Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14A-101)

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

Table of Contents

5 Old Lancaster Road
 Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held on June 1, 2016

Dear Shareholder:

You are cordially invited to attend our 2016 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on June 1, 2016, at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Time, at the offices of CubeSmart, 5 Old Lancaster Road, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355, for the following purposes:

1.                            To elect as Trustees, the eight individuals named in the accompanying proxy statement to serve until our 2017 annual shareholders meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified;

2.                            To consider and vote on a proposal to amend and restate our Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares available for grant thereunder;

3.                            To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016;

4.                            To cast an advisory vote to approve our executive compensation; and

5.                            To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 15, 2016 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.

Your vote is important.  Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, please vote your shares electronically via the Internet, by telephone or, if you receive a paper copy of the proxy materials, by signing, dating and completing the accompanying proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.  Voting electronically via the Internet, by telephone, or by returning your proxy card in advance of the meeting does not deprive you of your right to attend the meeting.  If you attend the meeting, you may vote your shares in person, even if you have previously submitted a proxy in writing, by telephone or via the Internet.  Our Proxy Statement includes additional instructions on voting procedures for shareholders whose shares are held by a brokerage firm or other custodian.

Table of Contents

5 Old Lancaster Road
 Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE 2016 ANNUAL MEETING
OF SHAREHOLDERS

The Board of Trustees of CubeSmart is soliciting proxies to be voted at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on June 1, 2016, at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Time, and at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. This proxy statement, the form of proxy and our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K are first being furnished to shareholders and made available electronically on our website at www.cubesmart.com under “Investor Relations” beginning on or about April 14, 2016.

At the meeting, we will ask the holders of record of our common shares of beneficial interest as of the close of business on March 15, 2016 to consider and vote on the proposals listed below:

(1)                       To elect as Trustees, the eight individuals named in the accompanying proxy statement to serve until our 2017 annual shareholders meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified;

(2)                       To consider and vote on a proposal to amend and restate our Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Equity Incentive Plan”) to increase the number of shares available for grant thereunder;

(3)                       To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016;

(4)                       To cast an advisory vote to approve our executive compensation; and

(5)                       To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.

Our Board of Trustees knows of no other business that will be presented for consideration at the meeting. If any other matter should be properly presented at the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting for action by the shareholders, the persons named in the proxy form will vote the proxy in accordance with their best judgment on such matter.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials
for the Shareholders Meeting to Be Held on June 1, 2016

This proxy statement, the form of proxy and our 2015 Annual Report to Shareholders
are available at http://investors.cubesmart.com/Docs

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

Table of Contents

ABOUT THE MEETING

Introduction; Proposals for Shareholder Consideration.

We have provided to our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which instructs you as to how you may access and review all of the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice also instructs you as to how you may submit your proxy on the Internet. If you would like to receive a paper or email copy of our proxy materials, at no charge, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice.

This proxy statement and the form of proxy, which are first being furnished to shareholders on or about April 14, 2016, contain information related to the solicitation of proxies for use at our 2016 annual meeting of shareholders, to be held on June 1, 2016, at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Time, at the offices of CubeSmart, 5 Old Lancaster Road, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355, for the following proposals:

·                                          to elect as Trustees, eight individuals to serve until our 2017 annual shareholders meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified;

·                                          to consider and vote on a proposal to amend and restate our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares available for grant thereunder;

·                                          to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016;

·                                          to cast an advisory vote to approve our executive compensation; and

·                                          to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.

This solicitation is made by CubeSmart on behalf of our Board of Trustees. “We,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” refer to CubeSmart, a Maryland real estate investment trust.

What are the Board’s recommendations?

Our Board recommends that you vote:

·                                          FOR the election as Trustees of the individuals nominated and named in this proxy statement to serve as Trustees;

·                                          FOR the proposal to amend and restate our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares available for grant thereunder;

·                                          FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016; and

·                                          FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation.

Who is entitled to vote at the annual meeting?

Only holders of record of our common shares at the close of business on March 15, 2016, the record date for the annual meeting, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. Our common shares are the only class of securities entitled to vote at the meeting.  As of the record date, there were 176,599,321 common shares outstanding.

1

Table of Contents

Who can attend the annual meeting?

All holders of our common shares at the close of business on March 15, 2016, the record date for the annual meeting, or their duly appointed proxies, are authorized to attend the annual meeting. If you attend the meeting, you may be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, before being admitted. Cameras, recording devices, and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the meeting. If you hold your shares in “street name” (that is, through a broker or other nominee), you will need to bring a copy of the brokerage statement reflecting your share ownership as of March 15, 2016, or a legal proxy from your broker.

What will constitute a quorum at the annual meeting?

A quorum is required to hold a valid meeting of our shareholders. The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the common shares outstanding at the close of business on March 15, 2016 will constitute a quorum, permitting the shareholders to conduct business at the meeting. The shares of a shareholder whose ballot on any or all proposals is marked as “abstain” will be included in the number of shares present at the meeting for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. If a broker indicates on the proxy that it does not have discretionary authority as to certain shares to vote on a particular matter, those shares will be considered as present for purposes of determining a quorum, but will not be voted with respect to that matter.

How do I vote my shares that are held by my bank or broker?

If your shares are held by a bank or broker, you should follow the voting instructions provided to you by the bank or broker. Although most banks and brokers offer voting by mail, telephone and on the Internet, availability and specific procedures will depend on their voting arrangements. If you do not provide voting instructions to your bank or broker, your shares are referred to as “uninstructed shares.” Whether your bank or broker has the discretion to vote these shares on your behalf depends on the ballot item. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), your bank or broker does not have discretion to vote uninstructed shares on non-routine matters, such as Proposals 1, 2 and 4, and as such, may not vote uninstructed shares on such proposals. However, your bank or broker has discretion to vote your shares on routine matters, such as Proposal 3.

What vote is required to approve each proposal?

Voting Rights Generally. Each common share outstanding on the record date entitles its holder to cast one vote on each matter to be voted upon at the annual meeting. Shareholders have no cumulative voting rights. Although the advisory vote on Proposal 4 is non-binding, as provided by law, our Board will review the results of the vote and, consistent with our record of shareowner engagement, will take the result into account in making a determination concerning executive compensation.

Proposal 1: Election of Trustees. Trustees are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting. Shareholders may vote in favor of all nominees, withhold their votes as to all nominees, or withhold their votes as to specific nominees. “Votes cast” exclude abstentions and any votes withheld by banks or brokers in the absence of instructions from street-name holders (“broker non-votes”).  Abstentions and broker non-votes will therefore have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

Proposal 2: Approval of Amendment and Restatement of our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. Approval of the amendment and restatement of our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of all votes cast on this proposal.  For purpose of this vote, abstentions will have the same effect as votes against the proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

Proposal 3: Ratification of KPMG LLP as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of all votes cast on this proposal (which means the votes cast “for” the proposal must exceed the votes cast “against” the proposal). Accordingly, abstentions will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

2

Table of Contents

Proposal 4: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. Approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of all votes cast on this proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will therefore have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

How do I vote if I am the record holder of my shares?

If you are a shareholder of record, there are several ways for you to vote your common shares at the annual meeting:

Voting by Internet. You may vote your shares through the Internet by signing on to the website identified on the proxy card and following the procedures described on the website. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m. ET on the day before the annual meeting, and the procedures are designed to authenticate votes cast by using a personal identification number located on the proxy card. The procedures allow you to appoint a proxy to vote your shares and to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote through the Internet, you should not return your proxy card.

Voting by Mail. If you choose to vote by mail, simply complete the accompanying proxy card, date and sign it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.

Voting by Telephone. You may vote your shares by telephone by calling toll-free 1-800-PROXIES (1-800-776-9437) in the United States or 1-718-921-8500 from foreign countries. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m. ET on the day before the annual meeting, and the procedures are designed to authenticate votes cast by using a personal identification number located on the proxy card. The procedures allow you to appoint a proxy to vote your shares and to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote by telephone, you should not return your proxy card.

In Person Attendance. You may vote your shares in person at the annual meeting. Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting in person, we recommend that you submit the accompanying proxy card or voting instructions, or vote by telephone or via the Internet, by the applicable deadline so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the annual meeting.

May I change my vote after I return my proxy?

Yes. You may revoke a previously granted proxy at any time before it is exercised by submitting to our Secretary a notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or by attending the meeting and voting in person.

How are proxy votes counted?

If you vote your common shares by completing the accompanying proxy card, or by voting on the Internet or by phone, and you do not revoke such proxy, your shares will be voted as directed by you. Unless contrary instructions are given, the persons designated as proxy holders on the proxy card will vote “FOR” the election of all nominees for our Board of Trustees named in this proxy statement, “FOR” the proposal to amend and restate our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares available for grant thereunder, “FOR” the ratification of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, “FOR” the approval on an advisory basis of our executive compensation, and as recommended by our Board of Trustees with regard to any other matters which may properly come before the annual meeting, or, if no such recommendation is given, the persons designated as proxy holders on the proxy card will vote in accordance with their best judgment on such matter.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?

If you receive more than one proxy card, it means that you hold shares registered in more than one account. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, you should vote each of your accounts by Internet, phone or mail. If you mail proxy cards, please sign, date and return each proxy card to assure that all of your shares are voted.

3

Table of Contents

Who pays the costs of soliciting proxies?

We will pay the costs of soliciting proxies. We hired Georgeson Inc. to serve as our proxy solicitors at a cost of $7,500.  In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, our officers, Trustees and other employees, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies personally or by other appropriate means. We anticipate that banks, brokers, fiduciaries, custodians and nominees will forward proxy soliciting materials to their principals and that we will reimburse such persons’ out-of-pocket expenses.

How can I find out the results of the voting at the annual meeting?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the annual meeting. Final voting results for Proposals 1 through 4 will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, within four business days following the annual meeting.

How can I obtain our Annual Report on Form 10-K?

A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 is available electronically on our website at http://investors.cubesmart.com/Docs. Our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K is not incorporated into this proxy statement and shall not be considered proxy solicitation material.

If you wish to have printed copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, as well as a copy of any exhibit specifically requested, or printed copies of this proxy statement, we will mail these documents to you without charge. Requests should be sent to: Secretary of the Company, CubeSmart, 5 Old Lancaster Road, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355. Our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K has been filed with the SEC and may be accessed from the SEC’s homepage at www.sec.gov.

Who should I contact if I have any questions?

If you have any questions about the annual meeting, these proxy materials or your ownership of our common shares, please contact our Secretary by telephone at (610) 535-5000 or by fax at (610) 535-5729.

4

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF TRUSTEES

Our Board of Trustees is currently comprised of eight Trustees.  The term of each Trustee expires at the annual meeting.  Our Board, upon the recommendation of its Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, has nominated all eight of the current Trustees for re-election: William M. Diefenderfer III, Piero Bussani, John W. Fain, Marianne M. Keler, Christopher P. Marr, John F. Remondi, Jeffrey F. Rogatz and Deborah R. Salzberg.

The Board of Trustees recommends that shareholders vote in favor of the election of each of the eight nominees to serve as Trustees until the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Based on its review of the relationships between the Trustee nominees and us, the Board of Trustees affirmatively determined that seven of the eight nominees (William M. Diefenderfer III, Piero Bussani, John W. Fain, Marianne M. Keler, John F. Remondi, Jeffrey F. Rogatz and Deborah R. Salzberg) are “independent” Trustees under the rules of the NYSE.  See “Corporate Governance — Independence of Trustees.”

The Board of Trustees knows of no reason why any nominee would be unable or unwilling to serve as a Trustee. If any nominee is unable or unwilling to serve, the Board of Trustees may designate a substitute nominee and the persons designated as proxy holders will vote for the substitute nominee recommended by the Board of Trustees, or the Board of Trustees may decrease the size of our Board of Trustees, as permitted by our bylaws. Each nominee has consented to be named in this proxy statement and has agreed to serve if elected.

When considering whether nominees for Trustee have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board of Trustees to fulfill its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of our business and structure, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board of Trustees focused primarily on the information summarized in each of the Trustees’ individual biographies set forth below.

Nominees for Election

We have summarized below the backgrounds and principal occupations of each of our nominees for Trustee and the period during which he or she has served as a Trustee.

William M. Diefenderfer III, 70, has served as our Chairman of the Board of Trustees since February 2007 and as a Trustee since our initial public offering in October 2004. Mr. Diefenderfer has been a partner in the law firm of Diefenderfer, Hoover, Boyle & Wood since 1991. He served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Enumerate Solutions Inc., a privately-owned technology company that he co-founded, from 2000 to 2002. From 1992 to 1996, Mr. Diefenderfer served as Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Icarus Aircraft, Inc., a privately-owned aviation technology company. Mr. Diefenderfer served a two-year term on the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Standing Advisory Group from 2004 through 2005. In October 2006, he accepted appointment to the Commission on the Future of American Veterans, the purpose of which is to formulate a clear plan to guide the U.S. Department of Veteran’s Affairs for the next twenty years. Mr. Diefenderfer serves as Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors of Enumerate Solutions Inc., as well as chairman of its Audit Committee. He currently serves as the Chairman of the Board of Navient, a publicly-traded company offering a variety of loan management, servicing and asset recovery services to clients in higher education, and federal, state, and local governments.

Relevant Areas of Experience: Mr. Diefenderfer has experience serving on boards of directors and has a background in accounting, including serving a term on the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Standing Advisory Group.

Piero Bussani, 51, has served as a trustee since February 2010. Mr. Bussani was appointed by the Board upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.  Since November 2015, Mr. Bussani has been the Managing Director and Chief Legal Officer of Digital Bridge Holdings, LLC, a global communications infrastructure platform.  He previously served as Chief Legal Officer and Executive Vice President for Invitation Homes, a company owned by the Blackstone Group that owns and leases single family houses in the United States.  From 2004 to 2013, Mr. Bussani was the General Counsel and Executive Vice President of a Blackstone Group affiliate, LXR Luxury Resorts & Hotels. From 1996 through 2004, Mr. Bussani served as General Counsel and Executive Vice President of Development for Extended Stay Hotels. Mr. Bussani started his career as an associate in

5

Table of Contents

the litigation and real estate groups of the law firm Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn in Washington, D.C. where he worked from August 1991 through July 1995.

Relevant Areas of Experience: Mr. Bussani has significant experience as a general counsel in the hospitality and real estate industries, including combined business and legal experience with regard to customer retention, occupancy, and risk mitigation.

John W. Fain, 62, has served as a Trustee since May 2012.  Mr. Fain served in various capacities at Overnite Transportation Company — now a part of UPS Freight, a subsidiary of UPS — since 1982, including as Senior Vice President — Sales and Marketing (1998 to 2012), Senior Vice President — Operations (1995 to 1998), and General Counsel (1982 to 1992). Mr. Fain was an associate, practicing real estate law, at McGuire Woods from 1978 until 1982. Mr. Fain is a member of the board of directors of the Virginia Trucking Association, the Greater Richmond YMCA (on which he has served as chairman emeritus since 2002), the Virginia Commonwealth University Foundation and Ramp Access Made Possible by Students (RAMPS). Mr. Fain also served as a director and a member of the audit committee of the Virginia Business Bank from 2006 to 2011.

Relevant Areas of Experience: Mr. Fain has knowledge and experience in the transportation and logistics arena. In addition, Mr. Fain has also gained knowledge of our industry through his real estate law practice and his involvement in the operation and management of a large, logistics organization with multiple facilities nationwide.

Marianne M. Keler, 61, has served as a Trustee since March 2007. From 1985 to 2006, Ms. Keler served in various positions with SLM Corporation (Sallie Mae, Nasdaq: SLM) and has been a member of the Sallie Mae board of directors since April 2014. She served as Sallie Mae’s General Counsel from 1997 to 2004 and was Executive Vice President for Corporate Strategy, Consumer Lending and Administration from 2005 to 2006. Ms. Keler was an attorney at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission from 1981 to 1984. She is a partner of Keler & Kershow, a private law firm. Ms. Keler chairs the board of Building Hope, a charter school lender and is Deputy Chief of IAU College in Aix-en-Provence, a study abroad institute.

Relevant Areas of Experience: Ms. Keler has extensive finance, merger and acquisition, management, governance and risk management experience, including over 20 years of service as a senior corporate officer at a Fortune 100 financial services company.

Christopher P. Marr, 51, has been our President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2014 and also has served as a member of our Board of Trustees since that time.  Previously, Mr. Marr served as our President, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Investment Officer having assumed the President and Chief Investment Officer roles in 2008 and, additionally, the Chief Operating Officer role in May 2012. Mr. Marr joined CubeSmart in 2006, serving as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer until November 2008. Prior to joining CubeSmart, Mr. Marr was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Brandywine Realty Trust, a publicly-traded office REIT, from 2002 to 2006. Prior to joining Brandywine Realty Trust, Mr. Marr served as Chief Financial Officer of Storage USA, Inc., a publicly-traded self-storage REIT, from 1998 to 2002. Mr. Marr currently serves on the board of STAG Industrial, Inc., a publicly-traded industrial REIT, and also as a member of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts’ Board of Governors.

Relevant Areas of Experience: Mr. Marr has experience with boards of directors and real estate investment trusts and, in particular, knowledge and experience in the self-storage industry. Mr. Marr has gained extensive knowledge of our business through his service to our Company since 2006 and his position with Storage USA, Inc.

John F. Remondi, 54, has served as a Trustee since November 2009. Mr. Remondi is President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board directors of Navient, the nation’s leading loan servicing, management and asset recovery company.   In May 2014, Navient was spun-off from Sallie Mae, formally known as SLM Corporation. Mr. Remondi was Sallie Mae’s President & Chief Executive Officer from May 2013 to April 2014.  Prior to rejoining SLM in 2008, Mr. Remondi served as Portfolio Manager to PAR Capital Management Corp. in Boston, Massachusetts, from 2005 to 2008. From 1999 to 2005, Mr. Remondi served in several financial positions with SLM, including Executive Vice President, Corporate Finance. In addition to his experience at SLM Corporation, Mr. Remondi served in corporate finance positions with New England Education Loan Marketing Corporation and

6

Table of Contents

BayBank Boston. Mr. Remondi is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of RIF — Reading is Fundamental as well as a member of the board of directors for Nellie Mae Education Foundation.

Relevant Areas of Experience: Mr. Remondi has considerable financial management experience, including service as chief financial officer at a Fortune 100 financial services company.

Jeffrey F. Rogatz, 54, has served as a Trustee since January 2011. Mr. Rogatz is Managing Director with Robert W. Baird & Co., an investment banking firm. Previously, Mr. Rogatz was the co-founder of Palladian Realty Capital which provides consulting and advisory services to public and private real estate companies. In addition to Palladian Realty Capital, Mr. Rogatz was the founder and President of Triangle Real Estate Advisors LLC, a real estate asset management company, which is the manager of Triangle Real Estate Securities Fund LLC. Mr. Rogatz is also founder and President of Ridgeway Capital LLC, a real estate investment and advisory firm that invests in office, industrial and retail leased assets in the Mid-Atlantic area. Prior to founding Ridgeway Capital in 2001, Mr. Rogatz was chief financial officer of Brandywine Realty Trust, a NYSE-listed real estate investment trust. Prior to joining Brandywine in 1999, Mr. Rogatz was a managing director and head of the REIT practice for Legg Mason Wood Walker, Incorporated. Mr. Rogatz was a member of the Board of Directors of CapLease, Inc., a publicly-traded diversified real estate investment trust, until its sale in 2013. Currently Mr. Rogatz is a member of the William and Mary Business School Foundation Board.

Relevant Areas of Experience: Mr. Rogatz has experience serving on boards of directors and has knowledge and experience working with real estate investment trusts. Mr. Rogatz has also gained knowledge of our industry as a result his involvement in real estate ownership, strategy, operation and investment through his roles with Palladian Realty Capital and Triangle Real Estate Advisors, LLC.

Deborah R. Salzberg, 62, has served as a Trustee since May 2013.  Ms. Salzberg is the President of Forest City Washington, Inc., a Cleveland, Ohio based real estate firm specializing in the development, construction, ownership and management of mixed-use, commercial, residential, and military housing developments and has served in various capacities with Forest City since 1985.  Ms. Salzberg was President of RMS Investment Corporation, a privately held real estate management company in Cleveland, Ohio from 1999 to 2013.  Prior to joining Forest City, Ms. Salzberg was a trial attorney in the Civil Division of the U.S. Department of Justice.  Ms. Salzberg is a member of the Board of Directors of Forest City Realty Trust, Inc. and the Boards of Trustees for The Agnes and Eugene Meyer Foundation, Kenyon College, the District of Columbia Building Industry Association, the Urban Land Institute, and Co-Chair of the Washington, DC White House Fellow’s Regional Panel 2011 to 2016.

Relevant Areas of Experience:  Ms. Salzberg has experience serving on boards of directors and has knowledge and experience in the planning, development, construction and management of new construction, adaptive re-use and redeveloped real estate projects through her roles and responsibilities with Forest City Washington, Inc.

OUR BOARD OF TRUSTEES UNANIMOUSLY
RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE ABOVE NOMINEES.

7

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Documents

Our Board of Trustees maintains corporate governance guidelines and a code of business conduct and ethics. To view the corporate governance guidelines and code of business conduct and ethics, as well as the charters of each of the committees of the Board, please visit our website at www.cubesmart.com. Each of these documents is also available in print, free of charge, to any shareholder who requests them in writing to the Secretary, CubeSmart, 5 Old Lancaster Road, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.

Independence of Trustees

NYSE listing standards require listed companies to have a majority of independent board members and to have each of the nominating/corporate governance, compensation and audit committees comprised solely of independent Trustees. Under the listing standards and other independence requirements of the NYSE, in order for a Trustee to qualify as “independent,” our Board of Trustees must affirmatively determine that the Trustee has no material relationship with us (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us). The NYSE rules currently provide that a Trustee who has any of the following relationships or arrangements will not qualify as independent:

·                                          The Trustee is, or has been within the last three years, an employee of ours, or an immediate family member of the Trustee is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of ours.

·                                          The Trustee has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from us (excluding compensation in the form of Board fees and Board committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation not contingent on continued service).

·                                          (A) The Trustee or an immediate family member is a current partner of a firm that is our internal or external auditor; (B) the Trustee is a current employee of such a firm; (C) the Trustee has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and who participates in the firm’s audit, assurance or tax compliance (but not tax planning) practice; or (D) the Trustee or an immediate family member was within the last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on our audit within that time.

·                                          The Trustee or an immediate family member of the Trustee is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of our present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company’s compensation committee.

·                                          The Trustee is a current employee, or an immediate family member of the Trustee is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, us for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

Our Board of Trustees evaluated the status of each Trustee who served on our Board during 2015.  After broadly considering all facts and circumstances (including Mr. Rogatz’s affiliation with Robert W. Baird & Co.), our Board of Trustees affirmatively determined that each of our Trustees (other than Mr. Marr) meets the independence requirements of the NYSE because each has no known relationship (material or otherwise) with us.  Our Board determined that Mr. Marr is not independent because of his current position with us as an executive officer.

8

Table of Contents

Hedging Policy; Restriction on Pledges

Our executives and Trustees are prohibited from hedging their ownership or offsetting any decline in the market value of our shares, including by trading in publicly-traded options, puts, calls or other derivative instruments related to our shares.  In addition, in February 2013, we changed our restrictive policy on pledges of company securities to prohibit executives and Trustees from pledging company securities.  Our prohibition applies to pledges effected from and after the date of the change and not to pledges in effect prior to the change.  None of our current Trustees or executives have pledged company securities.

Oversight of Risk Management

Risk is inherent in business and we are exposed to a number of risks and we regularly identify and evaluate these risks and develop enterprise-based plans to manage them effectively. Our Board of Trustees and management consider risk for these purposes to be the possibility that an undesired event could occur that adversely affects the achievement of our objectives. Risks vary in many ways, including the ability of the Company to anticipate and understand the risk, the types of adverse impacts that could occur if the undesired event occurs, the likelihood that an undesired event and a particular adverse impact would occur, and the ability of the Company to control the risk and the potential adverse impacts. A discussion of particular risks identified by the Company is included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 19, 2016.

Our Board of Trustees and the relevant Board Committees that report on their deliberations to the Board have oversight of our risk management policies and procedures. In addition, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer are directly responsible for our enterprise risk management function and report to our Board of Trustees and the relevant Board Committees in this regard to discuss the risks facing us, highlight any new risks that may have arisen since they last met, and develop programs and recommendations to determine the sufficiency of risk identification and the appropriate manner in which to control risk. The relevant Board Committees then report their discussions with the President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer regarding our risk management efforts to our Board of Trustees for consideration. Our Board of Trustees and its Committees oversee risks associated with their respective principal areas of focus as summarized below:

In fulfilling their risk management responsibilities, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer have developed management reporting processes that are designed to provide visibility to the Board about the identification, assessment, and management and mitigation of critical risks. Our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer work closely with members of executive and senior management, the heads of each Company department, and financial and accounting staff to maintain these management reporting processes. Not less than quarterly, the President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer conduct a risk disclosure meeting with all members of senior management and the heads of each Company department to discuss financial (accounting, credit, liquidity, and tax),

9

Table of Contents

legal, regulatory, technology, compliance and reputational risks. Our executives also report directly to our Board on at least an annual basis to apprise them directly of our risk management efforts.

Members of our senior management also participate in the implementation of our risk management policy. Not less than annually, senior management and the heads of each Company department conduct a review of all enterprise risk management policies and procedures and recommend revisions to company controls and policies. Finally, we retain outside consultants to review risks facing us and to recommend policies and programs to minimize the impact of any risks identified in connection with such review.

Communications with the Board

Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board of Trustees or with the non-management Trustees, as a group or individually, by communicating directly with the Chairman of the Board of Trustees. Please send any correspondence in writing to the “Chairman of the Board” c/o Secretary of CubeSmart, 5 Old Lancaster Road, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355, who will then directly forward your correspondence to the Chairman of the Board of Trustees. The Chairman will decide what action should be taken with respect to the communication, including whether such communication should be reported to the Board of Trustees.

10

Table of Contents

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES REGARDING REVIEW, APPROVAL OR RATIFICATION OF TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Under our Declaration of Trust, we may enter into any contract or transaction with a Trustee, officer, employee or agent, or any person affiliated with any of them, in which such person has a material financial interest, provided that (i) the Board of Trustees is made aware of the interest and a majority of the disinterested Trustees approves or ratifies the contract or transaction; (ii) our shareholders are made aware of the interest and holders of a majority of our outstanding shares entitled to vote (excluding shares owned by the interested party) approve or ratify the contract or transaction; or (iii) the contract or transaction is fair and reasonable to us.

As set forth in our corporate governance guidelines, our Board of Trustees adopted a policy providing that transactions with a Trustee who has a personal or financial interest (direct or indirect) should be scrutinized carefully to ensure that the transaction is in our best interests and will not otherwise create a conflict of interest. Without the approval of a majority of the disinterested Trustees, we will not enter into a transaction or arrangement (including utilizing the services of any Trustee to provide legal, accounting, financial, consulting or other similar services) in which a Trustee has a material personal or financial interest (direct or indirect). Whether an interest is a material personal or financial interest in a transaction or arrangement will be determined by the Board of Trustees on a case-by-case basis, but at a minimum a Trustee will be considered to have a material personal or financial interest in a transaction or arrangement if we would be required to disclose such transaction or arrangement in our proxy statement or in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The interested Trustee will not participate in any Board discussion regarding the matter in which he or she has such an interest. For purposes of this policy, the disinterested Trustees will consider the interests of any entity with which a Trustee is affiliated, any immediate family member of a Trustee, and any entity in which a Trustee’s immediate family member has a material interest.

Pursuant to its charter, our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for reviewing any transactions and arrangements with our Trustees and making a recommendation to the Board of Trustees concerning such transactions and arrangements. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee maintains written procedures regarding general related party transactions and office lease agreements between the Company and related parties. Below is a description of the material features of these procedures, including types of transactions that are covered by them and the standards applied in evaluating transactions and arrangements with Trustees and executive officers.

General Related Party Transaction Procedures

The General Related Party Transaction Procedures govern the review of transactions and arrangements in which Trustees or executive officers may have a direct or indirect interest that, while not technically requiring approval of the disinterested Trustees under our declaration of trust or our corporate governance guidelines, may nonetheless be advisable to be reviewed and approved by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee to ensure that related party transactions are properly reviewed and, if necessary, approved first by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and if appropriate, by a majority of disinterested Trustees. The procedures outline: (i) requirements and procedures for Trustees and executive officers to report any potential related party transaction to our compliance officer (currently, our Chief Legal Officer); (ii) the procedures our compliance officer follows in collecting and submitting to the Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee information regarding potential related party transactions; (iii) the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s process for reviewing and evaluating potential related party transactions; and (iv) the process used by the disinterested Trustees in reviewing and evaluating a potential related party transaction once approved by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may consult with legal counsel as it considers all of the information compiled by our compliance officer and evaluates material issues raised and factors relating to the transaction. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee determines whether it is appropriate and advisable for us to engage in the transaction on the basis of whether the transaction is fair, reasonable and in our best interests, and if so, whether the proposed transaction requires approval by the disinterested members of the Board of Trustees.

11

Table of Contents

MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Board of Trustees Meetings

Our Board of Trustees holds regular and special meetings throughout the year. During 2015, the Board of Trustees held seven (7) meetings, including telephonic meetings. Each Trustee is expected to attend, in person or by telephone, all Board meetings and meetings of committees on which he or she serves. During 2015, each Trustee attended at least 75 percent of the Board of Trustees and committee meetings on which he or she served. Pursuant to our corporate governance guidelines, all of our Trustees are expected to attend our annual meetings of shareholders. All but one of our Trustees then serving on our Board attended our 2015 annual shareholders meeting.

Non-Executive Chairman of the Board; Executive Sessions

Our Board believes that independent Board leadership is a critical component of our corporate governance. William M. Diefenderfer III serves as our Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Christopher P. Marr serves as our Chief Executive Officer and as a Trustee. We believe that separating the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is currently appropriate for us given Mr. Diefenderfer’s business, legal, accounting and management experience and his knowledge and experience with our company.  Additionally, separating the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer allows us to achieve independent oversight and evaluation of our senior management and assures effective communication between the Board of Trustees and senior management on corporate strategy, while simultaneously allowing our Chief Executive Officer to focus on growing our business and implementing our strategic business plans. As Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, Mr. Diefenderfer is charged primarily with:

·                                          presiding over meetings of our Board of Trustees and shareholders, including executive sessions of the non-management Trustees;

·                                          establishing an agenda and setting the timing and length for each Board meeting in collaboration with our Chief Executive Officer and other Trustees and meeting with our Chief Executive Officer following each meeting to discuss any open issues and follow-up items;

·                                          facilitating and coordinating communication among the non-management Trustees and our Chief Executive Officer and an open flow of information between management and our Board;

·                                          facilitating and coordinating communication among our shareholders and our Board;

·                                          periodically meeting with each non-management Trustee;

·                                          providing assistance to and consulting with our Chief Executive Officer, as necessary;

·                                          coordinating the periodic review of management’s strategic plan; and

·                                          performing such other duties and services as our Board may require.

Pursuant to our corporate governance guidelines and the independence requirements of the NYSE, in order to promote open discussion among independent Trustees, our Board of Trustees devotes a portion of each regularly scheduled Board meeting to sessions of non-management Trustees without management participation. The Chairman of the Board presides over these sessions.

Board Committees

The Board of Trustees has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. All members of these committees are “independent” of us as that term is defined in the listing standards and other independence requirements of the NYSE. Our Board of Trustees has adopted a written

12

Table of Contents

charter for each of its standing committees. The full text of each charter is available on our website, www.cubesmart.com, under “Investor Relations.” In addition, each charter is also available in print, free of charge, to any shareholder who requests a copy in writing to the Secretary, CubeSmart, 5 Old Lancaster Road, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.

The table below provides current membership information for each of the Board committees and the number of meetings held by each committee during 2015:

Audit Committee

The principal purposes of the Audit Committee are to assist the Board of Trustees in the oversight of:

·                                          the integrity of our financial statements;

·                                          our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

·                                          the qualification and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm; and

·                                          the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm and is also responsible for reviewing with our independent registered public accounting firm any audit problems or difficulties they encounter in the course of their audit. The Audit Committee is also charged with the tasks of reviewing our financial statements, any financial reporting issues and the adequacy of internal controls with management and our independent registered public accounting firm.

Our Audit Committee’s written charter requires that all members of the committee meet the independence, experience, financial literacy and expertise requirements of the NYSE, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, and applicable rules and regulations of the SEC, all as in effect from time to time. All of the members of the Audit Committee meet the foregoing requirements. The Board of Trustees determined that Messrs. Fain, Remondi and Rogatz are each an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Compensation Committee

The principal purposes of the Compensation Committee are to:

·                                          review and approve our corporate goals and objectives with respect to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, evaluate the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, and determine and approve, either as a committee or with our other independent Trustees, the appropriate level and structure of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation;

13

Table of Contents

·                                          determine and approve, either as a committee or together with our other independent Trustees, the compensation of the other executive officers;

·                                          review and recommend succession plans for our key officers;

·                                          make recommendations to the Board of Trustees regarding compensation of Trustees; and

·                                          recommend, implement and administer our incentive and equity-based compensation plans.

Our Compensation Committee’s primary responsibility is to determine and implement our compensation policies and practices. In connection with its review and approval of compensation levels and structure, the Committee has authority to approve grants of equity-based awards to our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer, and our employees. With respect to compensation of our executives other than our Chief Executive Officer, the Committee considers recommendations made by our Chief Executive Officer with respect to compensation of executive officers who report directly to him. In addition, the Board of Trustees has delegated to our Chief Executive Officer the authority to make one-time grants of equity-based awards to non-executive, newly hired or promoted employees in an amount not to exceed the equivalent of $100,000. Our Chief Executive Officer must regularly report to the Compensation Committee information concerning the grants that are made pursuant to this authority. The Board of Trustees has not delegated authority with respect to executive or Trustee compensation to any other group or person.

In carrying out its duties, the Compensation Committee has sole authority, pursuant to its charter, to retain advisors, including compensation consultants and legal counsel, to advise the Compensation Committee on executive compensation matters. The Compensation Committee also has authority to delegate to one or more subcommittees as it deems necessary and appropriate. In addition, the Compensation Committee has the authority to approve any such advisor’s or consultant’s fees and other terms of engagement. Since May 2011, the Compensation Committee has retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., an independent compensation consultant, to review our compensation and benefits program, analyze competitive market compensation practices and make recommendations relating to our executive compensation programs.   Our Compensation Committee assessed the independence of Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. under NYSE rules and concluded that the firm’s work for the Committee does not raise any conflict of interest.  Factors considered by the Committee include: (i) whether other services are provided to us by Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. or its representatives; (ii) the amount of fees received by Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. from us as a percentage of its total revenue; (iii) policies of Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. designed to prevent conflicts of interest; (iv) the absence of any business or personal relationship of representatives of Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. or its representatives with a member of the Committee; (v) whether Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. or its representatives own any of our securities; and (vi) whether Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. or its representatives have any business or personal relationship with any of our executive officers.

With respect to compensation of Trustees, our Compensation Committee has the authority to make recommendations to the Board of Trustees regarding compensation levels and structure. The Board of Trustees, however, has the ultimate authority to approve Trustee compensation levels and grants of equity-based awards to our Trustees.

The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Remondi (Chair), Bussani, Fain, and Rogatz. Each member of our Compensation Committee is independent within the meaning of the listing standards and other independence requirements of the NYSE.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Mr. Bussani, Mr. Fain, Mr. Remondi, and Mr. Rogatz served on the Compensation Committee during 2015. None of the members of the Compensation Committee during 2015 or as of the date of this proxy statement is or has been an officer or employee of ours and no executive officer of ours served on the compensation committee or board of any company that employed any member of our Compensation Committee or Board of Trustees.

14

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

The principal purposes of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are to:

·                                          identify individuals that are qualified to serve as Trustees;

·                                          recommend such individuals to the Board of Trustees, either to fill vacancies that occur on the Board of Trustees from time to time or in connection with the selection of Trustee nominees for each annual meeting of shareholders;

·                                          periodically assess the size of the Board of Trustees to ensure it can effectively carry out its obligations;

·                                          develop, recommend, implement and monitor our corporate governance guidelines and our code of business conduct and ethics;

·                                          review any related party transactions and procedures for evaluating and approving such transactions;

·                                          oversee the evaluation of the Board of Trustees and management; and

·                                          ensure that we are in compliance with all NYSE corporate governance listing requirements.

The Board of Trustees has adopted a policy to be used for considering potential Trustee candidates to continue to ensure that our Board of Trustees consists of a diverse group of qualified individuals that function effectively as a group. The policy provides that qualifications and credentials for consideration as a Trustee nominee may vary according to the particular areas of expertise being sought as a complement to the existing composition of the Board of Trustees. However, at a minimum, candidates for Trustee must possess:

·                                          the highest professional and personal ethics and values;

·                                          a commitment to enhancing shareholder value;

·                                          broad experience at the policy-making level in business, government, education, technology or public interest;

·                                          an ability to provide insights and practical wisdom based on experience and expertise;

·                                          a willingness and ability to devote adequate time and resources to diligently perform Board duties;

·                                          a reputation, both personal and professional, consistent with our image and reputation; and

·                                          an ability to exercise sound judgment and make independent analytical inquiries.

In addition to the minimum qualifications listed above, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee believes that there are other qualities and skills that, while not a prerequisite for nomination, should be taken into account when considering whether to recommend a particular person. These factors include:

·                                          whether the person possesses specific expertise and familiarity with general issues affecting our business;

15

Table of Contents

·                                          whether the person’s nomination and election would enable the Board of Trustees to have a member that qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined by the SEC;

·                                          whether the person would qualify as an “independent” Trustee under the listing standards and other independence requirements of the NYSE and our corporate governance guidelines;

·                                          the importance of continuity of the existing composition of the Board of Trustees; and

·                                          the importance of a diversified Board membership, in terms of both the individuals involved and their various experiences and areas of expertise.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will seek to identify Trustee candidates based on input provided by a number of sources, including (a) Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee members, (b) other members of the Board of Trustees and (c) our shareholders. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also has the authority to consult with or retain advisors or search firms to assist in the identification of qualified Trustee candidates. From time to time, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee retains the services of the National Association of Corporate Directors, or NACD, and other advisors to identify potentially qualified candidates for the Board of Trustees.

As part of the identification process, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee determines the optimal size of the Board, assessing the future needs based on anticipated Trustee vacancies, the value of specific industry expertise, and the willingness of existing Trustees to continue to serve as Trustees if re-nominated. Once a Trustee candidate has been identified, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will evaluate the candidate in light of his or her qualifications and credentials, and any additional factors that it deems necessary or appropriate. Existing Trustees who are being considered for re-nomination are re-evaluated as part of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s process of recommending Trustee candidates. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider all persons recommended by shareholders in the same manner as all other Trustee candidates provided that such recommendations are submitted in accordance with the procedures set forth in our bylaws. For more information see the section entitled “Other Matters — Shareholder Proposals and Nominations for the 2017 Annual Meeting” below.

After completing the identification and evaluation process described above, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recommends to the Board of Trustees the nomination of a number of candidates equal to the number of Trustees expected to be elected at the next annual meeting of shareholders. The Board of Trustees selects the Trustee nominees for shareholders to consider and vote upon at the annual meeting.

16

Table of Contents

TRUSTEE COMPENSATION

Trustee Compensation Table for 2015

The table below shows the actual amounts earned by our Trustees for their service during 2015. As an employee of the Company, Mr. Marr did not receive compensation for his service as a Trustee. Compensation paid to Mr. Marr can be found in the table captioned “Summary Compensation Table for 2015.”

(1)                   Each person listed served as our Trustee for all of 2015.

(2)                   Includes fees paid in connection with: (a) the annual retainer for service on the Board; (b) the annual retainer for service on the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, as applicable; (c) the annual retainer for the Chairman of the Board of Trustees and the Chairman of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, as applicable.

(3)                   On May 27, 2015, each Trustee was granted 2,961 restricted shares, which restricted shares vest on the earlier of one year from the grant date or the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders in 2016. The amounts listed in this column reflect the grant date fair value of the award in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation— Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 15, “Share-Based Compensation Plans,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 19, 2016. As of December 31, 2015, each of the then non-employee Trustees named above had 2,961 unvested restricted shares outstanding.

(4)                   All other compensation includes dividends paid on unvested restricted shares, deferred shares under the 2006 CubeSmart Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan and dividend equivalents paid on phantom shares issued under the 2008 Amended CubeSmart Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. See “Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan” below.

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Trustees has responsibility to periodically review compensation policies and practices applicable to members of our Board of Trustees.  Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain independent compensation consultants, advisors and legal counsel to advise the Compensation Committee on compensation policies and practices applicable to members of our Board of Trustees.  Since May 2011, the Compensation Committee has retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., an independent compensation consultant, to review and analyze compensation practices of comparative boards of directors or trustees, and make recommendations relating to our trustee compensation programs.   The Compensation Committee reviews our Trustee compensation programs with the compensation consultant on an annual basis.

Cash Compensation

For 2015, cash compensation to our independent Trustees consisted of the following payments: (i) annual retainer for service on the Board of $40,000; (ii) annual retainer of $50,000 for the Chairman of the Board of Trustees; (iii) annual retainer of $20,000 for service as the chairman of the Audit Committee; (iv) annual retainer of $20,000 for service as chairman of the Compensation Committee; (v) annual retainer of $7,500 for service as chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee; (vi) an additional annual retainer of $10,000 for service as a member of each of the Audit Committee or Compensation Committee; and (vii) an additional annual retainer of $7,500 for service as a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Non-employee Trustees

17

Table of Contents

may receive additional fees for service on strategic initiatives or other special committees that the Board of Trustees may from time to time establish.  In February 2016 after review of an analysis of Trustee compensation prepared by the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., the Compensation Committee recommended and our Board of Trustees approved, an increase in the annual retainer for service on the Board from $40,000 to $50,000 effective with the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders.

Equity Awards

In addition to the cash compensation paid to independent Trustees for their Board service, on May 27, 2015 we granted to each independent Trustee a time-based restricted share grant with a target value of $70,000.  The price for each restricted share granted pursuant to the Trustee grant was determined based on the average of the trailing 30-day closing price for our common shares preceding the date of grant.  The number of shares granted to each Trustee was determined by dividing $70,000 by the share grant price.  Each Trustee received 2,961 restricted shares with an aggregate value for each Trustee of $71,360, based on the closing share price as of the grant date.  The restricted shares granted to our Trustees vested on the earlier of the first anniversary of the grant date or the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders in 2016.  In February 2016 after review of an analysis of Trustee compensation prepared by the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., the Compensation Committee recommended and our Board of Trustees approved, an increase in the target value of the Trustee’s annual equity award from $70,000 to $80,000.

Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan

In December 2006, our Board of Trustees approved the CubeSmart Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan (“Deferred Trustees Plan”), which was amended in December 2008 in order to bring such plan into compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. New deferrals under the former deferred compensation plan were suspended upon adoption of the Deferred Trustees Plan. At December 31, 2015, an aggregate of 5,690 deferred shares were outstanding under the former plan.

Pursuant to the Deferred Trustees Plan, the Board of Trustees designated non-employee Trustees as eligible participants. Participants may elect each plan year to defer all or a portion of their cash compensation and have such amounts credited to accounts until distributed in accordance with the plan and the participants’ distribution elections. Each distribution account is credited with the returns of the investment options selected by plan participants, which include investment options that are available in our 401(k) plan, or such other investment funds as the Board of Trustees may designate from time to time. At December 31, 2015, an aggregate of approximately 12,426 phantom shares were allocated to the accounts of plan participants, including phantom shares resulting from reinvestment of dividend equivalents.

18

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Current Executive Officers

Set forth below is background information on each of our executive officers as of April 14, 2016, other than Mr. Marr, whose background is described above under “Election of Trustees — Nominees for Election.”

Timothy M. Martin, 45, has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since November 2008. Mr. Martin served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from December 2006 to November 2008. He previously was employed by Brandywine Realty Trust from 1997 to December 2006, serving as Vice President, Finance and Treasurer from January 2006 to December 2006, as Brandywine’s Principal Financial Officer from May 2006 to December 2006, as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from March 2004 to December 2005, and as Director, Financial Analysis from 2001 to March 2004. Prior to joining Brandywine, Mr. Martin served as a member of the audit staff of Arthur Andersen, LLP’s Philadelphia office, specializing in real estate.

Jeffrey P. Foster, 46, has served as our Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary since February 2009. From April 2003 to February 2009, Mr. Foster served as Senior Vice President of Real Estate Transactions and Associate General Counsel of Gramercy Realty, a division of Gramercy Capital Corp., a publicly traded office REIT (formerly known as American Financial Realty Trust). Prior to joining American Financial Realty Trust, Mr. Foster was an associate with Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP from 1999 to 2003.

19

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement. Based on the Compensation Committee’s review of, and discussions with management with respect to, the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Trustees that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement for filing with the SEC.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous or future filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act that might incorporate this proxy statement or future filings with the SEC, in whole or in part, the above report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any such filing.

20

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Compensation Committee determines the compensation for our executive officers, sets corporate goals and objectives with respect to executive compensation, evaluates performance against those goals and objectives, and determines the appropriate level and structure of executive compensation based on its evaluation. In carrying out these duties during 2015, the Compensation Committee considered, among other things, analyses prepared by independent compensation consultant Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., which the Compensation Committee initially engaged in May 2011 as an independent compensation consultant to advise regarding our executive compensation programs. Our philosophy with respect to, and our objectives in setting, executive compensation are discussed below. As a part of this discussion, we also outline the elements of compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the named executive officers.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

We desire to build and maintain a superior executive management team to forge our business strategy and lead us to profitable growth. We believe success in accomplishing these goals will, in part, depend on the effectiveness of our executive compensation programs, which are designed to compensate and reward executive officers for the achievement of corporate goals and desired business results and for their personal contributions in the execution of our business strategy. Excellence in corporate and individual performance is our primary objective, and tying a significant portion of overall executive compensation to the achievement of our corporate goals is our philosophy. The Compensation Committee believes that the most effective executive compensation programs are designed to reward the achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals that align executives’ interests with those of the shareholders by rewarding performance above established goals, with the ultimate objective of improving shareholder value.

In setting executive compensation, we endeavor to:

·                                          provide compensation that is sufficient to attract and retain the very best possible executive talent;

·                                          provide a significant portion of total compensation linked to achieving performance goals that we believe will create shareholder value in the short and long-term to ensure that executive officers maintain an ongoing personal stake in our company; and

·                                          encourage executive officers to achieve superior individual performance.

2015 Executive Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., an independent compensation consultant, to review our existing compensation and benefits program, analyze competitive market compensation practices and make recommendations on our 2015 executive compensation program to achieve the objectives described above. Representatives of Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. were present at several of the Compensation Committee’s meetings and met with the Compensation Committee in executive session, where no members of management were present.

Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. provided the Compensation Committee with multiple market reference points, including compensation data compiled from the proxy statements of a group of 20 REITs with a median equity market capitalization of $2.5 billion.

As part of its process of designing our compensation programs, the Compensation Committee carefully considered the appropriate market reference points for determining pay competitiveness and determined that the comparative group for benchmarking purposes should represent the marketplace in which we are likely to attract, retain and compete for executive talent. The Compensation Committee faced challenges in determining a comparative peer group, including the fact that market data specific to our self-storage peers is limited to four publicly-traded self-storage companies.  The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the compensation data compiled by

21

Table of Contents

Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. In light of the top talent recruited from different industries, the tenure, caliber and diverse backgrounds of our named executive officers and our desire to retain a superior executive management team, the Compensation Committee considered and established executive compensation levels to reflect these diverse factors.

For our 2015 executive compensation program, our Compensation Committee, taking into consideration the views of Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., updated the peer group for compensation benchmarking to reflect a geographically focused composition.  The Compensation Committee selected peer companies that are within a reasonable distance of the Company’s headquarters where the Company would compete for executive talent.  When considering the Company’s publicly-traded self-storage peers, the Compensation Committee elected to exclude Public Storage and National Storage Affiliates Trust from the Company’s 2015 peer group because their respective equity market capitalizations were significantly greater (in the case of Public Storage) and smaller (in the case of National Storage Affiliates Trust) than the median equity market capitalization of the selected peer group.   Listed below are the companies that comprise our 2015 peer group.

REIT Group Companies (18)

Storage REIT Group Companies (2)

*      Indicates companies also included in the 2014 peer group

The Compensation Committee uses data provided by Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. to assess industry practices overall and also to provide comparisons as to individual positions. The Compensation Committee has generally focused on the median of the peer group as an approximate target in setting overall compensation amounts for each named executive officer, though it also applies its own judgment consulting with Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. and considering the specific responsibilities and attributes of each of our named executive officers. The ultimate compensation decisions of the Compensation Committee are not mandated by any specific correlation to the peer group, but also reflect the Compensation Committee’s views of competitive practice, individual role and performance, our operating performance and internal equity among our executive management team.

In considering executive compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee also reviews tally sheets prepared for each named executive officer. The tally sheets present the dollar amounts of each component of compensation awarded to the named executive officers, including base salary, annual incentive, accumulated deferred compensation balances, outstanding equity awards, defined contribution retirement plan, potential payments under the employment agreements for Messrs. Marr and Martin and Foster, severance payments, perquisites and other benefits. The overall purpose of the tally sheets is to bring together, in one place, all of the elements of actual and potential future compensation in certain circumstances so that the Compensation Committee may analyze both the individual elements of compensation (including the compensation mix), as well as the total amount of compensation.

In light of the more than 97% shareholder vote in support for the Company’s executive compensation program, as reflected in the shareholders’ adoption of an advisory resolution approving executive compensation contained in the 2015 proxy statement, the review of the tally sheets and the information provided by Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., the Committee concluded that no changes were required to be made to the overall structure of our 2015 executive compensation program.  The Compensation Committee considered factors such as the executive’s scope of responsibilities, a market competitive assessment of similar roles at a peer group of real estate companies, the total shareholder return of the Company, and the performance of the individual executive.  After evaluating the forgoing

22

Table of Contents

factors and in consultation with the Committee’s compensation consultant, the Committee recommended the following compensation adjustments for our named executive officers:

The Compensation Committee determined that the value of long-term incentive compensation will be allocated equally among time-vested options; time-vested restricted share units; and performance-vested restricted share units.  The time-vested options and restricted share units will vest one-third on each anniversary of the grant.  If and to the extent the performance objectives relating to total shareholder return are achieved, the performance-vested restricted share units will vest, with the value of the vested restricted share units tied to a percentage ranging from 0 to 200% of the targets.  The performance-vested restricted share units will cliff vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the grantee’s continued service with us and the satisfaction of performance objectives tied to our total shareholder return. The Compensation Committee believes that the structure of our long-term incentive compensation aligns our executives’ performance incentives with the interests of our shareholders.

Compensation Components

Our executive compensation program consists of three principal components: salary, annual incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation. The design and objective of each component of our 2015 executive compensation are set forth below. Using market data provided by Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., combined with our desire to retain a superior executive management team, the Compensation Committee determined the appropriate percentages of salary, annual incentive compensation and long term incentive compensation components. There is no predefined or preferred weighting among salary, annual incentive compensation and long term incentive compensation to achieve the goals established by the Compensation Committee. Decisions regarding the components of salary and the salary targets for 2015 were made in the first quarter of 2015.

23

Table of Contents

Total Cash Compensation

Base Salary. Base salary is the fixed component of pay for our named executive officers and is intended to provide a base level of compensation for the position. In setting base salaries, our Compensation Committee considers the linkage of base salaries to the elements of our compensation that are tied to base salaries (such as severance and change in control benefits and annual and long-term incentive targets that are computed as a multiple of base salary). Factors considered in determining base salaries included the executive’s scope of responsibilities, a market competitive assessment of similar roles at a peer group of real estate companies, and the performance of the individual executive. Minimum base salaries for Messrs. Marr, Martin, and Foster are established in their respective employment agreements, the material terms of which are summarized below under the heading “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.” Any increases to the base salaries of executive officers, other than our Chief Executive Officer, are set by the Compensation Committee after discussions with, and recommendations by, our Chief Executive Officer regarding each individual’s accomplishments, areas of strength and opportunities for development. Any increase to the base salary of our Chief Executive Officer is set after each Trustee completes a performance evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer, the results of which are summarized and reviewed by the Chairman of the Compensation Committee with Compensation Committee members and with the Chief Executive Officer. After review and discussion, the Compensation Committee for 2015, the Compensation Committee set the base salaries of our executive officers as follows:

24

Table of Contents

Annual Incentive Compensation.  We believe that annual incentive compensation is an important element of executive compensation that enables us to achieve our objectives of attracting and retaining executive talent, encouraging superior individual performance, and more importantly, achieving our corporate goals and objectives. In making annual incentive compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee approved a targeted cash annual incentive opportunity for each executive officer that correlated to specific performance achievements. Annual incentive compensation for 2015 was comprised of four elements — financial performance, measured by funds from operations (“FFO”) (weighted at 40%) and same store net operating income growth (weighted at 25%); achievement of strategic goals consisting of external growth (weighted at 25%) and achievement of individual goals (weighted at 10%).

For 2015, the financial performance and strategic goals approved by the Compensation Committee were set as follows: threshold 50%; target 100%; and maximum 200%.  Similarly, the Compensation Committee approved the individual goals for 2015 were set as follows: threshold 50%; target 100% and maximum 150%.

With respect to our annual incentive compensation, the Compensation Committee established the goals in February 2015.  Discussed below is a comparison of the targeted goals established by the Compensation Committee compared with our actual 2015 performance.

Funds from Operations:  Our target, maximum and actual FFO per share were $1.16, $1.21 and $1.25 respectively.  Accordingly, we achieved 200% of the FFO component of our 2015 annual incentive compensation plan.

Net Operating Income:  Our target, maximum and actual same store net operating income growth rates were 5.7%, 6.3% and 9.6% respectively.  Accordingly, we achieved 200% of the same store net operating income growth component of our 2015 annual incentive compensation plan.

Strategic Goals:  As for the 2015 strategic goals, the Compensation Committee uses both a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the Company’s external growth targets including the acquisition of storage facilities consistent with the Company’s investment criteria, evaluation of property investment and development opportunities, and growth in the Company’s third party management platform.  The Committee evaluated the overall quality of the Company’s growth efforts in addition to the achievement of a targeted $200 to $250 million of property investments and the net addition of twenty-five third party management contracts.  The Company invested $277.3 million in property investments and added seventy-six (76) third party management contracts.  The Compensation Committee determined that management achieved 200% of the external growth component of our 2015 annual incentive compensation plan.

Individual Goals:  Individual goals include a subjective assessment of management’s performance.  Specific individual goals for Mr. Marr in 2015 consisted primarily of ensuring that external growth goals were met including acquisitions, disposition, third party management and new storage developments; implementing a strategic workforce planning program; driving superior results and improving communication among the Company’s leadership team through regular, focused meetings; delivering strong operations performance with a focus on optimizing revenue growth in a high-occupancy environment; ensuring capital raising efforts successfully support external growth and are consistent with balance sheet objectives; focusing on outreach to Company stakeholders; and assisting Mr. Martin and Mr. Foster in the achievement of their individual performance goals.  Specific individual goals for Mr. Martin in 2015 consisted primarily of implementing the Company’s strategic workforce plan within the Company’s accounting and finance departments; continuing to engage rating agencies to communicate our business plan and execution; opportunistically raising capital and refinancing existing debt to

25

Table of Contents

improve debt service and maintain or improve leverage ratios; supporting external growth by raising capital in a manner consisting with a BBB/Baa2 Investment Grade credit profile; focusing effort on external communications to minimize cost of capital through the engagement of equity and fixed-income investors; and assisting the finance, investor relations and information technology groups in achieving their respective 2015 objectives.  Specific individual goals for Mr. Foster in 2015 consisted primarily of supporting the completion of the Company’s human resources strategic plan; assisting the restructuring of the Company’s training function including the recruitment of a new director of training and realignment of our divisional trainers; negotiating the Company’s insurance renewal process; engaging the Company’s corporate governance advisors to maintain and improve the Company’s governance ratings; developing an internal database and tracking of the Company’s property compliance requirements; and assisting the legal, risk management and human resources functions to successfully achieve their 2015 strategic goals.

The target award for total annual incentive compensation is a percentage of the 2015 base salary for each executive officer as follows: Mr. Marr, 100%; Mr. Martin, 80%; and Mr. Foster, 75%.  Performance above and below targeted levels results in a pro-rated award of 50% of target for threshold performance and 200% of target for maximum performance, except that the maximum percentage achievable for individual goals is limited to 150% of target. The table below lists the potential payouts at threshold, target and maximum performance, and the actual annual incentive compensation paid under each component as a result of 2015 performance.

Equity Compensation

Long-Term Incentive Compensation. Our long-term incentive compensation is comprised of three components: non-qualified stock options, time-vested restricted shares (“restricted shares”) and performance-vested restricted share units (“performance units”).  We believe that long-term incentive compensation is an important element in providing competitive compensation and, because such awards have a basis in our common shares, helps to ensure that executive officers maintain an ongoing personal stake in the achievement of superior corporate performance. In January 2015, the Compensation Committee awarded a target grant level for long-term incentive compensation for each executive officer as follows:

The foregoing amounts were established based on achievement of corporate goals and objectives, individual performance, and for the additional reasons discussed under “2015 Executive Compensation Program.” Long-term incentive compensation awards were allocated (by value) one-third to non-qualified stock options; one-third to restricted shares, and one-third to performance units.  For each of our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee determined that an equal allocation (by value) of long-term incentive compensation among stock options, restricted shares and performance units achieved the appropriate balance of performance-based long-term incentive compensation with the stability provided by time-vested equity awards.  The actual number of restricted shares, performance units, and non-qualified stock options received by each of our named executive officers in 2015

26

Table of Contents

as a result of the long-term incentive award is set forth below under “Executive Compensation — Grants of Plan Based Awards Table.”

Non-Qualified Stock Options — The stock options vest ratably over three years beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. The stock options have a term of 10 years and an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common shares on the date of grant.

Restricted Shares — Each restricted share has a value equal to the closing price of our common shares on the date of grant.  Like the stock options, the restricted shares vest ratably over three years beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.  Dividends are paid on restricted shares prior to vesting, which is consistent with the competitive practices among REITs and recognizes the competitive orientation of the awards. Unvested restricted shares are subject to forfeiture if the executive’s service terminates prior to the vesting date for any reason other than good reason, disability, death or a change in control.

Performance Units — We granted performance units, which represent the right to earn common shares, to our named executive officers in January 2015.  The number of common shares, if any, deliverable to award recipients depends on our performance, based on total shareholder return (measured by reference to the change in our share price plus dividends) over the applicable measurement period compared to the total shareholder return for a peer group consisting of all equity real estate investment trusts over the same measurement period. The measurement period for the performance units awarded to our named executive officers in January 2015 runs from January 1, 2015 until December 31, 2017.  Dividends accrue (in the form of additional performance units) with respect to performance units, prior to vesting. Unvested performance units are subject to forfeiture if the executive’s service terminates prior to the end of the applicable measurement period for any reason other than good reason, disability, death or a change in control, or if and to the extent the applicable performance conditions are not satisfied as of the end of the measurement period.

2016 Compensation Actions

The Compensation Committee, after reviewing compensation data from the Company’s 2015 peer group prepared by Frederic W. Cook & Co, Inc. determined that competitive adjustments should be made to the compensation components of our Executive Officers.  The compensation adjustments are designed to keep the Company’s executive compensation program within the median of the marketplace for executive talent, to reflect the growth of the Company and to reflect the performance and responsibilities of our executive officers.  The table below sets forth the base and target compensation levels for 2015 and 2016 for each component of the Company’s executive compensation program.

In January 2016, the Compensation Committee awarded a target grant level for long-term compensation for each executive officer as follows:

27

Table of Contents

Long-term incentive compensation awards were allocated (by value) one-third to non-qualified stock options; one-third to restricted shares, and one-third to performance units.

Other Compensation Elements

Employment Agreements. We have employment agreements with each of Messrs. Marr, Martin and Foster. We have summarized the material terms of these agreements under the heading “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Deferred Compensation Benefits. In December 2006, the Compensation Committee approved the CubeSmart Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (amended in December 2008 in order to bring such plan into compliance with Section 409A of the Code), which permits employees with the title of vice president or above, including our named executive officers, to defer receipt of all or a portion of their salary and annual incentive and have that deferred compensation credited to accounts until distributed in accordance with the Plan and their elections. Under the Plan, we credit to each participant’s account a matching deferred compensation amount that is equal to the difference between the total matching contribution we would have made under our 401(k) plan without regard to the limits imposed by the Code and the actual matching contribution that we make under the 401(k) plan.

Perquisites and Personal Benefits. We do not provide any significant perquisites to our executive officers. During 2015, we provided the use of a company car, life insurance equal to the lesser of the executive officer’s base salary or $500,000, and executive medical coverage to each of our named executive officers. In addition, the Company arranged for long-term disability insurance coverage for each of our executive officers, the premium for which is paid entirely by each of our named executive officers. While these benefits were not tied to any formal performance criteria, they were intended to serve as part of a competitive total compensation program.

Additional Compensation Principles

Policy on Grants of Equity Awards. The Board of Trustees adopted a Policy Statement on the Grant of Equity Awards to ensure compliance with securities, tax and accounting rules and regulations, and adherence to best corporate governance practices in granting equity-based compensation. This Policy provides that the Board of Trustees has sole authority to approve equity awards to our Trustees and our executive officers. The Policy further provides that the grant date shall be the date of the meeting at which the award is approved by the Board or the Compensation Committee, as the case may be, except that, with respect to new hires, the date of the award shall be the later of the first date of employment of such person or the date approval for the grant is obtained from the Board or the Compensation Committee, if required. Under no circumstances will the grant date for any equity award be any earlier than the date on which action is taken to approve such award. The exercise price of option awards shall be the closing price for our common shares on the NYSE on the date of grant. As a part of this Policy, the Board of Trustees delegated authority to Mr. Marr to make one-time grants of equity-based awards to non-executive new hires and internally promoted employees in an amount not to exceed the equivalent of $100,000, and Mr. Marr must make regular reports to the Compensation Committee regarding awards granted pursuant to this authority. We believe this delegation of authority facilitates improved efficiency in recruiting and retaining key non-executive employees.

Share Ownership Guidelines. We maintain share ownership guidelines for all of our officers to ensure that each Company officer maintains a material personal financial stake in us and to promote strong alignment between the interests of management and our shareholders. We expect each Company officer to acquire, within five years of his or her appointment, and thereafter to maintain ownership of, common shares having a market value equal to: five times annual base salary for the President and Chief Executive Officer; three times annual base salary for the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer; 1.75 times annual base salary for all Senior Vice Presidents; and 0.75 times annual base salary for all other officers. The Board of Trustees annually reviews progress toward achieving these ownership levels for the named executive officers. In February 2016, the Board of Trustees reviewed achievement levels and determined that each of our named executive officers meets or exceeds the applicable ownership levels.

Compensation Recovery. We have not adopted a policy that provides for recovery of a cash compensatory award if a performance measure used to calculate a cash award is subsequently adjusted in a manner that would have reduced

28

Table of Contents

the size of the award. If we were to experience such an adjustment, our Compensation Committee would assess the circumstances relating to the adjustment and take such action as it believes to be appropriate, including, potentially, an action to recover the excess portion of the award. The Compensation Committee intends to adopt a cash compensatory award recovery policy promptly following the adoption of regulations by the SEC governing such recovery policies.  In 2014, the Compensation Committee adopted the following policy to recover any equity-based compensatory award:

If it is determined by our Board that [Recipient’s] gross negligence, intentional misconduct or fraud caused or partially caused the Company to have to restate all or a portion of its financial statements, the Board, in its sole discretion, may, to the extent permitted by law and to the extent it determines in its sole judgment that it is in the best interests of the Company to do so, require repayment of any Shares delivered to [Recipient] pursuant to this Agreement or to effect the cancellation of unvested Shares.

Hedging and Pledging Limitations. Our executives and Trustees are prohibited from hedging their ownership or offsetting any decline in the market value of our shares, including by trading in publicly-traded options, puts, calls and other derivative instruments related to our shares. They are also prohibited from pledging Company securities.

Tax Compliance Policy. The Compensation Committee reviewed the potential consequences for us of Section 162(m) of the Code, which imposes a limit on tax deductions for annual compensation in excess of $1 million paid to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and the three other most highly compensated named executive officers employed at the end of the year. To the extent that compensation is required to and does not qualify for deduction under Section 162(m), a larger portion of shareholder distributions may be subject to federal income tax expense as dividend income rather than return of capital, and any such compensation allocated to our taxable REIT subsidiaries whose income is subject to federal income tax would result in an increase in income taxes due to the inability to deduct such compensation. Although we are mindful of the limits imposed by Section 162(m), even if it is determined that Section 162(m) applies or may apply to certain compensation packages, we nevertheless reserve the right to structure compensation, including equity-based awards, in a manner that may exceed the deduction limitations under Section 162(m).

RISK GUIDELINES

The structure of our compensation policies and practices is designed to discourage our executives from engaging in unnecessary and excessive risk taking. Our compensation policies and practices are centrally designed and administered and are substantially similar throughout the Company and among all levels of employees. Key components of our compensation policies and practices include base salary, performance-based compensation, employee benefit and welfare programs, and retirement plans. Executive attention is to be focused on key strategic, operational and long-term financial measures. In addition, the Compensation Committee considers the annual and progressive achievement of personal goals of each employee, including leadership, scope of responsibilities and experience. By focusing on the long-term achievement of corporate and personal goals, we discourage our employees from engaging in unnecessary and excessive risk taking. We maintain strong internal financial controls and use effective management processes for developing strategic and annual operating plans and employee development programs. As a result of our compensation policies and practices, we have concluded that we are not encouraging or creating risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

29

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following tables and narrative summarize the compensation for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015 paid to or earned by our President and Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and our other executive officer.

Summary Compensation Table

(1)                   The amounts reported in the Share Awards and Option Awards columns represent the grant date fair value of restricted shares, performance units and option awards granted to the named executive officers under our equity incentive plans. Such amounts were calculated in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Please refer to Note 15, “Share-Based Compensation Plans,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed with the SEC on February 19, 2016 for the relevant assumptions used to determine the grant date fair value of our share and option awards. The value of each of the awards granted to the named executive officers in 2015 is listed in the table captioned “Grants of Plan-Based Awards.”

(2)                   The amounts reported in the All Other Compensation column represent, for each named executive officer, the sum of (a) the aggregate incremental cost to us of all perquisites and other personal benefits, including personal use of a company car and executive medical insurance; (b) the amounts contributed by us to the CubeSmart, L.P. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan; (c) the amounts contributed by us to the CubeSmart Executive Deferred Compensation Plan; and (d) the dollar value of dividends on unvested restricted shares. The aggregate incremental cost to us to provide a company car is based on the actual lease cost incurred for the automobile provided to each of the named executive officers plus expenses for fuel, maintenance and insurance. In calculating the reported amounts, we disregarded business usage and assumed 100 percent personal usage. The aggregate incremental cost of executive medical insurance is based on the difference between the actual premiums we paid for executive medical insurance for the named executive officers and the actual average cost we incurred in providing family medical coverage for our general employee population.  Listed in the table below are the dollar values of the amounts reported in this column for 2015.

30

Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table and narrative provide information about plan-based awards granted during 2015 to the named executive officers.  These awards consist of restricted shares, performance units and options.

(1)                    Listed in these columns are the amounts that could have been paid at each stated level of performance for the annual incentive compensation under our 2015 Executive Compensation Program. For a detailed description of the annual incentive awards see “Total Cash Compensation — Annual Incentive Compensation” in the section of this proxy statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The “Threshold” column represents the minimum amount payable when threshold performance is met. The “Target” column represents the amount payable if the specified performance targets are reached. The “Maximum” column represents the maximum payment possible. See the “Summary Compensation Table” for the actual amounts paid to each named executive officer for the 2015 annual incentive compensation.

(2)                    This column reflects the grant date fair value of the equity awards in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, but excludes forfeiture assumptions related to service-based vesting conditions in accordance with SEC rules.

Each performance unit represents the right to earn common shares. The number of common shares, if any, actually issued to our named executive officers pursuant to performance unit awards will depend on our total shareholder return (measured by reference to the change in our share price plus dividends) during the measurement period that began on January 1, 2015 and that ends on December 31, 2017 as compared to the total shareholder return of a peer group consisting of all equity real estate investment trusts, subject to satisfaction by the recipient of the vesting conditions in the applicable award agreement (including continued service through the measurement period).  The number of performance units credited to award recipients’ accounts will be increased on account of dividends paid during the measurement period based on the closing price per common share on the measurement date.  At the end of the measurement period, the number of base units then represented by the performance units will be converted into common shares, provided that our total shareholder return ranking among a peer group consisting of all equity real estate investment trusts is at or above the 25th percentile.  If our ranking is below the 25th percentile, then the conversion factor will be zero, no common shares will be paid and the performance units will lapse.  At any ranking at or above the 25th percentile and up to and including the 50th percentile, the multiplier will be determined through a straight-line interpolation and the conversion factor would be between 50% and 100%.  At any ranking above the 50th percentile and below the 75th percentile, the multiplier will be determined through a straight-line interpolation and the conversion factor would be between 100% and 200%.  At any ranking at or above the 75th percentile, the multiplier is fixed at two (2).  Thus, if our ranking places us at or above the 75th percentile, the payment will be based on the product of the award recipient’s base units multiplied by two.

The named executive officers are not entitled to vote common shares issuable under performance units prior to issuance of the shares upon vesting of the units.

31

Table of Contents

The awards of restricted shares, performance units and options listed in the table above were made under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. For further information on these awards, please refer to the discussion above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Equity Compensation.” Each of the named executive officer’s right to the equity incentive awards listed in the table above vests upon termination of his employment under circumstances specified in his employment agreement or employment letter agreement. For information on the material terms of these employment agreements for Messrs. Marr and Martin and the employment letter agreement for Mr. Foster or for a further discussion of the circumstances upon which vesting of awards is accelerated, see the discussion below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2015

The following table reports outstanding equity awards held by the named executive officers at December 31, 2015. The right of each named executive officer to the equity awards listed in this table shall become fully vested in the event of termination of employment in certain circumstances. For a further discussion of the circumstances upon which vesting of awards is accelerated, see the discussion under the section headed “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”