis of the amount credited (charged) to other finance expense | ||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | 2,075 | 613 | 2 | 165 | 2,855 | |||||
Interest on plan liabilities | (1,198 | ) | (425 | ) | (190 | ) | (390 | ) | (2,203 | ) |
Other finance income (expense) | 877 | 188 | (188 | ) | (225 | ) | 652 | |||
Analysis of the amount recognized in the statement of recognized income and expense | ||||||||||
Actual return less expected return on pension plan assets | 406 | (28 | ) | | (76 | ) | 302 | |||
Change in assumptions underlying the present value of the plan liabilities | 513 | 358 | 137 | 607 | 1,615 | |||||
Experience gains and losses arising on the plan liabilities | (162 | ) | (27 | ) | 29 | (40 | ) | (200 | ) | |
Actuarial gain recognized in statement of recognized income and expense | 757 | 303 | 166 | 491 | 1,717 | |||||
Movements in benefit obligation during the year | ||||||||||
Benefit obligation at 1 January | 23,289 | 7,695 | 3,300 | 8,149 | 42,433 | |||||
Exchange adjustments | 394 | | | 917 | 1,311 | |||||
Current service costa | 492 | 227 | 43 | 132 | 894 | |||||
Past service cost | 5 | 10 | | | 15 | |||||
Interest cost | 1,198 | 425 | 190 | 390 | 2,203 | |||||
Curtailment | (7 | ) | | | | (7 | ) | |||
Settlement | (3 | ) | | | | (3 | ) | |||
Special termination benefitsc | 46 | | | 2 | 48 | |||||
Contributions by plan participants | 43 | | | 12 | 55 | |||||
Benefit payments (funded plans)d | (1,085 | ) | (580 | ) | (5 | ) | (182 | ) | (1,852 | ) |
Benefit payments (unfunded plans)d | (3 | ) | (37 | ) | (184 | ) | (379 | ) | (603 | ) |
Acquisitions | | | | 141 | 141 | |||||
Disposals | (91 | ) | | | (29 | ) | (120 | ) | ||
Actuarial gain on obligation | (351 | ) | (331 | ) | (166 | ) | (567 | ) | (1,415 | ) |
Benefit obligation at 31 Decembera | 23,927 | 7,409 | 3,178 | 8,586 | 43,100 | |||||
Movements in fair value of plan assets during the year | ||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at 1 January | 29,261 | 7,955 | 26 | 2,668 | 39,910 | |||||
Exchange adjustments | 488 | | | 316 | 804 | |||||
Expected return on plan assetsa, e | 2,075 | 613 | 2 | 165 | 2,855 | |||||
Contributions by plan participants | 43 | | | 12 | 55 | |||||
Contributions by employers (funded plans) | 524 | 97 | | 127 | 748 | |||||
Benefit payments (funded plans)d | (1,085 | ) | (580 | ) | (5 | ) | (182 | ) | (1,852 | ) |
Acquisitions | | | | 101 | 101 | |||||
Disposals | (91 | ) | (12 | ) | | (21 | ) | (124 | ) | |
Actuarial gain on plan assetse | 406 | (28 | ) | | (76 | ) | 302 | |||
Fair value of plan assets at 31 December | 31,621 | 8,045 | 23 | 3,110 | 42,799 | |||||
|
||||||||||
Surplus (deficit) at 31 December | 7,694 | 636 | (3,155 | ) | (5,476 | ) | (301 | ) | ||
Represented by | ||||||||||
Asset recognized | 7,818 | 989 | | 107 | 8,914 | |||||
Liability recognized | (124 | ) | (353 | ) | (3,155 | ) | (5,583 | ) | (9,215 | ) |
7,694 | 636 | (3,155 | ) | (5,476 | ) | (301 | ) | |||
The surplus (deficit) may be analysed between funded and unfunded plans
as follows |
||||||||||
Funded | 7,818 | 978 | (29 | ) | (263 | ) | 8,504 | |||
Unfunded | (124 | ) | (342 | ) | (3,126 | ) | (5,213 | ) | (8,805 | ) |
7,694 | 636 | (3,155 | ) | (5,476 | ) | (301 | ) | |||
The defined benefit obligation may be analysed between funded and unfunded
plans as follows |
||||||||||
Funded | (23,803 | ) | (7,067 | ) | (52 | ) | (3,373 | ) | (34,295 | ) |
Unfunded | (124 | ) | (342 | ) | (3,126 | ) | (5,213 | ) | (8,805 | ) |
(23,927 | ) | (7,409 | ) | (3,178 | ) | (8,586 | ) | (43,100 | ) | |
a | The costs of managing the funds investments are treated as being part of the investment return, the costs of administering our pensions fund benefits are generally included in current service cost and the costs of administering our other post-retirement benefits are included in the benefit obligation. |
b | Included within production and manufacturing expenses and distribution and administration expenses. |
c | The charge for special termination benefits represents the increased liability arising as a result of early retirements occurring as part of a restructuring programme in the UK. |
d | The benefit payments amount shown above comprises $2,398 million benefits plus $57 million of fund expenses incurred in the administration of the benefit. |
e | The actual return on plan assets is made up of the sum of the expected return on plan assets and the actuarial gain on plan assets as disclosed above. |
At 31 December 2007 reimbursement balances due from or to other companies in respect of pensions amounted to $496 million reimbursement assets (2006 $479 million) and $72 million reimbursement liabilities (2006 $71 million). These balances are not included as part of the pension liability, but are reflected elsewhere in the group balance sheet.
155 | |
38 Pensions and other post-retirement benefits continued
$ million | ||||||||||
2006 | ||||||||||
US | ||||||||||
UK | US | other post- | ||||||||
pension | pension | retirement | ||||||||
Analysis of the amount charged to profit before interest and taxation | plans | plans | benefit plans | Other plans | Total | |||||
Current service costa | 432 | 216 | 42 | 139 | 829 | |||||
Past service cost | (74 | ) | 38 | | 39 | 3 | ||||
Settlement, curtailment and special termination benefits | 4 | | | 227 | 231 | |||||
Payments to defined contribution plans | | 161 | | 16 | 177 | |||||
Total operating chargeb | 362 | 415 | 42 | 421 | 1,240 | |||||
|
||||||||||
Analysis of the amount credited (charged) to other finance expense | ||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | 1,711 | 564 | 2 | 133 | 2,410 | |||||
Interest on plan liabilities | (1,006 | ) | (423 | ) | (186 | ) | (325 | ) | (1,940 | ) |
Other finance income (expense) | 705 | 141 | (184 | ) | (192 | ) | 470 | |||
|
||||||||||
Analysis of the amount recognized in the statement of recognized income and expense | ||||||||||
Actual return less expected return on pension plan assets | 1,305 | 521 | | 141 | 1,967 | |||||
Change in assumptions underlying the present value of the plan liabilities | 114 | 195 | 111 | 352 | 772 | |||||
Experience gains and losses arising on the plan liabilities | (24 | ) | 17 | 80 | (197 | ) | (124 | ) | ||
Actuarial gain recognized in statement of recognized income and expense | 1,395 | 733 | 191 | 296 | 2,615 | |||||
|
||||||||||
Movements in benefit obligation during the year | ||||||||||
Benefit obligation at 1 January | 20,063 | 7,900 | 3,478 | 7,414 | 38,855 | |||||
Exchange adjustments | 2,748 | | | 632 | 3,380 | |||||
Current service cost | 432 | 216 | 42 | 139 | 829 | |||||
Past service cost | (74 | ) | 38 | | 39 | 3 | ||||
Interest cost | 1,006 | 423 | 186 | 325 | 1,940 | |||||
Curtailment | (20 | ) | | | | (20 | ) | |||
Settlement | (22 | ) | | | | (22 | ) | |||
Special termination benefitsc | 46 | | | 227 | 273 | |||||
Contributions by plan participants | 38 | | | 5 | 43 | |||||
Benefit payments (funded plans)d | (981 | ) | (615 | ) | (4 | ) | (149 | ) | (1,749 | ) |
Benefit payments (unfunded plans)d | | (37 | ) | (211 | ) | (321 | ) | (569 | ) | |
Acquisitions | | | | | | |||||
Disposals | 143 | (18 | ) | | (7 | ) | 118 | |||
Actuarial gain on obligation | (90 | ) | (212 | ) | (191 | ) | (155 | ) | (648 | ) |
Benefit obligation at 31 December | 23,289 | 7,695 | 3,300 | 8,149 | 42,433 | |||||
Movements in fair value of plan assets during the year | ||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at 1 January | 23,282 | 7,317 | 28 | 2,280 | 32,907 | |||||
Exchange adjustments | 3,325 | | | 122 | 3,447 | |||||
Expected return on plan assetsa, e | 1,711 | 564 | 2 | 133 | 2,410 | |||||
Contributions by plan participants | 38 | | | 5 | 43 | |||||
Contributions by employers (funded plans) | 438 | 181 | | 136 | 755 | |||||
Benefit payments (funded plans)d | (981 | ) | (615 | ) | (4 | ) | (149 | ) | (1,749 | ) |
Acquisitions | | | | | | |||||
Disposals | 143 | (13 | ) | | | 130 | ||||
Actuarial gain on plan assetse | 1,305 | 521 | | 141 | 1,967 | |||||
Fair value of plan assets at 31 December | 29,261 | 7,955 | 26 | 2,668 | 39,910 | |||||
|
||||||||||
Surplus (deficit) at 31 December | 5,972 | 260 | (3,274 | ) | (5,481 | ) | (2,523 | ) | ||
Represented by | ||||||||||
Asset recognized | 6,089 | 617 | | 47 | 6,753 | |||||
Liability recognized | (117 | ) | (357 | ) | (3,274 | ) | (5,528 | ) | (9,276 | ) |
5,972 | 260 | (3,274 | ) | (5,481 | ) | (2,523 | ) | |||
The surplus (deficit) may be analysed between funded and unfunded plans
as follows |
||||||||||
Funded | 6,089 | 601 | (30 | ) | (379 | ) | 6,281 | |||
Unfunded | (117 | ) | (341 | ) | (3,244 | ) | (5,102 | ) | (8,804 | ) |
5,972 | 260 | (3,274 | ) | (5,481 | ) | (2,523 | ) | |||
The defined benefit obligation may be analysed between funded and unfunded
plans as follows |
||||||||||
Funded | (23,172 | ) | (7,354 | ) | (56 | ) | (3,047 | ) | (33,629 | ) |
Unfunded | (117 | ) | (341 | ) | (3,244 | ) | (5,102 | ) | (8,804 | ) |
(23,289 | ) | (7,695 | ) | (3,300 | ) | (8,149 | ) | (42,433 | ) | |
a | The costs of managing the funds investments are treated as being part of the investment return, the costs of administering our pensions fund benefits are generally included in current service cost and the costs of administering our other post-retirement benefits are included in the benefit obligation. |
b | Included within production and manufacturing expenses and distribution and administration expenses. |
c | The charge for special termination benefits represents the increased liability arising as a result of early retirements occurring as part of a restructuring programme in the UK and Europe. |
d | The benefit payments amount shown above comprises $2,266 million benefits plus $52 million of fund expenses incurred in the administration of the benefit. |
e | The actual return on plan assets is made up of the sum of the expected return on plan assets and the actuarial gain on plan assets as disclosed above. |
156 | |
38 Pensions and other post-retirement benefits continued
$ million | ||||||||||
2005 | ||||||||||
US | ||||||||||
UK | US | other post- | ||||||||
pension | pension | retirement | ||||||||
Analysis of the amount charged to profit before interest and taxation | plans | plans | benefit plans | Other plans | Total | |||||
Current service costa | 379 | 216 | 50 | 140 | 785 | |||||
Past service cost | 5 | (10 | ) | (5 | ) | 51 | 41 | |||
Settlement, curtailment and special termination benefits | 37 | | | 10 | 47 | |||||
Payments to defined contribution plans | | 158 | | 14 | 172 | |||||
Total operating charge | 421 | 364 | 45 | 215 | 1,045 | |||||
Innovene operations | (38 | ) | (24 | ) | (3 | ) | (21 | ) | (86 | ) |
Continuing operationsb | 383 | 340 | 42 | 194 | 959 | |||||
Analysis of the amount credited (charged) to other finance expense | ||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | 1,456 | 557 | 2 | 123 | 2,138 | |||||
Interest on plan liabilities | (1,003 | ) | (444 | ) | (207 | ) | (368 | ) | (2,022 | ) |
Other finance income (expense) | 453 | 113 | (205 | ) | (245 | ) | 116 | |||
Innovene operations | (10 | ) | (5 | ) | 2 | 10 | (3 | ) | ||
Continuing operations | 443 | 108 | (203 | ) | (235 | ) | 113 | |||
Analysis of the amount recognized in the statement of recognized income and expense | ||||||||||
Actual return less expected return on pension plan assets | 3,111 | 96 | | 157 | 3,364 | |||||
Change in assumptions underlying the present value of the plan liabilities | (1,884 | ) | (59 | ) | 236 | (470 | ) | (2,177 | ) | |
Experience gains and losses arising on the plan liabilities | (14 | ) | (197 | ) | (17 | ) | 16 | (212 | ) | |
Actuarial gain (loss) recognized in statement of recognized income and expense | 1,213 | (160 | ) | 219 | (297 | ) | 975 | |||
|
a | The costs of managing the funds investments are treated as being part of the investment return, the costs of administering our pensions fund benefits are generally included in current service cost, and the costs of administering our other post-retirement benefits are included in the benefit obligation. |
b | Included within production and manufacturing expenses and distribution and administration expenses. |
$ million | ||||||||||
History of surplus (deficit) and of experience gains and losses | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||
Benefit obligation at 31 December | 43,100 | 42,433 | 38,855 | 39,945 | 35,995 | |||||
Fair value of plan assets at 31 December | 42,799 | 39,910 | 32,907 | 31,712 | 27,853 | |||||
Surplus (deficit) | (301 | ) | (2,523 | ) | (5,948 | ) | (8,233 | ) | (8,142 | ) |
|
||||||||||
Experience gains and losses on plan liabilities | (200 | ) | (124 | ) | (212 | ) | (468 | ) | 873 | |
Actual return less expected return on pension plan assets | 302 | 1,967 | 3,364 | 1,349 | 2,392 | |||||
Actual return on plan assets | 3,157 | 4,377 | 5,502 | 3,332 | 3,892 | |||||
Actuarial
gain recognized in statement of recognized income and expense |
1,717 | 2,615 | 975 | 107 | 76 | |||||
Cumulative
amount recognized in statement of recognized income and expense |
5,490 | 3,773 | 1,158 | 183 | 76 | |||||
|
Estimated
future benefit payments
The expected benefit payments, which reflect expected
future service, as appropriate, but exclude fund expenses, up until 2017 are
as follows:
$ million | ||||||||||
US | ||||||||||
UK | US | other post- | ||||||||
pension | pension | retirement | ||||||||
plans | plans | benefit plans | Other plans | Total | ||||||
2008 | 1,112 | 629 | 224 | 534 | 2,499 | |||||
2009 | 1,183 | 656 | 227 | 533 | 2,599 | |||||
2010 | 1,252 | 670 | 235 | 529 | 2,686 | |||||
2011 | 1,334 | 681 | 240 | 521 | 2,776 | |||||
2012 | 1,378 | 716 | 242 | 516 | 2,852 | |||||
2013-2017 | 7,650 | 3,301 | 1,243 | 2,551 | 14,745 | |||||
|
157 | |
The allotted, called up and fully paid share capital at 31 December was as follows:
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||
Issued | Shares (thousand) | $ million | Shares (thousand) | $ million | Shares (thousand) | $ million | |||||||
8% cumulative first preference shares of £1 each | 7,233 | 12 | 7,233 | 12 | 7,233 | 12 | |||||||
9% cumulative second preference shares of £1 each | 5,473 | 9 | 5,473 | 9 | 5,473 | 9 | |||||||
21 | 21 | 21 | |||||||||||
Ordinary shares of 25 cents each | |||||||||||||
At 1 January | 21,457,301 | 5,364 | 20,657,045 | 5,164 | 21,525,978 | 5,382 | |||||||
Issue of new shares for employee share schemes | 69,273 | 18 | 64,854 | 16 | 82,144 | 20 | |||||||
Issue of ordinary share capital for TNK-BP | | | 111,151 | 28 | 108,629 | 27 | |||||||
Repurchase of ordinary share capital | (663,150 | ) | (166 | ) | (358,374 | ) | (90 | ) | (1,059,706 | ) | (265 | ) | |
Othera | | | 982,625 | 246 | | | |||||||
At 31 December | 20,863,424 | 5,216 | 21,457,301 | 5,364 | 20,657,045 | 5,164 | |||||||
5,237 | 5,385 | 5,185 | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Authorized | |||||||||||||
8% cumulative first preference shares of £1 each | 7,250 | 12 | 7,250 | 12 | 7,250 | 12 | |||||||
9% cumulative second preference shares of £1 each | 5,500 | 9 | 5,500 | 9 | 5,500 | 9 | |||||||
Ordinary shares of 25 cents each | 36,000,000 | 9,000 | 36,000,000 | 9,000 | 36,000,000 | 9,000 | |||||||
|
a | Reclassification in respect of share repurchases in 2005. |
Voting on substantive resolutions tabled at a general meeting is on a poll.
On a poll, shareholders present in person or by proxy have two votes for every £5
in nominal amount of the first and second preference shares held and one vote
for every ordinary share held. On a show-of-hands vote on other resolutions
(procedural matters) at a general meeting, shareholders present in person or
by proxy have one vote each.
In the event of the winding up of the company,
preference shareholders would be entitled to a sum equal to the capital paid
up on the preference shares, plus an amount in respect of accrued and unpaid
dividends and a premium equal to the higher of (i) 10% of the capital paid up
on the preference shares and (ii) the excess of the average market price of such
shares on the London Stock Exchange
during the previous six months over
par value.
Repurchase of ordinary share capital
The
company purchased 663,149,528 ordinary shares (2006 1,334,362,750 and 2005 1,059,706,481
ordinary shares) for a total consideration of $7,497 million (2006 $15,481 million and 2005 $11,597 million), of
which all were for cancellation. At 31 December 2007 150,966,096 (2006 99,045,000 and 2005 nil) ordinary shares bought back were awaiting cancellation. These shares have been excluded from ordinary shares in issue shown above. At 31 December 2007,
1,940,638,808 shares of nominal value $485 million were held in treasury (2006 1,946,804,533 shares of nominal value $487 million). The maximum number of shares held in treasury during the year was 1,946,804,533 shares of nominal value
$487 million, representing 9.1% of the called up ordinary share capital of the company. During 2007, 1,700,000 treasury shares were gifted to the ESOP trust and 4,465,725 treasury shares were re-issued in relation to employee share schemes, in
total representing less than 0.1% of the ordinary share capital of the company. The nominal value of these shares was $2 million and the total proceeds received were $35
million.
Transaction
costs of share repurchases amounted to $40 million (2006 $83 million and 2005 $63
million).
158 | |
Share | Capital | |||||||
Share | premium | redemption | Merger | |||||
capital | account | reserve | reserve | |||||
At 1 January 2007 | 5,385 | 9,074 | 839 | 27,201 | ||||
Currency translation differences (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Exchange gain on translation of foreign operations transferred to (profit) or loss on sale (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Actuarial gain relating to pension and other post-retirement benefits (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Available-for-sale investments marked to market (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Available-for-sale investments recycling (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Repurchase of ordinary share capital | (166 | ) | | 166 | | |||
Share-based payments (net of tax) | 18 | 507 | | 5 | ||||
Cash flow hedges marked to market (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Cash flow hedges recycling (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Profit for the year | | | | | ||||
Dividends | | | | | ||||
At 31 December 2007 | 5,237 | 9,581 | 1,005 | 27,206 | ||||
|
Share | Capital | |||||||
Share | premium | redemption | Merger | |||||
capital | account | reserve | reserve | |||||
At 1 January 2006 | 5,185 | 7,371 | 749 | 27,190 | ||||
Currency translation differences (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Actuarial gain relating to pension and other post-retirement benefits (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Issue of ordinary share capital for TNK-BP | 28 | 1,222 | | | ||||
Available-for-sale investments marked to market (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Available-for-sale investments recycling (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Repurchase of ordinary share capital | (90 | ) | | 90 | | |||
Share-based payments (net of tax) | 16 | 481 | | 11 | ||||
Cash flow hedges marked to market (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Cash flow hedges recycling (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Profit for the year | | | | | ||||
Dividends | | | | | ||||
Otherb | 246 | | | | ||||
At 31 December 2006 | 5,385 | 9,074 | 839 | 27,201 | ||||
|
Share | Capital | |||||||
Share | premium | redemption | Merger | |||||
capital | account | reserve | reserve | |||||
At 31 December 2004 | 5,403 | 5,636 | 730 | 27,162 | ||||
Adoption of IAS 39 | | | | | ||||
At 1 January 2005 | 5,403 | 5,636 | 730 | 27,162 | ||||
Currency translation differences (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Exchange gain on translation of foreign operations transferred to (profit) or loss on sale (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Actuarial gain relating to pension and other post retirement benefits (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Issue of ordinary share capital for TNK-BP | 27 | 1,223 | | | ||||
Available-for-sale investments marked to market (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Available-for-sale investments recycling (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Repurchase of ordinary share capital | (265 | ) | | 19 | | |||
Share-based payments (net of tax) | 20 | 512 | | 28 | ||||
Cash flow hedges marked to market (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Cash flow hedges recycling (net of tax) | | | | | ||||
Profit for the year | | | | | ||||
Dividends | | | | | ||||
At 31 December 2005 | 5,185 | 7,371 | 749 | 27,190 | ||||
|
a | At 31 December 2006, the foreign currency translation reserve included $122 million relating to non-current assets held for sale. During 2007, this was included in the $147 million recycled to the income statement relating to disposals in 2007. For further details see Note 4. |
b | Reclassification in respect of share repurchases in 2005. |
159 | |
$ million | |||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign | Share- | ||||||||||||||||||||
currency | Available- | based | Profit | BP | |||||||||||||||||
Other | Own | Treasury | translation | for-sale | Cash flow | payment | and loss | shareholders | Minority | Total | |||||||||||
reserve | shares | shares | reserve | investments | hedges | reserve | account | equity | interest | equity | |||||||||||
5 | (154 | ) | (22,182 | ) | 4,685 | 386 | 39 | 859 | 58,487 | 84,624 | 841 | 85,465 | |||||||||
| | | 2,002 | | | | | 2,002 | 24 | 2,026 | |||||||||||
| | | (147 | ) | | | | | (147 | ) | | (147 | ) | ||||||||
| | | | | | | 1,290 | 1,290 | | 1,290 | |||||||||||
| | | | 152 | | | | 152 | | 152 | |||||||||||
| | | | (57 | ) | | | | (57 | ) | | (57 | ) | ||||||||
| | | | | | | (7,997 | ) | (7,997 | ) | | (7,997 | ) | ||||||||
(5 | ) | 94 | 70 | | | | 337 | (9 | ) | 1,017 | | 1,017 | |||||||||
| | | | | 138 | | | 138 | | 138 | |||||||||||
| | | | | (71 | ) | | | (71 | ) | | (71 | ) | ||||||||
| | | | | | | 20,845 | 20,845 | 324 | 21,169 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | (8,106 | ) | (8,106 | ) | (227 | ) | (8,333 | ) | |||||||
| (60 | ) | (22,112 | ) | 6,540 | 481 | 106 | 1,196 | 64,510 | 93,690 | 962 | 94,652 | |||||||||
|
$ million | |||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign | Share- | ||||||||||||||||||||
currency | Available- | based | Profit | BP | |||||||||||||||||
Other | Own | Treasury | translation | for-sale | Cash flow | payment | and loss | shareholders | Minority | Total | |||||||||||
reserve | shares | shares | reserve | a | investments | hedges | reserve | account | equity | interest | equity | ||||||||||
16 | (140 | ) | (10,598 | ) | 2,943 | 385 | (234 | ) | 643 | 46,151 | 79,661 | 789 | 80,450 | ||||||||
| (19 | ) | | 1,742 | 27 | 6 | | | 1,756 | 49 | 1,805 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | 1,795 | 1,795 | | 1,795 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | 1,250 | | 1,250 | |||||||||||
| | | | 478 | | | | 478 | | 478 | |||||||||||
| | | | (504 | ) | | | | (504 | ) | | (504 | ) | ||||||||
| | (11,472 | ) | | | | | (4,009 | ) | (15,481 | ) | | (15,481 | ) | |||||||
(11 | ) | 5 | 134 | | | | 216 | (79 | ) | 773 | | 773 | |||||||||
| | | | | 313 | | | 313 | | 313 | |||||||||||
| | | | | (46 | ) | | | (46 | ) | | (46 | ) | ||||||||
| | | | | | | 22,315 | 22,315 | 286 | 22,601 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | (7,686 | ) | (7,686 | ) | (283 | ) | (7,969 | ) | |||||||
| | (246 | ) | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
5 | (154 | ) | (22,182 | ) | 4,685 | 386 | 39 | 859 | 58,487 | 84,624 | 841 | 85,465 | |||||||||
|
$ million | |||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign | Share- | ||||||||||||||||||||
currency | Available- | based | Profit | BP | |||||||||||||||||
Other | Own | Treasury | translation | for-sale | Cash flow | payment | and loss | shareholders | Minority | Total | |||||||||||
reserve | shares | shares | reserve | investments | hedges | reserve | account | equity | interest | equity | |||||||||||
44 | (82 | ) | | 5,616 | | | 443 | 31,940 | 76,892 | 1,343 | 78,235 | ||||||||||
| | | | 230 | (118 | ) | | (355 | ) | (243 | ) | | (243 | ) | |||||||
44 | (82 | ) | | 5,616 | 230 | (118 | ) | 443 | 31,585 | 76,649 | 1,343 | 77,992 | |||||||||
| 12 | | (2,453 | ) | (35 | ) | (3 | ) | | | (2,479 | ) | (18 | ) | (2,497 | ) | |||||
| | | (220 | ) | | | | | (220 | ) | | (220 | ) | ||||||||
| | | | | | | 619 | 619 | | 619 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | 1,250 | | 1,250 | |||||||||||
| | | | 232 | | | | 232 | | 232 | |||||||||||
| | | | (42 | ) | | | | (42 | ) | | (42 | ) | ||||||||
| | (10,601 | ) | | | | | (750 | ) | (11,597 | ) | | (11,597 | ) | |||||||
(28 | ) | (70 | ) | 3 | | | | 200 | 30 | 695 | | 695 | |||||||||
| | | | | (149 | ) | | | (149 | ) | | (149 | ) | ||||||||
| | | | | 36 | | | 36 | | 36 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | 22,026 | 22,026 | 291 | 22,317 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | (7,359 | ) | (7,359 | ) | (827 | ) | (8,186 | ) | |||||||
16 | (140 | ) | (10,598 | ) | 2,943 | 385 | (234 | ) | 643 | 46,151 | 79,661 | 789 | 80,450 | ||||||||
|
160 | |
40 Capital and reserves continued
Share
capital
The balance
on the share capital account represents the aggregate nominal value of all ordinary
and preference shares in issue, including treasury shares.
Share
premium account
The balance
on the share premium account represents the amounts received in excess of the
nominal value of the ordinary and preference shares.
Capital
redemption reserve
The balance
on the capital redemption reserve represents the aggregate nominal value of
all the ordinary shares repurchased and cancelled.
Merger
reserve
The balance
on the merger reserve represents the fair value of the consideration given in
excess of the nominal value of the ordinary shares issued in an acquisition
made by the issue of shares.
Other
reserve
The balance
on the other reserve represents the fair value of the consideration given in
excess of the nominal value of the ordinary shares to be issued in the ARCO
acquisition on the exercise of ARCO share options.
Own
shares
Own shares
represent BP shares held in Employee Share Ownership Plans (ESOPs) to meet the
future requirements of the employee share-based payment arrangements.
Treasury
shares
Treasury
shares represent BP shares repurchased and available for re-issue.
Foreign
currency translation reserve
The foreign
currency translation reserve is used to record exchange differences arising
from the translations of the financial statements of foreign operations. Upon
disposal of foreign operations, the related accumulated exchange differences
are recycled to the income statement. This reserve is also used to record the
effect of hedging net investments in foreign operations.
Available-for-sale
investments
This reserve
records the changes in fair value on available-for-sale investments. On disposal,
the cumulative changes in fair value are recycled to the income statement.
Cash
flow hedges
This reserve
records the portion of the gain or loss on a hedging instrument in a cash flow
hedge that is determined to be an effective hedge. When the hedged transaction
occurs, the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is transferred out of equity
to either profit or loss or the carrying value of assets, as appropriate. If
the forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur the gain or loss recognized
in equity is transferred to profit or loss.
Share-based
payment reserve
This reserve
represents cumulative amounts charged to profit in respect of employee share-based
payment arrangements where the scheme has not yet been settled by means of an
award of shares to an individual.
Profit
and loss account
The balance
held on this reserve is the accumulated retained profits of the group.
$ million | ||||||
Effect of share-based payment transactions on the groups result and financial position | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||
Total expense recognized for equity-settled share-based payment transactions | 412 | 405 | 348 | |||
Total expense recognized for cash-settled share-based payment transactions | 16 | 14 | 20 | |||
Total expense recognized for share-based payment transactions | 428 | 419 | 368 | |||
Closing balance of liability for cash-settled share-based payment transactions | 40 | 38 | 48 | |||
Total intrinsic value for vested cash-settled share-based payments | 22 | 23 | 41 | |||
|
For ease of presentation, option and share holdings detailed in the tables within this note are stated as UK ordinary share equivalents in US dollars. US employees are granted American depositary shares (ADSs) or options over the companys ADSs (one ADS is equivalent to six ordinary shares). The share-based payment plans that existed during the year are detailed below. All plans are ongoing unless otherwise stated.
Plans
for executive directors
Executive
Directors Incentive Plan (EDIP) share element (2005 onwards)
An equity-settled incentive
share plan for executive directors driven by one performance measure over a
three-year performance period. The award of shares is determined by comparing
BPs total shareholder return (TSR) against the other oil majors. In addition,
for the group chief executive, 27% of the grant is based on long-term leadership
(LTL) measures. After the performance period, the shares that vest (net of tax)
are then subject to a three-year retention period. The directors remuneration
report on pages 62-72 includes full details of this plan.
161 | |
41 Share-based payments continued
Executive
Directors Incentive Plan (EDIP) share element (pre-2005)
An equity-settled
incentive share plan for executive directors driven by three performance measures
over a three-year performance period. The primary measure is BPs shareholder
return against the market (SHRAM) versus that of the companies within the FTSE
All World Oil & Gas Index. This accounts for nearly two-thirds of the potential
total award, with the remainder being assessed on BPs relative return
on average capital employed (ROACE) and earnings per share (EPS) growth compared
with the other oil majors. After the performance period, the shares that vest
(net of tax) are then subject to a three-year retention period. The directors
remuneration report on pages 62-72 includes full details of this plan. For
2005
and subsequent years, the share element of EDIP was amended as described above.
Executive
Directors Incentive Plan (EDIP) share option element (pre-2005)
An equity-settled
share option plan for executive directors that permits options to be granted
at an exercise price no lower than the market price of a share on the date
that
the option is granted. Options vest over three years (one-third each after
one, two and three years respectively) and must be exercised within seven years
of
the date of grant. Last grants were made in 2004. From 2005 onwards the remuneration
committees policy is not to make further grants of share options to executive
directors.
Plans
for senior employees
Medium
Term Performance Plan (MTPP) (2005 onwards)
An equity-settled incentive
share plan for senior employees driven by two performance measures over a three-year
performance period. The award of shares is determined by comparing BPs
TSR against the other oil majors and, additionally, by comparing free cash
flow
(FCF) against a threshold established for the period. For a small group of
particularly senior employees, only the TSR measure is applicable in determining
the award.
The number of shares awarded is increased to take account of the net dividends
that would have been received during the performance period, assuming that
such
dividends had been reinvested. With regard to leaver provisions, the general
rule is that leaving employment during the performance period will preclude
an award of shares. However, special arrangements apply where the participant
leaves for a qualifying reason and employment ceases after completion of the
first year of the performance period. The current policy of the company, which
is reflected in the terms of the MTPP, is that senior employees subject to
the
plan should meet a minimum shareholding requirement.
Long
Term Performance Plan (LTPP) (pre-2005)
An equity-settled
incentive share plan for senior employees driven by three performance measures
over a three-year performance period. The primary measure is BPs SHRAM
versus that of the companies within the FTSE All World Oil & Gas Index.
This accounts for nearly two-thirds of the potential total award, with the remainder
being assessed on BPs relative ROACE and EPS growth compared with the
other oil majors. Shares are awarded at the end of the performance period and
are then subject to a three-year retention period. With regard to leaver provisions,
the general rule is that leaving during the performance period will preclude
an award of shares. However, special arrangements apply where the participant
leaves for a qualifying reason and employment ceases after completion of the
first year of the performance period. This plan was replaced by the MTPP for
2005 onwards.
Deferred
Annual Bonus Plan (DAB)
An equity-settled
restricted share plan for senior employees. The award value is equal to 50%
of the annual cash bonus awarded for the preceding performance year (the performance
period). The shares are restricted for a period of three years (the restriction
period). Shares accrue dividends during the restriction period and these
are reinvested. With regard to leaver provisions, if a participant ceases to
be employed by BP prior to the end of the performance period, the general rule
is that this will preclude an award of shares. However, special arrangements
apply where the participant leaves for a qualifying reason. Similarly, if a
participant ceases to be employed by BP prior to the end of the restriction
period, the general rule is that the restricted shares will be forfeited. Special
arrangements apply where the participant leaves for a qualifying reason.
Performance
Share Plan (PSP)
An equity-settled
restricted share plan for senior professionals and team leaders. The award
takes into account the recipients performance in the prior calendar year (the
performance period). Shares, provided initially as share units,
are restricted for a period of three years (the restriction period).
Share units accrue notional dividends during the restriction period and these
are reinvested. At the end of the restriction period additional units may be
awarded based on BPs TSR performance against the other oil majors. At
award, share units are converted into shares. With regard to leaver provisions,
the general rule is that leaving during the performance period will preclude
an award of share units. If a participant ceases to be employed by BP prior
to the end of the restriction period, the general rule is that share units
will
lapse. Special arrangements apply where the participant leaves for a qualifying
reason.
Restricted
Share Plan (RSP)
An equity-settled
restricted share plan used predominantly for senior employees in special circumstances
(such as recruitment and retention). There are no performance conditions but
the shares are subject to a three-year restriction period. During the restriction
period, shares accrue dividends, which are reinvested. With regard to leaver
provisions, the general rule is that ceasing employment during the restriction
period will result in the forfeit of shares. However, special arrangements apply
where the participant leaves for a qualifying reason.
BP
Share Option Plan (BPSOP)
An equity-settled
share option plan that applies to certain categories of employees. Participants
are granted share options with an exercise price no lower than the market price
of a share immediately preceding the date of grant. There are no performance
conditions and the options are exercisable between the third and 10th anniversaries
of the grant date. The general rule is that the options will lapse if the participant
leaves employment before the end of the third calendar year from the date of
grant (and that vested options are exercisable within 31/2 years from the date of leaving). However, special arrangements apply
where the participant leaves for a qualifying reason and employment ceases after
the end of the calendar year of the date of grant. From 2007, share options
no longer form a regular element of our incentive plans.
162 | |
41 Share-based payments continued
Savings
and matching plans
BP
ShareSave Plan
This is a savings-related
share option plan, under which employees save on a monthly basis, over a three-
or five-year period, towards the purchase of shares at a fixed price determined
when the option is granted. This price is usually set at a 20% discount to the
market price at the time of grant. The option must be exercised within six months
of maturity of the savings contract; otherwise it lapses. The plan is run in
the UK and options are granted annually, usually in June. Participants leaving
for a qualifying reason will have six months in which to use their savings to
exercise their options on a pro-rated basis.
BP
ShareMatch Plans
These are matching
share plans, under which BP matches employees own contributions of shares
up to a predetermined limit. The plans are run in the UK and in more than 70
other countries. The UK plan is run on a monthly basis with shares being held
in trust for five years before they can be released free of any income tax
and
national insurance liability. In other countries, the plan is run on an annual
basis with shares being held in trust for three years. The plan is operated
on a cash basis in those countries where there are regulatory restrictions
preventing
the holding of BP shares. When the employee leaves BP, all shares must be removed
from trust and units under the plan operated on a cash basis must be encashed.
Local
plans
In some countries,
BP provides local scheme benefits, the rules and qualifications for which vary
according to local circumstances.
The above share plans are indicated as being equity-settled. In certain countries, however, it is not possible to award shares to employees owing to local legislation. In these instances the award will be settled in cash, calculated as the cash equivalent of the value to the employee of an equity-settled plan.
Cash
plans
Cash-settled
share-based payments / Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs)
These are cash-settled
share-based payments available to certain employees that require the group to
pay the intrinsic value of the cash option/SAR/ restricted shares to the employee
at the date of exercise or on maturity. The cash options/SARs have the same
rules as the BPSOP plan and the cash restricted share plans (MTPP, DAB, PSP,
RSP) have the same rules as their equity-settled counterparts.
Employee
Share Ownership Plans (ESOPs)
ESOPs
have been established to acquire BP shares to satisfy any awards made to participants
under EDIP, MTPP, LTPP, DAB and the BP ShareMatch Plans. The ESOPs have waived
their rights to dividends on shares held for future awards and are funded by
the group. Until such time as the companys own shares held by the ESOP
trusts vest unconditionally to employees, the amount paid for those shares is
deducted in arriving at shareholders equity. See Note 40. Assets and
liabilities of the ESOPs are recognized as assets and liabilities of the group.
At
31 December 2007, the ESOPs held 6,448,838 shares (2006 12,795,887 shares and
2005 14,560,003 shares) for potential future awards, which had a market value
of $79 million (2006 $142 million and 2005 $156 million).
Share option transactions | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||
Number | average | Number | average | Number | average | |||||||
of | exercise price | of | exercise price | of | exercise price | |||||||
options | $ | options | $ | options | $ | |||||||
Outstanding at beginning of the year | 426,471,462 | 8.25 | 450,453,502 | 7.64 | 470,263,808 | 7.16 | ||||||
Granted during the year | 6,004,025 | 9.11 | 53,977,639 | 11.18 | 54,482,053 | 10.24 | ||||||
Forfeited during the year | (3,924,714 | ) | 9.10 | (7,169,710 | ) | 8.69 | (4,844,827 | ) | 8.30 | |||
Exercised during the year | (69,715,558 | ) | 6.94 | (70,658,480 | ) | 6.52 | (68,687,976 | ) | 6.40 | |||
Expired during the year | (740,972 | ) | 8.68 | (131,489 | ) | 7.99 | (759,556 | ) | 6.75 | |||
Outstanding at the end of the year | 358,094,243 | 8.51 | 426,471,462 | 8.25 | 450,453,502 | 7.64 | ||||||
Exercisable at the end of the year | 238,707,055 | 7.70 | 236,726,966 | 7.41 | 222,729,398 | 7.54 | ||||||
|
As share options are exercised continuously throughout the year, the weighted average share price during the year of $11.72 (2006 $11.85 and 2005 $10.77) is representative of the weighted average share price at the date of exercise. For the options outstanding at 31 December 2007, the exercise price ranges and weighted average remaining contractual lives are shown below.
Options outstanding | Options exercisable | |||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||
Number | average | average | Number | average | ||||||
of | remaining life | exercise price | of | exercise price | ||||||
Range of exercise prices | shares | Years | $ | shares | $ | |||||
$5.10 $6.79 | 66,360,194 | 3.88 | 6.15 | 55,509,664 | 6.23 | |||||
$6.80 $8.50 | 162,364,928 | 4.00 | 8.02 | 156,236,204 | 8.04 | |||||
$8.51 $10.21 | 55,021,656 | 4.89 | 9.28 | 26,961,187 | 8.78 | |||||
$10.22 $11.92 | 74,347,465 | 7.80 | 11.13 | | | |||||
358,094,243 | 4.90 | 8.51 | 238,707,055 | 7.70 | ||||||
|
163 | |
41 Share-based payments continued
Fair values and associated details for options and shares granted | ||||
Options granted in 2007 | ShareSave 3 year | ShareSave 5 year | ||
Option pricing model used | Binomial | Binomial | ||
Weighted average fair value | $3.57 | $3.79 | ||
Weighted average share price | $12.10 | $12.10 | ||
Weighted average exercise price | $9.13 | $9.13 | ||
Expected volatility | 21% | 21% | ||
Option life | 3.5 years | 5.5 years | ||
Expected dividends | 3.48% | 3.48% | ||
Risk free interest rate | 5.75% | 5.75% | ||
Expected exercise behaviour | 100% year 4 | 100% year 6 | ||
|
Options granted in 2006 | BPSOP | ShareSave 3 year | ShareSave 5 year | |||
Option pricing model used | Binomial | Binomial | Binomial | |||
Weighted average fair value | $2.46 | $2.88 | $3.08 | |||
Weighted average share price | $11.07 | $11.08 | $11.08 | |||
Weighted average exercise price | $11.17 | $9.10 | $9.10 | |||
Expected volatility | 22% | 24% | 24% | |||
Option life | 10 years | 3.5 years | 5.5 years | |||
Expected dividends | 3.23% | 3.40% | 3.40% | |||
Risk free interest rate | 4.50% | 5.00% | 4.75% | |||
Expected exercise behaviour | 5% years 4-9, | 100% year 4 | 100% year 6 | |||
70% year 10 | ||||||
Options granted in 2005 | BPSOP | ShareSave 3 year | ShareSave 5 year | |||
Option pricing model used | Binomial | Binomial | Binomial | |||
Weighted average fair value | $2.34 | $2.76 | $2.94 | |||
Weighted average share price | $10.85 | $10.49 | $10.49 | |||
Weighted average exercise price | $10.63 | $7.96 | $7.96 | |||
Expected volatility | 18% | 18% | 18% | |||
Option life | 10 years | 3.5 years | 5.5 years | |||
Expected dividends | 2.72% | 3.00% | 3.00% | |||
Risk free interest rate | 4.25% | 4.00% | 4.25% | |||
Expected exercise behaviour | 5% years 4-9, | 100% year 4 | 100% year 6 | |||
70% year 10 | ||||||
The group uses an appropriate valuation model of expected volatility of US ADSs for the quarter within which the grant date of the relevant plan falls. Management is responsible for all inputs and assumptions in relation to that model, including the determination of expected volatility.
MTPP- | MTPP- | EDIP- | EDIP- | |||||||||||
Shares granted in 2007 | TSR | FCF | TSR | LTL | RSP | DAB | PSP | |||||||
Number
of equity instruments granted (million) |
9.4 | 8.5 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 7.7 | 4.4 | 14.8 | |||||||
Weighted average fair value | $4.73 | $10.02 | $2.81 | $9.92 | $11.93 | $10.02 | $12.37 | |||||||
Fair value measurement basis | Monte Carlo | Market value | Monte Carlo | Market value | Market value | Market value | Monte Carlo | |||||||
|
||||||||||||||
MTPP- | MTPP- | EDIP- | EDIP- | |||||||||||
Shares granted in 2006 | TSR | FCF | TSR | LTL | RSP | DAB | ||||||||
Number of equity instruments granted (million)
|
8.7 | 7.8 | 3.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.5 | ||||||||
Weighted average fair value | $7.28 | $11.23 | $4.87 | $11.23 | $11.07 | $11.06 | ||||||||
Fair value measurement basis | Monte Carlo | Market value | Monte Carlo | Market value | Market value | Market value | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
MTPP- | MTPP- | EDIP- | EDIP- | |||||||||||
Shares granted in 2005 | TSR | FCF | TSR | LTL | RSP | |||||||||
Number of equity instruments granted (million)
|
9.3 | 8.4 | 3.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | |||||||||
Weighted average fair value | $5.72 | $11.04 | $3.87 | $10.13 | $11.04 | |||||||||
Fair value measurement basis | Monte Carlo | Market value | Monte Carlo | Market value | Market value | |||||||||
|
The group used a Monte Carlo simulation to fair value the TSR element of
the 2007, 2006 and 2005 PSP, MTPP and EDIP plans. In accordance with the
rules of the plans the model simulates BPs TSR and compares it against
our principal strategic competitors over the three-year period of the plans.
The model takes into account the historic dividends, share price volatilities
and covariances of BP and each comparator company to produce a predicted
distribution of relative share performance. This is applied to the reward
criteria to give an expected value of the TSR element.
Accounting expense does not necessarily represent
the actual value of share-based payments made to recipients, which are determined
by the remuneration committee according to established criteria.
164 | |
$ million | ||||
Employee costs | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |
Wages and salariesa | 9,560 | 8,411 | 8,695 | |
Social security costs | 771 | 751 | 754 | |
Share-based payments | 428 | 419 | 368 | |
Pension and other post-retirement benefit costs | 504 | 770 | 929 | |
|
||||
11,263 | 10,351 | 10,746 | ||
Innovene operations | | | (892 | ) |
|
||||
Continuing operations | 11,263 | 10,351 | 9,854 | |
|
||||
|
||||
Number of employees at 31 December | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |
|
||||
Exploration and Production | 19,800 | 19,000 | 17,000 | |
Refining and Marketingb | 69,000 | 69,500 | 70,800 | |
Gas, Power and Renewables | 4,500 | 4,500 | 4,100 | |
Other businesses and corporate | 4,300 | 4,000 | 4,300 | |
|
||||
97,600 | 97,000 | 96,200 | ||
|
||||
|
||||
By geographical area | ||||
|
||||
UK | 17,000 | 16,900 | 16,500 | |
Rest of Europe | 19,900 | 20,200 | 21,300 | |
US | 33,000 | 33,700 | 34,400 | |
Rest of World | 27,700 | 26,200 | 24,000 | |
|
||||
97,600 | 97,000 | 96,200 | ||
|
2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | Rest of | Rest of | ||||||||
Average number of employees | UK | Europe | US | World | Total | UK | Europe | US | World | Total | |
Exploration and Production | 3,700 | 700 | 6,600 | 8,700 | 19,700 | 3,300 | 700 | 6,100 | 8,100 | 18,200 | |
Refining and Marketing | 10,600 | 18,600 | 23,500 | 16,300 | 69,000 | 11,300 | 19,300 | 24,900 | 15,000 | 70,500 | |
Gas, Power and Renewables | 300 | 700 | 1,800 | 1,500 | 4,300 | 300 | 700 | 1,600 | 1,700 | 4,300 | |
Other businesses and corporate | 2,100 | 200 | 1,700 | 200 | 4,200 | 1,900 | 200 | 1,900 | 100 | 4,100 | |
16,700 | 20,200 | 33,600 | 26,700 | 97,200 | 16,800 | 20,900 | 34,500 | 24,900 | 97,100 | ||
2005 | ||||||
Rest of | Rest of | |||||
Average number of employees | UK | Europe | US | World | Total | |
Exploration and Production | 3,000 | 600 | 5,300 | 7,300 | 16,200 | |
Refining and Marketing | 11,100 | 19,700 | 26,200 | 14,000 | 71,000 | |
Gas, Power and Renewables | 200 | 800 | 1,500 | 1,400 | 3,900 | |
Other businesses and corporate | 3,800 | 3,900 | 3,600 | 300 | 11,600 | |
18,100 | 25,000 | 36,600 | 23,000 | 102,700 | ||
|
a | Includes termination payments of $422 million (2006 $257 million and 2005 $348 million). A restructuring was announced in October 2007, the implementation of which is expected to continue through 2008 and into 2009. Additional restructuring charges to the income statement of around $1 billion are expected in 2008. |
b | Includes 25,900 (2006 26,100 and 2005 27,800) service station staff. |
43 Remuneration of directors and senior management
Remuneration of directors | $ million | ||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||
Total for all directors | |||||
Emoluments | 26 | 14 | 18 | ||
Gains made on the exercise of share options | 2 | 12 | | ||
Amounts awarded under incentive schemes | 10 | 14 | 8 | ||
|
Emoluments
These amounts comprise fees paid to the non-executive chairman
and the non-executive directors and, for executive directors, salary and
benefits earned during the relevant financial year, plus bonuses awarded
for the year.
This includes an ex gratia superannuation payment of $3 million (2006 and 2005 nil) and compensation for loss of office of $1
million (2006 and 2005 nil).
Pension contributions
Six executive directors participated in a non-contributory pension scheme established for UK employees by a separate trust fund to which contributions are made by BP based on actuarial advice. One US executive director
participated in the US BP Retirement Accumulation Plan during 2007.
165 | |
43 Remuneration of directors and senior management continued
Office facilities for former chairmen and deputy chairmen
It is customary for the company to make available to former chairmen and deputy chairmen, who were previously employed executives, the use of office and basic secretarial facilities following their retirement. The cost
involved in doing so is not significant.
Further information
Full
details of individual directors remuneration are given in the directors remuneration
report on pages 62-72.
Remuneration of senior management | $ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||
Total for all senior management | |||||||
Short-term employee benefits | 37 | 30 | 25 | ||||
Post-retirement benefits | 7 | 4 | 4 | ||||
Share-based payments | 22 | 26 | 27 | ||||
|
Senior management, in addition to executive and non-executive directors, includes other senior managers who are members of the executive management team.
Short-term employee benefits
In addition to fees paid to
the non-executive chairman and non-executive directors, these amounts comprise,
for executive directors and senior managers,
salary and benefits earned during the year, plus bonuses awarded for
the year. This includes an ex gratia superannuation payment of $3 million (2006 and 2005 nil) and compensation for loss of office of $1 million (2006 $5
million, 2005 nil).
Post-retirement benefits
The amounts represent the estimated
cost to the group of providing defined benefit pensions and other post-retirement
benefits to senior management
in respect of the current year of service measured in accordance with
IAS 19 Employee Benefits.
Share-based payments
This is the cost to the group of senior
managements participation in share-based payment plans, as measured by the fair value of options and shares granted accounted for in accordance with IFRS 2
Share-based Payments. The main plans in which senior management have
participated are the EDIP, MTPP and LTPP. For details of these plans refer
to Note 41.
There were contingent
liabilities at 31 December 2007 in respect of guarantees and indemnities
entered into as part of the ordinary course
of the groups business. No material losses are likely to arise from
such contingent liabilities. Further information is included in Note 28.
Approximately 200 lawsuits were
filed in State and Federal Courts in Alaska seeking compensatory and punitive
damages
arising out of the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Prince William Sound in March
1989. Most of those suits named Exxon (now ExxonMobil), Alyeska Pipeline
Service Company
(Alyeska), which operates the oil terminal at Valdez, and the other oil companies
that own Alyeska. Alyeska initially responded to the spill until the
response was taken over by Exxon. BP owns a 47% interest (reduced during 2001
from 50% by a sale of 3% to Phillips) in Alyeska through a subsidiary of BP
America Inc. and briefly indirectly owned a further 20% interest in Alyeska
following
BPs
combination with Atlantic Richfield Company (Atlantic Richfield). Alyeska
and its owners have settled all the claims against them under these lawsuits.
Exxon
has indicated that it may file a claim for contribution against Alyeska for
a portion of the costs and damages which it has incurred. If any claims are
asserted
by Exxon that affect Alyeska and its owners, BP will defend the claims vigorously.
It is not possible to estimate any financial effect.
Since 1987, Atlantic Richfield,
a current subsidiary of BP, has been named as a co-defendant in numerous
lawsuits
brought in the US alleging injury to persons and property caused by lead pigment
in paint. The majority of the lawsuits have been abandoned or dismissed as
against Atlantic Richfield. Atlantic Richfield is named in these lawsuits
as alleged
successor to International Smelting & Refining, which, along with a
predecessor company, manufactured lead pigment during the period 1920-1946. Plaintiffs include individuals and governmental entities. Several of the lawsuits purport to be class actions. The lawsuits (depending on plaintiff) seek various remedies,
including: compensation to lead-poisoned children; cost to find and remove lead paint from buildings; medical monitoring and screening programmes; public warning and education on lead hazards; reimbursement of government healthcare costs and special
education for lead-poisoned citizens; and punitive damages. No lawsuit against Atlantic Richfield has been settled nor has Atlantic Richfield been subject to a final adverse judgment in any proceeding. The amounts claimed and, if such suits were
successful, the costs of implementing the remedies sought in the various cases could be substantial. While it is not possible to predict the outcome of these legal actions, Atlantic Richfield believes that it has valid defences and it intends to
defend such actions vigorously and thus the incurrence of a liability by Atlantic Richfield is remote. Consequently, BP believes that the impact of these lawsuits on the groups
results of operations, financial position or liquidity will not be
material.
In addition, various group companies
are parties to legal actions and claims that arise in the ordinary course of
the groups business. While the outcome of such legal proceedings
cannot be readily foreseen, BP believes that they will be resolved without material effect on the groups results of operations, financial position or liquidity. The group files income tax returns in many jurisdictions throughout the world.
Various tax authorities are currently examining the groups income tax returns. Tax returns contain matters that could be subject to differing interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations and the resolution of tax positions through
negotiations with relevant tax authorities, or through litigation, can take several years to complete. While it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome in some cases, the group does not anticipate that there will be any material impact on the
groups results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
166 | |
44 Contingent liabilities continued
The
group is subject to numerous national and local environmental laws and
regulations concerning its products, operations
and other activities. These laws and regulations may require the group to take
future action to remediate the effects on the environment of prior disposal or
release of chemicals or petroleum substances by the group or other parties. Such
contingencies may exist for various sites including refineries, chemical
plants, oil fields, service stations, terminals and waste disposal sites. In
addition, the group may have obligations relating to prior asset sales or closed
facilities. The ultimate requirement for remediation and its cost are inherently
difficult to estimate. However, the estimated cost of known environmental obligations
has been provided in these accounts in accordance with the groups accounting policies. While the amounts of future costs could be significant and could be material to
the groups results of operations in the period in which they are recognized, it is not practical to estimate the amounts involved. BP does not expect these costs to have a material effect on the groups
financial position or
liquidity.
The
group generally restricts its purchase of insurance to situations where this
is required for legal or contractual reasons. This is because external insurance
is not considered an economic means of financing losses for the group. Losses
will therefore be borne as they arise rather than being spread over time
through insurance premiums with attendant transaction costs. The position
is reviewed periodically.
Authorized future capital
expenditure for property, plant and equipment by group companies for which
contracts had been placed at 31 December
2007 amounted to $8,263 million (2006 $9,773 million). In addition,
at 31 December 2007, the group had contracts in place for future capital expenditure relating to investments in jointly controlled entities of $1,039 million (2006 $32 million) and investments in associates of $74 million (2006 $36
million).
Capital commitments
of jointly controlled entities amounted to $2,273 million (2006 $1,217
million).
167 | |
46 Subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates
The more important subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates of the group at 31 December 2007 and the group percentage of ordinary share capital or joint venture interest (to nearest whole number) are set out below. The principal country of operation is generally indicated by the companys country of incorporation or by its name. Those held directly by the parent company are marked with an asterisk (*), the percentage owned being that of the group unless otherwise indicated. A complete list of investments in subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates will be attached to the parent companys annual return made to the Registrar of Companies.
Country of | Country of | |||||||||||||
Subsidiaries | % | incorporation | Principal activities | Subsidiaries | % | incorporation | Principal activities | |||||||
International | Netherlands | |||||||||||||
BP Chemicals Investments | 100 | England | Petrochemicals | BP Capital | 100 | Netherlands | Finance | |||||||
*BP Corporate Holdings | 100 | England | Investment holding | BP Nederland | 100 | Netherlands | Refining and marketing | |||||||
BP Exploration Op. Co. | 100 | England | Exploration and production | |||||||||||
*BP Global Investments | 100 | England | Investment holding | New Zealand | ||||||||||
*BP International | 100 | England | Integrated oil operations | BP Oil New Zealand | 100 | New Zealand | Marketing | |||||||
BP Oil International | 100 | England | Integrated oil operations | |||||||||||
*BP Shipping | 100 | England | Shipping | Norway | ||||||||||
*Burmah Castrol | 100 | Scotland | Lubricants | BP Norge | 100 | Norway | Exploration and production | |||||||
Algeria | Spain | |||||||||||||
BP Amoco Exploration | BP España | 100 | Spain | Refining and marketing | ||||||||||
(In Amenas) | 100 | Scotland | Exploration and production | |||||||||||
BP Exploration (El | South Africa | |||||||||||||
Djazair) | 100 | Bahamas | Exploration and production | *BP Southern Africa | 75 | South Africa | Refining and marketing | |||||||
Angola | Trinidad & Tobago | |||||||||||||
BP Exploration (Angola) | 100 | England | Exploration and production | BP Trinidad (LNG) | 100 | Netherlands | Exploration and production | |||||||
BP Trinidad and Tobago | 70 | US | Exploration and production | |||||||||||
Australia | ||||||||||||||
BP Oil Australia | 100 | Australia | Integrated oil operations | UK | ||||||||||
BP Australia Capital | BP Capital Markets | 100 | England | Finance | ||||||||||
Markets | 100 | Australia | Finance | BP Chemicals | 100 | England | Petrochemicals | |||||||
BP Developments | BP Oil UK | 100 | England | Refining and marketing | ||||||||||
Australia | 100 | Australia | Exploration and production | Britoil | 100 | Scotland | Exploration and production | |||||||
BP Finance Australia | 100 | Australia | Finance | Jupiter Insurance | 100 | Guernsey | Insurance | |||||||
Azerbaijan | US | |||||||||||||
Amoco Caspian Sea | British Virgin | Exploration and production | *BP Holdings North | |||||||||||
Petroleum | 100 | Islands | America | 100 | England | Investment holding | ||||||||
BP Exploration | Atlantic Richfield Co. | |||||||||||||
(Caspian Sea) | 100 | England | Exploration and production | BP America | ||||||||||
BP America | ||||||||||||||
Canada | Production Company | |||||||||||||
BP Canada Energy | 100 | Canada | Exploration and production | BP Amoco Chemical | ||||||||||
BP Canada Finance | 100 | Canada | Finance | Company | ||||||||||
BP Company | Exploration and production, | |||||||||||||
Egypt | North America | gas, power and renewables, | ||||||||||||
BP Egypt Co. | 100 | US | Exploration and production | BP Corporation | 100 | US | refining and marketing, | |||||||
BP Egypt Gas Co. | 100 | US | Exploration and production | North America | pipelines and | |||||||||
BP Exploration (Alaska) | petrochemicals | |||||||||||||
Germany | Inc. | |||||||||||||
Deutsche BP | 100 | Germany | Refining and marketing | BP Products | ||||||||||
and petrochemicals | North America | |||||||||||||
BP West Coast | ||||||||||||||
Indonesia | Products | |||||||||||||
BP Berau | 100 | US | Exploration and production | Standard Oil Co. | ||||||||||
BP West Java | 100 | US | Exploration and production | BP Capital Markets | ||||||||||
America | Finance | |||||||||||||
168 | |
46 Subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates continued
Country of incorporation | ||||
Jointly controlled entities | % | or registration | Principal activities | |
Atlantic 4 Holdings | 38 | US | LNG manufacture | |
Atlantic LNG 2/3 Company of Trinidad and Tobago | 43 | Trinidad & Tobago | LNG manufacture | |
Elvary Neftegaz Holdings BV | 49 | Netherlands | Exploration and appraisal | |
LukArco | 46 | Netherlands | Exploration and production, pipelines | |
Pan American Energya | 60 | US | Exploration and production | |
Ruhr Oel | 50 | Germany | Refining and marketing and petrochemicals | |
Shanghai SECCO Petrochemical Co. | 50 | China | Petrochemicals | |
TNK-BP | 50 | British Virgin Islands | Integrated oil operations | |
a | Pan American Energy is not controlled by BP as certain key business decisions require joint approval of both BP and the minority partner. It is therefore classified as a jointly controlled entity rather than a subsidiary. |
Associates | % | Country of incorporation | Principal activities | |
Abu Dhabi | ||||
Abu Dhabi Marine Areas | 37 | England | Crude oil production | |
Abu Dhabi Petroleum Co. | 24 | England | Crude oil production | |
Azerbaijan | ||||
The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Co. | 30 | Cayman Islands | Pipelines | |
South Caucasus Pipeline Co. | 26 | Cayman Islands | Pipelines | |
Trinidad & Tobago | ||||
Atlantic LNG Company of Trinidad and Tobago | 34 | Trinidad & Tobago | LNG manufacture | |
169 | |
47 Oil and natural gas exploration and production activitiesa
$ million | |||||||||||||||||||
2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | Asia | |||||||||||||||||
UK | Europe | US | Americas | Pacific | Africa | Russia | Other | Total | |||||||||||
Capitalized costs at 31 December | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross capitalized costs | |||||||||||||||||||
Proved properties | 34,774 | 4,925 | 53,079 | 10,627 | 3,528 | 18,333 | | 7,596 | 132,862 | ||||||||||
Unproved properties | 606 | | 1,660 | 297 | 1,188 | 1,533 | 4 | 349 | 5,637 | ||||||||||
35,380 | 4,925 | 54,739 | 10,924 | 4,716 | 19,866 | 4 | 7,945 | 138,499 | |||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | 25,515 | 2,925 | 25,500 | 5,528 | 1,508 | 8,315 | | 2,553 | 71,844 | ||||||||||
Net capitalized costs | 9,865 | 2,000 | 29,239 | 5,396 | 3,208 | 11,551 | 4 | 5,392 | 66,655 | ||||||||||
|
The groups share of jointly controlled entities and associates net capitalized costs at 31 December 2007 was $11,787 million.
Costs incurred for the year ended 31 December | |||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of properties | |||||||||||||||||||
Proved | | | 245 | | | | | 232 | 477 | ||||||||||
Unproved | | | 54 | 16 | | 321 | | 126 | 517 | ||||||||||
| | 299 | 16 | | 321 | | 358 | 994 | |||||||||||
Exploration and appraisal costsb | 209 | 16 | 646 | 72 | 51 | 677 | 119 | 102 | 1,892 | ||||||||||
Development costs | 804 | 443 | 3,861 | 1,057 | 333 | 2,634 | | 1,021 | 10,153 | ||||||||||
Total costs | 1,013 | 459 | 4,806 | 1,145 | 384 | 3,632 | 119 | 1,481 | 13,039 | ||||||||||
|
The groups share of jointly controlled entities and associates costs incurred in 2007 was $2,552 million: in Russia $1,787 million, Rest of Americas $569 million, Asia Pacific $17 million and other $179 million.
Results of operations for the year ended 31 December | |||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues | |||||||||||||||||||
Third parties | 4,503 | 434 | 1,436 | 2,142 | 1,148 | 2,219 | | 921 | 12,803 | ||||||||||
Sales between businesses | 2,260 | 902 | 14,353 | 3,142 | 970 | 3,223 | | 9,983 | 34,833 | ||||||||||
6,763 | 1,336 | 15,789 | 5,284 | 2,118 | 5,442 | | 10,904 | 47,636 | |||||||||||
Exploration expenditure | 46 | | 252 | 134 | 11 | 183 | 116 | 14 | 756 | ||||||||||
Production costs | 1,658 | 147 | 2,782 | 770 | 190 | 637 | 2 | 344 | 6,530 | ||||||||||
Production taxes | 227 | 3 | 1,260 | 273 | 56 | | | 2,224 | 4,043 | ||||||||||
Other costs (income) | (419 | ) | 123 | 2,505 | 395 | 378 | 200 | 169 | 3,018 | 6,369 | |||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 1,569 | 207 | 2,118 | 822 | 205 | 1,372 | | 995 | 7,288 | ||||||||||
Impairments and (gains) losses on sale of | |||||||||||||||||||
businesses and fixed assets | 112 | (534 | ) | (413 | ) | (43 | ) | | (76 | ) | | | (954 | ) | |||||
3,193 | (54 | ) | 8,504 | 2,351 | 840 | 2,316 | 287 | 6,595 | 24,032 | ||||||||||
Profit before taxationc,d | 3,570 | 1,390 | 7,285 | 2,933 | 1,278 | 3,126 | (287 | ) | 4,309 | 23,604 | |||||||||
Allocable taxes | 1,664 | 611 | 2,560 | 1,202 | 321 | 1,462 | 3 | 1,079 | 8,902 | ||||||||||
Results of operations | 1,906 | 779 | 4,725 | 1,731 | 957 | 1,664 | (290 | ) | 3,230 | 14,702 | |||||||||
|
The groups share of jointly controlled entities and associates results of operations (including the groups share of total TNK-BP results) in 2007 was a profit of $2,704 million after deducting interest of $401 million, taxation of $1,355 million and minority interest of $215 million.
a | This note contains information relating to oil and natural gas exploration and production activities. Midstream activities relating to the management and ownership of crude oil and natural gas pipelines, processing and export terminals and LNG processing facilities and transportation are excluded. The most significant midstream pipeline interests include the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, the Forties Pipeline System, the Central Area Transmission System pipeline and the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. Major LNG activities are located in Trinidad, Indonesia and Australia. The groups share of jointly controlled entities and associates acitivies are excluded from the tables and included in the footnotes with the exception of the Abu Dhabi operations, which are included in the results of operations above. |
b | Includes exploration and appraisal drilling expenditures, which are capitalized within intangible fixed assets, and geological and geophysical exploration costs, which are charged to income as incurred. |
c | Includes property taxes, other government take and the fair value gain on embedded derivatives of $47 million. The UK Region includes a $409 million gain offset by corresponding charges primarily in the US, relating to the group self-insurance programme. |
d | The Exploration and Production profit before interest and tax is set out below. |
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and production activities | ||||||||||||||||||
Group (as above) | 3,570 | 1,390 | 7,285 | 2,933 | 1,278 | 3,126 | (287 | ) | 4,309 | 23,604 | ||||||||
Jointly controlled entities and associates | | | 1 | 381 | 21 | | 2,292 | 9 | 2,704 | |||||||||
Mid-stream activities | 123 | (7 | ) | 472 | 42 | 6 | (10 | ) | (112 | ) | 116 | 630 | ||||||
Total profit before interest and tax | 3,693 | 1,383 | 7,758 | 3,356 | 1,305 | 3,116 | 1,893 | 4,434 | 26,938 | |||||||||
|
170 | |
47 Oil and natural gas exploration and production activitiesa continued
$ million | |||||||||||||||||||
2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | Asia | |||||||||||||||||
UK | Europe | US | Americas | Pacific | Africa | Russia | Other | Total | |||||||||||
Capitalized costs at 31 December | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross capitalized costs | |||||||||||||||||||
Proved properties | 32,528 | 4,951 | 44,856 | 9,404 | 3,569 | 15,516 | | 6,278 | 117,102 | ||||||||||
Unproved properties | 423 | 116 | 1,443 | 379 | 1,155 | 936 | 1 | 137 | 4,590 | ||||||||||
32,951 | 5,067 | 46,299 | 9,783 | 4,724 | 16,452 | 1 | 6,415 | 121,692 | |||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | 22,908 | 3,175 | 19,724 | 4,618 | 1,709 | 6,944 | | 1,708 | 60,786 | ||||||||||
Net capitalized costs | 10,043 | 1,892 | 26,575 | 5,165 | 3,015 | 9,508 | 1 | 4,707 | 60,906 | ||||||||||
|
The groups share of jointly controlled entities and associates net capitalized costs at 31 December 2006 was $10,870 million.
Costs incurred for the year ended 31 December | |||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of properties | |||||||||||||||||||
Proved | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
Unproved | | | 74 | 8 | 2 | 70 | | | 154 | ||||||||||
| | 74 | 8 | 2 | 70 | | | 154 | |||||||||||
Exploration and appraisal costsb | 132 | 26 | 838 | 135 | 45 | 434 | 73 | 82 | 1,765 | ||||||||||
Development costs | 794 | 214 | 3,579 | 820 | 238 | 2,356 | | 1,108 | 9,109 | ||||||||||
Total costs | 926 | 240 | 4,491 | 963 | 285 | 2,860 | 73 | 1,190 | 11,028 | ||||||||||
|
The groups share of jointly controlled entities and associates costs incurred in 2006 was $1,688 million: in Russia $1,109 million, Rest of Americas $424 million, Asia Pacific $16 million and other $139 million.
Results of operations for the year ended 31 December | |||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues | |||||||||||||||||||
Third parties | 5,378 | 628 | 1,381 | 2,196 | 1,159 | 1,647 | | 768 | 13,157 | ||||||||||
Sales between businesses | 2,329 | 1,024 | 14,572 | 3,229 | 807 | 2,875 | | 7,640 | 32,476 | ||||||||||
7,707 | 1,652 | 15,953 | 5,425 | 1,966 | 4,522 | | 8,408 | 45,633 | |||||||||||
Exploration expenditure | 20 | (1 | ) | 634 | 132 | 11 | 132 | 17 | 100 | 1,045 | |||||||||
Production costs | 1,312 | 145 | 2,311 | 638 | 155 | 509 | | 238 | 5,308 | ||||||||||
Production taxes | 492 | 38 | 887 | 295 | 63 | | | 2,079 | 3,854 | ||||||||||
Other costs (income)c | (867 | ) | 90 | 2,561 | 478 | 154 | 104 | 32 | 3,121 | 5,673 | |||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 1,612 | 213 | 2,083 | 685 | 175 | 865 | | 510 | 6,143 | ||||||||||
Impairments and (gains) losses on sale of | |||||||||||||||||||
businesses and fixed assets | (450 | ) | (57 | ) | (1,880 | ) | 42 | (99 | ) | (31 | ) | | | (2,475 | ) | ||||
2,119 | 428 | 6,596 | 2,270 | 459 | 1,579 | 49 | 6,048 | 19,548 | |||||||||||
Profit before taxationd,e | 5,588 | 1,224 | 9,357 | 3,155 | 1,507 | 2,943 | (49 | ) | 2,360 | 26,085 | |||||||||
Allocable taxes | 2,567 | 793 | 3,136 | 1,443 | 472 | 1,328 | 3 | 737 | 10,479 | ||||||||||
Results of operations | 3,021 | 431 | 6,221 | 1,712 | 1,035 | 1,615 | (52 | ) | 1,623 | 15,606 | |||||||||
|
The groups share of jointly controlled entities and associates results of operations (including the groups share of total TNK-BP results) in 2006 was a profit of $3,302 million after deducting interest of $324 million, taxation of $1,804 million and minority interest of $193 million.
a | This note contains information relating to oil and natural gas exploration and production activities. Midstream activities of natural gas gathering and distribution and the operation of the main pipelines and tankers are excluded. The main midstream activities are the Alaskan transportation facilities, the Forties Pipeline system and the Central Area Transmission System. The groups share of jointly controlled entities and associates activities is excluded from the tables and included in the footnotes with the exception of the Abu Dhabi operations, which are included in the income and expenditure items above. |
b | Includes exploration and appraisal drilling expenditures, which are capitalized within intangible fixed assets, and geological and geophysical exploration costs, which are charged to income as incurred. |
c | Includes the value of royalty oil sold on behalf of others where royalty is payable in cash, property taxes, other government take and the fair value gain on embedded derivatives $515 million. |
d | Excludes accretion expense attributable to exploration and production activities amounting to $153 million. Under IFRS, accretion expense is included in other finance expense in the group income statement. |
e | The Exploration and Production profit before interest and tax is set out below. |
$ million | |||||||||||||||||||
2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and production activities | |||||||||||||||||||
Group (as above) | 5,588 | 1,224 | 9,357 | 3,155 | 1,507 | 2,943 | (49 | ) | 2,360 | 26,085 | |||||||||
Jointly controlled entities and associates | | | 1 | 535 | 33 | 1 | 2,730 | 2 | 3,302 | ||||||||||
Mid-stream activities | 250 | (14 | ) | (31 | ) | 85 | (31 | ) | (11 | ) | (24 | ) | 18 | 242 | |||||
Total profit before interest and tax | 5,838 | 1,210 | 9,327 | 3,775 | 1,509 | 2,933 | 2,657 | 2,380 | 29,629 | ||||||||||
171 | |
47 Oil and natural gas exploration and production activitiesa continued
$ million | |||||||||||||||||||
2005 | |||||||||||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | Asia | |||||||||||||||||
UK | Europe | US | Americas | Pacific | Africa | Russia | Other | Total | |||||||||||
Capitalized costs at 31 December | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross capitalized costs | |||||||||||||||||||
Proved properties | 31,552 | 4,608 | 46,288 | 9,585 | 2,922 | 12,183 | | 5,184 | 112,322 | ||||||||||
Unproved properties | 276 | 135 | 1,547 | 583 | 1,124 | 656 | 185 | 155 | 4,661 | ||||||||||
31,828 | 4,743 | 47,835 | 10,168 | 4,046 | 12,839 | 185 | 5,339 | 116,983 | |||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | 22,302 | 2,949 | 22,016 | 4,919 | 1,508 | 6,112 | | 1,200 | 61,006 | ||||||||||
Net capitalized costs | 9,526 | 1,794 | 25,819 | 5,249 | 2,538 | 6,727 | 185 | 4,139 | 55,977 | ||||||||||
The groups share of jointly controlled entities and associates net capitalized costs at 31 December 2005 was $10,670 million.
Costs incurred for the year ended 31 December | |||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of properties | |||||||||||||||||||
Proved | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
Unproved | | | 29 | 34 | | | | | 63 | ||||||||||
| | 29 | 34 | | | | | 63 | |||||||||||
Exploration and appraisal costsb | 51 | 7 | 606 | 133 | 11 | 264 | 126 | 68 | 1,266 | ||||||||||
Development costs | 790 | 188 | 2,965 | 681 | 186 | 1,691 | | 1,177 | 7,678 | ||||||||||
Total costs | 841 | 195 | 3,600 | 848 | 197 | 1,955 | 126 | 1,245 | 9,007 | ||||||||||
The groups share of jointly controlled entities and associates costs incurred in 2005 was $1,205 million: in Russia $845 million and Rest of Americas $360 million.
Results of operations for the year ended 31 December | |||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues | |||||||||||||||||||
Third parties | 4,667 | 635 | 2,048 | 2,260 | 1,045 | 1,350 | | 690 | 12,695 | ||||||||||
Sales between businesses | 2,458 | 976 | 14,842 | 2,863 | 782 | 2,402 | | 4,796 | 29,119 | ||||||||||
7,125 | 1,611 | 16,890 | 5,123 | 1,827 | 3,752 | | 5,486 | 41,814 | |||||||||||
Exploration expenditure | 32 | 1 | 426 | 84 | 6 | 81 | 37 | 17 | 684 | ||||||||||
Production costs | 1,082 | 118 | 1,814 | 578 | 159 | 460 | | 180 | 4,391 | ||||||||||
Production taxes | 485 | 33 | 610 | 281 | 54 | | | 1,536 | 2,999 | ||||||||||
Other costs (income)c | 1,857 | (55 | ) | 2,200 | 537 | 170 | 98 | 8 | 2,042 | 6,857 | |||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 1,548 | 220 | 2,288 | 675 | 162 | 542 | | 193 | 5,628 | ||||||||||
Impairments and (gains) losses on sale of | |||||||||||||||||||
businesses
and fixed assets
|
44 | (1,038 | ) | 232 | (133 | ) | | | 2 | | (893 | ) | |||||||
5,048 | (721 | ) | 7,570 | 2,022 | 551 | 1,181 | 47 | 3,968 | 19,666 | ||||||||||
Profit before taxationd,e | 2,077 | 2,332 | 9,320 | 3,101 | 1,276 | 2,571 | (47 | ) | 1,518 | 22,148 | |||||||||
Allocable taxes | 405 | 880 | 3,377 | 1,390 | 447 | 1,043 | (1 | ) | 409 | 7,950 | |||||||||
Results of operations | 1,672 | 1,452 | 5,943 | 1,711 | 829 | 1,528 | (46 | ) | 1,109 | 14,198 | |||||||||
The groups share of jointly controlled entities and associates results of operations (including the groups share of total TNK-BP results) in 2005 was a profit of $3,029 million after deducting interest of $226 million, taxation of $1,250 million and minority interest of $104 million.
a | This note contains information relating to oil and natural gas exploration and production activities. Midstream activities of natural gas gathering and distribution and the operation of the main pipelines and tankers are excluded. The main midstream activities are the Alaskan transportation facilities, the Forties Pipeline system and the Central Area Transmission System. The groups share of jointly controlled entities and associates activities is excluded from the tables and included in the footnotes with the exception of the Abu Dhabi operations, which are included in the income and expenditure items above. |
b | Includes exploration and appraisal drilling expenditures, which are capitalized within intangible fixed assets, and geological and geophysical exploration costs, which are charged to income as incurred. |
c | Includes the value of royalty oil sold on behalf of others where royalty is payable in cash, property taxes, other government take, the fair value loss on embedded derivatives $1,688 million and a $265 million charge incurred on the cancellation of an intragroup gas supply contract. The UK region includes a $530 million charge offset by corresponding gains primarily in the US, relating to the groups self-insurance programme. |
d | Excludes accretion expense attributable to exploration and production activities amounting to $122 million. Under IFRS, accretion expense is included in other finance expense in the group income statement. |
e | The Exploration and Production profit before interest and tax is set out below. |
$ million | |||||||||||||||||||
2005 | |||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and production activities | |||||||||||||||||||
Group (as above) | 2,077 | 2,332 | 9,320 | 3,101 | 1,276 | 2,571 | (47 | ) | 1,518 | 22,148 | |||||||||
Jointly controlled entities and associates | | | | 309 | 35 | | 2,685 | | 3,029 | ||||||||||
Mid-stream activities | 52 | (11 | ) | 172 | 148 | (20 | ) | (39 | ) | (1 | ) | 24 | 325 | ||||||
Total profit before interest and tax | 2,129 | 2,321 | 9,492 | 3,558 | 1,291 | 2,532 | 2,637 | 1,542 | 25,502 | ||||||||||
172 | |
Additional information for US reporting
BP has taken advantage of the SEC ruling of 15 November 2007 that eliminated the requirement to provide a reconciliation from IFRS to US GAAP.
48 Suspended exploration well costs
Included within the total
exploration expenditure of $5,252 million (2006 $4,110 million and
2005 $4,008 million) shown as part of intangible assets (see Note 25)
is an amount of $2,342 million (2006 $1,863 million and 2005 $1,931
million) representing costs directly associated with exploration wells.
The carried costs of exploration wells are subject to technical, commercial
and management review at least once per year to confirm the continued intent
to develop or otherwise extract value from the discovery. In evaluating whether
costs incurred meet the criteria for initial and continued capitalization, management
uses two main criteria: (i) that exploration drilling is still under way or firmly
planned, or (ii) that it has been determined, or work is under way to determine,
that the discovery is economically viable based on a range of technical and commercial
considerations and sufficient progress is being made on establishing development
plans and timing.
The following table provides the year-end balances and movements for suspended
exploration well costs.
$ million | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||
Capitalized exploration well costs | |||||||
At 1 January | 1,863 | 1,931 | 1,680 | ||||
Additions pending determination of proved reserves | 773 | 590 | 565 | ||||
Exploration well costs written off in the year | (94 | ) | (168 | ) | (81 | ) | |
Costs of exploration wells divested in the year | (27 | ) | (36 | ) | (72 | ) | |
Reclassified to tangible assets following determination of proved reserves | (173 | ) | (251 | ) | (161 | ) | |
Reclassified to investment in jointly controlled entity | | (203 | ) | | |||
At 31 December | 2,342 | 1,863 | 1,931 | ||||
The following table provides an ageing profile of suspended exploration wells.
At 31 December | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Cost | Wells | Cost | Wells | Cost | Wells | ||||||||
$ million | gross | $ million | gross | $ million | gross | ||||||||
Age | |||||||||||||
Less than 1 year | 761 | 35 | 611 | 45 | 593 | 46 | |||||||
1 to 5 years | 1,081 | 73 | 736 | 64 | 823 | 69 | |||||||
6 to 10 years | 224 | 30 | 267 | 37 | 309 | 42 | |||||||
More than 10 years | 276 | 35 | 249 | 26 | 206 | 20 | |||||||
Total | 2,342 | 173 | 1,863 | 172 | 1,931 | 177 | |||||||
|
The following table provides an analysis of the amount of drilling costs directly associated with exploration wells.
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost | Wells | Cost | Wells | Cost | Wells | ||||||||||||||
$ million | gross | Projects | $ million | gross | Projects | $ million | gross | Projects | |||||||||||
Exploration well costs | |||||||||||||||||||
Projects
with first capitalized exploration well drilled in the 12 months ending 31 December |
168 | 11 | 7 | 188 | 17 | 12 | 451 | 31 | 14 | ||||||||||
Other
projects with recent or planned drilling activity |
1,502 | 92 | 24 | 894 | 86 | 21 | 718 | 65 | 20 | ||||||||||
Projects with completed exploration activity |
672 | 70 | 27 | 781 | 69 | 27 | 762 | 81 | 28 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December | 2,342 | 173 | 58 | 1,863 | 172 | 60 | 1,931 | 177 | 62 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration projects frequently involve the drilling of multiple wells over a number of years and several discoveries may be grouped into a single development project. The table above shows a total of 51 projects that have exploration well costs that have been capitalized for more than twelve months as at 31 December 2007. Of these, there are 24 projects where exploratory wells have been drilled in the preceding 12 months or further exploratory drilling is planned in the next year. Projects with completed exploration activity comprise a total of 27 projects, whose costs totalled $672 million at 31 December 2007. Details of the activities being undertaken to progress these projects towards development are shown below.
173 | |
48 Suspended exploration well costs continued
|
|
||||||||||||
Anticipated | |||||||||||||
2007 | Years | year of | |||||||||||
Cost | wells | wells | development | ||||||||||
Country | Project | $ million | gross | drilled | project sanction | Comment | |||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Angola | Chumbo | 26 | 2 | 2003-2005 | 2011-2014 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; development option identified and under evaluation; development plan for FPSO submitted. | |||||||
Plutao/Saturno/Marte/Venus | 51 | 5 | 2002-2005 | 2008 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; development option using FPSO identified and under evaluation. | ||||||||
Cravo/Lirio/Orquidea/Violeta | 32 | 7 | 1998-2006 | 2009 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; development option using FPSO identified and under evaluation. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
109 | 14 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Egypt | Ras El Bar Seth | 3 | 1 | 1995 | 2008 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; development options identified and under evaluation; development planned through tie-back to existing infrastructure; gas sale agreement in place. | |||||||
Western Mediterranean Block B |
13 | 3 | 2002-2004 | 2008-2010 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; development options identified and under evaluation; seismic survey completed and under review; concession agreement amendment negotiations under way. | ||||||||
East Delta Deep Marine | 11 | 2 | 2002-2006 | 2011 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; development options identified and under evaluation involving tie-back to existing infrastructure. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
27 | 6 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Indonesia | Tangguh Phase II | 51 | 9 | 1994-1997 | 2009-2011 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; assessment of economic aspects of project in progress; onshore and offshore development options identified and under evaluation. This is the second phase of the LNG project that is currently under development. | |||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
51 | 9 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Trinidad | Coconut | 47 | 1 | 2005 | 2014 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; assessment of economic aspects of project in progress; development options identified and under evaluation; planned subsea tie-back to existing infrastructure. | |||||||
Corallita/Lantana | 24 | 2 | 1996 | 2008 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; development options identified and under evaluation; planned subsea tie-back to existing infrastructure fields dedicated to LNG gas contract delivery; dependent upon capacity in existing infrastructure. | ||||||||
Manakin | 22 | 1 | 2000 | 2011 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; assessment of economic aspects of project in progress; development options identified and under evaluation; planned subsea tie-back to existing production facilities and LNG train; inter-governmental discussions on unitization continue. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
93 | 4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
174 | |
48 Suspended exploration well costs continued
|
|
||||||||||||
Anticipated | |||||||||||||
2007 | Years | year of | |||||||||||
Cost | wells | wells | development | ||||||||||
Country | Project | $ million | gross | drilled | project sanction | Comment | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK | Andrew | 14 | 1 | 1998 | 2008 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; development options identified and under evaluation; development awaiting capacity in existing infrastructure; negotiations under way for gas sales contract. | |||||||
Devenick | 90 | 3 | 1983-2001 | 2008-2009 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; assessment of economic aspects of project in progress; development options identified and under evaluation; development may be in conjunction with Harding Gas project nearby. | ||||||||
Puffin | 29 | 9 | 1982-1991 | 2009-2010 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; further assessment of economic and developmental aspects of project to be undertaken; sub-surface and feasibility review under way; development awaiting capacity in existing infrastructure. | ||||||||
Kessog | 35 | 4 | 1986-1987 | 2010 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; further assessment of economic and developmental aspects of project in progress. | ||||||||
Suilven | 20 | 3 | 1995-1998 | 2010-2011 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; assessment of economic and developmental aspects of project in progress; development anticipated to be by tie-back to existing production vessel; awaiting capacity in existing infrastructure. | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188 | 20 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US | Liberty | 20 | 1 | 1997 | 2008 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; development options identified and under evaluation; planned tie-back via extended reach drilling from existing infrastructure; memoranda of understanding with two key permitting agencies have been secured. | |||||||
Mad Dog Deep | 48 | 1 | 2005 | 2009-2011 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; assessment of economic and developmental aspects of project under way. | ||||||||
Mad Dog Southwest Ridge | 34 | 3 | 2005 | 2010 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; assessment of economic aspects of project under way; development options identified and under evaluation; development expected to be by subsea tieback. | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 | 5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vietnam | Hai Thach | 65 | 3 | 1995-2002 | 2009 | Assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; assessment of economic aspects of project in place; development options identified and under evaluation; licence extension secured. | |||||||
Kim Cuong Tay | 13 | 1 | 1995 | 2010-2012 | Initial assessment of hydrocarbon quantities as potentially commercial completed; further assessment of developmental aspects of project to be undertaken; further seismic study planned for 2008. | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 | 4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous smaller projects | 24 | 8 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672 | 70 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain projects that were classified as projects with completed exploration drilling activity at 31 December 2006 are not classified as such at 31 December 2007: | |
| The following projects were sanctioned for development in 2007: Skarv in Norway and Chachalaca in Trinidad & Tobago. |
| In Colombia, $43 million relating to the Volcanera project was written off. |
| In the US, the Entrada field was disposed of. |
175 | |
49 Auditors remuneration for US reporting
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Audit fees Ernst & Young | ||||||
Group audit | 37 | 36 | 31 | |||
Audit-related regulatory reporting | 7 | 9 | 6 | |||
Statutory audit of subsidiaries | 19 | 19 | 23 | |||
63 | 64 | 60 | ||||
Innovene operations | | | (8 | ) | ||
Continuing operations | 63 | 64 | 52 | |||
|
||||||
Fees for other services Ernst & Young | ||||||
Further assurance services | ||||||
Acquisition and disposal due diligence | 1 | 3 | 2 | |||
Pension plan audits | 1 | | 1 | |||
Other further assurance services | 8 | 5 | 23 | |||
Tax services | ||||||
Compliance services | | 1 | 10 | |||
Advisory services | 2 | | | |||
12 | 9 | 36 | ||||
Innovene operations | | | (1 | ) | ||
Continuing operations | 12 | 9 | 35 | |||
|
50 Valuation and qualifying accounts
$ million | ||||||||||
Additions | ||||||||||
Charged to | Charged to | |||||||||
Balance at | costs and | other | Balance at | |||||||
1 January | expenses | accounts | a | Deductions | 31 December | |||||
2007 | ||||||||||
Fixed assets Investmentsb | 151 | 158 | 2 | (165 | ) | 146 | ||||
Doubtful debtsb | 421 | 175 | 34 | (224 | ) | 406 | ||||
2006 | ||||||||||
Fixed assets Investmentsb | 172 | 26 | (3 | ) | (44 | ) | 151 | |||
Doubtful debtsb | 374 | 158 | 32 | (143 | ) | 421 | ||||
2005 | ||||||||||
Fixed assets Investmentsb | 168 | 18 | (13 | ) | (1 | ) | 172 | |||
Doubtful debtsb | 526 | 67 | (30 | ) | (189 | ) | 374 | |||
|
a | Principally currency transactions. |
b | Deducted in the balance sheet from the assets to which they apply. |
176 | |
51 Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges (unaudited)
$ million, except ratios | ||||||||||
For the year ended 31 December | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||
Profit before taxation | 31,611 | 35,142 | 31,421 | 24,966 | 17,731 | |||||
Groups share of income in excess of dividends from equity-accounted entities | (1,359 | ) | | (710 | ) | (81 | ) | (666 | ) | |
Capitalized interest, net of amortization | (183 | ) | (341 | ) | (193 | ) | (133 | ) | (123 | ) |
30,069 | 34,801 | 30,518 | 24,752 | 16,942 | ||||||
|
||||||||||
Fixed charges | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 1,110 | 718 | 559 | 440 | 482 | |||||
Rental expense representative of interest | 1,033 | 946 | 605 | 619 | 460 | |||||
Capitalized interest | 323 | 478 | 351 | 204 | 190 | |||||
2,466 | 2,142 | 1,515 | 1,263 | 1,132 | ||||||
Total adjusted earnings available for payment of fixed charges | 32,535 | 36,943 | 32,033 | 26,015 | 18,074 | |||||
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges | 13.2 | 17.2 | 21.1 | 20.6 | 16.0 | |||||
|
52 Condensed consolidating information on certain US subsidiaries
BP p.l.c. fully and unconditionally guarantees the payment obligations of its
100%-owned subsidiary BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. under the BP Prudhoe Bay
Royalty Trust. The following financial information for BP p.l.c., and BP Exploration
(Alaska) Inc. and all other subsidiaries on a condensed consolidating basis
is intended to provide investors with meaningful and comparable financial information
about BP p.l.c. and its subsidiary issuers of registered securities and is
provided pursuant to Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X in lieu of the separate financial
statements of each subsidiary issuer of public debt securities. Investments
include the investments in subsidiaries recorded under the equity method for
the purposes of the condensed consolidating financial information. Equity income
of subsidiaries is the Groups share of operating profit related to such
investments. The eliminations and reclassifications column includes the necessary
amounts to eliminate the intercompany balances and transactions between BP
p.l.c., BP
Exploration (Alaska) Inc. and other subsidiaries. BP p.l.c. also fully and unconditionally
guarantees securities issued by BP Canada Finance Company, BP Capital Markets
p.l.c. and BP Capital Markets America Inc. These companies are 100%-owned finance
subsidiaries of BP p.l.c.
Income statement | $ million | |||||||||
For the year ended 31 December | 2007 | |||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||
BP | Eliminations | |||||||||
Exploration | Other | and | ||||||||
(Alaska) Inc. | BP p.l.c. | subsidiaries | reclassifications | BP group | ||||||
Sales and other operating revenues | 5,243 | | 284,365 | (5,243 | ) | 284,365 | ||||
Earnings from jointly controlled entities after interest and tax | | | 3,135 | | 3,135 | |||||
Earnings from associates after interest and tax | | | 697 | | 697 | |||||
Equity-accounted income of subsidiaries after interest and tax | 586 | 21,201 | | (21,787 | ) | | ||||
Interest and other revenues | 758 | 205 | 377 | (586 | ) | 754 | ||||
Total revenues | 6,587 | 21,406 | 288,574 | (27,616 | ) | 288,951 | ||||
Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 1 | | 2,486 | | 2,487 | |||||
Total revenues and other income | 6,588 | 21,406 | 291,060 | (27,616 | ) | 291,438 | ||||
Purchases | 650 | | 205,359 | (5,243 | ) | 200,766 | ||||
Production and manufacturing expenses | 897 | | 25,018 | | 25,915 | |||||
Production and similar taxes | 1,052 | | 2,961 | | 4,013 | |||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 388 | | 10,191 | | 10,579 | |||||
Impairment and losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets | | | 1,679 | | 1,679 | |||||
Exploration expense | | | 756 | | 756 | |||||
Distribution and administration expenses | 22 | 921 | 14,536 | (108 | ) | 15,371 | ||||
Fair value (gain) loss on embedded derivatives | | | 7 | | 7 | |||||
Profit before interest and taxation | 3,579 | 20,485 | 30,553 | (22,265 | ) | 32,352 | ||||
Finance costs | | 381 | 1,207 | (478 | ) | 1,110 | ||||
Other finance expense (income) | 49 | (820 | ) | 402 | | (369 | ) | |||
Profit before taxation | 3,530 | 20,924 | 28,944 | (21,787 | ) | 31,611 | ||||
Taxation | 1,081 | 79 | 9,282 | | 10,442 | |||||
Profit for the year | 2,449 | 20,845 | 19,662 | (21,787 | ) | 21,169 | ||||
|
||||||||||
Attributable to | ||||||||||
BP shareholders | 2,449 | 20,845 | 19,338 | (21,787 | ) | 20,845 | ||||
Minority interest | | | 324 | | 324 | |||||
2,449 | 20,845 | 19,662 | (21,787 | ) | 21,169 | |||||
|
177 | |
52 Condensed consolidating information on certain US subsidiaries continued
Income statement (continued) | $ million | |||||||||
For the year ended 31 December | 2006 | |||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||
BP | Eliminations | |||||||||
Exploration | Other | and | ||||||||
(Alaska) Inc. | BP p.l.c. | subsidiaries | reclassifications | BP group | ||||||
Sales and other operating revenues | 4,812 | | 265,906 | (4,812 | ) | 265,906 | ||||
Earnings from jointly controlled entities after interest and tax | | | 3,553 | | 3,553 | |||||
Earnings from associates after interest and tax | | | 442 | | 442 | |||||
Equity-accounted income of subsidiaries after interest and tax | 570 | 23,119 | | (23,689 | ) | | ||||
Interest and other revenues | 627 | 187 | 881 | (994 | ) | 701 | ||||
Total revenues | 6,009 | 23,306 | 270,782 | (29,495 | ) | 270,602 | ||||
Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets | | 105 | 3,714 | (105 | ) | 3,714 | ||||
Total revenues and other income | 6,009 | 23,411 | 274,496 | (29,600 | ) | 274,316 | ||||
Purchases | 566 | | 191,429 | (4,812 | ) | 187,183 | ||||
Production and manufacturing expenses | 814 | | 22,479 | | 23,293 | |||||
Production and similar taxes | 665 | | 2,956 | | 3,621 | |||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 374 | | 8,754 | | 9,128 | |||||
Impairment and losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 109 | | 440 | | 549 | |||||
Exploration expense | 14 | | 1,031 | | 1,045 | |||||
Distribution and administration expenses | 20 | 278 | 14,264 | (115 | ) | 14,447 | ||||
Fair value (gain) loss on embedded derivatives | | | (608 | ) | | (608 | ) | |||
Profit before interest and taxation from continuing operations | 3,447 | 23,133 | 33,751 | (24,673 | ) | 35,658 | ||||
Finance costs | | 702 | 895 | (879 | ) | 718 | ||||
Other finance expense (income) | 11 | (675 | ) | 462 | | (202 | ) | |||
Profit before taxation from continuing operations | 3,436 | 23,106 | 32,394 | (23,794 | ) | 35,142 | ||||
Taxation | 1,243 | 686 | 10,587 | | 12,516 | |||||
Profit from continuing operations | 2,193 | 22,420 | 21,807 | (23,794 | ) | 22,626 | ||||
Profit (loss) from Innovene operations | | | (25 | ) | | (25 | ) | |||
Profit for the year | 2,193 | 22,420 | 21,782 | (23,794 | ) | 22,601 | ||||
|
||||||||||
Attributable to | ||||||||||
BP shareholders | 2,193 | 22,420 | 21,496 | (23,794 | ) | 22,315 | ||||
Minority interest | | | 286 | | 286 | |||||
2,193 | 22,420 | 21,782 | (23,794 | ) | 22,601 | |||||
|
Income statement | $ million | |||||||||
For the year ended 31 December | 2005 | |||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||
BP | Eliminations | |||||||||
Exploration | Other | and | ||||||||
(Alaska) Inc. | BP p.l.c. | subsidiaries | reclassifications | BP group | ||||||
Sales and other operating revenues | 5,052 | | 239,792 | (5,052 | ) | 239,792 | ||||
Earnings from jointly controlled entities after interest and tax | | | 3,083 | | 3,083 | |||||
Earnings from associates after interest and tax | | | 460 | | 460 | |||||
Equity-accounted income of subsidiaries after interest and tax | 576 | 22,255 | | (22,831 | ) | | ||||
Interest and other revenues | 454 | 556 | 749 | (1,146 | ) | 613 | ||||
Total revenues | 6,082 | 22,811 | 244,084 | (29,029 | ) | 243,948 | ||||
Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets | 1 | | 1,537 | | 1,538 | |||||
Total revenues and other income | 6,083 | 22,811 | 245,621 | (29,029 | ) | 245,486 | ||||
Purchases | 729 | | 167,349 | (5,052 | ) | 163,026 | ||||
Production and manufacturing expenses | 536 | | 21,056 | | 21,592 | |||||
Production and similar taxes | 352 | | 2,658 | | 3,010 | |||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 445 | | 8,326 | | 8,771 | |||||
Impairment and losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets | | | 468 | | 468 | |||||
Exploration expense | 1 | | 683 | | 684 | |||||
Distribution and administration expenses | 19 | 629 | 13,163 | (105 | ) | 13,706 | ||||
Fair value (gain) loss on embedded derivatives | | | 2,047 | | 2,047 | |||||
Profit before interest and taxation from continuing operations | 4,001 | 22,182 | 29,871 | (23,872 | ) | 32,182 | ||||
Finance costs | 169 | 590 | 898 | (1,041 | ) | 616 | ||||
Other finance expense (income) | 14 | (443 | ) | 574 | | 145 | ||||
Profit before taxation from continuing operations | 3,818 | 22,035 | 28,399 | (22,831 | ) | 31,421 | ||||
Taxation | 1,138 | 9 | 8,141 | | 9,288 | |||||
Profit from continuing operations | 2,680 | 22,026 | 20,258 | (22,831 | ) | 22,133 | ||||
Profit (loss) from Innovene operations | | | 184 | | 184 | |||||
Profit for the year | 2,680 | 22,026 | 20,442 | (22,831 | ) | 22,317 | ||||
|
||||||||||
Attributable to | ||||||||||
BP shareholders | 2,680 | 22,026 | 20,151 | (22,831 | ) | 22,026 | ||||
Minority interest | | | 291 | | 291 | |||||
2,680 | 22,026 | 20,442 | (22,831 | ) | 22,317 | |||||
|
178 | |
52 Condensed consolidating information on certain US subsidiaries continued |
Balance sheet | $ million | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December | 2007 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
BP | Eliminations | |||||||||
Exploration | Other | and | ||||||||
(Alaska) Inc. | BP p.l.c. | subsidiaries | reclassifications | BP group | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets | ||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment | 6,310 | | 91,679 | | 97,989 | |||||
Goodwill | | | 11,006 | | 11,006 | |||||
Intangible assets | 349 | | 6,303 | | 6,652 | |||||
Investments in jointly controlled entities | | | 18,113 | | 18,113 | |||||
Investments in associates | | 2 | 4,577 | | 4,579 | |||||
Other investments | | | 1,830 | | 1,830 | |||||
Subsidiaries equity-accounted basis | 3,117 | 115,476 | | (118,593 | ) | | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets | 9,776 | 115,478 | 133,508 | (118,593 | ) | 140,169 | ||||
Loans | 2,151 | 1,192 | 1,541 | (3,885 | ) | 999 | ||||
Other receivables | | | 968 | | 968 | |||||
Derivative financial instruments | | | 3,741 | | 3,741 | |||||
Prepayments | | | 1,083 | | 1,083 | |||||
Defined benefit pension plan surplus | | 7,265 | 1,649 | | 8,914 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,927 | 123,935 | 142,490 | (122,478 | ) | 155,874 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets | ||||||||||
Loans | | | 165 | | 165 | |||||
Inventories | 202 | | 26,352 | | 26,554 | |||||
Trade and other receivables | 15,986 | 840 | 44,686 | (23,492 | ) | 38,020 | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | | | 6,321 | | 6,321 | |||||
Prepayments | 24 | | 3,565 | | 3,589 | |||||
Current tax receivable | | | 705 | | 705 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | (10 | ) | 244 | 3,328 | | 3,562 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,202 | 1,084 | 85,122 | (23,492 | ) | 78,916 | |||||
Assets classified as held for sale | | | 1,286 | | 1,286 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,202 | 1,084 | 86,408 | (23,492 | ) | 80,202 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets | 28,129 | 125,019 | 228,898 | (145,970 | ) | 236,076 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities | ||||||||||
Trade and other payables | 5,233 | 3,115 | 58,296 | (23,492 | ) | 43,152 | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | | | 6,405 | | 6,405 | |||||
Accruals | | 10 | 6,630 | | 6,640 | |||||
Finance debt | 55 | | 15,339 | | 15,394 | |||||
Current tax payable | 306 | | 2,976 | | 3,282 | |||||
Provisions | | | 2,195 | | 2,195 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,594 | 3,125 | 91,841 | (23,492 | ) | 77,068 | |||||
Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale | | | 163 | | 163 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,594 | 3,125 | 92,004 | (23,492 | ) | 77,231 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities | ||||||||||
Other payables | 559 | 27 | 4,550 | (3,885 | ) | 1,251 | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | | | 5,002 | | 5,002 | |||||
Accruals | | 44 | 915 | | 959 | |||||
Finance debt | | | 15,651 | | 15,651 | |||||
Deferred tax liabilities | 1,765 | 1,885 | 15,565 | | 19,215 | |||||
Provisions | 946 | | 11,954 | | 12,900 | |||||
Defined benefit pension plan and other post-retirement
benefit plan deficits |
| | 9,215 | | 9,215 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,270 | 1,956 | 62,852 | (3,885 | ) | 64,193 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities | 8,864 | 5,081 | 154,856 | (27,377 | ) | 141,424 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets | 19,265 | 119,938 | 74,042 | (118,593 | ) | 94,652 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity | ||||||||||
BP shareholders equity | 19,265 | 119,938 | 73,080 | (118,593 | ) | 93,690 | ||||
Minority interest | | | 962 | | 962 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity | 19,265 | 119,938 | 74,042 | (118,593 | ) | 94,652 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179 | |
52 Condensed consolidating information on certain US subsidiaries continued | ||||||||||
Balance sheet (continued) | $ million | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December | 2006 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
BP | Eliminations | |||||||||
Exploration | Other | and | ||||||||
(Alaska) Inc. | BP p.l.c. | subsidiaries | reclassifications | BP group | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets | ||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment | 5,838 | | 85,161 | | 90,999 | |||||
Goodwill | | | 10,780 | | 10,780 | |||||
Intangible assets | 309 | | 4,937 | | 5,246 | |||||
Investments in jointly controlled entities | | | 15,074 | | 15,074 | |||||
Investments in associates | | 2 | 5,973 | | 5,975 | |||||
Other investments | | | 1,697 | | 1,697 | |||||
Subsidiaries equity-accounted basis | 2,586 | 107,717 | | (110,303 | ) | | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets | 8,733 | 107,719 | 123,622 | (110,303 | ) | 129,771 | ||||
Loans | 1,735 | 1,196 | 1,052 | (3,166 | ) | 817 | ||||
Other receivables | | | 862 | | 862 | |||||
Derivative financial instruments | | | 3,025 | | 3,025 | |||||
Prepayments | | | 1,034 | | 1,034 | |||||
Defined benefit pension plan surplus | | 5,662 | 1,091 | | 6,753 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,468 | 114,577 | 130,686 | (113,469 | ) | 142,262 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets | ||||||||||
Loans | | | 141 | | 141 | |||||
Inventories | 154 | | 18,761 | | 18,915 | |||||
Trade and other receivables | 15,710 | 3,074 | 47,450 | (27,542 | ) | 38,692 | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | | | 10,373 | | 10,373 | |||||
Prepayments | 15 | | 2,991 | | 3,006 | |||||
Current tax receivable | | | 544 | | 544 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | (5 | ) | (21 | ) | 2,616 | | 2,590 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,874 | 3,053 | 82,876 | (27,542 | ) | 74,261 | |||||
Assets classified as held for sale | | | 1,078 | | 1,078 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,874 | 3,053 | 83,954 | (27,542 | ) | 75,339 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets | 26,342 | 117,630 | 214,640 | (141,011 | ) | 217,601 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities | ||||||||||
Trade and other payables | 4,908 | 5,185 | 59,685 | (27,542 | ) | 42,236 | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | | | 9,424 | | 9,424 | |||||
Accruals | | 10 | 6,137 | | 6,147 | |||||
Finance debt | 55 | | 12,869 | | 12,924 | |||||
Current tax payable | 1,705 | | 930 | | 2,635 | |||||
Provisions | | | 1,932 | | 1,932 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,668 | 5,195 | 90,977 | (27,542 | ) | 75,298 | |||||
Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale | | | 54 | | 54 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,668 | 5,195 | 91,031 | (27,542 | ) | 75,352 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities | ||||||||||
Other payables | 249 | 27 | 4,320 | (3,166 | ) | 1,430 | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | | | 4,203 | | 4,203 | |||||
Accruals | | 30 | 931 | | 961 | |||||
Finance debt | | | 11,086 | | 11,086 | |||||
Deferred tax liabilities | 1,780 | 1,506 | 14,830 | | 18,116 | |||||
Provisions | 640 | | 11,072 | | 11,712 | |||||
Defined
benefit pension plan and other post-retirement benefit plan deficits |
| | 9,276 | | 9,276 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,669 | 1,563 | 55,718 | (3,166 | ) | 56,784 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities | 9,337 | 6,758 | 146,749 | (30,708 | ) | 132,136 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets | 17,005 | 110,872 | 67,891 | (110,303 | ) | 85,465 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity | ||||||||||
BP shareholders equity | 17,005 | 110,872 | 67,050 | (110,303 | ) | 84,624 | ||||
Minority interest | | | 841 | | 841 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity | 17,005 | 110,872 | 67,891 | (110,303 | ) | 85,465 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 | |
52 Condensed consolidating information on certain US subsidiaries continued | |
Cash flow statement | $ million | |||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||
BP | Eliminations | |||||||||
Exploration | Other | and | ||||||||
(Alaska) Inc. | BP p.l.c. | subsidiaries | reclassifications | BP group | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 3,072 | 15,403 | 22,839 | (16,605 | ) | 24,709 | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (532 | ) | 1 | (14,306 | ) | | (14,837 | ) | ||
Net cash used in financing activities | (2,545 | ) | (15,139 | ) | (7,956 | ) | 16,605 | (9,035 | ) | |
Currency translation differences relating to cash and cash equivalents | | | 135 | | 135 | |||||
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (5 | ) | 265 | 712 | | 972 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | (5 | ) | (21 | ) | 2,616 | | 2,590 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | (10 | ) | 244 | 3,328 | | 3,562 | ||||
|
||||||||||
$ million | ||||||||||
2006 | ||||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||
BP | Eliminations | |||||||||
Exploration | Other | and | ||||||||
(Alaska) Inc. | BP p.l.c. | subsidiaries | reclassifications | BP group | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 3,522 | 20,628 | 29,030 | (25,008 | ) | 28,172 | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (379 | ) | 843 | (9,982 | ) | | (9,518 | ) | ||
Net cash used in financing activities | (3,141 | ) | (21,495 | ) | (19,443 | ) | 25,008 | (19,071 | ) | |
Currency translation differences relating to cash and cash equivalents | | | 47 | | 47 | |||||
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | 2 | (24 | ) | (348 | ) | | (370 | ) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | (7 | ) | 3 | 2,964 | | 2,960 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | (5 | ) | (21 | ) | 2,616 | | 2,590 | |||
|
||||||||||
$ million | ||||||||||
2005 | ||||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||
BP | Eliminations | |||||||||
Exploration | Other | and | ||||||||
(Alaska) Inc. | BP p.l.c. | subsidiaries | reclassifications | BP group | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations | 3,558 | 19,835 | 23,592 | (21,234 | ) | 25,751 | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of Innovene operations | | | 970 | | 970 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 3,558 | 19,835 | 24,562 | (21,234 | ) | 26,721 | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (346 | ) | (2,410 | ) | 1,027 | | (1,729 | ) | ||
Net cash used in financing activities | (3,218 | ) | (17,426 | ) | (23,893 | ) | 21,234 | (23,303 | ) | |
Currency translation differences relating to cash and cash equivalents | | | (88 | ) | | (88 | ) | |||
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (6 | ) | (1 | ) | 1,608 | | 1,601 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | (1 | ) | 4 | 1,356 | | 1,359 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | (7 | ) | 3 | 2,964 | | 2,960 | ||||
|
181 | |
Supplementary information on oil and natural gas (unaudited)
Movements in estimated net proved reserves
For
details of BPs governance process for the booking
of oil and natural gas reserves, see page 14.
2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
Crude oila | million barrels | ||||||||||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | Asia | |||||||||||||||||
UK | Europe | US | Americas | Pacific | Africa | Russia | Other | Total | |||||||||||
Subsidiaries | |||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
Developed | 458 | 189 | 1,916 | 130 | 67 | 193 | | 88 | 3,041 | ||||||||||
Undeveloped | 146 | 97 | 1,292 | 237 | 86 | 512 | | 482 | 2,852 | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
604 | 286 | 3,208 | 367 | 153 | 705 | | 570 | 5,893 | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to | |||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates | (1 | ) | (25 | ) | 18 | (29 | ) | (7 | ) | (133 | ) | | (27 | ) | (204 | ) | |||
Purchases of reserves-in-place | | | 25 | | | | | 8 | 33 | ||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions | | 31 | 60 | 1 | 2 | 93 | | | 187 | ||||||||||
Improved recovery | 7 | 1 | 99 | 6 | 5 | 12 | | 1 | 131 | ||||||||||
Productionb | (73 | ) | (19 | ) | (169 | ) | (27 | ) | (15 | ) | (71 | ) | | (80 | ) | (454 | ) | ||
Sales of reserves-in-place | | | (94 | ) | | | | | | (94 | ) | ||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(67 | ) | (12 | ) | (61 | ) | (49 | ) | (15 | ) | (99 | ) | | (98 | ) | (401 | ) | |||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2007c | |||||||||||||||||||
Developed | 414 | 105 | 1,882 | 115 | 61 | 256 | | 104 | 2,937 | ||||||||||
Undeveloped | 123 | 169 | 1,265 | 203 | 77 | 350 | | 368 | 2,555 | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
537 | 274 | 3,147 | f | 318 | 138 | 606 | | 472 | 5,492 | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share)d | |||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
Developed | | | | 221 | 1 | | 2,200 | 520 | 2,942 | ||||||||||
Undeveloped | | | | 139 | | | 644 | 163 | 946 | ||||||||||
| | | 360 | 1 | | 2,844 | 683 | 3,888 | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to | |||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates | | | | 178 | | | 413 | 167 | 758 | ||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place | | | | | | | 16 | | 16 | ||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions | | | | 2 | | | 283 | | 285 | ||||||||||
Improved recovery | | | | 59 | | | | 1 | 60 | ||||||||||
Production | | | | (28 | ) | | | (304 | ) | (73 | ) | (405 | ) | ||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place | | | | | | | (21 | ) | | (21 | ) | ||||||||
| | | 211 | | | 387 | 95 | 693 | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2007e | |||||||||||||||||||
Developed | | | | 328 | 1 | | 2,094 | 573 | 2,996 | ||||||||||
Undeveloped | | | | 243 | | | 1,137 | 205 | 1,585 | ||||||||||
| | | 571 | 1 | | 3,231 | 778 | 4,581 | |||||||||||
|
a | Crude oil includes NGLs and condensate. Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Excludes NGLs from processing plants in which an interest is held of 54 thousand barrels a day. |
c | Includes 739 million barrels of NGLs. Also includes 20 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 30% minority interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
d | The BP group holds interests, through associates, in onshore and offshore concessions in Abu Dhabi, expiring in 2014 and 2018 respectively. During the second quarter of 2007, we updated our reporting policy in Abu Dhabi to be consistent with general industry practice and as a result have started reporting production and reserves there gross of production taxes. This change resulted in an increase in our reserves of 153 million barrels and in our production of 33mb/d. |
e | Includes 26 million barrels of NGLs. Also includes 210 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 6.51% minority interest in TNK-BP. |
f | Proved reserves in the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska include an estimated 98 million barrels upon which a net profits royalty will be payable over the life of the field under the terms of the BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. |
182 | |
Supplementary information on oil and natural gas (unaudited) continued
Movements in estimated net proved reserves | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||
Natural gasa | billion cubic feet | |||||||||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | Asia | ||||||||||||||||
UK | Europe | US | Americas | Pacific | Africa | Russia | Other | Total | ||||||||||
Subsidiaries | ||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed | 1,968 | 242 | 10,438 | 3,932 | 1,359 | 1,032 | | 331 | 19,302 | |||||||||
Undeveloped | 825 | 56 | 4,660 | 9,194 | 5,202 | 1,675 | | 1,254 | 22,866 | |||||||||
2,793 | 298 | 15,098 | 13,126 | 6,561 | 2,707 | | 1,585 | 42,168 | ||||||||||
Changes attributable to | ||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates | 93 | (37 | ) | 744 | (276 | ) | 140 | (146 | ) | | (21 | ) | 497 | |||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place | | | 23 | | | | | 109 | 132 | |||||||||
Discoveries and extensions | | 293 | 95 | 249 | 88 | 17 | | | 742 | |||||||||
Improved recovery | 15 | 1 | 326 | 32 | 111 | 9 | | 5 | 499 | |||||||||
Productionb | (299 | ) | (14 | ) | (879 | ) | (1,047 | ) | (261 | ) | (187 | ) | | (114 | ) | (2,801 | ) | |
Sales of reserves-in-place | | (68 | ) | (32 | ) | (7 | ) | | | | | (107 | ) | |||||
(191 | ) | 175 | 277 | (1,049 | ) | 78 | (307 | ) | | (21 | ) | (1,038 | ) | |||||
At 31 December 2007c | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed | 2,049 | 63 | 10,670 | 3,683 | 1,822 | 990 | | 583 | 19,860 | |||||||||
Undeveloped | 553 | 410 | 4,705 | 8,394 | 4,817 | 1,410 | | 981 | 21,270 | |||||||||
2,602 | 473 | 15,375 | 12,077 | 6,639 | 2,400 | | 1,564 | 41,130 | ||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) | ||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed | | | | 1,460 | 52 | | 1,087 | 170 | 2,769 | |||||||||
Undeveloped | | | | 735 | 23 | | 184 | 52 | 994 | |||||||||
| | | 2,195 | 75 | | 1,271 | 222 | 3,763 | ||||||||||
Changes attributable to | ||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates | | | | 73 | (2 | ) | | 61 | 11 | 143 | ||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place | | | | | | | 8 | | 8 | |||||||||
Discoveries and extensions | | | | 22 | | | | | 22 | |||||||||
Improved recovery | | | | 195 | 16 | | | | 211 | |||||||||
Productionb | | | | (176 | ) | (13 | ) | | (179 | ) | (9 | ) | (377 | ) | ||||
Sales of reserves-in-place | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
| | | 114 | 1 | | (110 | ) | 2 | 7 | |||||||||
At 31 December 2007d | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed | | | | 1,478 | 39 | | 808 | 148 | 2,473 | |||||||||
Undeveloped | | | | 831 | 37 | | 353 | 76 | 1,297 | |||||||||
| | | 2,309 | 76 | | 1,161 | 224 | 3,770 | ||||||||||
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind where the royally owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Includes 202 billion cubic feet of natural gas consumed in operations, 161 billion cubic feet in subsidiaries, 41 billion cubic feet in equity-accounted entities and excludes 10.9 billion cubic feet of produced non-hydrocarbon components which meet regulatory requirements for sales. |
c | Includes 3,211 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 30% minority interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
d | Includes 68 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 5.88% minority interest in TNK-BP. |
183 | |
Supplementary information on oil and natural gas (unaudited) continued
Movements in estimated net proved reserves | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||
Crude oila | million barrels | ||||||||||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | Asia | |||||||||||||||||
UK | Europe | US | Americas | Pacific | Africa | Russia | Other | Total | |||||||||||
Subsidiaries | |||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Developed | 496 | 225 | 1,984 | 215 | 70 | 142 | | 69 | 3,201 | ||||||||||
Undeveloped | 184 | 86 | 1,429 | 286 | 95 | 536 | | 543 | 3,159 | ||||||||||
680 | 311 | 3,413 | 501 | 165 | 678 | | 612 | 6,360 | |||||||||||
Changes attributable to | |||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates | (3 | ) | (11 | ) | (108 | ) | (9 | ) | | 2 | | 16 | (113 | ) | |||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions | 3 | | 48 | | 1 | 67 | | | 119 | ||||||||||
Improved recovery | 26 | 9 | 95 | 13 | 4 | 22 | | | 169 | ||||||||||
Productionb | (92 | ) | (23 | ) | (178 | ) | (39 | ) | (17 | ) | (64 | ) | | (58 | ) | (471 | ) | ||
Sales of reserves-in-place | (10 | ) | | (62 | ) | (99 | ) | | | | | (171 | ) | ||||||
(76 | ) | (25 | ) | (205 | ) | (134 | ) | (12 | ) | 27 | | (42 | ) | (467 | ) | ||||
At 31 December 2006c | |||||||||||||||||||
Developed | 458 | 189 | 1,916 | 130 | 67 | 193 | | 88 | 3,041 | ||||||||||
Undeveloped | 146 | 97 | 1,292 | 237 | 86 | 512 | | 482 | 2,852 | ||||||||||
604 | 286 | 3,208 | e | 367 | 153 | 705 | | 570 | 5,893 | ||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) | |||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Developed | | | | 207 | 1 | | 1,688 | 590 | 2,486 | ||||||||||
Undeveloped | | | | 124 | | | 431 | 164 | 719 | ||||||||||
| | | 331 | 1 | | 2,119 | 754 | 3,205 | |||||||||||
Changes attributable to | |||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates | | | | (2 | ) | | | 1,215 | (8 | ) | 1,205 | ||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place | | | | 28 | | | | | 28 | ||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions | | | | 1 | | | | | 1 | ||||||||||
Improved recovery | | | | 34 | | | | | 34 | ||||||||||
Production | | | | (28 | ) | | | (320 | ) | (63 | ) | (411 | ) | ||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place | | | | (4 | ) | | | (170 | ) | | (174 | ) | |||||||
| | | 29 | | | 725 | (71 | ) | 683 | ||||||||||
At 31 December 2006d | |||||||||||||||||||
Developed | | | | 221 | 1 | | 2,200 | 520 | 2,942 | ||||||||||
Undeveloped | | | | 139 | | | 644 | 163 | 946 | ||||||||||
| | | 360 | 1 | | 2,844 | 683 | 3,888 | |||||||||||
a | Crude oil includes natural gas liquids (NGLs) and condensate. Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Excludes NGLs from processing plants in which an interest is held of 55 thousand barrels a day. |
c | Includes 779 million barrels of NGLs. Also includes 23 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 30% minority interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
d | Includes 28 million barrels of NGLs. Also includes 179 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 6.29% minority interest in TNK-BP. |
e | Proved reserves in the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska include an estimated 81 million barrels upon which a net profits royalty will be payable over the life of the field under the terms of the BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. |
184 | |
Supplementary information on oil and natural gas (unaudited) continued
Movements in estimated net proved reserves | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||
Natural gasa | billion cubic feet | ||||||||||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | Asia | |||||||||||||||||
UK | Europe | US | Americas | Pacific | Africa | Russia | Other | Total | |||||||||||
Subsidiaries | |||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Developed | 2,382 | 245 | 11,184 | 3,560 | 1,459 | 934 | | 281 | 20,045 | ||||||||||
Undeveloped | 904 | 80 | 4,198 | 10,504 | 5,375 | 2,000 | | 1,342 | 24,403 | ||||||||||
3,286 | 325 | 15,382 | 14,064 | 6,834 | 2,934 | | 1,623 | 44,448 | |||||||||||
Changes attributable to | |||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates | (343 | ) | 11 | (922 | ) | (291 | ) | (92 | ) | (69 | ) | | 33 | (1,673 | ) | ||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions | 101 | | 116 | | 21 | 5 | | 2 | 245 | ||||||||||
Improved recovery | 144 | | 1,755 | 344 | 71 | 6 | | 9 | 2,329 | ||||||||||
Productionb | (370 | ) | (38 | ) | (941 | ) | (982 | ) | (273 | ) | (169 | ) | | (82 | ) | (2,855 | ) | ||
Sales of reserves-in-place | (25 | ) | | (292 | ) | (9 | ) | | | | | (326 | ) | ||||||
(493 | ) | (27 | ) | (284 | ) | (938 | ) | (273 | ) | (227 | ) | | (38 | ) | (2,280 | ) | |||
At 31 December 2006c | |||||||||||||||||||
Developed | 1,968 | 242 | 10,438 | 3,932 | 1,359 | 1,032 | | 331 | 19,302 | ||||||||||
Undeveloped | 825 | 56 | 4,660 | 9,194 | 5,202 | 1,675 | | 1,254 | 22,866 | ||||||||||
2,793 | 298 | 15,098 | 13,126 | 6,561 | 2,707 | | 1,585 | 42,168 | |||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) | |||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Developed | | | | 1,492 | 50 | | 1,089 | 130 | 2,761 | ||||||||||
Undeveloped | | | | 848 | 26 | | 169 | 52 | 1,095 | ||||||||||
| | | 2,340 | 76 | | 1,258 | 182 | 3,856 | |||||||||||
Changes attributable to | |||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates | | | | 7 | 13 | | 217 | 47 | 284 | ||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions | | | | 23 | | | | | 23 | ||||||||||
Improved recovery | | | | 73 | 1 | | | | 74 | ||||||||||
Productionb | | | | (171 | ) | (15 | ) | | (204 | ) | (7 | ) | (397 | ) | |||||
Sales of reserves-in-place | | | | (77 | ) | | | | | (77 | ) | ||||||||
| | | (145 | ) | (1 | ) | | 13 | 40 | (93 | ) | ||||||||
At 31 December 2006d | |||||||||||||||||||
Developed | | | | 1,460 | 52 | | 1,087 | 170 | 2,769 | ||||||||||
Undeveloped | | | | 735 | 23 | | 184 | 52 | 994 | ||||||||||
| | | 2,195 | 75 | | 1,271 | 222 | 3,763 | |||||||||||
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Includes 178 billion cubic feet of natural gas consumed in operations, 147 billion cubic feet in subsidiaries, 31 billion cubic feet in equity-accounted entities and excludes 8.3 billion cubic feet of produced non-hydrocarbon components which meet regulatory requirements for sales. |
c | Includes 3,537 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 30% minority interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
d | Includes 99 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 7.77% minority interest in TNK-BP. |
185 | |
Supplementary information on oil and natural gas (unaudited) continued
Movement in estimated net proved reserves | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||
Crude oila |
million barrels
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | Asia | ||||||||||||||||
UK | Europe | US | Americas | Pacific | Africa | Russia | Other | Total | ||||||||||
Subsidiaries | ||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed | 559 | 231 | 2,041 | 311 | 65 | 204 | | 62 | 3,473 | |||||||||
Undeveloped | 210 | 109 | 1,211 | 299 | 85 | 643 | | 725 | 3,282 | |||||||||
769 | 340 | 3,252 | 610 | 150 | 847 | | 787 | 6,755 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to | ||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates | (31 | ) | (8 | ) | 103 | (21 | ) | 21 | (190 | ) | | (148 | ) | (274 | ) | |||
Purchases of reserves-in-place | | | 2 | | | | | | 2 | |||||||||
Discoveries and extensions | 11 | | 40 | 3 | 11 | 83 | | | 148 | |||||||||
Improved recovery | 32 | 21 | 217 | 1 | | 2 | | 7 | 280 | |||||||||
Productionb | (101 | ) | (27 | ) | (200 | ) | (53 | ) | (17 | ) | (64 | ) | | (34 | ) | (496 | ) | |
Sales of reserves-in-place | | (15 | ) | (1 | ) | (39 | ) | | | | | (55 | ) | |||||
(89 | ) | (29 | ) | 161 | (109 | ) | 15 | (169 | ) | | (175 | ) | (395 | ) | ||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2005c | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed | 496 | 225 | 1,984 | 215 | 70 | 142 | | 69 | 3,201 | |||||||||
Undeveloped | 184 | 86 | 1,429 | 286 | 95 | 536 | | 543 | 3,159 | |||||||||
680 | 311 | 3,413 | e | 501 | 165 | 678 | | 612 | 6,360 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) | ||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed | | | | 204 | 1 | | 1,863 | 592 | 2,660 | |||||||||
Undeveloped | | | | 125 | | | 294 | 100 | 519 | |||||||||
| | | 329 | 1 | | 2,157 | 692 | 3,179 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to | ||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates | | | | 1 | | | 319 | 119 | 439 | |||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
Discoveries and extensions | | | | 2 | | | | | 2 | |||||||||
Improved recovery | | | | 25 | | | | | 25 | |||||||||
Production | | | | (26 | ) | | | (333 | ) | (57 | ) | (416 | ) | |||||
Sales of reserves-in-place | | | | | | | (24 | ) | | (24 | ) | |||||||
| | | 2 | | | (38 | ) | 62 | 26 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2005d | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed | | | | 207 | 1 | | 1,688 | 590 | 2,486 | |||||||||
Undeveloped | | | | 124 | | | 431 | 164 | 719 | |||||||||
| | | 331 | 1 | | 2,119 | 754 | 3,205 | ||||||||||
|
a | Crude oil includes natural gas liquids (NGLs) and condensate. Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others whether payable in cash or in kind where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Excludes NGLs from processing plants in which an interest is held of 58 thousand barrels a day. |
c | Includes 818 million barrels of NGLs. Also includes 29 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 30% minority interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
d | Includes 33 million barrels of NGLs. Also includes 95 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 4.47% minority interest in TNK-BP. |
e | Proved reserves in the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska include an estimated 85 million barrels upon which a net profits royalty will be payable over the life of the field under the terms of the BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. |
186 | |
Supplementary information on oil and natural gas (unaudited) continued
Movement in estimated net proved reserves | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||
Natural gasa | billion cubic feet | |||||||||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | Asia | ||||||||||||||||
UK | Europe | US | Americas | Pacific | Africa | Russia | Other | Total | ||||||||||
Subsidiaries | ||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed | 2,498 | 248 | 10,811 | 4,101 | 1,624 | 1,015 | | 282 | 20,579 | |||||||||
Undeveloped | 1,183 | 1,254 | 3,270 | 10,663 | 5,419 | 1,886 | | 1,396 | 25,071 | |||||||||
3,681 | 1,502 | 14,081 | 14,764 | 7,043 | 2,901 | | 1,678 | 45,650 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to | ||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates | (102 | ) | 11 | 447 | 104 | (133 | ) | 152 | | 15 | 494 | |||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place | | | 66 | 2 | | | | | 68 | |||||||||
Discoveries and extensions | 21 | 19 | 47 | 225 | 204 | 44 | | | 560 | |||||||||
Improved recovery | 111 | 19 | 1,773 | 87 | | | | 10 | 2,000 | |||||||||
Productionb | (425 | ) | (44 | ) | (1,018 | ) | (888 | ) | (280 | ) | (163 | ) | | (80 | ) | (2,898 | ) | |
Sales of reserves-in-place | | (1,182 | ) | (14 | ) | (230 | ) | | | | | (1,426 | ) | |||||
(395 | ) | (1,177 | ) | 1,301 | (700 | ) | (209 | ) | 33 | | (55 | ) | (1,202 | ) | ||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2005c | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed | 2,382 | 245 | 11,184 | 3,560 | 1,459 | 934 | | 281 | 20,045 | |||||||||
Undeveloped | 904 | 80 | 4,198 | 10,504 | 5,375 | 2,000 | | 1,342 | 24,403 | |||||||||
3,286 | 325 | 15,382 | 14,064 | 6,834 | 2,934 | | 1,623 | 44,448 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) | ||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed | | | | 1,397 | 107 | | 214 | 60 | 1,778 | |||||||||
Undeveloped | | | | 977 | 69 | | 10 | 23 | 1,079 | |||||||||
| | | 2,374 | 176 | | 224 | 83 | 2,857 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to | ||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates | | | | 26 | (81 | ) | | 1,337 | 102 | 1,384 | ||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
Discoveries and extensions | | | | 28 | | | | | 28 | |||||||||
Improved recovery | | | | 66 | | | | | 66 | |||||||||
Productionb | | | | (154 | ) | (19 | ) | | (184 | ) | (3 | ) | (360 | ) | ||||
Sales of reserves-in-place | | | | | | | (119 | ) | | (119 | ) | |||||||
| | | (34 | ) | (100 | ) | | 1,034 | 99 | 999 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2005d | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed | | | | 1,492 | 50 | | 1,089 | 130 | 2,761 | |||||||||
Undeveloped | | | | 848 | 26 | | 169 | 52 | 1,095 | |||||||||
| | | 2,340 | 76 | | 1,258 | 182 | 3,856 | ||||||||||
|
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Includes 174 billion cubic feet of natural gas consumed in operations, 147 billion cubic feet in subsidiaries and 27 billion cubic feet in equity-accounted entities. |
c | Includes 3,812 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 30% minority interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
d | Includes 57 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 4.47% minority interest in TNK-BP. |
187 | |
Supplementary information on oil and natural gas (unaudited) continued
Standardized
measure of discounted future net cash flows and changes therein relating to
proved oil and gas reserves
The following
tables set out the standardized measures of discounted future net cash flows,
and changes therein, relating to crude oil and natural gas production from the
groups estimated proved reserves. This information is prepared in compliance
with the requirements of FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
69 Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing Activities.
Future
net cash flows have been prepared on the basis of certain assumptions which
may or may not be realized. These include the timing of future production, the
estimation of crude oil and natural gas reserves and the application of year-end
crude oil and natural gas prices and exchange rates. Furthermore, both reserves
estimates and production forecasts are subject to revision as further technical
information becomes available and economic conditions change. BP cautions against
relying on the information presented because of the highly arbitrary nature
of assumptions on which it is based and its lack of comparability with the historical
cost information presented in the financial statements.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of | Rest of | Asia | ||||||||||||||
UK | Europe | US | Americas | Pacific | Africa | Other | Total | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Future cash inflowsa | 72,100 | 29,500 | 350,100 | 67,700 | 47,600 | 63,300 | 49,400 | 679,700 | ||||||||
Future production costb | 27,500 | 7,500 | 109,800 | 17,900 | 12,800 | 9,900 | 8,500 | 193,900 | ||||||||
Future development costb | 4,000 | 3,300 | 21,900 | 6,500 | 4,100 | 8,300 | 3,500 | 51,600 | ||||||||
Future taxationc | 20,200 | 13,000 | 71,600 | 21,700 | 9,700 | 17,100 | 8,700 | 162,000 | ||||||||
Future net cash flows | 20,400 | 5,700 | 146,800 | 21,600 | 21,000 | 28,000 | 28,700 | 272,200 | ||||||||
10% annual discountd | 6,500 | 2,800 | 76,000 | 9,500 | 10,300 | 9,400 | 11,500 | 126,000 | ||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flowse | 13,900 | 2,900 | 70,800 | 12,100 | 10,700 | 18,600 | 17,200 | 146,200 | ||||||||
At 31 December 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Future cash inflowsa | 45,300 | 18,200 | 218,900 | 46,800 | 36,800 | 47,700 | 36,200 | 449,900 | ||||||||
Future production costb | 20,700 | 4,700 | 71,300 | 14,900 | 9,400 | 8,700 | 7,200 | 136,900 | ||||||||
Future development costb | 3,300 | 1,500 | 18,600 | 4,900 | 3,800 | 6,600 | 3,900 | 42,600 | ||||||||
Future taxationc | 10,300 | 9,400 | 43,100 | 12,900 | 7,000 | 10,600 | 5,800 | 99,100 | ||||||||
Future net cash flows | 11,000 | 2,600 | 85,900 | 14,100 | 16,600 | 21,800 | 19,300 | 171,300 | ||||||||
10% annual discountd | 3,200 | 1,000 | 45,600 | 6,200 | 9,000 | 8,400 | 7,300 | 80,700 | ||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flowse | 7,800 | 1,600 | 40,300 | 7,900 | 7,600 | 13,400 | 12,000 | 90,600 | ||||||||
At 31 December 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Future cash inflowsa | 68,200 | 18,600 | 261,800 | 75,600 | 34,600 | 46,300 | 38,200 | 543,300 | ||||||||
Future production costb | 21,700 | 3,900 | 55,800 | 15,200 | 6,900 | 7,800 | 7,400 | 118,700 | ||||||||
Future development costb | 2,200 | 1,000 | 16,300 | 4,300 | 3,500 | 6,100 | 4,600 | 38,000 | ||||||||
Future taxationc | 17,600 | 10,200 | 65,300 | 28,800 | 7,300 | 10,600 | 6,000 | 145,800 | ||||||||
Future net cash flows | 26,700 | 3,500 | 124,400 | 27,300 | 16,900 | 21,800 | 20,200 | 240,800 | ||||||||
10% annual discountd | 8,500 | 1,400 | 63,700 | 12,600 | 9,600 | 8,700 | 8,100 | 112,600 | ||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flowse | 18,200 | 2,100 | 60,700 | 14,700 | 7,300 | 13,100 | 12,100 | 128,200 | ||||||||
|
The following are the principal sources of change in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows:
$ million | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs | (28,300 | ) | (35,800 | ) | (24,300 | ) |
Development costs incurred during the year | 9,400 | 8,200 | 7,100 | |||
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, less related costs | 12,300 | 7,900 | 10,100 | |||
Net changes in prices and production cost | 102,100 | (43,900 | ) | 84,200 | ||
Revisions of previous reserves estimates | (12,200 | ) | (9,500 | ) | (17,400 | ) |
Net change in taxation | (28,300 | ) | 32,200 | (20,500 | ) | |
Future development costs | (7,800 | ) | (7,000 | ) | (5,800 | ) |
Net change in purchase and sales of reserves-in-place | (700 | ) | (2,500 | ) | (2,500 | ) |
Addition of 10% annual discount | 9,100 | 12,800 | 8,800 | |||
Total change in the standardized measure during the yearf | 55,600 | (37,600 | ) | 39,700 | ||
|
a | The year-end marker prices used were Brent $96.02/bbl, Henry Hub $7.10/mmBtu (2006 Brent $58.93/bbl, Henry Hub $5.52/mmBtu; 2005 Brent $58.21/bbl, Henry Hub $9.52/mmBtu). |
b | Production costs, which include production taxes, and development costs relating to future production of proved reserves are based on year-end cost levels and assume continuation of existing economic conditions. Future decommissioning costs are included. |
c | Taxation is computed using appropriate year-end statutory corporate income tax rates. |
d | Future net cash flows from oil and natural gas production are discounted at 10% regardless of the group assessment of the risk associated with its producing activities. |
e | Minority interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC amounted to $2,300 million at 31 December 2007 ($1,300 million at 31 December 2006 and $2,700 million at 31 December 2005). |
f | Total change in the standardized measure during the year includes the effect of exchange rate movements. |
188 | |
Supplementary information on oil and natural gas (unaudited) continued
Equity-accounted entities
In
addition, at 31 December 2007, the groups share of the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows of equity-accounted entities amounted to $28,300 million ($14,700 million at 31 December
2006 and $19,300 million at 31 December 2005).
Operational and statistical information
The following tables present operational and statistical information related to production, drilling, productive wells and acreage.
Crude oil and natural gas production
The following table shows crude oil and natural gas production for the years
ended 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005.
Production for the yeara | ||||||||||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | Asia | ||||||||||||||||
UK | Europe | US | Americas | Pacific | Africa | Russia | Other | Total | ||||||||||
Subsidiaries | ||||||||||||||||||
Crude oilb | thousand barrels per day | |||||||||||||||||
2007 | 201 | 51 | 513 | 82 | 41 | 195 | | 221 | 1,304 | |||||||||
2006 | 253 | 61 | 547 | 108 | 44 | 177 | | 161 | 1,351 | |||||||||
2005 | 277 | 75 | 612 | 144 | 47 | 175 | | 93 | 1,423 | |||||||||
Natural gasc | million cubic feet per day | |||||||||||||||||
2007 | 768 | 29 | 2,174 | 2,798 | 699 | 468 | | 286 | 7,222 | |||||||||
2006 | 936 | 91 | 2,376 | 2,645 | 727 | 430 | | 207 | 7,412 | |||||||||
2005 | 1,090 | 108 | 2,546 | 2,384 | 751 | 422 | | 211 | 7,512 | |||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) | ||||||||||||||||||
Crude oilb | thousand barrels per day | |||||||||||||||||
2007 | | | | 77 | 1 | | 832 | 200 | 1,110 | |||||||||
2006 | | | | 77 | 1 | | 876 | 170 | 1,124 | |||||||||
2005 | | | | 71 | | | 911 | 157 | 1,139 | |||||||||
Natural gasc | million cubic feet per day | |||||||||||||||||
2007 | | | | 429 | 33 | | 451 | 8 | 921 | |||||||||
2006 | | | | 416 | 37 | | 544 | 8 | 1,005 | |||||||||
2005 | | | | 375 | 47 | | 482 | 8 | 912 | |||||||||
a | Production excludes royalties due to others whether payable in cash or in kind where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Crude oil includes natural gas liquids and condensate. |
c | Natural gas production excludes gas consumed in operations. |
Productive oil and gas wells and acreage
The
following tables show the number of gross and net productive oil and natural
gas wells and total gross and net developed and undeveloped
oil and natural gas acreage in which the group and its equity-accounted entities
had interests as of 31 December 2007. A gross well or acre is one in which a whole or fractional working interest is owned, while the number of net wells
or acres is the sum of the whole or fractional working interests in gross wells
or acres. Productive wells are producing wells and wells capable of production.
Developed acreage is the acreage within the boundary of a field, on which development
wells have been drilled, which could produce the reserves;
while undeveloped acres are those on which wells have not been drilled or completed
to a point that would permit the production of commercial quantities, whether
or not such acres contain proved reserves.
Rest of | Rest of | Asia | |||||||||||||||||
UK | Europe | US | Americas | Pacific | Africa | Russia | Other | Total | |||||||||||
Number of productive wells at 31 December 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
Oil wellsa | gross | 274 | 81 | 5,885 | 3,524 | 352 | 646 | 19,393 | 1,536 | 31,691 | |||||||||
net | 147 | 26 | 2,093 | 1,925 | 152 | 538 | 8,252 | 255 | 13,388 | ||||||||||
Gas wellsb | gross | 303 | | 18,173 | 2,274 | 681 | 90 | 47 | 131 | 21,699 | |||||||||
net | 140 | | 11,462 | 1,383 | 249 | 42 | 23 | 88 | 13,387 | ||||||||||
a | Includes approximately 1,016 gross (289 net) multiple completion wells (more than one formation producing into the same well bore). |
b | Includes approximately 2,489 gross (1,591 net) multiple completion wells. If one of the multiple completions in a well is an oil completion, the well is classified as an oil well. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Rest of | Rest of | Asia | |||||||||||||||||
UK | Europe | US | Americas | Pacific | Africa | Russia | Other | Total | |||||||||||
Oil and natural gas acreage at 31 December 2007 | Thousands of acres | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed | gross | 428 | 143 | 7,414 | 2,793 | 1,235 | 541 | 4,071 | 1,870 | 18,495 | |||||||||
net | 201 | 34 | 4,742 | 1,310 | 319 | 225 | 1,768 | 690 | 9,289 | ||||||||||
Undevelopeda | gross | 1,696 | 505 | 6,451 | 11,529 | 7,450 | 15,759 | 13,821 | 14,412 | 71,623 | |||||||||
net | 967 | 227 | 4,574 | 5,912 | 2,782 | 9,755 | 5,777 | 5,969 | 35,963 | ||||||||||
|
a | Undeveloped acreage includes leases and concessions. |
189 | |
Supplementary information on oil and natural gas (unaudited) continued
Net oil and gas wells completed or abandoned
The following table shows the number of net productive and dry exploratory and development oil and natural gas wells completed or abandoned in the years indicated by the group and its equity-accounted entities.
Productive wells include wells in which hydrocarbons were encountered and the drilling or completion of which, in the case of exploratory wells, has been suspended pending further drilling or evaluation. A dry well is one found to be incapable of
producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities to justify completion.
Rest of | Rest of | Asia | ||||||||||||||||
UK | Europe | US | Americas | Pacific | Africa | Russia | Other | Total | ||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exploratory | ||||||||||||||||||
Productive | 1.6 | | 4.1 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 6.1 | 16.0 | 1.7 | 31.1 | |||||||||
Dry | | | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 13.2 | |||||||||
Development | ||||||||||||||||||
Productive | 0.4 | 0.8 | 401.2 | 46.0 | 13.8 | 15.3 | 246.0 | 15.8 | 739.3 | |||||||||
Dry | 0.6 | | 4.2 | 8.8 | | | 9.5 | | 23.1 | |||||||||
2006 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exploratory | ||||||||||||||||||
Productive | 0.1 | 0.1 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 15.6 | 1.4 | 24.8 | |||||||||
Dry | | | 7.4 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 5.7 | 0.3 | 16.4 | |||||||||
Development | ||||||||||||||||||
Productive | 4.9 | 1.6 | 418.8 | 154.0 | 12.4 | 23.8 | 227.2 | 14.5 | 857.2 | |||||||||
Dry | | | 4.5 | 5.0 | 0.2 | | 20.8 | 1.0 | 31.5 | |||||||||
2005 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exploratory | ||||||||||||||||||
Productive | 0.5 | 0.8 | 10.7 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 14.5 | | 30.8 | |||||||||
Dry | 0.3 | | 6.4 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 5.2 | | 14.5 | |||||||||
Development | ||||||||||||||||||
Productive | 10.6 | 3.5 | 473.9 | 151.7 | 22.7 | 17.9 | 212.8 | 12.1 | 905.2 | |||||||||
Dry | | 0.3 | 5.0 | 3.3 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 17.7 | 0.3 | 28.0 | |||||||||
|
Drilling and production activities in progress
The following table shows the number of exploratory and development oil and
natural gas wells in the process of being drilled by the group and its
equity-accounted entities as of 31 December 2007. Suspended development
wells and long-term suspended exploratory wells are also included in
the table.
Rest of | Rest of | Asia | ||||||||||||||||
UK | Europe | US | Americas | Pacific | Africa | Russia | Other | Total | ||||||||||
At 31 December 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exploratory | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross | | 1 | 26 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 28 | 2 | 66 | |||||||||
Net | | 0.5 | 12.1 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 13.5 | 0.5 | 30.0 | |||||||||
Development | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross | 6 | 2 | 258 | 39 | 12 | 25 | 30 | 9 | 381 | |||||||||
Net | 2.5 | 0.5 | 130.5 | 23.1 | 5.0 | 8.9 | 12.5 | 2.7 | 185.7 | |||||||||
|
190 | |
Signatures
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing
on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to
sign this annual report on its behalf.
BP p.l.c.
(Registrant)
/s/ D.J.JACKSON
D.J.Jackson
Company Secretary
Dated: 4 March 2008