UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

        Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): April 16, 2002

                          Commission File No. 0-4846-3

                             LUMALITE HOLDINGS, INC.
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

                   Nevada                                        82-0288840
       (State or other jurisdiction of                        (I.R.S. Employer
       incorporation or organization)                       Identification No.)

        2810 Via Orange Way, Suite B
          Spring Valley, California                                91978
  (Address of principal executive offices)                       (Zip Code)

        Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 619 660-5410

                                  CONSIL CORP.
                     6975 South Union Park Center, Suite 600
                           Salt Lake City, Utah, 84097
                            (Former name and address)






Item 1.           Changes in Control of Registrant

Change in Control Transaction

         On April 16, 2002, our parent corporation, Lumalite Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company")  closed the merger (the  "Merger")  of its  wholly-owned  subsidiary,
Consil Merger Corp., a Nevada  corporation,  into  LumaLite,  Inc., a California
corporation  ("LumaLite").  Under the terms of the Merger, all of the issued and
outstanding  shares of common stock of LumaLite  were  cancelled  and  converted
into, and became a right to receive, in the aggregate,  17,800,000 shares of our
common  stock.  In  connection  with  the  Merger,  we  assumed  all of the then
outstanding  options (whether vested or unvested) to purchase  LumaLite's common
stock and we reserved an  aggregate of 98,298  post-reverse  split shares of our
common stock for issuance under those options.  The 17,800,000  shares of common
stock issued to the LumaLite  stockholders in the Merger collectively  represent
approximately  62.46%  of  our  voting  stock.  As a  result,  if  the  LumaLite
stockholders  act in  concert,  they  will  have  significant  control  over our
business and  operations,  including  the right to elect our Board of Directors.
For more information regarding the Merger and the other transactions we effected
in connection with the consummation of the Merger, see our annual report on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2001.

         The Company (which was formerly known as "ConSil Corp.") was originally
formed  to hold  mineral  property  in  Shoshone  County,  Idaho.  In 1995,  our
stockholders  approved the sale of those assets.  Following the sale, we engaged
in other mineral  exploration and acquisition  activities,  primarily in Mexico.
Those activities were unsuccessful and,  beginning in the fourth quarter of 1997
and continuing  through late 2001, we engaged in no active business  operations,
had no employees and maintained only minimal accounting,  management and officer
functions.  With  the  consummation  of the  Merger,  LumaLite's  business  will
constitute our primary business operations for the foreseeable future.

         LumaLite  was  incorporated  in  California  in June  1999 to  develop,
manufacture  and  sell  advanced   medical  devices  for  the  dental  industry.
LumaLite's  current business  operations are described in more detail at Item 2,
below.

         References in this report,  unless the context requires  otherwise,  to
"us,"  "our"  and  "we"  are  references  to the  Company  and its  wholly-owned
subsidiary,  LumaLite.  This report contains references to trademarks.  All such
trademarks are the properties of their registered or common-law owners.

New Management

         In connection with the Merger,  James  Anderson,  our sole director and
officer, appointed four new members of our Board of Directors (all of whom were,
pursuant to the terms of the Merger,  designees of LumaLite)  and new  officers,
and  then  resigned  from our  Board of  Directors  and as an  officer.  Our new
directors and officers,  and their respective ages and biographical  information
for each of them are presented below. There are no family relationships  between
or among any of our directors:








Name                        Age        Position

Dr. Dale Rorabaugh          58         Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
                                       Officer
Michael Jackson             55         Director and President
Hank Schumer                74         Director, Secretary-Treasurer and Chief
                                       Financial Officer
Joseph Forehand             46         Director, Vice President of Operations

         Dr.  Dale  Rorabaugh.  Dr.  Rorabaugh  is the  Chairman of our Board of
Directors and is our Chief Executive Officer.  He also serves as C.E.O. and as a
director of LumaLite.  Dr. Rorabaugh was one of the founders of LumaLite. He was
most recently President of the AuRora Group, a company  specializing in research
and  development  of new products for the medical  profession.  Between 1994 and
2000,  he  was  President  of  Eclipse  Ventures,   which  developed  a  corneal
topographer used in Lasik surgery for measuring curvature of the cornea.  Before
joining Eclipse, he was the founder and President of Dicon Corp., a company that
first introduced  micro-processors  to the ophthalmic industry in the form of an
automated visual field device.  Dr. Rorabaugh holds a degree in Physics from the
University of Virginia and a Doctor of Optometry  degree from the  University of
California at Berkeley.

         Michael Jackson.  Michael Jackson is a member of our Board of Directors
and is our President. He also serves as President and as a director of LumaLite.
Before  joining  LumaLite,  Mr.  Jackson was most  recently  Vice  President  of
Marketing and Sales with HGM Medical  Laser,  a medical sales  business.  Before
that,  Mr.  Jackson was the Vice  President of Sales for the Western  Region for
Kreativ, Inc., a dental sales organization.

         Hank Schumer. Hank Schumer is our Secretary-Treasurer,  Chief Financial
Officer,  and a member  of our  Board of  Directors.  Mr.  Schumer  also acts as
LumaLite's Vice President, Secretary, Chief Financial Officer and as a member of
its Board of Directors.  Mr.  Schumer was the  President of Cafe Cartes,  of San
Diego,  California,  a consulting services company. Mr. Schumer holds a Bachelor
of  Electrical  Engineering  degree  from  C.C.N.Y.  and a Masters  in  Business
Administration from Drexel Institute of Technology.

         Joseph Forehand.  Joseph Forehand is a member of our Board of Directors
and is our Vice  President  of  Operations.  Mr.  Forehand  also  serves as Vice
President  of  LumaLite.  Before  joining  LumaLite,  he was Vice  President  of
Operations at Kreativ, Inc., a dental equipment manufacturing concern.

Structure of Our Board of Directors

         At each annual meeting of our  shareholders,  our directors are elected
and hold office for a term  expiring at the annual  meeting of our  shareholders
held the next  succeeding  year, or until their earlier  resignation or removal.
Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that our directors may be removed only
for cause,  and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the
common shares entitled to vote at a meeting of our shareholders.

Executive Compensation

         During  1999,  2000 and 2001,  we did not pay any  compensation  to our
executive  officers or directors.  Following the Merger,  we anticipate  that we
will not pay salaries to our officers or directors,  but that we will compensate
the persons who act as officers of LumaLite  for the  services  they  provide to
LumaLite.  See the  section  entitled  "Employment  Agreements"  below  for more
information regarding LumaLite's agreements to pay compensation to its officers.
The  following  table  summarizes  the  compensation  LumaLite paid to its Chief
Executive  Officer  and each of its  three  most  highly  compensated  executive
officers (other than the chief executive  officer) who were serving as executive
officers at the end of the last completed fiscal year and whose salary and bonus
exceeded $100,000 (our "named executive officers"), for the periods indicated:




                           SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE


                                                    Annual Compensation
                                               -------------------------------
Name And                             Fiscal                                       Securities Underlying
Principal Position                    Year      Salary ($)       Bonus ($)          Options/SARS (#)
------------------                    ----      ----------       ---------          ---------------
                                                                          

Dr. Dale Rorabaugh,                   2001        $ 10,000        $79,028(4)
Chairman and CEO                      2000
                                      1999

Michael Jackson,                      2001          86,088 (1)    148,631             2,577,614 (7)
President                             2000          87,749 (1)
                                      1999          12,000 (1)

Joseph Forehand,                      2001          96,241 (2)    109,171(5)
Vice President                        2000         106,250 (2)
                                      1999          50,000 (2)

Hank Schumer,                         2001          38,500 (3)     79,065 (6)
Chief Financial Officer               2000          28,500 (3)
                                      1999          35,000 (3)



(1)  Amounts shown reflect agreed upon compensation, a portion of which was
     deferred at the election and agreement of the named executive officer. None
     of the amounts shown for 1999 was paid,  and $12,000 was deferred;  none of
     the amounts  shown for 2000 was paid,  and $87,749 was deferred and paid in
     2001; and none of the amounts shown for 2001was deferred.
(2)  Amounts  shown  reflect  agreed upon  compensation,  a portion of which was
     deferred at the election and agreement of the named executive officer. None
     of the amounts shown for 1999 was paid,  and $50,000 was deferred;  none of
     the amounts shown for 2000 was paid, and $106,250 was deferred and both the
     1999 and 2000 deferred amounts were paid in 2001; none of the amounts shown
     for 2001was deferred.
(3)  Amounts  shown  were paid to the  named  executive  officer's  wholly-owned
     consulting  firm.  See "Certain  Relationships  and Related  Transactions."
     Amounts  shown  reflect  agreed upon  compensation,  a portion of which was
     deferred at the election and agreement of the named executive officer. None
     of the amounts shown for 1999 was paid,  and $35,000 was deferred;  none of
     the amounts  shown for 2000 was paid and $28,500 was  deferred  and paid in
     2001; and none of the amounts shown for 2001 was deferred.
(4)  The named  executive  officer  received  $46,453 of the amount  shown.  The
     balance of the amount  shown  ($32,575)  was  deferred at the  election and
     agreement of the officer.
(5)  The named  executive  officer  received  $60,187 of the amount  shown.  The
     balance of the amount  shown  ($48,984)  was  deferred at the  election and
     agreement of the officer.
(6)  The named  executive  officer  received  $46,453 of the amount  shown.  The
     balance of the amount  shown  ($29,612)  was  deferred at the  election and
     agreement of the officer.
(7)  Represents  300,000 shares of LumaLite,  which,  as a result of the Merger,
     represent  the number of shares of Company  common stock  shown.  The named
     executive  officer  exercised  the options  shown in the same year of their
     grant for an exercise price of $75,000,  which was the fair market value of
     the stock at both the grant and exercise date.

Stock Option Grants

         Since  1997,  we have  maintained  two  stock  option  plans.  One plan
provides for stock-based  grants to selected  officers,  directors and other key
employees.  The other plan  provides  for grants of incentive  stock  options to
participating  employees.  The terms of the options  granted  under  either plan
cannot be longer  than five years from the date of their  grant.  No options are
currently outstanding under either plan.

         LumaLite also maintains an option plan for its employees,  officers and
consultants,  which it adopted in 1999.  As of December 31,  2001,  LumaLite had
granted options for 98,298 shares (on a post-Merger  basis) of its common stock,
but those  options were  assumed by the Company in the Merger and now  represent
options to acquire  98,298  shares of the  Company's  common stock at an average
exercise price of $.11 per share.  None of the options is in favor of any of our
named  executive  officers.  The  outstanding  options were granted as incentive
stock options,  have terms of four years and vest in 12.5%  installments every 6
months after the date of their grant.

Director Compensation

         Our directors do not receive cash compensation for serving on our board
(or any  committee of our board),  or for any other  services they provide us in
their  capacity as directors.  They are,  however,  reimbursed for expenses they
incur in connection with attending board or committee meetings.

Indemnification of Officers and Directors

         Our Certificate of Incorporation  limits the personal  liability of our
directors and officers for monetary  damages to the maximum extent  permitted by
Nevada law. Under Nevada law, those limitations include monetary damages for any
action  taken or failed to be taken as an officer or director  except for an act
or omission that involves  intentional  misconduct for a known  violation of the
law,  or the  payment  of  improper  distributions.  Nevada  law also  permits a
corporation to indemnify any current or former  director,  officer,  employee or
agent if the person  acted in good faith and in a manner in which he  reasonably
believed to be in or not opposed to the best  interests of the  corporation.  In
the case of a criminal proceeding,  the indemnified person must also have had no
reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.

         Our bylaws  also  provide  that,  to the full extent  permitted  by our
Certificate of Incorporation  and the Nevada Business  Corporations Act, we will
indemnify,  and advance  expenses to, our  officers,  directors and employees in
connection  with any action,  suit or  proceeding,  civil or criminal,  to which
those  persons are made party by reason of their  being a  director,  officer or
employee.  At present,  we are not  involved  in any  litigation  or  proceeding
involving   any  of  our   directors,   officers,   employees  or  agents  where
indemnification by us would be required or permitted.

Employment Agreements

         Prior  to  the  Merger,   LumaLite  entered  into  written   employment
agreements with Messers.  Rorabaugh,  Jackson, Schumer and Forehand (all of whom
sit on our board and hold officer  positions with the Company in addition to the
officer  and  director  positions  they  hold  with  LumaLite).  The  employment
agreements  are all dated  effective  January 1, 2002 and have initial  terms of
five years. The agreements are  automatically  renewable for one-year  extension
terms,  subject to notice by the other  party of his or its intent to  terminate
the agreement.  The agreements  provide for stated base salary amounts ($120,000
per year in the case of Messrs.  Jackson and Forehand,  $130,000 per year in the
case of Mr.  Rorabaugh,  and  $80,000  in the case of Mr.  Schumer),  payable in
monthly  installments.  Compensation for any extension terms will be as mutually
agreed to by the parties at the beginning of the extension period. Each contract
can be  terminated  upon the  agreement  of the  parties,  upon the death of the
employee or upon LumaLite's dissolution, bankruptcy or receivership.

         The  contracts  do not provide  for any  "change of control"  payments,
severance  payments or other  provisions that provide for or require payments to
the  employee in the event of any  fundamental  change in  LumaLite's  business,
operations or ownership. The agreements also do not contain any non-competition,
non-solicitation  or  assignment  of  inventions  provisions,  although  they do
require the  employee and  LumaLite,  during the term of the  agreement,  to use
their best  efforts to avoid  areas  which may  involve  conflicts  of  interest
between  LumaLite and the employee with respect to activities  engaged in by the
employee.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

         One of LumaLite's  named  executive  officers  provided his services to
LumaLite  through  a  consulting  arrangement.   Under  that  arrangement,  that
officer's  wholly-owned  consulting  company provides those services to LumaLite
and the amounts otherwise payable to the officer for the services is paid to the
consulting  company.  During 1999 and 2000, LumaLite paid the consulting company
$35,000 and $28,500,  respectively,  under this arrangement,  a portion of which
was deferred. See "Executive Compensation" above.

         LumaLite  has,  from time to time,  advanced  amounts to certain of its
named  executive  officers.  In 2000 and 2001,  LumaLite  loaned  its  president
$51,000 and $20,000,  respectively,  without interest. Those amounts were repaid
in 2001. In 2000,  LumaLite  loaned $65,000 and in 2001 LumaLite loaned $24,000,
without interest,  to its vice president of operations.  That loan was repaid in
2001.

Stock Ownership of Management and Certain Stockholders

         The  following  table sets forth,  as of May 15,  2002,  the number and
percentage  of the  outstanding  shares of common stock which,  according to the
information supplied to the Company, were beneficially owned by:

     o    each person who is a director of the Company;

     o    each executive officer;

     o    all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group; and

     o    each person who, to the  knowledge of the Company,  is the  beneficial
          owner of more than 5% of its outstanding common stock.

All  percentages  are based on a total of 28,501,692  outstanding  shares of our
common stock. None of the named persons hold any options or warrants to purchase
common stock. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table have
sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares beneficially owned,
subject to community property laws if and where applicable:






                                                                Total       Percent of Class
                                               Shares         Beneficial      Beneficially
Name of Beneficial Owner                       Owned         Ownership(1)         Owned
                                                                         


Eugene Breznock
(5% Shareholder)                             3,252,560        3,252,560           11.4

Dr. Dale Rorabaugh
(Chairman and CEO)                           4,571,853        4,571,853           16.0

Michael Jackson
(Director and President)                     2,577,614        2,577,614            9.0

Joseph Forehand
(Director, VP Operations)
                                             2,577,614        2,577,614            9.0
Hank Schumer
 (Director & C.F.O.)                         1,777,590        1,777,590            6.2

All directors and officers as a group (4
persons)                                    11,504.671       11,504,671           40.3

------------------------



(1)  Beneficial  ownership is  determined  in  accordance  with the rules of the
     Securities  &  Exchange  Commission.  In  computing  the  number  of shares
     beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person,
     shares of common  stock  subject to options  held by that  person  that are
     currently  exercisable or become  exercisable  within 60 days following May
     15, 2002 are deemed  outstanding.  These  shares,  however,  are not deemed
     outstanding  for the purpose of computing the  percentage  ownership of any
     other person.  Unless  otherwise  indicated in the other  footnotes to this
     table,  the  persons and  entities  named in the table have sole voting and
     sole  investment  power with respect to the shares set forth  opposite such
     shareholder's name.


Item 2.           Acquisition or Disposition of Assets

The Acquisition

         On April 16, 2002,  the Company and LumaLite  closed the Merger,  which
resulted in the Company's  acquisition of LumaLite and its business  operations.
The Company and LumaLite  subsequently  filed a number of state filings with the
Secretaries of State of Nevada and  California,  the last of which was filed and
accepted on May 15, 2002.  We will  conduct our  principal  business  operations
through LumaLite for the foreseeable future.

Description of Business of LumaLite

Overview

         LumaLite  develops  and markets  tooth-whitening  products and services
through wholesale  distributors,  primarily to dental practitioners.  LumaLite's
current principal  product is its LumaArch(TM)  bleaching product and associated
Xenon-halogen illumination system, which provides customers with tooth-whitening
results  that  we  believe  are  superior  to  those   provided  by   LumaLite's
competitors,  based on, among other  factors,  its lower cost and the  shortened
period of time that the customer is required to spend in the dental chair during
the  whitening  process.  LumaLite  intends to launch a number of  complementary
products to its current product and service offerings in the near future and, in
late 2002,  intends to  introduce  company-owned  and  operated  tooth-whitening
centers in major retail locations as a store-in-store concept.

LumaLite's Operations

         LumaLite  was  founded in 1999 for the purpose of  developing  advanced
device technologies for the medical and dental industries.  LumaLite has focused
its  research  and  development   activities  on  cosmetic  and  tooth-whitening
solutions,  and in late 2000, it commercially  introduced its principal product,
"LumaArch," a comprehensive tooth-whitening and bleaching system that we believe
is  more  effective,   cost  efficient  and  easier  to  use  than   competitive
tooth-whitening systems.

         The LumaArch system uses a multiple-use proprietary Xenon-halogen light
carrying  technology  and a  proprietary  liquid light guide to produce  uniform
tooth-whitening results without any heat. The system is used in conjunction with
single-use  LumaWhite  tooth-whitening  material,  a specially formulated to the
energy wavelength  produced by the LumaArch.  The LumaArch system provides up to
eight shades of whitening improvement in a procedure that takes approximately 30
to 40 minutes of chair time, and at a cost to the patient of approximately $295.
As of April 2002, LumaLite had an installed base of approximately 1,700 LumaArch
systems  nationwide (at an average  manufacturers  suggested retail price to the
dental  professionals of $6,000),  and we expect to have an installed  worldwide
base of 3,100 systems by the end of 2002.

         LumaLite  currently  markets its  LumaArch  system  through a series of
wholesale  distributor  relationships  with  leading  dental  supply  companies,
including  Henry Schien and  Patterson  Dental.  These dental  supply  companies
provide  LumaLite  with the  equivalent  of a 1,500 person sales  representative
force and ready access to the more than 120,000 domestic  dentists in the United
States.  For  more  information   regarding  LumaLite's  wholesale   distributor
relationships, see "Strategic Relationships and Contracts" below.

         LumaLite  intends to extend its current  product and service  offerings
through two initiatives.  First, beginning in the fall of 2002, LumaLite intends
to open company-owned and operated LumaLite retail tooth-whitening  centers that
will offer  consumers  accessible,  pleasant  and  affordable  access to quality
tooth-whitening   services  in  an  upscale,   "salon"  type   atmosphere.   The
tooth-whitening  centers  will be designed to avoid the stigma  associated  with
in-office  dental visits and make  tooth-whitening  less painful and easier.  We
intend to place the retail  centers in high traffic  locations  such as shopping
malls,  "store-within-a-store"  boutiques in major upscale department stores and
fitness  centers,  resorts,  spas and vacation  destinations.  We expect to have
between  five  and ten  centers  in  operation  by the  end of  2002,  and  open
forty-five  centers in 2003. By the end of 2004, we anticipate having a total of
125 centers in operation.  We believe the retail  centers will build  LumaLite's
brand   recognition   and  marketing   exposure,   as  well  as  offer  numerous
opportunities for the growth of LumaLite's customer base.

         The second  initiative  will focus on the  introduction  of a number of
ancillary   tooth-whitening   and  oral  hygiene   products,   such  as  at-home
tooth-whitening kits, toothpastes and mouthwash. These products will be designed
to supplement  and reinforce the  customer's  initial  LumaArch  tooth-whitening
procedure,  since  there  is  a  natural  degradation  in  post-procedure  tooth
whiteness from natural wear and the  customer's  use of staining  agents such as
coffee,  nicotine and red wine. We anticipate  initiating market introduction of
these  products  in  late  2002,  beginning  with  the  "LumaWhite  DIY"  (do it
yourself),  a home  bleaching and whitening  kit,  "LumaWhite"  toothpaste,  and
"LumaWhite"  branded  mouthwash and chewing gum. We believe that LumaLite's sale
of these consumer  products will leverage its established  reputation within the
cosmetic  dentistry industry and provide an additional,  high margin,  recurring
revenue stream.

Industry Overview

         Tooth-whitening  has been practiced in rudimentary  form since the late
1800s. With the discovery of carbamide peroxide,  an active bleaching agent, and
its  accidental  application  to aesthetic  dentistry  in the 1960s,  the modern
tooth-whitening industry began to develop. Initially, tooth-whitening procedures
were  generally  cost  prohibitive  and time  consuming.  During the 1990s,  the
industry  experienced  significant  growth  and,  by  2001,  was a $1.3  billion
domestic industry.  The industry is expected to have domestic sales exceeding $5
billion within the next seven years.  Industry experts believe that the industry
has grown due to a number of factors, including a fundamental shift in the focus
of the dental  profession (i.e., as baby boomers age there is less of a need for
traditional  dental services such as treating  cavities and tooth decay), a more
image conscious  American public that desires white,  good-looking teeth and the
growing  perception that the industry  represents a potentially  lucrative niche
industry.  According to the American Dental  Association,  approximately  84% of
U.S.  dentists now offer cosmetic  dental  procedures as part of their practices
and 50% of those  dentists  report a steady  increase  in the amount of cosmetic
procedures they have performed over the last three years.

         Despite the  substantial  changes in the industry over the past decade,
current  tooth-whitening  products  still suffer from the same general  problems
that have plagued the industry  historically  -- they are  generally  expensive,
inconvenient  and not  very  effective.  The  most  commonly  used  methods  for
whitening stained or discolored teeth have traditionally been at-home solutions,
such as whitening  toothpaste or  dentist-prescribed  bleaching trays that offer
only marginal shade  improvements  (1 to 3 shades of improvement for toothpastes
and 2 to 4 shares of  improvement  for  trays) at a  moderate  cost,  but with a
significant  investment in time.  The most  effective  whitening  solutions have
typically  relied  on  dental  professionals  using  light  or  laser  activated
bleaching  systems.  These systems have  historically been fairly expensive and,
because  the  procedures  are  done at  dental  offices,  cause  some  potential
customers to avoid the  procedures  because of a fear of dental  offices and the
assumption that the in-office  bleaching process will be painful,  difficult and
generally uncomfortable.

         In 1999,  one of our principal  competitors,  BriteSmile,  introduced a
relatively  cost  effective and easy to use in-office  bleaching  procedure that
offered  significant  whitening results at a moderate (although still relatively
high-end) cost.  Using that system,  a customer could obtain an average of eight
shades of whiteness  improvement  during a 90 minute procedure and at an average
cost of $600. In late 2002,  LumaLite will introduce its retail  operation using
the LumaArch,  which offers comparable results at approximately half the cost of
a BriteSmile  procedure and which requires customers to spend only 30-40 minutes
in the dentist chair.

Strategy

         We intend, through LumaLite, to become a leading provider of vertically
integrated  tooth-whitening products and services through the following business
strategies:

          o    We  intend  to  develop  a number  of  product  line  extensions,
               including  retail  tooth-whitening  centers in major retail mall,
               spa  and  vacation   locations.   The  centers  will  expand  our
               distribution   chain  beyond  wholesale  and  traditional  dental
               offices and into more consumer friendly locations. We believe the
               retail  locations will provide  LumaLite with an enhanced ability
               to cross-sell its other branded tooth-whitening products.

          o    We  intend  to  develop  and  market  ancillary   tooth-whitening
               products  (such  as  toothpaste,  mouthwash  and gum)  that  will
               enhance and maintain the tooth-whitening  effects of the LumaArch
               tooth-whitening  process.  We also  intend to  maintain  a strong
               research and development  abilities to facilitate the development
               of future ancillary products and services.

          o    We plan to expand  and retain a strong  and  seasoned  management
               team with proven  experience in developing and marketing  medical
               and dental  technologies,  as well as  assisting us in becoming a
               major  factor  in  the  consumer   tooth-whitening   arena.   Our
               management  team has worked  together  for  several  years,  in a
               number of  businesses,  on  medical  and other  technology  based
               products.

          o    We  intend  to  develop   additional   revenue   streams  through
               international  expansion.  Currently,  we reach the approximately
               120,000  domestic  dentists  through  our  wholesale  distributor
               relationships  and  accelerate  the marketing of our products and
               services  internationally to the additional approximately 300,000
               non-domestic dentists through additional strategic  relationships
               and/or distributor relationships.  We have executed international
               distribution contracts with distributors in Australia, Singapore,
               Indonesia,  Taiwan,  the European Union (United  Kingdom,  Spain,
               Italy,  Germany  and  France),  Middle  East,  Korea,  Brazil and
               Mexico.  We have received  both Canadian and European  regulatory
               approval (in the form of a "CE"  designation)  for the  LumaArch,
               which will allow us to  actively  market  the  LumaArch  in those
               territories.

          o    We  intend  to engage in  selective  acquisitions  of assets  and
               companies  where we  believe  those  acquisitions  will  enhance,
               supplement or speed up our business plan.

Products and Technology

         We believe the LumaArch bleaching system is technologically superior to
the tooth-whitening systems employed by our competitors. The LumaArch system was
developed by LumaLite's  co-founder,  Dr. Dale  Rorabaugh,  and is currently the
core of LumaLite's  product and service  offerings.  The LumaArch  system uses a
proprietary  Xenon-halogen  multiple  illumination  source that  produces a high
lumen energy output in a specified  bandwidth within the visible  spectrum.  The
Xenon-halogen  light is filtered  through a patented  "liquid  light" guide that
provides  a highly  focused,  uniform  wavelength  with  virtually  no heat as a
byproduct.  We believe the liquid light guide is more effective in the whitening
process than more commonly used,  but less  efficient,  fiber optic guides,  and
that our liquid  light  guides are the most  advanced  guides  currently  on the
market,  providing  operating  efficiencies  in the range of 85%. By comparison,
most  commonly   used  fiber  optic  light  guides   provide   efficiencies   of
approximately  45%, and the only competitive  liquid light product on the market
is 20% less efficient than the LumaArch liquid light guides. The LumaArch liquid
light guides produce  virtually no heat,  providing a safer and more comfortable
process for the patients.

         LumaLite's  liquid  light  guides  have been  specifically  designed to
interact with LumaLite's LumaWhite tooth-whitening material, which is the medium
that  actually  whitens  the  tooth  enamel.  The  material  is  developed  in a
proprietary formulation that increases the rate of oxidation on the internal and
external  chromagens  that cause tooth  staining.  The  LumaArch  system is also
unique in that it is designed only for  tooth-whitening  and can  simultaneously
whiten both tooth arches at the same time. In comparison,  other tooth-whitening
systems  typically  use  products  that have  multiple  applications,  including
composite curing.

         LumaLite has  received one patent on its LumaArch  system and has filed
three  additional  patents in the United  States.  LumaLite  intends to continue
filing patents,  with the advice of its counsel.  LumaLite also uses a number of
trademarks for its products and services. Currently, it uses "LumaLite," for the
company name, and has also trademarked "LumaLite Guide," "LumaArch,"  "LumaWhite
Plus" and  "LumaBlock." We intend to file additional  trademark  applications as
appropriate.

Strategic Relationships and Contracts

         We  have  entered  into  a  number  of   agreements   relating  to  the
distribution of our services and products both domestically and internationally.

         Domestic Distribution Relationships.  LumaLite distributes its products
domestically   through   relationships   with  a  number  of  nationwide  dental
distributors,  including  Henry Schein,  Inc.,  Patterson  Dental Supply,  Inc.,
Burkhart  Dental and Kings Two Dental  Supply.  LumaLite  sells its  products to
those parties through standard purchase order  arrangements,  pursuant to which,
upon the sale of a LumaLite product,  the distributor  presents a purchase order
to LumaLite and LumaLite then invoices the distributor  for payment.  LumaLite's
relationships  with its domestic  distributors are  non-exclusive and subject to
termination by either party at any time.

         International      Distributorships.      LumaLite's      international
distributorship  arrangements  are  evidenced by a series of written  agreements
using a standardized  form that LumaLite has developed.  The agreements  specify
the territory and the products covered by the distributorship  agreements. As of
the  date  of  this  report,  LumaLite  had  entered  into  agreements  for  the
territories of Australia,  Singapore,  Indonesia,  Taiwan,  the European  Union,
Korea, Brazil and Mexico.

         The  distribution  arrangements  grant the  distributors  the exclusive
right to  distribute  the products  specified  in the  described  territory  and
require the distributor to maintain  adequate  facilities and sales personnel to
sell LumaLite's  products.  The distribution  agreements  generally  provide for
minimum sales quotas by each  distributor.  If a  distributor  fails to meet the
sales quota during a particular year and fails to remedy any shortfall within 90
days  after  notice  from  LumaLite,  LumaLite  has the right to  terminate  the
distribution agreement. If the distributor sells more than the minimum quota for
any  particular  year,  the  distributor  receives a credit for the excess sales
toward the minimum quota required for the subsequent year.

         LumaLite is required to provide each  distributor  with a current price
list which is valid for the first 12 months after the date of the  agreement and
which  then may be changed on at least 60 days  notice to the  distributor.  The
distributor is required to pay for any products purchased under the distribution
agreement  by an  irrevocable  letter of credit  (or other  method  agreed to by
LumaLite),

         The distribution  agreements are generally for an initial term of three
years and then provide the distributor with a right to renew the contract for up
to two additional  three-year periods. The agreement can be terminated by either
party if the  distributor  fails to make  timely  payment  for the  products  it
purchases  or  if  a  party   declares   bankruptcy  or  institutes   insolvency
proceedings. In addition, either party may terminate the agreement for the other
party's  failure  to  perform  any  non-monetary  obligation  set  forth  in the
agreement  after 90 days  notice  specifying  the  party's  failure to  perform.
LumaLite  may  terminate  the  agreement  if  the  distributor  ceases  to  make
LumaLite's  products available to customers for more than 30 consecutive days or
the  distributor  states in writing that intends to cease  marketing  LumaLite's
products.

Sales and Marketing

         Currently,  LumaLite  distributes its LumaArch system using a wholesale
distribution  network  that  sells  to  professional  dental  customers  through
established relationships. LumaLite's wholesale distributors are primarily major
dental distributors.

         LumaLite's distributor relationships effectively provide it with access
to the  equivalent of 1,500 sales  representatives  who sell to the over 120,000
domestic dentists.  LumaLite believes that this distribution  system provides it
with rapid national market  penetration  without the heavy up-front costs that a
national  sales  platform  would  normally  require.  LumaLite  compliments  its
national distributor  relationships with a small  commission-only sales force of
approximately 20 independent sales  representatives  who train and update dental
end users on the LumaArch product and its use.

         LumaLite  believes  that  wholesale  distribution  provides a number of
distinct  benefits to it over the more traditional  direct marketing  approaches
and  independent  distribution  chains  used  by  its  competitors.   Typically,
traditional  marketing and distribution  chains are costly,  complex and slow to
gain momentum.  For example,  LumaLite believes its principal competitors employ
marketing  approaches that require them to spend a significant  portion of their
revenues  (at least in the early stages of  corporate  growth) on marketing  and
advertising.  We  believe,  however,  that by  using  distributor  networks  and
relationships, LumaLite's overall marketing and advertising costs will stabilize
in the range of between 10% and 12% of revenues.

         We believe that by the end of 2002 LumaLite's distribution network will
lead to an installed base of approximately 3,100 LumaArch systems on a worldwide
basis, and that those installed  systems will allow LumaLite to derive long-term
recurring  revenues  from  the  sale  of its  high-margin,  single-use  LumaLite
tooth-whitening  material as customers and dental practitioners use the LumaArch
systems.  LumaLite  also  intends  to take  advantage  of these  existing  sales
channels to  cross-market  its proposed  line of  complementary  tooth-whitening
products to its expanding customer base.

Competition.

         LumaLite's    tooth-whitening    systems    will   compete   with   all
tooth-whitening  products and services,  including  those offered through dental
offices,  retail stores and take-home  products.  LumaLite's  competition in the
in-office arena include  BriteSmile,  Inc.,  which offers its products through a
number of storefront centers, Air Technologies, which uses Patterson Dental as a
distribution channel, and Discus Dental, Inc., which markets its product through
a direct sales force.

         Companies that offer dentist-prescribed home bleaching products include
Opalescence, which is offered by Ultra Dent, Inc., Night White, which is offered
by Discus Dental, Inc., Platinum,  which is offered by Colgate, Crest Strips and
NuProGold,  which are offered by Dentsply  International,  Inc.,  and Rembrandt,
which is offered by DenMat, Inc.

         The company believes LumaLite's products and services compete favorably
with the products and services offered by in-office and store front products and
service  providers,  since the LumaArch system  provides  comparable or superior
tooth-whitening  services (on average, eight shades of whitening difference) for
a price  point that is  significantly  lower  than the cost of its  competitors'
products and services.  For example,  laser-based  bleaching  systems  typically
retail for between  $10,000 and  $50,000,  and cost  patients  between  $750 and
$2,000, while less effective power bleaching systems cost dentist between $1,000
and  $5,000,  with a cost to the patient of $500 to $1,250.  LumaLite's  primary
competitor in the marketplace,  which offers a comparable  whitening system that
produces  results  similar to those  produced by LumaArch,  with a minimum chair
time,  is available  to dental  practitioners  only through a 10 year  exclusive
contract  and at a cost  per  procedure  to the  dental  practitioners  of $250,
resulting in a customer cost of $600.  With respect to in-home  professional  or
over-the-counter   products,  we  believe  LumaLite's  products'  and  services'
competitive advantages include significantly reduced processing time, and better
results.

Governmental Regulation

         The business  operations  we conduct  through  LumaLite are and will be
subject  to  certain  federal,   state  and  local  statutes,   regulations  and
ordinances,  including those governing health and safety. The LumaArch system is
categorized  as a Class 1 exempt  medical device as defined by the Food and Drug
Administration,  and is used specifically to perform cosmetic dental procedures.
Therefore,  the LumaArch is not subject to the customary  rules and  regulations
of, and oversight by, the FDA.

         In most states, our tooth-whitening procedures are deemed to be part of
the  practice  of  dentistry.  Generally,  states  impose  licensing  and  other
requirements  on the practice of dentistry.  In addition,  some states  prohibit
general  business  corporations  from engaging in the practice of dentistry.  In
some states, our corporate structure (including,  as appropriate,  the structure
relating to our proposed retail  tooth-whitening  centers) may be required to be
reviewed by, and require the express  approval of, a state agency  governing the
practice of dentistry,  such as a board of dental examiners. In those states, we
may  need  specific   approval  for  the   operation  of  our  proposed   retail
tooth-whitening  centers.  Based  on  our  review  of  applicable  statutes  and
regulations and our corporate structure (including, with respect to our proposed
retain tooth-whitening  centers), we believe that our operations are and will be
in compliance in all material respects with applicable federal,  state and local
regulations.

Employees

         As of December 31, 2001, the Company had no employees.  As of that same
date, LumaLite had a total of 13 employees.  Of these employees, 2 were involved
in sales and marketing, 2 were involved in product development,  7 were involved
in quality assurance,  manufacturing and product support, and 2 were involved in
administrative and corporate functions.

Properties

         Prior  to  the  completion  of the  Merger,  our  properties  consisted
primarily  of minimal  office  equipment,  the right to use office  space at our
principal  executive location at 4766 Holladay Boulevard in Holladay,  Utah, and
the rights under our royalty  agreement  with Sunshine  Precious  Metals,  Inc.,
which,  as  noted  above,  filed  for  reorganization  under  Chapter  11 of the
bankruptcy code in 2000 and has shut down operations in its Sunshine mine.

         As a result  of the  Merger,  we now  conduct  our  principal  business
operations through  LumaLite's  properties and equipment.  LumaLite's  principal
business  operations  are  conducted  from a leased  4,500 sq.  ft.  combination
administrative,  research,  manufacturing  and warehouse space located in Spring
Valley,  California.  The lease for the property  expires in November  2004.  We
believe the lease is on  commercially  reasonable  terms and that it is adequate
for LumaLite's  current needs.  We also believe there is additional  lease space
available on commercially reasonable terms in the same general area if we decide
that LumaLite requires additional space for its operations.

         LumaLite  maintains  manufacturing  equipment,  as well as supplies and
inventory,  at its principal  business  location.  Its  manufacturing  equipment
consists  primarily  of  assembly  and  final-testing  machines  and  equipment.
LumaLite has the ability to source its  manufacturing  equipment and  components
from a number of vendors.  LumaLite believes all of its manufacturing  equipment
is in good condition,  normal wear and tear excepted.  LumaLite's  manufacturing
facilities comply with Good Manufacturing Procedures (GMP).

         In connection with our business  activities,  we have not  historically
engaged,  and  do not  intend  in  the  future  to  engage,  in any  significant
investment activities, including investments in real estate, investments in real
estate mortgages or in securities or interests of persons  primarily  engaged in
real estate activities.

Legal Proceedings

         We are not subject to any material actual or pending legal proceedings.

Risk Factors

         Prospective investors in our common stock should carefully consider the
following risks before deciding to buy our common stock. Our business, financial
condition or operating  results may suffer if any of the events described in the
following risk factors actually occur. There may be additional risks that we are
not currently able to identify.  These may also  adversely  affect our business,
financial  condition  or  operating  results.  If  any  of the  events  we  have
identified,  or those that we cannot now identify,  occurs, the trading price of
our common stock could decline,  and investors in our securities may lose all or
part of the money they paid to buy our common stock.

Our  business  is  difficult  to  evaluate  because  it has a limited  operating
history.

         At the parent company level, we have  historically  operated at a loss.
Between 1997 and 2001, we maintained only minimal  administrative and management
functions. As of December 31, 2001, we had an accumulated deficit of $3,469,284.
As a result of the  Merger we will  conduct  our  operations  primarily  through
LumaLite  (which began  operating in 1999) and also  consolidate  our operations
with LumaLite's for financial accounting purposes. Its limited operating history
makes  predicting  future  results  difficult.  LumaLite  generated  revenues of
$4,020,359 for 2001 and pre-tax income of $688,013 for the same period, compared
with  revenues  of  $585,380  and a pre-tax  loss of  $237,462  for 2000.  As of
December 31, 2001, LumaLite had an accumulated deficit of $136,333.

         Our historical financial  information is of limited value in projecting
our future results on a going-forward  basis for a number of reasons,  including
(i) because LumaLite has only had a limited operating  history,  (ii) because we
have  had  only  minimal  operations  since  1997,  and  (iii)  because  we will
consolidate  the  results  of  the  Company's  and  LumaLite's   operations  for
accounting  purposes as a result of the Merger.  Therefore,  it is  difficult to
evaluate our business and prospects.

         Further,  our quarterly  revenues and the results of our operations may
vary significantly in the future (from quarter to quarter or otherwise) based on
a number of factors, including the following:

          o    our  ability to  attract  new  customers  and  maintain  customer
               satisfaction;

          o    the  timing  of the sale of our  products  and  services  and the
               implementation  of our products and services  (including  opening
               our retail-based tooth-whitening centers);

          o    our ability to establish and maintain strategic relationships;

          o    increased  expenses,  including  expenses  related  to sales  and
               marketing,   research   and   development,    administration   or
               international expansion;

          o    our ability to enhance,  improve or  introduce  our  products and
               services,   either  internally  or  through  the  integration  of
               third-party improvements,  and to introduce those new or enhanced
               products or services into the market;

          o    the announcement or introduction of new or enhanced  products and
               services by our competitors;

          o    continued  growth  of  the  dental  market  and   tooth-whitening
               commerce; and

          o    governmental regulation surrounding the development,  sale or use
               of our products or services.

Accordingly,  we believe that  quarter-to-quarter  comparisons  of our operating
results are not  necessarily  meaningful and are not  necessarily  indicative of
future performance.

Our  success  will  depend  on  consumer   acceptance  of  our   light-activated
tooth-whitening and maintenance products.

         We  currently  derive,  and  anticipate   deriving  in  the  future,  a
substantial   portion   of  our   revenues   from   LumaLite's   light-activated
tooth-whitening  methods,  procedures and other dental products. Those products,
methods and procedures are based on a relatively new tooth-whitening concept for
consumers.  Our success will depend in large part on our ability to successfully
encourage  consumers,  dentists  and  dental  office  employees  to switch  from
traditional   bleach  and  tray   whitening   methods  to  our   light-activated
tooth-whitening products.

We compete in an industry that is characterized by rapidly changing technology.

         The  dental  device  and  supply  industry  is  characterized  by rapid
technological change. As technological changes occur in the marketplace,  we may
have to modify our products to become or remain  competitive,  or to ensure that
our products do not become  obsolete.  If we fail to  anticipate or respond in a
cost-effective and timely manner to governmental requirements,  market trends or
consumer  demands,  or if  there  are  any  significant  delays  in our  product
development or introduction of new products into the  marketplace,  our revenues
and profit  margins may decline,  which could  adversely  affect our cash flows,
liquidity and operating results.

We are subject to significant competition

         The  market  for  tooth-whitening   products  and  services  is  highly
competitive,  and that  competition  may  intensify  in the future.  A number of
well-established  companies and smaller  entrepreneurial  companies are focusing
significant  resources on developing  and  marketing  products and services that
compete  with our products and  services.  In addition,  many of our current and
potential  competitors  have  greater  financial,  technical,   operational  and
marketing  resources.  We may not be able to compete  successfully against these
competitors  in developing our products or services.  Competitive  pressures may
also force prices for  tooth-whitening  products and  services  down,  and those
price reductions could affect our potential future revenues.

We are  susceptible  to product  liability  suits  and,  if a lawsuit is brought
against us,  defending the action could  require us to pay large legal  expenses
and/or judgments.

         We have not had any product  liability  claims asserted against us, but
because of the nature of the dental device  industry,  there can be no assurance
that we will not be subject to those types of claims in the future. Our products
come in contact  with  vulnerable  areas of the human  body,  such as the mouth,
tongue,  tooth and gums, and therefore,  the sale and support of dental products
makes us  susceptible  to the risk of product  liability  claims.  A  successful
product liability claim, or the negative publicity brought by such claims, could
have a material adverse effect on our revenues and business.

         We  maintain  product  liability  insurance  with  coverage  limits  of
$1,000,000  per  occurrence  and  $2,000,000  per year.  While be  believe  that
coverage is adequate,  we do not guarantee that the amount of the insurance that
we carry will be adequate to satisfy any claims that are made  against us in the
future,  or  that  we  will  be  able  to  obtain  insurance  in the  future  at
satisfactory rates or in adequate amounts.

We may  experience  shortages  of the  supplies  we need  because we do not have
long-term agreements with our suppliers.

         Our  success  depends to a large  degree on our  ability to provide our
affiliated  dentists  with  our  state  of  the  art  light-activated  whitening
products,  and a sufficient supply of tooth-whitening  materials and maintenance
products. Since we first commercially introduced our products, we have relied on
manufacturing   and  supply   agreements   with  a  number  of   suppliers   and
manufacturers.  We have no long-term  purchase  contracts  or other  contractual
assurances  of  continued  supply,  pricing  or  access  to  those  products  or
manufacturing  services.  While we believe we have good  relationships  with our
suppliers  and  manufacturers,  if we are unable to obtain  supplies from one or
more of our key vendors on a timely basis,  or if there is a significant  change
in our  ability  to obtain  necessary  equipment  or  supplies,  our  results of
operations could be seriously harmed.

We do not intend to pay dividends.

         We do not  anticipate  paying any cash dividends on our common stock to
our  shareholders  for the  foreseeable  future.  We  intend  to  retain  future
earnings, if any, for use in our operations and expanding our business.

Our common stock price may be volatile, we trade on only a limited public market
basis, and we are subject to certain  restrictions  that may affect your ability
to sell our stock.

         Our common stock trades on the  over-the-counter  market  maintained by
the NASD. The over-the-counter  market is distinct from, and generally handles a
smaller  volume of  trades,  than  other  exchanges  over  which  securities  of
companies  are  traded,  including  the New York  Stock  Exchange,  the  "system
maintained by the NASDAQ  national market and small cap market systems and local
trading exchanges." The owners of our common stock may, therefore,  find it more
difficult to dispose,  or obtain accurate quotations for the market price of our
common stock. In addition,  stocks traded over-the-counter are generally subject
to a rule that imposes restrictive sales practice requirements on broker-dealers
selling  those  securities  to persons  other  than  established  customers  and
accredited  investors.  For transactions covered by this rule, the broker-dealer
must,  among  other  requirements,  make  a  special  suitability  determination
regarding the purchasers and must receive the purchaser's written consent to the
transactions  prior to any  purchase.  Consequently,  the rule may  restrict the
ability of  broker-dealers  to sell or limit the interest of  broker-dealers  in
selling our common stock and may adversely  affect the ability of holders of our
common stock to sell shares.

         The market prices for securities of emerging  companies,  including the
Company, have historically been highly volatile.  Significant  volatility in the
market  price of the shares of our common stock may arise due to factors such as
our developing business,  historic losses and relatively low price per share. In
addition,  future  announcements  concerning  us or our  competitors  may have a
significant impact on the market price of our common stock. Those  announcements
might include announcements regarding financial results, the results of testing,
technological  innovations,  new commercial  products,  changes to  governmental
regulations,   governmental   decisions   on   commercialization   of  products,
developments  concerning proprietary rights,  litigation or public concern as to
the safety of our products. As long as there is only a limited public market for
our common stock, the sale of a significant number of shares of our common stock
at any  particular  time could be  difficult  to  achieve  at the market  prices
prevailing  immediately  before those shares are offered,  and the offering of a
significant  number  of shares of  common  stock at any one time  could  cause a
severe decline in the price of our common stock.

We currently rely on wholesale  distributors  to market our products,  but there
can  be no  assurance  that  those  distributors  will  meet  their  contractual
obligations or be successful in their efforts.

         We market  the  LumaArch  primarily  through  a series of  distribution
agreements  with  wholesale  distributors  that have direct sales  contacts with
domestic  dentists.  We recently  entered into similar  arrangements  in several
foreign  countries  for sales of our  products  to  dentists  outside the United
States.  If our  distributors  fail to promote our products,  or if they fail or
refuse to comply  with the terms of their  agreements  with us,  our  ability to
market  our  products  and  services,  at  least  in the  short  term,  could be
materially and adversely  affected,  which could adversely  affect our revenues,
operations  and business plan.  There can be no assurance that our  distributors
will comply  with the terms of their  contractual  obligations  with us, or that
they will be successful in marketing our products.

We cannot guarantee that our patent  applications will be granted, or that, even
if they are granted, our competitors will not infringe on them.

         We  have  filed  a  number  of  patent  applications   related  to  our
tooth-whitening   products  which  are  currently   pending,   including  patent
applications  relating to our  LumaArch,  Liquid Light Guides and Do It Yourself
Trays. Although we intend to continue to apply for patents, we cannot assure you
that we will continue to apply for, or that we will actually be issued, patents,
and that,  if any such patents are issued,  that third parties will not infringe
on those  new  patents  or our  existing  patents.  If we are  unable or fail to
protect our intellectual  property rights through the patent process, that could
weaken our competitive position, reduce our revenue and increase our costs.

         In addition  to patents,  we rely on a  combination  of trade  secrets,
copyrights and trademark laws,  nondisclosure  agreements and other  contractual
provisions and technical  measures to protect our intellectual  property rights.
These  measures may not be adequate to safeguard the  technology  underlying our
products and  services.  If they do not protect our rights,  third parties could
use our  technology,  and our ability to compete in the market could be reduced.
In addition, our employees, consultants and other persons who participate in the
development of our products and services could breach their  agreements  with us
regarding our intellectual  property,  and we may not have adequate remedies for
those breaches.  We may also not be able to effectively protect our intellectual
property rights in some foreign countries.  For a variety of reasons, we may not
decide to file for additional patent, copyright or trademark protections outside
of the United States or in foreign jurisdictions. We also realize that our trade
secrets may become known through  other means that we do not currently  foresee.
Even though we intend to protect our intellectual  property, our competitors may
independently  develop similar or alternative  technologies or products that are
equal or superior to our  technology and products  without  infringing on any of
our intellectual property rights, or design around our proprietary technologies.

Our products or services could infringe on the  intellectual  property rights of
others, which could require us to engage in costly litigation and, if we are not
successful in that litigation,  could also require us to pay substantial damages
and/or prohibit us from selling our products or services.

         Third parties may assert  infringement or other  intellectual  property
claims against us if we use, even  inadvertently,  their  intellectual  property
rights. If it is ultimately  determined that our products or services  infringed
on a third party's proprietary  rights, we may have to pay substantial  damages,
including  treble  damages,  for those past  infringements.  Further,  we may be
prohibited  from  selling  our  products  before we obtain a license  from those
parties,  which,  if  available  at all,  could  require  us to pay  substantial
royalties.  Even  if  the  infringement  claims  are  without  merit,  defending
infringement  lawsuits  takes  significant  time,  is  expensive  and can divert
management's attention from other pressing business concerns.

We may be subject to government  regulations regarding the corporate practice of
dentistry.

         We intend to expand our current distribution system by opening a series
of wholly-owned and operated retail tooth-whitening centers in "in-store" retail
locations.  In certain  states,  we may operate those centers  through  licensed
dentists or other dental  practitioners.  Our corporate structure,  operation of
centers  and  contractual  relationships  with our  licensed  dentists  at those
centers  may  be  subject  to  government  regulation  and  may be  reviewed  by
applicable  state  agencies   governing  the  practice  of  dentistry  (such  as
state-regulated  boards of dental  examiners).  We believe that our operation of
centers will be in compliance in all material respects with applicable  federal,
state and local laws and regulations regarding the practice of dentistry (all of
which are subject to change),  and that any state  agency  which chose to review
our operational structure would conclude likewise. However, we cannot assure you
that we will obtain a favorable  review in all such instances.  If we are unable
to do so, we may be subject to  penalties  or be  prevented  from  operating  in
certain  jurisdictions.  Further, if we are unable to comply with the applicable
laws and regulations in any state, we may be limited in those states to offering
our products and services through other means than wholly-owned centers.

We may  be  subject  to  government  regulation  regarding  our  tooth-whitening
services and products.

         The light used in our tooth-whitening systems is categorized as a Class
I exempt Medical Device, as defined by the Food and Drug Administration, or FDA.
As long as the light is used  specifically to perform cosmetic dental procedures
(i.e.,   tooth-whitening),   it  is  not  subject  to   premarket   notification
requirements, although we are subject to FDA requirements regarding the handling
of complaints and other general FDA record keeping  standards.  We cannot assure
you that some or all of the existing government  regulations  regarding the use,
storage,  administration  or  manufacture  of our  products or services  (either
existing or under development) will not change significantly or adversely in the
future,  or that we will not become  subject to  compliance  with  additional or
stricter  governmental  regulations  which  could,  in the  future,  affect  our
potential revenue or operations.

The  ownership  of our  outstanding  common stock is  concentrated  in a limited
number of shareholders.

         Our current directors and executive officers, or their affiliates,  own
and control approximately 40% of our common stock and, therefore, if they act in
concert,  those persons would have significant  influence on decisions affecting
our business,  including the identity and makeup of our board of directors,  and
any other matters requiring approval of our shareholders.

We may not be  successful  in  building a strong  brand  identity  and  customer
loyalty.

         We believe that  establishing and maintaining  brand identity and brand
loyalty  is  crucial  to  attracting  customers,  dentists  and other  strategic
partners.  To attract  and  retain  those  groups,  and  respond to  competitive
pressures,  we  intend to  continue  substantial  investments  in  creating  and
maintaining brand loyalty for our products and services.  We believe advertising
rates,  and the cost of  advertising  campaigns in  particular,  could  increase
substantially  in the future.  If our branding  efforts are not successful,  our
results of operations could be adversely affected.

Promotion  and  enhancement  of  our  brands  will  depend  on  our  success  in
consistently  providing high quality  tooth-whitening  services and products and
customer satisfaction with those products and services.

         If our  customers  do not  perceive  our services and products to be of
high quality, or if we introduce new services or products that are not favorably
received by our  potential  customers,  the value of our brands could be harmed.
Any such  decrease in the value or perceived  value of our brands could harm our
reputation,  reduce our net revenue,  cause us to lose  customers and affect the
price of our common stock.

We may need  additional  capital to fund our  operations and finance our growth,
but we may not be able to obtain it on acceptable terms or at all.

         If we expand our operations more rapidly than we currently  anticipate,
if our working  capital needs exceed our current  expectations or if we make any
acquisitions,  we will need to raise  additional  capital from either  equity or
debt sources. If we cannot obtain financing on terms acceptable to us or at all,
we may be forced to curtail our planned business  expansion and we may be unable
to fund our ongoing operations.

Our business  strategy may not  effectively  address our market and we may never
realize a return on the resources we invest to execute our strategy.

         LumaLite  has made  substantial  investments  to  pursue  its  business
strategy. These investments include investments in:

          o    infrastructure and equipment;

          o    research and development;

          o    expanding its work force;

          o    experienced management;

          o    product and service offerings; and

          o    developing marketing and sales resources and brand awareness.


These  investments  may not be successful,  and other  companies may employ more
cost  effective  strategies  than  LumaLite  has used to compete  in  LumaLite's
markets.  LumaLite may never  realize a return on the  resources in which it has
invested or in which it may invest in the future.

Our competitors may seize the market opportunities we have identified because we
may not effectively execute our business strategy.

         If we fail to execute on our business strategy in a timely or effective
manner, our competitors may be able to seize the marketing opportunities we have
identified. Our business strategy is complex and requires us to successfully and
simultaneously complete many tasks. To be successful,  we will need to:

          o    invest in state-of-the-art equipment, research and development;

          o    attract and retain customers;

          o    improve or enhance our products;

          o    attract and retain highly skilled employees and consultants;

          o    introduce  complementary  products and  services,  including  our
               retail  tooth-whitening  centers  and  ancillary  tooth-whitening
               products;

          o    attract and retain  experienced  management,  sales and marketing
               personnel;

          o    evolve  our  business  to  gain  advantages  in  an  increasingly
               competitive environment.

Although  most of our  management  team has worked  together for several  years,
there  can be no  assurance  that we will be able to  successfully  execute  all
elements of our business strategy.

We plan to expand very rapidly, and managing our growth may be difficult.

         LumaLite has rapidly  expanded its  operations  since it was founded in
1999. We expect its business to continue to grow  geographically and in terms of
the number of products  and services it offers and the manner in which it offers
those products and services.  We cannot be sure that we will successfully manage
that growth. To successfully manage our growth. We must:

          o    invest in research  and  development  personnel  to make sure our
               products and services remain up-to-date;

          o    hire and retain key executive management personnel;

          o    improve our  management,  financial and  information  systems and
               controls; and

          o    expand, train and manage our employee base effectively.

There will be  additional  demands on our  customer  service  support and sales,
marketing and administrative  resources as we increase our service offerings and
expand our target markets. The strains imposed by these demands are magnified by
the  relatively  early stage of our  operations.  If we cannot manage our growth
effectively, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be
adversely affected.

Our growth  could be limited  if we are unable to attract  and retain  qualified
personnel.

         We believe that our short- and long-term  success depends  larmaterialy
on our ability to attract and retain highly  skilled  technical,  managerial and
marketing  personnel.  We may not be able to hire  the  necessary  personnel  to
implement our business strategy,  or we may need to pay higher  compensation for
employees  than we  currently  expect.  We  cannot  be sure we will  succeed  in
attracting and retaining the personnel we need to continue to grow.

         We depend, particularly in the case of LumaLite, on a limited number of
key  personnel  who would be difficult  to replace.  Our success also depends in
significant  part on the  continued  services  of our key  technical,  sales and
senior management personnel.  Losing one or more of our key employees could have
a material  adverse effect on our business,  results of operations and financial
condition. LumaLite has employment agreements with each of its key officers.

                 DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

         This Form 8-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private  Securities  Litigation  Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate
to,  among  other  things,  analyses  and  other  information  that are based on
forecasts  of future  events and  results,  and  estimates  of  amounts  not yet
determinable. These statements also relate to future prospects, developments and
business strategies.  These  forward-looking  statements are identified by their
use of terms and phrases such as "anticipate,"  "believe," "could,"  "estimate,"
"expect," "intend," "may," "plan," "predict,"  "project," "will" or the negative
of those or other variations, or comparable expressions, including references to
assumptions.

         The forward-looking  statements in this Form 8-K, including  statements
concerning  projections of future results,  operating  profits and earnings,  if
any,  are  based  on  current   expectations   and  are  subject  to  risks  and
uncertainties  that could cause actual results to differ  materially  from those
expressed or implied by those statements.  The risks and  uncertainties  include
but are not limited to our continued ability to:

          o    develop and market our current  products  and services and expand
               the scope of our products and services  through the  introduction
               of complementary products and services and retail tooth-whitening
               centers;

          o    attract and retain customers;

          o    attract and retain highly skilled employees;

          o    effectively manage growth; and

          o    evolve  our  business  to  gain  advantages  in  an  increasingly
               competitive environment.

Our  risks  are  more  specifically  described  in the  section  entitled  "Risk
Factors," above. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materializes, or
if the assumptions prove incorrect,  our actual results may vary materially from
our expected,  estimated or projected results.  Given these  uncertainties,  you
should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking  statements  contained in
this Form 8-K.

         We undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements or risk
factors  other than as required by  applicable  law,  whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.

Item 7.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.

          (a)  Financial Statements and Proforma Information

              The Company  will file,  as an amendment to this report and within
         the time period set forth in Item 7, the  financial  statements  and/or
         proforma  financial   information   specified  in  regulation  S-X,  as
         promulgated  under the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as amended,
         together (as appropriate) with signed accountant's  reports as provided
         in Regulation S-X.

         (b)      Exhibits.  N/A







                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the  registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                                LUMALITE HOLDINGS, INC.



Date:   May 17, 2002                            By:    /s/  Michael Jackson
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Michael Jackson, President