TSN 2015 Q2 10Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
| |
x | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 28, 2015
or
|
| |
¨
| Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
001-14704
(Commission File Number)
______________________________________________
TYSON FOODS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
______________________________________________
|
| | |
Delaware | | 71-0225165 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
2200 Don Tyson Parkway, Springdale, Arkansas | | 72762-6999 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(479) 290-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | x | | Accelerated filer | | ¨ |
Non-accelerated filer | | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of March 28, 2015.
|
| | | |
Class | | Outstanding Shares |
Class A Common Stock, $0.10 Par Value (Class A stock) | | 304,003,272 |
|
Class B Common Stock, $0.10 Par Value (Class B stock) | | 70,010,805 |
|
TYSON FOODS, INC.
INDEX
|
| | |
| | PAGE |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Item 2. | | |
| | |
Item 3. | | |
| | |
Item 4. | | |
|
| | |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
Item 1A. | | |
| | |
Item 2. | | |
| | |
Item 3. | | |
| | |
Item 4. | | |
| | |
Item 5. | | |
| | |
Item 6. | | |
| |
| |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| |
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
TYSON FOODS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In millions, except per share data)
(Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Sales | $ | 9,979 |
| | $ | 9,032 |
| | $ | 20,796 |
| | $ | 17,793 |
|
Cost of Sales | 8,990 |
| | 8,381 |
| | 18,851 |
| | 16,457 |
|
Gross Profit | 989 |
| | 651 |
| | 1,945 |
| | 1,336 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative | 442 |
| | 290 |
| | 889 |
| | 563 |
|
Operating Income | 547 |
| | 361 |
| | 1,056 |
| | 773 |
|
Other (Income) Expense: | | | | | | | |
Interest income | (1 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (5 | ) |
Interest expense | 71 |
| | 25 |
| | 148 |
| | 53 |
|
Other, net | (6 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (7 | ) | | 1 |
|
Total Other (Income) Expense | 64 |
| | 20 |
| | 138 |
| | 49 |
|
Income before Income Taxes | 483 |
| | 341 |
| | 918 |
| | 724 |
|
Income Tax Expense | 172 |
| | 131 |
| | 297 |
| | 262 |
|
Net Income | 311 |
| | 210 |
| | 621 |
| | 462 |
|
Less: Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests | 1 |
| | (3 | ) | | 2 |
| | (5 | ) |
Net Income Attributable to Tyson | $ | 310 |
| | $ | 213 |
| | $ | 619 |
| | $ | 467 |
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding: | | | | | | | |
Class A Basic | 334 |
| | 273 |
| | 335 |
| | 272 |
|
Class B Basic | 70 |
| | 70 |
| | 70 |
| | 70 |
|
Diluted | 415 |
| | 356 |
| | 416 |
| | 355 |
|
Net Income Per Share Attributable to Tyson: | | | | | | | |
Class A Basic | $ | 0.78 |
| | $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 1.55 |
| | $ | 1.40 |
|
Class B Basic | $ | 0.71 |
| | $ | 0.58 |
| | $ | 1.42 |
| | $ | 1.26 |
|
Diluted | $ | 0.75 |
| | $ | 0.60 |
| | $ | 1.49 |
| | $ | 1.32 |
|
Dividends Declared Per Share: | | | | | | | |
Class A | $ | 0.100 |
| | $ | 0.075 |
| | $ | 0.225 |
| | $ | 0.175 |
|
Class B | $ | 0.090 |
| | $ | 0.068 |
| | $ | 0.203 |
| | $ | 0.158 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
TYSON FOODS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Net Income | $ | 311 |
| | $ | 210 |
| | $ | 621 |
| | $ | 462 |
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Taxes: | | | | | | | |
Derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges | (1 | ) | | 7 |
| | — |
| | 5 |
|
Investments | 2 |
| | — |
| | 11 |
| | 3 |
|
Currency translation | (25 | ) | | 6 |
| | (19 | ) | | (5 | ) |
Postretirement benefits | — |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | 2 |
|
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Taxes | (24 | ) | | 13 |
| | (1 | ) | | 5 |
|
Comprehensive Income | 287 |
| | 223 |
| | 620 |
| | 467 |
|
Less: Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests | 1 |
| | (3 | ) | | 2 |
| | (5 | ) |
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Tyson | $ | 286 |
| | $ | 226 |
| | $ | 618 |
| | $ | 472 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
TYSON FOODS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 28, 2015 | | September 27, 2014 |
Assets | | | |
Current Assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 223 |
| | $ | 438 |
|
Accounts receivable, net | 1,632 |
| | 1,684 |
|
Inventories | 3,262 |
| | 3,274 |
|
Other current assets | 346 |
| | 379 |
|
Assets held for sale | 205 |
| | 446 |
|
Total Current Assets | 5,668 |
| | 6,221 |
|
Net Property, Plant and Equipment | 5,278 |
| | 5,130 |
|
Goodwill | 6,689 |
| | 6,706 |
|
Intangible Assets, net | 5,223 |
| | 5,276 |
|
Other Assets | 668 |
| | 623 |
|
Total Assets | $ | 23,526 |
| | $ | 23,956 |
|
| | | |
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | | | |
Current Liabilities: | | | |
Current debt | $ | 1,236 |
| | $ | 643 |
|
Accounts payable | 1,694 |
| | 1,806 |
|
Other current liabilities | 1,072 |
| | 1,207 |
|
Liabilities held for sale | 49 |
| | 141 |
|
Total Current Liabilities | 4,051 |
| | 3,797 |
|
Long-Term Debt | 6,438 |
| | 7,535 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes | 2,452 |
| | 2,450 |
|
Other Liabilities | 1,215 |
| | 1,270 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 16) |
| |
|
Shareholders’ Equity: | | | |
Common stock ($0.10 par value): | | | |
Class A-authorized 900 million shares, issued 346 million shares | 35 |
| | 35 |
|
Convertible Class B-authorized 900 million shares, issued 70 million shares | 7 |
| | 7 |
|
Capital in excess of par value | 4,282 |
| | 4,257 |
|
Retained earnings | 6,285 |
| | 5,748 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (148 | ) | | (147 | ) |
Treasury stock, at cost – 42 million shares at March 28, 2015 and 40 million shares at September 27, 2014 | (1,106 | ) | | (1,010 | ) |
Total Tyson Shareholders’ Equity | 9,355 |
| | 8,890 |
|
Noncontrolling Interests | 15 |
| | 14 |
|
Total Shareholders’ Equity | 9,370 |
| | 8,904 |
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | $ | 23,526 |
| | $ | 23,956 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
TYSON FOODS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | | | |
Net income | $ | 621 |
| | $ | 462 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 347 |
| | 254 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 12 |
| | (24 | ) |
Convertible debt discount | — |
| | (92 | ) |
Other, net | 36 |
| | 32 |
|
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities | (208 | ) | | (367 | ) |
Cash Provided by Operating Activities | 808 |
| | 265 |
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | | | |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | (435 | ) | | (293 | ) |
Purchases of marketable securities | (17 | ) | | (21 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities | 15 |
| | 18 |
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | — |
| | (56 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of businesses | 142 |
| | — |
|
Other, net | 4 |
| | 8 |
|
Cash Used for Investing Activities | (291 | ) | | (344 | ) |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | | | |
Payments on debt | (715 | ) | | (390 | ) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | — |
| | 14 |
|
Borrowings on revolving credit facility | 1,080 |
| | — |
|
Payments on revolving credit facility | (905 | ) | | — |
|
Purchases of Tyson Class A common stock | (150 | ) | | (275 | ) |
Dividends | (75 | ) | | (50 | ) |
Stock options exercised | 34 |
| | 49 |
|
Other, net | 10 |
| | 19 |
|
Cash Used for Financing Activities | (721 | ) | | (633 | ) |
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash | (11 | ) | | 5 |
|
Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents | (215 | ) | | (707 | ) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year | 438 |
| | 1,145 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period | $ | 223 |
| | $ | 438 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
TYSON FOODS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1: ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated condensed financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared by Tyson Foods, Inc. (“Tyson,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”). Certain information and accounting policies and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Although we believe the disclosures contained herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, these consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2014. Preparation of consolidated condensed financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated condensed financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
We believe the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements contain all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary to state fairly our financial position as of March 28, 2015, and the results of operations for the three and six months ended March 28, 2015, and March 29, 2014. Results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year.
Consolidation
The consolidated condensed financial statements include the accounts of all wholly-owned subsidiaries, as well as majority-owned subsidiaries over which we exercise control and, when applicable, entities for which we have a controlling financial interest or variable interest entities for which we are the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued guidance changing the criteria for recognizing revenue. The guidance provides for a single five-step model to be applied to all revenue contracts with customers. The standard also requires additional financial statement disclosures that will enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows relating to customer contracts. Companies have an option to use either a retrospective approach or cumulative effect adjustment approach to implement the standard. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods and interim periods within those annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, our fiscal 2018. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2015, the FASB issued guidance changing the analysis procedures that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. The new guidance affects the following areas: (1) limited partnerships and similar legal entities, (2) evaluating fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider as a variable interest, (3) the effect of fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary determination, (4) the effect of related parties on the primary beneficiary determination, and (5) certain investment funds. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods and interim periods within those annual reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2015, our fiscal 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued guidance which requires debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the associated debt liability. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods and interim periods within those annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, our fiscal 2017. Early adoption is permitted. This new guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2: ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
Acquisitions
On August 28, 2014, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of The Hillshire Brands Company ("Hillshire Brands") as part of our strategic expansion initiative. The purchase price was equal to $63.00 per share for Hillshire Brands' outstanding common stock, or $8,081 million. In addition, we paid $163 million in cash for breakage costs incurred by Hillshire Brands related to a previously announced acquisition. We funded the acquisition with existing cash on hand, net proceeds from the issuance of new senior notes, Class A common stock (Class A stock), and tangible equity units as well as borrowings under a new term loan facility (refer to Note 6: Debt and Note 7: Equity). Hillshire Brands' results from operations subsequent to the acquisition closing are included in the Prepared Foods segment.
The following table summarizes the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. Certain estimated values for the acquisition, including goodwill, intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, and deferred taxes, are not yet finalized and the preliminary purchase price allocations are subject to change as we complete our analysis of the fair value at the date of acquisition. The purchase price was allocated based on information available at the acquisition date. During the first six months of fiscal 2015, we recorded measurement period adjustments, which reduced goodwill by $15 million, after obtaining additional information regarding, among other things, asset valuations and liabilities assumed. The amount was not considered material and therefore prior periods have not been revised. |
| | | | |
| in millions | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 72 |
|
Accounts receivable | | 236 |
|
Inventories | | 414 |
|
Other current assets | | 337 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment | | 1,301 |
|
Goodwill | | 4,789 |
|
Intangible Assets | | 5,141 |
|
Other Assets | | 65 |
|
Accounts payable | | (347 | ) |
Other current liabilities | | (326 | ) |
Long-Term Debt | | (869 | ) |
Deferred Income Taxes | | (2,072 | ) |
Other Liabilities | | (497 | ) |
Net assets acquired | | $ | 8,244 |
|
The fair value of identifiable intangible assets is as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | |
Intangible Asset Category | | Type | | Life in Years | | Fair Value |
Brands & trademarks | | Non-amortizable | | Indefinite | | $ | 4,062 |
|
Brands & trademarks | | Amortizable | | 20 years | | 532 |
|
Customer relationships | | Amortizable | | Weighted average life of 16 years | | 541 |
|
Non-compete agreements | | Amortizable | | One year | | 6 |
|
Total identifiable intangible assets | | | | | | $ | 5,141 |
|
As a result of the acquisition, we recognized a total of $4,789 million of goodwill. The purchase price was assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition, and any excess was allocated to goodwill, as shown in the table above. Goodwill represents the value we expect to achieve through the implementation of operational synergies and growth opportunities primarily in our Prepared Foods segment. The allocation of goodwill to our reporting units is pending finalization of the expected synergies and the impact of the synergies to our reporting units. The fair value of goodwill is not deductible for U.S. income tax purposes.
We used various valuation techniques to determine fair value, with the primary techniques being discounted cash flow analysis, relief-from-royalty and excess earnings valuation approaches, each of which use significant unobservable inputs, or Level 3 inputs, as defined by the fair value hierarchy. Under these valuation approaches, we are required to make estimates and assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates, royalty rates and discount rates based on budgets, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and marketplace data.
The acquisition of Hillshire Brands was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting, and consequently, the results of operations for Hillshire Brands are reported in our consolidated condensed financial statements from the date of acquisition.
The following pro forma information presents the combined results of operations as if the acquisition of Hillshire Brands had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2013. Hillshire Brands' pre-acquisition results have been added to our historical results. The pro forma results contained in the following table include adjustments for amortization of acquired intangibles, depreciation expense, interest expense related to the financing and related income taxes. Any potential cost savings or other operational efficiencies that could result from the acquisition are not included in these pro forma results.
The pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations as they would have been had the acquisition occurred on the assumed date, nor is it necessarily an indication of future operating results. The pro forma results for the six months ended March 29, 2014 include a nonrecurring tax benefit of $46 million recognized by Hillshire Brands primarily related to the release of valuation allowances on state deferred tax assets.
|
| | | | | | | |
in millions | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 29, 2014 |
Pro forma sales | $ | 9,970 |
| | $ | 19,787 |
|
Pro forma net income from continuing operations attributable to Tyson | $ | 223 |
| | $ | 561 |
|
Pro forma net income per diluted share from continuing operations attributable to Tyson | $ | 0.53 |
| | $ | 1.34 |
|
Additionally, during the second quarter of fiscal 2014 we acquired a value-added food business as part of our strategic expansion initiative, which is also included in our Prepared Foods segment. The aggregate purchase price of the acquisition was $56 million, which included $12 million for Property, Plant and Equipment, $27 million allocated to Intangible Assets and $18 million allocated to Goodwill.
Dispositions
In fiscal 2014, we announced our plan to sell our Brazil and Mexico operations, which are included in our International segment, to JBS SA ("JBS") for a combined $575 million in cash, subject to certain adjustments. As a result, we conducted an impairment test and recorded a $39 million impairment charge in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 related to the Brazil operation. We completed the sale of the Brazil operation in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 for net proceeds of $130 million subject to working capital and net debt adjustments. The sale did not result in a significant gain or loss as the carrying value of the Brazil operation approximated the sales proceeds at the time of sale. In April 2015, we received additional net proceeds of $23 million related to the working capital and net debt adjustments. The additional proceeds did not result in a significant gain or loss. The assets and liabilities associated with the Brazil operation were classified as held for sale on the balance sheet at September 27, 2014. The sale of the Mexico operation is pending the necessary government approvals, and we expect to receive a decision during fiscal 2015. Subject to governmental approval and completion of the sale, we would realize a gain on the sale. The assets and liabilities related to the Mexico operation are classified as held for sale on the balance sheet at March 28, 2015 and September 27, 2014.
The following table summarizes the net assets and liabilities held for sale (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 28, 2015 | | September 27, 2014 |
Assets held for sale: | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 74 |
|
Inventories | 76 |
| | 141 |
|
Other current assets | 15 |
| | 72 |
|
Net property, plant and equipment | 75 |
| | 132 |
|
Goodwill | 14 |
| | 16 |
|
Other assets | 8 |
| | 11 |
|
Total assets held for sale | $ | 205 |
| | $ | 446 |
|
Liabilities held for sale: | | | |
Current debt | $ | — |
| | $ | 32 |
|
Accounts payable | 25 |
| | 61 |
|
Other current liabilities | 14 |
| | 27 |
|
Long-term debt | — |
| | 9 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 10 |
| | 12 |
|
Total liabilities held for sale | $ | 49 |
| | $ | 141 |
|
In fiscal 2014, we sold our 50 percent ownership interest of Dynamic Fuels LLC (Dynamic Fuels) for $30 million cash consideration at closing and up to $35 million in future cash payments contingent on Dynamic Fuels' production volumes over a period of up to 11.5 years. Additionally as part of the terms of the sale, we were released from our guarantee of the $100 million Gulf Opportunity Zone tax-exempt bonds, which were issued in October 2008 to fund a portion of the plant construction costs. Dynamic Fuels previously qualified as a variable interest entity which we consolidated, as we were the primary beneficiary. As a result of the sale, we deconsolidated Dynamic Fuels and recorded a gain of approximately $3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2014. We will recognize the future contingent payments in income as the required volumes are produced.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2015, as part of our ongoing efforts to increase efficiencies in our Chicken business, we announced the planned closure of our Buena Vista, Georgia plant. Due to a combination of factors that included changing product needs, the age of the facility and the prohibitive cost of its renovation, operations are expected to cease during the third quarter of fiscal 2015. The closure is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's operating results.
In fiscal 2014, we recorded impairment charges of $52 million related to the planned closure of three Prepared Foods plants. The Company’s Cherokee, Iowa plant closed in September 2014 and the Buffalo, New York and Santa Teresa, New Mexico plants each closed in January 2015. Additionally, in April 2014, Hillshire Brands announced that it would discontinue all production at its Florence, Alabama plant. The plant closed in December 2014 and the closure costs did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial results.
NOTE 3: INVENTORIES
Processed products, livestock and supplies and other are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost includes purchased raw materials, live purchase costs, growout costs (primarily feed, grower pay and catch and haul costs), labor and manufacturing and production overhead, which are related to the purchase and production of inventories.
At March 28, 2015, 68% of the cost of inventories was determined by the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method as compared to 66% at September 27, 2014. The remaining cost of inventories for both years is determined by the weighted-average method.
The following table reflects the major components of inventory (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 28, 2015 | | September 27, 2014 |
Processed products | $ | 1,788 |
| | $ | 1,794 |
|
Livestock | 1,060 |
| | 1,066 |
|
Supplies and other | 414 |
| | 414 |
|
Total inventory | $ | 3,262 |
| | $ | 3,274 |
|
NOTE 4: PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The major categories of property, plant and equipment and accumulated depreciation are as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 28, 2015 | | September 27, 2014 |
Land | $ | 128 |
| | $ | 126 |
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements | 3,578 |
| | 3,501 |
|
Machinery and equipment | 6,322 |
| | 6,144 |
|
Land improvements and other | 281 |
| | 276 |
|
Buildings and equipment under construction | 444 |
| | 334 |
|
| 10,753 |
| | 10,381 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation | 5,475 |
| | 5,251 |
|
Net property, plant and equipment | $ | 5,278 |
| | $ | 5,130 |
|
NOTE 5: OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other current liabilities are as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 28, 2015 | | September 27, 2014 |
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits | $ | 393 |
| | $ | 490 |
|
Other | 679 |
| | 717 |
|
Total other current liabilities | $ | 1,072 |
| | $ | 1,207 |
|
NOTE 6: DEBT
The major components of debt are as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 28, 2015 | | September 27, 2014 |
Revolving credit facility | $ | 175 |
| | $ | — |
|
Senior notes: | | | |
2.75% Senior notes due September 2015 (2015 Notes) | 403 |
| | 407 |
|
6.60% Senior notes due April 2016 (2016 Notes) | 638 |
| | 638 |
|
7.00% Notes due May 2018 | 120 |
| | 120 |
|
2.65% Notes due August 2019 (2019 Notes) | 1,000 |
| | 1,000 |
|
4.10% Notes due September 2020 (2020 Notes) | 286 |
| | 287 |
|
4.50% Senior notes due June 2022 (2022 Notes) | 1,000 |
| | 1,000 |
|
3.95% Notes due August 2024 (2024 Notes) | 1,250 |
| | 1,250 |
|
7.00% Notes due January 2028 | 18 |
| | 18 |
|
6.13% Notes due November 2032 (2032 Notes) | 164 |
| | 164 |
|
4.88% Notes due August 2034 (2034 Notes) | 500 |
| | 500 |
|
5.15% Notes due August 2044 (2044 Notes) | 500 |
| | 500 |
|
Discount on senior notes | (10 | ) | | (12 | ) |
Term loan facility: | | | |
3-year tranche A (1.56% at 03/28/2015) | 842 |
| | 1,172 |
|
5-year tranche A | — |
| | 353 |
|
5-year tranche B (1.69% at 03/28/2015) | 552 |
| | 552 |
|
Amortizing Notes - Tangible Equity Units (see Note 7: Equity) | 175 |
| | 205 |
|
Other | 61 |
| | 24 |
|
Total debt | 7,674 |
| | 8,178 |
|
Less current debt | 1,236 |
| | 643 |
|
Total long-term debt | $ | 6,438 |
| | $ | 7,535 |
|
Revolving Credit Facility
We have a $1.25 billion revolving credit facility that supports short-term funding needs and letters of credit. The facility will mature and the commitments thereunder will terminate in September 2019. After reducing for the amount borrowed and outstanding letters of credit issued under this facility, the amount available for borrowing at March 28, 2015, was $1,069 million. At March 28, 2015, we had outstanding letters of credit issued under this facility totaling $6 million, none of which were drawn upon. We had an additional $95 million of bilateral letters of credit issued separately from the revolving credit facility, none of which were drawn upon. Our letters of credit are issued primarily in support of workers’ compensation insurance programs and derivative activities.
The revolving credit facility is unsecured and is fully guaranteed by Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (TFM Parent), our wholly owned subsidiary, until such date TFM Parent is released from all of its guarantees of other material indebtedness. If in the future any of our other subsidiaries shall guarantee any of our material indebtedness, such subsidiary shall also be required to guarantee the indebtedness, obligations and liabilities under this facility.
2019 / 2024 / 2034 / 2044 Notes
In August 2014, we issued senior unsecured notes with an aggregate principal amount of $3,250 million, consisting of $1,000 million due August 2019, $1,250 million due August 2024, $500 million due August 2034, and $500 million due August 2044. The 2019 Notes, 2024 Notes, 2034 Notes, and 2044 Notes carry interest rates of 2.65%, 3.95%, 4.88% and 5.15%, respectively, with interest payments due semi-annually on August 15 and February 15. After the original issue discounts of $7 million, we received net proceeds of $3,243 million. In addition, we incurred offering expenses of $27 million.
Term Loan Facility
In August 2014, we borrowed under an unsecured term loan facility, which provided for total term loans in an aggregate principal amount of $2,300 million, consisting of a $1,202 million 3-year tranche A facility, a $546 million 5-year tranche A facility, and a $552 million 5-year tranche B facility. The principal of the 3-year tranche A facility amortizes at 2.5% per quarter. Interest is reset based on the selected LIBOR interest period plus 1.375% for the 3-year tranche A facility and 1.50% for the 5-year tranche B facility. In addition, we incurred term loan issuance costs of approximately $11 million.
On April 7, 2015, we entered into a term loan agreement, which provided total borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of $500 million, the full balance of which was used to prepay outstanding borrowings under the existing 3-year tranche A term loan facility. The new $500 million term loan facility is due April 7, 2018. Interest is reset based on the selected LIBOR interest period plus 1.125%.
2015 / 2020 / 2032 Notes
In August 2014, in connection with our acquisition of Hillshire Brands, we assumed $840 million of Hillshire Brands' debt, which had an estimated fair value of approximately $868 million as of the acquisition date. We recorded the assumed debt at fair value. The fair value adjustment is being amortized and recorded as a reduction of interest expense. The debt assumed is mainly comprised of senior unsecured notes which consist of $400 million due September 2015, $278 million due September 2020, and $152 million due November 2032. The 2015 Notes, 2020 Notes, and the 2032 Notes carry interest rates of 2.75%, 4.10%, and 6.13%, respectively.
Debt Covenants
Our revolving credit and term loan facilities contain affirmative and negative covenants that, among other things, may limit or restrict our ability to: create liens and encumbrances; incur debt; merge, dissolve, liquidate or consolidate; make acquisitions and investments; dispose of or transfer assets; change the nature of our business; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and enter into hedging transactions, in each case, subject to certain qualifications and exceptions. In addition, we are required to maintain minimum interest expense coverage and maximum debt-to-capitalization ratios.
Our senior notes also contain affirmative and negative covenants that, among other things, may limit or restrict our ability to: create liens; engage in certain sale/leaseback transactions; and engage in certain consolidations, mergers and sales of assets.
We were in compliance with all debt covenants at March 28, 2015.
NOTE 7: EQUITY
Share Repurchases
In fiscal 2014, our Board of Directors approved an increase of 25 million shares authorized for repurchase under our share repurchase program. As of March 28, 2015, 28.8 million shares remained available for repurchases under this program. The share repurchase program has no fixed or scheduled termination date and the timing and extent to which we repurchase shares will depend upon, among other things, our working capital needs, markets, industry conditions, liquidity targets, limitations under our debt obligations and regulatory requirements. In addition to the share repurchase program, we purchase shares on the open market to fund certain obligations under our equity compensation plans.
A summary of cumulative share repurchases of our Class A stock is as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
| | Shares | | Dollars | | Shares | | Dollars | | Shares | | Dollars | | Shares | | Dollars |
Shares repurchased: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Under share repurchase program | | 1.3 |
| | $ | 50 |
| | 2.5 |
| | $ | 100 |
| | 3.3 |
| | $ | 131 |
| | 7.1 |
| | $ | 250 |
|
To fund certain obligations under equity compensation plans | | 0.2 |
| | 9 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 16 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 19 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 25 |
|
Total share repurchases | | 1.5 |
| | $ | 59 |
| | 2.9 |
| | $ | 116 |
| | 3.7 |
| | $ | 150 |
| | 7.8 |
| | $ | 275 |
|
Share Issuance
In fiscal 2014, we issued 23.8 million shares of our Class A stock to provide funding for the Hillshire Brands acquisition. Total proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and other offering related fees and expenses were $873 million.
Tangible Equity Units
In fiscal 2014, we completed the public issuance of 30 million 4.75% tangible equity units (TEUs). Total proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and other expenses, were $1,454 million. Each TEU, which has a stated amount of $50, is comprised of a prepaid stock purchase contract and a senior amortizing note due July 15, 2017. We allocated the proceeds from the issuance of the TEUs to equity and debt based on the relative fair values of the respective components of each TEU. The fair value of the prepaid stock purchase contracts, which was $1,295 million, is recorded in Capital in Excess of Par Value, net of issuance costs. The fair value of the senior amortizing notes, which was $205 million, was recorded in debt, of which $65 million was current. Issuance costs associated with the TEU debt were recorded as deferred financing costs in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets in Other Assets and are amortized over the term of the instrument to July 15, 2017.
The aggregate values assigned upon issuance of each component of the TEUs, based on the relative fair value of the respective components of each TEU, were as follows (in millions, except price per TEU):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Equity Component | | Debt Component | | Total |
Price per TEU | $ | 43.17 |
| | $ | 6.83 |
| | $ | 50.00 |
|
Gross Proceeds | 1,295 |
| | 205 |
| | 1,500 |
|
Issuance cost | (40 | ) | | (6 | ) | | (46 | ) |
Net proceeds | $ | 1,255 |
| | $ | 199 |
| | $ | 1,454 |
|
Each senior amortizing note has an initial principal amount of $6.83 and bears interest at 1.5% per annum. On each January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15, we will pay equal quarterly cash installments of $0.59 per amortizing note, which cash payment in the aggregate (principal and interest) is equivalent to 4.75% per year with respect to the $50 stated amount per TEU. Each installment constitutes a payment of interest and partial repayment of principal. Unless settled earlier at the holder's or the Company's option, each purchase contract will automatically settle on July 15, 2017, subject to postponement in certain limited circumstances. We will deliver between a minimum of 31.8 million shares and a maximum of 39.7 million shares of our Class A stock, subject to adjustment, based upon the Applicable Market Value (as defined below) of our Class A stock as described below:
| |
• | If the Applicable Market Value is equal to or greater than the conversion price of $47.20 per share, we will deliver 1.0594 shares of Class A stock per purchase contract, or a minimum of 31.8 million Class A shares. |
| |
• | If the Applicable Market Value is greater than the reference price of $37.76 but less than the conversion price of $47.20 per share, we will deliver a number of shares per purchase contract equal to $50, divided by the Applicable Market Value. |
| |
• | If the Applicable Market Value is less than or equal to the reference price of $37.76 per share, we will deliver 1.3244 shares of Class A stock per purchase contract, or a maximum of 39.7 million Class A shares. |
The "Applicable Market Value" means the average of the closing prices of our Class A stock on each of the 20 consecutive trading days beginning on, and including, the 23rd scheduled trading day immediately preceding July 15, 2017.
On March 13, 2015, we paid our quarterly dividend to shareholders of record at February 27, 2015 equal to $0.10 per share on our Class A stock. The amount of the distribution exceeded the $0.075 per share dividend threshold amount. Consequently, the settlements rates, reference price and conversion price were adjusted and are reflected above.
The TEUs have a dilutive effect on our earnings per share. The 31.8 million minimum shares to be issued are included in the calculation of Class A Basic weighted average shares. The 7.9 million share difference between the minimum shares and the 39.7 million maximum shares are potentially dilutive securities, and accordingly, are included in our diluted earnings per share on a pro rata basis to the extent the Applicable Market Value is higher than the reference price but is less than the conversion price at period end.
NOTE 8: INCOME TAXES
The effective tax rate was 35.6% and 38.3% for the second quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively, and 32.4% and 36.2% for the first six months of fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. The effective tax rates for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 were impacted by such items as the domestic production deduction, state income taxes and losses in foreign jurisdictions for which no benefit is recognized. In addition, changes in tax reserves resulting from the expiration of statutes of limitations reduced the effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal 2015 by 3.2%.
Unrecognized tax benefits were $229 million and $272 million at March 28, 2015, and September 27, 2014, respectively. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, that would impact our effective tax rate was $200 million and $241 million at March 28, 2015, and September 27, 2014, respectively.
We classify interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. At March 28, 2015, and September 27, 2014, before tax benefits, we had $49 million and $54 million, respectively, of accrued interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits.
We are subject to income tax assessments for U.S. federal income taxes for fiscal years 2011 through 2013. We are also subject to income tax assessments by major state and foreign jurisdictions for fiscal years 2005 through 2013 and 2002 through 2013, respectively. We estimate that during the next twelve months it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits could decrease up to $18 million primarily due to the expiration of statutes of limitations in various jurisdictions.
NOTE 9: OTHER INCOME AND CHARGES
During the first six months of fiscal 2015, we recorded $3 million of equity earnings in joint ventures and $1 million in net foreign currency exchange gains, which were recorded in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income in Other, net.
During the first six months of fiscal 2014, we recorded $4 million of equity earnings in joint ventures, $1 million in net foreign currency exchange gains and $6 million of other than temporary impairment related to an available-for-sale security, which were recorded in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income in Other, net.
NOTE 10: EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in millions, except per share data):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Numerator: | | | | | | | |
Net Income | $ | 311 |
| | $ | 210 |
| | $ | 621 |
| | $ | 462 |
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 1 |
| | (3 | ) | | 2 |
| | (5 | ) |
Net income attributable to Tyson | 310 |
| | 213 |
| | 619 |
| | 467 |
|
Less dividends declared: | | | | | | | |
Class A | 31 |
| | 20 |
| | 69 |
| | 48 |
|
Class B | 6 |
| | 5 |
| | 14 |
| | 11 |
|
Undistributed earnings | $ | 273 |
| | $ | 188 |
| | $ | 536 |
| | $ | 408 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Class A undistributed earnings | $ | 230 |
| | $ | 153 |
| | $ | 451 |
| | $ | 332 |
|
Class B undistributed earnings | 43 |
| | 35 |
| | 85 |
| | 76 |
|
Total undistributed earnings | $ | 273 |
| | $ | 188 |
| | $ | 536 |
| | $ | 408 |
|
Denominator: | | | | | | | |
Denominator for basic earnings per share: | | | | | | | |
Class A weighted average shares | 334 |
| | 273 |
| | 335 |
| | 272 |
|
Class B weighted average shares, and shares under the if-converted method for diluted earnings per share | 70 |
| | 70 |
| | 70 |
| | 70 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | |
Stock options and restricted stock | 5 |
| | 6 |
| | 5 |
| | 5 |
|
Tangible Equity Units | 6 |
| | — |
| | 6 |
| | — |
|
Warrants | — |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | 8 |
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share – adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions | 415 |
| | 356 |
| | 416 |
| | 355 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Net Income Per Share Attributable to Tyson: | | | | | | | |
Class A Basic | $ | 0.78 |
| | $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 1.55 |
| | $ | 1.40 |
|
Class B Basic | $ | 0.71 |
| | $ | 0.58 |
| | $ | 1.42 |
| | $ | 1.26 |
|
Diluted | $ | 0.75 |
| | $ | 0.60 |
| | $ | 1.49 |
| | $ | 1.32 |
|
Approximately 5 million of our stock-based compensation shares were antidilutive for the three and six months ended March 28, 2015. Approximately 4 million of our stock-based compensation shares were antidilutive for the three and six months ended March 29, 2014. These shares were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation.
We have two classes of capital stock, Class A stock and Class B stock. Cash dividends cannot be paid to holders of Class B stock unless they are simultaneously paid to holders of Class A stock. The per share amount of cash dividends paid to holders of Class B stock cannot exceed 90% of the cash dividends paid to holders of Class A stock.
We allocate undistributed earnings based upon a 1 to 0.9 ratio per share to Class A stock and Class B stock, respectively. We allocate undistributed earnings based on this ratio due to historical dividend patterns, voting control of Class B shareholders and contractual limitations of dividends to Class B stock.
NOTE 11: DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Our business operations give rise to certain market risk exposures mostly due to changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We manage a portion of these risks through the use of derivative financial instruments, primarily futures and options, to reduce our exposure to commodity price risk, foreign currency risk and interest rate risk. Forward contracts on various commodities, including grains, livestock and energy, are primarily entered into to manage the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of these inputs used in our production processes. Foreign exchange forward contracts are entered into to manage the fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily as a result of certain receivable and payable balances. We also periodically utilize interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk associated with our variable-rate borrowings.
Our risk management programs are periodically reviewed by our Board of Directors’ Audit Committee. These programs are monitored by senior management and may be revised as market conditions dictate. Our current risk management programs utilize industry-standard models that take into account the implicit cost of hedging. Risks associated with our market risks and those created by derivative instruments and the fair values are strictly monitored, using Value-at-Risk and stress tests. Credit risks associated with our derivative contracts are not significant as we minimize counterparty concentrations, utilize margin accounts or letters of credit, and deal with credit-worthy counterparties. Additionally, our derivative contracts are mostly short-term in duration and we generally do not make use of credit-risk-related contingent features. No significant concentrations of credit risk existed at March 28, 2015.
We recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets, with the exception of normal purchases and normal sales expected to result in physical delivery. The accounting for changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, we designate the hedging instrument based upon the exposure being hedged (i.e., cash flow hedge or fair value hedge). We qualify, or designate, a derivative financial instrument as a hedge when contract terms closely mirror those of the hedged item, providing a high degree of risk reduction and correlation. If a derivative instrument is accounted for as a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the instrument either will be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings, or be recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI) until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of an instrument’s change in fair value is recognized in earnings immediately. We designate certain forward contracts as follows:
| |
• | Cash Flow Hedges - include certain commodity forward and option contracts of forecasted purchases (i.e., grains) and certain foreign exchange forward contracts. |
| |
• | Fair Value Hedges - include certain commodity forward contracts of firm commitments (i.e., livestock). |
Cash Flow Hedges
Derivative instruments, such as futures and options, are designated as hedges against changes in the amount of future cash flows related to procurement of certain commodities utilized in our production processes. We do not purchase forward and option commodity contracts in excess of our physical consumption requirements and generally do not hedge forecasted transactions beyond 18 months. The objective of these hedges is to reduce the variability of cash flows associated with the forecasted purchase of those commodities. For the derivative instruments we designate and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of OCI and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in earnings in the current period. Ineffectiveness related to our cash flow hedges was not significant for the three and six months ended March 28, 2015, and March 29, 2014.
We had the following aggregated notional values of outstanding forward and option contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges (in millions, except soy meal tons):
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Metric | | March 28, 2015 | | September 27, 2014 |
Commodity: | | | | | |
Corn | Bushels | | — |
| | — |
|
Soy meal | Tons | | 2,300 |
| | 2,300 |
|
Foreign Currency | United States dollar | | $ | — |
| | $ | 1 |
|
As of March 28, 2015, the net amounts expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months are pretax losses of $2 million related to grains. During the three and six months ended March 28, 2015, and March 29, 2014, we did not reclassify significant pretax gains/losses into earnings as a result of the discontinuance of cash flow hedges due to the probability the original forecasted transaction would not occur by the end of the originally specified time period or within the additional period of time allowed by generally accepted accounting principles.
The following table sets forth the pretax impact of cash flow hedge derivative instruments on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI On Derivatives | | | Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income Classification | | Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from OCI to Earnings | |
| Three Months Ended | | | | Three Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Cash Flow Hedge – Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | | | | |
Commodity contracts | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | 8 |
| | Cost of Sales | | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (3 | ) |
Foreign exchange contracts | — |
| | — |
| | Other Income/Expense | | — |
| | — |
|
Total | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | 8 |
| | | | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI On Derivatives | | | Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income Classification | | Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from OCI to Earnings | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Cash Flow Hedge – Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | | | | |
Commodity contracts | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | 6 |
| | Cost of Sales | | $ | (4 | ) | | $ | (3 | ) |
Foreign exchange contracts | — |
| | (1 | ) | | Other Income/Expense | | — |
| | — |
|
Total | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | 5 |
| | | | $ | (4 | ) | | $ | (3 | ) |
Fair Value Hedges
We designate certain futures contracts as fair value hedges of firm commitments to purchase livestock for slaughter. Our objective of these hedges is to minimize the risk of changes in fair value created by fluctuations in commodity prices associated with fixed price livestock firm commitments. We had the following aggregated notional values of outstanding forward contracts entered into to hedge firm commitments which are accounted for as a fair value hedge (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Metric | | March 28, 2015 | | September 27, 2014 |
Commodity: | | | | | |
Live Cattle | Pounds | | 359 |
| | 427 |
|
Lean Hogs | Pounds | | 122 |
| | 329 |
|
For these derivative instruments we designate and qualify as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative, as well as the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized in earnings in the same period. We include the gain or loss on the hedged items (i.e., livestock purchase firm commitments) in the same line item, Cost of Sales, as the offsetting gain or loss on the related livestock forward position.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | in millions |
|
| Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income Classification | | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Gain/(Loss) on forwards | Cost of Sales | | $ | 32 |
| | $ | (34 | ) | | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | (40 | ) |
Gain/(Loss) on purchase contract | Cost of Sales | | (32 | ) | | 34 |
| | 8 |
| | 40 |
|
Ineffectiveness related to our fair value hedges was not significant for the three and six months ended March 28, 2015, and March 29, 2014.
Undesignated Positions
In addition to our designated positions, we also hold forward and option contracts for which we do not apply hedge accounting. These include certain derivative instruments related to commodities price risk, including grains, livestock, energy and foreign currency risk. We mark these positions to fair value through earnings at each reporting date. We generally do not enter into undesignated positions beyond 18 months.
The objective of our undesignated grains, livestock and energy commodity positions is to reduce the variability of cash flows associated with the forecasted purchase of certain grains, energy and livestock inputs to our production processes. We also enter into certain forward sales of boxed beef and boxed pork and forward purchases of cattle and hogs at fixed prices. The fixed price sales contracts lock in the proceeds from a future sale and the fixed cattle and hog purchases lock in the cost. However, the cost of the livestock and the related boxed beef and boxed pork market prices at the time of the sale or purchase could vary from this fixed price. As we enter into fixed forward sales of boxed beef and boxed pork and forward purchases of cattle and hogs, we also enter into the appropriate number of livestock options and futures positions to mitigate a portion of this risk. Changes in market value of the open livestock options and futures positions are marked to market and reported in earnings at each reporting date, even though the economic impact of our fixed prices being above or below the market price is only realized at the time of sale or purchase. These positions generally do not qualify for hedge treatment due to location basis differences between the commodity exchanges and the actual locations when we purchase the commodities.
We have a foreign currency cash flow hedging program to hedge portions of forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies, primarily with forward and option contracts, to protect against the reduction in value of forecasted foreign currency cash flows. Our undesignated foreign currency positions generally would qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. However, to reduce earnings volatility, we normally will not elect hedge accounting treatment when the position provides an offset to the underlying related transaction that impacts current earnings.
We had the following aggregate outstanding notional values related to our undesignated positions (in millions, except soy meal tons):
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Metric | | March 28, 2015 | | September 27, 2014 |
Commodity: | | | | | |
Corn | Bushels | | 91 |
| | — |
|
Soy Meal | Tons | | 247,100 |
| | 195,800 |
|
Soy Oil | Pounds | | 5 |
| | 3 |
|
Live Cattle | Pounds | | 91 |
| | 22 |
|
Lean Hogs | Pounds | | 46 |
| | 22 |
|
Foreign Currency | United States dollars | | $ | 46 |
| | $ | 108 |
|
The following table sets forth the pretax impact of the undesignated derivative instruments on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income Classification | | Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Earnings | | | Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Earnings | |
| | | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | | | | |
Commodity contracts | Sales | | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | 30 |
| | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | 32 |
|
Commodity contracts | Cost of Sales | | (8 | ) | | (40 | ) | | (34 | ) | | (42 | ) |
Foreign exchange contracts | Other Income/Expense | | (2 | ) | | 2 |
| | (4 | ) | | 1 |
|
Total | | | $ | (17 | ) | | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | (46 | ) | | $ | (9 | ) |
The following table sets forth the fair value of all derivative instruments outstanding in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Fair Value |
| March 28, 2015 | | September 27, 2014 |
Derivative Assets: | | | |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | | | |
Commodity contracts | $ | 25 |
| | $ | 17 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | — |
| | — |
|
Total derivative assets – designated | 25 |
| | 17 |
|
| | | |
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | |
Commodity contracts | 21 |
| | 42 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | — |
| | — |
|
Total derivative assets – not designated | 21 |
| | 42 |
|
Total derivative assets | $ | 46 |
| | $ | 59 |
|
Derivative Liabilities: | | | |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | | | |
Commodity contracts | $ | 15 |
| | $ | 78 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | — |
| | — |
|
Total derivative liabilities – designated | 15 |
| | 78 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | |
Commodity contracts | 17 |
| | 80 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | 2 |
| | 2 |
|
Total derivative liabilities – not designated | 19 |
| | 82 |
|
Total derivative liabilities | $ | 34 |
| | $ | 160 |
|
Our derivative assets and liabilities are presented in our Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets on a net basis. We net derivative assets and liabilities, including cash collateral when a legally enforceable master netting arrangement exists between the counterparty to a derivative contract and us. See Note 12: Fair Value Measurements for a reconciliation to amounts reported in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets in Other current assets and Other current liabilities.
NOTE 12: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy contains three levels as follows:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices available in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.
Level 2 — Other observable inputs available at the measurement date, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, either directly or indirectly, including:
| |
• | Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; |
| |
• | Quoted prices for identical or similar assets in non-active markets; |
| |
• | Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and |
| |
• | Inputs derived principally from or corroborated by other observable market data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. In instances where the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement has been determined based on the lowest level input significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular item to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, including the consideration of inputs specific to the asset or liability.
The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy our financial assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis according to the valuation techniques we used to determine their fair values (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 28, 2015 | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Netting (a) | | Total |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Commodity Derivatives | $ | — |
| | $ | 46 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (23 | ) | | $ | 23 |
|
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Available-for-Sale Securities: | | | | | | | | | |
Current | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
Non-current | 20 |
| | 29 |
| | 63 |
| | — |
| | 112 |
|
Deferred Compensation Assets | 9 |
| | 235 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 244 |
|
Total Assets | $ | 29 |
| | $ | 312 |
| | $ | 63 |
| | $ | (23 | ) | | $ | 381 |
|
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Commodity Derivatives | $ | — |
| | $ | 32 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (32 | ) | | $ | — |
|
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 1 |
|
Total Liabilities | $ | — |
| | $ | 34 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (33 | ) | | $ | 1 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
September 27, 2014 | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Netting (a) | | Total |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Commodity Derivatives | $ | — |
| | $ | 59 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (50 | ) | | $ | 9 |
|
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Available-for-Sale Securities: | | | | | | | | | |
Current | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Non-current | 1 |
| | 24 |
| | 67 |
| | — |
| | 92 |
|
Deferred Compensation Assets | 15 |
| | 218 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 233 |
|
Total Assets | $ | 16 |
| | $ | 302 |
| | $ | 67 |
| | $ | (50 | ) | | $ | 335 |
|
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Commodity Derivatives | $ | — |
| | $ | 158 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (148 | ) | | $ | 10 |
|
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
Total Liabilities | $ | — |
| | $ | 160 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (148 | ) | | $ | 12 |
|
| |
(a) | Our derivative assets and liabilities are presented in our Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets on a net basis. We net derivative assets and liabilities, including cash collateral, when a legally enforceable master netting arrangement exists between the counterparty to a derivative contract and us. At March 28, 2015 and September 27, 2014, we had posted with various counterparties $10 million and $98 million, respectively, of cash collateral related to our commodity derivatives and held no cash collateral. |
The following table provides a reconciliation between the beginning and ending balance of debt securities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the table above that used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Balance at beginning of year | $ | 67 |
| | $ | 65 |
|
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses): | | | |
Included in earnings | — |
| | — |
|
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) | — |
| | — |
|
Purchases | 9 |
| | 15 |
|
Issuances | — |
| | — |
|
Settlements | (13 | ) | | (13 | ) |
Balance at end of period | $ | 63 |
| | $ | 67 |
|
Total gains (losses) for the six-month period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities still held at end of period | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument:
Derivative Assets and Liabilities: Our commodities and foreign exchange forward contracts primarily include exchange-traded and over-the-counter contracts which are further described in Note 11: Derivative Financial Instruments. We record our commodity derivatives at fair value using quoted market prices adjusted for credit and non-performance risk and internal models that use as their basis readily observable market inputs including current and forward commodity market prices. Our foreign exchange forward contracts are recorded at fair value based on quoted prices and spot and forward currency prices adjusted for credit and non-performance risk. We classify these instruments in Level 2 when quoted market prices can be corroborated utilizing observable current and forward commodity market prices on active exchanges or observable market transactions of spot currency rates and forward currency prices.
Available-for-Sale Securities: Our investments in marketable debt securities are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value based on pricing models and quoted market prices adjusted for credit and non-performance risk. Short-term investments with maturities of less than 12 months are included in Other current assets in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets and primarily include certificates of deposit and commercial paper. All other marketable debt securities are included in Other Assets in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets and have maturities ranging up to 35 years. We classify our investments in U.S. government, U.S. agency, certificates of deposit and commercial paper debt securities as Level 2 as fair value is generally estimated using discounted cash flow models that are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including time value and yield curve as well as other readily available relevant economic measures. We classify certain corporate, asset-backed and other debt securities as Level 3 as there is limited activity or less observable inputs into valuation models, including current interest rates and estimated prepayment, default and recovery rates on the underlying portfolio or structured investment vehicle. Significant changes to assumptions or unobservable inputs in the valuation of our Level 3 instruments would not have a significant impact to our consolidated condensed financial statements.
The following table sets forth our available-for-sale securities' amortized cost basis, fair value and unrealized gain (loss) by significant investment category (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 28, 2015 | | September 27, 2014 |
| Amortized Cost Basis |
| | Fair Value |
| | Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
| | Amortized Cost Basis |
| | Fair Value |
| | Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
|
Available-for-Sale Securities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt Securities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury and Agency | $ | 31 |
| | $ | 31 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | — |
|
Corporate and Asset-Backed | 62 |
| | 63 |
| | 1 |
| | 65 |
| | 67 |
| | 2 |
|
Equity Securities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stock (a) | — |
| | 20 |
| | 20 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
|
| |
(a) | At March 28, 2015 and September 27, 2014, the amortized cost basis for Equity Securities had been reduced by accumulated other than temporary impairment of nil and $2 million, respectively. |
Unrealized holding gains (losses), net of tax, are excluded from earnings and reported in OCI until the security is settled or sold. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate whether losses related to our available-for-sale securities are temporary in nature. Losses on equity securities are recognized in earnings if the decline in value is judged to be other than temporary. If losses related to our debt securities are determined to be other than temporary, the loss would be recognized in earnings if we intend, or more likely than not will be required, to sell the security prior to recovery. For debt securities in which we have the intent and ability to hold until maturity, losses determined to be other than temporary would remain in OCI, other than expected credit losses which are recognized in earnings. We consider many factors in determining whether a loss is temporary, including the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been below cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and our ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery. We recognized no other than temporary impairment in earnings for the three and six months ended March 28, 2015 and $6 million for the six months ended March 29, 2014, which was recorded in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income in Other, net. No other than temporary losses were deferred in OCI as of March 28, 2015, and September 27, 2014.
Deferred Compensation Assets: We maintain non-qualified deferred compensation plans for certain executives and other highly compensated employees. Investments are maintained within a trust and include money market funds, mutual funds and life insurance policies. The cash surrender value of the life insurance policies is invested primarily in mutual funds. The investments are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices and are included in Other Assets in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets. We classify the investments which have observable market prices in active markets in Level 1 as these are generally publicly-traded mutual funds. The remaining deferred compensation assets are classified in Level 2, as fair value can be corroborated based on observable market data. Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on deferred compensation are included in earnings.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
In addition to assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, we record assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Generally, assets are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as a result of impairment charges. We did not have any significant measurements of assets or liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to their initial recognition during the three and six months ended March 28, 2015 and March 29, 2014.
Other Financial Instruments
Fair value of our debt is principally estimated using Level 2 inputs based on quoted prices for those or similar instruments. Fair value and carrying value for our debt are as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 28, 2015 | | September 27, 2014 |
| Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value |
Total Debt | $ | 8,057 |
| | $ | 7,674 |
| | $ | 8,347 |
| | $ | 8,178 |
|
NOTE 13: PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The components of the net periodic cost for the pension and postretirement benefit plans for the three and six months ended March 28, 2015 and March 29, 2014 are as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pension Plans |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
| | | | | | | |
Service cost | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | 3 |
|
Interest cost | 21 |
| | 2 |
| | 42 |
| | 4 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | (25 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (50 | ) | | (2 | ) |
Amortization of: |
| |
| | | | |
Net actuarial loss | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | 3 |
| | 2 |
|
Settlement loss | — |
| | — |
| | 8 |
| | — |
|
Net periodic cost | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | 7 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Postretirement Benefit Plans |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
| | | | | | | |
Service cost | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 1 |
|
Interest cost | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 3 |
| | 2 |
|
Net periodic cost | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 3 |
|
We contributed $6 million and $9 million to our pension plans for the three and six months ended March 28, 2015, respectively. We contributed $3 million and $5 million to our pension plans for the three and six months ended March 29, 2014, respectively. We expect to contribute an additional $6 million during the remainder of fiscal 2015. The amount of contributions made to pension plans in any year is dependent upon a number of factors including minimum funding requirements in the jurisdictions in which we operate. As a result, the actual funding in fiscal 2015 may differ from the current estimate.
NOTE 14: OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The before and after tax changes in the components of other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
| Before Tax | Tax | After Tax | | Before Tax | Tax | After Tax | | Before Tax | Tax | After Tax | | Before Tax | Tax | After Tax |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Gain) loss reclassified to Cost of Sales | $ | 1 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1 |
| | $ | 3 |
| $ | (1 | ) | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 4 |
| $ | (2 | ) | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 3 |
| $ | (1 | ) | $ | 2 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) | (2 | ) | — |
| (2 | ) | | 8 |
| (3 | ) | 5 |
| | (2 | ) | — |
| (2 | ) | | 5 |
| (2 | ) | 3 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Gain) loss reclassified to Other Income/Expense | — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| | 6 |
| (2 | ) | 4 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) | 4 |
| (2 | ) | 2 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| | 19 |
| (8 | ) | 11 |
| | (1 | ) | — |
| (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency translation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Translation loss reclassified to Cost of Sales (a) | — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| | 37 |
| (1 | ) | 36 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
|
Translation adjustment | (27 | ) | 2 |
| (25 | ) | | 6 |
| — |
| 6 |
| | (64 | ) | 9 |
| (55 | ) | | (5 | ) | — |
| (5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Postretirement benefits | 1 |
| (1 | ) | — |
| | 1 |
| (1 | ) | — |
| | 10 |
| (3 | ) | 7 |
| | 2 |
| — |
| 2 |
|
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | $ | (23 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (24 | ) | | $ | 18 |
| $ | (5 | ) | $ | 13 |
| | $ | 4 |
| $ | (5 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | 10 |
| $ | (5 | ) | $ | 5 |
|
(a) Translation loss reclassified to Cost of Sales related to disposition of a foreign operation, which is further described in Note 2: Acquisitions and Dispositions.
NOTE 15: SEGMENT REPORTING
We operate in five segments: Chicken, Beef, Pork, Prepared Foods and International. We measure segment profit as operating income (loss).
Chicken: Chicken includes our domestic operations related to raising and processing live chickens into fresh, frozen and value-added chicken products, as well as sales from allied products. Products are marketed domestically to food retailers, foodservice distributors, restaurant operators, hotel chains and noncommercial foodservice establishments such as schools, healthcare facilities, the military and other food processors, as well as to international export markets. This segment also includes logistics operations to move products through our domestic supply chain and the global operations of our chicken breeding stock subsidiary.
Beef: Beef includes our operations related to processing live fed cattle and fabricating dressed beef carcasses into primal and sub-primal meat cuts and case-ready products. Products are marketed domestically to food retailers, foodservice distributors, restaurant operators, hotel chains and noncommercial foodservice establishments such as schools, healthcare facilities, the military and other food processors, as well as to international export markets. This segment also includes sales from allied products such as hides and variety meats, as well as logistics operations to move products through the supply chain.
Pork: Pork includes our operations related to processing live market hogs and fabricating pork carcasses into primal and sub-primal cuts and case-ready products. Products are marketed domestically to food retailers, foodservice distributors, restaurant operators, hotel chains and noncommercial foodservice establishments such as schools, healthcare facilities, the military and other food processors, as well as to international export markets. This segment also includes our live swine group, related allied product processing activities and logistics operations to move products through the supply chain.
Prepared Foods: Prepared Foods includes our operations related to manufacturing and marketing frozen and refrigerated food products and logistics operations to move products through the supply chain. Products primarily include pepperoni, bacon, sausage, beef and pork pizza toppings, pizza crusts, flour and corn tortilla products, appetizers, prepared meals, ethnic foods, soups, sauces, side dishes, meat dishes, breadsticks and processed meats. Products are marketed domestically to food retailers, foodservice distributors, restaurant operators, hotel chains and noncommercial foodservice establishments such as schools, healthcare facilities, the military and other food processors, as well as to international export markets.
In fiscal 2014, we acquired Hillshire Brands, a manufacturer and marketer of branded, convenient foods which includes brands such as Jimmy Dean®, Ball Park®, Hillshire Farm®, State Fair®, Van's®, Sara Lee® frozen bakery and Chef Pierre® pies as well as artisanal brands Aidells®, Gallo Salame®, and Golden Island® premium jerky. Hillshire Brands' results from operations are included in the Prepared Foods segment.
International: International includes our foreign operations primarily related to raising and processing live chickens into fresh, frozen and value-added chicken products in Brazil, China, India and Mexico. Products are marketed in each respective country to food retailers, foodservice distributors, restaurant operators, hotel chains, noncommercial foodservice establishments and live markets, as well as to other international export markets.
In fiscal 2014, we announced our plan to sell our Brazil and Mexico operations, part of our International segment, to JBS for $575 million in cash, subject to certain adjustments. As further described in Note 2: Acquisitions and Dispositions, we sold the Brazil operation in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. The sale of the Mexico operation is pending the necessary government approvals, and we expect to receive a decision during fiscal 2015. Subject to governmental approval and completion of the sale, we would realize a gain on the sale.
The results from Dynamic Fuels are included in Other in fiscal 2014. We allocate expenses related to corporate activities to the segments, except for third-party merger and integration costs of $9 million and $24 million for the three and six months ended March 28, 2015, respectively, which is included in Other.
Information on segments and a reconciliation to income before income taxes are as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Sales: | | | | | | | |
Chicken | $ | 2,829 |
| | $ | 2,842 |
| | $ | 5,609 |
| | $ | 5,498 |
|
Beef | 4,130 |
| | 3,825 |
| | 8,521 |
| | 7,559 |
|
Pork | 1,204 |
| | 1,487 |
| | 2,744 |
| | 2,911 |
|
Prepared Foods | 1,871 |
| | 861 |
| | 4,004 |
| | 1,768 |
|
International | 222 |
| | 328 |
| | 527 |
| | 655 |
|
Other | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Intersegment Sales | (277 | ) | | (311 | ) | | (609 | ) | | (598 | ) |
Total Sales | $ | 9,979 |
| | $ | 9,032 |
| | $ | 20,796 |
| | $ | 17,793 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Operating Income (Loss): | | | | | | | |
Chicken | $ | 332 |
| | $ | 234 |
| | $ | 683 |
| | $ | 487 |
|
Beef | (20 | ) | | 35 |
| | (26 | ) | | 93 |
|
Pork | 99 |
| | 107 |
| | 221 |
| | 228 |
|
Prepared Foods | 160 |
| | 21 |
| | 231 |
| | 37 |
|
International | (15 | ) | | (30 | ) | | (29 | ) | | (58 | ) |
Other | (9 | ) | | (6 | ) | | (24 | ) | | (14 | ) |
Total Operating Income | 547 |
| | 361 |
| | 1,056 |
| | 773 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Total Other (Income) Expense | 64 |
|
| 20 |
| | 138 |
| | 49 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Income before Income Taxes | $ | 483 |
| | $ | 341 |
| | $ | 918 |
| | $ | 724 |
|
The Chicken segment had sales of $6 million and $2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively, and sales of $7 million and $4 million in the first six months of fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively, from transactions with other operating segments of the Company. The Beef segment had sales of $77 million and $67 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively, and sales of $155 million and $130 million in the first six months of fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively, from transactions with other operating segments of the Company. The Pork segment had sales of $194 million and $242 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively, and sales of $447 million and $464 million in the first six months of fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively, from transactions with other operating segments of the Company. The aforementioned sales from intersegment transactions, which were at market prices, were included in the segment sales in the above table.
NOTE 16: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Commitments
We guarantee obligations of certain outside third parties, consisting primarily of leases and grower loans, which are substantially collateralized by the underlying assets. Terms of the underlying debt cover periods up to 10 years, and the maximum potential amount of future payments as of March 28, 2015, was $53 million. We also maintain operating leases for various types of equipment, some of which contain residual value guarantees for the market value of the underlying leased assets at the end of the term of the lease. The remaining terms of the lease maturities cover periods over the next 13 years. The maximum potential amount of the residual value guarantees is $53 million, of which $46 million could be recoverable through various recourse provisions and an additional undeterminable recoverable amount based on the fair value of the underlying leased assets. The likelihood of material payments under these guarantees is not considered probable. At March 28, 2015, and September 27, 2014, no material liabilities for guarantees were recorded.
We have cash flow assistance programs in which certain livestock suppliers participate. Under these programs, we pay an amount for livestock equivalent to a standard cost to grow such livestock during periods of low market sales prices. The amounts of such payments that are in excess of the market sales price are recorded as receivables and accrue interest. Participating suppliers are obligated to repay these receivables balances when market sales prices exceed this standard cost, or upon termination of the agreement. Our maximum obligation associated with these programs is limited to the fair value of each participating livestock supplier’s net tangible assets. The potential maximum obligation as of March 28, 2015, was approximately $320 million. The total receivables under these programs were $1 million and $4 million at March 28, 2015 and September 27, 2014, respectively. These receivables are included, net of allowance for uncollectible amounts, in Accounts Receivable in our Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets. Even though these programs are limited to the net tangible assets of the participating livestock suppliers, we also manage a portion of our credit risk associated with these programs by obtaining security interests in livestock suppliers’ assets. After analyzing residual credit risks and general market conditions, we have no allowance for these programs’ estimated uncollectible receivables at March 28, 2015, and September 27, 2014.
Contingencies
We are involved in various claims and legal proceedings. We routinely assess the likelihood of adverse judgments or outcomes to those matters, as well as ranges of probable losses, to the extent losses are reasonably estimable. We record accruals for such matters to the extent that we conclude a loss is probable and the financial impact, should an adverse outcome occur, is reasonably estimable. Such accruals are reflected in the Company’s consolidated condensed financial statements. In our opinion, we have made appropriate and adequate accruals for these matters and believe the probability of a material loss beyond the amounts accrued to be remote; however, the ultimate liability for these matters is uncertain, and if accruals are not adequate, an adverse outcome could have a material effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Listed below are certain claims made against the Company and/or our subsidiaries for which the potential exposure is considered material to the Company’s consolidated condensed financial statements. We believe we have substantial defenses to the claims made and intend to vigorously defend these matters.
There are nine pending lawsuits involving our beef, pork and prepared foods plants, in which certain present and past employees allege that we failed to compensate them for the time it takes to engage in pre- and post-shift activities, such as changing into and out of protective and sanitary clothing and walking to and from the changing area, work areas and break areas in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and various state laws. The plaintiffs seek back wages, liquidated damages, pre- and post-judgment interest, attorneys’ fees and costs. Each case is proceeding in its jurisdiction.
| |
• | Garcia, et al. v. Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., D. Kansas, May 15, 2006 - After a trial involving our Garden City, Kansas beef plant, a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs was entered on March 17, 2011. Exclusive of pre- and post-judgment interest, attorneys’ fees and costs, the jury found violations of federal and state laws for pre- and post-shift work activities and awarded damages in the amount of $503,011. Plaintiffs’ counsel filed an application for attorneys’ fees and expenses which we contested. On December 7, 2012, the court granted plaintiffs' counsel's application and awarded a total of $3,609,723. We appealed the jury’s verdict and trial court’s award to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. The appellate court affirmed the jury verdict and judgment and subsequently denied our petition for rehearing. We subsequently paid the judgment. |
| |
• | Bouaphakeo (f/k/a Sharp), et al. v. Tyson Foods, Inc., N.D. Iowa, February 6, 2007 - A jury trial was held involving our Storm Lake, Iowa pork plant which resulted in a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs for violations of federal and state laws for pre- and post-shift work activities. The trial court also awarded the plaintiffs liquidated damages, resulting in total damages awarded in the amount of $5,784,758. The plaintiffs' counsel has also filed an application for attorneys' fees and expenses in the amount of $2,692,145. We appealed the jury's verdict and trial court's award to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The appellate court affirmed the jury verdict and judgment on August 25, 2014, and we filed a petition for rehearing on September 22, 2014, which was denied. We filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court on March 19, 2015. |
| |
• | Acosta, et al. v Tyson Foods, Inc. dba Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., D. Nebraska, February 29, 2008 - A bench trial was held involving our Madison, Nebraska pork plant, in January 2013. In May 2013 the trial court awarded the plaintiffs $5,733,943 for unpaid overtime wages. Subsequently, the court ordered the class of plaintiffs expanded, and the plaintiffs submitted an updated calculation of $6,258,330 for unpaid overtime wages as reflected by payroll data through May 2013. On January 30, 2014, the trial court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount of $18,774,989, which represents a tripling of the plaintiffs’ alleged damages. The court denied our post-trial motions, and we appealed to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Oral argument was held before the appellate court on January 15, 2015. |
| |
• | Gomez, et al. v. Tyson Foods, Inc., D. Nebraska, January 16, 2008 - A jury trial involving our Dakota City, Nebraska beef plant, was held, and the jury found in favor of the plaintiffs on April 3, 2013. On October 2, 2013, the trial court denied the parties’ post-trial motions and entered judgment awarding unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages, and penalties totaling $4,960,787. We appealed the jury’s verdict and trial court’s award to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Oral argument was held before the appellate court on January 15, 2015. |
| |
• | Edwards, et al. v. Tyson Foods, Inc. dba Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., S.D. Iowa, March 20, 2008 - The trial court in this case, which involves our Perry and Waterloo, Iowa pork plants, decertified the state law class and granted other pre-trial motions that resulted in judgment in our favor with respect to the plaintiffs’ claims. The plaintiffs have filed a motion to modify this judgment. |
| |
• | Abdiaziz, et al. v. Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., D. Kansas, September 30, 2011 - This case involves our Emporia, Kansas beef plant, and was bifurcated from the case involving our Garden City, Kansas beef plant. The parties filed a joint motion for approval of a settlement, totaling $730,548 in back pay and attorneys’ fees and costs, which the court approved on March 30, 2015. |
| |
• | Murray, et al. v. Tyson Foods, Inc., C.D. Illinois, January 2, 2008; and DeVoss v. Tyson Foods, Inc. d.b.a. Tyson Fresh Meats, C.D. Illinois, March 2, 2011 - These cases involve our Joslin, Illinois beef plant and are in their preliminary stages. |
| |
• | Dozier, Southerland, et al. v. Hillshire Brands, Co., Inc. E.D. North Carolina, September 2, 2014 - This case involves our Tarboro, North Carolina prepared foods plant and is in its preliminary stages. |
| |
• | Awad, et al. v. Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., M.D. Tennessee, February 12, 2015 - This case involves our Goodlettsville, Tennessee case ready beef plant and is in its preliminary stages. |
Our subsidiary, The Hillshire Brands Company (formerly named Sara Lee Corporation), is a party to a consolidation of cases filed by individual complainants with the Republic of the Philippines, Department of Labor and Employment and the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) from 1998 through July 1999. The complaint is filed against Aris Philippines, Inc., Sara Lee Corporation, Sara Lee Philippines, Inc., Fashion Accessories Philippines, Inc., and Attorney Cesar C. Cruz (collectively, the “respondents”). The complaint alleges, among other things, that the respondents engaged in unfair labor practices in connection with the termination of manufacturing operations in the Philippines by Aris Philippines, Inc., a former subsidiary of The Hillshire Brands Company. In 2006, an arbitrator ruled against the respondents and awarded the complainants PHP3,453,664,710 (approximately US$77 million) in damages and fees. The respondents appealed the arbitrator’s ruling and it was subsequently set aside by the NLRC in December 2006. Subsequent to the NLRC’s decision, the parties filed numerous appeals, motions for reconsideration and petitions for review, certain of which remained outstanding for several years. While various of those appeals, motions and/or petitions were pending, The Hillshire Brands Company, on June 23, 2014, without admitting liability, filed a settlement motion requesting that the Supreme Court of the Philippines order dismissal with prejudice of all claims against it and its predecessors-in-interest in exchange for payments allocated by the court among the complainants in an amount not to exceed PHP342,287,800 (approximately US$8 million). While such settlement motion remained pending, however, the Supreme Court of the Philippines set aside as premature the NLRC’s December 2006 ruling. The respondents subsequently filed with the court a motion for reconsideration bringing to the court’s attention the settlement motion that was recently filed. Based in part on its finding that the consideration to be paid to the complainants as part of such settlement was insufficient, the Supreme Court of the Philippines, in a decision dated January 14, 2015, denied the respondents’ motion for reconsideration and the settlement motion. A motion seeking leave to file a second motion for reconsideration of the Supreme Court’s January 14, 2015 decision was filed on March 13, 2015 and remains pending before the court.
NOTE 17: CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TFM Parent, our wholly-owned subsidiary, has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the 2016 Notes. Additionally, TFM Parent has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the 2022 Notes until such date TFM Parent has been released of its guarantee of both (i) Tyson's $1.25 billion revolving credit facility and (ii) the 2016 Notes, at which time TFM Parent's guarantee of the 2019, 2022, 2024, 2034 and 2044 Notes is permanently released. The following financial information presents condensed consolidating financial statements, which include Tyson Foods, Inc. (TFI Parent); TFM Parent; the Non-Guarantors Subsidiaries (Non-Guarantors) on a combined basis; the elimination entries necessary to consolidate TFI Parent, TFM Parent and the Non-Guarantors; and Tyson Foods, Inc. on a consolidated basis, and is provided as an alternative to providing separate financial statements for the guarantor.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 28, 2015 | | in millions |
|
| TFI Parent | | TFM Parent | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Total |
Sales | $ | 221 |
| | $ | 5,252 |
| | $ | 4,977 |
| | $ | (471 | ) | | $ | 9,979 |
|
Cost of Sales | 17 |
| | 5,122 |
| | 4,321 |
| | (470 | ) | | 8,990 |
|
Gross Profit | 204 |
| | 130 |
| | 656 |
| | (1 | ) | | 989 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative | 32 |
| | 59 |
| | 352 |
| | (1 | ) | | 442 |
|
Operating Income | 172 |
| | 71 |
| | 304 |
| | — |
| | 547 |
|
Other (Income) Expense: | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | 64 |
| | 1 |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | 70 |
|
Other, net | (1 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (3 | ) | | — |
| | (6 | ) |
Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries | (247 | ) | | (50 | ) | | — |
| | 297 |
| | — |
|
Total Other (Income) Expense | (184 | ) | | (51 | ) | | 2 |
| | 297 |
| | 64 |
|
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes | 356 |
| | 122 |
| | 302 |
| | (297 | ) | | 483 |
|
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense | 46 |
| | 24 |
| | 102 |
| | — |
| | 172 |
|
Net Income | 310 |
| | 98 |
| | 200 |
| | (297 | ) | | 311 |
|
Less: Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Net Income Attributable to Tyson | $ | 310 |
| | $ | 98 |
| | $ | 199 |
| | $ | (297 | ) | | $ | 310 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) | 288 |
| | 72 |
| | 176 |
| | (249 | ) | | 287 |
|
Less: Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Tyson | $ | 288 |
| | $ | 72 |
| | $ | 175 |
| | $ | (249 | ) | | $ | 286 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 29, 2014 | | in millions |
|
| TFI Parent | | TFM Parent | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Total |
Sales | $ | 148 |
| | $ | 5,168 |
| | $ | 4,159 |
| | $ | (443 | ) | | $ | 9,032 |
|
Cost of Sales | 4 |
| | 4,953 |
| | 3,867 |
| | (443 | ) | | 8,381 |
|
Gross Profit | 144 |
| | 215 |
| | 292 |
| | — |
| | 651 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative | 28 |
| | 57 |
| | 205 |
| | — |
| | 290 |
|
Operating Income | 116 |
| | 158 |
| | 87 |
| | — |
| | 361 |
|
Other (Income) Expense: | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | (15 | ) | | 34 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | 22 |
|
Other, net | 1 |
| | — |
| | (3 | ) | | — |
| | (2 | ) |
Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries | (128 | ) | | (6 | ) | | — |
| | 134 |
| | — |
|
Total Other (Income) Expense | (142 | ) | | 28 |
| | — |
| | 134 |
| | 20 |
|
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes | 258 |
| | 130 |
| | 87 |
| | (134 | ) | | 341 |
|
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense | 45 |
| | 44 |
| | 42 |
| | — |
| | 131 |
|
Net Income | 213 |
| | 86 |
| | 45 |
| | (134 | ) | | 210 |
|
Less: Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | — |
| | — |
| | (3 | ) | | — |
| | (3 | ) |
Net Income Attributable to Tyson | $ | 213 |
| | $ | 86 |
| | $ | 48 |
| | $ | (134 | ) | | $ | 213 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) | 224 |
| | 91 |
| | 51 |
| | (143 | ) | | 223 |
|
Less: Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | — |
| | — |
| | (3 | ) | | — |
| | (3 | ) |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Tyson | $ | 224 |
| | $ | 91 |
| | $ | 54 |
| | $ | (143 | ) | | $ | 226 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income for the six months ended March 28, 2015 | | in millions |
|
| TFI Parent | | TFM Parent | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Total |
Sales | $ | 449 |
| | $ | 11,061 |
| | $ | 10,302 |
| | $ | (1,016 | ) | | $ | 20,796 |
|
Cost of Sales | 36 |
| | 10,784 |
| | 9,043 |
| | (1,012 | ) | | 18,851 |
|
Gross Profit | 413 |
| | 277 |
| | 1,259 |
| | (4 | ) | | 1,945 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative | 66 |
| | 120 |
| | 707 |
| | (4 | ) | | 889 |
|
Operating Income | 347 |
| | 157 |
| | 552 |
| | — |
| | 1,056 |
|
Other (Income) Expense: | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | 133 |
| | 1 |
| | 11 |
| | — |
| | 145 |
|
Other, net | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (3 | ) | | — |
| | (7 | ) |
Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries | (484 | ) | | (88 | ) | | — |
| | 572 |
| | — |
|
Total Other (Income) Expense | (353 | ) | | (89 | ) | | 8 |
| | 572 |
| | 138 |
|
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes | 700 |
| | 246 |
| | 544 |
| | (572 | ) | | 918 |
|
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense | 81 |
| | 54 |
| | 162 |
| | — |
| | 297 |
|
Net Income | 619 |
| | 192 |
| | 382 |
| | (572 | ) | | 621 |
|
Less: Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
Net Income Attributable to Tyson | $ | 619 |
| | $ | 192 |
| | $ | 380 |
| | $ | (572 | ) | | $ | 619 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) | 620 |
| | 176 |
| | 362 |
| | (538 | ) | | 620 |
|
Less: Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Tyson | $ | 620 |
| | $ | 176 |
| | $ | 360 |
| | $ | (538 | ) | | $ | 618 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income for the six months ended March 29, 2014 | | in millions |
|
| TFI Parent | | TFM Parent | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Total |
Sales | $ | 315 |
| | $ | 10,216 |
| | $ | 8,146 |
| | $ | (884 | ) | | $ | 17,793 |
|
Cost of Sales | 21 |
| | 9,779 |
| | 7,541 |
| | (884 | ) | | 16,457 |
|
Gross Profit | 294 |
| | 437 |
| | 605 |
| | — |
| | 1,336 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative | 51 |
| | 112 |
| | 400 |
| | — |
| | 563 |
|
Operating Income | 243 |
| | 325 |
| | 205 |
| | — |
| | 773 |
|
Other (Income) Expense: | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | (10 | ) | | 49 |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| | 48 |
|
Other, net | 7 |
| | (1 | ) | | (5 | ) | | — |
| | 1 |
|
Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries | (303 | ) | | (12 | ) | | — |
| | 315 |
| | — |
|
Total Other (Income) Expense | (306 | ) | | 36 |
| | 4 |
| | 315 |
| | 49 |
|
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes | 549 |
| | 289 |
| | 201 |
| | (315 | ) | | 724 |
|
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense | 82 |
| | 96 |
| | 84 |
| | — |
| | 262 |
|
Net Income | 467 |
| | 193 |
| | 117 |
| | (315 | ) | | 462 |
|
Less: Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | — |
| | — |
| | (5 | ) | | — |
| | (5 | ) |
Net Income Attributable to Tyson | $ | 467 |
| | $ | 193 |
| | $ | 122 |
| | $ | (315 | ) | | $ | 467 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) | 467 |
| | 192 |
| | 114 |
| | (306 | ) | | 467 |
|
Less: Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | — |
| | — |
| | (5 | ) | | — |
| | (5 | ) |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Tyson | $ | 467 |
| | $ | 192 |
| | $ | 119 |
| | $ | (306 | ) | | $ | 472 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of March 28, 2015 | | in millions |
|
| TFI Parent | | TFM Parent | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Total |
Assets | | | | | | | | | |
Current Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | — |
| | $ | 30 |
| | $ | 193 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 223 |
|
Accounts receivable, net | — |
| | 587 |
| | 1,045 |
| | — |
| | 1,632 |
|
Inventories | — |
| | 1,405 |
| | 1,857 |
| | — |
| | 3,262 |
|
Other current assets | 35 |
| | 62 |
| | 280 |
| | (31 | ) | | 346 |
|
Assets held for sale | 3 |
| | — |
| | 202 |
| | — |
| | 205 |
|
Total Current Assets | 38 |
| | 2,084 |
| | 3,577 |
| | (31 | ) | | 5,668 |
|
Net Property, Plant and Equipment | 27 |
| | 965 |
| | 4,286 |
| | — |
| | 5,278 |
|
Goodwill | — |
| | 881 |
| | 5,808 |
| | — |
| | 6,689 |
|
Intangible Assets, net | — |
| | 13 |
| | 5,210 |
| | — |
| | 5,223 |
|
Other Assets | 162 |
| | 154 |
| | 352 |
| | — |
| | 668 |
|
Investment in Subsidiaries | 21,365 |
| | 2,115 |
| | — |
| | (23,480 | ) | | — |
|
Total Assets | $ | 21,592 |
| | $ | 6,212 |
| | $ | 19,233 |
| | $ | (23,511 | ) | | $ | 23,526 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | |
Current Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Current debt | $ | 827 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 409 |
| | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | 1,236 |
|
Accounts payable | 32 |
| | 761 |
| | 901 |
| | — |
| | 1,694 |
|
Other current liabilities | 5,259 |
| | 148 |
| | 804 |
| | (5,139 | ) | | 1,072 |
|
Liabilities held for sale | — |
| | — |
| | 49 |
| | — |
| | 49 |
|
Total Current Liabilities | 6,118 |
| | 910 |
| | 2,163 |
| | (5,140 | ) | | 4,051 |
|
Long-Term Debt | 5,932 |
| | 1 |
| | 505 |
| | — |
| | 6,438 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes | 12 |
| | 98 |
| | 2,342 |
| | — |
| | 2,452 |
|
Other Liabilities | 175 |
| | 118 |
| | 922 |
| | — |
| | 1,215 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Tyson Shareholders’ Equity | 9,355 |
| | 5,085 |
| | 13,286 |
| | (18,371 | ) | | 9,355 |
|
Noncontrolling Interest | — |
| | — |
| | 15 |
| | — |
| | 15 |
|
Total Shareholders’ Equity | 9,355 |
| | 5,085 |
| | 13,301 |
| | (18,371 | ) | | 9,370 |
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | $ | 21,592 |
| | $ | 6,212 |
| | $ | 19,233 |
| | $ | (23,511 | ) | | $ | 23,526 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of September 27, 2014 | | in millions |
|
| TFI Parent | | TFM Parent | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Total |
Assets | | | | | | | | | |
Current Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | — |
| | $ | 41 |
| | $ | 397 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 438 |
|
Accounts receivable, net | 3 |
| | 665 |
| | 1,016 |
| | — |
| | 1,684 |
|
Inventories | — |
| | 1,272 |
| | 2,002 |
| | — |
| | 3,274 |
|
Other current assets | 42 |
| | 78 |
| | 379 |
| | (120 | ) | | 379 |
|
Assets held for sale | 3 |
| | — |
| | 443 |
| | — |
| | 446 |
|
Total Current Assets | 48 |
| | 2,056 |
| | 4,237 |
| | (120 | ) | | 6,221 |
|
Net Property, Plant and Equipment | 30 |
| | 932 |
| | 4,168 |
| | — |
| | 5,130 |
|
Goodwill | — |
| | 881 |
| | 5,825 |
| | — |
| | 6,706 |
|
Intangible Assets, net | — |
| | 15 |
| | 5,261 |
| | — |
| | 5,276 |
|
Other Assets | 204 |
| | 148 |
| | 326 |
| | (55 | ) | | 623 |
|
Investment in Subsidiaries | 20,845 |
| | 2,049 |
| | — |
| | (22,894 | ) | | — |
|
Total Assets | $ | 21,127 |
| | $ | 6,081 |
| | $ | 19,817 |
| | $ | (23,069 | ) | | $ | 23,956 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | |
Current Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Current debt | $ | 240 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 403 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 643 |
|
Accounts payable | 35 |
| | 755 |
| | 1,016 |
| | — |
| | 1,806 |
|
Other current liabilities | 4,718 |
| | 235 |
| | 921 |
| | (4,667 | ) | | 1,207 |
|
Liabilities held for sale | — |
| | — |
| | 141 |
| | — |
| | 141 |
|
Total Current Liabilities | 4,993 |
| | 990 |
| | 2,481 |
| | (4,667 | ) | | 3,797 |
|
Long-Term Debt | 7,056 |
| | 2 |
| | 532 |
| | (55 | ) | | 7,535 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes | 21 |
| | 96 |
| | 2,333 |
| | — |
| | 2,450 |
|
Other Liabilities | 167 |
| | 125 |
| | 978 |
| | — |
| | 1,270 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Tyson Shareholders’ Equity | 8,890 |
| | 4,868 |
| | 13,479 |
| | (18,347 | ) | | 8,890 |
|
Noncontrolling Interest | — |
| | — |
| | 14 |
| | — |
| | 14 |
|
Total Shareholders’ Equity | 8,890 |
| | 4,868 |
| | 13,493 |
| | (18,347 | ) | | 8,904 |
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | $ | 21,127 |
| | $ | 6,081 |
| | $ | 19,817 |
| | $ | (23,069 | ) | | $ | 23,956 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended March 28, 2015 | | in millions |
|
| TFI Parent | | TFM Parent | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Total |
Cash Provided by (Used for) Operating Activities | $ | 113 |
| | $ | 33 |
| | $ | 672 |
| | $ | (10 | ) | | $ | 808 |
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | — |
| | (86 | ) | | (349 | ) | | — |
| | (435 | ) |
(Purchases of)/Proceeds from marketable securities, net | — |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | — |
| | (2 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of businesses | — |
| | — |
| | 142 |
| | — |
| | 142 |
|
Other, net | — |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
|
Cash Provided by (Used for) Investing Activities | — |
| | (84 | ) | | (207 | ) | | — |
| | (291 | ) |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Net change in debt | (539 | ) | | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | (540 | ) |
Purchases of Tyson Class A common stock | (150 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (150 | ) |
Dividends | (75 | ) | | — |
| | (10 | ) | | 10 |
| | (75 | ) |
Stock options exercised | 34 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 34 |
|
Other, net | 4 |
| | — |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | 10 |
|
Net change in intercompany balances | 613 |
| | 40 |
| | (653 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Cash Provided by (Used for) Financing Activities | (113 | ) | | 40 |
| | (658 | ) | | 10 |
| | (721 | ) |
Effect of Exchange Rate Change on Cash | — |
| | — |
| | (11 | ) | | — |
| | (11 | ) |
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | — |
| | (11 | ) | | (204 | ) | | — |
| | (215 | ) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year | — |
| | 41 |
| | 397 |
| | — |
| | 438 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period | $ | — |
| | $ | 30 |
| | $ | 193 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 223 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended March 29, 2014 | | in millions |
|
| TFI Parent | | TFM Parent | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Total |
Cash Provided by (Used for) Operating Activities | $ | 10 |
| | $ | 129 |
| | $ | 171 |
| | $ | (45 | ) | | $ | 265 |
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | (1 | ) | | (67 | ) | | (225 | ) | | — |
| | (293 | ) |
(Purchases of)/Proceeds from marketable securities, net | — |
| | — |
| | (3 | ) | | — |
| | (3 | ) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | — |
| | — |
| | (56 | ) | | — |
| | (56 | ) |
Other, net | — |
| | 1 |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | 8 |
|
Cash Provided by (Used for) Investing Activities | (1 | ) | | (66 | ) | | (277 | ) | | — |
| | (344 | ) |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Net change in debt | (370 | ) | | — |
| | (6 | ) | | — |
| | (376 | ) |
Purchases of Tyson Class A common stock | (275 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (275 | ) |
Dividends | (50 | ) | | — |
| | (45 | ) | | 45 |
| | (50 | ) |
Stock options exercised | 49 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 49 |
|
Other, net | 19 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 19 |
|
Net change in intercompany balances | 618 |
| | (64 | ) | | (554 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Cash Provided by (Used for) Financing Activities | (9 | ) | | (64 | ) | | (605 | ) | | 45 |
| | (633 | ) |
Effect of Exchange Rate Change on Cash | — |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | 5 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | — |
| | (1 | ) | | (706 | ) | | — |
| | (707 | ) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year | — |
| | 21 |
| | 1,124 |
| | — |
| | 1,145 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period | $ | — |
| | $ | 20 |
| | $ | 418 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 438 |
|
| |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Description of the Company
We are one of the world's largest producers of chicken, beef, pork and prepared foods that include leading brands such as Tyson®, Jimmy Dean®, Hillshire Farm®, Sara Lee® frozen bakery, Ball Park®, Wright®, Aidells® and State Fair®. Some of the key factors influencing our business are customer demand for our products; the ability to maintain and grow relationships with customers and introduce new and innovative products to the marketplace; accessibility of international markets; market prices for our products; the cost and availability of live cattle and hogs, raw materials, and feed ingredients; and operating efficiencies of our facilities.
Our operations are conducted in five segments: Chicken, Beef, Pork, Prepared Foods and International. On August 28, 2014, we acquired and consolidated The Hillshire Brands Company ("Hillshire Brands"), a manufacturer and marketer of branded, convenient foods. Hillshire Brands' results from operations for the first six months of fiscal 2015 are included in the Prepared Foods segment.
Overview
| |
• | General – Our operating income grew 52% in the second quarter of fiscal 2015, which was led by record earnings in our Prepared Foods segment and strong earnings in our Chicken and Pork segments. Sales increased 10.5% to approximately $10 billion in the second quarter of fiscal 2015. We continued to execute our strategy of accelerating growth in domestic value-added chicken sales, prepared food sales, innovating products, services and customer insights and cultivating our talent development to support Tyson's growth for the future. |
| |
• | Hillshire Integration – We continue to maintain focus on the integration of Hillshire Brands and synergy capture. As we execute our Prepared Foods strategy, we estimate the impact of the Hillshire Brands synergies, along with the profit improvement plan related to our legacy Prepared Foods business, will have a positive impact of more than $250 million in fiscal 2015, $400 million in fiscal 2016 and $600 million by fiscal 2017. The majority of these benefits will be realized in the Prepared Foods segment. In the second quarter of fiscal 2015, we captured $77 million of synergies and profit improvement initiatives of which $70 million impacted the Prepared Foods segment. For the first six months of fiscal 2015, we captured $137 million of synergies and profit improvement initiatives of which $125 million impacted the Prepared Foods segment. |
| |
• | Market environment – Our Chicken segment delivered strong results in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 driven by favorable domestic market conditions. The Pork segment’s operating margin was above its normalized range due to favorable market conditions associated with strong demand for our pork products. Our Prepared Foods segment delivered record operating income and operating margins as we continued to execute our profit improvement plan and integrate Hillshire Brands. The Beef segment experienced a loss driven by lower availability of fed cattle supplies, higher fed cattle costs and reduced demand for premium beef products. Our International segment experienced losses due to challenging market conditions in China. |
| |
• | Margins – Our total operating margin was 5.5% in the second quarter of fiscal 2015. Operating margins by segment were as follows: |
| |
• | Liquidity – For the first six months of fiscal 2015 we generated $808 million of operating cash flows. At March 28, 2015, we had approximately $1.3 billion of liquidity, which includes availability under our revolving credit facility and $223 million of cash and cash equivalents. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
in millions, except per share data | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Net income attributable to Tyson | $ | 310 |
| | $ | 213 |
| | $ | 619 |
| | $ | 467 |
|
Net income attributable to Tyson – per diluted share | 0.75 |
| | 0.60 |
| | 1.49 |
| | 1.32 |
|
Second quarter – Fiscal 2015 – Net income attributable to Tyson included the following items:
| |
• | $8 million, or ($0.02) per diluted share, of net insurance proceeds (net of ongoing costs) related to a legacy Hillshire Brands plant fire. |
| |
• | $14 million, or $0.02 per diluted share, related to the Hillshire Brands merger and integration costs. |
Six months – Fiscal 2015 – Net income attributable to Tyson included the following items:
| |
• | $28 million, or $0.04 per diluted share, of ongoing net costs (net of insurance proceeds) related to a legacy Hillshire Brands plant fire. |
| |
• | $33 million, or $0.05 per diluted share, related to the Hillshire Brands merger and integration costs. |
| |
• | $26 million, or ($0.06) per diluted share, related to recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits. |
Summary of Results
Sales
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
in millions | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Sales | $ | 9,979 |
| | $ | 9,032 |
| | $ | 20,796 |
| | $ | 17,793 |
|
Change in sales volume | 2.4 | % | | | | 5.0 | % | | |
Change in average sales price | 7.9 | % | | | | 11.3 | % | | |
Sales growth | 10.5 | % | | | | 16.9 | % | | |
Second quarter – Fiscal 2015 vs Fiscal 2014
| |
• | Sales Volume – Sales were positively impacted by higher sales volume, which accounted for an increase of $370 million. The increase was from the Prepared Foods segment due to the acquisition of Hillshire Brands on August 28, 2014, partially offset by a decrease in sales volumes in each of the remaining segments. |
| |
• | Average Sales Price – Sales were positively impacted by higher average sales prices, which accounted for an increase of $577 million. The Beef and Prepared Foods segments each had an increase in average sales prices, partially offset by a decrease in average sales prices in the Chicken, Pork and International segments. |
Six months – Fiscal 2015 vs Fiscal 2014
| |
• | Sales Volume – Sales were positively impacted by higher sales volume, which accounted for an increase of $1.1 billion. The Chicken and Prepared Foods segments each had an increase in sales volume, partially offset by a decrease in sales volume in the Beef, Pork and International segments. Prepared Foods contributed the majority of the increase due to the acquisition of Hillshire Brands on August 28, 2014. |
| |
• | Average Sales Price – Sales were positively impacted by higher average sales prices, which accounted for an increase of $1.9 billion. The Chicken, Beef and Prepared Foods segments each had an increase in average sales prices largely due to better mix in Chicken, continued tight domestic availability of beef and the acquisition of Hillshire Brands on August 28, 2014 in Prepared Foods. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in average sales prices in the Pork and International segments driven by an increase in live hog supplies, which drove down the average sales price in pork and volatile markets in our International segment. |
Cost of Sales
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
in millions | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Cost of sales | $ | 8,990 |
| | $ | 8,381 |
| | $ | 18,851 |
| | $ | 16,457 |
|
Gross profit | $ | 989 |
| | $ | 651 |
| | $ | 1,945 |
| | $ | 1,336 |
|
Cost of sales as a percentage of sales | 90.1 | % | | 92.8 | % | | 90.6 | % | | 92.5 | % |
Second quarter – Fiscal 2015 vs Fiscal 2014
| |
• | Cost of sales increased $609 million. Higher input cost per pound increased cost of sales $293 million and higher sales volume increased cost of sales $316 million. |
| |
• | The $293 million impact of higher input cost per pound was primarily driven by: |
| |
• | Increase in live cattle cost of approximately $400 million in our Beef segment. |
| |
• | Increase in input cost per pound related to the acquisition of Hillshire Brands on August 28, 2014. |
| |
• | Decrease in live hog costs of approximately $120 million in our Pork segment. |
| |
• | Decrease in raw material and other input costs of approximately $40 million in our legacy Prepared Foods business. |
| |
• | Decrease due to net gains of $15 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2015, compared to net losses of $45 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2014, primarily from our Beef and Pork segments commodity risk management activities. These amounts exclude the impact from related physical purchase transactions, which mostly offset the losses. |
| |
• | Decreases in feed costs of approximately $75 million in our Chicken segment and $10 million in our International segment. |
| |
• | The $316 million impact of higher sales volume was driven by the acquisition of Hillshire Brands on August 28, 2014 in our Prepared Foods segment, partially offset by sales volume decreases in each of the remaining segments, of which the majority of the decrease was in our International segment due to the sale of our Brazil operation in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. |
Six months – Fiscal 2015 vs Fiscal 2014
| |
• | Cost of sales increased $2.4 billion. Higher input cost per pound increased cost of sales $1.4 billion and higher sales volume increased cost of sales $990 million. |
| |
• | The $1.4 billion impact of higher input cost per pound was primarily driven by: |
| |
• | Increase in live cattle cost of approximately $1.2 billion in our Beef segment. |
| |
• | Increase in input cost per pound related to the acquisition of Hillshire Brands on August 28, 2014. |
| |
• | Decrease in live hog costs of approximately $10 million in our Pork segment. |
| |
• | Decrease in raw material and other input costs of approximately $30 million in our legacy Prepared Foods business. |
| |
• | Decreases in feed costs of approximately $185 million in our Chicken segment and $20 million in our International segment. |
| |
• | The $990 million impact of higher sales volume was driven by increases in sales volume in our Chicken and Prepared Foods segments, partially offset by decreases in sales volume in our Beef, Pork and International segments. Prepared Foods contributed a majority of the increase due to the acquisition of Hillshire Brands on August 28, 2014. |
Selling, General and Administrative
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
in millions | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Selling, general and administrative expense | $ | 442 |
| | $ | 290 |
| | $ | 889 |
| | $ | 563 |
|
As a percentage of sales | 4.4 | % | | 3.2 | % | | 4.3 | % | | 3.2 | % |
Second quarter – Fiscal 2015 vs Fiscal 2014
| |
• | Increase of $135 million related to the inclusion of Hillshire Brands in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 results with no corresponding amounts in the second quarter of fiscal 2014. |
| |
• | Increase of $19 million related to amortization associated with acquired Hillshire Brands’ intangibles. |
| |
• | Increase of $14 million related to merger and integration costs. |
| |
• | Increase of $5 million related to employee costs including payroll, stock-based and incentive-based compensation and travel. |
| |
• | Decrease of $24 million related to advertising and sales promotions in the legacy Tyson business primarily attributable to discontinuing certain programs that were present in the second quarter of fiscal 2014. |
Six months – Fiscal 2015 vs Fiscal 2014
| |
• | Increase of $269 million related to the inclusion of Hillshire Brands in the first six months of fiscal 2015 results with no corresponding amounts in the first six months of fiscal 2014. |
| |
• | Increase of $37 million related to amortization associated with acquired Hillshire Brands’ intangibles. |
| |
• | Increase of $33 million related to merger and integration costs. |
| |
• | Increase of $15 million related to employee costs including payroll, stock-based and incentive-based compensation, and travel. |
| |
• | Increase of $18 million in all other primarily related to professional fees, information technology costs, and other intangibles. |
| |
• | Decrease of $46 million related to advertising and sales promotions in the legacy Tyson business primarily attributable to discontinuing certain programs that were present in the first six months of fiscal 2014. |
Interest Expense
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
in millions | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Cash interest expense | $ | 72 |
| | $ | 26 |
| | $ | 147 |
| | $ | 54 |
|
Non-cash interest expense | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | 1 |
| | (1 | ) |
Total Interest Expense | $ | 71 |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | 148 |
| | $ | 53 |
|
Second quarter and six months – Fiscal 2015 vs Fiscal 2014
| |
• | Cash interest expense primarily included interest expense related to the coupon rates for senior notes and term loans and |
commitment/letter of credit fees incurred on our revolving credit facilities. The increase in cash interest expense in the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2015 was primarily due to senior notes and term loans issued and debt assumed in connection with our acquisition of Hillshire Brands on August 28, 2014.
•Non-cash interest expense primarily included amounts related to the amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts/
premiums on note issuances, offset by interest capitalized.
Other (Income) Expense, net
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
in millions | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
| $ | (6 | ) | | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | 1 |
|
Six months – Fiscal 2015
| |
• | Included $3 million of equity earnings in joint ventures and $1 million in net foreign currency exchange gains. |
Six months – Fiscal 2014
| |
• | Included an expense of $6 million related to the impairment of an equity security investment, which was partially offset by income of $5 million of equity earnings in joint ventures and foreign currency exchange gains. |
Effective Tax Rate
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
| 35.6 | % | | 38.3 | % | | 32.4 | % | | 36.2 | % |
Second quarter and six months – Fiscal 2015 – The effective tax rate was impacted by:
| |
• | the domestic production deduction; |
| |
• | losses in foreign jurisdictions for which no benefit is recognized; and |
| |
• | decrease in tax reserves due to the expiration of statutes of limitations and settlements with taxing authorities. |
Second quarter and six months – Fiscal 2014 – The effective tax rate was impacted by:
| |
• | the domestic production deduction; and |
| |
• | losses in foreign jurisdictions for which no benefit is recognized. |
Segment Results
We operate in five segments: Chicken, Beef, Pork, Prepared Foods and International. The following table is a summary of sales and operating income (loss), which is how we measure segment income.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
in millions | Sales |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Chicken | $ | 2,829 |
| | $ | 2,842 |
| | $ | 5,609 |
| | $ | 5,498 |
|
Beef | 4,130 |
| | 3,825 |
| | 8,521 |
| | 7,559 |
|
Pork | 1,204 |
| | 1,487 |
| | 2,744 |
| | 2,911 |
|
Prepared Foods | 1,871 |
| | 861 |
| | 4,004 |
| | 1,768 |
|
International | 222 |
| | 328 |
| | 527 |
| | 655 |
|
Other | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Intersegment Sales | (277 | ) | | (311 | ) | | (609 | ) | | (598 | ) |
Total | $ | 9,979 |
| | $ | 9,032 |
| | $ | 20,796 |
| | $ | 17,793 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
in millions | Operating Income (Loss) |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Chicken | $ | 332 |
| | $ | 234 |
| | $ | 683 |
| | $ | 487 |
|
Beef | (20 | ) | | 35 |
| | (26 | ) | | 93 |
|
Pork | 99 |
| | 107 |
| | 221 |
| | 228 |
|
Prepared Foods | 160 |
| | 21 |
| | 231 |
| | 37 |
|
International | (15 | ) | | (30 | ) | | (29 | ) | | (58 | ) |
Other | (9 | ) | | (6 | ) | | (24 | ) | | (14 | ) |
Total | $ | 547 |
| | $ | 361 |
| | $ | 1,056 |
| | $ | 773 |
|
Second quarter – Fiscal 2015 – Operating income included the following items:
| |
• | Operating income was increased by $3 million in the Prepared Foods segment due to $8 million of net insurance proceeds related to a legacy Hillshire Brands plant fire, partially offset by $5 million of merger and integration costs. |
| |
• | Operating income was reduced by $9 million in Other for third-party merger and integration costs. |
Six months – Fiscal 2015 – Operating income included the following items:
| |
• | Operating income was reduced by $37 million in the Prepared Foods segment due to $28 million of ongoing costs (net of insurance proceeds) related to a legacy Hillshire Brands plant fire and $9 million of merger and integration costs. |
| |
• | Operating income was reduced by $24 million in Other for third-party merger and integration costs. |
Chicken Segment Results
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
in millions | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | Change | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | Change |
Sales | $ | 2,829 |
| | $ | 2,842 |
| | $ | (13 | ) | | $ | 5,609 |
| | $ | 5,498 |
| | $ | 111 |
|
Sales Volume Change | | | | | (0.2 | )% | | | | | | 1.4 | % |
Average Sales Price Change | | | | | (0.3 | )% | | | | | | 0.6 | % |
Operating Income | $ | 332 |
| | $ | 234 |
| | $ | 98 |
| | $ | 683 |
| | $ | 487 |
| | $ | 196 |
|
Operating Margin | 11.7 | % | | 8.2 | % | | | | 12.2 | % | | 8.9 | % | | |
Second quarter and six months – Fiscal 2015 vs Fiscal 2014
| |
• | Sales Volume – Sales volume was virtually unchanged in the second quarter of fiscal 2015. For the first six months of fiscal 2015, sales volume grew as a result of stronger demand for chicken products and mix of rendered product sales. |
| |
• | Average Sales Price – Average sales price was virtually unchanged in the second quarter of fiscal 2015. For the first six months of fiscal 2015, average sales price increased as a result of market conditions and sales mix changes. |
| |
• | Operating Income – Operating income increased due to improved sales mix in addition to lower feed ingredient costs which decreased $75 million and $185 million during the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2015, respectively. |
Beef Segment Results
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
in millions | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | Change | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | Change |
Sales | $ | 4,130 |
| | $ | 3,825 |
| | $ | 305 |
| | $ | 8,521 |
| | $ | 7,559 |
| | $ | 962 |
|
Sales Volume Change | | | | | (0.8 | )% | | | | | | (1.7 | )% |
Average Sales Price Change | | | | | 8.8 | % | | | | | | 14.7 | % |
Operating Income | $ | (20 | ) | | $ | 35 |
| | $ | (55 | ) | | $ | (26 | ) | | $ | 93 |
| | $ | (119 | ) |
Operating Margin | (0.5 | )% | | 0.9 | % | | | | (0.3 | )% | | 1.2 | % | | |
Second quarter and six months – Fiscal 2015 vs Fiscal 2014
| |
• | Sales Volume – Sales volume decreased due to a reduction in live cattle processed. |
| |
• | Average Sales Price – Average sales price increased due to lower domestic availability of beef products. |
| |
• | Operating Income – Operating income decreased as we were not fully able to pass along increased inputs from higher fed cattle costs, in part due to the seasonal reduction in beef demand as well as the relative value of competing proteins, in addition to increased operating costs. |
Pork Segment Results
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
in millions | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | Change | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | Change |
Sales | $ | 1,204 |
| | $ | 1,487 |
| | $ | (283 | ) | | $ | 2,744 |
| | $ | 2,911 |
| | $ | (167 | ) |
Sales Volume Change | | | | | (4.4 | )% | | | | | | (1.6 | )% |
Average Sales Price Change | | | | | (15.4 | )% | | | | | | (4.2 | )% |
Operating Income | $ | 99 |
| | $ | 107 |
| | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | 221 |
| | $ | 228 |
| | $ | (7 | ) |
Operating Margin | 8.2 | % | | 7.2 | % | | | | 8.1 | % | | 7.8 | % | | |
Second quarter and six months – Fiscal 2015 vs Fiscal 2014
| |
• | Sales Volume – Sales volume decreased due to the divestiture of our Heinold Hog Markets business in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. Excluding the impact of the divestiture, our sales volume grew 3.2% and 2.4% for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2015, respectively, driven by better demand for our pork products. |
| |
• | Average Sales Price – Live hog supplies increased which drove down livestock cost and average sales price. |
| |
• | Operating Income – While reduced slightly compared to prior year, operating income remained strong as we maximized our revenues relative to live hog markets, partially attributable to operational and mix performance. |
Prepared Foods Segment Results
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
in millions | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | Change | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | Change |
Sales | $ | 1,871 |
| | $ | 861 |
| | $ | 1,010 |
| | $ | 4,004 |
| | $ | 1,768 |
| | $ | 2,236 |
|
Sales Volume Change | | | | | 70.6 | % | | | | | | 80.1 | % |
Average Sales Price Change | | | | | 27.4 | % | | | | | | 25.7 | % |
Operating Income | $ | 160 |
| | $ | 21 |
| | $ | 139 |
| | $ | 231 |
| | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 194 |
|
Operating Margin | 8.6 | % | | 2.4 | % | | | | 5.8 | % | | 2.1 | % | | |
Second quarter and six months – Fiscal 2015 vs Fiscal 2014
| |
• | Sales Volume – Sales volume increased due to incremental volumes from the acquisition of Hillshire Brands. |
| |
• | Average Sales Price – Average sales price increased primarily due to price increases associated with better product mix which was positively impacted by the acquisition of Hillshire Brands. |
| |
• | Operating Income – Operating income improved due to an increase in sales volume and average sales price mainly attributed to Hillshire Brands, as well as lower raw material costs of approximately $40 million and $30 million for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2015, respectively, related to our legacy Prepared Foods business. Additionally, profit improvement initiatives and Hillshire Brands synergies positively impacted Prepared Foods operating income by $70 million and $125 million for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2015, respectively. |
International Segment Results
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
in millions | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | Change | | March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | Change |
Sales | $ | 222 |
| | $ | 328 |
| | $ | (106 | ) | | $ | 527 |
| | $ | 655 |
| | $ | (128 | ) |
Sales Volume Change | | | | | (30.5 | )% | | | | | | (17.0 | )% |
Average Sales Price Change | | | | | (2.7 | )% | | | | | | (3.1 | )% |
Operating Income | $ | (15 | ) | | $ | (30 | ) | | $ | 15 |
| | $ | (29 | ) | | $ | (58 | ) | | $ | 29 |
|
Operating Margin | (6.8 | )% | | (9.1 | )% | | | | (5.5 | )% | | (8.9 | )% | | |
Second quarter and six months – Fiscal 2015 vs Fiscal 2014
| |
• | Sales Volume – Sales volume decreased due to the sale of our Brazil operation during the first quarter of fiscal 2015 and weak demand in China. |
| |
• | Average Sales Price – Average sales price decreased due to supply imbalances associated with weak demand in China and currency devaluation in Mexico. |
| |
• | Operating Income – Operating loss improved due to the sale of our Brazil operation and better market conditions in Mexico. |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our cash needs for working capital, capital expenditures, growth opportunities, the repurchases of senior notes, repayment of term loans and share repurchases are expected to be met with current cash on hand, cash flows provided by operating activities, or short-term borrowings. Based on our current expectations, we believe our liquidity and capital resources will be sufficient to operate our business. However, we may take advantage of opportunities to generate additional liquidity or refinance existing debt through capital market transactions. The amount, nature and timing of any capital market transactions will depend on our operating performance and other circumstances; our then-current commitments and obligations; the amount, nature and timing of our capital requirements; any limitations imposed by our current credit arrangements; and overall market conditions.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
|
| | | | | | | |
in millions | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Net income | $ | 621 |
| | $ | 462 |
|
Non-cash items in net income: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 347 |
| | 254 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 12 |
| | (24 | ) |
Other, net | 36 |
| | 32 |
|
Convertible debt discount | — |
| | (92 | ) |
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities | (208 | ) | | (367 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 808 |
| | $ | 265 |
|
| |
• | Operating cash outflow associated with the Convertible debt discount related to the initial debt discount of $92 million on our 3.25% convertible notes issued in 2008, which matured on October 15, 2013 and were retired in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. |
| |
• | Cash flows associated with net changes in operating assets and liabilities for the six months ended: |
| |
• | March 28, 2015 – Decreased primarily due to lower accounts payable and accrued salaries, wages and benefits, partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable. The change in accounts payable, accrued salaries, wages and benefits, and accounts receivable are primarily due to timing of payments and sales. |
| |
• | March 29, 2014 – Decreased primarily due to higher inventory and accounts receivable balances and decreases in taxes payable and accrued salaries, wages and benefits balances, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable. The increase in inventory and accounts receivable balances is largely due to increased raw material costs and timing of sales. |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
|
| | | | | | | |
in millions | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | $ | (435 | ) | | $ | (293 | ) |
(Purchases of)/Proceeds from marketable securities, net | (2 | ) | | (3 | ) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | — |
| | (56 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of businesses | 142 |
| | — |
|
Other, net | 4 |
| | 8 |
|
Net cash used for investing activities | $ | (291 | ) | | $ | (344 | ) |
| |
• | Additions to property, plant and equipment include acquiring new equipment and upgrading our facilities to maintain competitive standing and position us for future opportunities. |
| |
• | Capital spending for fiscal 2015 is expected to be approximately $900 million, and will include spending on our operations for production and labor efficiencies, yield improvements and sales channel flexibility. |
| |
• | Proceeds from sale of businesses primarily include proceeds, net of cash transferred, from the sale of our Brazil operation. |
| |
• | Acquisitions - During the first six months of fiscal 2014, we acquired a value-added food business as part of our strategic expansion initiative. The purchase price of the acquisition was $56 million, which included $12 million for property, plant and equipment, $27 million allocated to Intangible Assets and $18 million allocated to Goodwill. |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
|
| | | | | | | |
in millions | Six Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 |
Payments on debt | $ | (715 | ) | | $ | (390 | ) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | — |
| | 14 |
|
Borrowings on revolving credit facility | 1,080 |
| | — |
|
Payments on revolving credit facility | (905 | ) | | — |
|
Purchases of Tyson Class A common stock | (150 | ) | | (275 | ) |
Dividends | (75 | ) | | (50 | ) |
Stock options exercised | 34 |
| | 49 |
|
Other, net | 10 |
| | 19 |
|
Net cash used for financing activities | $ | (721 | ) | | $ | (633 | ) |
| |
• | During the first six months of fiscal 2015, we retired the 5-year tranche A term loan facility for $353 million and paid down the 3-year tranche A term loan facility by $330 million. Additionally, we had borrowings and payments on our revolver, which for the second quarter of fiscal 2015 totaled net proceeds from borrowings of $175 million. We utilized our revolving credit facility to balance our cash position with term loan deleveraging and changes in working capital. |
| |
• | Our 3.25% convertible notes issued in 2008 matured on October 15, 2013 at which time we paid the $458 million principal value with cash on hand, and settled the conversion premium by issuing 11.7 million shares of our Class A stock from available treasury shares. These notes were initially recorded at a $92 million discount, which equaled the fair value of an equity conversion premium instrument. The portion of the payment of the notes related to the initial $92 million discount was recorded in cash flows from operating activities. Simultaneous to the settlement of the conversion premium, we received 11.7 million shares of our Class A stock from call options purchased at the time of issuance of the notes. |
| |
• | Purchases of Tyson Class A stock included: |
| |
• | $131 million and $250 million of shares repurchased pursuant to our share repurchase program during the six months ended March 28, 2015 and March 29, 2014, respectively. |
| |
• | $19 million and $25 million of shares repurchased to fund certain obligations under our equity compensation programs during the six months ended March 28, 2015 and March 29, 2014, respectively. |
| |
• | We currently plan to repurchase a number of shares equivalent to the dilution expected to be realized from the current fiscal year grants under our stock-based compensation programs. |
| |
• | Dividends paid during the first six months of fiscal 2015 included a 33% increase to our quarterly dividend rate. |
Liquidity
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
in millions | | | | | | | | | |
| Commitments Expiration Date | | Facility Amount |
| | Outstanding Letters of Credit (no draw downs) |
| | Amount Borrowed |
| | Amount Available |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | | | $ | 223 |
|
Short-term investments | | | | | | | | | 2 |
|
Revolving credit facility | September 2019 | | $ | 1,250 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 175 |
| | 1,069 |
|
Total liquidity | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,294 |
|
| |
• | The revolving credit facility supports our short-term funding needs and letters of credit. The letters of credit issued under this facility are primarily in support of workers’ compensation insurance programs and derivative activities. Our maximum borrowing under the revolving credit facility during the first six months of fiscal 2015 was $450 million. |
| |
• | At March 28, 2015, we had current debt of $1,236 million, which we intend to repay with cash generated from our operating activities and other liquidity resources. |
| |
• | We expect net interest expense will approximate $280 million for fiscal 2015 (53-weeks). |
| |
• | At March 28, 2015, approximately $209 million of our cash was held in the international accounts of our foreign subsidiaries. Generally, we do not rely on the foreign cash as a source of funds to support our ongoing domestic liquidity needs. Rather, we manage our worldwide cash requirements by reviewing available funds among our foreign subsidiaries and the cost effectiveness with which those funds can be accessed. The repatriation of cash balances from certain of our subsidiaries could have adverse tax consequences or be subject to regulatory capital requirements; however, those balances are generally available without legal restrictions to fund ordinary business operations. U.S. income taxes, net of applicable foreign tax credits, have not been provided on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries with the exception of the undistributed earnings of our Mexican subsidiaries due to the pending sale. Except for cash potentially generated from the pending sale of our Mexico operation, our intention is to reinvest the cash held by foreign subsidiaries permanently or to repatriate the cash only when it is tax effective to do so. |
| |
• | Our current ratio was 1.40 to 1 and 1.64 to 1 at March 28, 2015 and September 27, 2014, respectively. |
Capital Resources
Credit Facility
Cash flows from operating activities and cash on hand are our primary sources of liquidity for funding debt service, capital expenditures, dividends and share repurchases. We also have a revolving credit facility, with a committed maximum capacity of $1.25 billion, to provide additional liquidity for working capital needs, letters of credit and a source of financing for growth opportunities. As of March 28, 2015, we had $175 million borrowed and $6 million of outstanding letters of credit issued under this facility, none of which were drawn upon, which left $1,069 million available for borrowing. Our revolving credit facility is funded by a syndicate of 42 banks, with commitments ranging from $0.3 million to $85 million per bank. The syndicate includes bank holding companies that are required to be adequately capitalized under federal bank regulatory agency requirements.
Capitalization
To monitor our credit ratings and our capacity for long-term financing, we consider various qualitative and quantitative factors. We monitor the ratio of our net debt to EBITDA as support for our long-term financing decisions. At March 28, 2015, and September 27, 2014, the ratio of our net debt to EBITDA was 3.3x and 4.1x, respectively. Refer to Part I, Item 3, EBITDA Reconciliations, for an explanation and reconciliation to comparable GAAP measures. The decrease in this ratio at March 28, 2015 was due to increased EBITDA and the reduction of debt during the first six months of fiscal 2015 of approximately $500 million.
On April 7, 2015, we entered into a term loan agreement, which provided total borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of $500 million, the full balance of which was used to prepay outstanding borrowings under the existing 3-year tranche A term loan facility. The new $500 million term loan facility is due April 7, 2018. Interest is reset based on the selected LIBOR interest period plus 1.125%.
Credit Ratings
2016 Notes
On February 11, 2013, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, a Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC business (S&P), upgraded the credit rating of the 2016 Notes from "BBB-" to "BBB." This upgrade did not impact the interest rate on the 2016 Notes.
On June 7, 2012, Moody's Investors Service, Inc. (Moody's) upgraded the credit rating of the 2016 Notes from "Ba1" to "Baa3." This upgrade decreased the interest rate on the 2016 Notes from 6.85% to 6.60%, effective beginning with the six-month interest payment due October 1, 2012.
A one-notch downgrade by Moody's would increase the interest rates on the 2016 Notes by 0.25%. A two-notch downgrade from S&P would increase the interest rates on the 2016 Notes by 0.25%.
Revolving Credit Facility
S&P's corporate credit rating for Tyson Foods, Inc. is "BBB." Moody’s senior, unsecured, subsidiary guaranteed long-term debt rating for Tyson Foods, Inc. is "Baa3." Fitch Ratings, a wholly owned subsidiary of Fimalac, S.A. (Fitch), issuer default rating for Tyson Foods, Inc. is "BBB." The below table outlines the fees paid on the unused portion of the facility (Facility Fee Rate) and letter of credit fees (Undrawn Letter of Credit Fee and Borrowing Spread) depending on the rating levels of Tyson Foods, Inc. from S&P, Moody's and Fitch.
|
| | | | |
Ratings Level (S&P/Moody's/Fitch) | Facility Fee Rate |
| Undrawn Letter of Credit Fee and Borrowing Spread |
|
A-/A3/A- or above | 0.100 | % | 1.000 | % |
BBB+/Baa1/BBB+ | 0.125 | % | 1.125 | % |
BBB/Baa2/BBB (current level) | 0.150 | % | 1.250 | % |
BBB-/Baa3/BBB- | 0.200 | % | 1.500 | % |
BB+/Ba1/BB+ or lower | 0.250 | % | 1.750 | % |
In the event the rating levels are split, the applicable fees and spread will be based upon the rating level in effect for two of the rating agencies, or, if all three rating agencies have different rating levels, the applicable fees and spread will be based upon the rating level that is between the rating levels of the other two rating agencies.
Debt Covenants
Our revolving credit and term loan facilities contain affirmative and negative covenants that, among other things, may limit or restrict our ability to: create liens and encumbrances; incur debt; merge, dissolve, liquidate or consolidate; make acquisitions and investments; dispose of or transfer assets; change the nature of our business; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and enter into hedging transactions, in each case, subject to certain qualifications and exceptions. In addition, we are required to maintain minimum interest expense coverage and maximum debt-to-capitalization ratios.
Our senior notes also contain affirmative and negative covenants that, among other things, may limit or restrict our ability to: create liens; engage in certain sale/leaseback transactions; and engage in certain consolidations, mergers and sales of assets.
We were in compliance with all debt covenants at March 28, 2015.
RECENTLY ADOPTED/ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Refer to the discussion of recently adopted/issued accounting pronouncements under Part I, Item 1, Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Note 1: Accounting Policies.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
We consider accounting policies related to: contingent liabilities; marketing and advertising costs; accrued self-insurance; defined benefit pension plans; impairment of long-lived assets; impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets; and income taxes to be critical accounting estimates. These policies are summarized in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2014.
Based on our sale of the Brazil poultry production operation and the pending sale of the Mexico poultry operation, we are reviewing our strategies and outlook for the remaining operations in our International segment. Additionally, we are evaluating the operations of our legacy Prepared Foods and legacy Hillshire Brands facilities, which are all part of the Prepared Foods segment. If we have a significant change in strategies, outlook, or manner in which we plan to use these assets, we may be exposed to future impairments.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS RELEVANT TO FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
Certain information in this report constitutes forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, current views and estimates of our outlook for fiscal 2015, other future economic circumstances, industry conditions in domestic and international markets, our performance and financial results (e.g., debt levels, return on invested capital, value-added product growth, capital expenditures, tax rates, access to foreign markets and dividend policy). These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties that could cause our actual results and experiences to differ materially from anticipated results and expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements. We wish to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Among the factors that may cause actual results and experiences to differ from anticipated results and expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are the following: (i) the effect of, or changes in, general economic conditions; (ii) fluctuations in the cost and availability of inputs and raw materials, such as live cattle, live swine, feed grains (including corn and soybean meal) and energy; (iii) market conditions for finished products, including competition from other global and domestic food processors, supply and pricing of competing products and alternative proteins and demand for alternative proteins; (iv) successful rationalization of existing facilities and operating efficiencies of the facilities; (v) risks associated with our commodity purchasing activities; (vi) access to foreign markets together with foreign economic conditions, including currency fluctuations, import/export restrictions and foreign politics; (vii) outbreak of a livestock disease (such as avian influenza (AI) or bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE)), which could have an adverse effect on livestock we own, the availability of livestock we purchase, consumer perception of certain protein products or our ability to access certain domestic and foreign markets; (viii) changes in availability and relative costs of labor and contract growers and our ability to maintain good relationships with employees, labor unions, contract growers and independent producers providing us livestock; (ix) issues related to food safety, including costs resulting from product recalls, regulatory compliance and any related claims or litigation; (x) changes in consumer preference and diets and our ability to identify and react to consumer trends; (xi) significant marketing plan changes by large customers or loss of one or more large customers; (xii) adverse results from litigation; (xiii) impacts on our operations caused by factors and forces beyond our control, such as natural disasters, fire, bioterrorism, pandemic or extreme weather; (xiv) risks associated with leverage, including cost increases due to rising interest rates or changes in debt ratings or outlook; (xv) compliance with and changes to regulations and laws (both domestic and foreign), including changes in accounting standards, tax laws, environmental laws, agricultural laws and occupational, health and safety laws; (xvi) our ability to make effective acquisitions or joint ventures and successfully integrate newly acquired businesses into existing operations; (xvii) failures or security breaches of our information technology systems; (xviii) effectiveness of advertising and marketing programs; and (xix) those factors listed under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” included in our Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2014.
| |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Market risk relating to our operations results primarily from changes in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign exchange rates, as well as credit risk concentrations. To address certain of these risks, we enter into various derivative transactions as described below. If a derivative instrument is accounted for as a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the instrument either will be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings, or be recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of an instrument’s change in fair value is recognized immediately. Additionally, we hold certain positions, primarily in grain and livestock futures that either do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting or are not designated as hedges. With the exception of normal purchases and normal sales that are expected to result in physical delivery, we record these positions at fair value, and the unrealized gains and losses are reported in earnings at each reporting date. Changes in market value of derivatives used in our risk management activities relating to forward sales contracts are recorded in sales. Changes in market value of derivatives used in our risk management activities surrounding inventories on hand or anticipated purchases of inventories are recorded in cost of sales.
The sensitivity analyses presented below are the measures of potential losses of fair value resulting from hypothetical changes in market prices related to commodities. Sensitivity analyses do not consider the actions we may take to mitigate our exposure to changes, nor do they consider the effects such hypothetical adverse changes may have on overall economic activity. Actual changes in market prices may differ from hypothetical changes.
Commodities Risk: We purchase certain commodities, such as grains and livestock in the course of normal operations. As part of our commodity risk management activities, we use derivative financial instruments, primarily futures and options, to reduce the effect of changing prices and as a mechanism to procure the underlying commodity. However, as the commodities underlying our derivative financial instruments can experience significant price fluctuations, any requirement to mark-to-market the positions that have not been designated or do not qualify as hedges could result in volatility in our results of operations. Contract terms of a hedge instrument closely mirror those of the hedged item providing a high degree of risk reduction and correlation. Contracts designated and highly effective at meeting this risk reduction and correlation criteria are recorded using hedge accounting. The following table presents a sensitivity analysis resulting from a hypothetical change of 10% in market prices as of March 28, 2015, and September 27, 2014, on the fair value of open positions. The fair value of such positions is a summation of the fair values calculated for each commodity by valuing each net position at quoted futures prices. The market risk exposure analysis includes hedge and non-hedge derivative financial instruments.
|
| | | | | | | |
Effect of 10% change in fair value | | | in millions |
|
| March 28, 2015 | | September 27, 2014 |
Livestock: | | | |
Cattle | $ | 34 |
| | $ | 42 |
|
Hogs | 6 |
| | 32 |
|
Grain | 8 |
| | 10 |
|
Interest Rate Risk: At March 28, 2015, we had variable rate debt of $1.6 billion with a weighted average interest rate of 1.6%. A hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates effective at March 28, 2015, and September 27, 2014, would have a minimal effect on interest expense.
Additionally, changes in interest rates impact the fair value of our fixed-rate debt. At March 28, 2015, we had fixed-rate debt of $6.1 billion with a weighted average interest rate of 4.2%. Market risk for fixed-rate debt is estimated as the potential increase in fair value, resulting from a hypothetical 10% decrease in interest rates. A hypothetical 10% decrease in interest rates would have increased the fair value of our fixed-rate debt by approximately $104 million at March 28, 2015 and $109 million at September 27, 2014. The fair values of our debt were estimated based on quoted market prices and/or published interest rates.
We have interest rate risk associated with our pension and post-retirement benefit obligations. Changes in interest rates impact the liabilities associated with these benefit plans as well as the amount of income or expense recognized for these plans. Declines in the value of the plan assets could diminish the funded status of the pension plans and potentially increase the requirements to make cash contributions to these plans. See Part II, Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 15: Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2014 for additional information.
Foreign Currency Risk: We have foreign exchange exposure from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates primarily as a result of certain receivable and payable balances. The primary currencies we have exposure to are the Brazilian real, the British pound sterling, the Canadian dollar, the Chinese renminbi, the European euro, the Indian rupee and the Mexican peso. We periodically enter into foreign exchange forward and option contracts to hedge some portion of our foreign currency exposure. A hypothetical 10% change in foreign exchange rates effective at March 28, 2015, and September 27, 2014, related to the foreign exchange forward and option contracts would have a $5 million and $9 million impact, respectively, on pretax income.
Concentration of Credit Risk: Refer to our market risk disclosures set forth in the 2014 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for a detailed discussion of quantitative and qualitative disclosures about concentration of credit risks, as these risk disclosures have not changed significantly from the 2014 Annual Report.
EBITDA Reconciliations
A reconciliation of net income to EBITDA is as follows (in millions, except ratio data):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended | | Fiscal Year Ended | Twelve Months Ended |
| March 28, 2015 | | March 29, 2014 | | September 27, 2014 | March 28, 2015 |
| | | | | | |
Net income | $ | 621 |
| | $ | 462 |
| | $ | 856 |
| $ | 1,015 |
|
Less: Interest income | (3 | ) | | (5 | ) | | (7 | ) | (5 | ) |
Add: Interest expense | 148 |
| | 53 |
| | 132 |
| 227 |
|
Add: Income tax expense | 297 |
| | 262 |
| | 396 |
| 431 |
|
Add: Depreciation | 296 |
| | 241 |
| | 494 |
| 549 |
|
Add: Amortization (a) | 46 |
| | 9 |
| | 26 |
| 63 |
|
EBITDA | $ | 1,405 |
| | $ | 1,022 |
| | $ | 1,897 |
| $ | 2,280 |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Total gross debt | | | | | $ | 8,178 |
| $ | 7,674 |
|
Less: Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | (438 | ) | (223 | ) |
Less: Short-term investments | | | | | (1 | ) | (2 | ) |
Total net debt | | | | | $ | 7,739 |
| $ | 7,449 |
|
| | | | | | |
Ratio Calculations: | | | | | | |
Gross debt/EBITDA | | | | | 4.3x |
| 3.4x |
|
Net debt/EBITDA | | | | | 4.1x |
| 3.3x |
|
| |
(a) | Excludes the amortization of debt discount expense of $5 million and $4 million for the six months ended March 28, 2015, and March 29, 2014, respectively, $10 million for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2014, and $11 million for the twelve months ended March 28, 2015, as it is included in Interest expense. |
EBITDA represents net income, net of interest, income tax and depreciation and amortization. Net debt to EBITDA represents the ratio of our debt, net of cash and short-term investments, to EBITDA. EBITDA and net debt to EBITDA are presented as supplemental financial measurements in the evaluation of our business. We believe the presentation of these financial measures helps investors to assess our operating performance from period to period, including our ability to generate earnings sufficient to service our debt, and enhances understanding of our financial performance and highlights operational trends. These measures are widely used by investors and rating agencies in the valuation, comparison, rating and investment recommendations of companies; however, the measurements of EBITDA and net debt to EBITDA may not be comparable to those of other companies, which limits their usefulness as comparative measures. EBITDA and net debt to EBITDA are not measures required by or calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and should not be considered as substitutes for net income or any other measure of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP or as a measure of operating cash flow or liquidity. EBITDA is a useful tool for assessing, but is not a reliable indicator of, our ability to generate cash to service our debt obligations because certain of the items added to net income to determine EBITDA involve outlays of cash. As a result, actual cash available to service our debt obligations will be different from EBITDA. Investors should rely primarily on our GAAP results, and use non-GAAP financial measures only supplementally, in making investment decisions.
| |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
An evaluation was performed, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on that evaluation, management, including the CEO and CFO, has concluded that, as of March 28, 2015, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
In the second quarter ended March 28, 2015, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Refer to the description of certain legal proceedings pending against us under Part I, Item 1, Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Note 16: Commitments and Contingencies, which discussion is incorporated herein by reference. Listed below are certain additional legal proceedings involving the Company and/or its subsidiaries.
On June 17, 2014, the Missouri attorney general filed a civil lawsuit against us in the circuit court of Barry County, Missouri, concerning an incident that occurred in May 2014 in which some feed supplement was discharged from our plant in Monett, Missouri, to the City of Monett’s wastewater treatment plant allegedly leading to a fish kill in a local stream and odor issues around the plant. That lawsuit alleges six violations stemming from the incident and seeks penalties against us, compensation for damage to the stream, and reimbursement for the State of Missouri’s costs in investigating the matter. In January 2015 a consent judgment was entered that resolved the lawsuit. The judgment required payment of $540,000, which includes amounts for penalties, cost recovery and supplemental environmental projects. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has also indicated to us that it has begun a criminal investigation into the incident. If we become subject to criminal charges, we may be subject to a fine and other relief, as well as government contract suspension and debarment. We are cooperating with the Environmental Protection Agency but cannot predict the outcome of its investigation at this time. It is also possible that other regulatory agencies may commence investigations and allege additional violations.
On June 19, 2005, the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Environment of the State of Oklahoma filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma against Tyson Foods, Inc., three subsidiaries and six other poultry integrators. The complaint, which was subsequently amended, asserts a number of state and federal causes of action including, but not limited to, counts under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and state-law public nuisance theories. Oklahoma alleges that the defendants and certain contract growers who were not joined in the lawsuit polluted the surface waters, groundwater and associated drinking water supplies of the Illinois River Watershed through the land application of poultry litter. Oklahoma’s claims were narrowed through various rulings issued before and during trial and its claims for natural resource damages were dismissed by the district court in a ruling issued on July 22, 2009 which was subsequently affirmed on appeal by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A non-jury trial of the remaining claims including Oklahoma’s request for injunctive relief began on September 24, 2009. Closing arguments were held on February 11, 2010. The district court has not yet rendered its decision from the trial.
Other Matters: At September 27, 2014, we had approximately 124,000 employees and, at any time, we have various employment practices matters outstanding. In the aggregate, these matters are significant to the Company, and we devote significant resources to managing employment issues. Additionally, we are subject to other lawsuits, investigations and claims (some of which involve substantial amounts) arising out of the conduct of our business. While the ultimate results of these matters cannot be determined, they are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors listed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2014. These risk factors should be considered carefully with the information provided elsewhere in this report, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
| |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
The table below provides information regarding our purchases of Class A stock during the periods indicated.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased |
| | Average Price Paid per Share |
| Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
| | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1) |
|
Dec. 28, 2014 to Jan. 24, 2015 | 1,165,154 |
| | $ | 39.88 |
| 1,087,000 |
| | 28,967,771 |
|
Jan. 25, 2015 to Feb. 28, 2015 | 265,168 |
| | 40.81 |
| 163,000 |
| | 28,804,771 |
|
Mar. 1, 2015 to Mar. 28, 2015 | 44,350 |
| | 40.53 |
| — |
| | 28,804,771 |
|
Total | 1,474,672 |
| (2) | $ | 40.06 |
| 1,250,000 |
| (3) | 28,804,771 |
|
| |
(1) | On February 7, 2003, we announced our Board of Directors approved a program to repurchase up to 25 million shares of Class A common stock from time to time in open market or privately negotiated transactions. On May 3, 2012, our Board of Directors approved an increase of 35 million shares authorized for repurchase under this program. On January 30, 2014, our Board of Directors approved an increase of 25 million shares authorized for repurchase under this program. The program has no fixed or scheduled termination date. |
| |
(2) | We purchased 224,672 shares during the period that were not made pursuant to our previously announced stock repurchase program, but were purchased to fund certain Company obligations under our equity compensation plans. These transactions included 189,310 shares purchased in open market transactions and 35,362 shares withheld to cover required tax withholdings on the vesting of restricted stock. |
| |
(3) | These shares were purchased during the period pursuant to our previously announced stock repurchase program. |
| |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None
| |
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures |
Not Applicable
Grant of Non-Qualified Stock Options
The Compensation and Leadership Development Committee (Committee) of the Company's Board of Directors adopted a procedure in 2006 to grant non-qualified stock options on the fourth (4th) business day immediately following the date of our release of fiscal year-end earnings to the public, with such options to be granted at the closing price on the date of grant. At the April 29, 2015 meeting, the Committee approved resolutions stating earnings for fiscal 2015 are currently expected to be released November 23, 2015, and options shall be granted on the 4th business day after earnings are released, making the expected option grant date November 30, 2015. The resolutions further stated that if the earnings release date for fiscal 2015 is changed, the option grant date shall also be appropriately changed to fall on the 4th business day after the announcement of the earnings.
The following exhibits are filed with this report.
|
| | | |
Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | |
| | |
12.1 | | Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
101 | | The following financial information from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March, 28, 2015, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income, (ii) Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets, (iv) Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| | TYSON FOODS, INC. |
| | |
Date: May 4, 2015 | | | /s/ Dennis Leatherby |
| | | Dennis Leatherby |
| | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| | | |
Date: May 4, 2015 | | | /s/ Curt T. Calaway |
| | | Curt T. Calaway |
| | | Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |